Slashdot Mirror


Humans Accidentally Made a Space Cocoon For Ourselves Out of Radio Waves (vice.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Motherboard article: Humans have accidentally created a protective bubble around Earth by using very low frequency (VLF) radio transmissions to contact submarines in the ocean. It sounds nuts, but according to recent research published in Space Science Reviews, underwater communication through VLF channels has an outer space dimension. This video explainer, released by NASA on Wednesday, visualizes how radio waves wafting into space interact with the particles surrounding Earth, and influence their motion. Satellites in certain high-altitude orbits, such as NASA's particle-watching Van Allen Probes, have observed these VLF ripples creating an 'impenetrable boundary,' a phrase coined by study co-author Dan Baker, director of the University of Colorado's Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics. This doesn't mean impenetrable to spacecraft or asteroids, per se, but rather to potentially harmful particle showers created by turbulent space weather.

137 comments

  1. Shields up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I got nothin' else.

    1. Re:Shields up! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      And what you got, ain't much.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  2. This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you can get people there without the proteins in their brain being denatured by radiation, maybe you could keep them that way for extended periods without their brains turning into scrambled eggs.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you can get people there without the proteins in their brain being denatured by radiation, maybe you could keep them that way for extended periods without their brains turning into scrambled eggs.

      It wouldn't work on Mars because there are no oceans to put Submarines in to communicate with.

      / yes I'm being facetious.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Also suppose the core of the earth solidifies and loses it's magnetism, this could be used to prevent the atmosphere from evaporating into space.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the proteins being denatured, it's more the DNA being fragmented by the gamma rays/particles, which causes apoptosis (programmed cell death).
      If there are too many DNA fragments, the cell concludes that the damage is too severe, and it starts to shut down in an orderly way, by neatly disassembling itself. Perfect for a single cell to prevent cancer, but not so much if the whole body starts to shut down... Incidentally, brain neurons have probably the highest radiation resistance of all the cells (second only to erythrocytes)!
      In contrast, to cause significant protein denaturation, you would need millions of times stronger radiation, so it's not ever relevant in most cases. Exactly opposite with heating: DNA survives pretty well, but most human proteins will denature around 150 F or so.

      In time we will figure out how to colonize Mars and the stars. The humans are awesome that way! If only we could one day figure out how to cure Brain Liberalism, we might have a future.

    4. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mere technicality.

      One can create underground submarines with boring pieces and they can communicate with VLF. That's more exciting than creating VLF emitters on Mars.

    5. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Informative

      1) Don't worry about the core, it'll last. It's currently at ~5000K and will be at ~4950K in a billion years... which is about 300M years after the surface will be baked sterile by the Sun.

      2) Even so... it would take a LONG time for the solar wind to strip our atmosphere away. And in fact, it turns out we were wrong about the effect of the Earth's magnetic field; it is actually helping the solar wind heat and strip the atmosphere. At current depletion rates, it's estimated to be good for another 4 billion years or so. That's more than 3 billion years after the planet is baked and around the time it'll be engulfed by the Sun.

      We really don't need to worry about the core, its magnetic field, or the density of the planetary atmosphere.

    6. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      / yes I'm being facetious.

      You just think you are, because it would be relatively simple to generate VLF on Mars. It really opens a possibility for a human colony there.

      Cap: people

    7. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can this help global warming on earth?

    8. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about the core, it'll last. It's currently at ~5000K and will be at ~4950K in a billion years...

      Wait a second. The core is cooling? Does Al Gore know about this?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    9. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Don't worry about the core, it'll last. It's currently at ~5000K and will be at ~4950K in a billion years... which is about 300M years after the surface will be baked sterile by the Sun.

      Earth has just 500My left. We have only 10% of the time available for life formation.

    10. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the smartass who is neither right nor funny.

      Climate doesn't affect the core of the earth, and no one cares about Al Gore anymore.

      Better luck next time.

    11. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Americans will build the best submarines on Mars. We know space submarines; we do fantastic work; everyone knows that.

    12. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward = "Blah, blah, blah..."

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    13. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      But if they are boring, why would they bother communicating?

    14. Re:This might make Mars habitation more feasible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The submarines don't need oceans to be in...Just get the submarines to Mars!

  3. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the black obelisk told us to develop this space blanket for the space baby.

  4. Or anyone who's forgotten their wife's birthday by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    >> 'impenetrable boundary,' a phrase coined by study co-author Dan Baker

    Or anyone who's forgotten their wife's birthday. Amirite?

    1. Re:Or anyone who's forgotten their wife's birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One would have to be quite stupid to acquire a wife, in the modern day.

    2. Re:Or anyone who's forgotten their wife's birthday by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well since the frequency of your wife's birthday is around 1/31536000 Hz, you can always say you rounded that event to zero, which means that while you never tell her "happy birthday" it also means she never ages.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  5. "space blanket" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why do we still get Bit Flips with large HDD"s??????????

    Bitrot!

    1. Re:"space blanket" by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Because the impenetrable layer is penetrable.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:"space blanket" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or permable

  6. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps if we can emit VLF radiation at very high frequency

    If we emit Very Low Frequency radiation at very high frequency it won't be very low frequency any more.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  7. Humans can be proud of Pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Human electro-magnetic pollution has long made bitch-Gaias ebola/rabies/smallpox-laden earth a more humane environs . From Neolith forest-burning to star-powered solar concentrators watts to complain? Start another coal-mine today or krank that gas-powered generator; keep shoveling on biomass! Ectopic-pregnancy-pimping-Gaia self mutilates in protest haha! If simultaneous you can fuck-to-death a snowflake blonde, encourage a lib.com suicide or drive a tree-hugging eco-roach into the mud ... better for the human ansatz!

  8. Can it help on Mars and moon? by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, if this can lower possible harm to a ground crew, that could be useful. Perhaps directed to cover a small area.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Can it help on Mars and moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a basic sense, probably. It would also allow for safer interplanetary transit. The limiting factor will be having enough spare energy with whatever setup you design to also power a high energy VLF antenna. That is mainly an engineering problem, but engineering problems tend to be the expensive ones.

    2. Re:Can it help on Mars and moon? by Falos · · Score: 4, Informative

      Peeked at TFA, sounds like it amplifies an existing Van Allen belt. Probably doesn't work surgically. Probably impossible to set up a belt on other planets with known tech, but I don't know belts and maybe a mild one can be synthesized, then amplified. I imagine the scale/distribution of radio emitters required isn't too impossible since we did it accidentally.

    3. Re:Can it help on Mars and moon? by chuckugly · · Score: 2

      The real trick will be to get the submarine into space.

    4. Re:Can it help on Mars and moon? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      yeah, that is why I am a fan of getting nuclear SMR going. Some of these are small enough to send to both the moon and mars.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Can it help on Mars and moon? by plague911 · · Score: 1

      They already put them on stilts during construction. We just need bigger stilts.

    6. Re:Can it help on Mars and moon? by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      but I don't know belts

      try one, your pants will thank you.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  9. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if we can emit VLF radiation at very high frequency and..... Uhmm... what?

    I honestly can't tell if you were trying to be funny by saying that or you simply didn't actually read what you wrote

  10. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    But it would still be very low frequency as far as high frequency goes.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  11. Too late to prevent the scrambled-egg effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can get people there without the proteins in their brain being denatured by radiation, maybe you could keep them that way for extended periods without their brains turning into scrambled eggs.

    It's too late for that. Just look what 20 years of FOX "News" has done to brains of millions...

    1. Re:Too late to prevent the scrambled-egg effect by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      This is only a test.

      [annoying high frequency noise that older people can't even hear properly]

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Too late to prevent the scrambled-egg effect by haruchai · · Score: 1

      If you can get people there without the proteins in their brain being denatured by radiation, maybe you could keep them that way for extended periods without their brains turning into scrambled eggs.

      It's too late for that. Just look what 20 years of FOX "News" has done to brains of millions...

      Roger Ailes is dead but only after he left Fox so perhaps you need to be close to the source to have scrambled brains & a long life

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:Too late to prevent the scrambled-egg effect by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      If you can get people there without the proteins in their brain being denatured by radiation, maybe you could keep them that way for extended periods without their brains turning into scrambled eggs.

      It's too late for that. Just look what 20 years of FOX "News" has done to brains of millions...

      Roger Ailes is dead but only after he left Fox so perhaps you need to be close to the source to have scrambled brains & a long life

      mmm... scrambled brains....

    4. Re:Too late to prevent the scrambled-egg effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roger Ailes is dead but only after he left Fox

      The obvious conclusion is that he was no longer able to restore his life essence through the harassment of women.

    5. Re: Too late to prevent the scrambled-egg effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not unreasonable, no one wants to eat your eyes.

  12. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All you ever need to do is emit a tachyon pulse.

  13. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by fisted · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if we can emit VLF radiation at very high frequency and.....

    Uhmm... what?

    I honestly can't tell if you were trying to be funny by saying that or you simply didn't actually read what you wrote

    I honestly can tell that you didn't actually read what you wrote.

  14. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Mediocre Frequency?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  15. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally! The real cause of global warming!!! :D

  16. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Ludicrous Frequency!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  17. Obligatory Star Wars Quote by Suomi-Poika · · Score: 1

    "Now Witness the Firepower of this fully Armed and Operational Earth!"

  18. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    Or invert the polarity. Or modulate the frequency.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  19. Re:Smells like pseudo-science exaggeration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucknuts, Vice is NOT "the source"
    https://link.springer.com/arti...

  20. Re: Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has nothing to do with monoliths. Has all to do with HAARP and geoengineering in collusion with the Russians who shared their chemtrail technology originally with the Reagan administration and now with TRUMP. TRUMP and the Russians are wholly owned by Reptilian Zionist Jews who want to eradicate the surface of the earth of "space pork," aka humans possessed by Mohammed promising 1024 virgins (joke's on Slashdot), Mohammed actually being a yerk slug and mind control virus created by Vindoor and delivered by his moon pod to paralyze us all.

  21. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    A plaid shield!

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  22. Humpback Whales by redshirt · · Score: 2

    Is this how they lost contact with their alien overlords?

  23. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't even spell interference.

  24. Re:Smells like pseudo-science exaggeration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    springer says nothing about impenetrable space cocoons

    pure vice

    pure bullshit for (((sciencetistians))) to feel smart about

  25. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but rather to potentially harmful particle showers created by turbulent space weather.

    Means, it affects particles which are potentially harmful, not potentially affects harmful particles.

  26. Re:Smells like pseudo-science exaggeration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I smell frogs!

  27. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You misspelled 'interfere' TWICE in TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WAYS!!! Are you fucking retarded? Jesus, end my life. I can't live in a world filled with such morons. FUCK!

  28. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by nine-times · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps if we can emit VLF radiation at very high frequency

    If we emit Very Low Frequency radiation at very high frequency it won't be very low frequency any more.

    Hmmm... Ok. So we can't increase the frequency, but what if we just took this Very Low Frequency radiation and shortened the wavelength?

  29. Earth is definitely armed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure how operational, though.

  30. Re:Interesting... by msauve · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Space whales?"

    Yes, that, and a bowl of petunias.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  31. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Megol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could we modulate the polarity?

  32. Re:Interesting... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    Well, we will miss you, 'cuz the rest of us 6.5 billion souls aren't leaving to make room for just you. Usually grammar and spelling mistakes are supposed to be, by Netiquette, not the focus of responses unless ironically used by a poster. Like when one states, "you mismelled that", or "you're grammar is bad to" and the like. But to the matter at hand, how do you expect Jesus to take you? And could you kindly not be in a position where when you are suddenly taken put others in danger. I suggest the safest course to lessen your impact on society be to just stay calm, remain home, with the power turned off and the stove off (as it may be gas). Then you can wait quietly for your personal rapture and the world avoids messy things like car accidents where the driver was vanished from the car in rush hour traffic. Best of luck.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  33. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, if you really want to see how bad it is, get a degree in logic then design computer chips for a few decades.

  34. Re:Interesting... by diesalesmandie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You misspelled 'interfere' TWICE in TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WAYS!!! Are you fucking retarded? Jesus, end my life. I can't live in a world filled with such morons. FUCK!

    And you are an Anonymous Coward, i'll take the bad speller any day over pedantic people like you.

    --
    This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine
  35. Up in the air Jr. Birdmen ... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    Maybe a first step in terraforming Mars. And does this "shield" keep particles in as well as out? If it works both ways it could help prevent atmospheric depletion and allow bulking up the atmosphere on celestial bodies that have lost their magnetic fields. Lake Armstrong here we come! And maybe even generation ships crossing interstellar distances.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    1. Re:Up in the air Jr. Birdmen ... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Maybe a first step in terraforming Mars. And does this "shield" keep particles in as well as out? If it works both ways it could help prevent atmospheric depletion and allow bulking up the atmosphere on celestial bodies that have lost their magnetic fields. Lake Armstrong here we come! And maybe even generation ships crossing interstellar distances.

      Would it work without the magnetic field of the earth? It appears to be interacting with Earth's magnetic field. Mars has a much weaker magnetic field, I don't know if the magnetic field is important for it to work, if it is, this wouldn't work on Mars.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  36. Re: Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you don't understand what "inrefear" means you have to turn into a bully...

  37. What about Earth habitation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like we need this to surround the White House. If it is that impenetrable, maybe it can be used to seal that piece of shit off from the rest of the world before he does any more damage.

    1. Re:What about Earth habitation? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Sounds like we need this to surround the White House. If it is that impenetrable, maybe it can be used to seal that piece of shit off from the rest of the world before he does any more damage.

      And make Trump pay for it!

  38. Sorry, but I have to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Stop producing those radio waves! The use of power and emission of harmful waste gasses from electric production into the air causes global warming! Stop immediately and all life will benefit!"

  39. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Is it opposites day? ;)

  40. Re:Interesting... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Weaponized = removed. Why haven't the terrorists done that yet? Blow all of those VLF RF emission devices to pieces and they'll scare and harm Humans until their deity is appeased enough to give them enough virgins to last about two and a half months! That's right, one a day for almost two and a half months! Get your terror on today! Psh.

  41. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if we can emit VLF radiation at very high frequency

    If we emit Very Low Frequency radiation at very high frequency it won't be very low frequency any more.

    Hmmm... Ok. So we can't increase the frequency, but what if we just took this Very Low Frequency radiation and shortened the wavelength?

    Or you could change the Lambda instead.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  42. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Could I emit VLF radiation by rubbing a balloon on my head then waving it about in a vaguely sinusoidal motion? :D

  43. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you have multiple sources that emit VLF radiation, and stagger them?

  44. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    Could we modulate the polarity?

    Two transmitters, same freq. but 180 degrees out of phase.
    It may cancel out or it might do something interesting...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  45. Very Large Transmitter by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, basically (and unwittingly), we're using the Earths' own natural magnetic field as a carrier wave, and our VLF emissions are modulating it? Cool.
    Makes me wonder if, now knowing this, we could engineer the effect to, say, mitigate the effects of solar flares on our various technologies?

  46. Wait What!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in a dramatic turn of events, it seems human activity is PROTECTING the planet

  47. No Star Trek reference yet? by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Basically, we've figured out how to make a rudimentary deflector shield.

    1. Re:No Star Trek reference yet? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      So all the huge antennas are a part of a secret government conspiracy to...keep everyone safe?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  48. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, if Jesus CAN take me then let be in whatever way He prefers. The fact that He even exists would be good enough for me. I wouldn't even mind spending eternity in hell (should that also exist) pondering on the fact that so many of us were not only wrong with our spelling, but were wrong about Jesus, too! Can you imagine!? It also implies an immortal existence. However, since I am still living here with all of you pathetic people that misspell the same word twice in two different ways, I will just continue to call-out the morons. Seriously, though? If one is going to misspell, one should pick an incorrect spelling and stick with it! If it weren't for how much that moronic mega-typo depleted my energy, I'd now focus my attention to people who use 'cuz' instead of 'because'. I will leave that performance for after my nap.

  49. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you equating Anonymous Cowards with pedantry? Stereotype much? Racism must run deep within your veins. You're in luck as I have a solution for you! Just drain all of the racist blood from your body. That should do it. One less racist in this world. Soon I will be recognized with the other great men such as Al Gore and Michael Moore. See how I am using your hate for the betterment of my life? Let this be a lesson to the children: when you face hatred and racism, use it to your advantage.

  50. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    7.5 billion*

  51. They need an emergency ramp up button by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Solar storm approaching! Earth shields to maximum power! *hits big red button on VLF machine*

  52. Mars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, there's hope for a human colony on Mars.

    1. Re: Mars! by Atomic+Fro · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm wondering... could this be used to wrap Mars in a protective space blanket to protect its atmosphere from solar wind? If so, that's a pretty huge step in teraforming.

      --

      ==================
      Hippie Logger Jock
      ==================
    2. Re: Mars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pretty huge step would be making all that ocean for the subs.

  53. Yes, but does it cause global warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Protection, shmection. If it causes even a slight change in the Earth's climate, it'll have to be eliminated.

  54. Re: Interesting... by VernonNemitz · · Score: 1

    Isn't the main weapon of the Death Star a particle beam? Perhaps Alderaan needed more submarines and a VLF comm system.

  55. Re: Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You had me until I noticed that there's no mention of Elvis or Bigfoot. Nothing this big takes place without them.

  56. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if we can emit VLF radiation at very high frequency

    If we emit Very Low Frequency radiation at very high frequency it won't be very low frequency any more.

    Hmmm... Ok. So we can't increase the frequency, but what if we just took this Very Low Frequency radiation and shortened the wavelength?

    Or you could change the Lambda instead.

    That only works infrequently at best.

  57. Re: Interesting... by demonlapin · · Score: 0

    It's (((Zionist Jews))), FWIW, but mostly I just want to ask who the hell Vindoor is. Otherwise, complete agreement. Though you did forget to mention how HIV ties in. It's super secret!

  58. cocoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a cocoon like a niniggra?

  59. fermi paradox by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    (This sounds like an episode of The X-Files.)

    So the real answer to the Fermi Paradox is... Before a coronal mass ejection hits the planet, civilization has to have developed... submarines. Well, *that's* counter-intuitive.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  60. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you go. Modded down by request.

  61. Re: Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  62. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by dejaniv · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if we can emit VLF radiation at very high frequency

    If we emit Very Low Frequency radiation at very high frequency it won't be very low frequency any more.

    Hmmm... Ok. So we can't increase the frequency, but what if we just took this Very Low Frequency radiation and shortened the wavelength?

    Sounds too complicated. How about we fluctuate the mass of earth instead?

  63. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I think that's how my Bose QC25 work....

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  64. harmful particle showers ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And could those particles have an effect upon cloud formation ? Sure thy could. And do clouds have an effect upon how much sunlight does or doesn't get reflected back into space ? Yes. And could that have an effect upon global warming ? Yes. And did global warming become a problem just about the time we started communicating with nuclear submarines ? ( yes actually ) Hmmm, just wondering.

  65. Protective Bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word "science" should be removed from anything on this site.

  66. So the reason for "climate change"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be the most logical conclusion.

  67. WRONG by budsetr · · Score: 0

    Everyone know it is our Lord and Benevolent protector President Trump that did this.

  68. Nothing New Here by jasnw · · Score: 3, Informative

    This effect has been known, and studied, for many years. One of the early discoverers, and researchers into the effect, was Robert Helliwell of Stanford. ELF generated by lightning, which is happening around the world all the time, was triggering this cleaning-out of the earth's inner radiation belt long before the first submarine ever existed. I'm afraid this is old news in a typical NASA PR flack package. I suspect there are people waiting in the wings ready to propose setting up large ELF transmitters along the equatorward edge of the auroral zone so as to clean out the radiation belts on a routine basis. I believe this sort of thing was even proposed (may still be on the books) as a way to dump out an artificial radiation belt generated by a high altitude nuclear explosion (like the Starfish experiment back in 1962) should some Bad Guys decide to do that as part of an attack on satellite assets.

    1. Re:Nothing New Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another NASA media release carefully tailored to sound hugely important carefully crafted to generate headlines and buzz but that conveys little or no information.

      The submarine ELF and VLF antennas are hugely inefficient because they are so small with respect to the operating wavelength. I for one would like to hear a quantitative explanation how 100 or so radiated Watts creates an impenetrable shield.

    2. Re:Nothing New Here by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      The ground based VLF antennas have efficiency in the 10-50%, and so radiated power levels appear to be in the kilowatt to low megawatt range, according to the Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:Nothing New Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about shielding us from a Carrington-class solar flare? Useful for that? Or would that plow right through and fry everything anyway?

    4. Re:Nothing New Here by jasnw · · Score: 1

      Nope, not really. This is strictly a radiation-belt, high-energy electrons thing. The geomagnetic storm impact of what's referred to as a Carrington event is not going to be mitigated by this effect. It might speed up the reduction of the fluxes in the high-energy electron radiation belts after the storm, which would cut down on the length of time that satellites in certain orbits have enhanced conditions for spacecraft charging events, but that's about it. This whole thing is a can of Pretty Paint on something that, while interesting from a scientific viewpoint (hey, I enjoyed it when I first learned about it in the 1970s), it's not really world-changing in any sense of the word.

  69. Hm by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Considering the major impact that the solar wind has on high level ozone concentrations and cloud formation that we're only beginning to understand, one might wonder how much of an impact this may be having on global temperature.

    BTW, that linked video was pretty nearly worthless explaining anything.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Hm by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Terrible cartoon, and the short feature article wasn't much better. I guess we have to find the full report, somewhere.
      https://www.nasa.gov/feature/g...

  70. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Wargames · · Score: 1

    Imagine n transmitters each transmitting at a low frequency f, starting at t0 + ndt such that sum ndt = f. As n goes to infinity we have VLF cacophony.

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
  71. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    But what if we turned it up to 11?

  72. There is an alternate technology for that... by emil · · Score: 1
  73. Cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical humans, always needing a safe space, grow up already

  74. VLF Radio Blanket = ET Signature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this has beneficial effects, why wouldn't another species do this as well? Is there a way to check for this signature when looking at exo-planets?

  75. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It pretty clearly says "but rather to potentially harmful particle showers".... It does NOT say "but rather it's potentially impenetrable to harmful particle showers". That is to say, it at least implies that the particle showers are potentially harmful, not that it potentially stops them. Sheesh.

  76. Re:Nothing New Here (COR) by jasnw · · Score: 1

    Oops - for ELF in my post read VLF. My irritation with NASA fuzzed my brain. For those interested in the physics/math behind all this, take a look at "Particle Diffusion in the Radiation Belts" by Michael Schulz and Lou Lanzerrotti (published in 1974 - NOT news).

  77. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well first you have to know what's the frequency Kenneth.

  78. Re: Interesting... by blibbo · · Score: 1

    Buddy, you're shouting. And if you talk like you type, my kids and i will cross the road to to avoid the crazy guy when we see you.

  79. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    So we can't increase the frequency, but what if we just took this Very Low Frequency radiation and shortened the wavelength?

    The resulting change of the speed of light would make every day a slow news day.

    In other words, a slashdotter wouldn't notice!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  80. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    But then it just Hertz more.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  81. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Maybe we could increase the Amplitude?

  82. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    That's it, reverse the polarity on the space positron emitter.

  83. Re:Beginning of shield technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is possible to modulate a very high frequency primary carrier wave with vlf and simultaneously emit another secondary carrier wave 180deg out of phase with the primary carrier wave frequency thereby cancelling out the primary wave and leaving the vlf behind :)

  84. EMPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Motherboard article:

    Next, scientists are figuring out whether the VLF bubble can be used to purify the near-Earth environment from charged particles, which would make humanity a little safer.

    If so, then could we use VLF ripples to protect us from EMPs - either from the sun, or from a nuclear weapon?

    1. Re: EMPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about also from the effects of a nearby nova?

      It sounds like great technobabble for a Doctor Who episode.

  85. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it or does it not inrefear with spacecraft or asteroids? If not than what does it interfear with? Anything? Space whales? Potentially?

    "[Singing] We're whalers on the Moon, we carry a harpoon. But there ain't no whales so we tell tall tales and sing a whaling tune"

  86. Climate Change Smoking Gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It figures that the real smoking gun for man-caused climate destruction would be instruments of war; sumbarine communications systems in this case. A device designed with the sole purpose of killing people en masse.

  87. Bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't an accident. Word in the "Alien Visitor" camp says that this 'bubble' inhibits the operation of certain aspects of alien spacecraft. Furthermore, the spraying of barium mixture into our atmosphere as contrails enhances the effect. The technique was given to us by a competing alien race. Any takers?

  88. Couldn't happen at a better time by doccus · · Score: 1

    Since our magnetic shield is almost toast right now, this really is GOOD news. I, for one. don't care to be bombarded with high energy protons, and right now the sun has been loosing them on us at a furious pace...

  89. Re: Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you forgot the transexual / gluten allergy / autism connection.

  90. Re: Beginning of shield technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your 180Â phase carrier wave has vlf signal it would cancel out the vlf too. If it doesn't, the output would be exactly the same as if you had no hf to begin with. Anyway, HF tends to reflect off the ionosphere. I'd like to pulse some xrays at vlf, see if we can make our own cosmic wind

  91. Re: Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess it's good bye then.

    Goodvye

  92. Re: Interesting... by syntotic · · Score: 0

    I cannot go anonymous here? Well, anyway, it does sound like the start of preparations to shun frequency transmissions, whatever that might mean. Too much of it, babies? Insect cocoons? Sounds like a Chinese meal.