Slashdot Mirror


China Expresses Concern at Revelations in Wikileaks Dump of Hacked CIA Data (reuters.com)

China has expressed concern over revelations in a trove of data released by Wikileaks purporting to show that the CIA can hack all manner of devices, including those made by Chinese companies. From a report on Reuters: Dozens of firms rushed to contain the damage from possible security weak points following the anti-secrecy organization's revelations, although some said they needed more details of what the U.S. intelligence agency was up to. Widely-used routers from Silicon Valley-based Cisco were listed as targets, as were those supplied by Chinese vendors Huawei and ZTE and Taiwan supplier Zyxel for their devices used in China and Pakistan. "We urge the U.S. side to stop listening in, monitoring, stealing secrets and internet hacking against China and other countries," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang told a daily news briefing.

122 comments

  1. China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps China should be *more* worried about the people who hacked the CIA, rather than the CIA? If there are all these security holes in Chinese made kit, then the Russians will be exploiting them just as much as the CIA.

    1. Re:China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Chinese are probably more concerned that their backdoors have been found than anything else.

    2. Re:China should worry by gnick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps China should be *more* worried about the people who hacked the CIA, rather than the CIA?

      Maybe, but I think it's far more likely to be a leak than a hack.

      If there are all these security holes in Chinese made kit, then the Russians will be exploiting them just as much as the CIA.

      Well, the Russians now know about these vulnerabilities as well as the ones they've discovered on their own - Just like every other country with a cyber-warfare division. You have to assume that there was some overlap - The Russians were likely already exploiting some of these holes. The big difference now is that we have a large number of cards on the table. Oops.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! We all know China has left security holes in its devices deliberately, so that the Chinese Govt can snoop on purchasers of that equipment. Turn about is fair play!

    4. Re: China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pot calling the kettle black, eh? That's right China, there is no spoon. Well...until there is a spoon.

      Douchebags

    5. Re:China should worry by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

      That would make sense if the CIA had been hacked. All indications are that contractors working for the CIA gave the info to Wikileaks, so it wasn't a hack.

    6. Re:China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more recent review indicates that they are all patched exploits

      Old new, keep on moving

    7. Re:China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *some*, not *all*
      Big difference.

    8. Re:China should worry by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Let's add US Citizen's living within the US to the list of "please stop monitoring our communications plz" list.

    9. Re:China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here are on slashdot, do we really think 7 billion people couldn't basically find any and every exploit if give a computer each?

      Isn't the threshold for most of this stuff pretty low if a state actor has the resources, ie china, russia, US, europe, to find most of these?

      It isn't as if someone goes 'hey, president Trump has a blackberry, I wonder if I can hack it"

      It's someone goes, "We need 1 million dollars to have access to espionage tools"

      Then another goes "Hey our target is using Samsung, where's the tooling for _that_"

      This entire conversation is radically dumb, unless someone's got evidence these kits were used on regular americans or that theres operators out there just running around hacking things for financial gain.

    10. Re: China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So non us citizens aren't people ?

    11. Re: China should worry by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Not saying that non-Citizens are not people... but the NSA/CIA, being American government organizations with [supposedly] rules and limits to it's function, are supposed to be restricted from spying on certain people. Specifically, US Citizens within the US borders.

    12. Re:China should worry by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      They're not backdoors, they're front doors. The typical Chinese product is mostly a collection of security holes tied together with buffer overflows and XSS, there's so much there it's not like you need any actual skill to exploit them. OK, there are backdoors as well, or more accurately phone-homes, but it's hard to spot them in the mass of front doors, side windows, and roof hatches.

    13. Re: China should worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No your either targets or statistics

  2. So long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    d-link is safe from prying eyes everything is good.

    1. Re:So long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent as funny ^

      Here is a link to all of the default passwords... What could be more secure than that?

  3. Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Canadian, it's become harder and harder to decide which country is the least hostile between the U.S.A., China and Russia.

    I like most Americans, but your government? Yuck.

    1. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Americans. You guys are funny.

    2. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but we're funny and have nukes.

      So you WILL laugh at our jokes. . .

    3. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As a Canadian, it's become harder and harder to decide which country is the least hostile between the U.S.A., China and Russia.

      I like most Americans, but your government? Yuck.

      Then you're an idiot. The Senators and Congressmen/women are the expression of the American electorate. The only difference is that they are rich while more than half the country is not. Americans are bastard racists, imperialists and hell bent on world domination (if not through direct military intervention then through economic coercion or putting military bases in countries whose people are against it). It's like the Google "do no evil" mantra. Americans do evil in the world, it's just their stupid infotainment propagando doesn't inform them at all.

    4. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dude, your govt is just as guilty. They are part of Five Eyes. Have you never heard of any of this stuff?

    5. Re:Tough by Wootery · · Score: 1

      And, if you're in Canada, live under their M.A.D. protection.

    6. Re:Tough by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      We're too busy trying to not freeze to death because we all live in igloos.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:Tough by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every major country spies - even Canada (ever hear of CSIS? https://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/in... ).

      The real question is what they do with the information they're looking for. Do they conduct industrial espionage and give/sell it to companies who then can crush the competition? http://www.afr.com/technology/... (Note, not conclusively proven, but pretty scary potential example nonetheless, and a Canada-centric one at that)

      Do they use it to try and influence democratic elections and destabilize peaceful political blocs, like Russia has been (and not just America - go look at France, or Germany, and their election troubles with the Russians).

      Now I certainly won't claim the CIA, and US Government more generally, haven't done some f*cked up shit in the past (Iran/Persia, Central America, etc), but do try to keep some perspective on things.

    8. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""Triggered""

    9. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't you use them in Iraq to squash isis

    10. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have described many countries as far as I have seen. The USA is indeed the biggest, strongest (for now) player in the game.

    11. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like you, because we hate the same people, which is sad.

    12. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 to 4 million barrels of oil a day shipping from Canada to the US says that's unlikely to happen.

    13. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Americans are bastard racists, imperialists and hell bent on world domination (if not through direct military intervention then through economic coercion or putting military bases in countries whose people are against it). It's like the Google "do no evil" mantra. Americans do evil in the world, it's just their stupid infotainment propagando doesn't inform them at all.

      If Canadians, French, Germans, British etc had a country the same size and power as the Americans, they would act the same way. Human nature is universal.

    14. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Mr. Grumpy get up on the wrong side of the bed today? Well, you just put on your happy shoes and get out there.

    15. Re:Tough by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      Yes Anonymous, which country spies more.. Hmm, that's a tough one. Both of the finger pointing at each other is funny and would be good fodder for a comedian.

    16. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but we're funny and have nukes.

      So you WILL laugh at our jokes. . .

      The U.S. Government has the nukes. You have nothing. You are just a false-bravado, no-name puke pounding on a keyboard.

    17. Re:Tough by Talderas · · Score: 1

      So you all congregate at Tim Horton's because they're heated buildings with insulation!

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    18. Re:Tough by Phusion · · Score: 2

      because a nuke would squash the entire region and as much fun as it would be to vaporize all the camel jockeys, it's probably a human rights violation of some sort to turn civilians into radioactive sludge in the pursuit of crushing terrorists.

      --
      640k ought to be enough for anyone.
    19. Re:Tough by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Has Québec signed the Canadian Constitution yet or are the Canadian imperialists in Ottawa still asserting dominance over it?

    20. Re:Tough by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Tim Horton's has the same motto as the police: "To serve and protect".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    21. Re:Tough by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You know who I hate? Not governments, people like you. Ignorant fucking people like you who think that you're better than the rest of the world.

      He doesn't appear to be claiming he's better than the rest of the world. Just that his country's government is better than the US government, and by extension, those who elected the US government.
      Which seems plausible. As an example, Canada scores 9.15 points on the EIU Democracy Index, while the US scores 7.98 points - less than e.g. Uruguay.

    22. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that make Canada the little chihuahua dog that acts tuff by barking at a stranger from behind the safety of it's owners leg?

      Don't forget that Canada is a "French Colony", at least parts of it. And we know the French don't have backbones when it comes to world affairs and conflicts.

    23. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less than 1/4 of Canadians actually speak French.

      In 1812 Canada burned down the US Whitehouse. Pretty ballsy, if you ask me.

      You're just pissy that everyone loves Canada more than the US.

    24. Re:Tough by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      If you really believe your own government isn't doing this, you're fairly naive. "oh, we're good, and all you bad fellows out there, don't trust you!".

    25. Re: Tough by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

      1812: that was the British.

    26. Re:Tough by aod7br · · Score: 1

      That's the face the US shows to the outside world, to Brazil inclusively. One thing is the American People, the other is what the US government does around the world, but the American People has to be held accountable because only them can stop their government. Now that it has been proved that CIA is interplaying with internal agencies, I hope things change.

    27. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superman was Canadian.

    28. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the burger chain, right? ;)

    29. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... learn to value what little freedom we let you have

      FTFY

    30. Re:Tough by Frank+Burly · · Score: 1

      The answer now is pretty damn obvious. Check back in 4 years, though.

    31. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's only about half the population of Americans, the half that occupies about 98% of the land area. The half of the population that lives in major cities is not so bad.

    32. Re:Tough by DedTV · · Score: 1

      If anyone thinks Canada, France, Germany an Britain don't already do the same things, they're delusional. Every country with any economic resources at all is spying on everyone they possibly can. It's just that the most powerful nations that proclaim to be in favor of democracy and freedom are scrutinized for hypocrisies and when discovered, have those hypocrisies exposed.

    33. Re:Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're too busy trying to not freeze to death because we all live in igloos.

      So y'all are the ones doing all that global warming. Must be why the Russian are pushing for a global warming denier in Amerika.

    34. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they laughed at the Americans.

    35. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      British colony, mostly fought by civilians and Natives.

      http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/m/article/war-of-1812/

    36. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, you might want to look at a map.

      Did you mean size of population? So Canada is about 1/10th in people. If Canada's population kept growing until it reached the US population, at which point would Canada on mass turn into American cunts? If we surpassed in population, would that make us bigger cunts than Americans but less than Chinese or Indians? How does the asshole country scale?

    37. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our Drone program consists of teenagers on a farm flying them with their iPods.

    38. Re: Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was Krypton a Canadian or British colony?

  4. ...... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We urge the U.S. side to stop listening in, monitoring, stealing secrets and internet hacking against China and other countries," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang told a daily news briefing.

    really?????? thats funny coming from china, the king of stealing IP

    1. Re:...... what? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      man all the chinese are on this thread downvoting everyone who is saying what everyone is thinking now arent they???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:...... what? by gnick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's sure the way it seems. This is an obvious case of pot/kettle. I'm sure our response would be the same if the tables were turned. We all act shocked when the other guy is exposed for the same activities that intelligence agencies all over the world surely take part in. The Chinese stand out because the economic espionage is so prevalent.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:...... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they also missed the point about how developing a capability is different from using it. A point which is also regularly missed by countries such as Israel and the US.

    4. Re:...... what? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      Captain Renault: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
      [a croupier hands Renault a pile of money]
      Croupier: Your winnings, sir.
      Captain Renault: [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.

    5. Re:...... what? by jandersen · · Score: 1

      They know perfetcly well that this has been going on for years - I suspect that a certain level of spying is actually not frowned upon by the countries targeted as much as people imagine; when you know somebody is spying, you also know something about what those behind the activities are interested in and capable of, and have a sense of what their motivation and thinking are. And of course, everybody's at it, so the moral outrage is somewhat limited. But once the spying becomes public knowledge, it would look wrong if they ignored it - the Chinese population in this case will expect their government to make stern comments on the issue and possibly even show some resoluteness and strength by kicking out a couple of diplomats.

      As for stealing IP: all countries have done it and still do, when there is something worth stealing; the US isn't an entirely self-made nation either. No doubt, in years to come, you will be the ones trying to steal IP secrets from China - if you aren't already. It's part of the international game, and in a sense it benefits us all, if progress is made more widely available. Yes, yes, it's wrong too, but what has morals ever got to do with business and politics?

  5. Don't do the thing we do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We urge the U.S. side to stop listening in, monitoring, stealing secrets and internet hacking against China and other countries"

    I enjoy that a Chinese official is openly asking the US to stop doing what the Chinese are trying to do. Clearly the Chinese are embarrassed because they thought they had high level abilities but now with the leaks it's obvious that the Chinese are as behind the times as ever.

    1. Re:Don't do the thing we do! by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Dear China, I will speak to my government about stopping listening on your conversations as soon as our home and business routers/firewalls stop getting flooded with Chinese IP addresses on a daily basis.

      Sincerely, Americans

    2. Re:Don't do the thing we do! by Blig · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Just thinking about looking at my router's logs make me twitch because there is so much activity from IP addresses of that region it hurts the mind.

  6. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We urge the U.S. side to stop listening in, monitoring, stealing secrets and internet hacking against China and other countries,"

    Next: China resumes hacking the planet.

  7. Using China's Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China is just mad that the CIA is using the backdoors installed in the equipment they build.

    1. Re:Using China's Backdoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly. China is simply shocked, shocked, that someone else is using the backdoors that they demanded be added.

      A perfect example of why the US government should stop demanding backdoors themselves. Because those backdoors can and will be discovered and exploited by foreign governments, just as these Chinese backdoors were discovered and exploited by us.

      CAPTCHA: royally. As in, "you royally fucked up now son".

    2. Re:Using China's Backdoors by b783719 · · Score: 1
  8. What a Coincidence by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    How many of those product back doors in items sold to the USA are there at the request of the Chinese government? We do this, it would be insane to believe they didn't. Much face-flapping about nothing.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:What a Coincidence by Blig · · Score: 1

      There just pointing fingers right now to try and hide the fact that they're just as guilty.

    2. Re:What a Coincidence by Blig · · Score: 1

      There just pointing fingers right now to try and hide the fact that they're just as guilty.

      Oops, supposed to be "They're" not "There". There, I grammar nazi'd myself. How about that?

  9. Irony? by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a prime example of the pot calling the kettle black.

    1. Re:Irony? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There is no evidence of China hacking and putting its own citizens at risk on anything like the scale of the NSA/CIA. When China wants a backdoor they just ask the manufacturer to insert one, so they don't need to rely on zero day exploits, for example.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that means the scale is less than that of the NSA/CIA? They have military/government hackers too. And remind me what the population of China is, again?

    3. Re:Irony? by caladine · · Score: 2

      Maybe I'm missing something, but the GP is 100% correct. This is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. I fail to see how China making a manufacturer insert a backdoor is any "better" than relying on zero-day. This is just another hypocritical points-scoring exercise by a government.

    4. Re:Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no evidence of China hacking and putting its own citizens at risk on anything like the scale of the NSA/CIA.

      There wasn't evidence of that 2 weeks ago in the USA either. Does that mean that the USA was not guilty of it until this week? And therefore China is not guilty of it until it's been leaked that they are doing it?

      When China wants a backdoor they just ask the manufacturer to insert one, so they don't need to rely on zero day exploits, for example.

      Is that really better? Is the backdoor more secure because you made the manufacturer put it there rather than searching for an existing one and not telling them? Is it more ethical to guarantee that a security hole exists or to just look for ones manufacturers overlooked?

    5. Re:Irony? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "There is no evidence of China hacking and putting its own citizens at risk on anything like the scale of the NSA/CIA."

      Falun Gong. Holy shit do you even pay attention?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Irony? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Because if they do it openly they need only install a government owned SSH key. Everyone knows it is there, it can't be exploited any more than any other SSH key, the only loss of security is that the government has a way in. It's almost like having another user account, and if it does ever got compromised at least you can just turn it off and wait for a new government key.

      With an exploit anyone who finds it gets in. There is no way to protect yourself until the vendor supplies a patch, which may never happen. It's far worse.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Irony? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What technical measures have they used against Falun Gong that compromised IT security? Do Falun Gong make their own brand of routers with special Falun Gong firmware?

      I'm not saying they don't abuse their citizens, they clearly do. It's just that they don't bother hiding the fact that they can read your email and require companies to give them full access, rather than using zero day exploits. One is legal (in China) and doesn't compromise security much (it's just another user account with database access, secured in the normal way with SSH keys or whatever) and the other leaves gaping holes that anyone can walk through in your fence.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point is that the US has always presented itself as being some innocent victim of Chinese hacking. The Chinese have always stated that the US is hacking us too. No one was listening, even after Snowden revelations.

    9. Re:Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Falun Gong is a religious group, Chinese government explicitly hates any religious group. Unlike the west, it doesn't grant any favor to religious groups. Chinese government doesn't attempt to draw line between religious group and cult, it sees all of them as cult.

    10. Re:Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Idea! When can we implement that in the US?

      It would greatly improve so many aspects of everyday life

    11. Re:Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if they do it openly they need only install a government owned SSH key. Everyone knows it is there, it can't be exploited any more than any other SSH key, the only loss of security is that the government has a way in. It's almost like having another user account, and if it does ever got compromised at least you can just turn it off and wait for a new government key.

      With an exploit anyone who finds it gets in. There is no way to protect yourself until the vendor supplies a patch, which may never happen. It's far worse.

      "turn it off", you say? How would you do that? The whole point is that you can't turn it off.

    12. Re:Irony? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? The ENTIRE Chinese Internet is monitored- The Great Firewall.
      And if you don't understand why backdoors are ripe for being exploited....I'm at a loss for words.

    13. Re: Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The logic in your post is retarded.

      You're saying it's better to collaborate and intentionally put in backdoors rather than discover unintentional backdoors that worst case gets discovered by small group of people or best case the backdoor discovered by all (going by something intentionally designed being easier to find than an unknown bug).

  10. Obligatory "Animal House" reference by timholman · · Score: 1

    China: "They can't do that to our equipment. Only we can do that to our equipment."

  11. Its all a farce. by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    A political point-scoring game, nothing more.

  12. Weak Media-drive Face Saving by adosch · · Score: 2

    This really isn't news, it's just countries trying to save face and do a quick shaming, finger wag at the US and CIA in regards to 'get off our digital lawns'. All countries have, do, practice, implement, will and always forever have cyber-warfare and hacking toolkits developed in-house for any op, espionage, defensive or offensive they do.

    This is easy for China: I mean, who the hell wouldn't jump on the shit-talk bandwagon to get a few jabs in after a release like this just so you don't look 'as bad'?

    All immediate perception here IMHO.

    1. Re:Weak Media-drive Face Saving by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It would be weird (and to my mind deeply worrying) if China didn't issue this sort of diplomatic nothing.

      I know many folks these days are too young to remember the Cold War, but this is what superpowers do. They engage in a slightly more polite version of schoolyard taunts whenever one of their peers has any sort of public embarrassment. It's part of how you maintain your diplomatic face. It's protocol.

  13. Oh, Really ? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . . irony, indeed, from a nation with a well-established formal hacking infrastructure, both military and corporate. . .

  14. DDOS by Kagato · · Score: 2

    Without poorly made Chinese IoT devices we wouldn't have the DDOS attacks that currently plague the internet. If you make them secure from DDOS you'll do just fine with national state attacks.

    1. Re:DDOS by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Without a retarded internet architecture we wouldn't have DDOS's either. The most popular programming languages, OS architectures and the internet almost all seem to designed to be abuseable. Retaining fundamental design flaws we knew about decades ago.

      It's only now with Apple forcing privacy and security down their competitor's throat simply to be able to compete that things are improving (I fucking hate Apple, but they do provide some value).

  15. Made by Chinese companies? by quonset · · Score: 2

    show that the CIA can hack all manner of devices, including those made by Chinese companies.

    Isn't that redundant? Aren't the vast majority of devices made in China, including the ones they've ripped off from everyone else? Of course they can be hacked, it's the same product with a different face.

  16. LOL ! Thief crying "thief!!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL ! Thief crying "thief!!!!". No more decency in this world ....

  17. Dear China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear China.

    You first.

    Sincerely,
    The IC.

  18. "But everybody else is doing it..." by evolutionary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We accuse people of hacking our systems, but we are doing it in turn. No surprise. And what do we expect the Chinese to say with these finding? Of course they are doing it, and we are doing it. Everybody's doing it now. We seem to be like children: "Why can't I, everybody else is?". It's like the arms race with nuclear weapons, expect we are using these weapons and they are easy to make publicly accessible. (As the frequent leaks are proving).

    What I'd really like to know is why aren't US citizens showing their outrage at having their basic constitutional right to privacy as well as due process to search of private data (which often resides in their home) violated on a daily (more likely many. many times per day) basis. Americans' need to stand up for what they say they believe in.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most. People. Don't. See. Themselves. As. Targets.

      The police could come and drag your neighbor away and you'd stand there sipping your coffee and not know jack from shit. It's only when they come FOR YOU that it becomes an issue

      For reference see: Every totalitarian State ever

    2. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      What I'd really like to know is why aren't US citizens showing their outrage at having their basic constitutional right to privacy as well as due process to search of private data (which often resides in their home) violated on a daily (more likely many. many times per day) basis. Americans' need to stand up for what they say they believe in.

      OK. I'll explain it to you. Short version - you're basically the old man yelling for the kids to stay off his lawn but you don't realize it. Society has changed and you are stuck in how things used to be, not how they are.

      Today's millennials grow up with all aspects of their life documented on video and publicly available for viewing. Even stupid things. I'm sure most of us have read about crimes that some dumb young person will do, get a friend to record it to video on a cell phone, share it publicly in some way like Facebook and then act totally shocked when the law comes after them. Anthony Weiner is over 50 years old and he's best known for being so addicted to what they call "sexting" that even despite losing good paying jobs and having his wife separate from him, he can't stop doing it. Does that seem rational? How many of your male friends, and I assume you are male, wake up in the morning and go "Hmm.... I think my best plan for today is to take a picture of Little Joey and send it to a person I've never actually met in person". I've got friends close to 50 years old on both sides of that age who seemingly can't live without posting photos every day to Facebook. One is the wife of a good friend and she seems to be a good person, but I feel kind of sorry for her because it just seems like it's extremely important to her to get positive feedback on Facebook for photos she posts of herself. And I know a guy who it seems like every other day posts a new photo of him and his girlfriend with text saying how much he loves her and I'm starting to wonder who exactly he is trying to convince here. The right to privacy is pretty much gone and people gave it up willingly. You don't have to like it, but you could at least accept the reality of it. As far as your complain about the search of private data in homes goes, currently that still requires a court order. Maybe that will change, but we're not there yet. I'm sorry but society decided it wanted to live in a world with a lot less privacy and I get that you weren't asked to agree to this, but that's how it is.

    3. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its interesting how people complain that warfare has evolved.

      Instead of slaughtering each other every year or two, we have information wars. espionage wars, propaganda wars.

      We have finally evolved a little bit where we avoid death and destruction and environmental scarring, to wars of words where even when economies are damaged and people die, the rest of the planet moves on.

      Yet now everyone's pretending that this tit for tat and espionage gamesmanship is The Worst Thing Evar.

      It's not.

      World War III is going on now and its not a nuclear planet killing exchange. While we haven't evolved far enough to not resort to such exchanges at all, we've made a tiny step in the right direction.

      If angry tweets and wikileaks and espionage is the modern war, I welcome it over the mud and blood of the last two world wars, Vietnam, Korea, and the ongoing cultural battles in the ME.

    4. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by evolutionary · · Score: 1

      Actually, you don't need a court order to search private data as Snowden revealed. The so called "Fisa Court" is actually a rubber stamp. So there is no due process in fact for searching anyone's data. Yes People in the USA probably gave up their basic constitutional rights since they allow the initial version of the so-called "Patriot Act" to go forth, which Obama expanded every year he was in office. As Benjamin Franklin said, "Those who give up their civil liberties for a little extra safety deserve neither". And here we are proving it.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    5. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by evolutionary · · Score: 1

      And no, I'm not accepting the reality of it. It's kind of like rolling over and dying which I'm not prepared to do. Nor are other heroic whistle blowers out there. I'm pretty sure many people said "accept the reality" of thing like racial segregation, gay rights, and women's right to vote. If you accept it, it's true. Only by not accepting what the forces at large tell you do things actually improve.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    6. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMFAO. A long screed that doesn't actually address the question. What people do on Facebook VOLUNTARILY does NOT negate my or even their 'right to privacy'. I'm sure there are a lot of things that even millenials do on a daily basis that they do NOT want posted on Facebook or widely known.

      Think about it, you're basically trying to make the equivalence that because garage sales are a common thing that I have no right to be secure in my property...RIGHT. These are 2 entirely different things as is posting on Facebook regularly versus not wanting the government to actively spy on me in private conversations including texting & e-mail that I don't make available to the world.

    7. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > Americans' need to stand up for what they say they believe in.

      They don't believe in it. They're just regurgitating those phrases, because they heard it so many times during their upbringing.
      It's called programming.

      Even if they believed in it, people that make the rules don't.

    8. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by strikethree · · Score: 1

      What I'd really like to know is why aren't US citizens showing their outrage at having their basic constitutional right to privacy as well as due process to search of private data (which often resides in their home) violated on a daily (more likely many. many times per day) basis. Americans' need to stand up for what they say they believe in.

      And how would you suggest this be done? The standard is: Soap Box, Ballot Box, Ammo Box.

      We have done the soap box and the ballot box and got fucked off. HARD.

      Are there other steps that can be taken between ballot box and ammo box because I am not seeing any. Your perception that Americans do not give a fuck is evidence that the media control is very effective.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    9. Re:"But everybody else is doing it..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans don't stand up for anything.
      Except their own "exceptionalism" and the illegal "privileges" that they continue to enjoy at the expense of all other life (including other humans) on the planet.

  19. Pot/Kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear China

    Did you guys stop yet?

  20. "Pot, stop being black." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks,
    Kettle

  21. Dear China by GerardAtJob · · Score: 1

    Could you please contains the massive 25000 hits I get from your country each day? Then, perhaps, we'll try to stop hacking your butt off.

    Tx.

    --
    I can't call that English ;-)
  22. Correct Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "China concerned that someone else is able to do what they have been able to do."

  23. China to US: Stop waking our citizens by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    China is far more concerned that now all Chinese citizens will know their own government spies on them using the backdoors they built into all the TVs and cell phones they made.

    They care nothing about the US impact, only propping up their government.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  24. Quid pro quo? by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    "We urge the U.S. side to stop listening in, monitoring, stealing secrets and internet hacking against China and other countries," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang told a daily news briefing.

    And I urge China to stop with the intense industrial espionage, including disassembly of a satellite they were hired to launch. And of course stop the spying in the US. China places "students" in US Universities and then encourages the hiring of them by US defense and technology companies. They take a traditional long view and can wait years before gathering useful information. Only the clumsy spies get caught. The US has no idea of the actual numbers due to their liberal support for foreign students by the State Department, and, well, the freedoms in the US. Take a look at recent Chinese aircraft designs, their missile programs rapid advances, as well as their nuclear weapons programs advances. US technology finds it way into all of them. And just on the level of insipid deception alone, they bought an aircraft carrier from Ukraine (sans nuclear reactors that had not been installed yet); purchased by a private Chinese concern and destined to be a casino. That casino is the Chinese military's first aircraft carrier.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  25. Try being over here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm now getting hate from Liberals and Conservatives alike for being a moderate. It got lost in all the 'OMG Libtards going APESHIT' 'Conservatives rubbing it in Libtards faces' drama the media was pushing, but the major concern of the election shouldn't have been who won, it was that the popular vote was ALMOST EVENLY DIVIDED ACROSS PARTY LINES.

    That should have recieved a lot more discussion, and a small bit of it was coming out recently: Liberals and conservatives have dramatically different ideas of what America should be, and the two sides have been growing more polarized each year. It is getting to a point where for America to function there either needs to be a second civil war, a constitutional referendum, or a mass migration and secession movement as the country's inhabitants reorganize themselves into liberal and conservative strongholds and formally separate. The current situation has been coming for at least 150 years (and depending on who you ask, for as long as the colonies have existed.)

  26. Pot, Kettle "Your Black" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We KNOW that China, Russia etc. are doing these things & can at least suspect now that they have equivalent capabilities and potentially worse since alot of 'silcone' comes out of China. I take it for granted I/we have to guard against them & I suspect everyone with a brain does as well. The only thing this CIA drop does is allow China et.al. to take a 'holier than thou' position but that's just good to give us all a good laugh. I'd like to know if the Chinese spokersperson could keep a straight face when saying this shit.

  27. Best to blacklist all US IP addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America has a history of stealing technology from other nations. The post war economic boom in America was driven by plundered German and British technology, particularly in rocketry and aerospace. This is a parriah state that does not play by any legal norms, and as such needs to be completely isolated.

  28. Incorrect by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Complete distortion of reality and a generalization fallacy. The majority of Americans are not imperialist war mongering bigots as you claim, the majority want to be left alone to pursue a career, family, and make their lives a little better. They don't care who their neighbors are as long as they respect Liberty in the same way they do. That is the majority, and what is represented in Congress and Senate. We protested the wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and demanded no action in Syria. What was done in Yemen and Syria were not voted on Congress (see 4th paragraph) and most wars gain support by dishonesty. Once US Citizens find out, protests get more severe and people lose offices.

    If you were correct that Americans as a whole wanted imperialism, what exactly would have stopped the US after the USSR collapse? The US could have thrown Iraqis out of their Government after Gulf 1 or Gulf 2 and simply absorbed a 51st State. The US could do it in Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, and any country in Africa. There are no Countries that are a military match for the US, and there is no need for the US to use Nukes on any of those countries to take them over.

    Most countries have military bases because they asked the US to put them there for protection. The DPRK will not attack South Korea simply because of that reason. Pull the US out and the DPRK would have been free to start a conflict and South Korea lacks the military to defend itself. We maintain bases in Germany because it helps to serve their defenses.

    The only thread of truth in your post is that there is a very tiny number of people who are abusing power for mostly personal gain and an ideology that most people don't accept. Global World Government. It was that ideology that caused Hillary to lose much more than anything else. It was that ideology that caused the EU, and that ideology that people like Farage and LePenne are fighting against.

    I'll further state that there is a whole lot of shit in US politics that "we" the people need to clean out. That is not an "America" issue, because countless governments have been infested with that same world domination ideology at all levels of their Governments too. The UK is a great example, and Nigel Farage is seen as an enemy of people like Soros who spend billions of dollars a year pushing that ideology (there are others, but he's an easy target to track down).

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  29. 'Dozens of firms' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would these be the same Chinese firms that when told of a security hole in one of their products, shrug and bring out another product with the same problem?

  30. I'm shocked by LordIvan · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!

  31. its NOT stealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you fucking tool - it's IMAGINARY PROPERTY
    it only exists in someone's head
    you can't steal it

    just because the west has fucked-up laws about copyright, patents, trademarks etc. , that doesn't mean that China is obliged to follow the same stupidity

    america will figure it out eventually, that they're being bilked by the lawyers, judges and corporations for extortionately inflated prices based on IMAGINARY PROPERTY
    but it will be along time from now ... :(