Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: Which Wireless Carrier Do You Prefer?

Earlier this year, telecommunications giants like T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon and Sprint were battling to see who could release the best unlimited data plan(s). T-Mobile started the domino chain reaction with the launch of its "One" unlimited plan in August. But the competition became especially fierce in February when Verizon introduced unlimited data plans of their own, causing Sprint and AT&T to unveil new unlimited data plans that same week, both of which have their own restrictions and pricing. Each of the four major carriers have since continued to tweak their plans to ultimately undercut their competitors and retain as many customers are possible.

Given how almost everyone has a smartphone these days and the thirst for data has never been higher, we'd like to ask you about your current wireless carrier and plan. Which wireless carrier and plan do you have any why? Is there any one carrier or unlimited data plan that stands out from the others? T-Mobile, for example, recently announced that it added 1.1 million customers in Q1 2017, which means that it has added more than 1 million customers every quarter for the past four years. Have they managed to earn your business? MyRatePlan has a good breakdown of the current unlimited data plans on the market today.

208 comments

  1. AT&T by slasher999 · · Score: 4, Informative

    AT&T customer here for several years. Evaluated all of the main carriers and a few mvno plays last year, including a trial with T-Mobile who came the closest in service quality. Ended up staying with AT&T.

    1. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon is reliable robust solution, but there are better values now such as att

    2. Re: AT&T by chipschap · · Score: 3, Informative

      I went from Verizon to T-Mobile to Google Fi, which suits me well as a very low-end mobile data user (typically 500MB per month mobile and 25GB wifi). It would be a terrible choice for heavy mobile data users, though, as data is strictly pay as you go (a cent per megabyte). And what I do like is that they don't pack in every conceivable fee like some of the others. $20 per month, about $5 for data, and $5 in taxes and fees.

    3. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AT&T and Verizon tend to flipflop in terms of which has better price offerings and which has bigger asshole policies and shitty customer service.
      Coverage / signal reliability varies by specific location. Bandwidth during peak times also varies, load increases then they up backhaul bandwith and it gets better for a while.

      So for me, Verizon is currently better where I am. Two years ago it was AT&T, and in a year they'll probably be better again.

      But both of them still piss me off all the time. Better isn't usually the same as Good in this game.

    4. Re:AT&T by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm AT&T mostly because I inherited it from a work account. It did have the best voice coverage of anything else in the state. I don't care about data plans though, so I bought the minimum allowed for smart phones, which I think is ridiculous (they should allow no dataplan if that's the customer choice, otherwise it's just another expensive tacked-on fee).

    5. Re: AT&T by WaywardGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Full disclosure: I work for Google. Regardless, Google Fi is a no-brainer, IMO. My wife and daughter do not agree, and have iPhones with Verison. We pay about $160/mo combined for their plans, while my son and I get by with typically $40/mo combined. My son and I have at least as good service as Verizon, because of the switching between Sprint and T-Mobile.

      My daughter had to have an iPhone, and not an Android device, because her friends hang out on iMessage. Her Android messages were shown in the wrong color on iMessage, which offended some teens to the point of excluding her from conversations. So... I pay a $60/month premium so she can be the right color. Evil!

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    6. Re: AT&T by schnell · · Score: 5, Informative

      Coverage / signal reliability varies by specific location. Bandwidth during peak times also varies, load increases then they up backhaul bandwith and it gets better for a while.

      Full disclosure: I work for one of the four big carriers. But this isn't a commercial for my unnamed employer, it's just a description of why they are different.

      There is a fundamental strategy difference between AT&T/Verizon and Sprint/T-Mobile. The key, of course, is money. And as a customer, you do get what you pay for.

      Did you know that in the US, almost 70% of the population lives in 3% of the landmass? (That sounds shocking until you think about Alaska, Montana, West Texas, Nevada and Wyoming.) It doesn't take (comparatively) that many towers to cover the 70%. But it takes a disproportionately higher number more to cover the next 10% of the population. And the next 10% after that take almost half again the number of towers. The expense gets higher and higher as you try to reach 99% of the population (which is contained in roughly 70% of the land area of the US).

      If you have the money to buy the spectrum and build the towers, you can choose to cover as many people as possible (and the side benefit is that you provide better coverage for people who travel a lot, especially to rural areas). If you have the money, you can also spend the billions on spectrum needed for the capacity to support users in dense areas and the backhaul to go with it. AT&T and Verizon, because they have the big subscriber/revenue bases and the cost advantages of legacy ILEC backhaul facilities in collectively more than half the states, choose that path. But it all costs money to do that, and you as a consumer pay more for the coverage quality.

      Sprint and T-Mobile don't have the big piles of money or the huge subscriber bases. The good news for them: like I said, it costs a lot less money in tower building to cover 70% of the US population, and if you have fewer subscribers then you don't have to shell out as much on spectrum and backhaul. They have chosen (probably wisely, given their bank accounts) to go for the low hanging fruit, which costs less money and they can price their service more aggressively because they aren't trying to spend the money to cover everybody. So their strategy works well for most people, although if it works TOO well, then they have to start shelling out money that they don't have for more spectrum. (Sprint already has more spectrum than they know what to do with, but most of it is high-band ex-Clearwire WiMax spectrum that is almost useless in dense urban areas with lots of buildings to penetrate.)

      So the bottom line is:

      • Live in an urban area and spend most of your time there? T-Mobile or Sprint are likely to meet your needs.
      • Live in a suburban/rural area, travel much and/or want to make sure you've got connectivity wherever you go? Verizon or AT&T are probably a better choice.
      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    7. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the same boat, left VZW after years and went to Fi. Service has been great, love watching it hop from network to network when I travel (just some geeky fun) but agreed, heavy data users need not apply.

    8. Re: AT&T by Glarimore · · Score: 1

      Her Android messages were shown in the wrong color on iMessage, which offended some teens to the point of excluding her from conversations. So... I pay a $60/month premium so she can be the right color. Evil!

      Stupid of Apple to do that (pointing out the "other"), but I can't believe you caved. Granted, I don't have a daughter (or children), so maybe I'll understand better when and if I get there.

    9. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My teenage daughters have Windows Phones. They've played with their friends' iPhone's and originally had Android, but they now prefer W10 Mobile (currently 735 since VZW is the only reliable service in our area).

      I originally used WP specifically due to lack of apps to minimize the impact of social nonsense. IMO, they are more mature and outgoing than their peers.

      RRK

    10. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Full disclosure: I work for Google

      Sorry to hear that.

    11. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to add we currently use Tracfone at ~$15/mo each with 90 day plans. I like the rollover. Wish it had unlimited text option.

      Looking into the Walmart Total Wireless family plan (which is TracFone/VZW), but no rollover.

      RRK

    12. Re: AT&T by swillden · · Score: 1

      Live in a suburban/rural area, travel much and/or want to make sure you've got connectivity wherever you go? Verizon or AT&T are probably a better choice.

      I live in a rural area, travel quite a bit (domestically and internationally), and need connectivity wherever I go, and I find Project Fi works better for me than Verizon (haven't tried AT&T). The combination of T-Mobile and Sprint's networks gives me roughly equal coverage to Verizon in the US (there are places I can't get coverage with my Verizon SIM and places I can't get coverage with my Fi SIM, in about equal proportions), and Fi's international coverage is great.

      Disclosure: I work for Google (on Android), but that has nothing to do with my use of Fi, other than the fact that I always have a Nexus/Pixel, so I don't have to switch phones to switch carriers.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re: AT&T by ausekilis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If teenagers were offended by the color of a text message, maybe your daughter shouldn't be considering them friends. Anybody that petty doesn't deserve the attention.

    14. Re: AT&T by nine-times · · Score: 2

      To offer a mild defense of Apple, there's a reason they make messages a different color if you're using a non-Apple phone:

      Their iMessage app debuted at a time when carriers generally still charged for SMS messages. If a blue message came in, it meant that it was going over iMessage, which meant that it was a free message. If it was green, it was SMS, and therefore it would be charged as an SMS message according to your carrier's plan. You definitely wanted to have a way to know the difference.

      It's less important now that carriers are generally offering unlimited SMS messages, so you could argue that they could drop the distinction. However, there still may be places or situations where people are charged for SMS, even if only when doing international texting, so it's not completely meaningless. Also, iMessage still provides some different features, such as providing read-receipts (if you allow that) and being encrypted, so someone might care about knowing which messages are going over which service.

    15. Re: AT&T by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2

      Teenagers, boys or girls, aren't the most rational creatures. Convincing his daughter she needs new friends is probably as impossible as convincing her existing friends that excluding someone for using Android is absurd.

      I'm having the same problem with my own teenage kids. We live in a moderately wealthy area, and more than half their classmates have iPhones. My kids are excluded from a lot of the social activity due to their Android devices. One is tolerating it well, the other isn't. No matter how much he hears weird old dad claim that having a recent i-whatever to communicate with the cool kids is pointless and feeds into the Apple advertising machine, he doesn't believe it.

    16. Re: AT&T by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      I use Ting ( ting.com ), which is similar to Google Fi in that it uses the Sprint and T-Mobile networks. Differences:

      1. Each Ting device uses T-Mobile or Sprint exclusively. We have three Ting phones, two are always on the T-Mobile network and one is always on the Sprint network.
      2. Project Fi is $20 per device plus $0.01 per MB in data, that's the whole pay-for-what-you-use. Ting is $6 per device plus pay-for-what-you-use, but they charge separately for minutes, texts, and mobile data. With our three Ting phones, the monthly bill is between $55 and $75. So even with a thousand or so texts and a few GB of mobile data, it's still very slightly cheaper than Project Fi.
      3. Ting supports iPhones and a reasonable selection of Android phones, including Nexus, Samsung Galaxy, etc.. Project Fi is limited to recent Nexus phones and Pixel phones.

      I'm not a representative of the company, just a customer thrilled to have such transparent billing. I may switch to Project Fi with my next phone anyway, I haven't decided yet. I plan to only get Google Android devices in the future since all of the other vendors are so awful about providing security updates. But as chipschap said, this kind of service only makes sense if your mobile data usage is low.

    17. Re: AT&T by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I have to raise an eyebrow about your comments. Granted, I'm not out in the middle of nowhere, but I live in North GA and can drive all the way to Orlando, FL and not lose service, although it may not be as strong in some places, it's still there. On the other hand, there's a control room at work, buried deep in the middle of the building, and if the door to the room is closed, I get nothing. If the door is open, I get enough to get the occasional text message. I have to go to my office to make a call. I have T-Mobile, and had the same problem when I had Virgin (Sprint network). On the upside, I've traveled to Canada, and my son to Germany, and our phones "just worked." So I can't attest to network performance for where anyone may live, nor customer service (haven't needed it, which is the best service, IMO), but if you travel internationally, T-Mobile can be very handy to have. I pay $160/month for my family of four. I was paying the same at Virgin, but for prepaid without as many minutes and much less total bandwidth.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    18. Re: AT&T by hogger · · Score: 1

      I'm in a very similar situation. My son and I are perfectly happy with Google Fi with our Nexus 5x phones. My daughter wanted an iphone, wife needed better coverage (she spends a lot of time in areas that are only served by AT&T). I bought my daughter a $150 iPhone 5C at Walmart, wife a $150 Asus phone on Amazon, and they're both on Walmart Straight Talk with bills at around $45 each per month. Not quite a cheap as Google Fi, but they've got what they want.

    19. Re: AT&T by iamgnat · · Score: 1

      Another Fi user here.

      Was on a grandfathered iPhone unlimited plan from the iPhone 3G days paying about $70/month.

      Finally sick of Apple (and with the new iPhone 7 work just gave me I'm ecstatic I dropped that crap for my personal phone!) I switched to the Nexus 6p just before the Pixel came out. After a month to decide I was happy with the phone I dropped AT&T and am now paying less that $30/month.

      The auto switching and utilizing vetted WiFi has cut my data usage significantly. That they actually credit you back for unused data is the part I find most refreshing. Imagine that, NOT paying for something you don't use.

      My only complaint with Fi is that I'm restricted to Google's phones and while I really like the Nexus, I'm not a fan of the iPhone path they appear to be following for the Pixel.

    20. Re: AT&T by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Fewer dead spots along I-70 through the Colorado Rockies with AT&T than Vzn.

    21. Re: AT&T by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...until you think about Alaska, Montana, West Texas, Nevada and Wyoming

      So don't think about Utah (highest porn consumption in the nation) or New Mexico (legal bestiality)? ;)

    22. Re: AT&T by futuresheep · · Score: 1

      Travel much? Unless you're traveling to some FAR rural area in the U.S. you want T-Mobile. The international access you get as part of your account is simply amazing. I've been in a dozen countries across Europe, Asia, and Central and South America over the last 18 months and have had free data and text as soon as my plane touched down in each country. Coworkers on Verizon and AT&T are stuck buying expensive supplementary data plans.

    23. Re: AT&T by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      I just went to Ting after RingPlus bit the dust. It pains me to have fewer minutes and data, and pay around $60 a month for 3 phones when I was paying $30 a month for 3 phones before. Oh well.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    24. Re:AT&T by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1

      I was an AT&T customer ever since they bought Cingular, including buying the iPhone 1 (iPhone 0? iPhoneC for "classic"?). Even with a heavy corp discount, T-Mo was still a better deal than AT&T. I switched over and had the worst time unlocking my phone. It took almost 2 weeks, several lengthy calls to customer service, and several escalations in tech support (I wondered how much longer it would be until they connected me to the CTO or CIO!). It was their fuck up, 100%. As if the pricing weren't incentive enough, my experience with tech support pretty much sealed the deal. I don't know the details of the plans right now, but when I was switching T-Mo was including HotSpot capabilities and unlimited international calls/SMS/data, which would've cost extra at AT&T.

      Disclosure: I'm in an area where coverage and speeds are very similar. The small differences are definitely not enough to offset pricing advantages.

    25. Re: AT&T by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      iMessages are "secure" while texts are not. I set my phone to not auto send over text if an iMessage can't get through.

    26. Re: AT&T by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I like the colors. My wife and I use Ting for our wireless carrier and are charged in buckets. Knowing that the person I'm texting is also using iMessage means I can make shorter texts and not care. Though, perhaps ironically, we both generally use Facebook for messaging between each other anyway and have never left the first bucket on Ting (100 messages).

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    27. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlocked iPhones work on Google FI. I've been using a 5s on it for a year now.

    28. Re: AT&T by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      " $60 a month for 3 phones when I was paying $30 a month for 3 phones before." well, honestly, that's probably a major reason they went bust...

    29. Re: AT&T by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      " I'm not a fan of the iPhone path they appear to be following for the Pixel." that may be, but at least the Pixel still has a headphone jack!

    30. Re: AT&T by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Historically, T-mobile has been stuck with higher bands that don't penetrate buildings well. They are trying to buy lower band spectrum.

    31. Re: AT&T by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      iMessage had a few advantages over SMS when it first came out - carriers charged per text message and you didn't get charged for iMessages since they used data and it works over WiFi when you couldn't get a cell signal. So you needed some type of way to know whether you were sending an iMessage vs SMS.

      At least in the U.S. those are mostly moot points now. Most plans have unlimited SMS and most carriers support WiFi calling.

    32. Re: AT&T by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Lots of phones appear to work on Project-Fi, but they likely aren't fully compatible.
      They may not switch to WiFi when the cell signal is poor, or switch between mobile carrier signals, as well text-messages can have odd (longer-than-the-message) hash-sum-like values appended to them -- for no apparent reason.

    33. Re: AT&T by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I have a currently unused Lumia 550, and am thinking of going Tracfone w/ that once the downpayments on my Android phone ends - which is next month. I'll move the number, and then drop that line from Verizon's end. I would have stayed w/ Verizon had they allowed me to

      - bring in my own old unused phones into the network;

      - supported Microsoft's latest Windows 10 phones, namely the Lumias 550/640/950. Only reason I had the Android was the apps, but I've lost the reason to need most of them

    34. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full disclosure: I work for Google.

      Oh so you are a Peeping Tom.

    35. Re: AT&T by chipschap · · Score: 1

      And the Pixel is easy to root (thank you Chainfire!), and although that prevents OTA updates, it's still easy enough to get updates from the Google site.

  2. Keeping the subject matter relevant to geeks by redmid17 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not as if there is a website that does yearly reviews of things like this: http://www.consumerreports.org...

    1. Re:Keeping the subject matter relevant to geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They all suck.

    2. Re:Keeping the subject matter relevant to geeks by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      None of them have coverage where I live.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  3. Cricket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 phones for $100/month total. It's unlimited data but slower, and they piggyback on AT&T so coverage is good.

    1. Re:Cricket... by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Cricket here too - 3 lines with 5GB LTE data + unlimited 128kbps after that for $90. The kids burn through their data but I'm fine with it. Coverage has been good and the slower speeds are also fine for everything I do.

  4. Tmobile claimed to have service here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it worked great for two days. 100MB down +. after two weeks of waiting, they tell us we might not have the right carrier. had to get with verizon or att... got 5 together on verizon and it's still almost $50/month/line

  5. No data, pay as you go only. by Tyr07 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have wifi in enough places if I actually need data, and otherwise I'm out and about, and don't need it.

    I refuse to deal with contracts, locking me into shitty deals when better ones come out, their prices are over the top for data as is, always has been.

    They keep trying to add more value but take more dollars while as employers they keep trying to add more value but not pay more. People are trying to minimize the money you get constantly while trying to maximize what they take from you.

    Their only luck when it comes to me is that in todays day and age everyone has to have a phone, and a landline is just as expensive (as intended).

    1. Re:No data, pay as you go only. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      This... after I looked at my actually usage I switched to USmobile for 12$ a month, 250mb is plenty for me.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:No data, pay as you go only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always buy my phones out right now, and do something similar. In the UK, we have giffgaff which don't lock you in. You buy a 'goodybag' which contain a set number of texts, minutes and data which lasts for a month. Anything you don't use you loose, but then that's the same as a normal contract, it's just worded differently. You can then choose what you want to do next month without any notice. Buy smaller, buy bigger, not buy at all. You can buy credit and effectively it's just pay as you go, any SMS, etc, just comes off your credit.

      Bought a Nexus 5 back in March 2014 for £240, set a monthly reoccurring £7.50 bag. Nexus 5 is finally showing its age, and bought an LG G5 last month for £350 while the price is lower before the G6 comes out. (£350 is still an outrageous price for a phone, but better than £600!) Still using the £7.50 goodybag. They've increased the threshold over the years I've had it, but you currently get unlimited texts, 250 minutes and 750MB which I think is reasonable.

      This probably sounds like I'm a giffgaff employee, but I can only say I'm not without any proof. They appear to be one of these rarer companies these days which actually respect their customers and not milk them for every last penny. I cannot recommend them enough. Before I switched, I had a HTC Sensation XE on Orange (now EE), with the phone being 'free' as part of the contract. Phoned up to cancel, had to give 30 days notice despite being out of my 24 term contract. Still getting charged the next month, phoned up again, to which apparently there was no record of my notice to cancel. C***s.

    3. Re:No data, pay as you go only. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      People are trying to minimize the money you get constantly while trying to maximize what they take from you.

      Don't take the money from yourself. I pay $36-something for 4G Verizon MVNO / 5GB through Walmart and the ability to access data on the road saves me more than $36 a month (Gas Buddy, kids-eat-free deals, GPS navigation, Prime audio books, etc.). It would harm me economically to get a cheaper plan.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:No data, pay as you go only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Google's Project Fi is an excellent solution if you take this approach, and very good for international calling as well. Here is a first-hand review.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. TracPhone: $7/month. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TracPhone. $7 per month, everything included. Smartphone was under $100.

    I figure I can take the money I would pay Verizon, $80+ a month, and, at the end of the year, have $960+, and buy myself a nice really high end laptop. That's a new laptop *every* year!

    Y'all ever heard of "rent-seeking" behavior?

    1. Re: TracPhone: $7/month. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh rly? Which plan is that? The Pinocchio plan?

  8. Project Fi by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use Google Project Fi. Just because.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Project Fi by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same here, no regrets.

      I get coverage from T-Mobile, Sprint, and U.S. Cellular, so you really have to be in the middle of bum fuck nowhere to not have anything.

      The only downside would be to people who are heavy mobile data users, as it is strictly pay for what you use on data. With WIFI being everywhere I only use a small amount of mobile data these days, so paying ~$24-25/ month for phone + data is pretty sweet, especially after years and years with VZW and USC.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    2. Re:Project Fi by Kevoco · · Score: 1

      Shout out to Project Fi and Republic Wireless
      I'm on Project Fi and my kids are on Republic Wireless

    3. Re:Project Fi by binarybum · · Score: 2

      Hey, have you ever even been to Bum Fuck, Nowhere you insensitive clod?
            Project Fi works fine here, especially in our city center (central Bum Fuck). Perhaps you were on the very outskirts of Bum Fuck, or maybe in our sister city Western Bumble Fuck, Nowhere when you had reception issues.
           

      --
      ôó
    4. Re:Project Fi by HEMI426 · · Score: 1

      Project Fi is working very well for my wife and me. Bills are lower than they've ever been since we got smartphones, plus the coverage is outstanding around here.

    5. Re:Project Fi by Peter+Allan · · Score: 1

      +1 No gotchas. I travel internationally, and everywhere it just works. Bills for international data, used heavily for navigation, and information, but not video streaming, are never more than $5.

      Was on a ship passing Morocco, and got a message to say "no service here yet" but Europe and Caribbean are no problem. My wife has corporate Verizon with international options enabled, but she invariably borrows my phone for calls and hops on my (free) hot-spot. With hotel or other wifi, you can call (or Skype) for free. It's close to free anyway if you're not a chatter.

  9. Prefer???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you mean "prefer"? They're all filth!!

  10. Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to go with Verizon. I live out in the middle of nowhere, Montana, and Verizon coverage is the best out here.

    1. Re:Verizon by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      +1. Zion National, Denali, etc. and yes, we needed superior service for medical reasons.

    2. Re:Verizon by mtmiller100 · · Score: 1

      I live in suburban Charlotte, but in a heavily wooded neighborhood. Verizon is the only provider to have 4G service at my house, despite each carrier having a tower very near by. Somehow Verizon's signal gets through the trees (only 2 bars), where the other carriers just don't.

    3. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically this, Verizon is the gold standard pretty much in terms of quality of service but their prices are unfortunately quite high. If you can afford it, its very much worth it.

    4. Re:Verizon by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      I have to go with Verizon too. They have a tower on my property. I get good reception.

    5. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $279 a month is insane for high speed internet.

    6. Re: Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great analogy. I'm sure vdub considered that aspect when they decided to block the S8 Amazon feature. They want you to pay top dollar so they control how you use your service. Way to help them male the world a better place.

    7. Re:Verizon by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      And speaking of "what can you afford", I've found that with my phone on Verizon and my wife's on AT&T (she's still on her parents' plan after fifteen years of marriage), one of us will have service almost anywhere. If you can split the big two carriers, you can vastly improve your service availability. The new Verizon "unlimited" plans are well above my usage level, and treat Canada, USA, and Mexico as one big no-roaming zone for call and text (though they do throttle you after 500 MB/day data in CA/MX).

    8. Re:Verizon by garcia · · Score: 1

      I take trips with my buddies each year where we fly to a big airport and drive around 1500-2000 miles round trip from there into rural areas on back roads.

      We are a great cross-section of providers with Tmo, ATT, Sprint and VZW. I was the only one with service for the entire trip the last two times (NE states and NW states). ATT was next best. Sprint was the worst and Tmo was next.

      My family takes a ~3000 mile road trip every summer. I've only been out of service once or twice in 7 years and those were in rural areas of Alabama or Oklahoma (IIRC).

      I wouldn't give up VZW for anything.

    9. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my main reason for sticking with Verizon, they have the best coverage in the area. T-Mobile has been expanding and has moved in to number 2 for coverage, AT&T covers the nearest town but if you are anywhere beyond the outskirts of town (I live a few miles out of town) the coverage drops. Sprint coverage is even less than AT&T.

      The $40 prepaid plan on Verizon is sufficient for me - I rarely hit the data limit (2GB LTE, + previous month carryover & unlimited at 128k), have access to wifi in my most frequently used areas (home/work). I do wish the carryover would let you bank more than just the prior month more like T-Mobile's 12 month, but what good is the data if you have no coverage?

    10. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a T-mobile plan with unlimited text, talk and data for 5 phones and 2 tablets for $250 and that includes some equipment payments.

      Paying $280 for service for just two phones even if it includes the equipment is obscene.

    11. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well LA DE DA to you!!!!!!!!

  11. Ting by msk · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Ting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot referral link.

    2. Re:Ting by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Unlimited data is for people who just like giving away money.

    3. Re:Ting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ting is a ripoff. 200 minutes, 200 texts, and you're already around $20/month BEFORE TAXES/FEES. Add on a gig of data, you're at $36! With taxes/fees, $40+. You can get unlimited talk and text for $40 flat with 5GB or more of high speed data and unlimited throttled after that at a number of other carriers.

      And in a low-usage situation? Like under 100 minutes/texts? You're still paying like $18/mo when you could get that using US Mobile for about $7. Ting tries to be fair, and I get that it might work under some multi-line setups where one person uses very little and another has moderate usage, but it's really smoke and mirrors. They were good when they first came out but literally ANYONE is now a better deal than Ting.

    4. Re:Ting by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      They were good when they first came out but literally ANYONE is now a better deal than Ting.

      You've literally named one thing that appears to be better than ting in terms of price. AT&T is still a massive ripoff compared to Ting, I assume verizon and t mobile are too. Google fi isn't a clear winner over Ting in my experience either.

    5. Re:Ting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TPO is better. Less than $12 for 250MB data and 1000 calls 1000 txt.

    6. Re:Ting by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      My next Mintsim renewal for 2GB/month is $160 for the year. The standard price for 2GB/month LTE, unlimited voice, unlimited text is $199/year + 3% taxes ($205). For 5GB it's $299/year +3%; 10GB is $399/year +3%.

      What's Ting? $6/month for the line, plus $3 for any voice at all, plus $3 for text, plus another $5 for data, plus $7 in taxes, plus any usage? That's like $24/month minimum; if you're eating more than 100 messages and more than 500MB data, you're already around $38/month. I'm paying $17/month.

      Sounds like you're getting soaked.

    7. Re:Ting by Kagato · · Score: 1

      Add a phone for $6. When I had Ting I had two smartphones. As low data users we were running about $45/mo after taxes and fees. We eventually moved to Project Fi for international service, but we're paying about the same as we did on Ting.

    8. Re:Ting by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      +1. Ting with 2 lines, $30-50 per month with moderate data usage, so $15-25 per line. Not the best coverage ever though, especially when traveling across the US.

  12. Recently switched from AT&T legacy iPhone plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to an AT&T GoPhone (pre-paid) plan. $43.50 / mo. (auto-charged) gets 6 GB at LTE speed, and most, if not all, of the unused data rolls over into the following month's LTE allotment.

  13. t-mo.co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. Verizon by stevez67 · · Score: 1

    4 smartphones and a Samsung LTE tablet, unlimited data plan, heavy data users, $279/mo includes payments for a Pixel phone and a Droid high end phone (we own the iPhone 6+ and 6S). Always have good coverage, good calls, no drops, fast data, no complaints. We've been with Verizon since our first cell phones. We're always open to offers, but so far no one has beat VZ on quality. Price maybe, but connections, stability, speed and quality count for a lot. Cheap service isn't a value if you can't use it.

  15. Ting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just left AT&T. Two iPhones with fake-unlimited data and texting ran me $130 a month. Now I pay as I go on Ting, and it's $40 a month (for both phones) and the same data volume as AT&T before they throttled it into oblivion. (about 2G) Savings will cover cost of new phones in a little over a year. Best part was Ting is online, and I didn't have to leave my house or talk to a droid at the AT&T store!

  16. I'm happy with Sprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No complaints. Works great in my area, and free data when I'm in Canada.

  17. Verizon by mtmiller100 · · Score: 2

    Over the years, I've been with T-Mobile, AT&T, and lastly, Verizon, whom I've been with for 10 years. All three of them excelled at charging an arm and a leg, and were never shy about letting me know all the new ways I can go into debt with them (I politely declined all of these "wonderful" opportunities)... but Verizon, despite costing the most by a hair, had the best coverage and reliability. I've been letting them pound me in the rear end, sans lube, for 10 years, and unless I move, I see this relationship continuing.

  18. This question is very subjective... by sudden.zero · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...it really depends on so many variables that there is no accurate answer. For example I am currently a T-Mobile customer, and have been for several years. Their service, for me, was very good until about four years ago. Then about four years ago my usage, and coverage area changed. I used to use my service mainly in major metropolitan areas, and T-Mobile is great in those types of areas. However, the minute you are anywhere out of the ordinary T-Mobile's service goes down the toilet. Four years ago a couple of things changed for me: My parents retired, and became part owners of a resort. I also bought a boat around the same time. These details are important because whenever I am on my boat or at the resort I have no service. This brings me to my next point which is anytime I see someone using their phone at the resort or on the water I ask them what carrier they use. The answer is almost always Verizon, and if it is not it's AT&T. Not a single person has ever answered that question with T-Mobile or Sprint. Nor has anyone ever said Cricket, Boost, Freedom Pop, etc. Just my opinion whatever that's worth.

  19. been on AT&T for almost 10 years now by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

    They're not the best but i don't care. i have a 6 line account where my mom and in-laws pitch in for their part. $270 a month including all taxes and paying installments on two iphones.

    just switched to unlimited and I get HBO included along with a $25 discount on Direct TV now which is great since my internet is only $45. $25 a month for TV i was watching the NBA playoffs yesterday and will be watching the Yankees this summer and the NFL this fall. Another $10 a month and I'll get college football

  20. T-mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T-mobile One - gives me so many extras that I use all the time including free low speed data in 140 countries, taxes included, double the low speed in the 140 countries at no extra cost, free texting in those same countries, kickback promotion when any line uses less than 2gig for the month, free Gogo texting on domestic flights, free one hour of Gogo wifi per flight, never a price increase, promotion of a free additional line (forever), free wifi router, wifi calling, free gifts each Tuesday, massively improved network and data speeds

  21. Straight Talk (at&t) by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Been using straight talk for around 4 years. Never had an issue. I use the "at&t" tower frequencies, since at&t has better coverage in my area. 5GB data, which I never go over, unlimited talk/text, just under $50.00/month.

  22. dunno by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    I had ATT for years and generally no issues with them in my area, my wife has used various services on the sprint network and is now with sprint, and it mostly seems ok

    my current phone is on Verizon, and wow for as much crap they talk, at least in my area, it sucks donkey ass, its constantly at 3g or lower, often with no mobile data, and it drops at a gnats fart, not impressed for as much as it would be costing me.... now to be fair its mostly fine when I travel to other large area's, but I don't do that but a handful of times a year

    So while being smack dead center in their blood red map, it is by far the worst service I have ever had... and I had cellphone's since the brick with a rubber ducky antenna Motorola's on gaping wide gaps in analog coverage, and its less reliable than that

  23. Especially when by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You travel overseas. AT&T makes this very simple and has deals with local phone companies in ever country I, and people I know, have traveled. It took all of 2 minutes to enable, and while perhaps a few bucks more than some of the other methods required nothing extra. No hardware swapping, no hassle.

    Prices have come down recently, which made me happy. Price was my only knock against AT&T, and I have been a customer since the iPhone 3 which had no choice but AT&T.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Especially when by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      If you can be careful with your calling when overseas, T-Mobile has a great offering: data (slow, but usable) is free. SMS is free. Calls cost money, but not too much and, if you use WiFi calling, calls become free.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Especially when by quetwo · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile has had this for years as well. Their current plan actually offers /free/ roaming to most countries. I travel to Canada and Mexico on a regular basis, and voice and data at LTE speeds are included in the base package for free. In Europe, roaming is also free, but not always high speed.

    3. Re:Especially when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overseas roaming has never been a problem with any network, really, except when the US still had their own different system that wasn't compatible with rest-of-the-world phones. Even that is now gone for years.

    4. Re:Especially when by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yes, this... and when my son traveled to Germany we were able to talk to him at no extra cost.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    5. Re:Especially when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex AT&T, current T-Mobile.

      I got sick of being nickel and dimed by AT&T so voted with my wallet. My $70 AT&T bill would always find a way to get up to 3 digits. The final straw was when they started counting iPhone OS updates on my data limits and gleefully charging this against my data usage on a regular basis. Got sick of paying triple figures every month when my plan was $70.

      Now with my $68 T-Mobile plan I get included in the price:
      - Unlimited Overseas data (3G only but that's good enough for me, if I need more than that I'll find somewhere with wifi).
      - Unlimited Overseas texts (including texting while you are overseas),
      - Unlimited Tethering (at 3G speeds) which is fine for me too.
      - Unlimited data. I watch a lot of video on my phone - perhaps as much as 40G+ / month
      - Unlimited minutes (US).
      - The guarantee that my plan will never exceed $68 unless I CALL an overseas number (which I never do).

      Now for the bad:
      - The coverage is not as good as AT&T - especially when driving highways between cities. Thankfully spotify will buffer like 30-40 minutes in advance usually and with spotify premium I have plenty of music downloaded to my phone anyway. Sometimes an issue if I haven't loaded in my GPS destinations beforehand, but easily solved by waiting until you pass through a town and get coverage again).
      - Network speeds do seem slower but that could be due to the worse coverage.

      I'm happy with the worse coverage/service because I know that each month my bill will be exactly the value I'm expecting it to be, and not a dollar more. If coverage is more important to you than price, then go with AT&T (provided you don't mind calling them to argue over the bill).

  24. Situationally dependent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It all depends on what exactly you need from your provider. My own personal preference is for Verizon because our family travels heavily within the continental United States and requires fast data at all times. Sure Verizon provides this better than most carriers, but good lord is it expensive. We pay around $300 usd a month right now for 6 smartphones and unlimited data.

  25. Verizon by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    Verizon has the best coverage here.

    Att is very close in coverage and is faster in town.

    T-mobile has great speeds nearly everywhere you can get a signal but there are still too many places that I can't.

    Sprint suprisingly has fairly good coverage here but their speeds are terrible everywhere 8Mbps tops.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  26. I hate them all by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Cricket/AT&T kept jacking up my rates. T-Mobile neglected to mention the "Regulatory Compliance Fees" that added $15/mo to my bill (and made them look like taxes when they're not, and no, they're not the fees for giving poor folks phone access, those have a separate line item). Verizon's expensive as hell and has overage fees like crazy (yeah, unlimited right now, but as soon as the pressure's off they'll start cancelling those plans). The little guys who resell for the big 3 have lousy coverage because they're deprioritized on the network.

    Cellular is a God damned natural resource (Radio Waves) and we gave it away to businesses and let them rape us in the name of the "Free Market". A modest profit is one thing but this is nuts.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I hate them all by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Cellular is a God damned natural resource (Radio Waves) and we gave it away to businesses

      They may have ben given away in the beginning, but since 1994, spectrum licenses have been auctioned

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:I hate them all by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Cellular takes up space. You can't have similar-frequency radio waves in the same space. It's the same thing as giving buildings or pools (water) to businesses.

    3. Re:I hate them all by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile neglected to mention the "Regulatory Compliance Fees" that added $15/mo to my bill (and made them look like taxes when they're not, and no, they're not the fees for giving poor folks phone access, those have a separate line item)

      That's pretty much true of all cellular companies, I've never come across one until recently that doesn't outright lie about their prices, omitting stuff like the universal service fee that's actually a cost of doing business. They lobby quite extensively to the FCC to get the FCC to agree they should be able to lie about their prices in their ads by omitting various costs-of-doing-business and adding them to bills as mandatory add-ons.

      The one carrier that doesn't? Well... actually it's T-Mobile. No, not accusing you of lying, you were right up until a few months ago, it's just they've finally started to be honest about it with their T-Mobile One plan, where the prices quoted are all-inclusive.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  27. Google Fi by vanyel · · Score: 1

    Most of the time *I'm* the wireless carrier, and it saved so much money over what I was paying Sprint, it paid for the phone in 4 months (for the Nexus 5X).

    1. Re:Google Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second Google Fi. Only reason it's not my exclusive cellular plan is travel to a couple of remote regions that do not have any coverage from Sprint, TMo, or US Cellular.

      I keep hoping they'll license some Verizon backhaul then they'd truly be good to go.

      It's $20 for the first line, $15 for additional lines, unlimited calling and texting you just pay $10 per gig of data. My bill if I use zero data for two lines is $45.

      The gimmick is the phones seamlessly flow from the strongest signal tower of the three carriers above as needed, and leverage wifi for calling and data whenever available to the fullest extent. When combined with something like a comcast or at&t account you can keep your data usage to a minimum.

      It's also unfortunate that it only works with Google Nexus 5x, 6, 6P and Pixel phones.
      g=

  28. Silly question by denbesten · · Score: 1
    Unless your usage patterns are the same as mine (and you live/work in my neighborhoods), my experience really will not help you. Between the provider coverage maps and comparing my usage against their restrictions, my choice was obvious.

    I am fortunate that my phone will show me monthly usage (Settings >> Wireless & Networks >> Data Usage) so I can quickly understand which restrictions are irrelevant to me. And, yes, headroom/carryover are parts of that equation.

  29. None of the above. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My primary carrier is verizon.net (via FIOS land line). While I do own a cell phone, I'm not stupid enough to live the life-cellulite wherein number of minutes/seconds is relevant. That is: my cell phone is an older (apple 4 variant) phone. I do not have a compelling reason to switch to a consumer-abusive-account in the name of "progress"

  30. Uneven coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uneven amounts of coverage by the providers for me makes it less about preference, more what works. At this time my only option to have consistency is Verizon.

  31. T-Mobile, despite issues by Octorian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, we only have 4 real options in the US. Everyone else is just piggybacking on one of them.

    I like to be able to use whatever phone I want, gotten from anywhere, without needing to buy it through my carrier, and which I can keep updated without needing to crack it.
    That means I refuse to use a carrier with a sufficiently proprietary network technology that enables them to be assholes about devices. This excludes Verizon and Sprint right off the bat.

    So my only real options are AT&T or T-Mobile. Since T-Mobile has gone out of their way to be the least-jerk'ish mobile carrier in the US, while AT&T generally hasn't, I've basically stuck with T-Mobile. Sure, their coverage may not always be the best, but it does keep improving. And if I ever actually want to travel, I don't need to worry about having to shut off my phone to not be totally gouged on the bill.

    1. Re:T-Mobile, despite issues by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      same here. For the price and extras they are the best deal for me. Coverage is fine and I travel overseas so the free data and texting are a big plus. I can Skype on the slow speed data just fine so calling works and my clients Skype routinely so they are used to reaching people that way, and 90% of my needs are covered by texting for non-business needs. Even with clients a quick text is generally the prefered method anyway. Their customer service is great, any issues I have had with billing were resolved quickly. The last time I had a problem they even credited a full months service, above what I was owed, for my troubles even though I only asked them to credit what I was owed. The free line lets me use unlimited data on my iPad; before that the 200mb free per month let me use email without any overage. Coverage is good as I live in a major metropolitan area. I'm paying 1/2 of what I paid with ATT so I left them after quite a few years and don't regret it. YMMV but my mileage is fine.The best hint that happened for consumers, IMHO, is ATT didn't buy them so T-Mobile has been able to shake up the industry to everyone's benefit. ATT, in contrast, sent me bills for 0 dollars every month for a year before they realized I was no longer with ATT; even though they had already ported my number to another carrier. When I calle dream they said since I was on a corporate account they could not close the account unless the person in charge of phones closed the account. I worked for a major international company who had no one "in charge of phones" and all it took to get their rate was for me to call ATT and say I worked at X and they put me on the account. I eventually had a friend still there call, say they were in charge of phones and to take me off the account. ATT's coverage was great but their customer service wasn't; at one point I kept getting transferred from corporate accounts to personal ones, while I tried to get them to fix the problem, because neither could figure out who was responsible for it since it was my personal number with a corporate rate. As I have had the number for years, even pre ATT when I was on VZW so I could not afford to lose the number and have clients all of a sudden not reach me or get a black mark on my credit score for not paying 0 dollars. When I asked what would happen if I simply didn't pay if I had a bill they said "No problem we just would bill the corporate account and not cut off service." At one point I even called the President's office to get it fixed (I had a friend who worked with the CEO so he gave me the number to call) and even they couldn't figure it out. My friend there said if I didn't pay they would just write off the loss eventually; but I didn't want to go that route as it wouldn't be right. They magically stopped billing me finally and all is well but I would not want to be held hostage by the Death Star so I will not go back to them. I also had VZW for a few years and was happy with their service. VZW, while they were a lot better than ATT and even sent me new phones for free before my contract was up, their CDMA technology limited my ability to use a phone overseas and I didn't want to have to get a new number on a prepaid card every time I traveled and give clients a new number every time I traveled. I realize they now have world phones but since TMobile meets my needs there is no compelling reason to go back to VZW.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:T-Mobile, despite issues by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      verizon and sprint still use CDMA for voice. AT&T and Verizon have VoLTE on newer phones but it's still flaky and the older tech works better.

    3. Re:T-Mobile, despite issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon has allowed VoLTE on any phone that supports it since 2015.

  32. TMo to ATT switcher for coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched from ATT to TMo when ATT started screwing around with their grandfathered unlimited plans. TMo worked great in my usual locations (home, commute, work, travel to family).

    But.

    Zero coverage on leisure vacation. Thankfully TMo didn't have the idiotic wifi-calling restrictions that ATT does, so I was able to use that when I was at our lodging -- but nowhere else.

    I loved and still miss TMo's no bullshit approach to service: no silly activation fees, no nickel and diming, good customer service, etc.

    The final straw was when we moved out to the suburbs and couldn't get cell signal anywhere on our property. I didn't want to be cut off from civilization if power goes out and my internet service dies. I did wait until I upgraded our phones before switching, though, so I wouldn't get hit with an extra activation fee from ATT.

    Now, on ATT, I can make reliable phone calls from our house. Verizon was a no-go because of their broken can't-use-the-phone-and-data-at-the-same-time limitations.

    If TMo's coverage were better, I'd have stuck with them. I have high hopes for their new 700 MHz rollout. I'd go back to them in a heartbeat.

    Amusingly, I now get worse data throughput on my commute, I think in large part because of the heavier congestion of ATT users...

  33. Re:T-Mo by magarity · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have to travel internationally every couple of years and the TMo international is no joke. Upon landing in Beijing you get a 'Welcome to China' text and service includes unlimited pokey 2G data speed data that goes straight through TMo's US servers so the websites blocked normally in China work just fine. Coverage is most excellent; pretty much any city or town, just not out in the countryside.

  34. TMO and Xfinity WiFi by grumling · · Score: 2

    T-Mobile is pretty good in my area, they really got good after the AT&T deal fell through and they picked up extra spectrum. But I also take advantage of the Xfinity wifi hotspots I get through Comcast, which are great when they work and save a lot of data on the LTE side. And they were the first US company to do wifi calling and are pretty good at it. I have an iPad and iPhone 7 that both have the latest LTE radios to get the 700 MHz band. Pricing isn't too bad either, I get a discount through work on an unlimited talk/text plan with 6 GB/month of data on each device, with rollover that lasts for (I think) a year.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    1. Re:TMO and Xfinity WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-Mobile is pretty good in my area, they really got good after the AT&T deal fell through and they picked up extra spectrum. But I also take advantage of the Xfinity wifi hotspots I get through Comcast, which are great when they work and save a lot of data on the LTE side. And they were the first US company to do wifi calling and are pretty good at it. I have an iPad and iPhone 7 that both have the latest LTE radios to get the 700 MHz band. Pricing isn't too bad either, I get a discount through work on an unlimited talk/text plan with 6 GB/month of data on each device, with rollover that lasts for (I think) a year.

      UMA is what it was called a decade ago. Unregistered Mobile Access. Loved my BlackBerry Pearl flip phone that used that on T-Mobile. WiFi calling was a thing a while ago. Get off my lawn!!!

  35. Carrier comparison by SteveWoz · · Score: 2

    Many who comment here will have a reason that they chose one carrier over one other carrier. They may have switched carriers. I always found that the latest carrier plan was better than the competition, and that it would go back and forth or be too confusing to come up with one clear answer. I actually have iPhones and aPhones on 5 carriers. I also travel the world quite a bit. Domestically, all the carriers are good for most unless you live in an area not covered by some. I remember times when Verizon was faster but now it seems that AT&T is faster for me, most of the time. I remember when you could buy international data from Verizon that covered 200 countries, while the AT&T list was only about 50 countries. That affected me in places like Russia and South Africa, back then. T-Mobile has incredible data plans for here and away but they don't seem as fast as claimed unless I'm in the store. Sprint has gone far out of their way to help me with issues, including a stolen phone number. Right now I believe that the best carrier I have, for my own needs, is Google Project Fi because the plan works in over 100 countries. You can even order a free data-only SIM for free, without even a shipping charge, to use it on iPads and the like. I would never say that anyone's choice of plan is bad in any way though.

    --
    OK a new size TV
  36. CC for minutes; UnlimitedLTE Advanced for data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Consumer Cellular for 3 phones as we don't use a lot of minutes.$60/mo.

    But for data we have a NETGEAR AirCard on unlimitedlteadvanced.com for unlimited data for the phones and 3 tablets for $80/mo. The AirCard stays in the car 99% of the time since most of the non wi-fi data use is while riding in the car. Kids and spouse do a lot of streaming videos in the car.... usually around 150-200 GB/mo.

    So $140/mo for 3 phones plus 3 tablets.

    "Unlimited data" in this case is better than most since there is no throttling and it really is unlimited.

  37. Virgin Mobile by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    I've been a custom of theirs before smart phones were even around. I had a small pay-as-you-go phone before getting their iPhone. It's $30 a month unlimited but throttled after 1 gig. Which for me is no big deal. Just give me phone, e-mail and weather and I'm fine. Also, when I bought my iPhone 5c I think it was $350. Which was $100 cheaper than everyone else at that time.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    1. Re:Virgin Mobile by moronikos · · Score: 1

      So, you're on Sprint?

    2. Re:Virgin Mobile by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      I have VM with voice + 5G of data for $35/month, on an HTC phone that I bought for $150. It's not easy to beat that deal.

      Verizon, on the other hand, has no service at my house. All of the other carriers do. Therefore, my choice for wireless carrier is "anyone but Verizon".

  38. Ting by locater16 · · Score: 1

    No, you've probably never heard of it.
    But seriously, if you don't use a ton of data, fuck every other carrier. Ting is an MVNO that's incredibly cheap, allows you to bring your own device, runs on Sprint for CDMA and they won't say for GSM. But get a GSM phone because whether its AT&T or Tmobile the cost is the same and the reception is better. How cheap? You pay only for what you use, no fixed monthly fees beyond lines and the usage rates for anything other than data are great.

    If that sounds like your kind of thing go check it out.

  39. Re:T-Mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you travel internationally and have to pay for calls/data yourself or have family or friends overseas, T-Mo is really tough to beat. Data nearly everywhere in the world included, no worries about data roaming charges - yes, slow data, but enough for maps, e-mail, on line radio, and VOIP. I was month in Europe and even with this slow speed I managed over 4Gb of (free) data ;-)
    Family - 4 phone lines (4GB data each) + 1 iPad (2GB data) for $100 + $10 for whole family free (nearly whole) world international calling. With some taxes less than $120 which I think it is a great deal. And their coverage has improved even in less populated areas of US.

  40. additionnal lines by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    honest question from someone who lives in a country where these kind of cheap ($10) additional lines do not exist. What is stopping group of friends from subscribing together and splitting the bill? One must be an idiot to get one line for $50 when you can get 8 for an average of $17.50/line before tax and your international calling add-on.

    1. Re:additionnal lines by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      What is stopping group of friends from subscribing together and splitting the bill?

      Nothing.

      Some years ago, I worked for a large company and what they did was group their cellphone users into family plans. I could see the total usage of the group (other employees) in the same plan as I was on (no call records, just total minutes).

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:additionnal lines by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      There's one person's name on the bill, and that person has pay the whole bill (and subsequently collect from everyone else) every month. When you're all family, this is pretty straightforward. Can be trickier with friends. Furthermore, from the add-on's perspective, would you really want someone else to be able to cancel your phone service at any time, no questions asked, because they're the account holder and you're not?

    3. Re:additionnal lines by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      One of your friends inevitably runs up an $800 overage and then vanishes to another country.

    4. Re:additionnal lines by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      To me it sounds like you don't have very good friends if you don't trust them to pay you the $15-20 they owe you every month or if you fear they will cancel your phone line without asking.

    5. Re:additionnal lines by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      And that risk is worth quintupling the cost of your phone line to you?

    6. Re:additionnal lines by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It is if you don't have any way to make rent if a $50 unexpected expense shows up because you pre-spend all your money on shitty beer.

  41. Re:T-Mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Project Fi has better international data speeds and coverage than t-mobile.

  42. GSM: AT&T by tmshort · · Score: 1

    AT&T Next Family Plan 15GB with 5 lines, and corporate discount. I'm at the sweet spot price-wise for 5 lines. When I switched, at least 3 of the phones were still under contract, and were released upon switching.
    Went with them because they were the first with iPhones (had a 3G), and supported GSM (for European travel).
    Not going to unlimited because I don't care about DirectTV.

  43. Virgin Mobile by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    $35/month, good signal in my apartment, good signal all around town.

    Some 15 years ago I drove from San Diego to Oklahoma with my sister. She had Verizon. She had signal between cities when I had nothing. Then again, she was paying twice what I was. When I got close to a city I got a signal.

    Few years ago I drove from San Diego to Salt Lake City, then to Montana. Never had an issue with signal strength.

  44. Telstra by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Tel$tra

  45. Project Fi here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm on wifi most of the time and hardly use mobile data, so it works for me.

  46. Short answer.... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2

    In my case its Ting, an MVNO that operates on both the Sprint and Tmobile infrastructure.. I buy my own phones, currently a Nexus 4, and refuse to do contracts.. With Ting, you only pay for what you *actually* use. My only nit with them (and its not just them) is their data usage prices are a bit steep.. For instance, my phone bill for TWO phones this month was $21.. It was that low as wife's phone was turned off most of the month, and I only used less than 100Mb of data.. On average, in normal months, the bill for two phones is between $35-$45.... Can't beat that with a stick...

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    1. Re:Short answer.... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      $13.73 month this year, normally $17.08/month, 2GB LTE, unlimited voice, unlimited SMS, one line. You're doing better with anemic data use on two phones, slightly.

  47. verizon reseller by danpritts · · Score: 1
    I use an MVNO (puppy wireless) on verizon's network. Downside vs. vzw branded: no international coverage (incl canada, presumably mexico), no visual voice mail on iphone. Customer service mediocre, but i have had a couple problems and they have come through.

    Upside vs. vzw branded: It's really cheap. $10/mo for a basic plan, and $.015/mb $.015/min $.01/txt PAYG. Or $30/mo for 1.5GB, 750min, 750txt.

    MVNO's are by nature a little flakey, and i've seen warnings on web forums about the puppy operator being a previous scam artist. I've used it for a couple years with no issues.

  48. Fuck the data plan! by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

    All I want is consistent coverage, even in hard-to-cover areas. Verizon wins hands-down. BTW, I tried AT&T for 2 days - without being able even to connect to a tower! - then spent 6 months dealing with their billing department even though I returned and canceled within 3 days of their "30-day" trial period. Fuckers! In a decent society, I would be able to bill THEM for the HOURS I spent arguing over a fucking 12-cent bill that they were going to "turn over to collections".

  49. Re:T-Mo by gweilo8888 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Project Fi is also limited to just a couple of handsets, and *far* more expensive unless you don't use much data.

  50. T-Mobile == Carrier From Hell by michael.karl.coleman · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile was great until I made the mistake of moving. Coverage unusable at new place, even though it was in an urban area. After many months of run-around from T-Mobile, finally gave up and ate the contract penalty, which was about $800. Never again.

    1. Re:T-Mobile == Carrier From Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that was a long time ago, or they shouldn't have eaten the contract. T-mobile hasn't had contracts in years. The only ETF they charge is the balance on any equipment that you've borrowed for.

    2. Re:T-Mobile == Carrier From Hell by Mr.Radar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      T-Mobile hasn't had contracts since 2013 so your story is at least a few years old. Over the past few years they've completely revamped their network and rolled out lots of new coverage (mostly by acquiring "low-band" spectrum that lets them cover 4x the area per tower of their previous "mid-band" spectrum). They've also rolled out wifi calling (which lets you make and receive calls and texts over wifi) and "CellSpot" units that let you use your home internet to provide cell coverage at your house if you're in a complete dead zone.

      --
      What if this signature were clever?
    3. Re:T-Mobile == Carrier From Hell by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      At my previous residence we had 1-2 bars on the top floor North bedroom, 0 bars in the rest of the house. We were supposedly in the middle of a 4G area. They sent me a Cell Amplifier, which basically worked by placing the receiver end in the window of the aforementioned bedroom, and the extender somewhere central to my house, for us the Garage worked fine. This unit did not hook into the internet, but acted as a mini tower in our house. Had great coverage there with them after that.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  51. Unlimited isn't available for most carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one of the few legacy plans (Sprint) that is "unlimited". There are no caps, no throttle, no deprioritization, etc.

    Every other plan and carrier I have looked at don't have "unlimited" plans. They have plans they call unlimited and they apparently don't own dictionaries!!!!!!!!!! Or, they are liars.

    1. Re: Unlimited isn't available for most carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had that plan. Unlimited, but limited coverage, and the towers were overloaded in the city.

  52. None, really by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 0

    Coming from Europe, the mobile phone service in the US is both pathetic and expensive. I am sure though that many Americans are convinced that, like their health system, is the best in the world.

    1. Re:None, really by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Most Americans are painfully aware that both US cellular services and the US health system are terrible for anyone who isn't wealthy.

  53. T-mobile mvnos by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

    T-mobile MVNO's seem to be cheap and offer decent service.

    Mintsim is $300/year for unlimited talk/text and 5gb of data per month. This beats most comparable service for a single line.

    1. Re:T-mobile mvnos by hackel · · Score: 1

      That's pretty great, particularly because you still have unlimited 128 kbps data, the plan is only about the amount of "high sped" data you have. On the 2G plan, $35 for the first 3 months, then $200/year after that? That's hard to beat.

  54. Cricket Wireless by srwood · · Score: 1

    Used Cricket wireless for past 18 months without issues. Month to month, throttles after 12 gigs, AT&T network $55/month.

  55. Verizon Wireless... by antdude · · Score: 1

    ... due to the rural area. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  56. Cricket by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    super cheap and the data just cuts down to 2g speed when you go over limit, so no fees or disconnection.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  57. Whichever my company pays for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as I can see/get what I want, they can reach out to me when they want.
    Win, Win, Win, uh - let me get back to you on the oncall thing...

  58. Who covers where you need it by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    The real question with wireless is who provides the best coverage where you need to use it.

    Forget the TV ads and coverage maps. You don't care if they claim to cover 99% of the country. Real-world, in the places YOU use it, is what matters. Once you know who works where you need it, find the best deal.

    In determining coverage, it is important to use a device that can take full advantage of the signals in use. For example, if you are looking at T-Mobile coverage, you should do so with a LTE band 12-capable device, not an old T-Mo phone granny had in a drawer.

    For a relative of mine, we determined that Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint signals would not work for him. So I got him a T-Mobile phone and found a dirt-cheap MVNO to provide service. Works fine, costs very little. Done.

    It seems like a lot of people never bother to take that approach and instead get hung up supporting a company because that's who they have been with forever, or they don't mind paying whatever they pay.

    --
    Sig for hire.
    1. Re:Who covers where you need it by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Right, which is why I'm on O2, even though their data speed is shitty and their coverage on my train ride to work is sketchy. They do, however, have good enough coverage in my house, whereas the generally superior Three couldn't do that but did everything else much better.

  59. t-mobile unlimited data $30/mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    t-mobile pre-paid "wallmart" plan. Unlimited data (first 5G at full speed, throttled after that). Unlimited text. 100 minutes voice. I use google hangouts dialer for free unlimited outbound calls to US phone numbers, and a cheap VOIP provider (Callcentric) for all other outbound calls. I leave the 100min for inbound calls. And, if I get a call that is using too much of that 100min, I just call them back over voip.

    Also, you can get the phone credits for less than retail off ebay, if you are patient. So, it works out to about $25-28/mo.

    You need a phone with voice over LTE support for some areas (and support for t-mobiles LTE bands and frequencies), or you will get no voice coverage. But, with the right phone (nexus 5x) I have not had coverage issues in California. My old phone (n900) did have coverage issues in many areas with t-mobile.

  60. Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had Sprint, the coverage sucked. Really fast in some areas. Slower that 2G in some urban areas. When I complained, Sprint told me to use Wi-Fi, among other excuses.

    Verizon is faster, and I get service where my friends with other carriers don't.

  61. Fi by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Google Fi.

  62. Soup cans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tethered together with twine. It's free and has no overage charges, but it's a PITA to send texts one letter at a time. Coverage depends on string value and length.

  63. Re: TracPhone: $7/month. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OP is right. $20 for 90 days for 60 minutes, which accumulate and multiply like bunnies on Easter morning. After two years, I have 959 unused minutes, after paying for only ~540 of them, and using maybe an hour or two. (I don't need or use a phone much these days. I don't like phones much.)
    I'm using a tough Alcatel Flip Phone that can be used to crack Walnuts. One never knows when this could prove useful.
    The big caveat with Tracfone is that they have, by far, the worst Customer Service reputation around. Their incompetence is legendary, and it's best not to get into situations where this is needed.
    This is a Lessons Learned thing. I got my first Cell Phone back in 1996 with Cellular One, back when it was still all Analog. I got it because I needed it, not because I wanted it. Damn Beeper kept on going off, and I'd have to go find a Pay Phone. (Operations Supervisor for a Tech Outfit, 24/7/365...)
    I've been through a bunch of phones since, and most of the Carriers, and I simply can't be bothered any longer with the incompatibilities, the greed, and the fuss. For all of that silly Smartphone rubbish, I do what any sensible person does- I steal Wifi for my Macbook. (Note: anybody who wants to use my open Wifi is welcome if they don't abuse it. I check the Logs regularly; it's not been a problem.)
    I am not a typical user of Cell Technology these days, but then again, I wasn't in 1996. I was a bit more high tech, working on SOTA stuff, like the Cerebrum Communicator, or the "CC" for short. This dandy little device can actually perform every function of the old-fashioned telephone and more. And it does it without any costly maintenance. Without telephone poles, without wires, without exchanges, without anything in fact, except another CC in another location. And now you're probably wondering why have we made it so small. Because it will be in and powered by your own brain.

    Oops, I wasn't supposed to mention this.

  64. Re: TracPhone: $7/month. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    Oh rly? Which plan is that? The Pinocchio plan?

    It's not really a plan. It's the $19.99 60-minute, 90 day refill card. With a smartphone, the minutes "triple" to 180, and you also get 180 texts and 180mb data. If you sign up for auto-refill, you get a small discount off that (and it becomes kind of a plan).

    If your wireless needs fit that profile, it works out to around $7/month. I've saved a boatload of money going down that route, although I have needed to supplement it with a few data-only refills, which has only tacked on a couple of bucks per month for me on average. It does kind of rule out using any audio or video while not in WiFi range, and you can't yammer on the phone endlessly, but for me that's an acceptable trade-off.

  65. In the pacific northwest, Verizon. by eggman9713 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been with AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile in the pacific northwest (Washington, Oregon mostly) for the last several years. During that time I have traveled both to the more metropolitan western Oregon and Washington, as well as the more rural eastern sides of the states. AT&T is pretty good around major metros and most semi-rural areas. T-mobile is very spotty outside of the metros and most major interstates, and many rural areas of eastern Washington and Oregon they have zero coverage at all. I've never used Sprint in this area but I don't know anyone who even has Sprint so that should tell you something. Verizon seems to have the best overall coverage in the pacific northwest, especially the more rural areas. Even when really out in the middle of nowhere they always seem to have some coverage to at least get a call out if nothing else. I can't speak for Idaho as I have not traveled in that area in several years. All of the major companies are awful in terms of pricing and customer service when you have a problem, but the best of all of the evils seems to be Verizon in my experience in this region of the US.

    1. Re:In the pacific northwest, Verizon. by chubs · · Score: 1

      I live in Idaho and I'll second that. Verizon abuses its customers, but it's the only carrier where you can consistently expect to be able to place a call while on the Interstate.

  66. FreedomPop is interesting. by caferace · · Score: 1

    You can kind of game them on data, SMS and voice to keep your costs near zero.

    Granted, certainly not for everyone but there is nothing less expensive and coverage in the States is fine.

    1. Re:FreedomPop is interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another satisfied FreedomPop customer. If your data needs are modest, the monthly costs really are zero. I have a two phones, so I have access to the Sprint CDMA network as well as the AT&T and T-Mobile GSM networks. There was small upfront cost for the phones, but no monthly fees.

  67. Sauteed by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    pigeon

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  68. SCORE % INFORMATIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they all suck - get a burner phone .......(get 2)

  69. Re:T-Mo (no cut off, no extra fees) by kwerle · · Score: 1

    I love tmobile. If my data is getting used up they tell me (text). If I run out of data, they tell me. They don't charge me more, and they don't shut it off - they just slow things down.

    After having been gouged by AT&T and Verizon (some years ago), I have no interest in going back.

  70. T-Mobile by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    I was with AT&T for 12 years but they finally nickel and dimed me off their customer list. First, they were charging me for text messages when everyone else includes them. Then they started playing games with the grandfathered "unlimited" plan I had. Twice they raised the price by $10/month. That was the final straw.

    I went from paying about $145/month (and that included a 22% discount from a former employer) for two lines to $100/month for 3 lines with T-Mobile. The third line was a promotion so I put a chip in the wife's iPad and she's happy as a clam. No contract. Unlimited data, voice and text. No charge for tethering. Unlimited calling to Canada and Mexico. Pretty sweet deal.

    As near as I can tell, the coverage is just as good as it was before. Maybe better in some places. I think there was a time when AT&T and Verizon could legitimately say they had better networks. But I think the gap has closed considerably. It all comes down to where you live and the coverage in your neighborhood. Now it's just a race to the bottom.

  71. Verizon frequently drops to 3G, sometimes even 1X by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    I was on AT&T for several years. They were generally reliable, although couldn't get a signal in a few areas near me, and the speed was not very fast. So I switched to T-Mobile's unlimited plan this year. They were faster than AT&T and pretty good signal wise, except at my office where I get no signal at all. So I had to switch to Verizon. Initially the signal seemed good everywhere and speeds seemed decent, but generally not as fast as T-Mobile. But after a few weeks, the LTE signal at my home has become very intermittent - it frequently drops to 3G and even 1X sometimes. Not a big deal as I can use Wifi at home (although Comcast at home frequently has problems so it'd be nice if I could use the mobile hotspot). If T-Mobile ever upgrades their network near my office, then I will definitely switch back to them.

  72. Re:T-Mo by bgarcia · · Score: 2

    You should seriously look into upgrading to the T-Mobile One plan.

    Features: Unlimited calls, texts, and unlimited 4G data! Also, 10GB high-speed tethering for each line (3G tethering when exceeded). Unlimited texts & 3G data internationally, Unlimited calls to/from Canada & Mexico. Free use of GoGo Wifi on domestic flights.

    I have 7 lines for $220. This includes all taxes.
    Additionally, for each line that uses less than 2GB of data in a month, they refund you $10!!!
    My bill this past month was $170 for 7 lines.

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  73. What's stopping? Human nature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds good in theory. In practice there always seems to be someone who starts slacking off, never has their share, abuses the setup and the whole thing starts falling apart. Same reason why roommate agreements go bad.

  74. Midwest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had AT&T, Verizon, US Cellular, and finally settled on Google Project Fi. AT&T, US Cellular, and Verizon all felt roughly like the same version of a bad deal: the phone and plan were too expensive, the customer service wasn't great, and their primary objective seemed to be to lock me into a contract by having C and D students up-sell me at the local retailer.

    Project Fi just works and is very reasonably priced. The only difference being that I had to buy the phone out of pocket up front (although I'm saving money, even amortizing the capital cost of the equipment).

  75. Anyone with unlimited data and less than 20$/m by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Any carrier that offers unlimited 3G data for less than 20$/month per line.

  76. Lyca by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    I use Lyca. They are a Polish based carrier that are setup all over Europe, so offer lower (or no) roaming costs. And they are cheap. I can pay €5 and get some free data with that. Or €10 and get a lot more free data and free calls and texts. Or €15 for even more. Plus they have other packages available for people with different usage patterns. They don't offer LTE in Ireland (yet?!), but I'm happy with the speeds I to get on HSPA.

    But I guess you are asking about US carriers...

  77. Annoying by Thyamine · · Score: 2

    As someone who's company has paid for his phone/plan for the last 15 years, we are in the middle of having our numbers released and will be in charge of selecting our own provider and coverage plans. We've had Verizon for years, and I haven't had any complaints with coverage (mostly suburban/metro area), although I'm probably in that low-hanging fruit area where everyone has coverage.

    For me now, the biggest interest is in unlimited data, tethering/hotspot usage, and how much I get before I get dropped to lower speeds, although 10 GB for hotspots seems a default. AT&T slows speeds after 22GB of data; T-Mobile seems like they don't except if you fall into the >30GB a month and there is congestion (take that as you will). My new vehicle has a built in hotspot (cool or a WTF, I'm not sure yet), but I'm stuck with AT&T if I want to put it on a plan. So far T-Mobile seems to be the most cost effective, but as others have mentioned, rural coverage will be lacking. Right now, I expect I'll be negotiating with T-Mobile to see what my wife and I can get. If that is enough savings, I may then look at a separate plan for the vehicle to help offset coverage when I travel (I travel a good bit for work).

    You need a matrix just to try and keep track of what you need/where, and how to connect to avoid issues or using the 'wrong' data.

    --
    I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
  78. Re: T-Mo (no cut off, no extra fees) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have this same thing using AT&T's GoPhone service, and they've been adding more data to theor $45 tier every time I consider switching. Started with 3GB, then 4GB, now it's 6GB and the data I don't use rolls over.

  79. Re:T-Mo (no cut off, no extra fees) by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1

    That right there is the top reason why t-mobile rocks. That ceo of theirs knows how to treat their customers.

  80. Pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah I know.

  81. Re:T-Mo by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Huh. I have Mintsim and pay $200/year for 1 line, 2GB/month 4G LTE, unlimited text, unlimited voice. My next renewal is $160 for the year, though. Taxes are an additional 3%.

  82. Boost- for surprising reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so I know that Boost is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprint, but that is why i chose them. Nationwide footprint, lots of 4g lte and the same service that Sprint people are paying out the wazoo for. We have 4 people on the family plan and all 4 phones cost $98.10 with 2 of them having unlimited data.

  83. Re:T-Mo (no cut off, no extra fees) by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    I am quite happy with T-Mobile as well. I know that the other providers are doing "unlimited" plans, but I much rather deal with a slight slowdown than a surprise big bill.

    Plus, historically, it has been "the" provider to go to, if you have an unlocked phone.

  84. T-Mobile since 2006 by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    We celebrated the new year by ditching Cingular and getting those awful Blackberry 7105t phones with unlimited voice/data/text.

    I'm still grandfathered into that plan, which isn;t always the cheapest, but it is NEVER data capped for me, NEVER limited in any way for video playback, NEVER limited for streaming of any sort.I have never had an overage in now 11 years and 3 months, ever.

    Now the complaints...

    At my previous office location, the cafeteria suffered from being located too close to an old GPRS tower that TMO leased, and I had to sit by the windows to get 3G service. They could not solve it, the leased tower solved voice problems and the owner was raking in $ without further effort.

    Moved to my current office location 3 years ago, and here the lunch time demand is so great that I usually cannot get data service. Fortunately I like the lunch spots that give me WiFi. My Blu R1 HD may not be getting Band 12, but I don;t care to diagnose it further until my new phone next month. TMO will not build out further here, so it may be solved with Band 12/66 (TMO is leaving some Band 12 sites for Band 66, which is wack), though spectrum is changing for TMO so fast they can't keep up with phones, SDR can't come soon enough.

    My vacation spot was without service for 10 years until TMO finally got Band 12 there, which they bailed on for Band 66 this past fall. At least the resort WiFi got fixed.

    TMO does have odd dead spots, but not as many as Sprint. Mostly long stretches of highway through 'wilderness'.

    But on the positive side:

    Great customer service. Even when they can't solve the problem, they are at least pleasant and honest.

    They follow through when they say they will. I've logged several 3rd level calls, and got engineers calling back explaining. Once even a roaming problem turned out to be a config problem with my phone, and they helped me set it right.

    I have no intention of changing service, though right now I'm paying a bit more than I like with a 3rd line and extra phone on EIP. But it's too close to what VZW would gouge me for, and no one else can match it without exposing me to random plan changes.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  85. T-Mobile wins on international by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I go to Germany a lot, she grew up there. Having our unlimited data plan available through all of Europe has made traveling a breeze

  86. Savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I switched from Verizon to Fi and our bill went from about $150/month to $55. It didn't take too long to pay off the Nexus 5x phones we picked up.

    1. Re:Savings by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      Just because you were overpaying for Verizon or don't actually use mobile data much, that doesn't make Project Fi a good deal. I'd be paying *far* more for Project Fi than I am for T-Mobile, based on my current usage.

  87. Re:T-Mo by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1

    Absolutely agree. Went to Taiwan and a couple other countries in one trip and the T-Mo international plan was great. Yes, the speeds are limited to 256kbps, but at least you're not paying extra for it.

  88. MetroPCS, anyone? by walterhpdx · · Score: 1

    Surprised I haven't seen much (if any) love for MetroPCS here. I was on Credo (an MNVO) for a while, but moved to MetroPCS for truly unlimited. Now I'm paying half at $60/month for what my husband has on AT&T being grandfathered into unlimited data. He'll be moving when his AT&T contract is up later this year. And if we combine accounts, we'll pay $100/month for both lines with the discount.

  89. Verizon for rural America by chubs · · Score: 1

    I live in a rural mountain-west state. Around here, all four major carriers are fine in the center of the "city" (by city, I mean a town of about 50k people). However, in the surrounding area, Verizon is really the only show in town. T-Mobile is growing, but Sprint and AT&T don't really even have 3G reaching my house, much less 4G.

  90. Google Project Fi by kmassare · · Score: 1

    I started with Sprint then switched to AT&T after a couple of years. After a couple of more years with AT&T I switched to Simple Mobile for the unlimited data and the low cost. During a cross country car trip I switched to Straight Talk because Simple Mobile did not have coverage through large swaths of Tornado Alley. I currently use Google Project Fi while my wife is still on Straight Talk. Most of my data usage is on WiFi so the $0.01 / Mb data charge works well for me. My wife will probable switch also when we get her a new Google-phone.

  91. I 'prefer' none of them, they're all bastards by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    All wireless companies, broadband providers, cable TV companies, telecom companies, etc, are all greedy bastards who are screwing over their customers in one way or another (usually in several ways) and violating our privacy, so I 'prefer' none of them. I merely put up with them because unless you can manage to live with U.S. Mail and face-to-face meetings with people as your only means of communication and information sources, you end up paying these bastards, and they damned well know it. Landline phone service costs about the same, if not more, than having the cheapest wireless service, and is less convenient or efficient.. I'm not even sure if dialup internet access is even available anymore, but you'd have to have a landline to use it, so it'd cost at least as much if not more than the cheapest broadband connectivity, and you'd be lucky to get 28kbps out of it. DSL costs as much as broadband, and again you'd need a landline, so it costs more. I only put up with AT&T because I haven't had a contract with them for at least 10 years so they have nothing to hold over my head; if there was something significantly cheaper I'd jump. There's only maybe two choices for internet where I live, and unfortunately Comcast is one of them, and the cheapest; I'd go for a fraction of the speed if it would halve the cost. There are shitty choices all around, and again I'd do without all the above if it wouldn't completely sabotage my life. Really, seriously, honestly, there needs to be some sort of reforms on this sort of stuff. It's like paper companies deciding that since you can't live without toilet paper, that they'll start charging you $20 for a four-pack; it's price-gouging and it's wrong. Telephone and internet cost at least twice as much as it should, and that's the main reason I hate all of them.

  92. Miserable coverage even in cities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been a Verizon subscriber of nearly 18 years now and the reason I stuck with them (even though I HATE their policies) is that the other carriers have terrible coverage in most of the areas I've been. My in laws tried Sprint and T-mobile (not any experience with AT&T though, so maybe they come close to Verizon.)
    This includes in my neighborhood (in the urban area of a medium-small city in Ohio.)
    The only area I ever had an issue with VZW was in the Wabash Indiana area (I think VZW lost a tower contract or something like that and was too cheap to replace it???) All the people who lived in that area used AT&T or one of the other guys (I think Sprint.)

  93. Oister by Thraxy · · Score: 1

    I use Oister. Pay around $20 a month for unlimited talk + data + text in all of Scandinavia. It also includes 60GB data for internet sharing, and while that isn't enough for my monthly desktop use, it's very handy to have as a backup (faster than my wired connection).

    1. Re:Oister by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this post was a US-centric one.

      Anyone in Europe is paying ~20€ / month to get unlimited everything.

  94. Hey Verizon, you suck butt by nanospook · · Score: 1

    I avoid the carrier that has a problem with me rooting and works hard to prevent it.. Hey Verizon, yeah you! Tmobile doesn't care, sprint doesn't care.. Sprint is still building out their 4G network though lol (North Dallas) and that leaves TMobile..

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  95. None of them by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, I use AT&T but, quite frankly, none of them are as easy to use and as cheap as providers in South Korea, Japan, and the EU.

    None of them.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  96. T-Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2013 I was on Verzion and needed to travel internationally. They quoted me a price of $20 a MB for data while abroad. Once T-mobile started providing free international text and data I switched and haven't looked back. In most of South American I was getting 2G speeds but have received 4G in places like Germany and the Czech Republic. That is how T-mobile has kept me as a customer.

  97. Google Fi by hackel · · Score: 1

    Why choose? I prefer to be on T-Mobile, Spring, *and* U.S. Cellular. This thirst for unlimited data is ridiculous. What I want more than anything is a cheap data-only plan, so I can just use Google Voice/Hangouts for the 3 voice calls I make a year.

  98. Re:T-Mo by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

    Certainly not for everybody, but my wife being from Taiwan we already have a number there. With Chunghwa Telecom, which is sort of like the Taiwanese version of AT&T, we put her phone on a pay as you go plan. With this plan we only have to add about $3US ($100TWD) every 6 months to keep it active. That money stays on the account. When we go to visit about once a year the account will have perhaps $6 ($200TWD) in it. For about $30 ($1000TWD) we get an unlimited data plan AND the $30 we paid for the plan goes as a credit for voice and text but now expires at the end of the month. This means that we virtually have unlimited voice and text for the 14 days we are there, unlimited 4G data, and that $6 we paid during the year to keep the account active also just went towards the unlimited plan we purchased. It also has the great benefit of keeping her number, so when we get to Taiwan, we post on Facebook that we're back, and can instantly get phone calls from any of our friends or family.

    On one family trip within the country the B&B we were staying at had horrible internet on the 4th floor, but thanks to our unlimited plan I just started a hot spot and shared it with all four of us.

    The rest of the time we use Ting in the US. For our needs that amounts to less than $40/mo.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  99. Re:T-Mo by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

    Another plus of T-Mo is they just added optional spam filtering on calls. I imagine all carriers will or already have done it. I've not gotten a single "student loan", "CC Offer", ... call since I enabled it and I used to get at least 2/day. Thank you T-Mo.

  100. Project Fi / Google Pixel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me whine and moan about my expereince in Metropolitan NYC with the PFi/Pixel: AM UNDERWHELMED!

    !Fucking underwhelmed!

    * I live in the 11219 zip code
    * I spend my working day in the 11238, 11231 are codes
    * I eat on weekends in Chinatown ~10038 area code
    * I effing travel/visit in the weekend in Northern NJ: Paramus (northeast) _through_ Cherry Hill (southwest)

    And aside from _twice_ in *suburban* NJ, one of those at a Wendy's hamburger with bad wifi signal, and once near the (Brooklyn Academy of Music:) BAM I have NOT ...

    Nein

    Nunca

    Niet

    received wonderful, life giving, /abundant or even mealy/ data from my Project Fi smartphone plan.

    IOW, I am in the heart of civilization, supposedly, in kewl Paris/French/Moscow envious Brooklyn, NY, in some not shabby locations, but apparently IF I'M NOT IN SILICON ALLEY? MIDTOWN MANHATTAN, OR JUST EFFING ?MANHATTAN? useful/abundant/easily automatically cutting edge Google tech switchable wifi data is for the other guy.

    To wit, the Pixel is a universal network phone, so since November 2016 I've had pre-paid ...

    * VZW (Dec, Jan $45 / 3 GB)
    * ATT (Jan, Feb $45 / 4GB; $60 / 8GB)
    * Project Fi ({a Tmobile/Sprint hybrid network} Mar, Apr $30/1GB, $40/2GB, etc.)

    And here is where the putative Google Pixel-WiFi data-magic I was hoping for was supposed to kick in.

    What am I saying, the marketing I read at the GOOgle store led me to believe that living in a Metropolis like NYC, with high tech incubators up the Yang, with Verizon FIOS fiber universal-like, with BUSH Terminal ... O! Ecu'eme ... Industry City "Happening," and the likes of suck-my-dick Kanye, Jay-Z and his T&A motherfucking wife ... like ... chillaxing in the O so elite strip clubs there, and the raves' after hours parties that cocksucking Brooklyn ... in Sunset Park, Carrol Gardens, Prospect Heights, ad infinitum would get some major Wifi/Pixili tone!

    Man, I nearly love the phone ... but give me robust encryption with thine own adhoc chips a la iPhone ... password/pin demand for new app install, etc. or even a FUCKING WAY TO SET TEXTS/MISSIVES' REPEAT ALARMS. You know, fucking text arrives, so keep beeping/flashing at mine own set intervals, e.g., 3, 5, 10 minutes. WHATEVERS!

    Anyway. Eat me Project Fi! Am going to ATT soon, I think. King Fucker Chicken

    1. Re:Project Fi / Google Pixel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It;s not clear from OP, so FYI:

      More than a million Wi-Fi hotspots

      If you’re in an open Wi-Fi hotspot, your phone will automatically shift you over for faster calling, data and texting. All with our secure encryption to keep your data safe.

      FYI

  101. Republic Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really would thought that Republic Wireless would be known and popular among the Slashdot crowd.

    Republic Wireless is not a carrier but MVNO which defaults to Wi-Fi and falls back to Sprint's and T-Mobile's cellular network. It does seamless handover and starts at $10 p/m with unlimited call/text, no contract. Data is cheap too and they refund unused data from your chosen bundle. Only limited to Android phones that support that seemless handover but many popular Motorola, Samsung and Google phones work fine. You can bring your own phone or lease them with Republic Wireless.

    For iPhone I would choose AT&T GoPhone, only $40 for unlimited call/text and 6GB high speed data (slow down after that), no contract. If you sure you never want data or recieve text and call very little you can to that for $25 per year on AT&T without contract. For that get a SpareOne emergency phone ($12 on Amazon) and use that SIM in your iPhone. I have my old iPhone setup like that and it works fine, was even able to set it up with Google Voice.

     

  102. phone choices of kids by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Is it more of a class (meaning social status, not school grade) snobbery, or mere incompatibility? Like if you gave them a lower end iPhone, such as an SE or a 5s, would their friends still ostracize them? If it's incompatibility, your kids do have a case, such as not being able to FaceTime w/ their friends (and it's too much to expect some 10 or so kids to go out of their way and download Duo or WhatsApp just in order to include your kids). But if they were to be looked down on b'cos they had an SE, then you'd have a case.

    For kids that age, might as well give them something they could use, rather than something that just satisfies your own ideological POV of a company. Otherwise, you could just as easily have given them a Lumia 520 and saved the most money

  103. iPlum by unixisc · · Score: 1

    If you need to use your phone overseas, why not just get iPlum, and then use that during those trips? You could even make that a common number for all your work related stuff, while using your actual cell number for personal/family stuff

  104. None of the above by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    They're all terrible in terms of most of the things I care about, so I avoid any service contracts whatsoever and pay as I go, using whichever service is currently giving me the best rates.

  105. Re:T-Mo by magarity · · Score: 1

    Project Fi's coverage maps lists a few addresses around Beijing. To say the coverage is better means you haven't actually tried it. TMo uses one of the major telecoms so coverage is almost everywhere.