Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Unveils 256GB MicroSD Card, Highest Capacity In Its Class (thenextweb.com)

Samsung recently unveiled its EVO Plus 256GB microSD card, capable of storing more than 12 hours of 4K video footage, 33 hours of full HD recording, 55,200 photos or 23,500 MP3s. While you most likely do not need such a large microSD card in your life, you'll probably want one. The card features Samsung's newest V-NAND technology, with read/write speeds of 95MB/s and 90MB/s, respectively. It will be available in June to over 50 countries at a price of $250, which includes a 10 year warranty. Personally, I have no need for such a high-capacity card at this time, but I marvel how far technology has progressed in the last few years, let alone months. SanDisk, for example, revealed a 200GB microSD card back in March, 2015, which was the highest capacity microSD card up until now.

117 comments

  1. Can i... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get 1000 of them in an iSCSI setup?

    1. Re: Can i... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ceph nan

    2. Re:Can i... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Imagine... a Beowulf cluster of these!

      --
      C|N>K
    3. Re:Can i... by KiloByte · · Score: 2

      'Ere you go.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Can i... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

      Bearing in mind I can remember the first removable HD http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/rog... which weighed about 15kg this is a vast improvement.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    5. Re:Can i... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is Roger and what has he done with the cabinet key?

  2. No, and no by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    While you most likely do not need such a large microSD card in your life

    Correct

    you'll probably want one.

    Incorrect.

    I'm not quite the gibbering moron you seem to imagine me to be...

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re: No, and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well I am. Gibber gibber!

      But seriously.... Nobody knows when they're going to need a couple hours of video recording capacity.

      Those circumstances can't be predicted... But they do happen. Alien visitations, cops torturing someone, once in a millennia volcanic eruptions, you actually get laid, etc.

      Having excess video capacity is never a bad thing.

    2. Re:No, and no by prezkennedy.org · · Score: 1

      In regards to the subject... wouldn't that be "Yes, and no" you gibbering moron?

      --
      It started back in Team Fortress Classic
    3. Re: No, and no by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those circumstances can't be predicted... But they do happen. Alien visitations, cops torturing someone, once in a millennia volcanic eruptions, you actually get laid, etc.

      We all know that three of these events are likely to occur in our lifetime.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have porn video files to classify.

    4. Re: No, and no by chipschap · · Score: 2

      Just that it seems pretty expensive. If you need it you need it, but I'll stick with $10 cards for now.

    5. Re: No, and no by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      you actually get laid

      But why would you need multi-hour capacity for a 15 seconds event?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:No, and no by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      While you most likely do not need such a large microSD card in your life

      This is correct in that no, I do not need such a large microSD card.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re: No, and no by Kjella · · Score: 1

      once in a millennia volcanic eruptions

      We all know that three of these events are likely to occur in our lifetime.

      Well I guess this is the unlikely one then, works for me. Unless those bastards discover immortality.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:No, and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Hell yes, now 2/3rds of my pirate music collection can come with me!

    9. Re:No, and no by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite the gibbering moron you seem to imagine me to be...

      Not a gibbering moron, but I do imagine you're somewhat of a wonkey monkey.

    10. Re:No, and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would buy one just to toss into my MP3 player. I currently have a 128GB card in it, but that only holds about half of my music library.

      Also, 640K ought to be enough for anybody.

    11. Re:No, and no by jtgd · · Score: 1

      It might come in handy inside a Rubik's Cube.

      --
      J
  3. SanDisk 256GB microSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SanDisk announced a 256GB micro card, but it never fully came to market; instead the 200GB was released... Since it was announced, I think they ran into production/reliability issues and killed it...

    I wonder if Samsung might be in a similar boat(will have to see the failure rates etc)..

    1. Re:SanDisk 256GB microSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sandisk 200GB MicroSD costs around £90 in the UK from online retailers. There's an unbranded 256GB MicroSD that costs around £9.

      It is amazing to see how memory has shrunk in size. In the 1980's, 32Kb of memory for an 8-bit home computer would take up the space of a modern day GPU board. In the early 1990's, you would be lucky to get 40 Megabytes on a 3.5" PC hard disk drive. In the mid 2000's, you could get 2.5" laptop hard disk drives with 200GB of storage.

      Now this storage space has been reduced to a small piece of plastic, smaller than the size of a fingernail. Assuming that a single DVD is around 4GB is size, this is the equivalent of 64 DVD's or video cassettes. An entire video collection of music videos of a single decade could be stored in this space. A credit card sized microSD RAID array could store 16 micro-SD cards, or around 4 terabytes.

    2. Re:SanDisk 256GB microSD by Barny · · Score: 2

      Note, those ultra cheap off-brand (or even sometimes good counterfeit brand name) ones are always fakes. They edit the thing so that it reports that it is the size they claim, but the moment your write more than the actual size (normally like 2-8GB), you get an error and it all goes to shite.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    3. Re:SanDisk 256GB microSD by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      At least they can't fit freakin' steel nuts into a microSD card.

  4. is SD fading away though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like the majority (yeah, not every last one of...) of new phones, tablets, and even laptops no longer offer SD card support. My phone does, but it's a several year old model. Newer iPhones and Samsung S-series phones for example do not have SD slots.

    It seems like it's not _quite_ there, but the era of SD supporting devices is fading away.

    Why, I do not know, because I go out of my way to only buy things with SD slots since I like the idea of expandable storage. It seems however that most people do not, and they are disappearing from latest-gen electronics.

    1. Re:is SD fading away though? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      but the era of SD supporting devices is fading away

      No it isn't. Not at all. The latest gen phones not supporting an SD card is a stupid marketing trick to get you to purchase a phone with larger internal capacity. This says absolutely nothing about anything else. Sane portable devices will still use an expandable memory slot for a long long time to come.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:is SD fading away though? by queequeg1 · · Score: 2

      Only the S6 omits it (it's back on the S7).

    3. Re:is SD fading away though? by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify - I was referring to Samsung phones only. Apple seems to have abandoned the expandable storage idea.

    4. Re:is SD fading away though? by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

      My new Samsung Galaxy S7 has a microSD slot (same hole as the SIM card), but now I'm pissed off because I just bought a 128GB card to go in it. I could have had TWICE as much porn on my phone!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:is SD fading away though? by slaker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple has never offered an idevice with removable storage. It didn't abandon the concept. It has actively refused to participate in the first place.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    6. Re:is SD fading away though? by jcr · · Score: 1

      iPhones never had any kind of removable memory slots.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:is SD fading away though? by ewhac · · Score: 1

      It seems like it's not _quite_ there, but the era of SD supporting devices is fading away.

      Do you not own a camera? You know, something from Pentax/Olympus/Sony/Nikon/Kodak/Canon or some such? While a few models use CompactFlash cards, SD cards are pretty much the only game in town.

    8. Re:is SD fading away though? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You can store user info on a SIM card. Not much, but you can.

    9. Re:is SD fading away though? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      +5 informative

    10. Re:is SD fading away though? by fizzer06 · · Score: 1
      The new LG G5 has replaceable battery and an SD card slot spec at 2 TERABYTE! I don't know HOW they know it will handle that much memory.

      http://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phones/lg-g5.html/

    11. Re:is SD fading away though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the average person (not prosumer photo enthusiasts, who are a small niche), their phone IS their camera, and that reverts to square one: many modern phones don't have SD slots.

    12. Re:is SD fading away though? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We are supposed to keep all our content on 'the cloud.'

      Me, I like having hundreds of television programs on my Galaxy Tab so I can watch one if I like at lunch break.

    13. Re:is SD fading away though? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      My Raspberry Pi 3 uses a MicroSD card for it's main mass storage. All the Raspberry Pi's do that. It's really convenient in a classroom, because if a kid corrupts his filesystem, you pop out the SD and reimage it.

    14. Re:is SD fading away though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that "handheld devices" is what OP meant when he said *i*device. That I'm aware of, the only exception would be the iMac line, which are desktops.

    15. Re:is SD fading away though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, funnily enough, Apple's first handheld device, the Newton, had a PC Card expansion slot. This permitted, among other things, the use of CompactFlash memory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MessagePad#Connectivity

    16. Re:is SD fading away though? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      The new LG G5 has replaceable battery and an SD card slot spec at 2 TERABYTE! I don't know HOW they know it will handle that much memory.

      They know because that is what the SDXC standard supports. I find it incredibly frustrating when manufacturers limit their specifications of the maximum memory card size as the largest card available at the time of release of a product. Then in a few years time, when larger cards become available, you can't be sure if they are supported or not. You just have to try it and see. It gets worse then they just say "SD slot" without specifying which SD standard it really is.

      The LG G5 explicitly says microSDXC, so we can look it up even if they hadn't said that it was 2TB.

    17. Re:is SD fading away though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The usual limit is 32GB, and you can thank the SD association and Microsoft for that.
      exFAT support is *required* if you want to claim SDXC compatibility. Even if all your device does is immediately reformat any memory card to FAT32, ext2 or whatever, you have to have exFAT support and pay MS royalties for exFAT patent licensing.
      It's pretty easy to spot - if a mobile device claims to support SDHC <=32GB but MMC > 32GB and doesn't mention SDXC at all, it's pretty much guaranteed to be a SDXC controller without paying the exFAT Danegeld.

    18. Re:is SD fading away though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Mr. Cook, for your insightful contribution to Slashdot.

    19. Re: is SD fading away though? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      I don't go through any trouble to find a phone that reads and writes MicroSDHC cards. Problem is SDHC cards only go up to 32GB and capacities greater than that are SDXC cards. I caught Sony selling a card branded as a MicroSDHC card and reported it to the SD consortium. I got a one sentence email that read "We will deal with Sony."

    20. Re:is SD fading away though? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      An old school monochrome LCD pocket computer thing with storage on old SIM cards would be fun. Or it could be a nice silly place to store encryption, ssh keys.
      I wonder if there's NOR flash in there?
      Also, as a kid we found a really old phone as far as GSM goes. The SIM card was smartcard/debit card sized originally.

    21. Re:is SD fading away though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Powerbooks and Macs are now considered iDevices?

    22. Re:is SD fading away though? by jtgd · · Score: 1
      Instead of paying for a larger capacity of internal storage...

      We are supposed to keep all our content on 'the cloud.'

      ...and pay for a higher tier plan with more GB/month. I guess they're going to get you one way or the other.

      --
      J
  5. Crash Kit by darkain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reason I love having extremely large MicroSD cards is because my cell phone is essentially a mobile crash kit. I keep things like OS ISOs, drivers, and repair utilities on my phone, in case I ever walk into a place and need to repair a computer system or server. There is also a samba server on my phone in case I need to quickly distribute files to multiple machines at once over a network, instead of a single machine over USB.

    1. Re:Crash Kit by julian67 · · Score: 2

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      He didn't retire. He didn't die. He bought a smartphone and became a new kind of superhero.

    2. Re:Crash Kit by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I tried that sort of with a dumbphone. 2GB SD card with bootable linux mint iso, micro-USB cable. It boots! Sadly the phone only has USB 1.1 making the linux live USB totally unworkable. I might as well put MS-DOS in there.

  6. Can they please make a bigger one? by CaptainLugnuts · · Score: 1

    I do crapcan endurance racing, the longest race we've run is 36 hours straight. Not having to fiddle with a camera to swap a SD card when you're sleep deprived would be awesome.

    1. Re:Can they please make a bigger one? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Most cameras take full-size SD cards, which are available in 512GB now.

      I guess you're using Gopros or similar "action cameras", though? Do they even support microSD cards with this much capacity?

      --
      Eat the rich.
  7. 128gb is the sweet spot for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'll settle for 128gb at 1/6 the cost.

  8. Olympic sized swimming pools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the standard unit. What is all this other stuff?

  9. 200 GB in March.... 2015 by starless · · Score: 3, Informative

    SanDisk, for example, revealed a 200GB microSD card back in March,

    which implies this year, except it was 2015
    https://www.sandisk.com/about/...

    1. Re:200 GB in March.... 2015 by BeauHD · · Score: 1

      I updated the story to include mention of the year, sorry for the confusion.

  10. 12 hours of lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uncompressed 4K is almost 500MB/s. So this card can store not even 10 minutes of 4K. The more you know.

    1. Re:12 hours of lies by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Where you see a market for people wanting/needing uncompressed 4k video on a microsd card?

      There are far better options for them.

    2. Re:12 hours of lies by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      256 GB divided by 12 hours would correspond to a bandwidth of about 48.5 Mb/s. That's more than enough to support compressed 4K video.

      Consider that UMAX in Korea supports streaming of compressed 4K video at 60 fps progressive, using 32 Mb/s of bandwidth.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re:12 hours of lies by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Assuming 3840*2160 pixels for "4K", 24 bits per pixel, and 30 frames per second: 711.9140625 MBps
      Even at NTSC Film rates (24000/1001 fps) we're at 568.96228771228771... MBps.
      You'd have to go to a cropped ultrawide movie theater resolution of "4K" such as 4096*1716 to get under 500 MBps uncompressed.

    4. Re:12 hours of lies by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Actually, this would be the perfect application for policy body cams. Just shove 2x of these 256GB MicroSDs for a total of 512GB of storage. That's more than enough for 12 hours of 1080p @ 30fps in H.264 file format. That calculates to about 363GB of video.

      Actually, you don't even need to keep that much time on file Just buffer 4 hours @ 60fps and index the event with a push of a button to prevent over-write of the video. Anyways you see the implications of this tech.

      In the not so-distant future, we'll all of the ability to buffer entire DAYS of video and only index when an event occurs to be uploaded later.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  11. And likely not vaporware this time by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    These asshats http://www.androidcentral.com/... were going to do 512GB - and as late as January of this year were saying the just hadn't released them because they hadn't sold their stocked supplies of smaller cards.

    At least Samsung will probably deliver. And just in time for me not to need it as Dropbox introduces Infinity.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:And likely not vaporware this time by nintendoeats · · Score: 1

      I expect that they were lying. Sandisk and Samsung pour millions into these projects.

  12. Re: I have no need for such a high-capacity card a by wbr1 · · Score: 2

    I have no need for a blow job from a horse at this time....

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  13. Isn't 640k enough for anybody? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While you most likely do not need such a large microSD card in your life...

    At one time I bought an iPad with 16 GB of storage, since the storage was infinite compared with my ability to come up with material to store on it. Then I discovered new applications like ForeFlight for flight planning. I now use a 128 GB iPad mini in the cockpit.

    When I bought my current Mac (admittedly, a few years ago) I figured that 4 GB of RAM and 250 GB of disc space was ample. I bought a GoPro camera earlier this year. Two hundred fifty gigs is now nothing.

    ...laura

    1. Re:Isn't 640k enough for anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man. Foreflight single handedly made my i-products obsolete.

    2. Re:Isn't 640k enough for anybody? by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah, it's always fun to see some of the morons who claim that nobody needs cards like these, just because all they do is tool around with email etc.

      I spent the weekend at the WEC 6 Hours of Spa. I filled 4 128GiB cards with photos and videos, and was also well into the 5th card.

    3. Re:Isn't 640k enough for anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm finally switching to a phone that takes storage cards. I thought 64GB was going to make me happy, but then I saw that full, off-line wikipedia was a 64GB zip. (I think about 108GB unzipped, haven't got it running yet) KIWIX app. And HERE Maps, the whole world is about 26GB. So I just ordered a 128GB micro sdxc. Maybe if I leave out Africa I can get a few songs in there too.

      But will I be happy?

  14. Pocket NAS by adam.jimenez · · Score: 1

    Has anybody considered making a NAS out of high capacity MicroSD cards?

    1. Re:Pocket NAS by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, use full SD cards which aren't much bigger and have a longer life of uses.

    2. Re:Pocket NAS by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      You mean like a ZSUN?

      Conveniently has an (unconnected) wired ethernet header, dual 802.4G radios, is cheap, and can run OpenWRT?

    3. Re: Pocket NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure it's only a single radio in the zsun, although I believe the chipset actually supports two Ethernet ports - some other Atheros devices with the same chip have dual Ethernet, although there are only pads on this board for a single port.

  15. Re: I have no need for such a high-capacity card a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you try a Samsung horse "any time is a good time"
    Clean, gentle and reasonably priced
    To book just text "Horseblowjob" to 555Samsung
    Remember that's
    "Horseblowjob" to 555Samsung

    Samsung from when Life is better than Good

  16. how much is an iphone with one? by ealbers · · Score: 0

    Apple! Mwahahahahahahahahhaha

    Wonder how much a Iphone with one of these will cost...

    Everyone else can just buy one and slip it in their phone, not hAPPLEss users.

  17. $1/GB by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 2

    And yet another top of the line card comes out at $1/GB more or less. With even the smallest cards going for $10 a Best Buy due to shipping and storage prices... can we find some better way of doing this? How about a box of 10 SD cards like floppies at the signoff price for floppies at $10/box?

    1. Re:$1/GB by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yet another top of the line card comes out at $1/GB more or less. With even the smallest cards going for $10 a Best Buy due to shipping and storage prices... can we find some better way of doing this? How about a box of 10 SD cards like floppies at the signoff price for floppies at $10/box?

      Best Buy? LOL. Ever hear of eBay, grandpa? Here's 10 32GB microSD cards for $29.99 with free shipping, that works out to $3/card and less than $0.1/GB.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:$1/GB by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Just go to Micro Center and get them at the checkout. They just keep them in bins there and the clerk hands them over to prevent theft. I don't waste my time with best buy as they are over priced, the clerks are dumb as rocks, and if you have to return something it is a pain in the ass even if it is defective. As far as reliability is concerned the micro center branded cards have been pretty reliable as have the USB drives as I still haven't had one fail that wasn't abused*.

      * By abused I don't mean regular normal use but things like being plugged in to a machine that is at knee level and then accidentally bashing your knee into it breaking the connector, sending one through the washer and dryer several times, getting run over by a car.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:$1/GB by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Here's 10 32GB microSD cards for $29.99 with free shipping, that works out to $3/card and less than $0.1/GB.

      You're assuming an awful lot there. That they will arrive at all, that they will provide the stated capacity, that they will work at all, that they will work longer than a couple of weeks... if it's not from a name brand with a decent warranty procedure and with at least a five year warranty, it's garbage not fit for ass-wiping (it's not soft and fluffy.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:$1/GB by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So we've gone from 10 32GB uSD cards to 5 8GB SD cards... that seems a bit of a fail

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:$1/GB by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Holy affiliate link, Batman!

      (That's a flag to remind the Slashdot admins to make a few bucks for Slashdot!)

  18. Oh sure, I want one by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to have one in an abstract kind of way, but not enough to plunk down even near to that kind of money.

    I actually bought an Evo+ because benchmarks revealed that the Evo and Evo+ are some of the best cards at random I/O, and thus better for running your operating system from than for example a Sandisk Ultra. I bought a 32GB when I could have probably done fine with a 8GB, let alone a 16GB, because apparently the 32GB and larger cards have even better random-access performance. It's annoying that some SD cards should suffer extremely poor performance on random writes, but sure enough, switching out my Sandisk Ultra 32GB for the Evo+ 32GB significantly improved Android performance on my Pine A64+ 2GB.

    Sorry that reads like a fat block of ad copy, as if any advertisers were ever concerned with such trivial matters as random write performance; in fact, no SD card manufacturer of which I'm aware advertises any specs like that whatsoever. It's all just classes, and those only refer to sustained writes.

    So far I am getting nowhere near using up my 32GB card, and don't expect to be in any danger of doing so any time soon. I have a 32GB Sandisk Ultra in my phone just for data, and it's doing that job just fine too — and I've lots of free space.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Oh sure, I want one by sconeu · · Score: 1

      You can buy the 200GB SanDisk for about USD$80 on Amazon.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Oh sure, I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy 512GB generic brands for about UK £5 on salelist.co.uk .

    3. Re:Oh sure, I want one by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You can buy generic trash labeled as 512 GB, sure. You won't find any that actually hold 512 GB worth of data.

    4. Re:Oh sure, I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha, why don't you buy one and come back with a product review?

      They are small cards (8GB or so) that have been given fake cases and packaging, and report a far larger file size to Windows. You can try putting a file on that's bigger than 8GB, but you'll never be able to retrieve it.

    5. Re:Oh sure, I want one by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I have a 32GB Sandisk Ultra in my phone just for data, and it's doing that job just fine too — and I've lots of free space.

      I have a 128GB EVO in my tablet and it's full.

      As with all things storage there will people people who aren't interested because they will never use it, and people who aren't interested because it's still not big enough.

      For a DSLR recording video is limited by memory card not by battery capacity. Recording photos at this point is limited by battery capacity where a typical 64GB card can hold over 1000 RAW files at which point the battery will already have given up unless you go crazy with power saving.

    6. Re:Oh sure, I want one by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can buy the 200GB SanDisk for about USD$80 on Amazon.

      OK, but I got my 32GB for $15 on Amazon, with Prime delivery. That works out to a tolerable price per GB, and provides more space than I actually need. I'm not parking anything on slow flash storage unless it has to be there. My data is mostly still on spinning rust (but high-capacity, relatively) and also on GigE. That way it can live in the closet and not spin on my desk.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake me up when you make a gazillion terabyte microSD so I can use it in my Tardis.

  20. Useful for ultracheap win8 tablets by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These would be useful on ultra-cheap win8 tablets, like those Nextbook things at walmart.

    They come from the factory neutered with a tiny internal flash storage, typically under 20gb of useful capacity, but feature a microSD slot.

    What you do is format the card as NTFS, but dont provide a drive letter. Instead, you mount it as an NTFS junction at say C:\SDCard, then you create softlinks under there to individual folders in Program Files, and other important places.

    That way C:\Program files remains traversable by the windows update process (and wont break spectacularly) because it is still native to the system volume, but the installed program directories underneath are redirected elsewhere on a per-program basis. (So, eg, the internet explorer subfolder remains native, but the Office 2007 subfolder is a symlink to the sdcard volume, etc.)

    This is pretty easy to do with some freeware like symmover.

    Big honking storage would turn the cheap walmart toy into a somewhat useable low-power tablet.

    The storage would be even friendlier to use on a linux friendly tablet PC, as it could be mounted as /home.

    For people with Linux Deploy set up on their phones, Big honking SDcard storage would let them set up a much more useful linux chroot with much more installed in it.

    Big honking storage like this is really aimed at power users like that.

    The prior suggestion I saw of setting these up in a raid array isnt so hot though. While individually these cards boast an interesting read/write access time, the limiting factor for raid will be bus saturation. Typically, the bus that lots of these would be put on is USB. USB has a limited total bus bandwidth, which IIRC, is 12mbit for 1.1, 400mbit for 2.0, and USB 3.0 is 5gbit. Once you saturate the bus, additional devices in the stripe only add complexity without benefit. For USB 3.0, that works out to about 7 of these cards (assuming the 96MB/sec figure holds, which it probably doesnt.). After that, the USB bus itself is the bottleneck. More cards wont make it go any faster, and the cost would be prohibitive. About the only neat thing about such an array would be the very low power requirements.

    These cards are really best used in devices that SHOULD have had beefy internal storage, but dont, because of cheapness on the OEM's part.

    Things like the afore mentioned tablet PCs.

  21. I can buy 100 blank recordable DVDs for ~$20 by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    These single level DVDs will hold about 450 GB of data, although not as a single item, not in such a small volume, not erasable, and less convenient to use but for about 1/12 the price. Both may have their place, though.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:I can buy 100 blank recordable DVDs for ~$20 by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      A microSD card weighs less than 1 gram, and requires very little power to run. It has faster access time than those DVDs as well, being solid state.

      Good use cases include:

      Teeny tiny drones, with large integrated map sets and aggressive flight telemetry logging

      Large data store on tiny pocket NAS (like a ZSUN running openwrt). (Aside from corporate espionage, There are some useful situations where a sizeable local file store without a big honking server would be beneficial. Say, hosting the client images for a bank of thin-client terminals at a coffee shop. The ZSUN could live peacefully above the ceiling tiles. The ZSUN has dual wifi radios, so it can act as both a repeater/bridge, and a local NAS on a shoestring budget.)

      Large user-added storage to ultra-thin, ultra-low-power devices, like "toy tablets."

      Storage for "enormously large" password libraries for portable WPA passcode breaking solutions.

      in addition to just "Hey, now I can film non-stop with my GoPro for over 24hrs! awesome!"

      Some of the older tablet devices out there had hidden internal microSD slots instead of soldered flash chips. Straight up replacement with one of these is a direct storage upgrade.

      There are quite a few ways a really spacious microsd card is very desirable and useful. Dont scoff too much at the price. It will go down with time.

    2. Re:I can buy 100 blank recordable DVDs for ~$20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you store 450GB on a single layer DVD? The standard was 4.7GB. Blu-Ray is around 25GB for single layer.

    3. Re:I can buy 100 blank recordable DVDs for ~$20 by Nadir · · Score: 1

      He says "100" DVDs

      --
      --
      The world is divided in two categories:
      those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
  22. Lifetime need? by chilenexus · · Score: 1

    When I was in high school people were looking at the most recent personal computer, which had 64k of ram, and exclaiming "when would you ever need that much ram?" The whole lab shared a 6 MB hard drive, and floppy disks held 360k. In college the computer I bought came with a 256 MB read/write optical drive and eventually a 40 MB hard drive. Everyone still thought those were huge.

    Even a small OS like linux is a 180 MB download, and the USB sticks we use like we used to use floppies are now measured in GB. Assuming you won't need larger storage is a sure way to get yourself in trouble in a little while.

  23. Ad signature by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    256GB ... capable of storing more than 12 hours of 4K video footage, 33 hours of full HD recording, 55,200 photos or 23,500 MP3s

    This is where you see it's an ad and not a regular story ; who on slashdot needs to be explained what is 256GB?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re: Ad signature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux isn't an OS, it's a kernel.

    2. Re: Ad signature by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      If something is an OS (mac os, windows, ...) that's Linux!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:Ad signature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      256GB ... capable of storing more than 12 hours of 4K video footage, 33 hours of full HD recording, 55,200 photos or 23,500 MP3s

      This is where you see it's an ad and not a regular story ; who on slashdot needs to be explained what is 256GB?

      I'd guess that most folk here would say 256GB is 1024*1024*1024*256 = 274,877,906,944 bytes.

      But, it turns out, that some marketing bastards went ahead and re-defined what a GB is. Yes, it turns out that this thing is actually 256,000,000,000 bytes. So, it's probably a real 240GB drive - which is 240*1024*1024*1024 = 257,698,037,760 bytes.
      Don't even think about asking what sort of free space that is after formatting.

  24. But does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why, but all the MicroSD cards above 32 GB that I use, sooner or later all become "locked" somehow. No, it isn't the physical lock switch, I said MicroSD. There is no lock switch on a MicroSD card. I try to write anything to it or format it, and Windows tells me that it cannot write to the card. Yes the card reader supports MicroSDXC (or at least it claims to..).

    1. Re:But does it work? by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Informative

      MicroSD is flash memory.

      Flash memory has a write life limit, because of how it physically operates. (The gates that store the information degrade from having their states changed. Eventually, they degrade to the point where they are unreliable.)

      Due to architectural restraints, flash memory is changed in 64kbyte blocks, on average. Most filesystems still believe the smallest writable unit is 512 bytes. This means that when you write lots of little files, and the card tries to be space efficient, the same block can be read-erase-written dozens of times on just a few filesystem writes. The choice of file system is very important here. This is one of the reasons why FAT performs so well on flash disks-- FAT has a very large cluster size (when used on "large" disks. ahem.), and can align natively with this block size in many cases. NTFS does not have a good block alignment with most flash systems, because the allocation unit sizes are not nice even multiples of the block size.

      EXT CAN have the block size specified at file system creation time, but special care needs to be taken to assure inode size corresponds to the physical flash block size, which most people dont do when they reformat the media.

      Poor alignment makes the device degrade much faster than it really should under ideal conditions, and drastically shortens device lifespan, even with advanced internal wear leveling. This is especially true if the system using the device as storage is treating it like a spinning disk, and not trimming writes and coordinating cache flushes with flash in mind.

      Most likely, you have been destroying your media through improper data alignment in this fashion, and when it cant handle any more writes, it tells you so.

  25. UHS 1 or UHS 2? by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    There's finally been some innovation in the SD / MicroSD arena - with a new standard for cards, they now have backwards compatible, much faster ones, with extra pins.
    https://www.google.com.au/search?q=uhs+2+u3&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwit5b2PrdPMAhXDnaYKHQtUD30Q_AUICCgC&biw=1707&bih=929

    I don't believe this one uses the new standard. If you're just using it to play music or videos, it's fine but (IIRC) a high end gopro would like a faster card when recording 4k 60fps for example.
    I'd like to see all cards utilise this sooner than later.

  26. Hooray! by nintendoeats · · Score: 1

    I just today received a 200 GB card which has dropped sharply in price over the past month. I had wondered why, and now it seems clear.

    Since the death of HDD music devices the capacity of MicroSD has determined their capacity. As somebody who stores their music in FLAC I have had to move music out of my library to fit. The 200 will do for now, but I'm glad to see that there will be an option when I need to upgrade again.

    1. Re:Hooray! by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Yeah I never understood that. They almost all have the physical space to accommodate a full sized SD card and 512GB versions of these have been available for quite sometime and at better GB/$ than microSD too.

      That said 256GB of FLAC is a *LOT* of music, we are talking well in excess of 600 albums. I have 282 in just over 100GB and that includes a whole bunch of multi CD compilation albums.

    2. Re:Hooray! by nintendoeats · · Score: 1

      I felt the same way. I have an SD -> MicroSD adapter but that isn't great for something that you carry around. For the last few years the best option I have seen for large capacity players had two MicroSD slots and even that wouldn't build playlists across both of them (it also isn't great for syncing).

      But uh...I was already over-capacity on that 128, so I don't know how long it will be until I need a 256. If you consider that My parent's started collecting CDs in the mid-90s, this is essentially a 20 year music collection.

  27. One word: Porn by bughunter · · Score: 1

    While you most likely do not need such a large microSD card in your life

    In fact, yes, one would be rather convenient. But then I have no life.

    (I have filled four 1TB hard drives with downloaded 720 and 1080p porn, and am starting on a 2TB. It would be nice to bring as much of that with me as possible when traveling.)

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  28. A 512 is needed, please. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    How else can I put ROMs of every single Nintendo DS game into a R4 card?

    512G would be enough, btw.

    1. Re:A 512 is needed, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could settle for just the good games and get by with 640K.

  29. Re:One word: Porn by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1
  30. Mind-boggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how they can actually fit that amount of storage in such a tiny space. Also, a photo is 5 MB in size, and an MP3 is 11 MB? Got it.

    1. Re:Mind-boggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A song stored lossless @ 16/44 is actually about 10-30mb depending on run time. MP3 lossy compression throws away around 90% of the data.
      The master, if available in 24bit, is actually 30mb+. Some albums at 24/192 can take nearly a gig of space. Most 16/44 CD's are around 200mb of space.

    2. Re:Mind-boggling by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      24 bit is used at the recording, editing, mastering stages because you can "waste" many bits due to digital volumes/levels not tightly adjusted, and not lose anything. Then as far ad human hearing is concerned 16/44 and 16/48 are the best.
      Some people upconvert things at 192 kHz and output on a DAC at 192 KHz, which lowers quality a tiny bit. Perhaps some rare genuine 191 content exists? Still likely to give slightly worse sound than 48 KHz.

  31. Wrong unit by HaaPoo · · Score: 1

    How many library of congress would fit on this cards?

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Are you kidding? It's my card and I want it now! by Metal+Cutter · · Score: 2

    You can't be living in the same universe as me. I have a 128 gig in my 1520 now and considered buying a 200 gig but the reviews were very negative toward the large capacity. But a major manufacturer producing a 256 gig will make me spend my money! I get those pesky notices from Win 10 now telling me I am near full on my 128 gig now. As a matter of fact, I will buy one for my Surface too.

  34. 512 GB for $6.68 by vandamme · · Score: 1