Slashdot Mirror


Apple Unlikely to Make Big Changes for Next iPhone

The next iPhone isn't going to look much different from the last year's iPhone 6s, or 2014's iPhone 6. According to a WSJ report (paywalled; alternate source), Apple will release two new iPhone models with screen sizes 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch, and both the models will look pretty much similar to the last two year's models. There won't be any 3.5mm headphone port in the new iPhone, though, the report adds. The Cupertino-based company plans to introduce major design changes in its next iPhone, using OLED display and eliminating the home button to use the display for fingerprint scanning. From the report: For years, Apple Chief Design Officer Jony Ive has expressed a desire for the iPhone to appear like a single sheet of glass, according to people familiar with the matter. The current design ideas for the 2017 iPhones are expected to push the handsets in that direction by eliminating much of the bezel around the display, with the OLED screen.

227 comments

  1. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's the same phone, but faster. And it won't work with almost all of my headphones. Then why would I buy it?

    1. Re:why? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Because it has less of the stuff that helps stop your phone from getting broken (bezel) and a higher percentage of the stuff that's easy to break (the glass), of course!

      Probably a wise business decision, mind you - style trumps functionality on the market every time. As for me, I'm just hoping I don't need to switch phones before a Tango device comes out...

      --
      Monkeywrench Ex Machina.
    2. Re:why? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Presumably you wouldn't, especially if you already have an iPhone 6 or 6S. I can understand that for those people who are on contract and can get a new phone for "free" they have no reason not to get a newer model, but for anyone who outright buys their device, either of those phones are going to be more than fast enough and are still receiving software support.

      We've come to the point where additional hardware improvements don't result in a better experience (e.g., faster browsing) and so there's no reason for most users to upgrade more than every four years at this point. When that becomes the reality of the market it doesn't make sense for Apple to design around most consumers upgrading every two years and it's more cost effective to keep the same design for another year or two before launching a new model.

    3. Re:why? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It's the same phone, but faster. And it won't work with almost all of my headphones. Then why would I buy it?

      Same with me, I like my jack....

      And if they require you to use a fingerprint to open the phone, etc....then I"ll likely bail on the iPhone myself.

      I don't use it now, and don't WANT my fingerprint to be what opens the phone. I'd rather use a nice, long passcode.

      They might can force my finger to touch the phone, but they can't very readily force me to punch my code in for them....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:why? by Northdot · · Score: 1

      Without the jack, it might be waterproof?

      It's the only possible trade-off I can think of that makes losing the headphone jack a reasonable compromise. Because who cares if you can shave a millimeter off of the overall thickness...80 percent of smart phones ride around in fat cases to protect the ultra-fragile tech as it is.

    5. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it is shinier and it renews your participation on church of Apple. Just obey your master and give up your money.

    6. Re:why? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      And if they require you to use a fingerprint to open the phone

      Highly doubtful. iOS already gives you several options to unlock your phone now, fingerprint will just get tossed in the mix.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    7. Re:why? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Umm. There are two methods: passcode and fingerprint.

    8. Re:why? by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because it has less of the stuff that helps stop your phone from getting broken (bezel) and a higher percentage of the stuff that's easy to break (the glass), of course!

      Yeah, I can't imagine why Apple would even consider going back to those glass backs. I was planning to upgrade my original iPhone as soon as they got a front-facing camera, but I ended up skipping the iPhone 4 and 4s precisely because the last thing I want is a fragile decorative element that does nothing but add risk.

      Ironically, when I got the iPhone 5, I found it so thin that I kept dropping it, so I immediately put it in a case. I honestly don't understand why Apple even cares about the case design of phones anymore. The darn things are so hard to hold that nobody I know actually carries one without a case that completely hides Apple's industrial design anyway.

      I don't know what's more horrifying—the idea of extra glass or the idea that the author of this story thinks that removing the iPhone's only analog I/O and forcing everybody to either use horrible, high-latency bluetooth or fragile, Apple-proprietary adapter cables doesn't constitute a big change.... It will be enough to make me skip two generations again.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:why? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      If they're not capable of waterproofing a simple headphone jack, then maybe their industrial designers aren't as good as they think they are.... This isn't rocket science.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:why? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      If they're not capable of waterproofing a simple headphone jack, then maybe their industrial designers aren't as good as they think they are.... This isn't rocket science.

      No, it isn't rocket science; but it DOES make the 3.5mm jack nearly as fat (5-6 mm) (or maybe even fatter) as a USB connector, which of course won't do in ANY phone.

    11. Re:why? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the passcode option has sub-options and there's always the choice to have no passcode. /pedant

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    12. Re:why? by namgge · · Score: 1

      You are on the nail. I see the beautiful iPhone design twice: for 20 seconds when its new before I put it in an Otterbox, and for another 20 seconds a couple of years later when I take it out and hand it over to be recycled.

    13. Re:why? by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

      It also has the antenna band removed from the back for aesthetic reasons (despite the fact you'd probably throw a case on it), meaning a weaker signal. These are, apparently, the "things we can't live without" (http://www.cnet.com/uk/videos/tim-cook-says-the-iphone-7-will-give-us-things-we-cant-live-without/)

    14. Re:why? by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

      To each, his own. I'm still using the iPhone5. I love the size. It feels like nothing in my pocket and I have only dropped it once. It's also so touch, I don't need a case. So far it is the best one yet.

      I'm a long, long tie Apple user (Apple II, anyone?) and I absolutely, positively will NOT buy any phone sans 3.5mm headphone port. The desire for more memory to hold more music is the only reason I have even considered upgrading my iPhone 5.

      There must be several megatons of Beats headphones (among others) out there that are going to be made ewaste with this brain dead idea. And no, I do not want to have to use an adapter, even if it comes free with purchase.

    15. Re:why? by Billlagr · · Score: 1

      I have a Sony Xperia Z3, and it has a water resistant rating (that I can't remember offhand) with an open jack - no flappy door on it. The USB port does have a little flappy door, but there's also an external magnetic charging connector on the side - so the only time it gets opened is the rare occasion I HAVE to connect it via USB, or if I borrow a charger from someone

    16. Re:why? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't rocket science; but it DOES make the 3.5mm jack nearly as fat (5-6 mm) (or maybe even fatter) as a USB connector [technik.com.hk], which of course won't do in ANY phone.

      No, it doesn't. That jack is built the way that it is because it is designed to be a complete waterproof package in a device whose case can't be designed to provide any additional waterproofing. You could waterproof Apple's existing headphone jack by putting a rectangular gasket on the underside of the top face of the phone and putting a box sticking out of the back face, so that the back plate of the phone forms a complete box around the jack except on top, and the rubber gasket forms the top. A flat (FFC) ribbon cable would then be pressed slightly into the rubber gasket to ensure a solid seal. That ribbon cable would, in turn, be connected to the main board. Such a design would add zero thickness to the device, and would only take up about a millimeter or two of additional space in the horizontal and vertical directions to accommodate the walls.

      Of course, that might require moving some other components around or something, so it might not be quite that trivial, but waterproofing a headphone jack sure as heck doesn't require you to use a giant behemoth of a jack like the ones you linked to there.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re: why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone SE is for you. A iPhone 5 with the innards of a 6.

    18. Re: why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the only value add between 5s and SE is tokenized NFC payments (Apple Pay).

      The rest is meh:

      Same touchID sensor
      Faster SoC (same as 6)
      Live Photos (yawn)
      Same size case
      It can't bend in your pocket
      Serious snooze fest and lack of creativity.

  2. Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't a surprise. The next Intel chip won't be much different than the last one either. The next computer you own will be very similar to the one you owned 5 years prior. We have really reached an end of the digital road now. You won't likely see huge progress like we have seen in the past due to limitations of physics and power concerns. I know people will scream "Moores Law!!!" but that doesn't apply in 2016. It looks like the Star Trek type future won't be happening.

    1. Re:Not a surprise by macs4all · · Score: 2

      This isn't a surprise. The next Intel chip won't be much different than the last one either. The next computer you own will be very similar to the one you owned 5 years prior. We have really reached an end of the digital road now. You won't likely see huge progress like we have seen in the past due to limitations of physics and power concerns. I know people will scream "Moores Law!!!" but that doesn't apply in 2016. It looks like the Star Trek type future won't be happening.

      Exactly correct.

      Unless there is some newly-discovered law of Physics, Moore's Law is proving to be a "For limited values of..." doctrine.

      I wouldn't say that the Star Trek future won't EVER be happening; but it doesn't look good for the next 20 years or so...

    2. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple need Samsung and LG to create new components before "design" corporations can use said parts in the next iteration of products. Apple do not invent, they use off the shelve components made by the Japanese and Korean R&D electronic companies you xenophobic types love to hate.

    3. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Samsung and LG and Koreans and Japanese and Americans all are bound by the laws of physics. Not sure what your rant is about.

    4. Re:Not a surprise by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Especially since right now fans can't even make a Star Trek movie without being sued. That's the complete opposite of the no-cash society depicted in those movies.

    5. Re:Not a surprise by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Personally, I think there are a lot of things they could do with the iPhone to make it better, but I think it would hurt their bottom line so they don't do it. The iPhone is $700. Why not ship the base unit with 256 GB of storage. They could do it and still remain profitable. Then they would only have 1 option for storage space, and they could differentiate models on things like battery life. Have a thick version with a headphone jack and an extra large batter, and smaller, thinner version with a smaller battery and no headphone jack (since they insist this is what people want).

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you are saying that 256GB should be enough for everyone?

    7. Re:Not a surprise by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> the Star Trek future won't EVER be happening

      In terms of ship-board computing, personal communication and handheld devices, I think we're already at or past Star Trek standards. If we could just wear pajamas at all times I'd be 100% happy.

    8. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Captain: "Siri, how many times have the Romulans violated the neutral zone?"
      Siri: "The Romans were from Italy and had big noses. Here are some results I found for 'Romans" on the web"

    9. Re:Not a surprise by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If we could just wear pajamas at all times I'd be 100% happy.

      Haven't been to Walmart lately, have you?

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    10. Re:Not a surprise by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Which Star Trek? My smartphone can do a lot of the stuff that the Enterprise computer was shown doing.

    11. Re:Not a surprise by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      This isn't a surprise. The next Intel chip won't be much different than the last one either. The next computer you own will be very similar to the one you owned 5 years prior. We have really reached an end of the digital road now. You won't likely see huge progress like we have seen in the past due to limitations of physics and power concerns. I know people will scream "Moores Law!!!" but that doesn't apply in 2016. It looks like the Star Trek type future won't be happening.

      Nope. The Intel chips keep getting faster. They keep on with the incremental improvement that renders big changes over a few years (the replacement lifetime of a computer). What's changed is that we passed the point where most people's compute tasks are slow enough to present an uncomfortable latency to interactive users. That was fine 5 years ago. My IvyBridge gaming machine with a 680 still works fine. That's 5 years old. But a SkyLake machine with a 980 would be a big step up in performance, although excel would not feel any different.

      My simulations would be faster though. I was running week long sims on Broadwell machines recently. Dropping it to a day would improve the quality of my life. In effect the sims I can run are bounded by the compute power available to me.
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    12. Re:Not a surprise by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think Siri has quite a few accounts here.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Not a surprise by tomhath · · Score: 1

      You won't likely see huge progress like we have seen in the past due to limitations of physics and power concerns.

      That isn't stopping innovation. The problem Apple has is that Steve Jobs is dead. He was Apple innovation, without him all there will be is incremental changes.

    14. Re:Not a surprise by dixonpete · · Score: 2

      Intel's 3D Xpoint and Samsung's 3D NAND should be hitting the market by the end of the year so next year's phones could have a very significant bump.

    15. Re:Not a surprise by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I'm sure some people would be able to fill it up. But it's twice as big as the largest option on current generation iPhones, and larger than I've seen on any other phone out there, although there may be some that support more if you put in a very large SD card. I'm not saying 256 GB will be all anybody every needs, but we all know Apple will never support SD cards, so just giving everybody 256 GB of storage would be a big plus. I think a lot of people would go for something like that. But they wouldn't be able to sell extra iCloud storage, and they wouldn't be able to charge $200 more for $20 worth of built-in storage.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    16. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet 1 strip of gold press latinium you are wrong.

    17. Re:Not a surprise by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      This isn't a surprise. The next Intel chip won't be much different than the last one either.

      Right, it's not a surprise that Apple ran out of ideas, but it's still just an excuse to say "intel did too". The real issue is, the Tim Cook culture does not value ideas, it values milking the cow.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    18. Re:Not a surprise by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry

      Mr. Hognoxious

      I couldn't find anything for

      I think Siri has quiet snooze amounts here

    19. Re:Not a surprise by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Modifying the form factor means you fracture the accessories market. It took them ages to release a big phone alongside a not-so-big phone partly because of this.

    20. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      OK. Name one.

    21. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      They get incrementally faster, for small amounts of increment. But Intel chips haven't been getting much faster lately. You won't see much change between your computer you buy now, and what you buy in 5 years. We are reaching an end.

    22. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Even Steve Jobs was limited by physics and power concerns.

    23. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Bump in what? More memory? Doubtful. Even if that were so, that isn't much of a change.

    24. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They keep on with the incremental improvement that renders big changes over a few years (the replacement lifetime of a computer)."

      From my last computer to my current computer there was a 5 year wait between. I thought I'd see a big speed bump with the upgrade because games were getting slow. Turns out that I could have saved myself a fair bit of cash by just buying a new graphics card. The CPU was maybe 20% faster at best. If you call 20% in 5 years a big change, you and I have different definitions of big changes. My income has grown faster than that, and I wouldn't say it's growing quickly.

    25. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      It isn't an excuse. It is physics. I am sure Intel wants to make faster and faster chips like they used to. But due to physics that is coming to an end.

    26. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhoooohgaah! Ahhoooohgahhh!

      Red lights flashing.

      Smoke and flames from the device.

      There, got three....

    27. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blasphemer.

    28. Re:Not a surprise by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      It looks like the Star Trek type future won't be happening.

      in case you missed it, the star trek future came and went. flipping open communicators was 20 years ago.

    29. Re:Not a surprise by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Computer, what's the current location of Ensign Expendable Blonde?

      Computer, search the database for "Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra."

      And most amazingly, translation. Audio to audio even.

    30. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I must have the wrong phone. If I say "search the database for Darmok and Jalad" it gives me a recipe for beet salad.

    31. Re:Not a surprise by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't do things like uploading at a petabyte/s to unknown alien civilization's computers.

    32. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel wants to make products that sell. Right now, the bulk of the market isn't looking for faster. Instead, the market wants smaller and more power efficiency. If you look at those areas, the gains that are occurring now have rivaled the historic gains in speed.

    33. Re:Not a surprise by Flea+of+Pain · · Score: 1

      My IvyBridge gaming machine with a 680 still works fine. That's 5 years old. But a SkyLake machine with a 980 would be a big step up in performance, although excel would not feel any different.

      I was running week long sims on Broadwell machines recently. Dropping it to a day would improve the quality of my life. In effect the sims I can run are bounded by the compute power available to me.

      I really don't think you need a SkyLake machine in order to run The Sims. Pretty sure the last game came out in like 2013...

      --
      Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
    34. Re:Not a surprise by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Personally, I think there are a lot of things they could do with the iPhone to make it better, but I think it would hurt their bottom line so they don't do it. The iPhone is $700. Why not ship the base unit with 256 GB of storage. They could do it and still remain profitable. Then they would only have 1 option for storage space, and they could differentiate models on things like battery life. Have a thick version with a headphone jack and an extra large batter, and smaller, thinner version with a smaller battery and no headphone jack (since they insist this is what people want).

      Then people who only want 16GB will ask Apple for a cheaper model.

      You and I might feel 16GB is highly inadequate, but the 16GB models do sell, and there's lots of people who find it more than adequate - they don't use apps, take very few photos, etc. More than likely, their phone will be broken/obsoleted long before they're even 50% used.

      Different formfactors is stupid - accessory manufacturers like case makers really hate when you do more than a few. Apple keeps the formfactors similar so a case maker can use the same molds with the cases for a few years (and people like to keep the same case patterns). It's why on the Android side other than a few top selling phones, cases are non-existent and you either deal with it caseless, use an ill-fitting generic case, or use whatever crappy one the manufacturer supplies.

      As for the headphone jack, Apple's just copying a trend in the Android space where phones there are shedding them - I believe the OnePlus did it as does some other big phones.

    35. Re:Not a surprise by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you need to take your speech recognition library out more.

    36. Re:Not a surprise by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Especially since right now fans can't even make a Star Trek movie without being sued. That's the complete opposite of the no-cash society depicted in those movies.

      If the fans embraced the no-cash society and didn't ask for money for the film, they wouldn't have been sued.

    37. Re:Not a surprise by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      My IvyBridge gaming machine with a 680 still works fine. That's 5 years old. But a SkyLake machine with a 980 would be a big step up in performance, although excel would not feel any different.

      I was running week long sims on Broadwell machines recently. Dropping it to a day would improve the quality of my life. In effect the sims I can run are bounded by the compute power available to me.

      I really don't think you need a SkyLake machine in order to run The Sims. Pretty sure the last game came out in like 2013...

      If The Sims is Turing complete, maybe I can use it.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    38. Re:Not a surprise by PeelBoy · · Score: 2

      No it's not correct. (Well maybe the Star Trek part) People have been spouting that crap since the day I started reading Slashdot.

      Yes, we'll reach some sort of limit at some point, but technology will still find a way to progress even when that happens.

      In terms of speed, we're not close to that limit yet.

      In terms of functionality, features, looks, feel, there will always be room for change.

      ESPECIALLY with phones and smaller electronic devices.

    39. Re:Not a surprise by swb · · Score: 2

      I think they could loosen up on peripheral attachment without affecting the bottom line much.

      It sure seems like you could do a lot more with their devices if they allowed more ancillary peripherals to be attached to them. You still can't pair a mouse with an iPad, fer cryin' out loud.

      Other than mass storage devices, it's hard to see where a sensor or some other widget attached to an iDevice would impact Apple's bottom line other than Apple not getting a cut of the sale.

      In some ways, though, they seemed to have backed themselves into a profitability corner. Any change they might make which would *doesn't* directly increase profitability and even only theoretically may cause them to lose out on revenue becomes a non-option. Trouble is, without any innovation, the entire thing starts to stagnate.

    40. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      The market is always looking for faster too. They are just limited by physics by making things faster. It isn't like Intel can only do one thing at once. If they could make much faster chips they would.

    41. Re:Not a surprise by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Apple need Samsung and LG to create new components before "design" corporations can use said parts in the next iteration of products. Apple do not invent, they use off the shelve components made by the Japanese and Korean R&D electronic companies you xenophobic types love to hate.

      Of course.

      That's why there are benchmarks for Apple's A[x] SoCs vs. Qualcomm's Snapdragon and Samsung's Exygenous (or whatever) SoCs. That's because Apple just re-branded other people's SoCs rather than designing their own from the ground-up (rolls eyes).

    42. Re:Not a surprise by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I wonder if Job's last decree was "make it thinner", and Apple has not been willing to change it out of respect for Jobs. They've clearly gone past the point where thinner is better, but they just can't think of something better to do instead.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    43. Re:Not a surprise by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Tom's Hardware says 30% core performance increase from Ivy Bridge to Skylake, wither lower power consumption by SkyLake.
      That's not not getting faster.

      They summarize..

      "Sandy/Ivy Bridge users:

      This time it's a yes. Sandy Bridge and Ivy bridge are both getting pretty old by now, and upgrading to Skylake will yeld a 30-45% (45% if your a sandy user) increase in performance. You will also get the latest technologies from Skylake, namely power efficiency, a variety of USB ports, high speed LAN, and probably the biggest upgrade will be high speed storage. Together, all these features makes it a worthy upgrade to Skylake."

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    44. Re:Not a surprise by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Android vendors typically use plastic and come in basic black.

      Why the obsession with thinness from Apple, with sleek materials such as polished glass or metal only to conceal the phone within a rubber case?

    45. Re:Not a surprise by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      It's nothing to do with Moore's law. Intel's next chip will only be marginally faster, because it has no competition. They could make it a lot faster by redesigning the core, but why bother if there's no competition?
      Moore's law hasn't stopped, it's just slowed down. They will have 10nm next year and then 7nm and there's also 3D packaging that will keep Moore's law going for quite a while.

    46. Re:Not a surprise by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      It isn't physics that makes Tim Cook undriven and uncreative.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    47. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      No they couldn't make it a lot faster. Moores Law hasn't been accurate for about 10 years.

    48. Re:Not a surprise by immortalcrab · · Score: 0
      The distance between my 2000 machine and my 1995 was abyssal thanks to Moore's law, the difference between your IvyBridge and your current machine is a couple frames more on games that run very similar, very optimized engines.

      I'm on on the Apple fanboys side either, even if progress has slowed, Apple products don't even keep up with the new, slower rate.

    49. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      30% in 5 years isn't so great. They are getting faster, but in very small increments.

    50. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yes we are close to the limit. Physics. Learn it. Technological progress is not inevitable.

    51. Re:Not a surprise by immortalcrab · · Score: 0
      That's 30% in five years, from 1995 to 2000 there was a 750% increment (200mhz pentium pro to 1.5 gigahertz pentium 4 willamete).

      Sure 30% is not "not getting faster" is just getting faster at a much much slower rate.

    52. Re:Not a surprise by dmt0 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think there are a lot of things they could do with the iPhone to make it better, but I think it would hurt their bottom line so they don't do it. The iPhone is $700. Why not ship the base unit with 256 GB of storage. They could do it and still remain profitable. Then they would only have 1 option for storage space, and they could differentiate models on things like battery life. Have a thick version with a headphone jack and an extra large batter, and smaller, thinner version with a smaller battery and no headphone jack (since they insist this is what people want).

      Are you from the ThinkPad team?

    53. Re:Not a surprise by immortalcrab · · Score: 0

      iPhone 9, so thin you can shave with it!

    54. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what translation service you're using but audio to audio translation via Google Translate on a smartphone is appallingly bad. At least, when I tried the English // Mandarin translation last month it was essentially useless. It achieved about a 10% correct translation rate, which makes it functionally of no value whatsoever.

    55. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are nowhere near the limit of physics and power concerns.There is plenty of room at the bottom.

      We're just doing things in stupid ways. Or at least, in ways that people in 50 years will think are cute and retro, if all goes well. After all, isn't worrying about the power and scaling of our current chips awfully reminiscent of Vannevar Bush's "electronic brains the size of the Empire State Building with a Niagara Falls-scale cooling system"?

    56. Re:Not a surprise by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      How do you know? Going from netburst to core gave a huge performance boost.
      Moore's law has slowed down, that's what I said, but progress hasn't stopped.

    57. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      No. We really are near the limit. There are physical limits to how small you can get the process down to. Physics doesn't lie. Sorry about that. There is a reason your processor five years ago was only slightly slower than the one you have today.

    58. Re:Not a surprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it stopped. I am saying you will see small incremental improvements. Maybe 20-30% every 5 years like we have for the last 10 years. There is a reason Intels processors are only 30% faster then they were 5 years ago.

    59. Re:Not a surprise by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Just like they insisted that USB was worth becoming the new standard, and were the first to produce computers with USB ports and no parallel or SCSI port?

    60. Re:Not a surprise by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      If we could just wear pajamas at all times I'd be 100% happy.

      Haven't been to Walmart lately, have you?

      Not once for the last 20 years.

      You?

    61. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically wrong.

      Apple still haven't caught up with the standard (1334 x 750 doesn't cut it when flagships are 1440p) and really need to get there this year. Their problem is that Android phones are about to take off again, both with the Daydream spec that they will have to hit by Xmas to be considered flagships, and with the modularisation (which they are still feeling towards). And then Tango sensors will be coming along next year. Oh, and probably x256/HEVC hardware encoding for 4K will also make a showing.

      And all that is before people start seriously looking at machine learning on the phone (GPUs can go a fair distance, but enhancing them for this role is an obvious development path).

      Upshot is, apple need to make the best use of the last of the plateau that Android has been on for the past three years - otherwise the gap will widen again and their 20% market share will drop to sub 10%.

    62. Re:Not a surprise by orasio · · Score: 1

      It's why on the Android side other than a few top selling phones, cases are non-existent and you either deal with it caseless, use an ill-fitting generic case, or use whatever crappy one the manufacturer supplies.

      Remove your goggles.
      You don't "deal with it" caseless. It's not a problem you have to deal with, it's the expected case. A phone doesn't need a case for regular use, including being dropped from time to time. That's why they are made of plastic, and they try to make them very light, which helps with damade. Some specific phones do expose their glass a bit more, and have a fragile design, like iPhones. Those do definitely need cases, but a phone without a case is not something you have to "deal with", it's the most reasonable scenario.

    63. Re:Not a surprise by antdude · · Score: 1

      Frak clothes. Just go naked. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    64. Re:Not a surprise by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

      I think it's because Intel is investing billions of $ into mobile tech. Low power, single chip, stacked ram, etc. They don't have the need for a faster desktop chip. Hope AMD catches up soon.

    65. Re:Not a surprise by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Stop it, stop it. It's all getting a bit siri.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    66. Re: Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let's all just be a bit more sirious about this.

    67. Re: Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Apple Ax CPUs are just ARM implementations, made because they can, not because another SoC wouldn't do.

    68. Re: Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faster per unit of consumed energy. Gross speed is no longer the metric.

    69. Re: Not a surprise by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The Apple Ax CPUs are just ARM implementations, made because they can, not because another SoC wouldn't do.

      They are NOT "just ARM implementations".

      Apple is one of just a handful of ARM licensees on the planet that has an "Architecture"-class License. That means that they can (and do) actually "roll-their-own" ARM CPU cores. IOW, it is MUCH more than the typical "silicon compiler" cutpasta "Engineering" that most ARM Licensees can do.

      And considering that their CPUs are regularly at the top of the food-chain, performance-wise, no, not just any ol' ARM SoC will do. Why else would someone like Apple expend the tens-of-millions of dollars to design and qualify a new SoC, rather than just reaching onto the shelf and purchasing an existing one?

  3. Only incremental change I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple is preparing the distracted world for disappointment. But I know what will make me happy.

    If Siri makes all the calls necessary to all her stripper friends for my bachelor party, I would die a happy man.

    1. Re:Only incremental change I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thinking with your balls like that will leave you a bankrupt derelict.

  4. Confusing Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next iPhone isn't going to look much different from the last year's iPhone 6s, or 2014's iPhone 6.

    The Cupertino-based company plans to introduce major design changes in its next iPhone, using OLED display and more glass material in the body.

    Which is it?

  5. If nothing much is changing... by PmanAce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...why release a new one? I guess for suckers like my friend who has bought every single new version of the iPhone since day 1.

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    1. Re:If nothing much is changing... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      My iPhone 6 Plus is still chugging along - I figure I'm good for at least two more iterations. I like to keep my phones until they die a natural death (or until my daughter drops one in the toilet, which is why I have a 6 Plus rather than my previous 5).

      Removing the headphone jack is a rather annoying move, though. The iPod Touches are quite a bit thinner than the current iPhones, but they still have a headphone jack... so it's not a question of thinness.

      And don't get me started on the ludicrous "IT MUST BE EVEN THINNER!" sentiment that seem to be the controlling directive at Apple as well as at most other major phone producers.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:If nothing much is changing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's no need to buy new ones every time, that does seem silly. But people still need new phones, old ones break, eventually the difference in technology is very noticeable and an upgrade is desirable, and so on. There's always someone who for one reason or another is looking to get a new phone. I suspect iPhone needs to remain competitive; Android phones are constantly improving, iPhone just can't sit around really. It is, generally, much easier to engineer smaller iterative improvements than sudden jumps. A small improvement every year keeps the iPhone more on par with competitors without having to suddenly play catchup.

    3. Re:If nothing much is changing... by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Do you ask the same question when an auto manufacturer releases a new model year that is almost identical to the previous year?

      People still need new phones because their old ones break. Or they just want the latest and greatest. Even with nothing much changing, there's still likely parts that are changing. Old parts might be superseded with new parts of better quality. Or more cost effective. Maybe a better way of doing something was found that you the end consumer doesn't notice but makes sense from an engineering standpoint.

    4. Re:If nothing much is changing... by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, I totally forgot the Chevrolet Camaro 6S is coming out this year, except it's not cause that's not how the auto industry works.

      They call the car the same as they did the year prior.

      --
      Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
    5. Re:If nothing much is changing... by PmanAce · · Score: 1

      People still need new phones because their old ones break.

      Yes, what is wrong with buying last years model which will be practically the same as this years model, but costing less? Just like the lottery, it's called the stupid tax and that is one tax I choose not to pay.

      Maybe a better way of doing something was found that you the end consumer doesn't notice but makes sense from an engineering standpoint.

      You truly believe that? Unless there was a recall or something broken, Apple isn't going to go out of it's way to cut into profit margins and spend on R&D...

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    6. Re:If nothing much is changing... by PmanAce · · Score: 1

      My Galaxy S4 is still chugging along, rooted and paid off. I'm in the same boat as you except minus the daughter/toilet danger.

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    7. Re:If nothing much is changing... by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They call the car the same as they did the year prior.

      And Apple is calling all iPhone an iPhone, just like Chevy calls all Camaros a Camaro. Chevy differentiates models by model year and trim level. Apple differentiates iPhone models by a model number and a modifier.

    8. Re:If nothing much is changing... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      They might call the car the same, but they will refer to it by the year it was released. e.g. The 2016 Chevrolet Camaro which is different than the 2015 Chevrolet Camaro and the 2017 Chevrolet Camaro.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    9. Re:If nothing much is changing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like iPhone 6 is different than iPhone 5 and iPhone 6s ?

    10. Re:If nothing much is changing... by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      They call the car the same as they did the year prior.

      And Apple is calling all iPhone an iPhone, just like Chevy calls all Camaros a Camaro. Chevy differentiates models by model year and trim level. Apple differentiates iPhone models by a model number and a modifier.

      Typically with Automakers, a certain model will be based on a certain platform virtually unchanged for about 5 years. During this time there will be insignificant changes to trim level equipment (This year the SE comes with reverse camera and heated mirrors, where last year you needed the SS), and the grill and taillights may change slightly yet be interchangable, but the underlying engine, transmission, etc will be the same. Go to the parts store and the brake parts are the same for all 5 years. Yes there will be improvements in this period, but these are usually technical in nature, and (sometimes) backported to older models of the same generation (replacement part substitutions, recalls, TSBs, "customer experience programs.")

      Usually after 5 years the platform will be mildly refreshed. The sheetmetel will change, the instrument cluster will change, the wheel design will change, but underneath the same powertrain, brakes, tire dimensions, etc are there. The manufacturer will sell this model for another 5 years, giving a total of about 10 years on the same platform, before doing a large re-engineering of the platform, even if they give it the same model name.

      In the Camaro example, there are six "Generations" of Camaros spanning 42 model years.

      With iPhone at best the n, and nS models are similar, but the between those they are different.

    11. Re:If nothing much is changing... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      I'll wager that you can't differentiate a 1968 Mustang from a 1969 Mustang at a glance...

    12. Re:If nothing much is changing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the Camaro will run for more than a few years before the battery starts to fail and requires it to be sent back to the manufacturer for a replacement. Then you can drive again after 2-3 weeks.

    13. Re:If nothing much is changing... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Only the Camaro will run for more than a few years before the battery starts to fail and requires it to be sent back to the manufacturer for a replacement. Then you can drive again after 2-3 weeks

      Better than having your device cut off from updates 18 months after purchase, Fandroid.

  6. No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by powerlord · · Score: 2

    As someone who was starting to look at upgrading his phone (5s going strong so far), I know that the lack of headphone jack is going to make me sit right back down and wait on the purchase.

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  7. How is this news? by scunc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple is releasing a new product with little to no changes compared to the previous model, and yet still expects people to shell out hundreds of dollars for the new version? Sounds like they've finally figured out their customer base! Steve Jobs would be so proud ...

    1. Re:How is this news? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Apple is releasing a new product with little to no changes compared to the previous model, and yet still expects people to shell out hundreds of dollars for the new version? Sounds like they've finally figured out their customer base! Steve Jobs would be so proud ...

      I would suggest that TFS was written to give that impression; however, I personally would consider the shift to OLED (and the increased battery life that change alone will bring) is a pretty significant change, in and of itself.

    2. Re:How is this news? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and the increased battery life that change alone will bring

      You may not want to celebrate too much in advance. Those power savings haven't really eventuated in real world use cases. The OLED consortium loves to tell people how power is dependent to the brightness of each pixel unlike LCD which is dependent on the global backlight, but then here I am, nearly every pixel except for the text I am reading is bright white. OLED displays are still massive power drains when showing a picture in natural light.

    3. Re:How is this news? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      and the increased battery life that change alone will bring

      You may not want to celebrate too much in advance. Those power savings haven't really eventuated in real world use cases. The OLED consortium loves to tell people how power is dependent to the brightness of each pixel unlike LCD which is dependent on the global backlight, but then here I am, nearly every pixel except for the text I am reading is bright white. OLED displays are still massive power drains when showing a picture in natural light.

      You're right, of course; but I would imagine that, knowing Apple, they will offer a optional "Dark Look Theme" for iOS (kind of like some OS X applications do) if you want to take advantage of the power savings for "OFF" (or dim) pixels.

    4. Re:How is this news? by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Apple is releasing a new product with little to no changes compared to the previous model, and yet still expects people to shell out hundreds of dollars for the new version? Sounds like they've finally figured out their customer base! Steve Jobs would be so proud ...

      Nuthin' wrong with making small incremental improvements over an otherwise stable product. Car manufacturers have been doing it for years, they don't even change the model number. And you don't have to but it... who buys every iPhone anyway? Most people I would say wait 2 iterations atleast before upgrading. You don't really want to get into the situation the original Nexus 5 was in, sold for 2 years before it got an update. Yes there was nothing wrong with it but it was a bit weird to buy a new phone that was out-of-date.

    5. Re:How is this news? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah this would be good. Some flavours of Android offer that. The Galaxy has an inversion feature that saves power on traditional web browsing, but it makes things look oh so wrong :-)

      Actually one good thing is the ultra-low power modes in Android. It locks the graphics to a simple white on black with very minimal white in the first place. You get quite good power consumption that way.

  8. No Headphone Jack by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't believe that the next iPhone won't have a headphone jack. I think the world really isn't ready for this change. Personally I use Bluetooth headphones 80% of the time, but I think going that last 20% would be problematic. And if their headphone adapters are as resilient as their charging cables, this is going to end up being a major problem. I don't think that most people would go for a phone without a headphone jack. Even if they don't use it most of the time.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:No Headphone Jack by desdinova+216 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was at a gaming convention this past weekend, and a number of vendors were using card reader dongles that attach via the headphone jack

    2. Re:No Headphone Jack by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      I was at a gaming convention this past weekend, and a number of vendors were using card reader dongles that attach via the headphone jack

      I guess Square will refocus on Android.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:No Headphone Jack by _xeno_ · · Score: 2

      The latest Square connects using Bluetooth, so there's that.

      But if you read that page, you'll discover that it still requires the headphone jack for swiping cards. So maybe they will just focus on Android.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    4. Re:No Headphone Jack by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But if you read that page, you'll discover that it still requires the headphone jack for swiping cards

      To much of the world the concept of swiping a card is unknown. Rather that lamenting the loss of a headphone jack I'd instead be slapping your bankers around with a stick for dragging their feet.

  9. I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    My kids iPhones have pretty consistently later 2.5 years. After that they get slower and slower until they're junk. Oh, and can we please get some gorilla glass? Every time she drops the damn thing it's $250 for a new screen.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by jasnw · · Score: 1

      The only way to impact Apple's market-driven (as opposed to engineering-driven) culture is to vote with your wallet. Don't buy your kids a new iPhone until Apple starts building something worth shelling out big bucks for. As long as parents continue to buy their kids new iPhones every two years Apple has no reason to change how they're operating.

    2. Re:I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 1

      You're taking it to the wrong place for repair, then. Even Apple charges, at most, $149 for a new screen at an Apple Store. I just got my wife's iPhone 6 screen replaced for $130, and that wasn't the cheapest place in town, merely the most convenient. Also, believe it or not, there is a pretty good market on eBay for broken screens, so you can make $30ish back selling your old one on there.

      --
      Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
    3. Re:I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So:
        - your kids download crapware; after 2.5 years there's so much of in on the phone it slows down
        - your kids then start "dropping" the phone so they can get a new one
        - you don't buy any of the many available cases to prevent the screen from breaking
      Which one of those is Apple's fault?

    4. Re:I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      this is why you make her use a case or tell her to use a broken phone until it's paid off. there is no way i would be paying that if one of my kids broke their phone.

    5. Re:I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I replaced my own for about $30. Then I did it again because at $30 you're less careful with them.

    6. Re:I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Mine lasted 5 years. Not bad.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    7. Re:I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy a Samsung J1 Mini for $100.

    8. Re:I'll settle for the thing just not burning out by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Now replace your home button.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  10. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a bit skeptical but then I remembered I haven't used the headphone jack as my primary audio source since like the iPhone 4.

    The headphone jack is like the only component on an iPhone I ever had issues with. It would always end up staticy and sometimes replacing the headphones was enough but normally it was the port itself.

    Once I switched to Bluetooth I haven't looked back.... except for when I forget my wireless headphones. Once a month or so I'll use the headphone jack with my spare wired headphones I keep in my car for when I forget to bring my wireless ones. It's this situation that is the only reason I'd still want a headphone jack.

    But if it means thinner phone/more screen I'd still be OK with maybe once a month not being able to use headphones.

  11. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by geek · · Score: 1

    As someone who was starting to look at upgrading his phone (5s going strong so far), I know that the lack of headphone jack is going to make me sit right back down and wait on the purchase.

    I bet you said the same about PS2 ports, floppy drives and the recently defunct CDROM drives too.

  12. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 2

    As someone who was starting to look at upgrading his phone (5s going strong so far), I know that the lack of headphone jack is going to make me sit right back down and wait on the purchase.

    Depends on how they handle this.

    You DO realize that Apple has a pretty long and successful track record of getting excoriated for getting rid of "legacy" ports and peripherals, only to have the rest of the industry follow suit in the next year or so, right?

  13. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    USB-C supports using the connector as an analog headphone jack. You just need a specific resistor on a specific pin and it will switch over to analog headphone mode on one of the pins. You wouldn't even need an adapter with the right set of headphones. There's a strong likelihood that they're finally going to kill their proprietary connector on the iPhone in favor of USB-C.
     
    So there is your precious analog headphone jack.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  14. No built in 3.5mm headphone jack by HannethCom · · Score: 2

    Apple has said that they will have an adapter that you can use the 3.5 headphones on. It will plug into the charging/data port. Of course being Apple the adapter will be way over priced.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
    1. Re:No built in 3.5mm headphone jack by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine it's also going to be much more fragile than the 3.5mm TRRS connector.

    2. Re:No built in 3.5mm headphone jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno about that. Not all that happy about losing the 3.5 mm jack as I have thousands of dollars invested in analog headphones ... but .... it's the one thing that has failed on every iPhone I've owned. Either it breaks and I'm spending hours cursing out tiny little wires or it gets filled with stuff and I have to dissect the lint out.

      I hate BT for decent audio, perhaps the fifth iteration will make it palatable since decent quality DACs are now dirt cheap, but an external wire adapter no matter how ridiculously Apple prices it at will be an OK compromise.

      It will fit in the bag with the 75 other adapters I always travel with...

    3. Re:No built in 3.5mm headphone jack by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It had better be a Y dongle too so you can charge and listen at the same time. This obsession with only having one port is the ultimate in anti-user, anti-usability asshattery.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We want you to break and repair it more.

  16. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    Get a Nexus 6P.

    You'll _never_ look back.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  17. Single Sheet of Glass? by foxalopex · · Score: 1

    Single sheet of glass huh? I'm not sure that's a good way to describe how you'd want a phone. Hopefully it doesn't break like a single sheet of glass!

  18. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    Except I *do* use the jack on my phone as input for the stereo in my car. "Use bluetooth" you say... fine. Maybe my next car purchase in 10-12 years I'll remember to include BT for the stereo system...

    This is all good for me though since it should drop prices on the SE I've been wanting as an upgrade/replacemetn for my 4 ...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  19. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Still not waterproof, still no wireless charging? Why would I want an iPhone, went they haven't yet adopted features that Samsung has been offering for years? And yes, the minimum memory size SHOULD be 32GB, except that Apple makes money selling you iCloud storage. 5GB free? Hint: the iPhone backup takes up 4.9 GB!

    1. Re:So... by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      No wireless and less space than a Nomad? Lame.

  20. Idiots and their money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... why would I buy it? /quote.Because of 1. the idiots, and 2. their money

  21. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    I built a bluetooth receiver for my car out of a Raspberry Pi. You can buy them too, except they cost $80 instead of the $20 I paid. It's much nicer than an audio cable.

  22. Thanks, Submitter Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And fuck you, editors, for allowing this non-story that is neither news nor stuff that matters.

  23. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    You realize the Raspberry Pi on board audio has terrible quality right? I hope you somehow included a good usb sound adapter for that $20.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  24. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by crankyspice · · Score: 2

    Maybe my next car purchase in 10-12 years I'll remember to include BT for the stereo system...

    It's a cheap and decidedly worthwhile upgrade to existing tech / cars. I stuck a Grom unit behind the stock radio in my '04 E46M3, and in my 21-year-old 1995 Jeep Wrangler I simply swapped in a sub-$100 new head unit (Clarion but there are so many options). Much better solution than wrestling with a 1/8" cord constantly, especially with the wear and tear those cords get in an automotive environment (jiggle it just right to get audio out of both channels...).

    --
    geek. lawyer.
  25. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This one is a pretty big leap. Most people who buy headphones I want them compatible with everything. I have some devices I plug into that are 10 years old and will still be used long into the future, and this means an audio cable. While I have an audio cable anyway, why would I want to pay a premium for in-headset bluetooth and at the cost of having to charge them all the time. When flash drives came out, USB was already prevelent and that was fine. I haven't looked for a thunderbolt hub for quite awhile but last I checked they were still a lot harder to find than usb hubs. Finally, I swear at apple every time I have to find my displayport adapter. I still have three working VGA monitors and the macbook is so far the only PC I have without a VGA or HDMI port.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  26. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Maxwell · · Score: 1
    A blue tooth head unit is $99 at best buy.

    If you a) plan on driving the same car for 10 years and b) listen to a lot of music in it, it would be a worthwhile investment.

  27. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    I'm sure if you can afford the $700 iPhone, you should have no problem paying for the $25 new adpater, or find one for $3 on ebay.

    Here you go: https://www.amazon.com/GOgroov...

  28. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by KingMotley · · Score: 2

    Oh, and if you don't happen to have a car stereo with a line in because it's so old, here you go: https://www.amazon.com/Audio-C...

  29. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by hvdh · · Score: 1

    You can also order a nice USB-powered BT audio receiver (TSBT35A24) and a cigar lighter to USB adapter from China for less than $5 shipped.

  30. Apple continues to ignore market desires by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, I bought an Apple iPhone 5 and it worked fine for almost 5 years. When it finally stopped working, I bought an iPhone 5 SE. Same size.

    But they try not to sell them in America.

    Why? Because the little n00bZ in their marketing and sales departments apparently don't have useful Business degrees like I do. Ones that tell you to listen to your customers and if they want smaller phones, sell them smaller phones.

    Here's a free message to Apple: listen to your customers. And stop trying to sell grandpa and grandma phones. They don't buy new phones. Sure, they have money, but they're not your market.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Apple continues to ignore market desires by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      My god, can you tell us who wins the election in November? Did Hillary take everyone's guns, or did Trump start WW3 when Putin suggested he had small hands. I need to know if I should start stocking up supplies of canned food and ammo (BTW the IPhone 5 only came out 3.5 years ago)

  31. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by caseih · · Score: 1

    There's a big difference between replacing a simple, ubiquitous, general purpose, analog headphone jack and replacing the special-purpose PS/2 with USB. The PS/2 port had one function, whereas the headphone jack can interconnect nearly any audio device going back 40 years.

    The headphone jack is small and simple, and compatible with just about everything out there. Headphones aren't magically obsolete just because they are 10 or 20 years old. (Dropping the jack to make the phone even thinner is just silly.

    Do people really want their phones even thinner than they are now? Judging by the bulky cases people buy for their phones, I am not so sure. Pretty soon we'll have phones as thin as a sheet of paper and we'll keep them in our wallets or pocket, and then they'll provide a bluetooth headset that looks like an old nokia candy bar phone to keep it useable and we'll have come full circle.

  32. Stagnated by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Apple is so stagnated I'm bringing back the stagnated "<THING> is stagnated!" troll.

  33. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to get a whole new car if you want bluetooth?

  34. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Every machine I buy will have a PS/2 port. It'll also have an optical drive to read and write the latest BluRay/whatever format. Floppies are dead for me, though.

  35. Removing headphone jacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Removing headphone jacks, because they're costing us a $8 royalty on every headphone produced. Fuck off, Apple.

  36. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by sexconker · · Score: 1

    So now you need new headphones, or a $30 adapter. And another thing if you want to charge the phone at the same time, use an OTG device, or whatever.

  37. Be bold! by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    His Steviness the Jobs didn't make Apple what it is by doing the same thing over and over again.

    Be bold! Make the corners pointed. Heck, stick bloody great spikes on them! Or even make them in black!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  38. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

    What car built since the turn of the millennium has a radio that can be (affordably) replaced without losing functionality of an existing system as well as retaining a semi-stock appearance of the dash? In other words, what vehicles still have an actual DIN radios?

    Every vehicle I've ridden in for a long time has had a radio that is fairly well integrated into the dash. My Honda Accord for instance has to resort to something like this if you want to keep climate control functionality which is integrated into the display. Plus none of the original radio work, nor steering wheel control, despite all still being present.

  39. Re: No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Headphone jacks are an "analog hole" and Apple is getting further involved as a streaming music provider. They could next switch to a more "secured" form of bluetooth connection.

  40. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current iPhone wasn't that bad, other than the 2GB of RAM, a travesty. I guess they are just going to let everyone breeze past them again.

  41. Out of new ideas by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    We knew Apple had to reach this point eventually....

  42. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    This one is a pretty big leap. Most people who buy headphones I want them compatible with everything. I have some devices I plug into that are 10 years old and will still be used long into the future, and this means an audio cable. While I have an audio cable anyway, why would I want to pay a premium for in-headset bluetooth and at the cost of having to charge them all the time. When flash drives came out, USB was already prevelent and that was fine. I haven't looked for a thunderbolt hub for quite awhile but last I checked they were still a lot harder to find than usb hubs. Finally, I swear at apple every time I have to find my displayport adapter. I still have three working VGA monitors and the macbook is so far the only PC I have without a VGA or HDMI port.

    As I said: Depends on how they handle it.

    Like everyone else, I have several headphone/earbud sets that have either 3.5mm or 1/4" plugs on them. I would imagine that Apple will go wireless on the next iPhone, with Bluetooth 5 being used (with possible failover to older BT standards). I would NOT expect them to simply switch to using the Lightning connector and keeping the headphone/earbud user TETHERED to the device. What's the sense in that?

    If that (Bluetooth) happens, Apple and a zillion other companies will rush to market with receiver/DAC dongles that you can plug analog 'phones into, and Apple and a zillion other companies will start (continue) making BT headphones/earbuds, and as time goes on, the 3.5mm jack will start being the thing you have to have an adapter for, for everything; rather than the other way around.

    I just converted my home stereo system from entirely analog, with piles of RCA cables running everywhere, to HDMI/TOSLink. I thought it was going to be very hard to get everything together; but it was quite the opposite. I replaced a gallon-ziploc bag STUFFED full of RCA cables with about 5 HDMI cables and a couple of TOSLink cables. Took a couple of hours to do the switchover, and everything just worked. So it IS possible to move forward without having to rewrite the entire U.S. Constitution... I swore it would be 50 years before the last RCA jack disappeared from audio/video gear; but now I'm not so sure. More like 10-15 years at MOST. Time marches on... You can either march too, or get trampled. That's just the way it is with everything, and even more so with electronics.

    As far as your Thunderbolt/DisplayPort issues go, that has more to do with when you bought your last PC and monitors than anything else, and with things like the Surface Pro and others switching to either MiniDisplayPort/Thunderbolt or USB-C, the days of the VGA connector are pretty much OVER. Even Slashdot has admitted it. But don't get me wrong, I have multiple things that are VGA, and so, having something like MiniDisplayPort actually allows me to have VGA compatibility for FAR longer than if I had to depend on a built-in VGA Port or some hinky, expensive, half-assed "converter box". (Been there, done that with HDMI -> Component Video. $70 for something that barely worked, and then failed after about a year)...

    I personally like having the TB/MiniDisplayPort connector and Dongle setup; because 1) VGA (and DVI) Connectors, like the Universe itself, are BIG, REALLY BIG; 2) With just a little planning, I can output to a variety of Displays, without having to worry about having a particular Port available on the computer itself (and with an aftermarket TB display adapter, I don't even have to have 3 separate dongles; instead I can have ONE dongle that costs about HALF that Apple's dongles and has VGA, DVI and HDMI on the same dongle, how cool is that?); and 3) There is a modicum of protection afforded by having an active "dongle" b

  43. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    It's bluetooth audio, in a car. It doesn't have to be great. If you like spending money then yes, you could absolutely spend whatever you like, from $2 to $10,000 on a DAC.

  44. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Nice, thanks for the link. When I built the Pi solution the only other reasonable way I found to do that was to take apart a pair of Sony bluetooth earbuds. The car Pi also does some other stuff, like interfacing with OBD, but a cheap bluetooth receiver is handy.

  45. Re: No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Apple was the first major digital audio seller to go DRM-free. Your fantasies need updating.

  46. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Get a Bluetooth car adapter. I use a one from Kinivo that Amazon sells for $35.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  47. Location, location, location by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    Why do journalists need to say where a corporation is based? They could just say "the company" instead of the "Cupertino based company".

  48. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 3.5mm jack has been used for decades and is standard on many audio devices.

    Apple, as usual, is all "fuck standards".

  49. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

    A number of companies offer kits to add Bluetooth to your stock head units. We added Bluetooth, hands free phone and audio streaming to our 2007 Honda Odyssey with no impact to the head unit or steering wheel controls. The only change was a button I had to add to the dash (to answer calls, or initiate voice dialing) and a microphone above the driver side a-frame for hands free calls. Cost me ~$100

  50. Re: No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only douchebag and stupid assholes drive around with headphones on.

  51. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Optical is dead for me but for stupid reasons : tax on blank media, lack of enough SATA or IDE ports on some machines.
    On the other hand, gimme dual PS/2. I even made sure to have dual DVI-I for now (not DVI-D)

  52. Re: No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    In reality it was Amazon, in shitty memory Apple does all the good stuff first.

  53. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    Man you are really fishing for something to complain about today, huh? It would be a $2 adapter, or you can just build your own with a $0.05 resistor and an old USB-C cable. It's a really, really simple device. The 3.5mm analog jack is ready to be put out to pasture, long live the 2.4mm analog jack (USB-C).
     
    Re: charging, with fast charging and/or modern battery life it's really not an issue.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  54. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by irrational_design · · Score: 1

    My cars (early 2000 models) don't have any sort of aux/headphone jack/input port. Is there some way to make this work?

  55. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    But if it means thinner phone/more screen I'd still be OK with maybe once a month not being able to use headphones.

    Why would you want a thinner phone? No, really. They're already so thin that human skin doesn't provide enough friction to keep it in your hand if your hands are sweaty. These things are a usability disaster because they're already way too thin.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  56. My mobile phone replacement strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First mobile phone: 2008 (flip phone)

    Second mobile phone: 2015 (smartphone)

    Looks like hopefully I'll replace my phone in 2022 if all goes well

    I don't like spending money for nothing. I don't like being a sucker.

  57. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    I guarantee that if I owned an iPhone with no headphone jack, I would not have been able to plug my iPhone in to play a song over the speakers at a jam session last week. Everybody else had Android phones. I reached over and plugged my iPhone in, and everything just worked, because my iPhone 6S is actually standards-compliant, using an industry-standard connector. When Apple requires me to carry a proprietary adapter just for their devices, suddenly access to audio output is not ubiquitous, and suddenly I have to plan a day in advance to pack that adapter in my car or whatever.

    So basically unless Apple ditches their proprietary dock connector at the same time, and if they're wrong about all the Android companies following suit, they'll have a situation where iPhone users are at a decided disadvantage over Android users, which is likely to make a number of users switch to Android.

    It's too bad Bluetooth provides such a bad user experience on iOS, with multi-second playback delays (at least in my personal experience, with all brand new hardware). Otherwise, that would make ditching the headphone jack would at least suck a little less.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  58. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by iris-n · · Score: 1

    You don't travel to conferences, do you? I have just been to a conference in the Czech Republic and had to plug in my laptop into the projector to give a presentation. Which standard did the projector use? That's right, VGA. I just plugged the cable directly in my laptop, whereas all the macfags had to fumble around with adaptors.

    --
    entropy happens
  59. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Merk42 · · Score: 1

    ...There's a strong likelihood that they're finally going to kill their proprietary connector on the iPhone in favor of USB-C.

    HAHAHA Apple kill a proprietary connector??

  60. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by swb · · Score: 1

    The only way they could handle this would be to bundle in headphone jack adapter with the phone. It ought to be a cost wash with the shitty headphones, which they really ought to stop including anyway.

    Anything else is a massive failure of good will.

  61. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by iris-n · · Score: 1

    I'm bitter about the death of VGA. It is not being replaced by a reliable standard, but by a mess of DisplayPort, miniDisplayPort, DVI, HDMI, and USB-C. I still have a VGA laptop, and it still works everywhere I go. But in a few years I'll have to buy a laptop with the least non-standard port and carry with me a bunch of adaptors. Sigh.

    --
    entropy happens
  62. Meh by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    I think I'm the only one that isn't ready to burn down Cupertino over the headphone jack. Yes I'd sorta rather have it than not, but I really don't physically plug my phone into anything other than to charge it. I either use my suppplied earbuds or I use bluetooth.

    I will concede, though, that if they remove it something interesting should be put in its place. I don't need a better speaker, which is what it sounds like they're doing. You've got me there, I'd be frustrated if they dumped the headphone jack for that. But if they used that space for more battery, or maybe somehow that extra space got it a better camera, I'd toss that jack away in a heart beat.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't used headphones in years myself. I bluetooth to my car stereo, or to my wireless speaker at home.

      Analog speaker jack is very 20th century. Time to move on, like we did with physical media.

    2. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like floppy drives and ADB ports on the original Bondi Blu imac.

      Sure, some people missed them, but 95% of users realized they didn't need those things anyway. Adapters and usb floppy drives were available for those that did.

      Also spurred the adoption of USB in general. The iphone will do the same thing for bluetooth headphones. (Which are already silly cheap if you know where to look. Now you'll just be able to find them more easily in retail outlets)

    3. Re:Meh by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Haven't used headphones in years myself. I bluetooth to my car stereo, or to my wireless speaker at home.

      Analog speaker jack is very 20th century. Time to move on, like we did with physical media.

      How do you think your internet gets across the Atlantic, Pacific, and other oceans? How does it get to your home?

      Physical (wire/fiber) connections are the bedrock of communications, and will be for the next 30 years at the least.

  63. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by GuB-42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Except that the jack connector is far from obsolete.
    It is used on new products everywhere, in all price ranges, even Apple's earbuds use it. Quality-wise, it is more than enough for stereo audio signals within the range of human hearing, in fact you will be hard pressed to find a high-end headset that uses something else.

  64. Re: No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Only douchebag and stupid assholes drive around with headphones on.

    As long as you aren't driving around with a pair of these on, you should be able to hear with most earbuds just as well as you can with your stereo turned up to a reasonable listening level (let's say around 80-90 dB SPL or so).

  65. Re: No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

    Yes, but Amazon did it using plain old MP3s you can play everywhere while Apple did it with some crappy Apple-only format that only worked on iPods, so ...

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  66. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    I built a bluetooth receiver for my car out of a Raspberry Pi. You can buy them too, except they cost $80 instead of the $20 I paid. It's much nicer than an audio cable.

    It wasn't $20 after that Bluetooth adapter, or if it was a Raspberry Pi3 B, then those cost about $35-$40, not $20. And of course that all made sense because your time is worthless, right?

  67. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by hvdh · · Score: 1

    If you don't have line-in, look for "car fm transmitter". There are also some with BT, like "BC09 car Bluetooth charger FM transmitter".

  68. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Toshito · · Score: 1

    I just converted my home stereo system from entirely analog, with piles of RCA cables running everywhere, to HDMI/TOSLink. I thought it was going to be very hard to get everything together; but it was quite the opposite. I replaced a gallon-ziploc bag STUFFED full of RCA cables with about 5 HDMI cables and a couple of TOSLink cables. Took a couple of hours to do the switchover, and everything just worked. So it IS possible to move forward without having to rewrite the entire U.S. Constitution... I swore it would be 50 years before the last RCA jack disappeared from audio/video gear; but now I'm not so sure. More like 10-15 years at MOST. Time marches on... You can either march too, or get trampled. That's just the way it is with everything, and even more so with electronics.

    I'm curious how you could do that?

    The only devices I have with HDMI are the Bluray player and the TV.

    The XBOX 360 has an optical audio out.

    But all the other equipment is RCA only, both for video and audio. I'm talking about the Wii, a turntable, a tapedeck, a CD player, the small 3.5mm to RCA lead we use to plug phone/tablets/mp3 players in the receiver (no pairing, no lost connection, no authentication problem... Instant plug and play).

    Where can you find a turntable with a TOSLINK out? Or a tapedeck with TOSLINK in/out?

    --
    Try it! Library of Babel
  69. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 0

    You don't travel to conferences, do you? I have just been to a conference in the Czech Republic and had to plug in my laptop into the projector to give a presentation. Which standard did the projector use? That's right, VGA. I just plugged the cable directly in my laptop, whereas all the macfags had to fumble around with adaptors.

    And you don't know much about electricity, do you?

    So when a ground-loop or other electrical potential between that Projector and your laptop, eats the built-in VGA port on said laptop, you'll WISH you had an interposing "adapter" to serve as a buffer between that projector and your precious laptop's motherboard. Because, if that happens to me, I can go to any largish electronics store and for $30, buy another VGA "adapter" for my "Macfag" laptop, while yours is now TOAST. Forever.

  70. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    The only way they could handle this would be to bundle in headphone jack adapter with the phone. It ought to be a cost wash with the shitty headphones, which they really ought to stop including anyway.

    Anything else is a massive failure of good will.

    Who says they won't?

  71. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Oh Slashdot. How far you have fallen.

  72. Headphone jack by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

    I have had an Iphone since the 3G model, but if they remove the headphone jack I will consider an Android.

    1. Re:Headphone jack by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I have android, I think pretty much people stick with what they are used to. Unless new iphone headphones are much more expensive than 3.5 mil jack headphones and there are no reasonably-priced adapters that seems like an odd reason for switching. Considering how much replacing your phone will cost anyway a little more for a headphone adapter seems small in comparison - is it really worth you finding your way round a different system, finding replacement apps, etc.

      I can understand if there are other dissatisfaction and this is the last straw but to change just because of the jack plug seems odd. I wouldn't switch from android just because a plug had changed (though that is much less likely with multiple manufacturers)

  73. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    I just converted my home stereo system from entirely analog, with piles of RCA cables running everywhere, to HDMI/TOSLink. I thought it was going to be very hard to get everything together; but it was quite the opposite. I replaced a gallon-ziploc bag STUFFED full of RCA cables with about 5 HDMI cables and a couple of TOSLink cables. Took a couple of hours to do the switchover, and everything just worked. So it IS possible to move forward without having to rewrite the entire U.S. Constitution... I swore it would be 50 years before the last RCA jack disappeared from audio/video gear; but now I'm not so sure. More like 10-15 years at MOST. Time marches on... You can either march too, or get trampled. That's just the way it is with everything, and even more so with electronics.

    I'm curious how you could do that?

    The only devices I have with HDMI are the Bluray player and the TV.

    The XBOX 360 has an optical audio out.

    But all the other equipment is RCA only, both for video and audio. I'm talking about the Wii, a turntable, a tapedeck, a CD player, the small 3.5mm to RCA lead we use to plug phone/tablets/mp3 players in the receiver (no pairing, no lost connection, no authentication problem... Instant plug and play).

    Where can you find a turntable with a TOSLINK out? Or a tapedeck with TOSLINK in/out?

    Well, every setup is of course, different. My TV has HDMI (obviously).

    My DVD player has HDMI (and RCAs and TOSLink).

    I took my VCR out of the system because it had a bad power supply, and because I hadn't used it in about 5 years.

    My cable box has HDMI (and RCA (and TOSLink I think)).

    I purchased a 4-port HDMI switch box to replace the 3 port RCA switch box I was using to consolidate ports. (I had also been using my VCR to do some signal-routing; but I had long-ago bypassed (literally) that.

    The computer I use (an old G5 Tower) as an iTunes server has TOSLink out, so that goes over to one of the Optical inputs on the A/V Receiver.

    The HDMI switch does audio extraction from HDMI to TOSLink, so I run TOSLink from the switch over to another Optical Input on the A/V Receiver.

    As for your tape deck, unfortunately, most modern receivers don't have a "Tape Loop" anymore (mine does, both analog and TOSLink). But you can get from RCA To/From TOSLink for less than $20 per device-to-convert with things like these, and once it is all TOSLink, there are any number of Switches, or if you have a "modern" receiver, it will likely have enough TOSLink inputs to obviate the need for an external TOSLink switch box.

    DId I forget anything? Oh yes, Turntable. Well, my Thorens TD160 has been sitting in quiet repose in my "storage room" for over 20 years; but my Receiver also still has a forest of RCAs (and I believe a Mag-Phono input), in case I ever want to hook it up again. Or, I could just get one of these thingies. I am sure there are less-expensive ones; but that is what I found in 0.5 secs of Googling for "Magnetic Phono to TOSLink".

    As I said, every setup is different, and presents different challenges. The more "legacy" media (tape and vinyl) you want to support, the more "shopping" you need to do; but it is still possible in any event.

  74. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by sexconker · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see Apple price the adapter at $2. Build your own? Most people can't solder, and most people who can solder can't solder on something as tiny as a USB-C cable's wires. Stripping the cable and the individual wires alone is a test of patience and dexterity. And an old USB-C cable? How many people out there have spare USB-C cables laying around?

    The 3.5mm jack isn't ready to be put out to pasture any more than RJ45 or NEMA 5-15.

  75. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can purchase a bluetooth receiver for your car for less than $5 on AliExpress.

    http://www.aliexpress.com/af/c...

  76. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by the+agent+man · · Score: 1

    Congratulations to owning a - probably one inch thick - laptop computer that is so old that it can directly connect to an antique East European video projector.

  77. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Personally the car is the only place I listen, so that's usually where I care the most about the sound. Car speakers tend to have a lot more fidelity than you're average home stereo; in the vehicles I buy, at least.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  78. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by iris-n · · Score: 1

    Antique? Since when projectors with VGA connectors are antique? I have never even seen a projector without a VGA connector!

    And my laptop is a T440s, bought in 2014, and a bit thinner than one inch.

    --
    entropy happens
  79. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by iris-n · · Score: 1

    Wow. So you like adaptors to protect against ground loops. Do you also walk around with shark-repellant bat-spray, just in case?

    For your information, I'm a physicist, so I actually know more about electricity than you ever will. And my professional advice is that you should worry more about being hit by a lightning than about having your motherboard fried by a ground loop.

    --
    entropy happens
  80. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by swb · · Score: 1

    How did you like your free lightning to 30 pin adapter?

  81. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Wow. So you like adaptors to protect against ground loops. Do you also walk around with shark-repellant bat-spray, just in case?

    For your information, I'm a physicist, so I actually know more about electricity than you ever will. And my professional advice is that you should worry more about being hit by a lightning than about having your motherboard fried by a ground loop.

    For your information, I have been an Embedded hardware/software developer for almost 40 years.

    So, you definitely know more about the Second Law of Thermodynamics than I ever will; but I'll bet I've had my hands on more electronics than you will ever have, you insufferable snot.

    Oh, and at one point in my youth, I was a professional audio engineer, and have personally experienced what a ground loop (or other potential caused by disparate power sources) can do, when I plugged in the non-isolated preamp-out of a guitar amp that was powered by the stage power into an audio input (also non-isolated) of a mixer that was running on "house" power. An op-amp IC in the guitar amp lost that battle, instantly, and with a nice SNAP and a satisfying little curl if smoke. This was all on stuff running on plain ol' 120 VAC.

    So, in the hypothetical example with a Projector, if the Projector was mounted on the ceiling (as many are), instead of sitting on a conference table, it is not at ALL unheard of that the Projector could be sitting as much as 192 VAC away from the power that the computer was running on. In fact, around 50 VAC mismatches are rather common. It just depends on how much CURRENT can flow through that unintended "circuit".

    And if you think what I am saying is so rare, tell that to all the people who have laptops and desktops with one or more fried ports. It is unfortunately all too common. Especially laptops, because they tend to get hooked up to every crazy thing in every crazy electrical environment. And also likely because they are designed with smaller, lower-wattage components; so a mismatch that just makes a nice, fat 0804 SMT 1/4W resistor kinda warm in a desktop is death to the teeny 0201 1/16 W resistor in the laptop.

  82. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    How did you like your free lightning to 30 pin adapter?

    Never needed one.

  83. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Toshito · · Score: 1

    The HDMI switch does audio extraction from HDMI to TOSLink, so I run TOSLink from the switch over to another Optical Input on the A/V Receiver.

    RCA To/From TOSLink for less than $20 per device-to-convert with things like these

    That's very interesting, didn't know that these converter existed.

    Thanks for the reply.

    --
    Try it! Library of Babel
  84. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    The HDMI switch does audio extraction from HDMI to TOSLink, so I run TOSLink from the switch over to another Optical Input on the A/V Receiver.

    RCA To/From TOSLink for less than $20 per device-to-convert with things like these

    That's very interesting, didn't know that these converter existed.

    Thanks for the reply.

    Yeah, there's all kinds of converters and extractors and switches, and combination-devices thereof. Amazon and eBay seem to be good sources of stuff, and also B&H Photo.

    You just have to plan it all out a bit, and be willing to re-think parts or the whole thing to get to what you want, as your research turns up devices that may suggest a better way to do things. Try to make sure anything that has multiple inputs also has a Remote.

    Speaking of Remotes, For me, the other thing that made it all make sense was the purchase of a Harmony Remote for $52 on Amazon. It "knew" every one of my kinda obscure Audio and Video devices except for my WAAAY off-brand Chinese HDMI Switch. But defining it only took about 5 minutes. But having a " scriptable" Remote takes ALL the "set this to that input, set that to this input, and set the other to another input" stuff and turns it into a one-button "Watch a DVD" or "Listen to Tape" or "Watch the Computer" "Activity", while also providing full and separate control of each device. I think it took me all of a half hour to set everything as far as the "Add Devices" and "Create Activites" goes, and then, I was actually just using the thing!

  85. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What like my $350 Bose noise cancelling headphones?

  86. Good Products, Bad Corporation. by sudon't · · Score: 1

    Two things. Number one, I can't understand why "thin" is so damn desirable for a phone. I mean, up to a point - you don't want to carry a brick in your pocket - but they're already plenty thin enough for me.
    As for the mini-jack, this is a problem for me. For one thing, I won't be able to connect the thing to my stereo, which is analog. Presumably, I'd have to buy a DAC, or some kind of wireless receiver, neither of which I'm planning on doing. Nor would it be convenient, perhaps not even possible, to use the iPhone with my truck's stereo. In my Peterbilt, the stereo, GPS, and other things are all integrated into one touch-screen display. It does have an interface to operate an MP3 player, but it's not designed for Apple devices, and it's a pretty piss-poor interface. It has no way to deal with podcasts, except as MP3 files, so I already have to work around that. Much easier to use the mini-jack and the Apple device's interface.
    Here's another thing. I'm glad my old iPod "Classic" is still working. I looked at getting a new iPod, but the hard drive sizes are all smaller. As it is, I can't fit all my music on the 160 GB hard drive I have. Aren't we supposed to be getting more storage with newer devices, not less?
    It seems people either love to bash Apple, or they're fawning fanboys, but here's my take after using their products for thirty years: Great products, (usually), bad corporation. I've always hated Apple, but I certainly wouldn't switch to Windows.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  87. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    an old USB-C cable

    I don't have a USB-C cable, the local super market that sell all kinds of cables doesn't have USB-C, I have never seen a USB-C even in the wild before... Where exactly do you live again?

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  88. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    I'm bitter about the death of VGA. It is not being replaced by a reliable standard, but by a mess of DisplayPort, miniDisplayPort, DVI, HDMI, and USB-C. I still have a VGA laptop, and it still works everywhere I go. But in a few years I'll have to buy a laptop with the least non-standard port and carry with me a bunch of adaptors. Sigh.

    Based off your description, won't you just need a single adapter to VGA at worst?

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  89. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    I simply swapped in a sub-$100 new head unit

    I have to admit, it's been years since I've been in a car that didn't have a fully integrated radio dashboard thing. I forgot those even existed. Do you think the grandparent has a swappable radio unit like you?

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  90. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by iris-n · · Score: 1

    Nowadays, yes, but soon the VGA ports will disappear from the projectors as well.

    --
    entropy happens
  91. sound quality by Smiddi · · Score: 1

    Correct me if im wrong, but doesn't the compression algorithm for wireless (Bluetooth) sound diminish the quality of the music? It might be good for "average Joe" but music buff's wont like the removal of the headphone jack?

  92. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bluetooth sucks in general, and it eats battery life.

  93. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they going to put on a second lightning port? Listening to Music or any audio uses up the battery quickly. its nice to be able to listen with the audio jack, AND have it plugged into a power source at the same time!

  94. Car audio connection by DrYak · · Score: 1

    My cars (early 2000 models) don't have any sort of aux/headphone jack/input port.

    Your car's radio doesn't have an aux jack.

    The car ifself has probably something that looks a bit like the ATX power connector of your desktop PC and is the standard connection interface between a car and a car-radio.

    From that point:

    - check if the car's radio doesn't have an external input *on* the back.
    either stereo audio + button commands (in some industrial connector too) to control a multi-CD music jukebox.
    or a stereo audio + audio mute (might be industrial, might be simple screw-on) to connect to an external in-car phone dock (but in practice, actually used for bluetooth receiver)

    - if the radio has no such connectors on its back, but only power and speakers:
    then most car electronics shop sell some spliter cable with a relay that you can use to interconnect the bluetooth receiver between the radio and the speakers and mute the audio.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  95. Re:No Headphone Jack? No Sale. by powerlord · · Score: 1

    As someone who was starting to look at upgrading his phone (5s going strong so far), I know that the lack of headphone jack is going to make me sit right back down and wait on the purchase.

    I bet you said the same about PS2 ports, floppy drives and the recently defunct CDROM drives too.

    Since you asked (assuming you mean the removal of those technologies):

    1) PS2 ports were fine for the Keyboard and Mouse, but honestly USB was a great technology to replace both those and the Serial Parallel ports (and honestly one I looked forward to since it simplified cabling and wiring). The removal of the PS2 ports happened gradually though, after USB had a chance to appear. There were also more options available at the time in terms of Windows computers. Hardly a comparable comparison.

    2) Floppy Drives were a bane. I certainly picked up a USB version for the rare times when I needed one, but it wasn't something that affected my buying choices.

    3) The recently "defunct" CDROM drives? Honestly, I can't remember the last time I bought a CDROM drive, probably ~1999. Since then its been CDR/DVD/Combo drives all the way. If you're referring to the removal of generic Disc drives, then I'd also point out that this wasn't something that happened all at once. My laptop from 6 years ago came with a disc drive. It also supported USB. The transition to flash drives and everywhere internet access is what drove and allowed the removal to not affect most people. External optical drives also allowed those who wanted/needed one to keep using one.

    Yes, assuming Apple does away with the headphone jack in favor of a Lightning connector, I am sure there will be adapters available, however the main reason for the previous changes you listed were because the technologies listed (PS2, Floppy, CDROM) had been obsoleted by existing newer technologies.

    In this case, Lightning headphones are a recent niche innovation, solely related to iOS portable devices, and the change will impact the majority of people who use those devices.

    Further while the change may certainly make the iPhone slightly thinner (is anyone really calling it fat?), the change also means Apple gets to cut the jack, the DAC and all the ansillary circuitry from the new iPhone, which I'm sure help drive costs down a little bit.

    Will it ultimately allow them to make the phone thinner, more waterproof, and allow them to deploy a full wrap-around screen (as some analysts think)? Maybe, and I can understand why it might be good for Apple to implement this technology NOW to help get the market ready for those changes, but I'm less confident that adding a new adapter is going to be that great for the consumer (but for Apple, yeah sure, great move).

    Will that alone mean I don't get a new iPhone?

    Honestly, dunno. I was on the fence as it was. The additional space and speed would be nice, but as Apple's iPhone sales have shown, existing phone technologies are sufficient for lots of people to not need the latest and greatest as fast as they used to (similar to how computer technologies have advanced to the point that most people don't need to refresh them every 2 years).

    If I have to add more costs and changes to the phone purchase (new headphones? adapters of uncertain longevity?) I may take my usual stance on any of Apple's (or any companies) new "innovations".

    Wait a revision or two for them to iron out some of the small problems that will almost inevitably crop up. By that time either the market will embrace the change, bringing with it more choice in headphones and adapters at lots of quality and price points and with the added design experience from lots of real world trials (I'm looking at you original iPhone headphone jack), or the market will reject the idea and we'll see the re-introduction of the headphone jack to the next iPhone model.

    Honestly I doubt they will revert the decision (if it has even been made, since no one knows apple's plans but apple), but it seems so silly that at the point that everyone (including airlines) have adopted the headphone form factor, Apple has decided to remove it from their lineup.

    tl;dr I need lunch :)

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.