Ask Slashdot: Should You Upgrade To Windows 10 For Accessibility Features?
BarbaraHudson writes: Non-Visual Desktop Access (NVDA) is a free screen reader that is only available for Windows and comes with lots of features for people with visual handicaps. NVDA recommends to delay moving to Windows 10 because of problems with the Edge browser, PDF reading, Cortana, and applications designed for the Windows Store. There's only a few weeks to "upgrade" to Windows 10. My question is, does Windows 10 have compelling reasons for the visually handicapped to switch to it that are worth putting up with these (hopefully temporary) problems? Please note that NVDA doesn't require an internet connection to work; any Windows 10 assistive technologies that require one are a minus because they can leave the user high and dry with no notice. By the way, I've tried the KNOPPIX Adriane Audio Desktop and unfortunately it's really not there yet in comparison. Microsoft did highlight several accessibility features in the Windows 10 Anniversary update. Some of the features include faster text to speech, improved keyboard navigation, verbosity, AutoSuggest results, and support for more languages. In many of the core Windows 10 apps, Microsoft has made changes to Microsoft Edge, Mail, Cortana, and Groove to provide various features like modern web accessibility standards, improved account setup experience when using a screen reader, more reliable search and navigation functionality when using a keyboard, and better support for high DPI scaling and high contrast. There are also new accessibility resources available to developers, including an updated Visual Studio App Analysis tool to make it easier to find and fix accessibility errors, and support for Mnemonics in the Universal Windows Platform to help developers more easily provide Access Key customizations.
will be the day they pry 7 away and force me to use that bloated piece of spyware/advertising filth that is Windows 10.
Should we widen our arses for purposes of accessibility?
Depends on what you want.
No.
It's not a hard calculation.
As in Microsoft accessing your personal information and computer habits and selling it to the highest bidder.
For the visually handicapped to switch to it? Yes. They won't have to look at it.
Have gnu, will travel.
I saw a visual studio reference in the summary.
Why do the blind need a GUI? Or a monitor for that matter...
Well three things then.
Serenity now, insanity later.
The link to Paul Thurrott doesn't really answer the question - it's just a copy of the generic new feature list in the anniversary update, with no information about what parts need the Internet to work, or whether Edge has now been fixed to work with other screen readers.
NVDA has had the "new" features like speech "up to double the words per minute" for quite a while, and there's no indication that Edge will work with screen narrators other than Microsoft's. (sigh)
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
All in all, I'd have to say that Windows 10 is far better at making your computer accessible to Microsoft than making it accessible to the user.
This is probably the first of an ongoing series of "articles" subtly prodding laggards to move to the wonderfulness of Windows 10 data harvesting.
They don't allow Enterprise or any version of Windows besides 7 or 8 iff it isn't one of the editions they exclude. I don't know anyone that is allowed to upgrade to 10. I want to upgrade, but everything I have is running 7 Enterprise or Vista Ultimate. It sucks that Microsoft has released a new product that is better, but they don't allow the vast majority of people to upgrade to it.
Asking this crowd for advice about Windows 10 is a waste of time.
This is where you need to go: NVDA Community Add-ons: Windows 10 App Essentials Last updated June 18. But allow me to suggest that accessibility is something that Windows does quite well and a free upgrade to Win 10 is not something to be dismissed lightly if you are at home in the Windows environment.
Hello. My idea is not to upgrade to Windows 10. I am currently with Windows 8.1 ... When is the FINAL day that we should upgrade to 10? Does anyone know this?
Ask Slashdot: Should You Upgrade To Windows 10 For Accessibility Features?
Should I upgrade? Or do you mean "you" meaning you?
Wait, who's asking the question?
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
I'a,m blind amnd I'msa writtngb htois on my win0sws labtop righjt onow!
No, they scrapped RDP access on the home version of the OS which is LAME. Kinda defeats the idea of "Accessibility Features".
Lol, "Edge", the little browser that couldn't.
When I tried it, it crashed half the time I tried to visit slashdot and would politely inform me that it had "stopped working", then try and reload the page. And then it would crash again, and again, and again. After several iterations of that crap I'd close it and use Firefox.
And it wasn't just slashdot, it was a slew of sites that caused it to barf and reload, barf and reload, barf and reload, barf and reload....it couldn't even render Yahoo's front page without falling on its face. The Daily Mail, the BBC home page, Kitco, Neatorama, it couldn't/wouldn't load any of those sites half of the time.
Thanks Microsoft, but I'll stick with Win 7 when I need a Windows machine and use Linux Mint for everything else.
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
The Windows 10 upgrade will continue to be free post July 29 for people who use accessibility features...
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/accessibility/2016/05/06/accessibility-and-the-windows-10-free-upgrade/
It's an irrelevant question. If someone was visually handicapped they almost certainly wouldn't have been able to avoid being automatically "upgraded". It's hard enough for non-handicapped people to avoid the "upgrade".
Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
If you have a PC with only 4GB of memory, don't even touch it. I had to upgrade my laptop from 4GB to 12GB for it to become really usable. I actually run the Windows Insider Home builds. My mom runs the ordinary Home version and now has an 8GB machine. I actually run my laptop closed and upgraded from a 24 inch 720p TV as a monitor to a 32 inch 1080p TV as the monitor. I was changing the size of the text in Windows elements in Control Panel Display to 20 on the 24 inch, and have the display set to 175% and still have elements scaled to 14 on the new display. For some applications I have to turn Magnifier on.
Microsoft has already announced that Windows 10 will continue to be a free upgrade for people with accessibility options turned on, even after the deadline for everyone else. As long as they don't rescind that, I'd personally wait until Win10 is fully compatible, rather than jumping the gun.
And, for reference, I'm someone who highly recommends the upgrade for standard users.
As I have said in prevoius posts, Do a full backup of your system that allows Bare-Metal recovery. Then do an In-Place update to Win10. Now your machine's "fingerprint" is in Microsoft's database.
Restore your previous OS. Voila! Free upgrade, and you can keep using your older OS.
But, while I am no expert in accesability, none of the problems that NVDA lists are unsurmountable, as there are workarounds.
EDGE BROWSER: InternetExplorer 11 is still included and installed in Windows10, is just not the default. Just make Explorer the default and bury EDGE as deep as you can (without uninstalling), and instruct your user to use it. Or, install an alternate browser that is compatible with NVDA. Once NVDA solves the EDGE problem, use it if you want/need.
Windows Store APPs: DO not install any, hide the pre-installed ones, install suitable replacements. Instruct your user to NOT use the Windows Store until NVDA fixes the problem.
PDF Reading: Is a special case of the former, as in Windows10, the default PDF reader is a Windows Store APP. Just install Adobe Acrobat Reader, change the defaults and bury the default reader as much as you can (without uninstalling).
Best of luck
*** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
other "articles" that were obviously written by covert PR drones:
>"Microsoft's newest desktop operating system comes with a range of interesting features"
>"[it's] fiscally conservative [to upgrade]"
>Windows 10 skeptics are subtly portrayed as being scared of all things new
https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...
Followed by a good dose of sock puppetry.
>"Windows 10 offers a range of interesting features including virtual digital assistant Cortana. While these features and a substantial boost to performance and speeds could be a big reason for the fast adoption of Windows 10"
https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...
More specifically, "no if you have some eye sight, enough to do common tasks through a combination of memory and site." My primary visually-impaired client knows that to do a certain routine task, he clicks the upper left menu, selects the first option, sets the select box to item #2, then clicks the submit on the lower right. He can't easily read the text on these UI elements, but knowing what he's looking for and where they always are, he can find them. People with good eyesight can probably relate to how they can move around their own house in near complete darkness, because they know where everything is. You only have to recognize the objects you already know, not identify unknown objects.
The best way to piss him off is to "improve" (change) the UI. For him, at least, any new OS would be very difficult. It's much easier for him to use a system he already knows well.
This will preserve your ability to install Windows 10 on that computer in future, when A11y features are sorted out or you really need new functionality.
Though from your description, problems are mostly in new functionality that is in addition to apps that you currently use. For example, Windows 10 still has classic Internet Explorer. Consider keeping the upgrade for a week or so and seeing what you miss. You have a month to rollback.
One positive thing - I've got to see my parents a lot ever since MS Windows 10 ended up on the laptop they only use for web browsing and skype.
It seems that one update or another or just sheer fragility really fucks things up on average about every two weeks and it needs serious stuffing about to get it going again. The thing doesn't have much memory so never should have got MS Windows 10 on it in the first place and that's probably why it keeps playing up.
Sorry folks - that's the only positive thing I can think of for MS Windows 10. It provides no new applications worth mentioning, usability is far worse since the navigation to launch many things is far more cumbersome and performance is dismal.
It's not done. Maybe come back in six months and see if it is a bit less fragile.
That works until the next update rolls in and resets all the custom app settings. Another reason to not even bother with Win 10.
Video demonstration http://news.softpedia.com/news...
Here are your options.
1. Upgrade to Windows 10.
This is the option for those of you that wish to keep on using Windows. It may not be the option you want, but face reality. Windows 7 (and 8.1) is, at this point, deprecated (as opposed to XP, Vista and 8.1 which are considered obsolete). Now you can fight this kicking and screaming but it won't change the fact that Windows 7 is deprecated. And that means at some point in the future it will no longer be supported. Imagine installing Windows XP today, on your new PC. It does not make sense. Same thing will be true for Windows 7 in a few years.
2. Switch to something non-windows.
There is Linux, BSD or OSX. All based on UNIX and all fine choices. You might also want to consider iOS, Chrome OS or Android. This may or may not be viable for you and WINE may or may not help you in the transition. But it is about the only other true choice.
3. Don't upgrade or switch.
I can't honestly see any reason why you'd want to stay on Windows 7, unless you plan to switch from Windows entirerly in a year or two, or certain key applications won't yet work with Win 10. This only prolongs the inevitable until such a time where you *have* to upgrade to Windows 10 - or switch.
Resistance is futile. You will be upgraded.
systemd is not an init system. It's a GNU replacement.
Yeah, MS thinks that phone toys and desktop power systems (gaming, non-linear editing, content creation) are somehow exactly the same, and therefore need a similar toy interface meant for a 4 inch screen.
Does an 10-12 inch laptop with a touch screen more closely resemble "desktop power systems" or "phone toys"? There are arguments for both:
Like desktop power systems The screen is big enough to hold two 80-column text editor or terminal windows side by side. And the screen is also big enough for small windowed "accessory" apps, as proven by "desk accessories" on the single-tasking operating system of the original Macintosh with a 9" black and white screen. (DAs ran in the running application's process; MultiFinder didn't land until System 5 and was optional before 7.) Like phone toys These laptops have touch input. And the screen isn't big enough to hold two full pages side by side.