Slashdot Mirror


A Design Defect Is Plaguing Many iPhone 6 and 6 Plus Units (iphonehacks.com)

Evan Selleck, writing for iPhoneHacks (edited and condensed): For many iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus owners out there in the wild, a design defect is apparently causing some huge issues. Gadget repair firm iFixit has reported about a flaw dubbed "Touch Disease", which it claims is cropping up. With it, owners of the phones are experiencing, to start, a gray bar that appears at the very top of their display. And, for many others, the display itself becomes unresponsive to touch, or less responsive overall. In the blog post, iFixit says the problem stems from issues with the touchscreen controller chip, which is soldered onto the logic board. Interestingly enough, iFixit posits that the same internal design decisions that led to "Endgate" might be causing the issue leading to Touch Disease, too: "In both the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, the Touch IC chips connect to the logic board via an array of itty-bitty solder balls -- "like a plate resting on marbles," Jessa explains. Over time, as the phone flexes or twists slightly during normal use, those solder balls crack and start to lose contact with the board. "At first, there may be no defect at all. Later you might notice that the screen is sometimes unresponsive, but it is quick to come back with a hard reset," Jessa explains. "As the crack deepens into a full separation of the chip-board bond, the periods of no touch function become more frequent."

146 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. You're by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    bending it wrong.

    1. Re:You're by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I was just trying to get the Beveling around the icons right

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  2. Defective by Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So that you buy the iPhone 7.

    1. Re:Defective by Design by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Glad that I skipped the iPhone 6 altogether. Actually, I had bought the 5s before the 6 was released 2 years ago, and my contract expires next month. I'll just upgrade it to the 7. Only reason - Apple Pay, and also, I want a storage upgrade to 64GB. I do have a Moto-X and a Lumia 550 as well, so I know what the competition is. FaceTime is the only reason I use an iPhone

    2. Re:Defective by Design by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple pay isn't on android, by definition. Unless you're talking about the competing Google Pay, which is a different competing standard. And then there's Samsung pay because they have to duplicate everything Google does.

      The real question is whether your institution supports it. If your bank, etc, supports Apple Pay but not Google Pay, or vis versa, and you really want that functionality, then your answer is clear, regardless of your brand loyalty.

      Also, what is this facetime equivalent you speak of, assuming you're not just talking about Skype?

    3. Re:Defective by Design by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Informative

      Samsung Pay is the most supported option out there, as it works with any mag stripe reader. Not just those with NFC in your network... I've never seen a place that will take ApplePay buy NOT Samsung Pay - and I've seen hundreds of places where Samsung Pay works and they do not have NFC so no Apple or Google Pay. If you want convenient payments, go for Samsung Pay - it will work everywhere you use Apple Pay now, and literally hundreds of thousands of places that Apple Pay will not.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Defective by Design by ilsaloving · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hmm...
      *google Samsung Pay*
      *goes to Samsung Pay website*

      "SAMSUNG PAY IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE ONLY IN THE US AND KOREA" in ginormous 48 point font.

      So much for that... :P

    5. Re:Defective by Design by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only reason - Apple Pay, and also, I want a storage upgrade to 64GB. ... FaceTime is the only reason I use an iPhone

      I'm not sure you understand what "only" means.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re:Defective by Design by unixisc · · Score: 1

      FaceTime is the only reason I use an iPhone. The Apple Pay and 64GB is the reason I'm planning to go from 5s to 7, although from what's been described above, SE might be a good deal as well. The latter 2 are not reasons I picked iPhone over either Android or Lumia.

    7. Re:Defective by Design by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'll look at that as well when I upgrade. The larger form factor of the 7 sounds enticing, since I could use more icons on the main page (and don't like shifting across too many pages). I don't use iPhones for music, so the lack of the .35mm slot won't be an issue.

    8. Re:Defective by Design by unixisc · · Score: 1

      So did iPhone 5s, except that it was top of the line and I didn't buy it for that reason. Now, it's I think the mid level. I don't have a Samsung, but from what I know, it's less of an issue on Samsung since that phone has SD cards as well, which iPhone doesn't. I doubt that I'll have so many apps that 32GB won't be enough.

    9. Re:Defective by Design by unixisc · · Score: 1

      apple pay isn't new, and was on android phones a long time ago. Face time has an android equivalent now. Don't be a sucker.

      I'd have to check which of them my cards work w/. I have Android Pay on my Moto-X. On the Lumia, I have a 550, rather than a 950, so Microsoft Wallet won't support payments on that model.

    10. Re: Defective by Design by unixisc · · Score: 1

      It's just surfaced now Whereas I've been using FaceTime the last couple of years, and had an iPhone for that reason. Will probably add Google Duo there since some of the people in my circle do have Androids rather than iPhones.

    11. Re:Defective by Design by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      64 gig? I find that surprising. Samsung has had 64g for years.

      So did iPhone 4s. Apple came out with iPhone 4s at the starting of the 4th quarter in 2011. Samsung came out with 64GB model -- Galaxy S III -- in May 2012. All before that, more storage spaces (up to 32GB at the time) on Sumsung phone are from external/removable, not built-in. Back in 2011, you should be surprised by 64GB storage space on a cellphone (and it was very expensive to get that kind of storage size on a phone).

      If you really want to make that silly comment, please get the fact straight first (and then there wouldn't be such this kind of comment).

    12. Re:Defective by Design by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      64 gig? I find that surprising. Samsung has had 64g for years.

      So did iPhone 4s. Apple came out with iPhone 4s at the starting of the 4th quarter in 2011. Samsung came out with 64GB model -- Galaxy S III -- in May 2012. All before that, more storage spaces (up to 32GB at the time) on Sumsung phone are from external/removable, not built-in. Back in 2011, you should be surprised by 64GB storage space on a cellphone (and it was very expensive to get that kind of storage size on a phone).

      If you really want to make that silly comment, please get the fact straight first (and then there wouldn't be such this kind of comment).

      And Samsung you are able to expand it with a TF card.. can you do that with apple? if you want to leave a comment that laves you open to being laughed at for your non expandable fruity cupertino company

    13. Re:Defective by Design by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      I don't use iPhones for music, so the lack of the .35mm slot won't be an issue.

      that's good because they never had a .35mm .. they did however have a 3.5mm

    14. Re:Defective by Design by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple pay isn't on android, by definition. Unless you're talking about the competing Google Pay, which is a different competing standard.

      You mean Android Pay, not Google Pay. And it's not a different, competing standard. Both Apple Pay and Android Pay use the same NFC technologies and standards.

      On the name, I should point out that it's somewhat understandable that you call it "Google Pay", since Android Pay is a successor to Google Wallet, which was Google's original NFC payment solution, released in 2011 (long before Apple Pay). The Google Wallet approach was a little different, though. Because of payment network limitations, Google used a "proxy card" solution, where a Google-issued credit card was what was actually used to pay at the point of sale, and Google then charged your credit card on the backend. That approach had problems both for the user, who might not get full credit from rewards cards, and for Google, who lost money on every transaction due to the difference in fees between the card-present transaction at point of sale, and the card-not-present transaction used for user's payment, but had the supreme advantage that it would work with any credit or debit card. Banks also really disliked the proxy card solution because it threatened to take too much control of the payment systems away from them. With the intermediate routing step Google could have arranged to use any payment system on the back end, and then used its clout to get the point of sale updated to a solution that didn't involve the banks, and removed the banks from the process completely. There's no evidence Google was going to do that, but the banks were afraid of it and chose to make Google's life very hard in all sorts of ways around the NFC proxy card (and its physical, plastic analogue, which Google issued for a while).

      Apple waited until networks were ready to do "network tokenization", and until some more banks were ready to handle NFC transactions, both of which are required to enable the Apple Pay model where the payment is done directly against the user's card, with payment clearinghouses routing the the transaction directly to the bank that issued the credit card. Android Pay uses this same model, with the difference that if you have a credit card which was previously used with the Google Wallet proxy card solution, Google "grandfathers" your card in and continues using the proxy. This direct model fixes the disadvantages of the proxy card solution, but means that you can only use cards whose issuers have set up the necessary infrastructure. But these days, lots of them have. In particular, the big bank service providers like First Data have got everything set up so their clients who issue credit cards can do NFC. This means that nearly all small banks and credit unions can do it, and most of the big banks can do it. Some of the big banks, and many of the medium-sized banks still aren't set up.

      (Note that I've intentionally left out some details, like the first version of Google Wallet using a direct, non-tokenized approach that only worked with one bank, and some of the other intermediate steps. I figured this was long enough.)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    15. Re:Defective by Design by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      If that doesn't deserve a +5 Informative, I dunno what does.

    16. Re:Defective by Design by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Your data is a bit out of date, and I can confirm operation in China and Singapore, at least as of 4 weeks ago when I visited and used it at local 7-11 stores...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    17. Re: Defective by Design by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Skype's been available since like forever.

    18. Re:Defective by Design by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Also, what is this facetime equivalent you speak of, assuming you're not just talking about Skype?

      Google Hangouts has let you make video calls for almost as long as Facetime. It's actually functionally superior to Facetime - it allows multiple people in the hangout (basically a conference call with just text, sound, or video, or any combo, also supposed to have a whiteboard feature though I never used it) across multiple platforms (phones, tablets, PCs; Android, iOS, Windows, OS X, Linux). Or at least it used to be. For some reason, Google is in the process of shuttering Hangouts and will be moving the video call feature to Google Duo, which is only available on Android phones and (as the name implies) only connects two devices - no more conference video calls.

      Google's problem is they have a lot of great stuff that nobody knows about. They had a voice assistant before Siri, they just never thought of giving it a spiffy name and didn't market it so nobody knew it was on their phone. I only learned about it via the xda-developers forums. They moved Google Voice over to Hangouts a few years back essentially making every Android phone a VoIP phone, but they never said anything about it so nobody who wasn't using Google Voice before knew about it. Hangouts has been great because it combines multiple platforms - I can respond to short text messages on my phone, but more involved messages I can type up on my laptop since Hangouts shows up in my Gmail sidebar (which incidentally is also how you make video calls from PC). But they never even tried to publicize that capability, and are now in the process of dismantling it (Hangouts no longer combines SMS and hangouts conversations, and MMS has already disappeared from the PC, I expect SMS will go next).

    19. Re:Defective by Design by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Well apparently nobody told Samsung this.

      http://www.samsung.com/ca/sams...

    20. Re:Defective by Design by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      How would that work? Samsung Pay works by modulating a magnetic field that transmits the card's mag stripe to the sensor in the pay terminal, how would it not work elsewhere?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    21. Re: Defective by Design by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Google Duo is new, Hangouts predates Facetime.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    22. Re:Defective by Design by unixisc · · Score: 1

      For some reason, I was thinking about the diameter of the plug, instead of its length

    23. Re:Defective by Design by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Reasons are for totally different things. FaceTime is the only reason I chose iPhones in the first place. The other 2 reasons are not reasons I chose iPhones as opposed to Androids, but reasons I'm considering going from 5s to 7

    24. Re:Defective by Design by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      I would hazard to guess that the issue is regulatory rather than technical.

    25. Re:Defective by Design by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      it's diameter was 3.5mm ..

  3. Not a design flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The owners are holding it wrong

    1. Re:Not a design flaw by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Should I expect my 50" lcd tv to work properly if I bend it multiple times a day?

      I'll tell you precisely why that is an excellent comparison/analogy. It is because people really do frequently put 50" televisions in their pocket.

      Good going.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  4. I-Beams by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like apple could use some mechanical engineers to stiffen up the case by design.

    1. Re:I-Beams by danomac · · Score: 1

      Or just make the phone thicker so it has more rigidity... the HORROR.

    2. Re:I-Beams by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      There are multiple ways to solve the problem. Making the phone thicker also results in more material use. Additionally depending on the materials you're still might not get the bending moment of inertia you need.

      Plus you miss the marketing opportunity of "Now with a titanium backbone" marketing.

    3. Re:I-Beams by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      The board flexes because it warms and cools during operation. The Apple 3 had the same problem.

    4. Re:I-Beams by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Making the phone thicker also results in more material use.

      Which I'm sure is a great concern to a company which used to mill a laptop case out of a solid aluminium block.

    5. Re:I-Beams by VanGarrett · · Score: 2

      Thermal expansion. Hard reset means that the components stop receiving a current for a brief period, allowing them to cool, and therefore, shrink. You might get the same, or similar results from just putting it down and leaving it alone for a few minutes.

    6. Re:I-Beams by willoughby · · Score: 1

      Gawd, don't tell people that. We'll have a thousand YouTube videos showing how to put your iPhone in the freezer to "fix" it.

    7. Re:I-Beams by sjames · · Score: 1

      But how will I chop onions?

    8. Re:I-Beams by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Making a phone thicker adds minimal structural material. Only around the edges. More volume internally, but actual structural material increase is negligible. Stiffness of the phone increases with the cube of thickness, so a small increase in thickness = more volume = infinitesimal increase in structural material = massive increase in stiffness. And you can put more battery in that extra volume, too...

      Going from an 8mm thick phone to a 10mm thick phone may increase structural materials by 5%, but you gain 73% more stiffness and 25% more internal volume.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    9. Re: I-Beams by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

      god my 6s+ sometimes gets too hot to hold, legit. there is this one star trek game that i really liked but i uninstalled it because the opening level alone nearly burned my hand.

    10. Re:I-Beams by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Making the phone thicker also results in more material use.

      Which I'm sure is a great concern to a company which used to mill a laptop case out of a solid aluminium block.

      You do realize that the material removed isn't discarded, right? It goes right back into the forge for next week's aluminum block.

    11. Re:I-Beams by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Thermal expansion. Hard reset means that the components stop receiving a current for a brief period, allowing them to cool, and therefore, shrink. You might get the same, or similar results from just putting it down and leaving it alone for a few minutes.

      So blowing on it might actually work in this case!?

    12. Re:I-Beams by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The Apple 3 had bigger problems than it's board flexing.

    13. Re:I-Beams by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but now you cannot advertise how thin your fancy new phone is. It always surprised me how that is supposed to be important.

      Remember, iPhones are not so much phones but fashion statements.

    14. Re:I-Beams by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Especially since there has been thinner phones on the market before the S6...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    15. Re:I-Beams by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You do realise the purpose of my comment is to point out that Macbooks were solid aluminium though different allows now. Not plastic with window dressing, not a tiny bit of structural support with some fake carbon fibre look over the top, but a solid chunk of metal.

      Apple wouldn't give two shits about increasing the amount of material used in the iPhone and any fraction of a percent that eats into the margin they would just recoup by upping the price which is easy to do when you have a captive customer base.

    16. Re:I-Beams by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would point at the use of a BGA package being the issue, those things have been shown not to last through temperature cycling and physical deformation very well.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:I-Beams by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The NES repair returns!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    18. Re:I-Beams by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I remember the original RAZR was so thin...people were breaking them in half by accident.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    19. Re:I-Beams by Maritz · · Score: 1

      ethics in gaming journalism. boo, women.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  5. YouTube video showing BGA damage under microscope by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Informative
  6. Apple to fix it? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Considering the huge price of these things (love my iPhone 6+ anyway) let's hope Apple will offer some solution. Depends upon the number of affected devices I guess. Mine has been slightly bent regularly in my jeans pocket and is still working fine (no "touch disease yet"). Too old for a fix?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Apple to fix it? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering the huge price of these things (love my iPhone 6+ anyway) let's hope Apple will offer some solution.

      Presumably they will offer a solution, along the lines of "bend over and buy an iPhone 7, peasant!"

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Apple to fix it? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reminder to EU residents, all electronics must come with a minimum 2 year guarantee under EU rules. Each country implements it a little differently, but you have at least a 2 year warranty.

      Reminder to UK residents, in the UK the Sale of Goods Act applies. An expensive, high end phone should last 6 years. If it dies after 3 years then Apple can either repair it or offer you a 50% refund, excluding any damage you did and fair wear and tear.

      If they argue, mention the Sale of Goods Act (loudly, in their store) and if that fails Small Claims Court.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Apple to fix it? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the "50% refund..." figure from? Could you cite a source?

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    4. Re:Apple to fix it? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Sale of Goods Act. Goods must last a reasonable length of time, typically 6 years for electronics. If it doesn't, you get a refund. The retailer can argue that you had 50% life's use out of it, and courts generally use that to calculate the refund.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Apple to fix it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reminder to US residents, your corporate overlords run the government so you have no such protections.

    6. Re:Apple to fix it? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "typically 6 years for electronics"

      I suspect that time range was for a toaster or a TV. Items that are not portable, subject to weather, extreme heat/cold conditions, dropped regularly, and on 24/7.

      6 years ago, you could have gotten a brand new iPhone 4 or a discounted 3GS. How many of those are still operational?

    7. Re:Apple to fix it? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Reminder to AU residents you also have a Sales of Goods Act that applies and puts in previsions for expected performance including longevity.

      That's why Microsoft had to replace Xbox360s out of warranty.

    8. Re:Apple to fix it? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I still have a working 3GS. The only thing which did not last was the crappy Apple headphones.

  7. Bending and Twisting, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Over time, as the phone flexes or twists slightly during normal use,

    I always knew it was a bad choice to leave your phone in your back pocket and sit down with it.

    1. Re:Bending and Twisting, huh? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Temperature fluctuations are enough to cause the issue from the "bending and twisting" it causes.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  8. So much for Apple's "better design" by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I would like to hear what Apple fan boys especially in the media have to say about this. There's one particular Apple zealot who wrote this , praising Apple's design as still the best. I will wait for his take.

    1. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Informative

      "you're soldering it wrong"

      isn't that what nvidia said?

      these bga's really scare me. so fragile and so unworkable from a tech POV. I can rework square flat packs but I can't do bga's. I hate them since they are just not really repair-friendly, not to mention its not inspection-friendly.

      flat packs with leads flex and bend. bga's are a fucking abortion, especially if they are at all big, in chip size.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      > its not inspection-friendly.

      That what JTAG boundary scan is for.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The Nvidia issue was a bit different. Due to repeated heating/cooling cycles eventually the solder joints would fail as the PCB and chip expanded and contracted. In the iPhone's case the movement is not due to heat but rather flexing of the entire phone (TFA typos "bendgate" as "endgate", repeated in the summary).

      The iPhone 6/6+ are kinda bendy phones. Tests showed that they were significantly weaker than other phones in the market, requiring much less force to deform. Repeated flexing and poor mechanical design that stresses the PCB (due to the whole thing being stupidly thin) causes this inevitable failure.

      If this is the case, this will be like the Nvidia plague. All affected devices die prematurely, guaranteed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Inspection friendly is a matter of opinion.

      Inspection for who? For you and me, they are not inspection friendly. For the QA parts of production they are just as inspection friendly as every other system. A bit of x-ray and some electrical tests are similar for all packages.

    5. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Planned obsolescence is good for business if done right. It's like the recall formula from Fight Club.

      If X phones need replacing before Y years have passed, and most users can be easily convinced to buy a new phone after Y years (Y is probably about 2), and the cost of replacing X phones is less than waiting Z years for people to buy a new phone, (Z = number of years it take people to replace a phone that has no real issues, so Z probably close to 4 or 5), then the "broken" phones are profitable to the company.

      I didn't say it was good for consumers, but it can be good for business.

    6. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by jeremyp · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the first time I've heard of this problem.

      I have an iPhone 6 and many people I know have the 6 or 6s and nobody has reported it that I am aware of. This, to me, suggests that the "many" spoken of in TFS is actually quite a small percentage of iPhone 6/6s owners.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    7. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yep, in an nutshell.

      You sell 215 million (how many phones Apple sold in the last 12 months) of *anything*, and there's going to be a tiny percentage of them that go wrong in some pattern-like way. Even 0.001% of 215 million is 2150 people with a problem, and although a failure rate of 0.001% is pretty damn good with such a complex device, that's still enough for "many" people to come up with a common problem and someone to get some ad-revenue from the click-bait headline.

      (Also own an iPhone, a 6+, and haven't seen any issues)

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    8. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by sshir · · Score: 1

      Yes, the common root of these failures is the same - it is mechanical stress.

      Although Nvidia's (customers) problem was somewhat different - NV decided to save few pennies on BGAs by telling their foundry not to bother putting stress relieving layers on their wafers. Great writeup is here

      BGAs in general are fine. Overtime, mechanical stress will kill anything not properly designed for it.

    9. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Consumer Reports did some tests:

      http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm

      Apple iPhone 6         70 lbs
      Apple iPhone 6 Plus    90 lbs
      LG G3                  130 lbs
      Apple iPhone 5         130 lbs
      Samsung Galaxy Note 5  150 lbs

      So an iPhone 6 is about twice as easy to deform as an iPhone 5 and other manufacturer's high end phones.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Lothsahn · · Score: 2

      Firstly, you're correct. Nvidia was thermal expansion/contraction, while this is due to physical bending.

      However, if you look at Louis Rossman's videos, the Nvidia issue was due to internal points WITHIN the chip, not due to the BGA points themselves. This means that simply reflowing the chip (or even resurfacing and resoldering the BGA) won't solve the issue. You NEED a new chip.

      Heating the chip might slightly reflow the internal connections which may make the device work for a few days or even weeks, but it's going to fail very rapidly again.

      The Apple issue is with the BGA points themselves, not inside the chip, which means that, as long as the points aren't super oxidized (as they were in Jessa's video), a reflow might resolve the issue. Fully resurfacing the BGA as Jessa did should completely resolve the issue, but Jessa replaced the chip anyway--I suspect the chip cost is low enough that putting a new chip on just makes more sense--just to make sure.

      Source (Louis Rossman):
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    11. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      We, the hardware design community, have been working with BGAs now for well over a decade. A lot of time and energy has gone in to investigating how to design them in and get good results on a reasonably consistent basis. Still shit happens both in manufacturing and product integration.

      The absolute worst description for BGAs I have ever read is this:
      the Touch IC chips connect to the logic board via an array of itty-bitty solder balls -- "like a plate resting on marbles,"

      I understand that hobbyists do not like BGAs, it requires substantially more effort to solder them down than other packages but they are neither new nor unreliable. But in terms of products you own, everything uses them, from computer DRAM to game console components.

      Yes, inspection is difficult, but then visual inspection of products like a cell phone with many parts all of which are microscopic (an 0201 resistor, for example, is large) is not practical on millions of devices. x-ray techniques can catch these issues, but again on millions of parts I am not aware of anyone who x-rays every device. Latent defects end up being the hardest things to catch.

    12. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      That what JTAG boundary scan is for.

      Seldom used, I have no idea what Apple does, but most places I work with do not use JTAG for factory test of consumer devices. The other issue is that if this was an issue that came from board flex or a bad solder joint, JTAG would not have caught it...at the time of manufacture the part was still making contact!

      The only things I know of that can reliably catch weak joints are "bed of nails" probes, which are not frequently done on devices like cell phones where every pad is taking up precious space. Or x-ray can sometimes catch weak joints though it usually ends up best with broken joints, and is too expensive and time consuming for consumer designs.

      They are assuming this issue was caused by flex, I am not sure that's necessarily true (or at least haven't found anyone who has a smoking gun). Often very fine pitched BGAs suffer from manufacturing issues on their own, that show up later even if the board was not flexed.

    13. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      tv-washer-dryer-refrigerator-stereo

      That sounds like an awesome appliance.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I have a 6 Plus and have not had this problem nor heard about it until yesterday, when I saw the story elsewhere. However anecdotal evidence does not necessarily invalidate the claims being made.

      What I'd be curious about, though, is the results of a survey attempting to correlate the various problems people have reported with the 6 or 6 Plus (or any large phone, for that matter) with how those same people carry their phones. I see a fair number of people keeping their cell phones in their pant's back pocket - something that seems ridiculously stupid. But then I wear cargo pants pretty much all the time, so I've always got a big stress-free pocket available for my phone.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    15. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

      The plural of 'small sample size anecdote' is not 'data'.

    16. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      When dealing with millions, nothing at all is completely reliable. The PCBs they are built on fall out, even simple resistors will not lay down flat 100% of the time. But you can reliably make a working product.

      A phone in which a human checks everything carefully with test equipment would cost you more than you'd want to pay.

    17. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I didn't say whether JTAG BS was good or bad. I said that's what it's for. It can perform continuity checks on otherwise inaccessible pins. Done right boundary scan can and is used for periodic self test, but no so much in consumer gear. It's widely supported in silicon.

      BGAs can be fine if done properly, but 'done properly' can be hard to achieve when they keep shrinking the grid and ball sizes so no one knows what 'done properly' entails.

      I agree, the flex cause seems unfounded. Poor solder joint integrity can happen various ways. It would manifest the same symptoms and the same fix would work.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    18. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Ah yes the anecdote of one person...modded up. The "hasn't happened to me" approach is like a reverse ad hominem -- "You can't attack Apple, because I say there is no problem."

      This page, that Google returned as the first link, is rather extensive.

      Clearly this is a massive problem, both in how many are affected, and the cost to rectify things.

      --
      I come here for the love
    19. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 6 is about as bendable as "other phones on the market" if you define "other phones on the market" as "iPhone 6 Plus". Even then, it bent with 22% less force. Even if we increase the scope of our comparison to include additional iPhones (and still ignore every other manufacturer), the iPhone 5 takes 86% more force to bend than the iPhone 6.

      Yes, it's significantly weaker than other phones on the market. Even when you limit "other phones" to just Apple's own offerings, against which it should compare most favorably.

      When you open up the scope of the comparison to include all phones on the market at the time, the worst non-Apple performer was the LG G3, which matched the iPhone 5. Literally every other phone on the market at the time did better than that, with the larger-but-not-meaningfully-thicker Samsung Galaxy Note 5 holding up to more than twice as much force before bending.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    20. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If you don't use BGA you can inspect visually (accurately, and without X-Rays). This can be done by a human in a second, or by a machine or a pigeon in a fraction of a second.

    21. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      control-alt-f12 defrosts. its pretty sweet, really.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Continuity checks catch pins that are open circuit. It doesn't catch poor soldering quality that will result in early failure. Visual inspection of solder connections that are visible catches and prevents early failure, and as GP commenter said, can also be fairly easily repaired in the aftermarket.

    23. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll be the counter-anecdote, then. When I bought my iPhone6+, after about two weeks it started to compulsively touch itself. For example, I could be looking at a Google Map (not doing anything, just looking at the phone while it sat on the table), and suddenly the map would spontaneously scroll from my location in LA to somewhere in Utah, all on its own; as if it had received a touch event somewhere way off the edge of the screen. Similar strange spontaneous behaviors would occur in all other apps (and even on the "Desktop") at random times, every few minutes, and it was enough to drive anyone crazy.

      I took the onanistic iPhone6+ back to the Apple store back for a replacement, and so far the replacement has had no problems (knock on wood).

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    24. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd trust a BGA repair without an xray being done. I realize there's plenty of people who do it without one successfully, but from a quality perspective that doesn't ease my mind at all.

    25. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Provided your pigeon has good vision and can scan thousands of microscopic joints in a second. Maybe you can train him to run an assembly line and we can bring those jobs back to America!

    26. Re:So much for Apple's "better design" by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Pigeons do have good vision and can be trained to do such things (and have, with ball bearings). Your typical BGA package doesn't have thousands of connections, however.

  9. Had the problem... by Shalian · · Score: 1

    Got a refurb phone from iCare+ for another issue. It developed that problem intermittently within 2 weeks. Took it to an Apple store but it wasn't happening then so they wouldn't do anything but clearly knew the issue. Told me if it happened again to record a video of it. Within 3 seconds of me arriving home it happened and I grabbed a video. When I went back to the Apple store a different guy took a look at the video and in the first second or so said, "Yep, I've seen this happen before." and handed me a new phone.

    Sample size 1, ancedote is not the singular form of data etc...

    1. Re: Had the problem... by jerk · · Score: 1

      The Apple Store replaced mine under AppleCare+ about a month ago. It was a crapshoot as to when the problem would rear its head, but it did happen while I was near an Apple Store, so I took it in and they handed me a new one.

    2. Re:Had the problem... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs to upload this video, to save people time recording it themselves.

  10. I've gone through four iPhones due to this issue. by buckmelter · · Score: 1

    And soon to be a fifth, all in under two years. This last one only lasted about three weeks. While it hasn't cost me anything out-of-pocket, it does add up in time, about 2-3 hours for each instance when you include backing up/restoring, driving to the "genuis" bar, sitting around for my appointment, explaining the issue, having them check for water damage, etc. Thinking about moving to a Note7 due to the quality issues.

  11. Re:BGA = shit by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Honest question, what technologies exist to get the IO density that you can get with BGA? What alternatives are there?

  12. Don't count on it... by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've personally had 3 iPhone 4 & 4S's get the dreaded "wifi grayed out" issue where your wifi, bluetooth and gps stop working. It was so common that dozens of forum threads involved long discussions about it (you can still find them easily - and also on ebay devices with the problem) and even Apple had a page about it where they offered as a solution to "reset your network settings". Obviously this did nothing, as it was discovered the problem was the temperature sensor was malfunctioning and disabling the wireless module (which took down BT, GPS as well) and once your one year warranty was over you were out of luck with Apple. What's crazy is that the temperature sensor was not enabled with the shipping iOS of the iPhone 4 (possibly the iPhone 4S as well), but Apple enabled it from either iOS 5 or iOS 6 (I forget - but people not upgrading never had the problem), so they could disable it again if they wanted to. But they did not want to, my company purchased 3 iPhones for me because they were all failing the same way (after being used only in the office, sitting on a desk, occasionally debugging iOS apps), so it was good money for Apple.
    Apple won't fix a widespread problem even if it is just a firmware update for them, so don't count on a solution (other than offering you the newest iPhone perhaps with a "generous 10% discount" if you are "lucky").

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Don't count on it... by MullerMn · · Score: 1

      Apple won't fix a widespread problem even if it is just a firmware update for them, so don't count on a solution

      Well, just as a counterpoint to this, I had a problem with my 3+ year old Macbook pro retina where the screen just died one day. It was well out of warranty (I never bought any extended cover). I bit of googling found this (https://www.apple.com/uk/support/macbookpro-videoissues/) which says that Apple was aware there was a problem with some of the display controllers in the model I have. I took it in to my local Apple store, and 24 hours later they had replaced the display controller and I had the laptop back working perfectly. That's a repair that would have cost £3-500 (I can't remember what it was, but it was in that range).

      I've also previously had an iphone which just stopped doing wifi one day and they replaced that on the spot in the apple store. One icloud restore later and the phone was good as new. I think that one might have been less than a year old though, so perhaps less impressive in terms of customer service.

  13. Interesting design/engineering question by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    Something like this poses an interesting challenge. When you have to build a product that is not quite cheap enough to easily replace, but expensive enough to make it painful to do so, and has a shelf life of about 3 years, what design corners do you cut?

    Back when computers of any kind were thousands of dollars, the answer was easy - engineer them to the max since people were paying good money for them and wanted them to last. This is how we get things like the IBM PC case made out of solid steel. Now the equation is flipped, because mobile phones get replaced so frequently. The problem is that you can't get around the fact that you're carrying a laptop in your pocket and it's not just a cheap throwaway toy. This is getting even more noticeable since carriers have pretty much abandoned subsidies and are passing more of the cost of the phone on to the consumer. The top end model is starting to touch that $1000 price point that makes people stop and think hard about replacement costs if they're not getting some deal from their phone carrier.

    1. Re:Interesting design/engineering question by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      My friend just gave up on his iPhone -- and Apple's BS -- in favor of a cheap but totally adequate prepaid Android phone. The phone cost less than $20 on sale (normally $30). $20 vs. $500+. He did the math.

  14. The common denominator by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And soon to be a fifth, all in under two years. This last one only lasted about three weeks.

    If indeed that is true I think the problem is most likely you, or more accurately something you are doing. While Apple does have issues with devices from time to time, the probability of a single person have 5 failed iPhones in two years due to (conveniently unspecified) quality problems is remote to say the least. I've known of people to break that many phones in a similarly short time span but that was a user error problem. If there was evidence of Apple having widespread quality issues I'd be the first to pile on but I just don't see the evidence for it here.

    1. Re:The common denominator by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's probably dropping it wrong.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:The common denominator by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe they live in a sauna.

      Seriously, a friend of a friend's son who works in their public bath had similar issues until he realized that the very humid environment and moving between indoors and outdoors was causing moisture to build up inside.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:The common denominator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'd be surprised how frequently Apple's pieces of shit go through repair stores. If you so much as look at them wrong, they'll crack or break. If you work in a mixed Apple/PC environment, go ahead and ask how often Apple's shit has to be repaired. You'd be amazed.

      Remember Antennagate? Bendgate? Screengate? (Different Screengate, this one was MacBook Pros having their displays turning all blotchy.) There was a time when recommended advice for failing MacBook Pros was to try baking them briefly to see if that would resolve the soldering issues!

      Apple is frequently plagued with quality problems that rival the Xbox 360. But for some reason, people keep buying their crap and they keep on getting a pass, despite making some of the worst quality hardware available.

    4. Re:The common denominator by buckmelter · · Score: 1

      I live in the PNW, but there's been no water damage (or other external damage) on any of these phones (they check every time as they would understandably love to charge me the replacement fee). I understand that the number of phones I've gone through on this contract lends credence to the idea that I'm doing something to affect the longevity, but all I can say is that I don't do anything unusual with my phone, and if I did I would modify my behavior because, frankly, dealing with this has been a pain in the ass.

    5. Re:The common denominator by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Um, why do you keep buying them if they don't last?!

    6. Re:The common denominator by jcr · · Score: 1

      It's never Apple's problem. It's always "you're doing it wrong".

      Bullshit. The single time I had a hardware issue with an iPhone (stuck sleep/wake button), I took it to the store, showed them the issue, had my SIM transferred to a new unit and was walking out the door 15 minutes later.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  15. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    Good luck trying to get *any* cell phone without BGA chips in them. Or any electronics component, really - maybe a toaster.

    To be honest, I agree with the above poster. Absent any specifics, I'd say the problem is you and how you treat the phone.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  16. I can say this despite liking the iPhone by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    When they made the 6 and 6+, Apple broke one of the most critical tenets of engineering: Form Follows Function, not the other way 'round. Thinner isn't always better. They made the 6 and 6+ trendy, hip and skinny -- and that broke the Function part of engineering.

    I'm glad I still have my 5S, and when the time comes that it goes to cellphone heaven, I'll replace it with a new small phone. I'm so glad Apple is making one again. Fatter, shorter phones don't bend as much as a thin huge phone.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:I can say this despite liking the iPhone by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      In this case, form is function--part of the function of a mobile phone is to be portable. I'm not saying that they shouldn't have been more careful with it--supposedly the 6s is less bendable, which means they could design it to be strong AND skinny, if they want--but part of what I want in my phone is for it to be as invisible to me as possible when I'm not actually carrying it.

      Whether or not that meets your goal for 'function' is another question. I can easily see other people wanting a phone that's considerably more robust. With the thinnest case I could find, I've had my 6 for two years, dropped it many times and not had any breakage problems. (I do have a faint blue streak in the middle of my screen which Apple tells me may be due to excessive pressure on that spot, but as its cosmetic and not a functional problem, they won't do anything about it.)

      We don't all have the same functionality goals. It's part of your job as a consumer to decide if your idea of function lines up with the manufacturer's.

      (It's worth noting that sometimes form is exactly the function--jewellery and other fashion items and ornaments are a good example of this. Do not denigrate people that carry phones for a reason that also has to do with fashion; for them, that's ALSO part of its function. It's not up to anyone else to decide if that's a worthwhile use or not. Even nerds carry things for 'fashion' reasons--sometimes we pick something that's objectively the ugliest, bulkiest, whateverest item to telegraph that we're the nerdiest kid on the block to all the other nerds. There's nothing wrong with that either.)

    2. Re:I can say this despite liking the iPhone by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      "When I'm not actually USING it" is what that should read. Sigh. :/

  17. I had this issue with a G4 laptop by GhengisCohen · · Score: 2

    I had a dead 12" white g4 powerbook. This happened to the cpu. I figured I had nothing to lose, so I took out the mother board, wrapped all of it bu the cpu with aluminum foil. I put a tea light on the chip (it was about the same size) I fired it up figuring it would be a prayer to the computer gods, or part of a wake ceremony. Once everything cooled off the laptop worked, still does. I wonder if a little heated press could be made to heat up and re-seat the chip without letting it slide at all. Sounds like an aftermarket tool business if anyone wants to make it.

  18. Maybe I'm doing it wrong? by ausekilis · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I try a hard reset the screen only gets worse.

  19. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by wbr1 · · Score: 2
    The price of these phones is 550 to 650 US. I love the video and this kind of work, but how economically feasible is it for an owner? A shop equipped like that probably charges 75 to 150 per hour. Full disassembly, reassembly and microsoldering I would assume is at least 3 hours. That is 1/4 to 1/2 the device price for a repair that may not last.

    I love performing electronic repairs, although I do not have practice (and wonder how good I would be) on devices this small. However I do not see the economic feasibility... someone enlighten me.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  20. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by buckmelter · · Score: 1

    I do have specifics. The video in the referenced post explains the difference between the current models with this issue and the prior models--namely the lack of underfill and of a metal shield to provide rigidity over the affected chips. As for how I treat my phone, it's a smart phone, I treat it like one. It goes in my pocket. It comes out of my pocket. I set on my desk. I pick it up. Occasionally I knock it off my bedside table.

  21. Re:BGA = shit by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Same ones used on LCD screens - teeny-tiny arrays of connections on the edge, that you simply glue the control IC to. You don't even need solder.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  22. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

    If it's truly this issue, you may be bending your phone or dropping it more than the average.

    Are you storing your phone in your back pocket? Are you wearing tight jeans that is putting physical flex on the board? Sitting on the phone? If you are, you might be able to get them to last longer by avoiding those behaviors.

    Note: I'm not defending Apple, or justifying their quality/phone/design. I'm just saying that, knowing what the cause is of this failure, a behavioral change could make a huge difference to your device longevity.

    --
    -=Lothsahn=-
  23. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

    I'd also strongly recommend Nexus devices over Note devices. You get much better software upgrades and security updates.

    --
    -=Lothsahn=-
  24. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by Wargames · · Score: 4, Informative

    FYI: BGA = Ball Grid Array,
    "Ball Grid Array rework is one of the most challenging procedures performed at assembly facilities and repair depots around the world. " ---
    http://www.circuitrework.com/f...

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
  25. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by buckmelter · · Score: 1

    None of these things should cause a phone to fail in this manner, but no, I don't wear tight jeans, nor do I habitually sit on my phone. My phone is also in an Apple case. There's a real problem with the design of this phone as the video in the story illustrates.

  26. It just works... by trboyden · · Score: 1

    It just works. Well sometimes... But we're Apple and you love us anyways!

  27. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    Well, literally hundreds of millions of people (per year) buy iPhones (last 12 months was 215 million) and don't have this problem.

    I could see you getting a bad phone - shit happens. I could (just about) see you getting *two* bad phones out of two. There is no way I'd buy that you got three successive phones that failed in the same way, as for five ? Well, I'll be charitable and say you must be the unluckiest person on the planet. Is your name Brian by any chance ?

    For reference: "In line with the firm’s fourth-quarter report, a study that analyzed smartphone failures during the first quarter of 2016 determined that Android devices cause far more problems for their owners than iPhones. According to Blancco Technology Group’s new data, 44% of Android phones experienced failures between January and March of this year, compared to 25% of iPhones"

    Occam's razor says I still think you don't look after the phone, assuming you're telling the truth. Sorry.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  28. Apple support by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I see someone's dealt with Apple's "support". It's never Apple's problem. It's always "you're doing it wrong".

    Hogwash. I've had two iPhones replaced by Apple in the last 5 years. One for cracked screen - small crack in upper right corner they indicated was a known design issue, replaced for free. The other was for a camera that wouldn't focus for some reason, also replaced for free under warranty. I'm under no illusions that if I threw my phone on the ground or dropped it in the toilet that they would replace it for free (that would be my fault) but they've been nothing but courteous and helpful when I've needed it. They asked if I had dropped the phone but when I answered no they did not pursue the matter further. I've never once heard an Apple representative tell anyone "you're doing it wrong" *in person* and I'm quite confident you haven't either.

    That alone is why I'm done trying to deal with Apple. The high prices and poor quality just further cement that decision.

    High prices? Sure. Poor quality? There are a lot of things I could critique about Apple's but as a general proposition hardware quality is not among them. They are well made and widely acknowledged even by their competition to be well made.

  29. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by JoeyRox · · Score: 2

    I agree, on a direct replacement vs labor cost comp these types of repairs are uneconomical. However when one considers the total systemic cost including dispoal/landfill/recycling/PCB pollution I think repair becomes a more feasible solution. Unfortunately manufacturers are mostly not required to incur/consider these tangential costs and so replacement is the most economically expedient solution.

  30. Ugh by whipslash · · Score: 2

    This happened to my iPhone 6 Plus

    1. Re:Ugh by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      And what did you do? Apple fix? Replacement? Keep it as is?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Ugh by whipslash · · Score: 1

      The Apple Store refused to replace it unless I paid $400 since my warranty was up, so right now I am dealing with the inconvenience but will try another store.

  31. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by buckmelter · · Score: 1

    If the referenced study is correct (I didn't bother to read it), 25% of iPhones experienced failures in a three month period. Accepting that percentage, then I could have a 25% chance of some failure each time I get a new iPhone. And since all subsequent ones after the first one are a refurbished unit I imagine it could be even higher. While we don't know why they fail, if a large portion are due to this issue then five in a row doesn't seem all that unbelievable to me. Just bad luck.

  32. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2

    A "failure" here includes an app that crashes. In your case you're saying the touch screen has failed to work, 4 times in a row, and somehow you know it's about to be 5 times.

    The chance of a failure involving the touchscreen is statistically (from the report you didn't read) 3%. Raising 0.03 to the fifth power gives a failure rate of 0.0000000243.

    Still going with Occam.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  33. It happened to me. by neoRUR · · Score: 1

    Yes I have an iPhone 6+ that I bought full out 3 years ago and about 3 months ago I started getting that grey line. It randomly appears and you can't touch or swipe. It's a grey little line that jitters on the top. If you bend the phone in a little you can get it to work temporary. I think it was caused by the phone being bent by being in the back pocket. Now it just randomly does it and pushes buttons for me, opens apps, texts. I tried to bring it in to Apple, but the tech to was too busy and had to make an appointment, but couldn't so left.. Then the next day I broke the glass, so I know they would claim that was it, so ended up getting a new phone iPhone 6S+. I got a new one from ATT, but of course I had to pay for it all again...I still have the old phone and it still does it. And I am quite sure it's a defect in the hardware when it bends out of alignment over time. Quite frustrating, was planning on using the phone for 5 years.

    1. Re:It happened to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3 years ago, huh? The iPhone 6 line was released on September 19, 2014.

    2. Re:It happened to me. by neoRUR · · Score: 1

      Really? wow it's was only a little less then 2 years? Well its out of the 1 year warranty either way. I guess 2 years is the norm for product life times now. When it cracked I just used Siri on it so I didn't have to use the touch, worked ok to make phone calls and open apps. Not so good on typing.

  34. I'm pretty sure by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 2

    Tom Brady was responsible. He breaks every cell phone he can find.

  35. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by castus · · Score: 1

    It's funny how they provide those number for failures without elaborating on what a "failure" acually is. As if 44% of android phones actually failed in Q1 of 2016.

  36. Re:I've gone through four iPhones due to this issu by buckmelter · · Score: 1

    I just read the source whitepaper, it deals separately with crashing apps and these are not rolled into the device failures. However, the reported failure rate for my model is 9%, however, it doesn't indicate what percent are due to touchscreen failures. I'll say it's 75%, so that would be a 6.75% chance of a failure each time I get a phone, or if you want to talk probabilities of five times in a row it would be 0.00000140126045. Slightly better odds for me.

  37. easy fix i heard about by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    i heard if you put the phone in the oven that will fix both that and the red ring issue.

    1. Re:easy fix i heard about by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I honestly am curious if simply reflowing the board is adequate to fix it, or if there is damage to the IC/PCB as well that makes rework a bad idea?

      We've seen these issues with many other BGA parts (Macbook Pro 2009 is a prime example), especially since RoHS compliance resulted in lead-free BGA balls being phased in. Lead BGA balls had more give and self-annealed, but these lead-free ones seem to need more babying and fatigue due to temperature cycling and flexure much more than before.

  38. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by plover · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that video, it's completely amazing to watch!

    --
    John
  39. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by plover · · Score: 2

    The average iPhone user is not going to evaluate the repair on anything but the replacement cost. Disposal of the old phone is a negative cost - after all, there is a large market for broken iPhones. So sell the year-old broken phone for $100, get the "newest" phone with all the new features for $100 down payment, and the cell company just charges an extra $50 a month for a few more years.

    To people who don't understand the costs of buying on credit (which are most of them) it's a new phone for free.

    To the people who buy the broken or used phones, it's a bargain.

    To the cell carriers who sell the new phones, and to Apple, it's a platinum-plated gold mine.

    --
    John
  40. Re:BGA = shit by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Sure, you'll just grab that bare 7x2mm die with your fingers in your living room, and just plop it down and magically align the hundreds of pins perfectly to the 1 mil traces on the 1 mil thick Kapton board, and then what? Get the Krazy Glue you enjoy huffing?

    Still easier and more feasible than repairing anything using BGA.

  41. Uhh... by easyTree · · Score: 1

    That's some pretty shoddy work ppl. It's supposed to be hidden and deliberately fail further down the line.

  42. Lead free solder to blame??? by labnet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yep. BGAs are difficult to rework, but perhaps the real blame for this can be aimed at the EU when they forced the electronics industry to transition to lead free solder 15 years ago, while not touching other industries, like car batteries.
    Solder used to be 60%tin 40% lead. Lead was a great modifier to give ductility to solder joints. By going to almost 100% tin, solder joints are now more brittle, thus micro BGAs suffer more from thermal expansion fractures and shear fractures from physical drops.
    The crazy thing, is the transition, which cost the industry Billions, was based on unproven science that tin/lead solder leached in ground fill rubbish dumps. It doesn't unless you have acid. But here we are today, stuck with a EU mandated change that increases energy to manufacturer and decreases reliability (see tin asker problem as well).

    --
    46137
    1. Re:Lead free solder to blame??? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      FYI 60/40 solder was not immune to stress cracking, just less prone to it than lead-free solder. I used to help my dad out in his electronics repair business by performing the menial task of wearing a monicle to identify, desolder and resolder cracked joints. This was usually a first step done on inbound equipment before even breaking out diagnostics and things would often be fully functional before without going any further. Most problems occured around heat-generating components in power supplies and flyback circuits such as high-wattage resistors, transformers and chopper transistors because of the physical stress placed on the joints during repeated thermal expansion and contraction.

    2. Re:Lead free solder to blame??? by Kneo24 · · Score: 2

      Some of the motor controllers I have to repair at work are made in the EU and cold solder is a huge issue with those due to the lead free solder. I do sometimes see cracked solder joints too. A lot of these controllers are 10+ years old. The whole process to get a board ready for testing takes about 40 minutes. Disassembly, rework, and reassembly for testing. The design is kind of shit, but they're otherwise a solid product functionally if it wasn't for the lead free solder.

      As far as BGA's go, fuck that. The ECM's in some of your somewhat older Chrysler vehicles have three of four BGA's on them depending on the version of it, and it's the number one cause for failure on those modules. It's not worth it to even fix it if you're a repair shop as you have to dig out the potting around it, and ensure that you're using enough heat, but not too much heat, to get the BGA off, and hope that there isn't too much potting that seeped between the board and the BGA, holding it down.

      Due to reasons you mentioned, the BGA is not something that should be used in modern electronics. Gull wing and J lead parts will typically last longer than a couple years with lead free solder. I realize their foot print is significantly larger, but I'd rather not deal with an expensive piece of electronics that's going to fail so quickly.

      And fuck Apple for not being aware of this issue with BGA's. It's quite known to anyone else who has ever dealt with one.

      One thing a lot of board houses are doing is using an x-ray machine to look for voids in the solder to help alleviate premature failure. This is even more critical with lead free solder.

    3. Re:Lead free solder to blame??? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      They have even dealt with BGA issues in the past. The video issue in their laptops was caused by the BGA used and the thermal stressing of the connection between heating and cooling from usage.

      http://www.macrumors.com/2016/...

      You would think they would have learned of the in-advisability in using BGA in a device that has thermal cycling from this misstep.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  43. Thought so, Apple denied by Theovon · · Score: 1

    When my wife’s iPhone 6 had this problem, I thought maybe it was just a fluke. Then when my iPhone 6+ had exactly the same problem, I asked the AppleCare rep if this was a known problem. Of course, she denied it. Turns out my suspicion was correct.

  44. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by citizenr · · Score: 1

    Those repairs DO last because Jessa actually fixes Apples shoddy design by _reinforcing_ touch ic with additional metal shield, you know, the way Apple did it in previous models.

    As for economics, would you rather pay another $600 when you can repair your current device for half as much?

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  45. Re:YouTube video showing BGA damage under microsco by citizenr · · Score: 1

    If you liked Jessas content you will love Loius Rossmann: https://www.youtube.com/user/r...

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.