Slashdot Mirror


Not Just Samsung? The Increasing Frequency Of Battery Fires (sltrib.com)

Dozens of aircraft fires have been caused by lithium batteries, and after 2013 Tesla even strengthened their battery shields after several of their cars caught on fire. An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes the AP: Samsung's Note 7 isn't the only gadget to catch fire thanks to lithium-battery problems, which have afflicted everything from iPhones to Tesla cars to Boeing jetliners. Blame chemistry and the fact that the batteries we rely on for everyday life are prone to leaking and even bursting into flame if damaged, defective or exposed to excessive heat...

Still, lithium batteries are so ubiquitous that ordinary users of phones and computers shouldn't worry. Research suggests that you're more likely to get hurt by a kitchen grease fire or a drunk driver than the battery powering your iPhone, Kindle or laptop. "It's not like we live in a world where people's smartphones spontaneously combust," said Ramon Llamas, research manager of research firm IDC's mobile phones team. He said owners of Galaxy Note 7s should err on the side of caution and contact Samsung for a replacement that doesn't run the same risk.

The article also reports that hoverboards were linked to at least 99 electrical fires in America that were presumably caused by battery problems. "Amazon, Best Buy and other retailers dumped the products after videos of burning hoverboards went viral."

51 of 89 comments (clear)

  1. Asus had this problem by thundercattt · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was a big issue with Asus also when I worked there. Took them awhile to figure out that it was the camera wire that crossed the battery that was causing it.

  2. That's it, I'm switching to something safer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like gasoline, or propane, or radioactive plutonium.

    1. Re: That's it, I'm switching to something safer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean there's unradioactive plutonium too ?

  3. excessive heat by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there is one critical thing about the excessive heat that is being left out, the batteries are generating the excessive heat. the basic issue is that if you exceed a certain rate of charge or discharge then your battery is going to go up in flames. this is why battery cells are rated for maximum charge and discharge rate. when companies ignore the charge/discharge ratings you end up with devices that are prone to combusting.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:excessive heat by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Well Shakira get's around without bursting into flames, so the problem can be solved...

      Yeah, it's the guys around her that catch on fire...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:excessive heat by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      when companies ignore the charge/discharge ratings you end up with devices that are prone to combusting.

      Except that few if any of these fires are caused by improper charging speeds. Nearly all product recall related fires have been due to quality control issues on the cells themselves, or faults in the circuit that overcharge individual cells in a pack, not due to engineering fault on the charging rate.

      Especially since overdoing the rates of charges and discharges cause premature battery failure long before it causes batteries to catch fire.

    3. Re:excessive heat by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      there is one critical thing about the excessive heat that is being left out, the batteries are generating the excessive heat. the basic issue is that if you exceed a certain rate of charge or discharge then your battery is going to go up in flames. this is why battery cells are rated for maximum charge and discharge rate. when companies ignore the charge/discharge ratings you end up with devices that are prone to combusting.

      Excepting a Tesla, most battery powered devices are charged from current-limited sources and draw so little power that neither extreme is even close to being reached. A USB powered device can draw around 2A or so, and the charge current isn't much more than that (typically 4.1V so 3A tops at 100% efficiency, which is typically well under 2C for devices that need 2A.

      In fact, charging at the limit would imply charge times on the order of 5 minutes or so (10C), and that's from empty to completely full. I believe the Note 7's fast charge is 60% in 15 minutes, or just over 2C.

    4. Re:excessive heat by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Or if companies making the batteries claim that their product can handle the charge/discharge rates just to get the multimillion order from Samsung. Would not be the first time where vendors make all kinds of claims and promises just to close a deal.

    5. Re:excessive heat by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      This is 2016! Quality control was abandoned years ago in favor of lower cost and faster delivery times. Eating the cost for having to replace or rework stuff is considered cheaper than preventing bad things from happening, although it rarely is.

    6. Re:excessive heat by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Given the number of lithium batteries in the world, the number of fires, and the quick recall, your statement is unfounded. Not only because of the rarity of events, but given the volumes of production when compared with the rarity of events, it probably truly is cheaper to simply replace all devices than to do many years of QC to catch such a rare event.

    7. Re:excessive heat by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      there is one critical thing about the excessive heat that is being left out, the batteries are generating the excessive heat.

      It all comes down to energy density. As customers demand long battery life, and marketing forces push thinner and lighter, we have largely accommodated them. But the margins between safe operation and a big problem become razr thin.

      And the high energy density packed into a small space is just asking for trouble. It's a tribute to manufacturing that we've had a little trouble with battery fires as we have so far.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:excessive heat by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      This is 2016! Quality control was abandoned years ago in favor of lower cost and faster delivery times. Eating the cost for having to replace or rework stuff is considered cheaper than preventing bad things from happening, although it rarely is.

      Sorry, but that might be an issue if all the batteries burst into flame, or even a majority of them.

      Its actually a difficult task to pack that much energy into a tiny little battery, and while its possible to have QC issues, there is a whole lot of QC happening, or else the things wouldn't function at all.

      We're so used to these little gadgets, that when we get a phone that's half as thin as the last one, but the battery lasts twice as long, we just say 'Kewl", and don't give a second thought to it, until we're pissed that we can't have a yet thinner phone with a battery that lasts 3 times as long as the last one.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. Unpossible by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Technology improves every year. Batteries just get better and better. This must be a lie.

  5. What will the resolution be? by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 2

    I'm submitting from one of these. The question I have is am I trading a 1 in 50,000 chance of fire for a 1 in 1 chamce of crappy charging and low battery life. If the problem was an aggressive charge cycle the resolution might well ne to wimpify it.

    1. Re: What will the resolution be? by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 2

      Also, it needs a less fumblefingery keyboard.

    2. Re:What will the resolution be? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I'm submitting from one of these. The question I have is am I trading a 1 in 50,000 chance of fire for a 1 in 1 chamce of crappy charging and low battery life. If the problem was an aggressive charge cycle the resolution might well ne to wimpify it.

      They said that only batteries from one of their two battery suppliers had problem, so I'm guessing the fix is to identify whether your battery is from that battery manufacturer or not. If not, it would come back as "no problem found", else they would replace it with a battery from the other supplier while trying to find a third supplier to ensure that there aren't supply problems later.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:What will the resolution be? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The problem is, the aggressive charge/discharge cycle is what's giving these batteries a competitive energy density compared to other battery chemistry and other energy storage solutions.

      I'm gonna go out on a limb and predict that the solution will be to partition the two reactants in the battery chemistry with something more than a 24 micrometer separator. Possibly even switch to a chemistry which doesn't require carrying around one of the reactants at all, and getting it from the air. You know, like gasoline needs oxygen from the air to release its energy, so as long as you keep it in a sealed tank a fire is virtually impossible.

    4. Re:What will the resolution be? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Lowest tender wins, everybody else loses. Just a fact of psychopathic capitalism and being able to claim bonuses and make money disappear prior to declaring bankruptcy as a result of all the damages and as a bonus claiming a golden parachute. The reward buying politicians for decades, those doing the buying basically get away with fraud and greed driven murder.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:What will the resolution be? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The question I have is am I trading a 1 in 50,000 chance of fire

      Are you? On day one the chance was 1 in infinity because there were no fires. Only 16 days later were down to the 1 in 50000. What happens in another 16 days? If this was guaranteed to randomly burst into flames sometime in the next year, would you consider returning it then? I wonder what your insurance company would think if your house burnt down as a result of a device you knew had a product recall notice out?

      As for crappy charging and low battery life, you don't know that. You don't know the exact problem or the proposed fix. The only thing that is truly certain here is that people are very poor decision makers and poor at statistics.

    6. Re:What will the resolution be? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Don't blame it on capitalism and big wigs. It is us who rather buy the lower priced gadget than one that is much more expensive...unless, of course, it has an Apple logo on it, but that no longer stands for superior design or high quality either, only for high prices.

    7. Re:What will the resolution be? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I'm submitting from one of these. The question I have is am I trading a 1 in 50,000 chance of fire for a 1 in 1 chamce of crappy charging and low battery life. If the problem was an aggressive charge cycle the resolution might well ne to wimpify it.

      They said that only batteries from one of their two battery suppliers had problem, so I'm guessing the fix is to identify whether your battery is from that battery manufacturer or not. If not, it would come back as "no problem found", else they would replace it with a battery from the other supplier while trying to find a third supplier to ensure that there aren't supply problems later.

      So just unclip the battery and take a look. Oh wait...

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  6. Re:it's called cost reductions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This might explain why the smartphones are all crap. Their corners have been cut so many times that they almost look rounded to us.

  7. Because it's not Apple by Kohath · · Score: 2

    It's not Apple, so "ho hum, this has been happening to everyone more and more often".

    1. Re:Because it's not Apple by haruchai · · Score: 2

      When it comes to batteries catching on fire, Apple's both a pioneer and a market leader

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  8. Maybe due to Increasing frequency Li-ion sales by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Unit growth in Li-ion sales has been 18%+ for quite a while and is projected to continue at around 18% for years to come.

    1. Re:Maybe due to Increasing frequency Li-ion sales by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I think we need industry authorities to come to conclusion that the Lithium-Ion chemistry is too unstable and mandate the use of a safer option such as LiFePO4.

    2. Re:Maybe due to Increasing frequency Li-ion sales by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Increasing frequency does not mean increasing rate.

      There are a lot more automobile-related deaths than there were 70 years ago, does that mean cars are less safe?

  9. Energy density by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's all about our expectations of energy density. Think about it: would you be surprised to hear that a small container of gasoline caught fire? Of course not, and the risks involved in a gas-powered phone are obvious. Modern batteries don't store as much energy per mass as gasoline -- not even close -- but as we push in that direction we shouldn't be surprised that they start behaving less like electronics and more like explosives.

    1. Re:Energy density by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      I was hoping someone else figured this one out. I explain to non-technical people all the time that it's not hard to store large amounts of energy in a small space, it's hard to keep that energy from being released all at once in a KB malfunction.

      The smart ones ask what KB stands for. The really smart ones figure out it means "KaBoom" on their own.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Energy density by evilviper · · Score: 1

      batteries don't store as much energy per mass as gasoline -- not even close -- but as we push in that direction we shouldn't be surprised that they start behaving less like electronics and more like explosives.

      That's moronic. NiMH has about 2/3rds the energy density by volume (not weight) of Li-Ion batteries, and NiMH is about the most stable battery you can get, which won't explode or burn no matter how badly you abuse them. Similarly, LiFePo4 batteries are slightly less powerful than the more common Li-Ion chemistries, yet they're extremely stable and safe, too.

      On the opposite end of the spectrum, Lead-acid batteries have the lowest energy density (by weight) of any battery technology, and they're pretty dangerous, with both dangers of spilling a moderately strong acid, and routine flammable hydrogen out-gassing.

      In the hydrocarbon world, diesel/kerosene has higher energy density than gasoline/petrol, but is much more stable and less flammable. And we don't even need to talk about bunker oil (basically tar) that large ships have to preheat and liquify to burn in their engines...

      In short, energy density has NOTHING to do with it.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  10. Nothing inherent about this by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Lithium iron phosphate batteries have about the same energy density and yet they won't randomly explode or catch fire. You can shoot them, use them as bowling balls and Intentionally destroy them by massively over charging or pulling current down yet they are not going to explode or catch fire.

    There is obvious still risk with stored energy. You could short a conductor and start a fire by resistive heating yet the assertion this is unavoidable "cuz energy density" is BS. Food in your fridge has a much higher energy density than lithium ion batteries.

    1. Re:Nothing inherent about this by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      It's not the same energy density, it's about half. This is workable for a car - although it wouldn't have Tesla like range or handling, but you'd get 600k miles before the batteries were under 80% capacity - but impractical for a competitive phone.

    2. Re:Nothing inherent about this by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      It's not the same energy density, it's about half. This is workable for a car - although it wouldn't have Tesla like range or handling, but you'd get 600k miles before the batteries were under 80% capacity - but impractical for a competitive phone.

      I think people are confusing weight with density. Yes the battery itself would weigh twice as much but wouldn't necessarily be any bigger.

    3. Re:Nothing inherent about this by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Per wikipedia, "Energy density is the amount of energy stored in a given system or region of space per unit volume or mass". So other people aren't confused, they are just choosing the more relevant of the 2 measures. The reason it's generally more relevant is because weight more directly determines the energy required to carry the energy storage medium. For phones, obviously both a heavier weight and a bigger size are disadvantages, and the ~1000 cycles you get from lithium-cobalt is close to the ~3 year life of a phone anyway. So it's probably the optimal solution.

      For hoverboards, well, making it heavier might actually improve its stability, so you have a point there.

  11. Electronic Recycling Company battery fire epidemic by retroworks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I manage an electronics recycling company. We are all hand disassembly, but even we have seen lithium battery fires. The companies which switched to shredding (to reduce labor costs) have had a serious and growing problem with fires from charged lithium batteries exposed to oxygen.

    We use this youtube video for staff training

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    Gently reply
  12. Tesla? Really? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't it a bit disingenious to lump a whole lot of unprovoked fires started during standard normal operation of a device in with Tesla having major accidents? I mean every time we hear of a Tesla fire it's after the car got airborne, flew through a brick wall, and impaled itself on road debris. It's like lumping deaths due to mobster killings in with death due to medical conditions.

  13. Halt and catch fire by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    For real!

  14. Because it's Summer? by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

    ...apparently not, but it looks like Christmas might have something to do with it.

    RECALL JESUS.

  15. Re:kitchen fire is more likely? Is this 1916? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    A quick Google search turned up a news article from several years ago that indicated cooking fires (of which the leading type are grease fires) result in roughly 480 deaths per year at that time and presumably there are many injuries as a result as well.

    I couldn't find any statistics or news articles providing a figure for battery related deaths or injuries, but I suspect it's not as many, though I have heard multiple stories about batteries in electronic cigarettes causing injuries, though it's believed that in some part this is due to improper use of the device. Also, in past reports about battery fires, people have reported the device getting uncomfortably warm before the battery erupted (it doesn't really explode) and destroyed the device. Even if you had it on you, if you were awake and not intoxicated, you would probably notice and be able to remove the device from your person before being hurt.

    Your odds of either injury are very low, but for an arbitrary individual it's far more likely that they will be injured as a result of a grease fire than as a result of a battery fire.

  16. They are NOT hoverboards by Stan92057 · · Score: 2

    Stop calling them hoverboards!! They do not hover in any shape or form the are a device that carried its load on WHEELS.And the wheels are firmly planted on the ground.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:They are NOT hoverboards by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Stop calling them hoverboards!! They do not hover in any shape or form

      Sure. Just as soon as you stop calling cars by animal names... It's not a mustang, not a jaguar, not a ram, not a cougar. None of those animals have cup-holders. It's false-advertising!

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  17. The real issue keeps being ignored by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    I don't worry about the one off situations that occur for the end user. The real issue is what brought down the UPS 747 outside of Dubai in 2010. While this was a freight aircraft, pallets of these things are routinely shipped as cargo commercial airlines. Scores of lithium batteries left unattended in the cargo hold does concern me.

  18. I woke up to a Lithium Ion battery fire by kimvette · · Score: 1

    About six weeks ago I woke up to a fire started by a lithium-ion battery. It was pure luck I woke up because I had disconnected the smoke detector while seasoning cast iron cookware the evening before and hadn't yet reconnected it.

    It was a cheap chinese LED camping lantern with an integrated USB charger. I had it charging and went to bed. I woke up and put the fire out, and put the hot melty charred items in the freshly-seasoned cast iron skillet and let it cool off. Once it was cool enough I started disassembling what was left of the 18650 cell - it turns out that it was the typical problem - it was a counterfeit -"remanufactured" battery where the protective circuit was removed, a like-sized metal disc with no circuitry was put in its place and it was re-wrapped with a new shrink label. So, if the integral charger was relying on a protected battery to cut off charging, and the battery had no actual protection circuit there was nothing to make it stop charging so it just kept heating up until it went into thermal runaway.

    Too bad because it was otherwise an excellent camping lantern in terms of brightness and light spread but it was overall cheaply made. In fact when I received it I had to re-solder the leads to the LED strips because they were oringally connected with obviously too-cold solder, and the switch was misaligned with the case - and no there was no external damage to the packaging and there were no signs that it had been previously unpackaged. :-(

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re: I woke up to a Lithium Ion battery fire by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Li-ion cells are inherently hazardous because they're not safe to be used without a working cut-out and even then can catch fire when damaged. How many of these fires are down to dodgy remanufacturing practices like those you describe and how many to imperfect quality control when the cells were first made? How often do properly made Li-ion cells catch fire?

  19. Lipos are dangerous. But they are also tough. by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    I strap propellers to 1300mah lipos and drain them at rates exceeding 100amps. I will drain said Lipo in approximately 180 seconds. Sometimes less. And when they land they are often exceeding 60c.

    Not only that but I will often slam them into hard surfaces, trees, rocks, or pieces of plastic that are rotating at 30,000 rpm +. Despite this I have yet to have a single one spontaneously go up in flames. I have seen the after effects of over charging lipos when people decided to charge them to too high a voltage or charge them too fast. But if you treat them inside their design specs they are very unlikely to ever cause you a problem.

  20. Re:it's called cost reductions. by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    It is not only in China. Look at all the craptastic tech stuff and software from the US, quality wise not any better. Unless you go back to things built decades ago that still work fine like they did on day one. Consumers are not interested in paying a bit extra for quality, all they want is lowest price and fast product release cycles. I am sure we'd all be fine if Samsung and others took a few years to truly design a reliable and decent new product, but if there isn't a new release within a year's time the "experts" declare the company as defunct and going under dragging stock prices into the basement. The only ones who can change that is us consumers. Stop buying that stuff and send letters to the company CEOs demanding better quality.

  21. Re:Electronic Recycling Company battery fire epide by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    I was taking apart an old failed tablet, was going to use the battery for a fun project with mw daughter. When trying to cut away some adhesive I accidentally sliced the battery which immediately sparked and smoked. I was aware of that possibility but it was surprisingly easy to cause.

  22. Re:Lipos are dangerous. But they are also tough. by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    You may be using LFP batteries, which are much safer and support much greater loads than the LCO batteries found in phones.
    The downside is that they have about half the energy density.

  23. Re:Lipos are dangerous. But they are also tough. by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    I'm honestly not sure. They are always referred to as Lithium Poly. Claimed power density is 0.15-0.17kw/kg. They are 4 cells in parallel and operate at 16v

    http://www.hobbyking.com/hobby...

  24. Re:Lipos are dangerous. But they are also tough. by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    Your batteries seem to weight about twice as much as my cell phone batteries per Wh. They are however much, much more powerful.
    It seems to match a phosphate or manganese chemistry rather than the more common and more energy dense cobalt. I am no expert though.

    See : http://batteryuniversity.com/l...

  25. Re:Lipos are dangerous. But they are also tough. by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    They are also a lot larger. I don't know what the internal chemistry of them is.

    I do know though if you puncture them they will burn, especially when they are fully charged.

    The real risk comes though when people charge them the wrong way.