Slashdot Mirror


Fitness App Runkeeper Secretly Tracks Users At All Times, Sends Data to Advertisers (androidauthority.com)

An anonymous reader writes: FitnessKeeper, the company behind running app Runkeeper, is in hot water in Europe. The company has received a formal complaint from the Norwegian Consumer Council for breaching European data protection laws. But why? Runkeeper tracks its users' location at all times -- not just when the app is active -- and sends that data to advertisers. The NCC, a consumer rights watchdog, is conducting an investigation into 20 apps' terms and conditions to see if the apps do what their permissions say they do and to monitor data flows. Tinder has already been reported to the Norwegian data protection authority for similar breaches of privacy laws. The NCC's investigation into Runkeeper discovered that user location data is tracked around the clock and gets transmitted to a third party advertiser in the U.S. called Kiip.me.Finn Myrstad, the council's digital policy director, said: We checked the apps technically, to see the data flows and to see if the apps actually do what they say they do. Everyone understands that Runkeeper tracks users while they exercise, but to continue after the training has ended is not okay. Not only is it a breach of privacy laws, we are also convinced that users do not want to be tracked in this way, or for information to be shared with third party advertisers.

93 comments

  1. Is this not in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be very surprised if there's not some legalese in there that permits this.

    1. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0/10

    2. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can write whatever you want in your EULA, even with "user consent" (i.e. nobody reads those damn things, they're 20 pages long and requires you to be a lawyer to understand half of it) it cannot overrule the existing laws of the country.

    3. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by evilRhino · · Score: 0

      No amount of legalese can get you around European privacy laws.

    4. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Just downloaded my data and uninstalled the app from my phone.

      No time for BS like this, the meager benefit derived from the app was definitely not worth it.

    5. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      You can write whatever you want in your EULA, even with "user consent" (i.e. nobody reads those damn things, they're 20 pages long and requires you to be a lawyer to understand half of it) it cannot overrule the existing laws of the country.

      Going to be awesome to start to see these companies who believe they can get away with spying on everyone unravel as privacy laws and awareness of creepy stalker mentality that pervades this industry is brought out of the shadows.

    6. Re: Is this not in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can and do get around privacy laws. There are too many apps to go after all of them. At least 40% of Google store apps are malware according to an article on this site but judging on how many require bogus permissions I'd say it's much more than that.

    7. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TTIP can :)

    8. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A EULA is not a contract.

      There is no consideration. You already bought the gadget before agreeing to the EULA.

      Of course I ANAL.

    9. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just downloaded my data and uninstalled the app from my phone.

      Yep, same here. Haven't used it in a while anyway.

    10. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just downloaded my data and uninstalled the app from my phone.

      No time for BS like this, the meager benefit derived from the app was definitely not worth it.

      My overall trust for any app goes down when stuff like this is revealed. My smartphone keeps getting less fun as time goes on.

    11. Re:Is this not in the EULA? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I know I'm shocked that this information-gathering gadget was in fact gathering information.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  2. Your apps are spying on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop the presses!

    Drop the bomb!

    Exterminate them all!

  3. Price? by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not surprisingly, it is a free app(with in app purchases-not sure how that works with a running app, but whatever). They had to be getting their money from somewhere....

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Price? by SumDog · · Score: 2

      With Map My Ride, the in app purchases are to unlock "MVP mode" which allows you to get more workout analytics (break down your split times) or live tracking (let your friends track your ride)

    2. Re:Price? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Offer up an IAP to stop unwanted tracking and selling of data!

    3. Re:Price? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      By killing my data plan? I would say that is close to fraud!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't they just be getting their money from ads?

      "You've logged 500 miles, good job. You're probably due for a new pair of running shoes, click here for deals on Nike footwear."

      Free for the user, no shady practices.

    5. Re:Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Map My Ride, the in-app purchases are to unlock "MVP mode" which allows you to get more workout analytics (break down your split times) or live tracking (let your friends track your ride)

      FTFY (you were missing a hyphen).

    6. Re:Price? by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 1

      Runkeeper also keeps trying to sell you a premium service, which has more analytics. There is also the "reward" after you complete some accomplishment, which seems to be some product discount, and they probably could make money from advertising there.

      Last year I wondered if it was a Runkeeper developer asking what to do when dividing by zero. If you stay completely still for an entire workout, it decides that you are running at "zero minutes per kilometer" and even congratulates you on setting a new record.

      Sometimes the phone's GPS has been still running after I've finished, and I have had to swipe away the app. Up until now I've assumed this was incompetence on their part, rather than malice.

    7. Re:Price? by Mistakill · · Score: 1

      I paid for the app long before they went with the freemium model

  4. Oh wow how unexpected! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm shocked, shocked to discover there's undisclosed data slurping for advertisers going on in there.

    1. Re:Oh wow how unexpected! by Falos · · Score: 1

      I was going to do Shocked! but you've gone and beat me to it.

      If they can, they will. Why is this so hard to understand? Why do we think automated, dragnet surveillance knows the difference between "good guys" and "bad guys" (as if there was some binary, defining property)? Why do we think we Totes Dodge The Bullet because we clicked some "No thanks" checkbox with carefully phrased wording?

      Security doesn't have this problem. When they see an access, they assume everything's been hoovered up. Why would it not? When they see a vulnerability, a potential means of discernment, they assume it WILL be used and must be corrected until inaccessible.

      Inaccessible in their vocabulary means hard walls, not words and paper walls.

    2. Re:Oh wow how unexpected! by Dins · · Score: 1

      If they can, they will. Why is this so hard to understand?

      It's not, and I kinda figured apps like this may very well be doing this. But when it's confirmed that they are, well, bye bye...

    3. Re:Oh wow how unexpected! by mspohr · · Score: 2

      Welcome to the world of "Surveillance Capitalism"... you are the product they are selling.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  5. Not just for running by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... for running(NSFW)

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  6. in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bet there's something in there that allows this.

    1. Re: in the EULA? by Frankzy · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter since that shit carry very little weight here...

  7. Can we sue for this? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    If I'm going over my monthly data cap because an app it using up my bandwidth, can I ask them to reimburse me for added data costs? Seems fair to me...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Can we sue for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reimburse me for added data costs? Seems fair to me...

      In what world do you live in that that seems fair? They have no idea if you have a data cap, or what it is, or how much it costs you. If there was a concern there it is on you to not use the app. This current generation will install anything at all onto their hardware without a second thought and expect all the responsibility for ensuring its proper behavior should be someone else's problem. It's not. It's yours.

    2. Re:Can we sue for this? by crow · · Score: 1

      Right. The solution is to have the OS support per-application data caps. If an app hits the daily limit, you get a pop-up asking permission. Unless (and until) you say yes, the app sees that the network is down.

    3. Re:Can we sue for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of secretly tracks do you not understand.

    4. Re:Can we sue for this? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      You can sue for anything. I can sue you for daring to use the username Locke2005, when I am clearly the one and only Locke2005.

      This is the kind of thing that you need a class action lawsuit, because the money is so small that it can't be worth it.

      If this were the US, a class action lawsuit of this type would most likely settle with the company paying legal fees, agreeing to stop doing it, and maybe give their customers a coupon of some kind for pennies off future services. Not worth it for the customers, well worth it for the lawyers.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    5. Re:Can we sue for this? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You sure can.

      First, you must calculate how much bandwidth they used at times that you weren't expecting it to be using bandwidth. Be precise. Its likely in the low MB.

      Next, look at your recent phone bills, and document your actual overages. (If you weren't actually over, what are you suing for?)

      And calculate (show your work) what portion of that overage is attributable to the app running when it wasn't supposed to be. Hope you didn't have a 2GB overage streaming movies because the 2MB contribution of the app to your overage is then only about 1% the 20$ you spent on overages. (or 20 cents)

      Next, document what steps you took to minimize the harm. (If you've had data cap overages for the last 3 years and you are only doing something about it now, the judge will disallow most of your claim as you have an obligation to minimize harm. So you'll need to show that you took reasonable steps to monitor and control your data use and manage overages.)

      Finally, file your lawsuit; attend the hearing; and then wait for your check for $2.27 in data overages that the court is likely to allow as directly attributable harm from the app for data use.

      Assuming it allows anything at all.

    6. Re:Can we sue for this? by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Your logic is perfect.

      Yet "we" still get hurt.

      So how is this system supposed to protect us?

    7. Re:Can we sue for this? by sjames · · Score: 1

      They know it isn't likely to be free. If they did anything to obscure the constant tracking and use of data, they should be forced to pay.

  8. Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Never met one that didn't tell the world when and where they ran. They're like vegans in that regard. I doubt many of their users will care.

    1. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cyclists are worse.

    2. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My meal was vegan today. And yesterday's meals too. And the day before that...

    3. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Never met one that didn't tell the world when and where they ran.

      How would you know? If you met a jogger who didn't tell you anything about their jogging then you wouldn't know it. You would just assume that they were non-joggers and your preconceived notions about joggers would remain untested.

    4. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does vegan taste like? Chicken or pork?

    5. Re: Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither. Tastes like disappointment.

    6. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by zarr · · Score: 1

      When joggers don't jogg, they're just ordinary, but fit, people. Some of those actually care about privacy.

    7. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by DoubleParadoxx · · Score: 1

      Its one thing to share where you ran. Its another to share your location at all times.

    8. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awful. Too stringy.

    9. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      Its one thing to share where you ran. Its another to share your location at all times.

      Which it cannot do. Privacy settings on iOS9 for Runkeeper has only two settings: never, and only when app is active. What is stated in the summary should not be possible.

    10. Re: Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I meant, what does a vegan taste like?.

    11. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by friesofdoom · · Score: 1

      That is a bit presumptuous. Maybe the first think he asks people when he meets them is if they jog...

    12. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly, but if we are to believe that, then we should also account for the possibility that the next questions he asks people upon meeting them is when and where they run.

    13. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not a real fan of apples products but I do have an iphone. What made me switch from android was a similar story regarding the uber app and Googles' conflict of interest handling my privacy.

    14. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which it cannot do. Privacy settings on iOS9 for Runkeeper has only two settings: never, and only when app is active. What is stated in the summary should not be possible.

      You did read the articles where you will see that this is about the Android version of the application, right?

      The council argues that the Android version of the app tracks users and transmits personal location data to a third party in the United States, even when not in use.

      Silly me. Of course you didn't.

    15. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Tom · · Score: 2

      Never met one that didn't tell the world when and where they ran. They're like vegans in that regard. I doubt many of their users will care.

      Here.

      There are a lot of casual joggers in the world, who don't make it a religion but use an App simply to track or to remind or because they can.

      Just like there are a lot of people in the world who sometimes eat a lunch that would qualify as vegan, not because they think anything about vegan food, but simply because their choice of what to eat that day turned out to be so.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    16. Re:Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What does vegan taste like? Chicken or pork?

      Soylent Green.

    17. Re: Joggers don't care about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the flavor of lube you're using. -PCP

  9. Garmin Connect by IMightB · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised at all, I would like someone to do this analysis with the Garmin Connect app. A while ago it was updated so that you couldn't connect the vivosmart directly to your phone without doing it through the app. Then, another update the app isn't even usable unless you turn on location services. So for someone like me whose use case is mostly so I don't have to pull my phone out of my pocket to check/ack a page and occasionally for exercise. It became a piece of junk that sits in a drawer.

    1. Re:Garmin Connect by Piata · · Score: 1

      I'm curious about this as well. Garmin's primary business is selling reliable hardware with a long term ecosystem so you would hope that selling user information to marketers isn't worth the effort.

  10. I think they all do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sister got Dad a fitbit as a gift. It wants so many permissions in Android that the family decided not to install, activate, or use it. Seems corporations view people as marks to be fleeced instead of valued customers.

    1. Re:I think they all do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fitbits are all-but-useless unless you join the cult (i.e. create an account with them) and allow their app to upload all of your data to their servers. How useless? You can't even set the damn time on a Fitbit without using the app and you can't use the app if you don't have an account.

      I bought a Fitbit HR in hopes of logging & tracking heart rate data locally, either on my computer or mobile device. What a waste of money. I can check my current heart rate, but because I'm not willing to join the cult, I can't track it over a period of time. And I can't set the time, so the watch aspect is always off by about UTC-offset plus 7 minutes.

    2. Re:I think they all do by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Uninstalled 15 minutes ago.

      Easiest decision I had to make today.

    3. Re:I think they all do by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      I have been looking at these type of devices too, as I am getting in to better shape, why not buy gadgets and make it more fun. But I could not really see what they could do for me, and I must say I had concerns about how much data I am giving out to unknown parties.

    4. Re:I think they all do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Clinton Foundation...fo.

    5. Re:I think they all do by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      Another one to echo your sentiment here. There are no tasks that the Fitbit account does that couldn't be handled within the app with the data kept locally. The fact that this isn't an option - not just on a fitbit but with any of the other fitness trackers I've looked at - gives me grave discomfort. It'd be a trivial selling point for anyone to do, but the fact that no one is doing it means that someone, somewhere, is paying handsomely for that data.

    6. Re:I think they all do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't a problem when you choose to wear one of these devices (still don't understand the point of these things). The problem is with companies that have been forcing their employees to wear such devices to track their activity for their health insurance.

  11. Battery usage? by smileham · · Score: 1

    That's am immediate uninstall then. I'm personally not that fussed about being tracked, it's more a concern on battery drain from an app that shouldn't be doing it!

  12. I'm curious about the tracking results by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    I agree it's a violation of user privacy but still I'm curious about what the tracking data shows. For example I wonder what percentage of those exercising hit up a donut shop after they're done.

    1. Re:I'm curious about the tracking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if it's tracking while the app is on then it's not going to get a great deal of useful information. You can make a pretty decent guess of where I live, which is the same as the city I specified in my profile. You can work out I ran a marathon recently, and that I tend to run early morning or late at night so probably have a full time day job. Given "targeted" advertising seems to completely fail to show anything I'm remotely interested in, if an advertising company wants to be ripped off by a company offering a free app then so be it.

      The article's light on the details, but is this with recent versions of the app? I've always suspected it logs data secretly when I've finished a run until I turn off GPS and/or exit the app. However, once the app has closed I'm not sure how it would be tracking anything: it has no background services running, indeed I'm looking at my phone now and can't see anything other than the usual minimal set of services. Nothing RunKeeper related at all. For reference, I'm using an old version of the app, because I have Android 2.3 (no sniggering please).

  13. Falling behind by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

    "Another branch of the European government was furious they had not thought of this first because les terroristes "

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  14. A numbers of apps does this by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    my iPhone says that the app wants access to GPS even when I am not using it or have opened it. So these get uninstalled again. I believe the last one I tried was Waze.

    1. Re:A numbers of apps does this by orev · · Score: 1

      You can easily going into the Location Services and change it to "While Using", and actually in the most recent version at least, there isn't an option for "Always", so this must only be an Android thing.

  15. Android Version Only? by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

    The first link goes to a website named "Android Authority"; the article in the second link includes the phrase "...the Android version of the app...". Anyone know if the iOS version is doing this also?

    --
    "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
    1. Re:Android Version Only? by orev · · Score: 1

      You can check by going into Location services and seeing what it's set to. Only options I see are "Never" and "While using", so it can't be tracking you all the time.

    2. Re:Android Version Only? by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      No, it cannot do this. You can't even give it permission to track you all the time.

    3. Re:Android Version Only? by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

      Thanks, both you and orev.

      I expect that, in the (vast?) majority of cases, RunKeeper is doing this without the user's knowledge or permission; I inferred from the articles that it may be doing that by somehow overriding the user's tracking settings in Android. (But, that was an inference only.) I didn't think there was a way to do that in iOS, so glad to have my understanding affirmed.

      --
      "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
    4. Re:Android Version Only? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      It could do the same if it had the Location permission "always" (and the user allowed it), but like they said it only offers "Never" and "While Using" - Apple added the "while using" item back with iOS8 I think. After they added that I always shut down location permissions for any app that does not offer the "While Using" option.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  16. Shouldn't happen on iOS 9 by Isao · · Score: 1

    There are only two location sharing options, Never and while the app is active. If they're bypassing this on iOS 9, Apple has got some problems.

    1. Re:Shouldn't happen on iOS 9 by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Article mentions that this issue is specifically for the Android version of the app. You are correct that this is impossible on iOS. Doubly so if you actually completely close the app (swipe it away).

  17. So these people are safe ... right? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    All those people who did not root their phones, used official market place or the official app store all should be safe, right?

    The App is snooping, it has been outed, it is simply a matter of time, next security update will blacklist the app, revoke all it s privileges and all is well in the world, right?

    In reality, people who rooted their phone, run a security manager that sandboxes all apps and prompts for every network access, will be safe. People who trusted Apples and Googles to keep them safe would be taken to the cleaners.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:So these people are safe ... right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please keep in mind that it may be safer for technology experts like yourself to subvert Google and Apple device security. However, the vast majority of people using these devices are not computer wizards or security professionals. Disabling the builtin security will most likely expose these users to greater risks.

  18. You need the ability to lie to the app by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Some apps that you really want demand all sorts of capabilities that you do not want to give to them. Some will not install or behave badly if you do not grant what they want. What is needed is a 3 way grant of permissions: yes (allow), no (do not allow), lie (use a contact list of: mickey mouse, the queen, pres obama, ...; location: North Pole; ....) like that they are happy and just report to their masters junk information.

    1. Re:You need the ability to lie to the app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is more or less what "deny" does.
      Most apps will crash if they don't get what they want.

      Instead of really denying access to the contact list, what happens in reality is that a blank contact list is presented.

  19. Basic right and contracts by aepervius · · Score: 1

    In the US maybe you can put a lot of stuff in some state like enforcing arbitration and giving up rights, but in europe we take a deem view of this, you cannot waive your fundemental rights, and, depending on the juridiction, either be those clause are waived , and can in some cases up to nullify a contract. In this case data protection comes in, and I am guessing that kiip.me will find itself in very hot water rapidly.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  20. How many times must it be said? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has gotten burned by this kind of crap and is surprised, hurt, or indignant, please repeat after me: "If I'm not paying for the product, I AM the product". Now, continue to repeat it, out loud if necessary, until it sticks. Make it a daily mantra. When you see a 'free' service you're interested in, if your immediate thought is "how will I and / or my data be taken advantage of if I sign up for this?", then you've successfully activated your best protection against being an unwitting victim of 'free'.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:How many times must it be said? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who has gotten burned by this kind of crap and is surprised, hurt, or indignant, please repeat after me: "If I'm not paying for the product, I AM the product". Now, continue to repeat it, out loud if necessary, until it sticks. Make it a daily mantra. When you see a 'free' service you're interested in, if your immediate thought is "how will I and / or my data be taken advantage of if I sign up for this?", then you've successfully activated your best protection against being an unwitting victim of 'free'.

      false. this is lesbian logic.

      distrowatch.com for links.

      Linux/BSD are Free. Free like it works on all your shit, unless you are stupid, and it's free like it's cool to have free. to wit: FreeBSD

    2. Re:How many times must it be said? by epine · · Score: 1

      "If I'm not paying for the product, I AM the product". Now, continue to repeat it, out loud if necessary, until it sticks.

      Sure. But here's a question. What does Caveat Emptor 101 for Slow Learners actually buy you at the end of the day?

      What it bought me is an Android cell phone with such a pathetically small number of data-enabled applications installed on it that I turned off my data modem six months ago and have yet to miss it.

      Furthermore, actually paying for an application is no guarantee it doesn't partake in same additional revenue streams. If you were too busy shouting the take-away slogan from Caveat Emptor 101 from the nearest available e-rooftop to notice this ugly fact, you might want to check yourself into the horror show known as Caveat Emptor 102. No need to write "102" down on paper lest you forget.

      No, just "continue to repeat it, out loud if necessary, until it sticks."

      With hard work and persistence, eventually you'll become qualified to enroll in Houston We Have a Problem Here 400 or Privacy 911 (dissertation mandatory).

  21. Moving your data from runkeeper by dagooncrn · · Score: 1

    There's very useful service https://tapiriik.com/ (free and open source https://github.com/cpfair/tapi... ) that lets you migrate workouts between different fitness apps. It supports runkeeper, strava (my favourite), endomondo, garmin and even dropbox.

    --
    -- mg
  22. Muhaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just need to be a U.S. owned 1% corporation like Google. Then the German government will allow you to do things they would never permit a German company to do.

    For example, Google Mail (and scanning emails in order to present ads) would never have been allowed to be done by GMX.

    In other words, the vasalls of the Imperium have very little rights while the Imperator's corporations have LOTS of rights.

  23. A Small Jammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...could work wonders in order to address these issues. Turn it on whenever you need privacy.

  24. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vote Clinton or Bush, so that their Riad friends can kill 4000 Americans without punishment.

    Even better, the 1% press will whip you up to kill a million IRAQIS in retaliation for Saudi terror.

  25. Remember, folks by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    If you're transmitting data to a service provider, that data will be sold.

  26. Locke2005 by antdude · · Score: 1

    Prove it that you're the only Locke2005. I am Locke2005 too. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  27. Battery life by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    So that explains why my battery life has tanked since I installed Runkeeper...
    F' them.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)