Slashdot Mirror


What the Hell Is Happening To Cryptocurrency Valuations? (techcrunch.com)

The investment category of cryptocurrencies hit a new milestone this week, one that would have been unfathomable just a couple of years ago: $100 billion in combined market capitalization. The break above the 12-digit threshold is largely attributable to bitcoin, which is by far the largest digital currency in the still-nascent category, and which has been on a tear lately. From a TechCrunch article: There is one rational explanation that, if true, would totally justify this rapid increase in price across some of the major cryptocurrencies. And that is, maybe these currencies are actually worth these high prices, and maybe even worth many times more than that at which they are currently trading. But the problem is we have no way to figure out their value. Cryptocurrencies aren't public companies with earnings and expenses and EPS. For example, we can look at Apple's financials and determine its book value -- what the company's assets would be worth if hypothetically liquidated today. Of course, stocks trade at a premium to this, because people are enthusiastic that Apple will continue to perform well and this book value will continue to rise. But we can't do this with cryptocurrencies. We could guess -- and compare it to things like the total money or gold supply in the U.S. For example, if you're someone who thinks of cryptocurrencies as a store of value, the total estimated value of all gold in the world is more than $8 trillion dollars... meaning if bitcoin would ever replace or supplant gold, its current value is pennies on the dollar.

33 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. tulpenmanie by fabriciom · · Score: 3, Informative

    New boom with disaster to whoever is left holding the last "coin".

    1. Re:tulpenmanie by gnick · · Score: 2

      The way that works is the two highest bidders have to pay, but only the highest bidder gets the money. People will bid up to the value of $20 because why not it's free money.

      I'm not convinced that it would get bid up to $20. What idiot would enter an auction where the second place bidder still pays but gets nothing in return? Does this situation exist in some context? If you're the only bidder, fine, wager a buck. Otherwise, the only way to win is not to play.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:tulpenmanie by TheCowSaysMoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I *GUARANTEE* you the bidding will get to AND surpass $20. It's happened every time I've ever seen the auction experiment happen. Follow along...

      Bidder A: Sure, why not? I'll bid $1.
      Bidder B: (Thinking: So, I can bid $2 and profit $18?) I'll bid $2.
      Bidder C: (Thinking: So, I can bid $3 and profit $17?) I'll bid $3.
      Bidder D: (Thinking: Duh! I'll take $16 profit!) I'll bid $4.
      Bidder B: (Thinking: There's still $15 profit to be had.) I'll bid $5.
      [Bidder A drops out because they're getting a bit confused about everything]
      Bidder D: (Thinking: $14 profit, baby!) $I'll bid $6.
      Bidder C: $7
      Bidder D: $8
      Bidder B: $9
      Bidder C: $10
      Bidder D: $11
      [Bidder B now realizes that the auctioneer is going to make $21 for a $20 bill because both Bidders C and D have to pay up. Bidder B drops out.]
      Bidder C: (Thinking: At least I'll still profit $8.) $12
      Bidder D: (Thinking: At least I'll still profit $7) $13
      Bidder C: $14
      Bidder D: $15
      Bidder C: (Thinking: I don't really care about $4 profit, but I don't want to pay $14 for nothing) $16
      Bidder D: (Thinking: I don't really care about $3 profit, but I don't want to pay $15 for nothing) $17
      Bidder C: $18
      Bidder D: $19
      Bidder C: (Thinking: I don't want to pay $20 for a $20 bill, but I DEFINITELY don't want to pay $18 for nothing. Fine. We'll just end this whole thing and everything's even) $20
      Bidder D: (Thinking: Dammit! Now I'm screwed! He's getting $20 for $20 and I'm getting shafted with nothing, but I still have to pay $19! Screw it! I'll take a $1 loss instead of a $19 loss!) $21
      Bidder C: (Thinking: WTF?!?! He just bid $1 more than what he's getting in return and now I'm stuck paying $20 for nothing?! No way! I'll take a $2 loss instead of a $20 loss!) $22
      Bidder D: (Thinking: $3 loss is better than $21 loss) $23
      Bidder C: (Thinking: $4 loss is better than $22 loss) $24
      [etc., etc., etc.]

      It's not unheard of for the bidding to surpass $100 ($80 loss is better than a $98 loss!) before the experiment is ended due to the point having been made many bids earlier.

      The context is in how people think about risk, loss, and similar factors. Consider an RFP process for a $1-million project with a major, multi-national corporation (MMC) with billions of dollars in market cap. Winning the contract for the project would be a MAJOR windfall for the winning company (WC) on the assumption that a successful project might lead to more work. But, to win the contract, the bidding companies (BC) are going to have to travel to MMC headquarters several times over the course of the next several months on their own dime. They'll also need to create prototypes and other proof-of-concept materials on their own dime. Let's say that over the first month or so of the RFP process that most BC are eliminated and only two BC remain. We'll call them BC1 and BC2.

      Now that things are getting real, BC1 checks in with the group leading the RFP bid and finds out they've spent approximately $100k so far on the bid process. That's okay because their estimates suggest the project will cost $750k to complete successfully ($850k total; $150k profit). BC2 checks in with their group and finds they've also spent approximately $100k and they also estimate the project will cost $750k to complete successfully ($850k; $150k profit). BC1 and BC2 are aware that they are the last remaining companies bidding for the contract and that each very likely has similar expenses and estimated project costs.

      BC1 decides to up the game a bit and tells the RFP group to setup a special one-on-one meeting with BC1 CEO and the head of the project for MMC. They want further refined prototypes and a WORKING proof-of-concept. They estimate the additional meeting/work will cost $25k, but that still has them at $125k of profit. Meanwhile, BC2 catches wind of the special meeting and works up their own special meeting. Estimated $25k expenses, but that still has them at $125k profit as well. If both companies stopped at this point, one would win

    3. Re:tulpenmanie by Khyber · · Score: 2

      " Cryptocurrencies are not just a fancy collectible, they perform valuable services in the real world."

      Can you eat that cryptocurrency? Can you melt that cryptocurrency down and make a useful tool out of it? Can that cryptocurrency be utilized to transmit or generate energy?

      No? It's just a fucking ledger, you say? Well, then.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  2. Ransomware by Luthair · · Score: 3, Interesting

    are the only external buyers - the rest is a crypto circle jerk.

    1. Re:Ransomware by supremebob · · Score: 2

      I would think that most of that trade volume is being processed at Silk Road like illegal goods trading sites, or by currency manipulators pulling various pump and dump and money laundering schemes on the currency trading sites.

      Sure, there are a handful of legit sites taking Bitcoin thanks to sites like BitPay who instantly convert them to traditional currency. That said, don't kid yourself into thinking that those transactions make up the majority of Bitcoin transactions. It's still the Wild West out there in cryptoland.

    2. Re:Ransomware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bitcoin's growth is a combination of countries seeing it as legal tender (e.g. Japan, India), more companies accepting it in exchange for goods, and being the intermediary currency between FIAT and other cryptocurrencies. The other cryptocurrencies are design to improve bitcoin, or specialize in a specific industry.

      Industries like banking that have been running on the same slow, antiquated system for decades. There is no reason in this day and age, for money to take days to transfer. The smart ones know they need to adapt.

  3. What's happening by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Human greed. When people start selling houses and taking out new mortgages to "invest" in bitcoin, that's when you get the hell out.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:What's happening by nomadic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, this.

      It's pretty much a Ponzi scheme.

    2. Re:What's happening by sl3xd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have no problem saying that cryptocurrency is a bubble and that there's a huge amount of speculation over hype driving up prices.

      What we're seeing is definitely not a Ponzi scheme, which is its own, very special -- and very different, form of fraud.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    3. Re:What's happening by rkordmaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yes, bitcoin is certainly built on greed, and you know what? It works. Will bitcoin crash, absolutely, just like it has many times before and just like it will many times more. But the damn thing is just not going away, like an std, it just keeps bouncing back stronger than ever. Because its built on strongest foundation of them all - greed. That, is the true (evil)genius of the cryptocurrency. The key is that even with a crash, the losers are not left with nothing, the bitcoins they are holding might be worth much less but they are still worth something and it costs nothing to hold onto them and wait for better days.

    4. Re:What's happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should probably stop now because you have no idea what you're writing about.

    5. Re:What's happening by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Rule of acquisition #10: Greed is eternal.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:What's happening by tbannist · · Score: 4, Informative

      It becomes a Ponzi scheme when one or a small group of people benefit from the wealth, and the value of current bitcoins is driven by a constant flow of new buyers.

      Actually, it becomes a Ponzi scheme when the investments of new buyers are used to pay the returns on the investments of the earlier buyers.

      Since cryptocurrencies do actually pay any returns, they can never actually be a Ponzi scheme. Though you could, in theory, run a Ponzi scheme that uses cryptocurrencies... You could also try to argue that the entire marketplace for cryptocurrencies is a Ponzi scheme, but it doesn't fit the definition very well. The central problem is that new investments aren't actually paying the returns (profits) of earlier investors, instead the new investments are buying the inherently worthless numbers that the earlier investors own, which is generally considered a bubble.

      And to answer the submission's question, the proper value for a cryptocurrency is however much the collection of people who want to buy them are willing to pay for them. They have no inherent value. They're the opposite of gold-backed currency, they're demand-backed currency. If next week everyone decided that cryptocurrencies were a fad, they'd all be worthless. It's not likely to be that extreme, but buyer beware.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  4. Stop Ransomware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stop ransomware and you kill Bitcoin.

    1. Re:Stop Ransomware by crtreece · · Score: 2

      The WannaCry payment address has collected just over 17 BTC https://blockchain.info/addres...
      May 13 had the lowest bitcoin trading volume in the last 30 days @ around 75k BTC traded.
      So, the total number of payments for wannacry equals approximately .022% percent of BTC transactions on the day with the lowest trading volume in the last month. Total payments for wannacry are approximately .0017% of last weeks BTC volume of over 1M BTC. I don't think ransomware is the primary driver of BTC transactions, and statistics support that.

      --
      file: .signature not found
    2. Re:Stop Ransomware by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      Stop ransomware and you kill Bitcoin.

      Bullshit!

      Ransomware payments are only a tiny fraction of the drive behind the increasing demand/value of crypto-currencies.

      The true drivers are the impending collapse of the US Dollar combined with the world dropping it as the primary trade currency, and the global trend towards governments taking ever more control of people's money through "cashless" systems and fears of Greece-style "haircuts" where government simply confiscates some percentage from individual accounts when the government is in financial crisis.

      People increasingly wish to place their wealth out of the reach of governments and their spending habits out of the reach of law enforcement/intelligence agency databases and data analysis systems. People do not trust them, and with very good reasons backed by history.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  5. Re:This is an actual story by nomadic · · Score: 2

    Bitcoin will be the new pets.com or webvan!

  6. Speculation by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is one rational explanation that, if true, would totally justify this rapid increase in price across some of the major cryptocurrencies. And that is, maybe these currencies are actually worth these high prices, and maybe even worth many times more than that at which they are currently trading

    Or more likely its a speculative bubble and like the stock price of Tesla it has far outpaced the current underlying fundamentals. They are basing this on valuations of derivative instruments relating to (mostly) bitcoin. Like a stock there is no cause and effect link between the market price and the actual value of the underlying asset. All it takes to get an absurd "valuation" is one party purchasing an interest in a fund or company dealing in bitcoin for a large amount of money. If I buy 10% of your company for $1 million dollars I am de-facto saying I think your company is worth $10 million. But the problem with that is that there is a winner's curse effect at work. Just because one person overpays doesn't mean everyone else agrees.

  7. Bitcoin valuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bitcoin is skyrocketing mainly because it's one of the only safe ways for kleptocrats to move their money out of China. For those that don't know, China has exceptionally strict wealth export laws so the paper billionaires there need a way to move their money out and into other markets.

    Take a look at a chart of BTC vs Yuan and you'll see an almost perfect inverse relationship.

    1. Re:Bitcoin valuation by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not just China but I see this being used by anyone wanting to move money across borders.

      They recently had a story on how Trump was going to start taxing money going to Mexico, I can send money right now to anyone in the world sans any tax.

  8. Okay.... by dugancent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    maybe these currencies are actually worth these high prices

    Hahahahahaha

    I have nothing useful to say. Just had to point out that it's not every day that see such absolute BS.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  9. Interesting by jediborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Financial Expert Peter Shiff made an interesting point in his podcast this week about crypocurrency valuations. As an Austrian Economist he believes the digital currencies will eventually implode and become worthless. The interesting point he made is that while bitcoins may be limited (they will eventually be capped at 21 billion bitcoins) cryptocurrencies ARENT. You can make as many cryptocurrencies as you wish, meaning they can be created in excess and therefore be exposed to inflationary or hyperinflationary effects that could cause a massive crash in the value of all crypto currencies.

    That said, i'm still gonna wait for a crash in bitcoin value this year, and then buy some as a purely speculative bet

    1. Re:Interesting by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can make as many cryptocurrencies as you wish,

      The value of cryptocurrency comes from the network effect. Sure you can take the Bitcoin code, and create a new blockchain, and change the name, but if nobody wants to use your coin, it's not worth anything. In order to gain value over existing coins it must offer some new distinguishing features that people actually care about.

  10. Re:This is an actual story by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

    Yeah but you can use gold for things, even post-apocalypse. Paper money is at least paper... Bitcoin is even more ephemeral than my electronic dollars at the bank.

  11. Re: This is an actual story by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    Why are proponents of gold standard also proponents of Bitcoin? You can't get any more fiat than Bitcoin. Nothing at all backs it up, even less than government promise backing up real money.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  12. Re: This is an actual story by Junta · · Score: 2

    The *theory* is that there is some hard upper limit that cannot be manipulated on a whim by humans in control, one by physical reality and one by math.

    In practice, it's not so clean, and contrary to how preppers feel, in general the economy is much better now than it was in the gold standard days.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  13. Get Ready for the Crash by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unbelievably high values for something that doesn't actually have any intrinsic value are generally followed by crashes.

    This is obviously a conspiracy theory, and I have no evidence, but the shady origin of Bitcoin (nobody really knows who Satoshi Nakamoto is) could mean that it was engineered by a national actor to crash national economies. It is, after all, a caricature of fiat currency.

  14. Re:The irony of slashdot by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

    When Bitcoin first appeared on slashdot I thought it was a neat experiment. I followed up by finding people on IRC and getting some Bitcoin. Over the years slashdot users have maintained a staunch incredulity and mostly hate on Bitcoin here. Well that's fine, but some of us did pretty well out of it no matter what your opinion is.

    The first people in to a pyramid scheme usually do well. It's everybody else...

  15. Two reasons by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First is that gold bugs hate inflation. They see it as the ultimate evil. They like deflation. Well gold can lead to deflation, and likely would in the long run due to its limited supply, but bitcoin is guaranteed to have deflation given its design. So they like it because if it is used it would guarantee deflation.

    The second is something you might have guessed from the first, it is because they don't know shit about money. They don't really have an understanding of what makes money what it is, or what makes a given currency good or bad. They see big amounts = good, big gains = good. Since both gold and bitcoin have been on a run as of late, that makes them good.

  16. Re:This is an actual story by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

    Yeah but you can use gold for things, even post-apocalypse

    While technically true, the very post-apocalypse utility of gold does not explain its current valuation. Based on that logic, you'd expect stainless steel to have a higher value than gold, because it's more useful. Same with paper in paper money. A $100 bill has the same paper as a $20 bill, so this does not help explain the value either.

    Bitcoin is even more ephemeral than my electronic dollars at the bank

    Your electronic dollars at the bank are just ones and zeroes, just like bitcoin. The only real difference is the central vs distributed transaction model.

  17. I'm going with bubble by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

    I've seen two big bubbles in my life in the USA come crashing down - the internet bubble of the 1990s and the previous decade's housing bubble. Here are the signs of a bubble.

    1) Prices keep going up even though intelligent people (Slashdotters, for example) can't see any real justification for it.
    2) People who don't know anything about the subject come to the conclusion that it will last forever and can't ever lose money.
    3) People believe it can't ever go down and start investing in it as a retirement strategy.
    4) Stupid people start getting into it. No offense, but when your waitress decides that cryptocurrency is going to be her ticket to becoming wealthy, it's time to get out of it.
    5) People start finding high risk ways to put money they don't have into it because they believe that as the price will only go up, they'll soon turn enough profits to pay back the high risk loans they got. Examples would be buying stock on margin and subprime home loans.
    6) Big money banks/investment firms in the USA find new ways to invest in it that nobody understands.

  18. Re:This is an actual story by nealric · · Score: 2

    The suit or 5-star restaurant arguments are devious because these are both items available at a wide variety of price points. A "fine" suit could be defined as a Men's Warehouse basic suit that is at least all wool (~$300), or it could be defined as the finest bespoke Saville Row suit ($10k+). "Armani Suit" is a ridiculous measure of value because Armani actually makes suits at a fairly wide range of price points with several sub brands. A "5-star restaurant" could be defined as a basic entree and appetizer at a nice steakhouse with no alcohol (~$100) or it could be defined as a spot at a multi-Michelin star restaurant with the finest Bordeux to wash it down ($1k+).

    Long story short, compared to real goods, the price of gold has varied widely. In the last 100 years, an ounce of gold has been worth as much as $2,500 in 2017 dollars or as little as $300. At times, it's bought a J.C. Penny Suit, at other's it's bought a fine bespoke suit.