Slashdot Mirror


The Next President Will Face a Cybercrisis Within 100 Days, Predicts Report (cnbc.com)

The next president of the United States will face a cybercrisis within 100 days, predicts report from analysts at Forrester. The crisis could come as a result of hostile actions from another country or internal conflict over privacy and security legislation, said Forrester analyst Amy DeMartine, lead author of the firm's top cybersecurity risks for 2017 report, due to be made public Tuesday. From a report on CNBC:History grades a president's first 100 days as the mark of how their four-year term will unfold, so those early days are particularly precarious, said DeMartine. The new commander in chief will face pressure from foreign entities looking to embarrass them early on, just as U.S. government agencies jockey for position within the new administration, she said. Cyberwarfare between Russia and the U.S. will escalate, and the U.S. government will respond in 2017, said DeMartine. [...] Chinese government hacking will continue in 2017, despite a joint agreement not to conduct cybertheft of intellectual property. The massive U.S. Office of Personnel Management breach, which exposed the records of millions of U.S government workers, has strained diplomatic relations between the U.S. and China, since the U.S. believes Chinese spies carried out the attack. Countries like North Korea and Iran have been building capabilities for offensive purposes and will likely try to hack public and private databases, said DeMartine.

122 comments

  1. It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donald Trump will make The Cyber great again. So much cyber you're going to get sick of cyber. Yuuuge cyber.

    1. Re:It's ok by hort_wort · · Score: 1

      Donald Trump will make The Cyber great again. So much cyber you're going to get sick of cyber. Yuuuge cyber.

      I'm almost wondering if he spoke that way on purpose to dissuade hackers from bothering. Where would the challenge be?

    2. Re:It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald Trump will make The Cyber great again. So much cyber you're going to get sick of cyber. Yuuuge cyber.

      I'm almost wondering if he spoke that way on purpose to dissuade hackers from bothering. Where would the challenge be?

      He speaks that way about everything he does not understand (which is a lot). It's become a game for interviewers to ask him technical questions with as little context as possible then watch him squirm and produce some incoherent word salad.

    3. Re:It's ok by unixisc · · Score: 1

      If we can get along w/ the Russians, that'd be a good thing! Then we'll be on the same side, and there will be no cyber warfare

    4. Re:It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Hillary will have her own servers.

    5. Re:It's ok by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well he knows those Cyber terrorists and are great friends with them. He know all the best Cyber terrorists and know they wouldn't do anything against him.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald Trump will even cyber with the overweight 14-year-olds in their basements.

    7. Re: It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're talking about sounds a lot like surrender. Are you French?

    8. Re: It's ok by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If he was French he would have written a/, not w/.

      He's certainly pretentious enough, I'll give you that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re: It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well bleach my emails and call me Donald.

    10. Re: It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like Trump.

    11. Re: It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Weiner, Hillary's girlfriend's hubby.

    12. Re: It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better believe it! The cyber will be great. Well have so much cyber believe me. And I'd you don't not, you're a gross pig. And I'll put you in jail. Now, I need to go fondle my 12 year old daughter

      ~Donald Jerkoff Trump

    13. Re:It's ok by GNious · · Score: 1

      If we can get along w/ the Russians, that'd be a good thing! Then we'll be on the same side, and there will be no cyber warfare

      As evidenced by how the USA is not on the same side as Germany, and so had to hack everything there...

      *cough*

    14. Re:It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US didn't need to hack Germany. The Germans did the hacking and collected information on it's citizens and shared it freely with the NSA. The German government started loudly castigating the NSA until their own security services pulled them aside and told them to shut up because they were doing the same thing they were bitching about the US doing. All in all the Germans should be grateful the US gave them the western part of their country back after WW2 instead of making them a US state.

    15. Re:It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britain tried to "get along w/" Germany, and exactly one year later they realized it hadn't been such a good idea and started hacking the Enigma. Just imagine they hadn't been successful.

  2. how to!! by zlives · · Score: 3, Insightful

    easy fix,
    tell nsa to stop hacking citizens and focus on outside threats.

    1. Re:how to!! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      NSA should find and publish zero days, not find and collect them for their own use.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:how to!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and stop treating your allies as bad or worse than your enemies

    3. Re:how to!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      NSA should find and publish zero days, not find and collect them for their own use.

      Well, if they didn't use them ON US citizens...then their actions would be just fine.

      After all, they are an agency who's mission is (supposed to be) spying on foreigners and foreign nations.

      It is their somewhat recent (as far as we know) turning of their sites inward and doing domestic spying that is what has gone wrong with them.

      We do need them in their primary mission, spying on foreign interests.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:how to!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA's job is SIGINT, not computer security.

    5. Re:how to!! by russotto · · Score: 1

      Nope, they cover computer security under Information Assurance.

      https://www.nsa.gov/what-we-do...

    6. Re:how to!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if they didn't use them ON US citizens...then their actions would be just fine.

      Seriously, with this attitude is any wonder that no one likes the US anymore.

      It is this 'it is OK to fuck over everyone else' attitude that pisses off everyone and turns friends into enemies.

    7. Re:how to!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It is this 'it is OK to fuck over everyone else' attitude that pisses off everyone and turns friends into enemies.

      It isn't so much trying to fuck other countries...hell, they ALL spy on each other, that's a hard fact.

      But I *do* fully expect my country's government to do everything it can to promote our interests above all others, that's the main reason for having a government.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:how to!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't so much trying to fuck other countries..

      Well that is how it plays out, the US goes around fucking with everyone else then has a good cry when people do it back. You reap what you sow so stop being so surprised when people have a go at fucking you guys over.

      But I *do* fully expect my country's government to do everything it can to promote our interests above all others, that's the main reason for having a government.

      There is that attitude again, think about it, look at the guy that lives next door to you, do you approach him with the attitude "I won't hesitate to fuck you over if it benefits me"?

      Seriously, think about what you are saying, civilised people don't act like that.

    9. Re: how to!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is that attitude again, think about it, look at the guy that lives next door to you, do you approach him with the attitude "I won't hesitate to fuck you over if it benefits me"?

      I'm sure he does. Never been to the US I take it?

    10. Re: how to!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, a few times.

      Generally the people are great, friendly as can be and will often go out of their way to help strangers. Great place to visit.

      However, they have this 'us vs them' mentality when it comes to people that are outside the US boarders, extreme xenophobia. They use it as an excuse to treat other countries/peoples badly and give permission for their government to do so. They like the original poster thinks that civil rights only belong to them and those rights outweigh the rights of others.

    11. Re:how to!! by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1
      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    12. Re:how to!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Data provided by a Washington based think tank surveying "selected countries" working for an American "Charitable Trust".

      You like smoke been blown up you arse do you?

      Travel around a bit (outside US boarders) and ask for yourself, dudes in Washington are not known to be the honest sorts.

    13. Re:how to!! by hlavac · · Score: 1

      Rest of americans is so foreign to the ruling elite that they use NSA to spy on them

  3. Considering rump has shown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he knows nothing about technology, we shouldn't vote for him or his kind. They hate technology. On the other hand, Hillary has thwarted the FBI for over a year. She has proven to be a security expert.

    1. Re:Considering rump has shown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually she has been caught and then intimidated every one from prosecuting her.

    2. Re:Considering rump has shown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump knows enough about technology to not get his servers hacked. Hillary is the one who knows nothing. About technology either.

    3. Re: Considering rump has shown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, Hillary's a master criminal. She's murdered hundreds of people and not got caught. I'm voting for someone who's competent rather than someone like Trump who can't even scam some old people out of their life savings without getting sued.

  4. Obviously by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hillary's e-mails on the Wiener's laptop will be exposed

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    1. Re:Obviously by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hillary's e-mails on the Wiener's laptop will be exposed

      That's better than Hillary's wiener on the Emails laptop being exposed.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Obviously by bongey · · Score: 2

      The Clinton campaign is experiencing election dysfunction, their having a hard time keeping the campaign up.

    3. Re:Obviously by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Methinks Wiener was sexting Hilary, who was posing as the 15 year old

    4. Re:Obviously by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Hillary has already had bunches of cybercrisises.

      "The Next President Will Face a Cybercrisis Within -100 Days"

      FTFY

    5. Re:Obviously by Xenographic · · Score: 2

      At least this time it's not Bill's wiener that's causing problems for Hillary.

    6. Re:Obviously by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      "This Home Server pill may cause electoral dysfunction. If your electoral dysfunction lasts until November 8, you will survive as long as electoral dysfunction from other medications affects your competitor deeper and harder.

      Symptoms may include coughing, sniffing, regurgitation of green phlegm into your water glass, ignored pneumonia, calling others "deplorable", insulting pageant contestants and veterans, urge to build walls, and rapid change of subject when the topic of emails is brought up.

      Notice: the Bernie Pill and Rubio Pill are no longer available. We apologize for the reduced choice, which is the result of the recent Affordable-Hubris-Care legislation, and not our attempt to blatantly rip off consumers for profit by merging with our competition.

      Note the Gary Johnson Pill is still available, but it's a placebo. Although, some have found placebos more effective than real candidates because they are not smart enough to meddle on the globe. Have a nice day."

    7. Re:Obviously by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      OK, this is simply the best interpretation of events so far.

    8. Re:Obviously by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      ok, that's one of the funniest things you've written recently. Very clever.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there's a mental image I didn't need.

    10. Re:Obviously by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      That story is actually an early propaganda plant for limited martial laws due the the unpopularity of the establishment selected president and the blatantly phony election process. They are expecting a major disturbance across the political spectrum from left to right and are establishing the early line for the necessity of martial law to enforce the power of a corrupt establishment plant. No jokes in this what so ever, they have created a climate for chaos and just keep pushing and pushing and pushing to force control over the majority. Push to hard and it breaks and chaos, they do not care because how much they cripple society as it is prison for them. They won't let go though and they will kill to keep power, hence the stories will start coming out about major existential threats in order to justify martial law, so that activists can be targeted at silenced, journalists who do not toe the line rounded up and of course any protests brutally stomped out of existence with the acceptance of firing upon protesters (the us government has done it before, this time dressed up with, we heard gun shots before they fired and guns planted around the scenes of mass corrupt government shootings). You are now running like mad on a log floating on water and do not know it. Keep on top of the situation our you will fall and get crushed, really is not so funny any more.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  5. can you say TOOL?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, I smell a Tool here..

    1. Re:can you say TOOL?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, I smell Toolism in this mix..

  6. Elect Hillary by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    She's already more than 100 days ahead of Trump with her cybercrisis.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  7. Vote Hillary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary has shown herself to be a dab hand with computers, particularly email servers. She can fend of any cyberattack single handedly with her l33t hacking skills. She doesn't like to publicise it, but Hillary's online name is in fact Zero Cool. If Putin tries anything she'll turn the attack right back at him and be into the Kremlin servers in no time.

    Vote Hillary for a nation that's secure against cyberattacks.

    1. Re:Vote Hillary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only she realizes that war with Russia is how to handle the Cyber threat.

    2. Re:Vote Hillary! by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ironically, there may be something to what you say. The dodgy Clinton email server is the one thing that apparently has not hacked. State department? Yes. DNC? Check.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Vote Hillary! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You're saying that disabling all logging is your advised security solution?

      Clinton's server was hacked between 0 and infinity times. There is no data.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Vote Hillary! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      If Clinton wins, she can make Brian Pagliano the IT Czar of the US

    5. Re:Vote Hillary! by hey! · · Score: 1

      The logs were not deleted.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Vote Hillary! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It never logged anything in the first place. Logging was disabled, in a 'non standard' way, they did it on purpose.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Vote Hillary! by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Or it was hacked and the information it contains is damaging enough that if you keep it secret you've got a President in your pocket. People who assume that Russia has dirt on Hillary and are just holding onto it until closer to the election are idiots. Why would Putin want Trump to win if they could keep Clinton from opposing them for the next 4+ years?

    8. Re:Vote Hillary! by hey! · · Score: 1

      Citation, please. FBI preferably.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Vote Hillary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Bing is broken? Here is a linky

    10. Re:Vote Hillary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bogus logic. The server was wiped clean. No one has any idea if it was or was not hacked as a result.

    11. Re: Vote Hillary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a cloth!

    12. Re:Vote Hillary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that if it had been hacked, we'd have seen the leaks by now.

    13. Re:Vote Hillary! by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not my job to source any nonsense you believe in. I see no information about her deleting any metadata; just messages being erased with bleachbit.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:Vote Hillary! by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I've been bemused by the fact that, while systems all around her were falling, hers wasn't hacked.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    15. Re:Vote Hillary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denial is a river in Egypt, buddy. You are deep in it.

    16. Re:Vote Hillary! by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Wooaa hold your insight, we don't want the American sharpest crayons going all common sense here, whats important is to remember that you have only 2 options, and that your vote always count, and that Clinton y BAD and that Trump is, well, Trump, what a guy.
      - Sincerely, your not-Russian-internet-citizen

  8. At least one candidate... by OakDragon · · Score: 1

    At least one candidate has suffered cyber crises 100 days preceding, at least.

  9. Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by Feneric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Neither Democrats nor Republicans thought that being even a little bit computer-savvy would be useful for the POTUS. This means that the decisions made by either will likely be either 100% trusted to aides, or made by "feel". Furthermore, both these candidates have expressed an interest in increased surveillance, weakened encryption, etc. Seriously, how do you think this'll play out?

    1. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No politician in this country from city level on up is computer savvy.

    2. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither Democrats nor Republicans thought that being even a little bit computer-savvy would be useful for the POTUS.

      Does anyone? Why would they?

      Most likely "computer-savvy" people would be creating such a crisis, exploiting the errors of other "computer-savvy" people.

    3. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by stabiesoft · · Score: 2

      Donald's already said he is going to ask his 10 year old to handle cyber. The kids really good at computers.

    4. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/aides/highest bidders

    5. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I thought the kid was 15

    6. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I dunno, Trump seems to have a pretty good handle on how huge the cyber is these days.

      To be honest I think being clueless might be the best option. If they knew more they might do some real damage.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Trusted aides? I think you mean lobbyists from the various huge companies that spend millions of dollars on campaign contributions. It's pretty clear that neither candidate has the interest of the American people in mind and don't give two shits about stepping all over our Constitutional rights.

    8. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear God help us. She's going to take direction from Dr. Evil himself, Eric Schmidt.

    9. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Nope the "Barron" is 10.

    10. Re:Neither Big Party Candidate Computer-Savvy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Donald says he's going to cyber with a 10 year old. He cybers all the time, he's totally the best at cybering. You just type "I grab you by the pussy", see how easy that is?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. no crisis that hasn't happened by XparXnoiaX · · Score: 1

    What exactly is a cybercrisis? A ddos on a major dns server? Or is it a hack of the DOD? Or is it a hack of the DoJ and DHS?

    At this point, nothing short of poisoning a water supply would be called a 'crisis.' It would be called, "been there, done that."

    --
    Irresponsible disclosure is responsible
    1. Re:no crisis that hasn't happened by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I would expect a targeted attack that can sustain a prolonged attack on a vital infrastructure.
      Taking out a power grid, Sending random nuclear launch codes, take down major aircraft control stations....

      Heck just tweaking traffic lights, to make lights go from Green to Red with no yellow could cause mass car accidents

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:no crisis that hasn't happened by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      A cybercrisis is a bored teenager forwarding a link on Twitter that surreptitiously calls 911 when stupid people click it.
      It has just been scientifically proven that there are a lot of stupid people on Twitter.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. How do I filter this out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of receiving "news" about US politics. Why is there a filter for Canada and not US politics?

  12. too easy by slashmydots · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Hillary will go to prison over her emails. That's the impending cyber crisis.

    1. Re:too easy by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      Please, please, please let President Clinton go to jail!!!

      See what I did there, a win win for everyone.

    2. Re:too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this could be win-win-win. Clinton wins, gets impeached and simultaneously they actually get clear evidence that Trump was conspiring with Russian hackers. All of the above go to prison.

    3. Re:too easy by hambone142 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Naw. Obama will pardon her after the election, stating that it doesn't imply guilt.

      He'll say "it just needs to be over".

    4. Re:too easy by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Actually, this could be win-win-win. Clinton wins, gets impeached and simultaneously they actually get clear evidence that Trump was conspiring with Russian hackers. All of the above go to prison.

      Nah. In this scenario, Trump would go to prison, and Hillary would receive a Presidential pardon.

  13. History != The Media by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    History grades a president's first 100 days as the mark of how their four-year term will unfold

    Either history is a lot more retarded than it used to be, or you're talking about the media and not history.

    1. Re:History != The Media by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      Aliens!!!!

  14. cyber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grab 'em by the cyber! Fookin cyber XML! Cyber president! Cyber mooooooslims!

  15. Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putin will treat Trump like a favorite son.

    1. Re:Putin by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Trump will let Putin bang Melania while he watches. And then...Chris Christie.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  16. Likely the least of their concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the civil up rising that will likely follow if either of the 2 main divisive candidates are elected will be a more immediate concern.

    I don't really see any scenario after this election that will be peaceful and civil.

  17. Vote Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll just share the information willingly with Russia. There will be no need for hacking.

  18. Bleachbit by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I meant to ask this for a while now, but missed... What exactly is bleachbit? Does it do anything physically to the storage media? Like over-erase or over-program, so that a bit becomes unalterable or unreadable?

    1. Re:Bleachbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  19. as if it could get any worse. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The new commander in chief will face pressure from foreign entities looking to embarrass them early on

    as if systemic racism and poverty,
    warrantless surveillance,
    the continued existence of a foreign torture prison,
    holding 25% of the worlds incarcerated,
    an openly corrupt presidential candidate with a rigged delegate process,
    a complete mistrust of the concept of climate change,
    a guerilla war machine directly resultant from two failed wars of interventionist policy,
    two back to back government shutdowns
    a complete inability to elect members to its supreme court
    and a secret drone-war werent enough to discredit the mere idea of American Exceptionalism(c), it appears as though the haggard burro of liberty and freedom can only be brought to its knees by a "cyber crisis," whatever the hell that could be.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:as if it could get any worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the pretext for a digital 9/11. Seriously. You should be fucking terrified.

  20. THE SKY IS FALLING! by Vermonter · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall the media saying in late 2007 that the next president would face a major terrorist the scope of 9/11 within the first 100 days of office, too.

    1. Re:THE SKY IS FALLING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next president will also have to deal with something terrible in the first 100 days in office. No kidding. I am sure something horrible is reported to the president almost daily.

  21. That stock image by SmokeyRobot · · Score: 1

    On an off-topic note the guy on the stock image in the CNBC article is hacking what appears to be the Matrix with a sweatshirt hood over his head. Clearly the realism of stock images has gone too far.

  22. Hairy scary times indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially if it is a republican win. Considering the clowns running his IT show are still using defunct Win servers 2008 last I heard. The Russians reading all of Trump's correspondence since he decided to buy the presidency is a even more scary than Hillary's ongoing e-mail fiasco. But then again Trump may be smart enough to use BB secure when speaking to Tzar Putin so we might never know what is really going on behind the scenes though you can bet that the Russians are more up to speed than the CIA when it comes to Donald Inc!

    1. Re:Hairy scary times indeed. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      It was Windows Server 2003. A pretty good server before the current generation like Windows 2012. Now, if only they could get hold of some DEC era AlphaServers and put Windows Server 2003 on them, that would be ideal. That is a platform w/ probably the least amount of coverage

  23. On the other hand... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    In other news, Gartner says the internet will spontaneously deliver not just unicorns and rainbows but free beer for all.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:On the other hand... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      In other news, Gartner says the internet will spontaneously deliver not just unicorns and rainbows but free beer for all.

      Free spontaneous unicorns, rainbows, and intoxication? Sounds just like Windows 10. They were right!

  24. Won't take that long by russotto · · Score: 2

    If it's Clinton; she's facing a cyber-crisis _already_.

    1. Re:Won't take that long by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      notwithstanding the fact that Bush Administration's email coverup and war crimes will never be scrutinized with an eye towards criminal prosecution at the level that Hillary has been for her email server and Benghazi (along with everything else she has done for the past 20 years)....

      I predict that if Hillary is elected the Republicans will imediately try to start impeachment proceedings against her.

        -although it will be as ineffectual as their Romneycare defunding votes have been for the past several years unless they gain an unexpectedly large majority or something particularly damning comes out...

      There is certainly something 'October Surprise-ey' about the 2016 election endgame....

      -I'm just sayin'

    2. Re:Won't take that long by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      And if it's Trump, we'll have the Russian hackers protecting our cyber-borders! Wouldn't want to jeopardize their new puppet^H^H^H^H^H friend in the Oval Office, would they?

      --
      ~X~
    3. Re:Won't take that long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly spoken as an unbiased individual, given that you call it RomneyCare.

      Massachusetts' state healthcare system was vastly different from ObamaCare, hence the fact that ObamaCare is about to catastrophically fail in the next year or two due to insurance companies pulling out and extreme rate hikes.

      Let me guess, Benghazi was Bush's fault? The State Department refused to improve security conditions and they (and the President) refused to reinforce them in their time of need. This directly led to the death of four US citizens, including a US Ambassador. Hillary, the White House, and our Ambassador to the UN got on the news and began an apology tour, claiming that a YouTube video caused the attack. Hillary further compounded this disaster by saying her now-famous quote:

      With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they'd they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?

      How out of touch does one have to be before people take note? First of all, neither of the options that she listed are what actually happened. It makes a huge difference whether it was a random killing, the response to something that "we" did (right or wrong), or a planned assault to capture or kill a US Ambassador on what is quite literally US soil on 9/11 when we had intelligence to suggest the need for stronger security, which was denied by the State Department.

      Oh and, fun fact, all this time she was operating on her private email server sharing classified details. As someone that clearly is okay with her, I know that the answer will be that there was "no intent", but intent has no basis in prosecuting extreme leaks (see 18 U.S. Code Section 1924 and 18 U.S. Code Section 793). With at least seven Top Secret / Special Access Programs leaked, that qualifies as an extreme leak.

      One -- maybe two -- accidental leaks are genuinely overlooked in practice, but that's not what happened here.

      We would both be in prison and rightfully so! FBI Director Comey, who is ironically being vilified right now for admitting that the investigation is continuing anew thanks to new evidence, said as much during his statement:

      To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

      It could not have been stated any more plainly without using the words: she is above the law. "But that is not what we are deciding now" directly goes against his earlier statement that no "reasonable" prosecutor would prosecute such a case.

      I find it quite despicable that people expect people to denounce Trump for being basically the second incarnation of Bill Clinton, without the political smooth talking, but then want to pretend that Hillary is clean of corruption following the WikiLeaks leaks showing off exactly how much her campaign has infested the media and the DNC itself. Trump is not even remotely a good candidate, but at least he's not guilty of getting people killed and attempting to cover it up, or leaking classified material while making dumbfounded remarks when questioned about it like thinking that (C) was preceded by an (A) and (B), which itself should disqualify her from ever touching classified documents (because she's either a very obvious liar or far too stupid to handle the material -- pick one).

    4. Re:Won't take that long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump being Putin's puppet? Where did this meme come from? What does Putin have that he could even offer Trump? It's insanity. You've got to realize it's like a prisoner saying "I've got the warden by the balls! If he's good, I'll give him 20% of my slop!" saying that Putin has Trump...

      President of the USA answering to the President of Russia... not in THIS particular reality.

  25. Which security company is shilling this? by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    I love these hysterics that are aimed at trying to get the Federal government to give some overhyped company a pile of cash. Right now if I check my server logs I will see at least 1000 "hack" attempts by stupid scripts trying to exploit old holes. Things like old IIS holes, being run against Linux servers. Then I will read where some "security" company will write a report saying that after they installed their crap software on some Fortune 500 company that they managed to "block" over 100 hack attempts.

    The average dog walking wordpress site probably blocks that many every afternoon.

    Will there be a cyber crisis someday. Yes. They are just playing the odds that it will happen in the first 100 so they can say, "Look how smart we are." plus they will no doubt point to one of the regular hacks that come out about every 100 days such as the Yahoo hack and say, "That is exactly what we warned you about, now give us bags of unaccountable cash."

    1. Re:Which security company is shilling this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hillary clearly does not know sendmail technique, and donald kung fu is much better

    2. Re:Which security company is shilling this? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Reading the pdf. Fortune 1000 at risk, IoT issues, Constitutional protections vs domestic collect it all tensions.
      Too few really great cyber experts in the US for some reason.
      Evil consumers are reviewing products and services of brands and talking about them with others on the net. Warning each other about brands.
      Cash might move to a great competitor with a great product based on the internet reporting issues.
      The internet allows consumers to share facts about stupid brands with a lack of design skills, product quality or delivery issues.
      Herd consumers back into a brand so they have to stay, won't report facts and have to spend.
      Something about cloud computing.
      Back to the news story.
      Something linked about Russia and a "signature". Cyber details are now reduced to a linked analogy about "shimmy down the chimney", "the door down", "build a tunnel".
      Seeing the inner working of US politics is very bad even when its factual.
      China. The lack of encryption, poor network design, not having skilled staff and a vast plain US text database policy is all the fault of other nations. Heathcare. Vast internet facing databases put genetic markers or fingerprints at risk. Were is the quality US encryption?
      North Korea and Iran have capabilities too. More on "embarrass" American organisations but not the lack of basic encryption to prevent staff walk outs.
      Constitution vs big government agencies doing domestic security and cyber stuff for protection.
      Something about party political staff.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  26. Cybercrisis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cybercrisis? That's a new cybernoun. Cyberattackers will breach our cyberdefenses to unleash cybergeddon HORROR!

  27. Then we must vote Hillary by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    She has a lot of experience with that!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. ... All while the NSA is hacking away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at other soverign nations' systems, who have done nothing to the U.S. And if there is no "cyber crisis", then one will be manufactured and crafted to have the desired fallout. Stop playing the victim, nobody listens to you anymore.

  29. Act of War.... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    During the Bush years (I believe it was the second term) that the US declared their intent that a cyber attack would be viewed as an act of war and could face retaliatory attacks up to and including kinetic responses to such attacks. Now this isn't obviously going to fall under routine script kiddy activity but specifically state sponsored hacking. It's interesting that Obama hasn't responded to the DNC and other hacks as they have been confirmed to be state sponsored attacks, maybe in an effort to draw the line at stuff that actually hurts people. Or more practically that their own hacks through the NSA would draw a similar response.

    I'm not sure how I feel about it but I think we need to treat state sponsored hacking as acts of war if for no other reason than it would slow down the actions of the NSA and other state sponsored entities as well because of the repercussions. Responding in kind to these type of hacks would do much to encourage state sponsored entities to stay out of the game as it could quickly get out of hand and move to kinetic attacks. Russia tampering in US elections should be viewed as a threat to our democracy and an act of war deserving of retaliation.

  30. so long as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary doesn't develop cyberpsychosis.

  31. What a load of cyber bullshit by khz6955 · · Score: 1

    "The next president of the United States will face a cybercrisis within 100 days, predicts report from analysts at Forrester"

    What a load of cyber bullshit. If he really wants to avoid a cybercrisis, tell the president to stop storing his secrets on Microsoft Windows.

    1. Re:What a load of cyber bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is out. TRUMP 22 is in.

      That's right, 22. It's more than twice as good as any Windows, it's just great. You won't believe how good this operating system is. Unhackable. All the best experts have told you that already. Why would you use anything else? You know what? It's a good thing that pervert Wiener didn't have this installed or we would never know about what his terrorist wife was doing with all the secret classified emails. Remember when I told you not to trust Wiener? I was right!

  32. Fixed your headline by satcomjimmy · · Score: 1

    The next president of the United States will STAGE a cybercrisis within 100 days, predicts report from analysts at Forrester. The crisis could come as a result of hostile actions from A FALSE FLAG ACTOR

  33. Switch from tubes to trucks by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    It's the only way to send an Internet

  34. Don't worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, you don't need to worry. I got the best guy on it. He's gonna lock it all down, we're running the most reliable firewalls. I helped design them myself, it's gonna be a great firewall, just you wait and see. These Mexican criminals think they can hack us. You know what? They can't hack us. I'm going to make cybersecurity great again.