Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Cuts Out Over 6 Days Of Commercials From Your Life Per Year, Compared To Cable TV (businessinsider.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Netflix knows their customers hate ads. "We know one of the benefits of an ecosystem like Netflix is its lack of advertising," Howard Shimmel, a chief research officer at Time Warner, told Bloomberg last year. "Consumers are being trained there are places they can go to avoid ads." In response to Netflix's advertising policy, many networks have actually cut back on the amount of ads they show in an effort to lure back in the younger Netflix generation. CordCutting.com crunched some numbers and found that each Netflix subscriber saves themselves about 158.5 hours of commercials per year. Here is how they figured that out: "First, it took Netflix's recent 75 million subscriber mark. Then, it combined that with a quote from CEO Reed Hastings that said subscribers stream 125 million hours every day. That means every subscriber streams about 1 2/3 hours per day. Then it looked at Nielsen data, which showed that the typical hour of cable TV includes 15 minutes and 38 seconds of commercials. If you combine that with the Netflix subscriber data, then you get that each subscriber avoids around 158.5 hours per year of commercials -- if they were watching Netflix instead of cable TV," writes Nathan McAlone via Business Insider.

127 comments

  1. Dirty Cerebellum by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Between Netflix and Adblocker, your brain is maybe in need of a wash.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re: Dirty Cerebellum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And? Are you implying that having more white people on commercials will make people want watch more of it?

      For all I care blacks can appear on all of them, I just want to see as little as possible of it all.

    2. Re: Dirty Cerebellum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Increasing percentage of blacks in commercials has been shown that commercial viewership has decreased. While this also coincides with an increase in total commercial time we believe this is due to the inherent racism within the viewing audience.

    3. Re: Dirty Cerebellum by neoritter · · Score: 1

      Interesting, a citation would be nice on the 80% number.

    4. Re: Dirty Cerebellum by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Increasing percentage of blacks in commercials has been shown that commercial viewership has decreased. While this also coincides with an increase in total commercial time we believe this is due to the inherent racism within the viewing audience.

      I don't really care about the race or sex of the person(s) on the commercials, I try to watch as few as possible.

      I have, however, been noticing trends:

      1. Do people no longer marry within their race? ON SOO many new commercials, they are mixed race, usually black guy with white girl. Strange that you don't see many variations other than that, but it seems if commercials are representing the spread of a demographic across the US, that no one is marrying within their race any longer at all...?

      2. I'm seeing more gay couples portrayed in commercials than what seems to be representative of their population in the US....that's what, 15% tops?

      3. The ONLY demographic you can freely make fun of in commercials, is the dumb white guy...usually dumpy, and married who is always messing up much to the derision of his wife. I don't see very many hispanic or black women on the side of the "dump" jokes or escapades, although I'm sure by mathematics alone, that they and other racial/sexual categories are likely equality represented as less than brilliant or just accidentally pulling their share of dumb acts....?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re: Dirty Cerebellum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, however, been noticing trends:

      Trends you believe exist. Whether or not they do is another story. If you try to watch as few as possible, who knows how many you are missing?

      1. Do people no longer marry within their race? ON SOO many new commercials, they are mixed race, usually black guy with white girl. Strange that you don't see many variations other than that, but it seems if commercials are representing the spread of a demographic across the US, that no one is marrying within their race any longer at all...?

      Did you see the reaction to the Old Navy Mixed Race couple?

      2. I'm seeing more gay couples portrayed in commercials than what seems to be representative of their population in the US....that's what, 15% tops?

      How many have you seen? Your number seems off no matter h ow read.

      3. The ONLY demographic you can freely make fun of in commercials, is the dumb white guy...usually dumpy, and married who is always messing up much to the derision of his wife. I don't see very many hispanic or black women on the side of the "dump" jokes or escapades, although I'm sure by mathematics alone, that they and other racial/sexual categories are likely equality represented as less than brilliant or just accidentally pulling their share of dumb acts....?

      Actually, there are plenty of complaints about those commercials regarding men, and in terms of depiction, well, being angry or sexy, or angry and sexy, tends to also be a problem that gets complaint. Just recently, the new Ghostbusters has had an issue with its characters.

  2. product placement = ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Netflix shows have a ton of product placement, just because the ads are on while the show is running doesn't mean it isn't there.

    1. Re:product placement = ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. The ads are just migrating deeper into the content.

    2. Re:product placement = ads by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Product placement doesn't bother me that much as long as its not blatant https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      And I don't watch much of the netflix originals so I haven't really noticed it. However It does annoy me when I get to the end of a movie and it minimizes the credits so it can show me a full screen ad for house of cards or whatever the new original crap they are currently trying to push. I wanted to watch the dance scene at the end of the credits dang it.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re:product placement = ads by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      There are only 3 news meta sites that i am aware of.
      News.yahoo.com
      News.google.com
      News.bing.com

      Yahoo has sponsored stories about every 4th story
      Google seems to have left their aggregator to rot as it is now picking up all sorts of stuff in the summarys savesaved.
      Bing I hate to say actually has the most bs free ui for news.

      Anymore I wonder if you just printed out a copy of the onion if people could tell the diffrence from the clickbait that is all too common now.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    4. Re: product placement = ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we all know that's where cable companies draw the line.

    5. Re:product placement = ads by marko123 · · Score: 2

      I can watch the credits full screen by arrowing to the small credits box and pressing select. Your particular button selection might be different.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    6. Re:product placement = ads by vux984 · · Score: 1

      If you click or select the minimized credits area, it restores them to full screen. Works with most netflix UIs I've run into... but if you are using the app built into your smart TV or something... all bets are off :)

    7. Re:product placement = ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix does that for the credits? I have not tried Netflix yet and it seems that I will not do so either in the future. If one pays a monthly subcscription, then there better not be any advertisements disturbing the actual content.

    8. Re: product placement = ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At a point where they will never ever receive my money.

      Netflix is good for now. If it changes for the worse I won't use it.

      I draw the line when I open my wallet not them.

    9. Re:product placement = ads by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Netflix certainly doesn't have ads to the extent of most channels. But you don't escape it entirely. It is always plugging their own shows (complete with automatic trailers these days) on the service AND on tv/radio/web. It's funny how often I'm recommended to watch some shows regardless of what my viewing history might say to the contrary. And the children's section is heavily laced with ads albeit in the form of TV shows - LEGO, Barbie etc. I wonder if Netflix even paid for these shows or if the toy manufacturers gave them for free or even paid to host them. And product placement does happen in their original series.

      So yes they have ads but not a huge amount. I wouldn't put it past Netflix to start throwing in affiliate links or buy it now promotions or "this show was brought to you by" or some other form of cross-marketing with certain forms of content.

    10. Re:product placement = ads by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Any way of configuring things so that it never does this?

      Sometimes this switch to minimized is really jarring and intrudes on stuff that the film producer wants people to see. I also like to know who I've been watching, who made it, what the music was, etc. I shouldn't have to leap for my remote in order to not have that interrupted.

    11. Re:product placement = ads by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      If you're watching a show it is just a block to show you what episode is going to play next. When you reach the end of a series or movie it then similarly shows you something it thinks you might like.

    12. Re:product placement = ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think cable shows don't?

    13. Re:product placement = ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sign this petition to stop this- it needs a LOT more signatures! https://www.change.org/p/neil-hunt-stop-netflix-from-shrinking-credits-after-movie-ends

  3. Uh, no. by msauve · · Score: 2

    "the typical hour of cable TV includes 15 minutes and 38 seconds of commercials"

    Unless you have a DVR. It takes me about 30 seconds to skip past those 15 minutes of commercials on my TiVo. News is about the only thing I watch live.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Uh, no. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Anyone with half a brain is skipping the commercials, using that time to get some food/drink, use the toilet, yell at the kids, channel surfing, or *anything* other than staring at the commercials.

    2. Re:Uh, no. by Master+Moose · · Score: 2

      We (my wife and I) don't watch live TV, too often. Where we can, we set the DVR and wait 15 minutes.

      We then happily add skip and usually end up finishing the show live - Sometimes we end up catching up to the live stream during the final add break, but such is life.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    3. Re:Uh, no. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Also, Netflix runs ads for its own content before shows and after shows.

      Of course, the CEO of Netflix states categorically that these previews Netflix forces you to watch (before being able to watch your own shows, or during the rolling of the credits) are not ads, but I don't think the idiot realizes that this kind of rhetoric doesn't help.

      As a customer, I can withstand ads of internal content, after all, they're not that bad, but having an asshole lie straight to my face over and over again and insult my intelligence every time he tries to deny the obvious really infuriates me to no end.

    4. Re:Uh, no. by quenda · · Score: 1

      Also, Netflix runs ads for its own content before shows and after shows.

      On what platform? Is it recent? I have not seen that.

    5. Re:Uh, no. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      But they have crippled fast forward to where you see the ads.

      When Dish started, you could skip 30 seconds forward by pressing the skip forward button.
      You didn't "fast forward" thru the content unless you pushed the fast forward button.

      Since most show are 42 minutes on DVD, they must have 18 minutes of non show / non-credit content.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:Uh, no. by Hemi+Roid · · Score: 2

      Anyone with half a brain is skipping the commercials, using that time to get some food/drink, use the toilet, yell at the kids, channel surfing, or *anything* other than staring at the commercials.

      You can't avoid commercials by surfing.... all the stations have synced their commercials so you have no choice but to surf to 'their' commercial.

    7. Re:Uh, no. by antdude · · Score: 1

      30 seconds? More like a minutes or so since there are many breaks! :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Uh, no. by fermion · · Score: 1
      This is what reporters don't seem to want to admit. The ad executives are all in an uproar because people can watch shows on netflix without commercials, but commercials on broadcast TV are largely optional, unless one has grown up in the 1950's and believe that TV must be consumed in real time, are a shut in, or a person who watches sports. Otherwise you can encode and strip commercials pretty automagically, or simply use one of the many devices to skip commercials with the press of a button.

      This is why the studios should have really pushed Hulu instead of letting it fall to the wayside. It was the one place that absolutely mandated commercial watching. Now they are offering commercial free fare for a fee.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    9. Re: Uh, no. by macaddict · · Score: 1

      Also, Netflix runs ads for its own content before shows and after shows.

      What do you use for watching Netflix? We use an AppleTV and I've never seen this. I just tried it out, played an episode of Daredevil (one of their original series). The episode began playing immediately, no ads. I fast-forwarded to the end. The credits minimized to the left, and on the right it showed the info for the next Daredevil episode and a countdown timer for it to auto-play (if you consider that an ad, that is being really nitpicky). To see the credits in fullscreen, just select them and click.

    10. Re:Uh, no. by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I surf my phone during commercials when watching broadcast. I glance up for movie trailers sometimes.

    11. Re:Uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen an ad on Netflix. Not sure where the ads you're getting are coming from.

    12. Re:Uh, no. by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      You assume everyone uses a DVR or such to do that.
      Sure, there are those who roll their own Myth TV or somesuch, but...
      the VAST MAJORITY of people with a DVR like device GET IT FROM THE CABLE OR SATELLITE company...
      Thanks for letting me clear that up for you.

      Myself, I don't have a DVR.
      I have NF and watch that or PBS.
      Occaisionally I watch the usual broadcast digital OTA channels also, which is when people mute the commercials.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    13. Re:Uh, no. by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 0

      You can't avoid commercials by surfing.... all the stations have synced their commercials so you have no choice but to surf to 'their' commercial.

      Right, because no one watches TV with a digital recording device that is capable of skipping ahead 10-30 seconds at a time, or skipping commercials almost automatically by pressing a single button.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    14. Re: Uh, no. by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

      Yup. I've never seen what the OP is talking about either. It's like you say - credits roll on the left, info about the next episode to the right. No ads for anything.

    15. Re:Uh, no. by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Pics or it didn't happen.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    16. Re:Uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing you will be telling me is that a lot of people still have black and white sets.

    17. Re:Uh, no. by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      Yes, Such restrictions are coming on content recorders here also. (New Zealand)

      My 1st DVD recorder (Panasonic) came with a Manual Skip functions - Automatic 30 Seconds. (preNZ Freeview)
      My 1st BluRay HDD recorder (Panasonic) increased the manual skip function to 1 Minute increments (non Freeview certified) - Also allowed HD output via component cabling.
      My 2nd BluRay HDD recorder (Panasonic) removed ManualSkip function altogether although we do use fastforward (FreeView Certified) Only Allows HD output via HDMI. . .

      As my mind is now, this is my last Panasonic recorder.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
  4. Okay, let's calculate this.... by mark-t · · Score: 0

    There are 6 TV programs per week that I regularly watch. Commercial breaks are about 3 minutes a piece, and there are typically 5 such breaks in one hour. That works out to 15 minutes per show of commercials, and six such shows makes 90 minutes of commercials. There are as many as 26 weeks throughout the year where there is actually new programming, and I don't watch shows I've already seen so that works out to a grand total of as many as 39 hours of commercial watching in an entire year. That's kinda falling pretty short of their estimate of 6 days. That's not even 2.

    Oh, and commercial breaks also gives the opportunity to mentally disengage from the tv screen at intervals that are not overly long, and be sociable with the people one may be watching television with instead of just staring at the screen like a zombie for one uninterrupted stretch.

    1. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by msauve · · Score: 1

      "commercial breaks also gives the opportunity to mentally disengage ..."

      Commercials are the opportunity to get some bread to go with the circus.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So once again, the pirates have a superior experience. I wouldn't mind paying for Netflix but if I am paying for content, I will only do so if there are no ads. Ads make sense in the case of free over the air broadcast. But not when I am paying directly. It's the same reason I haven't had cable tv, I cancelled it the moment it became as ad infested as free OTA tv. Fuck 're.

    3. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      Average American watches about 5 hours per day. You're the weird one.

    4. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with being weird. Remember that if you vote that also makes you weird; if you read then you're weird; if you're on slashdot then you're so weird that tofurkey seems normal.

    5. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, and commercial breaks also gives the opportunity to mentally disengage from the tv screen

      You know what else does that? The pause button. We use that when we want to talk about what we're watching. Then we un-pause, and go on watching it... on our schedule.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I sincerely do not understand the mentality of people that experience moral outrage at commercials. My son is the same way, and he can't explain it to me.... but commercials make him feel like his head is going to explode. He cannot even be in the same room as someone who is sitting quietly without even being phased by the fact that their entertainment happens to have been interrupted by a commercial.

      I frankly suspect it's some sort of power trip.... because commercials may represent a lack of control over what is happening to someone while they are intending to watch a program.

      Personally, I figure it's just television... and not worth getting upset over.

      I pay only marginally more than zero attention to commercials anyways... how can I get upset over something that I barely notice except when I pay explicit attention to it?

    7. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      True.... but the pause button is an active disengagement... you may pause in the middle of somebody saying something, for example, even without meaning to. Commercial breaks are, at least, usually actually *between* scenes... and give you the opportunity to disengage from the TV without having to concentrate over when to hit that pause button.

    8. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me its the fact that they seem to bump the volume 10x - I need to hit mute ... This comes and goes. A few years ago they fixed this but in the last few months they are back to Death-Metal volume on the adds.

    9. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't exactly call my feelings "moral outrage," but commercials are actually quite annoying. I personally never noticed it until I "cut the cord" and haven't had cable for quite a few years. Once you get used to TV all the time without commercials, you realize how truly disruptive and annoying they can be. Personally, when I stay with family or whatever now and they have broadcast TV on, I usually just leave the room and go do something else. TV is already mostly a waste of time, but with commercials it has now become unbearable for me.

      Imagine if you were trying to read a book or look at art in a museum or something, and every 5 minutes some annoying person would come around and shout at you or do something random and stupid to distract you... That would be really ridiculous, but most people accept it when watching TV. Once you live without those distractions for a while though, you realize how weird it is.

    10. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      but the pause button is an active disengagement... you may pause in the middle of somebody saying something, for example, even without meaning to. Commercial breaks are, at least, usually actually *between* scenes... and give you the opportunity to disengage from the TV without having to concentrate over when to hit that pause button.

      Huh, really? Commercials "between scenes"? I guess you've never watched any mystery series or drama or... Well pretty much anything that might ever have suspense built in. Or the news -- " Stay with us... Up next, all those parts of the news you actually want to hear about, but which we delay until later to force you to watch commercials..."

      I mean, seriously do you have a clue how programming is often explicitly designed to end on a disruptive point before a commercial to ensure you're in suspense and won't change a channel?? Or are you just trolling?

    11. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by Kinematics · · Score: 1

      ... so that works out to a grand total of as many as 39 hours of commercial watching in an entire year. That's kinda falling pretty short of their estimate of 6 days. That's not even 2.

      You're watching 0.86 hours per day, on average (6 1-hour shows over 7 days) rather than the population average of 1.67. Basically, half the amount of TV watching per week.

      Then you're only watching 26 weeks per year, so again, half of the population average.

      Thus, overall you're watching about 1/4 as much as the average person. 6.6 days / 4 = 1.65 * 24 = 39.6 hours. Tada! The magic of math.

    12. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by dinfinity · · Score: 2

      I'd like to add to this that not just the concept of commercials becomes foreign to you, but even more so the actual content of them.

      Once you're not used to commercials anymore, their absurdity becomes very readily apparent: Three people in big plastic balls rolling into a pool and subsequently drinking ice tea(tm). What the actual fuck?

      We all understand that the main thing about commercials is standing out and getting brand recognition, but that changes nothing about how weird it is to behold them.

    13. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      For me it's the insults. Some try to tell me I'm inadequate. Some try to tell me I'm an idiot. Some just insult my intelligence by assuming I'll enjoy their nonsense. And they have the audacity to crank up my volume control, another insult. The usually have some little insults written at the bottom of the screen too, stuff like "not actual gameplay" or "terms and conditions apply". They are trying to sell me stuff, and they lie to my face hoping I won't notice?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      I don't mind ad breaks in TV shows too much. It's when I watch a movie on TV that ad breaks make me mental. ESPECIALLY movies like Princess Bride, Star Wars, Breakfast Club, etc. where I know them by heart. The ads often ruin the flow.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    15. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      True.... but the pause button is an active disengagement...

      Oh noes, a passive disengagement from my active disengagement

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. I can't stand advertisements anymore; all those advertisements are rude and exploitative and I have no desire to watch any ever again.

    17. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      It is even worse with radio: in the rare instance when I'm listening to broadcast radio the ads seem so jarring since I've become accustomed to internet radio where I can skip actual content at a whim, let alone noise.

    18. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      The audio of commercials is the worst part for me.
      I HAVE TO mute commercials.

      It would be interesting for someone to do a study, using some kind of brain wave, ecg, eeg, whatever to monitor people.
      They would be watching something they enjoy, and then the commercials come on.
      How do they feel?
      How is their brain affected?
      Heart rate, blood pressure, anxiety levels, etc

      IMHO you could definitely see the negative affects of advertising.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    19. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't sit down in order to watch commercials. They're keeping me from the content I want. (When I watch TV, it is to see something. I don't have a TV on 'in the background') Most of the commercials are for things I have no interest in. I have no need for 'loans' or 'tampons'. I know where my next vacation will be, and so on. When I buy a car, I research in advance. When I buy beer, I buy beer I know I like. And many commercials are so STUPID. Starting with something weird, to catch attention. Then I mute and set a timer - I count it as a victory whenever I fail to notice what the commercial is about or what the brand name is.

      Product placement is much better. We know that James Bond drives that particular car because the car company paid for exposure - same with the suit, same with any airline he happens to use, and so on. But it is ok, it fits the story. It is not an interruption, and not overdone.

    20. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Once you get used to TV all the time without commercials, you realize how truly disruptive and annoying they can be.

      Netflix has also made me more aware of how some shows are structured for commercial breaks, when they fade to black and then come up at the same scene, or worse, repeat or even slightly change bits of what you just saw.

    21. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      I threw away my mod points to relate this to you, i hate commercials that much.

      When you say you don't even barely notice commercials then you have fully accepted them and let them program you completely. good job. If you noticed them at least you could make some conscious judgement about them but instead you don't even notice that the three food commercials in a row are now making you hungry, that you choice of drink is the one you've subconsciously seen more than the others.. oh wait you feel like a change? a change to the other drink you've been marketed.

      The whole purpose of commercials is to make you buy something you don't want or need. if it was something you needed you would search it out yourself, or if it had merits of it's own you would know about it from the people you interact with (aka word of mouth). It's basically lying to make money and it's so sophisticated nowadays that you barely notice it while it's completely programming you.

      try this one for size..honestly answer to see my point.

        name 3 drink brands. name 3 types of dish soap. name 3 brands of gasoline. name 3 brands of dog food/cat food. name 3 brands of toothpaste/razor/car/tv/anything!!!!!

      you are being programmed everyday, and at this point you can't even blame the ad companies because you're doing it to yourself.

    22. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Imagine if you were trying to read a book...and every 5 minutes some annoying person would come around and shout at you or do something random and stupid to distract you

      I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you haven't had kids :)

      Okay, seriously.... I've watched stuff on streaming services many times. One of my grown-up sons has a Netflix subscription and the year before last, he had moved back in with us for a few months due to some unexpected circumstances at his own home. During that time, I did actually watch quite a few shows on Netflix, especially on the weekends, and enjoyed rewatching some of the older tv shows that I had a fond recollection for. However, the experience overall seemed no different to me than watching the same TV series on a DVD, however, which is similarly without commercials, and for myself it did not alter the experience of watching regular TV shows with commercials in any way.

      I simply don't notice commercials enough to be bothered by them... I suppose I might if they lasted much longer than they currently do, but the duration seems to be short enough that it's not an issue, and generally speaking, television is not so important or urgent a priority to me that I would otherwise feel I can't afford to sit around waiting for a commercial to end.

    23. Re: Okay, let's calculate this.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched a movie on tv for years.... If I want to watch a movie, I will plug in a DVD, or buy/rent a digital copy.

    24. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Not meaning to sound like I'm trolling. I'm being entirely serious here when I say that I just don't take it as some sort of personal attack upon myself when a show that I might happen to be really getting into is suddenly interrupted by a TV commercial. It's just TV. It's just not THAT important to be something to get upset about.

    25. Re:Okay, let's calculate this.... by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      Even worse is when something is available online for free with commercials & they get the timing off...then you see or hear a second or so of whatever was about to happen, then have to wait for the ads to end to see the rest. Sometimes it is hard to remember half a word from 10 minutes ago (especially if you go do something else on the commercial break). (10 minutes because 3 minutes worth of ads expanded by the ads being forced to a higher bitrate than my link can support, even though the show plays just fine...you would think they would realize that nobody is going to even try watch an ad that stutters that badly.)

  5. Enjoy a Haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes I beat off
    Hands on mouse and dick, click click
    Mom knocks, get lost bitch!

    1. Re:Enjoy a Haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't breathe!

  6. Wasting your life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what you are doing if you watch enough television to have commercials occupy six days of your existance per year!

  7. Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Que another round of Cable cutting...... I love my job
    and another howl to congress of how unfair the world is to the poor "impoverished" Cable companies...
    Boo hoo

    1. Re: Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey now, don't trash cable companies. They perform a useful service. They sell me a decently fast net connection so I can watch all my tv on Netflix!

  8. No commercials for pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I download commercial free torrents of every show I watch. Even commercial broadcast OTA television shows for this very reason. All torrent TV shows are commercial free. There are shows that I probably wouldn't bother to watch if I had to slog thru commercials.

    1. Re:No commercials for pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard there's a Windows update coming up soon that injects ads between video files on your hard drive. "This ad brought to you by the MPAA"

  9. MythTV Removing Ads by crow · · Score: 4, Informative

    We have been using MythTV for over a decade. The automatic commercial detection is pretty good, but we usually take a minute to set cutpoints (tweaking the detected commercials), and then transcode the recording to drop the commercials. Our son *never* sees commercials. I'm sure that has saved us tons of begging for toys and whatnot.

    1. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Our son *never* sees commercials.

      Unless you homeschool your son and your son doesn't have any friend or classmate, this protection won't last long.

      Commercials and the influence they wield will get to him eventually.

    2. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by MrKaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We have been using MythTV for over a decade. The automatic commercial detection is pretty good, but we usually take a minute to set cutpoints (tweaking the detected commercials), and then transcode the recording to drop the commercials. Our son *never* sees commercials. I'm sure that has saved us tons of begging for toys and whatnot.

      My friend does this too, it makes for great kids that don't nag, which is exactly what the billions of dollars of psychology invested in commercials is designed to create. From what I've seen (they're about 10 now) you are on the right track to producing some well balanced human beings that won't require therapy later on in life.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by swb · · Score: 1

      Any child about 12 or under who grew up in a technology household with DVRs and streaming likely has seen a fraction of the commercials children 10 or more years old saw, even if there isn't any effort to specifically block them.

      I think you might be surprised at your son's reaction had he seen them. The few commercials my son does watch, it always surprises me how he sees through so many of them. "Dad, why is it the viagra commercials always have a woman a lot younger than the man?" stands out, but it's kind of interesting how they kind of see through a lot of them.

      At this point, he's better at skipping commercials with the Tivo remote than I am.

    4. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This... and Youtube, the next "watchable commercial" frontier.

      Unless your son don't have access to Youtube sooner or later he will be exposed to it.

    5. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by allo · · Score: 3

      Here in germany, the tv companies went another road. Now they use overlays on the movie for advertisment (additional to the breaks).
      They not only place them above the bottom of the movie (instead of inside the black bars, when there are some), but they even tried to awful extensions
      - Movie zoomes out. Blue border, to the left a video advertisment, to the right the movie
      - A Fullscreen Overlay (with some transparent non-square border) over the full movie. In an horror movie in an thrilling scene.
      Pretty desperate. Or pretty evil. Or both.

    6. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by crow · · Score: 1

      My ad blocking is successful at blocking Youtube ads, so at least at home, he's safe there.

    7. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by crow · · Score: 1

      To some extent, that's true. He's young enough that play with friends is still a bit managed (in large part because his friends are in different neighborhoods, so driving is involved). I expect the lack of exposure will reduce the impact they have on him when he does see them.

      On the other hand, he often gets excited about seeing ads the few times it happens because they're so rare.

    8. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the content itself. People playing with newly released toys, "let's play" videos, unboxing of anything and whatnot.

      That's the "real" new frontier, not formal ads.

    9. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      We cut cable years ago. At a hotel this weekend my 3-year-old complained every time a commercial came on, because she thought I'd changed the show on her. It was hard trying to explain why hotel TV was so obnoxious.

      On the other hand, even without commercials the kids never seem to run out of things to ask for, so I'm not sure it's that much of a benefit. Just not having to see/listen to the commercials is still the biggest perk, for me.

    10. Re:MythTV Removing Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that you have actually set him up to be more sensitive to commercials when he is finally exposed. They
      are like a virus. Exposure leads to immunity. Studies have shown that most kids by the time they are in school already know the time to go to the bathroom, get a drink, etc. is during the commercials. By not exposing your son you have made it more likely he will naively accept what the future commercials he sees without question.
      Better to make a mega length video of commercials and expose him under controlled conditions. Better yet stick contradictory commercials one after the other and then discuss how they are lying. How can five mobile companies all claim they have the best specs? Here's how they're lying.
      But refusing to expose him to commercials at all could prevent him from developing the skills necessary to realize all commercials are carefully packed manipulations.

  10. Six extra days of life per year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With 6 extra days, when my friends tell me to "get a life", I'll be out of excuses.

  11. You know what else will cut 6 days by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Read a book. Ok, not on the cheap Kindle but, you know what. Just shut up.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  12. FX by sycodon · · Score: 2

    While watching FX at my friend's place the other day, we put a stop watch on the shows.

    8:30 of show, then 4:30 of commercials, repeat.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re: FX by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how that compares to SyFy? It feels like they are running ads 50% of the time.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  13. Ahoy there! by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or alternatively clicking on "download torrent" :)

  14. Is TV 100 percent commercials now? by dprimary · · Score: 1

    I don't think I have watched 6 days of of TV in the past 2-3 years combined.

    1. Re:Is TV 100 percent commercials now? by Rob+Lister · · Score: 1

      No, it is ~25% commercials now.

      Looked at another way, 75 million subscribers * 158.5 hours per subscriber = 12 billion hours or 1.356 million years saved. Divide by the U.S. life expectancy of 78.74 years shows Netflix saved 17,234 lives.

      They should get an award or something.

  15. Satan isn't so bad by linear+a · · Score: 2

    Satan isn't so bad ... compared with cable TV.

    1. Re:Satan isn't so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this. Unfortunately I spend too much time on youtube though.

  16. No it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watch a total of about 20-30 hours of TV programs a year and I do so generally on Funimation.com or iTunes. I sometimes watch a movie on Netflix, but I can't imagine consuming as much as 50 hours a year of staring at an idiot box. I haven't seen a commercial anywhere except on YouTube (which I skip or ignore) in about 5 years.

    This is quite a bit more profitable for the companies showing commercials since they tend to create commercials focused on demographics which don't include me and their marketing approach usually makes me avoid their products simply to avoid being considered part of such demographics. Like "I don't want to buy something from someone who thinks I'm that stupid."... so I'm far more likely to buy something from someone who doesn't jam their commercials down my throat.

  17. 15 min an hour on average? I call BS on that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been running software like MythTV for years. Over the past decade, the average is actually more like 12 minutes of commercials per half-hour block (in the USA). If you factor in shows on channels like HBO where they presumably have no commercials at all, it skews the average down pretty sharply.

  18. Not better than not watching TV at all by cristiroma · · Score: 2

    Not watching TV at all saves you more than 6 days a month. Close the TV and go outside! Have fun!

  19. This is why I don't use Hulu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like Netflix and since I pay for the service. I expect the service to do any ads without being annoying. Yes, plenty of products get stuffed into content these days.
    But at least your watching content not some repeated commercial ad spot like on Hulu which seem's to do deals with certain companies and all you see are a handful of ads. Even if you pay the subscription fee each month, Hulu really doesn't improve that much other than giving you full content access.
    When I want pure non ad content I will subscribe to a show on Amazon or Google Play, Apple iTunes. I'd rather pay a little and avoid the ads.

  20. I think they did the math wrong by Rob+Lister · · Score: 2
    I think they did the math wrong.

    Here is how they figured that out: "First, it took Netflix's recent 75 million subscriber mark. Then, it combined that with a quote from CEO Reed Hastings that said subscribers stream 125 million hours every day.

    There is not a 1:1 relationship between subscribers and viewers; husband, wife, 1.25 kids, yada. I suspect--wild ass guess--it is more on the order of ~1:3. So the hours saved per account doesn't change but hours per viewer goes down by ~third. I'm a little surprised it is so few streamed hours per subscriber.

  21. Cable Too Greedy! by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    My cable bill is $240 a month. I also have Netflix. Programming on cable is also in sharp decline. If cable wishes to survive they need drastic price drops as well as more investment in high-quality programs. Even the big hits like Game Of Thrones seem to have suffered budget cuts and offer too few episodes per year to stay alive. Meanwhile, Deadwood as well as Boardwalk Empire, could have made wonderful long running series. When cable gets a winner they need to make more of it instead of sending it to the boneyard.

    1. Re:Cable Too Greedy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My cable bill is $240 a month.

      Seriously??

      As someone from outside the US I don't really have a handle on how much things cost over there, but really? $240? A MONTH?

      W T F ?

      I hope that means you're paying for the absolute top-rated package available.

      For comparison, here in the UK, Virgin Media charges £75 ($108 USD) a month for their top-spec package, which includes *all* their TV channels, 200mbps broadband and a phone line, plus a free 6-month Netflix subscription thrown in. Or I can pay £45 ($65) for the same thing minus the premium sports channels.

      You Americans are getting seriously ripped off.

    2. Re:Cable Too Greedy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as a counterpoint, my cable bill is $125/mo. That includes decent internet (don't know the specs off the top of my head but we never have an issue with download bandwidth), the usual basic cable channels and HBO.

    3. Re:Cable Too Greedy! by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      If you really want the top end package you should at least call and haggle with them... you could be buying a car with that money...

    4. Re:Cable Too Greedy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so tell me how "cable" discontinued these programs? If they're so good then the producers of the show will have no problem selling the content. It sounds like you don't know how this works.

    5. Re:Cable Too Greedy! by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      I'll chime in as another "$240?!?" voice here, because whittling that number down a bit can certainly be done. First off, you can purchase your own cable box outright. My cable company charges $20/month for a standard box, and $36/month for a DVR box. these boxes will pay for themselves in less than a year, and by law, your cable company must make a Cablecard available for you. If you're a DIY type like me, you can pick up one of these and use it with either Windows 7 (it's the only OS that supports all the DRM necessary for some of the ultra-premium channels) or Mythbuntu (free and formally supports that card) in a PC build. More expensive for sure, but even it will pay for itself in less than two years, especially if you have one Mythbuntu backend and use Raspberry Pis as frontends. Assuming three cable boxes and a DVR that are replaced with this setup and you buy new parts for the back end, you'll spend about $800 and two Saturday afternoons configuring it all, while my cable company would charge me $912 for the same service. The two caveats I'll fully admit is that the cable company's Video on Demand probably won't work, which may or may not be important to you - and I've got no idea how Pay-Per-View works (UFC fights, etc.), and also that the cable company may charge a fee to rent the CableCard (mine costs $2/month) while only providing support for the CableCard - you're responsible for the functionality of your own box.

      Another thing I've done to save money is to get rid of their telephone service. Ooma costs me about $5 a month, plus $40 for the number port. They have their own handsets, or you can use units that will work with the base directly. They've been around for a while, and I couldn't be happier.

      Finally, buy your own modem. That's $5-$10/month right there.

      This has been Voyager529's guide on saving a bunch of money on your cable bill.

    6. Re:Cable Too Greedy! by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

      I know! All Americans seem to have, like, massive cable bills. I get Netflix for £5.99 pcm, my broadband for £49 pcm (including line rental and an actual landline telephone) and whatever Amazon Prime goes for a year these days...£80 a year? Can't remember. I don't get Sky or anything but it's not that expensive. It's weird.

    7. Re:Cable Too Greedy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another counterpoint: My cable is ~$140/month. That includes lowest tier cable (130 or so non-premium channels), internet (60mb), and phone, plus hardware rentals of two boxes (IIRC, first free, second $10/month) and cable/phone modem ($5/month). I have my own cable modem, but it doesn't provide phone, so I have to rent the cable company's modem. I suppose you might suggest dropping phone, but that actually costs $10 to $12 more per month, even without the modem rental. It seems they really want to be able to sell large phone lists to telemarketers. But the joke is on them - we don't even have a landline phone.

      The OP probably has a premium package or added premium channels, else he cannot watch Game of Thrones (from HBO, a premium channel) on TV. Maybe he also rents the cable company's DVR system, has the maximum number of set-top boxes, or perhaps his company charges exorbitant rental fees for the hardware. I've heard of some companies charging $10/month for each cable-card, which is much more than the $2/month I would pay here, so it wouldn't surprise me if the box/DVR rental fees are similarly ridiculous in some locations.

      In short, yes, here in the US all cable subscribers are being screwed hard by the cable companies, but some of us aren't even getting any lube... Part of that is due to the so-called "Disney/ESPN tax" being forced on nearly all customers regardless of whether they want ESPN (or any Disney-owned channels), but not all of it.

      I've looked at the cost of going internet-only plus Hulu (2 streams) and Netflix (middle tier w/ 2 streams), and we would save money, but we'd have to buy a couple of Roku boxes or similar, so there's an upfront cost my wife will dislike. Further, Hulu doesn't provide any of the current shows my wife watches (that's a deal breaker right there) nor the live TV I want (news channels mostly), and Netflix simply doesn't tell anyone without an account the full set of available TV programs. So, that's still not an option for us.

      - T

  22. They're absolutely right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We know one of the benefits of an ecosystem like Netflix is its lack of advertising,"

    Yep, they're absolutely right. This is the number one reason why I subscribe to Netflix and why I do not subscribe to Sky or any of the other big name TV providers.

    It's also the reason why I put such a high value on the BBC (yes, I'm in the UK) and why I really don't mind paying the license fee.

    1. Re:They're absolutely right. by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      It's also the reason why I put such a high value on the BBC (yes, I'm in the UK) and why I really don't mind paying the license fee.

      The BBC kicks ass.
      I listen to it at night sometimes driving home.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  23. When can we have a health study on commercials? by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid I was diagnosed with ADHD. This wasn't some huge thing, it seemed like every other kid in my generation had it. For me, the medication works so it's minor inconvenience at best. But I've noticed that in the past few years as I've switched from cable TV to Netflix and Amazon Prime that my ability to concentrate has improved an astounding amount. It's almost like my brain isn't being conditioned to rip my attention away from what it is I'm focusing on and violently change contexts every 30 seconds anymore...

    1. Re:When can we have a health study on commercials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of what might happen if you stop filling your mind with television garbage altogether?

      I don't care where you get your content. It's still television in essence. And 95% of all television content is detrimental to being a good human being.

  24. everything is an ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every single thing on the television/Netflix/whatever is an advertisement. Ads are advertisements for products, and shows are advertisements for themselves, the network, or the actors/producers/crew/etc. Somehow the media companies have convinced everyone that there is a difference between content and advertisements. Ads only exist to distract you from this fact, like a decoy. It's all mind control at different levels. People will happily drink Kool-Aid-A because someone told them Kool-Aid-B is the one with the poison...
     

  25. That feeling when you anticipate a commercial by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

    I will be watching some tv program on NF, one that was designed/edited to be shown with commercials.
    Perhaps something from the History Channel.
    You can tell when the program is going to cut to a commercial, the music queues it up...
    But then...
    No commercial!

    I love it!

    What is interesting is sometimes I get an almost anticipatory anxiety, when I can tell it would normally go to a commercial.
    But then when the ad doesn't show and the program just keeps on going, its almost blissful.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  26. Demographics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this point in time, blacks land more on the poor and uneducated side of the various demographics. Advertising is aimed at the credulous and uninformed for a reason. It's a business case for the companies doing the advertising: they'll sell more stuff if they aim at a black audience.

    Advertising is, and pretty much always has been, a mechanism to sell stuff. Not to be fair, or reasonable, or even-handed.

    Ads will become even-handed when the demographics for who are the most credulous balance out. Not until then.

  27. Mute button, snacks, bathroom breaks, etc. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    I mute the system the moment a commercial begins. I check my email real quick on my phone (just a matter of seconds), maybe get a snack, turn my head to talk to my SO, etc.

    Commercials don't bother me at all. Because I simply don't pay any attention to the content they present.

    Hulu has a nice feature, a little timer icon at the top left. You can tell exactly how much time remains in the commercial. I use that to get the mute button off at just the right time, and no sooner. :) But if it goes away, it's no big deal. I still won't be listening, or otherwise paying any significant attention.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  28. Who ts being trained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > "Consumers are being trained there are places they can go to avoid ads."

    Umm, perhaps the industry is being trained. By the consumers. By the consumers' dollars or lack thereof.

    * the old days:
    Hi we're a new idea called broadcast TV. During our shows we'll promote products and you'll like it because you've nothing to compare this to.

    * nowadays:
    Hi it's the networks again, yeah we understand these interruptions are annoying as hell- and despite our attempts to make you understand the need for advertising you've shown a willingness to just pay us directly for some uninterrupted programming. Thanks for humbling us, and now onto your complete un-interrupted show!

    * future days:
    Now that 'brand loyalty' and 'company/consumer relationships' are part of your life, we can introduce non-commercial "breaks" that include self-promotional announcements (not outside products mind you) but self-promotional announcements that we feel you'll be ok with. You know, because we translate your mere presence as a customer as customer consent. Thank you for your continued dollars, and here is your interrupted show.

  29. Thank you ReplayTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the past 12 years I have *automatically* skipped the vast majority of commercials on cable. The only commercials not skipped are those in live sports such as the SuperBowl. ReplayTV was so far ahead of its time with features such as automatic commercial skip, networked playback from multiple units, show channels etc, that today it is still difficult to replace them. The only downside is that you cannot get beyond DVD quality images or stereo sound. MythTV is about the only viable alternative, but with the advent of streaming video services replacing my ReplayTVs is becoming less important.

  30. A datum for you kids by whitroth · · Score: 1

    When cable was first coming in, late seventies and early eighties... and I am not making this up, I saw the ads... a huge part of their advertising emphasis was "buy cable, and you'll never have to watch commercials again".

    And that was back when there *might* have been 10 min of commercials per hour.....

                      mark "they lie, like a rug"

  31. No net savings by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    If you use an Android set top box, you spend those 6 days searching for content they don't have, trying to figure out how to make the interface work with a remote, shopping for a new remote after you throw yours against a wall, and researching Netflix alternatives.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  32. The cable model is dead.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    The cable companies are desperately clinging to content monopolies (ex. ESPN, etc.) to survive. I rarely watch anything live on TV anymore, other than the local news. Even sports, which I at one time swore had to be watched live, is better on the DVR. I watched the Superbowl that way last year. Zipped over all the commercials and that ridiculous time waster of a half time show. Must have cut a good hour out of it.

    When I watch Netflix the thing I notice about having no commercials is not only less time to watch the show but the flow does not get interrupted.

    It's not only the commercials. The amount of money the cable companies charge is an absolute ripoff. You are paying for 200 channels, of which you might actually watch 10 or less. The cable companies have fought tooth and nail against a la carte programming. If they ever do agree to it you can be certain that it will cost as much or more than the 200 channel package.

  33. Let's be clear... by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

    8640 minutes of /non stop/ commercials.

  34. Nearly a thousand dollars for a TiVo by tepples · · Score: 2

    Not exactly "nobody", but I imagine that the majority of TV watchers aren't willing to pay $200-$300 for a TiVo device and $600 more for a subscription to the required service. Or to which competing "digital recording device" do you refer?

    1. Re:Nearly a thousand dollars for a TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to buy the most expensive/latest TiVo to get the benefits of their new skip capability. Also, you can get the service as a subscription model. Last, they have sales on a regular basis.. buy then. I am a very happy user of the TiVo system as it is something my wife can use without any problem. And that counts a lot when one is married.

  35. Eliminating Ads, Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Through adblocker, paid services that actually remove ads and alternative sources of media I haven't been watching adverts for a while and it's changed how I view them completely. When I'm traveling and end up flipping on the traditional TV it is completely unwatchable. The Hunt for Red October was on the other night on AMC and it was a complete fucking joke. Your view time feels like MOSTLY ads just due to the pace of the movie coming to a screeching halt every 10 minutes.

    I don't deny the need for consumers to know your product but it is completely psychotic the amount of time they demand for their trinkets. 30 seconds it more than enough for your product and 1-2 of them per 30 minutes should be the limit.

    I know this will never happen but that's why I work to eliminate them in my life. YouTube's system has it mostly correct... I watch shows from content creators like RedLetterMedia (shameless plug) and they have hour long videos that have roughly 90 seconds of ads throughout. THAT is appropriate. I will even watch them intently because they are responsible. Traditional TV I mute and turn away so I'm certain I don't see them at all.

  36. 25% junk? by sipke.van.der.meulen · · Score: 1

    So the amazing thing here is imo this: Cable tv, which is not free, but costs money, gives You 25% commercials????? So.. 25% of your free time, you're watching stuff you don't want? How the hell did they ever sell that? And why do people accept it?

  37. Re:ISPs are Too Greedy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CenturyLink recently started charging a $3.50 fee to process payments via credit card.

    I'd prefer not to trust them with my bank account info, especially because they want to constantly raise the amount and automatically debit it.

    After calling them up though I did manage to get them to reduce my $80 a month bill (40 Mbps down) to $25 if I'd do a 12-month contract.

    The thing is, I'll have to call in another year and complain to get even a reasonable rate again.

  38. fewer commercials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try watching CBSN or the ABC or NBC "news" channels on a Roku.

    The stories are often very short and there's almost always a commercial before them.

    Sometimes the commercials are longer than the actual "news" clip.

    If that's "fewer commercials" it really makes me wonder just how bad it had gotten since I cut the cable. I'm fortunate enough to be served by DSL which is more than fast enough for me - when it works at least, but it has fewer outages than Comcast.

    It's no wonder I end up watching France24, SkyNews and even RT with my Roku rather than American news channels. I used to be able to get AlJazeera English there too - AlJazeera America had commercials just like all their US competition.

    On those channels, you might occasionally hear "And now the weather brought to you by Qatar Airlines" which is not as annoying as them thinking anyone cares about their global weather forecast over the next 5 days.

    I do wonder though why Qatar Airlines thinks it's a good idea to bring "the weather" especially when the weather can often be very bad.

  39. If paying per month, get the cable company's DVR by tepples · · Score: 1

    You don't have to buy the most expensive/latest TiVo to get the benefits of their new skip capability.

    But you do need to buy TiVo service, and I seem to remember a sub costing $600 even on a device that isn't "the most expensive/latest".

    Also, you can get the service as a subscription model.

    If you're willing to pay $150 per year (source) for the use of a DVR, you might as well get the cable company's DVR, especially if you can bundle the federally mandated basic service (just locals, C-SPAN, and public access) with your existing Internet access from the same cable company. It's fewer boxes by your TV, and possibly more likely to support oddball cases such as SDV than putting a CableCARD access card in a TiVo DVR.

    Last, they have sales on a regular basis

    Sales on only the hardware or also on the sub?

  40. weird times by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    It's very strange that people still opt to pay for so much advertising. I am always amazed when I find a TV connected to cable and flip through the channels and channels of ads. Why isn't cable TV free already?