Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Amazon Wants To Put a Camera and Microphone in Your Bedroom (vice.com)

Posted by msmash on from the stranger-things dept.

On Wednesday, Amazon announced the Echo Look, the latest gadget in the company's new Echo-powered hardware lineup. Motherboard explains: The newly announced Echo Look is a virtual assistant with a microphone and a camera that's designed to go somewhere in your bedroom, bathroom, or wherever the hell you get dressed. Amazon is pitching it as an easy way to snap pictures of your outfits to send to your friends when you're not sure if your outfit is cute, but it's also got a built-in app called StyleCheck that is worth some further dissection. [...] "All photos and video captured with your Echo Look are securely stored in the AWS cloud and locally in the Echo Look app until a customer deletes them," a spokesperson for the company said. "You can delete the photos or videos associated with your account anytime in the Echo Look App." Motherboard also asked if Echo Look photos, videos, and the data gleaned from them would be sold to third parties; the company did not address that question.

11 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. God no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nope nope nope nope nope god no nope.

    1. Re:God no by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Ok, it's not quite the same form as the Telescreen in 1984...but damned close enough.

      Seriously folks...the novel, 1984 was supposed to be a fictional story, not a blueprint for society going forward!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:God no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The biggest mis-prediction by Orwell was that he failed to predict we would buy these devices voluntarily with our own money, and put them in our living rooms and bedrooms, carry them around in our pockets, all without being forced to do so. It took no force of law, no coercion.

      The world didn't look at his warning with horror, it looked at it with desire and said, "when can we buy that?".

    3. Re: God no by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many people charge their cell phones in their bedroom. They have both a camera (usually pretty good too) and a mic. What we really need is laws which require that any device with a camera or a microphone have a physical disable that cannot be overridden by software.

  2. I might get one of these by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some hacker has the misfortune of seeing me butt ass, it would persuade them into a more legitimate profession PDQ

  3. Filed under: Nobody needs this! by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you can't get dressed on your own without seeking the approval of others (who aren't even in the same room with you) -- then you're already failing at life.

    I mean, I realize I'm a guy (and one of those "techie" types who is know not to care about clothing style as much as others). But this is ridiculous, no matter who you are. If you spent hard-earned money on pieces of clothing you've got hanging up in your closet, that means you liked them enough to buy them in the first place. You're just being petty and superficial if you start changing your mind about actually wearing what you, yourself liked and picked out, all because someone else (looking at a digital photo sent over the Internet) disagrees with you.

  4. Nope ^ 1000! by DrYak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    camera that's designed to go somewhere in your bedroom, bathroom, or wherever the hell you get dressed

    and

    All photos and video captured with your Echo Look are securely stored in the AWS cloud

    What. Could. Possibly. Go. Wrong.

    I think this deserve a new concept of "Nope-finity" to be invented, just to have a proper answer.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by rickb928 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't care where they are stored.

      I care HOW they are USED.

      No, I won't be using any of these tools any time soon, if ever. Already these services are too intrusive.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  5. why?!? by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I imagine only teenage girls would be superficial enough that they'd feel the need to dress and undress in front of an Internet-connected camera so their outfits could be.... ...

    hang on, I need to order 10 of these and a copy of ORA's "Hacking the IoT".

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  6. Re:Jeff Peeping Bezos by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I agree with your "nakedness shouldn't matter" sentiment, in the current moral and legal context having underage kids changing outfits in front of the internet-connected camera that automatically uploads images to the cloud is all kinds of problematic.

  7. CP question by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What would happen if a child wandered in front of the camera nude, and amazon stored that on their server -- would they be responsible for CP?