Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Wants To Put a Camera and Microphone in Your Bedroom (vice.com)

On Wednesday, Amazon announced the Echo Look, the latest gadget in the company's new Echo-powered hardware lineup. Motherboard explains: The newly announced Echo Look is a virtual assistant with a microphone and a camera that's designed to go somewhere in your bedroom, bathroom, or wherever the hell you get dressed. Amazon is pitching it as an easy way to snap pictures of your outfits to send to your friends when you're not sure if your outfit is cute, but it's also got a built-in app called StyleCheck that is worth some further dissection. [...] "All photos and video captured with your Echo Look are securely stored in the AWS cloud and locally in the Echo Look app until a customer deletes them," a spokesperson for the company said. "You can delete the photos or videos associated with your account anytime in the Echo Look App." Motherboard also asked if Echo Look photos, videos, and the data gleaned from them would be sold to third parties; the company did not address that question.

131 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. God no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nope nope nope nope nope god no nope.

    1. Re:God no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nopers.

      Ages ago, a former Houston chief of police was saying that cameras in bedrooms was a good idea. Now, we get people wanting to pay for that. (Remember, if Amazon can look at something, any police department can.)

    2. Re:God no by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Why? Be it a Xbox Kinect, a Samsung Smart TV, a Nest/Dropcam or any number of other cheap cameras... they are becoming pretty common in more or more homes.

      Unlike those geared towards 'security' or convenience, I do (unfortunately) see plenty of these selling for those who are looking to up their style.

      I've no desire for one, but I'm afraid my wife will.

    3. Re:God no by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Ok, it's not quite the same form as the Telescreen in 1984...but damned close enough.

      Seriously folks...the novel, 1984 was supposed to be a fictional story, not a blueprint for society going forward!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:God no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The biggest mis-prediction by Orwell was that he failed to predict we would buy these devices voluntarily with our own money, and put them in our living rooms and bedrooms, carry them around in our pockets, all without being forced to do so. It took no force of law, no coercion.

      The world didn't look at his warning with horror, it looked at it with desire and said, "when can we buy that?".

    5. Re: God no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Came here for exactly the fuck this. I mean good God, we have an at this point week 4th amendment to keep people out of our homes and especially bedrooms and now people would willing put a fucking camera in their bedroom. Securely stored in AWS until the police want a look then maybe not so secure.

      Good God fucking no way.

    6. Re: God no by DaHat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is a good solution indeed, for you, but you forget, we are not normal people, this camera is targeted at normal people.

    7. Re:God no by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      "Alexa, does this make my bum look fat?"

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re: God no by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many people charge their cell phones in their bedroom. They have both a camera (usually pretty good too) and a mic. What we really need is laws which require that any device with a camera or a microphone have a physical disable that cannot be overridden by software.

    9. Re: God no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I agree it isn't a solution that a go-to-bestbuy person it going to have. I am just saying that if you're going to do it at least do it right.

      So for most people DON'T DO IT.

      captcha: neighbor

    10. Re:God no by BigT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "No. Your bum does that all on its own."

      --
      Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
    11. Re:God no by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pick one: 1984 or Idiocracy.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    12. Re: God no by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Exactly. This camera is targeted at normal people. To be more specific, it's targeted at your bed so bad guys can hack it and spy on you while you're fucking your wife/mistress/girlfriend/realdoll.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    13. Re:God no by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Nopers.

      Ages ago, a former Houston chief of police was saying that cameras in bedrooms was a good idea. Now, we get people wanting to pay for that. (Remember, if Amazon can look at something, any police department can.)

      Reminds me of the case recently where Amazon was asked to provide Alexa data to the cops on a murder, and insisted that the cops produce a warrant if they want it. Not that I want to murder anybody, but that last thing I want is something that is a telltale to the cops if ever they decide to investigate me (even if I have nothing to hide)

    14. Re: God no by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Um, I don't know about you, but while I do admittedly charge my phone on the bedside table, the phone is sitting usually face-up. That means the main camera is pointed at the table surface directly below it so it's useless, and the front-view camera is pointed at the ceiling. The only thing that front-view camera is ever going to see in that position is the belly of one of my cats when they decide to walk over it. (Sometimes the phone is face-down, but this isn't really any different, except that hackers will now have a higher-resolution view of my cat's underside.) The mic is definitely an issue though.

      The devices that come to mind immediately as a real danger in this way are these new "smart TVs", since on these any camera is pointing directly at the users in their normal TV-viewing positions. If the TV is in a bedroom, that means it's probably pointed at the bed and has an excellent view of whatever activity happens there. And why a TV could possibly need a camera and microphone, I have no idea. If we ever get to the point where we're Skyping people over TV screens, I can see the use, but we've had Skype-like technology for ages now and it's only rarely used for video chat it seems, and never on a TV that I've ever seen or heard of.

    15. Re:God no by slashrio · · Score: 2

      It wasn't really meant as fictional, as he has been discussing the reality of this with his teacher Aldous Huxley before, as we can learn from an article by Jan Irvin and Joe Atwill, describing their theory that, in short, banks and CIA work together to bring about a new age of peonage, for which a return to the Dark Ages would be needed, with the help of psychedelic (prescription?) drugs.
      It wasn't even a warning, well, maybe Huxley tried to warn, but rather an announcement made by Orwell.
      Expect some cognitive dissonance though...

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    16. Re: God no by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      This camera is targeted at normal people. To be more specific, it's targeted at your bed so bad guys can hack it and spy on you while you're fucking your wife/mistress/girlfriend/realdoll.

      Normal people can't afford a Realdoll. Or a mistress.

    17. Re:God no by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Why pick one? Brave New World, Idiocracy, 1984, Animal Farm all seem to be converging on us.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    18. Re:God no by taustin · · Score: 1

      1984 was supposed to be a dystopia, not a marketing plan.

    19. Re:God no by endercase · · Score: 1

      Yesss, Yess yess yes yes yes GOD!!! yes!!!!!!!! --"Exhibitionists everywhere shocked by this one easy trick. "

    20. Re: God no by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      All of my computers and both cellphones are in another room. The only electrical devices in the bedroom are a stupid alarm clock and some stupid lamps. And a POTS phone. No TV. No fancy electronics of ANY sort. The only way for anybody to peek into my bedroom is to do it physically. And I have motion-sensitive lights outside to illuminate anything outside my bedroom window. (To scare away animals, mostly, although it will be great target illumination if it ever comes to that.)

    21. Re: God no by p0larity · · Score: 1

      Physical disable: dark tape. At least for the camera.

    22. Re:God no by WeezulDK · · Score: 1

      GO AWAY! BATIN'!

    23. Re:God no by ExEm2SS · · Score: 1

      "I'm sorry. I don't know the answer to the question I heard."

    24. Re:God no by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      cops ... can cut a hole in your wall and install their own camera.

      That is how it should be. The police should get a warrant and then use their own products and tools to do their job. We should not be sold weak and broken mechanical and electronic devices, so that an investigative authority can turn our property into self incriminating evidence collectors at any time.

      Can you see the difference?

  2. Jeff Peeping Bezos by sinij · · Score: 1

    It is beyond me how could anyone think installing this in your home is a good idea. Plus, Jeff can afford to pay for his own pron.

    1. Re:Jeff Peeping Bezos by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Don't you remember when the Google subsidiary Nest purchased a company selling a product to do just this? They paid a cool half a billion for it: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/... Of course, they've done basically nothing with the platform/product since, so there may still be an untapped market.

    2. Re:Jeff Peeping Bezos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, if it get's popular enough than when the inevitable security breach finally occurs we as a society might finally get over our weird fixation with the idea that somone seeing a naked picture of you is some horrible injury, rather than somewhere between a non-issue and a minor annoyance.

    3. Re:Jeff Peeping Bezos by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I agree with your "nakedness shouldn't matter" sentiment, in the current moral and legal context having underage kids changing outfits in front of the internet-connected camera that automatically uploads images to the cloud is all kinds of problematic.

    4. Re:Jeff Peeping Bezos by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Lawmakers exempt themselves from laws and enforcers don't enforce the law against each other. Both of those classes are about as immune to the law as you can be. Embarrassing pics would need to be leaked before they would care about any implications.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  3. How many different ways can this go wrong? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Maybe technology is going too far.

  4. I might get one of these by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some hacker has the misfortune of seeing me butt ass, it would persuade them into a more legitimate profession PDQ

    1. Re:I might get one of these by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      If you're doing it as a public service to blind the hackers, perhaps a Kickstarter campaign is in order to finance the purchase. If donations reach above the threshold to buy one, then get extras and point them at printouts of Goatse.

    2. Re:I might get one of these by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Some hacker has the misfortune of seeing me butt ass, it would persuade them into a more legitimate profession PDQ

      They could always sell it to a humor website.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:I might get one of these by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Rule 34, dude. Rule 34.

  5. Automated Voyeurism! by chubs · · Score: 2

    Gone are the days where you have to wonder is there's a camera watching you dress or watching you be intimate in your bedroom. You never have to wonder again, because the answer is simply "Yes"! We will absolutely record your most private moments. Not only that, but we can automatically share them with the people who have no need to know. Have your parents been worried about how well you've been eating since you moved out? We'll send them a video of your latest BM!

    1. Re:Automated Voyeurism! by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Yet, how many people, pay any attention what so ever to where they place their smart phone, with microphone and cameras and dial home. What the hell is the purpose of echo, when you already have a smart phone invading your privacy in every way imaginable, especially after it has passed through US customs where they add programs.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  6. Good morning, Dave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I see you're having trouble merging with your wife tonight.

    May I suggest you update your Viagra drivers to the next version?

    1. Re:Good morning, Dave by sinij · · Score: 2

      I see you're having trouble merging with your wife tonight.

      May I suggest you update your Viagra drivers to the next version?

      The problem turned out to be a dangling pointer.

    2. Re:Good morning, Dave by digitig · · Score: 2

      No, it was a parity error. That wasn't his wife, it was his bit on the side.

      (Old Verity Stob joke)

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    3. Re:Good morning, Dave by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      The problem was his wife, it turns out he likes chasing pointers.

  7. Filed under: Nobody needs this! by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you can't get dressed on your own without seeking the approval of others (who aren't even in the same room with you) -- then you're already failing at life.

    I mean, I realize I'm a guy (and one of those "techie" types who is know not to care about clothing style as much as others). But this is ridiculous, no matter who you are. If you spent hard-earned money on pieces of clothing you've got hanging up in your closet, that means you liked them enough to buy them in the first place. You're just being petty and superficial if you start changing your mind about actually wearing what you, yourself liked and picked out, all because someone else (looking at a digital photo sent over the Internet) disagrees with you.

    1. Re:Filed under: Nobody needs this! by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must not be married.

      While I am happy to grab whatever t-shirt is next in the closet (sometimes the wife tries to arrange them based on the next pair of pants/shorts in the dresser)... my wife is a fair bit more concerned about her look, even though she will often deny it.

      It took me a while to realize, but Amazon's target market for quite a few things isn't geeks like us who want some random PC part or book delivered the next day... it's our wives/girlfriends who this is geared towards. Just watch the product video, all women, all into fashion. Sure, not all women are, but if you see enough of them in the wild you see how/why this is a smart move to target them.

      Go a bit further, ask married couples around you: Who orders more on Amazon? Who has a higher income in the household? More often than not (doubly so in households with children), the wife spends more on Amazon while the husband is the one paying for most of it.

      Note: I'm not saying any of this is good or bad (wrt who spends and who pays), simply that it is a smart move by Amazon to further exploit an area they've targeted for quite some time.

    2. Re:Filed under: Nobody needs this! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Some women, if given the chance, would not wear the same thing twice. Thankfully, there is a finite amount of money in the universe.

    3. Re: Filed under: Nobody needs this! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      We already have that... I still get asked the dangerous question "how does this look?" She will even take a pic herself and send it to a friend or family member for a second option, as clearly no answer I can give is correct.

    4. Re:Filed under: Nobody needs this! by naughtynaughty · · Score: 2

      Yes, we understand you are a guy who buys all sorts of tech equipment and talks excitedly about it with your friends and have no fashion sense.

      This isn't for you.

      Your perceived superiority over those who do want to look fashionable and enjoy clothes as much as you enjoy power supplies is, umm, something you should work on.

    5. Re: Filed under: Nobody needs this! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      "how does this look?"

      Answer: it's too late now, you already bought it.

    6. Re: Filed under: Nobody needs this! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Thrift stores, goodwill, ebay, etc. Plenty of ways to get rid of things already purchased... in order to make room for new things.

      One of these months I should measure exactly how much of the closet is mine and how much is hers. It's a good thing I don't have many shirts (because I don't need many), because I am left with very little.

    7. Re: Filed under: Nobody needs this! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you have a single rod, a nice closet system would make a huge difference: https://www.containerstore.com...

      We designed a custom setup with one rod across the top (up pretty high with some unusable shelving above the rod), and a lower rod on the left and right third. Middle is long hang / shelving / drawers. There are cheaper options elsewhere, but nothing beats their in-store software other than not being able to control the software myself.

  8. I think they already have it. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    I got my wife one of those $50 Fire tablets when they were new.

    Lot of good it does them when the battery is never charged.....

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  9. Not creepy, not at all ... by janoc · · Score: 1

    Who the f... thought that this is a good idea? That e.g. a woman would want to have her potentially naked photos "in the cloud"?

    Oh and how long until this gets hacked and the juicy pictures leaked/sold? Amazon didn't take the lesson from the phone hacking scandal in the UK? This sort of device/service would be a goldmine for stalkers, creeps and tabloids hunting for juicy dirt.

    Jesus Christ ...

    1. Re:Not creepy, not at all ... by xtal · · Score: 2

      Times change. A quick purvey of the internet demonstrates women are posting a lot more than naked selfies up - for free - largely in exchange for instant validation.

      There's so much amateur porn out there now that it is likely social norms and acceptance are rapidly being biased.

      Chances are nobody cares WHAT you post online anymore.

      --
      ..don't panic
  10. Will be popular by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that something like this has the possibility of being really popular. People are really, really stupid, and have little sense of self respect any more.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  11. Icloud leak writ large by TWX · · Score: 1

    Looks like we found the source for the next celebrity nude picture scandal. Only this time, instead of the pictures being intentionally taken by the celebrity or their lover, the photos are taken by someone that hacked the weak security surrounding the control system for the device and took the pictures themselves.

    Security cameras are already ironically highly insecure, and those theoretically are from companies that should specialize in security, where the data should remain only on tightly controlled networks. This thing doesn't stand a chance.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Icloud leak writ large by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      Most of the cheap security cameras are designed to be accessed from the Internet, making them inherently risk.

      This device is not designed to be accessed externally. It doesn't expose itself by default to the internet with a default username and password.

      I suspect that this thing stands a far better chance. It has a security model closer to the Nest Cam, which is pretty secure and uses good two way authentication and encryption to protect its video.

      Sure, you don't want to have your Amazon account account just like you don't want to have your Google account or iCloud account hacked as that gives someone access to pictures you've taken with your phone. But unless extremist terrorists are secretly fashionistas who buy Amazon Looks to see how they look wearing their suicide vests then I doubt the NSA will spend a lot of time trying to figure a way to hack them so they can secretly record suspected terrorists.

      It's really not too hard to turn it to face a wall. Heck, you can even unplug it when not in use.

    2. Re:Icloud leak writ large by Zmobie · · Score: 1

      It doesn't expose itself by default to the internet with a default username and password.

      .... Didn't the summary straight up say it automatically uploads the pictures to the cloud? How exactly is that not connected and exposed to the internet by default? I mean it might not have a default username and password but no company every took any shortcuts or did something outside best security practices right?

    3. Re:Icloud leak writ large by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      Many security cameras expose ports to the internet, they are directly connected and exposed. They get hacked by script kiddies.

      Devices that don't accept connections but make connections to a secure server and do so with secure authentication aren't a significant risk. They don't get hacked by script kiddies.

    4. Re:Icloud leak writ large by Zmobie · · Score: 1

      Yea, I'm well aware of how that works, but ANY exposure to the internet creates a remote attack surface that a bad actor can exploit. You are giving them a lot of credit thinking that they have locked it down so tight that it will be that difficult to get into. It may not be trivial, but I have known more than my fair share of blackhats that did that shit for fun and they weren't just a bunch of script kiddies.

  12. I hate this thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since I got it all Amazon has on its main page are "Recommendations for you"
    1. Diet pills.
    2. Tread mill.
    3. diet books
    4. fitness bands.

    Then under "Recommendations for you in clothing" all they have are tarps and a children's party bouncy castle.

  13. Obligatory quote by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2

    I felt a disturbance in the force, as if a billion teenage girls cried out all at once.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:Obligatory quote by WeezulDK · · Score: 1

      "I like where this is going... giggity, giggity, gig-a-dee!" - Quagmire

  14. I don't want one but.... by fishthegeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is honestly kind of a brilliant way to float a "presence" balloon. IMHO: At first Amazon didn't get what Echo was. They thought of it as an internet connected speaker, when in reality it was a modern day "Thing" from the Addams Family. I think they've learned that lesson, but one of the most important attributes of Thing is that it understood who was where, and who was addressing it. A lack of contextual awareness is what makes all automation suck. I don't want motion sensors to know if I moved, I want home automation that knows which room I'm in. I also think this is a shot across Apple's bow.

    --
    load "$",8,1
    1. Re:I don't want one but.... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "IMHO: At first Amazon didn't get what Echo was."

      Oh, you are funny.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:I don't want one but.... by Zmobie · · Score: 1

      So the next iteration is going to walk around your house making snarky gestures that make other people laugh?

  15. Progress is great by Coisiche · · Score: 2

    How did the human race survive with just mirrors before this technology was developed?

    Just fine, if you're actually looking for an answer.

    1. Re:Progress is great by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      How did we survive before {fill in the blank with anything}?

      Answer is the same, just fine. But just the same I like my phone even though it has a camera and microphone and GPS that someone can use to track me, hear me and see me.

      If I'm off to commit the perfect crime I'll leave my phone at home and not count the loot in front of an Amazon Look.

    2. Re:Progress is great by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      How did the human race survive with just mirrors before this technology was developed?

      Most people who have ever lived before Amazon planted cameras in bedrooms are dead.

      Most people who have lived since Amazon planted cameras in bedrooms are still alive.

      This is proof that Amazon's technology is a life saver.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  16. not for me by fattmatt · · Score: 1

    Like most geniuses I wear the same clothes everyday, so this has no value for me.

    1. Re: not for me by saboosh · · Score: 1

      Your mother needs to stop calling me

  17. There should be a law... by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    For several years now, Amazon really has been leading the way toward making it impossible to tell the difference between joke product ideas and the real ones. Google/Apple/Microsoft have had some bad ideas too, but they all get totally left in the dust by Amazon. I mean, this is the company that sells buttons for buying stuff.

    Is there a Poe's Law of consumer electronics yet? We're getting close to needing one.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:There should be a law... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They launched it during April...just a bit late.

      Also in late April Fool's Day news, Nordstrom now has fake "muddy" blue jeans for $425.

  18. Nope ^ 1000! by DrYak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    camera that's designed to go somewhere in your bedroom, bathroom, or wherever the hell you get dressed

    and

    All photos and video captured with your Echo Look are securely stored in the AWS cloud

    What. Could. Possibly. Go. Wrong.

    I think this deserve a new concept of "Nope-finity" to be invented, just to have a proper answer.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      camera that's designed to go somewhere in your bedroom, bathroom, or wherever the hell you get dressed

      and

      All photos and video captured with your Echo Look are securely stored in the AWS cloud

      What. Could. Possibly. Go. Wrong.

      Unlike say... a Nest/Dropcam which (with a cloud dvr plan) is more or less watching & streaming to the cloud 24/7... I would bet good money these things are built not unlike the Echo products... to only listen for a wake word locally, then transmit what it hears afterwards to the cloud for recognition and then act.

      Sure, if you get your hands on the hardware you could probably drop a custom FW load which would turn it evil, or if you had enough access at Amazon you could do the same, but if they are smart (ie their lawyers sufficiently paranoid), they took steps to make random remote access a good bit more difficult than you think.

    2. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by rickb928 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't care where they are stored.

      I care HOW they are USED.

      No, I won't be using any of these tools any time soon, if ever. Already these services are too intrusive.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by burtosis · · Score: 2

      Pretty sure this product idea is more inciteful than insightful.

    4. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by Darth+Twon · · Score: 2
      I read that as:

      "All photos and video captured with your Echo Look are securely stored in the AWS cloud and locally in the Echo Look app until a customer deletes them,"

      As in: once you delete them, they no longer store them securely, they just store them normally in AWS. Or they store them somewhere else.

      And then:

      "You can delete the photos or videos associated with your account anytime in the Echo Look App."

      As in: What if they make copies that they don't associate with your account? I.e. in aggregate with all metadata stripped out? Is my naked backside metadata?

      Too paranoid?

      --
      Take this sig and smoke it.
    5. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I care HOW they are USED.

      They tell you in the summary, so your friends can tell you if your outfit is cute.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    6. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      "Nope-finity": about 50100 results found.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      The Fappening 2: electric boogaloo

    8. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      "Infinope": about 184 results found.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      "Too paranoid?"

      No. Perhaps not quite paranoid enough.

      And remember, just because you're paranoid does NOT mean that nobody is out to get you!

    10. Re:Nope ^ 1000! by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does, because I'm not really all THAT paranoid. But I _AM_ paranoid enough to not have any "Internet of Things" devices in the house.

  19. Count your CHARGES name them one by one... by laurencetux · · Score: 1

    I could see

    1 the devices get hacked and take some "extra" pictures
    2 the data gets nicked and then resold
    3 somebodies kidlet gets filmed
    4 and the parent is a BIG NAME
    5 the units get used as a spycam

    So who wants to sell a "Blocker Bucket" that can be dropped on these things to prevent everything but 2??

  20. Too much noise by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Sorry, can't hear you.
    Over the noise of a billion of 4chan creepy online freaks fapping at hacked pictures of said teenage girls.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  21. Summary is misleading about intent by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    It's fairly clear the author of the summary didn't even RTFA. Here is a better summary: This is an idea targeted at women in particular. The intent is to have Amazon Echo be able to answer the question "How do I look?"

    Clearly, that's still kind of creepy but you can see why the person came up with the idea even if it's completely stupid. This kind of reminds of the Death 2.0 mobile app that can text you as if a dead loved one were still alive. These ideas are around trying to make "robots" or "artificial intelligence" have genuine human interaction with you.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  22. Just name it after me by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    "IoT devices designed to get you to use someone's services, are making it impossible to tell the difference between real products and parodies." -- Cajun Hell

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  23. OK I'm just too old. I know that now. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    " Amazon is pitching it as an easy way to snap pictures of your outfits to send to your friends when you're not sure if your outfit is cute "

    What the serious fuck?

    People can't even make decisions about their own clothes any more without consulting the groupmind?

    --
    -Styopa
  24. Yes! Always wanted to transmit my bathroom habits by evolutionary · · Score: 1

    Sure, I always wanted to send/transmit what I do in the bathroom to the world. Great opportunities for people pitch hair removal, hair growth, various enlargement products, dating services (complete with a hygiene rating index) as well as taste in perfume/cologne to consumers worldwide. It's a brave new world and EVERYTHING is up for grabs. Just take a good HOT shower and you have a smoke screen I guess.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
  25. As if this is new... by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

    I've wanted to put a camera in your bedroom for years, but where's my article?

  26. Amazon hasn't thought this out. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Amazon is pitching it as an easy way to snap pictures of your outfits to send to your friends when you're not sure if your outfit is cute, ...

    Alexa? Does this dress make me look fat?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Amazon hasn't thought this out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Alexa? Does this dress make me look fat?

      Alexa: "No, it is the fat that makes you look fat"

    2. Re:Amazon hasn't thought this out. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      Alexa? Does this dress make me look fat?

      "No, the dress has nothing to do with it".

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  27. I would also like to put a camera and microphone . by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    and best of all, my camera and microphone will cost HALF as much as Amazon is going to charge you. ;D

    Unfortunately both of my parents have fallen for this stupid Amazon scheme.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  28. Clap on by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Clap off. The Clapper(tm) is the only microphone allowed in my bedroom.

    Well... I guess the telephone has a microphone too.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  29. Re:OK I'm just too old. I know that now. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    People can't even make decisions about their own clothes any more without consulting the groupmind?

    I take you you have not gone shopping with girls in the last 50 years?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  30. I weep for humanity by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    If this is where our technology advances are leading us, it would not take an advanced AI to defeat mankind. Probably a refurbished C64 would do the job nicely.

  31. Apparently and obviously.. by 3seas · · Score: 2

    The NSA, CIA, FBI and local police are board....

    1. Re:Apparently and obviously.. by Phics · · Score: 1

      The NSA, CIA, FBI and local police are on board....

      FTFY

      --
      There are two types of people in the world; those who believe there are two types of people, and those who don't.
    2. Re:Apparently and obviously.. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when you do nothing but sit around calculating the plank constant....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  32. crazy time by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    People have got to be fucking crazy if they want this

  33. Re:OK I'm just too old. I know that now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, if there's one thing the internet has proven itself to be perfect at, it's telling what color a dress is.

  34. Guesswork? by Phics · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been wondering lately if tech companies are just throwing technology at various populations to see what sticks. Is it cheaper to develop this crap and see if they stumble on something popular and trendy, or if they actually spend any time or effort researching and vetting ideas before developing them? Maybe I'm slowly going beige, but this idea just seems ludicrous to my dusty old brain.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world; those who believe there are two types of people, and those who don't.
  35. Oxymoron by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    securely stored in the AWS cloud

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  36. why?!? by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I imagine only teenage girls would be superficial enough that they'd feel the need to dress and undress in front of an Internet-connected camera so their outfits could be.... ...

    hang on, I need to order 10 of these and a copy of ORA's "Hacking the IoT".

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  37. Re:OK I'm just too old. I know that now. by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

    I see lots of forums where people discuss motherboards, CPUs, power supplies, etc.

    They can't even make decisions about their tech purchases any more without consulting the groupmind?

  38. Re:They'll need to include a microscope by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    It's the only way to see Trump's dick

    You don't need a microscope to see Steve Bannon, what are you talking about?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  39. Re:OK I'm just too old. I know that now. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    How Slashdot users would use this:

    "Amazon, does this shirt and these trousers go together"
    "No, red jeans should never be paired with Hawaiian shirts"
    "Too late, it's already on my body"

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  40. Re:Dear Amazon by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Go fuck yourself. Stop trying to be anything other than a store.

    I am so happy I got rid of my Amazon account.

    I'm not sure I agree with that. Hardware wise they've had good success.
    The Kindle e-reader was a life changer. I appreciate that device.
    The Kindle tablet was fantastic. $35 (black Friday few years back) for a decent enough crappy tablet to give the kids- will play their crappy games without costing me a fortune if they drop it.
    Getting into distribution has saved a bunch on shipping.
    I watch Amazon Prime TV, only way I can find some shows.

    I'm rather glad they've innovated and branched out. We even have a DOT that we use everyday to control lights in a room where accessing the switch is a bitch and is very useful (we're aware it records and stores everything we ask it, and we don't ask it where to bury bodies or anything).

    The camera is a step too far, and one would hope those that use it, use it with some common sense (cover the lens when not in use, never walk in front of it naked, etc).

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  41. easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Step 1: install a cheap net-connected camera with a view of your kitchen
    Step 2: sometime when your wife is starting dinner before you get home, use it to see what she is making
    Step 3: text her to say you don't feel like [whatever she started making] tonight you want [something else specific]
    Step 4: hear your wife ban connected cameras from your house

    Practical demonstrations are more convincing than theory.

    If you have small children and are less brave, use this method to positively comment on how she handled something with them while you weren't home.

  42. Holy Panoptic Dystopias, Batman! by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1

    When I see ideas like this, I have to work hard to remind myself that they're just the natural outgrowth of random stupidity, rather than part of some crypto-conspiratorial plan, probably involving the Illuminati and/or some sort of emergent tachycognitive post-human intelligence.

    --
    Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
  43. BrickerBot by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1

    Also, BrickerBot seems more like a public service campaign every day.

    --
    Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
  44. Jailbait by grogger · · Score: 2

    This is where many stupidities collide. 1) 14 year old girl gets changed while talking on the phone 2) Says "It takes my picture when I say 'Photo me Echo'" 3) Echo takes picture of semi naked 14 year old 4) She says "And then I say 'Send it to everyone Echo'" 5) Picture goes to all her friends 6) School does random search of everyone's phone 7) All her friends charged with possession of Child porn and become sex offenders 8) Not sure who profits.

    1. Re:Jailbait by snookiex · · Score: 1

      Lawyers, of course.

      --
      Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  45. CIA performance review by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1

    This is going to keep the CIA hacking team busy. So many new products to hack.

  46. Re:The mic was bad enough. by vux984 · · Score: 2

    When the echo first came out, I thought the last thing I wanted in my house was an always-on microphone. I stand corrected.

    Took me a few reads to realize you stand corrected because this is the new last thing you want. I originally read that as you changed your mind and like the amazon mic now.

    Frankly these are all abominations, but the bedroom fashion camera still comes in second to the trivially hacked camera equipped vibrator...

    https://www.dailydot.com/irl/c...

  47. Re:Pictures with sound from my bedroom? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    With the activities in my bedroom, they have no idea what they're signing up for (and I'm only about half kidding).

    Why? Did RealDoll start making nekomimi furry dolls? I'm supposed to be on their mailing list, damnit!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  48. CP question by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What would happen if a child wandered in front of the camera nude, and amazon stored that on their server -- would they be responsible for CP?

    1. Re:CP question by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      I was just being flippant; and of course amazon has the legal clout to not be on the hook for such things.. but yeah, there's cases of people having photos developed of their young toddlers swimming nude, and getting the cops called on them -- so stranger things have happened.

  49. so amazon wants to be an sex offender?? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    so amazon wants to be an sex offender?? now just wait for this get someone under 18!

  50. Nopefinity and beyond by DrYak · · Score: 2

    I care HOW they are USED.

    They tell you in the summary, so your friends can tell you if your outfit is cute.

    I think what the above poster wanted to say would have been more appropriately expressed as

    HOW they are ABUSED

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  51. What could possibly... by MarkVVV · · Score: 1

    go wrong?

  52. I like to watch by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    How convenient, a RAT that you can install yourself.

  53. This will benefit boomers ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... as in: "How many times did I get up to pee last night?"

    "When was the last time I took a shit?"

    I already have this stuff, so I know there's a market.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  54. Petcam, baby monitor with Alexa by spinitch · · Score: 1

    I use an inexpensive baby monitor for a pet cam when away , shows temperature and provides audio otherwise it is off line. Think an Alexa capable web cam could be useful for their product portfolio. I would like one that has remote rotation capability if not to expensive. A couple inexpensive dot like cameras would be nice so could cover multiple viewing angles. The social features for others makes sense given Instagrams success for Amazon to tip into that space. Suggest hard off switches for devices with remote cams and mics- wish I had more confidence my smart phone not remotely recording/ transmitting. The Look not much different in this way but at least users should be more aware since its main purpose. Some over blown paranoia get a tin foil hat instead if turning off when don't want to use if to much of a chore for you.

  55. I wonder how long until these get hacked... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    As these are consumer devices, security will suck. Maybe it will be better than average, but even then it likely takes one talented black-hat and pictures from your bedroom will make it on the Internet.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:I wonder how long until these get hacked... by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      What, just because existing voice-activated consumer devices have terrible security, and existing IP-connected security cameras have terrible security, you think that a product combining the two will have terrible security?

      Of course on top of that we have the fact that the economic incentives are all for it to have terrible security (in the name of "usability" and "convenience").

      But I have to appreciate how Amazon is pitching its terrible security - particularly the lack of privacy - as a feature. Nicely played.

  56. Intent is irrelevant by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

    What it does is obtain footage of people and store it indefinitely (Amazon confirmed this), while feeding it to AI and potentially sell it to 3rd parties. Feature Creep is a real thing in privacy related matters: data is collected for X, but soon after someone sees that the data is also usable for Y and it's used for Y, without asking the original person giving data for X whether it can be used for Y, as they don't have to (it's in every EULA).

    Your post shows you're really naive when it comes to these things: don't trust anyone with your data and personal information: it _will_ be used for things you haven't given permission for.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  57. I can't even order one yet by LostPassword · · Score: 1

    "Thank you for your request. If selected, you will receive an email with an invitation to purchase. This product is available by invitation only." Bummer. How is this different than just using a selfie stick?

  58. Just wait by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    ... for Amazon's Echo Crap, which goes in the toilet bowl, analyzes your elimination procedures and products, and offers helpful advice on health, diet, and lifestyle. Thanks to the built-in waterproof camera it will also perform motion-efficiency analysis on your wiping activities.

    And should you suddenly decide you want to buy something while you're lightening your load, or feel that your Facebook friends want to know about your excretory success, it features Amazon's patented Intrusive Voice Activated Spying with Immediate Impulse Satisfaction.

  59. What do they want? by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    Old, fat people pr0n?

    Why the hell would you want a camera in my bedroom? WHEN you get "action" it's going to be a flabby @$$ attempting to (@)%@ another flabby @$$.

    The rest is going to be dark with a lot of snoring.

  60. Orwell was right, and wrong. by jtgd · · Score: 1

    What he got right was that we would all have a telescreens in our homes.

    What he got wrong is not realizing that we would enthusiastically welcome it with open arms.

    --
    J