'Unprecedented' Bleaching Damages Two-Thirds Of Australia's Great Barrier Reef (bbc.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Unprecedented coral bleaching in consecutive years has damaged two-thirds of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, aerial surveys have shown. The bleaching — or loss of algae — affects a 1,500km (900 miles) area of the reef, according to scientists. The latest damage is concentrated in the middle section, whereas last year's bleaching hit mainly the north. Experts fear the proximity of the two events will give damaged coral little chance to recover.
I'll bet they'll recover
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
and burning more Coal is going to save us all.
Sic.
Yes this is Global Warming in Action but those who decry it will just stick their heads in the sand (again).
All the President thinks about is going to Florida to play golf every weekend. I hope that the rising sea levels make that an impossibility very soon.
OR will we see President Trump standing on the shoreline commanding the sea to go back (like a famous king in English History)?
"I'm the President damm it. I signed this executive order commanding you to go back and not flood my golf course"
...by the amount of willful blindness in Australia's government.
I mean, I thought for sure, once serious, real, things started dying on the planet, people would start caring. But I'm proven wrong every year.
Well, at least we now know it's clean over there.
...then you're already too late.
How did it survive the Holocene climate optimum, Minoan, Roman and Medieval warm periods (which had global temps as high or higher than current) if current temperatures are too high?
Next ice age should be starting in next Millennia or so, and that will wipe it all out anyway as sea level drops ~130m.
The geography and climate of earth are ever-changing.
How come before cigarettes, cancer was caused by radiation?
Let me tell ya, it's a fake new plot by Obama loving scientists to outlaw cigarettes!! That's why!
My logic is undeniable! I've got awards for science stuff, and I say we need to roll back regulation on tabacco that's holding back the American tabacco industry. Those Obama loving lying scientists and their so called 'science', they claim to know, but they don't know, I know, because my twitter feed told me so.
Lets make American the leader in cigarettes again!
FYI: It is a stretch of 1500 linear km, not an area of 1500 km^2. The summary used the wrong terminology.
think of the children dead and dying the world over. Oh, okay, some fucking rocks under shark-infested water is on the list too. This is why Trump thinks austrians need a booting.
"We gotta do something or the corals will be dead!"
"The corals are fine, look, they're thriving."
"The corals are gone, everything's dead!"
"Well, then we can as well continue when it's too late to change anything anyway"
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
The coral reefs are only the START. Trump has been in office for 3 months and has already caused the total extinction of the human race! And he hasn't even broken out the nukes yet!
That and switching from stone washed Jeans to coral washed Jeans. It's the only thing Kendal Jenner will wear.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Put off in escrow what you bet. And with it when it will recover.
Deniers are heavy with the betting in the abstract. Only when it risks their personal wealth do they not care to risk things will get better.
This is a series of problems that exist at many levels.
- World population is still growing
- There are business reasons to look the other way
- There are political reasons to look the other way
- Much of the problem exists at a compounded micro level which means that each person contributes to the problem but doesn't feel they could contribute to the solution no matter what we do.
- Human consumption is at a level which is frightening.
- Recycling barely has any impact because we simply make too much crap we don't need.
Honestly, I could write 25 pages of items of the problems involved.
Let's be totally honest. No one in a position to actually make a difference can do so in any timeframe which is meaningful to them. Even if they could push through changes, whoever comes after them will just undo them. There is no political or business gain to making a difference.
We don't feel connected to the problem. I consider myself pretty smart and I can't grasp the scale of the problem. I know I am breathing as I type this. I was breathing 40 years ago as well. I admit I am warmer than I was back then, but I live someplace cold so warmer feels good to me and those around me.
I know damn well the problem needs to be solved, but to do so would require a massive shift to the way billions of people live and I know there is no chance in hell of that happening.
So, how do we mitigate the problem in a way that could actually happen?
What did we lose and what is the real impact of the loss?
Can we breed a type of algae that can populate the warmer reefs? Is it more about the coral rejecting it? Can we force the coral to accept a new type of algae without doing far greater damage?
If we can't recover the reef, can we recover otherwise? Can we build something which could replace the function of the reef?
Is there any way we can use resources such as the trash pile in the middle of the pacific as materials to help with the problem?
Is there a way we can build something like greenhouses in the desert wastes to mass produce oxygen?
Is there a way to make it profitable enough to attract interest from people who otherwise would fight against it?
I'm simply making things up now. But I do know we will never alter earth's population to make a meaningful change in time to fix the reef. Even if we could get a new head of the EPA in North America, what about Asia?
Someone has to start thinking creatively to fix this instead of depending on humanity.
Not evil, just a shithead.
Oh, not forgetting wilfully ignorant. You have preening pride in your intelligence and huge brain as being how you're better than animals, yet you wilfully ignore that brain because you're a fucking retard who prefers denial to a bruise to your ego or *potential* loss (though you ignore the "risk" of being better off in the changes) being risked.
Because, as far as you know then (iow nothing, you're dead), there's no thinking about what may or may not happen, and no catastrophe occuring (or has already happened, whichever you feel you want to think of as the case when you're dead).
If you're so tired of worrying about shit, die already. End of your worries. Nobody loses.
looks at the barrier reef as 2/3 dead. An optimist looks at the barrier as 1/3 struggling to stay alive.
"But the reefs! The ice! The bees! It's all propoganda by liberals for their global warming bs!
This Watts Up With That article (https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/04/05/falling-sea-level-the-critical-factor-in-2016-great-barrier-reef-bleaching/) gives a much better explanation and addresses the claims that climate change is the reason.
Bleaching is normal to some extent. Corals recover if they get a break. Problem here is they get 2 years - back to back of high temperature bleaching which lowers the chance of recovery.
I'll bet they'll recover
Oh yes, of course - corals have been around since the Cambrian or thereabouts...
True, but.
One type of coral or another has been around since the Cambrian, but species of corals have, in the past, been wiped out wholesale-- the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, in particular, (the "great dying") wiped out very close to all the reef-forming species, apparently due to the combination of anoxia and ocean acidification. In fact, 96% of all marine species were wiped out in that event.
It took about eight million years before corals are re-established in the fossil record. That's eight million years with no reefs; a period much longer than humanity has been around.
Most of the reef-forming coral species also went extinct at the K-T extinction. (The non-reef-forming corals were, for some reason, less affected.)
Extinction happens.
too many mosquitos, ticks, flies, jellyfish, rats, roaches, spiders!!
Don't forget when St Patrick drove all the snakes out of Ireland, they moved to Australia.
Also, we should convince the Chinese that jellyfish are an aphrodisiac. Probably starfish, too.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
What does vast quantities of aluminum do to an ecosystem? What does barium, strontium, nano-particles do to an ecosystem?
CHEMTRAILS, no one mentions chemtrails, and yet we ex[pect to find the reason somewhere else. Oh you want to donate to the diabetes research foundation, as you stand in front of a counter selling junk food, candy and cigarettes... we are so STUPID.
Want to get SMART and notice something above your head?
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
Well along with the aluminum in the chemtrails they are adding sulfuric acid:
https://www.reddit.com/r/chemtrails/comments/63284x/this_started_killing_people_worldwide_and/
CHEMTRAILS. Get to know and recognize them.
-Management
My previous comments on CHEMTRAILS have been removed... Chemtrails include aluminum, barium, strontium as well as Sulfuric ACID...
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/