Slashdot Mirror


223 Stranded Whales Rescue Themselves (npr.org)

More than 650 whales beached themselves in New Zealand, and more than 350 of them died. But now an anonymous reader shares NPR's report about a surprising result for the second group of whales. When volunteer rescuers left the beach for the night Saturday, hundreds of survivors from the second stranding remained ashore. Then something curious happened: When the people returned Sunday morning, almost all the surviving whales were gone. All but 17 had left the beach and returned to the waters of Golden Bay overnight.

"We had 240 whales strand yesterday in the afternoon and we were fearful we were going to end up with 240 dead whales this morning," Herb Christophers, a spokesman for New Zealand's Department of Conservation, told Reuters. "But they self-rescued, in other words the tide came in and they were able to float off and swim out to sea."

32 of 74 comments (clear)

  1. Yet another benefit of global warming by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rather than cause problems, as we can see a higher ocean level means more whales can return to the sea. What kind of monsters are you Warming Alarmists that want more whales to die, alone and sandy?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  2. disconcerting by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it's good that some whales managed to escape, I find it extremely disconcerting that whales are beaching themselves en masse and we don't know why.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:disconcerting by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Bad GPS units from some untrustworthy eBay sellers?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:disconcerting by fisted · · Score: 1

      It was obviously a protest.

    3. Re:disconcerting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My theory is a whale cult. Their leader said that they will get to heaven which is up there. They beach themselves, and find out "shit, I'm desiccating and can't get off this damn beach and I'm hungry. They said there would be endless all you can eat shrimp in heaven."

    4. Re:disconcerting by youngone · · Score: 1
      Have a look at this then.

      There's a graphic that attempts to explain why there are lots of whale strandings at Farewell Spit and while it's fair to say that we don't know why it happens, the explaination sounds likely to me.

      This has been pretty big news here in New Zealand for the last few days, and I heard the Department of Conservation guy on the radio this morning say that the whales that swam off the beach had been moved by volunteers during the previous high tide, so I don't think it's such a mystery.

      Looks like he has been misquoted.

    5. Re:disconcerting by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      "Eating their own shit or cat shit? That is disgusting but is it proof of being dumb? Without knowing the reason I wouldn't call it dumb."

      It's because they're fucking dumb! Only something dumb eats its own feces. And from what you said I'm assuming you've contemplated eating your own shit once or twice..fucking people these days.

    6. Re:disconcerting by gravewax · · Score: 1

      They have done this throughout history. It isn't something new and their are many theories from changing currents that disorient them to natural variances in the magnetic field. Not all mysteries are solvable sadly, hopefully one day they do work it out and more importantly work out a method to prevent it.

    7. Re:disconcerting by Anonymous+Curmudgeon · · Score: 1

      While it's good that some whales managed to escape, I find it extremely disconcerting that whales are beaching themselves en masse and we don't know why.

      One theory floated on the PBS New Hour was that the later beachers were responding to distress calls from the earlier beachers.

  3. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Japanese swooned in and nabbed em for "scientific research".

  4. i saw that movie by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    the Enterprise got 'em.

  5. Natural selection at play by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The lesson here is that returning beached whales to sea just returns them to the gene pool, harming the whale population at large.

    If you want to save the whales, you must let the beach-weak whales die. If we keep returning them to the sea, we'll simply have a whale population that's dependent on humans to survive!

    1. Re:Natural selection at play by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      If you want to se the whales on the otherhand... https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:Natural selection at play by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Yes, everyone knows the ocean is... the final Solution. :-)

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re: Natural selection at play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is evidence that they did this millions of years ago. We have visual sightings for hundreds of years. Blaming humans is kinda ignorant.

    4. Re:Natural selection at play by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      The lesson here is that returning beached whales to sea just returns them to the gene pool, harming the whale population at large.

      If you want to save the whales, you must let the beach-weak whales die. If we keep returning them to the sea, we'll simply have a whale population that's dependent on humans to survive!

      Your hypothesis assumes implicitly assumes that a survivable portion of the whale population can evolve to handle beaching events or not beach themselves.

      This may not be possible. Especially when you factor in that humans may be causing them to beach themselves.

      Some people believe that the whales are beaching themselves in response to human-induced stimulus (sonar, etc) that is literally driving them from the ocean because remaining in the water is causing them sufficient pain that they do not believe they can survive there.

      So what you really may end up with is no remaining whale population.

  6. They can't be sure..or can they? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    "But they self-rescued, in other words the tide came in and they were able to float off and swim out to sea."

    Maybe this is what happened...

    "The tide was big enough that it took the dead whales with it out to sea..."

    1. Re:They can't be sure..or can they? by mikaere · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nah, we've had saturation coverage of this event here in Aotearoa New Zealand. The second pod has been closely monitored and they did actually swim off.

      --
      It's good luck to be superstitious
    2. Re:They can't be sure..or can they? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      Ok...but why not lift them one at a time and dump them into the sea? Or simply roll them onto a tarp and drag this together with the beast into deep waters?

      Better than see hundreds dead and then have to deal with the rotting flesh, right?

    3. Re:They can't be sure..or can they? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Because you don't just ROLL A WHALE onto a TARP and DRAG IT OFF.

      Seriously, that's cartoon level science.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    4. Re:They can't be sure..or can they? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Pilot whales. 2000 to 3000 kg. You could roll/drag one with a tractor.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:They can't be sure..or can they? by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      Yes, I hear that whales love to be rolled over and dragged along land by their tails and being stuck in watery sand makes is so much easier to move them!
      Just as well they have loop-holes for the ropes too.
      Thanks for your scientific input, Trump.

    6. Re:They can't be sure..or can they? by PPH · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never seen dolphins carried in slings, lifted with cranes, etc. Some people have a pretty good idea of how to handle animals without harming them.

      whales love to be rolled over

      They may not love it. But it can be done.

      Some day, your parents are going to have to roll you up the basement stairs and out the front door to get a job. You probably won't like it much when it happens either.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:They can't be sure..or can they? by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      "You obviously have never seen dolphins carried in slings, lifted with cranes, etc. "
      You're right! Could you please show me pictures of a 3 ton whale being lifted by a crane, on sand, in a place like farewell spit in NZ (wee hint, farewell spit is in the middle of nowhere and you'd have to get this crane a few Kms along the spit)? https://goo.gl/yt8kpV

      "They may not love it. But it can be done."
      so can keeping them wet until the tide comes back in. What the fuck do you think is easier?

      "Some day, your parents are going to have to roll you up the basement stairs and out the front door to get a job. You probably won't like it much when it happens either."
      OW OW OW!!! MY FEELINGS!!!! OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!!! TOUGH GUY ON INTERNET TYPED BAD THINGS!!!!
      In the face of such stupidity, I'll leave you to consider reality, rather than this fantasy of cranes on a spit lifting whales stuck down in wet sand.

    8. Re:They can't be sure..or can they? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Sure, we'll just use our Tractor-Boats we just got from Caterpillar-Marine. You can't miss them, big fluffy tires, whale winch in the back, long side poles to stick through the water into the sand because water doesn't present much in terms of friction. Their sales have been going through the roof too given the demand for punting beached whales back into the water.

  7. Proper headline: "Stranded whales rescued by tide" by rundgong · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I guess that seems completely normal, and would not generate any clicks...

  8. Re:Proper headline: "Stranded whales rescued by ti by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would have made a hell of a good headline for Procter & Gamble though.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  9. Not disconcerting by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whatever the reason, it's a natural behavior. Contemporary documentation of strandings dates back to at least the 16th century. Archaeological evidence suggest a stranding about 12,000 years ago. And the earliest evidence is for a possible mass stranding is about 6-9 million years ago.

    So these strandings have been happening for a very, very long time. There is no reason to be disconcerted. Interest in the reasons why should be purely academic until prove to be unnatural. While there has been evidence correlating strandings with man-made activities, per scientific standards the burden of proof is upon those advocating such theories to prove a causal relationship.

    1. Re:Not disconcerting by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Whatever the reason, it's a natural behavior. Contemporary documentation of strandings dates back to at least the 16th century.

      In fact, I find it quite heartening that we, as humans, now react by gathering a crowd and equipment to try to save them. The historical reaction seems to have been to gather all your neighbors and equipment and cut up all the free meat and oil-blubber.

      If anyone is acting "unnaturally" here, its the humans.

  10. Re:Turns out they were only resting... by rossdee · · Score: 1

    ".pining for the fjords."

    the fjords are at the other end of The South Island

  11. Sonar by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    A 200dB sonar ping underwater would be a great way to drive whales out of the ocean. The question is whose sonar ping was it.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  12. Preperation by sabbede · · Score: 1
    I think it's obvious what's happening here. Whales are beginning to make their move, training to invade the land and slip quietly back into the sea.

    This is a war we can and must win! Lock up those literal race traitors at Greenpeace and join Japan in the race to save humanity from the terrors in the deep!