Slashdot Mirror


America's Most-Hated ISP Is Now Hated By Fewer People (oregonlive.com)

"Comcast's customer service may actually be improving," writes an Oregon newspaper. An anonymous reader quotes their report: In the second year of Comcast's broad customer service overhaul, complaints to Oregon cable regulators are down 25%. They've also declined 40% since 2014. Complaints are falling nationally, too, according to the highly regarded American Customer Satisfaction Index. Its most recent report showed a surge in Comcast subscriber satisfaction... Two years ago, Comcast made Oregon the test bed for its customer service push, responding both to disparaging headlines and the prospect of growing competition from other telecom companies and from streaming video services.

The company is adding Apple-style retail stores around the metro area and introduced innovations to help consumers understand what they're paying for and when technicians will arrive for service calls. It's rolling out new tools nationally to help them improve their home Wi-Fi, and diagnosing problems before customers call to complain... For example, if several subscribers in the same neighborhood use the company's tool for testing internet speeds, that triggers an alert at Comcast to look for a problem in the local network. The company redesigned its bills to make it clearer what customers subscribe to, and what it costs, in hopes of reducing confusion and calls. And Comcast has a robust social media presence, fielding complaints on Twitter.

The article points out that Comcast's satisfaction scores are still below-average for cable TV providers, "and well below the median among internet service providers. And that's a low bar -- the telecom sector is among the most complained about under ACSI's rankings." Their figures show that the only ISPs in America with a lower score for customer satisfaction are Cox Communications, Time Warner Cable, and MediaCom.

97 comments

  1. This is not surprising by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    they're spending money on customer service right now so they can get approval to buy up their competitors. Normally Americans don't think once let alone twice on letting companies merge until there's no alternatives, but Comcast took it too far and pissed off too many people. Even they couldn't buy off enough politicians to pull that one off.

    Just wait until they're done with their merger and they'll go right back to making everybody hate them and Europe and Canada can go back to gazing on us Americans and wondering why the hell we let things be so awful. Just as God and Nature intended.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they are have allocated billions to fixing customer service on the residential cable network - which is what drives most peoples perception of Comcast overall, the cable tv network is a small piece of Comcast, most people are not aware of that.

      The last big thing Comcast picked up was NBCU, GE dumped it cheap because they were panic selling everything it could during the GFC, because GE had dug it self a big hole by getting into lending money - GE Finance.

      I'd agree the mega mergers are a problem, its happening with a lot of things since deregulation started happening around 40 to 50 years ago - take a look at the airline industry. United doesnt care about the recent bad PR, the major airlines have carved up the market and avoid competing with each other. If you dont like United, guess what, in a lot of cases you dont have a choice if you want to fly between certain places. Alternatives ? None, the US has no high speed rail passenger network. Rail is tied up by several large freight companies, money is in freight - and the same thing happened there, a hand full of large operators that have carved it up into a few large bits and dont compete with each other. Cable TV, DSL, Satellite TV, cellular, all the same, merge merge merge.

      But, dont blame the companies, they are just operating in the environment that exists, sure they have had a hand in shaping it because of the way the government works here, but ultimately its the government that allowed it to happen, blame the crew in Washington DC for it, not the companies.

    2. Re:This is not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed something.
      1) Comcast is just one of the providers available in my (admittedly metropolitan) area.
      2) Everyone around me who hates Comcast has already migrated from them to a competitor.
      3) Once the whiners have migrated, what's left are people who are prepared to put up with Comcast's service.

      It's not that their service is improving, it's that those who complain loudest are now with someone else, have shut up, or moved to an area where Comcast isn't a provider.

  2. "Comcast customer service ... improving" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like dog shit on your shoe is improving. It's still there, just getting better with age.

    1. Re:"Comcast customer service ... improving" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect it could also be that people are just tired of complaining since nothing improves.

  3. Switching to Sonic as fast as my contract expires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can say Comcast is better than its abysmal dystopian past, and I'll agree. But I'm still getting the fuck away from them ASAP, Sonic doesn't play their games trying to undermine my rights to privacy and a free and open internet.

  4. Spectrum FTW by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    changed their name for the worse

  5. Cox has low customer satisfaction? by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Surprising. I've always been pleased with them. Few outages, and they regularly ratchet up their bandwidth and data caps.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:Cox has low customer satisfaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much the same here, Comcast is excellent - 200mbps plan often tests to around 225mbps, never breaks, never slow, just works - including IPv6.

    2. Re: Cox has low customer satisfaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had nothing but problems with network quality. Their technicians isolated it to poor line quality and infrastructure in my neighborhood but said it would cost too much to replace. I went to Verizon FIOS and gave never looked back.

    3. Re: Cox has low customer satisfaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had their service for 4 years now. No ploblems, no issues. Very happy with my service.

    4. Re:Cox has low customer satisfaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know until you switch. I've lived in Cox monopoly areas in two states on the east coast, and my mother lived in a third. We were never able to have an Apple FaceTime conversation for more than a couple of minutes, despite changing routers and cable modems. It was some problem on Cox' end. We both moved to different states with different cable providers, and for the first time we can actually use FaceTime to talk to each other.

      Has Cox residential service even enabled IPv6 yet? I remember checking their IPv6 FAQ year after year since the early 00's. Each year they promised that IPv6 would be rolled out next year. Each year they changed nothing on the page except the date. Always "next year."

      Comcast has been expensive but good so far.

    5. Re:Cox has low customer satisfaction? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know why they're hated as a cable TV company, but the ISP side of Comcast has always been pretty decent in my experience, and I don't know anyone who has anything bad to say about that side of them. Sure, the data caps is an ongoing concern, but they haven't implemented anything evil on that side, beyond introducing the concept to begin with.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Cox has low customer satisfaction? by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Our family regularly exceeds our monthly cap, and Comcast has yet to charge us for the overages. So we have that going for us, which is nice, but Comcast is still an ugly boil on Satan's teat. I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    7. Re:Cox has low customer satisfaction? by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Yeah I was as shocked by this as you. I've had them for about 10 years, and I can count the number of downtime hours on one hand.

      Fast speeds, a very high data cap (which doesn't appear to be aggressively enforced), and awesome customer service.

      The really crazy part is that they rate Cox just below Charter.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    8. Re:Cox has low customer satisfaction? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I found this one about Time Warner / Charter / Spectrum a month ago when I was visiting my family: they are traffic shaping on the port that Plex uses (32400). I couldn't reliably stream video from my own server to my tablet at either my brother's house (Comcast) or my parents' house (Frontier) until I opened a VPN connection to my home and then it worked perfectly.

      I have a problem with this - what do they care what I'm using the upload for, as long as it's legal? Now I'll just be sure to put everything through a VPN when I need to interact with systems I have at my house, and they can just see a whole lot of TCP 443. Douchebags.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    9. Re:Cox has low customer satisfaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast in SF Bay Area definitely made it look like they were going to charge for overages. I got the two free months with increasingly dire threats that my bill that the third month was going to cost me an extra $200 unless I agreed to pay them $50/month. I'm going to look into whether I can get two more free months a year from now, just to get $100 back from the these motherless fuckheads.

  6. An Insider's View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a Comcast employee I can say that I've definitely noticed a complete change in culture since the entire company adopted the NetPromoter system (https://www.netpromoter.com/know/). In every meeting, there is an undeniable effort to ensure the "customer" has a seat at the table. No agenda here on my part... I don't question the validity of the concerns anyone of you may have. Just giving you a bit of an insider's viewpoint. I can honestly say that an internal, company-wide strategy to improve the customer experience feels very substantive this time around, in contrast to previous efforts I've witnessed. Take from that what you will. I don't speak on behalf of the company. But, on a personal level, I think we offer a pretty competitive product and hope that we continue to do better by our customers. They've been a pretty great company to work for.

    1. Re:An Insider's View by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      First of all, never call your product a "competitive product". You know what this means? Essentially what you're saying is "the others are just as shitty, so why try harder?" Another thing is that the message is not what you say but what your audience hears. It's nice that you feel like your customer has a seat at your table, but this does not arrive at your customers. They do not feel that way. And if you care about how your customers think about you, this is what matters.

      One thing is certain: Goodwill goes a long way, and it takes a long, long time to rebuild from ruins. And let's be honest here, Comcast's goodwill is in the gutter. You have a long uphill battle in front of you if you really care.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:An Insider's View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, "competitive product" is a relative term ("best in class" would fall under the same category). Given the market in question, I think this means a little more than you seem to. And when you talk about how customers "feel", I don't know what you're basing that off of. Clearly, the data shows that Comcast still has (likely) years of work to do to promote their image to an acceptable position. But that wasn't the point of this report. The point is that, for the first time in a long time, the company is showing meaningful signs of improvement in the category.

      It sounds like you, like many others, have a negative perception of the company and/or industry, and I don't fault you for it. Just know that there are many of us hard at work who believe in the products and that are eager to take on the "uphill battle" you reference.

    3. Re:An Insider's View by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Lots of places have small local ISPs which offer better speeds and better service for much less, I wish I lived near one of those, or even AT&T broadband so I could at least get a service discount.

  7. Cause? by phorm · · Score: 1

    So are they getting better, the other are getting worse, or everyone is just busy hating United right now?

  8. The important question: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    Do the Comcast execs believe the result of this monetary investment is worth replicating?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:The important question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have rolled this out to the Atlanta area, so the answer appears to be yes. I had to replace my cable box, so I took it to one of their new "Apple-like" stores. Their old locations had a DMV or Social Security vibe to it, but the new stores were much more retail shopper like. You wait in a semi-comfortable area with TVs going, and then the CSR calls you, walks over to greet you, then takes you back to a desk/kiosk (very similar to the ones T-Mobile use) to handle the transaction. The CSR has clearly had more training than the sour-faced desk clerks that manned the older stores.

  9. A few ideas by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First and foremost, when a customer says they're down, try to ping other modems in the same neighborhood. If those are down too, roll a line truck. Do not claim it must be a problem at their house.

    Re-emphasize in training, if any light other than network activity is flashing on the modem, it is not a problem with their computer, don't try to sell them on paid Windows support, especially when they say they don't have Windows.

    If the customer is using words you are unfamiliar with such as traceroute or ping, just elevate the call to someone who understands the problem.

    1. Re:A few ideas by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      If the customer is using words you are unfamiliar with such as traceroute or ping, just elevate the call to someone who understands the problem.

      If the customer is using a language you are unfamiliar with such as English, just elevate the call to someone who understands the language.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:A few ideas by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      If the customer is using words you are unfamiliar with such as traceroute or ping, just elevate the call to someone who understands the problem.

      Or you'll eventually end up with someone like me who says, "Listen, just create the ticket and pass it back to the tech people. If they need any more information then have someone who knows what they are talking about call me." This wasn't Comcast but a service up in Canada for dealing with credit card payments that federal governments had to use. The first part was a transfer of XML files between the department and the provider which wasn't working. After 15 minutes of the call support person asking for a print screen of the problem I blurted out the above. I turned around to vent to the other people I worked with but it seems they were listening in on the conversation as they were staring at me with mouths open.

      It worked though as the problem was quickly resolved. They didn't call back for any more details. Though when they called back to say it was fixed they called one of my co-workers.

      I don't really expect the first line people to know enough about their system to be able to fix a problem like that but I do expect them to have a general enough idea of how their system works (transfers of data, etc) so that they don't spend 15 minutes asking for a print screen of an operation that doesn't involve any HTML. Specifically we weren't getting a reply from their server after transferring our XML file over. How do you do a print screen of that? An empty directory listing? :)

    3. Re:A few ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This!

      I finally ditched Comcast because they had lots of outages in my area but now I'm with CenturyLink and the speeds are good despite it being DSL but this is always their first line of defense. CLink doesn't have as many outages in my area as I experienced with Comcast but a good example is the last time there was an outage. I called and they insisted on sending me a new modem which they shipped by ground so I would be without internet for a whole week if that were actually the problem.

      But ten hours later they finally acknowledged the outage that I had informed them of and they promised to fix it within a few days. It only took them about an hour to fix it though,

    4. Re: A few ideas by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      Years ago comcast introduced some speed boost thing. I forget what they called it. It was basically a docsis command they used to temporarily uncapped the modem. Every time it would kick in my modem would take a dive. I finally just purchased my own. They weren't getting any more of my rental fees and trying to convince them to send a new modem didn't work.

      Next they were having problems with a particular router. Traceroute proved it. They didn't listen and it took weeks to fix.

      Comcast isn't better because they have better support. Comcast is better because the technology now tells them when they have problems and the lemmings go and fix it.

    5. Re: A few ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well, down in South Florida, they've instituted bandwidth caps (1TB for an ordinary home user like me),
      so I'm still not impressed. It took 4 months and threats of legal action (including formal complaints to the FCC)
      to get them to fix a billing problem in which they tried to charge us for something that we did not order, and
      which the cluck in the walk-in customer center supposedly fixed, only to be over-ruled by the computer.

      When they roll out gigabit fibre to the last mile with no bandwidth caps, then I'll be impressed. Otherwise,
      as far as I'm concerned, they're still a work in progress and have a very long way to go.

      And, all this is over and above sporadic outages and slow-downs that I don't even bother to report to them.

    6. Re:A few ideas by antdude · · Score: 1

      What if you don't know your neighbors? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    7. Re:A few ideas by sjames · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with it?

    8. Re:A few ideas by antdude · · Score: 1

      How would you know their IP addresses?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:A few ideas by antdude · · Score: 1

      Also, their routers might block pings. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    10. Re:A few ideas by sjames · · Score: 1

      Comcast knows the MAC of every modem connected to their system and the associated account and service address. They HAVE to. So it's a simple matter of a database lookup. The customer doesn't get to control anything on the cable side of the modem so they can't block the ping (Which I believe is more akin to arping anyway).

      So they know your address and they know the MAC addresses of the other modems on the same cable segment. Where's the problem?

    11. Re:A few ideas by antdude · · Score: 1

      I meant from the users to see if theirs work or not. How do we know which addresses our neighbors are using?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    12. Re:A few ideas by sjames · · Score: 1

      Why would I need to ping my neighbors to decide if my internet connection is working? I was saying when you call Comcast and report your connection is down, rather than instating on sending someone to your home between the months of June and July, THEY should try to other modems near you first to see if it's more likely a line problem.

    13. Re:A few ideas by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ah OK. I thought you were talking about the users, not the ISP. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    14. Re: A few ideas by sjames · · Score: 1

      Route problems seem to totally befuddle them. I had a terrible time getting them to fix it when they were black holing the entire 6to4 address space for outbound packets.

  10. Using emacs is unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use Visual Studio and a be a pro.

  11. Alternative to headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mother is ignorant of all technology woes. When her Time Warner internet goes out she literally told me not to call on her behalf to address it, instead encouraging us to just wait for it to come back.

    I spent two weeks with her after not seeing her for 5 years in the military. Every evening between 6pm and 10pm she cannot use streaming services and even her television gets wonky. She is in a new all fiber neighborhood but everyone has Time Warner. Everyone. It is the only provider out here.

    The point to my story is that I went behind her back and called 4 separate times. Never resolved. I gave up. My mother has given up. Consider less calls out of fear of futility and no options besides (INSERT NO COMPETITION COMPANY HERE)

    1. Re:Alternative to headline by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So the lack of complaints is simply due to people noticing that complaining only wastes their time without resulting in any measurable improvement?

      Guess why most people don't vote anymore...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Alternative to headline by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      The problem is the network is operating 100% as designed. The neighborhood node is unfortunately so over sold that they just drop connections. Think about airlines and overbooking flights. Some people get bumped from full flights. During prime time they bump people off the net. No use in making tickets or rolling a truck. Nothing is wrong with the infrastructure. It is working a designed. It is the over selling of the neighborhood node that is the problem.

  12. Comcast: In 2014, voted worst company in America. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consumerist stories about Comcast.

    One of the stories: Comcast: 2014 worst company in America. In 2014, Comcast was selected as worse than Monsanto!

    Comcast is disliked so much, the company is now calling itself Xfinity.
     
    In my experience, it is Comcast policy to be abusive to customers. One of the many negative results is that Comcast employees abuse Comcast.

  13. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They simply speak more nicely these days than in the past - and try to ooze the want of solving anything that might be wrong. In the end - the agents are just as inept as before, the service is just as meh as before - so really they just covered up the stink with more deodorant.

    1. Re:No... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So instead of telling you to "go to hell" they inform you that they "want you to have a warm, fuzzy feeling"?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. With all respect by rsilvergun · · Score: 1
    saying this:

    regularly ratchet up their bandwidth and data caps

    Makes you sound a bit like a battered housewife. It literally costs them about $9/mo to offer you your service; and I'm guessing you're paying about $50-$70/mo (depending on your region and how much competition you have). At the very least for a 5-7x profit margin you'd think you wouldn't have data caps to worry about. I'm on Cox and I don't.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:With all respect by Nutria · · Score: 1

      It literally costs them about $9/mo to offer you your service

      For hardware and peering?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:With all respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " It literally costs them about $9/mo to offer you your service". This is why prices for broadband Internet service need to be capped at $29.99 or less, and data caps made illegal!!

    3. Re:With all respect by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Yes. For a company of that size, peering is on the order of $10 per Gbps per month or less (including amortized hardware cost for those links). With 10,000 customers aggregated per $10 per month, "peering" is probably about 1/10th of a penny per customer. Why yes, I have worked for a large ISP with millions of customers. And yes, I've seen the cost to "peer"

      I put "peer" in quotes, because "transit" is what you meant. Peering, by definition, is free (Aside from hardware), as it's a mutually beneficial agreement. Paid peering should be referred to as "transit".

    4. Re:With all respect by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Why yes, I have worked for a large ISP with millions of customers.

      Then you should know that there are more expenses in a business than just transit costs.

      because "transit" is what you meant.

      Thank you.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:With all respect by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      "Hardware and peering" sounded like the costs associated with peering (not just the port, but the edge routers), and seemed to exclude core costs and other overhead.

      But, this being Slashdot, you meant the opposite of what you said, and I'm an idiot jackass for taking you at your word.

    6. Re:With all respect by Nutria · · Score: 1

      If you did nothing but take me at my word, you wouldn't have explained the difference between peering and transit.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    7. Re: With all respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. In 2010 30Mbps on Cox was $34 after taxes, these days the cheapest you can get is 5mbps for 39.99 and taxes. For 30Mbps you have to pay 79.99 and taxes.
      Somewhere along the lines of time cox went and decided to emulate Comcast, and have done down that way fast. If prices on Cox and Comcast are the same and I have a choice I would go with Comcast for a marginally better technical setup

    8. Re:With all respect by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Your words were incorrect. I corrected them, so that I wouldn't be technically correct in my reply. If you understood, you'd have used the correct terms in the first place.

  15. Most hated ISP? by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

    Any study that does not have Windstream at the top of the list is suspect to me.

  16. fewer complaints because..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    FEWER CUSTOMERS.

    most the unhappies have left already and they aren't exactly bringing in new customers in droves.

    the market and coverage is saturated. the only way comcast brings in significant amount of new customers is if they go build out in new markets and actually ::shudder:: compete with another wireline provider and steal their customers by providing superior product and service at ::thehorror:: lower prices.

    plus, "cord cutting" happens with internet access, too, not just tv. people are doing without wireline internet just like they're doing without traditional subscription television.

    absolutely NOT because they're actually providing better service. that's funny. fucking hilarious.

    1. Re:fewer complaints because..... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Comcast offering a better product cheaper?

      What hellhole would you have to live in for this to be even possible?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:fewer complaints because..... by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      I think he's saying Comcast needs to get better and do this.

  17. Stockholm Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's still a thing, right? I'm not sure we should assume Comcast is actually improving. People are just getting complacent with Comcast's poor service.

  18. Unlikely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outrage burnout is more likely.
    Everyones been fucked by comcast for so long.
    And have complained so much for nothing... They're giving up.

    I bet their subscriber #'s are down too.

  19. Another possibility by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    People have just given up hope and have stopped calling in to complain figuring that it'll get fixed sometime. They just don't have the energy to deal with the unhelp line anymore and that's why call volumes are down.

  20. Not true 4 me! by no-body · · Score: 1

    Depending where you land @ Comcast - ornery seems to be the right term....

    I am suing in small claims court by them being totally obnoxious and their - well, probably legal staff - is cocky.
    Will see what the outcome is.

    Seems that corporations make rules right now (or since the beginning of time, just bigger and bigger now) to their advantage and the small guy/gal has to swallow and see how to deal with it.

    The automatic process is, if there is no insight on their side, they rack up your bill and then forward it to a collection agency - in this case they are using http://www.windhampros.com/ - all those nice kiddies coming up on their site and how great they are... Hope they get burnt in my case.

    Problem is that you have to be quick to file at court if Comcast does business in your county - once it's at the collection agency, far far away, forget about small claims court and deal with endless phone calls talking to people in maybe far away countries and try to cut a deal....

    A basic question is, if a large corporation can even remotely be customer-friendly? Their rule set is purely profit maximization driven and somebody pays for that.

  21. May I guess? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Complaints are down by 25% in areas where a competitor opened shop and claims they took a market share of about 30ish percent from Comcast...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:May I guess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complaints were down 25% after we reduced consumer complaint staffing by 25%, showing that we correctly predicted the reduced demand.

  22. Don't worry, a few phone can videos will help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just show a Comcast Tech dragging some grandmother out of her house, and the ratings will go right back to normal.

  23. Or... by xlsior · · Score: 1

    ...they just gave up complaining because it seemed pointless, even though they still hate it with the burning passion of a thousand suns?

  24. Re:Switching to Sonic as fast as my contract expir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've wanted to switch to Sonic for a while. However I haven't because of the terrible reviews on Yelp. Sonic used to get wonderful reviews on Yelp. But then the average ratings went down. Right now more than half (14/22) of the Yelp reviews on the first page, sorted by "Newest First", are 1-star (counting both reviews when someone sent in an updated review).

    Those bad reviews seem genuine, not negative astro-turfing.

    I hope Sonic can fix whatever the problems are. I'd like to switch to them.

  25. Less Hated? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this like saying the flaming pile of shit is no longer on fire? How about comparing themselves to someone who actually has good customer service? Like your local pizza place for example.

  26. Re:Comcast: In 2014, voted worst company in Americ by Phylter · · Score: 1

    As much as it hurts me to say this, they are improving significantly. I'm still going to leave them as soon as decent competition moves into the area. They want customers to pay money but they still don't care about customers.

  27. Thank god I have alternative options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I moved to Keene, New Hampshire last year I thought I was going to be stuck on a slow ADSL internet connection (as I'm too far from the central office for decent or faster service) or get stuck on a crappy cable internet service provider. Fortunately I did a little hunting and for a mere $3,000 (which is low- compared to the $17,000 neighbours get quoted) was able to get fiber installed. There were 3-4 other providers as well that I could have gone through. Those providers though were much more expensive on a per monthly basis running all the way up to $500 / month. Currently I pay a lot ($155 / month for a 25/25 connection), but compared to the local cable provider it's a steal. I have a friend nearby who pays $300 for 4megabits up and a bit faster down connection. For $200 on fiber I'd get 50/25. Keep in mind I do live in the middle of nowhere. We're a town of 23,000 people and a good two hours from Boston.

  28. Comparing? by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    How do you compare service when you don't have any competition? So you are better than yourself? How do you gage that? Doesn't make sense to me.

  29. Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is unacceptable to me. Comcast is my Scrooge, my bête noire, my cartoon corporate villain. They are my Dr. Evil with a soupçon of Mr. Potter from It's a Wonderful Life.

    If Comcast is getting less evil, even if only by a little, who will play the role of evil standard-bearer for me? I am bereft!!

  30. I call BS by eyegone · · Score: 1

    I categorically refuse to believe that any ISP/cable company is hated more than Frontier Communications.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:I call BS by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      I have frontier. Comcast cut our line while installing for our neighbor. Took 3 utilities to graffiti a quarter of our block, now after a week of no internet we have a temporary drop, and have to go through the whole graffiti process to get the real drop. Then someone else has to come and remove the temp drop. Should be right at 10 utility visits just becuase our neighbors (who are moving, WTF?) got cable.

      Not sure who sucks the worst in the mess, sort of like arguing about which sewer reeks less.

  31. Had to cancel by Bruinwar · · Score: 1

    Yes, we have two choices for Internet/TV/, Uverse & Comcrap. Neither are good. Comcrap raised raised our bill to $189.00 a month. That being said, they did offer extremely fast speeds, both up & down. They would not lower by bill back to an acceptable level no matter how much I tried. They didn't really think I would leave, literally saying "we would hate to lose you, but there is nothing we can do...". So I got Uverse installed. I called to disconnect Comcast & they of course offered to match the price.

    Uverse works but upload is slow & really shows up when I am working using my employer's VPN. After my 12 month agreement is done, I'll likely return to Concrap & likely get a great deal. Maybe by then will be ready to just cut the cord & get straight up Internet.

    --
    SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
  32. Re: Switching to Sonic as fast as my contract expi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yelp is a racketeer.

  33. Competition and survivor bias by jensend · · Score: 1

    Would have been interesting to look at whether improved customer satisfaction was correlated with increased local competition. I strongly suspect it is, not just because Comcast works harder to try to retain customers, but largely because the unhappiest customers leave as soon as they have an alternative. Even if actual customer service doesn't get any better, the people who remain are more satisfied on average.

    Kind of like the famous demotivator says- "sometimes the best solution to workplace morale problems is just to fire all of the unhappy people."

    When Google Fiber came to my area, Comcast sent door-to-door salespeople to try to get signups before people were committed to Google; Comcast was offering something like half its usual price. I knew it wasn't the salesperson's fault, but I couldn't help laughing in his face.

  34. Re: Switching to Sonic as fast as my contract expi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yelp is a racketeer.

    Do you mean some of those bad reviews aren't genuine, or they're not the typical experiences of all of Sonic's customers? I'd love to disregard the bad reviews if I could, because I really do want to switch to Sonic.

  35. Smell ya later Time Warner. by binarybum · · Score: 1

    I, for one, am fed up with the awful customer service at TIme Warner, but I have good news - I'm going to switch to a shiny new company called Spectrum and I'm sure everything will be better. Eat my shorts Time Warner!

    --
    ôó
  36. Hated by fewer people... of course by ayesnymous · · Score: 2

    That's what happens when you lose subscribers. Less people to hate you.

    1. Re:Hated by fewer people... of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1
      still waiting on fiber. They offered to upgrade to 300/25 at the same price, but not doing that due to contract lock-in, cancellation fee, and future price hikes.

      There's something to be said for >100Mbit upstream.

    2. Re: Hated by fewer people... of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

  37. Better explaination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People stopped complaining because they realized that it is not doing any good.

  38. Time Warner Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time Warner Cable is now Spectrum, I assume the name changed is the hide the guilty and to try to ignore the sins of the past. Actually, I excellent service from my 100 mps fiber connection. But it's too much! I only need 20-30 mps but this lowest level for $66.66/mo. They throw in free ViOP phone service which I never use. They call it a landline--please! I called the Spectrum droid from India who advised to Google "Time Warner internet phones" and it shows business phones that start for $100. He didn't even know what VoIP is! As long I never talk to these spuds, I am satisfied with the service. Not so much the price for much more than I need.

  39. Re:Comcast: In 2014, voted worst company in Americ by eam3 · · Score: 1

    Their telephone support is still abysmal at best. However, one of their customer service centers opened about 3 miles from my house and the experience is radically different - I've actually gotten pretty good service and support by going in person. AT&T ran fiber all over my neighborhood about 2 months ago. If their offer is much better than my current Comcast plan then I might consider switching to them (their customer service makes Comcast look like heaven).

  40. Surely you Jest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slime Warner is Spectrum - owned by Charter, the second most hated cable cable company.

  41. Re: Switching to Sonic as fast as my contract expi by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    Could be both, most satisfied people never fill out surveys or reviews. Companies have been known to get people to complain about competitors. Did you read the reviews to see why they're complaining, that's what I've taken to doing on every site with reviews. 5 stars "It works", means 3 stars to me. 1 star with a "It came late but works fine," is a 3 star with a shipping problem. 1 Star, "It doesn't work with my iPhone", when the description says android only is a meaningless review.

  42. Nope, still hate Comcast more than ever by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    In light of recent events I'm putting up with using Tor just to give Comcast my middle finger. If I had a viable alternative to them I'd be gone in a heartbeat.

  43. Re:Comcast: In 2014, voted worst company in Americ by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    So what does it tell you that I wish I could get Comcast, and fire Time Warner / Charter / Spectrum?

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  44. Re:Comcast: In 2014, voted worst company in Americ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tells me you haven't been Comcast's customer yet.

  45. TWC lower than Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time Warner sucks. Everyone knows it, but it cannot be as bad as Comcast.

  46. I use comcast and.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    internet is fine but although they offer a lot on their home and cable services they have been really glitchy over the last year. once my contract on the home is up I plan on seeing if I can figure out a non bundled alternative that is more stable.

  47. Stop the monopoly. by martinfb · · Score: 1

    ANY proverbial "800-pound gorilla" corporation focuses solely on the bottom line.
    There is little concern for client satisfaction, especially when there are few choices available.
    Cox is absolutely VERY bad. Comcast is not far behind.

    And, another important consideration is that I have stopped complaining because I GIVE UP!
    NOT because they have made improvements!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  48. I don't have hate for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I have great dislike for my internet bill and how I constantly have to do the retention dance to save money on my bill. I'm going to have to do it again soon cause my price goes up again. I'd rather have either one fixed price for internet or something that decreases over some time based schedule with the same caliber of service. It is insane that my rates go up for changing literally nothing about my service. Griped to a couple city council reps about it and asking why Cambridge MA doesn't have municipal fiber or at least RCN to offer some competition.

    Funny thing is I was content to get cable at $100/month because my internet speeds would have been great. Then they wanted to tack on a $10/month router fee so I could use my $10/month DVR box and another $10/month for my bedroom. And then the fuck you $10/month HD fee even though that's the standard now. Now having realized a combination how little free time I have out of grad school and what costs matter while living alone, they priced me into cheaper internet and becoming a streamer.

    It's not entirely their fault - cable service is also victim to content providers - but that makes the point all that more clearer. Comcast might be better served just becoming an internet only company and focused on delivering a fast, dumb pipe. Then tell content providers they can figure out how to shovel their own shit to people. I'd bet a lot of the streaming options popping up would quickly die off as people can really start to drive the value of content. Maybe we'll even see less of it.

  49. A 25% improvement.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if Comcast warranted it, would mean that they are only hated with the intensity of 750 suns. They recently just demanded a 60% price hike just to remove the totally arbitrary usage cap that they chose to impose. And with the latest boondoggle that they and other ISPs have pushed for in Congress, I now have to pay extra money again just to keep my Internet usage private. Fuck theses guys. The only thing that limits the negative things that I have to say about them is that I am absolutely stuck using them with no effective competition just because I where I live, and with California's prop 13 and real estate commissions, it would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to move to get another ISP's service.