Slashdot Mirror


Mining Companies Are Using Autonomous Trucks, Drills and Trains To Boost Efficiency, Reduce Employees (technologyreview.com)

schwit1 quotes a report from MIT Technology Review: Mining companies are rolling out autonomous trucks, drills, and trains, which will boost efficiency but also reduce the need for human employees. Rio Tinto uses driverless trucks provided by Japan's Komatsu. They find their way around using precision GPS and look out for obstacles using radar and laser sensors. The company's driverless trucks have proven to be roughly 15 percent cheaper to run than vehicles with humans behind the wheel -- a significant saving since haulage is by far a mine's largest operational cost. Trucks that drive themselves can spend more time working because software doesn't need to stop for shift changes or bathroom breaks. They are also more predictable in how they do things like pull up for loading. "All those places where you could lose a few seconds or minutes by not being consistent add up," says Rob Atkinson, who leads productivity efforts at Rio Tinto. They also improve safety. The driverless locomotives, due to be tested extensively next year and fully deployed by 2018, are expected to bring similar benefits. They also anticipate savings on train maintenance, because software can be more predictable and gentle than any human in how it uses brakes and other controls. Diggers and bulldozers could be next to be automated.

94 comments

  1. And it has come to this: by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rio Tinto uses driverless trucks provided by Japan's Komatsu.

    Damn foreign trucks stealing our jobs. :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:And it has come to this: by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      We have domestic companies doing the same thing: http://www.cat.com/en_US/artic...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      For farms Case is doing autonomous tractors:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      The technology is there and easy enough that someone built his own version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:And it has come to this: by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Rio Tinto is Australian, so I guess it's more like foreign trucks stealing foreign jobs.

    3. Re:And it has come to this: by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Damn foreign trucks stealing our jobs. :-)

      We can defeat the foreign truck invasion, in the same way that we warded off the Dalek invasion:

      Stairs!

      No need for complete walls across our borders . . . just a few stairways at strategic locations will stop those wily foreign autonomous trucks.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:And it has come to this: by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      They're also using unmanned equipment for drilling in the Antarctic after that unpleasant business with the Pabodie Expedition to the Gamburtsev Mountains. Arkham Robotics is one of the major suppliers for the venture.

    5. Re:And it has come to this: by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      RLY? I thought it was owned, or at least founded by the Rothschilds. So calling it Australian would be a bit of a stretch.

    6. Re: And it has come to this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aussie/Pommy but they certainly dig more up here than sunny ole England.

    7. Re:And it has come to this: by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      These monster machines can thwart your stairs defense the same way Daleks do.

      They don't climb the stairs.

      They just level the building.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:And it has come to this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Komatsu mining trucks are manufactured in Peoria, Illinois.

      http://www.komatsuamerica.com/...

      So it's really American trucks stealing our jobs.

    9. Re: And it has come to this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rio Tinto owns a shitload of US coal production.

      A little known fact is that fossils are frequently found in coal beds. They are supposed to be reported, but it also causes a shutdown of operations so workers are unofficially told to "not see" them. The robots will also not see them, and can't file anonymous reports when the mine starts to talk about layoffs and cutting hours.

    10. Re:And it has come to this: by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Daleks levitate/fly

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    11. Re:And it has come to this: by Wimmie · · Score: 2

      These monster machines can thwart your stairs defense the same way Daleks do.

      They don't climb the stairs.

      They just level the building.

      Marvin, the Paranoid Android, will talk them into oblivion.

    12. Re:And it has come to this: by gtall · · Score: 1

      Damn, there goes all those coal industry jobs we were going to have.

  2. Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the deaths of Carrie Fisher and Debbie Reynolds are sad, the reactions are hilarious!

    And yeah, the autonomous mining trucks are cool. Autonomous farm equipment are also awesome. The unions finally need to adjust their expectations. 5 cents per hour is my best offer!

    1. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yup, it's all fun and games until your social model collapses and the unfed hopeless masses gather and hang you in your mansion.

    2. Re:Lololol leftists by Z80a · · Score: 2

      They probably will use a guillotine instead.

    3. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't wait for this to happen to the people promoting mass immigration.

    4. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, it's all fun and games until your social model collapses and the unfed hopeless masses gather and hang you in your mansion.

      Indeed. Time for The Purge ...

    5. Re:Lololol leftists by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Universal Basic Income will come sooner or later, peacefully or by revolution. In the US at least, welfare already costs enough that UBI would not that much more expensive. Plus, with UBI, people can still look for work without losing that income, which will be a boon to businesses that want cheap labor.

    6. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universal Basic Income will come sooner or later, peacefully or by revolution. In the US at least, welfare already costs enough that UBI would not that much more expensive. Plus, with UBI, people can still look for work without losing that income, which will be a boon to businesses that want cheap labor.

      UBI won't cover those that have a moderate, comfortable lifestyle. I suspect AI and machine learning will be incredibly destructive. It will be a pyrrhic victory for the powerful and politically connected

    7. Re:Lololol leftists by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      UBI won't cover those that have a moderate, comfortable lifestyle.

      It might not keep them in the style to which they are accustomed, but it will meet their needs. Not everyone is entitled to more rooms and cars than they need, and to live in San Francisco.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, I started self sufficient, sustainable farming. I have a very comfortable life, most modern conveniences almost no money spent per year. I'll take free money to buy another though.

    9. Re: Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food stamps, a free 3D printer, and a monthly allocation of 3D printing material. That's all they need.

    10. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's part of the problem. There are far to many people telling everyone else what they think they need. It's not about being entitled, it's about earning a living through hard work, and enjoying the fruits of that labor. Now we are threatened with the prospect of some machine(s) or software that will displace a lot of workers, many of whom have worked hard and for their entire lives - all in the name of efficiency and greater profit margins.

    11. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think you will get paid?
      You cant be automated or Outsourced?

      These are the Mining Jobs Trump promised to bring back

    12. Re:Lololol leftists by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not about being entitled, it's about earning a living through hard work, and enjoying the fruits of that labor.

      No, it absolutely is about being entitled. You seem to think that people are entitled to make-work to make them feel useful, even if it is "killing the planet" (i.e. damaging the biosphere beyond its ability to support our societies.) This is a load of dingo's kidneys. We must see our way past people being fulfilled by their jobs in some sort of ghastly caricature of an artificial protestant work ethic.

      You are not righteously, inherently entitled to have things if other people have to suffer for them, or at least not any more entitled than they are to punch you in the face for it. Our social models have to evolve past their idea that you should be able to have whatever you want, whenever you want it like some big spoiled baby who is never told "no".

      TL;DR: "no"

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UBI won't cover those that have a moderate, comfortable lifestyle.

      It might not keep them in the style to which they are accustomed, but it will meet their needs. Not everyone is entitled to more rooms and cars than they need, and to live in San Francisco.

      Abso-fucking-lutely correct.

      Luxury is not needed. Want is not need.

      We need: shelter, food, medical care, education, and freedom.

      A certain amount of entertainment is a good idea, but beyond this we have luxury not need.

    14. Re:Lololol leftists by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You know what I just noticed? We don't need you. You are, essentially, superfluous. We only need your money. I think we'll learn a bit from the capitalists and cut the fat. The fat cat, that is.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Lololol leftists by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      In theory the cost of living will drop as the machines do all the work, resulting in people working a few hours a month being able to pay for everything they need to live. It's not really a matter of companies generously passing on the cost savings, as people with no money won't buy their products otherwise.

    16. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " You are, essentially, superfluous."

      Much like, those two, extra commas.

    17. Re:Lololol leftists by losfromla · · Score: 2

      I'm with drinkypoo, I'd much rather enjoy the fruits of not working and find fulfillment in learning for the sake of it and taking up farming to grow some healthy food and for barter, etc. I would happily stay home and enjoy life rather than slaving for fake money to enrich some already over-rich executives.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    18. Re: Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your hypothesis take into account the monopolies that will emerge?

    19. Re:Lololol leftists by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Its not exactly as if progress is new - 150 years ago, a farms harvest used to take hundreds of workers days to accomplish, and those workers went from farm to farm doing harvests in a few short weeks. Millions of workers working across a country. Now, a couple dozen people using machinery do the same work - the social model has already collapsed, many times over, and we have never had a revolt before.

      The introduction of weaving machines, spinning jennies etc took the jobs of millions of home workers and replaced them with dozens of factory workers - but that resulted in cheap, quality clothing (have you ever actually worn woolen underwear? Its not nice - but it was all you had until the advent of cheap cotton) and the world moved on.

      Thousands of people used to work at a quarry face with hand tools, bringing a few hundred tonnes of product out of the quarry a day. Navvies used to be required in their thousands to dig railway cuttings and embankments. Steam shovels were invented and the jobs disappeared.

      So why is this worth new outrage?

    20. Re:Lololol leftists by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yep, all we need are printing presses or computer number generators, we'll all be rich with all that extra money to spend.

    21. Re:Lololol leftists by gtall · · Score: 1

      Because they are coming after your job and not someone else's?

    22. Re:Lololol leftists by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Let them eat Cake!

    23. Re:Lololol leftists by SandorZoo · · Score: 1

      [...]the social model has already collapsed, many times over, and we have never had a revolt before.

      It came close a few times in England, for example with the Luddites in the 1810s, which also had the Pentrich rising, Ely riots, Spa Fields riots, and the Peterloo massacre. The English parliament of the time certainly feared a revolution, and passed the Six Acts in response. Ten years later saw the Swing Riots, also protesting unemployment following agricultural mechanisation.

    24. Re:Lololol leftists by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Americans, on average, only spend about 10% of their income on food. I'm impressed that you have become self-sufficient food-wise, but for most people this is a small fraction of their expense. Housing (25%) and healthcare (~20%, depending on how you count) are a larger concern. Your family can eat like an affluent person for $180/week, which is around $10k/year - according to a recent Gallup poll of US families.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    25. Re:Lololol leftists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A highly misunderstood quote. Try reading your history, skippy.

  3. yup by zlives · · Score: 3, Funny

    not using mules and canaries either

  4. Trump will save the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't do that, we voted Trump in so that he can save all our the manual labor jobs. We love our real american blue collar jobs, we love building stuff, working hard in factories and mines and going home and drinking beer. We are uninterested in learning new fangled skills. AI and job loss is just a hollywood movie concept, it's not real. We are so glad we got our good ole white guy daddy Trump to make everything right again, he'll put an end to this technology crap

  5. I've been saying for a long time about autonomus t by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We had the technology from about the seventies to have a smart grid of trains to go to multiple locations, but no one wanted to invest in infrastructure like that. If instead of a road system, you had cards guide by wire or a rail hookup, it could be fully automated already without all the tricky edge cases.

  6. A little later than expected. by orlanz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Farm equipment has been automated for quite sometime. Even Artic fishing has a heavy amount of automation. I am surprised that this sector has taken this long to automate things like trains and haulers...

    Now digger automation I would like to see; where you trace out a 3D volume and let it go. It doesn't seem as simple as at first glance. Soil densities vary and you run into obstacles that need a little planning and strategy. Doing it wrong can break some expensive parts or at least wear them out faster. Neat times ahead, hope someone posts some YouTube vids.

    1. Re:A little later than expected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing the railroad union was stronger.

    2. Re:A little later than expected. by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Automated excavation already exists. Google Automated machine grading. You input a design terrain model into the equipment and put someone in the seat to drive it and the equipment does all the excavating and tells the driver where to go. This has existed for about a decade. The next step is get rid of the no skill driver in the seat and add the radar and cameras so it doesn't run anyone over. Given the advancement in driver-less vehicles it's not going to be long before the only people on construction sites are the foreman and engineer.

    3. Re:A little later than expected. by PPH · · Score: 1

      only people on construction sites are the foreman and engineer.

      Too dirty. I'm going to work via telepresence.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  7. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Very good news.
    Too much death and long-term negative effects on the health of people involved in the mining industry, regardless of technological advancement.
    In addition to that, regardless of various safety regulations and laws and struggles to enforce safety in the mining industry, most of it sooner or later went down the drain or had trivial influence.

    Better take people out of the equation as much as possible in this sector and have them learn and do better stuff to do safer jobs.

    1. Re:Good by gtall · · Score: 1

      This would require Congress fund re-training and education. Given their abhorrence of Science and spending money on education, those people are screwed, but thanks for playing.

  8. Tires last longer. by willy_me · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A big motivating reason for using the automated trucks is reduced wear on the tires. Each tire costs a small fortune. Extending their life by 5 to 10% is a big deal.

    1. Re:Tires last longer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A big motivating reason for using the automated trucks is reduced wear on the tires. Each tire costs a small fortune. Extending their life by 5 to 10% is a big deal.

      About $50,000 a piece, and each truck needs six. And that's just purchase cost.They're expensive to transport and probably not easy to fit. Plus the cost of having a vehicle out of commission. For a full tire change you'd spend half a million dollars.

      I wonder why they didn't start with the automated trains. Technologically, it must be a hundred times simpler.

    2. Re:Tires last longer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it that "Days of Thunder" documentary about race cars that showed this... that "proper driving" saves the quality of tires /s (about doc part, but the rest is right)

    3. Re:Tires last longer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why they didn't start with the automated trains. Technologically, it must be a hundred times simpler.

      It is cheaper until the automation fails. Failed automated mining equipment is cheap when compared to a train wreck.

  9. the world used to need ditch diggers! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    the world used to need ditch diggers! Now I need to punch the CEO in the face so I can go to lock up to get health coverage. As no plan will take me as that think I have miners lung or something and with no job I can''t pay 10K mo for a plan with pre existing conditions covered.

    1. Re:the world used to need ditch diggers! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Now I need to punch the CEO in the face so I can go to lock up to get health coverage.

      That's a bad plan. Prisons are in the news all the time for prisoners receiving inadequate health care.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:the world used to need ditch diggers! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

      still better then the ER that does not cover all stuff.

  10. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they've had "driverless" trucks at strip mines for a long time now. there is a command center nearby with humans remotely controlling the trucks like an RTS game.

  11. P/E ratio over a thousand what's up with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidentally I was just looking at their stock and that P/E ratio screams avoid.

  12. Don't worry, Trump brought back 8000 jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should more than offset the drivers put out of work by this.

    1. Re: Don't worry, Trump brought back 8000 jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't detect sarcasm anymore with these trumptards...

    2. Re: Don't worry, Trump brought back 8000 jobs by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      I can't detect sarcasm when people use terms like Trumptards or Killery. No matter which way I guess, I'm often wrong.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  13. Henry Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read up on Henry Ford and why he paid his workers well.

    And also consider that 70% of our economy is consumption. The rich can only buy so many cars and pillows and the revenues of their investments are dependent on us little people buying those iThings, cars, borrowing money for college so that we can get decent jobs to make money to pay for that loan, get mortgages, car loans, pay the taxes so the military can be funded to protect the rich's investments abroad, and medical and food.

    But they are hoping that the developing world will take up the slack - that's why they don't care when jobs are sent overseas or are replaced with cheap immigrants.
    That booming middle class in China has been making them richer while a handful of us peons benefit from it. Sure, that designer in California has a great job, but all those folks who lost their jobs to the Chinese and southeast Asian workers are SOL. The same goes for the folks who are displaced by automation. Where do they go? Retraining? For what? There are only so many jobs in any field - not enough to absorb all those workers who have been displaced.

    And companies won't hire a 30+ year old entry level person. And if you're middle aged? NFW. Being a 50 something and unemployed means you're unemployable.

    tl;dr; our economy is changing dramatically and there's going to be some painful adjustments. Trump's election was just one symptom. All those working class people who have been screwed over by globalization and automation are getting REAL pissed. And the Democrats were more worried about who can use what restroom; so they lost.

    1. Re:Henry Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tl;dr; our economy is changing dramatically and there's going to be some painful adjustments. Trump's election was just one symptom. All those working class people who have been screwed over by globalization and automation are getting REAL pissed. And the Democrats were more worried about who can use what restroom; so they lost.

      The funny thing is TRUMP was the worst thing for them! That "carrier" deal he raves about? Carrier is going to use their savings to automate the jobs by 2018. He spent all those tax dollars for a PR stunt.

      The real issue, there is no longer enough "work" needed and hasn't been for a long time. We need a different social model (and birth control)

    2. Re:Henry Ford by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Yep. And all they learned from it was to scream louder about social justice.

    3. Re:Henry Ford by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Eh, the locals aren't breeding that much, it's the immigrants that are keeping America's population growing, both by coming in in the first place and by having more than 2 kids. Stop immigration and our population will level off quickly.

  14. Job creators no more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The company's driverless trucks have proven to be roughly 15 percent cheaper to run than vehicles with humans behind the wheel -- a significant saving since haulage is by far a mine's largest operational cost.

    I'm hoping that their new largest operational cost is prevention and mitigation of the pollution and environmental damage they create. Now that these companies can no longer claim to be the source of as many jobs, they should have a harder time externalizing these costs.

    Okay, fat chance.

  15. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offence intended but there are always tricky edge cases. Reality is more complicated than we realize.

  16. As hard as it is to lose your job... by istartedi · · Score: 1

    As hard as it is to lose your job, we've come a long way from the days when "consumption" would be diagnosed in 20-year olds who died a couple years later. Even in the USA where we tend to take worker safety more seriously, it's still a chance of death every time a worker goes underground.

    The problem of what to do with displaced workers is not new. It's time we found a real solution. One that doesn't involve violent revolution/communism. Been there, done that. One that doesn't involve bogus "re-training" programs where they spend $100 million and can only point to 20 successful re-trained workers. I don't profess to have a magic answer, but it's probably going to look more like socialism than Republicans would like, and less like socialism than some Democrats would like. We're going to have to care for people without coddling them.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:As hard as it is to lose your job... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "We're going to have to care for people without coddling them"
      I expect a lot more people are going to end up in the military & Alaska

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:As hard as it is to lose your job... by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      I suspect it'll look a lot more like socialism than you think. UBI allowing people to play video games 24/7 with no need to work as long as they're willing to cut off other luxuries (and they are), UBI allowing people looking for a little more in life to get by just working 10-20 hours a week instead of 50-60. That's probably the future.

    3. Re:As hard as it is to lose your job... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      UBI allowing people to play video games 24/7

      As a videogame developer, the future is looking bright.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re:As hard as it is to lose your job... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Until the first real A.I. comes out, then you too (and me) will be out of a job. A real A.I. would be able to write code WAY faster then a puny human.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    5. Re:As hard as it is to lose your job... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Perhaps so, but "real AI" is still complete science fiction, and likely will be for the duration of my lifetime.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:As hard as it is to lose your job... by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      As a videogame player it is indeed. Of course in America UBI will probably never come.

    7. Re:As hard as it is to lose your job... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Except on UBI, gamers will only be able to afford free to play games and won't be able to afford to buy any microtransactions.

    8. Re:As hard as it is to lose your job... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Well I hope to still be alive by then, but retired. Would make for interesting times methinks.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  17. So much for all those coal jobs by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    At least we can retrain them to make air conditioners, right?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  18. Sounds like a good place to test the technology by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Get the miners out, let the big-ass machines think for themselves, see what happens. Shit happens, software gets tweaked, try again. Lather rinse repeat.

    Good side is fewer miners get trapped in cave-ins. Bad side is those miners are now on unemployment.

    1. Re:Sounds like a good place to test the technology by mmell · · Score: 1
      What they need is an ultimate computer (perhaps an M-5 unit) to do these dangerous things so that mankind need no longer die in mines. Perhaps Colossus can manage it, ushering in the human era. The City of Domes seems to work pretty well, at least for a few years.

      New technologies are coming at an amazing pace. Perhaps instead of fearing the disruptions these new technologies cause, we can start finding ways to moderate the disruptive effects. After all, I'm pretty sure my bread started out at one of those dark Satanic mills. My car was doubtless assembled at least in part by a robot which did not kill all humans. Unlike my lunch, I'm pretty sure my weekly check was never touched by human hands.

      Starting out with mining - a dangerous and traditionally not very rewarding career choice - strikes me as a good thing. Of course, I've never worked in a mine but then again I never wanted to either. Next thing you know, these machines will be working our farm fields, taking jobs away from honest hard-working illegal immigrants. Thanks to machines, we may no longer need that wall!

      A shame we can't find a way to impress the memory engrams of our POTUS-erect on the circuits of a computer. The torrential flood of illogic would doubtless prove fascinating.

  19. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    No offence intended but there are always tricky edge cases. Reality is more complicated than we realize.

    And yet, there are still dramatically fewer of them if you put the vehicles on rails. Ideally you'd have the vehicles locked to the track in the same way as a roller coaster, to keep them from falling off even in extreme circumstances.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >no one wanted to invest in infrastructure like that
    Right. The tech that "will" obsolete millions has been sitting outside the front door for ages; it's just that the ROI of using a $800,000 burger flipper doesn't pitch well.

    Drop a zero and every city will instantly have hundreds of illness-susceptible, bladder-needing, flesh-based students desperate to find a way to sell themselves. There will probably be several new ways to take advantage of them - no, not just that one.

    Yet they're the smart ones, dutifully trying to pay our glorified diploma mills (their relative cost will have doubled again by the end of this post) because they heard that everyone will need to have the same exclusive skills (do you really not see the oxymoron) to survive the new world, while avoiding the predatory scam we have somehow mislabeled with the euphemism "student loans".

  21. Humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans? Please remind me- what's their function again? I vaguely remember them doing something...

  22. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We had the technology from about the seventies to have a smart grid of trains to go to multiple locations..."

    Yup, it was called BART. I got involved slightly when they were on their Second Generation RTOS. The problem was as the System in simulation got consistently more sophisticated, as more and more sensors were added, it got to the point that when MTBF was factored in, at any given time, it Broke. (My minor contribution was working on inserting a token into the Device Addresses that requested Diagnostics, on a regular precisely defined basis. Which made it Break even more...) But things improved over the decades, and BART does pretty much run itself now, even though overall equipment reliability is still dreadful.
    One recurring complaint about BART to this day is that the Train Operators do nothing, they just sit on their well-paid butts and let the Trains run themselves. But they are actually there for those times when Things Break, for when people jump in front of Trains, for... unexpected... situations:
    http://sfist.com/2014/04/22/man_spotted_having_sex_with_bart_se.php

    "...but no one wanted to invest in infrastructure like that."
    Actually, BART spent a _lot_ of money on this, and still does. It is much easier for the Mining Companies; by taking out Humans, the Human Safety Record improves. But this doesn't work for BART, which isn't hauling tons of Rock, but >100 tons of Flesh, for a fully loaded 10 Car Train, during Rush Hour.

  23. Careful what you wish for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Later, when the owners have saved all they can save from automation and still need more money, they'll just start robbing banks, I guess.

  24. I've worked at a gold mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's super boring. Pick up dirt, move dirt over there. Extract gold. Move dirt back to where you found it. Repeat until insane.

  25. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    You also want the trains walled off and with a roof, or a subway. That eliminates animals/weather/kids as hazards. It also eliminates most of the risk of someone touching the overhead power lines powering the train cars, and putting it underground will free up enough expensive property to pay for the entire system.

  26. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    putting it underground will free up enough expensive property to pay for the entire system.

    Hmm, citation needed. One of the advantages of an elevated system is that you don't have to bury it, and it also doesn't use up much real estate. I question whether you could cost-effectively bury transportation systems under existing cities today, as compared to having to deal with the weather instead which has been relatively well solved by the auto industry already.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No offence intended but there are always tricky edge cases. Reality is more complicated than we realize.

    The worst edge cases by far are drunk, senile, texting and/or plain old incompetent drivers. Yet we're developing autonomous vehicles that can mix in with those and perform acceptably.

    By comparison, it would be a piece of cake to develop a dedicated transport system, allowing only automated traffic, with a safety level that's an order of magnitude better than current public highways.

  28. Seems great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until you realize they already have the automated military hardware and massive stockpiles of ammunition.

    Oh yeah and giant frickin 100 ton dumptrucks that could drive over your entire neighborhood.

    All autonomous and capable of being reprogrammed to ignore or even home in on human obstacles.

    So yeah, don't be surprised when you find yourself well and truly fucked.

  29. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    About 40-60% of the Dallas Texas DART light rail system is above grade, except for where it's already on existing railroad grades, or the brief ~1 mile subway section under the dense suburban area just north of downtown. It works really well, there's almost 0 at grade crossings in the most densely populated areas.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  30. Re:I've been saying for a long time about autonomu by gtall · · Score: 1

    So this could be part of the Trump Infrastructure Program? It will put people to work building it until it is built and they have nothing else to do.

  31. Argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got into a debate with a liberal room mate back in the 60s because of his constant whining about the poor farm labor wages. I finished him off by saying that farmers would just go to more farming automation rather than pay exorbitant wages. Thus liberal ideas of "helping the poor", which is only a vote luring trick, has been skirted by technology. If any of those union mining truck drivers need a job, my city is in desperate need of garbage truck drivers.

  32. Reducing employees? by lxs · · Score: 1

    I know mining is a tough life but reducing your employees sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
    At least they aren't being oxidised.

  33. Its called automation. by pjv936 · · Score: 1

    It has been going on few hundred years. We better get use to it.

  34. "War on coal"? How 'bout "war on coal miners"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The coal industry now employs 10% of the miners it did 50 years ago... because they've gone to mountaintop removal, and whatever other names they use for moving the whole surface above the seams, and then they use large machinery, rather than many, many miners going down into the ground.

    Those hundreds of thousands of jobs will never come back. The industry in the US employs now in the tens of thousands.

    Jobs? Oh, say the libertidiots, "just move, doesn't matter that's your home, family and friends, go find a burger flipping job far, far away. We don't have families, or care about anyone but ourselves, and you should be the same".

    And as a side note, I *NEVER* saw homeless people - and I grew up in Philly - until Raygun.

    Past time for a basic minimum paid to everyone by the government, the way that the folks in Alaska get a reverse income tax from the state's oil revenues.