Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek's LCARS Could Become Your Virtual Assistant (cnet.com)

H_Fisher writes: It has arguably inspired many other technological innovations in the fifty years since its premiere, and now another Star Trek-inspired touch could be coming to your device: the voice of Majel Barrett from the Star Trek universe's LCARS computer system. CNET reports: "The voice of LCARS was provided by Majel Barrett, who was married to Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry. Although Barrett sadly passed away in 2008, she took several roles on the show over the years, including nurse Christine Chapel in Star Trek: The Original Series and Betazoid ambassador Lwaxana Troi on Star Trek: The Next Generation. According to a tweet by the official Roddenberry account yesterday, this has provided enough phonetic data to perhaps get Barrett's voice appearing in upcoming new 2017 TV series Star Trek: Discovery -- and maybe even a Siri-like virtual assistant."

86 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. Aaaand a million nerds just came in their pants by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always been able to spot other trekkers by how people react to me referring to any digital female voice as Majel.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  2. Gene's favorite actress by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    I basically grew up in the time just after TOS aired (I was only 3 in 1967 so I wasn't watching then, and I barely remember the series being on first run TV at all). However, I do remember a number of TV pilots that Roddenberry created after Star Trek, that unfortunately were never picked up by the networks as regular series. I'm talking about made-for-TV-movies like Genesis II, Strange New World and Planet Earth (which were all attempts to boot up a series set in the same post apocalyptic future), as well as The Questor Tapes, and Spectre (a really weird supernatural series I didn't know about until recently). It's interesting to look at those shows now and see the familiar face of Majel Barrett in nearly all of them. She also had a small role in the movie Westworld, one of my favorite SF films of the 70s.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    1. Re:Gene's favorite actress by peragrin · · Score: 1

      That's because they were married. Majel Barrett Roddenberry.

      She could act too but most of her roles were done by her husband, and cameos after he died. That's why loxwana too gets more character development latter TNG and ds9

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re: Gene's favorite actress by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen them, you're probably right. But to suggest that stuff doesn't get picked up because it's shit is... brave, in today's world. ;)

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    3. Re:Gene's favorite actress by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I can't recall any of those. I was 5 when TOS first aired in '67. I do remember my older sister recording episodes on a small reel to reel tape recorder though (audio only, of course); the precursor to the VCR. She had a huge crush on Kirk.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    4. Re: Gene's favorite actress by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Very true. Looking at the garbage that has passed for science fiction since 2001 (the year, not the movie) people could do much worse than looking at these old pilots of Gene's and running with them.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  3. Feels a bit ... too much by Calydor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe I'm just old and boring, but I really don't like the way that being dead is no longer the end for appearing in new things you never knew about. Between the holographic appearances of ... was it Tupac? And now this, it all just feels a bit too morbid to me.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by coastwalker · · Score: 1, Troll

      Actually I think it is a sign of the times. Nothing new has been done since the 60's generation wrote the aspirational playbook. So why shouldn't they become immortal? They grew up in a world made grey by a world war and they wanted something better. Sadly the following generations mostly just want to breed and watch action adventure movies made by the man. The occasional spark of inspiration like Firefly is soon replaced by tedious soaps with soft porn and violence like Game of Thrones.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    2. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's fucking ridiculous. Nirvana is back on tour. Robin Williams is live at Winstar Casino this weekend. Gene Wilder is starring in the gay porno "Charlie the Fudgepacker"

      Eternity is a long time to go without a paycheck, so if I were you, I'd start planning your post-death retirement too. Your 401k isn't going to last forever.

    3. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      just want to breed

      No they don't. If they were Europe wouldn't be importing muslims and the US wouldn't be importing Mexicans. White european birthrates are catastrophically low and will likely never recover.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    4. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Can't forget Audrey Hepburn appearing in a candy commercial, decades after her death.

      And remember when those Matrix-movies-that-shall-not-be-named had hundreds of Agent Smiths? The technology they used to scan Hugo Weaving and replicate him digitally was already being billed at that time as a way to bring dead actors back, or else bring back younger versions of actors who've aged significantly...which is exactly what we saw in one of the newer Terminator movies (whatever the Christian Bale one was called), when a digitally created, young Ah-nold suddenly showed up to reprise the role.

      Captain America: Civil War even got in on the action, with a Robert Downey Jr. who was several decades younger in a flashback scene. When he was on the talk show circuit to market the film, he mentioned how weird it was to see himself like that, but I suspect we'll only be seeing more of it, since if there's one thing Hollywood likes to do, it's to rehash things they know we liked the first time around.

    5. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Firefly a spark of inspiration? You mean that shit american Blake's 7 ripoff, just with space zombies added?

    6. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't destroy a man's dreams.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Between the holographic appearances of ... was it Tupac?

      That wasn't a hologram. It was a special effect called Pepper's Ghost.

      Worse, the effect that was used for Tupac wasn't even three dimensional... if you were looking at it from an oblique angle, you'd see the image much as you would see a picture from a similar angle.. The smaller angular diameter you perceive of the surface would result in the visual features you could see from more directly in front being condensed into a tighter space, while with a hologram, the different view may actually expose features or detail you may not have otherwise perceived from straight on, albeit within a smaller angular diameter, much as looking through a window at a scene beyond would appear when seeing the window from a similar angle.

    8. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Eh, I kind of wanted the future to be like Star Trek. Do Mexicans and Muslims make spaceships? I don't think they do.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    9. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, academic research is also creepy. Dead people's ideas being used to support new ideas is kinda necromantic.

    10. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You appear to have problems differentiating between fact and opinion.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    11. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Maritz · · Score: 1

      and will likely never recover.

      Based on what? What particular crystal ball is being used for this? Never is a long-ass time.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    12. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Maritz · · Score: 1

      And we will eventually duplicate what's special about a brain.

      No we won't. We'll never, ever do that. God damn Singularity Nutters.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    13. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      At a minimum one testicle is.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      That new triangle Star Desrtoyer main body of the upcoming 2017 Enterprise is a hideous betrayal.

      That is an actual fact.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    15. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      A lot of story structure is far more ancient than that. When you are talking about most of the highly formulaic nonsense out there, the original comment is kind of spot on. Instead of being bored with yet another iteration of the same concept, you can just grab an earlier version of it that's probably better done.

      That's not even getting into the blatant remakes.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      "Space zombies"? Isn't a prerequisite for something being a zombie being dead at some point?

      A zombie (Haitian French: zombi, Haitian Creole: zonbi) is a fictional undead being created through the reanimation of a human corpse.

      Reavers aren't reanimated; they're just regular humans who went crazy.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    17. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Technically, Musk is an African-American, but generally not what people mean by that term.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    18. Re:Feels a bit ... too much by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I found one mistake!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  4. Is using a dead womans voice... by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... a fitting tribute to the actress or just that little bit creepy? I can't decide.

    1. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait till they realistically "reanimate" the original crew.

    2. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      They could do that today. They did it with Hitler for a documentary by digitally putting his face into an actor.

      I kinda wish they would actually. Bring back Firefly, finish Angel, do some more Next Generation stories with the characters from that era.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Less creepy when you remember that there were actual plans to call a digital assistant "Majel". And that all computer voices we hear today could already be the voices of dead voice actors. And they are already disembodied voices.

      I'd swing more to the "fitting tribute" side

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "And that all computer voices we hear today could already be the voices of dead voice actors. And they are already disembodied voices."

      True, but recording something then dying is one thing, using the voice of someone who is already dead is another.

    5. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must've missed Firefly the movie. There was pretty much nothing left to be discovered after that.

    6. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by azcoyote · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I miss Firefly too, but I think it's dangerous to assume that we can simply get back to the past. Whenever I watch Next Generation now, I realize how much it is a product of a bygone era, e.g. its extremely optimistic technological future (who would really work without money?). We can artificially bring back names and faces, but it would never be the same show again; in fact, it would probably just annoy the original fans for being different.

      --
      Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    7. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The odd part about Star Treks utopia was that the whole money part wasn't consistent. Apparently no one had to work for money, but people would still do underhanded things to get it and it was still exchanged for good and services.

    8. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      It's better they use a dead woman's voice than a dead woman's... ... no, I won't go there.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Her voice was recorded before she died too!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    10. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't ever watch old movies. The actors in there are like ghosts of the past, you know...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Have you ever met my grandparents? They had the habit of, when watching tv, going on about all those dead people, too...

      --
      bickerdyke
    12. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Nah, it'd result in some pretty crappy rip-offs.

      Have you seen the show Dark Matter? It tries really hard to be Firefly-esque - identical (if shallower) archetyped characters (bravado gunman, gifted girlchild, etc.) , all with a similar gist. At least in the first couple episodes, that's as far as I got due to the insufferable dialog and acting.

      And without the characters - the acting, the motion, etc. - it'd not be the same. And which is harder, impersonating someone, or playing a unique character? I'm fairly certain the latter, due to how many impersonators there are...

      Now, if you had a fan-made Firefly continuum? If production quality was good, I can definitely see that being potentially viable due to the love that fans put into their stuff....

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      They could do that today. They did it with Hitler for a documentary by digitally putting his face into an actor.

      I kinda wish they would actually. Bring back Firefly, finish Angel

      The ending is up to you! For example:

      Angel Secret Ending: Charisma Carpenter and Amy Adams make love to each other for 17 hours, the end.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Wait! I meant Amy Acker!

      Wait, both Amys. The ending is up to me!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    15. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Except for all those comic books they've been doing since then...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    16. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Whenever I watch Next Generation now, I realize how much it is a product of a bygone era, e.g. its extremely optimistic technological future (who would really work without money?).

      Anyone who wanted to have stuff that you couldn't have as an ordinary civilian. Not just anyone in the Trek universe got ferried around to pleasure planets, or even got to travel on starships to anywhere except colony worlds, even by the time of TNG. The only known privately owned starship in the Federation by the time of TOS was captained by a criminal and I don't recall any other personal vessels anywhere in the Federation in any show... but perhaps someone will show me up with their superior knowledge? heh heh. I did a quick search and the internets seem to agree with me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      I could have phrased that better.

      I mean that they have decided *after* her death to use recordings that were done for another series. She didn't record them for the new series then die.

    18. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      My grandma had the habit of reading the obituaries with her friends to look who they know. It was like a morbid game of "hah, outlived ya!"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think TNG is kind of timeless in that respect. Okay, some of the tech has dated badly, like why don't the com badges have cameras to save them describing everything over a voice channel (other than to save money and build suspense, obviously), but the ideas stand up. You mention the lack of money specifically, at a time when some places are experimenting with a universal basic income.

      Have you seen Star Trek Continues on YouTube? It's a continuation of the original series and actually better in many ways. It manages to update that show in terms of how society has moved forward (e.g. by having female characters who aren't just eye candy or who act like children). A recent episode even managed to do a rubber suit monster in a way that actually worked and looked pretty good, while remaining in the style of the original.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Is using a dead womans voice... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      As far as I recall, Angel had an ending. Was the ending just not good enough or something?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. I've always thought this by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When watching ST I always figured there were more than enough lines for her to be the computer forever in the series and the movies. Some people talk about it being morbid or creepy, but I think it's more of a tribute to her. We don't see her as replaceable even in death. My mom was always excited when she was on the shows as Lwaxana Troi and would always comment that she was Gene's wife and that she was the nurse on TOS. I doubt she could be a Siri or Cortana type assistant due to the words/products we use in speech that were never said by her and I don't think they recorder her just making phonetic sounds to combine into every word imaginable, but I would love to hear her on Star Trek again.

    1. Re:I've always thought this by bickerdyke · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's how the synthetic voices of Siri and Cortana are made, too. Voice actors read texts, the recordings are split up into phonemes and these are then used to synthesize the actual words we can hear. These computer voices aren't made on a word-by-word basis anymore.

      The recorded text however are nonsense texts that are specially designed to contain a maximum phonem variety in a minimum of recorded text and that way of course it's known how many vairants of each phonem are available exactly where in the recording. So, with enough recorded material it should be possible to extract the same phonem variety. It's just more work as you have to find them first

      --
      bickerdyke
    2. Re:I've always thought this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've heard an interview with the woman who voiced Siri. If I recall correctly she read a LOT of text for the 'role'. It wouldn't surprise me at all if there are huge numbers of phonemes that have no representation in all of Barrett's voice work. You may be better off finding a human to impersonate Majel and record all new text.

    3. Re:I've always thought this by doconnor · · Score: 1

      The technology to extract and create phonemes has probably improved since Siri's voice was created.

    4. Re:I've always thought this by plover · · Score: 3, Informative

      The number of actual complete words recorded can improve the overall quality of the synthesized voice. Phonetically pasted-together words are still not quite as good as complete, well formed words. (That's why they always have the talent read the full set of numbers instead of synthesizing words like "eleven".) Reading a phonetically complete subset of words is a good way to capture the most usable portion of the voice in the minimum amount of time. That's important when you're paying the talent by the hour, but it's not necessarily going to produce the overall best results. Having access to the full body of work will not only provide the needed phonemes, but will include a good vocabulary of higher quality words.

      Of course, having a slightly choppy computer voice is one way of overcoming the uncanny valley. Holding a conversation with a dead person might be unnerving for some people. Hearing the little clips and weird tone changes as the voice is reassembled would be a constant reminder that you're actually talking to a computer, not a person, and might be of some comfort.

      --
      John
    5. Re:I've always thought this by bickerdyke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, having a slightly choppy computer voice is one way of overcoming the uncanny valley. Holding a conversation with a dead person might be unnerving for some people. Hearing the little clips and weird tone changes as the voice is reassembled would be a constant reminder that you're actually talking to a computer, not a person, and might be of some comfort.

      So we are recreating the voice of a dead person as a computer voice to honor the person who actually gave a computer a human voice. That's no uncanny valley, that's a first class uncanny round-trip!

      --
      bickerdyke
  6. They could simply have found a similar voice. by master_p · · Score: 1

    But I guess going the emulation route is cooler.

  7. Re:Any Happily Passed Aways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Although Barrett sadly passed away in 2008, she took several roles on the show over the years . . .

    Wow, although she was dead, she still took on several roles?!? She must have been one amazing lady!!

    Great journalism skills you got there.

  8. Re:Foretold by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    And how long does your estate/corporation retain rights to your own voice and appearance after death? Does copyright law apply? Trademark law? If the rights expire after the lifetime of the actor plus 70 years will we reach a point sometime around, i dunno, 2086 or so when there are no employment opportunities for new actors because all the "great" actors are already in the public domain?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  9. Re:Any Happily Passed Aways? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    This is the technology of the future.

    For a while workers had retirement to look forwards to.
    The millennial generation, because of a greying population, won't have retirement, they'll have to work until they die

    In the Star Trek future it gets even worse - you have to keep working after you die.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  10. Re:Wishing for a spin-off by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd love a darker series Colonists crash landing on an alien planet disconnected from the rest of the federation Losing most of their technology. Finding out they're not alone and there is a semi-hostile primitive species there. Then they have to struggle, how hard do they try and stick with the prime directive, and non-interference, how does it impact their own survival.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  11. Re:Any Happily Passed Aways? by grumling · · Score: 1

    Fred Astaire came back from beyond the grave to sell a vacuum cleaner.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  12. Re:Any Happily Passed Aways? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The part that is more bothersome is they collected words from all her different parts.
    Her role as the ship computer vs. Lwaxana she is acting very differently. It would be a computer with some of the words expressed very emotionally with others very cut and dry. Also that doesn't say much for the show, because if they are going to have the computer say the same stuff, it sounds like a lot of recycled plots.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  13. Re:Any Happily Passed Aways? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Well, considering how wooden he acted, Shatner died somewhere in the early 1960s.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Re:Foretold by ebyrob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In 2086, copyright will be lifetime + 140 years (or 160 years for works for hire). Steamboat Willie can never enter the public domain after all...

  15. Re:Fascinating, but.... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Also remember this was a TV Show.
    In TV Shows having talking computers is useful to help move the plot along. In real life, even if I computer can talk, I turn off the volume most of the time, because I can read faster, skip useless information, and interface faster than verbally.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  16. Re:Wishing for a spin-off by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Or we could do something radical, something that hasn't been around for a decade or two: Come up with a new idea instead of rehashing old ones and putting some more lipstick on the corpse.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  17. Re: Any Happily Passed Aways? by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Spoken with the sincerety and conviction of someone who can only have zero clue as to what they're talking about.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  18. Re:Wishing for a spin-off by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    I'd love a darker series Colonists crash landing on an alien planet disconnected from the rest of the federation Losing most of their technology. Finding out they're not alone and there is a semi-hostile primitive species there. Then they have to struggle, how hard do they try and stick with the prime directive, and non-interference, how does it impact their own survival.

    So basically you want to watch LOST but set in the Star Trek universe? Why not make it a planet full of zombies and then you can call it "Walking Dead: Lost in Space"? Starfleet crash lands on an alien planet stranded with no communication. On the planet, they discover a planet full of zombies. Cobbling together the spare parts from their shuttlecraft they erect an encampment with a solar powered force field. During ever episode they try to sneak out of the encampment to search for food and supplies meanwhile the zombies continue to try to figure out how to penetrate the force field to eat the humans as food. Later on in the series they find a planet that is composed of tachyon particles that they learn they can combine with scrap metal and jute to form a communications device to transmit SOS messages in hopes that someone will find them. I think you're onto something here...

    --
    We'll make great pets
  19. Re:Any Happily Passed Aways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They don't play a recording of each word. They have a recording of each individual sound, that lasts a fraction of second, that a person uses. They string these individual sounds together to form any word. It's how they made Siri and Cortana.

  20. It didn't work for Roger Ebert by atrimtab · · Score: 1
    Roger Ebert, popular movie critic, lost his voice to when his jaw was removed to fight the cancer that eventually killed him.

    Like Majel he had 25+ years of recorded material from TV shows like At the Movies. He even hired a firm to create a voice from that material. As it turned out, that 25+ years of recording was inadequate to create a working synthetic voice.

    I suspect Roger had more material than Majel as he was doing 22 minute review shows for some many years compared to Majel's occasional appearances and scripted "computer voice" work.

    --
    Facebook is billions of individual "Skinner Boxes." And if you use it you are the pigeon!
  21. Phonetics, Not Performances by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    Phonetic data, not words, or lines. I worked on an English as a Second Language system back in 1996 that sounded really good and only had about 120 phonetic samples that you could make it say anything you wanted. It even had a basic emotion engine. The more complicated part we found was in translating the typed words into phonetic speech. Back then we went with a lookup table for words that didn't sound like how they were spelled, then falling back to a sound it out algorithm for everything else. We usually only used the table for words that really did not sound right, as RAM and CPU cycles were limited back then. Also much more efficient lookup algorithms have been developed since then.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
    1. Re:Phonetics, Not Performances by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      So 80% of your words had to go to the lookup table then :D
      English has more exceptions than rules. (put, putt; boot, book; school, scissors.. you get the gist). That must've been a tedious but interesting project.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  22. phoenetic samples aren't enough by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    There is a TOS episode where the computer voice was upgraded to a sexy sounding female. Kirk reprimands the computer, and it sounds noticeably sad. I don't think you can do that with the existing recordings of Majel Barrett.

  23. nahhhh by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Fuck that. I want a John Wayne styled LCARS first.

    "Life is hard when you're stupid."
    "Howdy, partner."
    "That'll be the day."
    "Take 'er easy there, Pilgrim."
    "I wouldn't make it a habit of calling me that, son."

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  24. Re:Wishing for a spin-off by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Because that theme hasn't been tried a billion times in other shows?

    I can think of a half dozen shows which fit that criteria and with only marginal retrofitting it'd be what you describe.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  25. Re: No, thanks. by Maritz · · Score: 1

    When I step away from this keyboard I have a life waiting for me.

    LOL Course you do, that's why you're in here trying to troll some neckbeards. I almost feel sorry for you.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  26. That's what Vocaloids are by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Vocaloids did this long before voice assistants. To be done properly though, the recording has to be done at a constant pitch, so it's easier to modulate it by computer later. "Harvesting" phonemes, diphomes, and polyphomes from pre-recorded spoken speech isn't as effective because you need to post-process it to remove the pitch change. (It should be noted that adding inflections to make it sound like spoken speech is a huge AI project in itself. Singing is a lot easier to synthesize because these changes in intonation and pitch are mostly pre-determined by the music.)

  27. those poor people by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    oh please spare us another "dark and gritty reimagining"

    instead, how about:
    1. a comedy
    2. a musical
    3. a war movie
    4. a police procedural
    5. a lawyer show
    6. a doctor show
    7. a buddy cop movie
    8. a special episode where the Harlem Globetrotters drop by

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  28. re: money in Star Trek by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Actually, I don't think it was so inconsistent .... Just not as well explained to viewers as it could have been.

    Those enlisted in Starfleet or living on planets under their control didn't have to work for money anymore.... For those who lived on planets outside their zone of influence, results varied. Many of those planets still exchanged currency for goods and/or services. Technology like replicators don't appear to have been universally available or prevalent.

  29. Re:Foretold by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    Yes. Staggering.

  30. Re:Foretold by srmalloy · · Score: 1

    Steamboat Willie can never enter the public domain after all...

    I've been referring to the 'Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act' as the "Mickey Mouse Perpetual Protection Act" for years, and I'll just shift the name to whatever bill Disney rams through Congress to extend copyright protection to ensure that no representation of The Mouse ever falls into the public domain.

  31. Re:Any Happily Passed Aways? by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    The part that is more bothersome is they collected words from all her different parts.
    Her role as the ship computer vs. Lwaxana she is acting very differently. It would be a computer with some of the words expressed very emotionally with others very cut and dry. Also that doesn't say much for the show, because if they are going to have the computer say the same stuff, it sounds like a lot of recycled plots.

    I'd have thought there'd have been more than enough vocal sampling for her just as the computer voice. Actually, I'm surprised the computer voice wasn't *already* in phonetic format just for all of the video games. Although she'd be able to give the most natural performance by recording the lines normally, I could see one of the (many, many, many) ST game developers realizing that they'd need TTS ability here and there (eg, player-generated names) and do the vocal data collection needed for it.

    Anyway, Majel Roddenberry's voice is more or less holy ground for both the franchise and fans of the franchise.... I don't think they'd mess up something so sacrosanct.

  32. Re: money in Star Trek by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Nah, it was still inconsistent. Harry Mudd clearly lived within Federation space, even if he considered himself an outlaw, and he was obsessed with money.

    And what about the Ferenghi living on Deep Space 9? Didn't they live on a "planet" under Starfleet's control? I guess technically they weren't really obsessed with money, they were obsessed with acquiring material things. But that in itself is a paradox when acquiring material things incurs no monetary cost.

    I mean, if you think about it, the idea of the end of scarcity for everything is preposterous, even with Replicator technology. Suppose you have a signed picture of Majel Barret and I want it? I don't want a replica of it, I want the one with her actual signature on it. I might want to trade you something for it. What? With no generally accepted form of money, you're stuck with a barter economy and the Federation is back to the Bronze Age.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  33. Re: money in Star Trek by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    The Ferengi explicitly rejected the very concept of material egalitarianism (which underlies the Federation using their replicated plenty to eliminate scarcity), and for entirely social reasons (status) strove to acquire something that specifically could not be replicated (Latinum). They basically worship capitalism (literally) and actively fight against the natural progress of technology eliminating it.

    Mudd likely wanted money for similar reasons. Some people -- lots of people -- don't just want all of the material things they could possibly need, they want social power, they don't want everything to be free and equal because then there's no hierarchy for them to be on top of. In Mudd's case, and probably the Ferengi as well, I imagine he sought out this kind of power over people in places outside the Federation, as it's hard to have power over someone who can get anything they want for free on a whim like most Federation citizens.

    As for your signed picture of Majel -- is it OK if I send that via transporter? You don't mind if its constituent atoms are converted into entirely fungible energy and then reassembled into the same pattern they started in on your end? What if there happens to be a transporter accident along the way, and a transporter duplicate gets sent back to me? Or is it that the original got sent back to me and you got the duplicate? How can we tell? What does it matter?

    Also, a Bronze Age with starships and replicators sounds pretty sweet to me.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  34. Re: Any Happily Passed Aways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's called "tenting ones fingers." And yes, it's eeeeexcellent.

  35. Re: money in Star Trek by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Mudd sometimes lived in Federation Space. He went out of it twice, the first to pick up whores for miners to marry, and the second to live on a planet of robots.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  36. Re: money in Star Trek by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Because Latanum appeared, at least in one episode, to be a dangerous liquid metal like mercury. Which might also be the reason it could not be replicated. The gold was used as shielding to make usable money.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  37. Re:More specifically... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    Oh right, *SPOILER*. If you haven't seen it after 13 years you probably weren't going to before this post went up :)

    Fair enough, but I was waiting for you to make an actual point with that instead of just dropping the detailed spoiler and otherwise contributing nothing to the conversation.

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  38. Life of grandchildren by tepples · · Score: 1

    In its opinion in Eldred v. Ashcroft upholding the Bono Act, the Supreme Court recognized the possibility of "legislative misbehavior" to repeatedly extend the copyright term. So far there have been only two, in both cases to harmonize to the European standard of "life of grandchildren". The Copyright Act of 1976 and the interim extensions that preceded it were the first to adopt the "life of grandchildren" standard, and the Bono Act merely updated it for longer life expectancy. Unless there's a breakthrough in health care that dramatically extends the life of grandchildren, the copyright lobby will have to argue anew that a further extension past the life of grandchildren is not "legislative misbehavior".