Slashdot Mirror


Vladimir Putin Is Replacing Microsoft Programs With Domestic Software (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Moscow city will replace Microsoft Corp. programs with domestic software on thousands of computers in answer to President Vladimir Putin's call for Russia's authorities to reduce dependence on foreign technology amid tensions with the U.S. and Europe. The city will initially replace Microsoft's Exchange Server and Outlook on 6,000 computers with an e-mail system installed by state-run carrier Rostelecom PJSC, Artem Yermolaev, head of information technology for Moscow, told reporters Tuesday. Moscow may expand deployment of the new software, developed by Russia's New Cloud Technologies, to as many as 600,000 computers and servers, and may also consider replacing Windows and Office, Yermolaev said. Putin is urging state entities and local companies to go domestic amid concerns over security and reliability after U.S. firms shut down paid services in Crimea following Russia's 2014 annexation. The plan poses a challenge to the likes of Microsoft, SAP SE and Oracle Corp. in the country's $3 billion software market. Adding to pressure, Putin's internet czar German Klimenko wants to raise taxes on U.S. technology companies to help Russian competitors such as Yandex NV and Mail.ru Group Ltd.

167 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. How a tyrant & dictator by vikingpower · · Score: 2, Interesting

    can unintentionally do the right things: kick Microsoft's, SAP's et al.'s ass.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meh. The likes of Schultz, Druncker and Verhofstad only dream of being Putin, and may strive to achieve some of the particular aspects of Putin's rule. Putin actually is Putin.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      Replying to myself, alas. I see that the trolls and AC Putin/Trump supporters have taken over this thread. This is most unfortunate and wholly unintended.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    3. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by gtall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really? Go criticize EU governments by starting a political party. Gee, no problems doing that. Now try the same in Putin's Russia. The ghost of Stalin is alive in Putin.

    4. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      can unintentionally do the right things: kick Microsoft's, SAP's et al.'s ass.

      ...and after defeating the nefarious Microsoft, SAP's, et al's. the tyrant and dictator would never replace them with software riddled with security loopholes and backdoors they could exploit, right?

      I know it's cool to hate big software companies, but at the very least they have better history of trying to maintain security and privacy than Russia of all places. Be careful who you you side with in this crusade.

    5. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      I call this a win, just means it will be easier for our hackers to get into Russian systems and expose political secrets. As for the business side of it, I seriously doubt Russia paid for any of that software.

    6. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by RandomSurfer314 · · Score: 1

      Why did you misspell all names except 'Putin'? Incompetence or your idea of appearing to be witty?

    7. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I misspelled "Druncker" on purpose because he is. The rest you can put down to laziness or incompetence if you want, but for what we pay into the EU, I have earned the right to spell their names any way I damn well please.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meh. The likes of Schultz, Druncker and Verhofstad only dream of being Putin, and may strive to achieve some of the particular aspects of Putin's rule. Putin actually is Putin.

      How the hell did this get modded 'Insightful'? Martin Schulz is a social democrat while Guy Verhofstadt and Jean-Claude Juncker are centre-right. Not exactly the kind of people who spend their days pining for an opportunity to crawl up Vlad Putin's ass. in Europe, an opportunity to crawl up Putin's ass is the wet dream of right wing xenophobes with either borderline or openly Fascist tendencies like Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders, Nigel Farage, Viktor Orbán, Frauke Petry and their ilk.

    9. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure criticizing the EU in Russia won't result in much.

    10. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by lalleglad · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is actually not true.
      Putin has said that he likes Trump.
      He didn't say, but it has been implied by experts that it is because Putin thinks that Trump is a foreign state moron that he can control much easier than Clinton.

    11. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by macs4all · · Score: 1

      So everyone who don't think like you are trolls and/or shills. Right?

      You REALLY must be new around here!

    12. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Where did I write about crawling up Putin's arse? I was talking about those people being jealous of Putin's ability to rule more or less absolute, without bothersome voters or national governents to deal with. Given some of the things those guys have said and done, it doesn't take a far stretch of the imagination to believe that.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    13. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      I don't believe the issue is black or white.

      Agreed. Nothing is black and white when global business, security, and international politics collide. My comment above was only to provide an alternative view and hopefully provoke more thought than OP's one-sided statement.

    14. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by lalleglad · · Score: 2

      I don't 'know' what Putin is thinking, but I am also not wearing a tinfoil hat, and I am also thinking that American voters in general aren't stupid, and I think that Putin knows that, too.

      And, as I think myself that Trump is a moron, also in foreign policy, and that Putin would think it is better for him to have Trump in the hot seat than Clinton, I believe it to be true.

      Out of curiosity, why do you say Trump and Hillary? Would it be the same to you to say Donald and Clinton?

    15. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      What an idiot. Russia, China, Iran,north Korea, AQ, and Isis have all suggested or outright said they want trump to win. Why do you gop/neo-cons/tea+ type simply own up to that. Heck America's kkk and nazi party are big time behind trump as well.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    16. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I am sure that Putin likes Trump for his American dollars...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    17. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by johanw · · Score: 1

      To avoid confusing Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton?

    18. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by lalleglad · · Score: 1

      Except as something from the past, Bill has nothing to do with this election, so there is actually no reason to bring him in.

    19. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is everyone who doesn't want a new cold war with Russia a right wing xenophobe? I do not understand. Guy Verhofstadt (who is social liberal btw, thus center left) stood together with Ukrainian fascists and nationalists against a pro Russian president. I know it were not only fascists and nationalists, but I do know that someone with profile like Guy Verhofstadt should not have shown himself on the front lines. I should have simply not been in Ukraine at all nor should he have been giving openly support to some groups in Ukraine. Ukraine is a mess, and the EU can't simply annex it. Ukraine will have even more problems to fights its internal corruption than other Eastern European states.

      Ukraine is not a normal country. It is a diverse country with many nationalities, among who Russians are a large minority. When you look at 20th century history you can see that Crimea for example was placed under Kiev control in the 50's or 60's in the USSR because it was easier to govern. At that time they didn't think that the USSR would implode 30 years later. I can understand why Putin wants the Crimea back. They annexed it in the 18th century and successfully defended it against the Ottomans and the British and French Empires. It probably is a symbolic price for the Russians that was 'given away' by the former communists. And error that had to be corrected. That doesn't mean I support what Putin did, I don't like how he took Crimea with a false referendum. But I do understand his motives, the importance of Crimea for defense and why the average Russian might see this annexation as 'the right thing' to do.

      But what does the West do? They just start another cold war. What does this lead to? Russian donations to destabilizing, populist parties. Without the anti Russian trade blocks, we would have had less problems with those people you seem to hate so much.

      I don't hate the people who are stupid(?), ignorant(?) or just convinced pro Russian (although I do not understand why they would), but I hate the ideas of those parties and I'm fully aware of their connections with Putin. That's why I'm against a new cold war. Not because I'm right wing xenophobe, but because I want to get rid of the feeding ground of this "right wing xenophobism". Just ignore what Putin does and trade with Russian companies directly. Ukraine can be helped, without promising potential EU membership and with respecting Russia's wishes to not invite them in the NATO. I understand why Putin feels threatened when a big European neighbor, enters an anti Russian military organization.

      I'm personally completely depressed by our European leaders who keep on embracing Turkey as a democratic nation that should be allowed in the EU as fast as possible, while Erdogan is not much better than Putin. Both are in my opinion equally bad. I would never vote for a party that is openly against Russia and pro new cold war tactics, while ignoring a maybe bigger threat of the new Ottoman empire. Russia only stood in Berlin to liberate Europe from the Fascists and because they were attacked first. The Ottomans stood in Vienna several times to conquer Europe and bring it under Islamic rule, while they sponsored centuries of white Christian slavery that depopulated vast amounts of coastal areas from Spain over southern France around Italy to the Greek lands. And without any reason but Islamic imperialism.

      No I don't want a cold war with Russia. Just a cool friendly relationship with respect for each other and some criticism that doesn't lead to boycotts when we don't agree on an issue. I want the same relationship with Turkey. Let those countries rule themselves and stop them on your own borders including the financial support from Russia to those 'extreme right' parties. In a cool friendly relationship you can gently ask to stop. In the current cold war this is no longer possible.

    20. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why do you say Trump and Hillary? Would it be the same to you to say Donald and Clinton?

      No.

      Go look at the campaign stickers and such for both candidates. Trump's stickers and signs all say "TRUMP" (or "TRUMP / PENCE"). Hillary's signs all say "Hillary 2016" or similar.

      "Clinton" refers to Bill Clinton, the former president. Hillary herself uses her first name to try to make a name for herself, instead of simply being "Bill Clinton's wife". It's actually a smart move. "Clinton" isn't even her last name, it's "Rodham"; she merely adopted the Clinton name when she married Bill, and honestly, it's an archaic and patriarchal old custom that really has outlived its usefulness IMO, and that's coming from someone who is not a big fan of SJWs, "safe spaces" and all that other crap going on in the far left these days. I'm no fan of Hillary, but if I were a woman politician, I'd also want to make a name for myself on my own merits and accomplishments, not my husband's (though she touts her "experience" of being First Lady way too much IMO which tarnishes this).

    21. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Then enemy of your enemy is not always your friend you know...

    22. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why do you say Trump and Hillary? Would it be the same to you to say Donald and Clinton?

      'Clinton' could be confused with Bill, and Hillary is known as Hillary, she even uses that name in her campaign, while Trump uses Trump. So Trump and Hillary seems to be the best fit.

    23. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Except as something from the past, Bill has nothing to do with this election, so there is actually no reason to bring him in.

      Trump has brought him in numerous times during the campaign and Hillary herself prefers to be Hillary rather than Clinton: https://www.hillaryclinton.com...

    24. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      You, Sir, are a moron and a drunk parrot.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    25. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Tuan164 · · Score: 1

      I don't think so.

    26. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      As a non-AC regular poster on Slashdot I entirely disagree with your statement.

      Putin is a very smart man managing complex politics in a complex (eastern Europe, middle-East, central-Asia) part of the world.

      Trump is easy to dislike but he has connected very well with a large part of the US.

      Hillary is my logical choice as I'm educated and tolerant and believe in left-ist ideals. However, I believe she is crooked and corrupt to the core and there is no way I can support her.

      So c'mon mate, it's a complex situation and you do yourself a disservice by "name calling" everyone you do not agree with.

    27. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by w1z4rd · · Score: 1

      Nicely said!

  2. So in Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...domestic software replaces YOU, mr. Nadella ?!?

  3. This will cost Microsoft a fortune by spywhere · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're going to lose the revenue from both of the Office licenses used by the Russian government...

    1. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 2

      I am only aware of this one... gc6j3-gtq62-fp876-94fbr-d3dx8

      Is there another one?

      (Seriously, it's an Office 2000 licence number, I typed it so often, I still remember it...)

    2. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, due to a mishap in bureaucracy, accidentally two different offices ordered a license. The responsible official has been relocated to Sibiria for extended education.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Do you mean for a copy of Windows 10 that dates from about the year 2000?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    4. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      anyone else remember the RQ2D3? or remember what this belonged to? 020736-428526-011875-6507
      good old days when no one called home

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    5. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess... You remember that number because you had to re-install your machine with Windows ME and Office2000 so many times?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    6. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Well, due to a mishap in bureaucracy, accidentally two different offices ordered a license. The responsible official has been relocated to Sibiria for extended education.

      Speaking of which, does anyone know what happened to the guys that Putin ordered about a month ago to decrypt the entire internet in 2 weeks or whatever that was?

    7. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Please, that was the barbaric times of the Stalinist era we left behind us. Today we are a modern society where we reeducate people instead of just punishing them.

      Admittedly, sometimes reeducation takes 25 years, especially when we're short on workers in Sibiria.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They have been relocated to the agriculture department and have now a glorious new career as fertilizer.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by losfromla · · Score: 1

      That sounds a lot like our mandatory minimum sentencing laws for drug-related offenses. Who's barbaric now?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  4. They'll come crawling back by Guyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once the average Russian gets tired of their homegrown software crapping out on them they'll be begging for their Windows 98 workstations back.

    1. Re:They'll come crawling back by houghi · · Score: 2

      They will just reopen the gulags untill it works.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:They'll come crawling back by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      (Assuming Russia is going Linux,) can you tell me which of these came crawling back to Microsoft? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:They'll come crawling back by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      The gulags run on Windows 10.

    4. Re:They'll come crawling back by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the gulag IS Windows 10.

    5. Re:They'll come crawling back by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Informative

      This has happened many times in many countries. The problem is, they didn't choose Linux because it is superior to Windows, they chose it only because Linux is not a product of an American company.

      There certainly are many good reasons to dislike the U.S. and American companies, but, business decisions made out of spite rarely work out well.

      Come back when you have any evidence for your claim that the Linux migrations didn't work out well. The millions of dollars that Munich and France and Brazil boast about saving means there's a pretty heft burden of proof.

    6. Re:They'll come crawling back by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only in the Russian Reversal. In the free world, Windows 10 IS the gulag.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed. However, the GP wanted examples from the article.. I merely supplied them. Your argument is therefore... lame.

    8. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Spite?

      It is done because of your government agencies. They have repeatedly stated that they will hack everyone and everything that they want to. Your laws allow them to force companies and private individuals to help them do that through the software and hardware you produce.

      It is insane for any government computer outside the US to still be running american operating systems, networking gear etc. without at least starting a migration plan away. It isn't the 90's any more.

      Any country that wants to protect itself, its data and it's economy needs to clean house and build out whatever they can for themselves. The internet is not going to survive the next 50 years in its current shape, it will segregate or be a war ground that only massive corporations can survive in/on.

    9. Re:They'll come crawling back by Archtech · · Score: 2

      This has happened many times in many countries. The problem is, they didn't choose Linux because it is superior to Windows, they chose it only because Linux is not a product of an American company.

      There certainly are many good reasons to dislike the U.S. and American companies, but, business decisions made out of spite rarely work out well.

      Come back when you have evidence for your claim that "they didn't choose Linux because it is superior to Windows, they chose it only because Linux is not a product of an American company".

      In many cases the decision to switch to FOSS was made on general philosophical grounds. Since as much as possible about the process of government should be transparent, the software used by government should also be available for the citizen to inspect and study - should she wish to do so.

      There were also other general considerations such as avoiding license costs and greatly reducing support costs, and completely cutting out all the expensive and restrictive bureaucracy involved in licence administration.

      Oh, and many people are becoming very wary of the likelihood that American software contains backdoors or other means by which information may be surreptitiously collected, and possibly handed over to US and other government agencies.

      None of those reasons has anything to do with the desire to avoid an American manufacturer, as such.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    10. Re:They'll come crawling back by toadlife · · Score: 2

      Their software works fine for me. Maybe the problem is you.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    11. Re:They'll come crawling back by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Microsoft achieved its position by creating and maintaining an illegal monopoly. Rewind to the 1980's. Before Windows. Back when there was this thing called MS-DOS and compatibility with the IBM-PC has become the industry standard for hardware.

      There were other OSes in the early 1980's. Some as good or better than MS-DOS. (You also have to remember how shockingly primitive hardware was back then.)

      But MS-DOS was the big one, because it was like PC-DOS on genuine IBM PCs.

      So Microsoft's deal with OEMs: if you want to sell MS-DOS on your PCs, you must pay Microsoft for an MS-DOS license on every PC you make, whether or not it comes with MS-DOS preinstalled. That instantly made every other OS uncompetitive. If you wanted to buy Brand X, you were also going to pay for MS-DOS no matter what.

      And that was just the start of the evil.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    12. Re:They'll come crawling back by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Name one stock exchange that runs on Windows.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    13. Re:They'll come crawling back by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Err... Exchange was written by The Open Group. The company that owns the UNIX trade mark. Ooops...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    14. Re:They'll come crawling back by Archtech · · Score: 2

      So, we have a blanket statement about the situation in many foreign countries, unaccompanied by any citations or sources, and posted by an AC.

      Well, I'm convinced.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    15. Re:They'll come crawling back by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I can name one stock exchange that tried to run on Windows and regretted it. (Now happily running on Linux.)

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    16. Re:They'll come crawling back by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In soviet Russia Windows 10 controls You!

      Wait why does that not make sense even though it sounds right?

    17. Re: They'll come crawling back by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Uh no. It was not. The open.group did a number of the protocols that exchange use, but MS took those and did their EEE to them.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    18. Re:They'll come crawling back by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Come back when you have any evidence for your claim that the Linux migrations didn't work out well. The millions of dollars that Munich and France and Brazil boast about saving means there's a pretty heft burden of proof.

      Er, shouldn't the burden of proof lie with the one doing the "boasting"?
      I couldn't say either way, but the scratch and sniff test says that if migrating to Linux was a net gain more people would be doing it.

    19. Re:They'll come crawling back by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Their software works fine for me

      Except for when Windows needs reinstall because of malware infestation of reboots in the middle of something important, or...?

      I take it that some Microsoft employee with mod points does not agree that Windws is a malware magnet and reboots at random times. Never used it I guess.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    20. Re:They'll come crawling back by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Their software works fine for me. Maybe the problem is you.

      That's customer service right there. And Linux people wonder why their desktop market share can't break out of the bottom 1%...

    21. Re:They'll come crawling back by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Name one stock exchange that runs on Windows.

      Or flight control system - they may exist, I just want to know which ones I should avoid flying on.

      Linux - it's not for grunts (which is a bad thing?).

    22. Re:They'll come crawling back by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Their software works fine for me. Maybe the problem is you.

      That's customer service right there. And Linux people wonder why their desktop market share can't break out of the bottom 1%...

      Most of us don't care about "market share" or bullshit categories like "desktop market share". We just want what we use - phones, servers, routers, micro devices, planes, medical equipment, and even that small category of devices where Linux isn't the overwhelming OS of choice called "desktops" to work the way we want.
      Most people have a phone, use the internet, watch television and use their pad devices far more than "Desktops" (even "Windows" fans who use Linux far more than Windows but are too dumb to realise it). We tend to leave the fan boi "brand loyalty" crap to face painters and other superstitious folk.

      Just because thousand dollar handbags are pretty popular with reality TV stars doesn't mean most people want or use handbags - and if they do, they don't tend to give a fuck about the brand (it's just a tool, fool). Just as most people don't pay much attention to political, geographic, or racial boundaries - it just sounds that way because those that do, have time to make noise about it (except for dem commies - they're all de same - especially the 400lb Ruskie bedsitting "hackers").

    23. Re:They'll come crawling back by Gussington · · Score: 1

      We tend to leave the fan boi "brand loyalty" crap to face painters and other superstitious folk.

      Yet here you are...

    24. Re:They'll come crawling back by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      We tend to leave the fan boi "brand loyalty" crap to face painters and other superstitious folk.

      Yet here you are...

      Clearly comprehension is one of your failings. How hard would it be to look up the meaning of "brand loyalty"? [sigh] and people like you are allowed to vote.

    25. Re:They'll come crawling back by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Absolutely nothing can beat Microsoft software at crapping out. They achieved their position with pure marketing and kickbacks. If those advantages are somehow countered there's simply no way Microsoft could be seriously considered for anything.

      Amen. Just yesterday, I had to clean up two Windows 10 machines that "updated" over the prior night and no longer worked correctly. One machine had a network printer that just quit working. The other had a local printer AND a wireless network device which quit working. Every day is a new Windows 10 repair. I get more jobs from making Windows work after updates than I do cleaning up malware anymore.

      Windows 10 users are all beta (or alpha) testers.

    26. Re:They'll come crawling back by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      LOL

  5. Come on baby by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let it be called KremLinux and all is forgiven!

    1. Re:Come on baby by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let it be called KremLinux and all is forgiven!

      KremLinux is for losers. I'm going with KGBSD.

    2. Re:Come on baby by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      That's already taken, Kripsy Kreme UNIX

    3. Re:Come on baby by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

      Moderate parent +5 Funny!
      Wish I still had my moderator points...LMAO.

    4. Re:Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are not keeping up with the times. The latest version is called FSBSD.

    5. Re:Come on baby by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      That's the krem de la Kreml of distros.

    6. Re:Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting something. We the Russians already have had KremVAX for years.
      BTW, nobody said the homegrown software will be open source or free or libre or whatever.

    7. Re:Come on baby by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      But will KremLinux run systemd?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    8. Re:Come on baby by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2

      Let it be called KremLinux and all is forgiven!

      KremLinux is for losers. I'm going with KGBSD.

      So let me get this straight ... In Putin's Russia, is it KremLinux or KGBSD that watches YOU? ... or is it both? ... I'm confused now ...

    9. Re:Come on baby by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 2

      Got another distro that's way more in depth. it's called KGBDSM.

    10. Re:Come on baby by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Damn it, I came here to post this.

    11. Re:Come on baby by unixisc · · Score: 1

      There is an original AT&T/USL/SCO version, called SVR. So you'd have KremLinux (for Linux), FSBSD (for BSD) and SVR (for SVR4.x)

    12. Re:Come on baby by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Too many letters.
        Kremix.

      That's already taken, Kripsy Kreme UNIX

      Oh, I thought that was KKUX....no wait... that's uh.... probably not right...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    13. Re:Come on baby by wraithr · · Score: 1

      This one sir is absolutely fantastic!

  6. Suprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only surprise here is that Moscow was using Microsoft software at all. That sounds insane.

    1. Re:Suprise by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. All they need to do is have ReactOS fully functional, and all the Windows software that they run will be good for it

  7. Vladimir Putin - tyrant, president, sysadmin by NuclearCat · · Score: 1

    All in one, just great!
    Now he is accused in uninstalling windows and installing Linux?

    1. Re:Vladimir Putin - tyrant, president, sysadmin by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Putin - the ultimate BOFH.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re: Vladimir Putin - tyrant, president, sysadmin by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Well, W already showed what he could do. Why do you keep bringing him up? Or were you thinking of the other yellow belly reagan?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  8. Let me foresee what will happen... by LostMonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let me foresee what will happen... Putin will replace Microsoft programs with ripped off open-source software with minor UI and major back-doors updates;
    Then, with great patriotic pride, will pronounce the motherland's major step towards cleansing itself from western spying and corruption.

    1. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by noodler · · Score: 1

      So, microsoft software after all?

    2. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by guestapoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Base on RT's article, the replacement is MyOffice, a cloud-based, similar to Office 365, running on browsers or as standalone applications for Window, Android, iOS.

    3. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It may surprise you to know that the Russians can and do write their own original software, some of it quite good. It's actually quite common, because even today support for non-Latin languages in western software can be quite poor. Japan and China also produce their own high quality office software and input translation utilities (for entering their languages using slightly modified QWERTY keyboards).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by dingleberrie · · Score: 2

      Who knows... maybe they already have all the Microsoft source code.
      There are state sponsored hackers, right?

    5. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      So, in Russia, software spies on YOU?

      Uh... where exactly is the reversal?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that a good part of the software sold by western companies is written by russian programmers. Seriously I am ashamed to be part of the tech community, because of the incredible stupidity and ignorance so-called "intelligent people" on forums like this show everytime in relation to Russia. And it is no surprise a lot of them live in "brainwashed" America.

    7. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I am ashamed to be part of the tech community...

      I interpreted the original post as claiming Russia will slap a new facade on OSS and claim they "made it" without giving OSS credit. It may not be a dig against Russian programmers, but against Russian politicians who lie, or perhaps politicians in general, who, as we all well know in the USA, often take credit for what's not theirs and blame others for what is theirs. It's not just a Russian thing.

    8. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      a good part of the software running in western companies is written by russian programmers.

      FTFY.

      Of course, most of them don't know it's there...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      A country level agreement is often met with a request to provide source code for "their safety". CHina demands it when they purchase Citrix Licensing, Russia can demand it when they use it for government purposes. I doubt they would need to hack MS to get their code made available. enough zeros in the order price is more than enough to get what you want. This change besides being a thumbing of the nose to MS also supports alternatives which boost their local economy. This is a move to hurt the US financially and boost their own services.

    10. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And what exactly is the problem with that? Any sane and competent national government will want to run their operations with software that they fully control, and that has backdoors that only they have the key to.

      Of course, you can argue that any backdoors are dangerous because the wrong people could learn about them and exploit them, but we're talking about replacing Microsoft software here: that stuff is already known to have backdoors. Substituting software that you've audited to not have backdoors, and have instead inserted your own backdoors into, is a big step up from software that a foreign government has backdoor access to.

    11. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's well known! ReactOS is an admirable project - too bad they haven't had more dedicated resources and goals devoted to it

    12. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Russia can do something like rebuild an ex DEC Alpha CPU from scratch, recompile Windows 7 for that, and then run it. They can then compile their domestic software on that, and it'll be like a walled garden, since no foreign hackers will be able to break into that

    13. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by cyberthanasis12 · · Score: 1

      Replace open-source software with free software and he has every right do to exactly this and be proud of it. I wish I could do the same thing where I live.

    14. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      How? And if it is a difference, how will you deal with other people on this planet *choosing* KGB over NSA??

    15. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by ppii · · Score: 1

      As far as I know it's not a rip-off. Many developers are coming from Lexicon (1980s product with about same age as MS Word) but MyOffice is more influenced by Google Docs and Office 365.

    16. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by whodunit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the constant invasions, undeclared wars and threats on our lives with nuclear weapons tend to kae us testy.

      But the absolute last straw was Wargaming nerfing battleships.

  9. Took them long to start building something of for by dr.Flake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    themselves,

    Would you feel comfortable if the White House, Wallstreet, DOD, DOJ, Police, Universities and Congress ran a complete Chinese software stack? Chinese routers, OS, Firewalls, Office, Mail, antivirus, etc etc.?

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
  10. I wouldn't be too suprised by sasparillascott · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft probably works with every government they sell their software into as far as spying on their citizens etc. (it only makes business sense since these guys control market access and Microsoft has never been a company to quibble over morals) - so I'm sure Microsoft and Mr. Putin's Russia were great partners up till now.

    Now Putin may be wary that Microsoft gives preferential treatment to the NSA (since we know they worked closely with them before thanks to Snowden) etc. or he may just be doing this for domestic consumption (he appears to do alot of this) since their economy is in a tailspin.

  11. Investing in your country by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    This is called investing in your country and people. America, its government, and its corporations should take note.

    1. Re:Investing in your country by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Isn't there already laws on the books that require contracts to be handed out to domestic companies whenever possible?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  12. Understanding the Vulnerabilities by lazarus · · Score: 2

    It makes perfect sense to remove the same systems you target in other countries from your own server farms and run proprietary systems that are less widely known and understood.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  13. What took him so long? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    I mean, really.

  14. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What if they ran on a set of hardware manufactured in China? That would be even worse!

  15. Absolute common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All countries should do this. Use open standards to exchange information with other countries/businesses and develop their own software. Having local operating systems/programs helps expand local computing knowledge and lessens the likelihood of data theft via back doors etc.

    As an added benefit people would be forced to start exchanging data in open formats or their partners/customers simply won't be able to read the data.

    I's a healthy idea.

  16. The perks of being a Russian dictator by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Hello, my name is Vladimir Putin. You may have seen my face, usually on the evening news, but not to worry; most of what you hear is true. Especially from that Snowden. I was shocked when I found out that your government does a lot of --how you say it, "dirty work" or "dirty laundry"? -- without asking for any of our help in these matters; your government firmly believes they are experts in these matters. Personally I have this to say: In Soviet Russia, Snowden is welcome to stay and ski. And here in Soviet Russia we tell Clippy to take a fucking hike, back to Redmond on that Microsoft horse it rode in on. Would you believe I asked to be their spokesman? Can you hear me now?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:The perks of being a Russian dictator by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      It's a joke some people don't like, but the guy has so much debt and so many dirty secrets that the Russians would seriously be remiss to not have him on their payroll by this point.

  17. Check the closet in the bathroom by Philosa · · Score: 1

    I wonder where the servers will be housed?

  18. Re:How is this different from the last 3 times? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    All of those links are talking about different things, they're not five updates on the same story. So let's look at them in chronological order:

    First link (2007): Announcement of Linux to be installed in every Russian school.
    Second link (Jan 2009): Russian gov't working on an official OS for the whole country.
    Fifth link (May 2009): The proposal for the national OS is temporarily shelved due to lack of support from the legislative branch.
    Fourth link (Nov 2009): A follow-up to the first link, where the plan to deploy Linux in every Russian school faces some difficulties. This article is terribly vague and there's no follow-up to this one, so it's hard to say just how bad it was; it could've gotten right back on track next year for all I know.
    Third link (2010): Putin declares Russian federal gov't will move to Linux. Doesn't seem to be related to any of the previous articles, except perhaps as an official clarification of the second.

    Today's article of 2016: Moscow City in particular is beginning their migration to Linux.

  19. Ternary computing too? by robinsonne · · Score: 2

    Come on Putin, as long as we're rebuilding the Soviet Union, bring ternary computing back for a second go-round!

  20. Never heard of free software? by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    Just saying... reinventing the wheel is hard and bug-prone.

  21. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by guestapoo · · Score: 1
  22. Re:Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then a by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    So the end of the communism did not end the shortage of toilet paper?

    For our non-Soviet friends: TP was in notorious short supply during the final days of the communist rule, which led to a lot of amusing anecdotes and jokes like:

    Party Speaker: Comrades! In 5 years, everyone will have a car!
    Listener: And when are we going to get toilet paper?
    PS: And comrades! In 10 years, everyone will have his own little house!
    L: But ... the toilet paper?
    PS (outraged): KISS MY ASS! (literally: lick me in the asshole)
    L: As usual. For themselves, the party has a solution, but for us...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  23. Why not invade Redmond? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Why not invade Redmond? It seems customary practice in Russia to take what you want by force.

    I'm sure some jerk could argue that Alaska was once Russian. That Washington isn't hat far away from Alaska. That Russia never sold Washington to the US. And that therefore...

    What a bunch of idiots. Regardless of the technology (I don't particularly like MS') you should know that coming up with an operating system, a desktop and usable applications is not an easy task. What's the Russian version be like? A ripoff of ?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> you should know that coming up with an operating system, a desktop and usable applications is not an easy task.

      Thats why you just know they will be using Linux.

    2. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Because there's nothing in Redmond that the Russians want?

    3. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the technology (I don't particularly like MS') you should know that coming up with an operating system, a desktop and usable applications is not an easy task.

      I find it very, very easy. I just go to linuxmint.com and look for the "download" link. Installing takes about 20 minutes tops. Much simpler, faster, and easier than messing with Windows. Updating my work computer to Win10 (not my choice) took ages.

      What's the Russian version be like?

      Probably some Linux distro with a new theme? What's so hard about that?

    4. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I'm sure some jerk could argue that Alaska was once Russian.

      Northern California once was as well. Actually, all of the western coast of North America as far south as Fort Ross (just north of San Francisco) was claimed by Russia, though the majority of their settlements and activity were in Alaska. They overhunted until the fur trade petered out, and by that point their North American settlements were economically impracticable and Alaska was sold.

      It seems customary practice in Russia to take what you want by force

      All they have to do is claim there are still ethnic Russians living in Washington and California who are of course being viciously persecuted by Washington (probably true, heh) and in need of liberating.

    5. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the part where I said it takes about 20 minutes to install. That's "usable" in my book, especially compared to Windows 10 where installation and updates are a complete PITA, and the user interface once you finally get it running is an abomination.

  24. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by Archtech · · Score: 1

    For the slow of understanding: Irony Alert.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  25. Allowed by GPL by anwyn · · Score: 1

    The GPL allows you to create modified version of the program without releasing the source, so long as you don't distribute. If they keep all the software inside the Russian government, they haven't distributed. So I don't think this can be called a rip-off.

  26. Re:Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then a by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    > In Russia, we wipe with TPP

    I thought most other nations used WIPO*.


    * World Imaginary Property Organization

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  27. Suggested name: Putinux by Steve1952 · · Score: 1

    It seems only fair to me. Since Linux is named after Linus, the Russian version should be named after Putin.

  28. Logical solution to NSA spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not to use backdoored software.

  29. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Each process will have standard putin and standard putout. You can redirect the latter to /dev/siberia if you do not want to see it (ever again).

  30. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    In the U.S., the software is the *ONLY* thing not made in China.

    That's because it is made in India.

  31. Vladimix by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

    The Russian government should develop their own distro and should call Vladimix.

    Joke aside, it makes sense that that Russian government would want to, and should, switch away from Microsoft Windows; ensuring one's data security is important.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
    1. Re:Vladimix by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I heard Putin wanted to call it Red Star OS but that's already been taken.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:Vladimix by unixisc · · Score: 1

      They are already supportive of ReactOS, which originates there

  32. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

    Damn, someone please do this. make LFS, link /dev/null to /dev/siberia in your build environment and s/null/siberia/g on every package. PLEASE. I know there are nutjobs among you good folk who are crazy enough to do this.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  33. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    Except that Linus is the first name, while Putin is the family name. So it should be more like Vlad the Compiler.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  34. russian programmers by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    To be fair, in my 30 coding career, some of the top programmers I've ever studied and worked with were Russian. Their skill was just vastly, disproportionately better than any other peers and colleagues. No idea why. I'd actually look forward to Russian made software! Except for all the pesky back doors.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:russian programmers by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      And they do well in coding contests (while it's in English...)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  35. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Sounds a bit like my home stdio.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  36. the USA should try to do the same! by 4wdloop · · Score: 1

    ....oh..wait...darn...they are in...Redmond, WA!

    --
    4wdloop
  37. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by spacepimp · · Score: 1

    From a hardware perspective (which can easily hide/mask mal intent) almost all of the hardware we purchase is difficult to trust. Add in the firmware added by the NSA for things like phones etc, and the saying only trust a source if you see the code. The same applies for hardware. I wish we could have open source hardware in more abundance.

  38. Re:Economic Development, Snowden, Noodleman by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The Russians have some excellent programmers, but they both work on malware for the mafia.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  39. Re:How the mighty have fallen. by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    When the Russian OS crashes - it will be the Tsar Bomba.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  40. why is protectionism so big right now? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Putin is a protectionist ... Trump is a protectionist ... Clinton is a protectionist ...

    People! What is going on?? Why do we have to pay more for locally created products? That's a large part of why we overthrew the British government in the first place.

  41. Next: ReactOS replacing Windows by unixisc · · Score: 2

    can unintentionally do the right things: kick Microsoft's, SAP's et al.'s ass.

    While it's a good first step, Russia should do the world a service on the OS front by backing efforts to make ReactOS a full fledged OS. Have 2 flavors - a win64 version that's fully compatible w/ Windows 7, and a win32 version that's fully compatible w/ XP. Make sure that Classic Shell runs on it, or better still, make it a part of the shell so that people can pick whichever UI they wanna work in.

  42. Re:Putin's internet czar German Klimenko by unixisc · · Score: 1

    During Soviet times, I used to spell it as CZAR - Communist Zenithal Authority in the Republics

  43. ex SSR by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Uh, Russia hasn't been Communist now in some 25 years. Expansionist, maybe, but certainly not Communist

  44. Chinese/Muslim preferences by unixisc · · Score: 2

    I could see Russia, but why would China, Iran or any Islamic entity want Trump to win? China would stand to lose big if they can no longer sell to the US, and if Trump follows through on his extreme vetting moves to stop hostile Muslims from coming into the US, ISIS and AQ have no reason to rejoice either. The last 3 have probably just said it hoping to apply reverse psychology on the US voters

    1. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      I could see Russia, but why would China, Iran or any Islamic entity want Trump to win?

      Because they don't like Hillary? She was always the war hawkiest of Obama's cabinet. Trump has yet to show any diplomatic competency, and his fans just lap up his nonsense that he's "the best" with no proof.

      China would stand to lose big if they can no longer sell to the US

      China has the US's balls in a vice, not selling to the US will hurt China, but it will hurt the US far FAR more.

      if Trump follows through on his extreme vetting moves to stop hostile Muslims from coming into the US, ISIS and AQ have no reason to rejoice either.

      ISIS's and al Queda's motivations are not difficult to figure out; they've been pretty honest in what they want: to drive a wedge between Muslims and non-Muslims. They dislike "moderate Muslims" in general, and feel like those who do not fight to pull down non-Muslim societies are traitors. Absolutely they are happy with Trump's tarring of Muslims and calls for Muslim travel restrictions. They YEARN for a horrible war.

    2. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      China, Iran and North Korea want somebody who can be easily manipulated. That is trump. Have you listened to him. He screams about BUSINESS with China and Mexico, but the ONLY one that he speaks of addressing is Mexico. Yet, NAFTA has 1 simple quick fix and it would solve EVERYTHING with Mexico trade, while helping them out. But what does Trump say about CHina's invasion into other nation's territory? NOTHING. What does he say about Iran and what he will do? NOTHING. What does Trump say that he will do with North Korea? He will ask China to invade them (kind of like asking America to invade Puerto Rico, or Canada).

      ISIS and AQ HATE hillary and anybody connected to O. He has overall done a good job on AQ, but he somewhat screwed up with ISIS. Hillary will send in troops and finish this. That is why Russia wants Trump. He and the neo-cons/tea* will walk away and allow Russia to own it all.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Trump has been pretty hostile to China setting up military bases in the South China Sea. There is nothing about him that's remotely pro-Chinese, the way he has been accommodating of Russian interests (e.g. in the GOP platform). Similarly, ISIS has nothing against Hilary, beyond the fact that she's an infidel, but if Trump had his way, none of their agents could get into the US anywhere as easily. Their candidate for president would be Hilary, not Trump!

    4. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Absolutely they are happy with Trump's tarring of Muslims and calls for Muslim travel restrictions. They YEARN for a horrible war.

      They should be careful what they wish for. If you push the US hard enough, this or this happens.

      Daesh thinks America is weak because we try to restrain our sociopaths and psychopaths. They don't seem to understand that we still have our sociopaths and psychopaths. We try to keep them on a tight leash. Push hard enough and—we stop trying.

    5. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I could see Russia, but why would China, Iran or any Islamic entity want Trump to win? China would stand to lose big if they can no longer sell to the US, Because that would never happen. Trump is business man, and China is the biggest partner around. As much as he says a bunch of stuff, he'll be looking to do any deal at any cost as long as he benefits personally somehow.

      and if Trump follows through on his extreme vetting moves to stop hostile Muslims from coming into the US, ISIS and AQ have no reason to rejoice either.

      The extremist message is that the US is evil and you should join the struggle against it. When Trump actually proves that the US is evil by implementing racist policy, it will hand extremists all over the world the biggest gift they could ever ask for.

    6. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      You are VERY mistaken WRT to foreign policy

      And here is what Daesh thinks.
      This is interesting in that a daesh expert believes that they will attack us like they attacked Paris to influence their election. And Daesh hopes that Trump wins according to them

      Finally, This one sums it all up best.

      But hey, look around. You can actually find articles written that will support your position, but, they are very far and few in-between and none by experts on China, Daesh, AQ, Russia, etc.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      China has the US's balls in a vice, not selling to the US will hurt China, but it will hurt the US far FAR more.

      LOL. You obviously do not know American manufacturing and our situation. China does NOT have us. Best thing that could happen to America is for us to raise taxes on consumed goods/services based on where the worst part/service comes from. If they emit a lot of CO2, then high tax. With this approach, we get all nations to clean up their CO2. At the same time, since America actually is low emission (with an intelligent normalization of emissions / $GDP ), it would allow the west to re-build rather quickly.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Ah, not quite.

      How will the working poor in the USA tolerate the dramatic hike in the cost of their manufactured goods that *will* come from the US shifting production away from China???

      A major part of your population is going to crack the shits.

      If you had cared more for your own along the way then this would be less of a problem.

    9. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      LOL. You obviously do not know American manufacturing and our situation. China does NOT have us.

      The US economy is a highly-tuned machine. Like a Jaguar car, it's high performance, but it doesn't take much to make it come tumbling down. The Dot-Com Bust and the Housing Bubble were minor problems compared to what a trade war with the country which actually makes all of our stuff would do.

      At the same time, since America actually is low emission (with an intelligent normalization of emissions / $GDP ),

      The rest of the world is not going to accept that definition of 'low emissions' because it's crafted to benefit only one country: the USA. It's pretty much the only way you could manipulate the definition of 'low emission" to make the US come out ahead. Pretty much everyone else is going to use 'per capita,' and it seems difficult to argue that they're wrong.

  45. Re: You insensitive clod! by johanw · · Score: 1

    > invade nations all over

    The EU is not the USA. Although some EU governments are willing henchmen of the USA government when they invade other countries.

  46. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by lalleglad · · Score: 1

    Actually I play more chess than checkers.

    When has foreign policy paid any attention to the American voter?
    Americans are very similar to the British, with the world being 'disconnected from us', so foreign policy has only attention in a presidential electorate when a lot of American lives are at stake, eg. the Vietnam War.

    Well, Putin is a moron as well as Trump, and Putin is not afraid of Trump as a president because he knows well that Trump will have a lot less power towards 'pressing the red button' than any previous US president had.

    Reagan was initially thought as not being a threat to Russia because many thought he was not really educated, and a moron. This turned out to be false because he had a lot more experience that he had learned from, and a political focus that few outsiders had expected, so he turned out to be a great US president of recent times.

    Trump shows none of those things, except being held up by his father, moving along with mafia connections and in general not getting the financial results he could have had with the environment he was in.

    Trump looks like a financial failure if you ask me, and soon he will also be a political failure.

    And I am not even in the race to decide it, as I can't vote the 8.Nov.

  47. Re:You play checkers, Russians play chess by lalleglad · · Score: 1

    I don't why I continue to reply to Cowards, and this will be my last.

    What makes you think that Putin is not also a dork?
    Have you seen any of the situations he is trying to create, showing that he is actually a superman?

    Trump won the republican primaries because a lot of Americans are so fed up with politicians that has no connection with the lives of regular Americans, so they saw Trump as way to protest that. Trump has the most support by 'angry white low waged trash' that has little education and knowledge about the world surrounding them.

    Using the Putin card doesn't favor Trump, because Putin is in himself a moron, and he is rather seeing a moron like the politically inexperienced Trump in office than the the experienced Clinton, that Putin knows he can't wind up his little finger.
    Putin knows more about what Clinton is like, but he doesn't like it because he know she is strong. Compared to the little experienced Trump that may throw fits, but won't otherwise know what he is doing and therefore a much easier target than Clinton.

    In all of this I am not saying that Clinton is the perfect president candidate, but compared to Trump, there is no comparison. Trump is not anything that he claims and he is everything the moron that the opposition claims, about a financial and political failure.
    Jeb Bush or Ted Cruz would have been more regular and respectable Republican candidates that I could have supported, compared to Trump.

    Trump is in himself a failure, in every way!

  48. I wonder how much Windows 10 OS-as-malware by waspleg · · Score: 1

    plays in to this. Very curious indeed.

    "Moscowâ(TM)s government has already switched Cisco Systems Inc. technology for city surveillance cameras to local software"

    Leaks also cover the CIA intercept of Cisco gear en route to places by NSA for spyware installation.

    This seems to be about national security more than the money despite their claim.

  49. Re:You play checkers, Russians play chess by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    What makes you think that Putin is not also a dork?
    Have you seen any of the situations he is trying to create, showing that he is actually a superman?

    Did you miss how he rather masterfully seized Crimea with very little bloodshed, while the western powers were unable or unwilling to do anything about it? He's not a superman, but he's no idiot either.

    Jeb Bush or Ted Cruz would have been more regular and respectable Republican candidates that I could have supported, compared to Trump.

    Ted Cruz is a religious loon whose views are even more right-wing and extreme than Trump's. Even other Republicans in Congress hated him with a passion. Jeb was about as establishment as you can get, and rode on his brother's legacy which only hurt him. But primaries these days tend to choose polarizing figures it seems, so someone "safe" and rather middle-of-the-road like Jeb had no chance.

  50. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by losfromla · · Score: 1

    To the morons going on about chess vs checkers: Being a competitive chess player does not indicate increased ability in areas other than playing chess. If you think you are smarter than average it isn't due to your chess playing prowess, it is due to other factors/advantages in our genetics or more-likely upbringing.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  51. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by Gussington · · Score: 1

    If you think you are smarter than average it isn't due to your chess playing prowess, it is due to other factors/advantages in our genetics or more-likely upbringing.

    An upbringing playing Chess?

  52. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    "Well, Putin is a moron as well as Trump..."

    Putin is not a moron.

  53. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by losfromla · · Score: 1

    The thing is typically if you are brought up playing chess you are surrounded by a family that does things that families (or a parent) that plays chess do. Like eat well, read to/with their kids, converse on various current topics, discuss history, etc. So the chess happens to be one of many things but as we like to say around here "correlation does not imply causation". In this case, playing chess isn't the reason people are more able at intellectual pursuits, it just happens to be one of many things they have been breast fed since young. In cases where youth chess clubs are established in "the hood", the kids can and do excel at chess but that doesn't translate necessarily into broad academic achievement, other than the effect that it can have in their belief in their own ability to achieve.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  54. Old news by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    The US started doing that years ago. Tables, ipad, phones, in fact almost nothing runs windows in the US anymore. Just some desktops. Even they are moving to the cloud. Won't need microsoft windows much longer.