Slashdot Mirror


LeEco's CEO Jia Yueting Says Company Overstretched, Now Running Out of Cash (bloomberg.com)

LeEco is a giant conglomerate in China. The company offers a range of services -- from online streaming service, to smartphones, to TV, to electric cars. On top of that, the company has been aggressively expanding into different markets with India and the United States being the two notable ones. How does it make so much cash? You wonder. It doesn't actually, according to the CEO, who has informed the employees that the company is quickly running out of cash. An anonymous reader shares a Bloomberg report: The billionaire chairman of China's LeEco has admitted his technology empire is running out of cash to sustain a headlong rush into businesses from electric cars to smartphones. In a lengthy letter to employees, company co-founder Jia Yueting apologized to shareholders and pledged to slash his income to 1 yuan (15 cents), slow LeEco's madcap pace of expansion, and move the company toward a more moderate phase of growth. LeEco is the umbrella holding company for a sprawling family of businesses that includes sports media, automobiles, smartphones and TVs. The company known for its LeTV streaming service has aggressively pursued funding and placed bets on new ventures, from an electric car plant in Nevada to a $2 billion acquisition of California TV maker Vizio Inc. "No company has had such an experience, a simultaneous time in ice and fire," Jia wrote in a letter, obtained by Bloomberg News, describing LeEco's rise and subsequent issues. "We blindly sped ahead, and our cash demand ballooned. We got over-extended in our global strategy. At the same time, our capital and resources were in fact limited."

37 comments

  1. And? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    Who cares? They will be replaced by the next company run by a meglomaniac pumping out cheap electronic garbage.

    1. Re:And? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Or you can take the American "too big to fail" model, appeal to the government and just print more money. See? Quantative easing solves all of our problems. Nothing to see here!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:And? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That only applies to corporations who guarantees board seats to the former-government employees who have "retired".

    3. Re:And? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      That only applies to corporations who guarantees board seats to the former-government employees who have "retired".

      Le Eco is Chinese. Former and CURRENT Government employees (via proxies like spouses or children) are guaranteed board seats for a cash infusion by Beijing...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:And? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Those darn Commies! Oh wait...

    5. Re:And? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for some reason Communism never makes it past the "strong dictator/fascist stage" on its way to the People's Utopia. I guess it's human nature that gets in the way...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:And? by gtall · · Score: 2

      Ah, so you'd have flushed the U.S. auto industry down the toilet during the last recession. Approx 1.5 million Americans worked directly the auto industry. Another roughly 6 million jobs are connected to it. They generate about $200 billion in state and federal taxes. The auto industry paid most of the U.S. government money back, as did the banks.

      So you'd whack them all on the alter of Ann Rand. Let's let cut the U.S. economy because some misguided theory which has no use for humans or their offspring.

    7. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooner or later, there will be a reckoning.

      It's human nature, of course, to put off that reckoning as long as possible, but it's going to be terrible for the generation the hammer finally falls upon.

      They're right to be pissed the fuck off that we keep bailing out failing businesses because muh jerbs.

    8. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a ridiculous statement. Lend me $100BB at no cost and I'll repay the government in 5 years, too, while making myself fabulously rich. And my balance sheet (in 2008 and now) is far, far better than that of those companies in 2008.

      The problem is that the automakers and especially the banks ran into trouble because they were terribly managed with the banks being criminally mismanaged. The companies can be saved if it is necessary to the economy but almost all management should have been changed. Last I checked, the boards of directors and many of the high-ranking executives are still at those companies.

    9. Re:And? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you'd have flushed the U.S. auto industry down the toilet during the last recession. Approx 1.5 million Americans worked directly the auto industry. Another roughly 6 million jobs are connected to it. They generate about $200 billion in state and federal taxes. The auto industry paid most of the U.S. government money back, as did the banks.

      So you'd whack them all on the alter of Ann Rand. Let's let cut the U.S. economy because some misguided theory which has no use for humans or their offspring.

      Sure, I base all my real world decisions on science fiction books I liked as a kid. While we're at it, let's only have voting for people who do Federal Service.

  2. people just don't get it by whoozwah · · Score: 2

    continued growth is unsustainable. sometimes you gotta get to a happy place and coast. shareholders are idiots. stocks that go up are nice, yes. Stocks that don't go down are nice too.

    1. Re:people just don't get it by WindBourne · · Score: 0

      You are posting on the wrong site. Please post your North Korean, CHinese or Iranian postings elsewhwere.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:people just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, what a surprise that a Space Nutter is a complete nutbag in all aspects of life...

    3. Re:people just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Math and natural sciences set hard limits on growth. Some people try to ignore it, but that doesn't mean they circumvented natural laws.

    4. Re:people just don't get it by lxs · · Score: 1

      Shareholders aren't idiots. They are in it for the money.
      Stable stocks are only nice if they pay a good dividend. Tech stocks usually don't, which is why they attract short term investors who aren't interested in timeframes beyond the next earnings report.

    5. Re:people just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windbourne is a Space Nutter. He thinks math and natural sciences guarantee him warp drives, Mars colonies and asteroid mining. His entire belief system is centered around eternal growth and progress, and to be fair, when he was young back in the 1950s, it sure seemed that way.

    6. Re:people just don't get it by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      100% correct. He is spoiled because digital computers have been getting faster and faster every year. Except for the last few years, but he hasn't noticed that (yet). Technological growth is NOT guaranteed. In fact, digital computer performance is rapidly reaching its limit.

    7. Re:people just don't get it by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Stocks that go up and down each day but still pay out a healthy dividend are very nice.

    8. Re:people just don't get it by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      Public companies are all failures in making. You see, a company needs an owner, and only one. Collective ownership of means of production is like 10 men banging one woman in one hole at the same time.

      Public companies are a commie thing, subversion agents planted to ruin economies of the free world.

    9. Re:people just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope public companies are like a high class whore. The pimp/ceo promises to all the stockholders they will get a chance at the hole but first they have to contribute some money to set her up in style. Most of the time by the time she is set up in proper style and the stockholers can get their chance at the hole the CEO has banged the hole to hell and left.

    10. Re:people just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but what does your conception have to do with anything?

  3. Hopefully, he will sell FF to Apple by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, Apple should buy Faraday Future and finish that work.
    No doubt if another CHinese buys it, they will shut it down and move it back to CHina.
    IOW, they will have simply picked up the IP from it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Hopefully, he will sell FF to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt if another CHinese buys it, they will shut it down and move it back to CHina.

      Well, anything would be better than trying to build cars in the middle of the desert, at least from a financial perspective.

      I suppose if they charge a ton for them, it doesn't really matter, but there is a reason that car companies don't do things like that - it's called suppliers, and they all need a lot of them.

    2. Re:Hopefully, he will sell FF to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost headed out there to work at Faraday Future. Something just seemed... off. The equity part of the offer was obviously a completely fantasy also.

  4. But don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China will totally colonize the Moon and Mars. They are immune and exempt from the same forces of reality that are tipping the world toward economic collapse.

    1. Re: But don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are crazy. As soon as they reach those places, they will turn it into a giant garbage heap.

  5. Common by cmiller173 · · Score: 2

    One of the most common causes of business failure is expanding too rapidly. You don't need an MBA to know that, a undergrad intro to business class would be enough.

    1. Re:Common by GNious · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure this is something that is actively untaught during the process of getting an MBA

  6. Personal experience with Le people by fubarrr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Incompetent people with truckloads of cash, well just like any other company that managed to secure a dominant market position in China. In that case it is "Chinese soap operas on demand". My girlfriend was offered a "personal secretary" position in their Russian office. Amazingly, they appointed a Chinese C-level for their Russian office who does't speak any foreign language at all.

    What do they want to push in Russia? Yes, what they are pushing are the same Chinese soap operas, but with computer translated Russian subtitles. They ran a ~50-70 people operation in Russia for close to a year, just to invite market entry consultants, make a single landing page, and do a 1 few weeks trial run of their Russian website.

  7. This reminds me of a business story... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    An entrepreneur wanted to build a widget factory. So he got some investors to pony up some money. A while later he requested more money to build the widget factory. The investors demanded to see the entrepreneur and see what he had done with the money so far. They showed up at a brand new campus, state of the art office buildings, and numerous employees running around. But they wanted to see the widget factory that was bringing in the profits to pay for all this and why they should put more money into the business. The entrepreneur admitted that there was no widget factory, as he spent all the money on the offices.

  8. Editing by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "How does it make so much cash? You wonder."

    What I wonder is who the hell edits this stuff.

    To paraphrase Monkey-Boy Ballmer, "Editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors! Editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors, editors!!"

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Editing by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      You are aware that editors don't actually edit and editing is the submitter's job?

    2. Re:Editing by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      You are aware that editors don't actually edit and editing is the submitter's job?

      Silly me, what was I thinking?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  9. So by Lirodon · · Score: 1

    You bought Vizio _JUST_ to destroy it. Nice job.

    1. Re:So by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Surely somebody else would be happy to buy it.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  10. Take a note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The takeway from management perspective... CEO's should cut their own salaries instead of laying off part of their workforce, or at least in addition to. Banks should have done this before they asked for a handout... Way before, when the writing was on the wall... SMH

  11. The wisdom of Derek Smalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post reminds me of an absurdly hilarious sequence in 'This Is Spinal Tap', except the moron in today's story is serious.

    "No company has had such an experience, a simultaneous time in ice and fire,"

    Derek Smalls: We're very lucky in the band in that we have two visionaries, David and Nigel, they're like poets, like Shelley and Byron. They're two distinct types of visionaries, it's like fire and ice, basically. I feel my role in the band is to be somewhere in the middle of that, kind of like lukewarm water.