Slashdot Mirror


Android is About To Eclipse Windows as the World's Most-Used Operating System (cnet.com)

John Falcone, writing for CNET: Android is poised to overtake Windows as the world's most-used operating system. That's the word from web analytics service StatCounter, which monitors worldwide web traffic with an eye towards device operating systems. The firm found that 37.4 percent of devices online were Android -- just a hair behind Windows at 38.6 percent. Perhaps the bigger concern for Microsoft are the trend lines, however: Windows is on a steady march down from 82 percent in 2012, while Android is mirroring it upward from 2.2 percent in the same 5-year period.

169 comments

  1. YEAR OF LINUX ON THE TABLET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All hail Linus, creator of Linux! May he live long, and may he father many more kernel releases to come!

    1. Re: YEAR OF LINUX ON THE TABLET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. Phones to pcs? This be the stupidest post yet.

    2. Re: YEAR OF LINUX ON THE TABLET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phones ARE "PC"s, by any definition you want to posit. Hell, my current (somewhat outdated) Note 4 has more processing power than the Pentium 90 I started out with! More RAM and Storage too!

    3. Re: YEAR OF LINUX ON THE TABLET by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Phones are computers, generically speaking, but not quite 'PCs', the way we've come to recognize them

    4. Re:YEAR OF LINUX ON THE TABLET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Android is nowhere near being king of tablets. It is not even close to being 2nd.

    5. Re:YEAR OF LINUX ON THE TABLET by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> Except that Android is nowhere near being king of tablets. It is not even close to being 2nd.
      B.S.
      Android is powering 62-68% of tablets.
      Source :
      https://www.statista.com/stati...
      https://www.netmarketshare.com...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      aaaaaaa
    6. Re:YEAR OF LINUX ON THE TABLET by stooo · · Score: 1

      Year of Linux on the Tablet ? Nope
      It's the Decade of Linux on the phone !!!!!!

      --
      aaaaaaa
  2. Eclipse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer IntelliJ over Eclipse

    1. Re: Eclipse? by rcastles · · Score: 1

      No, he means we're standing on a planet of Windows and Android is going to temporarily block the sun's light by passing between us and the sun.

  3. Android is not an operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a front-end that allows NSA access to your device. Linux is the OS, not Android. Android is just malware.

    1. Re:Android is not an operating system by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      No - though the Linux desktop "OS" has truly become thought of as being called "Linux" (despite containing a lot of other software - though even I can't possibly be bothered to call it GNU/Linux), in this case Linux truly is just the kernel, and Android is the OS.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:Android is not an operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. my Ubuntu is malicious too...

    3. Re:Android is not an operating system by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      The difference in a typical Linux distro (as opposed to Linux proper, which is just the kernel) versus Android is the userland. Different libraries, etc. For example, on Android, usually a form of Busybox is often the shell, because it is a statically linked executable and requires nothing else to be installed.

      Android and its security model isn't bad, although it would be nice if it were designed from the ground up with "ask on first use" permissions, as opposed to having them strapped on in a recent rev of the OS.

      I'd love to see some additional container and virtualization aspects for Android. It would be nice to be able to keep multiple userlands, all separate from each other, on a phone or tablet. That way, if home stuff is compromised, work stuff is still OK. Bonus if the hypervisor's FS has deduplication built in, so each userland would have relatively low overhead.

    4. Re:Android is not an operating system by w1zz4 · · Score: 2

      FreeBSD is a Unix type Kernel, Darwin too. Unix != Linux http://www.thegeekstuff.com/20...

    5. Re:Android is not an operating system by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Linux is not an adjective you can attach on everything.

    6. Re:Android is not an operating system by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Informative

      though the Linux desktop "OS" has truly become thought of as being called "Linux" ... in this case Linux truly is just the kernel, and Android is the OS.

      Not so. Android is an OS only according to marketers and those who believe them. For anybody who will trouble themselves to understand the textbook definition, Linux is the OS (e.g., it schedules, manages virtual memory and devices, enforces security) and Android is a platform, not an OS (e.g., Android does not schedule, does not manage virtual memory, does not implement device drivers and does not provide the base security mechanism).

      Now, I would not be surprised at all to see this post modded down once again by some morally challenged Google or Apple employee with too much time on their hands and too much skin in the game.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re:Android is not an operating system by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      on Android, usually a form of Busybox is often the shell, because it is a statically linked executable and requires nothing else to be installed.

      No, Android uses Bionic, which is a libc workalike, like Busybox, but is not Busybox. Google uses Bionic for Android in part because it is somewhat more compact, but mainly to escape the GPL. These inaccuracies make me wonder about the accuracy of your other claim:

      Android and its security model isn't bad

      Really? In truth, the Linux security model is pretty good, but the crap that Android piles on top is hastily conceived, leaky and widely exploited.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re:Android is not an operating system by drywater · · Score: 1

      Stop being so Linuxy.

    9. Re:Android is not an operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While this might sound hyperbolic, I don't think it is far from the truth. Android devices can't even be used unless you submit to google, by registering an account and phone number with them.

    10. Re:Android is not an operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf? who modded this informative? If Android is not an OS, what is the OS that runs on Android? Magic fairy OS? All of the functions listed run in kernel space. i.e. in Linux, except for the security thing. If you would have just called the desktop GNU/Linux, this wouldn't be so confusing, now would it?

    11. Re:Android is not an operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap that article you linked is hilarious! The "Linux Free BSD Kernel". With the Ubuntu logo! ROFLMAO! I thought it was satire at first it's so... wrong!

    12. Re:Android is not an operating system by dryeo · · Score: 1

      While you're technically right, the common meaning of an operating system includes its libraries, shell (including graphical) and usually basic utilities. Even your link at the top of the page (4th paragraph) says,

      The dominant desktop operating system is Microsoft Windows with a market share of around 83.3%. macOS by Apple Inc. is in second place (11.2%), and Linux is in third position (1.55%)).[3] In the mobile (smartphone and tablet combined) sector, according to third quarter 2016 data, Android by Google is dominant with 87.5 percent and a growth rate 10.3 percent per year, followed by iOS by Apple with 12.1 percent and a per year decrease in market share of 5.2 percent, while other operating systems amount to just 0.3 percent.

      Note that the article differentiates between Linux and Android.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re:Android is not an operating system by Trogre · · Score: 1

      No.

      Android really is a Linux-based OS, just as much as your Fedora desktop or Raspbian data logger. Just because it's no longer GNU/Linux doesn't make it not Linux.

      Take *that*, Richard Stallman.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    14. Re:Android is not an operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you think you are correct, you are actually incorrect, since Android DOES provide application scheduling (GC'ing, services, content providers, Intents, etc.) and "base security mechanisms" is a looser term than you want to imply... b/c you can't implement a semiphore in software without hardware support... but almost no one one writes their own semiphores (for good reason)... So Android 'core' security concepts (Each app is its own linux user ID/group ID + the Application manager + Binder framework to allow/manage IPC)

    15. Re:Android is not an operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Android devices can't even be used unless you submit to google, by registering an account and phone number with them.

      http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/using-android-without-google/

      We should have non-Google repos offering some Linux apps -- e.g. Gimp for tablets, Libreoffice (would be great with a Bluetooth keyboard), games (Linux already has a lot), etc.

      I still believe we'll be able to buy a tablet and _easily_ install Linux -- not as guest but as native and sole OS.

    16. Re:Android is not an operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because anyone who disagrees with you is a morally challenged astroturfer

      of curiosity, did you mean to post this on reddit, where that sort of behavior is tolerated and encouraged?

    17. Re:Android is not an operating system by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Consider the following two statements:

      1) A dog is a kind of animal.

      2) Android is a kind of Linux.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    18. Re:Android is not an operating system by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Better is,

      1) A dog is a kind of Canine

      2) Android is a kind of Linux

      Wolf, Coyote, Fox, Dog, all similar at the low level, can even interbreed
      GNU/Linux, X/Linux, BSD/Linux, Android, all similar at the low level, I have Debian, including X, running on my Android phone in a chroot. Sorta like interbreeding.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    19. Re:Android is not an operating system by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Sure, but BSD/Linux, what is that? Did you mean GNU/kFreeBSD?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    20. Re:Android is not an operating system by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Linux kernel with BSD user land instead of GNU. Not sure if anyone actually ships such a distribution.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    21. Re:Android is not an operating system by stooo · · Score: 1

      Android is open source. ( Mostly)
      It is what you want to do with it.
      You want to do a surveillance tool ? Go ahead.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  4. Fuck Auto Play, CNET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad I have flash disabled. I didn't read the article anyway after seeing the auto play attempt. I left the page. Good job!

  5. Dunno by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comparing apples and oranges makes a whole lot more sense than comparing two distinct OSes which run two distinct classes of devices.

    1. Re:Dunno by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      One is also free and the other is not. Thus one is still making infinite times more profit through licensing than the other.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're going to consider devices, I think Unix/Linux has them all beat. How many cars, planes, missiles, etc run a unix/linux flavor let alone small devices.

    3. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android is About To Eclipse Windows as the World's Most-Used Operating System...keep an eye on your GOOG and MSFT stock.

    4. Re:Dunno by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Only if you think they will stay distinct forever. How low does the Windows share need to go before people start to make the same old argument they always did: Why should I buy this other OS when it doesn't run all of my existing software?

      If Android continues to mature and tablets get more capable, why not expand into PCs? Already you are seeing Chromebooks which can run Android software. Will Windows be forced to adopt an Android environment as well? Will Adobe make a Photoshop for Android laptops? I think the way things are quickly changing is very interesting, and these comparisons are interesting to see.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next headline: "Expedia and Travelocity in danger? Study shows that the most common travel destination is your workplace!"

    6. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody likes to talk about it, but Chromebooks kinda failed.They never gained widespread adoption, and manufacturers are shying away from them. They remind me of netbooks when they came around.

    7. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Comparing apples and oranges makes a whole lot more sense than comparing two distinct OSes which run two distinct classes of devices.

      That sounds like the pathetic excuse of a Windows fanboi who is desperately clinging to the past. Android is usable as both a mobile OS and a desktop OS; something that Windows was never able to accomplish.

    8. Re:Dunno by evolutionary · · Score: 2

      Apples and oranges....I think not. The Average users is not using the desktop as much as tablets and phones due to portability and convenience. Desktop was the old mass market. Now portable/light devices is the new mass market. Certainly MS has bragged being the largest used OS platform worldwide. They knew they would lose that title if the iOS or Android took root. Unfortunately too little to late.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    9. Re: Dunno by Kkloe · · Score: 1

      Yes, this so called news can come back when android surpasses win as a 100% work environment

    10. Re:Dunno by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Microsoft still has MS Office and the Backoffice software, and this is where its hegemony remains. It long ago showed its willing to bring the software to other platforms with the Mac versions, and it has put its toes in the Android waters, so I think pragmatism is winning the day. I think MS is fully aware that it has not been able to meaningfully challenge Android and iOS in the mobile and smart device markets, and it must surely know that Google certainly has eyes on bumping further into the traditional PC markets. While the idea of a merger of Chrome OS and Android seems to be dead, my hunch is that more likely Chrome OS will probably simply be abandoned in favor of the much maturer Android environment.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    11. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chromebooks are just netbook v2. They suck.

    12. Re:Dunno by shigutso · · Score: 1

      two distinct OSes which run two distinct classes of devices.

      Which both can access... email, social media and messaging services. Which is what most people need anyway.

      Let's face it, Windows is becoming less and less needed, which is good :)

    13. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, thought you were meaning Android versus iOS.

      Needless to say, iOS on non-jailbroken hardware has not had a single exploit in the wild. I'd drop the mic right here, but the sound guys would kill me.

    14. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS never made the distinction (Windows, not "Windows95, NT, XP, Vista, Seven, 8, 10, CE, Mobile, Mobile again, still Mobile, 10, 10 and 10)...

      (captcha: mumble. Come on....)

    15. Re:Dunno by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      OS/2 had license fees too... how'd that turn out for 'em? ;)

      I guess the point is, license fees haven't much to do with the future viability of a given OS.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    16. Re:Dunno by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Nota Bene: Microsoft is making a *Linux* version of MS SQL Server... so yes, you're correct in that Microsoft can adapt as needed.

      That said, it still brings up GP's point: Eventually a tipping point will be reached, where people start asking "why bother buying Windows when all my stuff either runs on a web browser or it runs on {something with a Linux kernel under it}?

      We'll know when that tipping point is reached when OEMs start defaulting their consumer devices to ChromeOS (or whatever), instead of defaulting to Windows.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    17. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't this light use of operating systems like someone using a hammer as a paperweight? In terms of wealth produced, a single Windows machine running industrial design software is probably worth 10,000 Android phones used to watch cat videos.

    18. Re:Dunno by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's 2017. Only two things currently make lots of money for Microsoft: Office and Xbox. I'm not even sure thay actually care anymore about the "OS Wars"

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    19. Re:Dunno by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Well, Microsoft is supposedly readying a Chromebook competetor - defined, I guess as a low-cost, stripped down laptop that can only run 'modern' apps. Replacing the Chrome browser (and its apps) with Edge and Android apps with Windows app store apps. I guess if 'app store apps' includes WIN32 stuff that's been made app store ready, they might have something that could sell. But if it's just a stripped down version of Windows, with all the complexity, but none of the 3rd part apps, it's not really a better deal than a Chromebook. I assume Microsoft won't charge OEM's for the OS - at first, at least. But still, will this thing be as easy to administer for schools and libraries as Chromebooks are? I kind of doubt it.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    20. Re:Dunno by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Nah, they are better than netbooks. They have a reasonably-sized screen, their battery life is half a day, and they are inherently limited by running only a web browser. You don't get any delusions of grandeur and try to run Photoshop or Eclipse on it. If you have kids, the Chromebook is awesome. It costs around $200, does everything they need for school, and they quite literally cannot fuck up the software.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    21. Re:Dunno by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's not really much of a merger anyway - ChromeOS is just Chrome and some glue running on a Linux kernel. Android is a much more full-featured OS also built on Linux that also happens to run a mobile version of Chrome as an app. Port the full version of Chrome and some of the glue over to Android and you have all of the functionality of a Chromebook. I could see them selling two versions of the same machine - a locked-down ChromeOS-branded machine for schools and such and a more open Android version for the kids to buy at home. They do have to be careful not to open up ChromeOS too much or a lot of the administrative appeal goes away.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    22. Re:Dunno by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Never gained widespread adoption? They outsell both Mac and Windows laptops in terms of unit sales. They are ubiquitous at schools. You can buy them at Walmart and Target. If you have more recent information showing a downward trend, by all means share it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    23. Re:Dunno by tepples · · Score: 1

      For how long has Android been usable on the desktop? I can see three possibilities; to which are you referring?

      Remix OS Remix OS came out 14 months ago but lacks Google Mobile Services. Without access to Google Play Store, where do Remix OS users find apps to install? Stock Android 6 "Marshmallow" or earlier If you open the calculator app, does it fill the screen? Is there a way to make it not fill the screen? Stock Android 7 "Nougat" or later Devices still for sale today are unlikely to get an OTA upgrade to Nougat.
    24. Re:Dunno by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      I agree about Office, but Xbox is not a profit driver for Microsoft. The division barely manages to break even.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    25. Re:Dunno by shigutso · · Score: 1

      Both will play the cat video, right? So, your point is...

    26. Re:Dunno by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The actual trend is 30-40% YoY growth to 10M and with 260M PCs total it has about 3.8% of the PC market, if you count only notebooks it's 156M and 6.4%. That said, if you check StatCounter then ChromeOS comes in at 0.83%, less than Linux at 1.53% so accumulated they're still a very small part of the people browsing the web.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    27. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, Google Play Store is just an app and is installable on ANY Android distribution. Official Remix OS devices come with Google Play Store.

      Do Windows 8 Metro apps fill the screen?

      Most PCs won't be upgraded to Windows 10 either.

      In addition, most people don't need or want a full PC. Most people are happy using a tablet or smartphone.

    28. Re:Dunno by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is nation-dependent? PC and now Mac sales have taken a bigger plunge in the US than worldwide. StatCounter unfortunately is counting all users, not just people who purchased a PC last year. One of my PCs at home is a Core2Duo, and I'm sure I'm not alone. My Mac is from 2009.

      For instance, Windows 10 (a better proxy for recent machines sold vs ChromeOS) has a 25% web share - and that includes desktops.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    29. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that if you sum all the wealth produced by using Windows, and compare it to the sum of all the wealth produced by using Android, then Windows will win. "Both will play the cat video", but only Windows runs the industrial, engineering and financial software that generates our trillion-dollar economy.

    30. Re:Dunno by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but that's still a a massive improvement over ten years ago where it was doing nothing but bleeding money.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    31. Re:Dunno by drywater · · Score: 1

      Why buy a new PC when it's only moderately more powerful than the PC sitting on my desk since 2009? The best thing I ever did was drop SSDs in all of my PCs and laptops. Except for my game machine, which I keep bleeding edge since I have nothing better to do, my PCs are aging - 2007 to 2011. I have the memory maxed out and SSDs but I don't think a new processor makes much sense right now in a machine I use for checking email, surfing and looking at pictures. I have no plans to upgrade anything any time soon (except, uh, that game machine I was talking about).

    32. Re:Dunno by tepples · · Score: 1

      Uhh, Google Play Store is just an app and is installable on ANY Android distribution.

      Installing Google Play Store on a device that is not licensed to run Google Play Store is infringement of copyright, which incurs severe civil and/or criminal penalties under United States law and the laws of other Berne Convention contracting states.

      Official Remix OS devices come with Google Play Store.

      That was true prior to Remix OS 2.0.307. As of Remix OS 2.0.307 and later, Google Play Store is no longer included in Remix OS. From the article "Remix Mini users will lose access to Google Play if they install the latest Remix OS update" by Osarumen Osamuyi:

      I just read a couple of Facebook posts from Jide Technology’s Remix OS that say that their latest update to the Remix Mini Android PCs will disable access to Google Mobile Services. What this means is that Google Play, and all Google’s own apps will no longer come installed by default on new Remix Minis, and they will be removed from old ones if their owners install the update.

      Do Windows 8 Metro apps fill the screen?

      They are not required to. Windows 8 and Windows RT included the "Snap an App" feature, which allowed using three-fourths of the width of the screen for one UWP app and one-fourth for another. Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1 made the division more flexible.

      Most PCs won't be upgraded to Windows 10 either.

      Microsoft provides the means for any owner of a compatible PC to purchase and install the Windows 10 operating system. In fact, for a year, Microsoft ran a promotion where anybody with a valid Windows 7 or Windows 8.1 license could obtain a Windows 10 license without charge. In addition, installing Windows 10 preserves the user's documents. With Android devices not called Nexus or Pixel, on the other hand, only the manufacturer can sign OTA updates, not Google. On those devices whose bootloader can be unlocked, installing a different system software image causes the user's data to be wiped. And many manufacturers don't provide a way to unlock a device's bootloader in the first place.

      In addition, most people don't need or want a full PC. Most people are happy using a tablet or smartphone.

      What do "most people", those who you claim "are happy using a tablet or smartphone", do when they need to type something substantial? Do they buy a Bluetooth keyboard and carry it with them? And how do "most people" take notes on a tablet or smartphone while reading a document on a tablet or smartphone? Do they read the document on the tablet and take notes on the smartphone?

    33. Re:Dunno by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Yeah one on the archaic desktop that is in and of itself hugely losing market share (the desktop itself) and the other a Linux distribution (so sneaky numbers, seperating one Linux distribution from the other Linux distributions), winning in the expanding markets, phones, TVs, cheap notebooks, tablets and servers, well pretty much the entire rest of the growing computing market. M$ is dying and made a panic grab at future revenues, that panicky grab instead of being a positive step being a hugely negative one, destined to accelerate it's demise.

      M$ could have made smart moves, instead it made stupid panicky ones, bound around total domination and control, really stupid as fuck (this is what you get with circle jerks in boardroom, everyone agreeing with everyone else, not based upon sound business practice just based upon arrogance).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    34. Re:Dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll much?

      Installing Google Play Store on a device that is not licensed to run Google Play Store is infringement of copyright, which incurs severe civil and/or criminal penalties under United States law and the laws of other Berne Convention contracting states.

      Bullshit.

      That was true prior to Remix OS 2.0.307. As of Remix OS 2.0.307 and later, Google Play Store is no longer included in Remix OS. From the article "Remix Mini users will lose access to Google Play if they install the latest Remix OS update"

      That's only if the user updates. They can then install GApps to completely and legally restore Google Play.

      They are not required to. Windows 8 and Windows RT included the "Snap an App" feature, which allowed using three-fourths of the width of the screen for one UWP app and one-fourth for another. Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1 made the division more flexible.

      Windows 8 Metro apps are fullscreen, full stop. The only way they wouldn't be is if you BUY commercial software hacks.

      Microsoft provides the means for any owner of a compatible PC to purchase and install the Windows 10 operating system.

      And yet most PCs are running Windows 7...

      What do "most people", those who you claim "are happy using a tablet or smartphone", do when they need to type something substantial? Do they buy a Bluetooth keyboard and carry it with them? And how do "most people" take notes on a tablet or smartphone while reading a document on a tablet or smartphone? Do they read the document on the tablet and take notes on the smartphone?

      Try leaving the house. EVERYONE uses smartphones and tablets, far more than people using PCs. This very article is about Android becoming more popular than Windows.

    35. Re:Dunno by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft was pushing windows 10 upgrades very heavily on anyone running 7/8, not just selling it with new hardware... A significant portion of that 25% will be upgrades (intentional or otherwise) from earlier versions.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    36. Re:Dunno by tepples · · Score: 1

      Installing Google Play Store on a device that is not licensed to run Google Play Store is infringement of copyright

      Bullshit.

      Have you a citation that using GApps without permission does not infringe?

      That's only if the user updates. They can then install GApps to completely and legally restore Google Play.

      Have you a citation that installing GApps on a device that is no longer licensed is legal? I agree with your claim that it is possible, but I dispute your claim that it is legal.

      Windows 8 Metro apps are fullscreen, full stop. The only way they wouldn't be is if you BUY commercial software hacks.

      Then to what feature are "How Do You Snap Apps In Windows 8?" by cynthia of WorldStart and "Snap an App Alongside the Desktop on Your Windows 8 Tablet" by Andy Rathbone referring?

      What do "most people", those who you claim "are happy using a tablet or smartphone", do when they need to type something substantial?

      EVERYONE uses smartphones and tablets, far more than people using PCs.

      Then what does "EVERYONE" use when they need to type something substantial into an app for a smartphone or tablet running Android?

    37. Re:Dunno by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Both will play the cat video. Both will not easily handle the word processing/speadsheet using that many people do.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  6. first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bitches

  7. Netcraft confirms... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Six posts in and still no "netcraft confirms" joke?

    1. Re:Netcraft confirms... by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Funny

      Netcraft confirms, this joke is dying.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  8. Try Cliqz browser on Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's blocking a ton of /. ad spam on my mobile.

  9. Data? by quonset · · Score: 5, Funny

    They sure seemed to rely on Data much more than their ship's onboard computer. One would think they would either upgrade the ship's computer to how Data was configured or just plug Data into the ship.

    Despite the number of windows on the Enterprise, they still relied on an Android.

    1. Re:Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The few times that they did plug Data into the ship did not go so well... After all, I'm a droid and you're a noid.

    3. Re:Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that even StarFleet OS isn't Android compatible :)

    4. Re:Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LCARS

    5. Re:Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell does Data not have wifi that far in the future?

    6. Re:Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sure seemed to rely on Data much more than their ship's onboard computer. One would think they would either upgrade the ship's computer to how Data was configured or just plug Data into the ship.

      Despite the number of windows on the Enterprise, they still relied on an Android.

      Surely he could just connect via WiFi or Bluetooth... right? RIGHT?!? He wouldn't really actually need to plug INTO the Enterprise? Actually, we all think they'd have wireless charging by then, but ... no, there'll still be fights over the standards in the 23rd century. And Apple devices STILL won't be able to do it wirelessly. Because they've forgotten what's important. Good thing Data wasn't an iDroid, or you'd see him wandering the Enterprise with his plug hanging out, looking for an outlet to jack into.

  10. Re: More LUDDITE lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good too see you're back Luddite dude! We thought your electricity bill wasn't paid.

  11. IDE's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    IDEs are for girls

    1. Re:IDE's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IDEs are for girls

      Only the smart ones!

    2. Re:IDE's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the smart ones use SCSI.

    3. Re:IDE's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The truly smart ones use butterflies.

  12. Bad news by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    So Windows is finally going to be replaced by something much worse? (Both in terms of usability and openness)

    1. Re:Bad news by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      So Windows is finally going to be replaced by something much worse? (Both in terms of usability and openness)...yeah, right, if it weren't for Windows, the general public would be lost and basicly /. would not exist without people complaining about Windows so it's not going anywhere at least in our timeframe.

    2. Re:Bad news by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      I don't get it, do you think that Android is better than Windows?

  13. The Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android is Linux. So it looks like Linux if finally winning.

  14. Oh shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just got up. CIA got fucked!!

    Well, such is the times of extreme polarization.

  15. And the point here is? by RonVNX · · Score: 1

    Two different operating systems that have virtually no overlap. This isn't telling anyone anything.

    1. Re:And the point here is? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      It tells me that handheld portable devices are outnumbering windoz desktops in shear devices shipped and in operation... But we knew that already.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:And the point here is? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      They have virtually no overlap in approximately the same sense as land lines and cellphones have no overlap.

      For a long time most people kept their landlines (Windows PC's) and added a cellphone (iOS or Android). Then gradually, as they moved - or their old landline phones broke - or they changed cable providers - or kids got their own homes, they kept their cellphones and gave up the landlines. So, the comparison is pretty apt. Presumably at some point large swaths of the population won't buy a new PC when their old one dies - because they're doing most of their 'computing' on their phones of tablets. That's what Microsoft is up against. So far from 'not telling anyone anything', it's telling everyone that the OS that will for the most part supplant Windows - to the (significant) extent that it will be supplanted - will be Android. Unless Microsoft can pull off a miracle jack up Windows Phone market share to compete with Android and iOS.

      Of course, businesses that are dependent on Windows apps will keep buying new Windows PC's. But new businesses (parallel = kids moving out of their parents' houses), may well opt for Chromebooks or Macs or 'anything that can run web apps'/.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    3. Re:And the point here is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because which one of us doesn't have a half dozen crappy tables or SBCs sitting in a desk drawer today? I think I've thrown more of the devices out than total Windows devices I've ever owned in a much shorter time frame.

      Feel free to act like you've won some "good fight" but at the end of the day it hardly matters for anything.

    4. Re:And the point here is? by tepples · · Score: 1

      But new businesses (parallel = kids moving out of their parents' houses), may well opt for Chromebooks or Macs or 'anything that can run web apps'/.

      Good luck getting through a computer science degree in college, or even just the semester of introductory programming that all freshmen at a particular college take, with just a Chromebook.

    5. Re:And the point here is? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 2

      The vast majority of PC and/or cellphone users is not made up of Computer Science students or power-gamers. Are you so insular that you don't get that?

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    6. Re:And the point here is? by tepples · · Score: 1

      kids moving out of their parents' houses

      Good luck getting through [...] the semester of introductory programming that all freshmen at a particular college take, with just a Chromebook.

      The vast majority of PC and/or cellphone users is not made up of Computer Science students

      The majority of kids moving out of their parents' houses and into a freshman dorm are computer science students if only because college imposes it as "general education requirement", much like humanities for engineering students. Even some high schools are making programming a required subject. See, for example, Arizona Bill Would Make Students In Grades 4-12 Participate Once In An Hour of Code.

    7. Re:And the point here is? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Not a particularly good or interesting metric. I have 2 desktop computers as home, but between tablets and phones there is 9 devices (of which probably 5 are on). We are at a stage where portable devices are where desktops were 10-15 years ago where we replace them on such a regular basis that everyone has lots of them. That will change in the coming years as devices reach the point where most people find them powerful enough and don't need to replace which should see a massive consolidation in the industry, will be interesting to see who survives that apart from Samsung and Apple.

  16. It's a start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if we can get Linux on every desktop....

    1. Re:It's a start... by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I haven't had a real desktop, or desk for that matter, in over a decade but have been using linux continually in one form or another since 1993.

  17. Because all computers are connected to the web? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell would anyone think that stats for web traffic would equate to actual market share for operating systems?

  18. and the winner is Linux !? by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    First of all Android is based on Linux. Second - if you compare desktop to devices you have skipped all IoT devices that most of the time run Linux. So here we have it - 2017 a year of Linux!

  19. Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See my subject: The alleged "all those eyes so no security issues" Android (a Linux variant) failed & is most infected constantly!

    * Windows has been hardened VERY well due to that decades long experience & continues to be even moreso over time as patching occurs - STUPID JavaBased (dalvik) INTERFACES on smartphones etc. using droid are abused most (so much for restricting user rights on it also - doesn't work)... after all - we see Android being exploited almost DAILY for what? A decade++ now??

    APK

    P.S.=> No small wonder GOOGLE is not out to "OpenSORES" their next OS iirc - they don't want another EFast debacle either (Chrome doppleganger spreading malicious bs - so much for "all those eyes", MOST of which can't code to save their own lives = the problem & destruction of THAT "FAKE NEWS" often spread here on /. no less)... apk

    1. Re:Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by bobbied · · Score: 1

      What in the heck are you doing with your android?

      I've never had an issue with my Note4 which is 4 years old now. Not once. Now I haven't jail broken it but run the stock OS from my carrier or run anything but well known and respected applications. I have one free "Malware scanner" but it's never caught anything. Everything works just fine.

      If you are constantly having issues with your Android, I figure you are not applying due diligence about security for your activities. I suggest you figure out why your daily activities cause you so much trouble. Downloading Porn applications? Jail break your phone? Running a malware ridden custom firmware load? What is it you do to cause this?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by nasch · · Score: 1

      I take issue with the suggestion that "jail breaking" (I don't know if you mean rooting or unlocking the boot loader) is inconsistent with good security practice. But perhaps that is not what you meant.

    3. Re:Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See my subject: Not a smartphone user @ all by this point in fact on that account (fake news attempt? lol!).

      * User error is probably a good deal of it but for what? 13++ yrs. now you hear about androids being abused & infected nigh constantly (largely again imo due to the JAVA/dalvik shell on it more than the Linux core (but that's shown itself 'imperfect' on that account too!)).

      APK

      P.S.=> HOWEVER - When I WRITE SOFTWARE? No bugs to DATE since 2012 release & many 1,000's worldwide use it in APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ & comes well recommended from our /. peers (only partial list here mind you) & hosted + recommended by malwarebytes' hpHosts personnel too https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10320833&cid=53976475/ ... apk

    4. Re:Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking about getting SU to root. It is a common security practice to avoid having things running with root privileges when ever possible. In nearly all cases there is zero real reason to have root on an Android device for the average user. I know folks that bypass this protection in the system in an attitude of defiance (Hey it's MY device and if I want root, I'm entitled to it!), which from a security prospective is stupid, even if it makes you feel like you are in control.

      Personally, I have access to root on hundreds of boxes so the lure of being "in total control" of yet another system has no appeal to me. There is literally *nothing* I need to do to my phone that requires root. Where I understand that some need to feel like they are in control and having access to root fulfills that need, it also opens you up to a compromised device.

      However, Unlocking the boot loader is just about as bad...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by nasch · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking about getting SU to root. It is a common security practice to avoid having things running with root privileges when ever possible.

      When you root your phone, it doesn't just run everything with root privileges. If an app needs elevated privileges it asks the user for approval and the user can approve or deny the request. The OS will not grant access to anything requiring root without going through the approval process.

    6. Re:Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I fully understand that, but why on earth does an app need root on a device?

      Unless you are messing around with the hardware in the device in ways the manufacturer didn't intend or trying to hack a service you carrier usually charges for what does an app need with root? Nothing that I've heard of was worth given root to an app so why open up the path to give something root? It must makes your device more easily hacked. Take it from this ole' Unix admin with decades of experience, don't use root to run anything if you can help it. NO user app should need root on Unix, just about the only need for root is installing some kinds of software, which, even then, root isn't usually required. If your user application simply MUST have root to run, you are either an idiot, a newbie or a hacker who doesn't care about security.

      Besides, this is roughly the same thing Windows used to do with that crazy popup warning about giving a program administrator privileges... How well did that work out? Not very. Folks got accustomed to just hitting OK to get about their business or simply shut that annoyance off with a registry hack. Virus infections LOVE that kind of foolishness...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by nasch · · Score: 1

      Unless you are messing around with the hardware in the device in ways the manufacturer didn't intend or trying to hack a service you carrier usually charges for what does an app need with root?

      1. What's wrong with messing around in ways the manufacturer or carrier didn't intend (short of violating contracts)?

      2. other reasons:

      - disable or uninstall apps that came with the device
      - some ad blocking services require root
      - automation and system control (e.g. Tasker)
      - over or underclock CPU
      - better backups

      If your user application simply MUST have root to run, you are either an idiot, a newbie or a hacker who doesn't care about security.

      Well, I'm sure you know better than the developers of (paid) Android apps with millions of downloads.

      Besides, this is roughly the same thing Windows used to do with that crazy popup warning about giving a program administrator privileges... How well did that work out?

      Except that very, very few people root their devices, and the ones who do are almost exclusively tech savvy people who know what they're doing. The comparison to Windows works better when applied to normal non-root apps asking for permissions. The old system was pretty useless, but with the new permission system introduced with Marshmallow, I think it's great.

    8. Re:Android eclipsed Windows as most abused... apk by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll chalk you up to the "I need root because it's MY device" crowd... Which is fine... But my point here is you are taking a security risk when you do this stuff.

      Seriously, I don't care what you do with your device, but if you do this to your phone, don't complain to me that Android is now subject to malware and other problems. It's not. If you don't take unnecessary risks your chances of having a security issue with Android is pretty slim.

      Personally, I don't do this stuff to my PHONE. Why take the added risks. I just want my phone to work when I need it and I don't want to bother with it when I don't. I don't want to be responsible to administer yet again another Unix box in my life. I'm guessing you don't need root either, but if it floats your boat to have it, I don't care.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  20. I am still holding out hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That this could be the year Linux makes it to the desktop. After all, it's convenient place to put my phone while working on my windows laptop.

  21. Manure entrepreneurs by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    All of the people commenting that these 2 operating systems use 2 different types of devices are, of course, correct. The link at the bottom of the article about who is actually making money on mobile operating systems seems particularly relevant also. However, hasn't the idea been endlessly rehashed that the people are changing in the way they use devices and services? What if there are dramatic changes in technology that make mobile devices even more attractive for productivity? Also, are entrepreneurs (who live in manure) interested in starting companies and targeting markets more interested in a blue line that is trending downwards, or a green one trending upwards?

    1. Re:Manure entrepreneurs by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Also as more business apps get ported to android expect to see more and more instant device docks. Where a device gets docked and then powers a full screen keyboard and mouse. This has been tried over and over again however the hardware just wasn't good enough and the software stacks had stupid limitations. Now the hardware is there( se Nintendo switch). But software is still behind.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  22. Re:Free fuckery, thanks a mill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really? You downloaded "the latest Android"? Which version is that? Which repository did you use?

    If you've come to expect a bitchfest after every update, why are you updating?

  23. The other problem: All maximized all the time by tepples · · Score: 1

    Another big problem with the Android userland is that from the start through Android 6 "Marshmallow", stock Android supported only one application on the screen at once, as opposed to the tiling or floating window management policies that X11 window managers for GNU/Linux support. Got your phone plugged into a 1080p monitor? You can't view a web browser or PDF reader in half or your notetaking app in the other half. Using a 10" tablet? Enjoy your 10" full-screen calculator app. Android 7 "Nougat" finally fixes this, but existing devices are unlikely to get an official update to Nougat.

    1. Re:The other problem: All maximized all the time by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Another big problem with the Android userland is that from the start through Android 6 "Marshmallow", stock Android supported only one application on the screen at once...

      Truly barbaric and a huge step backward in time. The best you can say about it is, it's not worse than iOS. But that is not saying much.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:The other problem: All maximized all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My G3 came with Android 5 and supported running two apps side by side, so you are a liar.

    3. Re:The other problem: All maximized all the time by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Not a problem given the target platform for Android - phones, phablets and tablets. If you want what you are describing, you should use ChromeOS, which is to Android what OS-X is to iOS

    4. Re:The other problem: All maximized all the time by tepples · · Score: 1

      Not a problem given the target platform for Android - phones, phablets and tablets.

      My Nexus 7 (2012) tablet's display is larger than two phones' displays put together. There also existed Android tablets with even larger displays, such as 10 inches. So why did Google not add to the version of Android shipped on the Nexus 7 (2012) tablet the ability to run two phone-sized apps side by side to fill the tablet's screen properly?

      If you want what you are describing, you should use ChromeOS, which is to Android what OS-X is to iOS

      Until very recently, Chrome OS could run only web apps and Chrome OS packaged apps from Chrome Web Store, not Android apps from Google Play Store. As I understand it, most apps for Android were not written in a framework that would allow transpiling to ECMAScript using the APIs available to Chrome OS packaged apps. This means that switching from Android to Chrome OS would have caused me to have to do without such apps.

  24. Google Play Store and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 2

    You appear to be under the impression that Android is free software, and therefore, the royalty for putting Android on a device is zero. AOSP is free software, but Google Play Store and Google Play Services are not. Furthermore, makers of Android devices with a microSD slot that supports SDXC have to pay an exFAT patent royalty to Microsoft.

    1. Re:Google Play Store and exFAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android is "free as in speech". Google Play is "free as in beer". I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

      F-Droid and Amazon also have app stores that work with Android.

    2. Re:Google Play Store and exFAT by donaldm · · Score: 1

      You appear to be under the impression that Android is free software, and therefore, the royalty for putting Android on a device is zero. AOSP is free software, but Google Play Store and Google Play Services are not. Furthermore, makers of Android devices with a microSD slot that supports SDXC have to pay an exFAT patent royalty to Microsoft.

      Some Android devices use ext4 (over six years ago) as the internal file system thereby avoiding the exFAT royalty.

      As for removable SD cards, they normally come preformatted with FAT or exFAT which Android can read and write to which in turn avoids the exFAT royalty. Actually, the PS3 and PS4 also do this as well otherwise if they could format external devices with exFAT or NTFS they would have to pay Microsoft a royalty.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    3. Re:Google Play Store and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 1

      As for removable SD cards, they normally come preformatted with FAT or exFAT which Android can read and write to which in turn avoids the exFAT royalty.

      I don't see how that works if the patent is on the process of reading and writing novel data structures that a Microsoft employee invented for exFAT.

  25. Still apples and oranges. by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    Windows is a desktop operating system with its install base there, Android is a tablet/phone OS with all of its install base there. It's like saying coffee makers are about to eclipse ovens as the most used appliance....ok? Still need the oven for its purpose.

    You are right that usage behaviors are shifting but Android is not a desktop operating system so comparing the two is just silly. We know they both are trying to break into the other market but that ship has sailed, so yes the on 15$ tablets at Walmart is going to have a much bigger footprint than the one that is on 300-3000$ machines.

    1. Re:Still apples and oranges. by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      "the *OS* on 15$" is what I meant to say.

    2. Re:Still apples and oranges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's more like saying microwaves are about to eclipse ovens as the most used cooking appliance. And they have.

    3. Re:Still apples and oranges. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      But the point is that a desktop was always a toy for geeks and not really a suitable tool for typical users, it just happened to be the only thing available that fulfilled several requirements those users had such as browsing and email. Think of all the unnecessary complexity and knowledge required to keep a typical desktop os working and malware free - not suitable for typical users.

      Now there are more suitable tools available for those average users, so users are moving to them.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  26. Linux won by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

    Yes, we've won the desktop wars. Even if we had to cheat by slipping into mobile some 10 years ago and waiting for mobile devices to become nearly as capable as desktops.

    PS - My first Linux portable was an Agenda VR3 (a 64-bit MIPS) some 15+ years ago.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Linux won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine was the Sharp Zaurus SL5000D

  27. World domination! by paai · · Score: 1

    In short: the World Domination that our Great Leader predicted some twenty years ago, has come true...

    Paai
     

  28. grossly overestimating... by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    I think you are grossly overestimating the cross functionality between tablets/phones and desktop/laptop devices, sure they kind of both *do* the same things but they are used for very different things. Yes people are using their phones/tablets more but they are using them more for the trivial things like angry birds or facebook. The moment they need to work on something serious like photo editing or an excel sheet etc they realize they need a desktop/laptop computer.

    So yes, if Android OS starts gaining a foothold on the PC market then that is big news. This news just means android is on a *lot* of devices and that's completely not news because it's a free OS on every cheap device out there.

    All that said windows/desktops are a relatively stagnant market because trivial us/gaming is on phones and consoles, but they aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Like I said upthread it's like comparing the toaster to the oven.

    1. Re:grossly overestimating... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Again. What percentage of casual home PC users does photo editing (beyond what they can do on their phones) and/or works on spreadsheets (beyond what they can do in Google Docs or Office 365)? Hint - probably less than 50% these days. And some of that 50% only uses their PC's for that - because they're already there.

      If you're not inclined to believe this (based on your personal sampling), take my word for it - Microsoft knows it. And they're doing their damnedest to make sure there's a place for them in whatever develops. Of course, Microsoft's idea of "a place for them" is still 90% market share, so they definitely have their work cut out for them. But they are also starting from an enviable position.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    2. Re:grossly overestimating... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I don't know about photo editing, but I tried editing spreadsheets and/or documents on my phone. Once. I never tried it again, and IIRC that was Google Docs. Android (and iOS) just plain suck for that.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:grossly overestimating... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't suck because of Google Docs - it sucks because it's a small touch-screen device. A Chromebook or an Android laptop would be fine for that.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    4. Re:grossly overestimating... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I agree that Google Doc isn't the problem. Android is. It's not the small screen either, as a tablet should be big enough. IMO, it's the touch-screen and the fact that everything is full-screen.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  29. Wow. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I'm just amazed this wasn't already the case years ago.
    It seems hard to believe that until now that there really are more PCs running windows out there than all the people with android phones in the world.
    I wonder if they've still been counting windows licences for PCs that have actually been disposed of/recycled years ago, and those running Linux and other OS's just because they actually got sold with a windows licence?

  30. Is this one still funny? by emil · · Score: 1

    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect."

    - NYTimes article, Questions for Linus Torvalds by David Diamond (at the end)

    Bill, Steve, and Satya have probably discussed this at some length. To be a fly on the wall...

  31. Crap headline by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article headline is crap. Android/Linux total users passed Windows in long ago. The article should have said that, those users now create nearly the same amount of web traffic as Windows PCs.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  32. Re:Free fuckery, thanks a mill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's updating, you idiotic fuck-stick, because he needs the latest eighteen-thousand security patches to fix that broken pile of shit that you are supporting.

    Android is the Windows ME of modern security.

  33. Not really by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Especially if the two OS/devices are used for the same thing... chat, email, web browsing, videos...

  34. Re: Free fuckery, thanks a mill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iOS doesn't have good backwards compatibility either. An example is the game BioShock on iOS that is broke on current iOS version.

    If you want subdirectories on your home screen, use a different launcher.

  35. Why isn't Android considered a GUI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (real question)

    1. Re:Why isn't Android considered a GUI? by hduff · · Score: 1

      Same reason OS X isn't considered just a GUI while it sits on top of BSD?

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  36. Linux *scalability* - far wider than Windows by emil · · Score: 1

    Linux scales to far larger systems than does Windows. Microsoft does not run on the top 500 machines.

    Microsoft has been squarely beaten in mobile and enterprise systems. Microsoft is now the "OS of the gap" and is being crushed in the vice of Linux market share.

    1. Re:Linux *scalability* - far wider than Windows by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      Great, linux is a big competitor to microsoft. What does it have to do with this article or what I said?

    2. Re:Linux *scalability* - far wider than Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, linux is a big competitor to microsoft. What does it have to do with this article or what I said?

      The article is about android eclipsing windows. You do realize that android runs on the linux kernel, yes?

  37. Only now? by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    Apples to something less healthy, like Nougat/Lollipops?

    Seriously, I thought Android had already eclipsed Windows simply on the number of units installed since there are already billions of Android devices out there, while Windows has yet to reach or just gone past the billion dollar mark on the more costly desktop.laptop platforms. In the third world you can buy a cheap smart phone running some old unsupported possibly malware infested version of Android for a fraction the price of the least expensive netbook.

  38. Linux on the Desktop? by hduff · · Score: 1

    Still no.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  39. Google Play cert fee and M$ patent royalties by tepples · · Score: 1

    Google Play is "free as in beer".

    The article "The hidden costs of building an Android device" by Charles Arthur and Samuel Gibbs states that as of three years ago, the compliance testing to qualify for a Google Play license cost tens of thousands of dollars, or on the order of $1 per device. Even though the article states that the amount is payable to approved "third party testing facilities," not directly to Google, the article does not mention how much Google charges said facilities to become approved.

    The article "Why Microsoft Makes $5 to $15 From Every Android Device Sold" by Chris Hoffman states that as of three years ago, Microsoft was collecting several dollars in patent royalties for each Android device for the use of patented processes, such as those essential to the FAT file system.

    What has changed in the past three years, other than the replacement of a license for the VFAT patent(s) with one for the exFAT patent(s) after the expiry of the former and enshrinement of the latter in the SDXC specification?

    1. Re:Google Play cert fee and M$ patent royalties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and your article are wrong.

      http://opengapps.org

      QED

    2. Re:Google Play cert fee and M$ patent royalties by tepples · · Score: 1

      From the about section of the page whose URL appears in your comment:

      Take note that Open GApps does not provide you with any license for Google’s APKs included in the package. The Open GApps packages merely provide a convenient way to sideload APKs to your device. It is your own responsibility to obtain the proper permissions by e.g. buying an OHA-licensed device with pre-installed Google Apps and/or acquiring the applications from Google’s Play Store.

      If you install Open GApps on a device other than "an OHA-licensed device with pre-installed Google Apps", you lack "the proper permissions". This makes your use of Open GApps an infringement of Google's copyright.

  40. Linux is not an Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ, not this again. For somebody accusing others of falling victim of marketing you might want to check that glass house you live in.

    Scheduling, managing virtual memory and device drivers are what the kernel does, which is a part of the operating system, but not the operating system itself. Linux is not, and has never claimed to be, an OS. People use the term "Linux" to refer to a family of operating systems incorporating the Linux kernel because they typically share many features and it's easier than saying "a family of Unix-like operating systems incorporating the Linux Kernel and the GNU userland with a set of default applications that allow them to behave as a general purpose computing device."

    The very article you linked contradicts your pedantry:

    In the mobile (smartphone and tablet combined) sector, according to third quarter 2016 data, Android by Google is dominant with 87.5 percent and a growth rate 10.3 percent per year ... The Linux kernel is used in some popular distributions, such as Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, Linux Mint and Google's Android. ... In 2014, Android was first (currently not replicated by others, in a single year) operating system ever to ship on a billion devices, becoming the most popular operating system by installed base.

    Look at the about pages of the popular distros if you don't believe me:

    Debian is a free operating system (OS) for your computer. An operating system is the set of basic programs and utilities that make your computer run. (http://debian.org)

    The Official Release of Slackware Linux by Patrick Volkerding is an advanced Linux operating system, designed with the twin goals of ease of use and stability as top priorities. (http://www.slackware.com/info/)

    The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers. (https://www.ubuntu.com/about/about-ubuntu)

    SUSE Linux Enterprise Server is a world-class, secure open source server operating system (https://www.suse.com/products/server/)

    The only people who buy that "it's not an OS it's a platform" you're advocating are the marketing folks at RedHat who _despite_ their branding efforts _still_ can't avoid having statements like this on the RHEL about page:

    We're offering ...[a] cross-geographic high-availability environment, and we wouldn’t go there if we weren’t absolutely confident in our operating system. (https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/linux-platforms/enterprise-linux)

    The definition of an OS in the link you provided (which I don't fully agree with, but still) is:

    An operating system (OS) is system software that manages computer hardware and software resources and provides common services for computer programs.

    This is exactly what Android does: you write software against the Android API, so Android is an operating system. Under normal circumstances your software does not and cannot call the kernel or even most (any?) of the GNU userland utilities. Under normal operation, you can't even install your own (unsigned) software or bootloader. Therefore, Android is neither operationally or philosophically what most people mean when they say "Linux" and does not deserve the moniker "Linux".

    1. Re:Linux is not an Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My car is a gas car, although it has wheels, seats etc.

      Android has a Linux kernel, so it's a Linux OS.

      Debian, too, BTW.

      Thanks for reading. Whew, that was easy...

  41. Limits of manufacturer-customized Lollipop by tepples · · Score: 1

    stock Android supported only one application on the screen at once

    My G3 came with Android 5 and supported running two apps side by side

    That was a manufacturer customization, not stock Android. Some Samsung devices received a similar customization. Usually it involved zooming out, so as to maintain a requirement in the Android 5 "Lollipop" Compatibility Definition Document (CDD) that the screen size presented to the application not change after installation. But zooming out had the downside of often making text unreadably small. Some implementations, such as Samsung's, additionally allowed applications to opt into a tiling window management by specifying a Samsung-specific tag in the application's manifest file. But any application whose manifest did not specify so could run only in the full screen or zoomed out. In any case, it was not a standard feature of the Android operating system until Android 7 "Nougat".

    so you are a liar.

    Insults are uncalled for.

    1. Re:Limits of manufacturer-customized Lollipop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a manufacturer customization, not stock Android.

      Irrelevant. You claimed that Android was completely incapable of showing more than one app. That's false. Doesn't matter if it was using a customization.

    2. Re:Limits of manufacturer-customized Lollipop by tepples · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. You claimed that Android was completely incapable of showing more than one app. That's false.

      My comment did not use an intensifier to the effect "completely".

      Doesn't matter if it was using a customization.

      Yes it does, because my comment explicitly mentioned "stock Android".

      It sounds like your argument is to the effect "The features of stock Android are irrelevant because end users can count on manufacturers to provide needed customizations and on app developers to support said customizations." If so, then what fraction of tablets that shipped with Android 5 or 6 contained a multi-window customization? If less than a majority, this means that an end user would not perceive such a customization as part of the Android platform.

  42. hurr durr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the desktop is dead because i'm standing far enough away from real work i can't differentiate the use cases please someone drown me.

  43. Wikipedia by b783719 · · Score: 2

    Android, a popular mobile operating system based on a modified version of the Linux kernel

    [table] Operating system - Android [table]

    Android was first (currently not replicated by others, in a single year) operating system

    from your textbook

    Android (stylized as android) is a mobile operating system developed by Google

    from another page of the same damn textbook

    From the wiki 'textbook',
    Linux is an OS, Android also an OS, Windows also an OS, and MacOS also an OS.
    Linux kernel is the kernel. Android uses Linux kernel. Windows uses NT. MacOS uses Unix.

    In my book, Linux is a fat bird and Android is an edible robot. your augment is invalid.

    1. Re:Wikipedia by Tough+Love · · Score: 0

      Linux kernel is the kernel.

      How do you reconcile your refrain with the fact that this unambiguously defines the characteristics of an operating system, all of which Linux has, and not all of which Android (the user space, not the Linux part) has? Also, did you ever consider the possibility that the Android Wikipedia page just parrots the Google marketing line? As opposed to the Wikipedia operating system page, which matches what you will find in any operating system textbook. It seems clear that you never studied computer science and are unwilling to learn anything about it.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  44. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    though the Linux desktop "OS" has truly become thought of as being called "Linux" ... in this case Linux truly is just the kernel, and Android is the OS.

    Not so. Android is an OS only according to marketers and those who believe them. For anybody who will trouble themselves to understand the textbook definition, Linux is the OS (e.g., it schedules, manages virtual memory and devices, enforces security) and Android is a platform, not an OS (e.g., Android does not schedule, does not manage virtual memory, does not implement device drivers and does not provide the base security mechanism).

    Now, I would not be surprised at all to see this post modded down once again by some morally challenged Google or Apple employee with too much time on their hands and too much skin in the game.

    Linux is the kernel. It's not a SYSTEM. The entire thing, that lets you DO stuff, is a SYSTEM, so the operating system is GNU/Linux, if it is a distro featuring principally the GNU utilities and Linux kernel. By contrast, Android can be thought of as an alternative set of utilities replacing the GNU utilities, and focusing and specializing on embedded systems, phones, tablets, and similar devices. So technically, the thing should be called "Android/Linux" the same way people insist the aforementioned should properly be called "GNU/Linux," in recognition of the fact that without the REST of the OS, the kernel would do NOTHING, just as without the kernel, the rest of the OS could do nothing. TOGETHER, either collection can constitute an operating system.

    As for textbook definitions, they're no more than the opinion of whatever person or persons wrote or edited the textbook. Whatever THEY think, try running the Linux kernel by itself. Put the kernel on a disc of some kind ALONE, no LILO, no GRUB, no Chainloader, nothing, JUST the kernel, and try to boot from it.

    Good fucking luck.

    So since Android is also a Linux-based OS, (being as I pointed out, Android/Linux,) when people sit at work, with their Android phones and tablets sitting beside them on top of their desks, there are Linux-based operating systems, ON THE DESKTOP, and they, plus the GNU/Linux ones, probably DO outnumber the Windows ones, which makes 2017 truly the Year of Linux... On The Desktop! :-D

    This is a nice silver-lining, considering what an utter hurricane of dogshit 2017 is turning out to be in every other respect, from the end of American democracy, the election of a mentally unstable, megalomaniacal chronic failure, underachieving, screaming angry toddler with daddy-issues as a so-called "president," to his installation of the very worst dregs of humanity into positions of authority in what used to be called the US government, killing millions of innocent American citizens by stealing their health-care coverage by making it impossible for them to afford, to the degradation of the environment, in the form of more extraction of and burning of the same, of fossil-fuels, which is unavoidably going to mean more leaks, and other environmental catastrophes, the uptick in coming pollution of the air, the waters, from streams to rivers to lakes and the oceans, more garbage being pushed into our bodies from every conceivable direction... the fact that other countries formerly seen as sane and responsible bunches of stand-up guys following America's lead into the abyss...

    This being The Year of Linux on the Desktop would certainly be just the ray of sunshine we all need, on this otherwise very dark and cloudy day.

    1. Re:Wrong. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Linux is the kernel. It's not a SYSTEM. The entire thing, that lets you DO stuff, is a SYSTEM

      Oh, you mean like a Linux distribution? Android is a kind of Linux distribution, nothing more and nothing less. And therefore a kind of Linux.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Wrong. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      As for textbook definitions, they're no more than the opinion of whatever person or persons wrote or edited the textbook.

      Sorry, no. These textbooks are the textbooks of the people who built the operating system. I suppose you want to call a math textbook just a matter of opinion of the author as well? Maybe so, but the math itself is not an opinion.

      Whatever THEY think, try running the Linux kernel by itself. Put the kernel on a disc of some kind ALONE, no LILO, no GRUB, no Chainloader, nothing, JUST the kernel, and try to boot from it.

      Every heard of initrd? It's part of Linux, includes a complete user space. That is enough to boot Linux.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.