Slashdot Mirror


Congressman Calls For Probe Into Trump's Unsecured Android Phone (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNET: President Donald Trump regularly makes news because of his tweets. Now a congressman is making news because of the device the president reportedly uses to tweet. On Friday, Congressman Ted Lieu, a Democrat from Los Angeles, wrote a letter to the House Oversight Committee requesting an investigation into Trump's cybersecurity practices. In particular, he calls out Trump's apparent decision to keep using his personal Android phone instead of a secured phone the Secret Service issued him for his inauguration. The letter is also signed by 14 other members of Congress and calls for a public hearing to discuss the issues. "The device President Trump insists on using -- most likely the Samsung Galaxy S3 -- has particularly well documented vulnerabilities," the letter says. "The use of an unsecured phone risks the president of the United States being monitored by foreign or domestic adversaries, many of whom would be happy to hijack the president's prized Twitter account causing disastrous consequences for global security. Cybersecurity experts universally agree that an ordinary Android smartphone, which the president is reportedly using despite repeated warnings from the Secret Service, can be easily hacked."

61 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. How could you tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our president's postings are so bizarre.

  2. Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well if you're unhappy with it, why not pay the $200k fee and go tell the President yourself!?

    He's selling access to himself for that. No kidding.

    His home, Mar-a-largo is a private club, you pay $200k to join and have wide access to the President (fee was doubled when he because President and a suite was renamed "President Suite").

    It's a dog and pony show folks.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/video_and_audio/headlines/39006681

    1. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's funny how everything that his supporters claimed Clinton was doing, the unsecured phones, the pay-for-access, the cronyism, the corruption, is all stuff that we have absolute proof Turmp is doing barely a month into his presidency.

      The guy is so brazen about it, he doesn't even bother to cover it up at least try to avoid doing the exact same thing he was criticising her for months earlier.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re: Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's of the permitted to break rules demographic, wealthy white male.

    3. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by flopsquad · · Score: 2

      We have no evidence that the money being used to bribe Trump for access isn't being used for the good of the country. Somebody has to pay the troll armies to combat all the fake news! How do you think the dozen anon sockpuppet posts get to the top of any article about Trump?

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    4. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by flopsquad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's funny that all of this stuff wasn't a big deal to you hyper-partisans when Clinton was accused of them, but they suddenly are a big deal when Trump is doing them.

      Your rah-rah-my-team bullshit is fucking up our world. It's a big deal when both teams do it. (And I'm calling you out, Ami, because you were defending Clinton for these very same things.)

      It's perfectly valid to point out and criticize hypocracy, regardless of whether one personally agrees or disagrees with the underlying position.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    5. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "His home, Mar-a-largo is a private club,..." ...created because none of the local clubs would have him as a member.

      And neighbors complaining that only white trash goes there.

    6. Re: Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by guruevi · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Trump trademark was granted several months ago, when the majority of news sources still put him at a huge disadvantage in the polls. There was a 3 month period where you could dispute the trademark which ended last week.

      Making up stories does nothing good to the press, it only makes people distrust them more.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    7. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      Secret service is trying to shut that down. Access is being limited.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

    8. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "absolute proof"? Lol, you loonies are hilariously deluded.

      Project Veritas provides proof, ON VIDEO, of election rigging in the DNC and the leftists can't refute it so they just claim its faked even though they can't provide any proof of it being so. Yet, some vague rumor about what Trump is doing comes up, and all of a sudden it's "absolute proof".

      Why would I believe a serial liar like OKeefe who keeps getting caught again and again and again fabricating evidence for his shitty witchhunts, when multiple enquiries by people who are actually domain experts have said that no, there is just no evidence at all of it.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    9. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by flopsquad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      hypocracy

      I see what you did there.

      Hasn't made it into the dictionary so far, but I can't think of another word for "Government by all the evil things you denounced to get you there in the first place."

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    10. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Why would I believe

      Because when the PV videos on staging violence came out, we found evidence that Zulema Rodriguez was employed by MoveOn to be in Arizona, we have a video of her blocking the road and lying to cops, and that corroborates the video?

      Your original source is a video by a guy who is famous for dishonestly editing videos... and yet you keep going back to him as a primary source.

      I have absolutely zero confidence that you know how to determine if a piece of evidence is true or relevant.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    11. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Your original source is a video by a guy who is famous for dishonestly editing videos... and yet you keep going back to him as a primary source.

      There's a bunch of evidence that corroborates it, unless you don't believe the FEC pay stubs or the independent YouTube videos of her lying to the cops?

      You don't believe the DC police arrest records?

      The evidence speaks for itself. I don't need to consider them credible.

  3. Re:too late by craigminah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Elections have consequences" -- Obama

  4. If his phone can easily be hacked, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    then it very probably has ALREADY been hacked. The reason we haven't heard about it is a), it's been covered up or b), it hasn't been discovered yet, and the hacker is laying low in order to collect as much dirt as possible and/or do as much covert damage as possible. Trump as President is too high-profile, too controversial, too thoroughly disliked, and too valuable as a potential blackmail asset, for there NOT to have already been multiple hacking attempts by serious players with deep pockets. If he IS using anything like a stock Android phone, it's very unlikely that he hasn't already been pwned at least once.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:If his phone can easily be hacked, by Falconhell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, the Russians have hacked it, at least its secure from everyone but them.

    2. Re:If his phone can easily be hacked, by tomhath · · Score: 2

      As long as he only uses it for personal communications there's no problem. Keep government work separate on government issued devices; that's what Powell told Hillary to do.

    3. Re:If his phone can easily be hacked, by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's still a problem with GPS tracking and remote activation of microphone and camera.

  5. Re:Let's not make this political by Highdude702 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yet nobody steps up to fight except a few crazy terrorists. Because its well known that once outsider step in we will look past our differences and kill whoever comes. Liberals and Conservatives are like siblings. I can punch my little brother. But if you touch him i will kill you.

  6. Process already in place for fake Trump tweets by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the problem for any potential enemies is that there seems to already be a process for dealing with Mr. Trumps bizarre proclamations on Twitter - the actual administration official responsible for the portfolio provides what is the correct information.

    This has happened at least a couple of times with the most recent one being Mr. Trump announcing a One State Solution for Israel - the UN ambassador just said that the US policy on the issue hasn't changed and the Two State Solution is the preferred approach.

    Other than his base, I think the rest of the world treats Mr. Trump's tweets the same way they would when read something strange and inexplicable that has gone viral from an eccentric old man that's gone viral.

    1. Re:Process already in place for fake Trump tweets by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Other than his base, I think the rest of the world treats Mr. Trump's tweets the same way they would when read something strange and inexplicable that has gone viral from an eccentric old man that's gone viral.

      My problem is that I subscribe to a philosophy that basically says

      If I see something wrong on the surface that is obvious to fix, then what am I missing underneath that I can't see?

      This sort of thinking assists me in fault finding and problem solving in my job. But applying it to the current administration is making me shake in my boots.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Process already in place for fake Trump tweets by skids · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless that official is Kellyanne Conway, in which case, she provides information which sounds correct and then Trump says, "no really we're going the batshit crazy route on this one, ignore her."

  7. Re:Just another mindless attack by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

    Exactly and as it has been pointed out in the past. Top secret meetings have phones barred from entering rooms. I doubt he can get around that no matter how much of an asshole he is.. Hes not Stupid.

  8. Re:Just another mindless attack by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Informative

    What they forget is no one cares what phone Trump uses to tweet from. As long as he has a second phone to keep the classified stuff secure, who cares if he also keeps his personal phone? Not even the Democrats really care: this is just yet another tactic to try and smear a very popular president.

    Wouldn't you want to know if his personal phone was compromised and he was carrying it around all over the place?

    At the very least it acts as a big red target painted on his back where ever he goes. At the other end of the spectrum the microphone and camera record and pass on everything it sees and hears.

    This is security 101 and not political. That is Trump we are talking about makes it very easy to slip into an argument of "He's a doofus. No, you're just butthurt".

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  9. The Enemy Within by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    For decades, the Republicans have been warning us that there was a political party embedded with Freedom-hating people who would gladly sell us out to Russia.

    Seems like they knew what they were talking about.

    1. Re:The Enemy Within by Highdude702 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, All the Millennials complaining are too young for any real history that hasn't been doctored to one side.

    2. Re:The Enemy Within by LifesABeach · · Score: 3, Funny

      It will be really easy to tell when Trumps phone is being hijacked, the messages will be coherent. Also, is Trump on some kind of medication that the American people should be made aware of?

  10. Re:Just another mindless attack by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And then when the president leaves the meeting, you REALLY think he doesn't talk about the meeting within earshot of his phone?

    Really? I think being a fly on the wall even just where the phone was allowed to go would be plenty interesting.

  11. Re:Just another mindless attack by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative

    Exactly and as it has been pointed out in the past. Top secret meetings have phones barred from entering rooms. I doubt he can get around that no matter how much of an asshole he is.. Hes not Stupid.

    Look at what happened in Mar-a-lago with the North Korean issue and the lackadaisical handling of documents in public. If they think that is reasonable then I don't put anything past this administration.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  12. Re:Just another mindless attack by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Top secret meetings have phones barred from entering rooms. I doubt he can get around that no matter how much of an asshole he is.. Hes not Stupid.

    Read it and weep.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  13. Easily detected by belthize · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just watch his twitter feed. If he begins making sane, rational tweets you'll know it was hacked.

    1. Re:Easily detected by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Just watch his twitter feed. If he begins making sane, rational tweets you'll know it was hacked.

      His tweets are made both by him and his staffers. There was some analysis last year that shows a split between Android and iOS devices as well as the times of day the tweets were made. Basically he makes the un-hinged ones while his staffers make the rational ones. See things like http://varianceexplained.org/r...

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Easily detected by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      I'm really looking forward to the "Hall of Tweets" exhibit at the future Donald J. Trump Presidential Library and Casino, where all of his top tweets are presented in golds on the walls (which are also gold).

      "I have never seen a thin person drinking Diet Coke."

      "Fidel Castro is dead!"

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  14. Re: Just another mindless attack by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wouldn't you want to know if his personal phone was compromised and he was carrying it around all over the place?

    OMG! Then we'd know where he is every minute of the day! (You do know the President's daily schedule is public record, right?)

    OMG the presidents schedule is public. But what happens when there is a security issue and the president is whisked away to a secure location. Do you really think that the schedule is publicized.

    Or how about the use of Marine one to transport the president:

    As a security measure, Marine One always flies in a group of as many as five identical helicopters. One helicopter carries the President, while the others serve as decoys.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    So do you want that security measure invalidated?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  15. Re:Just another mindless attack by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He has tweeted at a time he was scheduled to be in a Top Secret meeting. Either he's not attending his meetings, or he's tweeting during them. Either is gross negligence, so which gross negligence is it today?

  16. Re:Just another mindless attack by belthize · · Score: 2

    And you're reasonably confident he never discusses anything of a sensitive nature outside that room ? It's trivial to remotely enable the mic and record.

  17. Be careful what you ask for.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As democracy is perfected, the office of the president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people.
    On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House
    will be occupied by a downright fool and a complete narcissistic moron.

    ~H.L. Mencken

  18. Re: Just another mindless attack by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    And you could turn the mic on and listen in on everything, or get access to all the accounts on the phone. Why you think the most interesting thing a compromised phone is good for is location tracking is between you and your stalking victims, but there are other uses for a compromised phone.

  19. Re:He can just wipe it with a towel by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Along these lines, I think that Trump should be investigated over this at least nine times.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  20. Re:Just another mindless attack by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because it's impossible that he could have an aide tweeting on his behalf.

    It's well known and obvious that aides tweet for Tump. Because aides use an iOS device and Trump uses and Android device. That doesn't change the issue.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  21. Re:It Just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It DOES matter. A hacked phone allows the hacker to access everything in the phone, like the camera, the microphone, the GPS. Trump is known to be using an out of date, hackable phone for his Twitter nonesense. Nevermind that Twitter-time should be over... you won, damn-it, now get on with doing the job instead of bitching about Hillary, who likely has already gotten rip-roaring drunk, yelled, screamed, ranted, fallen down, puked all over Bill and herself, slept it off for about a week, and moved on. Trump's still chasing invisible enemies with his Tweet phone. He needs to get down to the incredibly boring, tedious business of keeping the machinery of the country running smoothly and reliably. Instead, he's Tweeting on an old Android phone like he's still running for office, signing orders as vague as campaign slogans, and people charged with getting the job done don't know what the fuck. And all the time, Putin's listening and watching through his unsecure Tweet phone? Four years of this shit! Pray to Christ he doesn't start a war just so he can blame someone and throw all the mean people calling him names into camps!

  22. Re: Just another mindless attack by Ly4 · · Score: 2

    And within 30 seconds of reading your post, I came up with the idea of storing recordings on a phone, and then forwarding them later when the signal isn't blocked.

    Except that I didn't actually come up with that idea, it's how many real world apps work (and how much eavesdropping malware works).

  23. Re: I got a probe for ya.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's only twitter you know. His tweets are not a state secret. That doesn't mean he uses that phone for government communication. I am not a fan of Trump but this is plain ridiculous.

  24. Don't bug me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Russians and the Chinese are arguing with each other about the hours they get to listen in but the malware is making the phone unreliable so they'll have to sort that out first with the Iranians.

  25. It's the other way around doofus by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    we're upset because after nearly a decade of the right chanting Lock Her Up that resulted in the worst presidency in history (and we're 30 days in) we're damn well going to point out that the right are a bunch of hypocrites. Nobody ever cared about the emails. They hated Hilary. What bothers me most about the Hilary hate is it was mostly manufactured. A bunch of wealthy and powerful men decided the country was going to hate Hilary Clinton and it did. We all did exactly as planned. My God, we're a bunch of shleps...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  26. Re:Why so many leftists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Story after story on globalists giving our jobs to India and H1Bs, finally we have a President who cares and you're all sour grapes.

    He cares by using a Samsung Galaxy phone not vetted by U.S. services? You know what "Samsung" is, right?

    Why aren't you giving nationalism a chance? Because the snarky jews on TV convinced you someone is Hitler?

    The snarky jews could not care less about what happens to muslims. Take a look how Israel treats Palestinians. No, he isn't Hitler. Just like Hitler, with the "Jewish World Conspiracy" replaced by a Muslimic one, painting members of a religion with an overarching brush in colors of prejudice with only a homeopathic connection to facts.

    Take a step back and think about yourself for a change - you're going to be better off. More jobs, lower taxes, not competing with Xi and Pajeet.

    Have you considered applying for the job of propaganda minister with Trump? You are putting up a nice Goebbels incarnation. Nationalism has been given lots of chances in lots of places, and its death toll exceeds that of most natural catastrophes and epidemics. There is a reason people are wary of giving it a whole lot more chances than less potent mass murderers, rapists, and robbers.

  27. Re:Just another mindless attack by mean+pun · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sure obama never had a vulnerable phone. As every time a phone is released there are GROUPS of hackers that try to break it as fast as humanly possible. Mind you it never takes more than a few days

    Well, at least the NSA damn well tried to give him a secure phone, and Obama cooperated with them. See the constant stream of news items on this subject during his presidency. You can always insist that it is not secure enough, no matter what was done. There is even a tiny chance that you are right, and that the hackers were smarter than the NSA. Your claim that it `never takes more than a few days' is just unfounded speculation, though. (To avoid using a stronger term.)

    In any case, surely you're not going to argue that this is equivalent with a president who refuses to give up his civilian phone that is known to be insecure?

  28. Re: I got a probe for ya.... by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    " The secure phone isn't even capable of communicating with Twitter. "

    So his private phone is like a private email server?

  29. Re: I got a probe for ya.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here is the thing you don't get. Phones can be compromised, and they have microphones and have a camera.

    He could be using a secure phone for some important conversation where the android phone is just sitting on the table, but that android phone could be recording the whole thing and uploading it to some server.

  30. Re: I got a probe for ya.... by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, according to his own words, he should be locked up in prison.

  31. Re:Just another mindless attack by ghoul · · Score: 2

    I love that the President uses an unsecured phone. He will care about the privacy of all us normal folks using unsecured phones and rein in the NSA. At least hes not allowing the washington apparatus to put him inside a bubble and neuter him like they did to Obama

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  32. Re:An S3? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    Um, why is that BS? Trump could absolutely afford a new phone, but Trump is a man who does what he wants. If he doesn't want a newer phone, he's not getting one. Remember Trump is 70; older people tend not to update their technology unless they have to update it.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  33. Re:Oh No we can't have this! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    The last time I checked Hillary isn't President. But your point is as silly as saying since your neighbor deals drugs; therefore, you are free to deal drugs. Hypocrite much?

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  34. Re: Just another mindless attack by Ly4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    But if they are whoever tasked at keeping the situation secure should be fired.
    Nobody was fired after this:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    The president gets to make the rules - everyone else just gets to make suggestions. So if Trump wants to overrule someone who tells him to not bring his android phone into a SCIF, he can. And the Mar-a-Lago example indicates that he might be willing to do exactly that.

  35. Re:Oh No we can't have this! by TheDarkener · · Score: 4, Informative

    Obviously Hillary can NOT run a private email server without a lot of negative publicity and essentially costing her the election. But oh, SHE did it, so anyone else who does it shouldn't have the same negative publicity?

    You're fucking stupid.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  36. Re: I got a probe for ya.... by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

    How much "Top Secret" information have you seen on twitter? Why do you people try to make yourself look like morons.

    If you think that posting "Top Secret" information on twitter is the only security risk of a private phone, you are the moron.

  37. Re:Just another mindless attack by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

    You're correct. But the fact of adding potential attack vectors making it harder to secure. Why not use shit like twitter and other social bullshit on a separate phone since its all trivial public crap anyways. the people comparing this to the hillary email server are ignorant. from what I understand from the article. They are speculating the phone that he is using. and directly linking to other liberals mad that hes not using a trivial service like twitter from a phone that also handles top secret matters. I feel from a security standpoint there is nothing wrong with what he is doing with the phones.

  38. Re: too late by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "If you can't explain something in simple terms, you don't understand it."

    Your claim falsely assumes that everything can be explained in simple terms.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  39. Re:Just another mindless attack by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    I know I'll get modded down for being honest here, but I don't care.

    Nah, if you get modded down it'll be for the rant in the second half of your post.
    The first half of your post was good and informative, and if you added a link to support the info, it would have been a good solid post.

    Also, your sig is inflammatory, which (shouldn't but) can cause people to moderate differently.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  40. Re:too late by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    after 8 years of Obama we have more racial tension than ever before

    No, we don't. All of that racial tension you're seeing was already there. What happened was that having a black president encouraged black Americans to speak up about the ways in which they're systematically oppressed, which means that you are now more aware of the existing racial tension.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  41. Where are you all now? by dbIII · · Score: 2

    So, all those "but Hillary uses email - lock her up" folks, where are you now? What do you think of this situation?
    Silence?
    There's been so much partisan political bullshit in this place pretending to be about online security but really nothing of the sort.