Slashdot Mirror


Verizon To Hike Prices On Plans But Offer More Data (cnet.com)

Roger Cheng, reporting for CNET: Big changes are afoot at Verizon. The nation's largest wireless carrier is set to unveil changes to its plans that will make them more expensive, but will also include more data, according to someone familiar with the changes. The low-end "S" plan will go up by $5 to $35 a month, but will include 2 gigabytes of data, twice as much as before. The "M" plan will go up by $5 to $50 a month, while its data will rise from 3GB to 4GB. The "L" plan will go up by $10 to $70 a month, while data increases from 6GB to 8GB. The "XL" plan will go up by $10 to $90 a month, but you'll get 16GB, up from 12GB before. Lastly, the "XXL" plan will cost $10 more at $110 a month, but you will get 24GB instead of 18GB. The changes are part of a broader overhaul of its plans, which will also include a rollover data program called "Carryover Data," a new way to avoid overage fees, and better access to Canada and Mexico. The move reflects a heightened competitive environment, one in which smaller rivals T-Mobile and Sprint have begun winning away customers through aggressive offers. Many of these changes mimic offers already available at the other carriers.

145 comments

  1. Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outrageous.

    People don't want more data.

    Why doesn't the FTC stop this?

    1. Re:Outrageous by TFlan91 · · Score: 3

      Money, duh.

      There are various bills a typical household in America has, a mortgage, utilities, cable, and cell phones.

      Until recently, people would couple cable and cell phones with the broad brush of "utilities", but cable bills costing $200+/month as well as cell phones costing families another arm; It seems they also want that proverbial leg as well...

      > The move reflects a heightened competitive environment, one in which smaller rivals T-Mobile and Sprint have begun winning away customers through
      > aggressive offers. Many of these changes mimic offers already available at the other carriers.

      This is what saddens me... The process that would make things cheaper, are someone twisted into making it more expensive, but, but MOAR DATA!

      I don't think I've ever used more than 5 GB of data in a month. That was while I was living in my car for a couple months too, so I didn't have wifi most of the time.

      With WiFi usage, I can't possible see anyone using 24 GB of data... That's a shit load of data.

    2. Re:Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money, duh.

      There are various bills a typical household in America has, a mortgage, utilities, cable, and cell phones...

      I meant this Slashvertisement for Verizon.

      Slashdot is misrepresenting its advertising as stories. That kind of deception is what the FTC is for.

    3. Re: Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People certainly want more data, they just want lower prices more.

    4. Re: Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My moto x pure used 16.5gigs over WiFi and 1.5 gigs over LTE mostly Pandora, goggle play and Facebook and YouTube.

    5. Re:Outrageous by ranton · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why doesn't the FTC stop this?

      Why would the FTC stop this? Verizon has plenty of competition from AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint. Verizon and AT&T compete for customers who can pay for the best product, and T-Mobile / Sprint compete for more cost-conscious customers. Considering AT&T has a larger wireless market share than Verizon, I'm not sure how Verizon raising prices hurts consumers in an anti-competitive way.

      Right now Verizon provides the best service of the four major carriers, and they charge a premium for that. I will stay a Verizon customer until another carrier gives faster data with better coverage, regardless of the price.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    6. Re:Outrageous by rockout · · Score: 2

      Also from Project Fi. Yes, they use the networks of three other carriers, but they charge for data in a completely different way. You pay exactly 1 cent per MB, plus the $20/month for the service and unlimited talk/text. As you said, plenty of competition.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    7. Re: Outrageous by Ralgha · · Score: 1

      I'm at 36GB used with 6 days to go in plan cycle. Hotel Wi-Fi sucks, it's not even worth trying to use.

    8. Re:Outrageous by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that people don't want more data? I mean if you look at data usage charts you see an increase in data usage. Sites are getting larger so people need more data. Now I personally think how they charge for Cell Data is a scam, almost as bad as texting rates. However Version is on its rights to raise it rates without increasing data. At least we are getting something for our money.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:Outrageous by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      you have three more choices for a carrier with one or two of them being substantially cheaper than Verizon. along with prepaid and a dozen regional carriers in the USA

    10. Re:Outrageous by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

      you've never seen my father in law surfing youtube. he'll blow through 20GB in a week if given the chance

    11. Re:Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a option in Youtube app to not stream HD when not on Wifi, it saves alot of bandwidth and he probably wont notice a difference.

    12. Re:Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently at 46GB with another week left in the billing cycle....

      but I work in audio/video production and this is my only internet access (grandfathered Verizon unlimited plan) ... I don't even think I use a lot...

    13. Re:Outrageous by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      With WiFi usage, I can't possible see anyone using 24 GB of data... That's a shit load of data.

      24GB makes no sense for 1 or 2 lines but does for families sharing the data plan. I've been grandfathered into a 30GB plan for $120/mo for a few years now (Verizon keeps trying to trick me into switching... ain't happening) that is shared by 8 phones, a tablet, and a wifi hotspot, and it's often that we approach the limit - every few months we go over and eat the $15-per-extra-GB fee (fuck you very much Verizon).

    14. Re:Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Right now Verizon provides the best service of the four major carriers"

      That statement is completely false. I switched from Verizon to T-Mobile, (same comparable data plan but $70.00 cheaper a month) and my bandwidth and connectivity went up 10 fold.

      As far I and many are concerned, Verizon is an over-hyped, under-delivered , price gouging cunt of a company. Also after totally closing my account with them, they still send me a bill for $0.47 cents. What kind of loser piece of shit company does this?

      Hopefully when people realize their bill is going up $50.00 more a month, they will finally realize they were being totally lied to about their connectivity and being "the best network" , they will finally dump that turd for good.

    15. Re:Outrageous by ranton · · Score: 1

      Right now Verizon provides the best service of the four major carriers

      That statement is completely false. I switched from Verizon to T-Mobile, (same comparable data plan but $70.00 cheaper a month) and my bandwidth and connectivity went up 10 fold.

      You are either trolling or live in an area which is not representative of most of the country. There is no disputing Verizon has the best coverage, although there is more debate on which service is fastest. But no carrier is 10x faster than any other. In almost all cases the best and worst national provider will be within 20% of each other in any major city.

      ROOT Metrics is a reliable third party company which compares wireless service between the four major carries. For Overall service in 125 metro areas, it gives 78 rewards to Verizon, 43 to AT&T, 29 to T-Mobile, and 5 to Sprint (it gives rewards to more than one provider in a tie).

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    16. Re:Outrageous by Vintowin · · Score: 1

      I have three cell phones. My wife and I use anywhere from .5 to 1.5 GB of data a month each. My 17 yo daughter on the other hand, 14-18 GB a month, mostly cause she is on it 24/7 and streams music when she is out.. I was on the 18GB plan and bumped it to the 20GB plan for another 20/month cause she kept going over. Screamed about it till I was blue in the face. nothing. Got the family manager and locked her down to 14 GB a month. when the lock went in she wasn't able to text to all her Group Messages and blew a gasket!.. So yes, it is very easy to use 24GB of data.. Imagine adding two more teens to my situation...LOL

    17. Re:Outrageous by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      I've done 84 gigs in one month. Thank god for true unlimited data.

    18. Re: Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should not have had so many kids. Stay off public assistance. Other taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize your brood.

  2. "Heightened competitive environment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're in an extremely competitive environment these days. What should we do? Hike rates! yeah, that's the ticket!

    1. Re: "Heightened competitive environment" by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But it is not our fault if our competition raises their prices too.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    2. Re: "Heightened competitive environment" by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And it is pure coincidence that this all happens the same time we do it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:"Heightened competitive environment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the market is that competitive, why are the prices so high? I pay £15 (approx $20) a month for 3GBytes mobile data plus unlimited texts and more talk minutes than I ever use.

    4. Re:"Heightened competitive environment" by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      it is competitive. Only thing is that Verizon has the best frequencies for using a phone indoors along with the best quality network for people who absolutely need coverage in every square inch they travel to. you can move to T-Mobile, our version of deutsch telekom for about 2/3 to 1/2 the price of verizon but their indoor coverage is not as good along with coverage away from major roads and towns.

    5. Re:"Heightened competitive environment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when you're away from the T-mobile coverage areas... how many people really want to be reachable? I mean, really.

  3. Fireworks have damaged Verizon's hearing by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And made them tone deaf, because the idea of raising prices even with a new program to allow rollover data is a non-starter in the U.S. market, which already has some of the highest cellular fees in the world.

    1. Re:Fireworks have damaged Verizon's hearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know! This is ridiculous pricing, especially considering all the hundreds of millions of tax dollars given to the major carriers to build out their infrastructure. Guess they want to get you from both ends.

    2. Re: Fireworks have damaged Verizon's hearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... Let us talk about this taxpayer-funded infrastructure and this amazingly competitive market for cell phones, shall we?

      I used to live in a city. Unfortunately, I moved back to my roots to keep an eye on my elderly parents. I'm not in Alaska or the middle of a state park or anything like that, but the only carrier with any data coverage here is Verizon, and I refuse to pay their rates. Especially since Verizon's data coverage here is sloooow and sporadic. Even with Verizon, wander anywhere away from the small city and it's not unusual for your voice call to drop without warning.

      So where exactly is this infrastructure? In the big cities and along the Eastern seaboard. It sure as hell doesn't actually exist much in the rest of the country.

      I got a tracphone for something like $100 a year prepaid. I can use it to text and for voice, and the quality is honestly the same. At home, I use my PC for Internet. When traveling, I take my tablet and look for free wifi. Since Verizon was charging me over $100 a month for crap service, I'm ok with this.

  4. This will actually save me $10 a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This will actually save me $10 a month. The 1GB plan was too small so I was forced into the 'M' 3GB plan which was $15 more a month and larger than I needed. With the new changes for only $5 more a month I will get a 2GB which is perfect.

    1. Re:This will actually save me $10 a month by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      I was thinking the same. I am on the 6gb plan. Rather than paying an extra $10 to go to 8gb I may just drop back to 4gb - particularly if the "rollover" data they mention really is a thing.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:This will actually save me $10 a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will actually save me $10 a month. The 1GB plan was too small so I was forced into the 'M' 3GB plan which was $15 more a month and larger than I needed. With the new changes for only $5 more a month I will get a 2GB which is perfect.

      This perfectly reflects the point that the data really cost next to nothing, that they can decide 1 GB more now is only $5 more instead of $15. Sickening.

    3. Re:This will actually save me $10 a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding roll over to the lower plans will cost an extra $5 per month (Nice data plan you have there. Would be a shame if something were to 'happen' to it).
      I have been quite happy with my 6 gig plan, rarely breaking 5 gig. The "new" 4 gig plan is too small for safety and the 8 gig plan is more than I need. I am sure Verizon bean counters have calculated the average usage tiers and set the new levels and pricing just above those tiers. Guarantees more profit, and no real increase in the usage.
      I can't get Fi, AT&T does not quite have the coverage area....I am stuck with Verizon.

  5. "heightened competitive environment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Therefore, we're going to jack up your prices.

  6. Competitive my a$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Verizon is going to compete by raising prices. We already know that giving us more data doesn't cost them anything. Google fi here I come

    1. Re:Competitive my a$$ by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      If you actually used all of the data you'd end up paying more with fi's 1cent/MB. 2GB is $40 with fi but $35 with Verizon.

    2. Re:Competitive my a$$ by Ded+Bob · · Score: 1

      I just switched from Verizon to Google Fi. Verizon is still more expensive if that is the same plan I had (Unlimited Talk & Text & 1GB) since that price does not include the $20 charge for the account (or phone?). Anyway, I was paying close to $58/mo for 1GB on Verizon while I was not even using 100MB/mo there. If I had stayed, the change would have added $5/mo to my expenses with no benefit.

  7. range of increase by donaggie03 · · Score: 1, Funny

    $5 to $35 is a huge range for the rate increase. Couldn't they narrow it down a little more?

    --
    Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    1. Re:range of increase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure it means they are going from $30 to $35. Just really bad way of saying it.

    2. Re:range of increase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go up BY $5 to $35, meaning the original cost was $30.

  8. Typical corporate tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay more for a little bit more of what you used to get for free.

  9. Technically all of the plans are cheaper by Scyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you calculate it as $s per gigabyte. WIth this change I can actually save money by lower my data plan to the 4GB plan. 3GB was just about our monthly data usage, but 4GB should give me enough overhead to not worry about overages.

    1. Re:Technically all of the plans are cheaper by Jeslijar · · Score: 1

      If you calculate it as $s per gigabyte. WIth this change I can actually save money by lower my data plan to the 4GB plan. 3GB was just about our monthly data usage, but 4GB should give me enough overhead to not worry about overages.

      And when you go over you get to pay an arm and a leg in fees! woooo

    2. Re:Technically all of the plans are cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even "cheaper" -- we're raising your bill to $330/month but 75GB data! Enjoy!

  10. Data is free to Verizon.... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Verizon is an ISP... Data is free to them. This is simply a way to extract more money out of customers...

    1. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Data is free to them

      Speaking as someone who works at an ISP, I'm wondering what the heck gave you that idea?

    2. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by rockout · · Score: 1

      What's with your "..." ? Is that some kind of hint that you have more to say, but you aren't willing to say it yet?

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    3. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      Not all ISPs are equal. Verizon (UUNET) is a Tier 1 provider, meaning they do not buy transit from other ISPs. Data is not a finite resource, and therefore whether Joe Blow uses 3 or 4GB of data a month, it doesn't cost Verizon any differently.

    4. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Data is not a finite resource, and therefore whether Joe Blow uses 3 or 4GB of data a month, it doesn't cost Verizon any differently.

      Um, you are aware that wireless networks don't build themselves, right?

    5. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      I am aware, your point?

    6. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the billions they have been given or exempted by Govt, that point should be null. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131012/02124724852/decades-failed-promises-verizon-it-promises-fiber-to-get-tax-breaks-then-never-delivers.shtml

    7. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Meaning that looking at a GB of usage as having no cost ignores the fact that it does in fact have a real cost.

    8. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      You don't understand how the cell network works. More towers do not give you more bandwidth. More towers gives you more coverage, and more capacity. Like adding a 12 port switch to a network with a 48 port switch that is full. You're not going to see speed increases, you're going to gain the ability to connect more devices to the network.

      The speed comes from the backhaul, which already exists.

      So again, allowing people to use more data per month does not increase costs for a provider who doesn't pay transit. If they get an influx of customers and need to add capacity, or want to expand their coverage, that is not a factor of data usage, and they would have to build those towers anyways.

    9. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      You don't understand how the cell network works. More towers do not give you more bandwidth. More towers gives you more coverage, and more capacity. Like adding a 12 port switch to a network with a 48 port switch that is full. You're not going to see speed increases, you're going to gain the ability to connect more devices to the network.

      The speed comes from the backhaul, which already exists.

      So again, allowing people to use more data per month does not increase costs for a provider who doesn't pay transit. If they get an influx of customers and need to add capacity, or want to expand their coverage, that is not a factor of data usage, and they would have to build those towers anyways.

      Your analogy would only be appropriate if the network were constrained by the number of customers it can serve simultaneously, and not by the total data utilized. It's the latter that's the primary constraint.

      Backhaul's a constraint in some locations, but not most.

    10. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      Your analogy would only be appropriate if the network were constrained by the number of customers it can serve simultaneously, and not by the total data utilized. It's the latter that's the primary constraint.

      You are absolutely wrong. RF is a shared medium, you're not going to somehow get more data by adding towers running on the same frequency bands. 1 tower or 50 towers, the bandwidth is the same.

    11. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Your analogy would only be appropriate if the network were constrained by the number of customers it can serve simultaneously, and not by the total data utilized. It's the latter that's the primary constraint.

      You are absolutely wrong. RF is a shared medium, you're not going to somehow get more data by adding towers running on the same frequency bands. 1 tower or 50 towers, the bandwidth is the same.

      That's completely untrue. Dividing cells, adding micro/pico/femtocells, etc., lets you increase the amount of frequency reuse.

    12. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wanted to say that you're a douche, but he was waiting for you to reply first.

    13. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Not the OP)

      They don't build themselves, but all of the carriers rake in billions in profits each quarter. Those profits clearly, by nature of being profits, cover their infrastructure rollouts. To his point, there's no justification that the cost of moving bits has stayed flat (or even increased, as they have gone from Unlimited to tiered plans), so the old infrastructure is capably handling itself while the new infrastructure is even better (hence why it doesn't really stay flat).

      One day we'll have regulators that are competent enough to recognize this, thus saving us hundreds of dollars each year is bullcrap expenses.

    14. Re: Data is free to Verizon.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You proved his point.

      More towers/WAPs do not increase the backhaul speed. The backhaul "ISP connection" is the bottleneck if it is near 100%.

      No tier 1 ISP is at 100% unless they deliberately overload things for the purpose of, say, screwing Netflix and extorting extra payments.
      If I have a 1gbit ISP, putting in motr 1gb or even 10gb switches wont speed up internet to my users.

    15. Re: Data is free to Verizon.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah he pretty much wanted to call you a douche but wanted you to confirm it for us. He's probably new here. You otoh have been here quite awhile so you know damned good and well what the ellipses means...

  11. "but"???? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be "and"?

    Please people... learn your conjunctions for cryin' out loud.

    (Damn... now I have that old "conjunction junction" song stuck in my head).

    1. Re:"but"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "but" is the appropriate conjunction in this case.

    2. Re:"but"???? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      How is it appropriate? "But" connotes that the information that follows is somehow unexpected, or does not logically follow from whatever preceeded it. If they had raised prices *without* improving services, then "but" would be appropriate.

    3. Re:"but"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon offering more data per dollar at the same time as raising prices is unexpected. Price changes from Verizon are typically a total ass fuck with no reach around. "but" is completely appropriate.

    4. Re:"but"???? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is characteristically unexpected because of the nature of the company, but it is still not grammatically correct. It's like saying "I was unsatisfied with my purchase but got my money back". Using the word "but" makes no real sense, even if where I had purchased the item were not a place that was well known for not giving refunds. The only way the word "but" can be used properly in the headline sentence or my example sentence is if "but" is both preceded by a comma and followed by the words "at least", which then conveys the proper and literal meaning.

  12. TMobile.... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unlimited Data. $50 a month. Roaming data in 100+ countries. Free rental of WiFI router.

    I'm glad that Verizon is being forced to acknowledge that customers are beings other than walking wallets, but TMobile is just better., Sorry.

    1. Re:TMobile.... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Unlimited Data. $50 a month. Roaming data in 100+ countries. Free rental of WiFI router.

      I'm glad that Verizon is being forced to acknowledge that customers are beings other than walking wallets, but TMobile is just better., Sorry.

      I'm surprised VZW and ATT haven't tried to offer plans that are equal to TMobile's. I switched to TM and, despite all the "their network sucks" posts have found them to be perfectly fine for my use, and the international free data/text an added perk. In addition, I get 14GB of tethered data / month which is more than I ever use.. At half the price of my old plan plus unlimited data I am quite happy that I switched.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re: TMobile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-Mobile is horrible internationally, it's a sale gimic.

    3. Re:TMobile.... by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Free calls in Mexico is the primary reason my wife switched us to T-Mobile, but that said, T-Mobile has zero coverage in rural Nebraska and South Dakota,which is where I was over the weekend. Zero bars for the lot of it, whereas Verizon at least had some coverage. In the past my brother (who flip-flops carriers all the time) used to get analog service, but on modern phones, it literally is Verizon or nothing.

    4. Re:TMobile.... by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Or Sprint, a little more at $80 a month for unlimited data. Verizon users are fools to pay as much as they do for as little as they get.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    5. Re:TMobile.... by garcia · · Score: 2

      It really depends on your location of use and how far from interstates you travel, when you do.

      In my case, there is absolutely NO coverage for T-mobile at my lake home on any provider except Verizon. Considering we spend ~40% of our summer months there, this is a necessity.

      We also travel, by car, over 3500 miles each summer on a road trip. With Verizon I have never been out of coverage; however, AT&T and T-mobile cannot keep pace--not even close.

    6. Re:TMobile.... by genka · · Score: 1

      Sprint is OK for people leaving in large cities and not traveling. Otherwise their coverage sucks. Verizon is the best, it will not compete on price.

    7. Re:TMobile.... by dwillden · · Score: 1

      The few times I've found myself outside of Sprint coverage, I've been covered by the included unlimited nationwide roaming. Mostly on Verizon's network I'm sure since they've long had cross company roaming agreements. A couple remote areas (Out camping where I don't expect coverage anyway) only Verizon users have had signal but most areas I have some coverage too. p.s. I live in the mountain west where coverage outside the cities and freeway corridors always sucks for everybody (or it has since the old AT&T shut down their analog network).

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    8. Re:TMobile.... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      TMobile is just better

      TMobile has lower prices in densely populated urban centers.

      If you live in the 2/3 of the country where Verizon is sometimes sketchy but TMobile is at best fifty miles away, it doesn't even qualify as 'usable', much less 'best'.

      Speaking of which, if anybody can recommend a phone that works on Verizon with Cyanogenmod and has an SD card slot and removable battery, it's time for me to upgrade. Something that doesn't overheat rapidly like my current Galaxy would be great.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:TMobile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also need a phone with newer tech to actually be actually to connect to T-Mobile's more recently acquired lower-frequency LTE band (band 12), which is around 700 MHz.

    10. Re:TMobile.... by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Unlimited Data. $50 a month. Roaming data in 100+ countries. Free rental of WiFI router.

      You forgot little to no service in many rural (and some not so rural) locations. If such things are important for your use, T-Mobile may not be the best choice. It's gotten better the last while, but it's still doesn't come close to Verizon and AT&T's footprint.

    11. Re:TMobile.... by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      I've been eyeing the LG V10... open removable back, so I can get an extended battery, SD card. The T-Mobile version has a Cyanogenmod port, but I don't see one for Verizon. Some of the other LGs have slide out batteries; removable so you can have multiple, but limited volume so you can't upgrade the capacity much.

      -R C

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    12. Re:TMobile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my case, there is absolutely NO coverage for T-mobile at my lake home on any provider except Verizon. Considering we spend ~40% of our summer months there, this is a necessity.

      This. I love T-Mobile and it's glorious when it works.

      The operative word is 'when'.

      Meanwhile, I've yet to find anywhere that I don't get good speed with Verizon.

    13. Re:TMobile.... by toadlife · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile is fine in urban areas, but in rural areas like mine it's garbage. I was a T-mobile subscriber for ten years. I then switched to Sprint because they had "3G" service, but the towers in my area ended up being 3G radios fed by what must have been 56k ISDN lines. I also noticed that my phone would frequently roam on Verizon towers.

      T-Mobile has 4G around here now, but it's still confined to inside towns. Venture out into the 30 mile patches of nowhere in between towns and you're back to 20th century "EDGE" speeds.

      I finally got tired of putting up with shitty service, all to save $20 a month. I get 50 Mb/s in the middle of nowhere with Verizon. With T-Mobile I couldn't even make a call for short stretches on my commute home.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    14. Re:TMobile.... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised... haven't tried to offer plans

      I have unlimited data with AT&T (via Cricket) for $65/month; it's throttled at 8Mbit... however, I also have overpriced 10GB/month Verizon on my other phone; Cricket service can be flaky...

    15. Re:TMobile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. For Apple this is only the iPhone6 series or the SE, neither of which I own.

    16. Re: TMobile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been out of Verizon coverage? It has pretty crappy service in Western NY and Western PA, along with plenty of spots it doesn't cover although it claims to. When I had Verizon and I went to visit relatives, I learned to drive around looking for hills I could park on top of to call home. :P

    17. Re:TMobile.... by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      Verizon has the coverage and they know it. Verizon was very meticulous in which local carriers and towers they bought up over the last 3 decades. They made sure that whenever possible they were going to have service in every nook and cranny in the states. While the other carriers largely focused on population dense cities.

      For city dwellers that don't travel much it makes sense to not use Verizon. But if you want cell service with reasonably reliable data nearly everywhere you go you have no other choice but Verizon.

      As a Verizon customer I hate that they charge so much, but for me the extra expense is worth having the extra coverage. And as much as I drive, it could potentially save my life or that of a family member in a breakdown or accident.

    18. Re: TMobile.... by RCourtney · · Score: 1

      Actually ATT does offer something competitive with the other carrier's $40-50 semi-unlimited plans - its just that its part of their GoPhone (prepaid) section.

      $45/month ($40 with auto refill)
      Unlimited calling.
      Unlimited texting (including to over 100 other countries).
      2GB (they bumped me to 3GB) 4G data and then unlimited 3G after that.

      This is better than any of their post-paid plans and the guy at the ATT store couldn't give me a reason why pre-paid had flat rate semi-unlimited when their regular plans did not.

      The same thing from their family plan, minus unlimited 3G on their family plan, (last I checked) cost $10 more per month.

    19. Re:TMobile.... by jandrese · · Score: 2

      T-Mo has made big strides in upgrading their network in the past few years. Getting a chunk of prime bandwidth was a huge boost for them. I had T-Mo years ago but switched to Verizon after being without coverage too many times, but then Verizon started dicking with the bills so we switched back to T-Mo and to my surprise I rarely am without service. Most of the old deadspots are gone, although a couple do remain.

      They got rid of overages. They don't charge you for your phone when you bring your own. Then added free international. Then added free SMS (Does Verizon still rape you on SMS? $20/month or $0.35/per?). Then added free calling. Then added Wifi calling. Then doubled everyone's data for free. I am absolutely not switching back to Verizon anytime in the near future.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    20. Re:TMobile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlimited Data. $50 a month. Roaming data in 100+ countries. Free rental of WiFI router.

      I'm glad that Verizon is being forced to acknowledge that customers are beings other than walking wallets, but TMobile is just better., Sorry.

      I wish TMobile would come to Canada and bring the same low rates the US subscribers enjoy. Bell, Rogers, and Telus (BRT) are robbing us on a monthly basis.

    21. Re: TMobile.... by lsllll · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct. I can vouch for this. Having been to Canada, China and Mexico this year so far, I can tell you that the free data plan pretty much sucks and is completely useless. Texting worked great, as did calling for $.20/min.

      --
      Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
    22. Re:TMobile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost everywhere I've been while being a T-Mobile customer has also had wifi. T-Mobile has supported wifi-calling for quite a few years, they were the first to embrace as a nod to their lackluster coverage. As a result I'm rarely without coverage because I'm rarely some place that I can't be on wifi. Most areas in Metro-Phoenix are totally fine as well even without wifi so 98% of the time I don't worry about coverage. Mainly it is just when driving to Vegas or LA or Mexico. Areas where Verizon and ATT both are quite lackluster as well since my work phones over the years have been Sprint, then Verizon, then ATT.

    23. Re:TMobile.... by antdude · · Score: 1

      In my nest area, Verizon wins barely since other providers get no signals due to huge hills/small mountains that block their transmitters. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    24. Re:TMobile.... by dwillden · · Score: 1

      As I said in another reply to someone else. Sprint's unlimited plan also has unlimited roaming. I live in the mountain west, there are very few areas I've traveled to where I don't have some coverage and Verizon users do. Such locations do exist but they are not common.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    25. Re:TMobile.... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm running a battery that's 3x the capacity of stock and even that doesn't get me a full day. Hey, I have a little unix machine in my pocket - I want it doing things, so I don't have to.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  13. You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by DeathToBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bloody hell. Here in the newly-independent UK[1], £11 per month gets me 1GB of data, among other things. Another £3 per month turns that into unlimited data. ANOTHER £2 per month turns that into unlimited data with 4GB of data usable by a device tethered to the phone. That's right, £16 per month for unlimited data on the phone and 4GB for tethered devices. "Heightened competitive environment"? Could still use some work, I think. [1] Yes, yes, I know.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
    1. Re:You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      £20/month gets me unlimited (4G) data in the UK, plus 4GB tethering. If I travel abroad, I also get 25GB roaming data in the US and other countries included in that. Plus calls back to the UK come out of my standard minutes allowance.

    2. Re:You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by Second_Derivative · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not the biggest fan of US telcos, but to be fair to them the UK is much more densely populated compared to the US, and is also much smaller. The better comparison would be Virgin Media versus Comcast. In both cases you have absolutely zero competition for your wireline ISP, but at least VM gave decent value for money a few years ago when I lived in the UK.

    3. Re:You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how about Sweden? I pay SEK 50/month for unlimited data, unlimited tethering, and unlimited (albeit bandwidth-limited to 2 Mbit/sec) roaming data within EU.

    4. Re:You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prices from sweden. 1sek=0.12USD (Tele2)
      0,5GB =49sek
      5GB=99sek
      20GB=199sek
      50GB=249sek
      100GB=399sek

      Unlimited number of call inside sweden
      149sek.
      Otherwise
      0,69sek/minute

      No additional fees, no subscription fee.

      For the price of the L plan 70USD = 596sek in sweden you get unlimited calls and 100GB of data, and money left to spend.

    5. Re:You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prices from sweden. 1sek=0.12USD (Tele2)
      0,5GB =49sek
      5GB=99sek
      20GB=199sek
      50GB=249sek
      100GB=399sek

      Unlimited number of call inside sweden
      149sek.
      Otherwise
      0,69sek/minute

      No additional fees, no subscription fee.

      For the price of the L plan 70USD = 596sek in sweden you get unlimited calls and 100GB of data, and money left to spend.

      There is also a cheap option of this using tele2 sub-brand with no human support (comviq)

      200minutes of calls and 1GB of data for 95sek
      Unlimited calls and 1GB of data for 145sek
      Unlimited calls and 3GB of data for 195sek
      Unlimited calls and 7GB of data for 245sek

    6. Re:You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      You have minute allowances? In the US the trend is unlimited minutes and unlimited text with some amount of data.

    7. Re:You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If you think the EU model of cellular could work in the US, go check on T-Mobile's prices (Deutsche Telekom). Oddly enough, their service costs just as much.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:You pay WHAT for mobile data??? by number6 · · Score: 1

      I hardly use my phone to make phone calls or texts, less than 15 minutes a month and an average of zero texts. I deliberately chose a plan with minimal minutes (about 200 I think) to save a few quid. The default tends to be unlimited though.

      --
      I'm a number, not a free man!
  14. They are being competitve??!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently they haven't actually looked at their competition, because other than AT&T, the trend has been more for less.....not more for more.

  15. Don't forget the device charge by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case anyone is unfamiliar with AT&T / Verizon pricing, these fees are in addition to the 'device' charges, which run ~$20-25/mo per connected phone.

    So Verizon is offering a marginally less pathetic amount of data for a marginally more outrageous sum of money. Hooray?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Don't forget the device charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like it because it will allow me to move from the M to the S plan, for an net savings of $10 a month. That being said, if it really was about the cost of providing data Verizon would charge a fixed rate based on actual usage rather than having tiers.

    2. Re:Don't forget the device charge by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      I use the AT&T gophone (prepaid) network. It costs me $50 (including tax+fees. $5 cheaper if you have auto-refill) and has unlimited data (capped after 3GB).

      I rarely go over my cap and the unused data is rolled into the next month.

      Just in case anyone is looking for a cheaper alternative to VZ.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:Don't forget the device charge by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I use the AT&T gophone (prepaid) network. It costs me $50 (including tax+fees. $5 cheaper if you have auto-refill) and has unlimited data (capped after 3GB).

      You could get almost that exact same thing for $35/mo with Cricket, using the same phone, still on AT&T's network.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  16. Revenue and Profit per Customer? by ytene · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe we're thinking about this the wrong way. Verizon revenue is about $32 billion and their profits about $4.4 Billion. How many customers do they have? If we could get reliable data and do the math, it would show how much profit they are making per customer.

    I'm not a US citizen so in a sense this is not directly relevant, but across the world the mobile telcos seem to be pushing up prices, charging huge roaming premiums and raking in massive profits, yet, curiously, it doesn't seem to be resulting in a better service...

    Does anyone know how much it's costing them to maintain enough bandwidth? Is this a genuine "cost of doing business" or is this "squeeze 'em till the pips squeak"???

    1. Re:Revenue and Profit per Customer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >... yet, curiously, it doesn't seem to be resulting in a better service.

      That's because turning profits into real & tangible growth (ie: infrastructure), is only done after much protest!

      You see business make quarterly projections, and they are 'expected' to grow, (monetarily that is). These projections are not based on reality, but on projected reality. The actual demand for a product, the sustainability of sales, or quality of product are hardly considered. Merely the existence of commerce itself is enough to expect & demand growth. From us to them.

      Reminds me of the 'ol cinema popcorn pricing scheme. Small bags of popcorn are seemingly expensive for what you get compared to the larger tubs. The larger tub 'seems' to be the deal, (within a few coins of the smallest size) because the small sizes are artificially expensive... to push you to the larger. In the end the purveyer has expended little more for the larger, but you seem to get a deal.

  17. Data costs are probably level... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2
    The cost of that extra data is probably the same as it was when the price points were first set up.

    .
    So it looks like Verizon jacking up their prices while the costs are remaining the same.

    Pure profit for Verizon.

  18. Pay more money to avoid having to pay more money. by ardmhacha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Safety mode" eliminates the prospect of an overage fee, and reduces the speed of the service until the end of the month....Customers with smaller plans can pay $5 extra to access "safety mode."

    "a new way to avoid overage fees" by paying a fee

  19. MetroPCS FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am paying $55 a month for unlimited data, and last month alone i used over 100GB, which is the most i have ever used in a month.

  20. poor policies by dingleberrie · · Score: 2

    I get it. So they just changed everyone to be half a plan above where they chose to be. If these people wanted more data, then they'd have chosen those more expensive plans with more data, but they didn't, so Verizon chose for them. It's like ordering a medium size and they say "oh, we give you more than medium, so you pay us more, no? Don't break contract or you pay us more then too. Have a nice day."

    I won't use Verizon mobile because of poor policies like this. I have a non-verizon plan that has unlimited data... but only the first 3GB is fast. After that, it's slower. I asked Verizon how I could make sure I don't pay more than my budget for data and they said I could have them turn off all data at 3GB or pay their relatively expensive overage charges. So they won't have my business.

    1. Re:poor policies by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Well, that is the cynical view. I am not sure its all that customer unfriendly though. I for one feel the plan on my handset is a bit restrictive, I have to pay a little more attention to my usage than i would like, but the next size up before now was a lot more than i would use most months.

      I suspect a lot of people are in the same boat. My usage has trended upward over time, I used to use 200MB a month on average just a few years ago. Now i am often around 500 or so. I have come darn near my 1GB cap around holidays where people are sending tons of pictures, though on occasion. This year if I don't "put a lid" on people sending giant iMessages to me around that time, I am sure I'll go over given my base usage has increased.

      My guess would be most peoples data usage trends upward. Overages are very expensive on cost per MB basis compared with this proposed plan adjustment. It makes some sense that the plans would need to be 'right sized' every few years to me.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:poor policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will actually save me $10 a month. The 1GB plan was too small so I was forced into the 'M' 3GB plan which was $15 more a month and larger than I needed. With the new changes for only $5 more a month I will get a 2GB which is perfect.

  21. 2 1/2 months of contract and I'm free of Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just got a Google Fi phone and plan. Can't wait to dump Verizon for good once my contract expires in 2 months.

  22. Though to be fair by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    That is unlimited data at 2G speeds (around 100kbps usually), 2GB of data at 4G speeds. I love T-Mobile and have been a customer for quite some time but it isn't unlimited data in the sense many people would expect. On their base $50 plan you get as high a speed as the network can support for the first 2GB of data, then they throttle it down to a slower speed.

    If you want unlimited (barring abuse, if you go too nuts they still might throttle) high speed data that is another $45/month.

    Their base plan is the best plan going though. Really these days I think many people will find 2GB more than sufficient since WiFi is everywhere.

    1. Re:Though to be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close, but incorrect.

      If you want unlimited (barring abuse, if you go too nuts they still might throttle) high speed data that is another $45/month.

      The unlimited 4G data is an extra $5 per month.

      I have two phones on this plan. Unlimited data at full 4G speed for $55 each. Tethering included. My wife and I both tether our tablets, I tether my laptop, she tethers her desktop, and I tether the Roku. We use a lot of data. $110 a month prepaid and no additional fees in the past couple of years.

    2. Re:Though to be fair by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      I've hit over 100gb in a month with another 10GBP feathering and I never heard crap from them. Still was running a full 75mbps connection speed through all the usage.

  23. Why the wife and kids are on TMobile now by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Two months ago we decided to put service on our daughter's old iPhone. Verizon wouldn't simply let me add a $15/month line to our shared pool of data - they said my plan was "too old". Instead they wanted me to switch to a new plan, which would have raised my monthly total cost by $35/month.

    Instead I moved my mom, wife, sister and daughter all to TMobile. We are spending $30/month less with an added phone and more data to boot. Binge-on is also nice since daughter and wife use youtube and Pandora quite a lot.

    The coverage isn't quite as good as Verizon - but it is good enough.

  24. Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want a cheap yearly plan for minimal calls.

    No data. No frills. No fancy phones. No cement ponds.

    Give me 10 brief calls (5 minutes or less) a month and I'm done.

    I hate all of the Pay-Go plans because I end up with thousands of minutes I don't and will never use.

    Yeah, I know, I'm a terrible person, but the fact is, I hate using a cellphone, and only use it for the occasional incident where they are desirable.

    1. Re:Can you hear me now? by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      then go with something like ting where your only guaranteed payment is 6$/mo for your phone. Other than that its whatever bucket of usage you end up in. With no txt and no data you would end up in the min call bucket and your bill would be 9$/mo+small amount of fees compared to big providers

      Theres other options out there just like ting, just have to look around

  25. Virtual monopoly here... by soapdude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I could move to anyone but Verizon, I would. Unfortunately, no other carrier has decent signal where I live and work. Looks like I'm stuck.

    1. Re:Virtual monopoly here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel your pain. in my area we have two towers and both are Verizon. AT&T and TM both get "searching for service" out here.... We wouldn't even have that but the NAVY Admiral at the time twisted Verizon's arm when they were hired to put in a crapload of other Telco gear for the base itself.

    2. Re:Virtual monopoly here... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If I could move to anyone but Verizon, I would. Unfortunately, no other carrier has decent signal where I live and work. Looks like I'm stuck.

      Not entirely. There are carriers like Republic Wireless and TextNow who use WiFi for calls/sms/data if available, and seamlessly fail-over to cellular only when you go out of range.

      Republic Wireless also has unlimited free (voice and sms but not data) roaming onto Verizon wherever there's no usable Sprint signal.

      Fortunately, AT&T's coverage is just as good as Verizon's coverage almost everywhere, which makes Cricket the best deal out there right now. I don't even understand why anybody is on T-Mobile or Sprint when they charge more for service with their awful patchy coverage.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Virtual monopoly here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can switch to a Verizon MVNO such as Page Plus Cellular, Selectell, or Total Wireless. I think some Straight Talk plans also use Verizon towers.

  26. where's the plan with ZERO data.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but allows use of a "smartphone", with data via wifi, without the smartphone 'tax' (mandatory data plan)?

    1. Re: where's the plan with ZERO data.. by magarity · · Score: 1

      You can have that as soon as you can provide a smartphone out of the box that doesn't use any data. The problem isn't that you don't want to use cel network as a data network; the problem is that the phone treats it as just another network to transfer via.

    2. Re: where's the plan with ZERO data.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ting wireless (www.ting.com) uses Sprint (I know... but it works here in TN) and is pay-as-you-go. You pay whatever tier your voice, data, and text usage falls within. Voice and Texts are pretty darn reasonable. Data can be the majority of the bill, but... you can also disable data service completely for your account. My kid's cell bill is about $12 a month and he uses an old Samsung S3. He can get on WiFi, contact and text us, and it's cheap and all he needs.

    3. Re:where's the plan with ZERO data.. by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      MVNO's with bucket plans, and turn off the mobile data on your phone or block it through the provider

  27. Verizon still has contracts you just have to dig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took me 4 phone calls + a trip into an official Verizon store and threatening to tell everybody inside about the deal before they would give it to me, but you can still get onto traditional 2yr contracts under Verizon loyalty and rewards programs if you twist enough arms.

  28. Bloody hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a massively overpriced 4 handset business contract that I'm tied into for another 12 months and even I winced at those prices.

  29. Re:First by tripleevenfall · · Score: 0

    Even on Slashvertisement posts like this one!

  30. That sounds pretty shitty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK you have a wealth of choice - for £15 (less that $20, even in post-Brexit money) I get 1,000 national minutes to mobiles or landlines, unlimited SMS, 4Gb of data and FREE calls to other users of my network...

  31. Verizon has other issues than data volume by magarity · · Score: 1

    I left verizon because they rarely update the device's system software and when they did the primary purpose seemed to be to lock down the bootloader more and more. Yes, most users don't give a hoot, but that's my case.

  32. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would someone pay $50 for 2gb a month when straight talk is unlimited (5gb) at high speed over verizons own towers?

  33. T-mobile $30 unlimited data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have been on this plan for years.

    first 5gb is 4G thereafter it's 2G.

  34. header didn't come out right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've been on T-mobile $30 unlimited data plan for years
    first 5gb is 4G thereafter it's 2G.
    available at Walmart

  35. How are we not all on pay-as-you-go by now? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

    I don't know about anybody else, but my data usage fluctuates pretty widely based on unpredictable travel and other circumstances. For my family, Ting (mentioned above) works out well -- I'm sure my son would love to be able to stream all the time over cellular data, but he's bearing up well under the strain of his deprivation. If we have to spend a week or two on the road, we'll bump up into another data bucket, and pay an extra $10 or so at the end of the month. If not, we get the usual low rate we expect. Same for minutes and messages.

    I was on Verizon years ago, and clung to a very old plan with very old flip-phones because I knew pay-as-you-go had to be coming soon. It took a bit longer than I expected, but it eventually arrived, and I couldn't have been happier to kiss Verizon goodbye.

  36. Or, you know, don't pay for overages by PPalmgren · · Score: 2

    At T-MO my data rate is simply lowered when I go over instead of being charged an extra $1/meg or whatever insane shit VZ is still running. They are so far behind their competitors its like the twilight zone over there. So glad I switched.

  37. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Second post

  38. I'm looking forward to September by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    That's when my 2 year Verizon contract runs out and I dump them for T-Mobile and an iPhone 7. I would rather do business with a company that competes by providing better service (free music streaming) than do business with a company that competes by cranking up prices. I'm surprised Comcast hasn't purchased Verizon, they seem like they do business the same way as one another.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  39. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... It's the bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verizon (UUNET) is a Tier 1 provider, meaning they do not buy transit from other ISPs. Data is not a finite resource, and therefore whether Joe Blow uses 3 or 4GB of data a month, it doesn't cost Verizon any differently.

    It's not the data, it's the bandwidth that is the expensive limited commodity. Never head of the FTC frequency slot auctions? (Billions of $) Neither are cell towers free; they are bandwidth-limited also..

  40. ATTN /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we have here is a prime example in the wild of some mangina who doesn't whip his kids. I don't want to hear your bitching. You spared the rod and now you've got a spoiled ass child. It's your own damn fault.

  41. Re:Data is free to Verizon.... It's the bandwidth by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

    And none of that changes the fact that whether Joe Blow uses 3 or 4GB of data a month, the cost to Verizon is the same.

  42. Con artists by jbrizz · · Score: 1

    The data costs them nothing, but increasing the allotment is a good way to excuse putting the price up. As a non American, those prices are horrendous.