Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Says It Puts Customers First - But Its Pricing Algorithm Doesn't (propublica.org)

ProPublica has a report today in which it warns Amazon shoppers about the results that they see on the shopping portal. It notes that people often hope that the results that come up first after a search are the best deals, and that's what Amazon will have you believe, but its algorithm doesn't work that way. In what may surprise many, in more than 80 percent of cases, Amazon ranks its own products, or those of its affiliate partners higher. From the report: Amazon does give customers a chance to comparison shop, with a listing that ranks all vendors of the same item by "price + shipping." It appears to be the epitome of Amazon's customer-centric approach. But there, too, the company gives itself an oft-decisive advantage. Its rankings omit shipping costs only for its own products and those sold by companies that pay Amazon for its services. Erik Fairleigh, a spokesman for Amazon, said the algorithm that selects which product goes into the "buy box" accounts for a range of factors beyond price. "Customers trust Amazon to have great prices, but that's not all -- vast selection, world-class customer service and fast, free delivery are critically important," he said in an e-mailed statement. "These components, and more, determine our product listings."

69 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Price isn't everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I buy an item, I will pay more to get it directly from Amazon or from a seller that ships through Prime. That way I don't get screwed if there is something wrong.

    1. Re:Price isn't everything by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I do the same but I do it for the guaranteed delivery dates.

      Problems are very few and far between. And everything has been taken care of very promptly..with the one exception of that one package they lost and I had to reorder all of the items. I did get a refund but it made everything I ordered about a week late.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re: Price isn't everything by telchine · · Score: 1

      If Amazon is the seller, you're getting screwed.

      Doesn't really matter. Amazon returns procedures are very good. If I buy a product from them that doesn't meet my expectations then I can return it at very little cost to me in terms of time & money. If I buy from another seller and it turns out to be a dud, it can often cost more than it's worth to return it.

    3. Re:Price isn't everything by sexconker · · Score: 2

      PPPS: camelcamelcamel.com
      PPPPS: fakespot.com

      Both have convenient extensions. They should be mandatory for all Amazon shoppers.

    4. Re:Price isn't everything by sexconker · · Score: 2

      This man knows how the game is played. Read 1-star reviews first.
      Also fakespot.com .

    5. Re:Price isn't everything by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      I do this on NewEgg also. The people with the biggest gripes are the ones that post the most. So, the most negative reviews are the most telling about a quality product, or lack thereof.

    6. Re:Price isn't everything by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Like everyone else, I've seen the odd newspaper photo of a Fedex or UPS truck dangling from an overpass, but surprisingly, very few packages are evr misplaced.

      There is, however, a cottage industry associated with following delivery trucks around to steal packages off of the stoop.

      Going with a large retailer, especially if you can afford their membership fees, is a bulletproof option. Primarily, if there's any discrepancy, they bend ovr backwards for you.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    7. Re:Price isn't everything by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      The package was lost somewhere between amazon and UPS it showed that it was sent to UPS but it never arrived at UPS to be shipped.

      There only company that is both large and has stuff I actually buy is amazon the only other I can think of that I might even consider is walmarts shipping pass.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    8. Re:Price isn't everything by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      ProPublica is an unethical tabloid. Read it in that light and you'll get it.

      I've previously commented about ProPublica's continuous attack on the American Red Cross, a publicity stunt that goes, "Find something people trust; tell people that something is violating their trust; gain lots of eyeballs". Sound familiar? Do we all trust Amazon here? I mean, I know the corporate bullshit line is coming, but be honest: you use Amazon every fucking day, and you don't feel like you're getting royally assraped every time you visit their site.

      Aside from shit on Reddit, I put something on Wikipedia's talk page because they mention ProPublica.

      ProPublica is an aggressive, overly-political, libelous organization which somehow has managed to keep itself afloat as a respectable investigative journalism operation despite its complete lack of journalistic ethics. Essentially all of ProPublica's statements of fact are factual; their analysis is highly-faulty in extreme ways.

      One repeating theme in ProPublica IJ is the "leaked internal document," whereby they get a hold of Red Cross Lessons Learned documentation--which includes listings of all things that went wrong, why they went wrong, what the American Red Cross must do in the future to prevent such problems, and what continuing effort must be made related to the issues encountered--and carry out a smear campaign accusing the American Red Cross of covering up and ignoring serious operational problems. This is particularly egregious because the evidence they cite directly demonstrates the American Red Cross investigating and addressing those very problems.

      ProPublica and NPR published an article about ARC Haiti Relief following the same formula of muddied facts and malicious analysis: they claim the Red Cross spent money but it went nowhere, because they don't see new buildings and cities and schools. The Red Cross published details about their spending, and ProPublica claims they're keeping those details a secret. The Red Cross provided sanitation services, vaccine distribution, food, water, temporary shelter, and infrastructure improvement--training the Haitian Government to better-respond to disaster in the future--and ProPublica asks where all the schools and roads and homes are. With ARC providing clear and effective aid, ProPublica has drawn a libelous narrative about ARC completely wasting nearly all of its resources and providing nothing of value to Haiti.

      ProPublica's most egregious transgression in that article is accusing The American Red Cross of having 40% overhead because contractors make a profit. By this logic, all of the material suppliers also make a profit, and have overhead; and every worker obtains wages, and thus makes a profit; and so 100% of the Red Cross's spending is overhead.

      Thanks to ProPublica's faulty and malicious reporting, Congress expressed its own concerns and considered holding an investigation into the American Red Cross. The American Red Cross is one of the most efficient charities in the world, and ProPublica's unethical journalism has drawn criticism and redirected funding away from ARC and to much-less-efficient programs. Even Doctors Without Borders, a highly-effective charity with a different specialization than ARC, has approximately 88% program efficiency, versus ARC's 92%. United Way Worldwide achieves a 91% efficiency, and Susan G. Komen for the Cure achieves only an 82% efficiency.

      That means ARC stands head-and-shoulders over most charities and is a model even for the most-efficient public charity groups; and ARC is itself the *best* disaster-response aid group in human history, while its peers are specialized for medical aid, education, poverty relief, and specific causes such as cancer. ProPublica has sought to interfere with the American Red Cross through the simple mechanism of making their readers feel that their trust was violated: people trust ARC, they give ARC money, and they will be very angry if they believe ARC is violating that trus

    9. Re: Price isn't everything by tazan · · Score: 1

      Yes, I used to buy a ton of stuff from certain giant computer discount seller. Occasionally I'd have to eat an item like a computer case because the return shipping was more than it was worth. Then for a while I started using both and comparing the prices. After a while I realized I was only using Amazon. Getting hosed on one product wipes out the saving on all the others.

  2. Scottish musician by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    That guy's given the Scottish musician a load of money, and he never plays my favourites. Jings, and also crivens!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Scottish musician by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Ah, Hognoxious! You'll have had your tea...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  3. Only its "Prime" customers come first... by kbonin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My own data points as a non-prime customer...
    - Not that long ago items purchased using "free shipping" arrived at my door 2-4 days after order; now its 2 weeks.
    - Free shipping orders seem to sit in a queue for up to 10 calendar days before being shipped now.
    - I've seen items in shopping cart suddenly get flagged as 'we're sorry, this product is now only available for Prime customers' and moved to the second cart.
    - With paid 2-day shipping, my items hang around 2-4 days before being shipped.

    For me, this all happened RIGHT as I was about to finally purchase Prime. Since I noticed this, I will never purchase Prime. And I've started shopping around for all my large purchases again, which are now made mostly elsewhere.

    1. Re:Only its "Prime" customers come first... by Leuf · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the sitting around is mostly them using their own trucks to bring the items from your order to a nearby fulfillment center. I notice this more when I order a bunch of unrelated small things. When I order a single large item it still ships fairly soon but spends longer with the shipping company. Either way it gets to me within the shipping estimate time. You just have to be aware that the shipping estimate range is not the same as what you get from a normal shipper where it's usually going to get to you at the early part of the range. From Amazon with free shipping it's always going to get to you at the end of the range.

    2. Re:Only its "Prime" customers come first... by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Nearly every purchase I've ever made comes with clearly marked options for lower pricing, but not all.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Only its "Prime" customers come first... by GrumpyNope · · Score: 1

      Ah I remember those days. Now you pretty much get the middle finger if you don't have prime. I try to do buy my stuff elsewhere now because I don't feel like waiting a month to get stuff.

    4. Re:Only its "Prime" customers come first... by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

      - Not that long ago items purchased using "free shipping" arrived at my door 2-4 days after order; now its 2 weeks.
      - Free shipping orders seem to sit in a queue for up to 10 calendar days before being shipped now.

      Amazon has always given extended projections on their free shipping. So, you can look at it as:
      1) They baited/conditioned you with faster than advertised shipping and switched to slower shipping (now that they've destroyed the competitors/developed a competing service), or
      2) They've been giving you better service than stated, and now they're scaling back on it to cut costs.

      I do agree that the whole thing stinks of "offer exceptional service, drive out competitors, drop quality of service, offer the old level of service for more money."
      But at the same time, nobody made an agreement with Amazon that they would provide faster than advertised free shipping.
      (For the record, my packages come in 4-7 days, in the suburb of a major city. They've pretty much always come in that time frame.)

      As for customer service - I ordered an item (silicone pot holder assortment) from a third party. It was packaged incorrectly, and had 2 of one size and none of the other. I couldn't figure out how to contact the seller to request a replacement pot holder, so I used the customer service chat. After explaining my issue, he responded with something along the lines of "I'm sorry this happened. Would it be acceptable for me to credit your account with the price of the item?" Just like that, full refund for the third party item, got to keep the extra pot holders. That was in May of this year.

      I'm not an Amazon fanboy (Disclaimer: I do own an Echo and a Kindle.) I think it was lame that they upped their free shipping threshold. Selling Prime only items seems like a shitty buisness model. Prime Pantry seems unnecessary/expensive. Their music app is clumsy, their online music library management is clumsy, trying to tell Echo to play music from my library can be clumsy, trying to find streaming video content is like navigating a god-damn Escher maze.

      At the same time, they are doing things right. I've found music I had bought years ago on CD magically available for me to stream. Prime benefits keep getting...not necessarily better, but more diverse. They fill sort of a jack of all trades role. The money I was spending on Spotify or Pandora One (neither perfect) can go towards Prime. The online video content might keep me off of Netflix and Hulu for an extra month or two (if I can find anything worth watching). There is free Kindle content, and soon free Audible content (though I'd much sooner just pay for what I want before I let Amazon curate for me). For $99, I'm not excited about it, and I've been putting it off. But considering a Pandora subscription of around $60/year, to Spotify's $120, it starts to look attractive on its own - and that's before all the other junk Amazon is throwing in with it.

    5. Re:Only its "Prime" customers come first... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      As a Prime customer myself, I won't even consider products from vendors on Amazon that aren't eligible for Prime.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    6. Re:Only its "Prime" customers come first... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      From Amazon with free shipping it's always going to get to you at the end of the range.

      Years ago I used to get items within a week. That's a big part of what initially turned me on to Amazon, its fast shipping.

  4. Re:Nor shipping by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    Must be talking about the free nonprime shipping.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  5. "...and that's what Amazon will have you believe.. by willoughby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Says who? Where does Amazon make the promise, or even implication, that it's search results will show the best bargains at the top?

  6. Wow - What Complete Bullshit by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2

    a spokesman for Amazon said the algorithm that selects which product goes into the "buy box" accounts for a range of factors beyond price. "Customers trust Amazon to have great prices, but that's not all -- vast selection, world-class customer service and fast, free delivery are critically important,"

    If I want to buy a widget and I'm looking for the one rated best or cheapest or whatever, why would that rating be affected by (a) how big Amazon's selection of products is (b) how good Amazon's customer service is (c) Amazon offering free delivery. Those things may be important in deciding whether or not to buy from Amazon, but how is any of that even remotely relevant to which widget is best or cheapest?

    What a load of fuck.

    1. Re:Wow - What Complete Bullshit by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Um, because with third party vendors you don't know what you might get and when. If a third party vendor is out of stock you might need to wait a long time for your item. Amazons website doesn't know if the third party actually has the item in stock. If you buy from Amazon you know it is in stock. Free delivery is kind of important too. Basically I only order from Amazon itself, and you should always choose Amazon over a third party vendor.

    2. Re:Wow - What Complete Bullshit by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      If I want to buy a widget and I'm looking for the one rated best or cheapest or whatever

      Not sure what the problem is. There are a number of different sorts and filters. Sorting by price, lowest to highest, highest to lowest, and rating all appear to do what you'd think they should. The only one I question is the "relevance", I'm assuming that's the "magic" one that shows you what amazon wants you to see. (and it's the default)

      Nothing here discusses their ratings being manipulated. I assume what's being discussed is how the magic sort works. And as long as you understand that what they are presenting you isn't always in your best interest, you are fine. (And as soon as you click on an item it shows you if there are other purchasing options that are potentially cheaper.)

    3. Re:Wow - What Complete Bullshit by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I completely prefer Amazon listing itself first because whatever I'm buying will (most likely) be what was shown/described and will ship quickly.

      Amazon is quickly turning into the huckster's bazaar that eBay was (is?), with the third party sellers doing things like sending used batteries in ziplock baggies instead of the retail packaged items described.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    4. Re:Wow - What Complete Bullshit by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If I want to buy a widget and I'm looking for the one rated best or cheapest or whatever, why would that rating be affected by (a) how big Amazon's selection of products is (b) how good Amazon's customer service is (c) Amazon offering free delivery.

      If you SORT your search results by "Price: Low to High", you will still see the lowest-priced sellers first, and when you click-through to the item, will be offered the lowest-priced seller. Of course Amazon's site is still crap after all these years, and shipping cost is NOT included with that, but still.

      It's only if you DON'T sort by price that Amazon will use numerous metrics to decide which seller to feature for that item listing.

      I've absolutely seen Amazon NOT featuring itself, when they have the item available, but other sellers have the item for a non-trivially lower price. When that doesn't happen, it seems to be because the cheaper seller has a poor seller feedback rating, or else is new enough to have little or no feedback.

      Your A, B, and C are absolutely relevant, in those cases. Most people don't want to hassle with some unknown merchant who might send them counterfeit crap, might disappear and refuse returns or fail to issue refunds, and it's also usually a benefit to spend a few cents more so that the item adds to your free-shipping total, or else can come with 2-day Prime shipping, if you are a subscriber. Amazon is almost always a better choice in those cases, for those reasons. How much of a price-difference that's worth is debatable, but you can do a couple more clicks and find the lowest-priced seller for that item, instead of accepting Amazon's judgement for you.

      Sorry for interrupting. You may now resume your insane and baseless rant against "the man". I'd like to preempt the paranoid ranting by stating I have no connection with Amazon, other than having been a heavy buyer for a few years, and just observing over a long period how their mess of a system works (and doesn't).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Wow - What Complete Bullshit by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'll outright not buy things from third-party vendors. I like my $80 of items and free shipping by the end of the week, versus $73 of items and $39 of shipping that'll get here 2-3 weeks later. I buy third-party when I'm getting 1-cent books, in which case I pay $3.99 for shipping and 1 cent for the book--that is, $4 instead of the advertised $0.01.

  7. I do this... by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I sell on amazon on the side. About 60-70k a year so small potatoes to amazon but a cool side biz. However, competing for the buy box is crucial to sales. One reason that amazon favors themselves and those that pay for services is that the items are in an amazon fulfillment center. This means amazon has control over inventory and shipping. If a 3rd party seller is fulfilling their own items, amazon has no view into inventory levels or shipping times other than past performance metrics (which do play a smaller role).

    Amazon closely guards the exact algorithm that chooses who has the buy box. It is known that they strongly favor themselves (of course.. they want the sales). So much so that I often avoid items that Amazon fulfills themselves unless the ROI and/or rank are very good, or my research indicates that amazon regularly runs out of an item and I can exploit the inevitable price jump during those restocking gaps.

    If you want more info on how the buy box works, there is a company called feedvisor that does repricing and other services for amazon vendors. I do not use their services (I use others), but they give away a yearly buy box bible. This uses information culled from their clients amazon seller accounts to see how competition and pricing and other changes affect buy box percentage and sales.

    http://feedvisor.com/r/resourc... - warning it does require email registration, but it is an interesting read.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:I do this... by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      If you are selling items that are fulfilled from amazon you CANNOT add S&H. That is determined by Amazon and no one else. Also on amazon you have to request permission to have more than one merchant account. They check IPs and other data to try to stop people who do it against the TOS. It does happen though.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
  8. Re:Nor shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not the original AC but Prime shipping often comes days later, I've had Prime items not ship for 3-4 days and then get here 2 days after shipping. They only guarantee the ship time, not when they plan to pick it. This is stated plainly on their terms if you care to look. Prime Shipping is 2 days...if they get around to it. It's happened so much that we're thinking of dropping them, that and their absurd Amazon Video scheme where you don't even own things you "buy". Don't believe me? Try to download and play an Amazon video. No longer works on Windows, never worked on a Mac, linux. They don't have an Amazon Video streaming app for Android, only for the Kindle Fires.

  9. I don't understand the issue by KenHansen · · Score: 1

    So Amazon lists items with zero shipping ahead of similarly-priced items that have shipping charges? So what? They are cheaper! Are they listing their house/preferred seller items before indentically-priced (including shipping costs) items? So what? Somebody has to go first! Dear lord, are we heading towards a 'retailer neutrality' movement where all items offered up get precisely equal ranking? How stupid. Did you know that supermarkets get paid for their premium shelf space (end cap, eye level)? Are we going to have a tizzy over your grocery store preferring one detergent over another through premium placements? What is the issue, really - what is it?

    1. Re:I don't understand the issue by godrik · · Score: 1

      If these items were really at free shipping, then there would be no issue.
      The issue is that they rank it for free shipping. But if you add to cart less than $x (I think it is $35) or if you are not a prime customer, then you are charged shipping.
      So essentially, amazon is not representing fairly shipping cost across sellers. (Which is a hard problem to be honest.)

  10. Business ethics by Doub · · Score: 1

    I guess the few people that still don't know that "business ethics" is an oxymoron don't know what an oxymoron is. But that won't stop them from pissing editos faster than silicon valley interns can piss code.

    Amazon need customers, not sellers. So guess which ones are getting screwed.

  11. Gomer Pyle Mode = On by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Amazon invents criteria for "best buy" which coincidentally match their own products. Surprise surprise surprise.

  12. There's no such thing as Free Shipping by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    I hate the term "Free Shipping." If there were free shipping UPS, USPS, FedEx wouldn't be paid to move Amazon purchases to your door. The term should be "Price includes shipping." And of course the value of this shipping depends on the distance from the shipping point to your door. Maybe the price depends on that, but I don't know. If the included shipping price is the same then those farthest from the shipping point to their door are being subsidized by those close to the shipping points. I'm surprised that some Federal regulator hasn't come down on Amazon and every other mail order company for using this term.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:There's no such thing as Free Shipping by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      what.

      I think everyone knows that free shipping means you won't be charged for shipping, rather than the vendor mysteriously doesn't pay the shipping company. Given how free is commonly used, you're making a meaningless dysfunction.

      And shipping charges very often don't vary by distance within a country. If you're complaining that the shipping companies don't make exactly the same profit on every product they sell, then ok... But I don't really see why you care.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:There's no such thing as Free Shipping by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Within the US shipping costs do vary by distance the package will travel. For UPS check this link for shipping from one zone to another: https://www.ups.com/content/us...

      It's possible that the price of an item on Amazon's web site varies with shipping cost when "free shipping" is part of the deal. For Prime subscribers Amazon knows the Zip code of the recipient of a package and its point of origin as well as its weight. One way Amazon may be evening out shipping charges it pays is by building shipping warehouses all over the country so shipping costs are the lowest it can add to the base cost of an item. But if the closest warehouse doesn't have an item it must make a longer trip to the customer. The other thing Amazon may be doing is figuring price on the greatest shipping distance and keeping the profit when the distance is shorter resulting in lower cost to itself. I don't know the answer to all this and Amazon may be keeping this very secret.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  13. Re:Amazon puts its customers LAST by rudy_wayne · · Score: 3, Funny

    The most likely algorithm being used by Amazon is to take 1% or less of the results that actually matched the query, throw away all the other matches, and backfill with 99% containing what Amazon wants to sell without any reference whatsoever to what was requested.

    Sounds like someone at Amazon copied Google's search algorithm.

  14. As long as they aren't increasing prices... by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...to repeat customers.

    Maybe I'm misremembering this, but wasn't there a similar but more scandalous Amazon pricing technique where they were actually tracking customers and jacking up prices to repeat buyers?

    Maybe they gave that up due to bad press or maybe they weren't doing it all.

    I'm pretty sure airlines have done this -- I've looked at flights a couple of times and when I was ready to book, bam, price had gone up. Checked from another device where I hadn't looked at flights (using a different browser) and I had the original price.

    I know Dell did something like this years ago, too -- logged into their site with some corporate credentials and priced a server, did the same thing from another computer/browser which had never used them and the price was a lot lower.

    1. Re:As long as they aren't increasing prices... by Songilly · · Score: 2

      ...to repeat customers.

      Maybe I'm misremembering this, but wasn't there a similar but more scandalous Amazon pricing technique where they were actually tracking customers and jacking up prices to repeat buyers?

      Maybe they gave that up due to bad press or maybe they weren't doing it all.

      I'm pretty sure airlines have done this -- I've looked at flights a couple of times and when I was ready to book, bam, price had gone up. Checked from another device where I hadn't looked at flights (using a different browser) and I had the original price.

      I know Dell did something like this years ago, too -- logged into their site with some corporate credentials and priced a server, did the same thing from another computer/browser which had never used them and the price was a lot lower.

      Oh they do. I got one of those push button devices to reorder as it made my first purchase like half price. Normal priced item was around $10, send time around $10, third time it was like $13. Canceled the order and threw the buy now device away. They are getting more and more cheaky about raising prices.

    2. Re:As long as they aren't increasing prices... by houghi · · Score: 1

      I use flights.google.com for prices and I have yet to notice any difference in what theysay and what the site says. Nice thing is that some combined flights will have different prices, depending on where you book.
      An example https://goo.gl/flights/ngYD
      Via Vuelling : 84USD on Google, 70USD on the website
      Via Iberia : 107USD on Google. 95USD on the website.

      As Google is indicative, it is a 25USD difference (30%) for the identical same flight.
      I always delete all cookies when I close my brower, so there is that. I only log in to book, not before.

      Obviously there are different sites that can do it, like Kajak.com, that will check several sites at the same time. I never go to the booking site before I have found a price.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  15. Re:Nor shipping by Pascoea · · Score: 1

    I've had Prime items not ship for 3-4 days and then get here 2 days after shipping

    I realize we are merely exchanging anecdotes, but I have never had that issue that I can recall. (Not with prime items anyway) It's 2 days (or less) every time, from order to delivery. Now that they are building a distribution center about 40 minutes away, I anticipate it will get better.

  16. You keep using that word by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    Amazon Says It Puts Customers First - But Its Pricing Algorithm Doesn't

    I think most people understand that the phrase "putting customers first" means "We strive to serve our customers well, with the expectation that we are going to be well-paid for it." So this complaint doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Amazon isn't necessarily going to offer me the lowest prices in the world. They aren't giving away stuff for free, after all. And I want them to profit so they will be around to serve me tomorrow, because I do feel like they serve me well.

    the company gives itself an oft-decisive advantage

    Decisive advantage over what? The customers? Is shopping a competitive experience between the buyer and the seller where one only gains at the expense of the other? This reads like an attempt to alienate a merchant and its customers. It's probably not actual astroturfing by a competitor, but one could be forgiven for wondering.

  17. Re:Nor shipping by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Same here. I've never had a Prime shipment (or any Amazon shipment, for that mater) arrive late. Prime is always 1-day free shipping or 2-day free shipping, and so far they've always been spot-on.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  18. Amazon, oh ya I used them once. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    I purchased something years ago, living in Washington state as does Amazon; I was told I was being taxed as there's a chance they will be taxed. Now if they aren't taxed well they would keep the extra monies.

    Newegg.com has been my shopping area for years now and right after my Amazon purchase.

  19. Amazon? What is that? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    I gave up on Amazon after minimum purchases and refusal to sell star wars to non-prime members.

    When companies start spending that much time and money on ways to maximize profits like this seems better to cut your losses and take your business elsewhere.

    Bad enough the "search" function has always been worthless. No matter what you type into the search box even smashing the keys randomly brings up search results. I don't want to wade thru crap in the off chance intentionally not having a rational relevancy cutoff pays off for them. If you want to screw with me that's your right just don't expect me to do business with you.

  20. Re:Nor shipping by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several years ago, everything I ordered off Amazon with "free super saver shipping" would arrive in a day or so anyway, despite my picking the slow option. Then after they started really pushing Prime, the super saver shipping got much slower (I think because they'd just wait for a week before sending it out). Funny, that.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  21. Time for the EU to get involved ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    the really don't like this sort of thing and will quite happily take the likes of Google on for what it sees as unfair/anti-competitive behaviour. The only trouble is that it takes them an age to act.

  22. Re:Nor shipping by Sowelu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Almost like they were spending extra to test out their capabilities before committing to Prime-level SLAs for more people. It's load testing. Hell, it's what I'd do.

  23. Am I confused or? by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    From the summary it looks like it says: "If Amazon is selling it for $6 + free shipping, and someone else is selling it for $4 + $3 shipping, then prefer Amazon for the buy box". Damn right I'd rather pay $6 than $4+3, I don't care which dollars go to which part of it.

    1. Re:Am I confused or? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Especially when shipping is not refundable.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  24. Relevant versus price sorting by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    When I buy an item, I will pay more to get it directly from Amazon or from a seller that ships through Prime. That way I don't get screwed if there is something wrong.

    Totally agree. Amazon's satisfaction policy is reasonable and uniform, so no surprises or hassles trying to save a dollar.

    Here's something that puzzles me about their search algorithm. The first search will pull up "most, relevant" items. And you quickly scan the first pag or two for the cheapest version and find something you like. Then you switch to "lowest price first" sort order. And when you do this something really odd happens. That item you found using the relevancy search is often not there at all???? That is to say as you scroll down pass the irrelevant cheap stuff listed first eventually you reach the price point of the item you saw before and it's simply not there.

    This also works in the reverse direction too. Sometimes a cheap item doesn't show up in the relevancy search as well. This I sort of understand: it must not have been indexed with the right key words so it gets knocked out of the relevancy search.

    But the other direction I can't fathom. Why would a relevant item not show up in the price sort?

    A cynical person might think they were trying to hide the cheap items from you but I sincerely doubt that.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  25. Re:Nor shipping by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    The shipping from China to the US can take six weeks. Usually, it's much faster, from 2 to 4 weeks.

  26. Re:Nor shipping by packrat0x · · Score: 1

    The shipping from China to the US can take six weeks. Usually, it's much faster, from 2 to 4 weeks.

    I've had same day shipping from Hong Kong. So YMMV.

    --
    227-3517
  27. Re:Amazon puts its customers LAST by packrat0x · · Score: 2

    Actually I get better results using google search with "site:amazon.com" than I get with searching within amazon.

    --
    227-3517
  28. How exactly is Amazon screwing me over? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    This just in "stupid people too stupid to shop on Amazon".

    A couple of clicks and a little bit of math and it's pretty easy to figure out what the best deal is.

    Price and shipping are but two items on my mental list to go through when I'm looking around. The time and cost of buying it local. Tax. Speed of delivery. Hassle factor if it is broken/wrong item/size etc.

    If you can't do the mental arithmetic then you probably shouldn't be allowed on the internet unsupervised.

    1. Re:How exactly is Amazon screwing me over? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Amazon always shows me the lowest price+shipping first.

      This is a ProPublica "investigative journalism" piece. You may as well read Drudge or ZeroHedge. ProPublica has no journalistic ethic and is invested in smear campaigns and moral panic over invented problems. I'm still surprised ARC hasn't sued them out of existence for libel, and can only surmise that they don't want people to take such legal action as validation; targeting Amazon is a switch for them, but not surprising.

    2. Re:How exactly is Amazon screwing me over? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      You do realize Drudge is nothing more than links to everything else, including the so called "real" media.

    3. Re:How exactly is Amazon screwing me over? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it's curated links. Real media says "man with gun stopped by armed restaurant patron," Drudge links to it; media says, "Armed patron was actually undercover cop; another patron opened fire and hit someone with a stray bullet," Drudge doesn't link that follow-up.

      You can do a lot by filtering information.

  29. Duh! that's how Fedex and Postoffic works too by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you can pay for various speeds of shipping. As people use the priority ones more the slower ones get slower as there are less gaps to insert the slow ones into and they get even slower.

    everyone knows this.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  30. Re:Jeff Bozos also wants robot workers by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

    The robots rule the roost at our locality, so no dirty minimum wage meat bags to get drool on your boxes.

  31. Re: Amazon puts its customers LAST by bestweasel · · Score: 1

    Yes, Amazon's search results are often polluted by other items because the search terms are just advisory:

    "You're looking for a 7200z? How about a BTX666? Go on, buy it, they're both laptops."

    I too conclude that Amazon do it purposely to promote their interests but it's their loss because I often give up and buy from somewhere where I can actually find what I'm looking for. It's a joy to find a site with a good search and indexing; conversely on one with a bad search, as with Amazon, I'm more likely to give up and buy elsewhere. eBay has very good search and sort, though you're at the mercy of the sellers' descriptions but that's just a bit of extra diligence.

    It applies to other sites too, say looking for a document or a driver. Intel's site is good. Google's search is a fairly easy standard which isn't often met: phrases, exclusions, dates (the last is why I rarely use Bing).

  32. amazon is teh sux0r by strstr · · Score: 1

    the search and display of items on the site is poor. the way I shop, I like things broken down into

    brands first-particular class of item-all the models with feature comparisons from particular manufacture side by side.

    generally what I have found is every item I buy comes in multiple models with stripped down versions, and multiple upgrades to choose from.

    w/ the current site design, it's actually impossible to locate all the specific different models in an easy fashion. you will literally be going in and out of the results, multiple types of searches, etc.

    also there's lots of duplicate results- pictures for items that are all the same, etc. the whole site is a mess unless you know precisely what you're looking for!

    often times I will have to go and search on the manufactures site and google to try to learn all the available models to choose from- and even then I sometimes miss models.

    example I was shopping for the very best power strip I could get w/ QC USB port and all the rest 2.4amp- I found a 6-outlet Bestek. I had no idea that there was a similar 8-outlet unit also available with identical specs otherwise plus an extra feature: EMI filter built in. What I did see was a worse unit, an 8-outlet Bestek w/ only 5amp's max for the USB ports, instead of every port being 2.4amp at the same time for a total of 2.4amp. I literally combed the pages looking for suggestions, clicked the bestek brand page, and I did a search for bestek QC 2.0- the rare 8-outlet unit was mislabeled and didn't even have the QC 2.0 in the title like the other bestek's.

    anyway I came across it after my purchase, forcing me to return the 6-outlet and get the 8-outlet.

    similarly I run into the same problem searching for many other types of items such as mirrorless cameras, TVs, computers, etc.

    generally, I like to shop by class- I eliminate all the cheap crap, and I shop for premium upper end models only.

    Amazon makes that hard to do w/o lots of searching in and out of the results.

    drrobertduncan.com

    just my opinion they need to invest in a new front end interface- and more advanced MySQL query style search so we can search performance and specific features of classes of items easier.

    1. Re:amazon is teh sux0r by strstr · · Score: 1

      meant to say 7.5amp max*

  33. Yes, and by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Amazon is becoming more and more like a sketchy third-world bazaar. Last month, I bought some hair product my GF liked thru Amazon. What we received were two jars, unsealed and only partially filled with... something other than the actual product. It finally occurred to me that the weird smell of it was akin to linseed oil.

    Amazon quickly refunded the purchase, but even after posting a blistering review of this counterfeit and possibly dangerous product, I do believe that vendor is still a valued partner to Bezos and company.

    If they yet again raise the cost of Prime, just like the higher packages on my cable service, I'll be dropping it as well.

  34. Re:Nor shipping by glazener · · Score: 1

    Whenever I buy a prime item, it always says -"Expected Ship Date" ..., or "Usually ships in ..." if the item is not going to ship same day or the next day. The only times that I can remember not receiving my package by the promised date was either during the Christmas rush 2 years ago and packages that come through the US Post Office where the package didn't reach the post office by the time that the driver left the main office. And that problem has largely disappeared with Amazon putting pressure on the post office to get their act together when delivering their packages. I get a lot of value from my prime subscription, even if the Amazon Prime price is somewhat higher than what I might pay elsewhere. The sheer convenience of being able to order something and have it show up at my doorstep 2 days later is worth a lot. And their return procedures are about as easy as can be imagined. I don't know about Android tablets and amazon video streaming, but it is certainly available for the iPad. I routinely download for later viewing movies and shows from Amazon to watch off line when I'm somewhere wireless is not available. Amazon music is pretty good as well.

  35. I just cancelled "Prime" by gmiller123456 · · Score: 1

    I've been a Prime member since shortly after it started. Laley though, most packages arrive late. And they're no longer as competitive on price for small ticket (cheap) items. They still seem to be competitive on big ticket itmes, and even ship them on time, but I buy those seldom enough that Prime doesn't pay for itself.

  36. Re:Call the WAAAAmbulance by Cederic · · Score: 1

    A lot of their products are also the more attractive option.

    USB cables are a serious fucking gamble with some horrifically low quality ones out there. Order by price and you'd better buy a dozen of the cheap ones to be sure one will work reliably.

    Or order the Amazon own brand one. It's not the cheapest per unit, but it's the lowest price/hassle to get one that works.

    Other products may vary, but going purely on price is always silly.

  37. The comparison tool works fine here by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    In my experience, the "price plus shipping" rankings are accurate and even include the effect of tax. In other words, the first offer listed has the lowest total delivered cost, and so on. Shipping charges are omitted for most shipments from Amazon because I'm a Prime member and thus shipping is free - the listings even say "free shipping with Amazon Prime" and how long the shipment will take. There are some things that are not eligible for two day delivery - those are either especially large and heavy items that would be too expensive to use two day shipping for, or things that must be shipped ground such as large quantities of liquids or big lithium ion batteries. And occasionally something says "may take an extra 1-2 days to ship" - I think some of those are products that they produce on demand, which can include books, videos, and printed items like T shirts.

    If the difference is small, I'm likely to choose the shipment from Amazon because I'll get the package faster and because their return policy is good. If there is a big difference in cost I may take another deal.