Slashdot Mirror


A Design Defect Is Plaguing Many iPhone 6 and 6 Plus Units (iphonehacks.com)

Evan Selleck, writing for iPhoneHacks (edited and condensed): For many iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus owners out there in the wild, a design defect is apparently causing some huge issues. Gadget repair firm iFixit has reported about a flaw dubbed "Touch Disease", which it claims is cropping up. With it, owners of the phones are experiencing, to start, a gray bar that appears at the very top of their display. And, for many others, the display itself becomes unresponsive to touch, or less responsive overall. In the blog post, iFixit says the problem stems from issues with the touchscreen controller chip, which is soldered onto the logic board. Interestingly enough, iFixit posits that the same internal design decisions that led to "Endgate" might be causing the issue leading to Touch Disease, too: "In both the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, the Touch IC chips connect to the logic board via an array of itty-bitty solder balls -- "like a plate resting on marbles," Jessa explains. Over time, as the phone flexes or twists slightly during normal use, those solder balls crack and start to lose contact with the board. "At first, there may be no defect at all. Later you might notice that the screen is sometimes unresponsive, but it is quick to come back with a hard reset," Jessa explains. "As the crack deepens into a full separation of the chip-board bond, the periods of no touch function become more frequent."

36 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. You're by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    bending it wrong.

  2. Defective by Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So that you buy the iPhone 7.

    1. Re:Defective by Design by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple pay isn't on android, by definition. Unless you're talking about the competing Google Pay, which is a different competing standard. And then there's Samsung pay because they have to duplicate everything Google does.

      The real question is whether your institution supports it. If your bank, etc, supports Apple Pay but not Google Pay, or vis versa, and you really want that functionality, then your answer is clear, regardless of your brand loyalty.

      Also, what is this facetime equivalent you speak of, assuming you're not just talking about Skype?

    2. Re:Defective by Design by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only reason - Apple Pay, and also, I want a storage upgrade to 64GB. ... FaceTime is the only reason I use an iPhone

      I'm not sure you understand what "only" means.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Defective by Design by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple pay isn't on android, by definition. Unless you're talking about the competing Google Pay, which is a different competing standard.

      You mean Android Pay, not Google Pay. And it's not a different, competing standard. Both Apple Pay and Android Pay use the same NFC technologies and standards.

      On the name, I should point out that it's somewhat understandable that you call it "Google Pay", since Android Pay is a successor to Google Wallet, which was Google's original NFC payment solution, released in 2011 (long before Apple Pay). The Google Wallet approach was a little different, though. Because of payment network limitations, Google used a "proxy card" solution, where a Google-issued credit card was what was actually used to pay at the point of sale, and Google then charged your credit card on the backend. That approach had problems both for the user, who might not get full credit from rewards cards, and for Google, who lost money on every transaction due to the difference in fees between the card-present transaction at point of sale, and the card-not-present transaction used for user's payment, but had the supreme advantage that it would work with any credit or debit card. Banks also really disliked the proxy card solution because it threatened to take too much control of the payment systems away from them. With the intermediate routing step Google could have arranged to use any payment system on the back end, and then used its clout to get the point of sale updated to a solution that didn't involve the banks, and removed the banks from the process completely. There's no evidence Google was going to do that, but the banks were afraid of it and chose to make Google's life very hard in all sorts of ways around the NFC proxy card (and its physical, plastic analogue, which Google issued for a while).

      Apple waited until networks were ready to do "network tokenization", and until some more banks were ready to handle NFC transactions, both of which are required to enable the Apple Pay model where the payment is done directly against the user's card, with payment clearinghouses routing the the transaction directly to the bank that issued the credit card. Android Pay uses this same model, with the difference that if you have a credit card which was previously used with the Google Wallet proxy card solution, Google "grandfathers" your card in and continues using the proxy. This direct model fixes the disadvantages of the proxy card solution, but means that you can only use cards whose issuers have set up the necessary infrastructure. But these days, lots of them have. In particular, the big bank service providers like First Data have got everything set up so their clients who issue credit cards can do NFC. This means that nearly all small banks and credit unions can do it, and most of the big banks can do it. Some of the big banks, and many of the medium-sized banks still aren't set up.

      (Note that I've intentionally left out some details, like the first version of Google Wallet using a direct, non-tokenized approach that only worked with one bank, and some of the other intermediate steps. I figured this was long enough.)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Defective by Design by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Your data is a bit out of date, and I can confirm operation in China and Singapore, at least as of 4 weeks ago when I visited and used it at local 7-11 stores...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:Defective by Design by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Also, what is this facetime equivalent you speak of, assuming you're not just talking about Skype?

      Google Hangouts has let you make video calls for almost as long as Facetime. It's actually functionally superior to Facetime - it allows multiple people in the hangout (basically a conference call with just text, sound, or video, or any combo, also supposed to have a whiteboard feature though I never used it) across multiple platforms (phones, tablets, PCs; Android, iOS, Windows, OS X, Linux). Or at least it used to be. For some reason, Google is in the process of shuttering Hangouts and will be moving the video call feature to Google Duo, which is only available on Android phones and (as the name implies) only connects two devices - no more conference video calls.

      Google's problem is they have a lot of great stuff that nobody knows about. They had a voice assistant before Siri, they just never thought of giving it a spiffy name and didn't market it so nobody knew it was on their phone. I only learned about it via the xda-developers forums. They moved Google Voice over to Hangouts a few years back essentially making every Android phone a VoIP phone, but they never said anything about it so nobody who wasn't using Google Voice before knew about it. Hangouts has been great because it combines multiple platforms - I can respond to short text messages on my phone, but more involved messages I can type up on my laptop since Hangouts shows up in my Gmail sidebar (which incidentally is also how you make video calls from PC). But they never even tried to publicize that capability, and are now in the process of dismantling it (Hangouts no longer combines SMS and hangouts conversations, and MMS has already disappeared from the PC, I expect SMS will go next).

  3. Not a design flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The owners are holding it wrong

  4. YouTube video showing BGA damage under microscope by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Informative
  5. Re:I-Beams by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

    There are multiple ways to solve the problem. Making the phone thicker also results in more material use. Additionally depending on the materials you're still might not get the bending moment of inertia you need.

    Plus you miss the marketing opportunity of "Now with a titanium backbone" marketing.

  6. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Informative

    "you're soldering it wrong"

    isn't that what nvidia said?

    these bga's really scare me. so fragile and so unworkable from a tech POV. I can rework square flat packs but I can't do bga's. I hate them since they are just not really repair-friendly, not to mention its not inspection-friendly.

    flat packs with leads flex and bend. bga's are a fucking abortion, especially if they are at all big, in chip size.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  7. Re:Apple to fix it? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering the huge price of these things (love my iPhone 6+ anyway) let's hope Apple will offer some solution.

    Presumably they will offer a solution, along the lines of "bend over and buy an iPhone 7, peasant!"

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  8. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    The Nvidia issue was a bit different. Due to repeated heating/cooling cycles eventually the solder joints would fail as the PCB and chip expanded and contracted. In the iPhone's case the movement is not due to heat but rather flexing of the entire phone (TFA typos "bendgate" as "endgate", repeated in the summary).

    The iPhone 6/6+ are kinda bendy phones. Tests showed that they were significantly weaker than other phones in the market, requiring much less force to deform. Repeated flexing and poor mechanical design that stresses the PCB (due to the whole thing being stupidly thin) causes this inevitable failure.

    If this is the case, this will be like the Nvidia plague. All affected devices die prematurely, guaranteed.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  9. Don't count on it... by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've personally had 3 iPhone 4 & 4S's get the dreaded "wifi grayed out" issue where your wifi, bluetooth and gps stop working. It was so common that dozens of forum threads involved long discussions about it (you can still find them easily - and also on ebay devices with the problem) and even Apple had a page about it where they offered as a solution to "reset your network settings". Obviously this did nothing, as it was discovered the problem was the temperature sensor was malfunctioning and disabling the wireless module (which took down BT, GPS as well) and once your one year warranty was over you were out of luck with Apple. What's crazy is that the temperature sensor was not enabled with the shipping iOS of the iPhone 4 (possibly the iPhone 4S as well), but Apple enabled it from either iOS 5 or iOS 6 (I forget - but people not upgrading never had the problem), so they could disable it again if they wanted to. But they did not want to, my company purchased 3 iPhones for me because they were all failing the same way (after being used only in the office, sitting on a desk, occasionally debugging iOS apps), so it was good money for Apple.
    Apple won't fix a widespread problem even if it is just a firmware update for them, so don't count on a solution (other than offering you the newest iPhone perhaps with a "generous 10% discount" if you are "lucky").

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  10. Re:I-Beams by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

    The board flexes because it warms and cools during operation. The Apple 3 had the same problem.

  11. Re:Apple to fix it? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reminder to EU residents, all electronics must come with a minimum 2 year guarantee under EU rules. Each country implements it a little differently, but you have at least a 2 year warranty.

    Reminder to UK residents, in the UK the Sale of Goods Act applies. An expensive, high end phone should last 6 years. If it dies after 3 years then Apple can either repair it or offer you a 50% refund, excluding any damage you did and fair wear and tear.

    If they argue, mention the Sale of Goods Act (loudly, in their store) and if that fails Small Claims Court.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  12. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by jeremyp · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is the first time I've heard of this problem.

    I have an iPhone 6 and many people I know have the 6 or 6s and nobody has reported it that I am aware of. This, to me, suggests that the "many" spoken of in TFS is actually quite a small percentage of iPhone 6/6s owners.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  13. The common denominator by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And soon to be a fifth, all in under two years. This last one only lasted about three weeks.

    If indeed that is true I think the problem is most likely you, or more accurately something you are doing. While Apple does have issues with devices from time to time, the probability of a single person have 5 failed iPhones in two years due to (conveniently unspecified) quality problems is remote to say the least. I've known of people to break that many phones in a similarly short time span but that was a user error problem. If there was evidence of Apple having widespread quality issues I'd be the first to pile on but I just don't see the evidence for it here.

    1. Re:The common denominator by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's probably dropping it wrong.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:The common denominator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'd be surprised how frequently Apple's pieces of shit go through repair stores. If you so much as look at them wrong, they'll crack or break. If you work in a mixed Apple/PC environment, go ahead and ask how often Apple's shit has to be repaired. You'd be amazed.

      Remember Antennagate? Bendgate? Screengate? (Different Screengate, this one was MacBook Pros having their displays turning all blotchy.) There was a time when recommended advice for failing MacBook Pros was to try baking them briefly to see if that would resolve the soldering issues!

      Apple is frequently plagued with quality problems that rival the Xbox 360. But for some reason, people keep buying their crap and they keep on getting a pass, despite making some of the worst quality hardware available.

  14. I had this issue with a G4 laptop by GhengisCohen · · Score: 2

    I had a dead 12" white g4 powerbook. This happened to the cpu. I figured I had nothing to lose, so I took out the mother board, wrapped all of it bu the cpu with aluminum foil. I put a tea light on the chip (it was about the same size) I fired it up figuring it would be a prayer to the computer gods, or part of a wake ceremony. Once everything cooled off the laptop worked, still does. I wonder if a little heated press could be made to heat up and re-seat the chip without letting it slide at all. Sounds like an aftermarket tool business if anyone wants to make it.

  15. Maybe I'm doing it wrong? by ausekilis · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I try a hard reset the screen only gets worse.

  16. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by wbr1 · · Score: 2
    The price of these phones is 550 to 650 US. I love the video and this kind of work, but how economically feasible is it for an owner? A shop equipped like that probably charges 75 to 150 per hour. Full disassembly, reassembly and microsoldering I would assume is at least 3 hours. That is 1/4 to 1/2 the device price for a repair that may not last.

    I love performing electronic repairs, although I do not have practice (and wonder how good I would be) on devices this small. However I do not see the economic feasibility... someone enlighten me.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  17. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Consumer Reports did some tests:

    http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm

    Apple iPhone 6         70 lbs
    Apple iPhone 6 Plus    90 lbs
    LG G3                  130 lbs
    Apple iPhone 5         130 lbs
    Samsung Galaxy Note 5  150 lbs

    So an iPhone 6 is about twice as easy to deform as an iPhone 5 and other manufacturer's high end phones.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  18. Re:I-Beams by VanGarrett · · Score: 2

    Thermal expansion. Hard reset means that the components stop receiving a current for a brief period, allowing them to cool, and therefore, shrink. You might get the same, or similar results from just putting it down and leaving it alone for a few minutes.

  19. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Lothsahn · · Score: 2

    Firstly, you're correct. Nvidia was thermal expansion/contraction, while this is due to physical bending.

    However, if you look at Louis Rossman's videos, the Nvidia issue was due to internal points WITHIN the chip, not due to the BGA points themselves. This means that simply reflowing the chip (or even resurfacing and resoldering the BGA) won't solve the issue. You NEED a new chip.

    Heating the chip might slightly reflow the internal connections which may make the device work for a few days or even weeks, but it's going to fail very rapidly again.

    The Apple issue is with the BGA points themselves, not inside the chip, which means that, as long as the points aren't super oxidized (as they were in Jessa's video), a reflow might resolve the issue. Fully resurfacing the BGA as Jessa did should completely resolve the issue, but Jessa replaced the chip anyway--I suspect the chip cost is low enough that putting a new chip on just makes more sense--just to make sure.

    Source (Louis Rossman):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    -=Lothsahn=-
  20. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by Wargames · · Score: 4, Informative

    FYI: BGA = Ball Grid Array,
    "Ball Grid Array rework is one of the most challenging procedures performed at assembly facilities and repair depots around the world. " ---
    http://www.circuitrework.com/f...

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
  21. Apple support by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I see someone's dealt with Apple's "support". It's never Apple's problem. It's always "you're doing it wrong".

    Hogwash. I've had two iPhones replaced by Apple in the last 5 years. One for cracked screen - small crack in upper right corner they indicated was a known design issue, replaced for free. The other was for a camera that wouldn't focus for some reason, also replaced for free under warranty. I'm under no illusions that if I threw my phone on the ground or dropped it in the toilet that they would replace it for free (that would be my fault) but they've been nothing but courteous and helpful when I've needed it. They asked if I had dropped the phone but when I answered no they did not pursue the matter further. I've never once heard an Apple representative tell anyone "you're doing it wrong" *in person* and I'm quite confident you haven't either.

    That alone is why I'm done trying to deal with Apple. The high prices and poor quality just further cement that decision.

    High prices? Sure. Poor quality? There are a lot of things I could critique about Apple's but as a general proposition hardware quality is not among them. They are well made and widely acknowledged even by their competition to be well made.

  22. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by JoeyRox · · Score: 2

    I agree, on a direct replacement vs labor cost comp these types of repairs are uneconomical. However when one considers the total systemic cost including dispoal/landfill/recycling/PCB pollution I think repair becomes a more feasible solution. Unfortunately manufacturers are mostly not required to incur/consider these tangential costs and so replacement is the most economically expedient solution.

  23. Ugh by whipslash · · Score: 2

    This happened to my iPhone 6 Plus

  24. Re:I-Beams by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Making a phone thicker adds minimal structural material. Only around the edges. More volume internally, but actual structural material increase is negligible. Stiffness of the phone increases with the cube of thickness, so a small increase in thickness = more volume = infinitesimal increase in structural material = massive increase in stiffness. And you can put more battery in that extra volume, too...

    Going from an 8mm thick phone to a 10mm thick phone may increase structural materials by 5%, but you gain 73% more stiffness and 25% more internal volume.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  25. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2

    A "failure" here includes an app that crashes. In your case you're saying the touch screen has failed to work, 4 times in a row, and somehow you know it's about to be 5 times.

    The chance of a failure involving the touchscreen is statistically (from the report you didn't read) 3%. Raising 0.03 to the fifth power gives a failure rate of 0.0000000243.

    Still going with Occam.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  26. I'm pretty sure by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 2

    Tom Brady was responsible. He breaks every cell phone he can find.

  27. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by plover · · Score: 2

    The average iPhone user is not going to evaluate the repair on anything but the replacement cost. Disposal of the old phone is a negative cost - after all, there is a large market for broken iPhones. So sell the year-old broken phone for $100, get the "newest" phone with all the new features for $100 down payment, and the cell company just charges an extra $50 a month for a few more years.

    To people who don't understand the costs of buying on credit (which are most of them) it's a new phone for free.

    To the people who buy the broken or used phones, it's a bargain.

    To the cell carriers who sell the new phones, and to Apple, it's a platinum-plated gold mine.

    --
    John
  28. Lead free solder to blame??? by labnet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yep. BGAs are difficult to rework, but perhaps the real blame for this can be aimed at the EU when they forced the electronics industry to transition to lead free solder 15 years ago, while not touching other industries, like car batteries.
    Solder used to be 60%tin 40% lead. Lead was a great modifier to give ductility to solder joints. By going to almost 100% tin, solder joints are now more brittle, thus micro BGAs suffer more from thermal expansion fractures and shear fractures from physical drops.
    The crazy thing, is the transition, which cost the industry Billions, was based on unproven science that tin/lead solder leached in ground fill rubbish dumps. It doesn't unless you have acid. But here we are today, stuck with a EU mandated change that increases energy to manufacturer and decreases reliability (see tin asker problem as well).

    --
    46137
    1. Re:Lead free solder to blame??? by Kneo24 · · Score: 2

      Some of the motor controllers I have to repair at work are made in the EU and cold solder is a huge issue with those due to the lead free solder. I do sometimes see cracked solder joints too. A lot of these controllers are 10+ years old. The whole process to get a board ready for testing takes about 40 minutes. Disassembly, rework, and reassembly for testing. The design is kind of shit, but they're otherwise a solid product functionally if it wasn't for the lead free solder.

      As far as BGA's go, fuck that. The ECM's in some of your somewhat older Chrysler vehicles have three of four BGA's on them depending on the version of it, and it's the number one cause for failure on those modules. It's not worth it to even fix it if you're a repair shop as you have to dig out the potting around it, and ensure that you're using enough heat, but not too much heat, to get the BGA off, and hope that there isn't too much potting that seeped between the board and the BGA, holding it down.

      Due to reasons you mentioned, the BGA is not something that should be used in modern electronics. Gull wing and J lead parts will typically last longer than a couple years with lead free solder. I realize their foot print is significantly larger, but I'd rather not deal with an expensive piece of electronics that's going to fail so quickly.

      And fuck Apple for not being aware of this issue with BGA's. It's quite known to anyone else who has ever dealt with one.

      One thing a lot of board houses are doing is using an x-ray machine to look for voids in the solder to help alleviate premature failure. This is even more critical with lead free solder.