Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Breaks $1,000 Level, Highest in More Than 3 Years (cnbc.com)

The price of digital currency bitcoin has hit the $1,000 mark for the first time in three years. From a report on CNBC: The cryptocurrency was trading at $1,021 at the time of publication, according to CoinDesk data, at level not seen since November 2013, with its market capitalization exceeding $16 billion. Bitcoin has been on a steady march higher for the past few months, driven by a number of factors such as the devaluation of the yuan, geopolitical uncertainty and an increase in professional investors taking an interest in the asset class. "We are seeing the aftermath of zero interest rates run amok. So bitcoin is a healthy reminder that we don't have to hold on to dollars or renminbi, which is subject to capital controls and loss of purchasing power. Rather it's a new asset class," Bobby Lee, chief executive of BTC China, one of the world's largest bitcoin exchanges, told CNBC by phone.

84 of 146 comments (clear)

  1. lulz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    i remember when you could use a bitcoin fountain and get 1btc at each pull of the virtual lever.

    1. Re:lulz by swm · · Score: 1

      i remember when you could use a bitcoin fountain and get 1btc at each pull of the virtual lever.

      It was a bit-nickle.
      But they were free to anyone who wanted.
      I think my son picked up a few for himself.
      I never did...

    2. Re:lulz by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      I got a bit nickel shortly after they dropped the drop size. Still have it, worth about $50 now . . . one of my better investments.

  2. Speculators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    So long as speculators can make money holding onto bitcoin while the value shifts, it will not be a viable means of exchange. Currencies need a stable value for people to want to use them as a currency.

    1. Re:Speculators by supremebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you look at the Bitcoin price charts, you see that it tends to crash in value quickly after rising for some time.

      To me, it looks like now would be a time to dump the currency before it tanks again.

      Of course, the person who wrote this article is probably a speculator themselves. They are probably hoping that they can increase their gains a bit more before unloading their holdings.

      Sadly, these price swings are one of the reasons why Bitcoin doesn't really work well as an actual currency. Well, that and the fact that payment confirmations now take forever to complete unless you bribe the miners with a big transaction fee.

    2. Re:Speculators by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But rest assured, the scale itself changes day to day, sometimes even as much as stocks change day to day.

      Rubbish. Currencies tend to be stable over time. It's when they're NOT stable (witness the Russian Rouble, the Euro, and the British Pound last year) that the shit tends to hit the fan. Which proves GP's point - people like STABILITY in their currencies. Instability is a sign of failure not success.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Speculators by netcruiser · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised by the little volatility in Bitcoin price over the past couple of years. Extrapolating from past volatility, some believe it will be on the same levels as "traditional" currencies in two to three years: http://woobull.com/bitcoin-vol...

    4. Re:Speculators by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Currencies, like other commodities, tend to be more stable when they are more widely traded. Bitcoin is exchanged sparsely, so a single big transaction can affect the price. As it is more widely adopted, it will be more stable.

    5. Re:Speculators by mrlibertarian · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin is slowly becoming more stable:

      "Its biggest daily moves in 2016 were around 10 percent, still very volatile compared with fiat currencies, but markedly lower than the trading of 2013, which saw daily price swings of as much as 40 percent."

      http://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-markets-bitcoin-idUSKBN14M0IF

    6. Re:Speculators by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Volatility can hurt the exchange function. If you are just using it to transfer funds between two different currencies, having the value drop 10% in the space of time it takes for the transactions to clear is less than ideal.

      Cheap enough is also questionable. If you want your transaction to not take days to clear, you are paying a higher fee than Visa or Mastercard charge.

    7. Re:Speculators by Luthair · · Score: 1

      According to the article its up 137% this year alone, unless you're referring to Zimbabawean dollar as the traditional currency its hard to see how that will be the case.

    8. Re:Speculators by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      If you look at the long-term chart, it does crash a bit after rising too fast, but it crashes down above the previous value and then continues to climb. It's similar to charts of the adoption rate of new technologies.

    9. Re:Speculators by supremebob · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at that big spike back at the tail end of 2013, where it the value went down by half.

      I could see that happening again in 2017. Nobody knows how the Trump cabinet is going to react to cryptocurrency, but I can't imagine it being good considering that the bankers seem to be in charge of the government again. If they start cracking down on crypto, the price could drop like a rock.

    10. Re:Speculators by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Currencies, like other commodities, tend to be more stable when they are more widely traded. Bitcoin is exchanged sparsely, so a single big transaction can affect the price. As it is more widely adopted, it will be more stable.

      Two days is a little short to start calling it a trend...

    11. Re:Speculators by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Dammit... Wrong thread... Sorry.

    12. Re:Speculators by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Two days is a little short to start calling it a trend. Lok at it over 3 years and then look at other currencies, all against the dollar.

    13. Re:Speculators by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      It is good for the economy when people spend their money as soon as it comes in. It is also wonderful for debt which both the US government and many of it's voters have a hell of a lot of.

    14. Re:Speculators by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      If you want your transaction to not take days to clear, you are paying a higher fee than Visa or Mastercard charge.

      Deposited a check lately?

    15. Re:Speculators by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Nothing is perfectly stable. We do not even know how to define "perfectly stable" in a manner that economists would agree on.

      Most major currencies exhibit less instability over the course of two decades than Bitcoin does over any year. So if we agree that stability is desirable enough to even discuss, then that is a major black mark against Bitcoin.

    16. Re:Speculators by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Yes I have, the funds are normally in my account within an hour. It did take two days when I recently sold my house. But I don't get charged a fee for cashing them.

      And Bitcoin is trying to be like handing someone digital cash. Do you remember the last time you sold something on Craig's list and got paid a $20 bill, but you had to wait three days before you could spend it?

  3. Re:Any way to hedge USD using smart contracts? by JcMorin · · Score: 1

    I think you are describing a ETF funds in Bitcoin.

  4. Shocking by Luthair · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone involved in bitcoin thinks its relevant and people are doing big things with it. Next thing you know companies will be sending out press releases saying they're releasing great products.

    1. Re:Shocking by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, the VC idiots have finally learned that Bitcoin is a way of stealing their money. The smart VC money never went there, except a few 'drop in the bucket, just in case' experiments.

      Slashdot really ought to just ban these stupid 'stories'; we don't post about Beanie Baby market fluctuations, and there's nothing technically interesting left with Bitcoin to discuss. It's just the latest attempt by scammers and cultists to pump their obsession.

    2. Re:Shocking by JcMorin · · Score: 2

      Beanie Baby could be created as much as the company wanted. Bitcoin are limited in quantity... for something purely digital this is a great invention... like it or not! The value of bitcoin derived from that fact... if you could multiply it, it would have no value.

    3. Re:Shocking by Luthair · · Score: 1

      You realize if they hadn't made beanie babies have artificial scarcity they would have had no value?

  5. And still the 1% problem by Sebby · · Score: 1

    While bitcoin is changing the landscape, I still think it suffers from the same problem that 'normal' currency has, in that the richest 1% control nearly all the currency, only this time that 1 percent are the techies/geeks.

    Only time will tell if they'll also fall prey to human nature (ie. greed, and hoard it all to themselves). Here's hoping that won't happen.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:And still the 1% problem by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      You realize that "the 1%" don't have Scrooge McDuck vaults dotting the landscape, right? They do not have "Money" they have assets. Stocks, bonds, businesses, land, gold, and now Bitcoin. The US Dollar is not considered an asset.

    2. Re:And still the 1% problem by stephenmac7 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the makeup of the "1%" has a high turnover, right?

      --
      "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." -- Judge Gideon J. Tucker
    3. Re:And still the 1% problem by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Wrong, there are indeed real Scrooge McDuck vaults in widespread use. Well, they don't have all the money in a pit with a big diving board over it, because you would kill yourself by diving into it and the money would be inconvenient to retrieve, but from a financial standpoint the concept is exactly the same:

      http://www.financialsamurai.co...

      http://www.cnbc.com/2014/09/22...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:And still the 1% problem by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure. If a rich person keeps lots of dollars around, for some reason, those dollars will be in a bank and therefore most will be usable in the economy. The BTC 1% are that way because they got BTC when they were cheap (in money or computrons) and sat on them. One big problem with a deflationary currency is that the holder can stuff the currency into a safe place where it will be unused and gain wealth, meaning that currency is driven out of circulation. These 1%ers generally have a decent income in dollars, and don't have any pressure to spend their BTC. These really are digital Scrooge McDuck vaults.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  6. Confused? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If someone is not interested in drugs or guns is there any benefit to bitcoin?

    Just curious.

    1. Re:Confused? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Why be into privacy? Why be concerned about NSA spying? Why be concerned if google knows everything you search for?

      I mean, unless you're interested in drugs or guns, why should you possibly care about privacy? /sarc

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:Confused? by grumling · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin mining is helping people in Venezuela avoid the problems of hyperinflation, thanks to state subsided (although likely illegally used) electricity:

      https://www.theguardian.com/te...

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    3. Re:Confused? by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      If someone is not interested in drugs or guns is there any benefit to bitcoin?

      Just curious.

      All cryptocoins are basically a stock trading simulation game being played with real money. Any other use cases are pretty much secondary.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    4. Re:Confused? by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      I have bought things with bitcoin, but never guns. All my guns have been paid for in cash. So I do not see the connection...

  7. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by JcMorin · · Score: 1

    I don't think having to hold or parse 1000 GB of data is too big requirement to run your own bank! If you just want to use Bitcoin, there is many clients that have none of those huge "problems" and can be use on your phone.

  8. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    With this description in mind, BTC seems to be more like gold than dollars.

    Like gold, it seems to have an intrinsic value, in the eye of the beholder. And gold is assumed to be a finite resource, which we discover and deliver with variable effort and cost. BTC seems to have an increasingly higher cost to discover and deliver new BTC, though technology (as happens sometimes with gold) may make this relatively easier from time to time, possibly affecting perceived value.

    Unlike gold, which has a broad, virtually universal appeal. BTC is less universally appealing, but still it is a perceived value.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  9. Re:Thanks, Trump! by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

    That doesn't make any sense. Nobody would buy US dollars if they thought things would go to sh!t.

    How many Venezuelan bolívars do you own? If you were an investment adviser would you recommend investing in Venezuela?

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  10. Pump and dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot is helping with the pump, who is out there dumping?

  11. Not good news by clovis · · Score: 1

    Another way of writing the story is this:
    People who bought bit coin in 2013 had lost money for the last three years, and at long last are now even.
    Look for the same if you buy bitcoin now, you can help make the 2013 losers whole by participating in the next round of pump and dump ... From the losers side.

    1. Re:Not good news by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      Another way of writing the story is this:
      People who bought bit coin in 2013 had lost money for the last three years, and at long last are now even.
      Look for the same if you buy bitcoin now, you can help make the 2013 losers whole by participating in the next round of pump and dump ... From the losers side.

      Not even even, they are still behind inflation.

  12. Hilarious by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seeing bitcoin and "professional investor" in the same sentence, as well as seeing real world economic situations used as an excuse for the latest bitcoin bubble.

    It's very easy to look "professional" when the bubble is inflating. Let's see how professional they look when it pops again, as it will - because Bitcoin is SPECULATION not investment. I'm pretty sure that tulip salesmen were highly respected financial professionals in the 1630's, a few months before they turned gardener again.

    Now don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with a bit of speculation and money can be made. However it is a universe of risk away from the term "investment" and the buyer must beware.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Hilarious by Adam+Back · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Hilarious by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I'll refer you to all those people who bought Bitcoin at $1000 per a few years ago and who only NOW have access to their money again.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Hilarious by Adam+Back · · Score: 2

      After 8.5 years the stories about imminent death of bitcoin gets kind of old - that was the reason people started collecting bitcoin obituaries. Trading strategy: buy and hodl and have a long term investment horizon. Lots of opportunity to average down as low as $200 during the intervening period. Point is if people see a value to permissionless, unseizable global digital gold. From the $16 billion market cap it seems that they do. Feel free not to buy any.

    4. Re:Hilarious by CoolCash · · Score: 1

      Unless you shorted bitcoin. Anyone who did that made a fortune.

    5. Re:Hilarious by Luthair · · Score: 1

      After 8.5 years the idea of bitcoin being relevant gets old.

    6. Re: Hilarious by CGordy · · Score: 2

      It is normal for investors to hold a percentage of higher risk assets, and to hold financial instruments for purposes other than long term growth, such as hedging contracts to protect against currency fluctuations. In BTC's case, holding it offers certain characteristics that are hard to get in other asset classes. To someone managing a fund or portfolio, these characteristics have little to do with the technology itself, and everything to how the bitcoin price responds to international events. In recent years, the bitcoin price has risen when uncertainty around the global economic system is high, or a country (read China) is trying to restrict money flow across its borders. Given recent worries about the US president-elect starting a trade war, bitcoin outperformance at the same time as a strong US dollar (hence a low gold price) is a foreseeable outcome. None of this is to say bitcoin has any inherent value. However, the fact that its price has reacted to world events in predictable ways has meant that it has been a useful financial instrument.

    7. Re:Hilarious by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      So, $16 billion is not relevant? You must be a politician...

  13. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time before one BTC is worth $200 in US money, too. How much are you willing to gamble?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  14. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    People buy US dollars because everyone else buys US dollars. It's as simple as that.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  15. Re:Thanks, Trump! by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    It's not as simple as that. People buy Renminbi, Yen, Euros, British Pounds.

    A currency goes up when people have confidence in it as a store of value and go down when they don't. Is it more complicated than that? Yes. But currencies do not go up when people lose confidence in it's stability.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  16. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    I guess you've never looked at a chart of BTC prices. Take a look at the volume, the transactions and tell me if you think it makes sense to wait until it goes back down to $200.00

    Will BTC go back to the $600s perhaps. Two hundred. I don't think so.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  17. Re:Thanks, Trump! by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    I have been following. So, if the pressure is to replace the US dollar as the reserve currency why is the Renminbi desperately being propped up and the US dollar surging?
    Br If you think this is a temporary phenomenon then this is a good time for you to short the US dollar. You'll make a killing.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  18. dumping... for 3 years? by JcMorin · · Score: 1

    You mean someone has been dumping it for 3 years? Recent days we have seen insane price increase if you look over 3 years, it's a pretty consistent price increase. Sad you probably never read how bitcoin works and understand to true power of p2p transactions. If that would have been possible... would you have invest in the p2p communication called the Internet? Or the p2p file sharing torrent? Bitcoin is the next logical step against censorship.

  19. Artificial scarcity is not a hedge by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    If you just want a way to digitally pay for things with limited (but far from perfect) anonymity, bitcoin is a fine mechanism if you can stomach the wild fluctuations in valuations relative to governmental currencies. But if you actually want something independent of government currency, you don't want to jump overboard into an exchange based on artificial scarcity backed by nothing but the good will of mathematicians; you want durable commodities. Bitcoin is simply a zero-value hash which a subset of people have agreed has value. Nothing less, nothing more.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Artificial scarcity is not a hedge by Adam+Back · · Score: 1

      Good will of mathematicians? Err math :) 2+2 = 4 regardless of the mood of mathematicians or their views on your spending choices. Try your claim with metals: Gold is simply a near zero-value metal ingot which a subset of people have agreed has value. Nothing less, nothing more.

    2. Re:Artificial scarcity is not a hedge by Adam+Back · · Score: 1

      Unique things that neither gold nor fiat/government money can do: move money globally, instantly in a permissionless way. Hold an asset unseizably and unfreezably.

  20. More fake news based on lies by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    Saying that bitcoin is not subject to capital controls and loss of purchasing power is something that the guy running Silk Road would strongly disagree with. He was one of several people who have lost their bitcoin's purchasing power following government controls - in this case seizure. Here's another in Australia.

    It's like anything else - if yu can own it, someone else can take it away from you. "New asset class" my arse.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:More fake news based on lies by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      That's an oversimplification to binary -- of course neither Bitcoin nor anything else is a magical solution to the fact that your government (or any other sufficiently powerful entity) could point a gun at your head (either literally or metaphorically) and force you to comply with whatever demands/rules they've come up with.

      The question is, how practical is it for a government to do that on a regular/systemic basis? With a formal banking system, it's quite possible, since there are only a small number of banks and they are easy for a government to regulate. With Bitcoin, it's still possible, but (for now, anyway) considerably more difficult/expensive to carry out, which is why you only see it done in special cases where the government(s) involved can justify the significant cost of doing so.

      Perhaps a government will in the future come up with a practical way to systematically regulate all p2p bitcoin-like traffic that can't be easily circumvented, but they haven't done it yet and it might turn out that it's infeasible to do it, ever.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:More fake news based on lies by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      More internet stupidity. The fact is that they were already under order to be seized. They would have been seized eventually no matter what - even if it meant offering someone a 10% finder's fee. There are plenty of people who can beg, borrow, or steal an electric drill or a hammer, and you'll be begging them to take every last bitcoin. And since it's not easily tracked, good luck getting it back, even if they catch the perps.

      The same things that make bitcoin attractive to crooks make you, the owner, a very easy target for a successful robbery. Also, given that 5 Chinese organizations control the computing power to generate the majority of bitcoins, you're a sucker to use them for anything long-term, as their value is very easily manipulated by them, as opposed to a real free market.

      Then again, the Internet makes people stupid, so what can I expect nowadays?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:More fake news based on lies by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Even p2p traffic requires the net. It's not like cash, which you can just carry around with you and spend as you choose without any infrastructure. I know which I want to have on me during a power failure, or when my battery is dead, or I'm in a dead spot ... or even when I want to bargain for a discount for cash payment. Cash is still king.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:More fake news based on lies by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Also, given that 5 Chinese organizations control the computing power to generate the majority of bitcoins,
      If that was the case, you would not know ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:More fake news based on lies by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      It's a known fact. 5 chinese bitcoin mines control the majority of the new bitcoins generated. Or weren't you here a few months ago when that was covered?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:More fake news based on lies by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I would say it is a /. myth :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:More fake news based on lies by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I would say it is a /. myth :D

      The New York Times disagrees with you. So does businessinsider. And bloomberg. The Chinese control bitcoin, even in Tibet.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  21. Dumbest comment ever in summary by Khyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "So bitcoin is a healthy reminder that we don't have to hold on to dollars or renminbi, which is subject to capital controls and loss of purchasing power."

    As if bitcoin isn't subject to a loss of purchasing power? As if that wasn't why the prices fluctuate so wildly?

    Holy shit, the people getting into bitcoin are getting scammed harder than I thought if they're buying this economically-unsound statement.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Dumbest comment ever in summary by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Even if BitCON hit $100,000 it'd still be worth less than even my most modest garnet mine.

      I can trade my mine for a house, and the person getting the mine can immediately be fruitful and productive. Trade bitcoin for a house, we gotta wait for transaction, the network to keep up, and then, bitcoin isn't immediately useful.

      Any removal of extra links in the chain is always the best option economically. But you probably failed economics and don't understand the bare basics of a trade and barter economy.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  22. Re:Any way to hedge USD using smart contracts? by mysidia · · Score: 1

    What kind of contract are you suggesting? You pay someone who holds BTC cash for a contract where they lock up some of their BTC and that BTC will be awarded to you (Or bought back from you for cash) if the BTC increases in value with respect to USD, and if the value of USD stays the same or increases in value with respect to BTC, then the Cash you spent on that contract becomes worthless?

    You could probably do it simpler with Call options on an ETF holding BTC

  23. Re:Any way to hedge USD using smart contracts? by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bitcoin as a currency has built-in deflation, so you can't peg it to anything.

    There are real reasons why all the serious, real fiat currencies are managed for low inflation. Having guaranteed deflation makes bitcoin useless long-term, and it even makes it hard to understand price changes.

    The supply is constrained. A bitcoin will always have more purchasing power in the future. So it can only ever succeed temporarily in "pyramid scheme" fashion. Success would mean demand, but demand cannot be sustained in those circumstances.

    The only reason it is in use is because drug dealers don't realize that it is more traceable than dollars. Ignorance is not a good basis for an economy. See also: information theory (economics)

  24. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because of the moronic increasingly constrained supply over time, the price will continue to trend up even as people abandon it and demand trends down.

    A normal fiat currency the price would crash until you need 10 billion Zimbabwe dollars to buy a sandwich. With bitcoin, you can't even print more; people will have to abandon it. It won't get easier/cheaper to get, either, because of the speculation premium.

    If you want a new fiat currency, fine. But it has to have long-term low inflation to succeed. If it has built-in deflation then speculation will dominate the market.

  25. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    LOL you're making a pretty huge vocabulary mistake when you confuse the definition of a fiat currency ("in the eye of the beholder" eg, value is in the perception/agreement that there is value) and intrinsic value.

    About $250/oz of the value of gold is based purely on the industrial value as a construction material! There is real long-term intrinsic value that serves as a guaranteed floor and allows gold to trade at a much higher level in a similar way to a fiat currency.

    Bitcoin has zero intrinsic value. Zero. You can love bitcoin and it isn't less true. ;) You can't even wipe with it. Even a dollar coin has 5 cents of metal value. Bits on a computer don't have higher intrinsic value if they're flipped one way than if they're flipped the other way.

  26. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Euro nobody even knows if it will exist in 10 years. There is no Euro nation state, there is no long tradition of union, and they don't seem to be increasing trust and cooperation over time in a way that leads to that. They seem increasingly dysfunctional. The British pound, well, Britain isn't the power they used to be. If their currency became too important, they wouldn't be able to keep control of the politics. The bigger it got, the less stable it would be perceived as being, and the more dangerous policy fights over monetary policy would become. Renminbi is seen as being state-supported, it is not even a viable choice for nation states to hold unless they're small and banking on being a satellite. Large investors aren't going to sit on holding in a currency where the market can't effectively set the price.

    There isn't even a viable alternative to the US Dollar as a reserve.

  27. Re:Any way to hedge USD using smart contracts? by Melkman · · Score: 2

    Why do you think demand cannot be sustained ? Bitcoin is a payment system. If you want to use it you need to purchase some bitcoin. The amount of bitcoin is largely irrelevant. You purchase for a certain value. If the value keeps going up you just get less bitcoin for the same value. But you can still use it for transactions for that value. Bitcoins are basically infinitely divisable. The current minimum amount of 1 satoshi can easily be subdivided.

    When you think of bitcoin only as an investment vehicle it's true that is has no value. The value is generated by trade in the form of transactions.
     

  28. Re:$1000 today... 5 cents tomorrow by Adam+Back · · Score: 1

    bitcoin had lower volatility than GBP for much of 2016.

  29. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    About $250/oz of the value of gold is based purely on the industrial value as a construction material! There is real long-term intrinsic value that serves as a guaranteed floor and allows gold to trade at a much higher level in a similar way to a fiat currency.

    What's "intrinsic" about that? Is there some particular reason to think that people will always and forever value gold at $250/oz or higher, no matter what?

    Keep in mind that aluminum was once valued more highly than gold, now it's cheap enough that many people don't even both to recycle it but rather just throw it in the landfill.

    Seems to me that gold is valued as an industrial material only as long as no cheaper/more-useful substitute can be found, at which point its value would drop accordingly. Outside of that, its main attraction is that it is shiny and people like the way it looks, at which point we're definitely back to 'eye of the beholder' territory.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  30. Re: Any way to hedge USD using smart contracts? by CGordy · · Score: 1

    The principal reason fiat currencies are managed for low inflation is to produce steady nominal economic growth, and encourage investment and redistribution of funds. This isn't necessary for bitcoin, because it doesn't need to replace fiat currency to have value.
    For example, Bitcoin offers a way to transfer funds in and out of war zones and political hot spots. Our existing monetary system breaks down in these cases, as trust breaks down, government stop operating, and the local fiat currency becomes worthless. Also, fiat is worthless if the government doesn't like you - just look at what happened to Wikileaks. The US government had their bank and PayPal accounts shut down and they were forced to rely on bitcoin donations.

  31. Re:$1000 today... 5 cents tomorrow by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Historically over a long time though it has been very volatile.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  32. Re:Thanks, Trump! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    There isn't even a viable alternative to the US Dollar as a reserve.
    Considering that Africa and (ex) Russia use Deutsche Mark as reserve currency, you must be living behind the moon.

    The Unites States are a sinking ship since 30 years, no one is really investing it either $ nor the nation. Even your own bigger corporations flee the country and set up shop elsewhere. If you don't get your ass out of your butt you will sink into oblivion over the next 30 years. What exactly does the USA have except Apple, Intel and Carriers? I mean: stuff that anyone wants or respects or fears?

    Ah, yes: Yellowstone, Yosemite, the Grand Canyon ... and the Rockies ... oh and Hawaii, I wonder when they secede.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  33. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Please stop this bullshit.
    You obviously have no clue about bitcoins and your economics 101 is pretty flawed, too.

    You get bit coins via bitcoin exchanges. You are mixing up mining, wich will hit a limited supply and will make finding new coins more and more expensive with transactions and payments.

    There is no difference between gong to an ATM, withdrawing $10, going into a pub and drinking 2 or 3 beer versus "withdrawing" bitcoins worth $10 from an "bitcoin exchange" and buying some thing you want to buy via the internet. Except for the difference in "physical" versus internet, both exchanges are exactly the same. And as far as I can see bitcoin will never vanish.

    It probably won't be hyper successful but it will be - like gold - always be a collectors item.

    With bitcoin, you can't even print more
    Exactly as with gold. The remaining gold simply gains worth, same as bitcoins. If you need more, you split the existing coins ... can't e so hard to grasp. The winning point of bitcoin is: they are limited.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  34. Re:Any way to hedge USD using smart contracts? by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

    your hilarious

  35. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Then you are not very smart ... as the opinions you form from your "even though I actually did look into the subject" make no sense and are wrong.

    Your whoe posts indicates: you have no clue.
    And your follow up indicates: You're not even logically competent enough to disagree with me without making an ass of yourself because you are full with insults ;D

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  36. Re:Thanks, Trump! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    There are no countries that are in any way meaningful that use US$ as "reserves".

    US$ is bought and sold by majour national banks to influence the value of the $ or their own currency on global markets. That is all.

    Do you really think when a majour crisis is approaching, like a big war, or even happening as the war is conducted, that any US$ would have any value for any one on the world?

    Or do you mean, personal savings? Personal savings in many countries are either old DM or modern EU and only in countries that have a strong connection to the US they are dollars.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  37. Re:Not surprised... there isn't anything capping i by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Wow, "you disagree with me, you must not be very smart."

    I know you are but what am I?

    You're right, I don't have anything but insults to respond to that with, because it is too fucking stupid to waste time with any other response. If you say shit like that to people, they are only going to respond for their own entertainment.

    I'll leave it to you to figure out why your response is idiotic.