Slashdot Mirror


Even In Remotest Africa, Windows 10 Nagware Ruins Your Day (theregister.co.uk)

Iain Thomson, writing for The Register: When you're stuck in the middle of the Central African Republic (CAR) trying to protect the wildlife from armed poachers and the Lord's Resistance Army, then life's pretty tough. And now Microsoft has made it tougher with Windows 10 upgrades. The Chinko Project manages roughly 17,600 square kilometres (6,795 square miles) of rainforest and savannah in the east of the CAR, near the border with South Sudan. Money is tight, and so is internet bandwidth. So the staff was more than a little displeased when one of the donated laptops the team uses began upgrading to Windows 10 automatically, pulling in gigabytes of data over a radio link. And it's not just bandwidth bills they have to worry about. "If a forced upgrade happened and crashed our PCs while in the middle of coordinating rangers under fire from armed militarized poachers, blood could literally be on Microsoft's hands," said one member of the team.This is not a one-off case. We're reading about similar incidents everyday. Automatic updates, accidental automatic update, and the humongous data that these updates eat are ruining user experience for many. These are real issues. It's been roughly a year since Windows 10 has been officially available to consumers, and Microsoft is yet to address the issue.

114 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Literally? by innit · · Score: 1

    Come on.

    1. Re:Literally? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Changing definitions like that to match incorrect usage by the idiot masses is literally the stupidest thing you can do.

    2. Re: Literally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Want to waste another mod point or do you want to see who the real racist is: https://i.sli.mg/oi5moL.jpg

    3. Re:Literally? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      So when the glorious IoT arrives, if I reach out from half way around the world and persuade your wi-fi enabled toothbrush to kill you, I have no responsibility?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    4. Re:Literally? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Alanis Morrisette called this usage very ironic.

    5. Re:Literally? by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      The word "literally" is often used figuratively. It's an oxymoron wrapped up into a single word. Kind of amusing when you think about it.

    6. Re: Literally? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I like how, instead of addressing the racism directly in the comment you bring in an unrelated politician and attack the AC for their supposed fascism.

      I really dislike Trump, but that was definitely a reach.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    7. Re:Literally? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Of course, figuring out how to prevent them while not having a lot of bandwidth with which to look things up is a lot more difficult. But I suppose realizing that would have required you actually thinking about it.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  2. Sue the Donator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why won't somebody donate some consulting help for the people using inappropriate operating systems in life-critical conditions?

    1. Re:Sue the Donator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How much for an enterprise version of Windows 10 ?

    2. Re:Sue the Donator by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Probably much less in central Africa than in the US where that laptop probably originated.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. Boot to the head by Lord_Rion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We keep hearing about this... it's clear that Microsoft doesn't care. I don't understand why people are so shocked by that concept.

    --
    --Hired Net Grunt
    1. Re:Boot to the head by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it's clear that Microsoft doesn't care.

      It's not that Microsoft doesn't care. Microsoft cares. The software is working as designed. Microsoft would be upset if the software did not work in this fashion.

      Did you mean that Microsoft cares about its users? When has Microsoft ever done that?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Boot to the head by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't care because the legal institutions that supposedly protect users from this kind of misuse of their computing hardware apparently don't care.

      I don't think I've heard a peep out of them on this. Not a single quote.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    3. Re:Boot to the head by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft got where it is by selling, not to user, but to people who buy stuff that other people have to use.

      The only successful (to some measure) consumer product the've ever made is the XBox, and that's largely a matter of developing relationships with game studios. No user buys a Microsoft console because of the cool things Microsoft put on it; those are tolerated rather than embraced. People buy XBoxes to run games; they've largely been lukewarm at best to Microsoft's attempt to take charge of their entertainment consumption.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Boot to the head by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't care because the legal institutions that supposedly protect users from this kind of misuse of their computing hardware apparently don't care.

      No, sorry, it is not the responsibility of legal institutions to protect users from doing stupid things like relying on Microsoft. As long as users are too lazy and/or apathetic to take control of their own computing devices using the alternatives available then they will continue to suffer abuse and loss of productivity, and that is self-inflicted.

      Legal institutions are supposed to protect consumers from harm by trust-making activities by corporations, it's pretty hard to spin these abusive upgrade shenanigans as that. You might hope for some relief from consumer protection agencies, but good luck with that. Your only realistic alternative is to vote with your install disk.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re: Boot to the head by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      And grandpa's eyes glaze over.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    6. Re:Boot to the head by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      X-box was a panicked reaction to the burgeoning TiVo/set top surfing market. Who cares about a home PC when you can surf through your TV? Make it Direct X-based for easy (so to speak) cross-development. This had to work, unlike the myriad other "me too" projects they flopped at.

      As it turned out, it was the touch screen tablets that wrecked home PCs as a necessity, and their "me too" of that did indeed flop.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:Boot to the head by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Actually Microsoft does a tone of this already. A 1 in 100,000 problem means up to tens of thousands of people bitching on the Internet.

      Clearly checking the connection for type and speed dynamically was not something they foresaw. This incident was like the Fukushima accident -- a whole bunch of rare things stacking up.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:Boot to the head by geoskd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This incident was like the Fukushima accident -- a whole bunch of rare things stacking up.

      Bullshit. This was a simple case of Microsoft being completely out of touch with their user base. Even to this very moment, the powers that be at Microsoft have the attitude of "who gives a damn? What are they gonna do about it? Switch to Linux? Hahahaha"

      Microsofts core customers are ignorant and Microsoft knows it. The rest of us have been held at ransom by this core bunch of retards for decades now. Those of us who could, switched to anything else long ago for everything we could.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    9. Re:Boot to the head by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Most corporations care about their customers as to their potential as a future sale. Microsoft is not burdened by this need to worry about future sales as they have a virtual monopoly. No matter how badly they shit on their consumer base they will all eventually purchase another microsoft licensed product. Only a few geeks who are able to use linux or a bsd alternative or those who spend the extra money to buy Apple which has it's own problems are able to avoid being subject to the whims of Redmond.

    10. Re: Boot to the head by doccus · · Score: 1

      I think all the complaints are due to the fact that even if all precautions are taken, such as Automatic upgrades disabled, the 10X "upgrade" still takes place. I would assume that most readerts of ZDnet have at least SOME computer experience, yet I have read easily over 100, and probab;ly many more, complaints that despite setting all the parameters against automatic install, it still occurred. In fact, the vast majority of comments posted were complaints about this.
      So something "jes aint right heah" ...

  4. When it happens in real life healthcare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and a patient is dead as a result, then this issue will get noticed. Not until then.

    1. Re:When it happens in real life healthcare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and a patient is dead as a result, then this issue will get noticed. Not until then.

      Only if it's a patient in a Western country. Nobody in Redmond will care if people from a developing nation die as a result, because they don't have the money it takes to hire the kinds of lawyers that can beat Microsoft's legal army.

    2. Re:When it happens in real life healthcare by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Not in the US. An unexpected upgrade would violate the certification of the medical device, so it's the device manufacturer's job to prevent it from happening.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Update? What update? by satch89450 · · Score: 1

    I have a Lenovo laptop with Windows 7 Professional on it. Sometime in the last nine months, Windows has forgotten how to talk with much of the hardware in the laptop. This includes the finger reader and all networking devices. I called both Microsoft and Lenovo, and both refused to help.

    So I never see the nags!

    The hardware works fine, as proven by the copy of Fedora 20 I have running on the thing -- when I need to network, I just boot into Linux and have at it. RJ-45 port. Wifi. All happy. (I haven't tried installing the finger reading software yet, because I don't have much use for it.

    When I need to copy software across, USB sticks and Blu-Ray drive work just swell. That's how I keep the DVD/BR reader up to date on the laptop that runs in the Windows side.

    So, no problem. That doesn't help the folks in hospitals or out in the field...

  6. Lame excuse... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If a forced upgrade happened and crashed our PCs while in the middle of coordinating rangers under fire from armed militarized poachers, blood could literally be on Microsoft's hands," said one member of the team.

    Sorry, it's your fault, pal. Didn't you know that Windows was an ancient American word meaning "I can't configure Ubuntu"?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  7. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now can we PLEASE stop seeing the same goddamned story posted every goddamned day?

    I'm guessing this concept is way too difficult for people like you, but you don't HAVE to read these stories and you don't HAVE to comment on them

    Or maybe you can get a refund from Slashdot for all the money that you've paid to them

  8. Blood on Whose Hands? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I don't reckon I'd ever have bet my customers' lives on Microsoft software.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re: Blood on Whose Hands? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      so your surgeries are done while Windows can update

      That depends a lot on the surgery. The anesthesia machine is usually too low tech to warrant a centralized computer and that's about the most vulnerable part. Still a competent anesthesiologist can live without one. S/He won't be happy, but s/he can manage. Most of the important stuff is mechanical. Unless you're going in for cardiac catheterization - usually they have a PC hooked up to the fluoroscope/EKG readout. Apart from other very specialized equipment (intravascular ultrasound for instance) there's not all that many computers involved in surgery. Certainly appendectomies (appendices) and colecystectomies (gall bladders) and all sorts of other common surgeries can be done without any computers at all.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re: Blood on Whose Hands? by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course the machine that goes ping will be fucked.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  9. Metered connection by Utopia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Set the connection as a metered connection. Windows Update will not pull updates over the connection.

    1. Re:Metered connection by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Windows Update should not pull any data unless /explicitly told to/.

      For /all/ types of connections.

      Your message is "blame the user, always."

      Ever watch a "normal user" (not anyone here commenting at slashdot) deal with a PC? Demanding that the user figure out whether or not to manually set the upgrade to "metered connection" is beyond the pale.

      GWX is malware attached to a user-hostile OS and society-hostile corporation.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:Metered connection by kyrsjo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the original reddit thread, someone mentioned that this was not available if the connection is seen by the OS as a normal Ethernet connection, and that most satellite connections presents them like this.

    3. Re:Metered connection by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what someone who knows what's going on would do.

      But I think the point that people on slashdot (a group that has a clue about these things) sometimes forget is that the average user doesn't really have a clue about technical details. They want to turn on their computer and they want it to work. They don't want to have to learn about internal workings, even at a shallow level. And I suggest that they are not wrong about this. They should have an expectation that their computer works for them just like their car works for them. Yes, they need to learn to drive, but they don't need to learn how to fix the engine.

      Microsoft is taking full advantage of the average user's lack of knowledge--- knowledge that they shouldn't rightfully be expected to have in the first place--- and it strikes me as immoral to say the least.

    4. Re:Metered connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      if the connection is seen by the OS as a normal Ethernet connection

      On ChromeOS & Android this is already working to automatically suppress ChromeOS updates while tethered to Android. It uses a standard DHCP option:

        http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23877476/android-why-connectivitymanager-isactivenetworkmetered-always-returning-true

      looks like Microsoft took the "just make it a setting" approach, and then also blocked the setting for Ethernet connections. both incompetent and jerky, just like I remember them being back when I cared.

      Of course, I bet the satellite terminals don't set the fancy DHCP option, but if they do chromeos would have dtrt automatically.

    5. Re:Metered connection by bmo · · Score: 1

      Do you really think you matter that much?

      YES.

      --
      BMO
       

    6. Re:Metered connection by west · · Score: 2

      You know, if you're going to castigate, you *need* to read the story to avoid sounding... uncharitable.

      The laptop was donated. They have $0 hardware budget and $0 software budget. Their expectation (obviously mistaken) is that like other infrastructure, it should not change radically without direct user intervention or an act of God.

      Your insistence that people be knowledgeable about all the tools they use is, let's say, optimistic. And your inability to comprehend that these people might have more important things to do than become computer experts is... well it's interesting. Unless, of course, you *are* an expert is all of the infrastructure that you interact with on a daily basis, in which case you're just too awesome for us mere humans.

    7. Re:Metered connection by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You know, if you're going to castigate, you *need* to read the story to avoid sounding... uncharitable.

      "Uncharitable"? Fuck that - I donated two 1 year old laptops with Linux Ubuntu pre-loaded to a save-the-rhino group here in South Africa, only to find out a month later that they took their funds and purchased Windows 8 for those laptops. I'm sorry - donors get to complain when their donations are misused.

      The laptop was donated. They have $0 hardware budget and $0 software budget. Their expectation (obviously mistaken) is that like other infrastructure, it should not change radically without direct user intervention or an act of God.

      Regardless, *now* they know that it is not fit for purpose - are they going to change the OS (at a cost of $0) or are they going to attempt to shift the damn blame? I know where my money is on this.

      Your insistence that people be knowledgeable about all the tools they use is, let's say, optimistic. And your inability to comprehend that these people might have more important things to do than become computer experts is...

      When we hand people guns, medication, tools and farming tech, we actually do fucking insist that they know how to use 'em.

      well it's interesting. Unless, of course, you *are* an expert is all of the infrastructure that you interact with on a daily basis, in which case you're just too awesome for us mere humans.

      Like I said, now that they know that it is not suitable for their purpose, will they change the tool or change their purpose? You are working from the assumption that they did not know it was unsuitable - fine. Now, they *do* know. Lets see what they do.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    8. Re:Metered connection by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In this case it is totally appropriate - why the fuck was a cash-tight operation *spending their donor money* to buy a proprietary OS anyway? For their particular use-case I can almost guarantee that a default Linux installation with web-browser will work.

      How do I know you live in a basement pontificating on how people work, don't know how to deal with PHBs, and in particular don't know how non-profits work? You don't get grant money if you can't convince your sponsor (likely in this case, a government) WTF "Linux" is, and for some grant writers, this is like trying to bleed a stone.

      More to the point, EVEN IF IT IS DONATED EQUIPMENT, they need to find someone /trained/ to set up Linux for them, plus the applications, plus a whole lot of other stuff. If they do not have this kind of staff, what the fuck do you expect them to do? "Oh hay, not only was your grant for computers not enough, but we need to hire someone to convert them over to Linux. Because reasons." Reply from donor "We gave you the computers with software, WTF more do you want from us?"

      Your mom is literally shouting down the basement stairs for you to come to dinner.

      BTW, I have been using Linux (GNU/Linux) for around 22 years. And it's people like you that hold us back.

      Just fucking stop it.

      --
      BMO

    9. Re:Metered connection by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Auto installing security updates is the right setting for most users. The problem is the abuse of the system to send malware to users who made the mistake of trusting Microsoft. Well, not even a mistake, that was the best advice until recently.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Metered connection by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Or bluetooth modem connections. And I have my doubt about 3G bluetooth dongles too.

    11. Re:Metered connection by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what someone who knows what's going on would do.

      I think you missed the funny part of this being a feature of Windows 8.1. Windows 7 has no such feature.

    12. Re:Metered connection by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I donated two 1 year old laptops with Linux Ubuntu pre-loaded to a save-the-rhino group here in South Africa, only to find out a month later that they took their funds and purchased Windows 8 for those laptops.

      Did you ever ask why? Do they use any particular software that runs on Windows? Do they use any software that might require some configuration? Ubuntu is very nice, but it hasn't implemented DWIM yet, and if someone is having problems with it there might not be someone who can figure out how to fix it.

      No, instead you gave them what you thought they should use, without bothering to find out what their actual needs and resources are. It wasn't what they did use, and using what you gave them without changes was going to cause more hassle than paying for a couple of Windows licenses. Then you assert a right to complain because the donation of two laptops apparently allowed you to dictate how they operate.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    13. Re:Metered connection by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      If they're already on a slow, expensive connection, changing the OS probably does have a cost. You still have to download it, after all.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  10. Why were updates enabled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If bandwidth was so precious, then why were updates enabled at all?

    1. Re:Why were updates enabled? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      And without updates, the laptop would end up getting hacked by worms and used for other bandwidth intensive tasks like ddos, spam, etc...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:Why were updates enabled? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Those systems may also be hacked by a "script kiddie" working for the poachers. Automated updates involve trade-offs of security versus stability and network resources that require real thought, especially with the constant critical security updates for Windows based systems.

    3. Re:Why were updates enabled? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      And without updates, the laptop would end up getting hacked by worms and used for other bandwidth intensive tasks like ddos, spam, etc...

      I have no objection to updates if they are useful like you have said but Windows 10 "nag-ware" (let's call it what it really is) and forced install by stealth is basically what is called "mall-ware". It is also known that while you can turn off some of the privacy features all of which are set to "on" by default some Windows 10 updates actually turn them some of those features back on again.

      Turning off the privacy features is not just a simple matter of selecting your privacy setup and clicking accordingly, but you also have to go into the registry as well if you know how to do that and what to look for. Basically, the majority of Windows PC users have no idea how to edit the registry much less that one exists.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    4. Re:Why were updates enabled? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Which just goes to show that windows is unsuitable for end users. It's for geeks or users with a competent IT department supporting them.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  11. the year of the Linux desktop might happen by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    not because Linux makes such as great desktop but because microsoft has become such incompetent assholes and windows has become such a pain the ass to bother with

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:the year of the Linux desktop might happen by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Why would Microsoft care if Windows 7 users who have no interest in ever upgrading, switch to Linux? It's not like they make any money off of people who already have Windows 7.

      Microsoft has a massive incentive to get people onto an OS where they have a convenient store where people spend money and they get a cut. Microsoft also has a massive incentive to get everybody off of Windows 7 so that they can stop supporting it with security and bug fixes. Windows 7 only represents a cost to Microsoft but no revenue. Windows 10 while a free upgrade represents a future where they never have to again support an OS for 15 years except for customers who pay them a costly support contract for long-term support. Everybody else will come hell or high water be on the latest consistent build within 6-18 months of its release (consumer/enterprise).

      Ending legacy support is every developer's wet dream. And anybody who isn't on board with that business model isn't a customer they want. Do you want to run Windows 7 in the year 2025? Well Microsoft doesn't want you to. They would very very much prefer you're running Windows 2025 edition. So maybe you as a customer are not worth selling to.

      I can see a good number of people switching to Linux, but most people have no need for 15 years of support. At 6 years and 2 major releases old Microsoft hates Windows 7 more than Linux probably at this point. Linux requires no support. Windows 7 means they have to back-port all of their security fixes to a more than half decade old OS that honestly offers its users nothing over their latest build.

    2. Re:the year of the Linux desktop might happen by donaldm · · Score: 1

      not because Linux makes such as great desktop but because microsoft has become such incompetent assholes and windows has become such a pain the ass to bother with

      I have been using Fedora for over seventeen years and in the last eight on my only personal PC's and in those eight years have only have had one major annoyance and that was when KDE came out with 4.0 which IMHO was not ready for prime time so to keep the peace in the family I switched to Gnome until KDE 4.1 was released. From then on everything I wanted to do with a PC including games although Microsoft-centric games are somewhat problematic, just works.

      I can compare Windows 10 to Fedora 23 KDE spin since I run Windows 10 in a virtual machine on my Fedora 23 desktop and IMHO Fedora is much more customizable and functional than Windows 10. Of course, if you want the so-called start menu intermixed with "tiles" then Windows 10 is fine but once you get over the "pretty" and "shiny" part of Windows 10 there is little that is appealing to me. I even have Linux Mint which is quite nice (I still prefer KDE although other may disagree and that is fine) in a virtual machine and I prefer that to Windows 10.

      What really does turn me off Windows 10 is the privacy concerns which are fairly easy to turn off (they are all on by default) in the settings menu, however, that is not the end of it, you really do have to know how to edit the Registry and know what to look for, which is no easy task and impossible for normal PC users. Sure there are third party tools that can assist, assuming you trust them, but basically "All your information belongs to us" is so true. Even if you have locked down your Windows 10 PC Microsoft has been known to turn some features back on "For our own good - of course".

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    3. Re: the year of the Linux desktop might happen by pakar · · Score: 1

      Android have reached, and passed, 300 million users. Think the last number was 1.3 billion..
      I group Android/iOS/OSX/Windows into one chunk since many people use tablets/phones as their main "desktop" today

      For "pure" linux distributions (debian/ubuntu/arch etc) for laptops/stationary machines i think the world-wide number was somewhere around 85 million.

  12. multiple levels of stupid by bzipitidoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The pushy upgrade was a stupid idea for more than one reason, and this was well known before Microsoft did it. There's the old saw "don't fix it if it ain't broke". Some hardware would quit working. The upgrades were most cavalierly programmed to happen without regard to the customer's needs, able to take a computer out of service for hours, and that could be just when the owner had scheduled some important work. And of course for those with limited, expensive bandwidth, it's damned rude of Microsoft to pig out on such a precious resource without asking. That's stooping to the level of online advertisers, who deserve to be blocked because they just can't lay off the obnoxious loud, flashing animated video advertising that eats gobs of bandwidth and CPU time. Not that Microsoft was ever much above that level.

    Speaking from my experience as a system administrator, doing a major upgrade on production systems for the heck of it was a major no-no. We only upgraded if we had to, for some crucial new functionality, and we'd spend at least a week preparing for it with tests on identical equipment if available, dry runs, and the like. We'd document how long it was going to take, and if too long we might set up a temporary system. We were not going to risk taking down the website of our company. Uptime is critically important. Stunts like this pushy, opt out upgrade assure that Windows will stay permanently banned from the server room.

    That Microsoft apparently can't grasp any of this or just doesn't care shows, again, how stupid their leadership is. Meh, they've been unbelievably stupid for 15 years now. Getting in bed with the MAFIAA of all people, and deferring to those idiots on technical matters around DRM, wow, just wow. MS doesn't deserve to be regarded as a tech company, not while they're willing to defer to tech morons on the areas they're supposed to be the experts on.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    1. Re:multiple levels of stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless otherwise asked, the UI I want to use should never change. I make Windows 7 look like Windows 2000. I make Mint look like Windows 2000.

      With Linux or FreeBSD anyone can continue to use their favorite Window Manager as they've always used it while continuing to upgrade the OS in the background.

      Microsoft needs to make Windows the OS and Windows the Window Manager and make them separate products. We have enough legacy code that we're never going to fully get rid of some machines, but it'd be perfect if I could run some FreeBSD Jailed "Windows XP instances". No window manager needed, I just need to run ONE app in the background. But something that would completely break with a forced 10 upgrade.

      It's what Apple has more or less done with OS X/iOS. It's all the *BSD/NeXT stuff they've had for a while with a new 'window manager' on top of it while the Core OS was separate. It's why OS X Server wasn't that difficult to make and is now just a $20 App on the Appstore

    2. Re:multiple levels of stupid by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The first and most significant layer of stupid is the user who keeps subjecting themselves to this year in and year out when they know perfectly well what they need to do to end the pain.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:multiple levels of stupid by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Windows is mainly still alive because of the network effect, that's why they can release every crap without fearing to lose market share.

      They are losing market share.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  13. Disable updates by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone who doesn't want Windows 10 could simply disable the "Windows Update" service, and simply wait for the Windows 10 free update period to expire. This tactic is well known for anyone who was bothered by the dialog boxes asking you to restart your computer every 10 minutes, or for power users that don't want 30+ documents to close overnight.

    Meanwhile, still waiting for the Windows 10 update to appear on Windows Vista.

    1. Re:Disable updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. I have a real hard time seeing how MS is going to pivot from "ALL MUST RECEIVE WINDOWS 10 RIGHT NOW" to "NONE MAY HAVE WINDOWS 10 NOW WITHOUT EGREGIOUS PAYMENT" on a particular date in July.

    2. Re:Disable updates by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      oh yeah...right, i am sure everybody just loves reading tech rags for the news on what microsoft is doing, these people are in the jungle and savannas of africa they got more important things to worry about than what microsoft's scheming and maneuvering is doing to their customers, (not until it breaks their computers) i am sure they are considering alternative operating systems like Linux, i know i would if i was in their shoes, and maybe getting rid of computers all together and getting a few portable 100 watt HF transceivers

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  14. Windowscide by castus · · Score: 1

    Next headline:
    "Man goes on windows 10 update-induced killing spree. Microsoft literally has blood on their hands this time"

  15. The big reveal by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

    "...rangers under fire from armed militarized poachers, blood could literally be on Microsoft's hands,"

    Guns don't kill people, Microsoft kills people.

  16. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by chipschap · · Score: 1

    I think these stories need to be kept in the public's eye. But the only thing that could possibly change is people's behavior, and that's not so likely, no matter how outrageous the provocations become.

    What is absolutely not going to happen is Microsoft bettering their behavior. They don't care, they don't have to care, and they're not going to care. Ever.

  17. General, General! We need air support asap! by P00rSpy · · Score: 1

    General, General! We need air support asap! Sorry lieutenant we are in the middle of a critical update here... So make sure you own that computer before betting your life on it... Not saying that MS is right, they aren't but at the same time this look similar as when a GPS tell you to drive outside of the road...

    1. Re:General, General! We need air support asap! by pakar · · Score: 1

      Sorry buy all user input was disabled at the time of the GPS taking control.. Did you not read and understand the 200 page EULA?

    2. Re:General, General! We need air support asap! by pakar · · Score: 1

      cannot spell today :P

  18. To play the devil's advocate... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Microsoft never expected that this version of windows would be used for anything of any importance.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      It is not a real operating system. FTFY

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  19. Issue? What issue? by swm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft is yet to address the issue

    There is no issue.
    There is nothing to address.
    Windows 10 upgrade is doing what Microsoft wants it to do: maximizing the number of machines running Windows 10.

    Think about it this way.
    If you pay a vendor for something, then--at some level--that vendor will serve you.
    If you do not pay a vendor for their product, then that vendor does not serve you. They may serve some other revenue stream, like advertising, or some kind of big-data analytics that they hope to sell, but they definitely do not serve you. If you are not paying for the product, then you are collateral damage, or prey, or fodder: something to be harvested and packaged for resale.

    Somewhere in Microsoft is a VP who is in charge of the Windows 10 upgrade.
    This VP has been told that his bonus, or stock options, or possibly his job is dependent on getting X million Windows 10 installs, or X million installs per month, or something. He doesn't care how many people are inconvenienced, or lose data, or have their machines bricked. He doesn't care how much bad PR Microsoft gets, or how much bad trade press, or how many outraged Slashdot comments there are. All he cares about is making his number. And this is going to continue until the CEO goes to this VP and changes his performance objectives.

    Deal with it.

    (Linux works for me. YMMV.)

    1. Re:Issue? What issue? by akozakie · · Score: 2

      I don't know about you, but I have paid for the system I use. It's a paid copy of Windows. If they think it was too cheap to not force a new ad platform (which 10 basically is) on me - they should have priced it higher, too late to change your mind now.

      Right now, from my point of view, MS is just not fulfilling their part of the contract. I was promised a feed of security updates. A feed I now cannot use, because it is used to push telemetry and the upgrade with an unacceptable EULA.

      I only bought this system as a gaming platform. It did the job. For other uses I was happy with Linux and can easily switch back. There will be no upgrade. Or another purchase. Sorry, you've just lost a client.

      Too bad Linux is going through an equally braindead period with systemd taking the role of gwx. Still, there is slack, I've used it for several years, time to get back to it after the bad experiences with ubuntu and others...

    2. Re:Issue? What issue? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Too bad Linux is going through an equally braindead period with systemd taking the role of gwx. Still, there is slack, I've used it for several years, time to get back to it after the bad experiences with ubuntu and others.

      Ok please explain to a person who has used Linux with "systemd" since inception what is really wrong with it. Just because you don't like something new or because it uses a database (have you heard of or used AIX?) does not cut it.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  20. "and Microsoft is yet to address the issue" by Munchr · · Score: 1

    Sure they have - they've stepped up the forced upgrade program, regardless of the bad press. It's almost like there's a gun to an executive's head, pressuring for upgrades to 10 at all costs.

  21. MSFT by tuxgeek · · Score: 2

    Not meaning to troll,
    but articles like this always leave me with a smile, not out of malice, but out of relief .. that I got away from M$ products SO many years ago.
    Not even a twitch, only condolences to the poor bastards having their lives literally ruined by M$ Abortionware and the reasoning of the assholes at the M$ helm. From TFA, et al.

    For the record:
    % uname -a
    FreeBSD Krypton42 10.2-RELEASE-p14 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p14 #0: Wed Mar 16 20:46:12 UTC 2016 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    1. Re:MSFT by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Not meaning to troll, but articles like this always leave me with a smile, not out of malice, but out of relief .. that I got away from M$ products SO many years ago. Not even a twitch, only condolences to the poor bastards having their lives literally ruined by M$ Abortionware and the reasoning of the assholes at the M$ helm. From TFA, et al.

      For the record:
      % uname -a
      FreeBSD Krypton42 10.2-RELEASE-p14 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p14 #0: Wed Mar 16 20:46:12 UTC 2016 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64

      Just for the record:

      > uname -srvm
      Linux 4.5.5-201.fc23.x86_64 #1 SMP Sat May 21 15:29:49 UTC 2016 x86_64

      Works for me. :-)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    2. Re:MSFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For the record:
      > uname -srvm
      'uname' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
      operable program or batch file.

  22. You are an idiot by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

    If a forced upgrade happened and crashed our PCs while in the middle of coordinating rangers under fire from armed militarized poachers, blood could literally be on Microsoft's hands," said one member of the team.

    No, you are responsible for all blood because you picked the wrong platform, wrong OS for operation of a system on which human life depends on. YOU and nobody else are responsible to design a system resistant to outages to ensure safe operation of your staff. Microsfot shares absolutely no responsability in that. You are an idiot.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
    1. Re:You are an idiot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Well done! You have managed to use your computer knowledge to make yourself feel to superior to people putting their lives on the line to prevent the extinction of species due to poaching. Well done!

      Back in the real world, not everyone has the resources to hire an obnoxious computer nerd to tell them they're idiots^W^W^W^Wset up systems for them.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:You are an idiot by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      It is if Ford suddenly decides to update the computer controlling the engine, shutting it down in the middle of your attempted escape.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  23. I had a dream last night by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    The dream was that there was a class action suit filed against Microsoft for the class that owned one or more computers that MS said qualified to be upgraded to Windows 10. The suit asked for $1,000 for each computer that the Windows 10 update nagging software appeared. The total cost to MS would be in the neighborhood of at least $100 billion if not more. In addition, MS would be required to send out techs to fix all computers damaged by the update, retrieve lost data or replace it if possible and/or replace broken computers with one of equivalent quality. All this fixing would probably cost more than the original $100 billion. MS countered by positing this would bankrupt the company. The supreme court said, "So what? Do it anyway." Too bad this was just a dream.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  24. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Personally I come to slashdot for my daily dose of completely warranted Microsoft bashing.

  25. Apt Comparison by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

    ...(T)heir computer works for them just like their car works for them. Yes, they need to learn to drive, but they don't need to learn how to fix the engine.

    Just so. Except when cars were new inventions, drivers *did* have to know how to do basic non-driving things like fixing flats, repairing failed parts and, indeed, fixing the engine. When photography was invented, camera-bugs had to know about chemistry and optics, exposure and light values, etc. And when computing was new, people had to know how to troubleshoot them and work on the commandline.

    As e e cummings said, "progress is a comfortable disease."

  26. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm guessing this concept is way too difficult for people like you, but you don't HAVE to read these stories and you don't HAVE to comment on them

    But if you don't, the story will install itself permanently.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  27. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Hylandr · · Score: 2

    Where the hell is the class action lawsuit or anti-trust suit?

    These incidents need to be kept in mind until legal action is spawned.

    Where are all the hero Lawyers??

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  28. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, we get it: Windows 10 updates are annoying and pushy, most users are too stupid to avoid them, and Microsoft doesn't give a crap how the users feel. Now can we PLEASE stop seeing the same goddamned story posted every goddamned day?

    You're looking at it all wrong. The way Slashdot is battering us daily with "Windows 10 Upgrade Horror Stories" is exactly like the way the Get Windows 10 nagware update screens batter the Windows 7 owners. This is just a sympathy posting.

    As a matter of fact, there's been so much battering of Windows 7 users that they've opened a shelter for them over on Second Street. When you walk in the door a counselor meets you to help you get over the abuse. But it turns out it's the Shuttleworth Shelter, and the counselors install Ubuntu and systemd on the poor peoples' machines! Oh, the irony!!

    --
    John
  29. Re:Windows 10 = Malware by jabberw0k · · Score: 2

    Wrong plural. "Malware" like software, hardware, firmware, and information, is a mass noun. You do not have "two informations" nor do you have "two malwares" or "two softwares" or "two firmwares" -- you have two pieces of information, two pieces of malware, two pieces of software, and two pieces of firmware.

  30. I'm pretty sure that *NO* version of windows... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    .... is warranted or even recommended for use in fields where lives *literally* depend on the software operating correctly.

    1. Re:I'm pretty sure that *NO* version of windows... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Lives don't literally depend on the OS in this case. Their PC is a management tool / information. MS's license prohibits it's use where the failure could directly and causally result in death. If a filed PC could cause your fighters under fire to get killed you have a really poor backup strategy.

    2. Re:I'm pretty sure that *NO* version of windows... by Noble713 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Spend some more time around military command & control facilities. While the servers are usually Unix (Solaris), the client workstations are all Windows boxes. In my experience, they are USUALLY pretty stable. Some of the client software (C2PC) can be wonky, and since we use that to display our Common Tactical Picture, when it goes down yes lives are at stake.

      Just this week I watched, 2 days in a row, as a briefer's laptop did a forced reboot countdown during his powerpoint presentation. "Um, ok....I guess I've got 15 minutes to get through this before my laptop restarts". This was during a planning conference for one of the largest Joint Exercises we do every year. And we're not even running Windows 10. I dread the day the Marine Corps is forced off of Windows 7.

      I run Ubuntu at home (Lubuntu on my formerly-Win7 gaming rig and Backbox on my laptop), with FreeBSD on an old netbook so I can learn my way around it.

    3. Re:I'm pretty sure that *NO* version of windows... by donaldm · · Score: 1

      I dread the day the Marine Corps is forced off of Windows 7.

      Well, how does January 14, 2020 if the Marine Corps have extended support. If they don't have extended support, too bad. Check here for more information.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  31. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    I do agree with your point about skipping stories you aren't interested in. I also agree that Slashdot *should* heavily cover this story so other companies don't get the idea they should follow MS's example.

    That said, Slashdot is most certainly *not* free. It is ad-supported. For that reason he does actually have a right to bitch.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  32. Independence Day by jetkust · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 update is how they defeat the aliens in the new Independence Day.

  33. Re:AFRICANS ruin your day in Africa... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    Or bicycles?

    You should stop reading faux news - the Ghanaians are producing their own cars http://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/29/africa/ghana-katanka-cars-feat/index.html - and even bicycles made from bamboo http://www.un.org/climatechange/blog/2014/08/bamboo-bikes-initiative-ghana/

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  34. Day already ruined by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

    Their day was already ruined when they chose to operate a military-style operation at the hands of an OS primarily designed for video games and Facebook.

    If they "didn't know better" then they were ill-prepared.

    Sadly, yes, the U.S. Military had a fair amount of windows in their operations, but they can afford the Microsoft tax to get customizations that others can't.

  35. Re:User error by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    Its not about stupid. How many people even now something like this could happen, I know it could happen, but I'm talking the average intelligent person, and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot less than half of those have ever heard something like this could happen.

  36. Corrected headline by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Even In Remotest Africa, Windows Ruins Your Day

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  37. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Should have gone to the Elon Musk Shelter instead. There's so much with all the battery that's happening he wouldn't even need to build that factory anymore.

  38. Re:not really... by Nethead · · Score: 1

    It sure does take place on Windows Professional 64 bit if not connected to a domain controller that is pushing out the right settings. Due to a refresh at dayjob I have a pile of HP desktops and laptops that once dis-joined from the domain will happily GWX if left to their own devices. Even with a fresh Windows 7 Pro install they will do that. So for the hand-me-down computers that we're giving to employees I need to install GWX control panel in the clonezilla image that I'm using.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  39. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    The way Slashdot is battering us daily with "Windows 10 Upgrade Horror Stories" is exactly like the way the Get Windows 10 nagware update screens batter the Windows 7 owners.

    Speak for yourself. I like these regular updates on the slow motion train wreck that is Windows.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  40. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can you please move back to San Francisco and stop shitting up PCs with your hipster bullshit?

  41. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by geoskd · · Score: 1

    Is it stupid to assume that an operating system that has been designed for end users will not go out of its way to harm those users?

    Windows 10 wasn't designed for end users. It was designed to meet Microsofts needs and business plan. Any semblance it has to be a product *for* users is purely accidental.

    --
    I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
  42. I think MS is simply incompetent. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    I think even if Microsoft did not want such a thing to happen, it can not stop such things. It is incompetent to that level. But, as they say sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  43. This is NOT the issue by axewolf · · Score: 2

    Microsoft is fucking evil.

    This tearjerking little story is actually in Microsoft's interest.

    The message here is that Microsoft can do whatever they want and we are all helpless.

    This is the pattern of narrative we are subjected to again and again and again. "We are helpless".

    We are NOT. Militarize. Get angry. Let the rage fly. If enough people do this simultaneously there cannot be consequences from any authority because they need us all to work. Once the "powers the be" start listening we can demand referendums and codify economic justice.

    1. Re:This is NOT the issue by donaldm · · Score: 1

      The message here is that Microsoft can do whatever they want and we are all helpless

      We?? Who's this we, I have been using Linux on my own PC's for over eight years, I have not missed Microsoft's operating system offerings at all.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  44. Re:ENOUGH ALREADY! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    I think these stories need to be kept in the public's eye. But the only thing that could possibly change is people's behavior, and that's not so likely, no matter how outrageous the provocations become.

    Is that why the stories about the murder-suicide over apparent stolen code has already dropped off everyone's radar in the media because one person wasn't the "right kind of person" to paint the narrative with?

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  45. Re:Update? What update? by donaldm · · Score: 1

    I have a Lenovo laptop with Windows 7 Professional on it. Sometime in the last nine months, Windows has forgotten how to talk with much of the hardware in the laptop. This includes the finger reader and all networking devices. I called both Microsoft and Lenovo, and both refused to help.

    Do you have "extended support" for your Windows 7? You probably don't hence the reason why Lenovo and Microsoft refused to help. Check here to get more information.

    Like it or not if you want support for Microsoft Windows you either get extended support or move to Windows 10. If you do want Windows 10 then get the ISO from here rather than upgrade although make sure you do backup your important data. It is very easy to install although before you do I do suggest looking at the following video . The presenter was a Microsoft employee for 15 years and is not against Windows 10 but what he does not like is how Microsoft Windows 10 phones home by default, he then goes on and explains how to tighten your privacy.

    If you have a powerful PC you can easily install Windows 10 in a virtual machine and the ISO is great for doing this. I actually have Fedora 23 on my Desktop (latest Skylake core i7 with 16GB DDR4 memory) and used my six and a half-year-old laptop's (has Fedora 23 on it) Windows 7 product key. I also used KVM as my virtual machine which surprisingly is actually certified to install Microsoft Windows. You can use VirtualBox if you wish but I am not overly impressed with Oracle at the moment.

    If you have watched the video and you can even search for "windows 10 privacy concerns" in your preferred search engine (Google gets 1.8 million hits) you will know that Windows 10 phones home by default. You can turn off many of the so-called privacy features but you will either have to fiddle with the registry (Oh joy!) or get some third party (if you trust them) software to lock down Win10 but it has been known for a Microsoft update to turn some features back on again (for our own good of course :-)) so you need to be vigilant.

    Basically, if you don't like Windows 10 then you better get to like it because soon it will be the only game in town (Windows 8.1 mainstream support expires 8th Jan 2018) or switch to an alternative OS such as one of the many Linux distributions, BSD or even a Mac if you have the money. If you have a work PC then the problem is not your problem.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  46. Microsoft will wins again... by uolamer · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has done many things that were monopolistic, illegal, patent infringing, etc. They get sued, eventually they loose typically but by the time they have to stop and/or pay up it is 5 to 15 years down the road and the path they took let them take an entire market, eliminate a competitor etc. DR-DOS, RealPlayer, Internet Explorer and many other examples that anyone can google. Even if the EU, US or whatever comes down on them they will profit from this and hold or increase their market share... At least that is what has always happened.

    --
    s/©//g
  47. Re:Blaming the equipment... by pakar · · Score: 1

    Crap.. first laptop stopped working because of some automatic upgrade crap... Bring out our spare!... Oh crap it also started doing the automated install!

  48. Mine didn't by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    There's something amiss here. I had four computers, win 7/8, with the little icon ready to upgrade. I said no. The icon sat there for eight months. It never tried to do anything on its own.

    But I use these machines for business. That means I've spent more than a few minutes properly configuring them to act like business machines -- in a reliable, determined-by-me kind of way. They take orders from me, and they do as I instruct.

    Of course I turned off automatic updates. Of course when I don't want them to download on their own, I disable the internet access. and, of course, they were the pro OS versions.

    There are so many ways to configure windows to ensure that it only ever does exactly what you ask. Hey, they had a year of warning for this. They could have simply blocked the update at the windows firewall level. Or at the windows check-for-internet-access level. Or, and here's a thought, at the radio link level!

    What idiot set up a radio link internet connection in the middle of the jungle, and didn't restrict access like any business network manager? Next up, researcher in the middle of the jungle watches porn, suddenly surrounded my monkeys.

    Here's what actually happened (my guess). Someone tried to save time, money, effort, and knowledge. They got a free computer that someone said they could borrow. They got a random radio connection that someone said they could piggy back. They configured nothing. They checked nothing. And, having spent zero dollars on a primary tool, it failed them.

    Well, you know what, the twenty year-old swiss army knife that I stole from my sister when we were ten, didn't fit the number two robbertson screw that I was using to build my $15'000 deck in the back yard this weekend. What a piece of crap.

    1. Re:Mine didn't by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      How effective would you be while under attack by poachers while holding a slightly damaged AK-47? If the answer is not "reasonably", I suggest you be a little more understanding when people who do get in those positions lack some knowledge you have.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:Mine didn't by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      I'm confused by your comment. Why would I be relying on a slightly damaged AK-47? Wouldn't I have had it properly repaired/configured/setup in-advance of my trip? Wouldn't I have my contracted rifleman check it daily? Wouldn't I bring a proper weapon to a proper scenario?

      Would you just borrow a friend's gun to protect you on such a trip? Seems like a very dumb thing to do.

    3. Re:Mine didn't by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Nothing's invulnerable. If I need a rifle, I want it to be in top condition, but I have to consider that things do happen, and if I'm relying on a rifle I have to know what to do if something happens to it. Alternatively, consider it to be a perfectly good AK-47, and my point stands.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Mine didn't by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      Your point doesn't stand. If you're carrying a rifle, and you're a rifleman, then it doesn't matter if the rifle can break, because you can deal with it. If you know what you're doing with windows as a business tool, then windows doesn't upgrade itself in the middle of the jungle.

  49. Re:not really... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    What to install then? 2008 R2? That's what it takes for an uncrippled version. It's also twice the cost of the hardware needed to run it. (or more)