Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Is Offering a Discount on Prime For People On Government Assistance (theverge.com)

Amazon announced on Tuesday that it is offering a discount on Prime membership for US customers participating in a number of government assistance programs. From a report: Anyone with a valid Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card, which disburses funds for programs like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, or food stamps), is eligible for Prime's discounted monthly price of $5.99. Prime's normal price is a $99 a year, or a monthly fee of $10.99. From a report:

91 comments

  1. Great... by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I'm sure this thread will be completely full of reasoned and polite discussions, free of any strawman arguments, ad hominem attacks, trolling, or general asshattery.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Great... by c · · Score: 2

      So... you're new around here, aren't you?

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    2. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot is dead.

    3. Re:Great... by MiniMike · · Score: 2

      Might actually be a bit quieter than usual, most of the trolls and asshats will be off enjoying their new discount.

    4. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? First post of the thread, and it's an announcement of possible bad-attitudes later in the thread? The heck Nidi62?
      Anyway... staying on topic...

          I think this is interesting and a definite attempt to 'grab' lower-tier shoppers that would otherwise heads towards WallyWorld or Goodwill. Can't let any consumers 'escape' our corporate shepherd now can we. And hey the program can probably be fooled, worked, or leveraged by having an eligible poor friend order stuff for the less-eligible purchaser. I wonder if folks will really move on this, or just stick with local Mart stores, etc. Will be interesting policy to witness roll-out.

    5. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're being forced to be here? That's odd. Perhaps you should contact the authorities...

    6. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Great... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Not it's not. It's feeling better. It's going for a walk. It feels happy, HAPPY!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you hippy, trump that bitch

    9. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FEEL THE BURN Nidi62. FEEL IT!!!

      *Yes literally, you can feel it right now Nidi61
      https://www.amazon.com/Gojo-1432-Large-Hi-Tactile-Glove/dp/B000CPAWGA

      _

    10. Re:Great... by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

      Umm... this is slashdot, right? ;)

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  2. Half the summary is missing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The linked article doesn't mention that Amazon is going after EBT dollars that typically gets spent at Walmart.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-lowers-prime-cost-for-shoppers-on-food-stamps-2017-6

    1. Re:Half the summary is missing... by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      third paragraph of tfa...

      This announcement is the latest in several recent moves Amazon has made to appeal to lower-income households and become a direct competitor to Walmart. Last year, it introduced the $10.99 monthly payment option, and earlier this year it announced the decision to start accepting food stamps for online grocery orders beginning this summer.

    2. Re:Half the summary is missing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      third paragraph of tfa...

      Buried that deep no wonder I didn't see it. ;)

    3. Re:Half the summary is missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been tested for ADHD? I've read a lot of your posts in the last week, and I think there's some attention-span issues there.

    4. Re:Half the summary is missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The linked article doesn't mention that Amazon is going after EBT dollars that typically gets spent at Walmart.

      quote>

      It appears to have some mutual benefits for customers and Amazon. Economically challenged customers will spend less on Amazon anyhow, so they'll typically get less of a return on their prime investment.

      Sounds like it could be a smart move by Amazon. However, they will get reamed like crazy and called all kinds of horrible things if they decide to cancel it in the future.

    5. Re:Half the summary is missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart??!! They have the highest grocery prices around. Why would anyone spend their SNAP at Walmart?

    6. Re:Half the summary is missing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I've read a lot of your posts in the last week, and I think there's some attention-span issues there.

      My posts or the posts written by the defunct trio of criemer, cremier and creinner?

    7. Re:Half the summary is missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have ADHD. I can tell cdreimer from creimer...

      So, ever been tested for ADHD? I can't be the first person to bring up that hypothesis.

    8. Re:Half the summary is missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, they will get reamed like crazy and called all kinds of horrible things if they decide to cancel it in the future.

      Yes, giveth but don't ever taketh.

    9. Re:Half the summary is missing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I can tell cdreimer from creimer...

      Lucky you. Most ACs can't tell the difference and blame me anyway.

      So, ever been tested for ADHD?

      Not to my knowledge. If I was diagnosed as ADHD when attending grade school in the early 1980's, I would have been medicated to the gills. Turning children into habitual drug users like their parents was a thing back then.

    10. Re: Half the summary is missing... by RCourtney · · Score: 2

      Except that Amazon does not accept EBT cards for payment.

      EBT cards are a special type of debit card that requires a different system than normal credit cards due to the fact that they are used for both SNAP (food stamps) as well as Cash Aid distribution of funds.

      As far as I am aware, you cannot use them online anywhere, only at physical locations where the retailer has tied into the EBT system.

      p.s. "Food stamps" for an individual in California are currently around $186 a month, so when people talk about people living the highlife on welfare's dime, try to keep that number in mind as what some people survive on. Cash Aid is another $198 per month per individual, which bring the total for ALL monthly expenses to just under $400 for a single person. Could you survive on $400 per month and be happy?

    11. Re: Half the summary is missing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      As far as I am aware, you cannot use them online anywhere, only at physical locations where the retailer has tied into the EBT system.

      Looks like Amazon joined the EBT program as an approved vendor.

      Could you survive on $400 per month and be happy?

      I shared a five-bedroom Victorian with 12 other guys for $200 per month while in college. Lived on $200 for the rest of the month. I worked full time in the summer to pay for classes and books. This was the early 1990's.

    12. Re: Half the summary is missing... by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      Cool story, but you forgot to adjust for inflation.

      Could you have lived on $250/month? Because that's the equivalent in 1995 dollars. (Per AIER's calculator... nit-pick with them if you object to the numbers)

      With $200 of that going to rent, you would have been left with ~$12 per week. Not a particularly glamorous lifestyle.

      The social safety net in this country is laughable.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    13. Re: Half the summary is missing... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If only there was a thread you could read, or an article. Hell, that thread might even quote the article. It might even talk about how they are now accepting EBT... Ah well.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re: Half the summary is missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Food stamps" for an individual in California are currently around $186 a month

      California is generous. Are you sure that's not the average per household?

      A quick google search shows the US average is $126/mo.

      Which is doable - about $30/week for food, but a pretty tight budget.

  3. "good business" but still slimy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is "good business" - setting up Amazon to suck at the teat of public money.

    Just like the scooter sales guys who advertise that the government will pay for it all.
    Just like the guys buying diabetic test strips.

    Now one can get your government money and have your junk food delivered- you won't have to get off your couch.

    OTOH, for the parent who's legitimately working/struggling, this might be a good thing. One less stop to make on the way home.

    But let's not pretend Bezos did this for altruistic reasons.

    1. Re:"good business" but still slimy by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      It's also good business from Econ 101, where you adjust your price based on the ability to pay. Do a find on "price discrimination".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:"good business" but still slimy by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      I suspect that won't stop the usual suspects going off on a rant about how the undeserving are getting something for nothing.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:"good business" but still slimy by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, this is just a corollary of Amazon's all-things-to-all-people strategy. If anybody buys anything, Amazon wants it to be through them.

      Even people on welfare have to buy stuff. And most people who are on welfare are off welfare in under three years and back in the workforce. So in a sense this is like the prime membership they gave my college student daughter, who is poor as a church mouse and has to live like a monk. But when she graduates she'll have a lot more money to spend, and she'll have been trained to find Amazon the most convenient way to buy things.

      Even I find myself buying things through Amazon for convenience. I should buy electronics shit through Digikey but sometimes if I'm ordering something else on prime I'll throw in something I need for my current project.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:"good business" but still slimy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can be good business. Not guaranteed. It is a tricky subject. Any price discrimination has a possibility of having an overall negative impact on business. If the number of lower price people start to significantly impact the regular price people, then someone's price has to go up. When that happens you will lose people from whichever group's price goes up. And because it's not guaranteed to work, it is nearly always guaranteed to fail over time.

    5. Re:"good business" but still slimy by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      To be successful, the classic requirements are:

      1. Must be a downward-sloping demand curve for the firms output.
      2. Firm must be able to identify consumers willing to pay more
      3. Firm must be able to prevent low-price customers from reselling to high-price customers

      I think it's safe to say that if they dropped the price of Prime, more people would join - so they meet the first criteria. They definitely have the means to identify consumers willing to pay more. And prime would be hard for low-price customers to resell.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:"good business" but still slimy by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Limited applicability, but valid in some cases. Some.

      This is part of the reason luxury items which actually cost more to make than most people can afford have higher profit margins (the businesses have higher net profits) than consumer goods. The other part is that high costs and small markets means lots of risk, meaning high probability of failure, and high barrier-to-entry: another player can't just stand up shop next to you and sell at a 10% margin versus your 20% if there are all of 1 million customers in the world for your product.

      Fail either of these and you get slimmer margins. They're sort of the same thing: an inability to pay means a loss of demand--consumers aren't willing to pay by virtue of being incapable of exercising any such will, or they're unwilling to pay because the next guy has it cheaper. Higher luxury goods are so expensive their target markets are folks with more-than-well-enough money to spend so freely, and at the same time the markets are capable of supporting fewer suppliers than broad consumer markets and thus fewer competitors to undercut your prices.

      The logical progression is, of course, that the ability to produce at lower cost allows you to sell to people with less money, taking even more profit. Keeping that 20% margin is hard, because now 100,000,000 consumers can buy your good instead of 1,000,000, and so a small-time competitor can slip in with a 10% margin and capture your entire vertical. At a point, lowering your prices won't attract enough additional consumers to generate an increase in profit, so these price cuts eventually stop until the product becomes even cheaper to make.

      In the case of Amazon, however, it's not just Prime they're selling. They don't want Prime subscriptions so much as they want people to order that $12.99 family pack of toilet paper from them instead of pay $15.99 at Wal-Mart, and they expect these people live disbursement-to-disbursement and so can't plan too far ahead. These potential customers need one- or two-day shipping, and they need it free, so they need Prime.

      If the target market is sufficiently small, then even the tiniest subsidy can cover a sizable discount. If 0.01% of their customers are buying groceries and paper towels on EBT, then a 50% discount means Prime for everyone else needs to cost $0.00395 more, or essentially nothing. If this makes an operating profit conversion, it's just slimming Prime margins as a razor-and-blade strategy.

      Could end up being good for basically everyone involved except whoever Amazon takes business from. Cheaper access to necessities for EBT recipients, more business for Amazon, more efficiency in consumer spending across the economy at large.

    7. Re: "good business" but still slimy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw. We make poverty too profitable and comfortable. We enslave these people under the guise of helping them.

    8. Re: "good business" but still slimy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If poverty was both profitable and comfortable I'd quit my job on the spot.

      I was lucky enough to never experience poverty for my self but I married someone who did and she's in no hurry to go back. As for the "profits" you claim she made, I never saw them.

  4. Food stamps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just sell the samps on Ebay and buy liquor and cigarettes.

    1. Re:Food stamps by PPH · · Score: 1

      Food stamps are pretty much a thing of the past. They give you an EBT card, which works like a debit card. They load it up with funds periodically. 'Loose' it and they invalidate the card. Loose it more than a few times and questions will be asked.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  5. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess there's the advantage of doing things month to month if you can't afford a year long subscription, but $99/12 months=$8.25/month, so only a $2.25/month saving.

    I didn't even know that you could get Amazon Prime on a single month basis.

  6. Pressing problem? by axlash · · Score: 1

    I would have thought that people using EBT cards have more pressing problems than dealing with the high cost of Amazon Prime subscriptions...

    --
    Deal with reality - the world as it is - rather than ideality - the world as you would like it to be.
    1. Re:Pressing problem? by queazocotal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Transport can be really difficult, to the point that doing 'more expensive' things like online ordering can work out cheaper.

    2. Re:Pressing problem? by enjar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of EBT recipients live in "food deserts" where there's no easy access to a supermarket. So an Amazon Prime membership could allow grocery items to be bought and delivered rather than relying upon convenience stores for food. So it could save time and money for grocery items. Sure, it's not the same as getting fresh vegetables but food options at gas stations are pretty horrible. http://americannutritionassoci...

    3. Re:Pressing problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Amazon sells a full grocery selection including fresh vegetables in many major cities. If you watch prices you can get stuff the same or cheaper than in stores and get it delivered for free!

    4. Re:Pressing problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knew I could find a map of all the places I don't want to live?

    5. Re:Pressing problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon (with free shipping) is the cheapest option for a lot of items.

      Depending on where one lives, even accounting for $15/month for prime fresh, it can be worth it (where I live that's 4 bus round trips).

      Sure, if someone is unemployed, it may be cheaper to round trip on foot at 45 minutes each way for a few bags of groceries, but otherwise, prime membership could lead to a much needed savings of 10-20/month, at worse, break even and save time.

    6. Re:Pressing problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're thinking of buying a house in an area, go into a McDonald's and see if the bathrooms are locked. If they are, you're in a diverse part of town and should get the fuck out as soon as possible.

    7. Re:Pressing problem? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      If you're thinking of buying a house in an area, go into a McDonald's and see if the bathrooms are locked. If they are, you're in a diverse part of town and should get the fuck out as soon as possible.

      That can't be right, the McDonald's near me has a locked bathroom. Oh, crap!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Pressing problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Locked bathrooms is nothing. Bars on the windows.... that's the real indicator.

    9. Re:Pressing problem? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Even if you have a direct bus line, a bus ticket costs about $2.50, so round trip is $5. One saved trip a month nearly pays for the prime membership.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    10. Re:Pressing problem? by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

      Food deserts are a myth created by SJWs who have nothing better to do with their time. There are plenty of ways to get to supermarket that's more than 1 mile away if you don't have a car. The entire notion is ridiculous. If you place a priority on feeding yourself and your family quality food you will find a way to get to a market. It's that simple.

      And if you're on SNAP or other assistance there are far better things you should be spending your money on than a $72 Amazon Prime membership. Like bus or Uber fare to a damned supermarket.

    11. Re:Pressing problem? by enjar · · Score: 1

      Uber fare to a damned supermarket.

      I can see the headline on Breitbart. "EBT BOTTOM FEEDERS TAKING UBER TO THE SUPERMARKET"

    12. Re:Pressing problem? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      I've never seen any food go for cheaper on Amazon than in real life. And you have to fill the box or pay for shipping. They gave me a bunch of those $5 for pantry if you don't get two day shipping. I was like I'll try it. Only one $5 per order, and all the food was way overpriced. The $5 didn't even make me break even.

    13. Re:Pressing problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it largely depends on where you live.

      Midwest? Local options are probably much, much cheaper.

      Coasts, on the other hand... I find Amazon has a better than 50/50 shot at being cheaper than supermarkets.

    14. Re:Pressing problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like bus or Uber fare to a damned supermarket.

      Let's say someone can get an Uber to the supermarket for $2.50 (and another $2.50 to return). That's a $5 roundtrip, which means they can go to the market 14 times a year for the cost of Amazon Prime. So, basically once a month with two "extra" trips for the year. If you're living paycheck to paycheck, you can't buy a month's worth of groceries at a time.

      On the other hand, Prime can handle the groceries (assuming comparable prices), a bit of streaming, some reading material, and regular Amazon purchases that would otherwise require a trip to a mall or department store.

      I can see this being very valuable on a case-by-case basis, dependent on local markets and transportation.

    15. Re: Pressing problem? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I live in a food desert. Of course, I live here on purpose and I drive. I have a tiny grocery store, about 25 miles away. McDonald's is seventy five minutes away. I kinda like it, actually.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    16. Re:Pressing problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "food deserts" Ya because people on EBT want to buy more fresh vegetables

  7. Basic income millenials want this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot gets all worked up over "basic income" but when that income comes out with a less palatable name such as welfare or benefits it suddenly doesn't want it. Remember when your javascript barista job gets sent to Indian Robots you will want it.

    1. Re:Basic income millenials want this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the "basic income" proposals are replacements for all the welfare programs.
      I'm not saying I support it, but the idea is it goes to everyone regardless of income or need.
      Traditional welfare programs actually provide a perverse incentive to keep one's income low.

  8. I pay enough taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very glad I never paid for Amazon Prime. And now I never will unless they offer me it for the discount price!

  9. Re:Transport?? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh stop with the left/right garbage. Democrats are just as responsible for ghettos as Republicans. Ghettos are deliberate policy, not an intractable problem that no one can figure out how to solve.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  10. Damn these mod points by itomato · · Score: 1

    Government Cheese flows more freely..

  11. Re:Transport?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF are you talking about?

    The MYTH of the welfare queen driving around in her Pink Cadillac is 100% a Republican one.

    Period. End of story.

    Now go shove your sanctimony up your ass.

  12. What about veterans? by firbolgar · · Score: 1

    We actually put blood and sweat in for society. What about disabled veterans who, in that vast majority of cases and despite service related injuries, continue as productive members of society? I hate to be that guy, but this really sounds like "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need".

    1. Re:What about veterans? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      We actually put blood and sweat in for society.

      I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and believe that your joining and serving was 100% motivated by nothing else but altruism. Would you say the percentage of armed services personal who could enjoy that same classification makes it out of single digits?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:What about veterans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a class traitor who murders for the capitalists.
      Fuck you!

  13. Re:Government handouts are bad enough... now priva by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    They really do help about 1% of the people who actually need the help, the rest are loafs who are freeloading, skating taxes and doing cash-only jobs to provide the illusion of being in need of assistance.

    We have a robust fraud investigation office servicing all levels of the welfare system. Inappropriate provisioning is mostly in the bureaucracy, where the rules don't cover people with real need and so the caseworkers use their judgment and bend the rules a tad. Actual abuse is approximately zero.

    2) the amount of soda, junk food and useless commodities spent using EBT

    Some of that is bad habits (soda...); some of it is a matter of people not being able to carry perishable goods or afford the higher-priced not-junk-food. Unsurprisingly, people end up eating what's cheap--in a number of ways. I've found I can design robust food plans on as little as $25/month for 2000kcal/day with several hours of Internet research and strict budgeting and planning behaviors--in other words, several dozen times the effort anyone invests. You have to know what you're going to eat pretty much every day 2 months in advance, what every meal is going to cost, and so forth. This also devotes a surprising amount of time to cooking and cleaning.

    At a point, it consumes your life. Likewise, people may not have such planning skills. For the most part, they all believe they don't have another choice.

    3) Using their own wads of 'cash' on booze, cigarettes, and anything else that would be shamed upon on the cant-have-that list

    Pretty much how it works. A lot of welfare is supplemental--you can even get unemployment if you have a part-time job (20 hours = employed for half a job). That means you have an earmarked account (EBT) and your own personal money (cash).

    Why even get a job, when you can get upwards of $300-800/month for free?

    For UBI systems, the answer is "to gain more purchasing power and enhance your standard-of-living." For the current public aid system, you're comparing your $10.25/hr welfare with the $10.75/hr FedEx warehouse job that's going to replace and terminate your welfare benefit, so why do you want to get a job making 50 cents an hour?

    If they aren't trying to look for new hire [slashdot.org] opportunities

    People aren't born with the Computer Programmer DNA. Talent is a myth and poor people aren't going to have a special magical power welling from their souls. The whole idea is mysticism, same shit as homeopathy.

    There are people who have had time to train themselves about things and are bad at life in general, so are potentially-useful employees. Better than any other employee? Doubtful. Even given the likelihood in large numbers, you're wasting resources digging for diamonds crapped out into the horse manure when you have access to actual diamond mines.

    All this does is keep on enabling a broken government hand-out system, not police it or make it better.

    Assuming the prices are better, it allows access to purchase more goods with the same money. That means maybe they can afford $12 family-pack toilet paper instead of $16 family-pack at Wal-Mart, and buy those $8 worth of fruits-and-vegetables (or, you know, pork--actual healthy food) instead of $5 worth of junk food.

    There's something else you missed: Unemployment trends toward ~5% in the U.S. (2% in Japan, etc.). If we get lower unemployment, people who plan to take a later retirement generally get laid off less, and job opportunities tend to draw more people to exit college early. If we get higher unemployment, those late retirements slow, and people go as far as taking up grad school to avoid the barren job market (2008 Great Recession, that happened a lot). A low-unemployment market also fails to discourage household members seeking second incomes (e.g. bored hou

  14. Re:Transport?? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    It's not actually a myth. It's just something very, very, very rare that happens in odd circumstances. For example, someone from a wealthy family becomes poor but their parents still let them drive the pink Cadillac.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  15. Re:Work hard! Other people need Prime Video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you work hard, what are you doing posting on Slashdot?

  16. Re:Transport?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pink Cadillac

    They are called donks. And the wheels alone cost as much as 3 months of a families food budget.

  17. Well, no TRUE Slashdotter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...would act like that here.

  18. Re:Work hard! Other people need Prime Video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good question. Everyone around the world works the same hours and never takes breaks, so he must be lazy.

  19. Re:Government handouts are bad enough... now priva by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When exactly do "clerks, cashiers, and customer service positions at gas stations and grocery stores" see the balance someone has on their debit/EBT card?

    "the HUGE thousands of dollars balances most people carry on EBT" Define most, what percentage? Also do you have a source other than anecdote?

  20. So it's sort of a good deal...demented and sad... by Whooty+McWhooface · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this is a good deal. Food stamps can't be used for the Prime membership cost (but lest's put that aside).

    The price of food tends to be so overpriced, unless you are ordering from the middle of nowhere it's a waste of food stamps. Took a quick peak and a package of Thomas' English Muffins is priced for $12.19. What. a. deal.

    I guess families are supposed to survive on one-fifth (or less) of the food they can get by getting their butt to the grocery store.

    Sure, I'm sure you could find a good deal on there somewhere, but you have to wade through a swamp of overpriced crap to find them and it's all on the taxpayer's dime if they tired of looking. There should be a separate search setting for purchases geared to the food stamp customers.

  21. Re:So it's sort of a good deal...demented and sad. by will_die · · Score: 1

    That product was being sold by a storefront and was not prime eligible. But yes there are lots of items like that being sold by third-party stores. They tend to be high priced because they are nostalgic foods or items you cannot get in all places so those store fronts are going for that one time sell that people want for some special reason.

  22. Amazon isn't more expense by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    At least not right now. Things like cloths, soap, house good, etc are often half the price on Amazon. There's a phrase for it: The High Cost Of Being Poor. Meaning you're too poor to take advantage of cost saving measures.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  23. Re:So it's sort of a good deal...demented and sad. by Whooty+McWhooface · · Score: 1

    According to their We don't accept EBT, food stamps, or any other payment method not listed for grocery purchases.

    I guess this is all moot. Rethinking the article, I guess this only is a discount on Prime membership, not opening up the floodgates for EBT purchases from an overlooked market.

  24. Re:Obama Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny thing is this is not a troll. That bitch really said that exactly on camera. That is a verbatim quote.

  25. Nice, just what I needed by Nyder · · Score: 0

    I was paying $10.99 and was considering dropping it because I don't really use it that much, but I'll keep it at $5.99. I don't order food from it because I live 5 blocks from a grocery store, but I do watch stuff on Prime & buy stuff every few months.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  26. Re:Transport?? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Awww, I'm sorry - did I interrupt your partisan spamming? Please, get right back to not solving the problem.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  27. Re:Transport?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love you for your pink Cadillac
    Crushed velvet seats
    Riding in the back
    Cruising down the street
    Waving to the girls
    Feeling out of sight
    Spending all my money
    On a Saturday night
    Honey I just wonder what you do there in back
    Of your pink Cadillac
    Pink Cadillac

  28. Re: Obama Phone by KGIII · · Score: 1

    That seems unlikely to be honest. I'm not sure why you'd lie about that.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  29. What discount? by Jerry · · Score: 1

    $72/yr used to be what Amazon charged for Prime until Bezos got greedy.

    However, Prime isn't that good of a deal. "Free Shipping" isn't really free. When you compare prices of alternate suppliers linked to an item you find that their price for that time, plus their shipping charges, usually is close to or equals Amazon's Prime price for that item.

    That leaves movies. Pay $10/mo to see movies you wouldn't walk across the street to see? No thanks. One can do that on NetFlix for $8/mo. But, no matter. What come out of Hollywood isn't worth watching.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  30. VA benefits ain't gov't assisance? by BeldarZconehead · · Score: 1

    I was a food stamps recipient---I now realize that bad diet is,
    like Monsanto, a war on the people.
            The program is for 'People on Government assistance.'
    It seems that only EBT holders need apply, not us Baby-burnin',
    mother-stabbin', father-rapin' VietNam vets on a VA disability such as myself--Hell Vit-NAM is just some place where they're startin' to make them newfangled hard drives and such so far as Bezos is concerned, not some place where Rockefeller and Cardinal Spellman (Look up Spelly's War) started a war against some far off people no one I knew was mad at nor whose country we wanted to go to---Long Story short, $100 /yr for me,
    Droolio Iglesias

  31. WTF? by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1
    So let's say I pay taxes. And I have to pay Amazon prices straight. And my tax dollars go to some people who can now get Amazon Prime for cheap? Talk about rewarding failure and punishing success.

    Also, what are they buying, that's so time-sensitive, if they're that impoverished?

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  32. Re:Transport?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MYTH of the welfare queen driving around in her Pink Cadillac is 100% a Republican one.

    Actually, she existed, and she drove a Cadillac, but it wasn't pink. Her name was Linda Taylor, and she was engaged in all sorts of identity fraud and scams. Plus she was linked to a few suspicious deaths.

    Now obviously she's the exception, rather than the rule. The level of fraud for welfare appears to be low.

  33. Re: Obama Phone by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    It's not verbatim, but indeed it happened:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    This was just one element of the Obama euphoria that people experienced. Another (quite nauseating I might add) example is this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...