Slashdot Mirror


Transparent Displays Are Here, But They're Pretty Useless

An anonymous reader writes: Samsung has debuted the first commercial installation of its 55-inch 'mirror' displays at a salon in South Korea with a transparent OLED screen overlaid over a mirrored surface to allow interaction. The Samsung product rivals an equivalent TOLED from Planar, with both intended for high-end use in the retail display and exhibition space. However both manufacturers are struggling to find practical applications for the much-awaited technology. Transparent displays have been a staple of sci-fi films such as Minority Report for decades, but only, it seems, because they helped to open up scenes which would otherwise have been difficult to film. With the pending advent of AR-based visualization, the innovation of the clear monitor seems not only to have come too late, but also offer limited practical use, even if its current breathtaking prices were to descend to the consumer space.

171 comments

  1. Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uber hipsters and possibly automotive windshields.

    1. Re:Very niche product. by mark-t · · Score: 2

      WIndshields? If you can convince regulators that it wouldn't impact visibility, maybe...

    2. Re:Very niche product. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing I thought, where would Augmented reality with a non opaque fallback mode be important, car windows.

      Maybe Glasses too.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Very niche product. by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Until you're checking your ass flab for zits in the mirror and accidentally accept a call from your grandmother.

    4. Re:Very niche product. by bondsbw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A HUD would actually help enhance visibility by tracking road markings, signs, and obstacles that are low visibility, as well as alerting you of events happening in your blind spots. Integrating 3D maps and directions would be handy. Putting your speedometer and other dashboard information closer to your view could reduce time you take your eyes off the road.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    5. Re:Very niche product. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You do not need a transparent display for a HUD.
      Now for wearables where you put the display into glasses it could be handy. You could have a good display in a profile pair of glasses.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely agree- am not surprised though that manufacturers are going for the higher margin business/high end retail market first though.

    7. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citations for any of this? I don't have one so what I'm saying is no more believable, but I do recall a study that showed HUDs were more of a hindrance than a help. The reason being that the bulk of the time looking at your dash is refocusing your depth of view, not moving your eyes, and the HUD does nothing to improve that but has the added disadvantage of being more visible so causing you to adjust your depth of view away from the road and onto the HUD more frequently than if it were on the dash.

    8. Re:Very niche product. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      The problem is, you need to refocus. And while devices that project the image into a considerable distance do exist (they're employed on military airplanes), they are quite expensive and offer only a limited field of vision.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A HUD would actually help enhance visibility by tracking road markings, signs, and obstacles that are low visibility, as well as alerting you of events happening in your blind spots. Integrating 3D maps and directions would be handy. Putting your speedometer and other dashboard information closer to your view could reduce time you take your eyes off the road.

      You are begging the question here. There is no reason to assume that cramming more information into peoples eyeballs will make them "see" more.

      If visibility is low slow the hell down!. That offers the additional benefit of not needing to constantly check your speedometer to see if you are "safely" above the posted limit. 3D maps and directions are not a necessity. Again, do the right thing and freaking prepare yourself so that you can focus on not killing yourself or others while operating heavy machinery, rather than fiddling around with gizmos and trying to consume extraneous information.

    10. Re:Very niche product. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      The problem is, you need to refocus.

      You need to do that anyway if you're going to look at your dashboard or your satnav's display.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    11. Re:Very niche product. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I thought the whole point of this was *not* having to look away from where you're driving? If not, dashboard it is.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    12. Re:Very niche product. by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      They are also available in a number of cars as well. I had a Corvette Z06 with a heads up display that reflected a standard display off the inside surface of the windshield. It looked like a vacuum fluorescent display for speed tach etc. floating near the front of the car.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    13. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WIndshields? If you can convince regulators that it wouldn't impact visibility, maybe...

      ever left an lcd in the sun?

    14. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't realize that a simple overlay on a windscreen does not a good HUD make. When your eyes focus on the road ahead, the HUD will be blurred. When your eyes focus on the HUD, the road will be blurred. Try driving around while you stare at precipitation, debris, or other optical perturbations on your windshield and you will see what I mean. In fighter jets, the HUD image is projected with optics set at infinity focus and then reflected off of a window. The actual portion of the pilot's field of view subtended by these reflectors is actually kind of small compared to the total field of view.

    15. Re:Very niche product. by Higaran · · Score: 1

      Haven't companies like caddilac, and mercedes already been doing HUDS for years now?

    16. Re:Very niche product. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I thought the whole point of this was *not* having to look away from where you're driving? If not, dashboard it is.

      Augmented reality goggles, or Google Glass 2.0, could accomplish the same thing, be more flexible and upgradable, and cost far less.

    17. Re:Very niche product. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      "Near the front" is unfortunately not what I was talking about, at least several meters would be required, tens of meters are better. But I suspect that even cheap solutions like this are somewhat usable and better than having to look away from the windshield.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    18. Re:Very niche product. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Yes, a head-mounted solution has the obvious benefit of having vastly smaller and more lighweight optics and not having to deal with head movements relative to the optical system, which is the bane of all real-world HUDs.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    19. Re:Very niche product. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Your arguments also work against lighted speedometers, speedometers that are graduated past 55 mph, and pretty much anything on the dashboard, including radio controls, fuel remaining, etc. After all, by driving more carefully, you eliminate the need for all these staples too.

    20. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you're checking your ass flab for zits in the mirror and accidentally accept a call from your grandmother.

      Damn you. Now I cannot get that visualization out my my head.

    21. Re:Very niche product. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Citations for any of this? I don't have one so what I'm saying is no more believable, but I do recall a study that showed HUDs were more of a hindrance than a help.

      I don't have any citations, but I do have one car that has a HUD. In all honesty, I thought it would be a stupid gimmicky thing, but I wish every car I owned had one now. Granted, mine is fairly simple, but well designed. It displays a digital reading of speed as the largest item. There's a bar graph of the tach across the top, bar graph for fuel along the right side, oil pressure and turn signals. What I found surprising is that the road is not as far in my peripheral vision when I glance at the HUD vs. the instrument panel. Plus, for me at least, my eyes don't really need to refocus (or not as much) to see the speed on the HUD. The numbers are large enough for me to see them.

      I saw something on /. a few months ago that mentioned that the amount of information on a HUD can become a big distraction after a certain point. So I can see how it would be a problem if turn by turn directions are up there and radio information, etc. I would think anytime you need to actually read words, or need to more than glance at something, it's going to be an issue.

    22. Re:Very niche product. by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      GM (quite a few different labels have them as options), Mercedes, VW (Audi and probably other high ends), Hyundai, Lexus, Land Rover, and BMW (including Mini) just to name a few.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    23. Re:Very niche product. by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      I think it would be a good idea for you to try test driving an existing vehicle with a heads up display if you're really curious. The way GM did it seemed pretty ideal. They could have made the virtual image further away (the system had a basic lens system for this) but I think there are solid reasons for having the virtual image appear where it did. Its far enough away for the eyes' depth of field to make focus a non issue. I'm not an expert in the field but I think it has something to do with increasing the cognitive load of studying an image in the distance at the expense of sensing things in closer proximity with peripheral vision.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    24. Re:Very niche product. by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I drove a grand prix that had speed and I think maybe fuel and turn signal indicators which was just projected onto a tinted section at the bottom of the windshield from inside the dash.

      What kind of car do you have with a HUD?

    25. Re:Very niche product. by JamesTRexx · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I told you to never call me on this wall! This is an unlisted wall!" - President Skroob

      --
      home
    26. Re:Very niche product. by jcochran · · Score: 0

      To all those who think a transparent display would be useful as an automotive HUD....
      You are wrong.

      The focus issues have already been adequately addressed, but there's even a more fundamental issue. Namely, light. The transparent display is basically a selectively opaque display and it requires a light source on the opposite side of the display from the observer. This might work during the day, but would definitely not work during the night.

    27. Re:Very niche product. by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      The Planar display is OLED based and does not require a light source, as mentioned in the video at the link in the summary. Not sure about the Samsung display although I suspect the same is true based on the provided images, unless they put a light source behind the mirror.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    28. Re:Very niche product. by jcochran · · Score: 0

      If there's a mirror, then the light source is on the same side as the observer. Light goes through the display, reflects off the mirror and then comes back towards the observer...

    29. Re:Very niche product. by mattventura · · Score: 1

      I'd like this simply because due to my upper body height, most cars force me to either:
      1. Have my head hit the top
      2. Put my arms in an uncomfortable position
      3. Have the steering wheel blocking the speedometer
      So it would be a huge help for me, since I wouldn't have to choose between comfort and being able to see my speed.

    30. Re: Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Football helmets. Like in 6th Day.

    31. Re:Very niche product. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes and aircraft since the 1960 or even farther back to around 1900 if you count reflector gunsights.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    32. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plain and simple: show me Google Maps with traffic overlay for my general area, there's data that's timely and useful that's otherwise unavailable behind a swipe, tap, pinch and flick gesture sequence.

    33. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Focusing isn't a linear effort, at the close distances we are talking about every foot counts.
      However, you will be able to track movements reasonably well without focus. Just getting the information up on the windshield would mean that you will still keep most of the traffic in your view while you glance at it.

    34. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your arguments also work against lighted speedometers, speedometers that are graduated past 55 mph, and pretty much anything on the dashboard, including radio controls, fuel remaining, etc. After all, by driving more carefully, you eliminate the need for all these staples too.

      Yeah. And?

    35. Re: Very niche product. by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      Eh, those photos show more vivid light than the mirror receives, I doubt that is the case.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    36. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you still had to refocus, it would still be an improvement. Of course, nothing is ever an improvement in the world of a naysayer.

    37. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A HUD would actually help enhance visibility by tracking road markings, signs, and obstacles that are low visibility, as well as alerting you of events happening in your blind spots. Integrating 3D maps and directions would be handy. Putting your speedometer and other dashboard information closer to your view could reduce time you take your eyes off the road.

      They already have all of this except the 3D map projected in front of you (but they do have driving directions via onboard gps systems). Of course it is predominantly on higher end vehicles.

    38. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had a HUD on my Corvette since 2000.

    39. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not that expensive. They are quite simple and require one lens. They are problematic in cars though. In vehicles with HUDs that focus the dash instruments at infinity, they found people tended to get unconsciously confused and run into things that were closer. The HUD on my car appears to be at the distance of my front bumper, and is visible from anywhere the driver's head is likely to be. I find it quite useful, and I never look at the dash. At night, I turn the dash lights off.

    40. Re:Very niche product. by bjwest · · Score: 1

      The general population has no idea how to use a HUD, it would cause more problems than it solves. Military pilots train hundreds of hours to properly use a HUD, your average driver will end up focusing on the pretty-shiny-flashy objects two feed in front of them rather than the light that just turned red and the pedestrian that just stepped out because he has a walk sign and is looking at his phone instead of watching traffic. I really don't think we need HUD systems for the general population, ever.

      No, we need self driving cars if we ever want to be safe from the idiots behind the wheels.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    41. Re:Very niche product. by bjwest · · Score: 1

      The problem is, you need to refocus.

      You need to do that anyway if you're going to look at your dashboard or your satnav's display.

      When you look down at the instruments, you know you need to look back up to drive safely. Most people can barely operate the automobile as it is, and you want them to believe they can't focus on the HUD full time? Sorry, but the majority of the population (driving or not) are not overly intelligent. Something like this will confuse the hell out of them and cause more accidents, especially with those that think it's a good idea to text while driving (further evidence of the lack of intelligence in the general population).

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    42. Re:Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HUDs are not focused that far out in front of the vehicle on purpose. People's depth perception tends to get confused when their dash instruments are farther out than the back end of the car in front of them and they run into things.

    43. Re:Very niche product. by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I was very disappointed to find nobody had mentioned Peril Sensitive Glasses.

    44. Re: Very niche product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, HUD has already been done on at least the Corvette.

    45. Re:Very niche product. by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Mine does as well, and it also has turn by turn directions in it, which I find one if it's most useful features. It's not a map, but just simply a bar that indicates how far until the next turn and the direction of the turn. It is really nice in the suburbs where intersections can be fairly close together.

      I think I had this conversation with Grim Reefer before as well, and I have a 2014 corvette stingray.

    46. Re:Very niche product. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      automotive windshields

      That has been working for decades using reflection. It's not terribly helpful in daylight - but exactly that problem would affect a transparent display.

      Plus there's the minor detail of repair costs. That springs to mind since the wife's car got broken into using a brick a couple of months ago, which bounced off the inside of the windscreen cracking that.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    47. Re:Very niche product. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If you can't change your focus between infinity and the metre-or-so range to a windscreen, then I suspect you've got some other serious issues going on with your vision. When did you last see your (opthalmic) optician? You should be doing it every couple of years at lest, if you're over your mid-30s.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    48. Re:Very niche product. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      That offers the additional benefit of not needing to constantly check your speedometer to see if you are "safely" above the posted limit.

      If I just drive, and don't check my speedometer, I will most assuredly be going well over the legal 10mph over the posted speed limit (Maryland law). If I just flow with traffic, or rely on my ability to read every road sign to gauge my speed I will be running 15-20 over the speed limit. If you have trouble with these things, perhaps you are the one who is an issue.

      I check the speedometer for what it is used for, to keep my speed down into the legal range, not to make sure I am only going 15 over the speed limit.

      Perhaps you are the one who needs to go back to driver's education, as it seems you don't know what a speedometer is for.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. Useless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who actually wants to wear a headset? No one. Give me transparent displays as a stepping stone, not the same uncomfortable headwear we've been subjected to since the 1980's.

    1. Re:Useless? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Having had to have molten plastic (*) scraped from the surface of my eyeball using the sharp-edge of a scalpel, I for one am perfectly happy wearing a headset.

      I've explained this to the morons trying to sell "laser eye treatment" in the street, watched them do their "drowning fish" impersonation, and then try to get back onto script with "but everyone thinks wearing glasses is so ugly. I really do not give one tenth of a flying fuck about ugly, compared to not wanting to see the blade of that scalpel coming towards my eye and having to NOT BLINK. They seem to have a mental problem accepting the concept that "ugly" isn't the most important thing in the universe.

      Actually, not one twentieth of a flying fuck.

      * - (well, hardened, formerly-molten plastic)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. Switchable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Make the transparency switchable, like with the privacy glass windows/doors that are available for commercial installations. Then we can all have monitors that fade from view and let us see the office through the screen. Probably a ways off from the tech currently available but it is what I hope for one day. I hate feeling like I'm staring at a wall 2 feet in front of me, no matter how fancy the graphics are.

    1. Re:Switchable by malditaenvidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then we can all have monitors that fade from view and let us see the office through the screen.

      While your idea is good, why would I want to see those assholes? They should make a screen that blocks all peripheral view besides the monitor.

    2. Re:Switchable by avandesande · · Score: 1

      thats called a cube wall ....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:Switchable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do they're called Oculus Rift/HTC Vive.

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. mirrors? by C3lt · · Score: 1

    If you thought the high gloss screen on your laptop was bad enough...

  6. Captain Obvious is hard at work by JoeDuncan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not news.

    Anyone with half a brain could tell you that transparent displays are useless except for some very small niche corner cases.

    1. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not news.

      Anyone with half a brain could tell you that transparent displays are useless except for some very small niche corner cases.

      What about those of us with full brains? I don't get why you think they are useless.

    2. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Foreseeing uses for technology - you make it sound so simple... Let me leave a few quotes you may be joining soon:

      "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
      Thomas Watson, president of IBM, 1943

      "Television won't be able to hold on to any market it captures after the first six months. People will soon get tired of staring at a plywood box every night."
      Darryl Zanuck, executive at 20th Century Fox, 1946

      "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home."
      Ken Olsen, founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977

      "640K ought to be enough for anybody."
      Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, 1981

    3. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine writing something on a transparent piece of paper. Now imagine that being upright and allowing you to see right through it, possibly with moving shapes behind it.

      It dramatically decreases readability in every case.

    4. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That would suck. It would be like drawing with a marker on glass. No one ever does that.

    5. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      In their current form factor they are but the tech is sound and useful for many things such as heads up displays and window blinds (down the road)

    6. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I see that overhead projectors are no longer used in any schools, and no students are taught about them. Pity. Seems to have stifled creativity a bit.

    7. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      It would be like drawing with a marker on glass. No one ever does that.

      They don't, actually. What you are thinking of is not a thing. You are mistaking "movies" and "TV" for "reality".

      Do you also think that cars explode when they get into accidents and that defibrillators restart stopped hearts?

    8. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      The difference is that all those things were said before people knew any better, and they're mostly myths anyway. Are you familiar with snopes? Might want to check it out...

      Transparent screens aren't all that new, and they've already been tested. We KNOW that they are *worse* than standard screens for like 90% of uses (e.g. the computer screen you're looking at now)

      They are harder to see, harder to use, reduce readability and increase reading time. These are known facts.

      Beyond the pretty obvious niche uses, transparent screens will NEVER replace standard screens for regular computer use.

    9. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      What about those of us with full brains? I don't get why you think they are useless.

      Your statements are self-contradictory, and therefore meaningless.

    10. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foreseeing uses for technology - you make it sound so simple... Let me leave a few quotes you may be joining soon:

      "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
      Thomas Watson, president of IBM, 1943

      A misquote

      "Television won't be able to hold on to any market it captures after the first six months. People will soon get tired of staring at a plywood box every night."
      Darryl Zanuck, executive at 20th Century Fox, 1946

      This one seems legit.

      "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home."
      Ken Olsen, founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977

      He admitted saying it, but seems to have had different computers in mind.

      "640K ought to be enough for anybody."
      Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, 1981

      You are not even trying, this is probably the most questioned attribution on the web

      I am surprised you did not misquote Henry Ford here, would be a perfect fit.

    11. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." Thomas Watson, president of IBM, 1943

      To be fair, at the time a computer was little more than a vacuum tubed contraption the size of a small house that was little more than a glorified adding machine.

      "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." Ken Olsen, founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977

      Wasn't that one taken out of context? I believe he was referring to having a computer that automated all household functions.

      "640K ought to be enough for anybody." Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, 1981

      It's debatable whether or not he actually said this. Most sources deny it was something that can be attributed to Mr. Gates. But this one can:

      "Two years from now, spam will be solved." -Bill Gates, 2004

    12. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that all those things were said before people knew any better...

      And you claim to know better now?
      Fields like Augmented reality are in their infancy, things like HUDs on windshields could become much more common, and literally thousands of other devices we haven't even thought of yet could use this technology. That you are only able to picture the world with gadgets that currently exist is your main problem. Your line of thinking would have led to saying there is no use for small LCD panels because TVs and monitors are going to get bigger and bigger, before the smart phones were invented.
      No one is talking about "regular computer use" because that may be .

    13. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er.. may be quite antiquated in the future

    14. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine writing something on a transparent piece of paper. Now imagine that being upright and allowing you to see right through it, possibly with moving shapes behind it.

      It dramatically decreases readability in every case.

      In a dimly-lit room a transparent display would be fantastic from an aesthetics point-of-view as well as in terms usability. A glow-in-the-dark keyboard, back-lit keys, and it would be easy to use for productive work.

    15. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Informative

      That would suck. It would be like drawing with a marker on glass. No one ever does that.

      Never been to an office with a shortage of white boards, but no shortage of big windows? People do it all the time. Not ideal but it works.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    16. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Right - not ideal. You are doing it only because you don't have what you really want: a regular white board or wall.

      Thing is, that transparent monitor costs lots extra. Would you pay a huge premium for your sub-optimal solution?

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    17. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      ... heads up displays and window blinds (down the road)...

      Exactly. All the things covered by "niche" uses, like I said.

    18. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      The difference is that all those things were said before people knew any better...

      And you claim to know better now?

      Yes, because transparent screens AREN'T new, and the research on their utility for standard computer display has been done already, or did you miss that part?

      Fields like Augmented reality are in their infancy, things like HUDs on windshields could become much more common, and literally thousands of other devices we haven't even thought of yet could use this technology.

      Oh, you mean all the things that I covered in the "obvious niche uses" disclaimer?

      No one is talking about "regular computer use" because that may be .

      The article was. I am. And yes.

    19. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone with half a brain could tell you that transparent displays are useless except for some very small niche corner cases.

      Anyone with 3/4 of a brain could tell you that transparent displays will usher in a new world where heads up displays and augmented reality are commonplace. At which point those with only half a brain will take the technology for granted and forget that they ever thought it was useless.

    20. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Agent0013 · · Score: 2

      That would suck. It would be like drawing with a marker on glass. No one ever does that.

      Never been to an office with a shortage of white boards, but no shortage of big windows? People do it all the time. Not ideal but it works.

      Or the Combat Information Center (CIC) room on a Navy ship. The people who write on those have to write backwards so the officers on the "correct" side can read what is written. The best ones can write a single sentence with both hands starting at each end and meet up at the middle. A couple of pictures.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    21. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Thing is, that transparent monitor costs lots extra. Would you pay a huge premium

      You don't know much about commercial buildings do you? Transparent monitors cost nothing, and neither do those $40000 smartboards (yes those are the correct number of zeros in some cases) which seem to be installed in every new building.

      for your sub-optimal solution?

      Sub-optimal to whom? There are many people who have already juryrigged similar systems together to solve their specific need. This is not a new concept.

    22. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One such edge case would be to stack multiple displays to get a depth resolution.
      It has previously been done for medical purposes, but the cost have been prohibitive.
      If it can be done cheaply it is a nice way to get a 3D display that doesn't relay on you wearing glasses.
      The display I was reading about had some 20ish layers or so. That probably gives a sufficient depth difference.
      I suspect that display data bandwidth becomes an issue beyond that.

    23. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for those places that put a transparent film on the glass which turns it in to a transparent dry-erase board.

    24. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by xeoron · · Score: 1

      Now if they are transparent rollable displays with tactile sensing we could have Earth Final Conflict scroll like smart phones. Example here.

    25. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by nnull · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the idea this is useless? I can already find uses for this for industrial automation. This is just what I wanted!

    26. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      OP said "No one ever does that". He's wrong, lots of people do that. What are you arguing? I made zero assertions about transparent displays.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    27. Re:Captain Obvious is hard at work by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      By definition you could argue that toilet paper is niche, staplers are niche that sun glasses are niche yet nobody discards them because of that.

      Transparent screens can become just as important as some of those items listed.

  7. AR / Windows by Thyamine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Really the place this will be useful is where we already have clear glass surfaces: windows, windshields, goggles, etc. But the main purpose there will be for AR or simple notifications. Standing at the window and having updates about what you are seeing or random data that somehow applies. Windshields and HUDs seems obvious. 'Smart' Goggles that give you useful info while working on whatever (chemicals, temperatures, electricity, etc). Or for that extra modern look, a TV that you hang on the wall and is clear while off or displays the art on the wall, but then turns on and 'replaces' the wall/art/etc with whatever you want to watch.

    --
    I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    1. Re:AR / Windows by janoc · · Score: 2

      AR not really. The display looks almost opaque when displaying anything, so that is not useful for displaying believable overlays over a real world scene - which is what you need for AR.

      This is mostly useful for signage, ads and similar stuff, assuming the prices will be reasonable.

      Also I am not that enthusiastic about AR being a competitor to this, as implied by the poster - for AR to work a precise registration of the overlay with the real scene is required. That means cameras and goggles and a lot of computing power. The tracking and image processing problems inherent in this are far from solved, especially for applications outside of the lab.

      Displaying random stuff on a transparent surface (aka Google Glass) is not AR by itself. That's just something like an airplane/car HUD.

    2. Re:AR / Windows by avandesande · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tons of applications in retail- think about a glass table top in restaurant where menu or other information is displayed, or items in glass cases could be queried about product information. A sensitive camera and computer could probably figure out what item you are looking at....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:AR / Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like a display in the smoked glass of my current desk which would put the angle of view in perfect alignment with my eyes since the keyboard is slightly lower on a pull-out slider. No need for a monitor sitting on the desk when it could be in the desk.

    4. Re:AR / Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of stuff that does not need to be done. Yes it can be done, IoT sorts of stuff, but do you think that once you've conveniently ordered your meal that the screen-table will honestly go blank & let you eat in peace? No.

      There will be nags for: would you like a refill? Would you like desert yet? Would you like some music? And worse yet... ADS.
      This can all be avoided with the simple human interaction of your server, who if good enough, will remember to visit & say hi in person rather than hope & dream on a computer to 'make the restaurant operate more efficiently'.

      Remember the ads part. Once a device has your attention, no amount of practical reason for its existence will ever outweigh the flood of annoying add-ons that can be built into them. Please leave digital-menus to the realm of iDevices, and the delivery to waitrons.

    5. Re:AR / Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine my office window could display the weather so when I look out I can know what weather we're having! Or maybe it can provide helpful captions for what I am seeing.... "Pacific Ocean", "fog", "smog", "tsunami", "hobos", etc.

      I suppose it would be entertaining for a while to see a little line pointing to each person walking, jogging, or biking on the coastal path below, with useful captions like their dossier or maybe a list of their clothing items and prices along with "buy now!" links since of course it would be a touch-screen window.

    6. Re:AR / Windows by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      As screens get cheaper, every available surface will become a flashing advert. Transparent displays built into glasses running an ad blocker will become necessary.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. Apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Appy screens can be apped with apps to let you app apps while apping other apps!

    Apps!

    1. Re:Apps! by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      I miss the cow spam.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  9. Useless??? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I have a list of applications I'd love to create if these things were readily available. I've been seething for them for a decade. How is it that they can't find applications? I've read university students projects and DIY makers who did frieking awesome stuff with them. Maybe the price point isn't good? Or the technology isn't any good? Or have the engineers been watching too many scifi movies and not going around the real world looking for applications?

  10. They have a use - heads up displays by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    And that's about it. If you need a head's up display, you need transparent displays. But if you are not displaying info directly on existing reality, there are few good reasons for a transparent monitor.

    If they become cheap enough, I could see car windshields being replaced by transparent displays, particularly for driverless cars.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:They have a use - heads up displays by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      " If you need a head's up display, you need transparent displays."
      Not really since no current HUD uses a transparent display. They all use a reflected image.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:They have a use - heads up displays by Goldenhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not so simple as transparent displays. I built a HUD for my car a few years ago, and proper optics are essential to the usefulness of a HUD. Essentially, you need lenses or curved mirrors or specially-tuned diffraction gratings to refocus the image some distance away - preferably many feet ahead of the car, so you don't need to refocus on the windshield.

      Having information presented at the same depth distance as your windshield, but in the same general direction you're already looking for at-a-distance viewing, is distracting and hard for the eye/brain system to tolerate.

      Here's a pretty good overview of HUD optics.
      http://www.mikesflightdeck.com...

      --
      --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    3. Re:They have a use - heads up displays by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      THIS^

      Only one who actually *gets it* so far.

    4. Re:They have a use - heads up displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did they get exactly? That's like saying there's no market for cars except among people who want motorized transit from point A to point B.

    5. Re:They have a use - heads up displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes but, if you put a little bit of a border on it then the optic nerve can idenfity it as an object and refocus on it when it mvoes into the primary vision. This means that you still have a hundred or so milliseconds of refocus time, but that you've saved half a second or so of head movement and you've kept the lateral peripheral vision up and outside instead of dropping it down to the door panels. That is much, much better, though, like you said, a HUD is the proper solution.

    6. Re:They have a use - heads up displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My eye/brain system has a particular intolerance for these shenanigans.

    7. Re:They have a use - heads up displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could still show things that normally would require looking away from the road like your speed or song number. A nice faint red might not be so bad.

    8. Re:They have a use - heads up displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually one of the benefits of non-HUD displays, and one of the main drawbacks of HUDs - they split your attention across space instead of time.

      When there is information being constantly presented to you within your visual field, it occupies a constant amount of your attention, leaving you *less* attention to use for other tasks, like say driving.

      On the other hand, a quick glance at your speedometer etc... takes less than a fraction of a second, and allows you to focus your full attention on the main task at hand, like driving.

      http://arstechnica.com/cars/2015/07/heads-up-displays-in-cars-can-hinder-driver-safety/

  11. Not useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see those on CSI. All they need to do is speak and twittle their fingers a bit and all kinds of pictures and information come up. I even seen they showed how a hacker tunneled into their network in real time by using an actual digital tunnel made out of numbers and lines of code.

    Maybe this is a first for you civies but the CSI has had them for years.

    1. Re:Not useless by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      CSI? You mean the show where they have a fingerprint search program that fetches a full set of fingerprints and a picture of the culprit from the database, renders it on the screen, THEN notices that it's the wrong guy, fetches the next set of prints and picture...

      Whoever develops the software for those guys sure has a contract with hardware manufacturers.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about instead of a mirror, it's backed by electrochromatic glass. Then turn it into a window. So I can flip a switch and watch TV, or turn it off and the window becomes transparent.

    It would be awesome. I would pay a lot for that.

    1. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a window, which gives you the current weather, while you are watching outside!

  13. few creative uses by nimbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    London: transform any day into a bright sunny summer day. downside: more pub brawls ensue after complicated arguments and tense standoffs arise from disagreements about blustery and sunny.
    Canada: images of alberta in february could be replaced by video of the leafs Borje Salming waxing your car which you tacitly know damn well has been under 7 feet of snow since october.
    America: imagine a mcdonalds window that makes the food appear to have been cooked from ingredients that came from actual vegetables and known animals. Or a convenient window treatment that could some day make Dick Cheney look like a real person instead of a villain from an episode of captain planet.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:few creative uses by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Or a convenient window treatment that could some day make Dick Cheney look like a real person instead of a villain from an episode of captain planet.

      Look, there are fundamental limits to technology that we will never be able to overcome.

  14. Some possible uses by Vapula · · Score: 2

    I can see a lot of possible uses...

    - easy HUD in cars : windshield but also on the external mirrors (augmented reality) for example...
    - at supermarkets, on fridge doors
    - on semi-transparent windows next to doors to show who is on the other side of the door while letting light get through when it's off ...

    basically, on see-through windows for Augmented Reality, on windows (normal or semi-transparent) to let light though when device is off, on mirror or windows where if the device is off you need full mirror/window functionnality (like car mirrors), on glasses, ...

    1. Re:Some possible uses by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      I think mirror displays are about their best hope for a market overall. That and AR if you can make them small enough and in the right shape.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  15. AR-based visualization by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should have linked "AR-based visualization"

    Not everyone knows what Armadillo-Rhinoceros-based visualization is. It's pretty much zoo-centric terminology.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:AR-based visualization by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Randall probably thinks it means "Angry Raptors" and is hiding under the table.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:AR-based visualization by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      No one has disproved Avisible Raptor theory, so until then, better safe than sorry.

    3. Re:AR-based visualization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have linked "AR-based visualization"

      Not everyone knows what Armadillo-Rhinoceros-based visualization is. It's pretty much zoo-centric terminology.

      I was thinking applied reality - you know, the stuff we've had since the caves.

    4. Re:AR-based visualization by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

      Many years ago a doctor asked me to pull my pants down, bend over, and cough twice, while he watched from behind. He was looking for my Anocutaneous Reflex, otherwise known as anal reflex or anal wink. I don't think I would feel more comfortable about the exam if he was watching me through a transparent display, but maybe he would. It's an interesting idea that deserves further research.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    5. Re:AR-based visualization by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I don't think I would feel more comfortable about the exam if he was watching me through a transparent display, but maybe he would. It's an interesting idea that deserves further research.

      And this would be how many times more wonderful than using a half-silvered mirror. At how many times the price?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    6. Re:AR-based visualization by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

      Slow motion replay is priceless.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
  16. They've been here for a while now by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw these in Vegas last year. Not at a trade show, in shops being used for serving beer, so obviously the cost isn't atrocious:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KAbiQLkuQ0

    And people have been doing smart mirrors for ages, and mirror display TVs. Not sure what the "new" hype is about.

    1. Re:They've been here for a while now by eumoria · · Score: 1

      hey that's neat. IT'S THE FUTURE (not really but someone from 1960 would shit their pants seeing that)

    2. Re:They've been here for a while now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done, and done with STYLE!
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf_kjwOSjGI

      _

  17. Weather by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    No more green screens: but the weather person behind the TOLED screen and we can see both the radar map and where they're pointing.





    Maybe they won't even bother with a sweater.

  18. Existing transparent displays by Dusthead+Jr. · · Score: 2

    A casino I visit has transparent displays over some slot machines. They've taken LCD diplays and removedance the back lights you can see the wheels through the animated images.

    1. Re:Existing transparent displays by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      About a year ago, I was attending an event in a hotel's banquet room. In the other (bigger) banquet room, a DJ was setting up, She had a transparent, touchscreen monitor (48cm, 1080p) as her DJ console. When I asked, she said it cost about $3000 US. The event she was DJ'ing was longer than the event I was attending, so I looked in on her before I left. Since the room was dark, could barely see her hands through the back of the screen. Mostly, it just added a little to the light show with the level meters and wave forms displayed on the screen.

      (BTW, she was running the open source Mixxx DJ console under Gentoo Linux on her laptop.)

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    2. Re:Existing transparent displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I thought this was several years old? Maybe they look better now... I think WMS came out with the first which they called, "transmissive reels" (where they used the transparent LCD to put animation over the spinning reels. Other companies jumped on the bandwagon from there. IGT uses a different technology to put a transparent LCD over a regular one to allow for "3D" graphics.

    3. Re:Existing transparent displays by dnwheeler · · Score: 1

      Slot machine manufacturers seem to be the first to adopt new display technologies. They have been using curved LCDs (with large and small radii, both convex and concave), transparent LCDs (both over mechanical reels and over opaque displays to create a multi-level display), opaque LCDs with clear "holes", small round (or square with rounded corners) LCDs for game buttons, LCD displays with RGB (or at least multicolor) backlights, etc.

      Most of these technologies have been on casino floors for several years.

  19. This just in by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After we have noticed that software that looks great in movies but are completely and utterly shit if they were used in reality (like, say, databases that display EVERY SINGLE false photograph of a potential culprit before finding the correct one, or interfaces where you have to wave your hands about instead of typing on a keyboard), we now find out that hardware that looks great in movies is ALSO crap for real applications.

    Who would have thought.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Best use I've seen so far by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1
  21. My retirement plan is coming closer. by will_die · · Score: 2

    My final job plan is to setup an office were the employees are facing each other and the only input devices on each computer are voice controlled and a vertical transparent touch display.
    After I take of picture of the office of the future I will retire and go down in history.

    1. Re:My retirement plan is coming closer. by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

      I don't think you would make it out the door, much less the parking lot, before the workers caught up with you.
      You would still go down in history.
      As the cause of the revolution.
      But history nonetheless.

  22. Applicable Uses by pr0t0 · · Score: 1

    I can think of many, many uses for such a screen. I think it can be distilled as such: you put them anywhere additional information through A/R would be useful, but where the viewer is fixed in space relative to the screen and needs to maintain that perspective to the world. So, perhaps the glass dividing a bank teller and a bank customer. How about a construction worker in a backhoe or crane looking through a transparent display that highlights buried gas lines, or potential danger areas. In fact, any automotive windshield has at least some potential for a transparent display. There are teleprompters that have a method of doing this, but perhaps transparent displays may do it better. If nothing else, the teleprompter only displays text...a transparent display would also allow the onscreen talent to look at images or video without breaking gaze to the camera.

    Just some ideas.

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
  23. License plate "protectors"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until some criminal tries to do a modern version of the James Bond rotating license plate using this?

    1. Re:License plate "protectors"? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I think e-ink/e-paper would be a much better technology for this idea.

  24. Slot machines had them years ago by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

    I saw the transparent LCD display on slot machines at a trade show in Vegas over 6 years ago. They were mechanical reel slot machines with the front glass as a clear panel that could draw lines or pictures over the matching symbols. This video shows one that is a bit fancier than the ones I saw years ago, but after the spin you can see the lines draw across the matches.

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  25. Next step the mirror monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was always obvious that a see through monitor was a dumb idea, but it allows for the practical implementation of a mirror monitor. That way I can look at myself while I tell other people about my life on facebook.

  26. True 3d TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First thing that pops into my mind. That is a rather huge market.

    1. Re:True 3d TVs by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how that would work. You're thinking layering transparent displays to some depth appropriate for 3d effects?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  27. Arcade games by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, arcade games have been using these for years. Skip to 45 seconds in for an example (volume warning - it's in an arcade so it's loud): https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    There's another arcade game with little fish bowls that's also transparent. It's really cool just to look at.

    Also, many years ago, around 20 or so, I took a calculator apart and removed the back-most layer of the LCD and... voila - it was transparent. This capability has existed for decades (in fact all LCD displays are transparent - it's only the more modern OLED where that hasn't been the case) but there have always been backlights or some other material placed behind them to make them contrast as much as possible.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  28. It's like videophones by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...a staple of science fiction for decades, but even when the price became trivial (most modern cell phones will do it) most people didn't want it.

    And for much the same reason -- videophone conversations work well in movies as they more closely resemble the "talking head" interactions the public is used to in films, but in the real world, people don't necessarily want someone else looking at their face while they talk.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:It's like videophones by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      But it makes for an easy "two shot" when the characters are not in the same space.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  29. true 3D pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about layering a number of them for true 3D imaging?

  30. autonomous car master race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like you still drive your own car like some sort of peasant.

    1. Re:autonomous car master race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not me, I'm a Google hipster on the rise. I take the Google bus to work while my car drives itself to the office!

  31. Public transportation by HelpTheNewOverlord · · Score: 1

    With some kind of multi-touch multi-user software, I would love to see this on a bus, or a train...

    You could be able to see maps, transit information, restaurants nearby without losing the view of the city. Even if you don't have AR it could be really interesting

    1. Re:Public transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to see this on a bus, or a train...

      Yeah, we need ads while trying to look out the window.

  32. Useless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd want one on my cornea. Like in Neuromancer I guess.

  33. AR Enhance Visualization by avandesande · · Score: 1

    A significant number of people become sick from this.... kind of makes it a non-starter for serious applications.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  34. Not completely useless by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    I'd use these to keep an eye on time stealing employees (or rather make them use these to make it easier for me to monitor their time theft).

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  35. Having Flown with a HUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having flown with a HUD, I'd say that the current generation of "reflect off the windshield" is completely adequate for speedometer, tach and such. However, a transparent film is not a good answer for low visibility, as those need to be projected exactly over the real obstacle. That isn't possible with an OLED display unless you have the head tracking correct and figure out how to deal with the parallax between the eyeballs. There's a valid complaint that the image will be focused in the focal range instead of infinity, but moving it up will still be an improvement, as the hundred milliseconds of refocus time has to occur with a dashboard anyway.

  36. True 3d TVs by plague911 · · Score: 1

    This is the first thing that popped into my head, Additionally it is a rather large market if successful.

  37. Background images and icon clutter by HeyBob! · · Score: 1

    I don't even like a background image on my desktop. Just a blank blue colour and a few key icons for programs and shortcuts to data.

  38. Glossy displays are here, but they're useless too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They got away with that bullshit though, didn't they... good luck with your 'glossy' display, all those lovely reflections so you can hardly see what's on the screen! But ooh, the shiny!

    But, but, the JEW film showed us transparent displays in 'Minority Report', so it MUST be right! Whatever is on the JEW TV is true, the JEW said so!

  39. Digital stained glass windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These could be installed in churches and homes to make digital "stained glass" windows.

  40. First world problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not able to find uses for transparent displays.

  41. Video Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having personally played Silent Scope: Bone Eater, I can say that these displays do have a use, and it's video games. You can do some REALLY cool things with the 3D effect this game uses by putting a projector screen 3" behind the transparent display, like actually obscuring your view with smoke, while having the object drawn at full brightness in the back. It looks a LOT more realistic than most games, and really adds a lot to the experience.

  42. Car windows by longfeet · · Score: 1

    Obviously

  43. pedestrian friendly phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walking while texting is dangerous

  44. layer displays to make make a 3d display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is about time

  45. Besy Use Evar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe transparent displays have had a good run already, BEHOLD THE TRANSPARO DOOR!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf_kjwOSjGI

    _

  46. Multi Layered Displays by neoRUR · · Score: 1

    Wow this is great! now I can have multi-Layered displays. Like virtual desktops, but layered on top of each other. One could have a game running, another videos, another some desktops. I frequently have more than one computer on at the same time and it's a pain to keep switching between them. Can't wait for those Dell multi-layered displays.

  47. Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can place these for ads in places where you want ads but want to allow the view. I live in Chicago and they just started putting those electronic billboards everywhere. They are ugly and obstruct the natural views. Replace those with glass like surfaces and not only will you up the coolness factor but allow people to enjoy natural lighting and views.

  48. Not for consumers by phizi0n · · Score: 1

    Not to worry, Wolf Blitzer and the acronym alphabet soup primetime police crime dramas will find great ways to distort reality with these displays.

  49. How about... by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

    Overlays during surgery. See through where the doctor is working, but with other info highlighted.

    Astronomy. Highlight stuff in the sky. You could have one in front of a telescope.

    Smart glasses - even if there was backlash for Google Glass.

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    1. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Astronomy. Highlight stuff in the sky. You could have one in front of a telescope.

      Spot on, dude! I used to play with Starry Night Backyard and turn the object labels on and off. I always wished I could do the same when looking through an actual telescope!

  50. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transparent display technology has been here since the first LCD screens came along. Just take the backlight off of them. They aren't useful or wanted for the same reason that newspapers and magazines have never been printed on transparencies.

  51. Perfect Halloween Item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be awesome for the fright industry. Place these on a mirror at your pre teans slumber party and get them to play Bloody Mary, put these on the front porch window and the real woulfman can jump at you on Halloween.

  52. Take a picture where your monitor should be, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    put your regular everyday monitor back in, crop the image adequately and set it as your wallpaper!
    Joking aside most people put a maximized web browser on their display.

  53. Just add mic and speaker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and speech recognition capable enough to pick up "Who is the most beautiful in the world?"
    then it'll have some place in disneyland..
    And maybe customers in that salon like it too..

  54. Should have stayed in the B movies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a reason transparent displays were in the movies, cause they were "movies" The only real world application I see for transparent displays are HUD's, and possibly bathroom mirrors. That's about it.