Slashdot Mirror


Android Users Need To Delete Google Maps and Google Play If They Don't Want Their Locations Tracked (theregister.co.uk)

Kieren McCarthy, reporting for The Register: Google, it seems, is very, very interested in knowing where you are at all times. Users have reported battery life issues with the latest Android build, with many pointing the finger at Google Play -- Google's app store -- and its persistent, almost obsessive need to check where you are. Amid complaints that Google Play is always switching on GPS, it appears Google has made it impossible to prevent the app store from tracking your whereabouts unless you completely kill off location tracking for all applications. You can try to deny Google Play access to your handheld's location by opening the Settings app and digging through Apps -> Google Play Store -> Permissions, and flipping the switch for "location." But you'll be told you can't just shut out Google Play services: you have to switch off location services for all apps if you want to block the store from knowing your whereabouts. It's all or nothing, which isn't particularly nice. This is because Google Play services pass on your location to installed apps via an API. The store also sends your whereabouts to Google to process. Google doesn't want you to turn this off.

395 comments

  1. Why is this a problem? by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love Big Brother. Don't you love Big Brother? Maybe you need re-education.

    1. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      big brother was always the cool guy that got us porn, beer and cigs.... now little sister was the freaking rat! I now call all surveillance Little Sister.

    2. Re:Why is this a problem? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's doubleplus don't be evil.

      Didn't Sergei grow up in the Moscow? He's built a panopticon that would make Stalin drool.

    3. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mind big brother - so long as he follows behind closely with a backpack and cable for the required phone battery ...

    4. Re:Why is this a problem? by rhazz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      After one of the more recent OS updates I noticed that my android phone would now tell me every morning just before I left for work how long my commute would be. Even though I've never identified my work address as "work", it has (probably easily) figured out where I work and tries to be helpful by doing a quick route lookup just before the usual time it detects that I leave the house. Honestly when I first noticed it I was a bit put off that they would go so far as to do that without any opt-in, but then I realized that it's kind of handy and frankly isn't really that concerning overall. If I actually had a need to suppress my whereabouts, just having a cell phone that is paid with a credit card pretty much defeats that.

    5. Re:Why is this a problem? by dbialac · · Score: 5, Informative

      I guess nobody noticed that maps.google.com now goes to www.google.com/maps, which means you have to give the entire site permission to access your location to let it use your location.

    6. Re:Why is this a problem? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

      but how to you feel if that info was passed to the FBI / CIA / NSA / ETC?

    7. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and a fresh gmail accounts that never references your name, or receives a shipping receipt email with your home address ...

    8. Re:Why is this a problem? by Luthair · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cellular companies already do it ;)

    9. Re:Why is this a problem? by ADRA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They can legally (or illegally) get it anyway. You either live on grid or off. Trying to achieve one-foot-in-one-foot-out is an exercise in futility.

      --
      Bye!
    10. Re:Why is this a problem? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I think you can go to your Google account and turn off location services to avoid this

    11. Re:Why is this a problem? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      If I actually had a need to suppress my whereabouts, just having a cell phone that is paid with a credit card pretty much defeats that.

      "paid with a credit card"? It is to laugh.

      Try "purchased and recharged with cash, while wearing a ski mask and having walked to (then returning from) the convenience store from a car with its license plates covered and parked away from traffic cameras (if you can find such a place within walking distance of a convenience store)."

      And leave the phone off except when making a call - and then walk away from home and car to do it.

      (Did you know the federally-mandated tire pressure warning system has the fill valves on each of your tires transmitting a unique serial number which can be read by loops in the road or antennas beside it?)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    12. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you haven't been reading the other comments?

    13. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that you can buy a pack of valve stems and change this yourself in about ten minutes for about ten bucks :O

    14. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +10 Insightful

    15. Re:Why is this a problem? by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Google Doubleplus

      I'm a bit surprised that isn't a major meme by now

    16. Re:Why is this a problem? by GLowder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ever been driving down the road and you get a message pop up about a 12 minute delay just ahead? Google saw everyone else's phones come to a stop/near-stop on the road ahead and is busy trying to help you route around it. Is that good? Bad? I don't know the answer but I find it convenient more than I find it obtrusive as I generally don't care if Google knows where I am.

      --
      I used to have a good sig...
    17. Re:Why is this a problem? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      but how to you feel if that info was passed to the FBI / CIA / NSA / ETC?

      As long as the phone has a headphone jack, he's okay with it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:Why is this a problem? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      And yet this is ok because it's Google.

      Windows 10 includes telemetry but that is spyware!

      Why do people write crap like this? Reading through the comments, it appears this feature is pretty well hated - which means people like it about as much as they like W10. Which is not much at all.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:Why is this a problem? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      If only that were true - the radios are inside the wheels and can only be removed when the tires are off, at least in my 1 vehicle that has these. My other vehicle uses a rotational difference monitoring system to detect low tire pressure, and thus has no TPMS radio anywhere.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    20. Re:Why is this a problem? by npslider · · Score: 1

      Big brother is showing tonight on YouTube.

      Attendance is mandatory!

    21. Re:Why is this a problem? by npslider · · Score: 1

      What government agency is the ETC? ;)

      Eternal Tracking Council?

    22. Re:Why is this a problem? by npslider · · Score: 2

      The headphone was how the tin foil hat was connected.

      Darn it! FOILED again!

    23. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Did you know the federally-mandated tire pressure warning system has the fill valves on each of your tires transmitting a unique serial number which can be read by loops in the road or antennas beside it?)

      I know that that's what they want me to think. So now I know who you're working for. Ski mask didn't help you there, did it?

    24. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Exactly. And most of the people bleating about the "invasion" of privacy (honestly, it's 2016, it's not an invasion anymore) are the same people who then fire up Google Maps to check traffic conditions - a feature populated, for the most part, by the same feature they're working so hard to opt out of.

    25. Re:Why is this a problem? by npslider · · Score: 1

      The FULL URL (including the hidden)

      www.google.com/maps/$WeKnowWhereYouWereLastNight.php

    26. Re:Why is this a problem? by swillden · · Score: 1

      After one of the more recent OS updates I noticed that my android phone would now tell me every morning just before I left for work how long my commute would be. Even though I've never identified my work address as "work", it has (probably easily) figured out where I work and tries to be helpful by doing a quick route lookup just before the usual time it detects that I leave the house.

      I work from home and live near a ski resort, which makes it very easy for me to go skiing on a regular basis during the winter. So, my typical winter workday is to start work at 6, work until 8:45 then drive to the resort, arriving right at 9 when the lifts open, ski for a couple of hours, then back home to work until 5 or so, with a break for lunch.

      So, Google noticed that I drive to this location every weekday morning, arriving at 9 AM. Obviously I must work there, right? I didn't correct it, because having Google Now pop up with traffic conditions for the route to the ski resort was quite useful.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    27. Re:Why is this a problem? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Did you know that you can buy a pack of valve stems and change this yourself in about ten minutes for about ten bucks :O

      Bullshit. You need to unmount the tires and you need a special tool to "re-learn" the new TPMS units to the vehicle's monitoring computer.

      Way more than ten bucks and way more than 10 minutes. More like ~$60 per TPMS unit and $120 for the TPMS programmer. And it takes an hour or so to demount all the tires and then remount them.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    28. Re:Why is this a problem? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Never had that happen because I keep location services turned off. The Google map app still shows me where the traffic jams are because of all the nice people who keep location services turned on on their phones.

      I have to open the app to see it, of course, but once or twice per 50 miles is plenty of warning about traffic.

    29. Re:Why is this a problem? by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 2

      I just changed the TPMS sensors on my girlfriend's shitty Cobalt. Each sensor was about 8 buck each. The reset process took about 5 minutes and was detailed in the owner's manual. Mounting the new sensors took considerably longer. Basically you're both waaaay off, but somewhere in between is about right.

    30. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems as though you missed the entire fucking point of the article. It doesn't matter that you keep location services turned off. That just keeps you from being given a heads up. It does not keep you from announcing to everyone behind you that you just entered heavy traffic.

    31. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventual Termination Committee

      When they decide that they don't like how you feel about _____________, they'll need to know where you are...

    32. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, as I understand it, that's not how it is done. Instead, Waze app users report various things like relative speed of traffic, if a cop/wreck/construction is up ahead, and so forth. Google owns Waze and assimilates this data into Google Maps. So, it's actively crowd-sourced by users, not passively by tracking everyone's phone sensor data.

    33. Re:Why is this a problem? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      Or just drive a Chrysler product. Those things died quickly, and they cost so much to replace I just live with the warning message. Oh, and I carry a tire gauge--and use it.

    34. Re:Why is this a problem? by dfghjk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Always love these tone-deaf comments. Since rape is inevitable, you might as well enjoy it.

    35. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does that matter when Google can do whatever it wants with the data behind the scenes? maps.google.com and www.google.com could easily access a centralized database of location data.

    36. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true about Waze, but Google does still utilize the location tracking of phones which aren't on Waze

    37. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >appeals to $Current_Year
      Kill yourself.

    38. Re:Why is this a problem? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Apple did this, there would be a slashdot outcry. So it goes.

    39. Re:Why is this a problem? by matbury · · Score: 1

      Doubleplusgoo... :)))

    40. Re:Why is this a problem? by matbury · · Score: 2

      I agree. You're absolutely right. Google are doubleplusgood and I want them to know exactly where I am and who I'm with and be judged on that (AKA guilt by association and guilt by circumstance) every minute of every day. I haven't committed any thought crimes for some time now. It's a beautiful thing you know; the destruction of privacy.

    41. Re:Why is this a problem? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Not with credit card, with cash.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    42. Re:Why is this a problem? by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's got nothing to do with Russia, the bogeyman of the American nation.
      Both Sergey and Larry Page are Jews.
      Go figure.

      By the way, you should really watch RT News to crawl out of your bubble.

    43. Re: Why is this a problem? by KenGingerich · · Score: 1

      Shut up, Slaves!

    44. Re:Why is this a problem? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      I work from home and live near a ski resort, which makes it very easy for me to go skiing on a regular basis during the winter. So, my typical winter workday is to start work at 6, work until 8:45 then drive to the resort, arriving right at 9 when the lifts open, ski for a couple of hours, then back home to work until 5 or so, with a break for lunch.

      I generally come in at least fifteen minutes late, ah, I use the side door - that way Lumbergh can't see me - and, uh, after that I just sorta space out for about an hour. I just stare at my desk; but it looks like I'm working. I do that for probably another hour after lunch, too. The rest of the time, I'm off skiing.

    45. Re:Why is this a problem? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Well, now that the "don't be evil" thing has been removed from their corporate code, they are really going full Microsoft.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    46. Re:Why is this a problem? by execthis · · Score: 1

      but how to you feel if that info was passed to the FBI / CIA / NSA / ETC?

      Depending upon who you are and what you do, the consideration that one's location history is potentially accessible to any other parties (not just government) could be an important one.

      But for a boring person like me its not really a concern. In fact there might even be benefit from it. If something ever happened to me it might actually be beneficial that some other(s) know.

      Another consideration is how malevolent those others might be. Even if there's basically no relevance to anyone knowing your location history, the idea that it might be collected out of a malevolent intent is still unpalatable.

      For me the issue is what are the intents of those others who might know it, and how and who arbitrates what is considered just and unjust with respect to the reasons and intentions it is collected.

      I believe that violation of trust is itself an actual harm, aside from whatever injury or damage might otherwise occur from unwanted disclosure.

    47. Re: Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't.

      i mean, you can turn it off from reporting said information to you. but thats not realky the same thing.

      there are some mdm firewalls that work for corraling some of it but google apps will bunch up the data and send it via whatever app has access.

    48. Re:Why is this a problem? by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      In Soviet America, app sells you!

    49. Re:Why is this a problem? by jmcvetta · · Score: 2

      bleating about the "invasion" of privacy (honestly, it's 2016, it's not an invasion anymore)

      If the invasion is over, is it now an occupation?

    50. Re:Why is this a problem? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      but how to you feel if that info was passed to the FBI / CIA / NSA / ETC?

      For one, this has been going on for a long time, so it's not news.

      Secondly, I don't really care. What are they going to find? Pictures of LOLCATS? My bookmarks for political articles? What's realistically going to happen?

      Now, if I were in Russia or China, were I could be suspect to *disappear*, then I would care.

    51. Re:Why is this a problem? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Turn off location. It's easy enough to use without it. You just have to manually scroll to the location you want on the map (which often isn't where you currently are anyway).

    52. Re:Why is this a problem? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      My approach is to leave stuff like tracking, usage reporting and so on all enabled. My patterns and habits are quite boring, and my reasoning is that by giving them tons of useless data, perhaps they'll miss someone else's possibly-interesting data.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    53. Re:Why is this a problem? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was a bit unnerved by Google Now's suggestions at first, but it's actually super handy at times.

      It's still a little bit unnerving how quickly it learns your habits, though.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    54. Re:Why is this a problem? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      bleating about the "invasion" of privacy (honestly, it's 2016, it's not an invasion anymore)

      If the invasion is over, is it now an occupation?

      Yeah, it is. But it's a relatively benign and sometimes benevolent occupation, which gives a lot of really convenient features in return.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    55. Re:Why is this a problem? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way. I'm a boring and very normal person, I don't do much of anything that would raise any eyebrows. Thus, my reasoning is that if they get a lot of data from me, other people's possibly interesting data could perhaps get lost in the noise. Which is a good thing for everyone :-)

      --
      Eat the rich.
    56. Re:Why is this a problem? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      And if I did actually want to do something illegal and questionable, the first thing I would leave at home would be my smartphone. I'd bring a burner dumbphone paid for in cash instead.

      My reasoning is that if I put a lot of normal-looking data into the system, it's way more unlikely they'll notice a small gap here and there when I leave the smartphone and other tracked devices at home.

      This is really basic stuff.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    57. Re: Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it,can you list some of these so called useful things an android phone can do by permanently knowing were a device is ?
      See,I've been using android since before even it's pre-beta release,I was a tester for Google,I still use android but find it does less and less that I find useful and am seriously considering digging out one of my old HTC hd2's and leaving it running winmo 6.5,as that does almost everything I want my devices to do,unless you learn to code for your self,the android universe is very dull,full of clone apps,and even after ten years can still do very little that I find "useful" or even Interesting.
      Winmo 6.5 is now probably one of the safest os's available,because who hacks/breaks it these days ? If only a few folk like me use it,it's hardly a target rich environment...

    58. Re: Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesnt hurt. Location for all apps is off on my phone all the time. Once in a while if I use something that really has a me-serving need for it I'll turn it on, but only for the duration of my need. My car has a built in GPS but has no built in transmitter. Sure I have to update an SD card once in a while to get the latest maps. Small price to pay.

      Would I find it perhaps a little more convenient to have location aware automatic things? Maybe. Doesn't really bother me not to, but what does bother me is this stuff could be made to protect privacy and it is not. In fact, it's deliberately made to not protect privacy.

      Now, some foolish people here say that most people don't care. That's a stupid statement. A more accurate one is most people don't understand what this stuff actually does beyond what they can see, and what they can see does not seem that bad to them. It's not like it's in Google's or Apple's interest to educate people on what really goes on in their respective ecosystems. Given full and understandable information, most people make surprisingly rational choices. That's why it's been the practice of corporations and governments to make sure full and understandable information is not widely publicized.

    59. Re: Why is this a problem? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      can you list some of these so called useful things an android phone can do by permanently knowing were a device is ?

      Traffic information, recommendations for nearby restaurants or venues, generally everything where using location data can be useful, especially aggregated location data, from which you can gather patterns.

      And on a more specific level, the ISP/telco I use has a version of NetPerform, which helps gather data about the quality of the network, to show where coverage should be improved.

      Of course, everything you can do with always-on location data is in the "nice to have" rather than "need to have" category, I have no argument against that. But it does enable some rather convenient features.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    60. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another selfish reasoning. It doesn't matter for MEEEEE so why would it be a problem in the grand scale of things?

      Is it absolutely unconceivable that FBI/CIA/NSA/ETC might become something that routinely makes people disappear simply because they have gathered enough power that they don't need to give it up anymore?

    61. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this is a real stretch here. Knowing my location is now equivalent to rape? Are you a SJW? Because this seems a lot like the ridiculous equivalencies they make, for example calling a man staring at you on the bus rape.

    62. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to play devils advocate....is this potentially a good thing? Isn't it possible they designed things like this so that third party apps don't have unfettered access to your location data and actually have to query it through Google, so there are more layers preventing a third party from just arbitrarily demanding your location from your phone without your approval being given at some point along the line?

    63. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like he should have renamed the parent company to The Manor Farm

    64. Re:Why is this a problem? by allo · · Score: 1

      And you give a site permanent location access? Really?

      Btw. if you do so, google could just use an iframe with maps.google.com to get the location on the main homepage.

    65. Re: Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...do you not know how politics works?

      It is ALWAYS "Us vs Them", them being the government. Our Constitution (for now) protects our rights and we can use our Judicial branch to enforce it. We vote for the politicians that make our laws, and it behooves us to pay attention to things like how they feel about our privacy.

      That being said, I don't care how effective it is to make it more difficult for the NSA. How hard their job is is NOT my problem, nor is it my concern. My concern is more with the 4th Amendment and the ever eroding freedoms that we apparently don't want to keep anymore.

      Rolling over and accepting it is a retarded answer. ALWAYS fight what's wrong, even if you stand to lose more by doing so (Snowden illustrated how this works). Rolling over makes you complicit in their criminal activity.

    66. Re:Why is this a problem? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1
      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    67. Re:Why is this a problem? by kaybee · · Score: 1

      Technically Big Brother is the state. You can choose not to use Google products, but in the book 1984 you couldn't choose to avoid Big Brother.

    68. Re:Why is this a problem? by rhazz · · Score: 1

      So your alternative is as described by other commenters - buy a pre-paid SIM/phone using cash only and don't let the cameras see you at the store and never use it from a location that might be traced to you. Alternatively if the man assumes you are where your phone is, that can make a great alibi. Leave the phone at home while you drive about committing murder. "Yes your honour, as my phone data will clearly indicate, on the evening in question I was at home playing Pokemon Go while walking in circles around my record player."

    69. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if (generic) bad guys were to get access to that info? (hacking, bribery, whatever). Then, most people would be very easy to kidnap for whatever purpose: extortion, torture, forced time-share presentations. . .

    70. Re:Why is this a problem? by matbury · · Score: 1

      Ah, you must be testing me, brother. That's doubleplusgood too. We have to catch out those thought criminals and make sure they're sent for re-education. And no, I don't think the US govt. are too worried about the proles committing violence on each other. TV shows and movies seem to encourage it.

    71. Re:Why is this a problem? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Umm, he was born in Russia? He's a Russian Jew?

      He also stated he hated being a Jew in Russia... so there's the irony aspect of it.

    72. Re: Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right to privacy is a UN basic human right for a reason.

    73. Re: Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Article 12.

      No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

    74. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would only be because iOS is mostly closed source and so it wouldn't be possible to have an alternative.

      Android is 100% open source and gapps are 100% optional closed source apps that you choose to install or not (or select individual apps from it). My phone doesn't have Google Play or Google Maps on it at all. I use OsmAnd for my maps and navigation and it works perfectly fine WITHOUT the Google proprietary spyware.

      THAT is why Google gets a pass while Apple and Microsoft don't when it comes to this spyware shit. When the latter two companies also release iOS, macOS and Windows as open source, then they will be treated the same.

    75. Re:Why is this a problem? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I figure I have a normal on-grid life, and so they're not likely to notice if I do something different, as long as it doesn't involve bringing my phone or credit cards.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    76. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google thinks that I am an 66 year old, Eskimo male to female post-op transsexual lesbian amputee with 7 children who goes shopping all of the time but hates actually shopping because I would rather be playing jai alai and watching televised bowling. Oh, they also think that I participate in dance competitions and go kayaking a lot.

    77. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing where somebody is is incredibly useful information. Oh, Jack's at work? Great, we can storm his apartment "by accident", kill his dog, and do a search, then act like it was the wrong house when he comes home and freaks out. Sprinkle some crack just to be sure, though, and that sweet entertainment system he just bought is ours due to civil forfeiture!

      Jack's home but not in his car? Let's install a little bug in the car to see what he talks about while he's on the road. Oh by the way, that bug also has a GPS radio so now we don't have to subpoena his phone records again.

      I'm not siding with SJWs here as I feel they have no grasp of reality, but the truth is knowing where somebody is can enable all sorts of activity, legal *and* illegal.

    78. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like W10. I'm not all that well-versed in the supposed massive amount of surveillance and data mining it does, but in terms of functionality and ease of use it seems pretty good to me. Why do people supposedly hate W10 so much?

    79. Re:Why is this a problem? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I like W10. I'm not all that well-versed in the supposed massive amount of surveillance and data mining it does, but in terms of functionality and ease of use it seems pretty good to me. Why do people supposedly hate W10 so much?

      I liked how it worked - at first. Then Microsoft went Microsoft on us. Aside from the surveillance, updates regularly make functioning computers not work. I've personally seen sound cards and sound software, Virtual serial ports, webcams, and Ethernet adapters. Here today, blow me tomorrow.

      And unless you are using W10 Enterprise, you have no choice - you get the updates. BOHICA. And I've seen the OS change from delaying updates to automatic updates after a delayed update is finally installed.

      I don't buy and use computers just to get them to work, then to get them to work again, then get them to work again. I ditched my W10 computer for a W7 install because I needed on I could depend on. The W7 install is 100 percent uptime so far.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    80. Re:Why is this a problem? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Did you know the federally-mandated tire pressure warning system has the fill valves on each of your tires transmitting a unique serial number which can be read by loops in the road or antennas beside it?

      This never crossed my mind, but you are certainly correct.

  2. Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about using Fake GPS location spoofer? Is it able to send fake coordinates to Google Play, too?

    1. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We need to make Google's spying illegal. Hopefully just shut the shit down for good.

    2. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's create malware that spoofs it to the fence line of the top exec's primary homes, or their kids bus stops.

    3. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      How about using Fake GPS location spoofer? Is it able to send fake coordinates to Google Play, too?

      I'm sure a GPS location spoofer, if such a thing exists, is highly illegal and would get you in big trouble to use it. GPS signals are on a licensed part of the spectrum, and interfering with those frequencies can cause not just your GPS device to fail, but possibly others around you. GPS is used in in some life or death applications, such as air navigation, so I imagine the feds would take this kind of spoofing very, very seriously.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    4. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get GPS jammers from China on all the dark web markets.

    5. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by k-vuohi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sure a GPS location spoofer, if such a thing exists, is highly illegal and would get you in big trouble to use it. GPS signals are on a licensed part of the spectrum, and interfering with those frequencies can cause not just your GPS device to fail, but possibly others around you. GPS is used in in some life or death applications, such as air navigation, so I imagine the feds would take this kind of spoofing very, very seriously.

      I believe schle means a software-based location spoofer that feeds a false location to the app in question, instead of messing with the actual connection to the GPS satellites.

    6. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by wbr1 · · Score: 2
      There are apps that do this. But, they require root to hook into the API. They have been used to cheat at games like pokemon.

      No need to broadcast or jam on licensed spectrum or buy a device.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    7. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      software. on the phone. spoofing.

      he's not saying hey i'm gonna try and fake a half dozen satellites using a swarm drones or something hovering around him and his phone. ...

    8. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Na, better to do it the Pokemon Go Map way.
      Have everyone speeding around at the speed of light in circles.
      Flood their servers with SCIENCE.

    9. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by farble1670 · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just not use a device w/ Google software on it?

      Try to understand. Google is a company. They need to make money. We all know how they make money. They aren't going to build something as complex as Android and Google Services for nothing. You are free to "buy" their product, or not. Exercise your right as a consumer. There's nothing nefarious going on here. If you don't like it, don't use it.

      But let me guess. You want to use Google, and let Google know others' location, just not yours. You want Google to make money from knowing everyone else's data, and have the profits from that support your mooching? Got it.

      And if you aren't using Google, WTF do you care?

    10. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      my assumption would be simply the app disabling the GPS and telling google you are at a different location

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    11. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      How about using Fake GPS location spoofer? Is it able to send fake coordinates to Google Play, too?

      I'm sure a GPS location spoofer, if such a thing exists, is highly illegal and would get you in big trouble to use it. GPS signals are on a licensed part of the spectrum, and interfering with those frequencies can cause not just your GPS device to fail, but possibly others around you. GPS is used in in some life or death applications, such as air navigation, so I imagine the feds would take this kind of spoofing very, very seriously.

      The reference to a spoofer in this case, is software that runs on the phone to tell the OS and the apps on the phone where the phone is. There isn't any radio frequency involved.

      Recently it's been used to let people "walk around" playing Pokemon Go while sitting in their basement.

    12. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is referring to spoofing location in software, as in, telling the device where it is in software. This can be done in Android, and is intended for debugging purposes.

      (Also, GPS spoofing can be done using radio frequencies: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c9d8/5878c56390b614a891d477b90d1b35ceb21b.pdf )

    13. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      A GPS spoofer app does nothing with GPS signaling. It simply sends mock location data to the requesting application, in place of legitimate recieved data.

      There's nothing at all illegal about it, though most location based AR games will permanently ban you if they detect such activity.

      Side note, the whole "Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment." thing is patently ridiculous these days. The site isn't even close to being high enough traffic that people can't reply as much as they'd like.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    14. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have spoofed the location on several phones that I use.
      Spoofing does not imply transmitting a fake GPS signal.
      Software running on the phone simply overrides its GPS data with an alternate.
      It can be switched off when I require the actual location.
      I choose a location in a large city - attracts less attention.

    15. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      GPS Spoofing can be done in an app that in no way modifies the operation of or broadcasts through the phone's GPS antenna. It simply allows you to manually punch in the coordinates you want to represent as your location that the system will use instead of reading from the GPS antenna itself. This functionality was even included as part of the Developer options menu in the Android settings; though the current build installed on my Galaxy S5 seems to only allow one to specify an app that serves as the gps location provider ("Mock Location App"). One such option: Fake GPS Location

    16. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by foradoxium · · Score: 2

      I can't tell if you're being serious.

      If yes: The person you were replying to is most likely talking about GPS spoofing software for phones that allows you to change your GPS coordinates that the OS reports. There is an option in Developer options that lets you change the program used for location.The 3rd party software usually lets you just point to a map to set the coordinates, and that's what the OS uses as your GPS coordinates. Nothing to do with actual GPS signals or frequencies :)

      It's primary use is for development and testing, but unless software checks for the use of these programs users do use them for less legit reasons. (Like cheating in location-based games such as PokemonGo or Ingress)

    17. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try to understand. Google is a company. They need to make money.

      They made their money when I bought the goddamn phone. If they don't feel like they made *enough* money, they should have charged more for the phone and/or licensing Android, not spying and selling out and digitally violating all of their users 24 hours a day.

    18. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure a GPS location spoofer, if such a thing exists, is highly illegal and would get you in big trouble to use it.

      I'm pretty sure that location tracking without my consent is highly illegal and no court is going to find me guilty for attempting to protect myself.

    19. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try to understand. Google is a company. They need to make money.

      They made their money when I bought the goddamn phone. If they don't feel like they made *enough* money, they should have charged more for the phone and/or licensing Android, not spying and selling out and digitally violating all of their users 24 hours a day.

      Samsung, HTC, et al made money when you bought the goddamn phone. Google makes money in services, like the one this article is about.

    20. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you new to the concept of publicly traded corporations? There is no such thing as making enough money. They have to find new revenue streams every year or else their shareholders bail.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    21. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just not use a device w/ Google software on it?

      Because due to the way that capitalism corrodes market choice and reduces product quality, I have two viable choices for a smartphone: walled-garden bullshit from Google, or walled-garden bullshit from Apple. Since GOOG's walls are a little lower and I can climb over them more easily, I take that lesser of evils...along with a sledgehammer to break down those walls.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    22. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it was never a technical limitation, just a social one. If the same person replies to literally everyone else's comments on a story, it's really offputting (especially if it's the kind of comments that inevitably show up as first posts--you know the ones).

    23. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to understand Google's business model, especially with respect to Android. They didn't make money off of you buying the phone. It is still effectively given away for free to the OEMs that produce the devices, even when it's a Nexus. They make money from advertising that is targeted to you based on every little detail that they can gather about you. The more they can data mine you, and target advertising in a way that advertisers like, the more money they make from said advertisers. The more devices can have in everyone's hands, that are sitting and collecting as much information as possible, is good for their business model. Anyone who honestly believes that Google is doing anything they're doing for free or out of the goodness of their heart is sorely mistaken.

      Hence part of the reason that I'm perfectly ok with paying a little bit a premium for an iOS device because their business model doesn't operate that way.

    24. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by pnutjam · · Score: 4, Informative

      I only turn on GPS when I want to use it, why waste the battery?

    25. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by haruchai · · Score: 0

      "they should have charged more for the phone and/or licensing Android

      Please read the highlighted, & emboldened text above, thanks

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    26. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Side note, the whole "Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment." thing is patently ridiculous these days. The site isn't even close to being high enough traffic that people can't reply as much as they'd like."

      That was never the point. The point was to stop spam and GNAA trolling.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    27. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by farble1670 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They made their money when I bought the goddamn phone. If they don't feel like they made *enough* money, they should have charged more for the phone and/or licensing Android, not spying and selling out and digitally violating all of their users 24 hours a day.

      That's not their business model. If you don't like their business model, don't buy their product. I know, it's not as much fun as whining about it here, but trust me it's more effective.

    28. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by farble1670 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because due to the way that capitalism corrodes market choice and reduces product quality, I have two viable choices for a smartphone

      Translation: you want to have your cake and eat it too. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to cheap wonderful smart phones. There's nothing in the Bill of Rights guaranteeing all citizens cheap, wonderful, feature rich smart phones. There are products on the market. Some gather usage stats. Others have more walled gardens than others. Others yet are more expensive and less feature rich. You get to choose one of these based on your criteria.

      Why don't you look into Ubuntu phones? http://www.ubuntu.com/phone

      What a wonderful 1st world problem we have here huh?

    29. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or ubuntu phone, or firefox phone ... If you really care as you seem to say then these should be the obvious solution

    30. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      This should be modded way down. "Not buying the product" on an individual level does SHIT to change corporate behavior.

    31. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No company *needs* to make money. Want? Yes. Need? No.

    32. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by farble1670 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This should be modded way down. "Not buying the product" on an individual level does SHIT to change corporate behavior.

      Yes you are right. Keep buying their shit and giving them money, but come here and whine about it. You know how to affect change. You are truly a revolutionary my friend.

      Plus, giving up that fancy smartphone would be HARD. No Angry Birds. No Snapchat. It's not a life worth living.

    33. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by lgw · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has had karma since - well, since this account was created. There is not a problem with high-karma users spamming. All the shitposting was from ACs and -1 accounts. Plus, you might have noticed, APK posts as much as he wants to as AC.

      The 5-mnute posting cap needs to go.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    34. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by npslider · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as making enough money

      As further evidence... I find it veeeeery suspicious that in addition to Google Earth, we now have Google Moon, and Google Mars.

      They are already getting ready to track us there too. The Lunar Positioning Service (LPS) will be online by decade's end. McDonald's is already working out franchise rights...

    35. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Isn't it interesting that the whole end result of capitalism was supposed to be about providing consumer choice. How many industries are there now where you get a choice of two, if that.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    36. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by shanen · · Score: 1

      It's a waste of time to worry about problems that have no solutions, and there is no amount of money that can solve the problem of greedy love of money. I'm not even sure it makes sense to describe such a thing as a real problem. More like a state of nature, in this case the nature of a disturbed personality. (No, I insist that a corporation is NOT a person and it has nothing, especially not a personality.)

      I think economics should be replaced with time-based ekronomics. From that perspective, tracking your location becomes a question of whether it increases the happy and memorable use of your time. Abuse of privacy cannot be justified by an appeal to the greater profit of some corporate entity.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    37. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All companies "need" to make money if they want to continue to exist. Which is typically how the word "need" is used.

    38. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spying on you is more important than making money. The smartphone was invented to spy on you, constantly. Asking them to not spy on you is like asking a leopard to get rid of its spots, not feasible.

    39. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming the GPS otherwise stays completely idle, you use more battery life going into settings and enabling GPS than you save by keeping GPS turned off. It's seriously completely negligible. Now if you're talking about rogue programs running in the background and using GPS when they shouldn't be, you should either uninstall those programs or go into your app settings and disable GPS permissions for that app. Either way, toggling off GPS or Bluetooth hasn't been an issue in several years.

    40. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Smartphones are not a necessity. They are a luxury. A mobile phone is a necessity (perhaps, although we somehow didn't die without them at one point in the not so distant past).

      The problem is that not indulging the luxury isn't an option people can comprehend. They think some kind of law is being broken if the vendor serves it up in a way they don't find palatable.

    41. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Do you "need" oxygen? Well no, only if you want to continue living. Understand now?

    42. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      If they did that, they would end up charging as much as Apple do for their phones. This is the price you pay for cheap Android devices. It's a pretty simple equation really. Google want to sell ads, so they sell cheap phones (and more-or-less give away an OS to other phone manufacturers), and track as much of your online activity, and your real-world movements, as they possibly can.

    43. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Well, we did die without phones. Mobile phones have saved a great many lives over the decades since their invention. Smartphones, on the other hand, probably not so much. In principal I suppose they could lead emergency services to your location in case you couldn't give that information out due to incapacitating injury. But I've never heard of such a thing actually happening.

    44. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll whine all I want and there ain't shit you can do about it. Whining works. Bitch long enough that sales drop and they'll fix what you don't like or another company will. That's capitalism which I know you love. Ain't it a bitch when your beloved arguments get used against you?

    45. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leopards can be skinned

    46. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      I don't recall any differentiation made between necessities and non-necessities. Is fast food a necessity? Because we sure seem to have a lot of selection when it comes to that. On the other hand, Epi-pens must not be a necessity, because only one company seems to sell them and is able to jack the price up to whatever they damn well please.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    47. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by plover · · Score: 1

      As further evidence... I find it veeeeery suspicious that in addition to Google Earth, we now have Google Moon, and Google Mars.

      They are already getting ready to track us there too. The Lunar Positioning Service (LPS) will be online by decade's end. McDonald's is already working out franchise rights...

      Does anyone else find Mayor McGreen-Cheese more than a little creepy? I thought bringing back their old Mac Tonight character for the Sea Of Tranquility store opening was more sleazy than corny, but the green cheese thing always grosses me out.

      --
      John
    48. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on, capitalism IS providing consumer choice: to buy or not to buy.

    49. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

      Except Apple. They just have to fart in the general direction of their customers and shareholders throw more money their way. Sweet sweet unicorn farts.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    50. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. There are always technical solutions to a problem like this available to technical people. It's really a legal problem and needs a legal solution. A few in fact:

      - end the ridiculous and wrong third party doctrine whereby corporations can give your data to the government without a warrant

      - establish that ownership of personal data like location is in fact personal, that businesses may use it in the necessary provision of services or for things like billing but that they may not use it for other purposes (you have to be harsh on this one or some weasel attorneys will try to EULA their way out of it)

      - start treating things like unkillable telemetry as violations of the computer fraud and abuse act

      - make interception of wifi, bluetooth, etc for commercial location tracking purposes (marketing) explicitly illegal

    51. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      It's an issue now... err.. known issue... It's probably been an issue all along.

      I have a toggle on my main screen, it's very simple. I also disallow the google location services, which make very good "guesses" about your location based on cell towers and nearby wifi. I'm not sure how this helps me in any way, I know how it helps Google. If I wan the phone to know where I am, I toggle on GPS, if I don't, I leave it off. Most apps that want to know have an option for zip code, which is what they get.

    52. Re:Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      users do use them for less legit reasons. (Like cheating in location-based games such as PokemonGo or Ingress)

      You are clearly speculating. Ingress will refuse to run if that feature is turned on. Android snitches on you for using it. Try it and see. It only takes a few clicks.

      This is wrong. Giving the user the right to spoof their location is the only way to set the balance of power correctly. Without that, the phone is an ankle bracelet like the ones issued to prisoners, but instead of being supervised by the government it's supervised by every two-bit scammy web ad ecosystem who wants to issue coupons. Helping out an hysterical game isn't sufficient reason to sacrifice this basic adult dignity. Google made the wrong call on Android, even though they made the right call in Latitude and in Chrome.

    53. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a phone that is recommended by security experts and has been thoroughly searched for unauthorized background communication, including all preinstalled apps?

    54. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu phones are all sold out from http://www.ubuntu.com/phone/devices.

    55. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Then don't use a phone. There's no market for $5000 phones with the features you require. They are not always products on the market that meet all of your requirements. You compromise or do without. Again, no are not entitled to such a product.

    56. Re: Fake GPS location spoofer by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Whining works.

      Oh absolutely. I hear that Google's board regularly reads /. and alters the direction of the company based on the comments here.

      Bitch long enough that sales drop and they'll fix what you don't like or another company will.

      This isn't your mom we're talking about here. Unlike her, corporations don't give a shit what you think. They care about what you buy. If you keep buying shit, no problem. They aren't people. You can't hurt their feelings or shame them or make them feel bad.

      That's capitalism which I know you love.

      Well, I know capitalism. You, not so much.

      The ONLY reason corporations exist is to make money. Google is a multi billion dollar company from advertising dollars. Are you really so naive as to think that if you whine enough, they are going to forgo those profits? They will act to maximize profits. If pummeling you with ads gets them there, that's what they will do. The only way you are going to influence them is to reward the behavior you prefer, and the only way to do that is to buy, or not buy their products and services.

  3. This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So finally a explanation why Google Play has started to be the most battery eating component in my Nexus 5. Fuck you Google and your spyware, this was my last Android phone.

    1. Re:This explains it all by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I must admit this news disturbs me, but I don't consider iOS a viable alternative. Would be nice to have a mobile OS without a walled garden that didn't track you.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you getting next? I'm thinking an iPhone, but not sure how good are its maps and navigation.

    3. Re:This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of tracking OR walled garden, which is worse for you?

    4. Re: This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the walled garden. Better security. And unlike Android, iOS devs don't feel the need to have complete access to my device. Why does every goddamn Adriod app need access to my location, contacts, file system, .... When they don't need it? And unlike iOS , you don't have a choice as to what access to give apps. Android s extremely insecure and violates privacy. Android devs are the bottom of the barrel too if they're too stupid to only use the features they need.

      Grade for Android D-

    5. Re:This explains it all by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      If you think iOS isn't phoning home with your location, I have a bridge to sell you. Same goes for ANY phone, since of course the carriers can detect your location from cell towers anyway (and they are, they just are not monetizing it as well as Google).

    6. Re:This explains it all by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be tracked and be able to use my device the way I want than the alternative.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re: This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure which Android version you are using, but you have been able to select individual permissions for apps for a while now

    8. Re:This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I put my phone in airplane mode, even carriers can find my location. If I switch on, I am using their towers to receive calls, so I have to tell the location.

      In this case, my locations are transmitted because my phone is using call service. In the case of Google, your location is transmitted not because your phone is using service but because the service is using your phone to locate you.

    9. Re: This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get these brand new and unlocked for between £50 and £100 on eBay at the moment. I got one and it's perfectly usable and no Google stuff on it at all http://www.tomsguide.com/us/blackphone,review-2442.html

    10. Re:This explains it all by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Suddenly, Ubuntu Phone is looking like a real option... If only the damn thing worked.

    11. Re:This explains it all by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      If you think iOS isn't phoning home with your location, I have a bridge to sell you. Same goes for ANY phone, since of course the carriers can detect your location from cell towers anyway (and they are, they just are not monetizing it as well as Google).

      So do you have any evidence that iOS is "phoning home your location" once you disable the necessary settings? iOS has three settings for GPS for individual apps -- Never, While Using, and Always.

    12. Re:This explains it all by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      If I put my phone in airplane mode, even carriers can find my location. If I switch on, I am using their towers to receive calls, so I have to tell the location.

      If your phone is in airplane mode, the radio is off. They can't know your location.

      But anyway, no. A provider can know your location, but they don't need to know your location for the service to work. Your device connects to the nearest tower, or the tower w/ the strongest signal. The tower doesn't need to know your location for that to happen. And even if they did, they don't need to TRACK your location for the service to work (yes, carriers are tracking your location, all of them, all the time).

    13. Re: This explains it all by bigwheel · · Score: 1

      From TFSummary, you cannot turn off tracking for Google Play or Google Maps. Google always knows where you are, and offers that information to installed apps.

      "Don't be evil" is so last-decade. According to Larry Page, the "Don't be evil" culture prohibited conflicts of interest, and required objectivity and an absence of bias. This does not apply to Alphabet. https://sputniknews.com/us/201...

    14. Re:This explains it all by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      No, I don't. iOS is closed source. I do know that anyone that decides to trust Apple over Google or Samsung has been completely brainwashed though. So are you making an offer on my bridge or what?

      P.S., that GPS setting is about battery life. Your phone knows your location from cell tower and wi-fi data anyway. Regardless, that's a setting for apps, not the OS itself.

    15. Re: This explains it all by joh · · Score: 2

      If in doubt just install Google Maps...

    16. Re:This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually as part of E911 they probably are pretty much required to track your location all the time. Even if at minimum it is coarse grained location based off triangulation of the cell signal. If the phone's GPS is turned off it could likely take several minutes for it to obtain an accurate GPS fix if it was turned on only during a 911 call.

    17. Re:This explains it all by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      Actually as part of E911 they probably are pretty much required to track your location all the time. Even if at minimum it is coarse grained location based off triangulation of the cell signal. If the phone's GPS is turned off it could likely take several minutes for it to obtain an accurate GPS fix if it was turned on only during a 911 call.

      Coarse triangulation is and always will be outside of your control. It's the very nature of the technology, like knowing which CO a call is being routed to or which phone number made the call. With any cell, you can't get much more anonymous than that without it being turned off with the battery disconnected.

      That being said, there's no requirement to "track your location all the time" and, until the availability of cloud-level mass storage and processing, there would be no need to. With one button they can get the current decibel values and hit recent logs and *calculate your location*, but live tracking had no purpose. Now, it *is* possible and *is* feasible and that's why we've got problems in 2016 that we didn't have in 2004.

    18. Re:This explains it all by Myself · · Score: 1

      The tower doesn't need to know your location for that to happen.

      Actually in CDMA, they do, to get the timing-advance that allows soft-handoff to work. It's down to tens of nanoseconds to make the chips line up when they're received at your location, and that means the trilateration accuracy is down to tens of feet.

      Also, all modern standards are based on CDMA for the air-interface portion, because it's so efficient.

      Look up any of the hyphenated terms if you care to learn more.

    19. Re:This explains it all by bobbutts · · Score: 1

      You can install a rom without google play services and sideload any apk's you need. You'll need an unlocked or cracked phone and some time reading up at xda.

    20. Re:This explains it all by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      P.S., that GPS setting is about battery life. Your phone knows your location from cell tower and wi-fi data anyway. Regardless, that's a setting for apps, not the OS itself.

      The GPS setting is not about battery life. If it is disabled for an app, the all can't access your location.

      Settings -> privacy -> location services -> system services

      Here you can disable location services individually for each system service that uses location services.

      https://support.apple.com/en-u...

    21. Re:This explains it all by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      From the OP: "iOS has three settings for GPS"

      What you linked is not "GPS settings".

      Thanks though for the post.

    22. Re:This explains it all by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      No. What I linked to was in response to the original poster saying that the privacy settings that disallowed location services were only for apps and not system services. There are 17 different system services - as shown in the link - for which you can disable location services.

      An app can ask for two levels of permissions when it comes to location services - always and when in use that was my the statement I was replying to.

    23. Re:This explains it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does exist and it is called Android Open Source Project. Just don't install gapps and your phone will never have a home to phone home to.

    24. Re:This explains it all by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      iOS now lets you install any apps that you compile yourself. It's not as convenient as F-Droid, but it's a step out of the walled garden. Unfortunately, such apps aren't allowed quite all of the permissions that ones from the App Store can request.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    25. Re:This explains it all by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      OSMAnd now has an iOS port, but unfortunately it doesn't yet do offline routing (and most of the places I want routing are when I'm travelling and data on roaming is expensive enough that I only want to use it as a last resort).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:This explains it all by AC-x · · Score: 1

      Cyanogen or other custom Android build without gapps installed?

    27. Re:This explains it all by AC-x · · Score: 1

      Lets be fair here, the Nexus 5 has an unlocked bootloader so unlike most other phones it's trivial to install an alternative OS on the hardware that doesn't include Google ad/spyware, or has additional permission settings that can block most tracking.

    28. Re:This explains it all by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The part of the walled garden I don't line is the reliance on iTunes. I don't like iTunes, never did right from its inception. The USB cord from the phone fits fine into my PC so why should I have to use an application to get functionality out of it? Any workaround I have seen that avoids iTunes is clumsy at best. I just don't want any part of that.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    29. Re:This explains it all by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Except install cyanogen and, oops, there goes your warranty.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    30. Re:This explains it all by AC-x · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for all manufacturers, but Google doesn't seem to care if you flash a Nexus, my brother got a warrenty replacement on his rooted N5, all we did was re-flash the recovery images. I bet OnePlus and FairPhone, who also ship with unlocked bootloaders, wouldn't mind either.

  4. XPrivacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Give XPrivacy a try.
    Or you could just trust Google....

    1. Re:XPrivacy by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine life without XPrivacy. Been using it for a few years now. I love the really really fine grained control it gives. Also fun busting apps asking for permissions they didn't declare in the Play Store page.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  5. Welcome to the goldfish bowl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone thought of not using these services, and explaining why not to the salesmen?

    Several years ago now, a UK IPS - British Telecom - decided it would be a good idea to deep packet examine all their customers data streams and sell the results to advertisers. They used a product called Phorm. They wee told that this would break practically all the data protection laws, but went ahead and did it anyway. Then they fought the resultant legal cases until the European Court of Human Rights became involved.

    Whenever a BT salesman phones me now, I just tell him that the reason I'm not buying his product is this history. Invariably, they have never heard of it......

  6. Yes because Android is so useful without software. by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 0

    and really, of COURSE Maps needs my location. how the fuck else am I supposed to use it to navigate? /facepalm

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  7. Simple solutions.. by wbr1 · · Score: 2
    Given the need for location awareness in many apps (regardless of the privacy implications), this makes some sense. Google could make it more granular, but most people want easy. They want to be able to say show me restaurants near me, or have pokemon go work. That said, if you do not want this level of tracking, you can turn your phone off when not in use.

    The power button still exists (unless apple deems it is not necessary in the next iphone).
    BTW, apple and MS location track as much as they can too.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Simple solutions.. by boristdog · · Score: 1

      I prefer to be tracked.

      So if I ever DON'T want to be tracked, I just leave the phone at home and commit my crimes. Law enforcement is so lazy they won't even think about actual detective work any more, they just find out who's phone was in the area.

    2. Re:Simple solutions.. by wbr1 · · Score: 1
      To clarify my statement, location tracking is here. The benefits in devices are many, and you can do without them by leaving the phone behind or off.

      More critically what we need are clear lines into who has access to that data and for what purposes. Google telling me that the drive into work is 10 minutes longer due to an accident is handy. Google noting I went fishing instead of work is a little more creepy. Telling my my boss is worse. Letting gov have the data without warrant is worse still.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    3. Re:Simple solutions.. by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Along the lines of the FaceBook friend suggestion of a prostitute he had just visited that prompted a concerned call from a client. Amusing and scary!

    4. Re:Simple solutions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, apple and MS location track as much as they can too.

      1. MSFT is no longer a viable phone manufacturer.
      2. Apple keeps location data on the phone, so no they do not track you. Your phone tracks itself.

    5. Re:Simple solutions.. by izzo+nizzo · · Score: 1

      You know nothing about Apple's policies regarding this type of data.

    6. Re:Simple solutions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree but its simpler than that. You cant and shouldnt trust apps. Most androids have a quick function to toggle gps so use it and toggle it on when you need it and off when you dont. Sure there is less granular tracking anyhow (cell tower, wifi) but its some level of balance of the granularity of data available.

    7. Re:Simple solutions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't make sense unless it's so Google can track you. Google Play is an app. Android the OS should be caching the location info and handing it to other apps. It makes no sense for Android to only give that data to Play who then caches it and hands it out to the other apps. That extra step is a complete waste of CPU, battery power, and additional code complexity unless it was added to prevent you from ever uninstalling Google Play and so Google can always know where you are if anyone knows where you are.

      It's like a desktop PC requiring you to keep your browser open in order to allow desktop applications to see your mouse cursor.

    8. Re:Simple solutions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My apologies. Other comments are saying its Google Play Services and not the play app. Apparently Google moved core OS features into services so that it could update them through the store without needing to push out OS updates across the phone providers. If that is what's going on, then partial kudos to Google (but it shouldn't be phoning home with the info and services should be replaceable if you want to root the phone). If not, then fuck you Google.

    9. Re:Simple solutions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To clarify my statement, location tracking is here. The benefits in devices are many, and you can do without them by leaving the phone behind or off.

      WTF kind of "solution" is that. Either submit to indiscriminate privacy violation or don't have a phone at all!?

      I don't use location based services on my phone at all, ever. Not because I care if Apple or Google or the FBI track my every move -- I don't. I just have zero use for the feature. So please don't tell me that I am so reliant on all these many benefits that without them my phone may as well stay home.

      'eff that.

    10. Re:Simple solutions.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You know nothing about Apple's policies regarding this type of data.

      Sure you do. They are spelt out clearly on their website. So are Google's, and other than the fact that it on Google's in aggregate it also feeds their anonymised advertising service they are completely identical.

    11. Re:Simple solutions.. by Maow · · Score: 1

      The power button still exists (unless apple deems it is not necessary in the next iphone).

      Well, gotta admit, that would he courageous.

    12. Re:Simple solutions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the need for location awareness in many apps (regardless of the privacy implications), this makes some sense. Google could make it more granular, but most people want easy. They want to be able to say show me restaurants near me, or have pokemon go work. That said, if you do not want this level of tracking, you can turn your phone off when not in use.

      The power button still exists (unless apple deems it is not necessary in the next iphone).
        BTW, apple and MS location track as much as they can too.

      Why inject Apple into this, TWICE? Agenda much?

      Apple has a MUCH finer-grained permission set for Location Services, and actually informs the user every time they open an App that wants to use it. In fact, I have noticed that Google has wanted my location every time I launch Safari Mobile. I tell it "no".

      Apple does NOT track your location unless you want it to. BIG difference!

  8. Clarification by LichtSpektren · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I have my GPS turned off, is it still recording my location? Or is the article saying that it records your location if the GPS is on, even if you're not actively using Maps? Big difference there.

    1. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is with Google assuming you want to be tracked, not whether a setting which nobody will use exists.

    2. Re:Clarification by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      If your phone's GPS is on, then it tracks where you are, even if you told the app not to track your location.

      Need a law preventing non-essential privacy invasions from being standard, let alone not cancelable.

      Every single should have to request permission from the phone's OS to get any information, and if the phone says no, the app can't get that information AND must still be able to do everything it can do without that information.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Yes, it still gathers your location periodically. It can use Wifi, Bluetooth, and cell towers to get your approximate location. It tell you as much on one of the screens you clicked past when you setup the phone.

    4. Re:Clarification by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      GPS is one of three ways "location services" work. It also uses Wi-Fi and cellular.

    5. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The GPS receiver isn't on when no app is using it, even if you enabled it. The issue is that the app store uses GPS often to get your location and sends the location to Google, and you can't disable that without disabling location services altogether. So yes, it is tracking you even while you're not actively using Maps, unless you always disable GPS entirely while you're not actively using Maps.

    6. Re:Clarification by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      I have location tracking turned off unless I'm actually using Google Maps. It's not hard it's a switch on my notification page. It's a power drain I don't need constantly running just like WIFI that's never on except when I'm at home. It's trivial, even my very non-technical oriented wife knows how.

    7. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you first set up your phone, it asks to keep the wifi probing / gps detection on even when decativated. If you agreed to this, you'll have to rummage around the wifi and gps settings to turn it off.

      The functionality is for mapping wifi to GPS coordinates for quick locking and is present in most OSes. Android just happens to be a bit more forthcoming about it.

    8. Re:Clarification by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      The GPS receiver isn't on when no app is using it, even if you enabled it. The issue is that the app store uses GPS often to get your location and sends the location to Google, and you can't disable that without disabling location services altogether.

      Are you sure about that? Because I just did it on my Android 6 phone...

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    9. Re:Clarification by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Turning off" your phone's GPS doesn't actually disable the capability. All phones with GPS are required to be able to use it, even if it's turned off, so it can relay your location if you happen to call 911. So it's not like a hardware switch which powers down the GPS chip.

      The title of the submission doesn't match the summary. Summary states this can be defeated by turning off all location services (same as the iPhone). You don't have to delete Maps and Play as the title states. This being Android, if enough people are upset about it, someone will create a widget which lets you change the setting with a single tap whenever you want.

      I wrestled with it a few years back (when I finally got a phone whose battery would last all day even with GPS on), and eventually decided to leave GPS on all the time. Yes Google uses it to track me, but it's one of those things where you give up a little bit of your privacy (location) in exchange for useful services (real-time traffic updates). It's kinda like bittorrent. Nobody wants to seed because it sucks up your bandwidth, but without seeders the service stops working. People who expect real-time traffic while leaving their GPS off are essentially leechers. And I decided considering how heavily I use real-time traffic, it was my civic duty to leave the GPS on.

      Also, one of the bugs I've encountered in Marshmallow is that sometimes battery life plummets with the battery use monitor saying it's the Android system which is consuming it. I eventually figured out this was linked to location services somehow getting "stuck" on in Google Play. The fix is to uninstall the updates for Google Play Services, then allow Android to re-update it. I wonder if that's the same bug causing the battery drain reported in Nougat in TFA.

    10. Re:Clarification by swillden · · Score: 1

      This being Android, if enough people are upset about it, someone will create a widget which lets you change the setting with a single tap whenever you want.

      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mayhemsoftware.com.locationservicesshortcut

      Not quite a single tap, but close.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy protection removed by Google in 2013

      Crippled version returned. In 2016.

    12. Re: Clarification by raind · · Score: 1

      What about for the iPhone ? I typically turn location off unless I'm using Maps .

      --
      Get up!
  9. Uhm.... article link? by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something, or there's no link to the actual article?

    I thought /. had editors ...

    --
    "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
    1. Re:Uhm.... article link? by wiggles · · Score: 1

      I see it. I just used it. It's in parentheses right after the title.

    2. Re:Uhm.... article link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Editors??

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:Uhm.... article link? by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

      Well, yes there is that link, but odd that all other stories in the page include links in the summary.

      It'd be nice to have some sort of consistency, don't you think?

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
    4. Re: Uhm.... article link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new batch of editors is a bunch of young kids that don't know what they're doing.

      Whether this is a step up or down from the old batch of editors who were old greybeards who didn't know what they were doing is an exercise left to the reader.

    5. Re:Uhm.... article link? by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      The consistency is that every article that goes outside of Slashdot has that little green link next to the title. Links inside the summary are just a bonus, especially if it's a link to an alternate copy of the story where the primary one may be paywalled/ad-block-blocked.

    6. Re:Uhm.... article link? by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      The consistency is that every article that goes outside of Slashdot has that little green link next to the title

      Unfortunately that's not true on mobile. That interface doesn't have the green parenthesized links at all, so if there isn't a link in the story text itself, there's no way to access the article(s). It looks like they updated this one and added the link.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  10. First Location Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First post because I had Google Maps enabled for 4 dimensions.

  11. google play was already denied gps on my phone by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    I followed the instructions to turn off google play's permission to use my location, but this was already turned off. Am I missing something? The article only says the "latest Android build".

    1. Re:google play was already denied gps on my phone by tsqr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I followed the instructions to turn off google play's permission to use my location, but this was already turned off. Am I missing something? The article only says the "latest Android build".

      Are you positive that "Location" wasn't already turned off in Settings when you went to look at Google Play Services permissions? On my phone (6.0.1), if Location is turned on and I try to set Google Play Services location permission to "off", I get a popup informing me that Google Play Services is the source of location services for all other applications, and that if I want to deny location privileges to Google Play, I have to turn off Location (in Settings). If Location is turned off, the location permission is off in Google Play Services.

    2. Re:google play was already denied gps on my phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my phone under "Apps > Google Play services > Permissions" there is no option to enable or disable Location.

    3. Re:google play was already denied gps on my phone by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

      The Location permission switch for Google Play Services is certainly there on my Nexus 6P, running Android 7.0.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  12. Just the beginning by somenickname · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It won't be long before they start selling intrusive ads based on location, time of day, etc. It's around lunch time and you're walking on the street? Your phone buzzes to recommend a restaurant for you. That kind of advertisement could be sold to restaurants based on location, time of day, implied salary, whether you frequent a competitor, etc.

    1. Re:Just the beginning by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      How long do you think that would last? I can barely tolerate ads on a web browser. Something that buzzes me trying to recommend a restaurant would result in me entering to tell the proprietor what a piece of shit I considered him and how there would be icicles in Hell before I'd ever eat in that establishment. That kind of annoying advertising only works if people tolerate it.

    2. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was implemented for Home Depot back in 2013. It's called geo-fencing mobile ads and your location is purchased directly from the carrier.

    3. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already happening. From the article:

      Security researcher Mustafa Al-Bassam reported on Twitter that he "almost had a heart attack" when he walked into a McDonald's and was prompted on his phone to download the fast food restaurant's app.

    4. Re:Just the beginning by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      It won't be long before they start selling intrusive ads based on location, time of day, etc.

      How about you complain about that when it happens? Or maybe you don't have enough real problems in your life that you are imagining possible problems and fretting over those? Shit, what if they start sending your p0rnographic photos when they detect your mom visiting?

      I mean really, if it happens, and you don't like it, get a different phone that doesn't have that behavior. Problem solved.

      Also, I'm pretty sure they have already developed software that can detect the time of day, so that ship has sailed.

    5. Re:Just the beginning by somenickname · · Score: 1

      If it's a choice between giving up their phones and tolerating intrusive daily ads that are derived from spying on you, most people will pick the phone without hesitation.

    6. Re:Just the beginning by robogoofers · · Score: 1

      You might even end up eating at one of those restaurants! For shame, Google.

    7. Re:Just the beginning by somenickname · · Score: 1

      I'm not complaining, just pointing out the logical progression of what a Big Data company that makes money on advertising will do once it knows your position 24 hours a day. I could see the writing on the wall several years ago so just stopped carrying a cell phone. It's actually quite pleasant. I can have a conversation with someone without checking my phone every 10 seconds, no one has the expectation that they can get a hold of me 24/7 (and none of the ensuing drama when they can't), I don't have to worry about Google/Verizon/NSA tracking my every move, etc, etc. My point is that this kind of GPS tracking is just another Con to weigh against the Pros of owning a cell phone. For some people, this kind of thing might be the tipping point.

    8. Re:Just the beginning by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Wasn't this the Apple Beacon shit?

    9. Re:Just the beginning by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I think there will always be an alternative. Most of the crap on my Wife's phone comes from her Facebook app. She refuses to get rid of it as she likes being able to easily converse and share pictures with family and friends online. I tell her it's a drain on her phone and almost qualifies as malware but she tolerates it because of the benefit to her. Then she wonders why my phone works so much better than hers despite mine being 2 years older. Most people are like her but there are still enough people like me that don't like taking shit off of companies when we are paying for a service.

    10. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do that today already, StepOrTwo app does that, in it you do have granular permissions to turn types of ads on and off and you can post your own ad in it and others might be notified as they approach you about your offer.

    11. Re:Just the beginning by epine · · Score: 1

      If it's a choice between giving up their phones and tolerating intrusive daily ads that are derived from spying on you, most people will pick the phone without hesitation.

      Most of us go with the flow 90% of the time. The other 10% of the time we're lectured about what "most people" do. To which I answer "yes, indeed, most of us go with the flow 90% of the time, now get out of my way, jerkface, because right bloody now is the other 10%".

      There is, of course, a lunatic fringe minority who make a point 100% of the time to always do what most people do, to whom I say "you're really weird, you know that, don't you?"

    12. Re:Just the beginning by rainer_d · · Score: 1

      You would maybe go into one shop. But not into three dozen shops while you happen to walk through the mall during lunchtime.

      Would you buy an iPhone instead?

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    13. Re: Just the beginning by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 2

      Uh, if you frequent McDonalds frequently you're probably at risk of a heart attack regardless of what your phone is doing.

    14. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same with me, I have a limited set of apps on my phone and tend to replace it only 3-4 years. I actually just replaced my (heavily modded) s4 with the unlocked honor 8, more control, memory, cpu, and features, 1/2 the cost. in 3-4 yrs, I'll start looking at replacing this one depending on custom rom support.

    15. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      adsense/adwords did that for like at least 10 years by now...

    16. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see one way around this. Everything nowadays is based on user ratings. If you see annoying ads, find that business and downvote it - foursquare, app store, booking or wherever else you think of. Send an angry message on their Facebook/Twitter.
      The thing is, businesses use advertising to get revenue. If they get bad returns from one channel they stop using it.

    17. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's already happening that's why you get asked if you want to installa the mc donalds app when you enter a mc donalds

      they haven't gone completely overboard with it yet, but give it a couple of years, they will

    18. Re:Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't be long before they start selling intrusive ads based on location, time of day, etc.

      Already done. We'll be driving down the street past a Jiffy Lube and my wife's phone goes Bzzzzt! Do you need an oil change? And it's not particularly smart about it, since we'll get it at 10 PM when they are closed for the day. God knows what she turned on/installed to get that "feature".

       

    19. Re:Just the beginning by allo · · Score: 1

      They already do. Some person reported, that he got prompted to install a mc donalds app when entering the restaurant.

    20. Re:Just the beginning by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      it's already happening that's why you get asked if you want to installa the mc donalds app when you enter a mc donalds

      No, it asks you if you want to pay using Android Pay if you enter a McDonalds. Well, that's what Android does. Maybe Apple does what you say, I don't know (but I doubt it).

      And here you go: turn off Android Pay. Problem solved. See how easy that was?

      they haven't gone completely overboard with it yet, but give it a couple of years, they will

      See above where I wrote about complaining about things when they actually happen.

    21. Re:Just the beginning by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Probably not. I can see a custom ROM in that future though. If not then maybe I'd have to bow to Apple assuming they don't participate in that madness.

  13. Re:Yes because Android is so useful without softwa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To be obnoxious, I've never actually given any app my location on my phone. And I use Google Maps often enough. But rather than using it for navigation, I use it for -- you'll never guess -- looking at maps. No facepalm needed!

  14. What about apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but this post is so bullshit.
    Of course google collects data. At least we know about it.
    What about apple? Could you please post a similar one about apple? If this is to make android users skeptical, then please do the same about apple users.
    Every bigger - and actually not even bigger - company collects a shit load of data about literally everything. There are dildos out there that send EVERYTHING about its usage to the company that made it.
    I believe that those informations are a little more sensitive than a simple location - but that's up to your own habits.
    When you think you're either good with apple or with google then you are wrong anyway.
    Just accept that data is tracked and if not then read the disclaimers that tell it at least.

    1. Re:What about apple? by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      Apple is actually pretty transparent about which apps are accessing your location (or, it seems to be). I noticed the location services icon a few times when I thought it didn't make sense, but I was able to see which app had recently used the location services and disabled it. Problem solved. The annoying location thing with Apple is that Siri can't search the web without location turned on (or at least, she couldn't the last time I tried, which was a relatively long time ago). So, I don't use Siri for that. The App Store doesn't access my location services as far as I can tell.

  15. They already used that trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on mobile data, since I can't block "android system" from doing background data transfers. But eating up my bandwidth is not enough, now they're after my battery. I don't mind tracking though, since I'm wearing a tinfoil hat.

    1. Re:They already used that trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh good, they won't be ble to track your head, which they don't care about, its the phone they do.

  16. Well actually it's still useful... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Granted being able to see where you are on the map is half of the usefulness.

    But just being able to dynamically sort through maps at any zoom level has a lot of value. When I'm in a city I can look at cross-streets and see where I am, then use the map to navigate by just being aware of what upcoming streets (and the few streets before that) are named so I know where to turn...

    But I agree it stinks you can't tell some other application to keep away from location data without disabling map location also.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  17. Re:Yes because Android is so useful without softwa by bano · · Score: 2

    There are non-google app stores.

  18. Usage Cost by ytene · · Score: 1

    This isn't so much a question about the rights or wrongs of Google deciding they have the right to track a user's phone if it runs Android, but more about the implications for the user.

    The introductory text, above, suggests that the Google Store will send your location data to Google, *without giving you the choice*. Now, if it also does this without explicitly telling you, without explicitly asking you to acknowledge and agree, then what happens if your monthly data usage cap is exceeded thanks to this "network chatty" application?

    What will *definitely* happen is that your mobile phone provider will slap you with a usage charge, which may contain a punitive "excess" for going above an agreed limit. Will Google indemnify all Android phone users against excess charges?

    I can't believe that they wouldn't have considered this, so either usage is trivially low, and/or there really is an opt-out with warning. If not this could be another class action waiting to happen...

    1. Re: Usage Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or this article is just an opinion of a poor guy. Period

    2. Re:Usage Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new to the world. This will go "unnoticed" for a year. Then a lawyer will do enough research to file a class action lawsuit. Then, after a year or two of negotiations, a settlement will be offered for 105% greater than the lawyer's fee and everyone get 1gb of free data. In the meantime google will add something to the ULA stating blah blah, we are not liable. Maybe in bold text if it is already in the ULA.

      That or Google tells the providers to simply not track this data usage and "pays" for it in some other way.

      No matter what, google will not be held accountable.

    3. Re:Usage Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe this type of data transmission is exempted from data usage, just like speed tests.

  19. New Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is tracking you. Leave the phone at home if you want freedom from being tracked. Well, as far a cell phone tracking you.

  20. Re:Yes because Android is so useful without softwa by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

    And they are useless, and frequently riddled with malware. I use Google services because they have a value to me. Samsung services (for instance) do not.

    I don't want carob instead of chocolate just to "prove a point". I bought an Android phone because I prefer it to Apple's walled garden, and have more freedom to use my hardware as I choose.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  21. Sometimes a "bad" thing can be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I'm really glad that Google tracks so much with my phones. I'm going through a divorce and ex has lied about so much. One of the lies involves when I was at work and got home. Thanks to Google location history, her lies have already been exposed to the child family investigator. She doesn't know it yet, but will soon. What I'm most looking forward to is using Google data, pictures and video recordings to finally shut her bitch of a lawyer down.

  22. This is why I still use a flip-phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a seperate GPS device (which stays in the car, unplugged if I'm not using it) if I need one for navigation.

    1. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      We can locate you within a meter based on cell tower logs, actually

      Even with your flip-phone

      Even when you think it's "off"

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is "we"?

      Sure, my carrier, the NSA, and anyone with a nearby Stingray can.

      Google, not so much.

      Actually in my area cell reception is so crappy I'm not even sure my carrier can.

    3. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Google can extrapolate it

      You'd be surprised

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can locate you within a meter based on cell tower logs, actually

      Not when I'm in range of a single cell tower, you can't - at best you might be able to make assumptions based on local road maps and changes in tower distance, which will have lower than one meter resolution in the best cases. Not everyone lives in a densely-tower-covered area, you know.

      Also, inside certain buildings all you can say is 'inside the building', which is somewhat lower granularity than one meter.

      So pretty please, with sugar on top, get off that damn high horse.

    5. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      You must live in a very remote area that only one cell tower can "see" it.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    6. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      And, actually, we can infer location inside buildings too. You'd be surprised how much. This is why China doesn't want you catching Pokemon near their sensitive areas. Even the existence of Faraday cages can be located via the impact of them.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    7. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by Yosho · · Score: 1

      We can locate you within a meter based on cell tower logs, actually

      Would you care to share the whitepaper describing how to get sub-meter accuracy from cell tower triangulation? As somebody who has actually done radio direction finding for a living I was under the impression that cell tower triangulation was considerably less accurate than GPS -- usually to within about 3/4 of a square mile.

      If it's so accurate, why do cell phones even bother using GPS, which is accurate to about 3 meters if you're lucky?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    8. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      GPS with full spectra is accurate to 0.1 meters

      You're not using full spectra.

      As to deets on in-building, there are tons of scientific papers on this, grandpa.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    9. Re:This is why I still use a flip-phone. by Yosho · · Score: 1

      GPS with full spectra is accurate to 0.1 meters

      Are you talking about RTK / CPGPS? I'd love it if you could show me a consumer cell phone that's capable of that. Every cell phone I've ever seen is lucky to get 3 m accuracy when it's outside and quickly degrades to >10 m indoors.

      As to deets on in-building, there are tons of scientific papers on this, grandpa.

      But you can't actually produce any at the moment, of course.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  23. And people complain about Windows 10? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why I've said over and over... Anyone who complains about Windows 10 thinking that it is the "big bad" when it comes to privacy simply hasn't been paying attention...

    That doesn't make Windows 10 spying all good, it just puts it into the same league as Apple and Google...

    1. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Telemetry is the new model.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by iampiti · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, Android spying is really bad but that doesn't make it right for Windows to do the same thing. It looks even worse because PC OSs didn't use to do that.
      What I hate most about this is that they don't give you the option to opt out of spying by paying some money. I'd gladly do it. Both on Android and on Windows. But. again, neither one gives you that option.
      Amazon got it right with the Kindle: You can have it cheaper with ads or you can pay some more and have no ads

    3. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by yodleboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is exactly what I said when the W10 telemetry noise started here on /. MS just looked at Apple and Google collecting craploads of data with hardly a peep from their users and said "hey let's do that too". I wasn't thrilled they did it, but wasn't very surprised. I wonder if some of the more rabid posters on ./ really believe that MS is doing something more nefarious with the data they collect than anyone else? MS is playing catch up, the nefarious use is already happening elsewhere.

    4. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't trust my phone. I use it accordingly. I used to sort of trust my PC, but Microsoft is changing that. What irks people isn't the Microsoft-Google comparison. It's the Microsoft before vs Microsoft now comparison. It's been a long time coming. Long before Windows 7, XP had been decried as a privacy nightmare. Windows 10 is just the culmination of Microsoft's efforts, but it's such a big step towards completely losing control over our own data that a lot of people won't ignore it this time.

    5. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What spying does Apple do?

    6. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have Windows 10 OR a cell phone of any kind, thank you very much.

      CAPTCH: dodged

      That being said, I'm sure there's a variety of other ways big brother can figure out where I am at any given time... whether it's by stitching together CCTV footage from various cameras that I pass, or by studying my nagging problem of having a job that I go to 5 days a week, and a home that I always return to. Hell, even the local transients' locations wouldn't be completely unknown. I myself see them wandering along their usual routes almost every day, and I'm just some shmuck. Imagine how precise a TLA's knowledge of their location is.

      You aren't totally without options...
      - go survive in the boonies with the bears and the bugs, and STFU
      - live in society and pick how easily you want to make it for TLAs and advertisers to get a bead on you, and STFU
      - attack some place in a vain attempt to try to make a difference, get your head blown off in the process, and make it worse for the rest of us as a result

    7. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is not even in the same league for tracking as Google.

    8. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Anyone who complains about Windows 10 thinking that it is the "big bad" when it comes to privacy simply hasn't been paying attention...

      Actually we have been, and there's a world of difference between tracking some shitty data on my phone and critical and highly sensitive data on a PC.

    9. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of the big 3, OS X/iOS is the most trustworthy one. Apple mostly makes their money from hardware, accessories, Apple music, and the app store, while Google makes money from advertising and to do that most effectively to earn the most money, they need to know every possible detail about everyone using their products at all times.

    10. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      some shitty data on my phone and critical and highly sensitive data on a PC.

      Your words betray you... You think your phone is worthless and your PC is special, but many people would say you have that backwards...

      My statement stands, you were kidding yourself if you thought you were private before, and this goes WAY beyond your phone, you just didn't know any better...

      Or did, and lied to yourself...

    11. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even windows 7 and windows 8.1 do that.
      iexplorer.exe periodically calls home to IP 72.21.81.200, which is a Skype address, owned by Microsoft.

      If you want proof, load up Resource Monitor and go to Network. You'll see it.

    12. Re:And people complain about Windows 10? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Your words betray you...

      No they don't. You said "anyone". I'm saying there's plenty of people who don't.

      My statement stands, you were kidding yourself if you thought you were private before

      Sure if by statement stands you mean change the statement then by all means it's stands. Actually no it doesn't. It's still wrong. We apply privacy as a sliding scale to different purposes. Just because I accept my location data being shared anonymously with Google doesn't mean I do the same with my credit card information, something which I have never typed into my phone.

      Now if you would agree that what you are saying applies differently to everyone and that people are arbiter's of their own fate then sure, that we can agree on.

  24. Street Traffic by darkain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you ever wondered how Google Maps has near-real-time display of traffic maps on surface streets that don't have monitoring equipment set up by the DOT? *THIS* is exactly how they do it. They track the relative speed and location of smart phones traveling down various streets to figure out current traffic patterns. This is simply another case of giving up a piece of privacy for a free service in return. Love it or hate it, that's how this shit works.

    1. Re:Street Traffic by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a use case (presuming anonymized data points are used) which argues FOR the use of persistent telemetry. State DOTs pay tens of millions of dollars a year to collect a tiny fraction of this data for traffic studies. All the while, we sit on an amazingly complete set of data which, though crowdsourced traffic mapping, has become a reality.

      Of all the seemingly infinite ways this data can be misused, traffic and route mapping data falls outside of the "always bad" mantra.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Street Traffic by kmg90 · · Score: 1

      They (Google) also have Waze, which is ALL about transmitting location data for the sake of identifying traffic conditions. Would be a little shocked if they didn't share data between services at this point.

    3. Re:Street Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you give up your privacy so that you know how long you're going to be in a traffic jam, you don't deserve the freedom you have.

    4. Re:Street Traffic by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Have you ever wondered how Google Maps has near-real-time display of traffic maps on surface streets that don't have monitoring equipment set up by the DOT? *THIS* is exactly how they do it.

      True. Google has been doing this since the beginning of Android. I think the complaint is that the location services subsystem has become integrated with Google Play. In the past, you used to be able to turn off location services and your phone worked fine. Not anymore.

      Basically Google Play has become the Systemd of Android. It's been that way for a while now (since Lollipop?). Someone finally realized this and is mad about it.

      Personally, my complaint is the new software strategy kills performance. That's why my Nexus is still on Kit Kat.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    5. Re:Street Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your data are belong to the Google!

    6. Re:Street Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you ever wondered how Google Maps has near-real-time display of traffic maps on surface streets that don't have monitoring equipment set up by the DOT? *THIS* is exactly how they do it. They track the relative speed and location of smart phones traveling down various streets to figure out current traffic patterns. This is simply another case of giving up a piece of privacy for a free service in return. Love it or hate it, that's how this shit works.

      No, actually, it isn't, because that wouldn't work.

      GPS is far too power hungry to turn on all the time, or even intermittently, and network and Wifi location aren't precise enough. Google Maps gets its traffic data from people who are using apps that have the GPS on so accurate location is available. The biggest such sources are people using Google Maps or Waze for navigation.

    7. Re:Street Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if properly anonymized I think the good outweighs any possible harm. The problem is, that alone doesn't justify all the other abuses in tracking individuals.

    8. Re:Street Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I said above: I'm not sure that's how it works at all. Google owns Waze and Waze users give such data. So, it's opt-in crowd-sourced supplied data.

    9. Re:Street Traffic by zennyboy · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the 'Doze' mode of Marshmallow is amazing. If you can, use it.

      Go to bed with 79%, wake up with 73%... I love it...

    10. Re:Street Traffic by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that it's even theoretically possible to anonymise this data, and still keep its utility. If you have location tracking data that's tied to any kind of identifier at all, even if there's no way of tying that identifier to an individual directly, you can still determine who it is by cross-referencing it with other data.

      Even if you rotated the identifier every day, you'll probably find that an individual's motions throughout the day, coupled with other other ways of tracking a person (cellphone, CCTV, general knowledge about where a person lives and works) are unique enough to match up unambiguously in many cases.

    11. Re:Street Traffic by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      It won't be that power hungry forever. And then, this is how they'll do it.

  25. profesora helena e o sirilo dela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a margarita faz um site de merda e coloca o telefone pra encontrarr o traficantezimnho de merda que traz maconha do uruguai. ciúme eu tenho de quem pára de fumar, não de uma retardada que tem um cú maior que o intelecto dela.

    1. Re:profesora helena e o sirilo dela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why we need Trump to build a Mexican wall !

  26. Voyeuristic and Parasitic society Monetizing you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is something fundamentally wrong with this Voyeuristic and Parasitic society Monetizing your life.
    But who is really doing the watching, why are they watching, what are they collecting and what are the doing with it?
    Its my info so if they are selling it I should be getting a substantial cut.
    I should have a right to know exactly the who, the what and the why about my info!
    I should also have the right to say NO and opt out!
    Like cockroaches they can't stand the light of day.
    NSA and advertisers are paying them to track everyone.
    They more they know the more they money can make.
    It seems like every app wants permissions to all my texts, email, contacts, location, blood type, shoe size etc. even when the app would never need that access for its intended function unless it has some sort of malevolent covert function.
    For example why would a fart app need all those permission when all it does is make stupid noises to annoy those around you.

  27. Re:Yes because Android is so useful without softwa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But what if you are not using maps. Can't you turn off location services to maps when maps are not in use? I have been doing that iOS since 2008.

  28. Use Apple Maps and no one will find you by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You won't even know where you are.

    1. Re:Use Apple Maps and no one will find you by npslider · · Score: 1

      You won't even know where you are....

      But Apple does. The Location Reality Distortion Field only envelops the end user.

  29. Seems A Little Alarmist by tsqr · · Score: 1

    Google Play Services claims to provide the location API for all apps, so of course if you turn off location permissions for Play you're going to turn it off for all apps. And if Maps is constantly reporting my position to Mother Google, why is it always pestering me to turn on location tracking?

    Personally, I have never been prompted by my phone to download an app just because of my location. Maybe that's because I don't leave Play (or Maps either) running in the background.

    1. Re:Seems A Little Alarmist by guises · · Score: 1

      It's rather invasive for Google to demand that if you're willing to trust someone with your location than it must be them. Still, you're right, the title is alarmist: if you switch off location services for all apps then there's no need to remove Google Play or Google Maps. Since there are no apps that I trust with that information, this is a non-issue for me.

  30. Location services = always a battery suck by phorm · · Score: 1

    Unless I'm implicitly using navigation or something similar, I've always turned off location services and only turned it on if I've using the GPS, etc.
    Otherwise, it's just too much of battery hog - especially if you're moving indoors or somewhere the GPS doesn't work well - and that's been a thing for years so it's not like this is a new revelation.

  31. Close the door! by robogoofers · · Score: 1

    I can get why someone would want privacy and that's their prerogative. However, it's not a secret that owning a smartphone can compromise that privacy, whether innocuously or maliciously. If you've opened all the doors and windows, don't complain about all the bugs and rodents.

    1. Re:Close the door! by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Where's a payphone at? Those roadside call boxes? Yes having a cell phone opens up a world of snooping and smart phones with locked in apps (such as facebook) that have the ability to track your every movement, text, phone call and contact.

      Gee, modern technology is so wonderful.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    2. Re:Close the door! by somenickname · · Score: 1

      Where's a payphone at? Those roadside call boxes?

      I'm sure I'm not the only one who carries a pre-paid phone in the glove box with emergency contacts in it and the battery taken out. I think it probably costs me $5 or $7 a month and provides me with one of the few truly useful aspects of owning a cell phone without the downsides of carrying one everywhere.

    3. Re:Close the door! by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      well only if you carry it around in an aluminum foil wrapper do you win the price. ;-)

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    4. Re:Close the door! by somenickname · · Score: 1

      Not possible. All my tinfoil has already been earmarked for making hats.

  32. Android 6 by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Finally allows me to select permissions for apps and services. Sure it'll bitch and yell "The sky will fall" but it hasn't.
    Google Play location services have been disabled on my phone for awhile already.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  33. No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > They made their money when I bought the goddamn phone.

    No, no they didn't. Google doesn't charge money for Android. That's why you can get an Android phone for $15. They made nothing when you bought your phone. They make money while you use your phone.

    If you prefer to pay for your phone in cash at the time of purchase, you can buy an iPhone for $650. Apple makes money when you buy your phone.

    Of course, the iPhone also tracks you by default, but by paying $650 you can turn location tracking off. Well you can turn it off completely on Android too, but anyway, no Google didn't make money when you bought your phone. The store you bought it from made money, the company that made the phone made money, hell even Microsoft made money, not so much Google.

    1. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by npslider · · Score: 1

      In Google Russia you are the product.

    2. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought my phone from Google. I'm pretty sure they made bank.

    3. Re: No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm still pretty sure they didn't make squat. Google doesn't build phones, not even the ones with their name on it.

    4. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by plover · · Score: 1

      Their revenue model is not the customer's problem. If they can't make money on the sale, why does that mean customers must give up their privacy unwittingly? Is there a reason you can't pay the true cost up front, instead of giving up privacy?

      Could it be that Google is an advertising company, and makes far more money over time through third-party sales of your location data to sleazy marketers? Ergo, if they don't sell their OS for a profit up front, it can be nothing but sleaze all the way down.

      --
      John
    5. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't charge money for Android

      This is true, however Google does have various deals for installing the Play store. In particular, device vendors only get it for free if they bundle all of the other Google Spyware junk on the phone.

      Looking at my phone now, the only app that I have installed from Google Play is the United Airlines app (easier than printing boarding passes) and that's also in the Amazon store. I'm tempted to replace the stock firmware with CyanogenMod and not install the Google apps at all.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      I am genuinely curious: What do you use on your phone? Do you use email with your own hosting etc.? If you are switching to the Amazon store, you might not be the product, but Jeff is going to try his hardest to sell you other products.

    7. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      For Maps, I use OSMAnd~, which has offline vector maps and offline routing.

      For mail, I use K9 Mail, with a few email accounts (one of which I host myself).

      For SMS, I use QKSMS.

      For calendars, I use Etar.

      For web browsing, I use Firefox with the self-destructing cookies plugin, which is the first mobile browser I found with a sensible policy for cookies.

      For the camera, I use OpenCamera.

      For all SIP calls, I use CSipSimple.

      For eBooks, I use FBReader

      For keeping track of dead trees, I use Book Catalogue.

      Looking at Google Play, it turns out that I also have the Radio Paradise app installed from the Play store. None of the other things from there are things that I remember using. I installed the Amazon app store for its free app of the day a while ago (and got Bloons TD 5 from that, which is why it's stayed installed), but pretty much everything I actually use regularly comes from F-Droid.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Thank you. This is informative.

    9. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      You mean from the Google Store? Google doesn't make hardware (well, I heard they made the Pixel C). The contract companies like HTC, LG, and Samsung to make phones that are Google branded. They supply the software. The profits from the sale go to the hardware company, not Google.

      Regardless, Nexus devices are priced for slim margins to begin with and never sell at quantities that would get them economies of scale. You think they make bank by selling Nexus phones devices for hundreds less than Samsung, HTC, and Apple?

    10. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      If they can't make money on the sale, why does that mean customers must give up their privacy unwittingly?

      It doesn't. DON'T BUY THE PHONE.

      It's not that they can't, but that's not their business model. You don't get to define their business model. You get to not buy their product if you don't like it. Buy a phone that meets your criteria. You may get less phone. It may cost you more money. But I'm sure your privacy means more to you than those things right?

    11. Re:No, they didn't. $15 Android phone vs $650 by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      You mean from the Google Store? Google doesn't make hardware (well, I heard they made the Pixel C). The contract companies like HTC, LG, and Samsung to make phones that are Google branded. They supply the software. The profits from the sale go to the hardware company, not Google.

      Wouldn't that be like money from selling iPhone going to Foxconn instead of apple as they make the actual phone?

      --
      bickerdyke
  34. Google Play & Location by rlp · · Score: 1

    I suspect we can blame the entertainment mafiaa for this one - Google Play sells movies and TV and the studios want to control access by geo-location to content.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  35. Lack of specifics or proof in article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Register article never mentions what application asked him if he wanted to see a McDonald's menu.

    Google Play Services is simply the API gateway to Location services for many applications. You can still choose to enable/disable Location services from the individual application. For example, I may have Location on for Google Play Services so its functionality is on for application whom I choose to allow it on. I can then DISABLE Location permission on
    Google App
    Google Play Newstand
    Google Play Store
    Google+
    Hangouts
    Messenger

    Then ENABLE it for
    Earth
    Maps
    News & Weather
    Street View

    If he's insinuating that Location services are being sent for an application which has the Location service disabled then he should show proof.

  36. xposed/other roms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the time I switch to Android N, Xposed will be running on it and I suspect I'll just be able to switch this off -- right?

  37. I only have an Iphone and Windows Phone by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

    I never will understand why people use android. Yes, the google integration is convenient, but the performance of the phones is terrible. I bought a brand new Samsung 1.5 years ago, and by this time last year, the thing had slowed to a crawl. Every single Android phone for years has been like this, to the point things like answering calls and texts or entering a girl's number in your phone is a challenge.

    So I got an IPhone 6S and a Lumia 950 just to check out the alternatives as I only had used android smartphones since the blackberry days. The iPhone interface is bland, and the sea of icons is cumbersome, but the apps are fast, plentiful, and I never have problems with crashes or slowdowns impeding normal activity. Windows 10 is a much better user experience, with a far more intuitive interface that is often even faster than iPhone, but the apps are lacking.

    Android is just pure garbage. Mind boggling we have to deal with this.

    1. Re:I only have an Iphone and Windows Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times did you update the Android OS ? Most likely it slows down with every update because of bloatware. Thats what happened to me. I went back to the original OS, and its still fast.

    2. Re:I only have an Iphone and Windows Phone by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has a windows phone. The OS is fantastic, the design of the apps is really nice, the whole thing just seems really well thought out.

      I'm sure though, if it had become as successful as full-blown windows, Microsoft would have found a way of cocking it up.

  38. Play Permissions by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

    You can try to deny Google Play access to your handheld's location by opening the Settings app and digging through Apps -> Google Play Store -> Permissions, and flipping the switch for "location." But you'll be told you can't just shut out Google Play services: you have to switch off location services for all apps if you want to block the store from knowing your whereabouts.

    Is this something new in Nougat? (Does anyone even run Nougat on anything yet?)

    I'm on Marshmallow (6.0.1), and I can turn off location permissions for the Google Play Store, and wasn't "told" anything when I did. Everything else works just fine. I can even turn on location for games or other apps, and they still work, and Google Play still doesn't have access to location. So I'm not sure what the summary is talking about, here.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
    1. Re:Play Permissions by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      You can try to deny Google Play access to your handheld's location by opening the Settings app and digging through Apps -> Google Play Store -> Permissions, and flipping the switch for "location." But you'll be told you can't just shut out Google Play services: you have to switch off location services for all apps if you want to block the store from knowing your whereabouts.

      Is this something new in Nougat? (Does anyone even run Nougat on anything yet?)

      I'm on Marshmallow (6.0.1), and I can turn off location permissions for the Google Play Store, and wasn't "told" anything when I did. Everything else works just fine. I can even turn on location for games or other apps, and they still work, and Google Play still doesn't have access to location. So I'm not sure what the summary is talking about, here.

      I'm running Nougat, and could turn off location for Google Play Store exactly as you describe without issue (actually, it was already off on mine). I suspect the article meant Google Play Service.

    2. Re:Play Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on 6.0, and I turn off every permission I can find. Maps gets uppity if you don't give it location services. Aside from that, the only permissions error I get from a Google app is Gmail constantly telling me it wants access to my camera and microphone.

      p.s. Dear Google, you'll never get camera or microphone permissions from me; not even if you pay me fat cash.

    3. Re:Play Permissions by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I'm running Nougat, and could turn off location for Google Play Store exactly as you describe without issue (actually, it was already off on mine). I suspect the article meant Google Play Service.

      I just checked Google Play Service. It wants permissions for quite a few things, but Location is not among them.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    4. Re:Play Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nexus line of phones, at least, are having Nougat pushed to them right now. (Just got it on my Nexus 6P over the weekend.)

    5. Re:Play Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nougat is running on my Nexus 5X in Australia from an OTA update.

    6. Re:Play Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's new in Nougat. Denying location to Maps triggers the warning mentioned in the article, and denying location to Play Services is not possible with stock Nougat. (I don't know if rooting would allow that or not.)

  39. Good luck with tracking me by techdolphin · · Score: 1

    Good luck with them tracking me. My phone's GPS stopped working. I have a LG G Stylo that is just over a year old, and my daughter has the same phone that is about seven months old. Both GPSs on our phones stopped working at the same time. I would be happier if I had to worry about being tracked. I really like th LG G Stylo, but T-Mobile or LG needs to step up and fix these phones. LG has a systemic problem with the GPS failing.

  40. Missing the forest for the trees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's that Google wants to track your every move.

    Or maybe, more likely, they're trying to make Android suck a lot less by enforcing policy to 3rd party apps to prevent them from hammering your phone's battery by constantly polling GPS. Secondarily, they also can completely sanitize the GPS this way, preventing malicious apps from grabbing data that really could be compromising for the user. Or, gasp, maybe they're trying to have a clean, unified API so that apps work across different phones and OS versions. I'm not saying google is perfect on privacy and such, but compared to disorganized startups with minimal investment in IT and development, I don't think it's really a contest on who people will feel safer with the data residing - you don't read about huge Google Apps breaches, but everyday it seems a new app, service or retailer gets hit.

    1. Re:Missing the forest for the trees by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      maybe they're trying to have a clean, unified API so that apps work across different phones and OS versions.

      Why would such an API be part of the Google Play app again? I missed the part where you explained how that makes sense. Such an API already exists for tracking location, and it's that API that's controlled by the privacy settings. Why make another one, built into an application that most people would never consider removing, that's not controlled by an individual application's privacy settings?

  41. I don't give a rats ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90 percent of the people that think that BB is watching them are delusional.

  42. A salt and battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big brother wants to wear out your batteries as soon as possible so you get on the replace-my-hardware train as often as possible.

    1. Re: A salt and battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a feature Samsung demanded to helo drain the battery fast to stop it exploding.

  43. Um you really can't turn it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you root your device these apps are embedded into the OS. Can't even disable them as some apps can be. I supposed you could sign out of Google but you really have a handicapped device with no Google Play. Although if your creative you could side load apps or join Amazon Prime and use Underground.
    I don't particularly mind some of this, and yet for me Google is too much about tracking and monitoring. They are not very good at security either which is more concerning to me.

  44. Your iPhone knows where you are by Solandri · · Score: 0

    And has probably been recording your location ever since you got your iPhone. Apple is also not afraid to secretly download this location history from your phone. You know how Google got in trouble with the EU because their Street View cars were also recording wifi hotspot info? Apple did the exact same thing, except instead of paying people to drive Apple cars around, they turned every iPhone owner into an unpaid contractor who would scurry around the globe gathering hotspot location information for them.

    1. Re:Your iPhone knows where you are by rainer_d · · Score: 2

      That data was stored only locally. And an update reduced the size of the local cache significantly.

      Also Apple is going to great lengths to keep data they collect locally on the phone or anonymize as much of the data that needs to be sent back to its servers, instead if selling it to the highest bidder like Google.

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    2. Re:Your iPhone knows where you are by zennyboy · · Score: 0

      or anonymize as much of the data that needs to be sent back to its servers,

      None of the data needs to be sent back to its servers...

  45. Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just disabled Google Play and my fully charged battery ran down in 2 hours.

  46. Technological Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A low-power RF jammer at the right frequencies will prevent a GPS lock. Battery life will be long, since you just need to add some frequent spikes to corrupt the data beyond what the ECCs can handle.

    1. Re:Technological Fix by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure attempting to acquire lock uses more battery life, due to constant trying. Otherwise, once you get the location it stops.

    2. Re:Technological Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent point. I was only thinking of the jammer's battery life. Also, in response to previous posts, a spoofing ap would be preferable, but it's doubtful you could get it from the Play Store.

  47. Idiot 'security researcher' by bongey · · Score: 4, Informative

    The so called 'security researcher' got confused with Google Nearby https://support.google.com/acc... . Google also moved core android OS functions into Google Play Services so core functions could be updated without rolling an entire android update(which the oem would never do). Moving the location provider was part of the this rework, so everyone could get the latest google maps turn by turn directions and provide a consistent api to developers http://lifehacker.com/why-goog....

    1. Re:Idiot 'security researcher' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McF50tjuFEs
      There was a DEFCON talk about android phones leaking data.

  48. Dammnnn thats a great app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wish I had thought of this! Would be a great app.

  49. Hardly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a CONSEQUENCE of Google tracking, not the start of it.

    Google has always collected location information from nearly all users. Every time you turn location on, it will nag you to consent to 24 hour location monitoring, even while you have location turned off. And every time you run maps, it tries to turn location on, even if you aren't trying to see a map of your current location. If you misclick and accidentally agree, you actually can go back and fix it, but Google gives no indication that this tracking is active.

    Having not experienced this problem, my guess is that it's because I have location off 95% of the time and do not consent to the full time monitoring.

  50. clarification: Play Store vs. Play Service by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    The article seems to use "Play store" and "Play service" interchangeably, but according to my app list (Android 7.0), they are two different apps. So which is it?

  51. Muddificaton of today's slashdot by shanen · · Score: 1

    You can't delete system apps on Android. You can turn them off on later versions of the OS, but that may cripple the operation of other apps that depend on them. Not sure about Google Maps, but Google Play is definitely deep in the system and there are also security-related reasons you need it.

    Not sure about the GPS details, but the phone can get an approximate location by other methods.

    These are the kinds of technical topics that were once addressed by slashdot discussions, assuming my memory is not playing tricks on me. I'll search some more among the comments that have been moderated "insightful" or "informative", but I'm not expecting much these days. (Expecting even less when I search for "funny". Where have all the comedians gone? Long time past.)

    Of course, it may be a more fundamental problem that this discussion is already on the edge of death from old age. There is a fix, but slashdot is unlikely to implement that kind of dynamic search capability. I would even be willing to chip in towards implementing such capabilities, but even less likely that slashdot can shift to or supplementally add that sort of economic model.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Muddificaton of today's slashdot by shanen · · Score: 1

      Predicted disappointment confirmed. Even worse than the waste of my time, one of the discovered posts actually contained a technical error.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  52. Nothing to hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google probably already knows I'm pedophile. My walking patterns are least of concerns. :)

  53. Why do all the suckers put up with this. by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    I find this absolutely reprehensible. I truly wonder why people put up with this. It's one thing to not care that google tracks you. I don't mind. But I'd be absolutely incensed if I had no way to prevent it and I'm locked into a 2 year contract with no way to have a usable phone and usable maps without granting google this prying eye. One of my kids has a phone which doesn't even allow google play to be turned off (the phone relies on it). Each week we notice data charges when he has used no data. When we trace their origin, it's google play. Now I know why.

    Boycott google.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      with no way to have a usable phone and usable maps

      Oh? So you want to use a company's services and all they provide without giving back? There are plenty of usable maps out there. There are plenty of phones on the market which don't have Google Services (which 1bn Chinese people don't even have access to).

      You can't have it all ways.

    2. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I would be tempted, if I cared and was locked in, to tell my provider that thanks toe the google software updates, they're system was broken. And stop paying.

      They'll certainly switch you to an iPhone or a flipphone if you raised a fuss.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shill much?

    4. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      with no way to have a usable phone and usable maps without granting google this prying eye

      Install OSMAnd~ from F-Droid. Send the authors a donation (that way they get all of it, Google doesn't get a cut as they would if you bought it from the Play store). It does offline maps and offline routing, and generally has much better map data than Google Maps (amusingly, this was even true last time I visited Google and walked around outside the office that contains the HQ of the Google Map steam). OpenStreetMap has my house labelled (no, I didn't add it), Google Maps doesn't even think that the road that I live on exists.

      One of my kids has a phone which doesn't even allow google play to be turned off

      And if you do turn it off, the WebView and a few other security critical components of Android are now updated via Google Play, so you'll end up with an insecure system very quickly if you do turn it off.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Paid a lot to get that phone, and pay a lot each month to use it. I don't consider that freeloading.

    6. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      You paid for the hardware and you pay for your cellular signal. You didn't pay for the services Google provides on an ongoing basis. Those are all given away for "free" so that they can monetize your activities. This isn't a new concept people.

    7. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They give it away free so that they can monetize from me, that does not mean I am required to allow them to monetize off of me. I have every moral and ethical right to turn off my location, use adblock, block scripts, not include full information, etc. If my information is that invaluable for them then they can subsidize my subscription.

    8. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I have every moral and ethical right to turn off my location, use adblock, block scripts, not include full information, etc.

      Absolutely agree with you. That being said, they also don't have the moral and ethical responsibility to make it easy and/or possible to do all those things.

    9. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I paid a lot to buy my bed. I should be able to use your car too.

      Wait what? Since when does giving money to one manufacturer for one thing allow you to get free access to another manufacturer's completely different service?

    10. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Because these applications came with the phone. These apps were a part of the reason I bought the phone, they were central to the phone's marketing. You don't pay extra to use notepad on Windows for example. If they did charge or try to monetize you, most sane people would go use a different program.

    11. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because these applications came with the phone.

      And did so with a specific license and purpose. Why would you buy a phone for the application? I don't know of any of these applications that need a phone. You bought the phone because you wanted the ability to run any application in your pocket. That doesn't give you an inherent right to use all applications in any way you see fit.

      You did not pay for Google Maps. You paid so you can run it and applications on a tiny device. The way you pay for Google maps is sharing your data, everything else is over-entitlement, and as said there are many other alternatives you can use instead if you don't wish to play by the rules. What you don't get to do is bitch about something that is provided to you for non-monetary compensation, not when there's alternatives on the market that suit your need.

    12. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ok, what phone comes with a map for free, no ads, no tracking, no other evil stuff? Right now the phone allows me to opt out (which is bad, all this spying should be opt in) so what's the problem? If it gets to the point where I can't get around it then I'll stop using it.

    13. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      From who specifically? Google? The Cyanogen phones, and every phone sold in the PRC. Every phone not featuring Google Play services like the Fire (is amazon still selling that?). But it's easier than that. The phone isn't a continuously tracking machine, not if you disable location tracking, don't sign in with a Google account, and don't use the Apps. So it's as easy as hiding all the icons in your launcher and sideloading an alternate app store.

      Also I disagree. Users have a tendency to adopt a default and people who care about something investigate further. Things like location tracking being opt out has improved far more lives that peoples lives being ruined by being attacked by a company. But that's neither here nor there. Calling Android's location tracking either opt in or opt out is neither here nor there for a device which gives you a full screen front and centre option without long walls of text or legalese when you first turn it on. Saying it's Opt Out has implications that simply aren't true, not like say opting out of Mozilla's live tile home page which was just there when you installed Firefox and had to find somewhere in the settings to turn it on, or Window's privacy options which you need to find by looking for some text in size 10 font during the installation.

    14. Re:Why do all the suckers put up with this. by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      It's mostly the manufacturer who is freeloading as using Android spares him from developing their own OS and App store infrastructure, push notification service and so on from scratch.

      --
      bickerdyke
  54. Didn't this used to be a tech site? by Conspicuous+Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a lot of misunderstanding here of how location and tracking on Android actually works.

    First of all, google play store has nothing to do with it. It's google play services that provides location services and implements location tracking in Android. That's the service that is used to retrieve AGPS data from the net, to correlate nearby wifi and mobile masts with lists held on google's servers to give location without GPS, and yes to provide tracking data on your location to google. Setting the location mode to "GPS Only" or similar is supposed to disable much of the tracking, but I'm not sure how much I'd trust that.

    Play services is a pretty core component of Android, and an awful lot of things will cease to function if you manage to remove it. You can block play services from accessing your location using 3rd party tools like XPrivacy, but location for most apps will cease to function without a complex set of workarounds.

    If you genuinely don't want your Android phone calling home with your location while still being able to use GPS, you need:

    • Root access
    • Xposed framework installed
    • XPrivacy installed and set to block location access for google play services
    • https://f-droid.org/repository/browse/?fdid=org.microg.nlp
    • http://repo.xposed.info/module/de.r3w6.xposedunifiednlp
    • To remove google maps
    • To have a fuck of a lot of patience

    Thanks google...

    1. Re:Didn't this used to be a tech site? by lexman098 · · Score: 2

      Xposed is a good solution, but Amplify would be preferred over Xprivacy if you're more concerned about battery life. You can directly limit Google's alarm to wake up your phone and take location data. I went from thousands of alarms per day from GPServices (by far the top) to a couple hundred (about on par with Tasker) and it massively improves standby battery life.

  55. Problem? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I'm running Android 6.0.1 and I have specifically disabled location for Google Play Store and Google Play Services has not asked for any location services. I have not been able to find any issues. Of course, the Android version I am using is fairly stock on the ZTE ZMAX Pro.

  56. Other GPS are available by coastwalker · · Score: 1

    Why buy a smartphone with GPS, there are plenty of feature phones with no GPS. Then you can use a Garmin or any other dedicated GPS.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    1. Re:Other GPS are available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a dedicated GPS and like it very much. However there's no way to feed the location fixes to Google Maps. Only the Android map app that comes from the GPS company can use fixes from the GPS, because of Android limitations. Cyanogenmod used to have options to use a Bluetooth NEMA source as the system GPS, but the feature regressed and was never fixed.

      Some of this goes back to the old Skyhook lawsuit. Google really doesn't want unreliable GPS data polluting the map of IP to GPS coordinate and wifi bssid to GPS coordinate that Android users are constantly running about collecting for them, from the air, and from infiltrated networks when unsuspecting hosts give their wifi passwords to Android-using guests and get their IP addresses mapped.

  57. More news at 11 by jstwinkles · · Score: 1

    Not that I'm against spreading awareness about the privacy/security concerns that come along with constant tracking like this, but how is this news exactly? Google Play Services has always been bad about destroying my battery's charge because of its constant need to know my location, among other things, and it always broke whenever I tried to deny it permissions so I was just forced to turn off location globally in the settings anyway. Perhaps the experience was different for others, but if you're truly concerned about it, install an aftermarket OS without Gapps. At least Google provides access to the data it collects about you and offers a way to supposedly delete it, as opposed to companies like Microsoft that use malware tactics to trick you into providing it and then don't give you a way to delete it, at least that I'm aware of.

  58. problem? by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

    So android play - It's also the permission manager for android apps right? It needs to have location permission before it can pass your location safely to third party apps you've installed and authorised. And this is a bad thing why? Because google gets your location? Until someone can demonstrate to me that google is using this location information to my detriment, why should I care? I certainly don't want to hand top level location trust to unknown third party vendors on a case by case basis - that sounds like a problem to me. I guess it's time to switch to apple! /s

    --
    "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
  59. CAREFUL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just did a forcestop and uninstall on either the service or play and now I can't get it back. No possible way to recover.

    Stupid me. Just use a firewall and limit access.

  60. And, because Google runs this shit anonymously. by Chas · · Score: 1

    There's nobody to directly complain to.
    Sure, you can PROBABLY dig this shit out, given enough time. But they make it a supreme pain in the balls.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  61. How did this happen? by sinij · · Score: 1

    Really, what the fuck? 10 years ago if I suggested that everyone get a device that always tracks your location and reports it to me, I'd probably end up on sex offenders lists and all kind of other bad lists. Now this?

  62. This doesn't make any sense by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

    Google Play Services is just a library. It doesn't access locations itself, but offers an interface for retrieving location information. Apps still have to have location permission themselves to get location information through Google Play Services (See the description of the api here, particularly the "Specify App Permissions" section).

  63. I have bad news for you by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

    Nobody really cares where you are. You're a tiny blip in a vast sea of Android users, and their collective behavior is what's interesting. Quit worrying so much about "surveillance", because, really, you're boring and not profitable, so Google isn't watching you.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:I have bad news for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is that the spying eats phone battery and causes expenses via data charges. No user was warned before buying a phone that they must tolerate the Google spyware and even pay for it.

    2. Re:I have bad news for you by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      If you hadn't already guessed that, you're probably clinically retarded.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  64. Fork Android! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw You Google,

    girls & boys, time to Fork Android, to make it "Non Evil...." You will stop your contempt for Basic Human Rights!

    Article 12.

    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

    Anon*

  65. I gave you the product name and price by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > Is there a reason you can't pay the true cost up front, instead of giving up privacy?

    Perhaps you missed this:
    >> If you prefer to pay for your phone in cash at the time of purchase, you can buy an iPhone for $650. Apple makes money when you buy your phone.

    > Could it be that Google is an advertising company, and makes far more money over time through third-party sales of your location data to sleazy marketers?

    Not quite. They are an advertising company, NOT a marketing data broker. They don't do "third-party sales of your data to sleazy marketers" because that would be giving up the cow; they'd rather sell the milk. Google sells ad placements (called Adwords), they do not sell the data, the data is their treasure.

  66. Ok Google, play fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Publish a list of all your employees and their locations, continuously updated in real-time. You can anonymize it; no names, just cell phone IMEI, phone number and IP numbers.

    1. Re:Ok Google, play fair by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Publish the phone numbers of all employees? Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a great idea. Dumbass.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  67. I'd say Cyanogen but... by Ilgaz · · Score: 2

    There is an alternative which performs way better than OEM or Stock Android, Cyanogen. The issue is, other app stores (Amazon, various Chinese) does their own evil things if not switched off.

      Google maps is and has always been overrated, disconnected from real World application, its walk and bicycle navigation is a joke compared to "Here" (Nokia) maps.

    The only issue here is a good app store, everything else can be achieved with Cyanogen without Google Services.

  68. Irony by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I installed Google Keep to try location-based notes with a reminder (a shopping list in other words). It only notified me twice: AFTER I had already returned home from said store.

    So silver lining: they do want to track you, but they're still rather shit at it.

  69. An apparently unknown fact? by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    Google Play is not the same thing as the Play store.

    Google Play includes a sizeable part of the operating system. Yes, the Play store is amongst it but go and have a read of the documentation to see what else it contains - some of it anyway...

    Why is this so? Well actually, it is the result of free enterprise - and not by Google!

    Perhaps some people in the USA have learnt just how bad some of your telcos are in comparison with ones elsewhere? They like to delay updates - whether deliberately or just by giving them near zero importance. They have shown how they do not want "older" devices to get updates. They would rather you got a new one. This could end up with everyone not owning a super shiny flagship phone being years behind with the security..

    A few years ago, Google put parts of the OS where they could get at with normal OTA updates. From time to time, you may receive updates even though you are still on Marshmallow or Lollipop . That is Google Play.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  70. New Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I just bought two new batteries because I thought my old battery was dying. Come to find out the new battery drains just as quickly. Their action caused me to spend money I did not need to.

  71. Get a clue by allo · · Score: 1

    It's not Google Play, but Google Play services, which provide the whole phone with location. If some app uses wifi location, the services provide it. in turn they send gps to google, so the matching gets more accurate (and google can improve the wifi map).

    But yes, you virtually cannot stop GPS from talking to google all the time and that's a big problem. And many apps won't work without play (and thus gps) installed, because they use it for Google cloud messaging (GCM) push notifications, DRM management, inapp purchases, location and much more.

  72. LOL Whut ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't be the only person who keeps location disabled until I actually need it ?

    Usually only when I pull up the map and want to see what route to take to get somewhere.

    Other than that, it stays off to help conserve the battery.

  73. GOOGLE IS EVIL... people should be aware of it!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GOOGLE IS EVIL... people should be aware of it!.

  74. I've declared Shenanigans on Google already by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    https://productforums.google.c...

    Google is constructing a complicated matrix of permissions to render the existing permissions system irrelevant. So my specific declaration of shenanigans was because your photos from the Camera app sends the photo to Google Maps. Camera has GPS permission turned off, but I can't use Maps without it. In order to disable the Camera/Maps off, I have to turn location history off which also disables Map's arrival time estimations. Meanwhile disabling web search history removes the ability for me to tag "Home" and "work" locations.

    It's time we get a third phone OS, accountable and controlled to no one. Linux Phone OS anybody?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  75. benevolent overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can google tracking data be used to prove I did not commit a crime?

  76. Yeah, I removed GooglePlay when their agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    changed and I didn't want to use G+. So I'll delete Google Maps too.

    Piss off, mate.

    And if you stop it being possible to remove, then I'll not buy anything, just like with OSes, games, DVDs, internet service and all the other crap that they demand moronic "agreement" to an asinine and feature-grabbing "license" for. Piss off and eat those products, you fuckwits.

  77. If you only fight where you know you'll win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you're a coward.

    Fight what's right, regardless of whether you can win. Even if it's doomed, if you aren't going to fight it, admit that it wasn't that big a deal for you, just an annoyance.

  78. It's beause Windows can't be at fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    therefore those who complain about Windows or Microsoft MUST be partisan morons who are just claiming it's bad because of hate, rather than the thing being complained about is actually wrong.

  79. And what changes if you don't buy or complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOTHING. YOU HAVE TO COMPLAIN. Otherwise all they know is their sales have dropped. ABSOLUTLEY NO IDEA WHY.

    Because moronic fuckwits like you SCREAM that we should STFU and just not buy.

    So they do random shit and that is unlikely to be the right thing, so sales slump more, and they close and no phone company replaces them because nobody will buy what people aren't willing to buy but aren't allowed by idiots such as yourself to explain WHY they aren't willing.

    Why not just STFU, it's VERY unlikely that "not buying the phone" never occurred to someone else, so why the fuck say it? It's just a way for you to whine at someone else and make your "choice" to give up feel better. Not by making it a better choice, but by dragging down all the alternative people out there to leave you "no worse than" anyone else.

    Pure Crab Bucket.

    1. Re:And what changes if you don't buy or complain? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      NOTHING. YOU HAVE TO COMPLAIN. Otherwise all they know is their sales have dropped. ABSOLUTLEY NO IDEA WHY.

      I didn't say don't complain, I said you have to ALSO not buy. Complain all you want as long as you actually take some action.

      Are you really so naive that multi-billion dollar corporations don't survey their users? You think they are just going to sit in their board room "Duh! I see sales go down! Uh oh!".