Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Nixes Access To Chats Outside Of Messenger Walled Garden (arstechnica.co.uk)

Tom Mendelsohn, reporting for Ars Technica: Some smartphone users of Facebook are reporting that they're no longer able to access their messages from the mobile site, and that they're being directed towards the free content ad network's dedicated Messenger app. Users of the regular Facebook mobile app were shunted over to Facebook Messenger to access their chats a while ago. Now, folk who access the service on their phone's Web browsers, or via third-party apps such as Tinfoil or Metal, are beginning to find that they can no longer view their messages. Complaints are popping up from users who are being told by Facebook that "your conversations are moving to Messenger." Some Android users are even finding themselves automatically redirected to the download link on the Google Play store when they try and view their messages on the mobile site.

155 comments

  1. Re: Why not just use email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because email isn't IM?

  2. Nothing to see. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You use a free service you have to accept their structure and design. Seriously, I'm tired of all the bitching about Facebook, don't like it, don't use it.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I'm tired of all the bitching about Facebook, don't like it, don't use it.

      I'm tired of all the people who bitch about the people that bitch about Facebook. Unfortunately, I seem to be compelled to read their comments, and then respond.

    2. Re: Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bitching is how you get them to change it, just like how you're bitching to get others to change their behaviour.

    3. Re:Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If user dissatisfaction causes people to move to other services or use Facebook less then Facebook will have no choice but to make concessions. It has fuckall to do with whether or not the service is "free" as Facebook is still profiting off of its users.

    4. Re:Nothing to see. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      If user dissatisfaction causes people to move to other services or use Facebook less then Facebook will have no choice but to make concessions.

      Because that approach has worked so well with Windows 10...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... But... But.... WHALLED GARDENZZZZ~~~~!!!!

      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like
      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like
      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like

    6. Re:Nothing to see. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      You use a free service you have to accept their structure and design. Seriously, I'm tired of all the bitching about Facebook, don't like it, don't use it.

      I don't use it, but I still enjoy bitching about it.

      I also don't rape children, but I still talk shit about people who do.

      NEWS FLASH: Not doing or using something doesn't mean you give up the right to bitch about it.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just deleted my FB account. It's the closest thing to "vote with your wallet" there is. I posted a brief "I'm closing my account because..." message before deactivating it. I found it amusing that somebody "Liked" that post while I was deleting the account. BTW, it's pretty easy to deactivate an account. Takes much more effort to actually delete it, but it is possible.

    8. Re:Nothing to see. by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Well this is exactly what I'm going to do. Not use it.

      Messenger is user-sanctioned spyware. Once installed it pretty much helps itself to anything it can get its hands on in your device, and sucks it back up to Facebook. No way is it going on my phone.

      I've used the mobile website for a while now. Today I get constant redirections to the Messenger download page. It's been on the cards for a while, and now it looks like it's time for me to part company with Facebook. I think I'll manage.

    9. Re: Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitching is how you get them to change it, just like how you're bitching to get others to change their behaviour.

      I see you rather enjoy an utterly fucking pointless battle.

      Have fun with that.

    10. Re:Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If user dissatisfaction causes people to move to other services or use Facebook less then Facebook will have no choice but to make concessions. It has fuckall to do with whether or not the service is "free" as Facebook is still profiting off of its users.

      Do the words Too Big To Fail ring a bell to you?

      It should, because Facebooks decisions to change any part of their service has fuckall to do with what users want, and has everything to do with monetizing you and your data on their service.

      The reason I bring up Too Big To Fail is due to their sheer numbers. They'll change any fucking thing they damn well please. The customer base is addicted now, and they know they'll always have enough addicts. Even change that "infuriates" some won't mean dick to them or their bottom line.

    11. Re:Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that approach has worked so well with Windows 10...

      That has yet to be determined.

    12. Re:Nothing to see. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Hold up. It IS within your right to bitch. Facebook doesn't have to listen, however.

    13. Re:Nothing to see. by anglico · · Score: 1

      I got the same result, but I eventually got it to let me in.
      - I clicked the back arrow on my Android phone
      - then it showed me the message in my inbox
      - I clicked on the message to read it
      - then it asked me to install the Messenger app
      - then I clicked the X in the upper right hand corner
      - then it showed me the full message
      How long this will work I don't know. YMMV

    14. Re:Nothing to see. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      It works better if more than 2% of the people actually switch to the competition.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    15. Re:Nothing to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your life that pathetic that you have time to complain about something you're not even part of? Wow. Just wow.

    16. Re:Nothing to see. by Holi · · Score: 1

      But why does it have to try to take over as my default SMS app?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    17. Re:Nothing to see. by Threni · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it's not interesting to read. The other day some twat on reddit was whining because he couldn't get his kindle replaced for free outside of the warranty period. He had an online chat with a customer services person and kept giving them links to pages which apparently described people getting post-warranty kindle replacement and he was outraged that the amazon stuff weren't interested. Reading people whining about facebook is a little like that; absent the moral outrage of child rape or whatever you're just going to come across as cranky and obsessive.

  3. I'm curious... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

    Assuming you want to use Facebook Messenger, why wouldn't you want to just use the app? I can certainly understand not wanting to use Facebook Messenger (or not wanting to use Facebook at all), but why a strong preference for using messenger through a mobile browser?

    1. Re:I'm curious... by Geeky · · Score: 5, Informative

      The apps are huge battery hogs - Facebook on Android is one of the worst offenders. Removing it virtually doubled my battery life.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    2. Re:I'm curious... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanks!

    3. Re: I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their mobile site nice and lightweight. It's not the best, but it's been way ahead of their app for usability for some time now. The push to update their app weekly has turned it into a bloated, unnavigable kludge.

    4. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that the amount of information available through the webpage is significantly restricted compared to what it can access through the app. I don't think a webpage can download your entire contacts list for example. As such for users who want (or need) to use facebook, this might have been a method to use it while still limiting facebooks access to private information.

    5. Re:I'm curious... by DewDude · · Score: 1

      If you don't have a high end phone with a lot of space; you're probably deleting things to make room for Messenger.

      On my phone right now; Facebook is using a total of 225MB (46.32MB for app, 179MB of data); the messenger app uses 71.04MB total; 42.2MB cache, 28.84MB data. On an Android phone...with Lollipop or Marshmallow; you're using about 5 gigs of space for just the OS; on an 8GB phone you have 3GB of space left. With how bloated Android apps can get; sometimes you literally don't have the space for it.

      There's also the annoyance that it doesn't integrate very well with the phone. You get a notification of a new message; you can't click the notification...it just attempts to load Facebook which then redirects you to the Messenger app.

      It's largely an annoyance.

    6. Re: I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple years ago Facebook was caught modifying contact's email addresses so that all email sent would go through them. It's shit like that without users permission that makes people want to use a web browser which is more limited in what it can do.

    7. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't want notifications, don't want tracking. Facebook has far too much access to everything I don't need to give them access to my GPS as well.

    8. Re:I'm curious... by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I can only speak for myself but...I find annoying having to install a separate app just to chat through Facebook. The main Facebook app is already huge (+100 MB) and it used to have the chat integrated so I resent having to install yet another app just for the chat.
      As for the main topic of the article: That's what you get for using a propietary protocol/service. The owner gets to dictate how you use it. Every day I grow more and more tired of walled gardens and propietary services.

    9. Re:I'm curious... by sirber · · Score: 2

      also, Facebook + Messenger uses more than 700MB of storage space. Add "Pages" and you get 1 GB!

      --
      Be or ben't
    10. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they set up the main Facebook app so that it still will show you Messenger notifications but not the messages themselves.

      Which means you end up with a permanent "you've got new messages!" notification until you either 1) install the Messenger app or 2) go to the website and clear them that way.

      Except they're now removing 2.

      Which means that when someone else sends me a Facebook message (which I'm never going to read) I get stuck with a permanent notification I can't get rid of.

      The main problem with Facebook and Facebook's apps is that it kind of doesn't matter if you don't want to use them, it matters if your friends and family want to use them. Sure, I may not care to use Facebook and I'm certainly never installing Facebook Messenger, but that won't stop my family from sending me Facebook messages or complaining when I haven't seen whatever picture they posted to Facebook.

    11. Re:I'm curious... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You do realise Facebook and Messenger are two completely different apps right? The former is a bucket of shit and the latter makes Skype and Whatsapp look like they were coded by 2 year olds after their first learn to code class.

    12. Re:I'm curious... by shortscruffydave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Assuming you want to use Facebook Messenger, why wouldn't you want to just use the app? I can certainly understand not wanting to use Facebook Messenger (or not wanting to use Facebook at all), but why a strong preference for using messenger through a mobile browser?

      When you install the app onto your phone, you grant it certain rights, like access to your address book. Just accessing the FB mobile site through a browser stops FB from getting access to stuff you might not want them to have access to.

      I remember a case a few years ago when the FB allocated FB-specific email addresses to its users. The app would actually scan through the contacts list on your phone and if it recognised the email address of one of your contacts as being another FB user it would *automatically and silently* change the email details on your phone's contacts database to use the new FB-assigned address.

    13. Re: I'm curious... by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      I agree I used it on the mobile site because the app was a battery hog. Also the permissions were terrible. I went to use the mobile site (Canada) and it directs me to install the app. My response? Guess that's 1 less thing I use on Facebook. I only go on FB now from Iceweasel, that I can control.

    14. Re:I'm curious... by Krojack · · Score: 2

      Just checked mine and both apps are using 475 megs of space. This is not counting cached data. Anything over that depends on what you send such as images and so on. Cached data depends on what the user does thus can't really place blame on the app.

    15. Re:I'm curious... by Krojack · · Score: 1

      I always see people saying this however I have never experienced it. I don't understand, are people that have it suck battery using it almost every hour of the day?

    16. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The largest concern for me is that when you install their app, they have full access to everything on your phone - including conversations via your microphone. That's not something I'm willing to give to that particular company.

    17. Re:I'm curious... by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 2, Funny

      Removing it virtually doubled my battery life.

      If the battery life savings were only virtual, that's no good to me. I need real change.

    18. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because the apps are Spyware. The app even listens with your mic and drains your battery.

      The reason they are doing this is to force people to download the spyware. The web sites have limited ability to spy on you.

    19. Re: I'm curious... by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      A couple years ago Facebook was caught modifying contact's email addresses so that all email sent would go through them. It's shit like that without users permission that makes people want to use a web browser which is more limited in what it can do.

      On my iPhone, it never altered contacts on my SIM or Gmail account; instead I got new a new "Facebook Contacts" account which I then had to manually associate with existing contacts. At most, contacts I had in Facebook, but not in Gmail got an @facebook.com email address.

    20. Re:I'm curious... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      It is because the official client (happens with Windows Live Messenger and Skype too) is usually a bunch of crap, full of propaganda and botched functions that do not matter to people who just want to send text messages to your friends. That's why these people are using third-party clients to access servers of official applications and their respective accounts, they are simply much better.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    21. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even not using it, the old facebook app was draining the battery on my phone. I was thinking something was wrong with the battery. I did use it, very occasionally. After killing facebook, it was good for more than a day (24 hours min) from 8-10 hours. The annoying thing was that Android's built in battery usage didn't show it.

      I had something similar with my smartwatch which is itself a phone, in that case the culprit was accuweather. To track it down, I found the data usage was a better indication, the battery usage was useless. In that case, it went from a few hours (3-4) to 8-12 hours. That was odd, because on my phone, accuweather seems well behaved.

      I've heard similar reports of messenger's battery consumption, and I'd believe them. I told some friends about this and they experienced similar increases in battery life with the old one. No way am I going to use messenger on my phone, with the permissions it wants, so I can't confirm the behavior with messenger. I'll use the desktop site on mobile, if I want to use it.

    22. Re:I'm curious... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      The apps are huge battery hogs - Facebook on Android is one of the worst offenders. Removing it virtually doubled my battery life.

      That's nothing....removing the Facebook app doubled my actual life.

      (In truth, I never actually used Facebook or had the app installed.)

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    23. Re:I'm curious... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      The "app" has full access to everything on your phone. The web page doesn't.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    24. Re:I'm curious... by Dale512 · · Score: 1

      FB messenger app on my brand new Nexus 5x destroyed my battery life during the day. Uninstalled it and I easily go all day. I rarely used the messenger app, but it still killed the battery. I simply do without the IM aspects until I'm at home.

    25. Re:I'm curious... by garcia · · Score: 1

      Well, a few reasons really:

      1. I don't like ads and I can adlbock on mobile web but not as easily on iOS for apps (if at all) which is why they are doing this in the first place.

      2. I don't want to download unnecessary applications which take up storage I want to use on other things.

      3. I don't see the need to have two different applications to interact on the same platform.

    26. Re:I'm curious... by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Why would it need to download your entire contacts list, when it can just make web API requests as you search?

    27. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I don't use their app or the messenger app because the list of permissions they want is hideous.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    28. Re:I'm curious... by epine · · Score: 0

      The former is a bucket of shit and the latter makes Skype and Whatsapp look like they were coded by 2 year olds after their first learn to code class.

      I wouldn't be too hard on the WhatsApp engineers. They weren't allowed an afternoon nap after achieving 140 million concurrent connections before taking their first learn-to-code class.

      Rick Reed: Half a billion unsuspecting FreeBSD users

      Kids these days. All they want is time off for good behaviour.

      Turning our heads 180 degrees, if you wanted to look like you'd taken your first learn to type properly class, you'd be writing "WhatsApp" instead of "Whatsapp" and "two-year-olds" instead of "two year olds". But no, you're from the school where noticing pre-existing paint on the road is considered optional.

      Nice post. Profane, hyperbolic, vaguely illiterate, extolling a competence inversion in simple language that could have come straight from the mouth of Donald Trump if his followers were down on the meme that programming requires skill.

      It's that last one that's going to keep you out of politics. Your methods are there, but you've got to go way down market to reach your intended audience. It's a lot harder than it looks. Down there, you don't have many sticks to rub together.

      In one short, Lucy points out to him the woefully inadequate range of a toy piano; an angry Schroeder yanks it out from under her, causing her to conk her head on the floor. This became a frequent running gag in the strip's later years. Lucy once "accidentally" washed his piano and threw it in the dryer, thus having the piano shrink, leaving Schroeder horrified.

    29. Re:I'm curious... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      You do realise Facebook and Messenger are two completely different apps right? The former is a bucket of shit and the latter makes Skype and Whatsapp look like they were coded by 2 year olds after their first learn to code class.

      Yeah, I stopped using their chat functionality when they introduced the Messenger App. Still drives me nuts because the Facebook App still has section in it dedicated for the Messenger functionality - including giving you notifications (e.g you have 5 messages) about messages that only Messenger will let you read - but gives you zero actual access to those messages instead trying to push you into Messager, which I refuse to install. So the messages just sit there until I eventually get around to logging into the FB website every once in a blue moon.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    30. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife's phone has a miniscule amount of storage, and she plays a lot of games on her phone.

      The Facebook app takes up enough space that removing it allowed her to install two more games.

      She was able to feed her Facebook addiction using the browser, and still play the games she wanted to play.

      Now she will have to give up a couple games... or buy a new phone.

    31. Re:I'm curious... by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      The apps are huge battery hogs - Facebook on Android is one of the worst offenders. Removing it virtually doubled my battery life.

      Not to mention that the Messenger app completely ignores the quiet time settings in Android. Enjoy getting woken up by BINGS in the middle of the night because someone sent a message.

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    32. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder the Android app sucks so badly, if it's trying to maintain 140 million concurrent connections...

    33. Re: I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, I want control over what Facebook can see about me.
      The app gives unlimited access to highly detailed information about me.
      Browsers don't.
      No identity, no contacts, no location (apart from the ip address)
      Far less spyware and limited tracking
      Also note, I rarely get messages on Facebook (yay) but I checked it and I am also getting the nag screen.
      I logged in with Android Firefox and set it to request the desktop version.
      No problem. Messager in the web still works. That means I can still read my once a month message. At least for the time being....

    34. Re:I'm curious... by Desty · · Score: 1

      Just checked mine and both apps are using 475 megs of space. This is not counting cached data. Anything over that depends on what you send such as images and so on. Cached data depends on what the user does thus can't really place blame on the app.

      Sure they can blame the app, if it doesn't manage the cached data properly. If you design programs that make use of a cache, one of the first steps you should take, especially on mobile devices, is to check that the cache doesn't grow beyond a certain limit.

  4. Re:FUCK EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're boring

  5. It is the tracking economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get through your heads...

    APP steal information
    Fackbook wants all your information
    Facebook APP is the worst of both.

    So you want to send a message, do not use Facebook.

  6. This is not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, so effin' what -- I really don't get what difference it makes if they decided to move messages to an app.
    Facebook's problem is a privacy problem. A couple of years back I started an anonymous facebook account as a public diary, only to find that a friend on facebook found about it because it was somehow visible from my other account without my full understanding. The same goes to 'likes' and 'comments' on external posts which are visible to your friends' newsfeed by default.

    These are some very serious privacy issues, and their seriousness comes from the fact that its entirely your responsibility to understand how facebook will share your data, you probably can't hold FB accountable to any of this.

    But moving messages to a seemingly harmless app -- not a big deal.

  7. it is easier to just nix facebook by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    block all of facebook with the hosts file

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:it is easier to just nix facebook by Krojack · · Score: 1

      Which can't be done on most phones because they aren't rooted.

    2. Re:it is easier to just nix facebook by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then wipe and root your phone, or if you can't, sell your used phone and put the money toward one that you can root.

    3. Re:it is easier to just nix facebook by Krojack · · Score: 1

      For your tech savvy person sure this can be done. I use to do it all the time. However go to your normal user and say this to them. They won't know what the hell you're talking about. Most people can't do this.. Most people shouldn't do this because they will do something wrong and brick the device.

      Anyone able to modify their hosts file most likely has better means to block the app from doing things such as using Xposed. Also the fact that host names can change all the time, it could be a never ending battle. Also what if they use direct IPs? Back to using Xposed for that one.

  8. Permissions by phorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When it installing Messenger, it "needs" access to
    * Identity
    * Contacts
    * Location
    * SMS
    * Phone
    * Media/Photos
    * Camera
    * Microphone
    * Wifi connection info
    * Device and call info

    Basically, EVERY bit of sensitive data on my phone. There was a recent radio broadcast where they were able to determine that FB was checking your location multiple times per second (whether or not you were using the app).
    So yeah, no f'ing way that PoS app is getting installed on my device.

    1. Re: Permissions by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      Also there are recent posts of if you were in the general area of someone, say at a mall, people near by were popping up in suggestions for friends. There was even an article of a girl mugged, then the mugger appeared in her suggestions

    2. Re:Permissions by Krojack · · Score: 2

      No it doesn't. I have all permissions for the app blocked and it works just fine. http://i.imgur.com/RcLJwsw.png

    3. Re:Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly why I won't install it. My version of Android won't allow me to deny those permissions to the app. It's also why I'm running a really old version of the Facebook app. The old version I have doesn't request any of those permissions. If they ever prevent that version from working, I'll simply uninstall the app and be done with Facebook on my phone until I am able to get one with a version that permits me to tell apps what they can do versus having to be a victim to the authors' whims.

    4. Re:Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Marshmallow, sure. Those of us still stick on Lollipop has no such option.

    5. Re:Permissions by tepples · · Score: 1

      Those of you on Lollipop have the choice to port Marshmallow to your phone, unlock its bootloader, and install your port of Marshmallow.

    6. Re:Permissions by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      When installing the Facebook App, it "needs" access to
      * Identity
      * Contacts
      * Location
      * SMS
      * Phone
      * Media/Photos
      * Camera
      * Microphone
      * Wifi connection info
      * Device and call info
      * Storage
      * Application UI overlays
      * System Tools including listing all applications
      * Control Audio settings
      * Accounts including acting as an authenticator for 3rd parties, and reading all accounts
      * The ability to modify battery statistics -- ??WTF
      * Read homescreen settings, widgets and shortcuts.
      * Control Vibrator ^_^

      If you have Messenger on your phone, chances are you have Facebook too. If you don't have Facebook, or a Facebook account, chances are that this app and all it's permissions are STILL installed on your phone (thanks Samsung, LG, etc).

      Guess which is by far the lesser of the evils.

    7. Re:Permissions by q4Fry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's cute. What happens when you tap the Menu and look at "All Permissions" ?

      Does it find all accounts on your phone? Linking you to any publicly available API data for any of those accounts, plus whatever non-public data Facebook managed to wheedle out of the organization (because, you know, "we're Facebook")
      Does it view Wi-Fi connections? Which they can cross-reference against anyone else who does have location enabled. Sure, maybe they don't have a GPS lock on you 24/7, but they can still tell where you went.
      Does it retrieve running apps? You know, to scope out the competition. Or to note down that you have $embarrassing_app running. Or whatever.

      And I'd be surprised if it stopped there.

    8. Re:Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XPrivacy exists, you can either block requests or feed incorrect data to them when they make said requests.

    9. Re:Permissions by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

      So it's some sort of flashlight app, is it?

    10. Re:Permissions by wicka_wicka · · Score: 1

      There are only one or two of those that aren't quite obviously critical to the basic functionality of the app.

      --
      hi
    11. Re:Permissions by phorm · · Score: 1

      Really? It needs to read the contacts ON MY PHONE in order to communicate with friends ON FACEBOOK? Oh, and to read my microphone?

      It needs to know WHICH WIFI I'm connected to, and to know WHO I'M CALLING?

      It's a fucking messenger. All it needs to know is which FB contact I'm talking to and what I'm typing as a message. I can give it a pass for camera in order to upload pictures etc but most of the rest is bullshit.

  9. Can you do a vacation autoreply? by swb · · Score: 1

    I would want to setup messenger with a message that replies 'I don't use messenger, so i am not going to get your message. please contact me some other way.'

  10. Remember when others started this? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yahoo, MSN, ICQ, they all tried to eliminate competitors by disallowing using competing messaging systems together with theirs.

    In other words, FB is working on making itself as obsolete as these market leaders once were. Took them shorter than I gave them, actually.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Remember when others started this? by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      Errr no. Facebook is not blocking 3rd parties. That hasn't been allowed for many years. What they are doing is blocking the use of their website on a mobile device, and with good reason too. Facebook messenger on mobile is basically Skype but a shitload better. Their website has a tiny fraction of the functionality and completely divided the user base.

    2. Re:Remember when others started this? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Call a spade a spade and say that they want you to use their messenger on mobile because of the sweet tidbits of personal info they can siphon that way. There is literally NOTHING they don't want to get their grubby paws on in your phone.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Remember when others started this? by chispito · · Score: 1

      In other words, FB is working on making itself as obsolete as these market leaders once were. Took them shorter than I gave them, actually.

      None of those others were tied to Facebook and Facebook is not going anywhere. Sure, I uninstalled Messenger several months ago and have no intention of installing it again, but all my friends and family won't magically start using some alternative app.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:Remember when others started this? by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      I was waiting for someone to come up with that comment. It's a funny comment since Messenger requires several permissions LESS than the Facebook app which everyone already has on their phone. The best part of that Facebook app is when it comes pre-installed you don't even get a chance to accept or deny the permissions it seeks. It's always there.

      I actually think it's a good thing. A ground-up re-write of the messenger app has produced something that's far slicker and more stable than the garbage Facebook app.

    5. Re:Remember when others started this? by rpresser · · Score: 1

      I only want Messenger for short TEXT messages with people I have friended. I do not want notifications, video calls, bots, suggestions about what to eat or which movies to see, permanently tracking my every step and possibly recording my microphone and camera ....

      I just want short text messages with my friends.

      The website has always been sufficient for that. Unfortunately for Facebook, it doesn't make them much money.

      I'm not sure why you added "completely divided the user base" to the end of your comment, unless it was just to increase the good feeling you get from licking Mark Zuckerberg's balls.

    6. Re:Remember when others started this? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I use neither the main app nor the messenger one because of the permissions. I'm not going to start now; FB messages can wait until I get to a non-phone computer.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    7. Re:Remember when others started this? by Holi · · Score: 1

      No, they want you to use it because it will attempt to become your default SMS app and then they can access all your communications.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    8. Re:Remember when others started this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use Facebook on my phone at all (I rely on e-mails for Facebook messages... which have gotten a lot less reliable in the past couple months), but a lot of the people I know say they use the mobile site instead of the app because it works better (and, as a bonus, doesn't require a ton of permissions).

    9. Re:Remember when others started this? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      What tiny fraction of the functionality? What is the difference the app gives? To me the user, the Facebook and messenger app didn't appear much different than the mobile site other than lacking notifications. The app also gives Facebook more permissions.

      Disa so far still works as a third party client. On a PC (or a mobile set to "Get desktop site"), www.messenger.com seems to give most useful features of the app

    10. Re:Remember when others started this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you want a "Facebook Messenger Lite".

      Might as well ask for it. Though good luck with getting that read.

    11. Re:Remember when others started this? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you added "completely divided the user base" to the end of your comment

      Easy. You just showed to me you have the ability to send a text message while the person at the other end may have the ability to video call. It's not sufficient that I see you online, but now I get to play the guessing game as to which of the buttons may or may not work when I want to talk to you. That's what we call a divided user based due to functionality.

      I'm not sure why you made reference to Mark Zuckerberg's balls. I can only assume you couldn't come up with a technical argument and started thinking about them.

    12. Re:Remember when others started this? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No, they want you to use it because it will attempt to become your default SMS app and then they can access all your communications.

      That would concern me more if the Facebook App that comes pre-installed on most phones, and is far more widely used than the Messenger app didn't already do that.

      It's like saying I want a photo of your so I know what you look like while we're talking face to face.

    13. Re:Remember when others started this? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The mobile page is unable to video call properly, unable to audio call properly, unable to access the camera, unable to select which hardware to use, and this goes for the desktop website too. Also casually saying "other than lacking notifications", is like comparing an sms to snailmail, quite a huge omission for an instant messaging system that is trying to rival skype or whatsapp.

      There's a good reason there's a different icon for someone on the web interface compared to messenger. It's a little indication to everyone else that half of the crap on offer doesn't work when talking to that person.

  11. Re:Apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're boring too.

  12. I like the service, not the app. by uvayankee1 · · Score: 1

    Because Messenger (as a service) is the only way I get messages from some people. I either stop talking to those people, piss those people off by constantly cajoling them into switching services, or just talk to them the way they want to talk to me.

    But Messenger (as an app) is a hateful piece of programming. I haven't had the battery issues others do, but it consumes too much memory, and causes other parts of my phone to misbehave (camera, etc.) so I'm happier not using it.

    1. Re:I like the service, not the app. by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Because Messenger (as a service) is the only way I get messages from some people. I either stop talking to those people, piss those people off by constantly cajoling them into switching services, or just talk to them the way they want to talk to me.

      But Messenger (as an app) is a hateful piece of programming. I haven't had the battery issues others do, but it consumes too much memory, and causes other parts of my phone to misbehave (camera, etc.) so I'm happier not using it.

      I migrated to Disa for my Facebook messenger needs a few months ago. So far so good. I got pissed off at the ever increasing notifications from the main Facebook app (itself old because I refused to upgrade to a newer version with more permissions) "Do you know so an so?" "Wish so and so a happy birthday" Fuck off and don't bother me unless someone is specifically engaging me (message, tag me in a post, or write on my wall).

      I use Disa for Facebook messaging, because for some friends it is the best way to contact them. However I'm using Facebook less and less. It used to be people posting individual ideas, and sharing photos of something (party, trip), now it's all resharing memes or Buzzfeed articles. I'd rather look at baby and puppy pictures than this!

  13. Re:Why not just use email? by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

    Why not just use email?

    It has none of these problems, and far more benefits.

    Because email has it's own problems. Mainly spam and pseudo-spam. I completely abandoned email a couple years ago. I still have an email address but the only thing I use it for is to search for a message that someone has told me via IM/text/phone that they sent me. If someone sends me an email message without notifying me via some other method that they are sending it to me then there is a 90+% probability that I won't read it.

    That being said, I also uninstalled facebook messenger from my phone because I don't want to be notified at 2am that someone sent me a message. People are generally smart enough to not have 2am phone calls or texts but facebook messenger not so much.
    I am one of those people who use facebook via the web browser on my phone and not allowing messenger via the web browser will not get me to install messenger but rather will just get me to use facebook less.

  14. digital public space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need it to ensure free speech and equality, please vote for publicly funded social networks.

  15. Protip: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let scummy companies run executable code on your devices.

  16. In Facebook's walled garden by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    You get to be the crop.

  17. free content ad network by aicrules · · Score: 1

    What is with the random reference of Facebook as "free content ad network"?

    1. Re:free content ad network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to showcase how smart the author is, compared to all you sheeple.

  18. Tough choice by c · · Score: 1

    Lose access to yet another message service or let Facebook's shitty apps waste my battery, slow my phone down, and piss all over my permissions.

    Man, I just don't know.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  19. Fake user agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll fake the user agent and use the desktop site. On a tablet it's ok.

  20. Garbage by fieldstone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The point where Facebook forces me to install software on my phone that drains my battery is the point where I stop using Facebook messenger entirely. Obnoxious but typical. I don't know why anyone is surprised at anything they do after their "real name" policy that actually puts LGBT people and abuse victims in physical danger.

    1. Re:Garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "after their 'real name' policy that actually puts LGBT people and abuse victims in physical danger."

      Nahhh... nowadays you get awards for courage and everybody hits the like button when you admit you are LGBT. It's any person who says anything even construed to be not completely accepting and embracive of anything and everything LGBT-related who is in danger of being fired, taken off the air, kicked out of the organization they started, taken to court, forced out of business, denigrated by the press, called a hater and a bigot, etc., etc., etc.

    2. Re:Garbage by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The point where Facebook forces me to install software on my phone that drains my battery

      You do realise the big complaints about battery life is the Facebook App itself right? I've yet to see a phone with Messenger listed up near the top of the battery usage stats.

      Except my sister's but then that's the only app that is ever open on her phone.

    3. Re:Garbage by fieldstone · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. Most of the battery life issues I had did go away when I switched to Metal, but I kept Messenger. Still, the website needs to be functional without forcing the user to install an app if they don't want to. That's how it is on the desktop, at least.

    4. Re:Garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :blink:

      But, back in the real world, I know multiple people who use fake names on Facebook because of stalkers. I have a fairly LGBT-friendly social circle, but even inside Seattle (the #1 most LGBT-friendly city in the US), it's not always safe to be publicly out.

    5. Re:Garbage by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Even on the desktop the messenger function of Facebook has a small amount of functionality compared to the mobile app. Somethings obvious, like being unable to send an photo directly from a camera, but others absolutely absurd, like being unable to select which camera or audio device you wish to use during a video call.

      There's been an unfortunate number of times where I've been using Facebook messenger on my Surface and someone says let's do a video call and I am forced to reply, wait, let me find my phone. :-(

  21. Desktop Version works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can still request desktop site and continue to use chat in web.

  22. Re: Why not just use telegram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Screw FB! Use telegram.

  23. Mobile sites more secure than social apps by dwheeler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mobile sites tend to be far more secure for users than social apps (you can say "privacy" instead if you want, though many people don't understand the difference). Most social apps, like this one, want total ownership of your phone - and therefore they own you. They demand access to your microphone, camera, location, contact list, and everything else. Big Brother never got so much data. In contrast, the websites don't get access to all that stuff. Facebook doesn't pay me enough to completely give up all my privacy.

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
    1. Re:Mobile sites more secure than social apps by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Mobile sites tend to be far more secure for users than social apps

      They also tend to be utter garbage that barely works and is rarely used.

    2. Re:Mobile sites more secure than social apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its really that way with ALL apps. This is the reason for the app craze instead of sites using the browser. A browser is built not to leak data or pull data from another app for security reasons. Apps are built to pull data from the phone and other apps. Android was built for this to harvest data from the user. Other words its all spyware.

      Got to go now I have a call on my flip phone.

  24. The demise of facebook?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is wonderful news! Anything to make Facebook fade into oblivion faster is a a good thing.

  25. Facbooks user = morrons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    If you're a faecesbook user you're a moron who has no understanding of privacy and likes being a sheeple, corporate slave. You have no soul, no independent mind and you are part of the problem. You're the type of person who says "I was only obeying orders".

    "But my friends need to contact me on faecesbook" - Get some better friends.

    "But my family need to contact me on faecesbook" - Get a better family.

    faecesbook - For morons, by evil morons.

    1. Re:Facbooks user = morrons by surd1618 · · Score: 1

      "But my friends need to contact me on faecesbook" - Get some better friends.

      I can't get better friends, I don't have any mod points!

  26. 'Twere that it would, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something something "internet.org" something "basics" something something.

    Yadda network effect yadda yadda.

  27. Request Desktop Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meh,
    *settings*
    *request desktop site*
    Problem solved.

  28. And the noose tightens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't say you weren't warned.

  29. That's why I use an older version by ryuzakixd · · Score: 2

    Long ago, the Facebook app wanted new permissions like access to my contacts. I didn't think they should have it, so I still don't allow the update.

    Turns out I'm using Facebook version 3.9 from 2013 on my mobile (Moto Maxx/Droid Turbo). I ripped the apk with AirDroid from my older phone and installed on the new one.

    The app has the messenger inside itself, instead of an independent app. With time, it stopped working and popped a message to download the independent app, until I found a guy which made an app to unblock the messenger inside my old app.

    Battery life is great, I don't even see Facebook on the battery manager (I use it very few times a day).

    1. Re:That's why I use an older version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are forcing it on users who don't use the facebook app, too (those who use the site through a mobile web browser). I uninstalled the fb app because any time a fb notification arrived, one half of my phone conversation (me or the person I was talking to) would go silent and we would have to hang up and call again. I have only looked at fb through the browser, and as of yesterday it started telling me I will soon only be able to access my messages through messenger (even though I am using facebook through a browser, not the app).

  30. Re: Why not just use email? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Why not use any number of alternatives that aren't Facebook? FB Messenger is probably the last resort for me.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  31. Re:Why not just use email? by nyet · · Score: 1

    I get maybe 2 or 3 spams a week at most that make it through my filters.

  32. This happened to me 2 days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same deal... every attempt to use the message functionality tried to pop up the Google Play Store and direct me to their app. I already choose to use the website instead of their app, and now they want to have two apps spying on me. No thanks. Instead I just stopped using Facebook. It's pretty much full of religious and political garbage at this point anyway. This was just the final straw. It's nice keeping tabs on some old friends, but the tradeoffs to use FB the way 'they' want it used are too much.

  33. www.messenger.com also, but has workaround by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

    For those of you who don't want to leave the browser, messenger.com will detect you're on mobile, but with "Request Desktop site" won't force you to the stores and actually be useful. Google also has Hangouts with the similar behavior: will "force" you Google Play instead, will allow usage with the toggle. They really want to force the un-savvy user to them low rated (sub-4), seriously dubious UX apps, probably so they get more ratings from those "either 5 or 1 stars" type of users, and will have some biased way of disregarding the 1 stars thus the average end result is beneficial to the apps.

  34. Re: Why not just use telegram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw telegram, use line.

  35. Lol, Facebook by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    I'm like, so shocked that Facebook would use its influence and power to lock its users into its own ecosystem!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  36. Re:FUCK EUROPE by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 0, Troll

    Our biggest mistake was creating the United States of America.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  37. Disable Facebook Messages? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    Is there a way to disable Messages on your account, so no one can message you? That'd be my inclination if I have to use their app. (Also one of the people who found their battery life increase significantly without FB apps on their phone.)

    1. Re:Disable Facebook Messages? by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      You can block message notifications on the desktop site & on the version of the main Facebook app I have installed (which is so old as to have working contact sync on Lollipop & built-in messaging), but people can still send you messages & wonder why you are not replying. I had the same problem with text blocking before we had unlimited texting...people (& more worryingly, businesses that I had never authorized to text me about things like stuff being ready to pick up) expected that I had seen their messages, but they were silently dropped somewhere before my phone. Probably the intent is that, by letting the messages accumulate unread, they can pressure people into unblocking the notifications & installing the app.

  38. Re: Why not just use email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just turn off notifications like most apps allow.

  39. Re:Why not just use email? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Mainly spam and pseudo-spam.

    Gmail spam filters work's so well these days

  40. TIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today I learned you can have chats on Facebook.

  41. Re: Why not just use telegram? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    remember XMPP?

  42. Re: Why not just use email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before I quit the facebook, there were people who, no matter how many times I asked them not to use FB messsages to contact me (people who have my cell phone number to text), simply continued to use FB.

  43. Re:FUCK EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The left's gotten pretty blatant with its radicalism over the last few years.

    1. convince reader to loath himself, his cultural background, and the society he lives in. check
    2. Use of the word 'imperialism.' check
    3. broad accusations of bigotry. check

    The soviet union's gone, btw, and china's far too interested in manipulating markets to be communist (though they kept the maoist/stalinist 'benevolent' authoritarian act going). That leaves north korea as the only truly communist country left. Now that place IS a shithole.

    Today the worst political trends in the west can be traced right back to the authoritarian leanings of cold war era socialism.

  44. I've used Xabber in the past... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    I've used XMPP in the past, but since Facebook Chat disabled XMPP support and I don't wat to use theirs IM, I've closed my account there (used FB just to use the chat to talk to family members...)

  45. It's been like that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been like that for over a year now on iOS. It's just another reason I am considering closing my Facebook account entirely. Everytime I log in to the site it seems like they've pulled some new crap to prevent me from seeing posts in chronological order. Having to constantly choose Most Recent is annoying enough but now they force posts to the top of the list that don't belong.

  46. Understandable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given how facebook tracks people who don't even have a facebook login and aren't even on the site, either.

    Are you saying you're only allowed to bitch about that if you're logged in and on facebook.com right now?

  47. What about requesting the desktop vers? by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

    Does requesting the desktop version of the page (instead of staying on the mobile version) in your browser still allow you to check messages, send/reply to messages?

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    1. Re:What about requesting the desktop vers? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      Yup, it's a bit more clunky, but still works. Not sure if Notification still work through Chrome, which was handy with the mobile site when avoiding the app.

    2. Re:What about requesting the desktop vers? by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      This is why I hate a trend I've been noticing more and more of making it so mobile versions of a site doesn't have all the features of the normal site unless you subscribe/pay up... it's pointless.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  48. Persistence Pays Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're persistent you can still get to your messages using the mobile browser version. It's a pain in the bass, but you can. Keep going back to the browser tab, close the ad, then go back, close the ad again, then go back and tap on which message you want to read. Or check "Request desktop site" in browser settings.

  49. Switch to desktop on your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I checked Request Desktop Site on my Nexus 6 and my ability to message on FB from my phone returned.

  50. "Request desktop site" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem solved. Move along.

    ( and yes i agree the apps are a battery sucking POS )

  51. Re: Why not just use telegram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Federated jabber is the right answer, but its a ghost town... Have to get all your 'contacts' to use it. I tried. Good luck.

  52. Re: Why not just use telegram? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    It's suitable for business use (I'm setting up a ejjaberd.im server on my work, using data from Active Directory for authentication and groups/shared rosters :P)

  53. Use desktop web site instead of mobile one by krouic · · Score: 1

    In your mobile browser login to the normal web site instead of the mobile one. Use the "Request desktop site" or equivalent option of your mobile browser.
    You'll have access to the chat and messenging functionalitiies, problem solved.

  54. Post pics of family and friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on a company's website along with where you are, who with, who you know, what you do, what they do, where and when it all happens etc...

    And wonder later oh damn, I can't access my shit but the gov can?

    dabbbft

  55. Re:Why not just use email? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    I get maybe 2 or 3 spams a week at most that make it through my filters.

    It's not the real spam as much as the psuedo-spam. Every single website, grocery store, credit card, etc... requires you to confirm your account with an email address and then each of these sites send you 2-3 emails per week. You've technically opted in but really only wanted a password not constant irrelevant updates. After a while, you have several hundred of these and many of them require you to remember your password and log into their site to unsubscribe. My postal mail is the same way. I have all my bills autodebited but they still send me a letter every month telling me that they autodebited plus random crap that goes straight in he trash. My electric company, my grocery store, and even Geico sends out a "magazine" each month. Does anyone actually read the geico magazine? I have something in my mailbox every day but probably only receive 1 letter a month that is important if that.

  56. Re: Why not just use email? by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 1

    Because email isn't IM?

    Unless you're logged in 24/7, Facebook Messenger (FM) via a browser isn't IM either.

    The main advantage for FM is lack of spam -- at the cost of surveillance.

  57. Dump the Facebook App and use the browser by Dr.+Charles+Forbin · · Score: 1

    Their stupid web page still tries to force you to download their messenger app, but if you set Chrome to request the desktop site, it will let you see your messages. At least it did yesterday.