Slashdot Mirror


Apple Exec Jimmy Iovine Confirms Company's Interest in Making 'Pop Culture' TV Shows (hollywoodreporter.com)

Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Apple is working to bring in veteran producers to help create original content, including TV series and movies. Apple Music head Jimmy Iovine has all but confirmed the report and company's intentions to expand. From a report: "We're going to do whatever hits popular cultural smack on the nose," Iovine said when asked about Apple's reported expansion. Days after The Wall Street Journal's report that Apple plans to expand into original TV series and movies, Apple executive Jimmy Iovine hinted at what that might look like. "At Apple Music, what we're trying to create is an entire cultural, pop cultural experience, and that happens to include audio and video," he told reporters at the Television Critics Association's winter press tour. "If South Park walks into my office, I am not going to say you're not musicians, you know?" Iovine continued when pressed about the report. "We're going to do whatever hits popular culture smack on the nose. We're going to try."

86 comments

  1. WHY DO ALL THESE POLLS SAY COWBOY NEAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know he was Morpheus on PeeWee Herman show but I can't find anything else on the www.

  2. I forsee a simple pricing model by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 2

    $250 for the show.

    Then for an additional $60, you can buy the audio track.

    --
    Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    1. Re:I forsee a simple pricing model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget a pair of Air Jordans By Dre or whatever to *listen* to the audio track, that sets you back even more.

    2. Re:I forsee a simple pricing model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But surely you need a special $50 adapter to decrypt that $60 audio track. And since this comes from a courageous company, you need to pay the same for the other side of audio channel - surely nobody expects to get full stereo sound without a small extra fee.

    3. Re:I forsee a simple pricing model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the good doses of far left propaganda thrown in at no extra charge..

    4. Re:I forsee a simple pricing model by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and all the actors are very thin.

    5. Re: I forsee a simple pricing model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Takes courage to sell afro-American apparel to white teenagers.

  3. Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs must be rolling over in his grave

    1. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by psergiu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Steve Jobs must be rolling over in his grave

      Maybe that's the whole idea. Those solar panels on the roof of Campus2 are not enough to power everything. But if they glue some rare earth magnets to a certain coffin and insert the resulting cylinder in an enclosure surrounded with a lot of coils ...

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    2. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much energy can you get from one complete roll? How many times must he roll per second to power the whole campus?

    3. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      As many as he wants. That's just the way he rolls.

      How about making a show about a high-tech company in decline jumping the shark? After all, we can skip the happy days and cut right to the present.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs must be rolling over in his grave

      Considering what a legendary evil prick he was, I imagine he's way too busy giving rimjobs to Genghis Kahn in the lowest pit of Hell to care.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I want to know the math. Someone do the math, please! I must know!!!!

    6. Re: Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know too. Who here is up for the challenge?

    7. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody here is smart enough to do that kind of high level calculation.

    8. Re: Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1500rpm

    9. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he would have to roll enough to go thermonuclear. 1.21 gigawatts at least.

    10. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Scott!

    11. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Considering what a legendary evil prick he was,

      Evil? That's a bit strong. Legendary Asshole, on the other hand, is probably accurate. Get these damned scribble-pads out of my office! etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "How many times must he roll per second to power the whole campus?"

      Sixty times, of course.

    13. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering what a legendary evil prick he was...

      And the people who fired him from his own company were not evil? No, they must've been lambs. No Steve Jobs, no GUI. Enjoy using computers with your stupid Unix or CP/M (DOS) command line.

      What about a certain person who worked on Apple's board of directors spilling iPhone's secrets to another company so they could clone it?

    14. Re:Apple has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and his evil empire lives on!!

  4. redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple. The reason I'm glad I'm not a stupid millenial.

  5. Splitting Apple by psergiu · · Score: 0

    And maybe they'll consider splitting the boring and uninteresting computing division as a separate little company: Apple Computer - that can resume making and improving the last Unix[TM] Workstations available.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    1. Re:Splitting Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And maybe they'll consider splitting the boring and uninteresting computing division as a separate little company: Apple Computer - that can resume making and improving the last Unix[TM] Workstations available.

      Bring back the Apple][ Plus - all 64K of it.

      Computers were fun back then. It wasn't so abstract as it is now. You had to understand the metal, the OS at its base and you had to roll your own everything.

      And with today's manufacturing techniques and modern components, they could sell it for $99 and still make a nice fat margin.

      Yeah, and Taylor Swift is coming over to give me a blowjob on my solid gold toilet that's in my private jet.

    2. Re:Splitting Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring back the Apple][ Plus - all 64K of it.

      Try an Arduino. Closest thing to an Apple ][ available, if you want an 8-bit machine with limited RAM and lots of interesting peripherals.

  6. I bet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "We're going to do whatever hits popular culture smack on the nose. We're going to try."

    translation

    "We're desperate enough to try anything at this point except add headphone jacks and escape escape keys."

    1. Re:I bet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "We have too much money and have no idea what to do with it. Let's spend some on overseas productions."

    2. Re:I bet! by gtall · · Score: 0

      Wow! You can save Apple with headphone jacks and escape keys? Have you told Apple this? Maybe you could apply to be CEO, with insight like that I'm sure they'd listen to you.

    3. Re: I bet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point is just as well made by attributing the quote:

      "We're going to do whatever hits popular culture smack on the nose."
      -former audio engineer

  7. Can only be played on Apple products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am sure this is yet another way to enforce vendor lock in. Want to watch this new pop-culture phenomenon? Here's a $300 dongle for your TV...

    Even if they do decide to play nice with Netflix or some other service, there is no way they will pass up the opportunity to brand the hell out of it so, at least, you will be able to easily identify it (and skip it).

    1. Re:Can only be played on Apple products by hey! · · Score: 2

      Everyone wants to own both the distribution channel and the content being sold over that channel. Netflix, Amazon, Hulu...

      They all want their own programming so that going to a different store means losing access to content. If Apple's content does appear on Netflix, you can be sure of two things: (1) it'll be old episodes and (2) their programs will include melodramatic, never-ending story arcs.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  8. Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the content be totally about promoting so-called "Social Justice" philosophies and ideals?

    We've seen a lot of content like that being produced lately. We've seen long-established characters changed to a different race or gender or sexual preference or some other trait just to make the content more "inclusive", even if it makes no sense within story lines or established canon. Or we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it, and the rest of the character pretty much ignored.

    Now is probably the wrong time to be dealing with such content. The American public, at least, is getting sick and tired of having this sort of crap forced on them at every opportunity by the media. Even in Europe, which has long been a stronghold of "Social Justice" philosophy, is getting very tired of all of it after dealing with the illegal aliens who have forced their way into those nations, only to commit crimes and terrorist attacks.

    I can't see how there would be a solid future to this, especially from a financial standpoint, if they're force-feeding leftist ideology to an ever-shrinking portion of the populace. America is swinging to the right. The UK is swinging to the right. Europe is swinging to the right. Australia is swinging to the right. The majority of the citizens of the major markets that would pay for and consume "Social Justice" content are all moving away from those leftist ideologies. I don't see how giving them content they don't want and won't buy will succeed.

    If this content avoids the "Social Justice" narrative, and perhaps even questions it and tears it apart, then it may have a chance for success. Otherwise, I can't see it being a success.

    1. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If this content avoids the "Social Justice" narrative, and perhaps even questions it and tears it apart, then it may have a chance for success.
      Have you ever seen an ipod ad?
      The only white you'll be seeing in these shows will be the airpods.
      You might want to stick with classically racist content producers, like Amazon & Netflix.

    2. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racism against white people is still just racism. Pretending that whites (especially white males) don't exist in your ads is just a step back to the 1950's.

      Martin Luther King wanted to end racism, not just flip who it's okay to be racist against. He must be very sad today to see how far we've turned our backs on his ideals.

    3. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how going from 100% white actors to 80% is OMG INVERSE RACISM

    4. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      You might want to stick with classically racist content producers, like Amazon & Netflix.

      Huh... So that's why Amazon decided to turn Man in the High Castle into a TV show... It all makes sense now.

    5. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      I think the point is that when television networks say they want to create shows for diverse audiences, they make shows that are almost exclusively one particular minority group, and they dedicate an entire time block to it rather than just one or two shows. UPN, WB, and Fox all did exactly this, and in most cases it was just black programming. I suspect the reason for this is that Latinos already have multiple channels filmed entirely in Spanish (telemundo, univision, etc) so there was little point in targeting them, and Asians are such a small group that they didn't think it would make enough.

    6. Re: Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, your diatribe about the downfall of Amerika is spot on. Heck, I remember when we could choose what to watch, based on our own preferences, rather than have "crap" "forced" on us by content providers and being "force fed" entertainment.

    7. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "You might want to stick with classically racist content producers, like Amazon & Netflix."

      ???
      Even for an AC, this is a weird one.

    8. Re: Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, MLK would be very happy to see afro-Americans pissing on white folk.

    9. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by ATMAvatar · · Score: 2

      We've seen long-established characters changed to a different race or gender or sexual preference or some other trait just to make the content more "inclusive", even if it makes no sense within story lines or established canon. Or we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it, and the rest of the character pretty much ignored.

      To be fair, there's also still a non-trivial amount of white-washing going on, too. The most recent and accessible example for the Slashdot audience would be casting Scarlett Johansson for the Ghost In The Shell movie.

      In fact, I am somewhat curious about this list of movies that fit your criteria, as I can easily rattle off several whitewashing examples from recent movies off the top of my head, but I cannot think of that many where the reverse would be true (though there are some).

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    10. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. It's an American remake, of course it's going to star an American. When the Japanese remake of Unforgiven came out, were there cries of "yellowwashing"? There are plenty of Bollywood remakes out there too, are those "brownwashing"?

    11. Re: Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, MLK would be very happy to see afro-Americans pissing on white folk.

      I don't think those Russian hookers were white.

  9. Now We Know by notsteve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, now we know what happened to the MacBook's development resources.

  10. I just want them to make Macs again. :\ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Macs I can upgrade. Desktop Macs.. COMPUTERS!!! ... Not glorified iDevices that are design over function.

    I miss the days when Apple was a computer company that cared about thinking-different.

  11. yippee, another vertical integrator.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what we needed. What is next? A merger with a large ISP? Or Apple fiber?

    I thought capitalism is supposed to supply people with what they want?

  12. It's a good idea by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We've already seen from Netflix that producing enough original content is a huge draw to making sure people use your service. No way would I ever unsubscribe from Netflix now.

    Similarly, a good enough base of original content would be a pretty good reason to buy an AppleTV. Amazon is trying the same approach themselves with Amazon content, which has no AppleTV app yet.

    The only issue is, can Apple produce anything anyone wants to watch? That's the real trick. To my mind Amazon has not yet been nearly as successful at that as Netflix has. But maybe Apple can do better with a greater knowledge of what people stream than Amazon has.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:It's a good idea by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      No idea why this is modded as troll. In any case, I agree that Netflix has better original content than Amazon, though Man in the High Castle has been very good.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:It's a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because anyone who thinks this is a good thing - at least for the consumer - is an idiot. People will end up having to subscribe to a dozen different streaming services, all with non-overlapping sets of supported hardware, to watch the shows they want. It'll end up costing more than the stone-aged cable TV model we all rail against.

      If Microsoft, Google, or anyone else were to do exactly the same thing, SuperKendall would be shitting all over it. And rightfully so.

    3. Re:It's a good idea by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No way would I ever unsubscribe from Netflix now.

      I would. Netflix's original remit was to provide current popular and existing shows as an alternative to driving down to Video2000. Unfortunately their library is utter shit.

      That said I'm not sure if you're being facetious or actually don't like content produced by other networks / studios.

    4. Re:It's a good idea by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      The only issue is, can Apple produce anything anyone wants to watch? That's the real trick.

      It was telling he mentioned South Park. South Park was edgy counter culture 20 years ago. "Oh my God I can't believe they said that it's so irreverent lolololol!" But today they're doing the exact same "lol Trump is orange and doesn't really want to be president and is stupid ha ha ha" joke you find on every single late night comedy show. They were a counter culture and they became the culture.

      The new counter culture is right wing, not lefty/libertarian. If they wanted something edgy and new that would get people talking it needs to be something the cultural establishment (college professors, the Daily Show, etc) would find outrageous and irresponsible, and that would be right wingers skewering the places where the cultural left has gone too far, and Apple is not going to air that kind of shit and weather the backlash from their hipster fan base.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    5. Re:It's a good idea by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I would love to see that same kind of content, and agree that is the new counter-culture - also agree it is very unlikely the Apple of today would fund such content.

      That's why I'm not really sure what success Apple will find, unless they hit on some interesting shows in spite of themselves.

      Oh well, more room for Netflix to prosper I guess!

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:It's a good idea by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Netflix's original remit was to provide current popular and existing shows

      They still do that. Not to the same extent as they used to, but that's on content providers. There is enough good rating content I've stayed happy with the service in that regard.

      In the meantime Netflix is building up a base of what will become a better base of content over time. A new subscriber at this point would have a lot of really good shows to go through - house of cards, that Orange show (first season anyway), Stranger Things, all of the Marvel stuff. Plus now Netflix has that contract with Disney so they get a lot of Disney content, I think going forward that even means new Star Wars movies.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:It's a good idea by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They still do that.

      Your statement is highly locale dependent. Their catalogue currently ranges from bearable to garbage depending on where you live. We only covered that recently

  13. I can see it now by nimbius · · Score: 1

    Mother: "young man just what do you think youre doing with that GNU operating system??"
    Son: thinking different.
    Mother: "oh i see and i suppose that richard stallman put you up to it did he? well id like to hear what youre going to call this GNU/Linux when your father gets home!"
    Son: braveness mom, GNU Linux is just like the new macbook!
    mother: "oh? and how is that?"
    son: ...no escape.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  14. Failing upwards by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jimmy Iovine was one of the most powerful record executives during the period when record labels were all sleeping on the digital revolution that was about to overtake them.

    Why would anyone, especially Apple, give a job to someone who was so clueless about technology and popular culture?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's hip n' cool and pop n' fresh

      Surely this dusty old square can find hep content that will make the kids drop their hoola hoops and portable radio sets

      Furthermore, BAZINGA!

      Finger on the pulse of Pop Media Culture(TM)

    2. Re:Failing upwards by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tim Cook was really drunk one night, thought he was renewing Jony Ive's contract, and got Jim Iovine by mistake.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    3. Re:Failing upwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His Rolodex.

      That nicely encapsulates technological ignorance and the complete meaninglessness of that if you have a recognized name and know other recognized names in the industry.

      Is Apple in any way "loyal to" or have any "shared values" with prescient or at least technologically-literate individuals? Of course not. Only the dollar potential matters.

  15. Tim Cook is destroying Apple, full stop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jobs used to insist Apple was a company which made things so people could create.

    Now, Cook wants to change Apple into a company which makes "entertainment".

    If Jobs was buried, surely he is spinning at very high rpm now, in his grave.

  16. Apple Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that they were forbidden from using that after the lawsuit with the real Apple Music?

    1. Re:Apple Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would not be the first time apple broke that contract, or even the third time.

  17. Sell sell sell by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cook: Hey, I've got a great idea: let's give up our overwhelming and unique advantage in selling premium phone and computer hardware and become one of the dozens of interchangable players making visual content.
    Ghost of Jobs: Fuck you Cook! Are you trying to piss on my legacy?
    Cook: Did someone else feel a breeze? Anyway, whadya think?
    Exec 2: Well...
    Cook: You're fired. Anyone else?
    Ghost of Jobs: Resign you hack! We're a hardware company! That's why I picked you, Mr. Hardware, to run it!
    Cook: Someone get this heating system fixed on Monday. OK, now where were we.
    Exec 3: TV shows.
    Cook: Yes, we're gonna do sitcoms, and reality shows, and soap operas...

    1. Re:Sell sell sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cook: Hey, I've got a great idea: let's give up our overwhelming and unique advantage in selling premium phone and computer hardware and become one of the dozens of interchangable players making visual content.
      Ghost of Jobs: Fuck you Cook! Are you trying to piss on my legacy?
      Cook: Did someone else feel a breeze? Anyway, whadya think?
      Exec 2: Well...
      Cook: You're fired. Anyone else?
      Ghost of Jobs: Resign you hack! We're a hardware company! That's why I picked you, Mr. Hardware, to run it!
      Cook: Someone get this heating system fixed on Monday. OK, now where were we.
      Exec 3: TV shows.
      Cook: Yes, we're gonna do sitcoms, and reality shows, and soap operas...

      Cook: "Is this a Newton I see before me?"

  18. Apple software, not Apple Products Only by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Want to watch this new pop-culture phenomenon? Here's a $300 dongle for your TV...

    Apple doesn't care where you watch it from, but it has to use iTunes (which you may have forgot they have for Windows as well).

    It's just that yes, it happens to be easier to watch all this stuff on an Apple TV.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Apple software, not Apple Products Only by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      iTunes video is defective due to DRM. Doesn't work on devices that don't support Apple DRM, i.e. most of them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Apple software, not Apple Products Only by bizquick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well in cupertino, Apple is the center of the world so from their perspective this makes perfect sense :P

      --
      My Audio Blog

  19. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what we need, a reboot of Queer as Folk combined with a non-satirical version of Portlandia.

  20. Ethics by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Pop culture? Seriously? Apparently we are willing to pay more and more for moral degradation and the promotion of selfishness. Have we no shame? Anyway, I'm glad there's someone out there making money off it. What a great contribution to the world and all of humanity you have made, Mr. Iovine. If not to the world, at least yourself. That oughta be worth something.

    The thinking people of the world have failed.

  21. Apple Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the Beatles' label ever sue them for that or what?

  22. No by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Make proper pro-level computers first.

  23. Beats... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    The acquisition that keeps killing Apple.

    Not that Tim Cook hasn't done a good job of trying.

  24. Borrrring!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With apple being well know for censorship just how watered down will this pop culture be?

  25. More Courage by mea2214 · · Score: 1

    There's an unlimited supply of it at Apple.

  26. I can see them now by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    All principal characters are forced to wear a turltle neck dickie with the new Apple Studios rainbow stripes logo. I am pretty sure there will be one stuck tothe butt cheek of the pants/skirt as well.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  27. please dont by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    please dont. just stop. please. for all of us. just dont. staaaap. :(

  28. Great, more popular culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what the world needs: more entertainment. Who was it who said television was the opiate of the masses? Oh yeah, that was me.

  29. Here's a show idea: My New Mac Pro Tower by sandbagger · · Score: 1

    And its spin off: My New 17 Inch Laptop.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  30. Whoosh by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    unes video is defective due to DRM. Doesn't work on devices that don't support Apple DRM

    Which includes Windows, is Windows an Apple product or not?

    How many laptops can run Windows again? What's that, most of them?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Whoosh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't watch TV on my laptop, I prefer my TV. I'm not paying out for an Apple TV and setting up associated services to stream to it.

      Maybe they could do a cheap dongle. They do love dongles. I really don't see much point paying to access a marketplace.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re: Whoosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then, you're in luck! Most recent tvs will let you stream to them without a dongle!

      But I bet that would take away from your "but I prefer sledges to wheeled vehicles" bitching.

  31. Hey Apple, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't work.

  32. SJW angle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being from a forward-looking inclusive company like Apple, these shows are certain to include much-needed pop culture elements like transgender characters, transsexual characters, and other gender-dyslexic types. I look forward to Trump's executive order cancelling this garbage.

  33. Some find Kevin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could probably get Kevin Perreira to bring back Attack of the Show!