Slashdot Mirror


Interview With A Craigslist Scammer (infoworld.com)

snydeq writes: Ever wonder what motivates people who swindle others on Craigslist? Roger Grimes did, so he set up a fake Harley Davidson ad on Craigslist and requested an interview with each scammer who replied to the ad. One agreed, and the man's answers shed light on the inner world of Craigslist scamming: "If you mean how often I make money from Craigslist, it depends on the day or week. Many weeks I make nothing. Some weeks I can get five people sending me money. But I respond to a lot of ads to get one email back. I'm not only doing Craigslist -- there are many similar places. I haven't counted, but many. It takes many emails to get paid. That's what I mean. Some weeks I lose money. It's harder than most people think. But I don't have to go into a place at a certain time and deal with bosses and customers. I can make my own time." Grimes asked the scammer a number of questions ranging from "How do you know when you have a good victim?" to "What country do you originate from?" and everything in-between. He ended the interview asking the scammer for any words of advice for readers. The scammer responded: "It's getting harder for business people like me to be successful, but if they [the victims] follow the rules it would be very hard for me to be successful. That's one of the surprises. My friends and I thought we would not be successful for so long, especially with how Craigslist is different now. But there is always someone looking to sell something who doesn't know the game."

241 comments

  1. No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >But I don't have to go into a place at a certain time and deal with bosses and customers. I can make my own time.

    And if you're lucky, you might also _do_ time.

    1. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I thought it was an interesting remark. So our sick workplace atmospheres are fostering crime...
      I guess we shouldn't be surprised, but I hadn't thought about this before.

    2. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And if you're lucky, you might also _do_ time.

      If you live in the US, yes. If you live in Nigeria, no.

    3. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you watch too much television, then yes.
      If you live in the real world where unsolved crimes vastly outnumber the solved crimes, then chances are no.
      Also, criminals are well aware of the risks they take, and they take them regardless, ergo they are criminals. Kind of a self-defeating argument cautioning a criminal that they can end up doing time.
      Kind of like saying that when you kill a person, they die...

    4. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      RTFA:

      No one ever gets caught. And if I ever got caught I would pay money and walk away. That is the way of the world.

      In Third World countries anyone can bribe their way out of anything. In the US you need to be politically well connected to get away with crimes.

    5. Re:No value by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, criminals are well aware of the risks they take

      If this were true, then setting penalties at 50% more than the reward of the crime divided by the probability of being caught would eliminate crime, yet time and time again we've seen that increasing penalties has a negligible effect on crime rates.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:No value by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      Financial penalties and being hidden away in prison does nothing for announcing to the world that Joe Criminal is a dirt bag. If we brought back stocks and chain gangs, and such, the criminals would have much more evidence that crime doesn't pay. But we are a polite society, so we hide our criminals behind doors, so that nobody knows about them.

      If I were "king" for a day, I'd start by putting every court room on TV, so that had record of everything.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:No value by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily - knowing the risks does NOT translate to believing you will be one of the ones to fail. It also doesn't mean you perform any sort of rational cost/benefit risk analysis - that's actually fairly rare behavior in any endeavor.

      Consider: organized gambling has a negative expected benefit, and pretty much everyone knows it. If people behaved rationally, there would be no market for casinos, but plenty of people are convinced that they can beat the odds, or enjoy the thrill, or become addicted to the random positive feedback, or any number of other reasons for partaking despite knowing they will almost certainly lose.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your casino one I think is incorrect. I gamble occasionally. The statement I make before I head over to a table to my friends is either "well, it's time to go throw $60 away" or "I'm going to go buy some extremely overpriced drinks". I tend to think most people go in with my mindset. Thrill? Maybe. It's entertainment and expect to pay for it same as a movie. It's an added bonus if you make money (I've only ever made money once). Now there will be those that get addicted which is sad, but it seems some will become addicted to almost anything. But if you view a casino as a place for entertainment, same as a movie theater or a "fun center" (can't think of a better term but the places with go-karts, mini golf, etc), then there's certainly a market for it. Just because it's not your brand of fun doesn't mean others don't.

      Personally for casinos I always play a meta game, it's "let's see how many 'free' drinks I can get before I've burned through my $60". If I end up at less that $10 per drink, I consider it a win.

    9. Re:No value by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Consider: organized gambling has a negative expected benefit, and pretty much everyone knows it. If people behaved rationally, there would be no market for casinos, but plenty of people are convinced that they can beat the odds, or enjoy the thrill, or become addicted to the random positive feedback, or any number of other reasons for partaking despite knowing they will almost certainly lose.

      Possibly but I know guys who just want to be entertained. Some of the games can have their outcomes optimized significantly if you understand them and apply strategy and thought. If you don't bet recklessly you can 'play' all evening on a few hundred bucks (winning occasionally) and enjoying a few drinks on the house while you are at it before you go bust. If you enjoy playing, I can see that being as rational an entertainment choice as any other.

      Now I would rather go out for a nice steak dinner and good bottle of wine followed by a movie or some other spectator event but that is a personal preference. At the end of my big night out, I'll have no more than a memory same as the guy who went to the casino most likely.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    10. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't read the article. He said if it does get caught, he'll just pay somebody and walk away. He's not in a first world country.

    11. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought it was an interesting remark. So our sick workplace atmospheres are fostering crime...
      I guess we shouldn't be surprised, but I hadn't thought about this before.

      It's not our sick workplace atmospheres, it's theirs. Wherever there is.

    12. Re:No value by Edzilla2000 · · Score: 2

      Yep, because chain gangs made sure that there was no crime, it's only in "polite societies" that there is crime...

    13. Re:No value by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Also, criminals are well aware of the risks they take

      If this were true, then setting penalties at 50% more than the reward of the crime divided by the probability of being caught would eliminate crime, yet time and time again we've seen that increasing penalties has a negligible effect on crime rates.

      The penalty doesn't have much to do with it. The prospect of being caught is what matters. You can make the penalty death by being eaten alive by rats, but if the prospect of being caught is vanishingly small most people will just disregard the punishment completely.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    14. Re:No value by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Financial penalties and being hidden away in prison does nothing for announcing to the world that Joe Criminal is a dirt bag. If we brought back stocks and chain gangs, and such, the criminals would have much more evidence that crime doesn't pay. But we are a polite society, so we hide our criminals behind doors, so that nobody knows about them.

      If I were "king" for a day, I'd start by putting every court room on TV, so that had record of everything.

      Public humiliation has a lot going for it. Private humiliation, which the prison system seems to be all about, is really not effective. It just builds relationships between the humiliated in the prison.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    15. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you're lucky, you might also _do_ time.

      In a place where somebody just might _do you_.

    16. Re:No value by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No it is just a normal criminals self rationalization.
      Just like "If the victim really cared they should had been more careful", "People are always scamming me, so I should be first"...

      Most people rarely consider themselves a monster or the villain, they will feel quite justified to themselves on what they are doing.
      That is why we have a court of law, to judge peoples actions beyond the point of view of the criminal and victim because often both sides are too focused on their point of view then what is considered right and just.

      Because often the victim of a crime does have a degree of responsibility too. Trying to acquire and illegal product. Avoiding working around the system to avoid taxes or extra fees... Often the victim isn't completely innocent, however the crime committed against them is far worse than what they were doing. However all this needs to be factored in.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    17. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criminals don't care about opinions on whether crime pays or not.
      Criminals are people who have a thirst which clouds any judgment,
      or a poverty/sense of poverty that drives them to do shit even if it means going out in a final blaze.
      We are talking the kind of people who are ready to die and ready to fail, so long as they try.
      Kind of like extreme sports enthusiasts who are driven by adrenaline,
      or people who have high risk jobs (underwater welders and such) who have accepted the risks of losing their life.

      We, and the television, constantly tell ourselves that criminals are inferior people with inferior minds, so we can feel good about ourselves and attempt to socially engineer people out of doing crime. But the reality quite different. Intelligence simply has no monopoly on morality, as the Nazis have proven for instance from the engineering and scientific aspect, or the Japanese from the bio-chemical aspect. While morality is a tool that can be bartered by people once they are driven into a corner or in other case to case scenarios.

    18. Re:No value by speedplane · · Score: 1

      ... So our sick workplace atmospheres are fostering crime... I hadn't thought about this before.

      "I don't like to work, therefore I am forced to commit crime." You haven't heard that one before?

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    19. Re:No value by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Who are you kidding. With civil forfeiture your little craiglist scam doesn't pay as well as the guy buying a dime bag of weed so the cops would much rather focus on that.

    20. Re:No value by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Yeah, by that measure, prisons make sure there is no crime too! Let's get rid of prisons, they don't stop crime either! /sarcasm

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    21. Re:No value by Sumus+Semper+Una · · Score: 1

      Also, criminals are well aware of the risks they take

      If this were true, then setting penalties at 50% more than the reward of the crime divided by the probability of being caught would eliminate crime, yet time and time again we've seen that increasing penalties has a negligible effect on crime rates.

      I think you're actually both right. Criminals are aware of the risks, but their *perception* of those risks convinces them to do it anyway.

      At some point penalties can lose meaning. The difference between 3 months in jail and a year is significant. The difference between 50 years and life in prison, not quite as much. You've still lost your place in the outside world when you get out either way about it. The difference between a $50 fine and a $250 fine is significant. A $50 million judgement against the average individual and a $250 million judgement, not so much. Either way you're going to end up bankrupt, so what's the difference?

      As others have already pointed out, you also need to factor in how likely someone *thinks* they are of getting caught. Most people are well aware that there have been draconian judgements against people who were convicted of distributing copyrighted content. But that makes no difference if they believe their chances of having a case brought against them are roughly the same as being struck by lightning. At that point it's just an act of god that happens to unlucky people.

      Tougher sentencing alone will never eliminate crime. At best, it will just skew the criminal population a little more towards those with little to lose and those who don't think they'll be caught anyway.

    22. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what point does that kick in?

      Advertisers and marketers screwing people? Selling cheap infomercial crap? Selling shit that doesn't REALLY do what you promised? Vaporware? Kickstarters? Bait and switch preorders? Selling flat out broken items?

      Companys do that all the time... Seems to be legal. And we wave it all away with 'caveat emptor'.

      'scamming' isn't much farther from any of those really. and yet is illegal.
      When they're all the same thing. taking money from the stupid.

    23. Re:No value by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      For the Cheap Infomercial Stuff, normally they do what they say they do. However not much more. Granted they are still scumm for giving the impression we are getting more, but at least we got what we ordered.
      Vaporware and Kickstarters you know the risk before you "Invest" into them.

      When companies cross the line, they get sued and the people win, it happens all the time. Now the key difference is corporation protection. Where such legal battles that may kill the company doesn't hold the owner responsible. This is a tradeoff to make sure companies are willing to take some risks and innovate. Because why would you want to sell a product where you could go to jail from a misunderstanding.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    24. Re: No value by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Criminals are badly trained neural nets.

    25. Re:No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Financial penalties and being hidden away in prison does nothing for announcing to the world that Joe Criminal is a dirt bag.

      Tell that to every ex-con who can't get an honest job. A lot of them could use a good laugh.

    26. Re: No value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I vote for hanging. All of em.

    27. Re:No value by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      If this were true, then setting penalties at 50% more than the reward of the crime divided by the probability of being caught would eliminate crime, yet time and time again we've seen that increasing penalties has a negligible effect on crime rates.

      Makes sense, however that's wrong. I've dealt with criminals. Let me take one chick for example. She is a bad check criminal. She was caught early, went to a judge, he sentenced her to I think it was a year initially. She was smart with him. He said if she comes before him again, it's 10 years. Made really, really, really sure she understood that. She was out just a week and started to write bad checks again, went before the same judge. He was flabbergasted. Asked if she understood the penalty for what she did. She said yes. She remembered from the first time.

      She got 10 years.

      So I asked her about it. She said - yea, I got caught that time. When I get out, you'll see, I'll get away with it. 10 years went by, she was let out, back in court within a month. She got another 10 years. They are convinced that they can get away with it. They are a whole lot smarter than anyone else. No matter how they are shown that's wrong. Even if you show them how 100% of the time they've been caught. I mean, they have a check, with their name on it and all... wonder who it was? Really?

      I interviewed her again, she said she'd like to be shot. She's wasting away in prison.

      Song remains the same. Murderers, rapist, drug users, etc. I won't get caught. Penalties mean nothing because they don't think they'll ever face it.

      My personal opinion - Murderers, Identity Theft, child rapist - just take them out to the court yard and hang 'em. Hang 'em high. Every 4th of July. In public display. Not cases where they *MIGHT* be not guilty. The ones where we know damn good and well they did it. Like John Gacy, Ted Bundy.... Not OJ Simpson. He *MIGHT* not have done it. Hey, stop looking at me like that. I think he did it too.

      As for the craigs list scammer? Eh, cut his balls off. If he continues, his head.

  2. Money from people who want to sell? by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

    Could someone wrap up in a few words how you could scam money from people who want to SELL something?

    From buyers, yes. You could simply ask for advance payment and refuse to deliver.

    Or is this the old "I'll overpay you $500 when I'm paying for the bike and you give $400 to my old friend Vladimirostowzitschzky, but have to do that before you see any money from my side"? Do people still fall for that?

    As another advanced reading about how successfull scamming works, I'd suggest the Most von Lipwick books in the Discworld series.

    --
    bickerdyke
    1. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes people still fall for that crap. Because most people are really stupid. and get more stupid when you trigger their "greed" center.

      It's why the Here is a $100,000 check, can you cash it and send me the change.... I'll let you have an extra $1,000 for your trouble, obvious as hell scam works. Most people brains shut off when the greed center in their brain is triggered.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As in a related blog post:
      Scammer says he'll arrange shipping.
      Sends check for amount asked + shipping + some extra "for your trouble", asks seller to pay shipping company via Western Union after receiving the check.
      "Shipping company" is a fake, selected by scammer, really is his accomplice.
      Seller receives and deposits cheque, thinks because bank "accepts" it it is good, pays shipping.
      A few days later the bank voids the bogus check because it isn't covered.

    3. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Tx · · Score: 2

      Could someone wrap up in a few words how you could scam money from people who want to SELL something?

      I was wondering that. There's probably a lot of different scams, but a commonly documented one seems to be that the "buyer" will send you a fake cheque for a larger value than what you are selling the item for under some pretext or other, and ask you to cash it and send them the difference via various hard to trace means. Often banks will cash the cheque and not discover the fraud until later, when you will be on he hook to pay the bank back the full value of the cheque.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    4. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Moist, not Most. Lipwig, not Lipwick.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    5. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/16/06/06/1748256/man-sued-for-30k-over-40-printer-he-sold-on-craigslist

    6. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Sorry. That's what you get from reading those books in more than one language....

      --
      bickerdyke
    7. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by RevRagnarok · · Score: 1

      Or audio, LOL...

      --
      I should put something clever here. Maybe someday.
    8. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by jurgen · · Score: 2

      Follow the second link. That page has cear info (with examples) of various types of common scams.

    9. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's why the Here is a $100,000 check, can you cash it and send me the change.... I'll let you have an extra $1,000 for your trouble, obvious as hell scam works. Most people brains shut off when the greed center in their brain is triggered.

      The main problem here is that people think the bank has verified the authenticity of the check when they've "cleared" it and given you access to the money, and that any failure to spot a fake check is now their problem. Like if I go deposit some cash I got from a yard sale I expect the bank to either accept it or reject it. Not accept it now and two weeks later say "Hey, those bills you gave us a few weeks ago were counterfeit we're deducting $200 from your account". And you never get a second "real" confirmation that your bank got their money from the intra-bank system you only know when they don't. The system is pretty rigged against the somewhat clueless and gullible person who goes to a professional money handler that appears to say everything is okay.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That page has cear info (with examples) of various types of common scams.

      It might for you, but for me it just says "This IP has been automatically blocked."

      I just clicked on it out of curiosity. I guess it thinks i am a scammer, despite having never used craigslist for anything before in my whole life.

    11. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Fraudulent checks, chargeback on PayPal accounts etc. The scammer gets the product and you're out of money. Others are of the "let us trade", but the trade is worthless (fake products etc). They then resell it elsewhere. There are others that simply rob you when you make the appointment.

      That's the scams I've seen. There may be others but those would be more obvious scams and less people fall for the "give me cash for this overvalued check".

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    12. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Could someone wrap up in a few words how you could scam money from people

      IRS, Apple, Starbucks, and the Department of Motor Vehicles

    13. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I once overheard a conversation in a bank where someone went to deposit a check for seven times the asking price of an old moldy trailer that she was selling to someone in Slovakia who just had to have that very trailer. This was in a Swedish bank. The cashier was gaping in awe at what an amazing deal the customer had gotten. Another customer who heard it tried to tell both of them what was going on, but they didn't want to hear any of it. This was about one week into a massive flood of news reports about this type of scam, in all major news media in the country.

    14. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandfather is one of those people. He's particularly gullible with phone scam artists. Some people called up and got him to wire them $15,000.

      I know people who fall for the fake cashiers check shit constantly. Random people ask them to go try to cash a fake check, and they do it. Oh just because the last 15 checks were fake doesn't mean this one is!

    15. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by JeffOwl · · Score: 2

      I wonder what would happen if you just went to a check cashing place. Obviously they wouldn't take a check for $100K, but say $1K.

    16. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      It's why the Here is a $100,000 check, can you cash it and send me the change.... I'll let you have an extra $1,000 for your trouble, obvious as hell scam works. Most people brains shut off when the greed center in their brain is triggered.

      The main problem here is that people think the bank has verified the authenticity of the check when they've "cleared" it and given you access to the money, and that any failure to spot a fake check is now their problem. Like if I go deposit some cash I got from a yard sale I expect the bank to either accept it or reject it. Not accept it now and two weeks later say "Hey, those bills you gave us a few weeks ago were counterfeit we're deducting $200 from your account". And you never get a second "real" confirmation that your bank got their money from the intra-bank system you only know when they don't. The system is pretty rigged against the somewhat clueless and gullible person who goes to a professional money handler that appears to say everything is okay.

      In the US, banks have to make the funds available shortly after deposit, before the check clears; which makes people think the check is good when it isn't.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    17. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      It might for you, but for me it just says "This IP has been automatically blocked."

      I just clicked on it out of curiosity. I guess it thinks i am a scammer, despite having never used craigslist for anything before in my whole life.

      IP blocking is not only for scam reason. If you really want to know, you need to check with the site...

    18. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by houghi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Same as some people who think that if they send you a proof of payment means that the payment is done. It isn't. It is when it is on our bank account.

      With automatic payment there are rules that they can get the money back within a certain amount of time and when they follow certain rules. So even AFTER it has arrived on our account. Luckily almost nobody knows how to do that and if they do it for the wrong reason, it will be fraud and the payment has to asked for by the receiver, not send to by the person doing the payment.

      As a European we do not use checks anymore. So no "the check is in the mail". What we are dealing with now is that when a person does a money transfer it take several working days (not even calander days) before the money is with us. Technically this could be done almost instandly, like a credit card payment. However due to some laws it takes 3 working days (to businesses).Not going int detail, but the reason is that the Americans are not working on the weekend when they want to look at the transactios.

      The issseu as a company is that when people say they did a payment, they show they did a payment we still can not handle it as if the payment was done and you have customers that are pissed of and thing we are stealing.

      So no, this is NOT because the banks can make money from those two days. It is NOT because we want to make money for a few days. It is even NOT the customer who want to pay a few days late and says the payment was done while it wasn't. It is because the Mericans need to know because of terrawrists.

      Unfortunately many banks employess do not know this and give the wrong info to their customers, because they do not deal with companies and mainly with payment between private persons within their own bank where the payments DO happen almost imediately.

      Private person to company at the same bank? 3 working days.

      In general I do like the banking system. It works, exept for this where the US had to meddle because they want all the data they can get their hands on.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    19. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The main problem here is that people think the bank has verified the authenticity of the check when they've "cleared" it

      Is it? I think the main problem is how slow and incompetent the banks are. Why does it take more than a few seconds to verify (or not) a check?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

      A friend's mom fell for the "cash our totally legitimate [wink wink] checks and money orders for us and you can keep ten percent" scam. They cleaned her out. I feel a little bad for her (more for him because guess who had to step up and cover bills and mortgage payments). But I don't feel a lot bad because she wasn't old and senile. She got greedy tunnel vision.

      If some company has tens of thousands of dollars in legitimate checks and money orders to deposit, they can get a bank account. The bank will assign them a personal banker who will stroke their egos (at the very least) every time they walk in the door. They won't need to find random people on the internet to cash the checks for a 10% fee. That's ridiculous.

    21. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They would have the information from your ID, which is likely real since you think you're being honest. Thus when the cheque bounces a bailiff will show up at your door for cheque fraud (a little more serious than just not paying debts, thus the bailiff rather than annoying collections agencies).

    22. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is a good bit of diversity in scams, however. I've been reading up on the different varieties as I've been looking to make some sizeable purchases from China and the number of scammers operating among the legitimate manufacturers/service providers over there is disturbing.

        For example, one involves freight forwarders. They actually do have your goods shipped to your port of destination - but they don't send you the bill of lading, so you can't prove that you actually own the goods and thus can't collect them from customs. They then demand huge sums for the bill of lading so that you can actually collect your goods.

      A common one with legitimate manufacturers themselves is exploiting any terms that you didn't specify, especially "price inflation". Unless you have it spelled out, they'll charge you for all sorts of unexpected costs (after you've made your initial deposit, of course) on top of the agreed-upon price. And more common than actual scams are quality issues. It's usually easier for them to just decide to lose you as a potential repeat customer than to spend a lot of money ensuring quality or to fix production errors.

      With actual scammers, and sometimes legitimate manufacturers, one's in big trouble if they don't use a service that allows them to dispute the charges (paypal, credit card, legitimate escrow service, etc) and instead get tricked into using western union or other non-contestable source. Even if you're dealing with a legitimate supplier, once they have your money, they have relatively little motivation to follow through. Few have any sort of reputation that they need to protect; they can always just rebrand. And sometimes the company is legitimate but an employee is acting rogue.

      Verification is made harder because sometimes the people buyers are supposed to be able to trust are in cahoots with the crooks - for example, there was a scandal a while back involving Alibaba with this sort of thing. An important part of working with foreign manufacturers is ordering an inspection (to see if you're dealing with a real factory that can actually make the real thing you're ordering, and to inspect produced goods before making the final payment). But there's no legal requirements for a person to meet in order to be able to classify themselves as an "inspector" or an "inspection company".

      The whole thing is a minefield :P

      --
      Monkeywrench Ex Machina.
    23. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You realize that every time you write "Crooked Hillary" you make yourself look like an idiot incapable of independent thought, don't you?

      Come on, at least make up your own name calling insults.

    24. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Why do people still use checks in this day in age? The mind boggles.

      --
      Monkeywrench Ex Machina.
    25. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, the same reason there are forums full of people saying COBOL is a great language worth learning. At some point you just have to draw the line.

    26. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew I smelled a trump zombie in this thread.

      PEEEE-YOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    27. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about half the bills i have to pay (mortgage, utilities, etc) would charge extra per month to receive an automatic draft.

    28. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're the sort of idiots who think that the IRS really wants them to pay their taxes in iTunes gift cards.

    29. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You listened to the audiobook? If so, could you tell me how "Lipwig" is meant to be pronounced? It always seemed like the "w" should be pronounced like an English "v", as in "Rottweiler", and the later revelation of Lipwigzers seems to support that. Or is it more of an English "w", making "Lipwig" sound like a creative name for a fake moustache? (which would be fitting for the character)

    30. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Why do they *have* to? In the UK thats the banks discretion - many don't credit the account until the cheque or payment has cleared, so why do US banks have to do it that way?

    31. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I prefer "Morally Bankrupt, lying, criminal, carpetbagger Hillary" personally.

    32. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... *you* just wrote Crooked Hillary as well...

    33. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the same reason there are forums full of people saying COBOL is a great language worth learning.

      Because the install base remains static year after year, but the number of people who can actually maintain such systems is always dropping? How does that relate to banks and the way that they handle checks?

    34. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Different AC here. I had been using Lyin' Ted, but it rolls off the tongue so easily. Crooked Hillary just doesn't really have any zing. I just like to remind people that Hillary is a lizard person instead.

    35. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to its common for them to do so though.

      Certain checks are cleared immediately, for example Government issued checks are usually available immediately for anyone. Other checks depend upon weather the account holder has been with the bank for a while, if the check is drawn from an account at an affiliate, if its an instate check, if the teller thinks your cute, etc.

      I have walked into a bank monthly and cashed checks on the spot without any issues, but get the teller who just transferred there, or a manager, or go in when a different shift is working, and been told I'd have to wait three days. This was with a reoccurring monthly government check. Honestly if you need the cash right away I recommend going in and asking when it will be available, and if you don't like the answer go to a different branch.

    36. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! I refuse to pay a "convenience" fee for any transaction which is more convenient for the one receiving my money. I will continue to mail a check to those companies, thereby costing them more money than if they would simply drop the convenience fee from the automatic debit.

    37. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Kierthos · · Score: 2

      An online friend of mine was doing book editing work for a "customer from hell", who kept demanding change after change after change, and when they finally told the CFH that they could no longer work with/for them, the CFH did chargebacks on all the payments they had done through PayPal.

      PayPal was of no help whatsoever in the situation.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    38. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Sarlok · · Score: 2

      It's the law. The maximum hold is 9 business days, but that's only for new accounts; accounts older than 30 days can hold funds for at most 7 business days.

    39. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth hurt, Hill Shill?

    40. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I don't disagree with your first point, your second assumes a legitimate company. Most of these scams let the victim think that the person needing to move the cash is not able to work with the banking system. A popular one involves someone needing to get money out of a failed state quickly. They make up all sorts of plausible sounding reasons why a bank wouldn't deal with them (in some cases, hinting that the money was acquired illegally, so you shouldn't feel bad about taking 10% for a few minutes' work because you're just stealing from a criminal).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    41. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by jcr · · Score: 1

      "Oh, sorry: I don't accept checks. For that amount, I'll only accept gold, and that will only be credited to you once I've melted the bars, struck coins out of them, and submitted them to a personal friend for an assay by mass spectrometry."

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    42. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by jcr · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Crooked Hillary" is a very succinct description of that corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, and self-absorbed bitch.

      BTW, what does a Crooked Hillary astroturfer get paid for sniveling on slashdot these days?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    43. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by jcr · · Score: 1

      I know this is difficult for you to understand, but not everyone fits into one of the two boxes in your tiny little mind. It does not follow that if someone criticizes one of the Ruling Party's criminal narcissists, that they support the other one.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    44. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Sique · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You don't have much clue about banking, do you?

      A check is just an order to pay from a certain account to either the specified person or the person cashing in the check. If the account is not with the bank the check is presented to, you have interbanking transfer. And you have transactions (read an RDBMS manual to learn about transactions!). Basicly one bank has to lock the account at the other bank, check the balance, withdraw the money and then credit it to its own account. For security reasons, no bank can simply lock an account at another bank. Instead, the transaction is split into two transactions between the banks and a clearing point. The bank the check is presented to is booking against that account at another bank at the clearing point, creating a short time debt. Then the clearing point is performing all transactions with the other bank, and thus creating a short time credit voucher. The debt and the credit voucher are then cleared at the clearing point, thus the name. If they don't match, both transactions are rolled back the next time the banks and the clearing point contact each other. A copy of the check is mailed to the other bank. So it takes at least three transaction runs just to get money from one checking account to the bank to cash out a check. For security reasons, the transaction runs are done several times (I know of one bank which does it at least five times with five different ways to transfer the transaction file, just to make sure the transaction file is complete, not hampered with and authorized).

      Now the other bank has an account where money was withdrawn. The owner of said account has a certain time limit (depends on the Terms of Services, but can easily be two weeks) to dispute the withdrawal and to cancel it. If he says that the check is fraudulent, the original check will be inspected at the other bank, and if there is anything fishy about the check, the transactions are reversed. So it can take easily more than two weeks until a check finally clears. And it has nothing to do with incompetent and slow banks.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    45. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I advertised a room available on CL, I got a feeler from some asshole who pretended that they wanted to send me a full year's rent in advance, sight unseen. I told him to go fuck himself, but if it happens again I think I'll try to get the check and turn it over to the Secret Service. I'd get tremendous satisfaction if one of these scumbags eventually ended up in jail.

    46. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Why is your banking system so backwards than from the rest of the modern world? Checks have been essentially completely phased out here among the general public because everyone has a common, unified banking system with free transfers between accounts with little effort, a unified billing system (everyone's bank account has a bill "inbox"), etc.

      --
      Monkeywrench Ex Machina.
    47. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 1

      We're trying to sell a couch right now - the only responses have been scammers.

      My wife has been handling the messages, but my understanding is that it works like this:

      (1) The "buyer" says they can't pay cash, that the only payment methods available to them right now are (something that can initially succeed, then fail later - e.g., a check, PayPal, etc.).

      (2) They'll send their mover to pick up the item once the transfer has succeeded.

      But...how do they get any money? My understanding is that there is a step 3 - they ask you to pay the "mover" who comes to pick up the item, after giving you more than you agreed to in step (2).

      The easiest way to make this work as a scammer would be to be the "mover" yourself, take the money and the item and then try to sell the item yourself. But that leaves a really obvious trail, so I'm not sure if there's more to it or not.

    48. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Most people brains shut off when the greed center in their brain is triggered.

      Its the old confidence man thing.

      And for the silliest things. Here's an example.

      Old Toyota RV's. These were made from the late 70's to the early 90's. But they have become popular in recent years. I have a mid-80's version.

      But people have become so enamored of the things that Craigslist and eBay get scammers regularly. With crazy stuff like telling the marks that the Mini-RV is wrapped in plastic in storage at an airport warehouse, or ripped off photos of other people's RV's posing as the scammer's own. With the owner of the RV warning the marks that it is a scam. The marks do not care.

      Belonging to a group involved with the Toyhomes, you can see the greed and scamming at work. I'd seen dozens of people ripped off, flying to another state with the intention of buying the RV and driving it back. And if you try to talk people out of it, you'll get attacked for it by other people who are future marks, and what can only be some of the scammers.

      Then after being taken to the cleaners, the marks come back and moan about it. But there have been a few who have a greed center so strong they have been scammed more than once.

      All over 30 year old RVs

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    49. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a European we do not use checks anymore

      Not true. Checks are quite common in some countries, and not at all in others. As another European, I use checks all the time. They work differently than US checks, though -- you can trust that the money is there if you are given a check.

    50. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by PixelPusher1532 · · Score: 1

      Why do people still use checks in this day in age? The mind boggles.

      For me checks feel more like money when I write them. There is not as much pain for some reason entering a few numbers on a screen, or just clicking 'auto pay'. We set up direct deposit payroll for my employees at one point. I stopped it after a month. I did not feel connected to where my money was going when I would just get a line on bank screen saying "total payroll draft was $xxxxx". Kind of the same reason that $50 bill can sit in your wallet for a long time unbroken, but the minute you break it and have two $20s, they are gone. If I could, I would do payroll in cash. Then would really love it if the employees could then take that cash and pay their taxes that are normally withheld from a check. Let them feel what they are really getting paid and how much they are paying (or I am paying on their behalf) for taxes and benefits. I pay everything I can with a check or cash.

    51. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously sign your post with your username even though your username is right above your post? What a weirdo.

    52. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Belonging to a group involved with the Toyhomes

      Hey, I knew someone who had an 80's Toyota Dolphin. I could see him falling for a scam.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    53. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I posted an anti-Clinton rant the other day at 6PM, when the paid shills were off the clock. It went to +4 insightful before the next morning over 14 hours. Between 8 am and 10 am it went from +4 insightful to -1 Troll. Nothing but name calling of me in response, no one refuted any of the facts posted.

      Anyone who thinks the Clinton supporters are not paid, just look at how many posts non-working hours in the East Coast of the US. One of their centers is in the Carolinas.

    54. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the US, banks have to make the funds available shortly after deposit, before the check clears

      The real issue is that it's 2016 and checks don't fucking clear instantly yet!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    55. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where? The last time I used checks was in 1997 during a trip to Japan since the closest ATM I could use my debitcard was 100+ km away at an international airport (hadn't used them since about 1992). In 2002 checks were abolished in the Netherlands.

    56. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      That really really sucks.

    57. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because banks were holding onto funds that had already cleared for up to two weeks, collecting interest on those funds, rather than the depositor. The banks' abusive behavior forced the law.

      At one point, Shittybank was holding PAYCHECKS done by direct deposit for up to two weeks. This would be around 1984 or so.

    58. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by MrKrillls · · Score: 2

      Why still use checks? Because it seems that too often online accounts are not properly secure. One company I deal with will not allow signins over 12 digits - and only alphanumeric, no other characters. They are a very big company with no excuse to be back in the 1990s level of sorta secure.

      --
      Don't step on the baby.
    59. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the rest of the world it is the exactly the other way, you'd have to pay extra for non automatic withdrawals. A withdrawal batch is created, uploaded to the bank, in a (work)day or 2 you know which ones failed, reschedule them in 1 week (repeat till you want to contact the customer). Your way there is extra handling needed to check for which customer and if there is enough credited.

    60. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Edzilla2000 · · Score: 1

      The real issue is that it's 2016 and checks are still actually used...

    61. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Edzilla2000 · · Score: 1

      France, at least.
      Most people routinely use checks for rent, for instance.
      In Belgium however, they haven't used a check in the last 15 or 20 years.

    62. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      I prefer "Monica's Ex Boy-Friend's Wife"

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    63. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      About the same as one supporting Monica's ExBoyfriend's Wife does.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    64. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      The amazing thing is that in today's world, it takes 7 days to clear a check at all. When the banking system is run on sub Millisecond transactions at Wall Street, millions of times a day, it is hard to believe that it takes seven days of float (the real game) to complete the transaction.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    65. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      Because the Visa/Mastercard cartel want to control any flow of money that isn't a paper check.

    66. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by cob666 · · Score: 2

      Could someone wrap up in a few words how you could scam money from people who want to SELL something?

      The most common scam aimed at sellers is the potential buyer (scammer) sends you an email that they want the item but they're out of town and will have their shipping company pick the item up. You're selling a guitar for $500, they tell you they'll send you a check for $550 to cover the guitar plus the $50 to give to their shipping company when the pick up the item. They send you a check for $650 and an email that the check was accidentally sent for the wrong amount. They ask you to cash the check at your bank and then Western Union the remaining $100 to them. Your bank will most likely 'clear' the check in 3-5 business days so you THINK the check is good because the money is in your account. You send them their 'extra' $100. 4 days later you check your bank account to find that the $650 deposit was reversed because it was in fact NOT a good check.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    67. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We anonymous Cowards need to sign our name. How else do you tell us apart?

      -Anonymous Coward

    68. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Banks make money off of float, which is the 2 day holding period you speak of, hence why it is business days and not weekend/holidays.

    69. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The w in rottweiler is pronounced as a w and not a v! It's German afterall (litterally: from the place Rottweil).

    70. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      You realize that every time you write "Crooked Hillary" you make yourself look like an idiot incapable of independent thought, don't you?

      Come on, at least make up your own name calling insults.

      Maybe AC really is Donald Trump?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    71. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      So no, this is NOT because the banks can make money from those two days.

      If the banks truly weren't interested in making money from those two days, they'd deduct the funds immediately. But then after the transaction was finalized, post-date the transaction as having occurred two days later. That way you'd get credit (earn interest) on that money during the two day float (time between when the money leaves your account and when the recipient gets paid). This would be trivial to implement.

      When I bought my house, the escrow company credited me with interest earned on my down payment during the 45 days from when I gave them the money to when they sent me back a refund check for the excess amount I'd paid (and earned as interest). That's the way it should work with an ethical third party overseeing a transfer of money between two parties. They were paid a fee for their services, but the money was never theirs so any interest earned wasn't theirs. The way banks do it now, they're stealing your money by keeping that interest. If they want to charge a transaction fee, then they should be up-front about it and tell you there's a transaction fee per check.

    72. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Why do they *have* to? In the UK thats the banks discretion - many don't credit the account until the cheque or payment has cleared, so why do US banks have to do it that way?

      Checks are way more commonly used in North America than they are in the UK. I hadn't seen a check book for 25 years, when I came to North America I basically had to have one.

      The banking system in North America is pretty antiquated, as are many things (taste in music for one thing, the only music you hear in public places is golden oldies. Motorbikes are just toys. Don't get me started on toilets).

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    73. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience most B-2-B transactions in the UK are cheques unless they involve 5 or more digits, I cash 4 or 5 of them a day.

    74. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      My 'favorite' thing with the banking here in North America is sending money from my bank account to someone elses bank account (within the same country) was a 'wire transfer' and they wanted $30 for it!

      WTF? I've lived in 3rd world countries where bank to bank transfers were free and instantaneous!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    75. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I've lived in 3rd world countries where bank to bank transfers
      >were free and instantaneous!

      That is not a nice thing to say about the EU.

    76. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't speak German.

    77. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Why do people still use checks in this day in age? The mind boggles.

      Because they live in North America. Its about the only place in the world so backward that they still routinely use checks.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    78. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Why is your banking system so backwards than from the rest of the modern world? Checks have been essentially completely phased out here among the general public because everyone has a common, unified banking system with free transfers between accounts with little effort, a unified billing system (everyone's bank account has a bill "inbox"), etc.

      Hah! In North America transfers between accounts (bank to bank) are a WIRE transfer and cost about $30.

      Coming here was like going back in time 30 years.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    79. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by taustin · · Score: 1

      In the US, banks have to make the funds available shortly after deposit, before the check clears; which makes people think the check is good when it isn't.

      With a check drawn on a US bank, normally, the bank you deposit it into knows it's good before you walk out the door. Sometimes (as with paychecks), before you walk into the door.

      This scam only works when it's (supposedly) drawn on a bank that's not part of the US banking system.

    80. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by taustin · · Score: 2

      Not as much as being evicted because your rent check bounced, because you bank held your paycheck deposit for three weeks to get the "float."

      There's a reason it's the law.

    81. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by taustin · · Score: 1

      From a US bank to a US bank, it takes minutes to verify a check (though I believe the transfer of funds is only once a day).

      Banks outside the US are not part of the same network.

    82. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally free if you ask for a EFT (electronic fund transfer). Mentioning the phrase "wire transfer" is automatic large fee

    83. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by speedplane · · Score: 0

      There is irony here that people are posting pro-trump comments on an article about scammers. No one is a bigger scammer than the drumpf.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    84. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Generally free if you ask for a EFT (electronic fund transfer). Mentioning the phrase "wire transfer" is automatic large fee

      I've found that this isn't always (even often) an option

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    85. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      >I've lived in 3rd world countries where bank to bank transfers
      >were free and instantaneous!

      That is not a nice thing to say about the EU.

      Ok I shouldn't refer to the EU as a country. That'll get the Brits all pissed off.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    86. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for this is that in the US, we do most things FIRST.

      Why does most of the world have better, cheaper cell service? Because we rolled out cell phones first and had to absorb all of those costs and now have to deal with all of the legacy legal issues and wavelength allocations. And the list goes on, but to the relevant topic:

      Why is our banking system the way it is? Because we invented wire transfer and most of the modern banking network systems, as well as credit card networks. Now we are stuck with massive lobbies for Visa and Mastercard who block any legal reforms to streamline and simplify electronic payments that dont go through their fingers (and giving them their 3% cut)... As earlier posts have pointed out, there is no reason not to be doing everything instantly through electronic bank to bank debit transactions with a $0.10 per transaction fee that is still $0.09 over the banks cost.

    87. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Why do they *have* to? In the UK thats the banks discretion - many don't credit the account until the cheque or payment has cleared, so why do US banks have to do it that way?

      Checks are way more commonly used in North America than they are in the UK. I hadn't seen a check book for 25 years, when I came to North America I basically had to have one.

      The banking system in North America is pretty antiquated, as are many things (taste in music for one thing, the only music you hear in public places is golden oldies. Motorbikes are just toys. Don't get me started on toilets).

      At least we don't drink warm beer, and don't get me started on British cars. In fairness to Britain, if Lucas made our refrigerators we'd be drinking warm beer as well.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    88. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. She'd go well with "Repeatedly bankrupt, lying, criminally fraudulent, silver spoon Trump."

    89. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by codeButcher · · Score: 2

      This is one of the things to look out for when selling in my locale at least:

      Seller wants to sell some not-too-cheap, but easily tradable item. E.g. mobile phone, TV, or even car. Buyer contacts him, sets up the payment (e.g. check deposit or EFT) and sends "proof of payment" to Seller (often, the Seller's bank will do this automatically, e.g. text message to mobile, or e-mail that a deposit was made). This often happens on a Friday afternoon. Then Buyer begs to take delivery of the goods "for emergency use on the weekend" or some other soppy story. Ignorant Seller agrees, because he has proof of payment. In the mean time, the check bounces while being processed (insufficient funds), the credit card gets cancelled by it's original owners somewhere in America or Japan, the EFT gets reversed (not sure how this is done, but it has been done), etc. etc. The Buyer now has some "free" goods to be sold by his fence for a net profit.

      Basically theft, just they do not come into your house to see what you've got, since you advertise it for everyone to see. More or less with the same difficulties of fencing the loot, which may be difficult but not insurmountable.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    90. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Why do they *have* to? In the UK thats the banks discretion - many don't credit the account until the cheque or payment has cleared, so why do US banks have to do it that way?

      Checks are way more commonly used in North America than they are in the UK. I hadn't seen a check book for 25 years, when I came to North America I basically had to have one.

      The banking system in North America is pretty antiquated, as are many things (taste in music for one thing, the only music you hear in public places is golden oldies. Motorbikes are just toys. Don't get me started on toilets).

      At least we don't drink warm beer, and don't get me started on British cars. In fairness to Britain, if Lucas made our refrigerators we'd be drinking warm beer as well.

      Well your beer has to be drunk freezing cold so that its palatable. Even the ales are over-hopped to compensate for how cold they are served... so when they are served at a proper temperature its like drinking earwax.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    91. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Yes and because you invented it you think that what you have now is perfect and you don't keep up with the changes and improvements that the rest of the world makes, because you are 'Murca, fuck yeah!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    92. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have sympathy for the idiot trying to commit money laundering. If all those scams were actually real that is what you would be doing, money laundering. I've never had sympathy of the people that do it for that reason, it's clearly illegal to do what you are asked to do you people follow through because of their greed.

      People would probably learn quicker if they prosecuted everyone that got scammed for money laundering.

    93. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Everyone one of those scams is implicitly asking someone to assist with money laundering, which is illegal. But people get tunnel vision thinking about the cash and don't really consider that what they have agreed to do is illegal if real.

    94. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I dont buy that - here in the UK, payroll is done by direct deposit, its a rare situation where you get a cheque or cash. And if you are paid by cheque, then you should be planning for the delays.

    95. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These posters may or may not be from Correct the Record. At the very least, it's in the lizard people's interests to keep this two party con game going as long as they can.

    96. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by phorm · · Score: 1

      As soon as I post up anything on kijiji (free buy-and-sell) with a phone #, I get texted within the day by all sorts of scammers. Normally it's similar to this sort of thing "oh, I'm buying it for my girlfriend who lives in X." Quite often, there's no overpayment necessary, just a fake paypal transaction (an email that looks like it's from Paypal saying you got cash) or even a real one but from a compromised card/account etc.

    97. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I would have guessed they'd be paid on a piecework basis, rather than hourly.

      BTW, would you mind posting those facts again?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    98. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by jcr · · Score: 1

      I'm seeing anti-Clinton comments. What pro-Trump comments are you referring to?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    99. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Kid, you've been bitching at me about signing my posts long enough to know that I'm not going to stop, no matter how much you snivel about it. Get some serious professional help.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    100. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by HeavenlyWhistler · · Score: 1

      The purpose of the law is to prevent banks from deliberately holding your money to avoid paying interest, or otherwise profiting on it. Years ago, when the regulations allowed a longer hold time of 10 days (or so, it was a long time ago), I had a case where I wrote a check to myself (from bank A) and deposited it in my account at bank B. Deposited on Friday, Bank A reported to me that the check cleared on Monday. Bank B didn't make the money available to me until around 10 days later. When I called bank B to ask why they held the money so long when I knew they had it on Monday, they replied "because we can". The employee gets points for being honest, I guess. In later years, when physical transportation time was less of an issue, the regulations were updated to reduce the hold times to what they are today.

    101. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Except you're not the one drafting the bad cheque, that would be the scammer that wrote it.

      They might get you for having a debt since the cheque didn't result in money - similar to a bounced cheque - but I don't think it's cheque fraud (not for you, anyhow).

    102. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You don't have much clue about banking, do you?

      I knew already most of what you've said here. What I don't understand is why clearing a check still sucks so badly when financial trades can be made in fractions of a second.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    103. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      well, that's why you spend money hiring a lawyer to convince the court/jury that *you* didn't craft that fraudulent check.

    104. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You have a negative impression of her. Now, think. Where did you get that impression? People keep talking about Benghazi without telling me anything she did wrong. They talk about the emails like they knew of specific criminal behavior. As far as I can tell, Republicans have been throwing baseless accusations against the Clintons for at least the last twenty years.

      I've reached the point in this process where I pretty much ignore anything negative I hear about the Clintons without strong evidence backing it up.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    105. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      First Nigerian scam email I ever got said they were sending the message to me because I was known to be honest. What I was asked to do was pretty obviously illegal. It amused me.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    106. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Web's babymama.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    107. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you're going to do any business with paypal, you setup a dedicated account for paypal to have access to and never leave a nickle in it.

      That information is as old as 'don't fall for nigerian scams'. It's not like paypal just recently became untrustworthy.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    108. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? I have yet to have someone hack my check password.
      and if someone were to steal my checkbook, it's on the bank to verify the signature when accepting the check on my account.

      so yeah, similar to the air force using 8 inch floppy discs for the nuclear system, I sometimes like the old tech.
      Or, if you're of a sci fi mindset, "Battlestar Galactica".

    109. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by fred911 · · Score: 1

      "didn't craft that fraudulent check."

      In the states it doesn't matter, the minute you endorse the back, you're responsible for the validity of the instrument and the return of funds if the instrument is returned unfunded for any reason.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    110. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      We have a word for that, "politician", or at least "successful politician". Especially true in some countries where money is one of the biggest qualifiers for office.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    111. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Why do they *have* to? In the UK thats the banks discretion - many don't credit the account until the cheque or payment has cleared, so why do US banks have to do it that way?

      Checks are way more commonly used in North America than they are in the UK. I hadn't seen a check book for 25 years, when I came to North America I basically had to have one.

      The banking system in North America is pretty antiquated, as are many things (taste in music for one thing, the only music you hear in public places is golden oldies. Motorbikes are just toys. Don't get me started on toilets).

      At least we don't drink warm beer, and don't get me started on British cars. In fairness to Britain, if Lucas made our refrigerators we'd be drinking warm beer as well.

      Well your beer has to be drunk freezing cold so that its palatable. Even the ales are over-hopped to compensate for how cold they are served... so when they are served at a proper temperature its like drinking earwax.

      In fairness, you don't drink beer, you just temporarily hold it; sometimes it's easier just to pour it into a toilet and cut out the middle man, especially if it is a "light" beer which is already preprocessed for disposal. I just admit to a liking for Fuller's London Porter properly served.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    112. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Why? I can easily write a cheque for my sons school and he isn't going to spend it and if it gets lost, it is easy to stop it. As nice as cash is, it is not always practical.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    113. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call that "shortly".

      In Canada, I was expecting 3-5 business days on $10,000+ cheque deposited into accounts less than a year old. I called up, the agent said three business days, but the system said after midnight of the second business day. I could understand that fast if the cheque was written from same bank, but it wasn't. I was pleasantly surprised.

      At my old bank, theyâ(TM)d give me access to $1000 right away, and then 3 business days for the rest. If you build a relationship with the bank branch, you might get the immediate access limit raised and days for rest reduced. I know when I called a branch years ago, upon giving my name, asked if I was Jerry's son, and I said yes, and had no issues getting funds made available immediately.

    114. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Not saying they are not interested. I am saying it is not the reason.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    115. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't speak German.

      Neither does my rottweiler.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    116. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      You know what? I have yet to have someone hack my check password.
      and if someone were to steal my checkbook, it's on the bank to verify the signature when accepting the check on my account.

      so yeah, similar to the air force using 8 inch floppy discs for the nuclear system, I sometimes like the old tech.
      Or, if you're of a sci fi mindset, "Battlestar Galactica".

      There are ways to access your account details through checks (the code numbers on them), you should never let a check fall into the wrong hands. They should always be securely disposed of.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    117. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      At Benghazi she repeatedly ignored requests for security upgrades for a year, and ignored an active riot condition where they were requesting help for many hours instead telling the soldiers to hold back. Also, because of her personal email server, she was able to delay, and conceal any evidence of her wrongdoing. The concealing was so bad that the congressperson was able to show that she hid around 9/10 of the emails having to do with it.

      As far as the email server, it literally broke the law. There are laws that define what records retension is required of a person who is in charge of the state department, she didn't follow them, and could be facing charges just for that. Encouraging people to remove classification markings from classified documents is just icing on the cake, and having the emails where she told her interns to do it, is just proof of a Felony. Receiving in email documents she should have known would be classified top secret and not reporting them is another Felony, but harder to prove. If she forwarded any of those emails on to anyone, that just adds to the charges.

      If you honestly believe that she did no wrong, I'm sorry for you. She intentionally hid the emails about what happened in Benghazi by running her own email server, then when they requested the emails, rather than turning them over, she went through them and cleaned out "personal" emails. Last I checked, when you get a subpoena, you don't get to decide which emails apply to the court order.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    118. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Feel the Johnson!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    119. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, there are currently 4 declared candidates (though Trump and Hillary are not actually the candidates yet, they are pretty much there).

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I much prefer Johnson, though some of the stuff he says is pretty out there.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    120. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, Clinton asked Congress for additional money for embassy and consulate security, and was denied this at least twice. She was working with inadequate resources. It's easy to say "she should have put Benghazi at higher priority" now, but not so easy in advance. There was also a lot of fighting going on elsewhere, IIRC, so I don't know that Benghazi stood out at the time. I do know that thirteen investigations by a hostile Congress turned up no wrongdoing, and I find that pretty convincing.

      As far as the email server went, which specific law did it break? I know it would be illegal now. Clinton had some classification authority, and telling her staff to send a classified document by unclassified channels strikes me as a judgment call she probably had the authority to make. You're also speculating here: "If she...". If you killed someone because they had different opinions of Clinton than you do, then you'd be a murderer. If I got drunk and went driving, I'd be guilty of drunken driving. (I'm sure neither of those is true.) And, yes, I'm speculating too. On the other hand, I'm not saying that she definitely committed a crime.

      You're also speculating on her intentions and what subpoenas actually do. If I were running an enterprise, and my emails for 2014 were subpoenaed, I'd hand over the ones for 2014. I wouldn't add in 2013 or 2015 on the grounds that I didn't get to decide which emails applied. You're apparently speculating on what the subpoena actually said, and assuming that Clinton violated the law.

      I'm not about to say she's perfect. On the other hand, she's been attacked by political opponents for over twenty years now, and nobody's come up with anything resembling a smoking gun. People claim to have, but the claim evaporates under scrutiny, even friendly scrutiny. I lost the ability to take partisan criticism of her seriously long ago. Bring me wrongdoing that has been examined by the appropriate authorities, or even known neutral parties, and I'll listen.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    121. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people don't like an extra third party tracking everything they buy. Some people don't feel safe carrying around a lot of checks. A few others like the instant financial organization your checkbook provides when you pay everything by check.

      Except for the stupidly long clear times, checks are the best thing to use. Unlike credit cards and cash, when stolen checks are mostly useless. Their biggest issue is the time it takes to fill them out. If stores provided stamps with their name that process would be faster. Hell, they could provide a fast printing option where you place your check in the printer and it'll print everything on it faster than the chip+signature verification process. They'd be no credit credit transactions fees, so they'd probably make more money moving towards checks.

    122. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I do know that thirteen investigations by a hostile Congress turned up no wrongdoing, and I find that pretty convincing.

      None of the investigations had access to her emails because she had them on a private server. How do you do an investigation when you have no information to use to investigate?

      As far as the email server went, which specific law did it break?

      https://www.archives.gov/about...

      I know it would be illegal now.

      It was just as illegal back then.

      Clinton had some classification authority, and telling her staff to send a classified document by unclassified channels strikes me as a judgment call she probably had the authority to make.

      As a classification authority, she can't tell people to just remove classification markings (that others put there) and send unclassified since they are having problems with the classified fax machine. This is breaking the law.
      Also, BECAUSE she is a classification authority, she should have been able to tell that the TS emails were not supposed to be emailed on the public internet. By the accounts I have seen, she received HUMINT, which is ALWAYS TS/HCS, not ever Unclassified.

      You're also speculating here: "If she...". If you killed someone because they had different opinions of Clinton than you do, then you'd be a murderer.

      As I am not a part of the investigation, and they haven't said if she sent emails that were classified or not, I can only speculate on that point. It isn't required for her to have broken laws, but it helps to pin that SHE sent classified emails, not one of her underlings.

      You're also speculating on her intentions and what subpoenas actually do. If I were running an enterprise, and my emails for 2014 were subpoenaed, I'd hand over the ones for 2014.

      The problem is, she sent over half the emails from 2014, claiming that the rest were personal email.

      Also, the problem is:

      http://talkingpointsmemo.com/l...

      Look at the size of the piles, there is no reason that there should have been that much of a difference in the number of emails she sent like that. The only reason for that difference is that Hillary didn't hand over emails that were related because they made her look bad.

      You don't even have to believe me, believe the inspector general of the state department about the email server:

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...
      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      At this point, if you still see nothing wrong with what she did, as Trump put it, she could murder someone on main street, and you would still cheer her on. She HAS broken the law, there is no doubt about it, the doubt is whether she will be charged before November, and if she isn't, it has more to do with politics than guilt.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    123. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Hah! In North America transfers between accounts (bank to bank) are a WIRE transfer and cost about $30

      hat would, of course, depend on your bank and the circumstances. I have two banks (BBVA Compass, First Republic); either one offers free bank-to-bank transfers - but there is a two to three banking day float.

      Immediate transfers from either bank do require a wire transfer, with the ~$30 fee.

    124. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      Checks still have valid, limited uses:
      1) Private transfers of money over almost every electronic method are either cumbersome, incur a fee, or both
      2) Even ignoring 1, transactions are not always concluded (money changes hands) where electricity or cell phone reception is available (if your bank even has a deposit-by-phone option)
      3) Checks are useful where currency would be cumbersome (e.g. much easier to hand my landlord a check than $X in cash)
      4) Checks can be used to pay for something when funds won't be available for a day or two[1][2]

      But paying for (say) groceries with a check, especially if you don't pull out the checkbook until after all items are scanned? There's a special circle of hell for those people.

      [1] Not as useful these days because a lot of places will use their POS to scan the check, use it as an ACH debit, and hand the check right back; in these case the system can sometimes tell when funds aren't available
      [2] I've done this once or twice (needed groceries over the weekend, but paycheck wasn't be "available" until Monday) but it's something I heavily discourage because it's so easy to be screwed over by the act, even if you're doing so "smartly"

    125. Re: Money from people who want to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't imagine why that Jesus guy threw them out of the temple.

    126. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Money-wise that makes sense, but criminally?

    127. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by speedplane · · Score: 1

      What pro-Trump comments are you referring to?

      You're attacking Hillary with Trump's verbatim rhetoric, and complimenting his rhetoric. It's an obvious endorsement of Trump, but maybe that's difficult for you to see.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    128. Re:Money from people who want to sell? by fred911 · · Score: 1

      In the state of PA you don't have to be the maker or the payee, a simple endorsement of the instrument will hold you criminally and financially responsible guaranteeing the instrument until funded.

      Any instrument.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  3. Fuck scammers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dregs of humanity, pulling us all into shit.
    They are everywhere, on the streets, in shops, on the fucking internet.
    Wanting to suck you dry for being a trusting human being.
    Lying, cheating, even resorting to violence if they need to.

    Fuck scammers!

    1. Re: Fuck scammers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spotted the mark.

  4. "Business people like me" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, a "businessman" so honest to admit that he's a scammer.

    1. Re:"Business people like me" by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Finally, a "businessman" so honest to admit that he's a scammer.

      I picked up on that quote as well, and you've got it the wrong way round. He's someone who - at heart- knows damn well he's a worthless, low-rent pissy little thief/conman and is trying to rationalise his behaviour and kid himself (more than anyone else) that he's a "businessman".

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:"Business people like me" by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did you read the article? Don't assume that he's a "little", "low-rent" conman. He may well be in a country where the scams he is pulling off, net him an income that allow him to live very comfortably and have considerable pull in local society. And in many developing countries, the line between "businessman" and "conman" is far more blurry than people in North America or Western Europe might think.

    3. Re:"Business people like me" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article?

      Did YOU read the article? I did and it specifically says he still needs to work other jobs. He absolutely comes across as a little, low-rent conman.

  5. Re:Trump 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if you realize how ironic is this specific trolling in a post about scammers.

  6. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...if he set up a fake ad, doesn't that just make HIM the scammer?

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, because he didn't take anyone's money and (without reading the article) he probably just told people who responded honestly to the ad that the bike was already sold. He only responded to the scammers (who asked if they could have him cash over value checks) with invites for interviews. So he didn't scam anyone. He may have wasted a small amount of some honest people's time when they responded to his ad, but this is really it. And of course sites like Craigslist are a waste of time anyway - so nothing lost.

  7. problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... we would not be successful for so long.

    I can see an international purchase on my bank's transaction history in one hour. Why does it take US banks 3 days to discover there's no money in a cheque writer's account? Why doesn't the seller wait a week before sending the item?

    1. Re:problems by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      It often takes much longer to confirm that a bad check is a bad check. I am not sure why. However, I read somewhere that some bad checks need to be physically inspected by the "issuing" bank to determine that they are forgeries. My understanding of that situation is that the check is written against an account which does have money in it to cover the amount of the check, but the check is not actually written by a person with authority to disperse money from that account.

      I am not sure on this because all of the articles I found on the subject merely stated that it sometimes takes weeks to confirm that a check is good or bad. None of them discussed why that is the case.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens if the depositor of the check removes the funds from his account after the bank accepts the deposited check, but before much later time when the bank decides it didn't like the check after all?

      It seems like there was fraud committed in this "fake check deposit" scam, but not by the depositor of the check. The fraud was by the check writer, not the check depositor, so it's not clear why the depositor is penalized.

    3. Re:problems by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      so basically that whole thing only happens because people are still using cheques?

      I only had to write one in my life and that was the first and the last one. over 20 years ago!!

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It often takes much longer to confirm that a bad check is a bad check.

      In which country are checks still used for financial transactions?

      Isn't the problem here relying on an antiquated method of money transfer that isn't in common use any longer?
       

    5. Re:problems by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      This is about Craigslist, which is essentially an electronic newspaper Classified section, so these are private persons interacting with one another. So credit cards are out, and due to the prevalent use of those, most people rarely carry enough cash on them for the sorts of large purchases these scams target, like vehicles. A check can be cancelled, but if you show up to shady guy's motorcycle ad with $6k and he holds you up and steals it, then you've a lot more trouble ever seeing that money again.

    6. Re:problems by m00sh · · Score: 1

      ... we would not be successful for so long.

      I can see an international purchase on my bank's transaction history in one hour. Why does it take US banks 3 days to discover there's no money in a cheque writer's account? Why doesn't the seller wait a week before sending the item?

      Banks can take just a few hours but scammers will seek out things which take the longest.

      For example, scammers use fake western union money orders which take longer for whatever reason.

    7. Re:problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They call the cops and they arrest you. You were the one that passed the bank a fake check. As far as they are concerned you perpetrated a theft.

    8. Re:problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checks are unfortunately used in the US all the time. For instance, auto-pay with my mortgage broker does not work. No idea why. They don't know why either. So I have my bank mail them a physical check once a month. It's awful.

    9. Re:problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you've never dealt with real money, congrats. When I've bought cars, they don't accept credit cards, same with motorcycles, so either you write a check or you go to the bank and get money orders. If you ever get to a point in your life of buying a house you'll discover that they won't even accept checks and only money orders, and those you have to make out to yourself and then sign it over to the closing company (that one has always confused me).

      Yeah, if you ever start going out and buying things, expensive things, you start dealing in checks and money orders a lot.

    10. Re:problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the internet tough guy!

      Good god, you idiot. This is why America never will be great again.

      The only check I wrote when I bought my home was for the electrician who replaced the fuse box with a breaker box. Everything else was handled with EFT.

  8. this is what "the rules" link says. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I clicked on that "about/scams" link from TFS out of curiosity. It told me:

    This IP has been automatically blocked.

    Uhh... ok? This is the first time in my life I have ever tried to visit the "www.craigslist.org" domain. It does not appear to want me to know "about scams".

  9. Easier in the UK by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Informative

    "From the end of the sixth working day after we receive it, if the Cheque is returned unpaid by the paying bank, we cannot take the money from your account without your consent unless you have acted fraudulently" Form TSB Cheque clearing process, but it is the same for all retail banks. Smaller building societies have a couple of additional days as they pass the cheques to a bank to clear.

    1. Re:Easier in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people do not know that in the US, a person have ~27 days to cancel a check that has been cashed. I know one person that was so burned because of a client putting a stop payment on a check despite services rendered. Worse the check was for services rendered 6 months prior, my friend was short on cash, and used it to pay rent and heating bill in the dead of Winter, and was really in a hard place a few weeks later when the bank reversed the check. Turned out, the client was dying and someone from the estate did not want to pay the bill. It went to collections with explanation of doing the right thing for a single mother with 2 kids who needed this income for services rendered. The client paid, again a few months later without issue.

    2. Re:Easier in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that in this scenario _you have acted fraudulently_ and so that rule doesn't apply.

      People often manage to persuade themselves that "I'm not a criminal, so, this must not be a crime" but they've got it precisely upside down. When what they're doing is a crime, that means they're a criminal.

    3. Re:Easier in the UK by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Note that in this scenario _you have acted fraudulently_ and so that rule doesn't apply.

      If you sell something and the payer gives a fraudulent cheque (or has fraudulent funds in the account), then as long as you did not know this you are not acting fraudulently.

    4. Re:Easier in the UK by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      which you can always try to convince counsel is a good argument when you are suing the bank for taking the funds out of your account...

    5. Re:Easier in the UK by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      How do you sue the bank for reversing a fraudulent transaction? The money was never legitimately there. It's like if you buy stolen property without knowing it: you haven't done anything illegal, but you don't get to keep the property.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  10. Wild guess by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Ever wonder what motivates people who swindle others on Craigslist?

    Could it possibly be money?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. self-justification by gsslay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This interview is full of classic self-justification;

    "I like to think I am a businessman. Not a criminal."

    "I like to think my victims are rich and won't miss the money I'm stealing."

    "I like to think those I'm stealing from had the opportunities I didn't. This makes us even."

    "I like to think that because scamming is hard and takes time, it's like a real job."

    "I like to think it's my victim's own fault I'm scamming them. It's not my fault they don't follow the rules and don't know the game."

    1. Re:self-justification by Robert+Goatse · · Score: 1

      What a piece of work that guy is. Hopefully he ends up in prison for larceny. As a Craigslist seller, it's a real pain to sift through the real potential buyers and scumbags like this. You can kind of smell the scammers a mile away, but I can see how not-so-educated people (in the Internet sense) could fall for their tricks.

    2. Re:self-justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you left out the part where he even pays a policeman (must be ok, since he looks the other way)

    3. Re:self-justification by Gilgaron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The cognitive dissonance may also be why he consented to the interview.

    4. Re:self-justification by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it funny where if you change the crime/justification the same criminals will be revulsed.

      "That 12 year old had a crush on me, she wanted it."

      "I like to think that you should have moved your face away from my fist."

      "She still would have had sex with me if she wasn't drunk and roofied."

      "The bank is insured, so it is like I stole from no one."

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    5. Re:self-justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, funny when a life insurance companies and used cars salesmen do the same thing its capitalism.

    6. Re:self-justification by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If he doesn't self-justify, he has to kill himself, so don't be surprised. The wealthy must share their wealth or the poor will share their poverty with us, and they won't start with the wealthy because they are well-protected. They will start with the other poor, who are easier to reach. The wealthy know this very well, which is how we get the Waltons and the Kochs of the world.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:self-justification by m00sh · · Score: 1

      This interview is full of classic self-justification;

      "I like to think I am a businessman. Not a criminal."

      "I like to think my victims are rich and won't miss the money I'm stealing."

      "I like to think those I'm stealing from had the opportunities I didn't. This makes us even."

      "I like to think that because scamming is hard and takes time, it's like a real job."

      "I like to think it's my victim's own fault I'm scamming them. It's not my fault they don't follow the rules and don't know the game."

      But, ultimately, he knows that what he's doing is bad. He's justifying to the interviewer but he knows deep inside that he is harming people. He's saying he does what he does to survive and he would do something else if he got the opportunity.

      If he was saying that he was helping people, saving the children etc then it would be dangerous.

    8. Re:self-justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the Soroses, you intellectually dishonest silly goose.

    9. Re:self-justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He won't end up in prison.

      If you read the interview - he's not from the U.S. Whatever country he's from doesn't have higher education, his girlfriend helps him learn English, and there is no enforcement for his international crime - and if he *did* get caught, he'd pay a fine, not do prison time.

    10. Re:self-justification by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      Just an observation.... I spent a good amount of time traveling in parts of the ex-USSR in the previous decade. I speak good Russian (not fluent, but pretty good) and I've been to places off the tourist track. Got to know several people there on a personal level. I can tell you that the justifications the scammer gave are exactly what someone from that part of the world would use to justify what they did. That doesn't mean that the scammer is from there, but if I had to bet on it, I'd bet that they were. You would not believe the tortured logic they can use over there to justify all kinds of immoral, illegal and unethical behavior.

    11. Re:self-justification by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      I've never had a life insurance company or used car salesman try to send me a cashier's check through Craigslist and call it "capitalism". I see where you're going and would like to respond but could you be more specific?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    12. Re:self-justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a calling. A well-executed con is a work of art.

      The best cons implicate the mark too, thus making it less likely they'll go to the authorities.

    13. Re:self-justification by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Same with most of the world, other than western Europe and its immediate descendants. We're so damn law-abiding that we expect the rest of the world to be equally ethical, and it just ain't so. In most of the world, people are out for their own advantage any way they can, and sucks to be you.

      This guy could also be from anywhere in Africa or the Middle East (to me his syntax sounds like a native Arabic speaker).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  12. Craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    CL has taught me just how broken the mental health system is in the USA, and just how many lunatics we have who seem to have access to the internet. I had a really old junk Craftsman garden tractor in my garage that i just wanted gone. So i put it on CL under the free section. My phone got so many calls, texts, and emails that my phone was LOCKED UP for nearly 2 hours from so many alerts (this is back in the Blackberry day). Couldn't do anything. My voicemail was filled up in under 3 minutes.

    I had every personality imaginable on the voicemails. I had death threats. I had people telling me i was a scam artist, or asking if i was lying. I had people going through lists of reasons why they should have the tractor over everyone else, including the "my kid has cancer" stories, because we all know lawn mowers are a critical element in most chemotherapy. I had people who were incoherent and didn't make any sense. I had people crying and begging. It was ridiculous, and I refuse to use CL for anything again.

    The calls and stuff started seconds after hitting "Post". There must be armies of people who literally sit there all day long clicking refresh on the fucking page.

    1. Re:Craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you live in a large city? I live in NH and I post stuff all the time for free or very cheap on Craigslist (my wife and I are getting serious about removing clutter from our lives). I typically get a dozen calls over an hour or so depending on the item, sometimes but rarely a loon but never a death threat, and the item is often gone the same day. I find Craigslist works pretty much like I expect it to - like a tremendous yard sale.

    2. Re:Craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never post your phone number directly. Honestly just use the build in anaomyzier email system. After you have exchanged emails you can move to phone numbers.

      They are just as annoying when you post stuff in the sell section. Your selling something dirt cheap, and people still try to talk you down. Yes the bicycle is worth at least twenty. No I wont take 10 for it. No I dont care if your poor you cant have it for free. No I do not want to trade it for a VCR.

    3. Re:Craigslist by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I never got anything that extreme. Maybe the combination of free plus an item with perceived decent value? Or as the other AC said, a large population center? I remember a buddy of mine trying to give away a car in Chicago that didn't run and getting mobbed because it was free.

      I sold a 15-year-old car a few years back, but I was asking $2,500. I got a couple of scam contacts that I ignored, and a couple of weird people, like one who wanted the car but lived three hours away, had no transportation, and didn't have the money anyway. Still, I had a couple of genuine queries and sold it within a week without madness and chaos. I'm also in a pretty remote spot, which maybe cut down on the mobs of interested people.

    4. Re:Craigslist by jcr · · Score: 1

      WTF? Was it some kind of special rare antique lawn tractor or something?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We just sold a car through CL. There were a couple questionable responders, but overall it worked well for all involved. One respondent wanted their son to pick up the car, then they would mail the cash. Their email said they were deaf as the reason... we responded by saying, "Me too, we can sign just fine." We never heard from them again.

    6. Re:Craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP here. Yeah, suburb of Detroit at the time

  13. Most amazing thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    [x] Dodgy character
    [x] computers involved
    [ ] call him a "hacker"

    What's this, the new new slashdot broken already?

  14. Wish it *were* this way even in job ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scam me into a job willyaz, make my application rise to the top, or be the only one left

  15. Air strikes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we vote for Donald Trump, will he order air strikes against CraigsList scammers in non-allied countries?

    1. Re:Air strikes? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      If we vote for Donald Trump, will he order air strikes against CraigsList scammers in non-allied countries?

      Donald Trump is the political equivalent of a Craigslist scammer.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Air strikes? by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      If we vote for Donald Trump, will he order air strikes against CraigsList scammers in non-allied countries?

      Nope, he'll build a wall around them, and make the scammers pay for it!

      --

      Enigma

    3. Re:Air strikes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And hillary is the political equivalent of being robbed at gunpoint. Shot. And dumped in a ditch. By the police.

      It will be ruled a 'suicide'.

    4. Re:Air strikes? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that he'll order air strikes on the competition?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  16. Paypal email spoof by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    I and my friends have encountered these scams numerous times. The scam actually revolves around Paypal, and not craigslist or whatever the listing / auction site is. They open up a conversation to obtain your email address (that's how craigslist works, unlike eBay which specifically discourages people from communicating outside their system). Once they have your email address they say they're sending money, and *oops* they "overpaid" by accident. They send a spoof "You've Got Money!" Paypal email from some domain that contains "paypal" in the domain in some way. Usually crap like paypal.asdasda.com. That is the key to the whole thing, is that fake Paypal email that makes it look like they paid.

    Then they immediately start threatening legal action unless you refund them the amount they overpaid. However, instead of Paypal, they insist the money be sent via Western Union.

    That's basically it. They typically copy / paste some background story about them being out of the country or something, and they'll have a transport service come get the vehicle. The "marine biologist on a ship doing research" is a story they were using a lot a few years ago.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  17. Please help me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just lost my job and this motorcycle would help me get to interviews for a new one. Please give it to me.

  18. I notice you blame the victim by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    And pretty much ignore mental illness, loneliness and Alzheimer's as factors. When people look it's mostly those 3 with a little bit of naivety from living a sheltered life...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. Scambait them by DidgetMaster · · Score: 2

    The only way to fight these scammers is to waste their time. Make them think you are falling for their scam so they lose time and money trying to pursue you for nothing in return. This scammer even admitted that he loses money some weeks. It is because he didn't get anyone to fall for it. If the typical scammer had to chase down 1000 dead-ends instead of 10 before he got someone to fall for it, the whole thing would not be worth it. It's like telemarketers. Ignoring their calls is not what you want to do. You want to answer it and give it to your 2 year old so the guy on the other end spends 5 minutes trying to get the toddler to "give the phone to mommy". Waste their time and they will eventually stop.

  20. NSF check # & Check 21 legislation... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I used to be a loss-prevention mgr. circa 1988-1990 (before being into computing) - folks like that + bank personnel used to check for "nsf" (non-sufficient funds) on checks & other like financial instruments (vs. frauds & what-not) but the banks CLAIMED it "slowed down financial transactions" so the "check 21" legislation came about relieving BANKS @ LEAST of checking for 'nsf' (especially on personal checks) & PUT THE LIABILITY ONTO THE DEPOSITOR OF THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT (be it a check or money order etc.)... that said, if YOU the depositor cash a check, usually way, Way, WAY over the value of what was sold, & it's fraudulent (happened to me on POSTAROO, selling a ATI 9800 vidcard asking $100 @ the time - the guys sent me $5,000 in fraudulent forged series Western Union money orders... I called him & said "Man, you sent me a WEE bit much don't you think?" & he replied "Oh, I am just being nice" - well, due to that I checked w/ the issuing institution Western Union who told me it was a known forged series... this came from doing my old job thank goodness on checking for nsf etc., & then it was off to the local Federal Building to speak to the FBI with the forged money orders... 2 wks. later they caught him - served him right. He tried suckering the WRONG guy & I was lucky to have background in it from previous employment I had).

    APK

    P.S.=> Was I bitten by 1 of what I call "viruses of the spirit" from Pandora's box in GREED? I'd be the one in trouble, due to Check21... heck, if you THINK about it?? Banks themselves could be BEHIND these scams too - the depositor's made @ FAULT is why! apk

  21. House rentals by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    House rentals are another big CL scam. My ex-neighbors house was being actively scammed.
    It was up for rent, and this young woman shows up at my door asking about it. She had been in contact with some dude on CL.
    "$900, all utilities included."
    Of course, he was out of town (had to move to California suddenly). He had the key in hand, and wanted her to send him the $900 + $900 security dep. In return, he sends her the key, blah blah.

    This was a house that actually was being rented for $1100, with no utilities. From a valid real estate agency.

    I told her in no uncertain terms..."This is a scam. You will never see the key, nor will you ever see that $1800 again"
    Young single mom, but she did have the smarts to ask around.

  22. Why Craigslist scamming works by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    I have no rational explanation for this. It's just how things are. If you sent a "Nigerian prince" email to a bunch of people, few would actually fall for it. But for some reason many people, especially but not only people under 30 years old, believe that you simply can't be cheated on Craigslist - ever. Simply doesn't happen. But if it did, Craigslist would make you whole. Ha ha ha! If they only knew.. I really have no idea why rational people lose their minds on Craigslist and assume there is no risk to any transaction.

  23. There will always be people to be scammed by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    How many people do you know that use Facebook, Whatsapp, Snapchat, Asley Madison, ... How many that buy lotto tickets or "may already be winners in the publisher's sweepstakes"? Nuff said.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:There will always be people to be scammed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lotto ticket isn't for people who are bad at math. It's for people who never will have enough cash to put their mathematics knowledge to work.

      Let's say I buy a $5 scratch-off game every Friday hoping to win $howevermuch per week for life. I need at least $5k if I want to gamble with stocks like the big boys who obviously know more math than I do and are obviously smarter than I am because they're rich. So that's little under 2 years of saving my $5/week before I can play big boy gambling. Maybe the stock will go up. Maybe it will go down. Maybe it will be worth $10k in 2 years. Maybe it will be worth $2.5k in 2 years.

      I can't live off $5k per year. I can live off $howevermuch per week for life. One of these strategies has a very small possibility of changing my life so that I never have to work a meaningless, boring, tedious, shit job where I'm a sexist solely because of my assigned gender at birth and I was fucking stupid enough to specialize in tech again. That strategy has a very slim chance of freeing me up so I can pursue my own projects and very likely start my own business. The other strategy has a ZERO probability of freeing me up before I'm 65^H^H67^H^H70^H^Hwhatever the age when I can finally tell massa I don't need him no more.

    2. Re:There will always be people to be scammed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lotto ticket isn't for people who are bad at math. It's for people who never will have enough cash to put their mathematics knowledge to work.

      The lottery makes a poor investment under any analysis. It is, however, decent cheap entertainment.

    3. Re:There will always be people to be scammed by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if you buy a ticket every drawing, you aren't spending much money, and it makes it easier to daydream about being rich. After all, it could happen, although it won't. I consider it entertainment.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:There will always be people to be scammed by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      A lotto ticket isn't for people who are bad at math. It's for people who never will have enough cash to put their mathematics knowledge to work.

      The lottery makes a poor investment under any analysis.

      Only when the analysts involved are stupid.

      There is a big difference between "0 chance of getting a million dollars" and "1/10m chance of getting 1m dollars". There is likewise a small difference between "1/10m chance of getting 1m dollars" and "2/10m chance of getting 1m dollars".

      And considering the negligible purchase price of a single ticket, the best expected value is to buy only one ticket. The first lottery ticket purchased infinitely improves your odds. The second ticket purchased negligibly and only marginally improves your odds.

      So buy only the first lottery ticket.

      (I don't personally buy *any* lottery tickets, but it's only 'cos I'm lazy)

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  24. Seems far more profitable than email spamming .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I can definitely understand the motivation for someone to do these scams. But ultimately, you're in a situation where you can't really get "the law" to crack down on the people doing them (thanks to their location and ability to post their ads using various internet connections that aren't their own).

    The way to deter them is to cost the scammers as much time, effort and money as possible. Lead them on into thinking you're going to give them a payout, when you're really just harassing them. (If they're going to "send you a check in the mail", make sure you tell them you never received it and get them to mail another. If you can get them to pay postage for an item they think they're scamming from you, mail some heavy rocks or bricks.)

  25. Re:Why all mass scamming works by DidgetMaster · · Score: 2

    Email and Robocalling works because scammers can send out a million emails or call a million phone numbers for nearly free. Most are ignored but a few respond and out of those few who respond, a few victims can be easily scammed. The answer is to force the scammer to waste too much time trying to find the few gullible victims. If every email blast got a million responses, but only one or two of them were going to fall for the scam and the other 99.999% of them were just bogus responses by people pretending to show interest; then it would cost them too much to find their victims. Same with phone calls. If you answer the phone and pretend you can't hear them or just put the phone down for a few minutes while they read their script to nobody, you are part of the solution. Making it super quick to rule you out means they can contact/bug 10 other people in the meantime. Waste their time!!! Buy or fall for NOTHING!

  26. I made them pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years ago I got really frustrated with these idiots scammers and I started scamming them back. I collected well over 50 fake bank checks that they sent to me via FedEx overnight. So each one of them had to go to considerable time and effort and cost to send me the bad check. This was about 2 to 3 years ago and I noticed a big drop-off since then. If all of us would do our part we could run these leaches out of business.

    1. Re:I made them pay by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Really? Suppose they were legitimate people and you sent them a bad check? It would be something if you have a warrant for your arrest for passing bad checks.

  27. Scammers and sociopaths should be killed by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Preferably immediately after detection and verification.

    This opinion is unpopular, until you've been scammed.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  28. Re: Rehabilitation by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Right now the so called solution is to make it difficult on people who misbehave and don't teach them the proper way to behave.

  29. How does the scan work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article appears to discuss a particular type of scam, but doesn't explain how it works. Can someone explain how this scam works, and how an over priced Harley on Craigslist helps?

    1. Re: How does the scan work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant, how does the "scam" work.

  30. A group of victims not often recognised by spbookie · · Score: 1

    We talk about the greedy being caught by these scams and don't feel too bad when they trap themselves. Another class of victim is the inexperienced and we know that they are unlikely to be caught twice. However one group of victims that gets hit time and time again is the mentally impaired. As the father of a son with Down Syndrome I am very scared that his beautiful trusting nature will expose him to this sort of crime. Sadly he won't learn from experience because he can't. It isn't in his nature to distrust and he really doesn't understand the concept of (malicious) lying.

    So without constant supervision, and from my talking with other parents with older kids even with, he is vulnerable. I'd love to have some way to protect him that didn't involve a magic bubble or disconnection from the modern world.

    1. Re:A group of victims not often recognised by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      My father-in-law was super careful with money and deeply suspicious of scammers until he got Alzheimers.
      Then he started freely giving money away to scammers without them even trying to fool him.
      All they had to do was ask for money and he would send it.

      Finally my wife (his daughter) got power of attorney and stopped it after many thousands of dollars were gone.

  31. I despise these people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lead one of these scumbag scammers on until he mailed me a fake check ----- and he paid to OVERNIGHT FedEx it. HAHAHAHA!

  32. Re:Why all mass scamming works by vandamme · · Score: 1

    I like to carry the phone to the loo where I give them an earful of at least a #1, bonus points for a #2. And there's always the "OK, wait a minute while I go find my credit card". Or just ask, "Does your mother know you're a criminal?" if you just want them to get pissed and hang up.

  33. ALLEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Guys I was a victim of numerous scams and I made several complains to the Authorities

    and even online for help and nohing was forth coming,I must tell you I took the braviest

    step in my life by going the extra Mile to Consult a Telepathic Expert who is specialised

    in recovery and restoration of what ever issues troubling you,At First I never believed in

    Such but when I contacted Master Tallion Bode,he asked me a few questions,Gave me an

    instruction which I followed and bearly seven days after the encountered I got several

    emails and calls from the Foolish Fraudster who Pleaded for mercy because he was having

    night mares and decided to payback the huge sum he stole from me. As at Today,I have

    recovered 60% of My Money he stole and he is Begging for his Life.
    Guys its either you remain a fool by wasting time complaining or Get those Bastards to pay

    back every penny they stole from you or relatives by Contacting Master Tallion Via

    Email:tallionbode@consultant.com
    Now is The Time To Act.