Slashdot Mirror


Managers Should Start Texting Job Candidates, Says Study (fastcompany.com)

From a report: A new survey by Yello, a talent recruiting software company, has found that there are some aspects of the hiring process that companies could stand to improve. The report, taken from a survey of 1,461 young adults between the ages of 18 and 30 who were either currently employed or had accepted full-time or internship offers, found that mobile phones are one of the most useful tools for the interviewing and hiring process. Text messages, for example, may be the unsung hero of the communication loop. Yello's survey data indicates respondents would welcome getting a text from a business, particularly because they're so used to responding quickly to text messages. The report shows that 86% of those surveyed felt positively when text messages were used during the interview period, an increase from 79% in 2016. More candidates are happy to do video interviews in lieu of traveling to meet hiring managers in person.

155 comments

  1. Cellular as a utility. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    So, which is essential? Broadband access, or cellular access?

    1. Re:Cellular as a utility. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cellular broadband.

    2. Re: Cellular as a utility. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for email

    3. Re:Cellular as a utility. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, which is essential? Broadband access, or cellular access?

      false dichotomy!

      The essentials are: food, water, clothing and shelter, sanitation, education, and healthcare.

    4. Re:Cellular as a utility. by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      The essentials are: food, water, clothing and shelter, sanitation, education, and healthcare.

      ...and the interview resulting in the job/money to obtain these essentials is NOT essential?

  2. Oh hell no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.. I pay per message on my plan and this would be ridiculous.. Plus, who wants to be woken in the middle of the night by a TXT from some automated system?

    1. Re:Oh hell no. by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 0

      Is it 2005 where you are? Why are you paying for text messages?

    2. Re:Oh hell no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you have, a grandfathered plan from the turn of the millennium? most providers have had unlimited txts for the better part of a decade.

    3. Re:Oh hell no. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Then buy a virtual number for something like $1.50 per month and enable SMS on that. Have the texts routed to your email so you don't get woken up.

    4. Re:Oh hell no. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      What do you have, a grandfathered plan from the turn of the millennium?

      My sister-in-law kept the same cellphone with a $10 per month plan for ten years. That is until she used the restroom at work one day. The cellphone slipped out of her of pocket and into the toilet bowl. Since it was an auto flush toilet, her cellphone was long gone by the time she turned around. She got an iPhone and paid $90 per month like the rest of us.

    5. Re:Oh hell no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep - Welcome to Komunustic Canada where everyone has Data Caps and SMS is Extra.

    6. Re:Oh hell no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay for out-of-network text messages because everybody I gave permission to text me is in-network and by paying for text messages my Verizon monthly bill is less than $80 with real, grandfathered, unlimited data even after taxes, fees, etc are counted.

      If you're happy paying more, living with limited data, or having connectivity in fewer places then bully for you. But I've got a good plan at a good price as long as assholes don't insist I give them permission to spam me with texts.

    7. Re:Oh hell no. by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Got a Google Voice number for free years ago that I can use for SMS without paying extra to my carrier. Also lets me send/receive SMS from the web interface using a real keyboard. Another bonus is that it transcribes my voicemail so I don't have to waste time listening to it.

      Seems extra pointless to pay for SMS messages, since they're low priority traffic that piggyback on the cellular control protocol, so they don't really cost the networks anything in terms of bandwidth or extra equipment. But American marketing likes to get you to pay extra for whatever they can make you perceive as a "feature".

    8. Re:Oh hell no. by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the US, where unlimited texting only comes with $50+/month plans.

    9. Re:Oh hell no. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'm an odd combination of agile[1] and clumsy, plus there are a lot pickpockets round here. My phone, wallet and keys are all on lanyards. The only way one of them can gan doon the netty is if I go with it.

      [1] not in the shitty excuse for a methodology sense.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Oh hell no. by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. You can easily get a $30 plan with unlimited texts, calls and 2GB of LTE.

    11. Re:Oh hell no. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I had to pay for mine so I disabled it. Later I found out I could get unlimited text, but they never notified me, I only learned when I went to change some other aspect of the account. Now I don't know where to get the plan you speak of without changing vendors, but I hear some people change often.

  3. Millenials by tattood · · Score: 2

    Its not surprising that the Millennials, who spend a lot of their time texting on their phones, like to be contacted by texts.

    --
    WTB [sig], PST!!!
    1. Re:Millenials by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So is this age discrimination?

      Because I usually only see the text alerts at the end of the day when I plug my phone in to charge.

    2. Re:Millenials by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Its not surprising that the Millennials, who spend a lot of their time texting on their phones, like to be contacted by texts.

      Not just millennials. I am very much not a millennial and I much prefer text over voice calls most of the time, especially for business. It forces people to be brief, and I can decide how urgent it is and respond appropriately.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:Millenials by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      To me, a text message is good for short conversations that require intermediate speed response.

      If you want me to drop everything I do and talk to you, call me, but in some cases (say, I'm driving) I may be unable to answer, then I'll call you back as soon as I can, hopefully you will be able to answer then. This is OK if what you need to talk about only has value in that instant or you really need a fast response from me r you need a confirmation that I have received the info.

      If you want to tell me something, but it can wait an hour or so, send me a text message, I'll read it as soon as I can.

      If you want to tell me something, but this does not require fast action from me, send me an email, I check my email a few times a day.

      So, to me, "You are (not) hired" is quite appropriate for SMS. It does not require me to drop everything and talk to you, but lets me know quite quickly about the result.

    4. Re:Millenials by boskone · · Score: 2

      The other thing that email is UNIQUELY great at is for having more than a few bytes of info.

      Great, you're hired.

      OK, sure, that could be text or call or email, but WtF are the next steps?

      Employment packet? Call Tim in HR to schedule your background check? What's his number again, here, let me find a pencil and write that down

      or send me a fucking email with the info I need.

      again, fine if some people want to hear via text they got it or not, but even the text would need to include "look for an email with details"

      BTW, it's never just "you're hired"

      it usually is "we'd like to make you and offer"

      then you dicker on start date and pay. I don't really want to do that via SMS.

      maybe i'm doing it wrong, but I actually like to get a useful amount of information, beyond twitter length

    5. Re:Millenials by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      No, I do not want to have a long conversation via SMS too. However, I may not be able to check my email very often (maybe my current job is away from a PC or I do not have a job and am doing something away from a PC), but I would like to be notified of the answer faster than the next time I check my email.

      After receiving the SMS, I would find some paper and a pen and would call back to ask for the additional information or check my email for it.

    6. Re:Millenials by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The part I don't understand is, "Managers should." This seems a bit like an underpants gnome exercise, with backwards phrasing. Underpants yoda, I guess.

      In other news, 83% of surveyed professionals said they would feel positive about being assigned a private business jet, and 92% would feel positive about being given a free car. Only 7% had positive feelings about receiving a pony as a signing bonus.

      98% of managers felt positive about hiring employees who read and comprehended the contact instructions in the job listing and conformed their normal practices to the requested procedure.

      83% of executives requested a meeting to discuss the company policy regarding use of cellphones during work after having heard of this study.

    7. Re:Millenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I see this is a good for is scheduling of appointments and reminders nothing more nothing less.

      HR Manager: Thank you for your interest in our company. Please come in for an Interview at 1030 AM on 6 June 2017. Dress Code is business casual. Contact 855-555-1212 for more information. [Add to Calendar]

      Potential Employee: Confirmed, and what is business casual?

      HR Manager: Polo Shirt and Khaki, Sport Coat button down shirt and slacks, or a blouse and slacks for females.

      Potential Employee: Confirmed please send directions.

      HR Manager: [Google Maps Link here]

      Potential Employee: Thank you for the link, and have a good day.

      Later that month................

      HR Manager: You have been selected as our best candidate look for an e-mail within the next days for your new hire packet which includes all the documents you need.

      Potential Employee: Thank you for this reminder.

      Couple Days later.......

      Potential Employee: You should be receiving my completed documents shortly. Please let me know when you have.

      HR Manager: New Employee Packet Received, on boarding and final offer letters will be mailed out next week via e-mail and snail mail.

      Next Week............

      HR Manager: Thank you for completing the process, your effective start day is 29 June 2017 at 0900. E-mail will follow shortly of what to expect the first day and welcome aboard.

    8. Re:Millenials by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Yea, it also leaves a log by default, so I can always just read the message again if I forget some detail. When talking over the phone I either have to write it down (good if I can do it at the time) or record the conversation (also good, but needs preparation).

    9. Re:Millenials by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Its not surprising that the Millennials, who spend a lot of their time texting on their phones, like to be contacted by texts.

      Meanwhile, Gen X likes to be contacted via ICQ or AOL Instant Messenger but the Millenials, who are attempting to hire them, don't understand what either of those things are. The struggle is real!

      --
      We'll make great pets
    10. Re:Millenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, THAT's funny.

    11. Re:Millenials by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Some of us (older) gen-xers prefer to use complete sentences, so email or (gasp!) paper also works.

    12. Re:Millenials by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm not a millennial but I'll take text over phone call. I get bombarded by calls whenever I update my profiles, most of them during work time. On the rare occasion I answer the other person is either on an unintelligible VOIP line or the job is bullshit. Most of them can't read ether, so rarely take into account my requirements. What part of "not on the Brexit zone (excluding Scotland)" is unclear?

      Email is best, easiest to ignore.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Hai u haz job? by zifn4b · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hai u haz job? I haz i wud lik to offr u, u intersted?

    Or u could just go straight to the employer equivalent of Tinder. Ideal candidates will have exceptional rap battle skillz.

    --
    We'll make great pets
    1. Re:Hai u haz job? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Hai u haz job? I haz i wud lik to offr u, u intersted?

      Sorry, I don't speak fluent Japanese. :P

  5. I guess I'm officially old now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just think this sounds ridiculous. I text my buddy to see if he saw that awesome goal on TV. I'm not interested in getting texts from companies in any way, shape, or form - employment related or otherwise.

    1. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather get the text. Its easier to dismiss the garbage messages than dialing into VM, listening to the 1st part of the msg or god forbid longer if they don't get to the point then deleting it. and then there's that damn nagging VM waiting indicator.

    2. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is ridiculous.

    3. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I just think this sounds ridiculous.

      I'm allegedly a millennial (at least of the "Oregon Trail" generation), and I concur.

      You know what every single person with a text-message-capable smartphone also has? A fucking phone! One that he can make a phone call with, and have a conversation with the interviewer using his voice! It's shocking, I know, but it's true!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Dialing into VM? Where do you get your cellular service from, the stone age?

      Give out a Google Voice number or build up your own transcription system using their Speech API.

    5. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And the bright side of this - if you leave a voicemail when they don't answer, you can weed out the people who don't check their voicemail.

    6. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome goal? I'm sorry, but nothing in sports is ever "awesome". Stop using inappropriate words.

    7. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep - your American bias is showing. Not available elsewhere.

    8. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      Why would somebody willingly engage in a game of phone tag?

      I'd rather die of dysentery.

      Well, maybe not die. But at least get really sick from.

    9. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      And the bright side of this - if you leave a voicemail when they don't answer, you can weed out the people who don't check their voicemail.

      Or anyone who didn't call within 15 minutes of a job posting appearing on Indeed.com.

    10. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any restrictions on the speech API - it's available in 80 languages.
      https://cloud.google.com/speec...

      Google Voice is only one way to get visual Voicemail - iPhone pretty much forced it with every carrier and Android at least makes it an option.

    11. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That just proves desperation - not always a good quality in an employee (or that they spend all day at work surfing Indeed.com).

    12. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That just proves desperation - not always a good quality in an employee (or that they spend all day at work surfing Indeed.com).

      I've gotten a half-dozen interviews that way. Alternatively, if a recruiter calls you and you don't call back in 15 minutes, some won't consider you for a position because you weren't "prompt" enough.

    13. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That just proves desperation - not always a good quality in an employee (or that they spend all day at work surfing Indeed.com).

      I've gotten a half-dozen interviews that way. Alternatively, if a recruiter calls you and you don't call back in 15 minutes, some won't consider you for a position because you weren't "prompt" enough.

      With that attitude they probably weren't worth calling back anyway.

    14. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      With that attitude they probably weren't worth calling back anyway.

      You wouldn't know until you called them back. Some recruiters think unemployed people just sit around waiting for the phone to ring. When I'm doing an active job searching, I'm tracking of 32 calls and emails each day.

    15. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't know until you called them back.

      Oh I know the type already. No thanks.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    16. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You know what else somebody with a smartphone has with them? Email. You can haz whole words!

    17. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes I heard someone do an interview by phone on a bus - I think that kind of sucked for both parties and the large audience was also visibly disgusted that there was a bit of nepotism in the mix.
      Sometimes setting up a time works better than just trying to do it on the fly.

    18. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You know what every single person with a text-message-capable smartphone also has? A fucking phone! One that he can make a phone call with, and have a conversation with the interviewer using his voice! It's shocking, I know, but it's true!

      But from an HR/interviewer's point of view it's far quicker and easier to get an unpaid intern send out a bunch of "soz u r not hrd" texts, rather than having a well paid professional spend all day on the phone listening to sob stories about how people were depending on the job to feed their bed-ridden mother, etc.

      This is about companies saving money.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:I guess I'm officially old now. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You know what's even faster than that? E-mail. Paste the rejected candidates' addresses into the BCC field and you're done.

      (There are ways to send SMS to multiple recipients at once too, but as far as I know they're less ubiquitously available. Also, copying and pasting on phones sucks.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re: I guess I'm officially old now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are replying to creimer. You might not have noticed because he didn't mention being laid off for two years from his job for being too awesome. Nor how he now (claims he) works a government IT job while shitposting on Slashdot in order to make... Up to $50/month in ads or some bullshit.

      He still weighs 350 pounds. But stopped powerlifting. No word on his 1500 calorie diet bit still not losing weight lately. Maybe he realized its not supposed to be 1500 calories per meal, but per day.

  6. More ways to shoot yourself in the foot by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With reddit full of auto-correct errors ranging from lewd to obscene, I cannot imagine the already stressful process of interviewing will be enhanced with the frustration of texting.

    1. Re:More ways to shoot yourself in the foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you for contacting me about this opportunity. I promise I will beat a harp worker for you.

      *beat a harp worker

      *BE A HARP WORKER

      *HARD, HARD, DUCKING AUTOCORRECT!

    2. Re:More ways to shoot yourself in the foot by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Thank you for contacting me about this opportunity. I promise I will beat a harp worker for you.

      *beat a harp worker

      *BE A HARP WORKER

      *HARD, HARD, DUCKING AUTOCORRECT!

      This must be an Iphone thing. I never get such incorrect texts on my Nexus 5x. Also if I write fucking, it prints fucking.

      Typed this out on my Nexus 5x. HTML is a pain in the arse.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  7. WTF LOL HR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like a job, RU serious bro? U pay me $ 2 fill seatz? Awsum BRB juz got 2 txt dicpic 2 IRS

  8. Re:I am extra partial to blowjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHA it's funny because dead.

  9. Re:I am extra partial to blowjobs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Texts are so 2000 and late. You give me a good blowjob, you got yourself an interview.

    This was the original idea for The Apprentice.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Codding childrens needs. by geekmux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...a survey of 1,461 young adults between the ages of 18 and 30...found that mobile phones are one of the most useful tools for the interviewing and hiring process"

    Translation: 1,461 young adults admit they can't live without their mobile phone, and prefer it as the tool for communicating, regardless if it's for an interview or a Tinder hook-up.

    I wonder how these young adults would feel if they got fired via text message. Oh, suddenly that would be rude and impersonal? Yeah, not unlike wanting to be hired via text message.

    "More candidates are happy to do video interviews in lieu of traveling to meet hiring managers in person."

    I can understand if a company is having a difficult time filling a position being open to a bit more flexibility when hiring, but this kind of pandering and coddling to the social-media texting generation is rather pathetic. You want the job bad enough? Then make an effort to get off your ass and go meet the human hiring you in fucking person.

    1. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "More candidates are happy to do video interviews in lieu of traveling to meet hiring managers in person."

      I can understand if a company is having a difficult time filling a position being open to a bit more flexibility when hiring, but this kind of pandering and coddling to the social-media texting generation is rather pathetic. You want the job bad enough? Then make an effort to get off your ass and go meet the human hiring you in fucking person.

      Generally, any video interview I have done was for a job in another state. So it's not a matter of "getting off your ass" but doing something is more personal than a phone interview, but doesn't waste $500-1,000 of either the party's money. And also more effective for both parties.

    2. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention actually SEEING the work environ before you accept an offer can be as enlightening as the interview itself... I'm old and only had to jump 8 or so jobs at most in my career because I made fucking sure I'd like the place before accepting... but hey, wtf would I know right??

    3. Re: Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just showing up is often sign of childish mindset, people have jobs other than come meet people who show up unannounced. If my company publishes procedure to apply for employment, I would not accept breaking rules, it leads to nepotism and hiring based on looks and other undesirable things.

    4. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texting job candidates is just silly. However I've noticed in the past year that phone interviews have become a lot more common and I don't mind them as they save time for both the hiring manager and myself, especially if it can be determined quickly that the job would not be a good fit at least I didn't have to take time off and dress up nicer than average just to find out that I wouldn't want the job anyway.

    5. Re:Codding childrens needs. by WDot · · Score: 1

      I'm in the age range and I've never personally requested a Skype interview, but it's common now from what I see. It's a convenience because the company doesn't have to fly me out and pay for my food and hotel.

      As for texting, yes I would like to be texted information about the current status of the hiring process. Or emailed. Honestly, 9/10 phone calls I get these days are spam. I regularly communicate with my friends through text messages rather than calling them up on the phone. It's quiet, convenient, and asynchronous. On a phone call I have to find a quiet place or advertise my conversation to everybody around me. Texting is discreet.

      Texting or other smartphone messaging does not have to have a brutish, uncouth character. One could use the same technology to discuss Dostoevsky or ancient Greek tragedy, with properly spelled words. Proper spelling is even easier these days because of Swype and autocorrect trying to match your taps to dictionary words.

    6. Re:Codding childrens needs. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      They must be having a difficult time hiring if they are "companies wanting to hire up-and-coming talent" (from TFA) instead of simply hiring proven talent.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    7. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone interviews have been a thing for a long time.

    8. Re:Codding childrens needs. by chispito · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who's slightly outside of that demographic, I'd appreciate the text because it lets me move the process forward without announcing to all the coworkers in a 50 foot radius that I'm job hunting.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    9. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 2

      I can understand if a company is having a difficult time filling a position being open to a bit more flexibility when hiring, but this kind of pandering and coddling to the social-media texting generation is rather pathetic. You want the job bad enough? Then make an effort to get off your ass and go meet the human hiring you in fucking person.

      Actually, being able to video conference in with the hiring manager is a boon when the hiring manager is at the other end of the state or across the country. It isn't 'pandering' or 'coddling'. It's a flat out necessity when you're unable to find the ideal candidate locally and flying potential candidates in is really expensive.

      I've found that it's fairly common for recruiters to recruit ideal candidates from around the country, even for jobs that aren't telecommute positions.

    10. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone interviews have been a thing for a long time.

      For jobs in different states it is common but not so much for when the prospective employer is only 10 miles away. Even then usually it was a short call to set up the in-person interview, not an hour long pre-screening and Q&A over benefits like I've been seeing more of recently.

      I've also noticed that companies are being more upfront about benefits as well, I received the entire package from one prospective employer via email just by asking for it. Years ago usually one didn't see it until it came over with the job offer.

    11. Re: Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One phb I had was literally wined and dined at all of the 5 star establishments in town. He was offered a month long VIP ticket at either of the two best "gentleman's clubs" in town, and a week long anything goes pass at the best nunnery in town. He neither saw corporate headquarters, nor the adress,untill an hour before his first day on the job. At that point, he was convinced he had the wrong address because the building was so delapidated, run down, and bad disrepair. Had he seen the building, he would have declined the job. The nieghbourhood was nicknamed "little vietnam", because of the gun fire during the day. As it is, he left that company two years later - when his contract expired, because he valued his physical safety, and the area wasn't.

    12. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When was the last time you were job searching? The standard procedure now is initial contact via email, followed by a screener call with an HR person. This is followed by 1-2 remote interviews with a manager or someone else from the team you're applying for. I use 'remote' because this is usually on the phone, but it is extremely common for it to be a video chat on Skype, Hangouts, or Webex. If it's a technical job it usually involves some sort of coding test in a shared document of some sort.

      After all that is when you actually get invited in to talk in person. Which is usually another 3-5 hour back to back set of interviews with lunch thrown in. Interviewing takes hours from both parties and video chat interviews even from the same city are the norm. It saves everybody time and effort.

      Now personally I prefer email over just about everything else for scheduling. But I wouldn't be particularly bothered by a text messages. It'd certainly mean more concise to the point interactions rather than the annoying "Hi Bob. How are things? What's your availability for this week? Thanks, Joe." email chains always are.

    13. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd never join a company I hadn't physically been to. Similarly I'd never hire anyone I hadn't met in person.

      That said, it's pretty common to have a multi-stage interview process, and increasingly people are having to move to get the best gigs. Having the initial interview via video conference seems like a great way to save cost and time for both parties. If you shortlist someone for an important role, it's worth paying for their trip.

      Currently phone interviews are pretty common, and I hate doing them. All the immediacy and stress of an in-person meeting, but without the visual clues and body language that allow you to tailor your questions to your audience and properly jdge their responses. Plus, I find that how someone chooses to present them self at interview is a fairly good indicator of personality, which is an important consideration for most (all?) roles.

      But TFA is actually mostly talking about using text messages rather than phone or email. Personally, I'd rather do that kind of thing via email (no chance in hell my mobile number is going in a job posting!), but times they are a-changin'. As my younger colleague said recently "email is one step up from throwing stone tablets at one another". Instant messaging (SMS, social media, Slack etc) is where the majority of communications happens now, and it certainly has a role when you start getting down the pipeline. Both sides need details quickly to make a decision, and it's honestly more convenient than email.

    14. Re: Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Millennials: Wouldn't it be easier if you just contacted me directly through the device I carry with me everywhere just like most normal people nowadays?
      Angry, confused baby boomer: YOU'RE SO ENTITLED. IN MY DAY WE DIDN'T HAVE PHONES SO YOU SHOULDN'T EITHER. COMMUNICATING EFFICIENTLY TRIGGERS ME.

    15. Re:Codding childrens needs. by mx+b · · Score: 2

      Translation: 1,461 young adults admit they can't live without their mobile phone, and prefer it as the tool for communicating, regardless if it's for an interview or a Tinder hook-up.

      I wonder how these young adults would feel if they got fired via text message. Oh, suddenly that would be rude and impersonal? Yeah, not unlike wanting to be hired via text message.

      The linked article never said anything about rude or impersonal, where did you get that? It just said the phone is most convenient, and that's kind of a 'duh', isn't it? Not just texts, but email and websites can be accessed by mobile phone, at any time.Of course people are going to say they prefer that to sitting around at home staring at a landline or PC waiting for the call/email. I'm sure people in the '90s were saying "These young people can't live without their internet and email, why can't they just pick up the phone and call? Phones are much more personal!".

      One of my biggest gripes with job applications these days is the complete lack of communication. I have no idea if my resume is being process, was rejected, or simply fell into a black hole and was never received. I'd like some feedback since I put some time and effort into applying for a job they took the time and effort to post for, especially because I might get an offer from a different job that wasn't my first choice and it would be nice to weigh the options if I have a chance at both. I think texts would be a perfect communication channel for this. A quick text of "Your resume was received and we'll get back to you", followed up with a request to set an interview time or a generic "Thank you for applying, we filled the position!" would be fantastic just to keep me in the loop. Wastes less time for everyone. Again, the article didn't say they expect interviews over text message, just that applicants feel more positive when texts are used as part of the process (which I interpret as the communication channel for updates as I said).

      I can understand if a company is having a difficult time filling a position being open to a bit more flexibility when hiring, but this kind of pandering and coddling to the social-media texting generation is rather pathetic. You want the job bad enough? Then make an effort to get off your ass and go meet the human hiring you in fucking person.

      Who says its pandering or coddling, or that millennials are too lazy to go in? There's plenty of reasons for both sides to enjoy video interviews: easy to schedule around a busy schedule (no travel time or sitting in traffic, in a rush to get back to another job or event; after all, interviews take place during the work day, so who can go on interviews easily when you don't already have a good job with paid time off?), saves money (interviewee saves parking fees, bus fare, gas, etc., and interviewer saves money particularly if the candidate is out of town and they don't need to pay to fly them in for an interview; remember also that every minute spent in the interview is the employer spending money on the salary of the interviewer, video interviews can be used as quick screening much easier than bringing someone in for a full day interview), and maybe using such tech is now an important skill in a now global economy (do you fly people half way around the world for a business meeting, or just video call them?).

      Millennials are adapting to changing economics and job market, as well as technology, cut them some slack.

    16. Re:Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my clients entire business is sending (and receiving) text messages. I believe one of their customers is a recruitment company.

      Where's the problem with:

      "We've just heard [company] are looking for [role] people in the £[range] range. Text CALLBACK or call us back for more details"

      ...and...

      "Your CV has been received by [company]"
      "[company] would like to get you in for a first interview. Can you call us to arrange a day, please?"

      ...and then...

      "[company] has send you a contract in the mail. Please sign and return it to them as soon as you can"
      "[company] has received your signed contract. As arranged, they'll be expecting you at 9am on the 27th for your first day!"

      I'd agree that "Sorry, [company] has passed on your application - better luck next time" isn't terribly good (and of course doesn't offer any chance for feedback or self-improvement).

      Honestly, any opportunity to avoid talking to recruiters is an opportunity I take. In 20 odd years of working, I've only ever found 2 recruiters I really rated. Some others have got me jobs quite effectively, but they weren't nice people I wanted to spend any time talking to.

    17. Re: Codding childrens needs. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      a week long anything goes pass at the best nunnery in town

      Either this is a piece of slang I've never heard before, the company was run by perverts, or you are a fucking idiot. Tough call.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re: Codding childrens needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty established, though probably not widely used. When Hamlet says to Ophelia "Get thee to a nunnery", Shakespeare is using it as a double entendre in exactly this way. It could be something of a complement, saying that she is pure and godly, or the exact opposite.

    19. Re:Codding childrens needs. by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I suspect, more likely, the companies don't want to spend money on bringing a candidate in for an interview until the very end. Many things are phrased like it's convenient for employees and potential employees but it's mostly for the convenience of the company. Which is fine, but a bit of honesty would be nice. But I'd like to see where I'd be living, the environment in which I would be working, and so on.

    20. Re:Codding childrens needs. by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Translation: "Up and coming" == "Cheaper"

  11. txt job to jobline to find jobs in your area by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    txt job to jobline to find jobs in your area
    txt cmd to jobline for help on to use our sms job app and hr chat system.

    Each SMS costs 99 cents + your standard rate.

    txt stop to jobline to stop.

  12. Revenue idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All the phone numbers gathered from unsuccessful candidates will be sold to data mining firms that specialize in marketing to people who are searching for jobs. This will help offset the cost of the interview process.

  13. What's wrong with email? by fred6666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not being limited to 140 characters, being able to reply from a PC with a real keyboard sounds like real advantages. No reason to still use SMS in 2017, but even less for job hiring.

    1. Re:What's wrong with email? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. SMS is so informal and limited. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:What's wrong with email? by belg4mit · · Score: 2

      I don't know, but many companies don't even bother to send confirmations/denials by email, I cannot imagine they'd be any better at doing so with SMS.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:What's wrong with email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I just don't get why people depend on telephony when we have email which is already the preferred method of communicating internally at most businesses

    4. Re:What's wrong with email? by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      Top posting is what's wrong with e-mail.

      How the hell are you supposed to reply to someone who top-posts?

      Whenever I need to converse with a top-poster, I keep deleting the old fully quoted messages the top-poster's email client left, and it gets old really quick and I lose a stupid amount of context with that act.

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
  14. Fuck texts by bigdavex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate texts. I hate that some people think that texts imply urgency for my reply. I hate that I do not receive them on my computer. I hate that I cannot search through very old texts. Texts are just email only shitty.

    --
    -Dave
    1. Re:Fuck texts by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I hate texting and yet everyone wants to use it. They hate e-mails, IMs, IRC, etc. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:Fuck texts by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      ... I hate that I do not receive them on my computer. ... Texts are just email only shitty.

      Buy a Mac, and you'll get texts on both your computer and phone.

      Kids prefer texts partially because they believe they are not logged. They are. They are legal documents, just like emails.

      And never respond to an out-of-hours text from the boss – unless it comes with some overtime pay.

  15. Re:I am extra partial to blowjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay son, I will kill myself. Having you for a son was always my greatest regret.

  16. I guess I will be showing my age here... by ControlsGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But for my first real job I was invited to the interview (and physical exam) by telegram.

    1. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Is your age 112?

    2. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, and I thought I was old now I've hit my 40s. Aren't telegrams what they used to call the lame jokes they'd tell at weddings back in Ye olden times?

      I'm off to google when telegrams stopped being a thing now.

    3. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, apparently you could send telegrams up to about 10 years ago (more recently in some parts of the world). If I'd known I might have sent some just for the hell of it so I could say I had.

    4. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeting:

      You are hereby ordered to report for induction into the ARMED FORCES of the UNITED STATES...

      Nobody wanted that job interview invitation.

    5. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, apparently you could send telegrams up to about 10 years ago

      I knew about that because I read about it on Slashdot.

    6. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      But for my first real job I was invited to the interview (and physical exam) by telegram.

      So why did Mr. Edison decide to hire you?

    7. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      wait... Telegram as in the old style messaging system? Or Telegram as in the chat program?

    8. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Telegrams were a thing for business clear up until cell phones were common. Even in the Pager Age they were still used.

      The point was that it is like a cross between the mail, and a taxi. And in fact, the person actually delivering the telegram was probably a taxi driver. The telegram company prints the text, gives it to the taxi, and they go and find you and deliver it. So if it is a hotel or something, you don't need the exact address or even the exact name, just a close enough description to get them there. You might even be at a restaurant or something and they find you there and deliver it because they talked to the doorman at the hotel. Keep in mind, there was no internet or Google Maps.

      Even once they could send a fax to the hotel it still kinda sucked, because "oh, you got a fax yesterday" wasn't a big deal. But everybody knew TELEGRAMS were IMPORTANT and so people would go to great lengths to find you if they knew you had one waiting. So sending a telegram to a prospective employee was a big "YOU'RE IMPORTANT TO US!!!" shout-out.

      And to tell a Special Someone how important they are, they had singing telegrams, and you could send flowers with an attached telegram. That is what people had to do before animated cat gifs.

    9. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Owww poor little baby http://www.telegraph.co.uk/tec...

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    10. Re:I guess I will be showing my age here... by WallyL · · Score: 1

      When I read GP's message, I truly was thinking of the chat program. I thought to myself, "He's... my age?" It took me a few additional seconds to realize he must mean the real, telegraph wire system.

  17. Legal issues by captaindomon · · Score: 1

    There are legal issues with offers and other job interview related functions. Usually retention rules on offers and communications, HR signoff, Finance signoff, etc. So this would be limited to "is next tuesday good for the interview?" and that's about it.

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re:Legal issues by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you're scared to retain documents related to your hiring practices, you're doing it wrong.

      If you're doing it right, those documents all cover your ass!

  18. audit trail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure you can store text messages in a coporate server but it just seems safer for any communication with potential employees to be through email in case there's ever a need to review those communications.
    do companies save text messages off their employees' phones to preserve correspondence?

    1. Re:audit trail? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Text messages don't always have to come from a cell phone tied number. You can set up a gateway and get a 10-digit SMS number and corporate it up all you want.

  19. considering offer by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    just give me sex

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:considering offer by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      OK yr apntmnt is tues 9:45a clinic at 555 Castro St, no fluids 12 hrs befr

  20. Don't try it with me by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If I'm not worth it to send me a reply that doesn't fit into a fucking Tweet, I guess you can't really want me that badly.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Smart phones for contractors... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    When I was working seven days a week for two years after the Great Recession, I upgraded my voice-only cellphone for a generic smartphone that got email and Internet access. That was quite useful as drove back and forth across Silicon Valley for contract assignments. The only problem that I had with generic smartphone that it would occasionally butt call my boss and I would hear his voice coming out of my ass.

    1. Re:Smart phones for contractors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your job was sex slave to a boss who liked to give you analingus? Figures you would be a bottom considering your problem getting your dick up.

      CAPTCHA: insides

      The parts of you receiving tongue.

    2. Re:Smart phones for contractors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An irrelevant story, courtesy of the man who loves to hear his own voice.

    3. Re:Smart phones for contractors... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      An irrelevant story, courtesy of the man who loves to hear his own voice.

      I have no plans to offer a podcast. Maybe next year. ;)

  22. I love replying at 3 am by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    It shows how responsible I am

    Also using abbreviations that can be easily misconstrued, and workplace invalid emojis.

    "It's So Fluffy!!!!"

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I love replying at 3 am by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      ...So, don't?

      Or do.

      If that's the sort of thing you're going to do, it's best they find out at the beginning of this process rather than some time after.

  23. Take away by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    If the applicant can't handle the hiring process, then maybe they aren't worth hiring. If the applicant is in demand, then they'll be hired regardless of what you do.

    1. Re:Take away by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If the applicant can't handle the hiring process, then maybe they aren't worth hiring.

      I have a zero tolerance for recruiters and hiring managers who waste my time. If I arrive 15 minutes early, announced my presence and nothing happens 15 minutes after the start of the appointment, I'll leave. The only exception to this rule would be if I've drove out of my way for an interview. One time I sat in a lobby for 90 minutes because the hiring manager thought I was a venture capitalist and wasn't expecting me to be dressed up in a suit-and-tie. I was better dressed than the CEO. Unbelievable.

    2. Re:Take away by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      You sat there 90 minutes without identifying yourself?

    3. Re:Take away by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You sat there 90 minutes without identifying yourself?

      There was no receptionist and only a phone in the lobby. I left a voicemail for the hiring manager. He wore a sweat suit and came through three times. The recruiter kept calling to ask where the hell I was. Finally, on the fourth walkthrough, he talked to me. Everyone in the company thought I was a venture capitalist. That was last interview I wore a suit and tie.

    4. Re:Take away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you seek employment primarily at locations that employ the mentally handicapped?

      This is not surprising at all, and it explains much.

    5. Re:Take away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. There is usually no shortage of qualified applicants: the hard part will be picking just one. If they want to self-sort by being incapable of handling the hiring process they're really doing you a favor by shortening the shortlist.

    6. Re:Take away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a contract job I had once where I showed up at the requested time, the manager came out to the lobby, brought me to the main cubicle farm and asked me to sit in a chair and that she would be back in a few minutes. She then left for a meeting and did not tell anyone I was there let alone who I was. I waited 30 minutes and eventually asked an employee for assistance locating the manager. The went and spoke to the cunt who told him she would come over in a few minutes to provide me with the work assignment. She instead left for another meeting and never returned. I called my contract agency multiple times complaining about what was happening and they kept saying they would take care of it but never did. I left at lunch, billed them for the time I was there and left the nastiest hate filled letter I had ever written for the bitch. Burned that bridge so good the contract agency lost the contract entirely and the last time I spoke with them they were still shell-shocked at what I had done to them. Good riddance to incompetent people that have no business being given the title of "Manager".

    7. Re:Take away by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      People who not ejaculate frequently enough have a vastly increased rate of prostate cancer.

      Your hangups might kill you, but they won't kill me!

      http://www.harvardprostateknow...

      You think employers are lining up to hire people at increased risk of cancer?

    8. Re:Take away by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I remember a study that they did in my area where they had business people meet with different actors impersonating business people, and then they gave them a survey about it. People in traditional business suits were viewed as untrustworthy. People in business-casual scored pretty well.

      But the highest scoring outfit was blazer + tie + blue jeans + dress shoes. This is in the Pacific Northwest.

      A similar study in California blue jeans scored really low, and blazer + tie + slacks + dress casual shoes scored at the top.

    9. Re:Take away by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Burned that bridge so good the contract agency lost the contract entirely and the last time I spoke with them they were still shell-shocked at what I had done to them.

      I try to avoid burning bridges whenever possible. Silicon Valley, for example, is a very small community. You may never know when your coworker will become your next boss or your last boss will become your subordinate. I do vent my displeasure on recruiters whom I felt misled me in some way.

  24. Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could just call like a professional should.

  25. What's good for the goose by taustin · · Score: 1

    is not always good for the gander.

    Sure, Millennials love to be able to ignore the world by sticking their nose in their phone, to the exclusion of all else (including oncoming traffic), but what manager in their right mind would ever interview someone by text, or hire someone without meeting them face to face?

    A conversation that takes two minutes face to face will take days by text, because you can only reliable get most people to answer a single question per exchange, and half the time, it won't be any of the questions asked. That's normal in text and email. Do that in person, and the interviewer will begin to question your mental health. Do that on the job, and you won't be on the job for long. Identifying people who are incapable of doing the job is the whole point of the interview.

    If a company is so desperate to hire employees they have to put up with this kind of childish nonsense, they have far bigger problems than interview processes.

    1. Re:What's good for the goose by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      Nobody said the entire interview was through text.

      It's likely much simpler to text somebody and arrange an interview than it is to call, leave a voicemail, wait for their call, possibly to your voicemail, and so on. Or do both. Call, and if it goes to voicemail, send a text as well. They'll read the text before listening to the voicemail, and can respond immediately if they're on a bus or grocery shopping, rather than waiting for later to listen to their voicemail.

      Of course, I don't see professional texting catching on, but life would be much simpler if it did.

    2. Re:What's good for the goose by Kjella · · Score: 1

      A conversation that takes two minutes face to face will take days by text, because you can only reliable get most people to answer a single question per exchange, and half the time, it won't be any of the questions asked. That's normal in text and email. Do that in person, and the interviewer will begin to question your mental health. Do that on the job, and you won't be on the job for long. Identifying people who are incapable of doing the job is the whole point of the interview.

      This sounds the exact opposite of my experience, what ought to be a ten minute effective time, three hour wall time email exchange instead becomes a one hour long meeting. I'd appreciate any employee who can get their own thoughts together and give some coherent request or response in their own time instead of scheduling a meeting with no clear agenda, arrive unprepared and spend five people's time getting their rambling thoughts together on the fly. Granted, not everything can be solved like that but the experience from forcing people to submit a request in JIRA explaing what they want and why they want it instead of standing on my doorstep as been almost exclusively positive. At least if it's not an emergency and must be solved right now.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:What's good for the goose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, I don't see professional texting catching on...

      I remember when people would say the same thing about email. Now it's gone from being a relaxed, informal (remember emoticons... sorry, smileys... I mean, emojis?) mode of communication for in-the-loop geeks to the being the default and very formal mode of communication. Don't be surprised when txting does the same thing.

    4. Re:What's good for the goose by taustin · · Score: 1

      You're funny. Most of the professional email I get is from people who can't spell, punctuate, or form a complete sentence.

  26. Seems like a non-sequitur by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    From TFS:

    "Yello's survey data indicates respondents would welcome getting a text from a business, particularly because they're so used to responding quickly to text messages."

    How are those two phrases actually related? It's like saying "He is quite tall, particularly because his favorite color is blue."

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  27. Miss Mash is a retard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retarded. These Ms. Mash stories don't even count as FUD they're so gay.

  28. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the Lifetime movie reference. Forgot the name. Summer '11, right?

  29. Even the surveys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the surveys ignore workers and job seekers over 30. Nice.

    1. Re:Even the surveys by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Probably because older Millennials over 30 are growing up and behaving differently than their younger counterparts. Don't want to skew the results.

    2. Re:Even the surveys by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      In the 1960s they had a saying, "Life ends at 30." Another one, "Don't trust anybody over 30."

      The song Lather by Jefferson Airplane still gets played on the radio. It sounds like it is about a Special Person, but actually it is just about their drummer's 30th birthday.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  30. that's a great idea by superwiz · · Score: 1

    I would love to be able to work with people who don't text. This would automatically filter out places with those people.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  31. FeltPositively by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Really? An interview candidate "felt positively" if they would get texted?
    They'd "feel positively" if they got paid 50 hours of work and only have to show up 2 days also.
    Grow up, it isn't about how you feel. Work hard, do a good job, receive recognition for skills and accomplishments. Get raises, move up the food chain...
    Or we can sit in circle holding hands and sharing our childhood insecurities....bwahahahaha
    Actually, I just don't want people to have my cell number...

  32. Video-recorded interviews? Really? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    FTS:

    More candidates are happy to do video interviews in lieu of traveling to meet hiring managers in person.

    Really?

    Hiring someone with advanced training is a $300k to $1M decision (BS to PhD). What company would rely on a video-recorded interview to vet candidates on such a major decision?

    Hiring is a major decision in other ways, too. Fit with local and company culture, and myriad other qualities that you can't suss-out without a day or two face-to-face.

  33. good filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will filter out the humans from the mindless millenials. If you don't pull the piece of paper out of the mailbox or talk to a real person, you're probably better replaced with a chatbot.

  34. If this help make job recruiters irrelevant.... by CaptnCrud · · Score: 1

    then im all for it. What a useless industry....

  35. Ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She could have just bought another similar phone.

    1. Re:Ummmm by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      She could have just bought another similar phone.

      She didn't want another 1990-ish cellphone.

  36. Here is what I currently have to deal with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My contract agency calls and leaves a voicemail asking me to call back to follow-up on the current contract. I call them back but the number routes through a telephone agent that looks at her computer screen and sees that so-and-so is currently on a call, or unavailable, or may have gone home for the day and asks if I want to be transferred to their voicemail. I say Yes and leave a voicemail for the person that originally called me. They never call back.

    Text messaging would be worse, the last god damn thing I want is to be at the beck and call of someone else. If they really wanted to communicate with me, they would either get off their lazy ass and drive out to the job site to sit down for lunch with me, or would send me an email so that I could type out a proper detailed response and send it to them at my convenience.

  37. Fuck No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have SMS disabled on my phone.There's not that many people that need to get hold of me urgently and those who do can call me. And those that are that important are also the same people I would actually accept a call from and probably not screen. Fuck you and fuck texting me about a job interview. Call me like a fucking human.

  38. Please don't by houghi · · Score: 1

    I will assume it was send as a massmailing. Just received one the other day, so I know I am still in some database from 10 years ago. If he really want to have me for a job, he best just pick up the phone and leave a message
    I have ALWAYS called back, even if I was not looking just to see what they where offering.
    OK, most of the time it will not be the manager himself and I am OK with that. He will also not be the person who picked me to make the list to be called.

    And yes, most people will not answer their phone, but as most will have voicemail, it is easy to leave a message.

    As a manager: If they do not call back, are they really the people you want in your company?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  39. Re:I am extra partial to blowjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahahaha a trump joke! good job!

  40. That's what scammers have done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time an "employer" tried to contact me via text it turned out to be, essentially, fake. I had just finished a round of submitting resumes and applications. All of a sudden I start getting texts, 5-6 over the course of an hour, from this guy. I hadn't even responded back once yet. He calls. He briefly asks if I'm interested in a position, and spends the rest of the call asking if I had the funds would I go back to college, he can put me in touch with people, etc. Then he's trying to transfer me over to someone to take out loans and shit. I hung up.

    If any employer ever tried to contact me via text again I'd tell 'em to get bent.