Slashdot Mirror


India is Rolling Out Trains With Solar-powered Coaches That'll Save Thousands of Litres of Diesel (qz.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: India's massive diesel-guzzling railway network is getting serious about its experiments with solar. On July 14, Indian Railways rolled out its first train with rooftop solar panels that power the lights, fans, and information display systems inside passenger coaches. Although the train will still be pulled by a diesel-powered locomotive, a set of 16 solar panels atop each coach will replace the diesel generators that typically power these appliances. The railways estimate that a train with six solar-powered coaches could save around 21,000 litres (5,547 gallons) of diesel every year, worth around $108,000. In 2014, Indian Railways consumed 2.6 billion litres of diesel, accounting for around 70% to the network's total fuel bill of $4.4 billion. The first of these trains will be pressed into service on the suburban railway network of New Delhi, one of the world's most polluted cities, before two dozen more coaches are fitted with similar rooftop solar systems. Retrofitting each coach with these system, including an inverter to optimise power generation and battery for storing surplus power, costs around $14,000.

136 comments

  1. Costs around Rs9 lakh? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Not sure what unit of measure you are using, or how many that is.

    1. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      You might lakh to know that a lakh is 100,000.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unlike western societies, where we generally use every 3rd power of 10 as a reference (thousand, million, billion), India uses the 5th power of 10 - "lakh" is 10^5 (which is one hundred thousand), and "crore" is 10^10 (which it 10 billion) as its main "reference" powers.

      Rs9 lakh should be parsed similar to how $1bn would be parsed in the US - 9 lakh rupees, which is 900,000 rupees. At current exchange rates, this is around $14,000 US.

    3. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      Nice explanation. Just confusing since the topic was translated into English, but used a word that very few English speakers would know. The monetary unit in rupees would be fine, but I didn't even recognize lakh as a numeric unit.

    4. Re: Costs around Rs9 lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it translated? I thought English is the most widely understood language in India.

    5. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crore will eat your magic shield, since it's lakh lakh.

    6. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by brianerst · · Score: 2

      The article was probably written in Indian English, which is one of the most common languages in India. It's often preferred as the inter-regional language (most regions in India have an indigenous language) as Hindi (the main other choice) is often disliked by Muslim communities.

      Rs is the symbol for Rupees. Lakh has already been explained.

    7. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A crore is 10^7, or 100 lakhs, or 10 million. Not 10^10. They now measure things in a 'lakh crores', which is equal to a trillion.

    8. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Crore is 10 million, not 10 billion. Also written as 1,00,00,000 with the commas separating lakhs and crores (and thousands)

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one minor correction. Hindi is not disliked by Muslim communities. Hindi is disliked in regions where it is not spoken - mainly the south and to a smaller extent in the far east. Religion has a very small part to play with this choice. As an example, Muslims in the south would rather speak their native language (say Malayalam) than Urdu which is considered the de facto language of Indian and pakistani muslims. Same with muslims in Bengal who prefer Bengali. There has been a wahhabist movement to try and pretend that arabic is the root of all the languages muslim but far as data shows this is a minority opinion.

    10. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Zelda.

    11. Re: Costs around Rs9 lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hindi is also a major pain in the ass to type on a phone or computer. Once you know English, and especially if you can touch-type QWERTY, learning how to type Hindi is almost more trouble than it's worth.

      For an Indian who's fluent in English, typing Hindi -- at best -- is kind of like making someone who's good at typing on a QWERTY keyboard struggle with Dvorak. Dvorak might be no harder than QWERTY for someone starting from scratch, but once you've already invested the time & effort to master QWERTY, Dvorak is just an annoyance. As a practical matter, anybody in India with a job that requires a college degree is at least theoretically fluent in English. If your job is to write things for less-educated Indians to read, you might have no choice but to write in Hindi... but if your audience is white-collar professionals throughout India, writing in Hindi would actually *limit* your audience, since all professionals know English, but only 50-70% really know Hindi well.

    12. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Whoever has points please downgrade the parent A crore is not 10^10 a crore is 100 lacs

      Western System

      1,000 Thousand
      1,000,000 Million
      1,000,000,000 Billion
      1,000,000,000,000 Trillion

      Indian System

      1,000 Hazaar
      1,00,000 Lac/lakh
      1,00,00,000 Crore
      1,00,00,00,000 Arub
      1,00,00,00,00,000 Khurub

      So a crore is 10 million not 10 billion

      9 Lakh is 900000 Rupees. With 1 USD=60 INR = 15000 USD approx (the rate is a little more than 60 to the dollar)

      Yes the Indian system is more confusing but its been around longer and people have got used to it just like Americans use wierd units like foot, pound, gallons etc

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    13. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by brianerst · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you have more knowledge about the Hindi issue than I do. I have both Indian Hindu and Indian Muslim friends and they all pretty much said that due to inter-community tensions that Hindi was less likely to be spoken by the Muslim community (which would speak regional language, followed by either English or Urdu).

      But they were all English-speaking emigres to the US, so their experience may not be typical in a country with over a billion people. Thanks!

    14. Re: Costs around Rs9 lakh? by brianerst · · Score: 1

      That's really interesting. Thanks for the local insight!

    15. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by polar+red · · Score: 1

      Western System

      1,000 Thousand
      1,000,000 Million
      1,000,000,000 Billion
      1,000,000,000,000 Trillion

      well, there are 2 naming systems for this in the west:
      the one above and :
      million : 1.000.000 10E6
      milliard : 1.000.000.000 10e9
      billion: 1.000.000.000.000 10e12
      billiard : 1.000.000.000.000.000 10e15
      trillion : 1.000.000.000.000.000.000 10e18
      etc ... which is I believe more for the French part of the west.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    16. Re:Costs around Rs9 lakh? by The123king · · Score: 1

      Tom Scott did a good explaination of number dividers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  2. Hanging off the cars by chriskovo · · Score: 2

    That's nice now if they can just stop people from trying to leap onto the engine fronts or sides of cars they may have something. Seem some crazy videos of the train system in India its like something from a 100 years ago.

    1. Re:Hanging off the cars by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      In San Francisco we charge tourists $7.00 for the privilege of hanging off the cable cars.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  3. Great idea by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't see how anything could possibly keep an idea like this from working.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost all of these trains are in Bangladesh and Pakistan.. Granted, a few of them are from India too :)

    2. Re:Great idea by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Maybe that's the whole idea of this initiative. If those people on top of the trains are freeloaders who aren't paying, this whole solar panels thing may just be an excuse to get rid of them for good.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Great idea by Idou · · Score: 1

      Finally! A real world application for my invisibility potion!

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    4. Re:Great idea by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      They'll probably have to put spikes on the roof, similar to pigeon spikes:

      https://www.google.com/search?...

       

    5. Re:Great idea by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Or make the solar panels very slippery. And use them to electrify the spikes.

    6. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spikes wont work. People will start bringing in their own stool (chair without back).

    7. Re:Great idea by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      If those people on top of the trains are freeloaders who aren't paying, this whole solar panels thing may just be an excuse to get rid of them for good.

      I can't see that stopping them. Even overhead electric catenary doesn't (NSFW) :-

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    8. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indonesia did it this way:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuCMm7F08ik

    9. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see how anything could possibly keep an idea like this from working.

      Exactly the first thing to come to my mind.

  4. Thousands of litres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that, a few cups? Several swimming pools? People that use real units want to know.

    1. Re: Thousands of litres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousand litres is a cubic meter. For water that would be a metric ton so it's probably around 800 or 900 kg of diesel.

  5. How will the solar panels work.. by YuppieScum · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...with hundreds of people sitting on them?

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
    1. Re:How will the solar panels work.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. Solar, great. Rolling out on a subway. In my experience, subways go underground. Hence the "sub" part. Gonna need lots of skylights in that subway!

    2. Re: How will the solar panels work.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suburban - NOT subway.

    3. Re:How will the solar panels work.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just people sitting on them - also luggage and chickens shitting on them. I'm sure the resultant cracked panels will be an electrifying experience all round.

  6. how is this going to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How is this going to work with all the passengers standing on the solar panels?

    http://www.my-travel-experience.com/upload/main/13/1n5jrlt710.jpg

  7. Units by ramsun · · Score: 3, Informative

    Rs 28,592 crore = USD 4.5 billion, approximately

    Rs 9 lakh = USD 14,000

    1. Re:Units by brianerst · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rs = symbol for Rupees (the local currency)
      lakh = x1,00,000 or x100,000
      crore = x1,00,00,000 or x10,000,000

      India separates numbers differently than most of the West - the first comma is at a power of three, all the rest are at powers of 2. Tens, hundreds, thousands, lakhs and crores are combined in various ways (with some older terms like arab, padma, neel and shankh occasionally used for very large numbers too)

      one, ten, one hundred, one thousand, ten thousand, lakh, ten lakh, one crore, ten crore, one arab / one hundred crore, one thousand crore, ten thousand crore, one lakh crore, ten lakh crore, one crore crore, one padma / ten crore crore, etc.

    2. Re:Units by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Solar power: spend billions to save millions!

  8. Er... by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...if the roof has solar panels, where do most of the passengers sit?

    I've been on Indian trains....the roof is a significant part of the carriage capacity.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Er... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just need one train guard with a cricket bat. Problem solved.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Er... by phayes · · Score: 2

      You clearly have never taken a train in India. The guy with a cricket bat will get swarmed and thrown off the train by the dozens to hundreds of people that ride the roofs every day. Commuter and even many long distance trains in India are packed to the gills overflowing to inter-wagon platforms/the roofs and run insufficiently frequently to be able to say "just take the next one".

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:Er... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Then get two guys, or a dozen. Or give them tasers or MP5s. Use barbed wire. Run the ground wire through the panel frames. Whatever works. Just don't make your lack of imagination my problem.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:Er... by phayes · · Score: 2

      They already don't have enough money to improve their infrastructure enough to make riding on the tops of the cars a non issue and you want to hire blackwater to "solve the problem". Do you also advocate pointing a revolver at your face to "solve" toothaches? "your imagination" isn't solving any problem that needs solving.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    5. Re:Er... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      They already don't have enough money to improve their infrastructure enough to make riding on the tops of the cars a non issue

      But they have it for the purchase, installation and maintenance of the panels? Maybe should have thought that argument through a little...

      and you want to hire blackwater

      Jesus, hyperbole much?

      Do you also advocate pointing a revolver at your face to "solve" toothaches?

      That answers the hyperbole question...

      your imagination" isn't solving any problem that needs solving.

      If you're gonna go strawman on me, then sure!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:Er... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      India is a pretty big place. 1.3 billion people. Sure, in some places people sit on the roof, but in other places the infrastructure is more modern and less crowded.

      TFA mentions that those trains do 80 kph, which is way too fast to be hanging on to without large numbers of people being killed. The ones covered in people move very slowly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Er... by phayes · · Score: 1

      They have the money for panels that will be saving money on diesel fuel, not for hiring thousands of people to stop people from travelling on train roofs. Do try to use your brain next time, will you?

      Who is it that was proposing to hire a dozen or more men -- per train -- and barbed wire to stop people from riding on the train roofs? Oh, yeah that was you. What, you _don't_ like hyperbole when it's pointed at you? Poor, poor you.

      Again, you have literally no idea of the conditions on trains in India. Stop proposing idiotic "solutions".

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    8. Re:Er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've never taken a train ride in India or have taken one and imagined the rest. Those pictures are almost always tied to big events - political, religious or natural (floods whatnot). You do not see large crowds on the roofs of any of the distance trains. Partly because most of those lines are electrified and partly because certain stretches (delhi-agra, agra-bhopal to name a couple) tend to see trains running at 120+ kmph. You see people climbing onto roofs of commuter trains (also known as locals) which tend to run very slow and stop in every godforsaken village in their path. Most trains have 2-3 compartment known as "unreserved" - these are ticket holders who pay close to full price but are not guaranteed anything resembling a seat on the train (but in the train, not on the roof). In certain states (Bihar - looking at you!), certain fine individuals ignore this requirement and move around anywhere in the train usually followed by their coterie of goons. But this is still a small minority given the size of the railways and its coverage.
      India struggles with modernizing its train services because the public and the politicians like the setup where you get things for nearly free. The toilets suck (everything that's not bolted down disappears etc.), the seats need work, the food is terrible ... all of this is true. But even with all its weaknesses, it tries very hard to be safe; so claims that all or most trains in India are full of people doing acrobatic tricks are plain false

    9. Re:Er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fire and replace any conductor who departs the station with passangers on the roof. When the passangers inside learn they won't go anywhere until the ones on the roof are gone they'll turn on the roof riders and attrition will eventually bring the total number down.

      Also, if the trains run infrequently and demand for them is so high obviously ticket prices are too low and there is room to raise them on at least some runs to pay for more trains.

    10. Re:Er... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I said the same thing a few weeks back and got modbombed. Bastards!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Er... by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      I've never been to India, but from what I hear from folks who have, the guy with the cricket bat will probably pocket a rupee or three from every roof passenger and in return will help them up and down, and assist in getting their baggage on and off the roof.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    12. Re:Er... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Who is it that was proposing to hire a dozen or more men -- per train -- and barbed wire to stop people from riding on the train roofs? Oh, yeah that was you.

      Still a far cry from the world's most expensive mercenary outfit.

      Again, you have literally no idea of the conditions on trains in India.

      Oh cool, you do strawman arguments as well!

      Stop proposing idiotic "solutions".

      That's OK, at least I didn't write this:

      They have the money for panels that will be saving money on diesel fuel, not for hiring thousands of people to stop people from travelling on train roofs.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    13. Re:Er... by phayes · · Score: 1

      What, you think that Blackwater only takes a single contract at a time and employs the entirety of it's personnel on it? It's a strange strange world you live in. For the rest of us, employing thousands "security consultants" with cricket bats is perfectly up Blackwater's line of business.

      You've never actually _taken_ any train rides in India, so to you, my arguments are far fetched strawman. To me and all those who _have_ taken Indian trains my arguments are realty. But you still think that your imagination trumps everyone else's reality.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    14. Re:Er... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      What, you think that Blackwater only takes a single contract at a time and employs the entirety of it's personnel on it?

      Another strawman! Will he make the trifecta? Can. He. Go. All. The. Way?

      my arguments are far fetched strawman.

      That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.

      But you still think that your imagination trumps everyone else's reality.

      GOOOOAAAAALLLLL!!!!!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    15. Re:Er... by phayes · · Score: 1

      A strawman isn't any argument you disagree with or cannot prove you twit, it's a ridiculous argument that you pretend your opponent supports that makes you look good when you knock it down.

      As you have no idea of the conditions on indian trains and _I_ and others who have commented do, my arguments are what is called _truth_ and yours the evasive maneuvering of a twit afraid to be caught out prevaricating.

      But then, in your imagination your lies and inventions trump real-world experience.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    16. Re:Er... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      it's a ridiculous argument that you pretend your opponent supports that makes you look good when you knock it down.

      Hence how a dude with a cricket bat becomes Blackwater.

      As you have no idea of the conditions on indian trains and _I_ and others who have commented do

      This is the third time you've brought this up, which I find hilarious since that was never a point of contention between us. Your time would be better served bitching at me about the things we disagree on.

      and yours the evasive maneuvering

      You'll be able to point out in my posts where I avoid your questions, then.

      your lies

      Looking forward to you pointing those out as well. I won't hold my breath.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    17. Re:Er... by phayes · · Score: 1

      lets count a few lies and evasions.

      You start off with "one guy" I correct you, he'll just get tossed off. You opine with two guys or a dozen give em tasers/MP5's. I reply that dozens of guys with MP5's * thousands of trains = blackwater. You either have the attention span of a gnat or are lying when you pretend to misunderstand how _you_ inflated a guy with a cricket bat into a substantial army & gnats don't know how to type.

      TFA specifically says that the panels will save money through diminished diesel needs, yet somehow when I tell you that the Indian railways don't have the money to hire your army you state "they have it for the purchase, installation and maintenance of the panels". You're either dumber than a gnat and/or lying.

      When I tell you that I have ridden Indian trains & that you clearly have no idea of their conditions you move on to "where did I lie & evade?" instead of admitting that you really don't know -- that's called evading.

      When engaging with others on /. it's often useful to look at their other posts to see whether they're a troll or not. You're a troll

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    18. Re:Er... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      LOL, I love me a good slashdot pedant in the morning...

      So let me help you out: You focused on the specifics of the post (good for you!) and not the theme, which was: I don't fucking care what the method is, find one that works since a dude with a cricket wasn't, according to you, enough. You chose the most extreme example out of many and ran as fast as you could with it. Does that make you technically correct? Yes it does! Congrats, you are the best kind of correct! Shame you still have a massive underlying problem, which is:

      you state "they have it for the purchase, installation and maintenance of the panels". You're either dumber than a gnat and/or lying.

      What? That's from the TFS, you jackass. And you still haven't addressed my point: According to you, they're going to install the panels, but there is nothing they can do about roof riders? Why the fuck would they plan the panels and not the method to keep people off? Might as well not plan the panels then. But you have no answer for that.

      When I tell you that I have ridden Indian trains & that you clearly have no idea of their conditions you move on to

      Man, you are one deranged puppy. We have never disagreed on this point. I got no idea why you thought you needed to use this cudgel four times. Reading is hard, huh?

      instead of admitting that you really don't know

      ROFL! Yup, reading is hard....

      When engaging with others on /. it's often useful to look at their other posts to see whether they're a troll or not. You're a troll

      Ah well, at least I'm imaginative. You'd apparently install the panels and throw up your hands when they didn't work cuz they're covered in Indian butt. But fuck actually grappling with the question, much easier to be pedantic little pissant and score your points. Enjoy your dull life.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  9. Billions minus thousands is = ? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Billions of liters of fuel used, each train saves thousands of liters. Unless Indian railways is running million rakes it might not make that big a dent.

    But if this use of solar panels puts money in the pockets of solar panel makers and make them reduce their costs and eventually utility scale/grid scale solar power generation happens ... then we are talking about something truly momentous.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Billions minus thousands is = ? by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      The panels pay for themselves by almost an order of magnitude in the first year. If that is a dent, it is a big one.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    2. Re:Billions minus thousands is = ? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The panels pay for themselves by almost an order of magnitude in the first year. If that is a dent, it is a big one.

      More accurately, the article claims they might.

    3. Re:Billions minus thousands is = ? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      The numbers in the article suggest break-even in about a year. It seems like a fairly straightforward win for the Indian rail system, and using more solar panels makes them cheaper for everyone else.

  10. That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    21,000 liters ~5,000 gallons = 108,000 dollars of fuel ?

    Yeah something is wrong with the story from the get go.

    1. Re:That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by Repentinus · · Score: 2

      According to the original source, the per train savings would be 1,200,000 INR/yr. That's about 16,200 €/yr or 18,700 $/yr. Seems fairly OK for 21,000 l of diesel. The editor or submitter just cannot convert currencies, but that's no surprise.

    2. Re:That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by mspohr · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article in Quartz states 21,000 liters of fuel costing Rs 12 lakh ($18,000) which is more realistic so the summary is the culprit here.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    3. Re:That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      21,000 liters ~5,000 gallons x 12 months x $1.8 each gallon ~ 108,000 dollars of fuel

    4. Re:That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by Wookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      Where did the 12 come from? The 21k liters is the yearly consumption, not the monthly consumption.

    5. Re:That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by Retric · · Score: 1

      Just poorly translated. The railways estimate that a train with six solar-powered coaches could save around 21,000 litres (5,547 gallons) of diesel every year, worth around $108,000. 5,547 * 3$/g * 6 = 99,846$, which seems legit.

    6. Re:That's $20 +/ gallon diesel by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Which is pretty good as I saw the other conversion of the panel costs being 14,000$. The 18,000$ is per year, meaning the solar panels pays for themselves the first year and assuming say a 20 year lifespan give a cost savings of 360,000$. Seems a no brainer to me (assuming those estimates are correct).

      Jokes of Indians sitting on them aside and all of course...

  11. surplus power? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    If there is surplus power, then throw in an air conditioner and a refrigerator or two

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  12. Good job India by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Good job India- the big question though is: why haven't countries been using solar panels on mass transit roofs before now? I'm sure it could save lots of money most places. ... well maybe not mass transit in subways.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Good job India by skids · · Score: 1

      In-flight electricity in vehicles is way less cost competitive with solar/TEG than the electricity at your home given it needs to be produced from fuel through a rather inefficient process, so it boils down to whether the extra weight and potential need for maintenance is worth it... and in the case of solar whether the panels can be kept safe.

      So yes, it's a missed opportunity.

    2. Re:Good job India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the use case where it becomes cost effective to do such an thing is unfathomably narrow.

      Most commuter trains for example in the northeastern united states are electric trains, so the roof space is reserved for centenary equipment and for the resistors and heat dissipaters that the regenerative braking systems require. There's just simply no room on the roof for anything else.

    3. Re:Good job India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why haven't countries been using solar panels on mass transit roofs before now?

      Paris considered doing this for the Metro system. Then someone pointed out that the system is mostly underground.

      So, will India need to run a larger number of these solar trains to shift the same number of people because half the capacity of the system will be lost when they ban the roof riders? I suspect that what will actually happen is the people inside the coaches will simply do without the "lights, fans and information displays" that are not being powered because the solar seating is filled.

    4. Re:Good job India by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good job India- the big question though is: why haven't countries been using solar panels on mass transit roofs before now? I'm sure it could save lots of money most places. ... well maybe not mass transit in subways.

      First, understand that these panels are not to help move the train, only to power on board electrical equipment (lights, etc).

      Although the train will still be pulled by a diesel-powered locomotive, a set of 16 solar panels atop each coach will replace the diesel generators that typically power these appliances.

      The first question I have is; How much to install more energy efficient equipment on the train? Second question is; How does that cost/benefit compare to added solar panels and weight. Solar panels only help part of the time, energy efficiency improvements will help 24/7. Unfortunately these articles never give us that kind of critical information, they are more about the symbolic wonder of solar panels.

    5. Re:Good job India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roof riders are already banned. It just turns out that the people who would ride on the roof don't particularly care about the ban.

    6. Re:Good job India by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The first question I have is; How much to install more energy efficient equipment on the train? Second question is; How does that cost/benefit compare to added solar panels and weight. Solar panels only help part of the time, energy efficiency improvements will help 24/7. Unfortunately these articles never give us that kind of critical information, they are more about the symbolic wonder of solar panels.

      I think it's safe to assume that the rail company will have thought of that and done the calculations, don't you?

      In any case, why not do both? In fact, that's probably what they are doing. It's a shame that TFA doesn't mention it, but I seriously doubt that there is any symbolism going on here.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Good job India by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I think it's safe to assume that the rail company will have thought of that and done the calculations, don't you?

      No, I absolutely don't. Its much easier politically to get support for the gesture of installing solar panels that for refurbishment.

    8. Re:Good job India by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What "support" would they need? It's their money. The sums on pay back time suggest less than a year.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Good job India by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      What "support" would they need? It's their money. The sums on pay back time suggest less than a year.

      It take money up front to do this type of work, not covered in operating budgets. You have to get the funding. Payback in a year is a guess that doesn't sound plausible or in line with other solar system payback periods.

    10. Re:Good job India by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Other countries have additional cost factors that don't make this as good of an ROI like India.
      1) Labor cost is usually higher in most other countries. This jacks up the installation & maintenance costs of panels.
      2) Other than Russia, China, & Japan, most other nations do not have the Diesel rail volume & revenues to justify this retrofit. Note India isn't doing this to their electrical nor AC compartments. They are doing this for their low cost metal boxes on wheels.
      3) Many countries do not have the solar availability nor energy conservation (we are talking about fans, open windows, & LEDs here, not AC units) to have the panels offset much. (ie: Russia, northern EU).
      4) Many countries have a cheaper and more reliable electrical grid that makes panels nothing more than a PR stunt. For these, it makes more sense to co-locate the panels and provide energy directly to the rail system; rather than run around on the cars (ie: US, Japan, & EU).
      5) Other countries (ie: African) do not have the political and/or economic stability to be able to fund & maintain panels for long

      China is a good candidate for solar on car roofs. But it makes more sense for them to invest their labor and resources in grid power and rail electrification infrastructure. They have tons of coal for traditional power or political stability to co-locate a bunch of panels in the middle of no where.

      For India, I am sure they are working on co-located solar but it is a bit harder. Every state, politician, and local tribe/cast will put demands on it. The local government may even demand 50% of the power to be provided free of charge to the local grid or "Stuff breaks on its own". These demands can change with every incoming political party. For the rail system, they can easily control what goes on their cars and runs around on their rails.

    11. Re:Good job India by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You can do the maths yourself. The cost of electricity from the diesel generator is given in the article, and it's high because burning diesel in a relatively small system (compared to a power station) is not very efficient.

      Typical domestic payback periods in western Europe are well under 5 years now. India has better insolation... Run the numbers yourself if you like, it's all in the article.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Good job India by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      What I'm wondering is why automobiles don't have solar panel roofs to keep some rudimentary climate control running while the car is sitting in the parking lot.

    13. Re:Good job India by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      2) Other than Russia, China, & Japan, most other nations do not have the Diesel rail volume & revenues to justify this retrofit. Note India isn't doing this to their electrical nor AC compartments. They are doing this for their low cost metal boxes on wheels.

      Minor nitpick; almost all passenger rail travel in the US & Canada is diesel, except for some of the northeast US, a small portion of Chicago's commuter lines, and one Montreal commuter line. There is volume. Revenue is another story...

      4) Many countries have a cheaper and more reliable electrical grid that makes panels nothing more than a PR stunt. For these, it makes more sense to co-locate the panels and provide energy directly to the rail system; rather than run around on the cars (ie: US, Japan, & EU).

      This is the better way to solve the problem; it doesn't matter what generated the power and you can use it to move the train as well (bigger savings).

    14. Re:Good job India by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      No, the numbers are not in the article. They give the results but not all the inputs and assumptions. How many KWH do they expect the panels to produce in a year? They probably assumed that the diesels fuel burn power would be reduced by the panel output amount. Of course we know that marginal power changes by the diesel can affect fuel consumption much less than the base average consumption per unit. Of course the guys pushing the solar panel idea could care less about those type of details. It seems you could care less as well because you never asked.

    15. Re:Good job India by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Do the math on how much actual power would be produced by those panels, compare it to the power needed to provide even a moderate level of climate control, and you will have your answer.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    16. Re:Good job India by blindseer · · Score: 1

      why haven't countries been using solar panels on mass transit roofs before now?

      Every time solar power comes up on Slashdot someone will mention how prices of solar panels have dropped in recent years. That could explain the reluctance to have solar panels on train car rooftops. It could be that the price of solar was too high until recently. Even if it was economically feasible years ago it could be that the people that plan such things saw how solar prices were falling and were just waiting until it hit bottom and stabilized.

      If prices for solar panels were dropping by 13% (or whatever the rate actually was) per year then that might make some people a bit reluctant to invest in this technology. Assuming that 13% is correct then panels bought 5 years ago could be had for half the price today.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    17. Re:Good job India by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      I don't mean heating/winter since that isn't really a problem (if there's enough sun for a solar panel the interior is warm enough).
      For summer, simply running the fans would keep the interior the same temperature as the exterior, and would move cooler air over surfaces that are heating up with the sun. It doesn't need to be 72 degrees when you get inside, just keep it down to 1-2 degrees warmer than the outside temperature. This would also stop hot car deaths.

    18. Re:Good job India by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I know what you meant. I'll help you with the math since you couldn't be bothered to do it yourself.

      Let's take the earth average sun at 1000 W/m^2. A typical solar panel used on a car will convert about 10% of that power into electricity, so 100 watts. A typical cabin fan used in a car will draw somewhere between 10 amps and 30 amps depending on size of the car and such, at 12 volts this means 120 to 360 watts.

      Assume that the solar panel shields the car from the heat by converting it to electricity you have 900 watts of heat into the cabin per square meter of roof and 100 watts to the fan. The total area doesn't matter much here since we assume that the larger the roof the more solar heating and more power to the fan. Assume now that the outside temperature is approaching 40C and you are trying to "cool" the cabin with that air. Or even at 25C that air is already quite warm, and you have nearly a kilowatt beating down on the roof and a teeny 100 watt fan to exchange the air with.

      A quick look at Wikipedia tells me that a typical automotive A/C unit will draw 4HP or 3kW. That's a lot of solar panels.

      This would also stop hot car deaths.

      No, it wouldn't. Even a pretty moderate temp like 25C with humidity above 40% is dangerous. A quick Google search will tell you that even at 20C on a sunny day and windows open to the breeze could mean dangerous temperatures in minutes. It's going to take more than just a couple hundred watts of cooling fans to keep up with that.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  13. If I understand it right by q4Fry · · Score: 1

    6-car trains at $14k/car comes $84k to retrofit and each train saves $108k/year on diesel. If you're getting a $24k return for each train you finish with the refit, just in the first year... awesome.

    1. Re:If I understand it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Something is not right with the math. 5k gallons of diesel doesn't cost $100k.

    2. Re:If I understand it right by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Something is not right with the math. 5k gallons of diesel doesn't cost $100k.

      Just did the math and there does seem to something off. The of a litre of diesel in India is about 0.9 USD and there are about 3.8 litres in a gallon, so 3.8 * 5000 * 0.9 = 17100 USD

      Source for diesel price: http://www.mypetrolprice.com/d... , noting this is just an estimate.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:If I understand it right by brianerst · · Score: 2

      The summary is wrong. According to the article, the fuel savings is Rs 12 lakh (1.2 million rupees) per train with six retrofitted cars. The cost to retrofit one car is Rs 9 lakh (900,000 rupees).

      So, it should take about 4.5 years to break even.

    4. Re:If I understand it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still not bad. Consumer solar panels here in the US have a lifespan of 20 years. Even with some money set aside for maintenance, you'll be saving close to quarter of a million dollars per train over the lifespan of the panels.

    5. Re:If I understand it right by polar+red · · Score: 1

      > Consumer solar panels here in the US have a lifespan of 20 years
      that's usually until they have only 80% power left ... which is still a lot. another 20, and they have still 64% ...

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  14. The End of Chaiyya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a terrible blow against bollywood.
    No longer will they be able to film dance scenes on trains without resorting to CGI.

    Captcha: villains

  15. Free-riders on roof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the cars have power will there be any sort of tasing / electrocution device to prevent free-riders on the roof / sides? If not, when the services requiring electricity do not function because the sun is being blocked by the free-riders will the passengers who pay for those services be refunded?

  16. re: by kiviQr · · Score: 0

    good luck in a tunels!

  17. Why not integrate with the locomotive? by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised that this isn't already integrated with the locomotive. The locomotive is almost certainly diesel-electric, so why did they have separate generators on the cars, rather than just drawing from the massive diesel generators in the locomotive? And if they add solar panels, to all of the cars why use them to charge batteries, rather than just feeding any excess juice to the locomotive, allowing it to burn a little less fuel to keep the train moving? I suppose this might result in a little bit of waste when the train is sitting still, so I suppose it's worth having enough battery capacity to capture that energy, but most of the time it's sitting still it's probably in a train station which could likely use the power.

    Note that I know almost nothing about any of this stuff, so this isn't a "they're stupid for not doing that" post; I'm actually asking questions. I suppose the simple answer may well be "Because the locomotive isn't presently designed to do that".

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised that this isn't already integrated with the locomotive. The locomotive is almost certainly diesel-electric, so why did they have separate generators on the cars, rather than just drawing from the massive diesel generators in the locomotive?

      The trains use air brakes and don't depend on any other connections. If the air brake connection is broken because cars are separated, then the brakes are automatically applied.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I suspect solar power couldn't provide the power needed to pull all that weight, which is why they've dedicated it to the lights, ACs and display systems inside the trains. It's a start - may not be 100% solar, but even something like 30% is good.

    3. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are feeding off the diesel generator on the locomotive in a traditional car, that diesel generator creates power by burning diesel... not drawing that power lets that generator generate less electricity and burn less fuel.

      Technical details are sparse in the articles that I can find... but if they can manage to detach from the locomotive power entirely, that means fewer connections to the locomotive, which depending on the use case could also be beneficial.
      As for the extra juice being dumped into the motors, that'd require a large DC/DC Converter to get it up to the voltage the locomotive is running at... which is variable depending on the power that the locomotive needs at the time. and there aren't data connections already there... it's a messy idea basically simpler to just leave teh cars to power themselves, and the locomotive to power itself.

    4. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by Above · · Score: 1

      It's a good question if you're not familiar with the typical setup.

      The cars generally use HEP, a 480v AC distribution system.

      In most locomotives the main diesel engine supplies electricity only to the traction motors. Basically the traction motors us a variable amount of volts and amps, and different voltages, than the passenger cars which want a fairly constant voltage. That's not to say this is a universal truth, one that has a single engine turning both the generator for the traction motors and for HEP is the F40PH, nicknamed the "screamer".

      To keep the voltage constant the engine has to turn at a particular RPM. For a large (think 2000-3000HP) locomotive engine idling in a station and producing 300HP of HEP load this burns a TON of fuel. Super inefficient, super noisy.

      As a result most passenger locomotives have a a separate genset for HEP only. Freight locomotives omit the HEP generator. Like any stand alone electrical generator, it's optimized for constant voltage output and continuous running.

      Most locomotives today have no battery capacity, although there are a couple of brand new models that do. The simple truth is the numbers are large, one of the largest engines the AC6000CW can produce 4.5MW of power to the traction engine. That takes a lot of batteries!

      These solar panels may allow them to ditch the HEP generator in the locomotive, and use that physical space for batteries that supply HEP only. More likely the generator will remain, and simply idle a lot more. Maybe a hybrid approach down the line. In regards to traction though, a whole train of solar panels is pretty much a drop in the bucket compared to the needs of 1-2 locomotives to move the train.

    5. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      why did they have separate [electrical] generators on the cars, rather than just drawing from the massive diesel generators in the locomotive?

      The trains use air brakes and don't depend on any other connections. If the air brake connection is broken because cars are separated, then the brakes are automatically applied.

      What has that got to do with the electrical power supplies?

    6. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by RailRide · · Score: 1
      Of all the dozens (hundreds?) of videos of Indian passenger trains I've seen (there seem to be a lot of railfans in India) on YouTube, none use head-end power (HEP) generated by the locomotive--even if it's an electric unit (as far as I can tell, locomotive-borne HEP just isn't a thing in India). There is almost always a diesel generator car at one end (usually both) of the passenger consist.

      (example)

      This is most likely due to the sheer length of these trains--it isn't even unusual for premium services to have well in excess of 15 coaches. Trains with non-air-conditioned classes (basically anything with bars on the windows instead of glass) can easily hit 18-20 cars and up. There is a limit to how many cars can be powered off a single generator car (or HEP-equipped locomotive), usually about 15 or so cars max.

      ---PCJ

    7. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's just a practicality thing. You could do it, but aside from the engineering complexity (which will inevitably result in reduced reliability) the amount of energy left over after running the carriages is probably not worth the effort. Maybe in a future version where reliability has reached very high levels and been proven.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What has that got to do with the electrical power supplies?

      They've literally found it easier to install diesel gensets in the train cars than one big fat inverter (or inverter bank) in the locomotive which has to deal with the varying output voltage of the engine at different speeds, and you're sitting here asking what the simplicity of the rest of the system has to do with the electrical power supplies?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you a moron? try reading before you puke up some thoughtless response, fuckface.

      Hugs and kisses,

      Juan Epstein

    10. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Surely it's closer to 3% than 30%. Exactly how much power does a train coach car need? Modern illumination needs virtually no power in the grand scheme of things. Likewise displays. Air conditioning? ... maybe ... The big power drain of a train is trundling maybe 30 metric tons per car (plus the engine) around the countryside.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    11. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually, here in the USA, Amtrak locomotives and locomotives used by commuter railroads use a system called "head-end power," where a diesel-powered generator in a diesel-electric locomotives provides power to all the attached passenger cars through a special power cable system. I believe something like that have been around since the late 1930's.

    12. Re:Why not integrate with the locomotive? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Surely it's closer to 3% than 30%.

      Actually, closer to 0.03% than to 3%. The locomotive needs... say 55000nm of torque, while the lights, these days, use pretty much negligible electricity.

      I suspect that the savings come from the reduced weight rather than the actual electricity usage (removing those smaller diesel generators per car).

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  18. Solar doesn't work in the shadows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this going to work with everyone standing on the roof?

  19. This won't work: people sitting on trains' roofs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You all know how an average indian train looks like. Like a grape wine made of human bobbles.

  20. Great ROI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most residential solar panels here in the US have a life span of about 20 years and average payback time of 7.5 years (that depends a lot obviously, but I've heard 7.5 years being thrown around). This is a no-brainer if the panels are really paying back for themselves in just 1 year. The other 19 years are pure gravy!

    1. Re:Great ROI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most US roofs do not have hundreds of people walking and sitting on them. I doubt that the panels would last one year, let alone twenty.

  21. Sold to them by Lyle Lanley??? by jzarling · · Score: 1

    Simpsons did it

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  22. Won't work by farble1670 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Solar cells do not generate energy when there are people sitting on top of them.

    1. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You spelled shitting wrong friend

  23. Money would be better spent on electrification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why waste money putting solar panels on trains for auxilliary power when the railway tracks apparently still aren't electrified? By investing in overhead lines and the infrastructure to go with it, the next generation of trains will reduce fuel usage by 100%.

    1. Re:Money would be better spent on electrification by orlanz · · Score: 1

      India already has a vast electrified rail network and it continues to grow. But the cost of that is pretty big and maintenance is hard. So many lines running through remote locations and/or steep grades are still diesel. Diesel maybe dirty, but per pound, it is pretty efficient, easy to transport, reliable, easy to fix, and requires minimum skills to work with.

  24. Re:Simple soution by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    Toting around rooftops full of smelly, dirty, non-paying parasites costs money in wasted fuel. Just removing the freeloaders and grifters alone will improve fuel economy considerably.

    Who says the roof riders aren't paying? If not, then the ones inside are probably not paying either.

  25. A Real guesstimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $108,000 for 21,000 litres doesn't make sense so lets do some reasonable guesstimating.

    21K litres is about $20K. I'm guessing they get the bulk discount since they buy it in multiple freighter loads. They may even own a few refineries. Each coach takes $13K to convert and it takes 6 coaches to save the $20K. Thats a conversion cost of 6 x 13 = 78K. Pay off assuming no other expenses, like maintenance, wear and tear etc is 78/20 ~ 4 years. Seems not bad but not a slam dunk either. Ongoing recurring expenses will eat into the savings quickly. I'd bet new batteries every so often would make things interesting.

    I'm guessing that the electricity used by the engines is a tad higher in voltage and amperage than anything a solar cell array that can be mounted on a train can produce. Not only that but the more conversions you do ( inverters, transformers, whatever) the more your losses are.

    1. Re:A Real guesstimate by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Seems reasonable. But I doubt it's a "conversion" More of an "installation. They probably need backup at night and on cloudy days. That'd be the existing diesel generation which will be retained but won't have to run all the time?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    2. Re:A Real guesstimate by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Good guess. The "hotel power" (lights and whatnot) on a train comes from what's called a HEP generator. Not all engines (at least in the US) have one built in, so they are sometimes installed in one or more coaches on the train. Turning off the HEP directly saves fuel.

  26. In other news by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    The Indian government still refuses to provide running water, electricity and sanitation to the more than 600 million Indian citizens who lack such services, choosing instead to devote resources to international pissing contests.

    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's literally always one here, isn't there.

      The USA has, of course, eliminated all the things that held it back in a medieval state like extreme poverty, trailer parks, West Nile and talk radio.

    2. Re:In other news by ghoul · · Score: 0

      Its not the govts job to provide any of these. India is a capitalist free market economy. If people want to shit in the fields and hence add organic fertilizer to their organic crops and also be more in commune with nature who is the govt to tell them to build toilets. What are you? Some kind of communist?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  27. Pressed into service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the cars reluctant or refusing somehow?

  28. There is an easier way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reduce the population

  29. 0.0008% by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Summary claims 21,000 liters of diesel saved over 2.6 billion liters yearly usage.

    Are they really boasting about a .0008% offset?I agree there is no small gains, but I am not sure it is worth the news.

    1. Re:0.0008% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      21,000 liters is per train. 2.6 billion liters is the total usage by all trains.

    2. Re:0.0008% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad I came back and read your post. Duh!

  30. Prediction: most panels stolen before fullrollout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, the people are already sitting up there and have already mastered getting up and down with cargo. It's not likely to be noticed with their 20 per cent plus transport losses anyway.

  31. I thought the roofs were covered with people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever I have seen any video of trains in India the roofs are always covered with people. Did they place the solar panels on stilts to provide shelter for the rooftop riders? I don't see how they intend for these to get much sunlight otherwise.