Slashdot Mirror


Apple Captures Record 91 Percent of Global Smartphone Profits: Research (cnbc.com)

Apple has captured a record share of profits in the global smartphone industry in the third quarter, according to new research, despite grappling with falling iPhone sales. From a report on CNBC:Third-quarter smartphone operating profit reached $9 billion globally of which Apple took 91 percent of the share, Strategy Analytics said in a note on Tuesday. This amounts to $8.19 billion for the U.S. technology giant. Apple has the highest profit margins in the smartphone industry thanks to a loyal brand following and the ability to price its iPhones at a premium. And the figures come even after Apple reported three straight quarters of iPhone sales declines. Sat a long way behind Apple is China's Huawei which managed to grab 2.4 percent of global operating profit share in the smartphone market, accounting for $200 million, according to Strategy Analytics. Chinese start-up brands Vivo and OPPO are in third and fourth place, both capturing 2.2 percent of global smartphone profit each.

142 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You DO NOT want the company you are buying things from to make record profits.

    It means that they are taking a higher percentage of your money than any of their competitors.

    You might want the company to have the greatest sales figures (not true of Apple), or the greatest proportional re-investment (not true of Apple), or the greatest customer base even (not true of Apple).

    But, like walking through Las Vegas... all that show and money to blow on things comes from one source... people like you paying over the odds for their products.

    1. Re:Sigh. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You DO NOT want the company you are buying things from to make record profits.

      Yeah, you want them to make record losses, how else can you assure that it goes broke before they can update or even fix your product,

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    2. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      91% of the profits share, would be fine, if they also had 91% of the market share, sadly they have ~40% of the market share.

      So either their product is more expensive than their competitors, or they have massive efficiencies that their competitors don't... (or some combination).

      Go to the store and look at the price of an iphone and an android to find out which!

    3. Re:Sigh. by kuzb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait .. Apple actually fixes their products? I was under the impression that they released broken products and had their customers pay to fix them.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    4. Re:Sigh. by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      "You DO NOT want the company you are buying things from to make record profits."

      Unless you're a CEO there or a shareholder of the company.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    5. Re:Sigh. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      It means that they are taking a higher percentage of your money than any of their competitors.

      That depends on why you are buying it. If you are buying it as a status symbol, then the higher prices are a benefit, because they make it more exclusive.

    6. Re:Sigh. by vux984 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If 2 companies are splitting the profits taken in a market 50/50 and one does a recall that wipes out their profit for a quarter, then the other company is making the same amount of money... but now has "100%" of the profit.

      This news is just a reflection of Samsung taking a giant loss on the Note7.

    7. Re:Sigh. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apple products are never broken, they're just held incorrectly.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or maybe their phones have a feature that their main competitors doesn't. I think it's called not exploding.

      Their sales are helped by the phone NOT EXPLODING.

    9. Re:Sigh. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You DO NOT want the company you are buying things from to make record profits.

      It means that they are taking a higher percentage of your money than any of their competitors.

      You might want the company to have the greatest sales figures (not true of Apple), or the greatest proportional re-investment (not true of Apple), or the greatest customer base even (not true of Apple).

      But, like walking through Las Vegas... all that show and money to blow on things comes from one source... people like you paying over the odds for their products.

      Mods: Insightful?!? Really? I see plenty of Hate; but Where is the INSIGHT?

      You might want the company to have the greatest sales figures (not true of Apple)

      Citation, please?

      [...] or the greatest proportional re-investment (not true of Apple)

      Citation, please?

      [...] or the greatest customer base even (not true of Apple)

      Citation, please?

      Be careful: We're talking about BRANDS, not PLATFORMS here.

    10. Re:Sigh. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Wait .. Apple actually fixes their products? I was under the impression that they released broken products and had their customers pay to fix them.

      The products weren't broken when they reached the Customers. Therefore, Apple did not RELEASE "broken" products. Or else, the "Touch Disease" bullshit would have been a news story when the 6s was RELEASED, September 25, 2015, instead of a couple of months ago.

    11. Re:Sigh. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Apple products are never broken, they're just held incorrectly.

      You mean dropped and sat-on incorrectly...

    12. Re:Sigh. by hey! · · Score: 1

      It depends. Pretty much the goal of every business is to score a higher-than-normal profit, and there are a lot of ways to do that. Some of them are clearly unethical and unfair to consumers (Volkswagen). But a lot of them are beneficial to consumers -- like shrewd engineering, efficient manufacturing processes, and economy of scale.

      There is also the issue of design which is a subjective judgment for a consumer -- but which doesn't make paying a premium for that thing irrational. Quite the contrary. It would be irrational to choose a lower-priced, worse-designed product if the marginal cost savings is less than the marginal loss of subjective enjoyment.

      The disadvantage of course is that subjective value creates a huge incentive to manipulate consumer tastes. The only answer to this is cultivate your own tastes.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Every company releases broken products. The difference is that you can take nearly any Apple product to a nearby Apple store and they will fix most problems right there on the spot for free. Good luck finding a Samsung store to put out your battery fire.

    14. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're living in a fantasy world. Samsung took back all their Note 7 phones and in less than a month. Look at how Apple handled the antenna issue, for example.

    15. Re:Sigh. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      That's OK. Those who deal with you know, instinctively, that they are dealing with something better wiped off their shoe with a tissue. You need to see an iPhone, but they just know, it's that obvious.

    16. Re: Sigh. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      My company just bought me a MacBook pro. I don't want to go out with it, because it is too risky with such a device. Really it feels like more of a burden than anything.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    17. Re: Sigh. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Most people get that. The thing people don't get is why people pay so much for the little bit extra that Apple puts into it. I mean, how much can you engineer a smart phone? I would have said ios is much smoother compared to a galaxy s3 but today android is just as smooth. There is an incredibly wide varience on what people will pay for those little small touches.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    18. Re: Sigh. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      My company just bought me a MacBook pro. I don't want to go out with it, because it is too risky with such a device. Really it feels like more of a burden than anything.

      Right. Because people will see that Apple logo through your computer-bag...

    19. Re:Sigh. by vux984 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Canaccord Genuity analyst Michael Walkley said in a research report Sunday that Apple captured 75% of smartphone industry profits in the second quarter. But that's down from 84% in Q1 and 91% in Q2 2015, he said.

      Apple's share of smartphone profits fell because of Samsung's improving profitability driven by streamlining its product lines along with strong demand for the Galaxy S7, Walkley said. Samsung's strong results are expected to continue in the third quarter ahead of the September launch of Apple's iPhone 7, he said."

      "Samsung's share of smartphone industry profits improved to 31% in Q2, up from 22% in the first quarter and 19% in Q2 2015."

      http://www.investors.com/news/...

      Apple's profit share of the smartphone market was in steady decline, and Samsung and others were in ascension. The ONLY reason Apple is back up to 90%+ in Q3 is that Samsung's profit share evaporated in Q3 due to the recall expense. It's that simple.

      "Sorry, yes."

    20. Re: Sigh. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      They will if I am working on it at an airport. Also I don't want to look like a contentious douche-bag.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    21. Re:Sigh. by malditaenvidia · · Score: 1

      You misread, he meant "fixes" as in "neuters". They neuter your product for your own convenience and safety. Could you people please think different for 5 minutes?

    22. Re:Sigh. by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      Interesting thoughts, but flawed.

      I like the idea of a company I've brought something from making record profits if what I buy from them is worth the money I've paid, then it's not over the odds.

      For example, recently I got work to buy an iPhone 7 (to replace my Samsung S5. Prior to that I had a Nexus 4).
      Wow, what a friggen awesome phone compared to my S5, they way iOS works is head and shoulders above Android (in my mind). Was so impressed with the device, I spent my own money to buy another iPhone 7 for the wife, who's smitten with it.

      Can't say I've felt that way with an Android device at the same price point. Therefore the price that Apple has their devices at is OK. Yes, of course we'd all like things to be cheaper, but hey, I can afford it so fuck it, why not.

      Can't afford one at the price Apple charges or don't like using iOS, then don't buy one, pretty simple.

    23. Re: Sigh. by mlts · · Score: 1

      Slap a case on it, get some insurance, and use a secure backpack to lock it up when out and about. Travelon and PacSafe make some decent secure backpacks. For security on the machine, FileVault Pro, and have the user that unlocks FV different from your usual user. That way, an attacker is confronted with the much longer FV boot password user if trying to turn the laptop on, while your day to day user can have a shorter PW.

    24. Re:Sigh. by kuzb · · Score: 2

      No, they were just designed to break easily under normal use. Totally fair!

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    25. Re:Sigh. by kuzb · · Score: 2

      ...and thank christ for that. Do you know how many times I've almost died due to that extremely dangerous headphones jack?

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    26. Re: Sigh. by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      Apple batteries have been blowing up too. Google it.

    27. Re: Sigh. by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      Will they still have 90% of the profits when the EU calls for their tax bill (which they've nevpaid ever). Easy to make record profits avoiding taxes.

    28. Re: Sigh. by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those "secure backpacks" will not present much trouble once the thief/robber has made it back home to their tools. They'll cut open that bag in a minute or two.

      My advice would be to use a cheap or heavily worn bag or backpack to falsely signal that the computer is cheap or old.

    29. Re:Sigh. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      No, they were just designed to break easily under normal use. Totally fair!

      So you are saying there is a design failure? Because relatively few of the million of iPhone 6 Plus actually are affected, and the others fail to break as designed?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    30. Re: Sigh. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Apple batteries have been blowing up too. Google it.

      So have the brains of Apple haters. No really, Google it.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    31. Re: Sigh. by Kopp · · Score: 1

      They paid their bills. They just had a custom made tax bills that was unfair to other companies. The EU isn't actually asking Apple to pay something directly, they're asking Ireland to get that tax money back

    32. Re:Sigh. by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      I can somewhat agree but look at the stupid competition. Can't buy a cheaper android phone from china without a 60% chance of some kind of backdoor. Also, given how Apple doesn't just discard updates for their phone after 6 months and trying to make the iPhone a black box really appeals to me.

      The constant interface between devices. A safer app store, abit shitty search for years. Its really REALLY hard for me to look at an alternative

      Hell, it was a Samsung phone I was looking to upgrade my iPhone 5 from, just because it seemed to have all these features above. They blew that one. There really aren't that many smart phone companies out there that keep this kind of quality. I am looking at the Google pixel too, but it's just too new and doesn't look that impressive to be honest. Its still $600+ too.

      I very much doubt anything is going to change in the next few years and both Apple and Samsung can charge insane prices for the phones because of it

    33. Re: Sigh. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      They will if I am working on it at an airport. Also I don't want to look like a contentious douche-bag.

      Slap a Linux sticker over the cute little Apple logo.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re: Sigh. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      If I could gut a Thinkpad T23 and put the contents of the MacBook into it I would.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    35. Re: Sigh. by Spectra72 · · Score: 1

      First of all, if your company bought it, why do you care if it gets stolen?

      Second, don't live in fear. People can smell fear a mile away. It makes you a target regardless of what laptop you're using.

      Third. Do you think you're something special by having a Apple product? Go into any airport, any coffee shop...ANYWHERE in the world. They are everywhere. Europe, Asia, North America, South America, Africa. I travel them all for work, constantly. Apple is everywhere. Business travelers are everywhere.

      Your Apple product is no more of a "High Value Target == business traveler" beacon than any other laptop.

      You're not going to attract a moments notice unless you give off that stink of fear.

      Reading your post...you give off that stink of fear.

    36. Re: Sigh. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Property doesn't matter if it isn't yours?

      Wow you got all that from one comment? I'm afraid to answer!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    37. Re:Sigh. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      You DO NOT want the company you are buying things from to make record profits.

      It means that they are taking a higher percentage of your money than any of their competitors.

      You might want the company to have the greatest sales figures (not true of Apple), or the greatest proportional re-investment (not true of Apple), or the greatest customer base even (not true of Apple).

      But, like walking through Las Vegas... all that show and money to blow on things comes from one source... people like you paying over the odds for their products.

      Teenagers are the ones driving Apple's sales. It is not adults. I know many adults who complained that their Apple phone had very limited lifespan, and that added software from the apple store did not function as advertised.

      Android has a larger selection of free or low cost apps. Android is more popular.

      However, if Trump convinces Apple to manufacture in the USA, they will either double the selling price of their phone, or receive a normal -non exaggerated profit.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    38. Re:Sigh. by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      It's only okay to tell Android users that they are holding their phone incorrectly.

      http://dontholditwrong.tumblr....

    39. Re: Sigh. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      If I could gut a Thinkpad T23 and put the contents of the MacBook into it I would.

      Thus proving which is the more desirable laptop.

    40. Re:Sigh. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      No, they were just designed to break easily under normal use. Totally fair!

      They were NOT designed to break, you idiot. They might have proven to be a little more fragile than Apple's testing would have indicated; but that does not constitute DESIGNED to break. Nobody but NOBODY does that, Hater!

  2. Does that include the App Store profits? by chispito · · Score: 2

    If that does not include their App Store profits, then it's even more significant.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    1. Re:Does that include the App Store profits? by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

      If that does not include their App Store profits, then it's even more significant.

      Apple's software profits probably look like a rounding-error compared to their hardware profits.

    2. Re:Does that include the App Store profits? by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      6B profit (in 2015) from the app store is a nice rounding error to have.

  3. Value for money by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You DO NOT want the company you are buying things from to make record profits.

    As long as I'm getting what I consider good value for money I don't care at all if they are making a big profit. The only way Apple or any company makes a big profit is if people like what they are getting for the price. If it wasn't worth the price then they would be forced to charge less. Apple products are a completely discretionary purchase.

    It means that they are taking a higher percentage of your money than any of their competitors.

    Which is irrelevant if I am getting a higher value for my money as well. Obviously a lot of people think Apple gives better value for the money than the alternatives. You don't have to agree with them for yourself but that doesn't mean they are wrong.

    But, like walking through Las Vegas... all that show and money to blow on things comes from one source... people like you paying over the odds for their products.

    Clearly people don't find that to be a problem. Yes Vegas wasn't built on winners but people keep coming so obviously they feel they are getting good value for what they spend. If it's not your thing then do something else and I assure you nobody will care or think less of you for it.

    1. Re:Value for money by chipschap · · Score: 3, Informative

      >The only way Apple or any company makes a big profit is if people like what they are getting for the price.

      What a naive way of thinking. Either that or Apple uses predatory tactics to trap people and trick them into using their products.

      Monopolies or near monopolies can easily be predatory, but that requires very limited consumer choice. I can't see how smartphones fall in that category.

      In my view Apple charges a lot for what they deliver. But I don't have to buy Apple and I don't. Others feel Apple is a value, whether based on quality, functionality, or simply perceived prestige. They buy Apple. That's how the market works.

      I suppose there is some lock-in, in that if you've spent a fair amount on Apple apps, you can't switch and take them to Android, whereas on Android, you can take your apps to a different brand of phone or tablet. But that doesn't seem like a predatory practice on Apple's part.

      Face it: Apple is expensive but many people are willing to pay Apple's prices. Apple makes a lot of money that way. What's the problem?

    2. Re:Value for money by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      >The only way Apple or any company makes a big profit is if people like what they are getting for the price.

      What a naive way of thinking. Either that or Apple uses predatory tactics to trap people and trick them into using their products.

      Puh-lease.

    3. Re:Value for money by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Apple owes its success to the 2008 crash when lots of smart engineers were out of work and were willing to bet thousands of hours on writing apps instead of full time jobs. This created the App economy where Apple gets 30% of the cut but more importantly the apps drive the demand for the phones. People dont want to switch to Android as iOS still has the most and best apps and app developers dont want to switch as the paying public is on iPhones. Android users are more sophisticated and more likely to use a freeware version than pay for something. This is an accident of timing rather than anything special Apple did. As they say its Smarter to be Lucky than lucky to be Smart. Jobs was Lucky. He got a special kind of economy to play in and he ran with it. There are well know studies that people buy the luxury item they can afford. Those who can afford luxury houses buy them but those who cant ,buy a livable house and a luxury car. Those who cant afford that ; rent, buy a usable car and buy a luxury phone. The recession helped the sales of iPhones as being one of the few luxuries people could still afford. As things get better and people can buy luxury cars they will probably just not replace their phones. Still Apple has used the last 8 years of a crappy recovery (Thanks Obama) to cement their place in the app economy. They can probably last another 10 years if they dont do anything really stupid.(Like trying to get into cars a notoriously capital intensive and unprofitable business)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re:Value for money by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      A subset of slashdotters hate free markets. They believe companies should sell at just above cost (if that much!) so they, the self-entitled narcissists, can purchase products without any of that messy production stuff. The idea that a transaction might be beneficial to both parties is simply not a concept they can understand.

    5. Re:Value for money by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I realize you're an anonymous cow-patty, but really, do you have to display unmitigated bigotry and complete disregard for facts? Do you have to demonstrate that such stupidity exists in the world?

    6. Re:Value for money by unixisc · · Score: 1

      >The only way Apple or any company makes a big profit is if people like what they are getting for the price.

      What a naive way of thinking. Either that or Apple uses predatory tactics to trap people and trick them into using their products.

      In the market, there are umpty number of Android phone manufacturers, and a few Windows phone manufacturers. Nothing stops anybody from buying those. While I have until now used an iPhone and just bought a 7 a few weeks ago, nothing stops me from using a Lumia going forward, especially if it supports video calling in WhatsApp

    7. Re: Value for money by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      How easy is it for a person to transfer a $1000 Apple music collection to Android? I don't know, just wondering.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re: Value for money by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Go into the iTunes folder, navigate the sub-folders and then see if they can be copied or not. If not, you're SOL, but if yeah, it can be copied into the music folder of your Android phone or SD card.

      I do have a few songs in iTunes, but the bulk of my music collection - here's what I did. I hear something on Sirius XM that catches my attention, I later download it on my PC using one of the many YouTube downloading apps out there. (If I need it in audio format, I'll convert it using Format Factory.) I have quite a collection. It goes to the SD card on my Verizon tablet, and I listen to it from there.

      If you must buy songs, why not buy it from Vevo, which is supported on all the platforms, and is official as well? I don't believe my list of liked songs amounts to 1000 (assuming $1/song)

    9. Re:Value for money by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      At least with Linux I can Google an answer.

      And of course, the internet doesn't allow posting of answers for Apple stuff, right?

      Oh, and you can "Google" an answer for Linux; but it doesn't mean you'll get one, or get one that doesn't include a trail of snarky responses instead of any real information or assistance.

      Oh, and by and large, you do NOT find the snarkiness on Apple-oriented forums. You just don't. People tend not to act like a bunch of adolescents with arrested social development, like they do in nearly every Linux forum.

    10. Re: Value for money by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      All I'm suggesting is, if someone has bought a lot of Apple music then they are an Apple customer forever.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    11. Re: Value for money by unixisc · · Score: 1

      How many people are like that, when they can not only hear but also watch any song they like on YouTube, and even download it if they want it offline? (I know Android systems don't allow YT downloads, but I've had no such trouble downloading from Windows apps, and I'm sure iOS apps would work as well)

    12. Re: Value for money by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting that no one buys music from iTunes?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    13. Re: Value for money by mlts · · Score: 1

      I have fairly large sized collection. It isn't tough to copy the files to a SD card (rsync), but since I have a YouTube subscription, I just let the music application scan through the collection, then I can just download the songs from Google. Of course, there is the privacy aspect, but the advantage is that you can download what you want to listen to fairly easily when you are away from your music collection.

      Of course, Android has some nice music players available, and depending on phone, there might be a utility to allow easier copying of files.

    14. Re: Value for money by unixisc · · Score: 1

      To the scale you are suggesting? Unlikely

    15. Re: Value for money by LanceMcGrath · · Score: 1

      Over the course of my life, I've spent maybe 100 CHF on iOS apps. Considering the cost of a phone is, what, 900 CHF, replacing all of those apps on an android device would not be a significant inhibitor. Especially since only a few of those apps are still installed and in use on my phone...

    16. Re: Value for money by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      You have a large iTunes collection purchased through Apple?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    17. Re: Value for money by mlts · · Score: 1

      More like CD rips and such downloaded and in iTunes because it used to do a decent job at song management, as well as Apple iTMS purchases. I would say these days, MediaMonkey would be a better utility for organizing music if one isn't purchasing through Apple's store.

    18. Re: Value for money by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      All I'm suggesting is, if someone has bought a lot of Apple music then they are an Apple customer forever.

      Actually, all you are suggesting is you are a fluffer and a nutter.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    19. Re: Value for money by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Go into the iTunes folder, navigate the sub-folders and then see if they can be copied or not. If not, you're SOL, but if yeah, it can be copied into the music folder of your Android phone or SD card.

      So, your answer to the question "can I move my music from my iPhone to an Android phone" is essentially "either yes or no, but I don't know which".

      Cheers.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re: Value for money by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      To the scale you are suggesting? Unlikely

      It's hardly inconceivable that someone could have spent a couple of hundred a year at the iTunes store and ended up with $1000 worth of music over a few years.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    21. Re:Value for money by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Hive Minds RULE!! I can tell you in the G+ apple groups anyone not conforming and worshiping apple in the highest is banned from the group. No wonder you dont find any snarkiness.

      Well, yes. Everybody in "G+ apple groups" is a dick, and you are one of them. Gee, I wonder if any of them have even touched an Apple product in years, let alone actually own one.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    22. Re:Value for money by chipschap · · Score: 1

      So? Sony is the only company producing Sony televisions.

      The point is that there are other TVs. There are other smartphones.

    23. Re:Value for money by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Apple makes a lot of money that way. What's the problem?

      The problem is that if one company makes all the money, it shows that the market is unhealthy, and it's actually quite likely that company isn't making all the money by their own merit.

      Even though Apple has a relatively small market share compared to others, they can still drive the entire market, and in many cases, ensure that certain technologies and standards are NOT available to competitors. Remember when multiple manufacturers were introducing e-IPS monitors over a year, and then they suddenly all disappeared and Apple was using e-IPS technology exclusively? How did that happen?

  4. sure by HBI · · Score: 1

    So the poor could buy Pabst Blue Ribbon and Mad Dog 20/20 with it. Or drugs. This is trickle-down economics at its best!

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:sure by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Maybe the poor don't all have bad taste in alcohol. Maybe they can only afford bad alcohol.

      How do you know they won't buy high quality champagne with all that money?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:sure by HBI · · Score: 1

      Because high quality champagne doesn't go as far, and the poor are practical.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:sure by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Because high quality champagne doesn't go as far, and the poor are practical.

      If someone gave me a good chunk of 6 billion dollars I'd soon stop being practical.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by Noishkel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Digital Trends work worked out a while back that Apple makes about $288 in profit for each iPhone sold. The average Android device... well it varies very widely. But According to 'Pocketnow' it works out to only about $25 of actual profit per device.

    Honestly... Apple is really REALLY screwing it's customer base by selling them last years hardware in every new phone and just pocketing the profits. And for some reason people STILL flock to them.

    1. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look, I hate Apple. I hope they go out of business, sell their headquarters, and the land where it stood is razed and salted.

      That said, the "last year's hardware" comment is a bit silly. I can be a hater and still be rational enough to say they make good hardware. Their hardware is cutting edge when released and their CPUs top shelf. Being in denial helps no one.

    2. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by Noishkel · · Score: 1

      Well you say that, but from where I sit all of my Apple friends are actually getting very frustrated with Apple, especially given the new MacBook Pro and it's gimmick TouchBar. Hell... Apple straight up REMOVED features from the entry level MacBook, then added them back in an over priced 'Pro' model.

    3. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Digital Trends work worked out a while back that Apple makes about $288 in profit for each iPhone sold. The average Android device... well it varies very widely. But According to 'Pocketnow' it works out to only about $25 of actual profit per device.

      Honestly... Apple is really REALLY screwing it's customer base by selling them last years hardware in every new phone and just pocketing the profits. And for some reason people STILL flock to them.

      (Apple, circa 2015) "Here's our shiny new iTurd."

      *iLemmings buy millions of them*

      (Apple, circa 2016) "Here's the same iTurd, in Rose Gold."

      *iLemmings still buy millions of them*

      I'm not going to even remotely blame the company here when it's rather obvious just how fucking ignorant millions of their rabid fans are.

    4. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by Noishkel · · Score: 1

      That's not MS fault. That's just how patent law works. :/

    5. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by kuzb · · Score: 1

      It's not silly. Compared to the hardware their competition is often using Apple devices ARE last year's hardware. They're about as cutting edge these days as a used 6 month old razer. To add to that, they make disposable products that are so anti-consumer that people are forced to replace these lemons more often.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    6. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by lusid1 · · Score: 2

      I'm as disappointed as everyone else in the new macbook pro, but I also recognize that its a great machine that been incorrectly positioned. If they had positioned it as "The best Macbook Air we've ever made" it would be enjoying completely different sentiment in the press. We'd all still be wondering WTF am I going to get a new pro level laptop, but it would be easier to move on if they admitted outright that they were abandoning the pro market.

    7. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Wasn't aware the MacBook was a phone...

    8. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by tsa · · Score: 1

      Have you ever touched an Apple product?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    9. Re: Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Maybe your just the ignorant one. You are depriving yourself of good hardware and software because of some artificial reasons. When you grow up you will understand.

      I own Apple hardware, and utilize it when and where necessary. The hardware itself used to be good. Now it's a sealed box with nothing but proprietary connections and no upgrade path. Soldering the fucking hard drive to the logic board is not what I call user-friendly.

      I have an army of iLemmings to thank for the fact that Apple's sealed box model and obscene profit margins will become the industry standard.

      Ignorance attempts to justify their actions of late.

    10. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Apple's phone hardware rates with the best available. Being a single manufacturer, they don't release as frequently as Android devices from half-a-dozen manufacturers do, so it might look like they're outdated pretty quickly. However, the hardware remains viable for years, and the iOS updates are optional, if you happen to be one of those who doesn't update because they don't want their device to feel slower. People hold on to iPhones for much longer than Android devices, so I don't know why you think they're disposable. I guess when you regularly shit all over everything, you replace stuff more often than average. You shouldn't project your own inability to use a toilet on the rest of us, though.

    11. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Better to be a rabid Apple fan than whatever it is you claim to be. In fact, being a turd is better than being whatever it is you are.

      Seriously, your bigotry and unreasoned hatred is so last election.

    12. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      And just because you you didn't post a picture of your last meal doesn't mean it wasn't shit from the neighbor's dog.

    13. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Their hardware design is not "cutting edge". Their hardware efficiency and utilisation is.

      There's no arguing that Apple provides a fast and silky smooth experience to the user. But to claim that this is due to "cutting edge" hardware is laughable when most of their competitors regularly outspec Apple's products long before they are launched.

    14. Re: Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The way macbooks are today it practically forces you to get apple care. I'm worried the touch strip will get diseased. How much will it be to repair in a laptop that is perfectly fine but unusable without the full keyboard?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    15. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The average Android device... well it varies very widely. But According to 'Pocketnow' it works out to only about $25 of actual profit per device.

      So, Samsung only made a (pre-explosion) profit of $25 on the GN7, even though:

      1. They make the display and digitizer themselves for their phones, vs. Apple having to purchase that.

      2. They Fabricate the SoC for their phones, vs. Apple having to purchase that.

      3. They Fabricate the Flash for their phones, vs. Apple having to purchase that.

      etc.

      And, (wait for it), even though a GN7 was MORE EXPENSIVE than an UNLOCKED iPhone 7 PLUS for the Equivalent Storage.

      Yeah, those Android profits sure DO "vary very widely"; like by about several THOUSAND Percent!

    16. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      They have smaller batteries and about half the RAM as current or even last gen devices

      And yet they STILL run rings around the competition, performance-wise.

      And an iPhone 7 Plus, with HALF the battery capacity of an exploding GN7, STILL gets BETTER run-time (and MUCH better performance) than the exploding GN7.

      I wonder why...

    17. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Their hardware design is not "cutting edge". Their hardware efficiency and utilisation is.

      There's no arguing that Apple provides a fast and silky smooth experience to the user. But to claim that this is due to "cutting edge" hardware is laughable when most of their competitors regularly outspec Apple's products long before they are launched.

      You apparently haven't seen any iPhone 7 benchmarks. I suggest you shut your mouth and open your browser.

    18. Re: Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Samsung phones cost just as much as Apple phones.

      More, actually.

    19. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by mea2214 · · Score: 1

      People flock to Scientology which makes no sense either.

    20. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I suggest you shut your mouth and open your browser.

      Well TheFakeTimCook has all the charm and social skills of TheLateSteveJobs

    21. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I suggest you shut your mouth and open your browser.

      Well TheFakeTimCook has all the charm and social skills of TheLateSteveJobs

      I have plenty of charm and social skills. But I don't suffer liars silently.

      By the way, I don't see a factual rebuttal to my challenge to prove that Apple's iOS devices have "Laughable Hardware" and have competitors that "easily out spec Apple's products even before they are launched."

      Wonder why?

    22. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      As do most apple worshippers. Cult mentality.

      ,,,And Linux and Android fanbois AREN'T "Cultish"???

    23. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I have plenty of charm and social skills. But I don't suffer liars silently.

      So you have 2 modes then? Silent and utter dick? Good to know.

    24. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      By the way, I don't see a factual rebuttal to my challenge to prove that Apple's iOS devices have "Laughable Hardware"

      I just typed iPhone 7 specs into my the browser. First result is a screen with half the resolution than a Galaxy S7.

      Yeah hahahahahahaha crap hardware. No wonder no one makes VR mounts for that shit.

    25. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I have plenty of charm and social skills. But I don't suffer liars silently.

      So you have 2 modes then? Silent and utter dick? Good to know.

      That's actually pretty funny...

    26. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      By the way, I don't see a factual rebuttal to my challenge to prove that Apple's iOS devices have "Laughable Hardware"

      I just typed iPhone 7 specs into my the browser. First result is a screen with half the resolution than a Galaxy S7.

      Yeah hahahahahahaha crap hardware. No wonder no one makes VR mounts for that shit.

      ONE spec does not a Benchmark make.

      And who needs a 500+ ppi screen RESOLUTION (pixel density)? Are we making smartphones for EAGLES now?!? Our eyes are only about 350 ppi resolution; so anything much higher is just a waste of resources (power and speed). Which is reflected in the DOUBLE the battery for about the SAME runtime, and the SLOWER (MUCH SLOWER!) Graphics Performance, due to having to assign values to all those unnecessary pixels. By comparison, the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are a more reasonable 326 and 401 ppi, respectively.

      And now, let's talk about the CPU benchmarks... (But I'm sure you'd rather not).

    27. Re:Yeah, well look at Apple's INSANE markup. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      ONE spec does not a Benchmark make.

      Yeah you're right so let's look at the whole package.

      Other phones have better screens, sd cards, headphone sockets, the water proof ones are more water proof, their screens can be used by people wearing gloves unlike the piece of shit iPhone provided for me for work. Apple is beaten by several devices in battery benchmarks (not sure where you got your numbers from, my guess the reality distortion field) and in camera quality with the only redeaming feature some double camera with fake blurry backgrounds, whoopdefucking do. Considering the iPhone 7 doesn't have a headphone port it's kind of retarded that their Bluetooth output doesn't support apt-X lossless or the standards apt-X which so far provides the best sound quality. The iPhone doesn't support NFC for anything other than Apple pay, in the meantime other devices on the market are making fun use of it.

      But hey we were talking about last years hardware right? The iPhone 7 is luck enough to fall in the crack of a lack of innovation. Yay it has Bluetooth LE like all the other devices. Well congrats everyone else has had that for the past 2 years. They still don't have an ANT+ receiver so many of the fitness / device monitoring tools don't work with it. They also have LTE-A now (finally, I mean LTE-A networks have been around for 3 years now but they were equally slow to market with 3G, HSDPA, and LTE)

      Now let's talk about things no one gives a shit about:

      let's talk about the CPU benchmarks...

      Yes the wonderful CPU benchmark that you hold so dear. No one cares. Absolutely no one. Unless you're running a beowulf cluster of iPhone this is a completely irrelevant metric in a world where not only ever flagship smartphone runs silky smooth, but every game, every app, and every task done by nearly every phone user happily works on $150 Indian made POS phones running 3 year old versions of Android. So let's talk about this CPU. The CPU seems to only allow Apple to add new updates to iOS slowing down older devices and forcing yet another expensive upgrade. A super fast CPU is like driving owning a Ferrari in a country made up entirely of school zones, no one gives a shit.

      For absolutely every other metric you're running last year's hardware. But you can feel smug with your nice iPhone while you drive the metaphorical equivalent of a Nissan 280Z with an incredibly suped up engine in your uncomfortable loud ride and broken air-conditioning. More power to you.

  6. Not all customers are equal by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    91% of the profits share, would be fine, if they also had 91% of the market share, sadly they have ~40% of the market share.

    Why is that sad? Not all customers are equally profitable. Companies that presume otherwise usually find themselves in a bankruptcy court rather quickly.

    So either their product is more expensive than their competitors, or they have massive efficiencies that their competitors don't... (or some combination).

    Apple phones ARE relatively expensive. This has never been a debate. Obviously most people that buy them find them to be good value for the money. The fact that they charge more than some others is irrelevant. If a company cannot sell something for enough money to make a profit then it is an indisputable fact that people don't value what they are selling.

    And yes Apple does realize some cost efficiencies from their size which few others in their market can match.

    1. Re:Not all customers are equal by mccalli · · Score: 2

      Being picky, it is in debate that they're 'relatively' expensive. Compared to the other flagships they tend to be around the same or cheaper. They don't do cheap phones and so the cost can be high in absolute terms. But in relative ones? Similar to every other flagship.

    2. Re:Not all customers are equal by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Actually, their market share has been running in the 15% range, not 40 (http://bgr.com/2016/05/23/smartphone-market-share-q1-2016/).

      This implies that they are making on the order of six times as much profit on each phone. This isn't a cost efficiency due to size issue. Their hardware is simply cheaper to make.

      So, yeh, people are paying a whole lot for pure vanity.

    3. Re:Not all customers are equal by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 1

      Why would that be, when the average system update support window is 41.2 months for Apple and 21 months for Android (source : http://www.androidpolice.com/2...) To me, an Apple device costing 2x an Android device would still be a good investment, since the $/month with security updates would be the same.It would also be more friendly to ecology, since it's a device less produced and a device less in the drawer or recycled or thrashed.

    4. Re:Not all customers are equal by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 2

      Apple phones ARE relatively expensive. This has never been a debate. Obviously most people that buy them find them to be good value for the money. The fact that they charge more than some others is irrelevant.

      Excuse me. You DO realize, of course, that the infamous Exploding Samsung GN7 actually costed MORE than an UNLOCKED iPhone 7 PLUS (for the equivalent storage).

      Yet NOBODY EVER WHINES ABOUT SAMSUNG'S HIGH PRICES!!! Why?

    5. Re:Not all customers are equal by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Apple has good hardware, especially in the phone department. If you don't want it, fine. That doesn't mean those who do are particularly vain. You sound more like a jealous loser who can't afford an iPhone and wants to make it seem like he's too good to want one, anyway.

    6. Re:Not all customers are equal by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      All the major electronics "manufacturers" use Foxconn and related supply chains. Calling out Apple as if they're special just paints you as an idiot.

    7. Re:Not all customers are equal by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      The major reason for the 91% Apple figure is that Samsung did a face-plant with its Note-7's exploding batteries, which cost it 95% of its profits in the most recent quarter. Assuming Sammy can wrangle its battery suppliers, this situation should be an anomaly.

    8. Re:Not all customers are equal by Kopp · · Score: 1

      The difference is that Sun workstations didn't really allow you to show off in society, or put out some fashion statement. Given how many people i've seen with iPhones in countries where the retail price is higher than the average monthly income... I think they can keep doing that for quite some times.

  7. An important note missing about that 91% figure... by NarcolepticPenguin · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article: Apple's closest rival Samsung does not feature in the Strategy Analytics report.

  8. That's because.... by Jodka · · Score: 1

    Android commoditizes the remainder of the cell phone market, making margins slim. The revenue from Android is captured by Google in the form of advertising sales on their integrated browser/search instead of by the cell phone manufacturers.

    Own the platform, not the factory.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  9. Is this surprising? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Despite the bendgates 'n whatnot, iphones has a very solid reputation for being reliable, secure and simple. You know, like a phone *should* be.

    People who make decent money have a tendency to seriously value their time and arn't willing to spend the time dicking around with their device to make it work.

    Buying an expensive item risks you overpaying. Buy a cheap item risks you buying something that isn't fit for purpose, and *all* the money is wasted.

    1. Re:Is this surprising? by tsa · · Score: 1

      Besides that, an iPhone will still work perfectly after four years, while most Android phones are completely exhausted by then.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re: Is this surprising? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I just don't get what isn't simple about Android.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re: Is this surprising? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Well, off the top of my head:
      -You have to manually manage resources because applications can't be trusted to destroy your ram/battery. This is supposedly improved with Android 6 and 7, but there are very few phones that run those versions.
      -The interface is far from simple. Every major vendor wants to create their own spin on the UI, so putting two android devices side by side can still result in wildly different interfaces, making it difficult for people to help each other figure things out.
      -Assuming you even get updates, each subsequent version of android can have a significantly changed UI, forcing you to relearn basic functions.

      The entire Android ecosystem, from the manufacturers to the 3rd party developers, are caveat emptor. You can't trust any particular application to not destroy your battery or privacy, nor can you trust the manufacturer to put out a quality product, nor can you trust the manufacturer to provide post-sales support like firmware updates for more than a ridiculously short period of time if at all. Android has become the Windows of the mobile world. Utterly prolific, but it's all one gigantic race to the bottom.

      What does it tell you when even Google has started forking their own private version of Android to put on their premium devices?

      Meanwhile, Apple is the McDonalds of the mobile world. It's f__king boring, but you know what you're going to get no matter when you buy it or which model of phone you buy. You can be reasonably sure that your phone is going to work day in, day out, unless something unexpected happens. Your battery life isn't going to shrink from a day to a couple hours cause an app you installed decided it needed to run 100% cpu in the background. And you know Apple is going to support you for well past the 'lifetime' of the phone (they dropped support for the 4s last month, making that almost 5 years)

    4. Re: Is this surprising? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Apple is the McDonalds of the mobile world

      I'm guessing you don't work in Marketing somehow.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re: Is this surprising? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Sysadmin. Basically the antithesis of Marketing. ;)

  10. Re:An important note missing about that 91% figure by edjs · · Score: 2

    Probably because the Note 7 recall erased their profits and put them in a loss for the quarter. Including the loss is what pushed the mathematically correct but misleading headline that Apple earned over 100% of the profits we saw earlier.

  11. Proud to be an American company. by caferace · · Score: 1

    And yet they *still* say there is no way they could make any money if they built their phones in the U.S. Yeah. Right.

  12. Economic theory [Re:Sigh.] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You DO NOT want the company you are buying things from to make record profits.

    Standard economic theory says that they will make record profits if and only if their customers believe that they are providing a superior product. So, yes, actually you do want to buy from a company making record profits: this is a sign that their customers like them; and, in this case, iPhones have been around long enough that it is a sign that their customers are repeat customers.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Economic theory [Re:Sigh.] by ledow · · Score: 2

      Churches make record amounts of profit.
      De Beers makes record amounts of profit.
      Microsoft made records amounts of profit before they were sued for anti-monopoly practices.
      Perfume manufacturers make record amounts of profit.
      I'm sure Dr Dre makes record amounts of profit from his Beats.

      It doesn't follow that they offer a superior product to their competitors. What it tells you is they are deliberately over-priced and under-delivered. And what you've bought into is snake-oil.

      In terms of VALUE for money, you've deliberately picked the worst, in effect. For show, for credentials, for a designer brand, but not for a superior product.

      Millions of people give the church money enough for them to have multiple numbered Swiss bank accounts to hold it all in, to own an entire city, and to own vast portions of the ancient buildings in most of Europe. Their "customers" being happy with that doesn't mean it's the sensible thing, or that they are the best, or that they even provide a better product.

      Similarly, it doesn't mean that De Beers diamonds are "better" than synthetic. In fact, probably much worse, if you have any kind of moral conscience.

      Profit is a perfect indicator of how much you are OVERPAYING for what you've bought, that's all. Whether people want that or not is a nonsense to do with trends, image and designer brands. Demand influencing price is entirely different to the consumer getting a fair deal.

    2. Re:Economic theory [Re:Sigh.] by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Profit is a perfect indicator of how much you are OVERPAYING for what you've bought, that's all. Whether people want that or not is a nonsense to do with trends, image and designer brands. Demand influencing price is entirely different to the consumer getting a fair deal.

      Spoken like a person who has never owned a successful business. And never will.

    3. Re:Economic theory [Re:Sigh.] by blindseer · · Score: 1

      It doesn't follow that they offer a superior product to their competitors. What it tells you is they are deliberately over-priced and under-delivered. And what you've bought into is snake-oil.

      I believe you've misunderstood what the products are in the examples you gave.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  13. Cure cancer or spinal injury by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Apple, you've got $200 bilion dollars. Put $20 billion of that into finding a cure for cancer or spinal injury or something fucking useful. You know how much money you can make off a cancer cure? About $1 trillion easily. Because you can charge $100,000 per treatment (even if it's one injection) and the insurance companies will gladly pay for it because they are paying way more than that for chemo and other stuff associated with people fucking dying from it. Millions of people get cancer every year .. a cancer cure would easily bring in $1 trillion pure profit per year. And after you cure cancer make a one shot instant cure for the cold or flu.

    1. Re:Cure cancer or spinal injury by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Do you give 10% of your income to pay for finding a cure for cancer? If so, I commend you heartily.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Cure cancer or spinal injury by ghoul · · Score: 2

      Far more than 20 billion is being spent on Cancer research. Its not a issue of money. Its just a difficult problem to solve. And by the way Cancer is not one disease. its a symptom of a disease like fever and many differnt things can cause cancer so cancer probably will never have one cure. You will need a cure each for all the thousands of things that can cause cancer

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re: Cure cancer or spinal injury by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      It's an issue of money. I am involved in research. $20 billion directly spent on cancer would help a little lot. You would be surprised at how little of the money people think is being spent on cancer research is being spent on finding novel treatments.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. iMessage by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    my kid uses it as an always on instant social network with her friends. It's what keeps her on the iPhone. She wanted a Galaxy S7 last time she got a new phone but iMessage kept her on the iTredmill. Vendor lock-in for the win.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:iMessage by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Well, they're porting iMessage to Android, so your kid will have some choices there

    2. Re:iMessage by puto · · Score: 1

      No they are not.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  16. Don't Christians tithe? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    And given the percentage of Americans who identify as Christian I'd assume we'd have all these problems knocked out by the Churches.

    Yeah, I'm being an ass. Nobody likes to be reminded that people aren't really charitable. This is one of the reasons I'm a socialist. You can't have a functioning civilization based on people's niceness. It's too easily for a few assholes to put us all at each others throats. You can't give people the option to support decent human civilization. They'll trade it all in for a nice pool in their back yard and maybe a manservant or two.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Don't Christians tithe? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      My problem is I'm too cynical and suspicious. Every guy on the corner just wants to buy booze. Every charity is giving 70% of the money I pay to the CEO and staff. I try to be charitable and giving, but I don't trust anyone.

      When I do, and when I know for a fact the money is going to a good place, I donate nicely, but in this age we live in, I don't trust most charities and that really sucks. I wish there were an easy way to know which ones give your money to the right people.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  17. Re:Air high five Apple by ghoul · · Score: 1

    The wealthy dont use apps. They have assistants (Trump doesnt tweet himself. He has 2 assistants to whom he shouts out his tweets and they tweet it). Its the assistants who are probably young interns making less than minimum wage, living in crappy shared apartments, surrounded by loads of money at work but having negative net-worths who spend their credit card limits on buying iPhones. Its the one thing in their lives which makes them feel in control. They are willing to skip buying groceries and mooch off fake dates for their dinner rather than give up their iPhones.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  18. Re:Air high five Apple by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    If you think wealthy people (i.e. those who can afford good hardware) are going to go broke buying an extra life or whatever in a mobile game, you are so out of touch with reality that you probably should drown yourself in the nearest puddle.

  19. Re:Imagine by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    If they gave all that money to the poor. But that will never happen.

    Just as soon as Samsung, HTC and LG do the same...

    Why not call for that, eh, Hater?

  20. There are different market levels by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    You have to realize that Apple sells a brand, which people associate with devices.

    One segment is status seekers, people who buy Apple Watches and Apple iPhones to display their status, much as the artificial scarcity in diamonds is used. These people want certain things, and servicing them is very profitable.

    Others use Apple for reliability and not having to understand the underlying technology. For them iPhones are a tool. They are more likely to do something like buy an iPhone 5 SE and never pay for any of the apps or music they use on it (you can legally get almost all music from Apple hosted podcasts, and the same goes for news, and you can turn off advertising feedback fairly easily). They are not as profitable as a market segment, but they are willing to pay the base premium for the devices they use which they find useful, and Apple makes more than enough from them, while using them as a marketing wedge to attract the first group and the third group, which leads to further profits.

    The third group are typical Apple users. They think "oh, my icons are using it, and my busy tech friends are using it, so it must be good". These people buy the iPhones, rarely buy the add on devices like the Apple Watch, but they pay a lot of money to buy music and shows and movies on their iPhones, which leads to massive profits for Apple.

    Quite a sound marketing strategy.

    (shoutout to my fellow Capilano University Business Alumni)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  21. Re:An important note missing about that 91% figure by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    /. is a pro-Apple site.

    You're kidding, right?

  22. Re:Air high five Apple by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    They have assistants (Trump doesnt tweet himself. He has 2 assistants to whom he shouts out his tweets and they tweet it).

    At 3 am? Right.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Others say 103% by SallyBowls · · Score: 1

    Previously, the market research was that Apple and Samsung had 99% of the smartphone profits. Other market researchers, presumablely who include Samsung, latest was Apple had 103% of the smartphone profits.

  25. Am I too late... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    ...to note that Samsung's profits for this year went up in flames?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.