Slashdot Mirror


Samsung's Upcoming Galaxy S8 Smartphone Could Run a PC - Report (cnbc.com)

Samsung's upcoming flagship Galaxy S8 smartphone could give users the ability to plug it into a screen and turn it into a desktop personal computer, according to a media report. From the article: The All About Windows Phone blog posted a leaked slide from a presentation showing a Samsung smartphone being connected to a screen with a keyboard and mouse. The slide is titled "Samsung Desktop Experience" and shows a phone powering a screen to create a multi-tasking interface, presumably running on Google's Android mobile operating system. There is not much more information on the slide than a visual representation, but if this is true, it'd be an interesting feature that Samsung will tout as it launches its next flagship phone, one that is crucial to make up the fire-prone Galaxy Note 7 which was subsequently recalled.

127 comments

  1. Needs a UPS... by Hydrian · · Score: 2

    And have no battery life..

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
    1. Re:Needs a UPS... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      And have no battery life..

      Don't worry - they'll work out some really hot deals in that department, same as always.

      Still better to just buy a laptop and plug a keyboard, mouse, screen, and printer into it and get two screens that are actually USABLE!

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Needs a UPS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No worries. The battery will catch on fire before it tuns out of juice.

    3. Re:Needs a UPS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they'll work out some really hot deals in that department

      I see what you did there.

    4. Re:Needs a UPS... by Hydrian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not for me.. If it's too much for a one handed phone, just give me a full laptop. Having to carry these multiple layers of devices, just seems silly. A mid sized smartphone that you can put in your pocket for easy access and a laptop for doing real work on the go. If it is too big for a laptop, it goes on a server.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished.
    5. Re:Needs a UPS... by SubtleGuest · · Score: 1

      Phones come with chargers...

    6. Re:Needs a UPS... by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      I don't know. Personally, I'm going to maintain my skepticism, but I've noticed that my smartphone has slowly been replacing a lot of things that I didn't think I'd give up.

      I never thought I'd really use the camera on a phone nevermind how common they were. I have a nice DSLR at home afterall. But then it got to where whenever I want to take pictures my phone is in my pocket and my DSLR is . . . at home.

      Like most people it's replaced my watch and alarm clock, and actually as a person who does a decent amount of hunting I've even taken to using the flashlight feature rather than carrying a separate flashlight.

      I used to have a standalone GPS and never thought I'd use my phone, but with it having essentially free map updates I always use the phone navigation now. My car audio system has basically just become a bluetooth output device for the phone.

      One thing that does seem strange to note is that my smartphone has completely replaced . . . my tablet. My smartphone (a Galaxy S7) feels as fast as or faster than just about any tablet, and the screen size on smartphones has crept up to the point where a tablet use is pointless for me.

      Now, admittedly I still keep a laptop and a desktop separate. I do most of my home computing on my desktop and only use the laptop for travel. I would say that I'd never replace them, but the simple reality is that it's VERY convenient to always have your primary device in your pocket. It probably won't be the Galaxy S8, but I can very well envision an EVENTUAL future in 5-7 years where my main "computer" is just my smartphone plugged into a docking station so that I use it with a large monitor, keyboard, and mouse. The only thing I'd be leery of is gaming but Nintendo is already basing it's next console on mobile tech. Depending on how much technology progresses if they just have a bluetooth gamepad to go with that large monitor that might do just fine for my gaming needs too.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:Needs a UPS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And have no battery life..

      And no 3.5 mm headphone plug.

    8. Re: Needs a UPS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem in general is that "desktop" software is not readily usable on mobile, and vice-versa. To illustrate this point you would still need to use the mobile phone as a multi-touch mouse, since software makes extensive use of this, and it is just not viable to plug a smartphone into a computer KVM and have it turn into a full featured desktop.

      Where the smartphone shines is in replacing the multitude of single-purpose consumer devices like cameras, video cameras, gps,compass, day-planners, notebooks, musical instruments, kid distractions, board games, and so forth. It does not replace any professional gear or crews. Like you would not use a smart phone as a replacement for your drummer and vocalist in a band, you would not replace your photography crew, your broadcast studio and so forth.

      It is however entirely possible to use a smart phone to 'standby' replace someone in person with someone remotely. Eg need a doctor on a bus 30 miles from civilization but still have a cell signal? That might save someone's life with a visit to webMd or a call to 911

    9. Re: Needs a UPS... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      and it is just not viable to plug a smartphone into a computer KVM and have it turn into a full featured desktop.

      Don't think of how things behave today - think of how things CAN behave.

      With sufficient advances in mobile computing power, there's no reason why you CAN'T do this. There's no reason why when you plug your phone in the smartphone apps couldn't become windows with a desktop UI. There's no reason why the monitor couldn't be touchscreen to facilitate applications that need multi-touch support. Some applications might be for sale in a Google or Apple "app" store but still be essentially for use only in "docked" mode, or it may feature two completely different UI's depending on the state of the device.

      You seem to be thinking too much in the mindset that if it doesn't work now, then it can't possibly ever work. A smartphone is a computer. It'll run anything compiled for it and the peripheral and and software issues are EASY. It's just a matter of the hardware getting fast enough and someone packaging everything up correctly.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    10. Re:Needs a UPS... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Also, smartphones don't come with internal clicky keyboards and mice. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  2. Samsung is run by LUDDITES. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Only LUDDITES would want to ruin an appy app device by making it run LUDDITE software. Modern app appers ONLY app apps!

    Apps!

  3. So can just about all modern mobile devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have these so-called tech reporters not looked at SoCs that power just about everything under the sun in the last few years?

    1. Re: So can just about all modern mobile devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like it

    2. Re: So can just about all modern mobile devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except iPhones and iPads because they don't support mouse.

  4. I can do that right now, by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    with my Pixel - it has USB C, that's all that's really required. I've put mice and keyboards on my phones all the way back to my HTC EVO, which had an HDMI port BTW making this sort of thing much easier.

    I think I probably could have done it with my HTC One M8 with USB OTG.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:I can do that right now, by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      I could do that with my first smartphone years ago. It has a HDMI port built right in and bluetooth for peripherals. My next smartphone needed an MHL to HDMI adapter and my current smartphone needs a SlimPort to HDMI adapter, but can still operate in the same fashion.

    2. Re:I can do that right now, by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      I don't think my first smart phone could have. I had a Motorola Q - I had a very bad battery heat up incident of its own and lacked any way that I knew of to get video out of it.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    3. Re:I can do that right now, by jimbob6 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yea I'm not sure what this article is talking about. Samsung has supported HDMI out over the OTG cable since all the way back to the S3.
      The only draw back is you couldn't use the HDMI and the USB host at the same time but you could always hook a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse to it.
      There are no details in the article that specify weather they're talking about over coming the OTG obstacle or what.
      The OP reads more like there's some kind of slick software interface that make the experience more like your current desktop computer.
      Of course stock Android already has a desktop mode so this looks mostly like marketing wank.

    4. Re:I can do that right now, by phrostie · · Score: 1

      I've been using OTGs for year and love them. Mouse, Keyboard, DSLRs
      I don't understand why they aren't more widely used.

    5. Re:I can do that right now, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There are no details in the article that specify weather ...

      Yes, it's all a bit cloudy.

    6. Re:I can do that right now, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my galaxy s4 took a mhl to hdmi adaptor and did this, so its not even a new feature for the galaxy lineup

    7. Re:I can do that right now, by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Probably because we have our phones over here and our computers over there and face it - as nice as our phones are they aren't full fledged desktops that run Steam.....

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    8. Re:I can do that right now, by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Big drawback to not have USB at the same time, where can you put 100BaseT, hard drive, keyb/mouse and such? Yes that reads like a late 90s laundry list but doing everything through wifi and bluetooth brings more cost and less performance/more lag/wireless spectrum issues. Hard drive is cheaper than a NAS, one cable is cheaper than a 5GHz router, and so on.

      But : I suppose they use USB-C, and this makes things somewhat easy. USB-C, like old ipod cables are something of a mash up cable, to keep things dumb it has power (enough power), low speed wires and high speed wires. The high speed wires can be used for USB 3, HDMI, Displayport or other things. Low speed wires are for USB 2.0. So I think, at worst you're using up the high speed wires for display (be it HDMI, Displayport, or using a cheap enough adapter from either of these to single link DVI or VGA) but you get to keep one USB 2.0 for everything else.

      You do have a few choices too : such as use USB 2.0 for networking, or use 5GHz wifi instead, or plain old 2.4GHz wifi. Use 5GHz wifi for display (a "cast", ideally on H265 codec) if that's supported, be able to use USB 3 for networking (gigabit ethernet) and/or storage.

      Thunderbolt 3.0 is the best you can achieve : this uses the high speed wires on USB-C to mux display and PCIe that can be used for anything, but I very much doubt we'll see this on smartphone anytime soon. Displayport on the high speed wires might carry one USB 2.0? Or HDMI might carry ethernet, as the spec allows. But I've left that crap for the last paragraph as it just complicates things. It will be hard to know what a USB-C connector on a random phone supports. Easier might be to get a "dock for Samsung S8".

    9. Re:I can do that right now, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost got a phone that was relatively low end, but had awesome specs (great display, 4G, 2GB RAM etc.). Like a mid range phone with a relatively mediocre camera and a low end quad core 64bit SoC. With Cyanogen support!
      I did discover on some review that it doesn't support OTG. So there's that. Seems like it is a shortcut that can be taken. Feck. Cyanogen's death came at the same time (although it's merely undead). Phone got returned without me taking delivery. Would not have got Android 7.0 or 8.0 anyway, even "Cyanogen" versions, I think.

      Easier answer : most people don't know it's possible and they don't like special cables and stuff.

    10. Re:I can do that right now, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wifi and bluetooth are perfectly reliable these days. My phone has a microSD slot and I have several 128GB cards, so no external hard drive is needed.

  5. One of the most hacked platforms... by geekmux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...in the known universe wants to reinvent itself as a desktop.

    I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

    Bah, what am I saying, it's not like consumers give a flying fuck about security or privacy anyway...

    1. Re:One of the most hacked platforms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously - maybe this will make people finally understand how terrible "smartphones" really are.

      It's such a terrible computing platform it's painful.

    2. Re:One of the most hacked platforms... by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you will get security updates for almost a year, after which you can simply buy a new Samsung Galaxy phone to keep your new desktop machine up-to-date and A-Okay.

    3. Re:One of the most hacked platforms... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Seriously - maybe this will make people finally understand how terrible "smartphones" really are.

      It's such a terrible computing platform it's painful.

      This move does nothing more than offer a larger screen for feeding Netflix/YouTube needs, along with a full keyboard to serve social media addictions, which the target audience will think is "awesome", and the best thing to happen to computing since smartphones.

      Security has sadly become irrelevant regardless of platform. Convenience trumps it every time.

    4. Re:One of the most hacked platforms... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Android is one of the most secure modern platforms available. Not least because by default you can't even install apps from outside Google Play, and because everything is sandboxed and running on SELinux. The issues that have been found have be mitigated by the layered security model and timely patches via Play (even if the manufacturer doesn't update the OS), which is why we see Smart Lightbulbs and Smart Fridges DDOSing away while the Android botnets are nowhere to be found.

      As for why someone would want to use it as a PC, mobile phones are capable gaming platforms now and could even replace the laptop some people take on business trips.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:One of the most hacked platforms... by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Android is one of the most secure modern platforms available. Not least because by default you can't even install apps from outside Google Play, and because everything is sandboxed and running on SELinux. The issues that have been found have be mitigated by the layered security model and timely patches via Play (even if the manufacturer doesn't update the OS), which is why we see Smart Lightbulbs and Smart Fridges DDOSing away while the Android botnets are nowhere to be found.

      As for why someone would want to use it as a PC, mobile phones are capable gaming platforms now and could even replace the laptop some people take on business trips.

      A secure platform only a viable defense when it is supported, and I don't feel like supporting a revenue model where a vendors greed translates to a need to replace my newfangled mobile-OS desktop every year simply because they don't feel like supporting the "old" model anymore. I'm still running a laptop with a fully supported OS that is 6 years old now, bolstered with an increase in RAM and SSD, otherwise known as inexpensive upgrades to avoid wasting hundreds of dollars and filling landfills prematurely with "outdated" hardware.

      It's not hard to see Greed scribbling away on the wall with this move. Not to mention this take-it-with-you-everywhere desktop model invading corporations, creating an fucking nightmare for Security, as if users don't lose laptops often enough.

    6. Re:One of the most hacked platforms... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      The older laptop might be serviced by changing the CPU's thermal paste, perhaps ordering a new keyboard if that's useful.

    7. Re:One of the most hacked platforms... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Apples and oranges. If you want a smart phone, your choice is basically Android or iOS. Windows Phone is dead, Ubuntu Phone is dead, Firefox OS is dead.

      So your choice is a fairly open OS, and if you pick your phone wisely the ability to install an up to date custom ROM, or a completely locked down system with insanely expensive hardware and accessories. Or no smart phone, I guess.

      For laptops, sure, take your pick.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:One of the most hacked platforms... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      So your choice is a fairly open OS, and if you pick your phone wisely the ability to install an up to date custom ROM, or a completely locked down system with insanely expensive hardware and accessories. Or no smart phone, I guess.

      Custom ROM implies limited or no support from the hardware vendor, and I see DRM marching in front of that "open" OS at some point, as vendors do not like it when you uninstall all that fancy adware they love to get revenue from.

      For laptops, sure, take your pick.

      Yes, take your pick from vendor supported options that are supported for many years, unlike the greedy smartphone revenue model that demands hardware replacement prematurely.

      This entire concept of turning an apple or an orange into a watermelon is just stupid, and does nothing but serve the hardware overlords that consumers are already forced to deal with. I'd prefer to keep that greed off my desk.

  6. What does that even mean? by IRGlover · · Score: 1

    "Could run a PC" - what is that supposed to mean? If it just means that you can use an HDMI cable or wireless connection to hook it up to a larger screen like a TV or monitor, then phones and tablets have been doing that for years. If it means that hooking it up to a screen allows the use of a 'full' desktop OS, then that is just what Ubuntu tried and failed to deliver several years ago. Either way, not news, just an ad.

    1. Re:What does that even mean? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      USB OTG (if you don't want bluetooth mouse/keyboard) + HDMI, most likely. "Could run [as] a PC" in the same way that any Android phone supporting those features have always been able to do. Doesn't sound like news at all.

    2. Re:What does that even mean? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I want a phone where I can plug in a big old Xeon to the back. And have it run my own OS and software.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:What does that even mean? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Except, with the S7, Samsung has abandoned MHL

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    4. Re:What does that even mean? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Bringing back a video connection that you just got rid of is also nothing to write a big press release about.

    5. Re:What does that even mean? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I want a phone where I can plug in a big old Xeon to the back. And have it run my own OS and software.

      I see Hardware Design is not your strong suit...

    6. Re:What does that even mean? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It isn't that far off from the x device haters where who are asking for feature X, Y, and Z. without sacrificing features J, V, and L.

      I mean my old Palm Pilot 3 had a serial port where I can connect to a Modem and do a PPP connection to the internet. Why can't I do that with my iPhone 7?
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:What does that even mean? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      It isn't that far off from the x device haters where who are asking for feature X, Y, and Z. without sacrificing features J, V, and L.

      I mean my old Palm Pilot 3 had a serial port where I can connect to a Modem and do a PPP connection to the internet. Why can't I do that with my iPhone 7?

      Um, because your iPhone already HAS a MODEM (actually several) in it. They just connect to the internet in a slightly different fashion...

  7. Iron Sky by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    In the documentary Iron Sky, an Apple iPhone powered an entire space craft.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Iron Sky by IRGlover · · Score: 1

      not surprising, since in Independence Day it was proved that aliens used Apple tech when Jeff Goldblum infected a mothership with a Mac virus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Iron Sky by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The computers that powered Apollo (a real spacecraft) had significantly less power, memory and I/O than your (non smart) watch. IIRC, NASA was running around at one time looking for 80386 chips to run the Shuttle computers.

      You've not set an exactly high bar here.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Iron Sky by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That seems unlikely. The used a radiation-hardened IBM AP-101.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Iron Sky by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      not surprising, since in Independence Day it was proved that aliens used Apple tech when Jeff Goldblum infected a mothership with a Mac virus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      He DEVELOPED and DEPLOYED the Virus on the Mac PowerBook; it was NOT a "Mac Virus" per se. Instead, it was obviously written to target the AlienOS, which of course Jeff Goldblum was fluent in...

    5. Re:Iron Sky by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Yet, he could not speak their language... Source code must be universal.

    6. Re:Iron Sky by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Yet, he could not speak their language... Source code must be universal.

      Everyone knows the universally-accepted language for coding is English, sheesh! ;-)

    7. Re:Iron Sky by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Having watched a lot of sci fi in my youth, I can confirm, most aliens in the galaxy speak English.

      The only exception is the ones that control giant dinosaur like creatures, those aliens speak Japanese.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:Iron Sky by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Hell, this was back in the day when NASA's 'computers' were black women working in the basement.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    9. Re:Iron Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, this was back in the day when NASA's 'computers' were black women working in the basement.

      And computers going down had a more interesting meaning than now.

    10. Re:Iron Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before TCP/IP became the standard protocol for the Internet, various companies all had their own network protocols (DecNet, etc...). But they all followed a similar structure to OSI and then TCP/IP with application/presentation/transport/session/data link and physical media layers. If they had the same technology as the Internet-of-Things, then every system would be loaded with the same network protocols regardless of what method they used to communicate.

    11. Re:Iron Sky by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Having watched a lot of sci fi in my youth, I can confirm, most aliens in the galaxy speak English.

      The only exception is the ones that control giant dinosaur like creatures, those aliens speak Japanese.

      Thank you for putting an actual smile on my face today!

  8. *yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So did the Motorola Atrix.

    1. Re:*yawn* by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Yup and I had one 6 years ago, along with the lapdock. So much potential, but they insisted on forcing their own repository on what they called "Ubuntu" (despite not using Ubuntu's repo) and never actually putting any useful working software in it. Sure, there was some useful software, but none of it worked; and there was some working software, but none of it useful.

      It also had a fingerprint reader long before Apple or Samsung even considered it.

      All in all, it was a decent phone if you ignored the crap desktop implementation; and, since the lapdock was implemented using standard ports (mini-HDMI and micro-USB), I was able to use it for a few projects (as a plug and play component), so it wasn't a wasted purchase.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  9. Editors, a bit more care please? by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey guys, it seems like the New Year cheer ran well into the new year at /. central as the work on summaries has been terrible.

    I presume the subject title should be "Samsung's Upcoming Galaxy S8 Smartphone Could Run AS a PC - Report" - I know TFA's title is poor, but you shouldn't be copying it along without some wordsmithing.

    1. Re:Editors, a bit more care please? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      ... as the work on summaries has been terrible.

      Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Editors, a bit more care please? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well my ~6 year old smart phone could run as a PC too. Not a very powerful PC, but still all the same. The entire premise of the article is that their phone is supposed to be some uber-powerful pile of shit, but it likely won't even reach the bar of a PC from 5 years ago. It's just the same marketing bullshit that console makers like to try with PC's, when current market PC's could beat the "next gen" consoles right out of the gate and for $300-400 -- the same price that those consoles were selling for.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Editors, a bit more care please? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      Likewise. My three-year old smartphone supports bluetooth mice and keyboards, USB mice and keyboards (including wireless ones), and multiple wired / wireless display standards (Google Cast, MHL, Miracast) right out of the box, and even includes the USB OTG adapter. There is absolutely *nothing* new here.

    4. Re:Editors, a bit more care please? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      when current market PC's could beat the "next gen" consoles right out of the gate and for $300-400 -- the same price that those consoles were selling for

      Links? Make sure it's off the shelf and can support 60FPS 1080p gaming on current AAA titles like a console.

    5. Re:Editors, a bit more care please? by mikael · · Score: 1

      For me. it was freaking amazing for me to see a Samsung S2 run 3D texture mapping using an micro-USB to HDMI cable to connect to a 40" widescreen. 20 years ago, you needed a $120K SGI workstation. Now one GPU core will fit into the die space of a single logic gate of a 6502.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  10. Sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ubuntu Phone...not readily available, but the idea was theirs: https://www.ubuntu.com/mobile

    1. Re:Sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd totally want one, but if I need a smartphone I will need to run one application (just one) that is only available for Android and iOS.
      Thus I need an Android runtime or VM to run on it (and not one that will empty the battery in an hour). At the same time, this would be likely to make the software ecosystem fail hard like OS/2 if it's too easy to install or get running.

  11. Connected with keyboard and mouse? by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...connected to a screen with a keyboard and mouse

    Interesting. I've never seen a keyboard and mouse used to connect a device to a screen. This truly is newsworthy!

    1. Re:Connected with keyboard and mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shop around more. You can find keyboards with essentially docking stations or cable switches built in. Though I've never seen one on a mouse before, but some keyboards do have integrated mice...

  12. Why is *This* Considered Ground Breaking? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    TFA makes it sound like this has never been done before. I presume that the "productivity" being discussed here is basically Microsoft Office or, more likely, Google productivity apps.

    Big whoop. These apps have been available on smart phones for years and (micro) HDMI ports have been on Android phones (as well as Blackberry's) for quite a while as well. I guess Apple's behind on this but...

    As I went through this at RIM, I was underwhelmed by the utility of a smartphone being plugged into a monitor without a reasonably sized keyboard (and mouse).

    1. Re:Why is *This* Considered Ground Breaking? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      And at least some Android phones have also supported USB wired / wireless or bluetooth mice / keyboards right out of the box for years, too.

    2. Re:Why is *This* Considered Ground Breaking? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      Windows apps using the latest APIs can be designed to work seamlessly between desktop and mobile, so when you plug your phone into a monitor you get an almost full-featured Windows desktop with actual desktop apps.

      The first time I did it, it was pretty neat. As a "power user" I haven't used it since, though my mother only uses a PC for email and web and I've had her doing it with 100% success.

      Definitely not the first time someone has tried it -- I think I remember Motorola being first to market with it 5-10 years ago -- but it was the first for me that truly felt like a desktop experience.

  13. Unrealistic by Comboman · · Score: 4, Funny

    in Independence Day it was proved that aliens used Apple tech when Jeff Goldblum infected a mothership with a Mac virus

    Typical unrealistic Hollywood. Everyone knows Macs can't get viruses.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Unrealistic by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that Hollywood knows of know other type of computer than ones with half eaten fruit logos.

      So... if a computer gets a virus, it must be one of those...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  14. Single point of failure by Comboman · · Score: 1, Funny

    Great! Now when my phone is dropped, lost, stolen or explodes (we are talking about Samsung), I don't just lose my phone but also my PC.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Single point of failure by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Look at the bright side.
      If your phone is your PC, you won't lose one because you are distracted by the other. Like forgetting your laptop bag because you are looking at your phone.

    2. Re:Single point of failure by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Great! Now when my phone is dropped, lost, stolen or explodes (we are talking about Samsung), I don't just lose my phone but also my PC.

      I guess you are anti-laptop as well, because those can be lost or stolen just as easily.

  15. I'll pay twice the price for an Intel x86 version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That can run Linux/XP-Win8.1. Removable battery, hdmi, sd, 2 usb(one for charging) and 3x the price if it's 5" screen or a bit less with slideout keyboard.

    Damn I want a modernized OQO.

  16. please light a fire under apple's ass by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 1

    The free market gives us a gift every once in a while.

    1. Re:please light a fire under apple's ass by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The free market gives us a gift every once in a while.

      Apple has supported Bluetooth keyboards (and I think even mice) on iOS for like, ever. And you can do Lightning to HDMI, or use AirPlay for the video out, if you have an AirPlay compatible Monitor/TV or an AppleTV box handy.

      And the Lightning to HDMI Adapter doesn't even "hog" your Lightning Port...

      And with VNC/RDP Apps like "Jump", etc., you can use your iPhone/iPad as a Remote Terminal for a "real" computer, which is where it actually becomes somewhat practical.

    2. Re:please light a fire under apple's ass by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      The free market gives us a gift every once in a while.

      Apple has supported Bluetooth keyboards (and I think even mice) on iOS for like, ever. And you can do Lightning to HDMI, or use AirPlay for the video out, if you have an AirPlay compatible Monitor/TV or an AppleTV box handy.

      Yes, iPhones have supported Bluetooth input devices forever. Lightning to VGA or DVI have also been possible forever. iPhone 6 certainly. If I had the adapter ($10-15), I'd try it with my iPhone 4 or GF's 5.

    3. Re:please light a fire under apple's ass by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking ubuntu-phone esque convergence of macOS and iOS, if I understand this Galaxy S8 correctly.

      Probably delusional. I'd love to have been a fly on the wall when the touch screen macbook pro meeting turned into the touch bar macbook pro meeting for fear of self-cannibalizing.

    4. Re:please light a fire under apple's ass by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking ubuntu-phone esque convergence of macOS and iOS, if I understand this Galaxy S8 correctly.

      Probably delusional. I'd love to have been a fly on the wall when the touch screen macbook pro meeting turned into the touch bar macbook pro meeting for fear of self-cannibalizing.

      I'm relatively sure that that hypothetical meeting occurred not in 2016; but rather around the time that Apple filed the Touchscreen iMac Patent (that MS blatantly ripped-off) in 2010. Look familiar? BTW, that's why I have to chuckle when people say of the MS Surface Studio "That's what Apple should have invented". Well, guess what?...

      And it was actually TWO meetings: One in 2010, where they demo'ed their Touchscreen MacBook and Prototype Touch-OS X (and decided they didn't like it), and another in 2015, when they demo'ed the TouchBar Prototype MacBook.

      If any product was in danger of cannibalizing sales, it is the iPad Pro. But, IMHO, they are intentionally not revealing their internal Port of macOS to ARM right now; so that product has kind of a "too big for its britches" feel to it.

      Interestingly enough, I read that when they were first considering the iPad, they were deciding whether to make it a "big iPhone" (iOS), or "a little Mac" (OS X), so Jobs supposedly assigned two teams to "horse race" the two concepts. Interestingly, Jobs actually favored the "little Mac" approach; but after the Demo, everyone agreed that the "big iPhone" concept was better.

      And the rest is history...

  17. Like Windows Phone, but worse. by VenFen · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 has it. With upcoming update it will be able to run x86 apps on ARM platform. So platform with 1% market share will be more usable.

    1. Re:Like Windows Phone, but worse. by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 claimed to have this back in Win 8 and Win RT. Those were lies that helped get them to 2%, until people realized it was just lies.

    2. Re:Like Windows Phone, but worse. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 has it. With upcoming update it will be able to run x86 apps on ARM platform. So platform with 1% market share will be more usable.

      Mmmm. Sounds like as much "fun" as "VirtualPC" was, back in the Mac PowerPC days...

    3. Re:Like Windows Phone, but worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And both will spy on you. What's not to like eh?

  18. So, Lumia 950XL + Continuum Dock reinvented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So - something I've been able to do *for a year already* with my Lumia 950XL + Continuum dock? Wow, groundbreaking indeed. Outputs to a 27" monitor quite nicely too. Win 10 Phone is really a bit of an underrated platform (if only there were more apps, sigh). I expect the rumored Surface Phone to take this feature and advance this capability in a serious way.

    1. Re:So, Lumia 950XL + Continuum Dock reinvented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Lumia 950XL + Continuum dock? Wow, groundbreaking indeed.

      Ubuntu produced a phone + desktop well before that. They didn't sell well (nor did the 950s). Several years ago I was running desktop software, and connecting keyboard and mouse, on my Nokia N800 tablet: Gnumeric, Abiword and others. OpenOffice would run too but was better on a N900. They didn't have video output though, but it was usable if the screen wasn't too far away.

      While the software used isn't specified, it could well be using a desktop GUI, like LXDE or Pixel (used on RaspberryPi) or like Unity (as used by Ubuntu) and running normal desktop applications when in docked mode, such as all those that run on RaspberryPi (which is almost _all_ Linux software, including Chrome, LibreOffice, and most development systems), as well as all Android apps (windowed).

      The problem with Continuum seems to be that it can't run 'Windows' software because that is all Intel and Win32-64, and there isn't much phone software because it needs to be redeveloped into UWPs, and the developers seem to not be bothered to do that: they delevoped WM6.x apps and were dumped on; they developed WP7 apps and were obsoleted; they rewrote them to WP8 and that was dropped; now they seem reluctant to rewrite them for UWP because that too, may be a short term system. They were told that if they wrote iOS apps they would run on Windows phones, they were told (for a short time) if the wrote Android apps they would run on Windows phones. So maybe they are doing that now.

  19. Motorola Atrix by DMJC · · Score: 1

    Boring, the Motorola Atrix did this first. Good concept poor execution. Phones will need 4-16GB of RAM to be useful. The Atrix had 1GB of ram and ran a Linux desktop. The experience was pitiful. They had the best concept by far for running phone apps in a window next to your desktop apps but the phone just didn't have the RAM to keep up. Firefox could open 1-3 tabs before it'd run out of ram and close. A full X11 stack running on Android is a good idea but only if the environment is unlocked in exactly the opposite way to how Android currently locks down the environment. You need to be able to add/remove desktop software to your phone for the concept to work.

    1. Re:Motorola Atrix by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      A full X11 stack running on Android is a good idea but only if the environment is unlocked in exactly the opposite way to how Android currently locks down the environment. You need to be able to add/remove desktop software to your phone for the concept to work.

      Why? Like, if I install the Google Docs app from the Google Play store, that's not good enough?

  20. Is The Battery Replacable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without this ability, Samsung has learned nothing.

    The most important question a customer should ask.

  21. What about fast updates and no carrier delay? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    What about fast updates and no carrier delay / let people flash a non carrier build with out knox getting in the way

  22. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah I have a cheap bluetooth keyboard and mouse for my samsung since ages. Some games even detect those. Commenting is easier. Tho it will never retire desktops with this shit battery life.

  23. It won't run Android & Windows at once by nateman1352 · · Score: 1

    Intel tried to do that a few years ago through the OEM channel when they were pushing aggressively in to the tablet market. Being able to run Windows and Android is a natural advantage for x86. Both Google AND Microsoft killed it by refusal to certify the resulting device. Even if Microsoft is cool with it now it is highly unlikely Google's stance has changed.

  24. 90% by fredgiblet · · Score: 0

    To pull a number out of my ass, 90% of people could get by just fine with that. I've been saying it for years. I think this is a pretty good idea, as long as it's executed properly. Of course a huge chunk of /.ers wouldn't be able to get by on just their phones.

  25. Run? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    I thought the new model could blow up a PC.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  26. Updates after 24 months?? by anoob7000 · · Score: 1

    Woohoo.. and never get an update after 24 months.

  27. SG S7 + ChromeCast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With SG S7 and chromecast you can already do this.

  28. huzzah, now for the docking stations by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Now, they just need to start making docking stations, and business travelers and telecommueters can have a do-it-all phone+camera+computer.

    Honestly, I thought the phase-out of laptops for powerful "smart phones" that could do their work, would have been here sooner.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  29. Less secure than a colander by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    The only way I'd ever use a smartphone, regardless of how powerful it's processor was, how much RAM it had, and how much storage it had, as a general-purpose computer, is if I could install any OS and software I wanted to on it. Otherwise your 'computer' has essentially zero security -- because it's a smartphone. I'm sure I'm far from being alone in thinking this. So-called 'smartphones' are pretty dumb when it comes to security; you'd be dumb to put your entire life onto one and use it like a general-purpose computer.

    1. Re:Less secure than a colander by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      You used bolds and italics, but you don't really know what you're talking about. There's nothing inherently insecure about smartphones when compares to a general purpose computer.

      Looking at your post history, you write like you're deranged and making flyers about 12 galaxies. For 2017 you might resolve to work on your writing skills.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:Less secure than a colander by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Otherwise your 'computer' has essentially zero security -- because it's a smartphone.

      We aren't fooled by the bold and italics. People are going to expect some facts that back up your claim.

    3. Re:Less secure than a colander by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      There's nothing inherently insecure about smartphones, and there's nothing inherently secure about mainframes, but you don't see smartphones with 30 years of support nor mainframes with 1 years of support.
      Car analogy : there's nothing insecure about a compact car, but if you can only buy ones made out of cardboard there's a problem.

    4. Re:Less secure than a colander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you talk that way to people in person? If so then I imagine you get punched in the nose quite a bit, or people just avoid you because you're an asshole.

    5. Re:Less secure than a colander by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I'm not your personal research monkey. If you want 'proof' then I suggest you go through the Slashdot archives and read all the news stories about exploits and weaknesses in smartphones, and how easily they can be compromised by apps, even those that come from sources you should be able to trust (and how some phones even have malware installed on them from the factory). Add to this how you have zero control over the OS your phone is running, and how there are parts of the firmware you can't change or even access, because they're not open-source. You can be in denial about it all you want, you can scoff at me and ridicule me all you want, but it doesn't change any of the above and you damned well know it.

    6. Re:Less secure than a colander by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      you can scoff at me and ridicule me all you want

      I'd be happy to.

      If you want 'proof'

      If you want people to take you seriously, it's fairly common practice to provide facts to back up your claims. Not only did you fail to do that, you didn't even make any arguments to back up your logic. I think you'll find that when interacting with the Humans, it is common to do so.

      how easily they can be compromised by apps

      They can't be compromised by "apps" any easier than an app running on any computer. In fact, less so since mobile apps run in a sandbox (iOS and Android) and the OS doesn't allow root access (or the equivalent thereof) at all.

      The only way I'd ever use a smartphone, regardless of how powerful it's processor was, how much RAM it had, and how much storage it had, as a general-purpose computer, is if I could install any OS and software I wanted to on it.

      You can do that with any Android phone w/ an unlockable bootloader, which turns out to be many.

    7. Re:Less secure than a colander by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You seem to think Slashdot is a debate forum or a research organization. It is neither; it is a place where pseudo-news stories are posted, and where people comment in whatever ways they see fit, usually their opinions. I have neither the time nor the desire to engage in pointless debate with people I've never met and never will meet, nor do I have the time or desire to do metric tonnes of research just to back up and 'justify' my opinions to people I have never and will never meet. In short you're taking this way too seriously and I really don't want to play. If you don't like my opinions then that's your problem not mine. :-)

  30. No thank you! by thedarb · · Score: 1

    I do NOT want my browsing habits on my phone, where the carrier spies on all of it and records it forever. Nooope!

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  31. Motorola Called, and wants its Feature back by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Didn't Motorola (at least in one incarnation or another) already try this a few years ago?

    It was a flop then, and likely would be a flop now.

  32. Re: I'll pay twice the price for an Intel x86 vers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised there isn't one yet. They make x86 phones don't they?

  33. Already been done by mysterious_mark · · Score: 1

    Motorola already did this, the Motorola Atrix: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... did not sell that well, however. M

  34. replacable batteries - good point by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Replaceable battery capability, yes please.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  35. On what site, proclaiming to be "News for Nerds".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...does this type of bullshit qualify as news for nerds?

  36. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own a Samsung Note 2. I got the optional Samsung docking station with hdmi and usb ports that would do the same thing. The only problem was that the mouse was too fast, the driver being set for a finger swipe on the screen.

  37. My iPhone 6... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    iPhone 6 can already do that. Just plug in a lightning-to-VGA adapter, and you are on the monitor. Add a Bluetooth keyboard. For mousing, just use the iPhone (or a Bluetooth track-pad). Most work can be done eyes-up, even without a mouse-and-pointer. AirPrint or other can be used for printing.

    You would be running iOS, but that runs Pages, Keynote, Numbers, and loads of others. Microsoft Office is available for the iPhone, but you must "subscribe" to the software. Skip that and use Apple's Pages, etc., which can File/Open and File/Save As... with no troubles. No formatting-loss or funkiness. Files are mutually stored in iCloud (or some other cloud), and thus are shared dynamically between computer and iPhone.

    I don't know why Apple didn't advertise this ability more broadly. They did for iPads, but not for iPhones... Who knows why?

    It's really useful for giving presentations at conferences.

    1. Re:My iPhone 6... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      For mousing, just use the iPhone (or a Bluetooth track-pad).

      I've tried Apple trackpads w/ iOS and it doesn't (didn't) work. Maybe I did something wrong.

    2. Re:My iPhone 6... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      iPhone 6 can already do that.

      iPhone 4 can do it, too. It came out in mid-2010 – a long time ago for a cell phone.

      I just ordered a 30-pin to VGA (Apple-branded) adapter from Other World Computing for $3.50 plus shipping, for a grand total under $8.

  38. Please not with Android by Punto · · Score: 1

    Android is horrible, it cripples the system, and adds huge unnecessary complexity to the development. Some people only need a main() entry point, and to go into a loop where they sleep and poll the OS and draw the screen, why put them in the position where they're forced to jump through all the hoops of a Java VM? That can be built on top of the basic system for the people who need it. This would be horrible for a desktop. There has to be a normal mobile OS out there

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  39. Possibly by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Chances are though that it would make it explode, as it behooves Samsung, the company on fire that knows how to keep the flame alive. I am already burning with anticipation for this product. When it comes to making things explode, you can't beat a Samsung handset.

  40. hmmm... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 2

    I know many people don't realize this, but high end smartphones have been able to do just that for quite a while now. Mouse and keyboard can be connected by either Bluetooth or USB OtG, and screen could be done either by MHL wired or wireless mirroring.

    The problem is the OS and a lack of good standardized accessories. Much like gamepads, it doesn't really matter if tou have the hardware to do it if apps are not gonna support it.

    Android alao gives a shit support for most of those things... I had a smartphone with a smashed touchscreen for a while, you can't use the phone without it (some functions are doable, but it's a pretty crappy experience). I had to use apps like Vysor to get by while waiting for replacement parts.

    The iPhone is even worse as it doesn't suppory most accessories.

  41. Been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It didnt do well that time either. But who knows, might make it this time.

  42. For real this time, guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew it, 2017 is The Year Of Linux on the DESKTOP!

  43. I want Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android is fine; it is Linux; but I want Linux as in Mint. As in LTS. As in being able to use the same hardware 10 years from now (and no, that's not binary).

    Android will not be updated. I'll be unsafe and some cool programs won't run.

    Besides there's the full control issue. I don't want any subsystem to engage, get some data and report to who-knows-where.

    Now the smarphone/tablet using an external monitor and keyboard is an old dream; I suspect this is all a lie and we won't be able to do it (what? and affect our laptop sales? no way!)

  44. This has been done on earlier notes/galaxy s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example: Note 2 and S4 - official Samsung accessory.

    https://www.uk-mobilestore.co.uk/genuine-samsung-multimedia-dock-station-edd-s20ewegstd.html

    How is this news?

  45. But...does it also explode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Explosively fast computing" is OK but "exploding fast computing" sounds wrong to me.

  46. Not.Buying.Sumsung.Ever.Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless you dont want any os updates. ever.
    unless you dont want reliability.

    fix your internal problems, then manufacturing. then talk to us again.

  47. Copy of Motorola Atrix.... by MercTech · · Score: 1

    It sounds like Samsung is trying to copy what Motorola did with the Atrix back in 2011. Wonderful smart phone with a keyboard/screen containing external battery that allowed it to be used as a laptop computer.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT