Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Will Soon Let You Opt-Out of Automatic Driver Updates (pcworld.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from PCWorld: Microsoft is giving users some more control over Windows 10 updates, with a new beta build of its operating system released Monday. The build allows folks with the Windows 10 Professional, Education, and Enterprise versions to defer new updates for up to 35 days. In addition, the company will allow those users to decide whether or not they want to include driver updates when they want to update Windows. It's a move that helps respond to one of the key criticisms of Windows 10: that Microsoft's regime of forced, cumulative updates has caused problems for users with some configurations. This way, users can steer clear of updates they don't want to install yet and dodge problematic driver updates. The newly-minted update changes are just one part of the improvements added to Windows 10 with the build released Monday. Microsoft is also working on making the initial Windows 10 setup more accessible using Cortana. The company's virtual assistant can ask users questions at setup -- when they speak languages that it can understand -- and use those answers to configure devices. A small number of beta users will also begin to see a battery life experiment pop up on their devices. Microsoft is also giving users an easier way to connect to a virtual private network. Once Windows 10 has a user's VPN settings loaded, it's possible to activate the connection with the tap of a button without opening up VPN settings.

156 comments

  1. I Already Opted Out by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I already opted out of ALL updates in Windows 10 by opting out of Windows 10!

    1. Re:I Already Opted Out by freeze128 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "DEFER" is not "OPT-OUT".

    2. Re:I Already Opted Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Defer" means delay. It's quite plausible that their device will never receive Windows 10, so opt-out is appropriate here.

    3. Re:I Already Opted Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "DEFER" is not "OPT-OUT".

      Oh, I beg to differ.

      The Windows 10 shenanigans we've been hearing about were enough to push me into the efforts required to run Linux Mint on my work laptop and desktop. These are the systems that I use to Get Shit Done and Feed My Family, so the decision was not made lightly.

    4. Re: I Already Opted Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too! (I was basically going to say this but you beat me to it.)

  2. About letting us choose everything? by ls671 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about letting us choose everything we want to update?

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:About letting us choose everything? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      What about letting us choose everything we want to update?

      Fuck you, you filthy child-molesting communist!!

      Signed, Satya Nadella
      Benevolent Dictator, Microsoft Corp.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:About letting us choose everything? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      At some point fragmentation causes serious issues. This wasn't a problem when they would release a major release every 5 years and a couple service packs inbetween. Now they're making substantial changes and feature improvements on a bi-annual basis. If most people are 2 years behind developers will have to target 10 different OS configurations instead of 2 (those who are on the latest and those who are deferred for a few months).

    3. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What about letting us choose everything we want to update?

      What if they later add that option to the updater, but you marked not to update the updater?

      (Yes, programmers think like this.)

    4. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about letting users opt-out of ALL of the spying and "telemetry"? And how about letting users opt-out of having all of their privacy settings reset to what Micro$haft wants with every update? What about letting users opt-out of having Non-M$ software replaced with inferior M$ software? Or letting them opt-out of M$ just deleting their paid for non-M$ software, claiming its a threat?

      I have opted-out of using M$ operating systems and software...totally. Free at last! Free at last!

    5. Re:About letting us choose everything? by urbanriot · · Score: 2

      Or what about us letting us configure the operating system to never disrupt me when I'm using it and 'install updates at shut down'.

    6. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people almost never shut down.

    7. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Windows 10 has been nothing but issues, failed updates, lost work, and totally ludicrous privacy settings from the start. Whatever their excuse is, it's a bad one. Whatever your apology for it is, it's a shit one.

    8. Re:About letting us choose everything? by urbanriot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's fine. Then prompt them every now and then to suggest it. Or give them the option to set it to automatically install at 3 AM.

      The big problem here is that Microsoft took away a pile of options when they came out with Windows 8 / 10 and haven't learned their lesson. I have an all-in-one in my kitchen and regretted Windows 10 within a few weeks because I'd come down in the morning to read the news while having breakfast and it wanted to update or it was finishing an update from the last time it interrupted me. Or I'd use it in the evening around dinner time and it suddenly rebooted on me for the same reason. It seemed like it was constantly disrupting my ability to use the system because of updates, it was extremely frustrating and since I outright disabled the Windows Update service my life has been peaceful.

      Innovative ideas for updates
      - Allow you to schedule updates to occur at a specific time.
      - Not interrupt you the next time you use your system if that specific time was missed.
      - Allow you to update when you shut down your computer.
      - Prompt you to update your computer every once in a while.

      I believe if you upgrade to Windows 7 you can gain all of those features.

    9. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some point fragmentation causes serious issues.

      And? Even if that were true, which it's not, that is the user's problem. Microsoft shouldn't have any say in how a person uses their computer.

    10. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      At some point fragmentation causes serious issues. This wasn't a problem when they would release a major release every 5 years and a couple service packs inbetween.

      There's an idea coming to me here... Something that might work better than pushing out new releases every five minutes... I think... I don't know, maybe there could be a way to still enjoy the kind of stability we used to have... I just can't... No, it's gone. I've got nothing. Never mind.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    11. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      You mean I don't have to replace Firefox with Edge to gain up to 75% more battery life any more? Well, that's a relief!

      Sent from my Windows 7 workstation.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    12. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Innovative ideas for updates?

      - Allow the user to install only essential security and stability updates.

      - Apply updates transparently so that any affected parts of the system transfer near instantaneously to the updated version without needing to restart the entire system or disrupt anything else that is running.

      I believe if you upgrade to certain other operating systems you can gain all of those features.

      The sad thing is that despite the vast resources at their disposal, Microsoft hasn't designed any of their newer versions of Windows to allow the same behaviour.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    13. Re:About letting us choose everything? by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      If most people are 2 years behind developers will have to target 10 different OS configurations instead of 2 (those who are on the latest and those who are deferred for a few months).

      So the argument is that users should not have control of their own computers because it presents a business problem if they do?

      I beg to differ.

    14. Re:About letting us choose everything? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Even if that were true, which it's not, that is the user's problem.

      No, it causes an ecosystem problems. It prevents the vast vast vast vast majority of users from being able to get new features because a few Luddites want to go unpatched.

    15. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is having the option to go unpatched preventing other people from receiving updates if they want them?

    16. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is worth the better part of a trillion dollars. Forgive me if I don't feel any sympathy for their quest to shave a few mil off the payroll budget by reducing the developers' workload.

    17. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Calydor · · Score: 2

      "Sorry JimBob, until you get your system up to date this here program just ain't gonna run. Everyone else gets to use it but you don't, so get patchin'."

      That wasn't hard to work around at all.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    18. Re:About letting us choose everything? by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> What about letting us choose everything we want to update?

      Use Linux :)

      --
      aaaaaaa
    19. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they're making substantial changes and feature improvements on a bi-annual basis.

      Ah, so like Intels Tick-tock then? It's been a very long period of substantial changes, are we going to switch to feature improvements soon?

      Windows 10 needs a lot of feature improvements to get anywhere near usable, and even more for users to become productive.

    20. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Go back to doing tech support, there you can do less damage, at least I can avoid calling you!

      --signed, MS Customer.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Then I guess the makers of the system should give us a good reason to switch to the newest one and now give us pretty much any good reason in the book not to.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      was supposed to be "not give us"...

      where's my coffee?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:About letting us choose everything? by peragrin · · Score: 2

      The average user treats their computer as an appliance and don't know the difference.

      Do you think some one who doesn't know that you can take the door off its hinges easily is smart enough to know windows drivers etc configurations?

      Hell I did a system wipe fresh install of Windows 7 yesterday. It took me 4 damn hours to find find the correct Dell network driver as Dell included 8 network card drivers on their restore CD. Why can't windows search subfolders while looking for drivers? Installed one reboot watch it fail install the next. My co-workers thought some of the status screens and driver screens I brought up were voodoo magic.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    24. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, we get spyware/adware/freemium/forced updates/forced reboots because the vast majority are laymen noobs who believe that newer is always better.

      I follow the old advice of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." If an update fixes something that is currently broken or adds a feature that I want, then I'll use it, however I won't risk screwing up the stability, compatibility and customisation of my systems by installing unnecessary updates just because entitled people like you have ADHD and feel the need for pointless updates every couple of minutes.

    25. Re:About letting us choose everything? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 2

      Now they're making substantial changes and feature improvements on a bi-annual basis.

      Ah, so like Intels Tick-tock then? It's been a very long period of substantial changes, are we going to switch to feature improvements soon?

      Windows 10 needs a lot of feature improvements to get anywhere near usable, and even more for users to become productive.

      But didn't you see? They're introducing another sweeping UI change with Transparecncy and Blur!!!

      Yeah, that'll fix EVERYTHING. You'll see...

    26. Re:About letting us choose everything? by admin7087 · · Score: 2

      Look, it's really super-simple. Many people do not want these new "features". They want a stable system to work and play with, without constant fear that some forced update will botch your PC or the software running on it. It's the one and only reason why I am still using Windows 7. I'm making music in my spare time, using plugins with lots of esoteric DRM schemes and low-level audio software that habitually breaks with new versions. Sure, that's the developers' fault, but I'm not interested in attributing blame, I want a working system. Hence, I need to check whether updates break my system before I install them - and consequently want to install them much later than anyone else or never.

      It's totally beyond me why Microsoft ignores such obvious needs. They seem to be fixed on destroying their company by driving people away from their core product. I don't get it.

    27. Re:About letting us choose everything? by ai4px · · Score: 3, Informative

      Win10 has reset my preferences for HTML, PDF and JPG files across several updates. Additionally, it takes a LONG time to boot during these updates. I literally walked in to work one morning needing to send an email. After two reboots and logging in, waiting for Outlook to pop up, I finally gave up and composed my email on my phone. No sooner than I got outlook running, the O/S wanted ANOTHER reboot for another queued update.

      Now look at this from the perspective of grandma and grandpa who just want to see the grandkids in email..... The IOS devices and even the android devices boot faster and when they do an update you don't even know it because all the apps stay where they were across the update.

      And we wonder why Win10 is losing market share?????

    28. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you didn't think to go to the Dell support site, type your service tag and get the driver?

    29. Re:About letting us choose everything? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The average user treats their computer as an appliance and don't know the difference.

      True, but how is the relevant? It is entirely possible to cater to the "appliance" crowd while still allowing people who care about such things to retain control over their computer.

      Besides, that wasn't the argument that I was responding to. The argument I was responding to was that letting users have control over their computers creates business difficulties. That may be true, but is a terrible argument. Why should being able to control my own property be restricted just because it makes someone else's business a little more problematic?

    30. Re:About letting us choose everything? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      It prevents the vast vast vast vast majority of users from being able to get new features because a few Luddites want to go unpatched.

      How is that? My decision about whether or not to install any particular bit of software does not extend to other people's machines.

    31. Re:About letting us choose everything? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      You can't use that slur anymore. Putin thinks Trump is a great guy, so all is now forgiven and clearly the last 3/4 century of fear regarding commies was just a mistake.

    32. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this in any way bad?

    33. Re:About letting us choose everything? by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      Why can't windows search subfolders while looking for drivers?

      As of Windows 7 (maybe Vista--I wouldn't know), it can. There is a checkbox labeled "Include subfolders" right under the text field where you specify the path to search. If they are Dell drivers as you mention, you might want to make sure they're not just EXEs, which you'll need to extract so Windows can find the INF files it scours for matches.

      --
      R.Mo
    34. Re: About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not commies anymore. They're oligarchs who hold pretend elections and feed, vampirelike off the blood of the common people in an Orwellian nightmare hellacape of permanent war, obvious and hilariously poorly-crafted government lies that only a sub-moron would believe and it's spreading around the globe.

      Just like in America.

    35. Re: About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blurs and transparency make it harder to see tho :(

    36. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Win10 has reset my preferences for HTML, PDF and JPG files across several updates. Additionally, it takes a LONG time to boot during these updates. I literally walked in to work one morning needing to send an email. After two reboots and logging in, waiting for Outlook to pop up, I finally gave up and composed my email on my phone. No sooner than I got outlook running, the O/S wanted ANOTHER reboot for another queued update.

      Sounds like you have a bad install or unsupported hardware. Haven't seen anything like this with any of my systems (4 systems, which 2 are 5 years or older), the 50 windows I support at work or any of my close friends. For the most part most users had very positive things to say about the OS.

      As for boot time, my boot time is 8 seconds on my most recent hardware and about 60 seconds on the old hardware. I think something is very wrong with your hardware or drivers.

      Now look at this from the perspective of grandma and grandpa who just want to see the grandkids in email..... The IOS devices and even the android devices boot faster and when they do an update you don't even know it because all the apps stay where they were across the update.

      Those devices are simpler and are much better suited for the clientele you suggest. Simple internet and computing usage requires nothing more than a tablet.

      And we wonder why Win10 is losing market share?????

      Where does it say that? Every article that comes out seems to suggest a higher number of users adopting Windows 10. Here's the stat counter for Windows 10. Constant incline. http://gs.statcounter.com/#des...

      I'm all for pissing all over a product but it needs to have a foundation to stand on. One bad user experience doesn't tell the full story. I could easily have a biased opinion at the moment because I just had a really bad experience with MS on the licensing side but I try to stay impartial when evaluation a product regardless of my views of said company.

    37. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the late 90s I ran BeOS is my primary OS both at home and at work. Updates went into place seamlessly, without the need to ever reboot. It's now almost 20 years later and Microsoft still can't produce an OS that is as good.

    38. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Actually he's probably talking about the service release 1 install. That one was a monster and took forever, and yeah if you didn't do it right away there was usually additional post-SP updates waiting for you. It was also a staggered rollout over a month or more so if you were at the end of the rollout, there was almost certainly a handful of additional updates waiting for you.

      Most updates are not that bad though. That one was just flat out big.

    39. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      It does all of this, though it'll eventually force the issue with regard to your second point if you tell it to postpone too many times.

      Look at your windows update configuration. Chances are you have your active hours set to something dumb.

      My biggest issue with windows update is that it happily kills unsaved work. It really shouldn't force a reboot if its unable to close any program that has a visible UI window until the user has had a chance to deal with it, given that a large majority of the time the reason a program doesn't close on request is because its waiting for a "Save? Yes/no/cancel" response.

      Of course someone would immediately come up with a program that just sits there popping up UI dialogs explicitly designed to prevent update reboots but its not like people who are willing to go to those extremes can't just disable the WU service anyway.

    40. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had the same experience. Avoided win10 so far. But gf got new pc with win10.

      First day everything went fine. Disabled telemetry crap, installed neccessary programs for her. One day later while she was using the computer update hell started, killed our crappy broadband connection and disabled the pc for the rest of the day. There is no way to schedule updates or limit bandwith. Win7 update mechanism was a lot better and mostly invisible.

      Great job Microsoft!

    41. Re:About letting us choose everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can agree with the privacy/telemetry stuff to an extent, but seriously... WHO is having all these issues with Windows 10? I have had one issue with it one machine out of three, and the issue turned out to be a setting on NVIDIA driver that was preventing the monitor from going to sleep -- NOT a Windows issue. Other than that, it's like a mesh between Win7 and Win8. Win8 was fine too once they released the first pack that brought back some normalcy to the start menu.

      And you can turn down the amount of stuff that gets sent back to Microsoft... if you're really paranoid, there's a guide out there on what outbound IP addresses to block on your firewall/router to prevent any of it getting sent back to Microsoft.

      I seriously get the feeling that people just want to bitch about Microsoft for the sake of bitching about Microsoft. That and they don't like change.

  3. too late, boys. by ChadRiden · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My Microcrap box is back running Windont 7.

  4. What's wrong with automatic driver updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, enjoy having to roll back the update that disables my touchpad's right click button every time I use my new laptop. /wish I were joking

    1. Re:What's wrong with automatic driver updates? by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      Is that why my XPS13 turned into a BSODing doorstop when the internal WiFi is connected to anything?

  5. Consoles with keyboards by jxander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When will MS just up and admit that they aren't in the business of desktop computer software anymore?

    Windows 10 is just an XBox with a keyboard and mouse. You have the same amount of control over the OS (basically none) and they're used for the same purpose (playing games and watching TV)

    --
    This signature is false.
    1. Re:Consoles with keyboards by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      They won't because they keep selling more licenses.

      As long as the majority of software built for corporations and enterprises runs on Windows you won't see a decline. The web took a big bite out of Microsoft Windows revenue stream and another big innovation will be required to see a continued decline. Better cross platform support of everything is key for this to happen.

    2. Re:Consoles with keyboards by Altrag · · Score: 1

      And running decades worth of business software that isn't available or easy to port to Linux or Mac.

      And frankly most people don't give enough shits to go through the hoops of setting up Linux and then Wine just so they can run something that they could have plugged in and ran without any hassle on the pre-installed OS that came with their computer.

  6. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Updating my recent drivers with outdated drivers is not cool.

  7. Mmmm by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd prefer an opt-out of the UI 'improvements'.

  8. If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only they would let us opt out of Windows completely and switch to Linux, then we could all have an operating system that does what we tell it to do. Alas, they will never allow that.

    1. Re:If only... by oddware · · Score: 1

      You don't need Microsoft's permission or blessing to do that!

    2. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the motherboards SecureBoot configuration, sometimes you do.

    3. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the motherboards SecureBoot configuration, sometimes you do.

      Most mainstream Linux distributions support secure boot or UFI.

  9. OH THANK YOU by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    OH THANK YOU my benevolent overlords from Redmond!

    Please, let me lick your boots for granting me this unprecedented freedom!!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:OH THANK YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post just gave them the idea of turning Siri to even more dominatrix-like. I might prefer that as an optional theme to utilize on those blue Monday evenings instead of all the time.

    2. Re:OH THANK YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your dog food.

    3. Re:OH THANK YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU you pussy

  10. The sign that you are a software slave: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The software doesn't allow you to do what you want.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:The sign that you are a software slave: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Super Mario Brothers didn't allow me to jump over the flagpole. Did that make me a slave? No, you idiot. The term "slavery" should NEVER be used in conjunction with software. Your boy Stallman started that craze. It's demeaning to those who are actually enslaved and it's just plain wrong.

    2. Re:The sign that you are a software slave: by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      The obvious difference is that SMB was a game, run solely for entertainment purposes and which has no impact on your daily life or productivity. We play games with the understanding that we're engaging in interaction with the software under a particular set of rules for the purpose of creating a challenging experience.

      A computer is a tool and the OS is part of its utility. An OS that imposes artificial limitations on what the user can do is akin to a tool dictating how its wielder can use it. People using a computer are generally not interested in a constant game-like experience with arbitrary rules and limitations. If they want that, they can install a game on the computer and run it to get that fix.

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  11. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nope.

    All changes to my system have to be OKed by me, with full disclosure of exactly what those changes are. Nothing gets a free ride to do as it pleases.

    Mickeysoft have made themselves a legacy OS out of their unwillingness to remember who's computer it is.

    1. Re:Nope by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      I don't know whether I should ridicule you for Mickeysoft or for who's.

      Decisions, decisions...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Don't be a moron!! by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 2

    Windows Insider builds can break stuff, period. I've lost count of the many times I saw this warning while studying the docs and following the procedure to become an Insider.

    Yes, I've been burned with a bad video driver once and a bad wireless card driver a couple weeks ago. Shit happens.

    If you can't deal with it, then there are a few options:

    1. Fall back to the Slow Ring.
    2. Do a clean reinstall and stay on Release Preview.
    3. Quit the Insider program altogether and do a clean reinstall.

    I've used Home Single Language, Pro, and Enterprise, and they all have the option to Defer Updates. All you have to do is follow the news on the Feedback Hub and enable the option when you find something you wouldn't like to install. Bonus points if you're on the Slow Ring, as there are fewer bugs and more time ffor you to receive the update.

    Finally, you only have yourself to blame if you entered the Insider program on a production or system-critical PC as opposed to a VR or spare / secondary PC.

    1. Re:Don't be a moron!! by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Or you can alternatively use an OS that allows you to pick what you want to install.

  13. Sorry, but this is not enough by guacamole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nearly every home computer is running Windows 10 Home. So this means that most of non-education non-enterprise users still don't have the ability to turn off the automatic forced updates, and reboots. Jebuz, Microsoft, why can it be so hard to the way it used to be in Windows 8?

    1. Re:Sorry, but this is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Plus, I'm certain you could already do this in Enterprise via group policy, and I thought you could in Pro too?

    2. Re:Sorry, but this is not enough by Noishkel · · Score: 2

      EXACTLY. Microsoft is so damn desperate to keep control so much so that it's tanking this OS' popularity.

      If Microsoft wants to stay relevant it needs to get it's collective head out of it's ass and get people their freedom back. One half way decent competitor could easily kill them in less than a decade with this continued unpopular OS design choices.

    3. Re:Sorry, but this is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One half way decent competitor could easily kill them in less than a decade with this continued unpopular OS design choices.

      Except that nobody really wants to compete. The Linux community cannot seem to be bothered with desktop user GUI concerns and all of the support headaches that come with them. They're too busy building the ultimate server appliances from the command line. Apple is basically the iPhone company these days and despite Tim Cooks protestations, it's clear that they have been neglecting the MacOS and desktop computing market. So that leaves Microsoft as the only major tech power that's still interested in building, maintaining and expanding a desktop, laptop and tablet user OS product to run on generic hardware in Windows 10. Despite that the fact that building and maintaining an OS is a boring business, it's actually quite a complex and expensive undertaking with many devils in many details and since consumers won't fork over much if anything just to purchase an OS, it's a thankless business to boot where margins are small and tens of millions of sales are necessary just to break even, let alone turn a profit. Under these circumstances it's hard to imagine a new competitor coming out of nowhere to challenge the entrenched Microsoft Windows fortress that still occupies an overwhelming majority of the desktop PC market which is currently on a long term glide path into niche status anyway. Eventually, only software developers and other professionals with serious computing needs will use desktop PC style workstations.

    4. Re:Sorry, but this is not enough by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Apple is basically the iPhone company these days and despite Tim Cooks protestations, it's clear that they have been neglecting the MacOS and desktop computing market.

      I know it seems that way from the outside; because the mobile side of the industry is still relatively young, and thus it is much easier to show fairly substantial gains year-over-year for both hardware and software, versus the "traditional" desktop/laptop hardware and software, which at this point have been honed to a fairly fine edge. This gives the overall impression that Apple is focusing 90% of its development efforts in the mobile space; which is really not the case.

    5. Re:Sorry, but this is not enough by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> Nearly every home computer is running Windows 10 Home.

      Nope. approx 10% of the home computers I know of run Linux.
      Another 15% run MacOs X.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  14. Microsoft Should Shove Auto Updates Up Ther Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft should shove all auto updates up their ass.

    Why?

    They have no problem shoving them up everyone else's ass.

  15. Not today, lamestream media by rewardian · · Score: 1

    I was about to write some really snarky prose until I read the rest of the article and realized that the headline was a dog whistle specifically for me. There's some good stuff there, for the poor souls who accept such limited control over their computer.

    1. Re:Not today, lamestream media by Nunya666 · · Score: 2

      I was about to write some really snarky prose until I read the rest of the article and realized that the headline was a dog whistle specifically for me. There's some good stuff there, for the poor souls who accept such limited control over their computer.

      Wait, someone on /. RTF?!?!?!?!?!

      My life is complete. I could die today in complete peacefulness, knowing that all is right with the world.

  16. "Automatic Driver" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    At first I thought this was a self-driving-car-AI story. Windows 10 driving cars, what could possibly go wrong?

    "Officer, um, Windows crashed, and I with it."

  17. Doesn't help me by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    I go so tired of seeing Windows 10 insist that there was a mandatory update that I just had to install that instant that it wouldn't let me do anything else until I did (except shut the machine down then reboot, giving me a day before it got bitchy again) that I fixed my Windows system to never get updates. So I guess I'll never get this one.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Doesn't help me by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wait, your Windows asks you? Mine just shuts down on me and takes all my work with it to the depths of Hades. Unless of course I want it to.

      That comic says it better than I ever could.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Doesn't help me by stooo · · Score: 1

      Use Linux instead :)

      --
      aaaaaaa
    3. Re:Doesn't help me by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      Use Linux instead :)

      If I only used a computer to run an operating system I would give your suggestion a try. Unfortunately, I use a computer to run applications, and many of the ones that I run are not available under Linux. I also support other people and so have to be able to run the programs that they run, not some Linux GPL app that has some of the same features. It isn't realistic for those people to try to use Linux (I'm not even sure that it is realistic for me to do battle with the Linux OS, and I've mastered quite a few OSs over the decades), so I'm still using Windows.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    4. Re:Doesn't help me by stooo · · Score: 1

      'don't have these problems here. Plenty of software available here.
      No mastering problems.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  18. Are they coming to their senses? by Master5000 · · Score: 0

    We have to watch this carefully for the next months see where it leads.

    1. Re:Are they coming to their senses? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You've been watching the development for a while now, what makes you think they did?

      A fool is the man who does the same thing and hopes for a different outcome. A fool, or a user of MS Windows.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Re: Microsoft Should Shove Auto Updates Up Ther As by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want the Hookers and blackjack version of Windows 10

  20. "Improvements" by ewhac · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The newly-minted update changes are just one part of the improvements added to Windows 10 with the build released Monday.

    Nice Newspeak(TM) spin there.

    It's not an improvement. It's a fix, to a facility they broke in Windows 10 -- namely, the ability to control the update system.

    And if we're being perfectly honest here, it's not even a fix. It's a workaround to a facility that never fscking worked in the first place , i.e. installing device drivers through Windows Update. Never. Worked.

    And deploying this workaround serves as tacit admission by Microsoft that they they haven't the remotest clue how to fix it. Even after locking out those terribly pesky, annoying users and arrogating all administrative control to themselves with Windows 10, it STILL. DOESN'T. WORK.

  21. Why were the updates problematic? by HalAtWork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Were they untested or something? Years of automatically accepting updates on Linux (kernel and otherwise) across varying hardware and it's been extremely rare that I've experienced any issues at all...

    Is all the software/drivers on Windows considered bleeding edge? Is the hardware not abstracted such that it would cause a complete meltdown with no user interaction possible? Are recovery options insanely complex for the user?

    1. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      Easy. Because device drivers can include bugs in bleeding edge releases especially for new games and hardware. An example you're running solid on say the 6mo old nvidia or AMD video drivers, a new game comes out. The new drivers are "optimized" for that game. So, windows decides to install those new drivers and breaks all your old games in the process. Because there were fundamental changes in the drivers. Now you get to have the fun and enjoyable part where you: Uninstall the driver, run the special MS 'deferment' upgrade for the driver they have in the standard release channel. Then install the old driver that was working fine, but shaved off a few FPS for that new game. It gets even worse when Windows will install an older driver over top of a new one. One of my friends had a problem where Windows 10 would install the 15.6 or 15.6 AMD catalyst drivers over top of the 16.xx drivers on every update and not even their "deferment tool" would stop it from happening.

      The real problem is that windows has been able to botch driver upgrades since ye olde days of windows 98 and the first gen of PnP(or plug and pray as it used to be called) and brick a windows install to the point where a format and wipe is the only solution. That's either the problem of the hardware manufacture, or something going wrong with windows. That's not even touching on the clusterfucks with minor hardware revisions from companies like Realtek(most motherboards use their chipsets for audio or network connections). And one driver release can work, and another completely breaks the device to the point where you need to remove every single backup instance as well.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      You are one person. For a specific person to experience an error with 0.001% chance of happening is extremely unlikely.

      Microsoft releases a patch to the whole world. Let's say a hundred million devices download it across the globe. Suddenly that 0.001% becomes really friggin' common to hear about.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by Greger47 · · Score: 1

      I ny case the OEM driver is simply stupid.

      I have a Lenovo laptop with 3 buttons next to the touchpad. I prefer using the center button as just button 3, same as clicking the mouse wheel. The default simple mouse driver included in Windows works just like this.

      However Windows 10 will detect that there is an "enhanced" Lenovo provided Synaptics driver and insist on installing that. This driver changes the center button to some "scroll" mode, hold the button and swipe the touchpad and it will send scroll events. This behaviour is not configurable.

      To add extra insult to injury the touchpad is perfectly capable of 2-finger multitouch scrolling. The center button scroll mode is some leftover mouse-wheel emulation crap from 10 years ago before multitouch touchpads where common. It's totally not needed.

      If I uninstall the "enhanced" driver Windows 10 will forcibly reinstall it for me in the evening. Gee thanks!

      Nowadays I run Fedora on the laptop.

      - greger

    4. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you MIGHT be able to understand how frustrating it can be when you get hit by the BSOD-hammer, reinstall your OS only to have it "updated" again with no chance to avoid the "update".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Were they untested or something?

      The problems are rare but not unprecedented in any OS. I had a kernel update cause panics in relation to a HighPoint RAID controller back in the day. Comparatively I've never had a WHQL certified driver get delivered through windows update cause a computer to crash (though I did get pushed the unethical and indefensible FTDI driver and rolled that back just because I wasn't certain it wouldn't cause a problem).

      The issue is with the number of computers in the world running the amount of code that it runs with the wide variety of drivers out there, something will go wrong for someone, especially as we optimise every last little bit of performance out of our equipment.

    6. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were they untested or something?

      Microsoft downsized its QA department before releasing Windows 10, so most likely yes.

      Years of automatically accepting updates on Linux (kernel and otherwise) across varying hardware and it's been extremely rare that I've experienced any issues at all

      You most likely never used the bleeding edge release of your Distro ( Debian Sid / OpenSuSE Thumbleweed ). Some features could be broken for weeks, since they are nearly untested at that stage.

      Is the hardware not abstracted such that it would cause a complete meltdown with no user interaction possible?

      Windows does not have a micro kernel so one bad software component in kernel space can take everything else down. Except the graphics drivers which live in their own isolated realm, those just take down everything else because everything relies on a Graphical UI.

    7. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even on 7, I've sometimes have an update break the system and have to revert it in safe mode. This was only... 3-4 over several years, but sometimes things just don't play nice.

      Recovery ISN'T hard (boot into safe mode, undo an update and try again). Problem is, for the "regular" user, safe mode is scary.

    8. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by guacamole · · Score: 2

      "Is all the software/drivers on Windows considered bleeding edge? Is the hardware not abstracted such that it would cause a complete meltdown with no user interaction possible? Are recovery options insanely complex for the user?"

      Absolutely. Microsoft and Linux vendors have released updates in the past that could cause if not a meltdown, then at least some discomfort. When the pending updates show up on my Windows 7 PCs, personally I prefer to install only the security updates immediately, and that is only if I am ready to reboot my PC at that moment. The rest of updates, I'd like to let them simmer and sit there for about a week. Then, if none of the tech news sites reports breaking news about how a recent update has destroyed something, then I also install it eventually on my PC, and again, only at the moment when I am ready to reboot it.

      Now, the way Microsoft handles driver updates is doubly bad. First of all, a whole lot of drivers come as a part of a software suite that includes a configuration utility app and the actual driver. But microsoft often just wants to push you an updated driver, without the utility. Now imagine what happens when you combine an out of date driver settings app with the latest driver? I personally don't want to be the first one to find out.

      Another, much bigger problem with the Microsoft driver updates is that Microsoft often keeps trying to push you completely old and out of date drivers. How many times I have seen the Windows update offering to install three years old AMD Radeon drivers, even though I already have a more recent AMD Catalyst suite, with drivers.

    9. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

      Yep. Not to mention when it destroys lan drivers. Then you're stuck with finding the old Mobo software to reinstall the right one since you're no longer on line.

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    10. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once had a distro completely FUBAR itself because it tried to update the C runtime in two stages: first remove the runtime, then replace the runtime. The second stage (obviously) failed.

    11. Re:Why were the updates problematic? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      I don't get why the driver suite has its own built in update mechanism if Windows Update can do it... but if Windows Update can do it then I don't get why it doesn't update the entire suite too (or all of the other software installed). It sounds like a very disjointed experince that is not well thought out... and if MS plans to take user agency out of the equation then naturally things will get messed up. They really should be more aware of the actual user experience and plan their software and services accordingly.

  22. TELEMETRY == No, Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Given the forced telemetry, Windows 10 doesn't even exist for me.

    And forced driver updates is so absurd!

    Forced anything is wrong!

    The privacy cost of telemetry greatly outweighs the savings in QA. The stability cost of forced driver updates greatly outweighs the benefits of making all Windows installations synchronized (making the PC a predictable target, like a console/phone).

    It is so sad that people at Microsoft, Facebook, Google, Unity, Apple, etc., can accept the immorality of some of their data collection efforts. And it's especially sad when the justification basically amounts to, "everybody else is doing it".

    When a user uses a service which explicitly requires the user to volunteer information essential to use the service (e.g., user enters search terms in to a search engine), there is transparency. But beacons on every web page, and browser fingerprinting, and ultrasonic sounds from web page to microphone, and sending every keystroke in an address bar or every spoken word to Microsoft/Google/Apple/Canonical/Amazon/LG/Samsung/Sony is very wrong.

    1. Re:TELEMETRY == No, Thanks! by erapert · · Score: 1

      USE LINUX.
      Choosing true software freedom is truly the only way to send a message to these people that you won't go along with their bullshit.

  23. That's nice by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    I've already opted out of their damn mandatory updates.

    The tablet I use ( Wacom Studio Pro ) simply isn't allowed to connect to the internet. I transfer all files I create on the tablet to my main system via USB stick or just upload it to the local NAS. I do not, and will never, allow a Windows 10 system to talk unrestricted outside of my local network.

    As such, the tablet performs flawlessly and I don't worry about some untested bullshit Redmond pushes out that will deny me use of my hardware. In the event I ever load software that requires a periodic connection to a server, I'll simply block everything except the server address ( or the address block of the company that owns the software, Eg: Adobe ) let it say hello, then go dark again until the next hello is required.

    When MS starts getting fined or slammed with lawsuits for releasing shoddy updates, they may be a bit more stringent in their QA testing before they release it.

  24. How 'bout opting out of data harvesting? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When will Microsoft allow me to opt out of the egregious data harvesting?

    1. Re:How 'bout opting out of data harvesting? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, this starts to remind me of an old GDR joke. You have to know that toilet paper was in short supply back then and politicians promised anything and everything but never once mentioned toilet paper with but a word.

      Speaker: Comrades! In only 5 years, everyone will have his own three-room flat!
      Man in the crowd: Yeah, but what about the toilet paper?
      Speaker: And comrades! In only 10 years, everyone will have his very own car!
      Man: Ok, but the toilet paper?
      Speaker (enraged): Kiss my ass (literally: Lick my ass!)
      Man: Typical, they have a solution for party members but what about us?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. "Monday"... you mean, "today"? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Ha! Shows what you know, there was no beta release on Monday. Oh, wait, today is Monday. Well, let me check the Feedback Hub. Well, what do you know, there is a new release. It wasn't there earlier today.

    1. Re:"Monday"... you mean, "today"? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      And Microsoft got done telling us on the 6th that they weren't having an update for some unspecified time period. Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

  26. " one of the key criticisms of Windows 10" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because that was such a problem compared to the forced harvesting of your personal data, the resorting to outright malware tactics to trick people into "upgrading" and all the other arrogant assholery associated with Windows 10... On a scale 1-10 I'd rate it "3, bloody annoying", while the rest is off the scale well into criminal behaviour.

  27. Use Windows 10 LTSB by schwit1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://www.howtogeek.com/27382...

    Did you know there’s a version of Windows 10 that doesn’t get big feature updates, and doesn’t even have the Windows Store or Microsoft Edge browser? It’s called Windows 10 LTSB, short for Long Term Servicing Branch.

    1. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      http://www.howtogeek.com/273824/windows-10-without-the-cruft-windows-10-ltsb-explained/
      Did you know thereâ(TM)s a version of Windows 10 that doesnâ(TM)t get big feature updates, and doesnâ(TM)t even have the Windows Store or Microsoft Edge browser? Itâ(TM)s called Windows 10 LTSB, short for Long Term Servicing Branch.

      Did you know there are other editions of Windows that give the exact same feature list you provided?
      It's called Windows 7, or XP, or 2000.

      And you know what those also have in common with Windows 10 LTSB?
      You can't fucking buy any of them!

      I included your linked article in the above quote, purely to copy/paste from your own helpfully provided article:

      Unfortunately, thereâ(TM)s no legitimate way for the average Windows user to get it. Thatâ(TM)s no surpriseâ"Microsoft doesnâ(TM)t even want businesses using Windows 10 LTSB for most of their PCs

      Even the enterprising company I work for is a couple hundred employees shy of the 1000 minimum employee requirement to qualify for enterprise licensing.

      Not to mention the $2k/month fees and the $200/user account charges that come with enterprise licencing even if you qualify.

      But have fun with the yearly audits by Microsoft lawyers that threaten to sue you for buying licenses and then using your software exactly as the licence dictates!

      (From a different company I worked for before, I have a scanned letter from a court where Microsoft tried to sue us for having 12 users authorized on a SQL server that had 40 user CALs with receipts from their own "Open Licencing" store, and another letter a month later dropping the lawsuit. They did the exact same thing two years later. It cost us an additional $60k in legal fees each of those years for following the law!)

      Enterprise licencing can and does cost you over a million dollars a year for the smallest of networks and user bases possible once you include the yearly legal fees.

    2. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by schwit1 · · Score: 2

      Unofficially, any Windows user can get Windows 10 LTSB if they want. Microsoft offers ISO images with Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB as part of its 90-day Enterprise evaluation program. You can download the ISO file-be sure to select "Windows 10 LTSB" instead of "Windows 10" when downloading-and install it on your own PC. It'll function normally for 90 days, after which it'll begin nagging you to activate Windows. But Windows 10 is perfectly functional even without activation, so you should be able to use it as long as you like without entering a product key. You'll just have to put up with nag screens.

    3. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also an enterprise only build that's not for retail sale. You need a Volume License agreement to use it.

    4. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by urbanriot · · Score: 1

      While LTSB is great in the enterprise, it requires a higher priced VLK to get it. AFAIK it doesn't come with the standard VLK agreement, you have to have the next tier agreement which costs considerably more. I believe in Canadian dollars it's about 3x the amount of the OEM license that comes with a business PC.

    5. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      I take it I wouldn't be able to activate Windows 10 LTSB using the license key from my free Windows 10 upgrade from Windows 7?

    6. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Awesome! Sell one to me!

      What do you mean, you cannot?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And worse, the howtogeek link talks about a $7 option, but the windows reference about that $7 option has no details at all.
      And the magical windows blog returns 0 hits when searching for LTSB.
      So you can pretty sure that the $7 option doesn't exist either ....

    8. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by erapert · · Score: 1

      Did you know there's an OS that doesn't force updates on you, does come with a software repository full of free software, and doesn't come with the Edge browser?
      It's called Linux.

    9. Re:Use Windows 10 LTSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy fuck. Time to find another OS instead of throwing good money after bad.

  28. Best explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upvote the parent comment.

  29. About that helpful VPN activation... by lhowaf · · Score: 1

    ...that wouldn't require Edge, would it?

  30. Who cares? by DogDudeIsCool · · Score: 0

    I mean this literally... other than Windows 10 salespeople, who cares? Every decade or two, when it's time to get a new Windows, I go to the Windows store, and I buy something that they have in stock, within my budget. I couldn't care if it had mandatory driver updates, optional driver updates, or FairyDust driver updates. A Windows is a Windows is a Windows.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, spoken like a true tech moron. Because you're clueless, does that mean we all have to be?

  31. Linux is Opted Out by stooo · · Score: 1

    Linux.

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re: Linux is Opted Out by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      I opted out of Windows back in 2002. #Debian never looked back.

    2. Re: Linux is Opted Out by stooo · · Score: 1

      Don't know.
      Probably well because several armies run their battlefield Software on Linux.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    3. Re:Linux is Opted Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      youse are?

    4. Re: Linux is Opted Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know and don't care. I have a PS4 for games.

  32. And soon everyone will be living in paradise! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Where have I heard the "soon we'll have..." bullshit before... right, in the speeches of politicians.

    Sorry, but announce it when it's here. Until then, why the fuck are you waking me again with stuff that simply is not newsworthy?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Well done Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally they did it! Sometimes you are working and the Pc start to update without warning and everything starts to fail.

    1. Re:Well done Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, it has happened to me many times

      http://bobybenet.tumblr.com/post/150681374705/ransomware-y-consejos-para-evitarlo

  34. Win 7 by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 2


    Make windows great again!

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  35. Always been opt out. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    It shocks me how many people on Slashdot don't know GPOs or the registry values they manipulate. It was always easily opt out for those technically inclined that know how to use Windows generally.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    1. Re:Always been opt out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It shocks me that you don't know Windows 10 IGNORES most of those keys, and more with each update.

    2. Re:Always been opt out. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I know from real world experience that it doesn't ignore them. Windows update registry keys are respected.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  36. Slashdot Poster by Merk42 · · Score: 1

    Beep Boop +5 Insightful
    Micro$oft did a thing! It's a thing we asked for previously, but it's still bad because it's M$!

  37. Attention to Telemetry redirect via Forced updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won't be thinking much about forced Telemetry (Which is also mandatory in Server 2016 BTW which will be GREAT for Hippa and Gov't use!) when your upset about your machine not working right or rebooting by itself to perform a 1 hour mandated updated.

    Microsoft has achieved what google vowed not to do... Become Evil. Microsoft is now synonymous with Dis-trust.

  38. Win 7 Win 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This Christmas I built 2 brand new PC's and both run Windows 7. I control the schedule of when and what I want to update. Windows Update and GUI were the deciding factors in my decision. You can still purchase legitimate unused OEM keys from 3rd party re-sellers for about $30! I was skeptical but indeed they were valid. I don't really want to advertise but I got them from Kinguin. The difference in price between home and pro is only $8 so I was like eh why not lets go for Pro. Only problem is they're OEM keys (read below for issue).

    Since optical drives are practically useless these days, getting a physical install DVD is pointless. So just buy the keys online, install from ISO, and voila. Works brilliantly with Windows 7 home and pro.

    I did run into an issue not finding a Win7 Pro ISO because Microsoft's ISO download site doesn't recognize OEM keys. Thankfully I already had a legit home ISO saved from playing with VMWare where I used my retail CD key to download the ISO for it. Used that to install Home from a USB drive.

    Home install won't allow you to register a Pro key, so once home was installed and I was on the desktop (without validation) I did an in-place upgrade to Pro and it immediately recognized my Win7 Pro OEM key. Took an additional 2 mins after desktop to do the Home>Pro upgrade as it forces an additional 50MB windows update file. The Home>Pro upgrade doesn't actually reinstall the entire OS like I thought, it only grabs a couple extra files during the first windows update, meaning that everything for Pro is already there in a Home version but simply disabled. Whole upgrade process was almost instantaneous, had no idea it worked like that. First time I'd ever actually upgraded to Pro. Blew me away that it was so quick and painless of a process.

    Until Microsoft gives me completely control of what/when for Windows Update I'm sticking with Windows 7. Windows 10 GUI mashup of NT + Metro is a puke fest of discontinuity. I'm much more productive professionally and personally with Windows 7 and at the end of the day that's what should count most in my opinion... efficiency and time management. For an operating systems that once hailed itself as the ultimate in word processing and business productivity it's taken a nose dive since Windows 8 and doesn't compare to Windows 7... not even close.

  39. I hear they are renaming Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard somewhere that they were going to rename Windows 10 since it has such a bad reputation. Rebranding always fixes that. From what I heard the front runner name is HAL.

  40. How gracious of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giving me the option not to brick my (or is it their) computer.....

  41. gpedit by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    there has been a setting in the group policy that does just this for a while. it seems to work, all my pcs now nag me in the middle of my games usually fucking it up requiring me to relaunch it.

  42. Sounds completely backwards by HalAtWork · · Score: 0

    Optimizing drivers for games? That sounds completely backwards. Drivers should be optimized for the hardware, and DirectX should handle any optimizations that need to be passed on to the driver. Is DirectX not doing its job? And all the game should have to worry about is talking to DirectX. It seems pretty straightforward. Why in the world should drivers have to worry about what one specific user application is doing?

  43. Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux runs on a lot of mixed hardware and works pretty reliably, sure it is a percentage of users but we are all using the same hardware for both Linux and Windows, not every Linux user has the same hardware and nearly all devices are supported

  44. It's not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The user should always have control whether to update his or her system. I refuse to willingly install this on any system until control is granted. Sorry MSFT you have unsold Windows to the more technically inclined.