Slashdot Mirror


Interviews: Ask Martin Shkreli a Question

Martin Shkreli has agreed to answer your questions. Shkreli is the co-founder of the hedge fund MSMB Capital Management, the co-founder and former chief executive officer (CEO) of the biotechnology firm Retrophin, and the founder and former CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals. Shkreli has been active on Twitter about a wide range of topics, including the 2016 presidential election. Most recently, he expressed interest in buying 4chan.

Ask him your questions here, and we'll post the full interview with Shkreli's answers in the near future.

203 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about you don't give the self important asshole more time in the public eye instead?

    1. Re:Or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I sincerely hope no one asks this douche a question. And shame on /. for sinking this low.

    2. Re:Or not. by Falconhell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its like Slashdot themselves are trolling us.
      *Popcorn time*

    3. Re:Or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What the fuck, /. ??? Why are you digging up infamous sociopaths for Q&A ??? Let me guess- You've hired staff from the National Enquirer?? Thank God Bundy's dead, or you might be tempted to do a Q&A with him next.

      Why not try to get Caitlyn Jenner or a Kardashian next??

    4. Re:Or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Controversy- It's all about the clicks, bitch.

    5. Re:Or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A quest for understanding should not be based on judgment/emotion, if we truly want to advance as a constructive forward thinking species. I'm most definitely interested to hear the interview, what facts we can uncover, and what loopholes we may want to focus on. Thanks /.

      A "constructive forward thinking species".... a "quest for understanding".... Jesus.

      You can hold hands and sing Kumbaya while you gently and thoughtfully seek to understand this guy's behavior, on the other hand save yourself from wading through his bullshit by reading this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#Sociopathy

    6. Re:Or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      your comment is probably what slashdot was looking for, but anyway...

      A quest for understanding should not be based on judgment/emotion, if we truly want to advance as a constructive forward thinking species. I'm most definitely interested to hear the interview, what facts we can uncover, and what loopholes we may want to focus on. Thanks /.

      We can always count on Jean-Luc Picard to bring sanity to a controversial situation. Thanks.

    7. Re:Or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on the FP and top mod. This is all we need to say about it. Add mine to the vote to simply not publish any of his replies, assuming anybody wants to ask that nameless person a question. IMHO, we should simply not even name such people, and if properly convicted through due process, part of the penalty should be no media exposure. AFAIK, it's already illegal for criminals to profit from their books in some cases, so there's precedent.

    8. Re:Or not. by halivar · · Score: 2

      I am dreading this. This is nasty election year, lots of shit going on in the news; I just don't need anymore toxicity in my system. I'm gonna pass on this. Hard.

    9. Re:Or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Having been a follower of slashdot forever, well, since "Chips & Dips" - this interview idea pretty much makes me want to stop.

    10. Re:Or not. by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      You can't see me, but my index finger is touching the tip of my nose as we speak... (If you're not a native english speaker, I mean I found the comment to be "on the nose" correct.)

      --
      Who did what now?
    11. Re:Or not. by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call this "public eye". Maybe you can tell me why you think I'm "self-important" or an asshole?

    12. Re:Or not. by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      Why is it "low"?

    13. Re:Or not. by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      ....About 2.75 inches, you say?

    14. Re:Or not. by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I hope he's paying Slashdot. It's not like he can't afford his own PR.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    15. Re:Or not. by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I don't see a question from you.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    16. Re:Or not. by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I ain't paying $2 million for someone's first album.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    17. Re:Or not. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope no one asks this douche a question. And shame on /. for sinking this low.

      Next up, Q and A with Kim Kardashian.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. So... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Mr. Shkreli, if you got rectal cancer, would it affect your entire body?

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    1. Re:So... by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Mr. Shkreli, if you got rectal cancer, would it affect your entire body?

      I think it's a safe bet that if Shkreli had an asshole transplant, that the asshole would reject him.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    2. Re:So... by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      Metastatic cancer, by definition invades other visceral organs. Anorectal carcincoma, if I recall correctly, generally has limited metastatic properties. Hope that helps!

  3. When and why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When did you first discover that you are a raging douche and why did you decide to embrace it?

    1. Re:When and why by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think a more pertinent question would be "When did you receive your diagnosis as a sociopath, and why did you choose financial scams as opposed to preying on young women between the ages of 18 and 30 and sexualy torturing them, murdering them and then taunting their relatives via anonymous letters to th Duluth News Tribune?"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:When and why by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's almost always a mistake to go in and submit for a diagnosis.

      There are always 'experts' who are willing and eager to prescribe their edict on you to 'fix' you.

    3. Re:When and why by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's no fixing sociopaths. It is an underlying neurological condition that leads a person to have no empathy and be highly narcissistic. In general, the only thing that keeps sociopaths in line is to demonstrate to them that behaving properly is in their best interests. But unfortunately, modern finance at least temporarily rewards sociopaths, because they tend to be charismatic, make grand claims and even grander plans, and by the time anyone figures out that the sociopath was full of shit and saying whatever it took to get what they wanted, the company is already been damaged, key employees have already left (usually after a lot of bullying or worse by the sociopath).

      It's largely why I feel anyone diagnoses as a sociopath should be banned from any position of authority; whether that be a manager, a police officer, judge, or politician.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:When and why by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      I'm confused by this question!

    5. Re:When and why by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Even if you're not fixable, there's ways it can hurt you. I was turned down for life insurance because of my depression. There are mental health restrictions on owning guns, I'm told. I was told by someone who should know that I'm ASD, but it doesn't show up in the slowly growing list of things that are medically wrong with me, so nobody official is going to discriminate me because of that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    6. Re:When and why by Mr_Whoopass · · Score: 1

      When do we as a civilization come to the realization that keeping these genes in the pool will ultimately prevent the evolution of society into anything remotely resembling a peaceful utopia? Wouldn't the greater good outweigh the inhumanity of terminating the genetic line of those that take for themselves at the expense of the majority? Why do we allow ourselves to be taken advantage of by sociopathic individuals over and over again when there is only one viable solution to the litany of these types that pervade our society at every level? Can we just get there already please before we allow them to strip our world of the ability to sustain us as a species?

  4. Why are you such a douche? by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Follow-up question: Were you born that way or did you have to work at it?

    1. Re:Why are you such a douche? by HBI · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I came here to ask. Particularly when someone is facing jail time, as he is...and almost assuredly as a direct result of alienating all of the authorities who might otherwise have protected him.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  5. Question for the editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are you encouraging this talentless, odious shit with this sort of coverage?

    1. Re:Question for the editors by mgoheen · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

    2. Re:Question for the editors by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Why are you encouraging this talentless, odious shit with this sort of coverage?

      ...as you ask the same society who made Kardashian a household name.

      Becoming a millionaire by doing nothing more than being a self-promoting narcissist on social media has become the new American dream.

      You're sure as shit not convincing anyone that obtaining a college degree is worth it these days.

    3. Re:Question for the editors by Galaga88 · · Score: 1

      Shkreli doesn't need encouragement. He's a psychopath.

      What this *is* worth, is a chance to see inside the mind of a psychopath and how their reasoning works. Does he actually think he can justify his insane greed?

    4. Re:Question for the editors by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, of course he can. Mostly by not understanding what the hell should be wrong with anything he did.

      I've worked with psychopaths before. They honestly don't get why you're outraged when they pull the shit they do.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Question for the editors by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You miss the point entirely.

      This isn't the same society that made Kardashian a household name.

      This is Slashdot. We have hope of being something better.

    6. Re:Question for the editors by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I've worked with psychopaths before. They honestly don't get why you're outraged when they pull the shit they do.

      Ditto. "Just get over it. It's water under the bridge."

      It's as if they expect everyone to be psychopaths like them, and are surprised when they are not.

    7. Re:Question for the editors by stabiesoft · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And yet /. is doing exactly the same thing as the rest of society by giving this crap hole a voice. Bury him.

    8. Re:Question for the editors by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Also, 100 of the last 100 times I've seen the name Kardashian, it's been by people on slashdot complaining about how the Kardashians get too much attention. I'd like to forget them, but the people who hate them most won't let me. It's like some twisted Streisand effect: "Hey, see over there? Stop looking over there! Why is everyone looking there, where I'm pointing?"

    9. Re:Question for the editors by dslauson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's my question:

      Mr. Sckreli, below is the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, a psychological tool for evaluating people for psychopathy. Please rate yourself on each trait on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 meaning "I do not exhibit this trait at all" and 10 meaning "I fully exhibit this trait".

      1. GLIB and SUPERFICIAL CHARM
      2. GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH
      3. SEEK STIMULATION or PRONE TO BOREDOM
      4. PATHOLOGICAL LYING
      5. CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS
      6. LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT
      7. SHALLOW AFFECT
      8. CALLOUSNESS and LACK OF EMPATHY
      9. PARASITIC LIFESTYLE
      10. POOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROLS
      11. PROMISCUOUS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR
      12. EARLY BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS
      13. LACK OF REALISTIC, LONG-TERM GOALS
      14. IMPULSIVITY
      15. IRRESPONSIBILITY
      16. FAILURE TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR OWN ACTIONS
      17. MANY SHORT-TERM MARITAL RELATIONSHIPS
      18. JUVENILE DELINQUENCY
      19. REVOCATION OF CONDITION RELEASE
      20. CRIMINAL VERSATILITY

    10. Re:Question for the editors by geekmux · · Score: 1

      You miss the point entirely.

      This isn't the same society that made Kardashian a household name.

      This is Slashdot. We have hope of being something better.

      Yeah, I remember what happened the last time a large group of people relied on hope (and change)...

    11. Re:Question for the editors by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      What nobody has ever told me is why I should care about the Kardashians, or why I should care about what people think about them. There's lots of things in life I just ignore and have no problems with. Having the Kardashians and the people who talk about them in that category works for me.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  6. Re:Why such a Douche? by helsinki92 · · Score: 1

    This is the same question I would ask.

  7. AKA... by Aaden42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Better known as “Pharmabro” or let’s increase costs of old meds by 5000%.

    This a new low, /. Not even offering to bail out 4chan should elevate this piece of garbage to “stuff that matters.”

    My only question would be, “Why haven’t you stopped breathing my oxygen yet?”

    1. Re:AKA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Y'mean that one drug that absolutely ravages the body of it's users? The drug that no other pharmaceutical company (bar Shkreli's) had bothered to pump R&D into finding a better alternative to because it wasn't worth their time? The drug that's offered at an incredibly low cost to individuals and it's price hike almost entirely impacted large hospitals and insurance companies instead? The drug that, because of the price hike, has received more publicity in the space of a week than it had throughout it's entire existence, leading to an increase in it's prescribed use, thus helping to fund even more research into superior improvements and alternatives?

      Yeah, Shkreli is an absolute monster for bleeding insurance companies of their horded wealth and using it to fund development for drugs no other company seems to care about because the current body-destroying, energy-sapping, will-barely-do-it's-job medications are "good enough".

      There are plenty of reasons to dislike Shkreli, please do your research and pick a legitimate one instead of the ridiculous hate-mongering strawman that the media has thrown around.

    2. Re:AKA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Shkreli is an absolute monster for bleeding insurance companies of their horded wealth and using it to fund development for drugs no other company seems to care about because the current body-destroying, energy-sapping, will-barely-do-it's-job medications are "good enough".

      Uh, you are aware that in insurance claims histories in each risk category cause a direct impact on the pricing for each risk category right? "Bleeding insurance companies of their horded wealth" isn't some magical source of funds, the costs get directly passed back to their consumers.

      Do you have any idea what insurance is?

    3. Re:AKA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Shkreli is an absolute monster for bleeding insurance companies of their horded wealth and using it to fund development for drugs no other company seems to care about because the current body-destroying, energy-sapping, will-barely-do-it's-job medications are "good enough".

      There are plenty of reasons to dislike Shkreli, please do your research and pick a legitimate one instead of the ridiculous hate-mongering strawman that the media has thrown around.

      Marty, Marty, Marty- Wait until the editors hand you some questions, will you please?

    4. Re:AKA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bleeding the insurance companies costs end-users. You don't think they'd let a thing like this hurt their margins, do you? Likewise, 'large hospitals' charge the medication to the users and insurance companies. So yeah, everyone pays.
      What this really hurts though is any company who wants to improve the drug. They can do the research, but in order to provide an alternate product in the USA you have to have clinical trials. Competitive clinical trials. That means competing drug firms who want to offer generics or improvements have to buy hundreds of thousands of doses to run the trial. Unlike hospitals, unlike insurance companies, they can't pass the costs off on anyone. Their choice is to pay it out-of-pocket or to forego the expensive drug trials and any chance of a product that can be sold in the USA.
      Shkreli's company didn't do any research on the product. His company only bought the marketing rights, which for some unknown reason allows them to prevent the drug from entering public domain and set any price they want for it. *NO* company, not Shkreli's, not anyone else, had been putting research into the drug for decades. That, plus it being irreplaceable for a certain life-saving treatment, was the core reason it was selected for purchase.
      So with all that, still think it was a great thing that he bought out the drug and increased its price 5000%? Still want to claim it was philanthropy? It's not. The only reason anyone's researching new things to do with this drug is, because of the 5000% increase in price, any alternate produced could be suddenly financially viable... but only in comparison.

    5. Re:AKA... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      ... it's price hike almost entirely impacted large hospitals and insurance companies instead

      And ultimately, who do you think pays that?

      Shkreli is a leech, nothing more, nothing less.

  8. #boycottthisshit by Burz · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Apparently new /. media company is finding new ways to outdo the old one. Have a nice life.

    1. Re:#boycottthisshit by Burz · · Score: 1

      Apparently new /. media company is finding new ways to outdo the old one. Have a nice life.

      And look at all the mod points the troll apologists wasted.

  9. Re:Dr. Shkreli by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Err, that was supposed to be Dear Mr., not Dr.

  10. Slashdot all-time low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Slashdot hits a new all-time low. Again.

  11. No. by Stephen+Gilbert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I won't have anything to do with that guy, and shame on Slashdot for providing a platform to him.

  12. How Things Came to be This Way by Rinisari · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In as much detail you care to provide, how did you get where you are today?

    Interpret that as you will.

  13. STOP! THINK! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You! Yes, you! You there, about the press the "Reply" button - think about what you're doing.

    Chances are you want to ask Martin Shkreli why he's such an utterly foul piece of human excrement - of course you do, it's what we're all thinking - but what will it achieve? I'm happy to see that the users of Slashdot have already asked this question several times, so that ground has been covered.

    So what can you do? My suggestion is: nothing. Don't hit Reply. Don't ask a question. Shkreli didn't get to be King of the Douchebags by having a thin skin, but if anything's going to wound him... it's nothing. No responses. No-one caring. No-one even expressing their disdain for him.

    So how about it? Just close the tab, and move on. Do more for the good of humanity than Martin Shkreli ever will simply by sitting on your arse and doing nothing. It's the right thing to (not) do.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:STOP! THINK! by sucko · · Score: 1

      shit. is the first slashdot post that's worth a shit? It might be.

      "the only winning move is not to play"

    2. Re:STOP! THINK! by Burz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. Slashdot giving this guy a platform is a pretty low thing to do. Maybe they are desperate.

    3. Re:STOP! THINK! by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      I hypothesize that Whipslash saw a mountain of opportunity to offload a stalling investment into and told his 'editors' to put this baby into a nosedive directly at it. Seriously, I'm at a loss to explain why anyone would allow this shit on the site aside from a deliberate and willful sabotage attempt.

    4. Re:STOP! THINK! by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You! Yes, you! You there, about the press the "Reply" button - think about what you're doing.

      Chances are you want to ask Martin Shkreli why he's such an utterly foul piece of human excrement - of course you do, it's what we're all thinking - but what will it achieve? I'm happy to see that the users of Slashdot have already asked this question several times, so that ground has been covered.

      So what can you do? My suggestion is: nothing. Don't hit Reply. Don't ask a question. Shkreli didn't get to be King of the Douchebags by having a thin skin, but if anything's going to wound him... it's nothing. No responses. No-one caring. No-one even expressing their disdain for him.

      So how about it? Just close the tab, and move on. Do more for the good of humanity than Martin Shkreli ever will simply by sitting on your arse and doing nothing. It's the right thing to (not) do.

      Excellent advice. And just to remind everyone, this tactic is not solely reserved for the King here.

      This will work for any annoying-as-fuck talentless narcissist prancing about on social media. The only way to make them disappear is to starve them of the very food they need to survive, which is attention.

    5. Re:STOP! THINK! by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Wonkeys is a fine example of the sort of post that keeps me here. it's interesting to see the mods flowing entirely one way, rare to see such agreement here!, even those who I often disagree strongly are of the same mind, the editors are deservedly copping an absolute pasting.

  14. Never heard of this guy... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Who's your daddy and what does he do?

    1. Re:Never heard of this guy... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Neither have I, but considering the mere mention of his name has triggered so many Slashdotters, he must be pretty awesome.

      He prevented the world from hearing a Wu-Tang Clan album. That's pretty much unforgivable around here.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  15. Trump support by Comboman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How does it feel to be so hated that even Donald Trump won't accept your endorsement (though he's fine with David Duke and Vladimir Putin endorsing him)?

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  16. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How did you become such a successful and well respected member of society?

  17. What the fuck Slashdot? by Chas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are you giving this worthless piece of shit the time of day?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:What the fuck Slashdot? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Tomorrow:

      A Slashdot Q & A with Brock Turner.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  18. This is deeply offensive by twistedcubic · · Score: 2

    What has this person done of note, other than charge lots of money for a product? I imagine some here will try to be civil, and ask him a serious question, but why? He is not a remarkable person, so please do not treat him as such. I know, I know, everyone is interesting in their own way, but then, we might as well interview a stomped cockroach on Slashdot next.

    1. Re:This is deeply offensive by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      What has this person done of note, other than charge lots of money for a product? I imagine some here will try to be civil, and ask him a serious question, but why? He is not a remarkable person, so please do not treat him as such. I know, I know, everyone is interesting in their own way, but then, we might as well interview a stomped cockroach on Slashdot next.

      I'd really rather hear from the stomped cockroach.

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
  19. I agree with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I agree with you. Shkreli is a fine, upstanding person. Also, TRUMP 2016!

  20. Should Compulsory licensing be the norm by ghoul · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Should compulsory licensing of all medicines be the norm rather than the exception and drug patents be banned. All drug research is based on basic research funded by the NSF so it does not seem fair that Pharma companies get to make the large profits based on doing the last 30% of the journey of bringing a drug to market. A reasonable 50% profit margin over manufacturing costs and a one time bounty based on the importance of the drug should be enough Profit motive .
    Such bounties could be announced in advance like the Ansari prizes
    This would refocus the Pharma industry from just trying to make money and instead on treating sickness.
    It would also make it unattractive for Wall Street Assholes to come to the Pharma Industry and the Scientists could work in peace.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Should Compulsory licensing be the norm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      a one time bounty based on the importance of the drug should be enough Profit motive

      Look, I agree that Martin Shkreli is an execrable worm, but I think putting a bounty on him is a little extreme.

      But just for the record, how much would this bounty be? Asking for a friend.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Should Compulsory licensing be the norm by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Actually, big pharmacy new drugs require billions of dollars of testing. Once a new drug is discovered, it requires roughly $350 million of investment to get to market. The FDA requires 3.5 years of experiments on rats, several safety and efficacy human trials, and then a few years of sponsoring patient follow-ups once the drug hits market to collect more data on dosing, safety, efficacy, and side-effects. All that comes after the drug has been designed in the first place; and fewer than 10% of drugs make it to market, so the amortized cost is ridiculous.

      It's part of why I want a big pharma co (I'm a fan of Shire and Sun Pharmaceuticals) to help me out in getting the FDA to GRASE Phenylpiracetam based on its 30 years of use to treat seizures, depression, and old-age dementia. $350M to get an old drug to market in the U.S. is a show-stopper, especially for something immediately-generic.

      I'm on amphetamine now in an attempt to treat ADHD--amphetamine because it's dopamine reversing (the neuroreceptors which uptake dopamine instead pump more into your brain). I have anhedonia, which means I don't feel good; I don't feel bad (depression, dysphoria), but rather don't get a thrill and a reinforcing reward out of laughing, success, sex, or the like. On Phenylpiracetam, I feel friggin' great, and laughing at something funny causes a ... tingly? ... feeling inside that fades slowly over 10-15 minutes, and really just feels awesome; my psychiatrist informs me that's not me getting really fucking high (although there's mild euphoria--it's like the dramatic movie image of waking up and today is such a fucking great day, you decide to accomplish everything), but that normal people just feel that way all the time. He put me on amphetamine rather than atomoxetine to give me that feeling.

      Amphetamine (dextro-alpha-methylphenethylamine, or d-a-m-ph-et-amine) is a dangerous drug. It's addictive (physical dependence, withdrawal), toxic (in moderately-high doses), and *very* readily-abused (it makes you want more); and it brings high heart rate, blood pressure, appetite suppression, sleep suppression, and psychosis both on its own and supported by those other issues. Adderall is a great treatment for ADHD, and amphetamine has a proven safety record when used properly; it is, however, a dangerous and addictive substance. That's not moral panic; the disease we face is abuse, not a toxic substance we should be looking to excise from our society and only accept out of necessity (although the methylated salt is probably that).

      Phenylpiracetam is non-addictive. It has a problem with tolerance, but not withdrawal; and "tolerance" might actually go as far as "raise to 200-300mg doses eventually", although I'd rather take breaks. It's got a shorter (30-year) safety record; a dose of 100mg is standard, 750mg per day is manufacturer-listed MTD, and the manufacturer has suggested toxicity starts becoming a concern around 24,000mg. It's anti-convulsive (Amphetamine can--rarely--cause seizure, mostly if you overdose), anti-psychotic, and of course a stimulant. Its main problems are, thus, more about dosing than about possible toxic side-effects. As for my purpose (anhedonia), a German patent showed it as a better motivator for rats, who worked 4-5 times harder to get tasty food and mostly didn't bother with less-tasty food when they were on phenylpiracetam (each group of rats ate the same amount, roughly; they weren't starving themselves, they were just damned determined to have steak tonight instead of McDonalds bullshit)--largely because "good result" plugged that feel-good reward thing in their brain a lot harder.

      Different drugs, different uses; and for my purposes, an un-approved drug is much safer and more-effective (it doesn't treat my attention issues, though, hence why I went for psychiatric care; I would really like to try this with Atomoxetine, but I'll have that discussion with my psychi

    3. Re:Should Compulsory licensing be the norm by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      That's just dumb. Too many people would do it for free.

    4. Re:Should Compulsory licensing be the norm by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Should compulsory licensing of all medicines be the norm rather than the exception and drug patents be banned.

      Drug patents aren't the problem here. This isn't a case of a company charging an arm and a leg (or maybe two legs - paraplegic with working arms might do) for a drug under patent, and drug patents don't last for that long anyway. The problem here is FDA approval, since getting something approved even if it's a copy of something else is expensive and time-consuming, and the newcomer into the field might not make that back if the original producer cuts prices sharply. It's good for the public if someone pushes this, but there has to be an incentive.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  21. I'd have a few questions by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    But it can be summed up with one:

    "How much for you to kill yourself? Maybe if we all chip in, we could get rid of you."

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I'd have a few questions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I mean, after all he's pretty much reduced human life to a question of money, it's only fair to ask him how much for his.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:I'd have a few questions by Burz · · Score: 1

      Interesting question. He already knows how to kill with money.

    3. Re:I'd have a few questions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, then maybe an add-on question would be "What does it feel like to kill off the poor?"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:I'd have a few questions by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      huh?

  22. Obligatory question to anyone interested in 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

  23. Re:Have you ever considered committing suicide? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And how much money could change your mind?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Re:Why such a Douche? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Money. Duh. Next question?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Re:Haters gonna hate by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    He might be charismatic, but he's definitely not likeable. Anyone who does the shit he has should not be liked in any way. He's a piece of shit who is literally profiting on people's misery and misfortune.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  26. Boogeyman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Martin,

    Is all of the irrational hatred you receive as a result of drawing attention to how the medical industry reconciles drug patents and generics with the FDA worth it? People who read past "ZOMG PRICE HIKE" learned that the FDA makes the process to genericize drugs like Daraprim harder than it should be. The idea being that perhaps if the FDA wasn't so obstructionist the market on Daraprim would never have been cornered in the first place.

    Follow-up: What's it like to be so based?

  27. About 4chong by Eika · · Score: 1

    What do you want with it? Any changes planned if you acquire it? PS. Do it, I'm interested in the outcome

  28. Let's not by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What if all of Slashdot refused to ask this guy any serious questions?

    I think we should refuse...he priced-gouged lifesaving medicines...he's not some fun trickster he's a villain pure and simple.

    I think what he did should be criminal.

    Let's ask him things like, "When do you think you'll finally go to jail?"

    or, "Have you been examined by a mental health professional for narcissistic personality disorder?"

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:Let's not by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      Law and morality are only casually related. The fact that he did a thing that isn't illegal doesn't mean he's not a reprehensible human being.

      I can honestly say there's nothing I want to hear from him, and no questions I want him to answer.

    2. Re:Let's not by barakn · · Score: 1

      Malaria is 100% avoidable? Why don't you go tell that to the 600 million people that get infected every year, you useless wanking prick. Maybe they'll stupidly and carelessly drop you into a septic tank where you belong.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  29. Honest question here by Kokuyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What you did makes me want to bash your skull in. Whether it was lawful or not, whether it adheres to capitalist principles or not, it takes QUITE an amount of egoism and delusions of grandeur to pull that off without losing sleep.

    So my question is this: If you think basic human ethics don't apply to you, why should I not come over there, kick your teeth to the curb and take from you whatever I damn well please?

    1. Re:Honest question here by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because that garbage ain't worth a nanosecond of jail time.

      Next question?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re: Honest question here by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What I meant is that he's one of those people who are still alive because ridding the world of them would make you for some odd reason a criminal and you'd go to jail for it.

      In a civilized world, you'd get some sort of medal.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. F off slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm done, 16 years reading with this site & about the last 2 debating whether its worth my time. Thanks for putting the nail in the coffin.

  31. Is "Fuck You" a question? by grimJester · · Score: 2

    n/t

    1. Re:Is "Fuck You" a question? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      "Fuck.. you?"

  32. How do your farts smell? by nucrash · · Score: 1

    Are they rose tinted, or do they smell like the rotted ass of a dead cow, much like your personality?

    --
    Place something witty here
  33. Re:Morales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please learn to spell first. "Morales' is a Spanish surname, and you're means you are.

  34. Re:Wow... by Galaga88 · · Score: 2

    I posted an honest question in a non-inflammatory way, and it's already gotten downvoted, but I'm holding out hope.

    I've seen a lot of crazed capitalists like himself have a somewhat consistent internal world view so I'm curious as to how he thinks his entire pricing situation is *supposed* to work. Clearly he fucked over people who were totally powerless but did he think the free market meant they could actually do something about it?

    Basically: Does he think everybody is as unethical as him, and hence assumes we're all playing the game the same way he is?

  35. Ethics by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    What is the ethical system that guides you?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  36. Re:How do you respond to those who criticize you? by avandesande · · Score: 1

    He is only successful because of a set of byzantine laws that force Americans to pay 10 or 20 times more for drugs than what they cost in other first world countries.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  37. What do you think of ObamaCare? by Dr_b_ · · Score: 1

    Hey Martin, what do you think of Obamacare, and if anything what would you fix about it? Would you repeal it outright? What does america really need to fix about healthcare?

  38. Re:How do you sleep at night? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    What is the "other" doing in that sentence? It does not belong there.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. OK by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Are you just trolling? Is there a Neo-Nazi Pepe hiding at the end of the rainbow?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. This guy is just a bag of dicks by CRidpath · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to give this bag of dicks any attention at all?

  41. Is it time? by Holi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this is the type of stunts you plan on pulling with your new management then It may be time to delete my account.

    Why would you think we care what that waste of oxygen has to say?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:Is it time? by Reason58 · · Score: 1

      Where is the link to delete your /. account?

  42. Twitter follower, writing an argumentative essay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Martin,

    I was offered an opportunity to write an essay on pharmaceutical pricing, so I jumped at the chance to advocate for an unpopular opinion supporting free-market based pricing.

    I want to make this interesting for you. I've watched many of your debates on YouTube where ignorant college students ask rude questions and express ignorant opinions. I'm going to try to do better:

    Question 1: You've become an overnight household name as a consequence of a manufactured controversy. Since then, you've managed to grow a cult-following by engaging the controversy rather than hiding from the attention. Do you enjoy your new celebrity status enough to justify the headaches the media attention has brought you?

    Question 2: Prescription drug prices don't seem to follow the same price trends as most other consumer commodities. Can you cast some insight into the process of pricing a prescription medication? Do you have any thoughts on the fairness of the perception that drug prices are excessively volatile? Is this perception deserved? In either case, what are some of the underlying causes behind prescription drug price volatility?

    Question 3: Do you believe the environment for pricing pharmaceuticals in the United States is optimal, or favorable to innovation and research that best benefits patients?

    Question 4: You've frequently expressed your desire to invest more money in researching new treatments and cures for diseases. What changes or reforms to the United States healthcare industry and relevant regulations would be most effective in maximizing health outcomes for patients?

    Question 5: What is the single most counterproductive aspect of the United States legal and regulatory structure surrounding health care and drug research?

    Question 6: In most colleges, the computer science, computer engineering, and electrical engineering departments are awash with student interest in these majors. Do you feel that the healthcare industry is suffering from a "brain drain" or talent-loss as a result of differences in perceived profitability and ROI for those education dollars? If so: do you expect the common desire to found a Silicon Valley "Unicorn" startup could be redirected to inspire those students to research treatments for diseases if the government changed its approach to healthcare regulations?

    Question 7: In my biology class, I learned that there are many sponges in the mediterranean which appeared to offer opportunities to research new antibiotics. The academic who was researching these sponges lamented about a lack of interest from the pharmaceutical industry in researching new antibiotics because the ones we had now worked "well enough". When I encounter news stories like this: http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/bashar-al-assads-war-syria-could-spell-end-antibiotics-498035.html I'm left with some level of dissonance between two anecdotes which seem impossible to reconcile. Clearly, victims of war are not especially well-equipped to vote with their dollars, but this alleged lack of interest in researching new antibiotics seems endemic of a more systemic issue. Do you believe the search for new antibiotics deserves more research funding than they currently receive? Is there a hype-gap between the threat of antibiotic resistance being portrayed in the media and the risk antibiotic resistance actually poses? Do you believe that antibiotic research funding reflects an appropriate priority level relative to the risk these superbugs pose?

    Question 8: Antibiotic resistant tuberculosis is alleged to be a growing problem in some developing countries such as India. Do you believe that this would be less of a problem if generic drugs were unavailable? Would increasing the supply of "affordable antibiotics" likely make this problem better, or worse? Is it hopeless to attack a public health problem by manipulating drug prices, when the core issue is malinvestment in sanitation infrastructure?

    Sorry for the long list! Huge fan!

    Respectfully,
    Hogan

  43. Re:Hey Martin by maliqua · · Score: 1

    I think almost everyone would care, they'd rejoice in the streets, parades would be had, there would be people lined up for hundreds of miles to urinate on his grave.

  44. Would you be willing to sit in a chair by hey! · · Score: 1

    ... and let me punch your smug little face over and over again?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  45. Re:Once Upon a Time in Shaolin by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    The answer to this is publicly available. He bought it to "keep it from the people" in response to a crowdfunding campaign to buy the record and release it to the public, and as such has no plans to release it himself.

    It also seems he has no plans to improve his public image, quite the opposite.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  46. clearly you are unpopular, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you get a lot of death threats?

    I am genuinely curious. As a person of normal to modest means, I receive no threats, have never been robbed as it is obvious I have nothing worth stealing, and otherwise do not live in fear. Do you? Please explain a little what it's like and how you deal with the negative reaction of society at large aims at you.

    1. Re:clearly you are unpopular, so... by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      Nope.

  47. If you buy 4Chan... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Will you raise the cost of membership to $25,000, like you do with everything else you buy?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  48. Re:No by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I think that wonkey_monkey's post above describing why not posting in this thread is a good course of action has sound reasoning, but I will reply to second your point.

    Slashdot, cancel this Q&A, do not submit these questions to him. In fact, if this whole article were deleted I wouldn't complain.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  49. Wu-Tang by Taquito+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Did the FBI seize the Wu-Tang album and do you know if Bill Murray has any plans to pull off a heist and steal it from them?

  50. What a fucking douche... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Emacs or vi, you excrement-coated human enema nozzle?

    --
    That is all.
  51. Serious questions by saurongt · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yes, everyone loves to hate on this guy, partly because of the obnoxious persona he presents. However, if you actually follow the guy closely, his heart is in the right place with regard to curing rare diseases. So here goes: 1) What advice would you give to young entrepreneurs? Are there any particular lessons you had to learn the hard way? 2) Are you interested in treating/curing senile diseases and ways to significantly extend human life? 3) What role, if any, do you think the government should play in pharmaceutical industry, as well as healthcare as a whole? 4) When can we expect Harambe to live again?

    1. Re:Serious questions by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Everyone's too busy being butthurt. I can try to ask him those questions directly if you'd like.

  52. Has anyone actually researched him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All this anger, but my understand of him price gouging, is that he was gouging the government and the insurance companies. Can anyone link actual research that shows that actual american humans either A) went without medicine or B) were refused the free medicines his company offered to the patients who were unable to procure the medicine through their insurance company?

    This kid is made out to be a terrible human, because of his douchbaggery towards the government, and we hate him WHY?!

    1. Re:Has anyone actually researched him? by Reason58 · · Score: 2

      The cost is passed on to us "actual American humans" in the form of higher taxes and premiums.

    2. Re:Has anyone actually researched him? by CannonballHead · · Score: 2

      gouging the government and the insurance companies

      Because, clearly, insurance companies will just eat those costs. It's not like they charge their clients anything to cover the costs...

    3. Re:Has anyone actually researched him? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      Because the government, like soylent green, is made of people.

      The government doesn't have any money of it's own, you know. It has your money. There is no gouging the government without gouging the taxpayers.

    4. Re:Has anyone actually researched him? by barakn · · Score: 2

      My insurance doesn't cover the full cost of anything, you fucking asshole. I don't use this medication but because insurance is a way of cost-sharing, I am paying for other people to use it. How in the absolute fuck did you get modded Insightful? By other people completely fucking clueless about how things work in real life? Shkreli can lube a porcupine with tar and shove it up his ass. Oh, wait, that would be cruel and unusual punishment... for the porcupine.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    5. Re:Has anyone actually researched him? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      It's a rare disease and Daraprim cures it after about 80 pills. The market is super tiny, and unfortunately R&D for a new drug doesn't shrink in cost just because the target market is tiny. When you biggie sized your dinner tonight, you paid many times more than the premium increases from Daraprim's price change. On the flip side, a market that has been dormant for 75 years is now active and innovating through R&D. Patients with rare diseases are fucked because almost no pharma company gives a shit about them. Shkreli, whether you agree with him or not, is trying to make the numbers work so he can innovate in these diseases with tiny markets.

    6. Re:Has anyone actually researched him? by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      Do you know how insignificant this drug is? Are you familiar with other problems in healthcare?

  53. Cancel it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here is what I recommend you tell Mr. Shkreli:

    "We are sorry, Mr. Shkreli, but an overwhelming number of our readers have asked us to cancel our planned question-and-answer session with you. Accordingly, we have decided not to submit any questions to you. You can read the discussion that lead to this decision here."

  54. Re: Are you eric? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    I am not too sure about that. Cartman being so nice and Kyle's dad so bad? Something smells fishy.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  55. Invitation by rpresser · · Score: 1

    Do you know the difference between a ham sandwich and being stuffed facefirst into a mound of elephant dung?

    Followup: Wanna have lunch at the zoo?

  56. Punch for charity by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

    The woman who had pledged to donate to the college fund for the son of your late PR consultant in exchange for the chance to punch you in the face reneged on the deal. How much would we have to raise in funding to let one of the current world boxing champions take that shot?

    1. Re:Punch for charity by avandesande · · Score: 1

      That's funny. Even without knowing anything about him, I believe he has one of the most punchable faces I have ever seen. He looks kind of like an evil keebler elf.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  57. Re:morales?? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

    "Morales" is usually someone's name, like Miles Morales (originally the Marvel Comics character Ultimate Spider-Man.)

    "Morals" are codes of conduct or ethics.

  58. Agreed, and a Message to Slashdot Mods by Pollux · · Score: 1

    Galaga, I agree completely.

    And to Slashdot Mods and community members, this is the first time I can say in my 16-year membership here at Slashdot that I can say I'm honestly disappointed in its behavior. What I'm seeing displayed here is a mob-mentality peer censorship at play. And while I do not disagree one iota that this man does not deserve the criticism he receives on a daily basis from the public for what he has done, I think it's a rare and unique opportunity that we can actually engage in discussion with this man. He is a quintessential example of the dangers of capitalism, and I have no doubt that he would sell you the rope you would use to hang him with if he could. ** Understanding his mentality can be incredibly beneficial to our society and our community, and I urge you all to exercise a more civil attitude towards this interview.

    Or, to put it another, more blunt way: Don't let this man drag you down to his level. He'll beat you with experience, and we're better than that.

    ** To inject a little humor into the conversation, if he did sell you something to hang him with, he'd probably insist on using this.

  59. Why did you..... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    Why did you steal money from Retrophin to pay off investors in your failed hedge fund?

    Follow up question, How much will you enjoy prison? After all they like assholes in prison.

    1. Re:Why did you..... by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? My hedge fund did quite well, actually.

  60. This is the absolute worst use of Ask Slashdot by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    There is absolutely no good reason to give this person a voice. He is horrible, he didn't even deny it. Then luckily for us, he got arrested. We should instead focus on what to do to prevent his sort of asinine behavior in the future, as we merely got lucky this time.

    How exactly are we going to prevent this sort of scum from jacking the price of life saving drugs, particularly those that impact a larger portion of the population. (epipen?)

  61. Question by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    If someone were to tie a noose around your neck, tie the other end to the trailer hitch of a pickup truck, and then drag your body through the street until there was nothing left but a skull with a few clumps of meat hanging from it, should the truck be a Chevy or a Ford? Or would you go with Toyota?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  62. If the role of money is... by See+Attached · · Score: 1

    If the role of money is to equate the work of the candlestick maker to the work of the accountant to the work of the airline pilot... and the amount of pay is proportionate to the contribution to society (rough jobs pay more, easy jobs pay less), how do you deserve such a salary? Is it really brilliant to buy a company and jack the prices up when that causes pain to the society that would reward you so?

    --
    Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
  63. More philanthropy by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

    Many music lovers applaud your work preventing the undoubtedly terrible Wu-Tang album from reaching the airwaves. Would you consider a similar effort for Kanye's upcoming release? It appears Kanye will want significantly more money. How would you feel about collaborating with other music fans, perhaps with a gofundme campaign?

  64. So... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Is there a sum of money after which you feel happy with the amount of money you have, or is it a matter of there not being enough penis in the world to fill the hole in your heart?

    Honestly I don't even know why I'm asking. There's about as much chance of these being answered as there was with SCO CEO guy. What was his name again? I don't even remember. I expect unpronounceable last name guy will be equally as memorable.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  65. Re:A new low, but not surprising by sdguero · · Score: 1

    -1 off topic... Because this shitpost has nothing to do with /. editors/ownership right? pfft. I think I'm right on topic.

  66. Serious Question by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    Were you born without a soul, or did you lose it in a deal with a well dressed gentleman with horns and a tail?

  67. Tag article "CANCEL" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Informative

    (Replying O/T to post this as close to the top as possible)

    To help express that Slashdot should not go forward with this interview, tag the article "cancel" until it's the top tag. Thank you and don't reply with a question for the Q&A.

    Here's how you can break the cancellation to him.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Tag article "CANCEL" by RandomSurfer314 · · Score: 3

      I like this Q&A, so go fuck yourself!

    2. Re:Tag article "CANCEL" by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1
      Sure, it'd be good to have him answer:

      Are you a psychopath or just morally and ethically bankrupt?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  68. Re:Why such a Douche? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

    I don't know the Bill Gates you're referring to. The one I know is an asshole, with an ego on par with Ellison's. But yeah, he helps people

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  69. What is your perspective of the media's portrayal? by Endloser · · Score: 1

    The media portrays your personality to be one of an ego maniacal sociopath. Please understand this is not me calling you a name or attempting to label you. My opinions are reserved from this until I've been able to hear from both sides. I can imagine that you may have something you would like to say or address about the overall negativity media expresses toward your character before people adjudicate personal bias toward it.

  70. Suggestion by outriding9800 · · Score: 1

    If this actually goes through slashdot parent company should donate all ad revenue to a charity the day they post that story.

  71. I got one question by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    How is that Magistrate Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto treating you?

    Which case is it, USA v. Shkreli Case "1:15-cr-00637" or "1:15-cr-00637-KAM"?

    Any chance you would share the court records with us? It seems that the only "public records" I can find are behind a lawyer only pay wall

    http://www.plainsite.org/docke...
    Unfortunately one needs either a PACER or PainSite.com login account just to check in on how you are doing.

  72. Re:Twitter follower, writing an argumentative essa by dr_canak · · Score: 2

    Here,

    let me save us all the trouble:

    Question 1: You've become an overnight household name as a consequence of a manufactured controversy. Since then, you've managed to grow a cult-following by engaging the controversy rather than hiding from the attention. Do you enjoy your new celebrity status enough to justify the headaches the media attention has brought you?

    "On the advice of counsel I invoke my 5th amendment privilege against self incrimination and respectfully decline to answer your question."

    Question 2: Prescription drug prices don't seem to follow the same price trends as most other consumer commodities. Can you cast some insight into the process of pricing a prescription medication? Do you have any thoughts on the fairness of the perception that drug prices are excessively volatile? Is this perception deserved? In either case, what are some of the underlying causes behind prescription drug price volatility?

    "On the advice of counsel I invoke my 5th amendment privilege against self incrimination and respectfully decline to answer your question."

    Question 3: Do you believe the environment for pricing pharmaceuticals in the United States is optimal, or favorable to innovation and research that best benefits patients?

    "On the advice of counsel I invoke my 5th amendment privilege against self incrimination and respectfully decline to answer your question."

    Question 4: You've frequently expressed your desire to invest more money in researching new treatments and cures for diseases. What changes or reforms to the United States healthcare industry and relevant regulations would be most effective in maximizing health outcomes for patients?

    "On the advice of counsel I invoke my 5th amendment privilege against self incrimination and respectfully decline to answer your question."

    Question 5: What is the single most counterproductive aspect of the United States legal and regulatory structure surrounding health care and drug research?

    "On the advice of counsel I invoke my 5th amendment privilege against self incrimination and respectfully decline to answer your question."

    Question 6: In most colleges, the computer science, computer engineering, and electrical engineering departments are awash with student interest in these majors. Do you feel that the healthcare industry is suffering from a "brain drain" or talent-loss as a result of differences in perceived profitability and ROI for those education dollars? If so: do you expect the common desire to found a Silicon Valley "Unicorn" startup could be redirected to inspire those students to research treatments for diseases if the government changed its approach to healthcare regulations?

    "On the advice of counsel I invoke my 5th amendment privilege against self incrimination and respectfully decline to answer your question."

    Question 7: In my biology class, I learned that there are many sponges in the mediterranean which appeared to offer opportunities to research new antibiotics. The academic who was researching these sponges lamented about a lack of interest from the pharmaceutical industry in researching new antibiotics because the ones we had now worked "well enough". When I encounter news stories like this: http://www.newsweek.com/2016/0... I'm left with some level of dissonance between two anecdotes which seem impossible to reconcile. Clearly, victims of war are not especially well-equipped to vote with their dollars, but this alleged lack of interest in researching new antibiotics seems endemic of a more systemic issue. Do you believe the search for new antibiotics deserves more research funding than they currently receive? Is there a hype-gap between the threat of antibiotic resistance being portrayed in the media and the risk antibiotic resistance actually poses? Do you believe that antibiotic research funding reflects an appropriate priority level relative to the ris

  73. Triggered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Excuse me Ordirules, didn't you know that Slashdot is a safe space now? Obviously these guys have all been triggered super hard by Martin Shkreli and want to censor him to protect their feelings. Guaranteed some of the same posters are people who use the word "SJW" seriously.

    1. Re: Triggered! by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      Psychopath?

  74. How do you manage to sleep at night? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    How do you manage to sleep at night?

    Do you need to take prescription sleeping pills? Have they had any price increases in the several thousand percent range?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  75. Re:Size of Financial Sector by plasm4 · · Score: 1

    +1 for this question. I'm genuinely interested in reading his response to it.

  76. Re:Haters gonna hate by plasm4 · · Score: 1

    I like him too.

  77. 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mr. Shkreli. Why are you interested in 4chan? Do you plan to turn the free 4chan image boards into a '$500 members only' imageboard ?

    1. Re:4chan by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      That would be quite foolish!

  78. Re:Twitter follower, writing an argumentative essa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    He'll just plead the 5th on all questions.

  79. Whiplash by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    You seemed to be all about listening to Slashdot when you first bought the site. You may have really really misread the site with this one. I urge you to contact Shkreli and say that Slashdot doesn't actually want anything to do with you and send him a poster size printout of goatse.cx signed 4chan for good measure.

    1. Re:Whiplash by whipslash · · Score: 2

      I'm always listening. But there are actually some really good questions here if you wade through the outrage and butt hurt. He'll probably give some interesting answers too. We won't post the interview if he refuses to answer some of the more pointed questions about his character or past perceived transgressions.

    2. Re:Whiplash by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It just seems like you're alienating a large part of Slashdot by even giving the guy the time of day.

    3. Re:Whiplash by whipslash · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone should take it personally. Just read another story if they don't want to read it. We've covered controversial stuff in the past and lord knows there's plenty of controversial stuff in the comments of almost every story. If people want to get outraged in the comments that's fine too. I'm listening.

    4. Re:Whiplash by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well it's your site. Just be aware that some people can take the fact that this is being covered as an indication of a changed site.

      Also this guy isn't controversial. Controversial implies that there's some discussion to be had on both sides. I think the only person on Shkreli side is Shkreli. :-)

  80. This is gold by ArylAkamov · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The absolute asshurt in this article is hilarious. Actual questions getting modded as troll, crying and screaming and "lol kill urself!" getting modded to +5.

    Crying and screaming to not give him attention, yet that is exactly what you're doing by crying and screaming about it.

    1. Re:This is gold by eaglesrule · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but some good does come of it. I enjoyed some very entertaining insults and had a good laugh at Shkreli's expense. This means Shkreli's existence is not quite completely a bane on humanity.

  81. What do you do for fun? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Any hobbies or interests that spark your imagination?

  82. Why is he still here? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

    When Frodo threw the ring into the lava, wasn't he supposed to die?

  83. No. by DexPleiadian · · Score: 1

    No.

  84. FFS by HBI · · Score: 1

    This is why people give money to charity - to buy a good name for themselves after a lifetime of being a huge turd.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  85. Re:A new low, but not surprising by whipslash · · Score: 1

    Your "shitpost" is inaccurate and off topic. Take the hiatus.

  86. Mr Shkreli by DMJC · · Score: 1

    How much of your company's income is being spent on R&D? What are the industry rates of spend on R&D into new medicine versus advertising and lobbying and where does your company sit within this area? Compared with say GSK or Bayer, how does your company compared on R&D spend?

  87. I have two questions actually by AvderTheTerrible · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Mr. Shkreli, how do you ethically justify to yourself a greater than 5000% price hike on medicines that are literally saving peoples lives?

    2. To Slashdot's editors: how do you ethically justify giving this scumbag free screen time like this?

  88. Ooh! Ooh! Pick me! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Instead of the usual "How do you live with yourself," I want to know more about the environment and culture on your world.

    How do you deal with the incredible heat, the pure hydrogen sulfide atmosphere and the constant pitchfork jabs from the native capriform humanoids? Is it true that the Internet provider is Comcast, and what's the broadband speed like? When you visit our world, do they make you fly Spirit?

  89. Re:A new low, but not surprising by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    Frankly, his post is spot on. Youve really screwed the pooch.

  90. Here's my question... by NoRefill · · Score: 1

    With all of the recent events around racial discrimination, how have you been dealt with discrimination as a Ferengi?

    1. Re:Here's my question... by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      I know this is Star Wars/Star Trek thing but nothing more!

  91. Re:A new low, but not surprising by whipslash · · Score: 1

    Your original comment was completely inaccurate and off topic, and it got modded down. If anything, people have been driven away by comments like yours that are based on no fact and prompted by a knee jerk reaction to a story or interview you don't like.

  92. Ask him if he could.. by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Ask him if he could eat poop and die please.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  93. What's your ID by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    You seem acquainted with internet subcultures. This suggests you may have a Slashdot ID and are perhaps even a regular poster. If so, what is your ID? Promise I won't tell you weasel of a little bitch.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:What's your ID by martinshkreli · · Score: 1

      Just made this one!

  94. Re:morales?? by Taquito+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Unless you're talking about Morales. Maybe know what you're talking about before you blow hot air. http://www.dictionary.com/brow...

  95. What is your major malfunction? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    See subject.

  96. I have a couple..... by ogdenk · · Score: 1

    "Were you born with such a smug punchable face or did you pay good money for it being the spoiled worthless poser rich boy that you are?"

    "Is your douchebaggery the result of a dismissive neglectful father and lack of attention or did you just grow into it without outside influence?"

    "Have you ever had a clinical diagnosis for Antisocial Personality Disorder (sociopathy) or any other interesting cluster B personality disorders?"

    "Do you want to buy 4chan because you enjoy the lack of empathy displayed by the user base? Would you hate to lose one of the only communities you can identify with?"

    All in all, I hope someone buys 4chan. I find it entertaining from time to time. I'd hate to see it go to this fuckstick though as he'd just drive the trolls toward less insane communities throughout the net when he decides he wants it to actually make money.

  97. Re:A new low, but not surprising by Falos · · Score: 1

    I don't care if this spiel is "wholly warranted reprimand" or "obliviously blind to reality", I just came by to say I found the sheer intensity of it refreshing. Karkat incarnate, in the last place I expected to educe Homestuck.

  98. Wu-tang by omar.sahal · · Score: 1

    Could you comment (in regards to the exclusive album created for you by the Wu-tang Clan) on the urban legend that if Bill Murray steals the recording in a heist he can then release the recording to the world.

  99. If your dog had your face... by barakn · · Score: 1

    ... would you shave its butt and teach it to walk backwards?

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  100. What Shkreli is Doing by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's a lot of pitchforks, Slashdot.

    Let's take a deep breath for a second and talk about what Shkreli is doing. If you take him at his word, and I do, he is interested in the niche market of pharmaceuticals for rare diseases. In the case of Daraprim (the drug he increased to $750 per pill), it cures Toxoplasmosis. Only a couple thousand people get Toxoplasmosis each year, which might not sound like a small number, except that Daraprim cures it after one regimen.

    Daraprim has the market cornered not because the FDA is slow to approve alternatives, but because companies don't give a shit about a drug that sells a couple hundred thousand pills per year. Daraprim has been the drug for 75 years. There has been no innovation, and luckily there have been no mutations that have made Daraprim ineffective. If there had been, those couple thousands of people would just die each year, because it's unlikely anyone would invest R&D into developing a new drug. Even so, Shkreli believes Daraprim is not that great and he can do better.

    Shkreli's theory is that you can actually make money in the rare drug business and that it's morally right to do so (and morally wrong to ignore these patients just because their disease is too rare to be a worthwhile market). He raised money on this theory, bought Daraprim, and increased the price *to insurers* as planned to make the acquisition worthwhile and fund the development of a better drug for Toxoplasmosis.

    Does this mean anyone is paying $750 per pill out-of-pocket? No.

    Does this mean hospitals are paying $750 per pill to stock the drug? No. Almost all hospitals pay somewhere around $1 per pill.

    Does this mean people without insurance are screwed? No. Shkreli gives away the pills to these people as inexpensively as he is legally allowed to (I can't remember if that's free or if he is required to sell it for what he charges the hospitals, but in either case it's as cheap as he's allowed to make it.)

    Is $750 per pill a large amount for a rare-disease cure? Absolutely not. It's small relative to many other drugs with even larger markets.

    Does this mean our insurance rates go up? In theory, yes. That is what insurance is for. You pay a little bit more than your expected benefit (probability X $amount) in order to cap your downside risk. In this case, the diseases are so incredibly rare that its contribution to your health insurance premium is not measurable.

    Shkreli's point is that areas of the rare disease pharma market are not functioning, and he believes he can make them function. In this case, that means these drugs are mis-priced.

    For someone to be controversial, there has to be two sides. Reading the comments here, there is clear universal hatred for Shkreli. That is not controversy and suggests that people here have not spent any time trying to understand what Shrkeli is doing. It doesn't mean you have to agree with it.

  101. Re:Wow... by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    > Clearly he fucked over people who were totally powerless

    Is this clear to you? It isn't clear to me. I think you're referring to people who get Toxoplasmosis, and if so you're simply uninformed. They don't pay anything for Daraprim. Their insurance company pays for the drug, and if they have no insurance they get it for free (or $1; can't remember). In theory this does increase insurance premiums, but we are only talking about 2,000 patients per year each taking something like 80 pills before cured. So, the apportioned cost of your Internet connection during the time you are complaining about Shkreli is many many times more than any theoretical increase in your health insurance premium from the Daraprim price increase.

  102. Who? by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    Who is Martin Shkreli?

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  103. Re:Why such a Douche? by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    So we ask, Martin Shkreli, why are you such a douche?

    It was the ONLY chance he had of tricking a skank into letting him inside a real vagina....

  104. Re:Wealth by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    What does he know about making yourself useful?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  105. Here's My Question by lowkeyknight · · Score: 1

    You justify your absurd Price Hiking of critical medications on the grounds that it is the Government and the Insurance companies that pay those hikes, not the consumer. However this argument is ultimately a semantic one: Gouging the Insurers, especially medical insurers, is what has led to a health insurance crisis in the first place. All insurance cost is, sooner or later, passed on to the consumer in premium, no sane, solvent insurer sells insurance (over the long term) for less money than they make in premium they take in, and profit on how they invest it. So when you gouge insurers, best case scenario is that you are hiking insurance prices to all consumers. When you gouge the government, that means you are gouging the tax payer, you are leaching tax money that could ultimately be spent on other programmes. I recognise your stated desire to invest this money in R&D. Laudable in theory, but in practice, what you are actually saying is, you want to do R&D, but you aren’t good enough, or promising enough, to get grants or investment, so instead you are going to gouge taxpayers and anyone who purchases medical insurance on essential drugs in the hopes of raising enough money to fund Research that no experts, investment firms or governments have seen anything promising in. Now independent research is fine and well and good, and governments and investors can be short-sighted, or outright contradictory in their desires and goals. But if you aren’t good enough to interest anyone at all in funding this research, or confident enough to put your own money into it, then why should people not be angry at what amounts to, at the least; profiteering?

  106. Rhetorical question? by keithrc · · Score: 1

    I don't guess there's any point in asking him how he got such a punchable face.

  107. Re: Are you eric? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    If you are making a South Park reference, I don't get it. Otherwise, what?! Well, if you are a nice single woman around my age, not completely crazy, currently located near my town and who has always dreamt about meeting a guy exactly like me, I might consider accepting your invitation :)

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  108. How did you find your first investors? What did you do to secure an initial meeting. what was the initial contact method?

  109. Here's one by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    Why don't you do a public service announcement for birth control?

    I see it going something like this:

    Remember folks, always use a condom

    That's how we lost Freddy Mercury

    And it's how we got Martin Shkrelli

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  110. Re:Why are you entitled to breathe our air? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    being such a weasel and all...

    Quit disrspecting weasels, They are cute fuzzy things, and Shkreli is an asshole.

    Oh wait, there I went and disrespected assholes.

    Are oyu serious Slashdot? Asking perhaps the most deservedly hated man in America to answer questions from some of the most rowdy nerds on the planet? Whatever could go wrong?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  111. Re:Impressive! by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    1. You don't know who or why I was down voted. It is not a qualification. You could have done it and you probably did.

    2. Slashdot is hardly conservative whatever that is supposed to be... its a tech site... so they're going to be more on the forward looking edge of society than most people.

    3. As to the Conservatives liking the ACA... you're conflating the state based Romney care system with the federal based Obama care... the conservatives did not write Obama care and it only passed through congress because the democrats had a majority in both houses... and even then the democrats had to hide the bill from their own members. Aka you need to pass the bill to see what is in the bill. The bill is not popular with either political party at this point in the US. Its just a question of where to now?

    Really all your post demonstrated is that you're so wildly butt hurt about getting serial spanked by me that you're going to make these frankly ego boosting fail troll attacks on me. Notice how I don't do this to anyone on slashdot? I know you know because you read every thing I post e-stalker style. Notice how all I do is respond to an article or a question... and throw in my two cents and then leave? But you. Look at yourself. And you think that by THIS behavior you're hurting me? I mean... how triggered are you by reality?

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  112. What has gone wrong in your childhood, ... by quax · · Score: 1

    ... to make you become such a flaming asshole?

  113. Re:Impressive! by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    So, you're one of those sad basement dwelling Bernie voters that Hillary was talking about... aren't you?

    Admit it.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  114. Why Biotech by goarilla · · Score: 1

    I would like to know why he keeps starting new biotech companies ?

  115. Re:Impressive! by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    So ... the answer to my question is "yes". Knew it.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  116. Re:Impressive! by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    We? That would be you and as many fingers as you can count before you get confused?

    You argue against me using the anon tag... you do that because you're trying to hide that you're just the same retard every time. Your problem is that you're very distinctive in the way you type your stupid insult laden posts. Thus your attempt to make yourself appear to be multiple people fails.

    When did I pick you up out of curiosity? It would be funny to know what triggered you so hard you decided to debase yourself to this extent.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  117. Re:Impressive! by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    When you do nothing but play dumb the net result is that you're behaving like an idiot.

    Just saying... if you don't ever cut to clever you never leave dumb. :wink:

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.