Slashdot Mirror


17 Years Later, A New Season Of MST3K Premiers On Netflix

Launched in 1988, Mystery Science Theater 3000 ran for ten seasons on Comedy Central and The Sci-Fi Channel, with its last episode airing in August of 1999. But now Slashdot reader #5844 ewhac writes: 17 years later, Season 11 of MST3K debuted Friday on Netflix. A full season has been produced, including a stretch-goal Christmas special, funded by the highest-earning Kickstarter Film & Video campaign to date ($5.76 million) -- thousands of contributors are listed in the show's end credits, spread across all fourteen episodes.

The show remains true to its low-budget roots, relying almost exclusively on models and practical effects, including a very inventive new door sequence. The backstory for the new season is very swiftly established in the opening to Experiment 1101, as Jonah Heston (played by co-producer Jonah Ray) is abducted by the evil mad scientist Kinga Forrester (Felicia Day) and her sidekick Max a/k/a TV's son of TV's Frank (Patton Oswalt). Together with Gypsy (Rebecca Hanson), Tom Servo (Baron Vaughn), and Crow (Hampton Yount), Jonah quips his way through a barrage of bad movies, including Reptilicus, Starcrash, The Loves of Hercules, and The Christmas That Almost Wasn't.

In 2008 MST3K's original creator Joel Hodgson answered questions from Slashdot's readers, and said he was fascinated by the popularity of Creative Commons licenses. "For most of the public domain titles that we've used, it's a matter of the garbage not being taken out. Basically, they forgot to apply for a copyright so it in fact lapsed into the public domain."

47 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It stinks!

    1. Re:Well? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I'm card-bored.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Well? by kimvette · · Score: 1
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  2. Re:Low hopes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Nothing new can ever be as good as anything old"

  3. MST3K with production values is weird. by SolemnLord · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've watched the first three episodes so far, and the movie sequences are all pure Mystery Science Theater. Not legendary episodes (although holy crap, Cry Wilderness is bananas), but solid throughout.

    But the skits feel off. It's not the cast, they're fine off the bat and are finding a rhythm more and more. It's more that the show has more money now than it did before, and a larger crew to go with it. It takes away a lot of the DIY feel from the early episodes, but it doesn't really bring anything new to compensate. The skits feel really flat too, in the physical sense. Compare the "family" visit in 1102 with almost any skit set in Castle Forrester.

    Settling in, maybe? Here's hoping. It still feels like Mystery Science Theater 3000, and I'm happy about that.

    1. Re:MST3K with production values is weird. by rworne · · Score: 1

      I felt the same way.

      Then again, I'm one of those old curmudgeons who felt the show "lost it" when Joel departed. Not that Mike's episodes were bad - they weren't, but I more personally connected with Joel's style on the show and missed it greatly. Who didn't go to the theater in the 70's and 80's and didn't appreciate this?

      On the newest series, the biggest shock was not the new host, but when Gypsy spoke. I don't know if that voice changed happened earlier in the older series (I never watched the SyFy run), but when I did stop watching, Gypsy was still using that weird falsetto.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    2. Re:MST3K with production values is weird. by rworne · · Score: 1

      Wow. The link got totally mangled by the editor.

      Here's the original link that was messed up. The old GCC Theater skit. I still laugh when I see it.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    3. Re:MST3K with production values is weird. by SolemnLord · · Score: 1

      On the newest series, the biggest shock was not the new host, but when Gypsy spoke. I don't know if that voice changed happened earlier in the older series (I never watched the SyFy run), but when I did stop watching, Gypsy was still using that weird falsetto.

      That's new to this season. They brought in a new actor, Rebecca Hanson, to do the voice (and also be "Synthia" in the mads segments). I'm with you: it's very, very strange at first, especially with the new "from the ceiling" design. Hopefully we'll see more of the new Gypsy and they'll make the most of it.

      Also you should dig into the SyFy episodes. Seasons 8-10 have a ridiculous number of gems.

    4. Re:MST3K with production values is weird. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I never say MSTK epidoes in order. The entire backstory was always entirely confusing. Not that there was much backstory to start with, but for me it was almost irrelevant (except for the being who no longer had a need for physical bodies).

    5. Re:MST3K with production values is weird. by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      Rowsdowerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    6. Re:MST3K with production values is weird. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      I don't get the sense that there's any animosity between them. In fact, Rifftrax has done a lot to help boost the new season of the show, including giving away Rifftrax videos to backers of the Kickstarter, and of course hosting a MST3K reunion show gathering together as many of the alumni who are still interested in doing riffs as they could get their hands on. I imagine that Rifftrax is enough of a full time job that they don't really have time to spare for the other stuff.

      I've also noticed that Rifftraxers Bill Corbett and Mary Jo Pehl are both on writing staff for some of the episodes, too.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  4. Old Shows, Aging Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Netflix is for Old People!

    1. Re:Old Shows, Aging Audience by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Yeah? I remember some folks saying "Voting is for old people" and look what happened.

  5. US Only it seems by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, this region crap has got to end.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:US Only it seems by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Netflix typically signs up for global distribution rights when they do a "Netflix Original" like this. Maybe they got an offer somewhere that they couldn't refuse, but it wouldn't be typical.

    2. Re:US Only it seems by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Not available in the Netherlands. But it's not really a surprise, people have complained for ages about the selection on Netflix here compared to other countries.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:US Only it seems by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      In this case, there's also the rights to the movies they show. It's probably a contractual issue.

  6. Re:Low hopes. by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, but it's more subtle than that.

    90% of everything is bad. 10% is good. Over time, that 10% is remembered, re-watched, re-lisened to, etc. While the bad 90% is forgotten.

    So when you look back at the old, you're only remembering the good, it's all been well screened for quality. When you look at what's new, you see it all so it's 90% bad.

  7. Re:Low hopes. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    It's not exactly Shakespeare at the Globe, now, is it? You should really just relax.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  8. Re:Still don't get why people liked this show by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I never got it either. Sometimes the bad movies behind it were somewhat interesting, and I'd have rather watched the bad movie without a bunch of crap in front of it.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  9. Re:Still don't get why people liked this show by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    This and "roasts" are two things an American friend of mine tried to explain to me when he realised we don't have either - and then our Comedy Central tried to get the UK all het up about Justin Beibers "roast" and it all failed miserably over here.

    The Americans just have some unique sense of humour, one that is hard to decipher some of the time :)

  10. Re:Still don't get why people liked this show by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    It's not for everyone. I remember first seeing MST3K when our cable (in the Netherlands) offered the SciFi Channel for 6 months as a sort of trial, and I was watching with a friend when an episode came on. First thought was "What the hell...", half an hour later we were fans. When I was in the States for work for a few months, I faithfully recorded every episode that aired during that time.
    My brothers didn't get it at all though, and with the many people I've tried to introduce to the show it's been hit-and-miss: people who I thought might enjoy it hated it, and others unexepectedly loved it. Same for Rifftrax, of which my wife (thankfully) became a big fan as well.

    By the way, I don't get "roasts" either.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  11. Lack of torrents is a bad sign by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    As of last night, there were NO torrents for the Netflix version. That seems to me to be a bad sign. Or the current seeders don't care.

    --
    Sig for hire.
    1. Re:Lack of torrents is a bad sign by chispito · · Score: 1

      As of last night, there were NO torrents for the Netflix version. That seems to me to be a bad sign. Or the current seeders don't care.

      Is torrenting Netflix originals really common? (I ask because I haven't looked on torrent sites for ages.) That's kind of Netflix's thing: "We're only marginally more expensive, and a whole lot more convenient than pirating."

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:Lack of torrents is a bad sign by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's common. I think that RubberDogBone is use to getting as much fag pr0n as he can on BT and is pissed that there is something else he wants to watch between taking on 6 men at a time and he thought he'd look this up since it was on Slashdot. Sadly he can't find it and doesn't realize this really doesn't happen normally for any media except fag pr0n.

      You are so wrong. But it made me laugh. Thanks.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    3. Re:Lack of torrents is a bad sign by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      As of last night, there were NO torrents for the Netflix version. That seems to me to be a bad sign. Or the current seeders don't care.

      Is torrenting Netflix originals really common? (I ask because I haven't looked on torrent sites for ages.) That's kind of Netflix's thing: "We're only marginally more expensive, and a whole lot more convenient than pirating."

      Beats me. I don't torrent any TV shows from Netflix, or TV from anywhere else really. Just an occasional movie.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    4. Re:Lack of torrents is a bad sign by SolemnLord · · Score: 1

      One of the rewards was DRM-free, downloadable copies of the new episodes. Netflix kept this promise even after they picked up the show, and I can download copies at any time. So availability is not an issue.

      The thing is that Joel has been very clear about the show's future: despite the kickstarter's success, what will ultimately determine if there'll be a season 12 is how many people watch it on Netflix. And despite MSTies passion for sharing the tapes, I think they're just trusting Joel and going along with his wishes (for now, anyway) because they want to see the show stick around.

      Sometimes, heartfelt pleas work!

      Or maybe I'm just being sappy.

    5. Re:Lack of torrents is a bad sign by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's priced fairly. Watch the whole season for under $10 - and get access to a whole lot of content during that month. People don't pirate Netflix much because they don't feel the need to cheat.

    6. Re:Lack of torrents is a bad sign by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and AC was doubly wrong 'cause the clues are right there in your name..."rubber" and "dog".

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    7. Re:Lack of torrents is a bad sign by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      This is also why you don't tend to see a lot of Baen ebooks being pirated. Creator requests do carry weight with something this much-loved.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    8. Re:Lack of torrents is a bad sign by ewhac · · Score: 1
      I'll let you in on a little secret: As you can see from the Kickstarter page, people who contributed at a certain level and above were granted access to downloadable copies of the entire season -- all fourteen episodes.

      However, throughout the entire production and post-production process, Joel has sent out updates to all the Kickstarter backers explaining that, if MST3K proves successful, Netflix may pick it up for another season. But in order for that to happen, Netflix needs to see that the viewing numbers would support such an investment. Therefore, he has firmly but respectfully asked backers not to share their downloadable copies with anyone. Since you claim that no torrents of the season are available, it would appear his request has, so far, been honored.

      ...Which is, kind of, y'know, what we've been saying the model should be all this time, right? Respect the artist's work and wishes? Well, so far, it looks like that's what's happening, so he can keep doing it.

  12. Re:It has the name, but does it have the spirit? by lord_mike · · Score: 1

    It's hard to say. MST3K suffered from a great schism after Joel left, with many saying that Mike was the true bearer of the MST3K flame. I am an originalist and feel that Joel is the true founder, so I would say that the MST3K legacy belongs to him.

  13. Re:white people be crazy by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hate to get off-topic on this story but you realize that most of your "big chunk" goes toward the military, veterans, retirees and people too sick to work?

    You want to tell which of them they're just being lazy?

    Politicians.

  14. Re:Still don't get why people liked this show by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I'm American, so I think it's just a matter of tastes. In the golden age of Dean Martin roasts, I was too young. There was a sweet spot where I understood what SNL was satirizing and loved it. Now I'm middle aged and out of touch with the popular culture in many ways. I *know* I'm watching satire on SNL, but I don't know what they're satirizing so it isn't funny. Likewise, a roast isn't going to be funny if you don't know the people being roasted. Of course it's also possible for these things to be poorly executed or out of touch with the culture as you say. I think a lot of SNL is poorly executed these days... but people have probably been saying that since the show first aired.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  15. Re:It has the name, but does it have the spirit? by bekeleven · · Score: 2

    They both are.

    Mike was head writer even before he took over as host. Joel picked him as his successor.

    Both sides have made clear their goodwill to the other. Some of the mads have done rifftrax. They all got together for rifftrax live recently to promote the new season.

    The real villain of the story is Jim Mallon.

  16. Re:Low hopes. by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Felicia Day was terrible in her role. Patton Oswalt started out sounding as bad as if he was just doing a table read and finally got into the role by the end of the first episode. I haven't watched past the first episode yet. Mary Jo Pehl was great in the original series, and truly underappreciated.

  17. Re:Low hopes. by omnichad · · Score: 2

    They already went through an entire cast change through the original series. And it mostly went pretty well. They were close to doing it again, but their "big" name actors were worse than the rest of the new cast.

  18. Re:It has the name, but does it have the spirit? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Little of both. The new host feels more like a Joel, mostly because Mike Nelson was head writer even before hosting. Mike is not involved in this project. I was more a Mike fan on the old series, but Jonah is really good. The riffs are much better than the filler bits, but that was always true in the Joel era for me.

    Rifftrax is a focus directly on commentary and has a whole new style (but familiar voices) and it's great that there are two entries in the genre, but this new show is firmly MST3K. Give both a shot if you haven't.

  19. Re:Low hopes. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    It's not exactly Shakespeare at the Globe, now, is it? You should really just relax.

    Well played sir! well played indeed.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  20. Re: Low hopes. by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

    Wheaton and Oswalt, thanks but no thanks.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  21. Re:It has the name, but does it have the spirit? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    My personal feeling is that Joel too frequently let his pride get in the way of what was best for the comedy. He was in a straightman role but hated being the straightman because it often meant the jokes were at his expense. This led to him stepping on jokes by having to get in the final word after the actual punchline.

    Mike realized his job was to be the robot's buttmonkey and was fine playing the buttmonkey.

  22. Re:MST3K wasn't "90% bad". That's in your head by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

    You completely misunderstood my post. MST3K was in the 10% that is good which by definition is why we're still talking about it. Had it been in the 90% bad it would be forgotten which is why most of the old stuff we remember is good. (unless we try to recall the bad stuff).

    This new MST3K may or may not be good, but it *seems* like new stuff is worse in general because it hasn't been culled of the bad part.

  23. Re:Still don't get why people liked this show by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    When we were teenagers we made fun of the bad movies on television just like MST3K does, but we were doing it a couple of decades before the original series was broadcast. One thing we did back then that MST3K never did was watch foreign language films with subtitles and do our own, funny translations.

    When MST3K came along in the 80s, it reminded me of the old times and it was hilarious.

    I'm watching the new series on Netflix right now and it's just as funny as ever. I could (and will) watch it over and over to catch jokes I missed the first time.

  24. Re:that German girl. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    That was one of the things that made the show work, it was basically the anti Star Trek. The heroes weren't heroes and the tropes were turned upside down. There werre some parts that didn't work well, but some parts were brilliant (the hall of records with the time prophet's instructions to Stanley).

  25. Re:Still don't get why people liked this show by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

    I never was a huge fan of it, myself. When the episodes were good, it was pretty awesome. But most of them just seemed kind of boring.

    Nonetheless, a lot of my friends were into it. And in kind of a meta sense, it's a lot more fun to watch this kind of show together with other people.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  26. Re:It has the name, but does it have the spirit? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

    Lots of people from the original are involved. It's just that they're mostly involved as writers, rather than in-front-of-the-camera personalities (barring a few amusing cameos).

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  27. Re:Still don't get why people liked this show by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    True. It's totally an American thing. Thanks why the show never got cancelled because the American audience loves it so much!