Slashdot Mirror


Lowe's To Lay Off About 125 Workers, Move Jobs To India (go.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Home improvement retailer Lowe's says it's laying off approximately 125 information technology workers, the third round of job cuts this year. Chief Information Officer Paul Ramsay said in a memo that the affected workers were notified Wednesday. He said the Mooresville, North Carolina-based company has spent the last several years planning a strategic IT workforce team to respond better in what he called "this highly competitive 24/7 retail environment." Some of the jobs will be relocated to Bangalore, India.

222 comments

  1. Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good job, Donald.

    1. Re:Making American Great Again by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Trump hasn't "made his move" yet, obviously. I'm sure he'll be all over this. He cares about American jobs after all.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Making American Great Again by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why didn't you blame Obama when this happened? Because he did shit for the American Worker.

      Obama's legacy is being written right now, and it is going to be not so kind to him.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Making American Great Again by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 4, Funny

      "All laid off IT workers will be given lifetime employment in my coal mines." - King Donald

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    4. Re:Making American Great Again by GLMDesigns · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm. Sarcasm. But when Obama said "nothing can be done" you were cool about it. So, if Trump comes out against this - will you give him credit?

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    5. Re:Making American Great Again by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obama didn't get elected based on a platform of bringing jobs back to America.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your a doosh

    7. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah he got elected on "hope and change" which was worse then before.

    8. Re:Making American Great Again by hawguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "All laid off IT workers will be given lifetime employment in my coal mines." - King Donald

      Fortunately, it'll be a short lifetime - a win-win.

    9. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The president doesn't charge anything. Congress does.

    10. Re:Making American Great Again by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well maybe Trump should have used the 'hope' part because that seems to be what everyone is doing. He certainly isn't changing anything. "Hope and Change" is refreshingly honest. Hope that things can be changed for the batter, and try to change them. Which he did.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    11. Re:Making American Great Again by sabri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure he'll be all over this. He cares about American jobs after all.

      If he does, he'll instruct USCIS to pay better attention to H1-B petitions that are being adjudicated right now, and make sure that none of the petitions apply to beneficiaries with a comparable skillset to those that are being laid off. In other words: until these 125 people have a new job, USCIS should scrutinize pending H1-B petitions.

      Let's be honest, that would only make sense, and if these guys are any good they'll have a new job tomorrow.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    12. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think people elected him to give his best shot. What did he accomplish in 8 years?

      No, don't compare him to other Presidents that suck. We're talking about Obama. What did he do beyond doubling the national debt?

      Obama seems like a swell guy. I wouldn't mind drinking a beer with him. But as far as accomplishing things, making tough decisions...nope. He had an open checkbook and gave everyone what they wanted, kicking that can to the next President.

    13. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Forcing Lowe's to do this should be he final straw for his impeachment. This will end Trump.

    14. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, without a living wage. Welcome to Trumpville...Pottersville.

    15. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it should. Presidents shouldn't be allowed to order companies to fire employees.

    16. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad Republicans are fine with Trump forcing a corporation to fire Americans.

    17. Re:Making American Great Again by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Other than just saying it was worse. How is was america worse during the Obama Administration?
      The Economy improved after a bad recession.
      Gas prices became low
      Improved rights for discriminated groups
      A larger portion of the population now has health insurance.

      Yes they are trade-offs for these decisions, but for the most part from 2008-2016 increasingly got better.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    18. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think people elected him to give his best shot. What did he accomplish in 8 years?

      He implemented Romneycare nationwide.

      Not the best healthcare plan, but at least insurance companies had a lot less ability to weasel out of paying your healthcare, even if you were too expensive or had been ill before.

    19. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The President can't write checks, only Congress can do that. Obama started his term during the worst recession since the 1920s, and left the job with a stock market at record highs, unemployment numbers at near record low, and 20 million Americans on health insurance who couldn't previously get it. On top of that, he vastly improved relations with all our allies around the world, who were delighted to get to deal with a mature, respectful, and thoughtful President after #43's reign. Of course Americans then deiced that "No, our President should be an uninformed, loudmouthed, bragging buffoon!". So our allies are once again having to deal with an American government that can't be unpredictable, untrustworthy, and undiplomatic...

    20. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans believe the President is allowed almost unlimited powers. They have no problem with the fact Trump fired these 125 Americans.

    21. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But losing jobs makes Republicans happy and they control Congress so they punish Trump for this action.

    22. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He hasn't gone far enough.

      No American should be employed.

    23. Re:Making American Great Again by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree. Everyone who loses a job should go into a registry and the number of H1-B offerings reduced by that number

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    24. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans get off on this sort of thing.

    25. Re:Making American Great Again by computational+super · · Score: 1

      And why do they think Hillary (or Bernie, for that matter) would have been any better?

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    26. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boycott!!! Screw them....

    27. Re:Making American Great Again by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Other than just saying it was worse. How is was america worse during the Obama Administration?

      A long-lasting and historic low in conservative good feels.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    28. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep just because you say its true, shithead

      You know nothing, go back to your mom's baserment

    29. Re:Making American Great Again by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      I agree. Everyone who loses a job should go into a registry and the number of H1-B offerings reduced by that number

      That would only help if the laid off people were replaced by H1-B workers. As TFA says, "Some of the jobs will be relocated to Bangalore, India", so those do not require visas.

    30. Re:Making American Great Again by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      It still means that there are that number of people who are available for work in the US and so should be taken off the H1-B count. Since H1-B is for positions that there is no one available to fill.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    31. Re:Making American Great Again by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the last years of the short life are considerably more expensive.

      The Government had set up funding to help coal miners, however they found out that black lung was seriously underreported.

      That increased demand comes as the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund is stressed. The fund is nearly $6 billion in debt. It has taken on 1,000 claims that were covered by self-insured mining companies until they went bankrupt. And the coal excise tax that supports the fund is set for a 50 percent cut in two years.

      However if we double down on rolling back all regulations they could hope for a quick (and cheap) death in a mine collapse.

    32. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he does, he'll instruct USCIS to pay better attention to H1-B petitions that are being adjudicated right now, and make sure that none of the petitions apply to beneficiaries with a comparable skillset to those that are being laid off. In other words: until these 125 people have a new job, USCIS should scrutinize pending H1-B petitions.

      Wait, wasn't he already supposed to have stopped H1B visas?

    33. Re: Making American Great Again by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Pottersville was a mis-statement
      The world the 1% wish to see is orderly, religious and poor
      There are no whorehouses as in Capra's classic, much less bawdy entertainments.

    34. Re:Making American Great Again by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Don't tell that to the 18 million people BUSH put out of work chump

    35. Re:Making American Great Again by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Oh really?
      How many unemployed in Bush's TWO recessions?
      Hmm?

    36. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: I am not for Obama.

      However, the problem is that Obama had little to no support in Congress, even when it was all blue. The Dems did not want to use the nuclear option, and the Reps were more than happy to lock down the place with filibusters, even about basic issues like passing a budget or raising the debt ceiling (which are common things.) The "Cruz Control" mentality ensured that nothing was done for the American worker whatsoever.

      Obama also was handed a crappy deck of cards. Worst economy since the Great Depression, every other country in the world hating Americans because of the unjustified attack and destruction of a nation without provocation, and a Congress uninterested in actually doing much about it.

    37. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Douche.

    38. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just stomping on a fact that is not a fact:
      "Obama had little to no support in Congress, even when it was all blue"
      Congress only had a filibuster proof majority for a little over a month.
      They used that majority to pass healthcare reform.

      The rest of the time, other than the 5 or so he had a true majority the other party obstructed everything they possibly could.

      This idea that Obama did not have support 'even when it was all blue' is simply not true.
      It was less than two months and he got the largest change in healthcare law since medicare passed during that two months.

      I know there are many things to criticize..
      But I don't like falsehoods that become popular 'facts'.

    39. Re:Making American Great Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Trump hasn't "made his move" yet, obviously. I'm sure he'll be all over this.

      Oh yeah, he'll spring into action with his dog-like reflexes!

      -

      He cares about American jobs after all.

      Which is why he makes all his stuff in China and Vietnam and India.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    40. Re:Making American Great Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you blame Obama when this happened? Because he did shit for the American Worker

      Wow, lie through your teeth much?

      The unemployment rate was 7.8% when Obama became president, and it was 4.7% when he left office.

      Overall, Obama took over a jobs market in crisis and ended up growing the labor market better than most of the modern US presidents.

      These are facts backed by hard numbers. You may not like them and they might make your tummy hurt, but these are facts.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    41. Re:Making American Great Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually it's different, he hated the American Worker with every fiber of his being.

      I'd like whatever medication you're taking, but in a smaller dose.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    42. Re:Making American Great Again by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      He tried to make sure everyone had decent healthcare, and did pretty good considering the Republicans fought him every step of the way. Anything closer to Canada's healthcare system is a step forward.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    43. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least we can be sure that you're not kind of an idiot.

    44. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assholes, both Hillary and Trump are self centered egomaniacs that should not have power. This is not the issue here it is short sighted greed. Boycott lowes if you want to stop this

    45. Re:Making American Great Again by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Americans cannot understand and do not trust a president who is, or seems to be, smarter than they are.

      Americans want somebody like them. Somebody they can understand. Somebody they can relate to.

      Even if that person is really like con man uncle Joe who always spins BS stories at family gatherings and doesn't appear to have a real job, yet always has a new car and women 1/3rd his age with giant boobs hanging around. Nobody knows what Joe does but he sure seems to be good at it, so why not elect him?

      --
      Sig for hire.
    46. Re:Making American Great Again by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Hope that things can be changed for the batter...

      Well, he struck out on that one!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    47. Re:Making American Great Again by skam240 · · Score: 2

      He did shit for the American worker? He saved the American auto industry for starters. Let's follow that up by taking a highly depressed economy and bringing it to a much better point. I realize the unemployment rate isnt a perfect metric but taking the country from 8 or 9% to what are considered to be the very healthy levels of 4 or 5% is certainly doing something for the American worker. After that we have lower income workers who weren't lucky enough to get health care through their employer that now have access to subsidized health care at a rate many more can afford.

      Considering that after year 2 Obama had a congress controlled by the opposition party whose clearly stated goal was to not govern in the country's interest but to thwart him, I think it's safe to say he did a good amount of good for the American worker.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    48. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't recall reading anywhere in the previous post about Israel and Iraq. Foreign relations covers more than 2 countries ya know. You've specifically called out 2 instances of foreign relations that you feel are bad. OP might agree with you. Point is, you're trying to put words in their mouth. Sad troll is sad.

    49. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know about that guy but I know I won't give him nothing but shit. There are 8 years of conservative deadlock and haters screaming "not my president" that require retribution and vengeance. That's the only thing conservatives know and they HATE a dose of their own medicine. Your guy is dead in the water, you commie loving bastard.

    50. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and you completely ignore that they weren't record highs if you index to CPI instead of the fudged inflation figures, that unemployment decrease was caused by record numbers dropping out of the workforce, and more americans turned 18 than jobs created during Obama's tenure. The fudged numbers look good on paper, but look like dogshit for the millions of marginalized millennials.

    51. Re: Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... awesome analogy!

      Just to be clear though... I strive to be that uncle joe, but with actual stories that happened haha (and not Trump style uncle joe)

    52. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. At least trump talks about the problems with the economy and acts as though he cares about Americans. It seems he at least tries to back it up, albeit with sometimes questionable wording and actions. Believe me, I am in no way even 50% supportive of him and what he's done so far. Lots of it has been a joke. Obama, on the other hand, seemed to be an apologist for all things American. Basically, criticizing or shaming anything that's good in america or has come out of america. He was way more concerned about being popular and liked and hanging out with JayZ and Beyonce than he was trying to protect americans. He covered it up with some well intended handouts for the very poorest of the country (which isn't necessarily a bad thing as long as it doesn't incentivize bad behavior). The way he saw it, middle-america was basically getting it's comeuppance.

    53. Re: Making American Great Again by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      You imagine 125 jobs means anything at national level? You are a dullard.

    54. Re: Making American Great Again by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      "Obamacare" (a modified Republican plan that gives more money to healthcare big players) is fiscally unsound being based on incorrect assumptions, and so it will collapse unless changed. Obama back pedalled on promise of robust public option so it is not in any way a step toward socialized medicine.

    55. Re:Making American Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something has to power the generators that "fuel" those Teslas driven by west-coast snobs who like to sneer at blue collar workers.

    56. Re:Making American Great Again by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Give it time, it's only a tempurary problem.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    57. Re:Making American Great Again by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      And I'd like to be as blind as you are, but hey, I can't do that without damaging my brain.

    58. Re:Making American Great Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      And I'd like to be as blind as you are, but hey, I can't do that without damaging my brain.

      Yeah, I think it's too late to worry about damaging your brain.

      Ask your doctor if "not being a dick" is right for you.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    59. Re:Making American Great Again by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Since I've never seen a so-called liberal who isn't a dick, you should know if this works or not.

    60. Re:Making American Great Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Since I've never seen a so-called liberal who isn't a dick

      Aaaaaaaaaaand that's where you reveal your constricted little ideology and worldview, lol.

      Living in your head must be like looking out the gun-slit of a tank. No shades of gray for you and whatever is in front of you is all there is and all there will ever be. SAD!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    61. Re:Making American Great Again by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      And living in a kumbaya world for you, where people are disposable commodities, is even sadder.

    62. Re:Making American Great Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      And living in a kumbaya world for you, where people are disposable commodities, is even sadder.

      Maybe you should look into Abilify or Zyprexa to treat your delusional episodes. I also recommend you get a copy of "How Not To Be An Asshole" ($6.99 paperback) and get someone to read it to you.

      It's really fascinating that you would come up with something like "people are disposable commodities", as that says a lot more about you and your state of mind than it does about me. It also shows how little you know about, well, everything.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    63. Re:Making American Great Again by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I hardly think people are disposable commodities, I wouldn't be a firefighter if I thought that. One of the reason why I fled the blue state where I lived for a decade was the attitude THERE that people were disposable commodities. I will never willingly live in a "blue" community again, as people there mostly wouldn't help someone bleeding on the street. I'd rather live in America, thanks, where people DO care about each other.

    64. Re:Making American Great Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I hardly think people are disposable commodities

      Then you probably shouldn't carelessly toss terms like that around. It speaks more to your outlook on the world than the person they're directed at.

      -

      I wouldn't be a firefighter if I thought that.

      So you claim.

      -

      One of the reason why I fled the blue state where I lived for a decade was the attitude THERE that people were disposable commodities.

      So you went from a "maker" state to a "taker" state, and you're touting that as some kind of personal indicator of pride? Lol, hypocrite much?

      -

      I will never willingly live in a "blue" community again, as people there mostly wouldn't help someone bleeding on the street.

      I've lived in both red and blue states and what I've found in general is that people are people wherever you go. I will say that the blue states seem to be more willing to help those in need and less concerned with ethnicity and how people live their lives. And there seem to be a shitload fewer racists too.

      -

      I'd rather live in America, thanks, where people DO care about each other.

      Oh please stop with your "but muh freedomz" trope. It's a crashing bore, and whatever trailer-park red state you're living in probably wouldn't even have roads and water if not for all the money you fake patriots shamelessly suck from the blue states. Think I'm kidding? See for yourself:

      https://wallethub.com/edu/stat...

      If all those numbers and charts are too complex for you, the takeaway is that:

      Blue states subsidize red states in nearly ever single instance.
      Blue states are less dependent on the Federal government than red states in almost every case.
      Blue states contribute far more to the government than red states in nearly every instance.
      Blue states have a higher standard of living than red states.
      Blue states receive less assistance (food stamps, TANF, etc) from the government than red states.

      Feel free to live in your fact-free Freedom Compound while you bleat about the gubmint, and remember that when you and your parasitic pals are out buying new wheels for your house.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    65. Re:Making American Great Again by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Feel free to live in your fantasyland buddy. And - remember, you cannot keep brown people down forever!

    66. Re:Making American Great Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      And - remember, you cannot keep brown people down forever!

      LOL!! Is that the best you can do? :)

      Nice try, pal, but no one here is buying your bullshit. Thanks for playing, better luck next time! Now go put on your MAGA hat and kiss the Trump poster over your bed.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  2. Home Depot here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer HD anyway so this helps the decision process.

    1. Re:Home Depot here I come by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

      They'll be next.
      Get used to it America. The Corporate Beancounters think that India is the answer to Life, The Universe and Everything.

      India is not the answer to anything except a life of pain.
      I know from bitter experience that the quality of code coming out of India is generally very poor and will often require extensive re-working to make it useful.
      No more though. My Job went to India at the back end of last year.
      The company wants me to come back and sort out the mess. Not going back even at twice the salary. They chose their fate.

      --
      I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    2. Re: Home Depot here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. I'm glad these stories get published.

    3. Re:Home Depot here I come by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They'll find someone else to sort out the mess; you might as well profit from it. Just make sure to set your prices very high, like 3x your old salary plus a guaranteed generous severance if they lay you off again. If they're that desperate, they may very well agree.

    4. Re:Home Depot here I come by unixisc · · Score: 1

      For starters, I'd like to see Lowes try & sell their wares in India, and see how far they get

  3. Passwords? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What passwords? I don't remember anything since I got a pink slip.

    1. Re:Passwords? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      What passwords? I don't remember anything since I got a pink slip.

      If laid off Lowes staff hold any "secret" passwords needed to run the company, whoever let that happen should be laid off too.

      Every secret password here is shared in a team password vault.

    2. Re:Passwords? by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      Then you don't get your severance check.

    3. Re: Passwords? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And I accidentally shredded the master encryption key media too for the backups.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  4. Midnight shed shopping. by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    Not sure where this 24/7 notion comes from. Lowe's has pretty mundane business hours and a pretty limited reach. They aren't exactly IBM. A 3rd shift IT workforce seems like it would be nothing but a total bother instead of some sort of benefit.

    125 jobs also doesn't seem like enough of a potential gain in terms of salary cuts to offset the potential PR blowback.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    1. Re:Midnight shed shopping. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      125 jobs also doesn't seem like enough of a potential gain in terms of salary cuts to offset the potential PR blowback.

      Those probably aren't the only cuts, just the ones making the press because 'some' of them will be offshored. But its still over $1M per year in salary saved just on that part. The only blowback will be from slashdotters and the like, I can't see many people would stop shopping at Lowes because of this. It is a very small cut for a company their size, but its smart to make moves before you need to have huge cuts.

    2. Re:Midnight shed shopping. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      125 jobs also doesn't seem like enough of a potential gain in terms of salary cuts to offset the potential PR blowback

      People economize. If you can somehow cut costs, you can get lower prices. People will always attempt to maximize the ends achievable by their means, and so will reach for the lowest-price thing that they expect to do the job.

      Ever notice that people who cook a lot buy high-end kitchen appliances? $400 food processor, $100 knife, $450 KitchenAid mixer, and so forth. They expect these things to perform better. They'll last longer than the $20 things they buy, produce better results, and do so more-quickly so as to cut the time spent in the kitchen. Meanwhile, you need to mix cake batter twice a year and don't feel like spending 20 minutes doing so with a whisk, so you buy a $40 mixer.

      If folks thought the $40 thing would actually do the same job as the $400 thing, they'd buy the $40 one.

      Every time you find a new way to produce with less labor, you cut costs. Pay for 10 hours of work done at $20/hr or pay for 5 hours of work done at $20/hr? If those factory workers, putting 10 hours of their time in, can build that car, then they account for $200 of the cost. If they can build two cars in 10 hours, then they account for $100 of the cost of each car. If people aren't buying twice as many cars as a result, then you lay off half your factory workers. Propagate this up through everything that goes into the car and suddenly you can build the same car for half the price.

      In the auto industry, they just start adding more-expensive extras to upper-end luxury cars, and move the luxury items downward as their costs fall. The car that a median-income American will buy is the one priced at a certain proportion of his income; that car today is loaded with more shit than the car median-income Americans bought 40 years ago, instead of just being the same car but shitloads cheaper.

      If you're dealing with food or new tech (SSDs, new types of TVs, etc.), they come out costing $5,000 and then fall in price to $2,000, $1,000, $500, $350, for the same size and features. The increase in demand--the access to larger markets--retains or creates jobs making TVs. Food, on the other hand... we have far fewer farm workers today than we did in 1890.

      Whenever we gain access to new goods and more goods, jobs change over. It's all well-and-good when TVs cost $300 and then a new kind of TV costs $3,000 and eventually costs $300, because people are already buying TVs at that demand rate. When the median income goes up by 20% over a decade and the price of cell phones goes up by 15%,

      one in four people making, shipping, and retailing cell phones now no longer has a job doing that

      . Then, we buy Bluetooth headsets to go with the cell phones with the money we're no longer spending on cell phones--and jobs are required (created) to make, ship, and retail those, replacing the jobs lost.

      People are afraid their job is going to go away. It's not that they won't find another one; it's that their life will be disrupted. Every time someone else's job gets turned over, we all get wealthier; if it's your job, then everyone else gets wealthier and you go out looking for a new source of income so you can get a late start on some of this newly-available wealth. It's a constant process and it's great for everyone; however, when it's your turn to pay the blood sacrifice, you're suddenly not so keen.

      This is essentially clickbait news to excite the emotions of those ignorant of economics. Basically, the article (and headline) relies on people's stupidity and sheer lack of education to drive them into a panicked rage.

    3. Re:Midnight shed shopping. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Off-hours is the best time to implement new technologies.
      Also there is the online store, processing inventory...

      With increase risk of computer security problems, off sourcing is increasingly a dangerous idea.
      Hiring an IT worker in India who is half as good but time times cheaper, back in the old days would seem like a good decision. However today, half as good, means you could be leaving yourself vulnerable

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Midnight shed shopping. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Just because the physical stores are closed it doesn't mean the IT shop closes down. Financial reports are generated from the stores, orders to move stock are generated automatically, sales are analyzed, HR, payroll, orders to suppliers are created, etc. Oh yeah, the web site is running and taking orders 24/7.

    5. Re:Midnight shed shopping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably just want their IT workers to work 24/7 while being paid 1/8 of minimum national wage or less.

      Captcha: rabbit

    6. Re: Midnight shed shopping. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      In a year or two it may be that it wasn't any saved money at all due to the cost of downtime and lack of competence.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    7. Re:Midnight shed shopping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure where this 24/7 notion comes from

      Really. I saw that and thought "I can't wait to buy power tools at 3AM!"

    8. Re:Midnight shed shopping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live near this. All of the tech workers around here 'know' about them. They are a crappy place to work and have been for a LONG time. You only took a job there if you could find nothing else. They also underpaid for the area by a substantial margin. That they are shipping it to india does not surprise me in the least.

      Their problem is their location. They refuse to move slightly closer to either Charlotte or over to Raleigh where they would have tons of workers. They literally carpooled people in from the surrounding areas. Then acted like they were google. The only guy I know who went to work there lasted a year and then moved to somewhere better as soon as he could.

    9. Re: Midnight shed shopping. by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      125 jobs doesn't seem enough to have an article or whine about what Trump did or didn't do. It's less than rounding error talking of national IT employment.

  5. IRIS By Lowe's by sl3xd · · Score: 2

    If IRIS by Lowe's is any indication, Lowe's either offshored the coding to the lowest bidder, on the notion that with enough heads banging on keyboards, they'll be able to beat much more capable competition... or the US team was already headbanging on keyboards, producing rotten code, and Lowe's figured they had nothing else to lose.

    Either way, it's hard to see the future looking bright for IRIS.

    --
    -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  6. It should not even be a blip on the radar by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    USA typically has been creating 100,000 to 200,000 new jobs a month. This 125 job loss should not even be a blip in the radar, but it is being taken so seriously with good media coverage.

    Where was the outrage when blue collar jobs by 100,000s were disappearing all through 80s and 90s? Textile jobs, furniture making... before that auto jobs, before that railroad jobs ... White collar and the educated never cared, never bothered and were telling the 50 year old furniture makers to learn new trades. Well, it is all coming back to them, now they cry a river for the loss of 125 jobs.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by fluffernutter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As a person in technology I don't care about 100,000 jobs if they are all Walmart jobs likely to be taken away by automation anyway. Do you even know how many of those jobs are quality jobs with a +$50K salary, benefits, and a certain amount of job security?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re: It should not even be a blip on the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      were you alive then? We had many newsstories on this.

    3. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk like a babyboomer. The shit that some executive "white collar" babyboomers put on the "blue collars" during eighties-nineties (thirty years ago) is all the fault of the new generation young new non-executive "white collar".

      You talk shit, sir.

    4. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      So your hot take on this is that shitty things happened to other people, shitty things are now happening to these people, everyone deserves shit because that's the way the world works, shut up and like it?

      Fantastic. When you wonder why the world sucks, go look in a mirror.

    5. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was quite a bit of outrage. There just wasn't this internet thingy to amplify it.

      And this is a shocker because it's a high skilled set of folks who have been canned. It's another wakeup call that no profession or work is safe from this.

      If anyone gets a chance, read "The World is Flat".

      Free trade is great one country trades with another country and everyone is better off.

      Globalization, on the other hand, allows businesses to arbitrage labor - like this. And we're are to continue to lose our standard of living. There are billions of poor people in this World who will work for a fraction of what we need to live in the USA.

      And while I'm stuck with these student loans, companies pull this shit and continually lessen my ability to pay them back.

    6. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THESE are the jobs we were promised would REPLACE all the blue collar job loss. Americans were told to go spend a fortune at college and retrain themselves from these blue collar to white collar. This isn't about white collar folks that didn't care then or now, this is the SECOND at least betrayal of us who were told to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps and adapt. Training your replacements for this loophole to keep low wage H1-B and offshore has been happening for a while, so 125 is a drop in the bucket of the good, middle class decent wage paying knowledge worker jobs that have been exported by the 100s of thousands too

    7. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Well, it is all coming back to them, now they cry a river for the loss of 125 jobs.

      wow, lots of AC's took offense, but you're absolutely right. Sure, 125 IT workers losing there jobs sucks, but when did 125 jobs become that big a deal? Even if they were all really great jobs, how many CS majors are getting pushed through the system every year? If there aren't way more than 125 more openings out there, then things are really really bleak.

      That said, if this were my department at my company, and that department happens to be much smaller than 125 seats, I'd be quite pissed if it was all moved out of country.

      Hopefully they're not getting H1B's while also offshoring loads of local IT jobs.

    8. Re: It should not even be a blip on the radar by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      I was, but was in India. Came in in 1991. From that day I am amazed by the lack of concern most ordinary Americans have for the level of imports or the export of technology.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    9. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under Clinton the US had its largest gain in employment in the last 50 years. It also had the only gain in median wages in 40 years vs inflation.
      If you could not get a real job in the 1990s you were not trying very hard. With Y2K jobs went begging.
      At my company we were training non IT majors and some non college graduates to be programmers,
      All this changed in the 2000s.
      Now you are competing with poorly trained IT people from 3rd world for jobs. Good luck.

    10. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      As a person in technology I don't care about 100,000 jobs if they are all Walmart jobs likely to be taken away by automation anyway. Do you even know how many of those jobs are quality jobs with a +$50K salary, benefits, and a certain amount of job security?

      Wow, what a whiner you are. A job is a job is a job. You shouldn't be worried about how much it pays or any benefits it has, you should just be happy to have a job and be willing to bust your ass for your employer. Just ask a politician; there's a reason they always talk about "jobs" as a straight number with no qualifiers. /s

    11. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      found the corporatist who cares only about wall street.

    12. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were there jackass. You conveniently leave out the weeks and weeks of Union strikes that were constantly going on until Reagan started his strike breaking bullshit. Sorry guy, your attempt to paint us as hypocrites is pitiful.

    13. Re:It should not even be a blip on the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was sarcasm stupid. That's what the /s means.

  7. Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Founder of Lowes is a Hillary supporter and contributed money to her campaign.

    Founder of Home Depot is a Trump supporter and contributed money to his campaign.

    These two companies form a duopoly in the home improvement stores in the US, and the Republican/Democrat parties are a duopoly in government.

    1. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Menards is pretty big, but not coast to coast.

    2. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      I love Menards and miss having them since moving to the South.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    3. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shop at True Value and similar small town stores before I go to HD/Lowes but I have a small town mindset (use it or lose it.)

    4. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rather stab myself in the eye going to a small hardware store hoping they have the one thing I need vs a big box where I can look it up before even getting off my ass

    5. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately we have several Menards stores in my area. They are always my first choice, I only go to Home Depot if Menards somehow doesn't have it or if I need it too quickly to make a trip to Menards as there is a Home Depot right by my office but not a Menards along the commute home. Lowes I pretty much never go to anymore and they have rather little presence here compared to Menards and Home Depot.

    6. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't bad for home improvement.

      They suck when it comes to hardware though. I find I'm better off going to Ace when I need specific hardware.

    7. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      You can phone the small hardware store and ask. In my experience they usually try to be helpful although it's true that their inventory is not as extensive as a big box store. Sometimes though they have better stuff.

    8. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom likes the dookie in mynards!

    9. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Ace Hardware near home. They may not have as massive a selection, but I've had extremely good luck getting competent advice from them. I usually get blank stares at Lowe's or Home Depot.

    10. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Strider- · · Score: 1

      I've done a lot of work with a local Ace/True-Value hardware store and it was so much easier to deal with for random/weird things than the big boys. I was involved in a project to renew/rebuild part of a camp/retreat centre, and so we were buying a lot of different items to make things happen. To get our stuff on-site involved sending it up a lake on a boat.

      Anyhow, for big ticket electrical items (spools of wire, conduit, 15 new electrical panels and associated breakers, etc... we dealt with the local electrical supply as they gave us the best prices, had what we needed, and one of their local reps lived 2 blocks from the boat dock so could just drop it off.

      For the onesies and twosies, and other random stuff, the Ace in town was the best to deal with, especially for those of us who aren't experts. We'd call them and go "Hey, we need 10lbs of 2" sheetrock screws" and their response was "no problem, we'll have them on the boat tomorrow." In a bunch of situations, too, where we didn't quite know what we needed, their expertise really came into play. Plus, if they didn't have it on hand, they could usually get it pretty quickly.

      Anyhow, my point is that the big box stores are fine if all you need is a 2x4, or a 20A eaton breaker, or a new light switch. If you need a 40A 3 phase breaker for a cutler-hamer breaker panel, or a replacement fan motor for a 15 year old bathroom fan, they're probably not going to be able to help you. The local guys, on the other hand, are usually willing to work with you can either get you what you need, or a replacement part.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    11. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by williamyf · · Score: 1

      Founder of Lowes is a Hillary supporter and contributed money to her campaign.

      Founder of Home Depot is a Trump supporter and contributed money to his campaign.

      These two companies form a duopoly in the home improvement stores in the US, and the Republican/Democrat parties are a duopoly in government.

      Duopoly?
      What About 84 Lumber?

      They will bring Jobs to America

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    12. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why make this political? Especially since only one of the Home Depot CO-FOUNDERS, Bernard Marcus, is a trump supporter; another, Arthur Blank, is not. The other two, seemingly have made no public announcements of their political affiliation.

    13. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why make this political? Especially since only one of the Home Depot CO-FOUNDERS, Bernard Marcus, is a trump supporter

      Because it's more fun when it plays out like that.

      Also note how Lowe's logo is BLUE, and their stores are painted in blue, which is the color of the Democrats.

      Now take a look at Home Depot, their corporate color is ORANGE. Trump is orange colored!

    14. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      These two companies form a duopoly in overpriced home hardware boutiques for yuppies in the US, and the Republican/Democrat parties are a duopoly in government.

      FTFY

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      We have a local hardware/home improvement chain in the Puget Sound region - McLendon's Hardware. I go there, rather than to Lowes or Home Depot, because their employees actually seem to know what they're talking about when I need advice (which is often, since I am not "handy" by any stretch of the imagination). You do pay a little bit more (not much) at McLendons than at the big chain stores, but I see that as the price for having a place which can afford to hire knowledgable people.

      Home Depot is a fallback for items McLendon's doesn't carry (e.g. a powered drain cleaner I purchased a few years back). Lowes does not get my business any more - they're just terrible. I did used to occasionally go to Eagle Hardware (which got absorbed into Lowes 15-20 years ago) way back in the day, though.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    16. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by rgbscan · · Score: 2

      Menard's is heavily republican, and includes anti-union training in their manager courses.

    17. Re: Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Home depot people don't have any idea of what the difference between amps and volts is.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    18. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Orange is the new Red. Blue, that's covered.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    19. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Phone them? That would require talking to a person, and wasting a lot of my time doing so, and having extremely poor communications reliability in the process. Why would I want to do that when I can go to the other store's website and search for what I want, and see actual photos and descriptions? Can the small hardware store employee show me a photo on the phone?

    20. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by arth1 · · Score: 1

      True Value has a web site with a search engine.

    21. Re:Interesting fact about Lowes and Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Founder of Home Depot is a Trump supporter and contributed money to his campaign.

      Now I even feel better about not liking Lowe's and not shopping there. Besides the fact they never seem to have what I need.

  8. 125 people? *shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry if you are one of those 125 but this isn't news without at least one zero on the end.

  9. Just another company that won't get my business by Nunya666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I guess I'll add Lowe's to the growing list of companies that won't get any of my business because they've fscked over their IT departments:

    Toys-R-Us
    Disney
    Carnival Cruise Lines
    And now Lowe's

    1. Re:Just another company that won't get my business by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Of course, the converse is also true -- we need to show support for companies that keep their IT in-house, or have insourced recently. (Because even companies are allowed a chance at redemption.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Just another company that won't get my business by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Can you list any corporation that hasn't fsck'ed their IT department at some point?

    3. Re:Just another company that won't get my business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not forget McClatchy Newspapers

    4. Re:Just another company that won't get my business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Home Depot, if they stood up and announced they keeping their IT in the US , I'd happily cancel my Lowe's cards, and switch to Depot if they offered the same 5% off. As a new'ish home owner of a house that needs a bit of this, and a bit of that, I'm always buying something at Lowe's, over the next 10 or 20 years we'll probably spend tens of thousands easily.

    5. Re:Just another company that won't get my business by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Netflix (AFAIK)...

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  10. Inevitable Call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hello. This is Punjab from Lowe's. Your hammer is sending signals to the internet and we need access to your bank account to fix this problem..."

  11. Indian Mainframe experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder where they're going to get the mainframe expertise over in India...

    (You have paid attention to the registers haven't you? - If that isn't a mainframe I don't know what one is....)

  12. note to self.... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Note to self: Don't call Lowe's and expect a useful or coherent answer.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  13. Lost my business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title says it all. Thankfully, HomeDepot is local.

  14. That's a new... by ehaggis · · Score: 2

    ...Lowe

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  15. Re:Indian Mainframe experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    its not, and you obviously don't

  16. Self-interested hyprocisy by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Did you complain when hundreds of small hardware stores closed down after Home Depot and Lowe's expanded across the country, bringing lower prices for your purchases with them?

  17. And what could he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    There's nothing Trump can do about it. He may tweet about it, but there's nothing in his powers he can do.

    I feel bad for the workers. They are all gonna be flooding the job market at once and the longer you are unemployed the harder it gets to get a job. Employers do not like hiring unemployed people.

    And the IT profession is especially brutal in that regard. The attitude of "if you're any good, you'd be employed" is still a thing out there even though the whole shortage idea has been proven to be a myth.

    1. Re:And what could he do? by footNipple · · Score: 1

      There's nothing Trump can do about it. He may tweet about it, but there's nothing in his powers he can do.

      You're right of course, but the President tweeting about this might be a good thing to do. It will give people some pause before making a purchase at Lowes.

    2. Re:And what could he do? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Boy, is that the truth. Last year, when I was interviewing after a merger and a mass layoff, I actually had people say that "if someone else doesn't think highly enough of you to hire you, then why should we?"

    3. Re:And what could he do? by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      Employers do not like hiring unemployed people.

      Employers like hiring unemployed people because they have more leverage. If you don't have a job, you can't negotiate a higher salary since you are not leaving your current job. If you are unemployed because of a layoff, then that doesn't matter to a hiring company because they are still getting a skilled worker, but at a lower salary.

  18. I hate Lowe's anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Home Depot has the better line of Chinese tools...

    1. Re: I hate Lowe's anyway by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      How about Harbor freight?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re: I hate Lowe's anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Harbor freight?

      Their stuff is disposable. And by 'stuff' I mean tools! It's cheap. Really cheap. But expect to use it 2-3 times and send it to the landfill. If you're inventive you can repurpose the parts/materials of their tools into your projects. I made a metal dowel for something I was making from one of their craptacular screw drivers. But you'll need some decent machining tools to be a good recycler.

  19. Taking it al back by sycodon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $550 worth of lumber is going back to Lowe's today.

    Fuck them.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Taking it al back by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      And then you'll go to Home Depot. Same shit, different label. It's everyone, including me, who goes to these big box stores that validates their business model to squeeze every last cent out of the system for what it costs to deliver the goods to the customer.

      If more people were willing to pay a little bit extra and go to companies that treated their employees fairly and bought their goods from firms that did the same the world would be a better place. Not that there are many of these stores around.

      As an aside, have you ever noticed these coffee places that proudly announce their fair trade coffee but then still pay their employees minimum wage. If they were really living up to their values shouldn't they be paying their employees a living wage too?

    2. Re:Taking it al back by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No. Working in a coffee shop was never meant to be a job that a person could live off.

      Oi, cayenne8! GTFO of my account you asshat!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re: Taking it al back by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that many corporations have moved their data to cloud based services, which means that when the shit hits the fan for real only the diehard businesses that still run their own servers with bookkeeping have a chance of survival when the IRS do an audit and the employees want their salaries.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Taking it al back by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Now don't be so hard on the coffee places. Where else would PhD's in Women's Studies work?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    5. Re:Taking it al back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working in a coffee shop was never meant to be a job that a person could live off.

      We hear this chestnut all the time - problem is, it appears to be grounded in nothing but the opinion of the writer.

      In fact, working in a coffee shop is absolutely intended to be a job that a person could live off of - problem is, it's not the person actually doing the job.

    6. Re:Taking it al back by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If more people were willing to pay a little bit extra and go to companies that treated their employees fairly and bought their goods from firms that did the same the world would be a better place.

      They mostly don't exist.

      I started driving 1.5 hrs to a HD after the local hardware store* would not sell me a replacement entry door for less than $459 and I found one at HD for $129, based on a co-worker's recommendation (HD did not have any websites then).

      * the one of three that actually had doors

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Taking it al back by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Wait, if the job was not supposed to be liveable, WHO is providing the service?
      Sounds like you are in favor of Government Subsidized Workers!!

    8. Re:Taking it al back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, if the job was not supposed to be liveable, WHO is providing the service?
      Sounds like you are in favor of Government Subsidized Workers!!

      Teenagers who need money for weed and video games.

    9. Re:Taking it al back by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. Working in a coffee shop was never meant to be a job that a person could live off.

      Says who?

      Exactly what authority says that a person working a 40 hour/week job in a coffee shop shouldn't make enough to live on?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    10. Re: Taking it al back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The person willing to work for less.

    11. Re:Taking it al back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to see exactly why the local shop had the door for $459 while Home Depot had it for only $129. Were any of the reasons for the price discrepancy rooted in fair treatment for employees?

    12. Re:Taking it al back by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Protip: read the entire post before responding. That way you'll be awesome and able to make a huge income as a government contractor like me.

      Fuck, he's at it again! Knock it off!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Taking it al back by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      That way you'll be awesome and able to make a huge income as a government contractor like me.

      I already made my huge income, dick weasel, which is why I'm ~95% retired and don't have to do a godamn thing, while stumble bums like you have to get up and go to work every day.

      While you're driving to work, I'm sleeping in. When you're dicking around at your desk at 10am, I'm probably making just breakfast. As you drone away at the daily meeting for simpletons at 1pm, I'm either taking a nap or reading or screwing around with whatever currently interests me. And when you're fighting traffic or suffering the bus ride home, I'm listening to the traffic reports and laughing at schlubs like you trying to get back to your warren.

      In other words, "Suck it, sonny boy!" Spare me your wisdom- you don't have that much to go around. :) lolololol

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  20. Race to the bottom by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Long term, I think that most IT jobs at non-IT companies will be outsourced, and those outsourcers will do anything to raise the margin on their deals. This includes offshoring anything that they possibly can and/or replacing native workers with H-1Bs. The offshoring firms have a well-known loophole in the law that sets the minimum salary for an H-1B at $60K per year, not adjusted for inflation. I actually think that closing this loophole while keeping the program for its intended purpose is the way to go. If you're a body shop, and average onshore salary is $40K more than the $60K you can get away with paying a visa holder, it's obvious how much of a gift that is for the company and no wonder their sales pitches to companies are so effective.

    IT companies that outsource are engaging in a race to the bottom - once you outsource, nothing new or interesting will ever be attempted in that environment again because the provider will want to charge an arm and a leg for change orders. Also, the wall between the company and the outsourcer is going to limit how much can be changed and how the company engages with IT.

    Other than the distortion of the market this causes, I also don't like the fact that new entrants into the IT world aren't able to find as many entry-level positions at reasonable salaries anymore. Speaking as someone who's been doing this for 20+ years, and got where I am today by going through a progression of these entry-level and mid-level jobs, that pipeline needs to be in place to ensure people have the foundational knowledge they need when tackling bigger, more complex problems. No one comes straight out of college with the entire skill set required to do IT in anything but the simplest environments. In my case, I did a series of support and admin jobs to get the expertise and skills to "learn how to learn" about new stuff and how it fits into the realities imposed by the surroundings.

    Fundamentially, I worry about so much cloud abstraction in IT that people who haven't been around forever lose the ability to understand what's actually being provided under the hood by hosted SaaS stuff. Companies who treat their IT like a janitorial service are going to fall into this trap too. Being at the higher end of things these days, I deal with a lot of "systems architects" who are very good at drawing hand-wavey diagrams but can't work out where the bottlenecks and dependencies are because they don't see the end to end view. Anything complex seems to be hand-waved away in a cloud symbol on their diagrams, and an "oh, the provider takes care of that." I'm not saying we should go back to the no-abstraction era of physical servers, etc. but that we should take the time to understand the realities of what's going on.

    1. Re:Race to the bottom by computational+super · · Score: 1

      lose the ability to understand what's actually being provided under the hood

      As far as I can see, we're already there. Unfortunately, the decision makers, who got to be decision makers by being ridiculously, unrealistically optimistic, are also assuming that reality doesn't matter. I would have thought that all of the security breaches that have happened, and continue to happen, would have brought the world to its senses, but it looks like they've decided to double-down on the "details and facts don't matter".

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    2. Re:Race to the bottom by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      My perspective may be limited and biased, but we will switch from using consultants to in-house IT over the next few months because the consultants are not offering us business value. We don't want to be cutting edge, but we do want innovation and systems geared for the challenges we will face in 3-5 years, and not just focused on the problems of the day. Everything goes in cycles, but an external consultant cannot have your company's business as their first priority. At a point in the value equation this matters.

    3. Re:Race to the bottom by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      " most IT jobs at non-IT companies will be outsourced" That's not a problem, IF the outsourced jobs actually remained inside the US AND wasn't an H1B shop. IMHO, that would be a good thing IF that happened, as a IT company with multiple clients is more stable financially and the parent company can focus on their core business more.

  21. Re:Making American straight-white-Christian Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Christ. If you are going to troll, at least make it readable you illiterate shit-bird.

  22. Re:Indian Mainframe experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's HP-UX actually, just given the login prompts.

  23. So could somebody tell me... by computational+super · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why exactly does Chief Information Officer Paul Ramsay have to be an American located in America? What does he do that an Indian in Bangalore couldn't do better for half the price in this highly competitive 24/7 retail environment?

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    1. Re:So could somebody tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make excuses for jobs leaving the country.

    2. Re:So could somebody tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does he do that an Indian in Bangalore couldn't do better for half the price in this highly competitive 24/7 retail environment?

      The needful?

    3. Re:So could somebody tell me... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      He claims to have saved the company 120 million dollars over the next ten years, claimed 12 million dollars as the bonus for this great feat and has already left town.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:So could somebody tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny I thought the same thing. Bet there are plenty of educated people in India who could run Lowes for a lot less. Let's just eliminate all human's in all stores and just have Kiosks and self service. Betcha those executives could give themselves a really big raise then too!

    5. Re:So could somebody tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think British Airways also had the same idea that they had saved money until recently....We have seen the result. And it they let it happen again and again....

  24. Talking to the fired, a new job is a new job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talking to the fired, a new job is a new job.

  25. feels bad man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are lame, i hope you die

  26. Re:Indian Mainframe experience... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Their registers are monochrome screens so I'm leaning towards AS/400.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  27. Well that explains it by sunderland56 · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I can't find any help in Lowe's, I usually figure they're out back smoking. So now it turns out they're in India?

  28. Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To hell with Lowe's. Time to go back to Home Depot crapola

  29. Lowe's will PAY DEARLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will not get away with moving jobs to India during the Trump administration! What are they thinking? It is going to cost them BIGLY! They'll pay much more money than they would have if they kept their American workers. This is guaranteed! Just wait and see...

    1. Re:Lowe's will PAY DEARLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our glorious leader is creating lots of jobs...just not in America.

  30. Re:Indian Mainframe experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their registers are monochrome screens so I'm leaning towards AS/400.

    The terminals in all the departments are thin clients that run suse linux i think the registers are the same and all of the sales/management stuff runs on a system called genesis with all of the product databases orders and stuff

  31. already wrecked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you used any of these big box stores' websites? They're so awful on so many levels, they may as well already be Indian.

  32. Please define... by lionchild · · Score: 1

    Can the CIO, Paul Ramsay, define for us just how many "some" is in the 'Some of the jobs will be relocated to Bangalore, India.'? Is that half a dozen? A dozen? Two dozen? Or more like 75 or 100...or, you know, 125 jobs?

    I'd like to think, likely naively so, that some day shareholders will wake up and realize that not all things that are good for the bottom line, are good for the company, either in the short term with morale, or long term for the longevity of and sustainability of the company.

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  33. Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I will no longer shop at Lowes; I will shop exclusively at Home Depot.

    1. Re:Response by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Truth.
      You can always "shop" for the better cardboard boxes out behind Home Depot.

      /jk! They all crush the boxes and recycle them now Comrade!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  34. All about the profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their is really no advantage to placing people in a foreign country like India other then its cheaper to do so then pay people here. When people at the top fear a pay cut what do they do. Recommend some at the bottom loose their jobs and move them to some where that pays even less. Then they give themselves a raise and call it a great financial strategy.

  35. You're Out - Home Depot is In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an extra half mile, but I'm going to Home Depot from now on. Lay that off!

  36. they make there in store people smocks with spanis by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    they make there in store people smocks with Spanish on them this is the USA not north Mexico!

  37. Re:Making American straight-white-Christian Again by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 0

    That would have required him to put down the bottle

  38. Re:Indian Mainframe experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're a System z (Mainframe) z/OS shop. I just interviewed one of their SysProgs who's looking to get out.

  39. "Would we lie to you?" said the Corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now Along with:
    The checks in the Mail
    I promise I won't cum in your mouth
    This won't hurt at all
    That's a great idea, boss

    Corporations have added:
    We would never outsource your job to india and force you to train them.

    You idiots refuse to unionize so you end up out of work. SUCKERS

  40. Re:Indian Mainframe experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    other things can use mono terminals

  41. Re:they make there in store people smocks with spa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mexicans have money too, dummy

  42. Menard's is weirder than that even by swb · · Score: 2

    Someone I know worked for a home improvement product company and was running a marketing project that involved a market research component.

    My friend had an ad taken out recruiting customers of Lowe's, Home Depot and Menard's who had bought a similar product in the last year. Pretty standard stuff in marketing.

    My friend got a call from a woman who identified herself as "Chief Counsel" for Menard's and demanded to know what the market research project was about, who was behind it. My friend said it was confidential and that they were not at liberty to discuss it. The Menard's counsel said that she was willing to go to court over it and got really mad.

    My friend went to their company's lawyers and they said "Just tell her, there's nothing that will hurt the company in her finding out, and Menard's will make a legal issue out of it, even if it only costs them money, we will end up wasting money defending ourselves."

    I've heard since then from other people that Menard's is run by some crazy right-wing family that sees conspiracies everywhere.

    I swear, every time I come even within an arm's reach of a family run company I see some kind of paranoid, power-mad behavior. They are the worst customers I deal with, always a ton of bad behavior. They almost always seem to have 1-2 non-family members they let halfway into the inner circle and keep on a string to do their dirty work. And tons of secrecy, always worried employees will "find out" about something, usually related to "business expenses" which end up being money shipped out to family members. I caught hell at one when preparing some planning for a project, asking about a group of users/computers that I couldn't pin down in the office -- as it turns out, they were owner family members on the payroll for no-show jobs and the computers/accounts were in place to demonstrate they were indeed employees, and not just a tax deductible way to siphon cash out of the company, which is what they really were.

    1. Re:Menard's is weirder than that even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a Menard's near my house and will NEVER shop there again.
      They burned me. Literally.

      We bought a house, and hence needed the services of a home improvement store.
      I bought some LED lights on sale, half did not work at all, so I returned them.
      They had a bin of like 15 of the same packages behind the counter they threw it in
      I bought a remote light switch on sale. Lasted a day. Returned it and they had a bin of 10 plus of these things behind the counter.

      THEN a few weeks later..
      I decided I needed a good flashlight to help with the house repairs and such. I went to Menard's and bought a nice metal LED flashlight for $25. Yes it was on sale, but it was still one of the more expensive models they had in the display. Bought the C batteries it used as well.
      I got home, opened up the package, inserted the batteries and turned it on and off a couple of times and set it down on the counter.
      Hours later when going up to bed I picked up the flashlight to test out in my now darkened house... I went to press the button and OUCH!
      The button was BURNING HOT. I got a blister on my thumb that lasted a full week.
      I went to return it.

      Counter lady: What are you returning?
      Me: This flashlight. You see I put batteries in it and then later...
      Counter lady: It burned your finger?
      Me: Yes??
      Counter lady: OK, yep, thought so.
      She then dumped it in a bin with like 15 of these things, one of them had a chunk of tape on it with sharpie that said "BURNED MY FINGER!"

      They KNEW this stuff was junk, but tried to sell it anyway.
      They LITERALLY burned me, and I believe they fucking knew all along that they were selling stuff that could hurt someone or start a fire.

      It makes me sad because I would love to use a more regional chain if possible.
      Never again.
      I'm NOT getting burned by them again.

      More reading:
      http://archive.jsonline.com/business/114143619.html
      The owner himself:
      In another criminal case in 1997, the company and founder John R. Menard Jr. pleaded no contest and paid more than $1.5 million in penalties on charges of violating state hazardous waste laws.

      The case included allegations that John Menard, a billionaire and one of Wisconsin's richest people, used his own pickup truck to haul bags of chromium-contaminated incinerator ash produced by the company and dump it into his trash at home.

      At the time, it was the largest criminal environmental fine ever imposed in the state.

      Exposure to chromium can irritate skin and cause lung cancer, federal health officials have said.

  43. New fridge not from Lowe's by myid · · Score: 1

    Hmm. I need a new refrigerator, and was thinking of getting it at Lowe's. I guess I'll get the refrigerator somewhere else.

    Does anyone know of any appliance companies that haven't outsourced their IT workers?

  44. My corp did this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big pressure to cut IT costs, so they pushed 90% of IT offshore to India. Flash forward about a year, and during a recent series of high-profile outages, high-level execs listening to the outage teleconferences finally noticed that the offshore folks on the line were clueless (and often unintelligible) and took no initiative to fix the problems. It was the remainder of the US staff that finally stepped in and fixed things. Now we hear rumblings that maybe we should bring some more US folks back on board.

  45. Bonus time already? by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    Someone is shopping for a big fat bonus.
    Too bad that Lowes stock holders and employees have to pay for it by hiring some incompetent Indian maggots.

  46. Fix This by rally2xs · · Score: 1

    Want to fix this? Its the US Federal Income taxes that are making US workers uncompetitive. Abolish the income taxes, every last one of them.

    Pass the Fair Tax. The Fair Tax runs the country on a consumptiion tax that, after a personal exemption keyed to your living situation - single, married, married with X dependents - taxes everyone at the same rate. The exemption is just enough to ensure that people in poverty pay no Fair Tax.

    Our economy would roar if the Fair Tax was passed. Not only would all the jobs that have left the USA come back, but 1000's of foreign manufacturers would move here to manufacture in the least-cost country on the planet, the USA.

  47. Thanks, Obama. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It all started with him.

  48. Oh noes by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    I guess it's time to call in.....Super Donald!

    Yes, Super Donald- the Defender of American Jobs and the downtrodden Working Man! Preventing corporations fro- wait, what? You say that this is okay by him because it allows Lowes to make an extra 0.00001% profit? Well ain't that somethin! Haw haw, the joke's on me!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  49. Re:Making American straight-white-Christian Again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Can someone translate this from "Retard" to "English"?

    I tried Google but it doesn't seem to recognize the source language.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  50. NC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Voted for Trump job offshored anyway. Sand for lube.

  51. Re:Making American straight-white-Christian Again by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    I think in this case, it would have required electric shock to help think better, and still keep the heart and other needed muscles moving for survival.

  52. They'll eventually find out by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 0

    that Bangalore programmers can't actually write code, and even if they can, they certainly can't design good software. I predict this will give Home Depot a strategic advantage.

  53. Prevent writing off consulting service fees on tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like a quick easy fix to the job export game would be to prevent companies from writing off foreign labor and consulting service fees on their taxes. If you legitimately need the help, then fine youâ(TM)d use it....if you are doing it to appease the stock market, then using slave labor may not be the best idea.

  54. What Lowes really means. by Chas · · Score: 0

    a strategic IT workforce team to respond better in what he called "this highly competitive 24/7 retail environment.

    Translation: For the price of 125 Americans, we can use 3 American managers to manage 500 incompetent Indian wage slaves that nobody will be able to understand due to accents so thick you need a Death Star superlaser to cut it. As such, calling these support personnel will be about as useful as an enema of fecal material and people will stop using it. Thus allowing us to eventually kill the unit off and save even MORE money!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:What Lowes really means. by MrPeach · · Score: 1

      So very true. You would think the number of horror stories of companies pulling this shit would serve as a deterrent, but it seems there is always another sucker thinking that India is a good investment.

    2. Re:What Lowes really means. by Chas · · Score: 1

      Yeah. "Oh. With a bit of management.."

      Yeah. Right.

      Then you tell them something they don't want to hear and the Adjustable English Comprehension Knob gets turned down to "I'm ignoring you." and they truck on doing whatever they want.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  55. Security issues by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    In order to get government contracts, Lowe's, home Depot, etc have jump through some hoops. For example, they require a drug test. They also require a minimal level of security on their computers. Yet outsourcing to a place that pays ppl under 10k / year and does not have decent coding skills makes them a large security risk.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  56. There's nobody more responsive than by sabbede · · Score: 1

    somebody on the other side of the planet with a potentially unintelligible accent. So much better than being in the same building.

  57. Competition? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Not sure if this is a contributing factor, but Home Depot is their only real competition. The Home Depot website and app are some of the worst I have ever seen for a large commercial enterprise. Half the time neither do not work at all, and if they do, they are full of problems with almost every aspect of the experience. On top of that Home Depot has started a policy awhile ago not to honor any giftcards or store credit online. Dealing with their technical support in an attempt to buying something online was a nightmare, though the options that are given to them to deal with customers isn't probably great. The last time I tried to by something, I ended up giving up in frustration in attempting to give them money, and in went and bought the same product someplace else (BestBuy of all places) where it was more expensive, but at least I could finish my damn transaction.

    Given that this is Lowes only "competition", perhaps they feel relatively save off shoring their IT staff and the possible degradation that may ensue, as it can't be any worse than what Home Depot does now. Perhaps they do the same, no idea. The only time I use Home Depot, now is if I need some lumber or widget that I am reasonably sure they will have in stock and go to the physical store. They are essentially a brick and mortar only store to me, seeming to regress into the past.

  58. Re:Making American straight-white-Christian Again by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    I'm voting for 480.
    Who's with me?

  59. Booo, Lowes! by rwuest · · Score: 1

    Very, very bad!

  60. India? by NewYork · · Score: 1

    No country will give you Visa when they know about your uncivilized Caste system http://blogs.wsj.com/indiareal...

  61. A new Lowe for outsourcing by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    ...I'll get my coat.

  62. thats why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I shop at home depot.