Slashdot Mirror


A Tour of Campus 2, Apple's Upcoming Headquarters (popsci.com)

Dave Knott writes from a report via Popular Science: Popular Science has an article detailing Campus 2, Apple's upcoming headquarters, including a video with a tour of the complex which is still under construction. The Spaceship, as many have nicknamed it, is over one mile in circumference and when it is completed later this year it will house 13,000 employees. Its exterior will largely be composed of thousands of huge curved glass planes; the floors and ceilings will be constructed from hollow concrete slabs that allow the building to "breathe," bolstering its eco-friendly qualities. Campus 2 will run entirely on renewable energy, with rooftop solar panels providing an output of 16 megawatts of power and acting as the campus's primary energy supplier. Upon completion, the main building will have four stories above ground and three below, with numerous other facilities including seven cafes, a fitness center and a 120,000 square-foot theater where Apple will hold its famous product announcements. Construction on the building is expected to be finished by the end of 2016. Interesting facts: Apple used 4,300 concrete slabs, weighing a total of 212 tons, to create the structure. The Spaceship also features 330-ton, 92-foot-tall steel reinforced doors for its restaurant -- the dining-hall doors alone span 60,000 square feet and collectively weigh 330 tons. The campus boasts 900 panels of vertical glass, 1,600 panes of canopy glass, 510 panes of clerestory glass, and 126 panes for skylight glass (3,000 total). The total cost of the project is approximately $5 billion.

14 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. 330-ton restaurant doors? by Entrope · · Score: 2

    I don't always build environmentally friendly campuses, but when I do, the restaurant doors are 92 feet talk and weigh 330 tons. Because energy efficiency when opening them.

    1. Re:330-ton restaurant doors? by thesupraman · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, they are needed to stop the whole building floating away, since all its concrete slabs only weight 212 tons in total ;)
      This is really a new low in the example of 'believe anything because... APPLE!', really, this summary is glaringly ridiculous.

    2. Re:330-ton restaurant doors? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      And on the 92 foot doors these words appear:
      'My name is Applemandius, king of kings:
      Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!'

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:330-ton restaurant doors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even more impressive is that, at 92' tall, they are several stories taller than the building itself!

      How can a magazine with the word 'Science' in its name be able to produce such nonsense?

      Presumably the doors are 92' wide, and only as tall as the building (52').

      dom

  2. Anecdotal evidence by OpenSourced · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's said that, usually, when a company builds some "flagship headquarters", that marks the apex of said company, and it's all downhill from then on. We'll see.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:Anecdotal evidence by NotInHere · · Score: 2

      Elon Musk is a bit critical about silicon valley, saying that there is too much talent bound by internet startups.

      I think he is right. We do need people to innovate in many other areas as well, and apply the same kind of "disruption" in non-software markets. Tesla is really disrupting the car industry, and there are many more industries.

      I think one sector which still can see lots of growth and innovation is the medicine sector. We haven't understood so many processes in the body, and health issues impact the lives of many people sometimes very severely.

      Also, I think politics needs disruption as well. Think of climate change for example, the threat of islamism and other despotist ideologies, or of instable states around the globe. All these problems are really complex and solving them requires really good skills.

      Working for startups that disrupt how one tags images or something is really waste of talent IMO. Also, there is lots of potential $$$ to be made on this.

    2. Re:Anecdotal evidence by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      Apple, going out of business since the 90s.

      http://www.macobserver.com/tmo...

  3. Re:Missing some zeroes? by msauve · · Score: 2

    It's a very poor summary. There's this:" Apple used 4,300 concrete slabs, weighing a total of 212 tons, to create the structure. The Spaceship also features 330-ton, 92-foot-tall steel reinforced doors for its restaurant -- the dining-hall doors alone span 60,000 square feet and collectively weigh 330 tons."

    Work the math, and those concrete slabs weigh about 100 lbs. each. I don't think so. And is that "doors" or a single "collective" door?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  4. They didn't answer the most important question... by codeButcher · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it have rounded corners? And are they patented?

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  5. Re:Is this... by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2

    He's not irrational. There's something really wrong with OSX. With each new release, what I see everywhere is complaints of how buggy it is. Also, their hardware is crippled, due to a stupid obsession with slimness that makes them put laptop parts in desktop machines.

    And his is based on your years of using OS X? ... or is it based on anecdotal evidence gathered form Slashdot summaries and your general dislike of Apple? I've been using OS X since 10.2 and I can't say I've noticed it being any more buggy than the Fedora Linuxs + Gonme 3 setup I use at work these days. I know this runs contrary to the preconceptions of a good number of the people that frequent this site and are experts on OS X despite never having used it, but I have karma to burn so I'll voice my experience regardless.

  6. Re:Missing some zeroes? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    The prose in the article was written by someone innumerate, but the bullet points call out reasonable numbers. The biggest concrete slabs weigh 60,000 lbs. and the heaviest panes weigh 7,000 lbs.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  7. Re:I would debate '16 mw of power from solar' by fnj · · Score: 2

    Yeah, 16 milliwatts sounds a mite wimpy.

  8. Re:Just like life one big circle by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 2

    Should be like an iPad.

    If they break any of that glass they should have to buy a new building.

  9. Re:Waste of the shareholders money. by GlenRaphael · · Score: 2

    if Apple needs to sell, the only kinds of companies who could afford to buy this thing would rather build one, so that leaves oil sheiks and China.

    It'll be nice office space. If and when Apple shrinks enough that they don't need it anymore, it could easily be subdivided into wedges that are rented out to whatever other firms are growing at the time. No need to allocate the entire thing at once. What you're saying is like complaining that few people can afford to buy the entire Empire State Building so it's a bad idea to build it.

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!