Slashdot Mirror


Sergey Brin: Don't Come To Silicon Valley To Start a Business (businessinsider.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Business Insider report:If you're itching to start a company out of a garage, then you shouldn't pick up and move to Silicon Valley, according to Google cofounder Sergey Brin. It's easier to start a company outside the Valley than in it, he said onstage at the Global Entrepreneurship Summit. "I know that sort of contradicts what everyone here has been saying," he said with a laugh. "During the boom cycles, the expectations around the costs -- real estate, salaries -- the expectations people and employees have ... it can be hard to make a scrappy initial business that's self-sustaining," he said. "Whereas in other parts of the world you might have an easier time for that."But he adds that Silicon Valley is good for scaling that opportunity.

103 comments

  1. It's good if you have money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's a good place to run your business if your business happens to have a lot of money. You can use that money to make even more money, if you're good at that sort of thing. You can also burn through a tremendous amount of cash without anything to show for it.

    1. Re:It's good if you have money by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Most startups here only have a goal of being bought out. Actaully becoming profitable is not in the plans. Their operations consist of continually going to all the countless conferences and trade shows that may be related to their "business". Basically, they're scams. The few honest ones may have a couple people mainly acting as consultants and other work for hire.

    2. Re:It's good if you have money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not even think of going to Silicon Valley, the same way you do not rush to buy everybody s stock... but when I business-planned a company which was going to be precisely (like) what G is now, within ONE MONTH I lost my girlfriend *permanently*, the family account was defrauded, a bad **friend** showed up again, phone bills became **get calls only** but we did not make those calls, and someone decided to kick me out of my life long apartment (which was a five years long process by the way, though hardly). Oh, and I literally saw a _UFO_ outside my window, which did not fully convince me but was real, and did manage to keep FOUR documents from that period, doc and three C++, to today after more than a dozen computer robberies. Two years later the computer was stolen and I am still looking for it. And my intention was not Silicon Valley, but a real city to start in. So **saying with a laugh** truly makes me think, particularly when there s a blame that why am I not in Silicon Valley in a job!? And I still would not go there for computing. BTW, thermostats was not a bad idea, but here the context is very different...

  2. Translation by Bovius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Do the riskiest part of starting a business somewhere else. Then, when it reaches maximum future potential, bring it to Silicon Valley so we can buy it out from under you for a song and make a ton of money."

    1. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense. Why would you sell your company for a song when it's at the scaling up stage? Who is dumb enough to do that??

    2. Re:Translation by PPH · · Score: 1

      This.

      Location doesn't matter until it's time to put your startup under Alphabet's management. 'Future potential' is the acquisition price Google and others are willing to pay. Not the earnings potential.

      OTOH, if you want to be bought out by Microsoft, come to Seattle.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Walter White

    4. Re:Translation by swillden · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, location doesn't matter for Google acquisitions except that if you aren't located near an appropriate Google office you may have to pack up and move post-acquisition. I suppose it *might* be a little easier to get someone to come look at you if you're in SV, but I doubt it makes much difference.

      What really matters, I think, is being somewhere that you can get the talent and resources you need to build your business. SV is good because there are lots of talented people around, but those people are expensive, as is real estate, etc. The other major resource a startup requires is capital, and I think the perception has been that there is more capital available in SV than elsewhere, but that really doesn't make much sense. Capital is highly mobile.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Translation by halivar · · Score: 2

      That "song" you sell it for is retirement in Tahiti. I envy entrepreneurs who receive the opportunity to have their work stolen thus.

    6. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, I'll sell out for a mere chorus. You can keep the rest of the song.

    7. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I can tell, location doesn't matter for Google acquisitions except that if you aren't located near an appropriate Google office you may have to pack up and move post-acquisition. I suppose it *might* be a little easier to get someone to come look at you if you're in SV, but I doubt it makes much difference.

      What really matters, I think, is being somewhere that you can get the talent and resources you need to build your business. SV is good because there are lots of talented people around, but those people are expensive, as is real estate, etc. The other major resource a startup requires is capital, and I think the perception has been that there is more capital available in SV than elsewhere, but that really doesn't make much sense. Capital is highly mobile.

      And those people are there because of all the businesses that are there. It's one big feedback loop that's going to keep building until it breaks because the city is getting to expensive for everyone else to live in, why commute in for a crappy service job when you can do the same job elsewhere with a lower cost of living, it's not like waiters and janitors and such are making a killing like the tech people do.

    8. Re:Translation by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Good call. For many songs the chorus is the best part anyway.

    9. Re:Translation by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And those people are there because of all the businesses that are there. It's one big feedback loop that's going to keep building until it breaks

      Or until the cities cave in and start allowing high-density housing to be constructed, building decent mass transit (which is easier with high-density housing), etc. The actual population density is quite low compared to truly urban environments. But while they insist on sticking with a suburban lifestyle they're going to be bursting at the seams.

      Luckily, it does appear that Mountain View, at least, is finally starting to recognize this. After years of obstructionism, they have finally approved some high-density housing on the north bayshore. http://www.mv-voice.com/news/2.... With a lot more of that sort of thing, they could fix the problem. Of course, if they do too much of it, all of the people with million-dollar mortgages on $300,000 (at best) houses are going to be in trouble...

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re: Translation by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Once you've got enough money you really don't need more. If you can retire comfortably then SELL! Don't stay in the rat race if you don't want to be a rat. I see executives hopping from job to job when they clearly have enough money to live extremely well compared to all their underlings, but they still keep grabbing for more and more.

    11. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the business. If I were making a startup that actually physically made stuff, I would locate it near San Antonio or Oklahoma City for ready access to almost anywhere in the US. For financial stuff, Dallas. For physical import/exports, Houston. For IT stuff, Austin, Oklahoma City, San Antonio, or Pittsburgh.

      There are many places to locate a business. Not all dot-coms have to be in the Bay Area. In fact, for one startup I helped get off the ground, I just based it in Austin, then got a physical mail drop in both Hong Kong and Akademgorodok, so the company was global.

    12. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitions_by_Google

      Obviously a song to one party can be a life-changing fortune to someone else.

  3. Start in a garage, go to SV for funding by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 0

    'nuff said

    1. Re:Start in a garage, go to SV for funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually like the undertone here that being the right person's son or having the right college degree no longer guarantees one access to tons of VC funding as it once did - now a successful project is already required before you can even think about funding.

      Ok, maybe it's a little good and a little bad. But you have to break a few eggs to make an omelette.

  4. Re:Google by halivar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "But he adds that Silicon Valley is good for for scaling that opportunity."

  5. Networking, obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The importance of Silicon Valley has waned as the Internet has become integrated into our daily lives. You could do this stuff from ANYWHERE -- your living room, a houseboat in Thailand, anywhere with cheap living costs and a stable government. But they don't want you to know that, because it's only "trade and capital" that should move freely.

  6. Cant speak for SV but I tried the SB thing in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But warehouse rents were too high and labor too expensive. I move it to Georgia where the dirt is cheap and the labor cheaper. Soon I'll be moving half our ops to China. How businesses keep any jobs at all in NYC is beyond me.

  7. Expenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you're starting a business, you really need to live in an area where it's cheap. Silicon Valley is anything but cheap now.

    1. Re:Expenses by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley hasn't been cheap any time in the past 30 years. It has always been an overpriced zoo, it just has money and momentum.

    2. Re: Expenses by peter303 · · Score: 1

      An incubator fellowship, like from ycombinator, hides the expenses until you get version 1.0 out. If its any decent, then a vc will throw money at you.

  8. Amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great to see all the people saying how stupid his advice is. People who have never started a business on here auto dismissing advice from a billionaire (who made his money by innovation rather than sitting on real estate).

  9. Re:Cant speak for SV but I tried the SB thing in N by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    I move it to Georgia where the dirt is cheap and the labor cheaper.

    That's because we have so much of the damn red clay we can't hardly give it away.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  10. Re:Cant speak for SV but I tried the SB thing in N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Labor too expensive."

    Maybe if you tried starting a business in a locale where the average price of a house isn't over a million dollars you'd have better luck.

  11. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They added a Pittsburgh regional HQ not that long ago for better access to Carnegie Mellon. WAY cheaper there. Uber is also setting up shop in pittsburgh.

  12. But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When we discuss stuff like this we need to consider that the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. It wasn't a spectacular burst like the initial .com crash, but the burst has still happened.

    We've seen IPOs dry up.

    We're seeing little to no growth for the major incumbents, even if they haven't completely flamed out yet.

    People are tiring of Facebook, Twitter, and nonsense "social media" (with is mainly about subjecting users to ads).

    LinkedIn, one of the Web 2.0 darlings, was just bought out by Microsoft.

    The Ruby on Rails fad died off some time ago. The JavaScript fad is dying off now. Now we're seeing the Rust fad start, but compared to its predecessors it's a total joke.

    Average users are getting fed up with the Hipster-oriented design we've been forced to ensure for years now. Software products that were one really usable have become damn near impossible to use (Google Maps, Windows, GNOME, Firefox, among others).

    Slashdot was nearly destroyed by the Slashdot Beta, but luckily it was spared in the end.

    The mobile device market has peaked.

    Beyond Web 2.0, we aren't seeing any traction.

    IoT isn't taking off like it was expected to. Average people have come to realize that these devices can be very obtrusive. Most normal people don't want some device videoing and recording them while they urinate or defecate. They don't want their penis measurements sent to "the cloud".

    VR isn't taking off as expected. The development is going way slower, and people aren't impressed by the results so far. It's a long way off.

    Drones were only ever a niche interest. Average people don't care about them, and business uses are facing many hurdles.

    The Web 2.0 bubble has burst. There is no bubble coming after it. San Francisco is looking to be in a very bad situation, even if the people there don't realize it yet.

    1. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've seen IPOs dry up.

      What you seen is venture capitalists and investors no longer throwing money at every potential "unicorn" (a startup with a $1B+ valuation) that comes along. A lot of these unicorns have very little to show for after blowing cash through the wazoo. One notable unicorn had to cut back on employee perks because it was costing $25K per year per employee. VCs and investors want to see profits from business operations. That's not a bubble bursting, it's reality sinking in.

    2. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not a bubble bursting, it's reality sinking in.

      What the hell are you talking about? That's exactly what a bubble bursting is: it's reality sinking in.

      Expectations adjusting downward to match reality is the bubble bursting!

      The expectations that are lowered include the value of companies and their stock, the salaries that employees will receive, the demand for products and services, and the understanding of what's viable.

      You apparently don't realize that you just described the bubble bursting, while at the same time misleading yourself into thinking it hasn't just burst!

    3. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Erm, no.

      It is reality sinking in but it is not a bubble bursting.

      The dot com bubble of 2000 was a bubble bursting.

      The housing crash of 2007 was a bubble bursting.

      But prices of companies, real estate, and so on regularly go up and down and sometimes go down sharply (eg. LinkedIn) when 'reality kicks in' but that that not automatically mean a bubble has burst.

      They're too different events - one is of a smaller scale the other is of a much LARGER scale that results in a large economy wide event that impacts everyone.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    4. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Expectations adjusting downward to match reality is the bubble bursting!

      THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!
      THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!
      THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!
      THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!
      THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!
      THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!

      Does this make you feel better?

      You apparently don't realize that you just described the bubble bursting, while at the same time misleading yourself into thinking it hasn't just burst!

      I lived through the bubbles bursting prior to the Dot Com Bust in 2001 and the Great Recession in 2009. Companies went out of business, employees got laid off, people moved out of the valley, housing and apartment rents dropped, and freeway traffic got better. Guess what? I'm not seeing any that at all. This "bust" is a whimper that has .

    5. Re: But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut your mouth. Rust is an amazing systems programming language.

    6. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denial of the bubble bursting is another sign of the bubble having already burst.

    7. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Denial of the bubble bursting is another sign of the bubble having already burst.

      This "bubble" is a like a bear taking a shit in the wood. Beside the bear, who else in world cares? (Hint: no one.)

    8. Re: But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But who cares? It uses C++ because it uses LLVM. In the end, you have to use something like C/C++ to get to the metal, so why not stop being lazy and just get good at those languages instead of jumping through pointless hoops to avoid thinking too hard?

    9. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've seen IPOs dry up.

      I would offer Twilio's IPO as a counter example.

    10. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as reality sinks in for Twitter, I can rest easy.

      Ten years, no profit, losing billions of dollars, still in business.

      That and a $16billion dollar snapchat valuation make me think we must be in at least a small tech bubble. Or alternate reality, as you say.

    11. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      During previous "busts" most of the people I knew in companies that were making profits kept their jobs. The job losses in the Silicon Valley are seemed to be from all those companies whose money was only in stock valuations. Of course that caused ripples across the country and world and seriously hurt retirement plans of everyone who kept their jobs. But utlimately it was just another California gold rush revived, with major financial experts getting conned into investing in the new econmy. The housing bubble collapse was the same thing all over again too, experts all giddy about short term profits from slicing and dicing mortgages until that vanished. We really need the "experts" to focus on fundamental basics in the economy instead of irrational exuberance.

    12. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      We really need the "experts" to focus on fundamental basics in the economy instead of irrational exuberance.

      That's what the VCs and investors are doing to the unicorns by forcing them to focus on profitable business operations and not offering endless perks for employees.

    13. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by epine · · Score: 1

      The United States can always be relied upon to do the right thing — having first exhausted all possible alternatives.

      In a similar vein, the valley can be relied upon to solve real problems — after financing all possible alternatives.

      Whatever goes on, there has never been a shortage of real problems out there. Solving a real problem ties your capital up for a longer stretch of time. No VC worth his salt would choose to do that, when the alternative is a quick in-out. After a decade where "scale" became synonymous with "cosmic inflation", oh, the groans will be loud and protracted.

      But it won't matter, because there's plenty of talent, plenty of tools nowhere near fully exploited, and more real world problems waiting to be solved that we can yet imagine.

    14. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Everyone talks about unicorns but they were always extremely rare (thus the name).

    15. Re: But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by avatar+avatar · · Score: 1

      Oh, pish-tosh. There will always be another bubble. The region's real Estate is riding high upon one right now, and there's no shortage of fabulists remaining in the valley.

    16. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Everyone talks about unicorns but they were always extremely rare (thus the name).

      The line I picked up from a recent WSJ article that VCs and investors were funding 20 potential unicorns per month, which is a much slower rate than last year. Unicorns that made $1B+ in real money averages to two per year.

    17. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Everything is a "potential" unicorn. No one has any clue what an unfunded company is going to be worth when they have no product, no employees, and only have a business plan that says "we're going to replace Facebook!"

      Turns out sometimes it's the company you overlook that is purchased by Google for over $1B (which greatly increases the statistics).

    18. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [...] a business plan that says "we're going to get bought out by Facebook!"

      FTFY - The dot com version had Microsoft as the fantasy buyer.

      Turns out sometimes it's the company you overlook that is purchased by Google for over $1B (which greatly increases the statistics).

      I worked for a company that went on a buying spree prior to the dot com bust that paid two to four times more than what each acquired company was actually worth. Something that Google found out when they bought Nest for $3.2B in 2014 and recently halted unlimited funding that the division enjoyed for showing little in return.

    19. Re:But the Web 2.0 bubble has already burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you keep telling yourself that.

      With grossly inflated startup valuations, especially with Google putting a crazy number on Magic leap and Deepmind, I've come to expect what the lifestyle in that area offers: inflation and dreams.

  13. location, location, location by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    payroll's a bitch when your employees have to be millionaires to afford their very own hovel.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:location, location, location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true!

    2. Re:location, location, location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My location has a thriving tech industry but they all serve a single industry. I thought how terrible it would be for the local economy if the industry dried up, and maybe I should try my hand at something else. Then I realized if I don't service industry X then I'm competing with industry X over rent, payroll, etc while trying to compete in industry Y in product.

  14. Can always just move in with Erlich Bachmann by Kargan · · Score: 1

    I am sure there is space at the incubator.

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
    1. Re:Can always just move in with Erlich Bachmann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You know, you can stay here for one year. Free rent."

  15. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not lead by example by moving Google away from the bay area

    But Google is not a startup, they have more money than they need. Do you have any idea how high real estate rents in the bay area have impacted startup costs?

  16. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Holy fuck are you dumb? Serge says moving TO the valley is a great place to scale the opportunity. As in, if your business is booming outside of the valley, move into the valley to make it even bigger.

  17. Re:Cant speak for SV but I tried the SB thing in N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How businesses keep any jobs at all in NYC is beyond me.

    Wall St privilege. The finance industry (especially HFT) loves centralization, and the amount of money being handled is so extreme that the trickle-down is enough to sustain much of the city. That's why they were the first to enact a BitLicense.

  18. Get out of his way by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    It sounds like Sergey Brin is tired of having to wait in long lines at the In-and-Out Burger.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Get out of his way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, he's watching VR pr0n on his Cardboard while Assistant orders for him from the driverless Goolge Car. In the time he spends in the drive-thru, he makes enough to buy the In-N-Out franchise.

    2. Re:Get out of his way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In-N-Out doesn't franchise. Just saying.

  19. Other places are better by DidgetMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are many places around the country (or the world) that have good talent and moderate to cheap living expenses. Those are the best places to get a tech business off the ground. You will probably have more trouble finding funding for your idea, but startup costs are much lower than in Silicon Valley. I am trying to start up my own business and it is a lot of trouble to find investors. It can be depressing to read about guys with great connections in SV who get $20 million in funding for some idea with a potential of about 10% of what you think your idea will do; yet you can't seem to get even seed funding of much smaller amounts. It drives you insane when someone gets $100 million in funding for a really bad idea that you know will crash and burn in just a year or two.

    1. Re:Other places are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am trying to start up my own business and it is a lot of trouble to find investors.

      Is it really that capital intensive? Can you start off small?

      Here's a strategy that I've seen work time and time again: start local and small and build a profitable base (of course CYA on the IP department with patents, trademarks and copyrights - if you want.). Expand with retained earnings. Nothing proves a concept like actually being a profitable business. And it gives you leverage with investors - "I don't NEED you, I just want to get bigger faster." or "I need more capital than I have because [insert big needed capital expenditure here] but, I'll get it eventually."

      The best book I've seen as a guide - believe it or not - the "Portable MBA in Entrepreneurship". They even have links to spreadsheets to to do a lot of the grunt work for you.

      Good luck! I hope you succeed and add wealth to our society.

    2. Re:Other places are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and help intercept wealth before it is funneled out of our society

      FTFY

    3. Re:Other places are better by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

      No. It doesn't take a lot of capital, but it is a pretty big software project that needs a lot more work to finish. I have already invested a couple hundred thousand of my own money and thousands of hours of time. I just need more resources to finish it. It is going too slow to finish with just a few part-time guys.

    4. Re:Other places are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm trying to start a business as well. We figure we need around 30 million to bring it to market. We're not bothering to try to find investors yet. We figure no investor will so much as listen to us until we have a functional prototype. Until then it's a group of us working for free in our spare time. I hope we can get there, but there's a high chance it'll all fizzle and there will be nothing. But such is life. If I were an investor I wouldn't give money to somebody who said they had a great idea with no proof of his commitment to it or how feasible it was.

    5. Re:Other places are better by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

      Lucky for us, we are way past that stage. We not only have a prototype working, but the program can already do a bunch of powerful things. There are still features on the drawing board and a lot of testing to do; but we can show it working. It is thousands of times faster than file systems at finding stuff and so far beats MySQL and PostgreSQL at a bunch of database functions. Here are some youtube videos of it in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    6. Re:Other places are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, no, you usually can't start off small. Suppose your project is a new compiler, or a project of similar complexity. You can't sell it until it's done, and it costs millions of dollars to make the first one. And if you do it with a bunch of part-timers working for equity it will take forever and the market will close. Or, even if you can build it quickly without capital, you need to get market share before competitors arrive and squeeze out your opportunity.

      Yeah if you're doing some flash in the pan crapware (e.g., iOS game using Apple's built-in kits), yes you can knock it out in your spare time with a bit of cash you won't miss if it disappears, and you can scale up the sales organization as it sells, but those ideas are worth exactly zero.

    7. Re:Other places are better by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

      Exactly. My project is in the same ballpark as a compiler in complexity. It is a kind of file system/database hybrid so it has to do a lot of things that both of those systems do. I have been able to create relational tables for quite a while now, but I just got inner join functionality working the other day and it still has some bugs to work out. It doesn't cost millions to develop, but more than my family budget can handle.

    8. Re:Other places are better by quetwo · · Score: 1

      It depends on the business. Certain businesses can start off small and build up. Some require a lot of capital up front (think, hardware or biotech), where others can rent space from AWS and just pay salary for the first few employees.

    9. Re:Other places are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is that? A windows file manager plug in?

      How much money and time wasted, I mean invested?

    10. Re:Other places are better by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

      Hardly. It is a general purpose data management system that will replace file systems and databases and even some NoSQL solutions. It does block I/O to the disk so it doesn't even use an existing file system, let alone the Windows File Manager. It is designed to run on any operating system and will scale from simple devices to super-computing clusters. It uses data objects that can do everything a file can do and more. They can be used to manage lists, attach tags, policies, configuration, and a much of other things too numerous to list. I have tested it out to 200 million objects in a single container and it can find any subset (e.g. find all the JPEG photos) in about 2 seconds with that many objects. If you think that is a waste, you must not work with data that much.

    11. Re:Other places are better by houghi · · Score: 1

      The thing is not that you think that others have only 1/10th of the potential. The problem is that you think you have 10* the potential.

      And don't forget they a paying into the whole package and perhaps they don't like you as a person or they like you but you are too nice or are percieved too nice or not nice enough or whatever.

      You also have no idea how hard the others worked to get where they are.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Other places are better by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

      I was not trying to compare my project with any one other project in particular. My comment was merely pointing out how funding amounts do not always correlate to the value potential of an idea. If you have a great idea that you think has a ton of potential, it can be very easy to see lots of other ideas that seem (to you at least) to have a much lower potential, yet are able to attract lots of money. It's not that you are the wrong person, or that you idea is dumb, or that others worked harder. It is just the nature of business where often luck (also known as being in the right place at the right time) plays a key role.

  20. Of course he'd say that... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    He doesn't want to have to compete with new startups for employees.

    1. Re:Of course he'd say that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This.

      While I don't think that he's particularly wrong, it seems a bit self-serving to push people out of the area. The advice should be to setup the business where it's affordable, but be open to hiring from anywhere, including Silicon Valley.

      My company has employees in that area and our headquarters has moved to be near Google's (just in respect to location, not as a reason), but the majority of our employees are not in the Silicon Valley area, including myself.

    2. Re: Of course he'd say that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he said to move to the valley you would say he wants cheap labor.

      Basically every statement anyone makes there are always critters to criticize it.

  21. Re:Google by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    Why not lead by example by moving Google away from the bay area

    I'm sure many of the employees will move, but the majority probably wouldn't. Forcing them to either retain a significant and expensive presence there, or lose the people who know how to keep the company going.

    Similarly, opening up sites elsewhere makes a lot of sense if you can divide up the work and minimize communication. No one likes having half their team split geographically (particularly across many time zones).

  22. start your business in Canada by cats-paw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The healthcare situation in this country is so fucked up.

    At least when you are paying everybody as little as possible to get off the ground, they will have good healthcare.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
    1. Re:start your business in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is not flamebait - we, as a Canadian business, have the majority of our customers in the US but every attempt to onshore employees has been blocked by this medical cost wall.

      We haven't tried since Obamacare - would that drop our out of pocket by 50% to provide coverage similar to Canada?

    2. Re:start your business in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >At least when you are paying everybody as little as possible to get off the ground, they will have good healthcare.

      * - Where good healthcare does not include most prescription medications, eye care, dental care, physiotherapy, and access to *personal family doctors. But does include fixing broken bones, patching up heart attacks (sorry, you will have to pay for the medication after they release you from the hospital, and it's not cheap), plus usually free cancer treatment. Oh, and each province manages healthcare individually, and several of them bill you for access to it, defeating the idea of "free". FWIW, the level of care Canada provides is about on par with US catastrophic care coverage insurance plans, which are so cheap you will wonder why Ontario spends almost $4000 per person living here to provide access to it.

      The US *and* Canada have fucked up healthcare, but in different ways. Oh, yes, I know that if you're on pogey, or are basically living at or below minimum wage, you do get a lot of the eye/dental/prescription items for free in most provinces. We're talking about employees at technology companies here. I hope they are doing better than below minimum wage.

      Citation for no access to personal family doctors: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/the-soul-destroying-search-for-a-family-doctor/article591331/

    3. Re:start your business in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the goal of Obamacare was primarily to expand coverage, not reduce costs. It's the same insurance and health provider industry as before, but things are more expensive because insurance companies are now covering sick people who previously had no insurance, but not enough young healthy people have signed up.

      Tech workers are generally paid well enough (and have relatively good health plans) that they wouldn't qualify of any of the subsidies that Obamacare offers for low income workers. The other major part of Obamacare, health exchanges, is a way for people without an employer's group health insurance to buy plans without it costing an arm and a leg (relatively ... it's still pretty expensive) -- again, no impact on tech employers.

  23. Well, no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no need to be in a particular physical location anymore, since we've given up on the physical world to "generate wealth". Now with 3D printing dead, there's nothing much left to pump and dump.

    Hyperloops, maybe?

    http://www.t3.com/features/state-of-play-3d-printing

  24. Great advice by sootman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Start your company anywhere... but if you want VC money, get your ass to Sand Hill Road because VCs can't see past the end of their own driveway.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  25. Re:Cant speak for SV but I tried the SB thing in N by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    WTF? I guess you haven't read about the BitLicense and the amount of companies that don't operate in NY as a result of it.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  26. Agreed - No skills in Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The handful of companies I've worked at I've met one or two competent programmers. The rest spent their days on StackOverflow.

  27. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back to Russia pinko commie Serge

  28. Atlanta, Atlanta, Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atlanta is the new hotspot for tech startups. I am in the process of moving my company out of the DC area to Atlanta to take advantage of the lower cost of, well, everything. Relocating was a huge decision but my employees are behind it 100% since they'll be walking away with plenty of cash from selling their homes in DC and buying homes in Atlanta.

    Georgia Tech is right there to provide excellent young talent, and Atlanta is so educationally diverse I can find good people in just about any field I might need.

    1. Re: Atlanta, Atlanta, Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too fucking hot. No amount of money is worth the heat and humidity.

  29. Re:Cant speak for SV but I tried the SB thing in N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're in agreement. I'm saying that entrenched firms don't want to compete worldwide, that's why they've forced out the bitcoin businesses.

  30. Silicon Valley is a great place to be from by alispguru · · Score: 3, Informative

    Worked and lived in Mountain View in the late 1980's; visited the peninsula many times since then.

    Got out when I realized that I would not be able to afford a house unless I hit the startup lottery.

    Also, realized I did not want to rear children in either side of Palo Alto (east or west).

    Still, having some direct experience of Silicon Valley has been useful ever since; it helped me get every job I've had since that time.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re: Silicon Valley is a great place to be from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working hard is always a great place to be from.

      Hard work is always hard, though. But often opportunity comes disguised as hard work. The key is to focus on the options most likely to pay back a good return for your time.

  31. web 3.0 is upon us by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Web 3.0 is about the merger of browsers and apps with advantages of both and no longer see the distintion between the two. Apps were a temporary aberration to wall of pieces of the internet often for financial gain. No longer will there be the tyranny of of app store censors.

    1. Re:web 3.0 is upon us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The web of the future is a series of walled gardens, rather than tubes. Nobody wants open discussion, everybody wants an echo chamber. The revolution is dead, the powers that be have won. Now deal with it.

  32. "Self-sustaining"? by DogDude · · Score: 1

    That's very odd to hear him talk about "self-sustaining" in Silicon Valley. I didn't think that *any* businesses started in that neck of the woods were "self-sustaining". I got the impression that everybody starts a company with somebody else's money and then sells it before they burn through all of the cash. Are there are Silicon Valley startups that have been self-sustaining in the past few decades (other than traditional businesses, of course, that actually have to ear a profit to stay alive).

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  33. Oh right by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Like I'd take advice from some nobody named "Sergey".

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  34. India? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    So like India for example.

  35. Come to NC by SkyLeach · · Score: 1

    High-Tech rednecks are a lot less expensive to hire than Hipsters and Yuppies.

    Heck I can get a website cobbled together for a case of beer and one visit to a strip club.

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
  36. Getting VC by TheSync · · Score: 1

    You are far less likely to get VC funding if you are not physically in the Bay Area.

    Yes, it is cheaper and easier to start a business outside of the Bay Area. But if you want the VC funding, you better be there. Then you can move your operations out...

  37. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google needs scaling?

    You don't want to eat it with the scales still on, do you? Yuck.

  38. this is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Detroit oughta become a tech boomtown. empty buildings, cheap real estate, a city in need of jobs and tax revenue.

  39. Re:Google by wyHunter · · Score: 1

    Unless you want to go to another US city that isn't as insanely expensive, but has a strong infrastructure for software, like Boston, Denver, Omaha, Atlanta...