Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Says He Has a Green Light To Build a NY-Philly-Baltimore-DC Hyperloop (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report:Elon Musk just tweeted that his Boring Company tunnel project has just received "verbal [government] approval" to build a hyperloop connecting New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington, DC. While we work to verify his claim, Musk is continuing to tweet more details about the project. The hyperloop, an ultrafast method of travel first developed by Musk in 2013, would only take 29 minutes to travel between New York City and DC, he claims. And it would feature "up to a dozen or more" access points via elevator in each city. Update: Eric Phillips, press secretary for the New York City mayor, tweeted, "This is news to City Hall," adding "The entirety of what we know about this proposal is what's in Mr. Musk's tweet. That is not how we evaluate projects of any scale."

308 comments

  1. Never going to happen by danbert8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt anyone in the government verbally approved a project that is likely in the hundred of billions...

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    1. Re: Never going to happen by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ^^ This.

      Show me a continuous, buildable line between those three cities and I'll show you more governing bodies (not to mention NIMBY NGOs and regulators) than you had kids your high school class.

    2. Re:Never going to happen by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hundreds of billions? You're forgetting that Musk has found ways to reduce the cost of tunneling from $1B/mile to 25c (and 10c at weekends.) His Hyperloop technology is revolutionary and won't be a barf ride, cramped, and ear splittingly loud so stop saying that - they've proven it works in NV or New Mexico by building a small test track where they totally proved that you can put things in pipes and make them move, which is the same thing yes it is.

      This is an amazing technology, one of the variants Musk has been proposing is going to totally end the problems associated with roads and congestion by moving your car right to the centers of major metropolises like Chicago and New York City, which are both famous for having ample space to drive around and park.

      Truly a visionary, and he's not just trying to cripple real public transportation projects politically by proposing "cheap", "private" alternatives in order to prop up his car company, so stop saying that.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Never going to happen by taiwanjohn · · Score: 2

      Then again, if it was a private tweet from Trump... that would count as White House policy. As for the cost, you might well be off by a couple orders of magnitude. IIRC, Elon's original hyperloop white paper estimated the cost of the SF-to-LA 'loop at around six or eight billion. Add in your fudge factors for Elon's notorious optimism and turning it into a 'gubmint' project... and I still think you'd be in the tens of billions, rather than hundreds. FWIW...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    4. Re:Never going to happen by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't particularly doubt that *someone* in the government would give verbal approval. I doubt that there's someone in the government who has the authority and influence to give verbal approval and have it mean anything.

    5. Re:Never going to happen by eepok · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'm going full Poe's Law here. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law)

      Either way, color me entertained!

    6. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He got verbal approval to buold it, not verbal approval for government payment

    7. Re:Never going to happen by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Even though I disagree with the "theme" of your post, I would mod you up "+1 Funny" if I hadn't already commented in this thread. Made me LOL, thanks. ;-)

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    8. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10s of billions wouldn't pay for the land needed to build the thing between LA and SF. Toss in the actual development costs for something that doesn't exist and is completely unproven in every way and if anything, I'd consider 100s of billions to be on the conservative side.

    9. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      He's trying to do something. You're not. He may fail, but he's doing more than you ever will.

      Living large by slurping up government subsidies?

      Oooooh-kay.

    10. Re:Never going to happen by bobbied · · Score: 1, Informative

      LOL.. EXACTLY what he's doing... Nothing like a government check to keep you rolling in the money.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:Never going to happen by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Truly a visionary, and he's not just trying to cripple real public transportation projects politically by proposing "cheap", "private" alternatives in order to prop up his car company, so stop saying that.

      And nobody is going to believe this one amazing trick that Musk will use on the project!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    12. Re: Never going to happen by guruevi · · Score: 2

      There's a difference between making something happen and feasibility. Only fools throw money at ideas purely because you want it to happen.

      SpaceX was going to Mars on a budget that wouldn't even cover a round trip to the moon... seems like the brass at NASA finally asked some engineers and scrapped that faster than a burnt potato. At least Musk got his money out of that deal but yeah, he's trying...

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    13. Re: Never going to happen by Albanach · · Score: 2

      I didn't see any suggestion from Musk that this would be publicly financed. Given the massive number of jobs that such a project would create, I'd doubt government would stand in the way on principal alone. That doesn't mean there won't be more government interest in the route or the regulation of the service if/when it was ever to come into existence.

    14. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to mod you "Funny," but now I'm suspicious about Poe's Law.

    15. Re:Never going to happen by jandrese · · Score: 1

      My first reaction on seeing the words "verbal agreement" is "you got jack shit". Nothing happens in DC on just a verbal agreement, and definitely not some multi-billion dollar porkstravaganza.

      Do you think he called Donald Trump directly and said "I'd like to do a bigly infrastructure project, would you like that?"

      Also, is he planning to build a tunnel from DC to NYC? That would be by far the longest tunnel in the world. The current record holder is the Guangzhaou Metro tunnel, at 37.5 miles. This tunnel would be over 200 miles long, probably closer to 225.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    16. Re: Never going to happen by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      It's way too early to say SpaceX isn't going to Mars. They've changed their mind about one particular technology, that's all.

    17. Re: Never going to happen by snarfies · · Score: 2

      We can even get rail lines from Philadelphia to our largest and busiest suburbs (King of Prussia and West Chester). In both cases, the lines are endless blocked because they don't want "those" people having access to their towns.

    18. Re:Never going to happen by BasilBrush · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, probably he did ask Trump. And Trump probably did say yes. Because that's the kind of thing Trump does.

    19. Re: Never going to happen by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      ^^ This. Show me a continuous, buildable line between those three cities and I'll show you more governing bodies (not to mention NIMBY NGOs and regulators) than you had kids your high school class.

      No need to show you, its been verbally green lighted. I'm sure they thought it all through, after all who would dare give a verbal green light if it weren't vetted. Verbal green lights must be taken seriously, for they spark global media attention.

    20. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eminent domain.

      that's how nyc got highways. yeah, it sucked for folks in the way of a highway, but realistically, there wouldn't be enough money in the world to fairly buy out everyone.

    21. Re:Never going to happen by Immerman · · Score: 2

      What land? Did you miss the part about it being The Boring Company getting approval? One of the many benefits of going underground is that you can potentially ignore surface property rights altogether - the law is extremely poorly defined when it comes to just how far down you own, far less so than even how much airspace above your land you have a right to. There have been a handful of cases in US law of successful lawsuits against people *mining* under your land, assuming you own the mineral rights as well, but that's about it. Dig the tunnels a few thousand feet underground, so that there's effectively zero surface disturbance, and there'd likely be very few people willing to take the case court on the off chance that they might win. Of course by the same token if someone decided to dig a borehole on their property and punctured your tunnel you probably wouldn't have any grounds for legal complaint either.

      Alternately, if you're feeling particularly cautious and well-funded, in most places you could probably purchase or lease underground right-of-ways for practically nothing, even relatively near the surface.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    22. Re:Never going to happen by mspohr · · Score: 2

      Apparently it was Jared Kushner who "approved" the project.
      This is the way our totalitarian capitalist government works. Just get the OK from the mafia boss representative of "the family" and you're good to go.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    23. Re:Never going to happen by mspohr · · Score: 1

      He got verbal approval from mafia don Jared Kushner which is the way our government works now under boss Trump.
      That's all he really needs.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    24. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked 18 months and spent $40k for permits to put a culvert in a creek. And I don't have the permits yet.

      Verbal approval for a hyperloop? Nope.

    25. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the part about it being The Boring Company getting approval?

      Frankly I skipped over that part, as I found it completely uninteresting. In fact, it was Boring.

    26. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least read the summery properly..

      "Elon Musk just tweeted that his Boring Company tunnel project has just received.."

      That suggests it might be underground out of everyones sight, and out of their minds. Meaning this thing isn't about be a golden egg laying goose for anyones land this night run over if its built above ground, when they realize this are no golden eggs to be had, they oppose it.

    27. Re:Never going to happen by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He's trying to fuck up public transportation by proposing "cheap" alternatives that, even if they work, will not be as cheap as he claims, and will on most metrics be horrible.

      Maybe he believes in it, I don't know: I do know the CAHSR-killing original Hyperloop proposal was so bad it was impossible to assume it had been written in good faith. Just the fact this "replacement" only served two of the four cities CAHSR is aimed at, wasn't designed to cope with anything like as many passengers, and had end-points 50-100 miles away from the cities they served, was enough to draw that conclusion. That was before getting civil engineers in to dispute the costs.

      So no, I don't give someone credit for merely "trying to do something". They have to be trying to do something worthwhile, not negative for me to support them.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    28. Re: Never going to happen by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      they'll kill it by every single governing body between and including those cities wanting their hands in the cookie jar.

    29. Re:Never going to happen by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Do you actually believe your BS?

      Mafia don?

      For your sake I hope not.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    30. Re:Never going to happen by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      No verbal approval no. But it's underground. Only the access points will be covered by NIMBY etc... If the tubes prove safe then a good portion of NIMBY and environmental impact is gone.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    31. Re: Never going to happen by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      That suggests it might be underground out of everyones sight, and out of their minds.

      Hmm...sounds like modern day Sub-Rosa Subway

      .....by Alfred Beach

      .

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    32. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The land that they need to bore through. I see you're not familiar with how property rights work, but just because you're going under ground doesn't mean that the land isn't owned. I own a plot of land, yet if I were to try to drill a hole down to access the water table (or natural gas) I'd be sued for very large amounts of money for not having rights to do that as I don't own it. You see, these mineral rights that you briefly mentioned, they're the problem, tagged in with water rights and several other rights. They're all owned. And "dig a few thousand feet under", well, congrats, you're now talking about whole other set of technical problems while still not avoiding mineral rights issues, so now costs are going to sky rocket for trying to develop new mining techniques while still paying for underground land. Trying to get approval for a subway in a single city is a regulatory nightmare and takes decades. Why do you think it would be easier going 100s of miles?

    33. Re:Never going to happen by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Yes, probably he did ask Trump. And Trump probably did say yes. Because that's the kind of thing Trump does.

      Well, if Musk is anything like a friend of mine then "That sounds like a good idea, why don't you draft up a proposal?" counts as approval. Then again he'll also take any casual remark on something that might happen at some unspecified point in the future as a done deal coming any day now and any girl that looks his way or says two kind words is flirting with him.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    34. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's about the same level of shithole as most other cities, it just happened to have a huge TV series to help paint it in a bad light.

    35. Re: Never going to happen by kenh · · Score: 1

      Show me a continuous, buildable line between those three cities...

      It's under ground - no need to have a right of way in the conventional above-ground manner.

      I can't imagine any actual civic leader giving a "verbal" green light to a project and having it mean ANYTHING.

      --
      Ken
    36. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt anyone in the government verbally approved a project that is likely in the hundred of billions...

      Typical pen-pushing bureaucrats. In the private sector, one email from a C-suiter and it's a done deal.
      --
      roman_mir

    37. Re:Never going to happen by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Considering the amount of red tape you have to sludge through just to build a simple apartment building in any of those cities, I would rate the likelihood that Musk is full of shit at about 99.999%.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    38. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's way too early to say SpaceX is going to Mars.

      Fixed that for you.

    39. Re: Never going to happen by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Courts have ruled that verbal green lights are the best green lights of them all. They're shiny and fun!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    40. Re:Never going to happen by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Hey, if Musk could figure out how to get a rocket to Mars by 2020, he can do anything!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    41. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reduce the cost of tunneling from $1B/mile to 25c

      Obviously Elon's just gotten permission to use the same tunnels built by the Trilateral Commission to connect the secret deep underground military bases. Just need to make sure you don't screw up the routing and send a train full of commuters to one of the stops where the reptoids are held. As thoroughly documented all over the internet by Dr Richard Sauder and the X Files.

    42. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      A charlatan whose business extracted billions from taxpayers gears up to do it again!

      But at least he is doing something. It may be a useless, corrupt, wasteful something, but it is something! Think of the children!!!

    43. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government is required to compensate owners fairly. And if they want to avoid getting tied up in lawsuits for decades, that's what they have to do.

      No, much as Hillary, Sanders, and Feinstein may think that eminent domain is a blank check for the government to rob people, in practice, it doesn't work that way.

    44. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's utter nonsense. If you own private property, you have property rights from the center of the earth to outer space. And if you build a tall structure on your private property, airplanes have to fly around it; they only have an easement to use airspace that is unused by the property owner.

    45. Re: Never going to happen by doctorvo · · Score: 1

      That comment is rich in light of the long history of Democratic corruption, influence peddling, and vote buying, and the absolutely deplorable history of the Clintons. It's particularly ludicrous to accuse a billionaire president of this sort of thing: billionaires don't have to prostitute themselves for a few million dollars in bribes. Seriously, man, snap out of your stupid partisan bigotry.

    46. Re: Never going to happen by doctorvo · · Score: 2

      Wake up, man, California High Speed Rail is dead. California is nearly bankrupt, the federal government is not going to pay for it, and as a business it makes no sense.

    47. Re: Never going to happen by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Never heard of that song before. Thanks!

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    48. Re:Never going to happen by Chas · · Score: 1

      He needs to shut the fuck up about mega-projects built on rainbows and unicorn farts and get the damn PROTOTYPES fully functional.

      Same thing with his "solar farm and battery" in Nevada.

      Same with his "Big Battery" project in Australia.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    49. Re: Never going to happen by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That's the "traditional" definition, since about the 1300s, but it's not formally codified in US law, nor does it have any real precedence to support it here. If the courts decided to use airspace rights as a reference point, then they might well decide to grant a similar easement for unused underground spaces - especially tunnels are deep enough that they're unlikely to have any effect on the surface or future construction.

      And, if the plan actually had significant high-level government support, then eminent domain might be invoked as well - which would probably be one of the least-abusive invocations to date.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    50. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There already is a tunnel from DC to NYC that was used in WWII.

    51. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone that is not Elon owns all the land and mineral rights to everything under their property. It may be "cheap" compared to surface rights but it all must be bought or obtained via easement. Otherwise it is literally stealing material that other people own out from under them and people will file suit, even if it is a sham lawsuit funded by greenies or other organizations that would want to stop it.

    52. Re:Never going to happen by kaybee · · Score: 1

      The oil industry gets more subsidies than Tesla. I agree neither should get them.

      SpaceX doesn't get any subsidies.

    53. Re:Never going to happen by Huge_UID · · Score: 1

      Have you not been paying attention to our new administration?

    54. Re: Never going to happen by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      I can't speak about the country as a whole, but in the several diverse areas I've lived in, those who owned the surface land rarely owned the underground rights. They had been sold off long ago. The presence of coal, oil, gas, or any of many other resources tends to cause large corporations to go through whole states at some point in time to purchase rights. This has caused a concentration of underground rights into the hands of far fewer people than the surface rights.

      Offering those organizations a little money today for nothing more than a path through something they are just holding for future value is usually enough.

      Furthermore, at some point in the future as we start building down instead of out, I would fully expect the government to step in and start performing 3D zoning. There is just too much money there. Such zoning will reduce the value to the owners and encourage cheaper sales.

    55. Re: Never going to happen by eliphalet · · Score: 2

      Someone once said that a verbal contract is not worth the paper it's printed on.

    56. Re: Never going to happen by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Show me a continuous, buildable line between those three cities...

      It's under ground - no need to have a right of way in the conventional above-ground manner.

      I can't imagine any actual civic leader giving a "verbal" green light to a project and having it mean ANYTHING.

      No problem! They are just going deep enough that they have two city officials in China who have approved* it!

      * as long as the bribes keep coming.

    57. Re: Never going to happen by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      And may not need it, though he'd get it regardless because the government isn't ready to give up their relevance yet.

      We have individual billionaires in this country whose fortunes rival many governments. I've been waiting for the day to come when some of the billionaires get together and decide to start guiding our development directions with their own funds. It is actually the ultimate way to make more money.

      For example, a mere 2 billion dollars could provide a $5K incentive on 400,000 electric vehicles. More than double what Tesla has sold to date. If a small group of billionaires decided to wipe out traditional auto manufacturers in favor of electric, they could easily make it happen and likely profit from it through creation of the new infrastructure.

      With government becoming increasingly non-responsive to the needs of the people, essentially abdicating its role, it is setting itself up for private takeover of its duties.

    58. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh? You threatening somebody because they know the scoop?

      Is he going to sleep with the artichokes if he doesn't keep his mouth shut?

    59. Re: Never going to happen by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Never heard of that song before. Thanks!

      From a group named Klaatu.....a pretty decent Canadian band from late 70's early 80's....

      They got some early notoriety for people thinking they were the Beatles on their first album.

      I still really enjoy their first 3 albums.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    60. Re: Never going to happen by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I thought they had a hardcore history of corruption? That makes Chicago look like a tea party.

    61. Re: Never going to happen by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot, it has already been said.

    62. Re:Never going to happen by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Just say that it is fracking. The current regulatory bodies will say DRILL BABY DRILL!

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    63. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK, I approved it verbally.

    64. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? Ok, so we accept that they don't have to, but they take the bribes anyway. See Spiro Agnew. The rich history of Republican corruption includes Credit Mobiler, Teapot Dome, the Whiskey Ring, McCarthyism, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and more. It's particularly ludicrous to defend this particular billionaire for this sort of thing, his repugnant history of corruption and malfeasance includes a lawsuit settled days after the election. Your comment is impoverished in everything except stupid partisan bigotry.

    65. Re: Never going to happen by mspohr · · Score: 1

      One thing you need to know about rich people. They never have enough money. They always want more and they are willing to do anything to get it.
      (Re: Partisan. I was only commenting on Trump since he is the current and most despicable inhabitant of the White House. I agree that Democrats also sell their votes to corporations. Our political system is totally corrupt. This is just the latest and most extreme example.)

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    66. Re:Never going to happen by mspohr · · Score: 1

      The Trump "family" is acting like a mafia family. Extortion, racketeering, influence peddling, attacks on the judges, etc.
      Yes, I believe this. It's time for the willfully ignorant realize what is going on.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    67. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, you agree: the earth below the land is private property.

      You're now simply arguing that it is private property that should be fairly easy to acquire for a variety of historical accidents. That may or may not be true. But the fact is that government can't simply start drilling through it without an agreement with the property owners, whoever they may be.

    68. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eminent domain doesn't change anything; the government still has to compensate property owners.

      Furthermore, if Hyperloop works, subterranean rights suddenly become quite valuable, so that may not be cheap. I expect it would also get stuck in court for a long time.

    69. Re: Never going to happen by doctorvo · · Score: 1

      "Ok, so we accept that they don't have to, but they take the bribes anyway. See Spiro Agnew." Spiro Agnew was worth about $700000, and much of that from bribes. He wasn't rich, he became rich through government. You know, just like the Clintons. Well, actually not like the Clintons: the Clintons have so far enriched themselves 50x more than Spiro Agnew ever did through their "government service". But I'm glad that you seem to agree that there are crooks in both parties. "The rich history of Republican corruption includes Credit Mobiler, Teapot Dome, the Whiskey Ring, Watergate" True, in the late 19th and early 20th century, corruption and progressivism infested both parties. Nixon has been the last gasp of that kind of Republican. I'm glad you reject those kinds of behaviors. I encourage you to apply your disapproval equally to Democrats. "McCarthyism, Iran-Contra" I'm not sure how these amount to corruption. "It's particularly ludicrous to defend this particular billionaire for this sort of thing," I still haven't seen anything I need to defend him from; since he hasn't been in office long and hasn't done much, who would even have had opportunity to bribe him? "his repugnant history of corruption and malfeasance includes a lawsuit settled days after the election." I get it: you don't like the Orange One and his small hands. That's your prerogative. But none of that amounts to bribery, which we are talking about here.

    70. Re: Never going to happen by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      True. I just believe that there is a huge difference in the behavior of corporate owners versus individual owners. Individual owners are on average more emotional and unrealistic in their pricing. There should also be a large reduction in the number of owners that need to be dealt with.

      I think an imminent domain approach would also be vastly easier if we're discussing the area 1000 feet under your property. In fact, as 3D zoning and development take off over the next half century or so, I'd be surprised if there is not a massive subsurface land grab from the various governments in which several levels of entire regions are rezoned to multiply the tax generating surface area.

    71. Re: Never going to happen by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      f you own private property, you have property rights from the center of the earth to outer space.

      Nope, at least not according to the Supreme Court. Check out US v. Causby. You have rights to the first 365-500 feet. Spoiler:

      The airspace, apart from the immediate reaches above the land, is part of the public domain.

      --

      Enigma

    72. Re: Never going to happen by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Well, there's the I-95 median strip.for maybe 95 % of the distance. And/or I suppose Elon could suspend his hyperloop over the Interstate somehow. He seems to have a certain talent for trivializing engineering problems.

      But I am curious where Musk found one person, or small group capable of speaking for the city and state of New York, the states of New Jersey,(Delaware?), Pennsylvania, Maryland, the District of Columbia, the city of Philadelphia, the City of Baltimore, and about 500 other counties, cities, towns, and other.legal entities with zoning authority.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    73. Re: Never going to happen by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Informative

      California hasn't had a budget deficit for 5 years, has paid off most debt, has in fact been setting aside money in reserve (despite having our tax dollars siphoned off to the southeast by the feds), and will build HSR. Unfortunately, since nobody's going to ride it when it opens in the 2040s and it will have huge ongoing maintenance costs.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    74. Re: Never going to happen by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      And if you build a tall structure on your private property, airplanes have to fly around it

      Yeah right. You have a 0% chance of getting clearance to build a skyscraper in a residential neighborhood -- it takes years of navigating bureaucracies and fighting NIMBYs to get permission for a skyscraper in a downtown business district, and that often fails too.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    75. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baltimore is a shithole. It has been a shithole for many years, and that's why they made the show. The fact it is a shithole is not dramatized. Yes, there are a few nice areas not that have gentrified, and those effete hipster youth who reside there believe Baltimore is a different Baltimore than the poverty stricken hellhole it is for MOST of its residents, but it isn't...it is horrible. And yes, corruption and greed amongst the local Democrats plays a major role. It's a city where the D primary literally IS the election, a city where you can be mayor just by being somebody famous'a aunt, and a city where you can get absolutely nothing done in a hundred years and still have the same party in power and not just in power but deeply corrupted

    76. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'proven' not sure if you watched the actual tests, but they were pretty shit.

      it's a nice idea, but please, keep a level of skepticism so you don't look stupid when the project gets delayed for more R&D.

    77. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting that Musk has found ways to reduce the cost of tunneling from $1B/mile to 25c (and 10c at weekends.)

      He's using Trump Math, the same model that delivers health insurance for $12/year.

    78. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nobody with the authority to "verbally approve" such a project, see comment above, rather it involves massive multiparty negotiations resulting in thousands of undertakings in writing to different organizations, years of public hearings, newspaper articles etc. The US government system just isn't set up for "sure Dr Brain go ahead with your space elevator" type of arrangements. What probably happened here is some midlevel federal regulator said "in principle such a thing is possible", notwithstanding the fact that this means nothing more than "our agency won't sue to stop you", and from there the process of salesmanship known as "baldfaced lying" turned that into the above headline. --Legal.Troll (besmirched with poor Karma)

    79. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things are so different in Republican cities. Thanks goodness they control all branches of government. Look at all the winning!

    80. Re: Never going to happen by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Maintenance should be significantly lower than the NEC/Acela Express, given the primary issue with the latter is that it's 150 years old and showing it. Ridership should be similar to the combination of the Acela Express and Northeast Regional with similar fares.

      The NEC is profitable BTW. Just saying. It's the reason why Texas Central and All Aboard Florida are doing their things.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    81. Re:Never going to happen by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      What extortion?

      Literally WHAT extortion.

      Attacks on judges? Disagreeing is an attack. Disagreeing when the judges obviously overstepped their bounds (see Supreme Court slapdown) is an attack? But when Obama criticized judges at the state of the union .... that wasn't an "attack".

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    82. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just described Chicago almost exactly

    83. Re: Never going to happen by Immerman · · Score: 1

      It's not unheard of for municipalities to seize property under eminent domain while paying for little more than the undeveloped land - after all, they get to set the price as well. It can be fought, but rarely successfully.

      Besides - underground "real estate" is almost limitless if you don't need surface access, and there's lots of precedence that the government can use it as they see fit (pretty sure nobody collects rent for the utilities, subway tubes, etc. running under their land)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    84. Re: Never going to happen by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      California still owes the US Federal Unemployment Trust Fund a metric butt-load of money because their state unemployment went deep into the red. Instead of paying it back, employers in the state are having to fork out a lot of extra money every year to cover their shit.

      FYI, California is the only state in the union that is still on the Credit Reduction list for this very issue.

    85. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt anyone in the government verbally approved a project that is likely in the hundred of billions...

      Musk might as well have made a verbal agreement with Darth Vader.

    86. Re: Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk doing something not publicly funded? That is even more improbable than any government ever giving a verbal approval for a project.

    87. Re: Never going to happen by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the warning. I'll make sure to avoid that pile of saccharin ('thinking they were the Beatles').

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    88. Re: Never going to happen by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Well, I think it was more some of the harmonies....

      Actually give it a listen...really good with lights out, and kinda feeling toasty, if you know what I mean....

      It was a lot of fun in college days after a night of partying....

      Turn out the lights, and crank up Little Neutrino....the explosions at the end always good for annoying the neighbors if you have a good system.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    89. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His hyperloop system still hasn't been proven to work yet but I hope you're the first to test it.

    90. Re:Never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The oil industry gets more subsidies than Tesla. I agree neither should get them.

      SpaceX doesn't get any subsidies.

      There wasn't a single factual statement here.

  2. Raises Many Questions by DanielBigham · · Score: 1

    - If the Boring Company is going to dig the tunnel, who will build the hyperloop in the tunnel? Hyperloop One? HTT? Musk? Yet to be decided? - How can the Boring Company be starting projects like this before they've made any progress in reducing the cost of such tunnels? Wouldn't that process of discovery and refinement take 10-15 years? - This implies a big underground Hyperloop station in NYC -- surely that would cost an immense amount of money to build

    1. Re:Raises Many Questions by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fortunately, there is almost nothing underground in NYC.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Raises Many Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, there is almost nothing underground in NYC.

      except for all of the subway lines and the water mains and the sewage drains and the utility cables and the many tunnels to NJ and other boroughs

    3. Re:Raises Many Questions by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Raises Many Questions by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeahhhh, that was sarcasm. I thought NYC was associated enough with subways, tunnels, and aqueducts to make it blatant.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:Raises Many Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, 5% of the first 100' of the cities underground is taken. Guess we'll have to angle the tunnel a bit in a few places, or put it down 120'. That's one of the nice things about underground networks, it is pretty easy to layer the infrastructure. And I believe in most places you can go down around a mile before you start having to deal with significant temperature issues.

    6. Re:Raises Many Questions by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      And NYC isn't sitting on what is basically one huge basalt boulder.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    7. Re:Raises Many Questions by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      London is full of tunnels too. But it isn't stopping them from digging the Crossrail tunnel right across it.
      And the diameter of Crossrail tunnels is far larger than hyperloop.
      So that's not a problem.

    8. Re:Raises Many Questions by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Not if you dig deep enough. I mean yeah, a 5-minute ride in an express elevator at each end does increase the total travel time considerably, but it's still a lot faster than driving.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re:Raises Many Questions by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Not a problem != problem that can be surmounted with huge expenditures and careful planning.

      The phrase you are looking for is 'Not impossible'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Raises Many Questions by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I knew what this was before I clicked.

    11. Re:Raises Many Questions by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Water table. It's less of a distinction than for tunnels that have to hold vacuum anyhow. Sure makes the digging part more complicated.

      Definitely an issue in NYC.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:Raises Many Questions by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Yeaaaahh, that's true. But it's _really_ deep. The water tunnels are 600 ft down, and there are subway stations as far down as 180ft (with very trouble-prone elevators).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Raises Many Questions by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      And NYC continues to construct subways, train tunnels, and water tunnels - at incredible expense.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    14. Re:Raises Many Questions by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Even the subway is up to 180 ft down. Try 600ft.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:Raises Many Questions by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Yeah no kidding! They dig much more and Manhattan will just float away on the tide!

    16. Re:Raises Many Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly would you have to run a Hyperloop more than 3 times the depth of the very deepest part of the subway line? That's a little like saying you have to build homes 90' from the property line despite virtually all homes being within 30' of the line.

    17. Re:Raises Many Questions by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It needs careful planning. But it doesn't necessarily add much to expenditures. They've got to dig the tunnel according to a plan regardless.

    18. Re:Raises Many Questions by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      A large part of the planning is rerouting other things. Which isn't free. More an issue shallower, but costs go up with depth, so tradeoffs with imperfect information.

      Always surprises. They haven't always kept as good underground maps as they do these days.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re:Raises Many Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a really fucking stupid dumbass.

    20. Re:Raises Many Questions by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I'm trying to stay concise, but I'll spell it out for you.

      NYC has a TON of underground infrastructure that goes down as deep as 600-800 ft (depending on where you are and how you measure). For a train traveling 700MPH, you are going to need to pick a depth and more or less stick to it over a distance as small as Manhattan (maybe 3 miles wide at most?). The higher you go, the more trouble you will have finding a clear straight run. You can't get too close to the infrastructure above, or the rock will not support the weight and you'll have to make expensive reinforcements. For instance, when putting the LIRR (Long Island Railroad) connection in at Grand Central ("East Side Access" if you want to Google it), they opted to dig 140 feet down so that they would not have to reinforce the foundations of the station above. The F train is about 100 feet down so it can pass under the other subways. I can tell you from experience that the escalator ride is no fun down to the F train, and I would avoid it if I could. Sometimes the escalator would be out of service and you got to use them as stairs. Fun. There is an infamous subway entrance at Washington Heights 180ft deep that is accessible only by elevator (well, also stairs). The elevators are troublesome and one of them has - I shit you not - a human operator who just sits there and presses the automatic buttons. The other (identical) elevators are fully automatic, they just still hire this one guy. Sorry, tangent.

      Finally, there is the water infrastructure. It is the deepest as far as I know, down something like 600ft. Maybe there is some way to "thread the needle" and get the hyperloop tunnel between the water infrastructure and the subway infrastructure. That'd be great, but it's still really far down. If he can dig all the way from Washington to NYC it will seem like a relatively minor thing, but lets not pretend it's trivial. It took them 4 decades to dig the water tunnel.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    21. Re:Raises Many Questions by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Yeaaaahh, that's true. But it's _really_ deep. The water tunnels are 600 ft down, and there are subway stations as far down as 180ft (with very trouble-prone elevators).

      At least the elevator problem is solved. No cables, so even at ridiculous depths, it works, and can move quickly.

  3. Musk is python fan? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Next: 'Tunnelling from Godalming to Java'? Jumping the English channel? Eating a cathedral? Summarizing Proost?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. Shark Jumping Transport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since there does not a exist a single government official (nor even a single government body) that is authorized to approve such a project, can Musk fanbois finally admit that at least *some* of his hype is unfiltered bullshit?

    1. Re:Shark Jumping Transport by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      My guess is, someone agreed to read his proposal. Nothing more. . .

  5. Inaccurate summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hyperloop, an ultrafast method of travel first developed by Musk in 2013

    I believe it was proposed to Musk in 2013, not developed. Unless I've been hiding under a rock, to date, the hyperloop has yet to be developed. Show me a functioning deployment scale test setup at the very least if you want to claim it's been "developed" and even then you're still missing the date.

    1. Re:Inaccurate summary is inaccurate by doconnor · · Score: 1

      The idea of running a train through a tube in a vacuum has been talked about for decades as the fastest and most efficient mode of transportation.

    2. Re:Inaccurate summary is inaccurate by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

      The fastest and most efficient mode of transportation is falling.

    3. Re:Inaccurate summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd believe it was very efficient for moving the vehicle, but I consider efficiency over the entire system. And though moving the vehicle would be efficient, I highly doubt maintaining the vacuum would be particularly efficient. I've heard of creating "on demand" vacuum, that seems even more so inefficient. Toss in the maintenance nightmare and yeah. Have a lot of the Musk fanbois never used a vacuum chamber?

    4. Re:Inaccurate summary is inaccurate by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, read about some oddball "twistor" physics which proposed just that. Falling through vacuum after a generated physics event.

      Of course, generating the "twistor" field that transposes your capsule into an alternate reality where Earth is not there, but "shadow gravity" from other realities is. . .

      . . . .is left as an exercise for alert minds. . .

    5. Re:Inaccurate summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, can you explain how one can fall between say New York and DC?

      Falling is only an efficient form of transportation if you want to go straight down.

  6. Really? by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The hyperloop, an ultrafast method of travel first developed by Musk in 2013"

    By "first developed" you presumably mean "applied some minor tweaks and a 'cool' name to a basic concept that's been around for over two centuries"?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Certainly Musk might end up being the first person to get a practical vacuum tube transportation network working, but crediting him with developing the idea himself seems a bit much.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Really? by eepok · · Score: 1

      By applied, you presumably mean "had some ideas to tweak other peoples' aged ideas"? He had yet to "develop" anything except for very small values of "develop". If he has "developed" the Hyperloop, then I have "developed" a universal job search engine-- that being I've thought about it a lot and made some rough sketches of some relational DBs.

    2. Re:Really? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I first saw it in Genesis 2 in the 1970's (Mariette Hartley as a two navel mutant) and a very young john saxon. I liked the idea so much that I had a global hyperloop in my post nuclear war non apocolyptic Superhero 2044 roleplaying game.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re: Really? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      People have had the idea and mothballed it almost 2 centuries ago. Turns out physics' a bitch and making vacuums requires lots of energy (potential energy, laws of thermodynamics and all that). At least last time they tried underground where you have a bunch of dirt to contain the system instead of a tube of sheet metal.

      Musk got around to having a single car go 50mph in a tunnel after 4 years. Doesn't bode well for the project.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Really? by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Innovation is very little about having completely new ideas. It's about execution. Many people might have fantasised about vacuum tube transport, but Musk is the one to actually get people started on doing it for real. That's the real achievement.

      Completely new ideas are very, very rare.

    5. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story of Apple.

    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who's seen Ghostbusters II will have heard of the Beach Pneumatic Transit System, which ran in New York from 1870 to 1873:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beach_Pneumatic_Transit

    7. Re:Really? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Innovation is very little about having completely new ideas. It's about execution. Many people might have fantasised about vacuum tube transport, but Musk is the one to actually get people started on doing it for real. That's the real achievement.

      No, it's a real achievement if and only if it works. Right now, its still an idea. And, certainly, in 2013, it was very much just an idea. Maybe one day it will work, and maybe it will have been one of the projects encouraged by Musk that did so. But let's not lose sight of the fact that the team that got it to work will almost certainly not include Musk, and the ones who overcome the details to make it work should be the ones we praise on a nerdy site.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely new ideas are very, very rare.

      No they're not. Those that get implemented are though.

    9. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. He is the Thomas Edison of our age. Thomas Edison managed invention and yet is frequently taught as one of America's greatest inventors.

    10. Re:Really? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No it's more than an idea. There's an actual company working on it and building things.

      What's the last project Musk came up with that didn't work?

    11. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every novel implementation, there's probably 10000-1000000 ideas about them, probably more.

    12. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barely started doing it for real. All I have seen so far is a few small carts pushed down a tube that did not run on their own power. Also the explosive decompression problem.

    13. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's more than an idea. There's an actual company working on it and building things.

      Cool. Where can I see these things they are building?

      What's the last project Musk came up with that didn't work?

      Tesla Autopilot.

    14. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one crucial difference though: Edison actually invented several things and Musk has so far not invented anything.

    15. Re:Really? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Hyperloop one's test hyperloop is in Nevada.

      Autopilot works just fine. It's shipping in Teslas right now.

  7. Access points by captaindomon · · Score: 1

    Multiple access points is the scariest thing to me. That means that while you are going upteen jillion miles per minute, you might accidentally have an elevator in front of you in the tunnel. That makes the security engineering way more complex.

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re:Access points by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Branch off the main line for the elevators. Like a pitstop. Then all you have to do is make sure there are no collisions coming out of the pitstop back onto the mainline. And that's technically trivial.

    2. Re:Access points by Immerman · · Score: 2

      I would assume the elevator doesn't actually intersect the main tunnel, but rather an underground station/siding where loaded cars would then wait for an opening large enough for them to merge into the through traffic.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  8. 29 minutes vs. TSA by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    Remember two hours of groping, humiliation and 4th Amendment violation.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:29 minutes vs. TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think there will be no TSA? It seems to be just as vulnerable as airlines, if not more.

    2. Re:29 minutes vs. TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember two hours of made up issues that have zero basis in reality.

  9. This sounds like nothing by Headw1nd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So I have some friends who are of the belief that Musk is just a consummate shyster, and I have disagreed, pointing to promising results with SpaceX and favorable sales from Tesla. This kind of talk makes me believe that there might be something to their concerns. I assume "verbal approval" from the gov't means that he asked someone (who knows who) if in theory he could do this and they said "sure", which counts for all of nothing. What this doesn't sound like is the well-established plan of an enterprise that is going to go forward.

    1. Re:This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe. Musk has stated that there is still "a lot" of work before formal approval, but he thinks it might go fast. One reason he can be optimistic is that Jared Kushner's Office of American Innovation has proposed doing just what Mush wants to do (but they said high-speed rail) and expediting permitting of such projects.

      Quote:

      In terms of infrastructure and jobs, the team plans to focus on four areas. The first is reforming the permit system for large-scale projects, which, as it stands, can take more than eight years to push through (one goal is to get this closer to two years). The second is what the O.A.I. calls “transformative projects,” or cutting-edge solutions that would “unleash a significant amount of economic growth,” the official explained, such as building an underground high-speed rail system across the Northeast corridor

      http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/06/jared-kushner-swat-team

    2. Re:This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original AC here again.

      I must note that my comment refers to the mysterious Mr. "Mush." I don't know about this Musk guy. Mush gets shit done, though, apparently.

    3. Re: This sounds like nothing by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Tesla was a good idea because the market wanted it and Musk capitalized on it. Same goes for his previous ideas. He's right that the market needs a high speed system between cities but Musk just has ideas, engineers do the work, and making an electric car is relatively easy even though it is far from his original promise (first model was going to have 300+ miles of range and second model was going to be affordable by families), it's taken many iterations to get Teslas to the point they are.

      Making electric cars go really, really fast in a really thin tube is harder than just making them go relatively slow (highway speeds). Vacuums are also really really hard, ask the LHC.

      Musk is proposing vacuums of much greater volume than the LHC which took two weeks to evacuate to be created in a matter of minutes.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re: This sounds like nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      LHC needs a complete vacuum. Hyperloop doesn't. It just needs low pressure. Pressure in the ballpark that a high flying passenger jet would encounter.

    5. Re:This sounds like nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Musk has succeeded at a lot of amazing things. And not so many public failures. So why on earth would anyone call him a shyster?

      Smells of jealousy. A lot of geeks hate people that are successful.

    6. Re: This sounds like nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Tesla was a good idea because the market wanted it and Musk capitalized on it."

      Absolutely not true. Musk essentially created the successful EV market. Previously electric vehicles were thought of as slow and heavy and ugly. OK for commercial vehicles and for cars for rich environmentalists. And that's it. Very small niches.

      Musk created the perception with the Roadster and then the Model S, that electric cars could be very fast and luxurious. It's almost totally down to him showing the way that nearly every other manufacturer has now gone all out to produce electric cars.

      You may not remember now, but the idea of packing a sports car with lithium-ion laptop batteries was novel when the Tesla Roadster was launched.

    7. Re: This sounds like nothing by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Still HL, per km, is about 9x the volume of the LHC (assuming a 10m diameter tube).

    8. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla's sales figures shows it's a massive failure.

    9. Re:This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting
    10. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The conceived Hyperloop design requires a pressure of under 100 Pa. That's closer to the "edge of space" than something a passenger (or even military) jet would encounter.

    11. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But LHC's vacuum is about ten orders of magnitude smaller, a whole different regime. At least a closer comparison would be LIGO which has a 4 km long, 1.2 m diameter vacuum (although still ultrahigh vacuum, while the hyperloop vacuum is pretty crappy by physics experiments standards).

    12. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was definitely RISKY but definitely NOT novel. The idea that you would get people to buy them for huge sums of money is what was "novel" and I will give him credit for that. He is 110% marketing and 50% substance with every idea he has ever had.

      All his ideas are government supported and subsidized. All his ideas cater to big and powerful decision makers. All his ideas live or die at the hands of subsidies or budget appropriations.

      But most importantly, all his ideas could have been executed much better by other people. Its just that no one else thought people could be so stupid as to entrust billions for the development of electric cars and billions for other investments with no return potential. So I give him credit for that - scamming people into making poor investments is what he is great at, nothing else. You must remember, Tesla, despite all the subsidies, STILL loses money on every car it sells. The billions in capital invested will never receive a return and certainly not an adequate one.

      As I always say - the Tesla "car" is very real and very impressive but throw me billions of dollars to play with and I can hire engineers to make cool shit too. Just because *something* popped out of the billions doesn't make it a success.

    13. Re: This sounds like nothing by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      People also seem to ignore his initiative in battery production when speaking ill of him. Opening that factory is a benefit to mankind in ways too profound to properly describe.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    14. Re: This sounds like nothing by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Tesla's success had far more to do with launching at the perfect time for li-ion batteries finally becoming affordable to pack a sports car with than any other reason. And I'm not sure if that is causal, or not. I'm not sure of how predictable the cost of batteries was, nor how long it took to establish Tesla.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    15. Re: This sounds like nothing by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      The market was there. Plenty of people wanted an electric car. Musk was just the first to deliver a product that was acceptable to the market (although arguably Prius went half way there).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re: This sounds like nothing by x0ra · · Score: 1

      The 1 millibar envisioned by HL is still 99.99% vacuum, which is still about 100T/kg of air to pump.

    17. Re: This sounds like nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Like I said, only a niche market of environmentalists. Tesla made EVs cool.

    18. Re:This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk doesn't finish what he starts. He makes some mockups, maybe sells some service or product to enthusiasts, gains investments, then bails for the next project. What he works on doesn't get finished. What he promises doesn't happen. He gets richer and richer off the hard earned dollars of people that believe in hype. He always has an excuse. He always frames failures as successes. He manipulates, deflects, and does every tactic that an MBA marketer with a sense of nerd culture would do, because that is what he is.

    19. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Because nearly every EV on the road isn't trying to cater to the "luxury" car buyer. You must be only following the ones who are selling for 70k+ USD.

      And Musk didn't design, develop or imagine the Roadster. He was just a guy with funding who road the coattails of better engineers.

    20. Re: This sounds like nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he just casually launched the internet payments service called PayPal at just the right time. And perhaps he just casually created Space-X at the right time. And Solar City. And the Power Wall business.

      Or perhaps he's really good at spotting something that's possible and important, that no one else is doing.

    21. Re:This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it is obvious at this point that we didn't elect a President but instead elected a Presidential Family Council (much in the same manner as the Christian god is a trinity). Elon apparently has approval from the Kushner aspect of the President. Whether having the approval of this President means anything is yet to be seen.

    22. Re: This sounds like nothing by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Tesla made them cool.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re:This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paypal is amazing? Refining Edison's electric motor is amazing?

      Yeah, no.

    24. Re:This sounds like nothing by Dread_ed · · Score: 2

      Easy explanation. This is market testing. Chuck the idea out to the public, watch what is said, use the results to sharpen the point of your thrust, which comes later.

      A big headline creates waves. Study the waves and you see the obstacles and advocates to actual implementation of the idea well before it is "make or break" time.

      Operating in a vacuum is good for the line itself, not for developing the line.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    25. Re: This sounds like nothing by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It wasn't novel, plenty of other car manufacturers were trying at the moment, not necessarily US-based, but Citroen, Peugot and Mitsubishi all had EVs before Tesla and Fisker also existed.

      Most US car manufacturers however didn't want to go that route because they would lose the franchise which makes it's money on the back of fixing combustion engines, electric cars all but obviate the need for expensive engine repairs. Most EV's in the US at that time thus were hybrids and there was at least one other company that tried what Tesla did and failed miserably but Europe and Japan had plenty of plug-in electric vehicles.

      Tesla initially used a Lotus frame which was simply repurposed and I remember Bugatti (I think) had a demo of a full-electric drivetrain as well when Tesla came on.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    26. Re: This sounds like nothing by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      A high flying passenger jet isn't really a good comparison for a number of reasons: it's a container of higher pressure air (it's relatively easy and easy on materials to contain 1 atmosphere of pressure - think about how you'd get a latex balloon and some wire to contain one atmosphere at 50,000 feet. Now think about how you'd use the same materials to keep the same amount of air at one atmosphere 30 feet below the surface of the ocean...);

      Another problem is that passenger jets don't try to keep a perfect one bar of pressure when they're flying at high altitudes, which is why divers are told not to fly within 24 hours of a dive.

      And a final problem is that, really, the pressure at 50,000 feet is about 0.1 atmospheres, whereas the pressure in a hyperloop tube will be a significant fraction of that. That said, building a container to protect 10% of an atmosphere from 100% outside probably isn't substantially different from building one to protect 1% of an atmosphere, it requires compressive strength only around 10% higher.

      It's a fairly massive engineering challenge to keep 400 miles of tubing big enough to contain a Tesla Model 3 at a pressure of 1% (or even 10%) of an atmosphere. I'm not saying it's impossible, but... it's certainly going to be expensive and/or will leak rather a lot requiring substantial energy expenditures just to maintain the vacuum.

      I'm personally more bothered about the fact it'll be a horrible traveling experience, but the engineering does seem a little off the wall from where I'm standing.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    27. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, 1 millibar is 99.9%, you're off by an order of magnitude.

      This is easily reachable by mechanical pumps, which makes it much cheaper in terms of equipment. UHV setups usually need special oil free mechanical pumps and multiple stages of pumps in series to get below the millitorr range. A previous story had comments working out the electrical costs as around $10 /km for initial pump out, and trivial amounts after that as we've gotten really good at making vacuum tight welds ( large vessels leaking less than a cubic meter per second at 10^-12 bar, which is effectively zero at 1 millibar).

    28. Re: This sounds like nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about the Citroen C1 Ev'ie. It was an aftermarket conversion of the C1, not produced by Citroen. And in any case didn't come out till the year after the Tesla Roadster.

      The Tesla Roadster certainly was novel. You are misremembering if you think otherwise.

    29. Re: This sounds like nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You are confusing 2 different tunnel technologies. The Hyperloop is passenger capsules running in a low pressure environment for long distance use. Seperate from that the Boring company has released a concept video of cars (Model 3s in the video) running through tunnels on skates. That is just tunnels at atmospheric pressure.

    30. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He needs to try get around the ridiculous road blocks we have currently. This is a way to get things moving.

    31. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previously electric vehicles were thought of as slow and heavy and ugly

      Are you trying to suggest here that the Tesla Model X neither ugly nor heavy?

      OK for commercial vehicles and for cars for rich environmentalists. And that's it. Very small niches.

      Well, Tesla's target audience is a niche consisting of (a) people who have the money and are willing to pay for the virtue signalling and (b) markets where BEVs are strongly favoured by the tax regime.

      Musk created the perception with the Roadster and then the Model S, that electric cars could be very fast and luxurious

      they are indeed fast, which is an easy thing to accomplish with electric traction, but luxureous? Have you ever been in one? Opels and Kias have nicer interiors.

      You may not remember now, but the idea of packing a sports car with lithium-ion laptop batteries was novel when the Tesla Roadster was launched

      Only in the same way that equipping a mobile phone with a camera was a novel idea at some point. It is an obvious application that would happen at some point when the technology was ready and the price was sufficiently low for the market.

      Tesla has made a product that a number of people are genuinely very happy with and that is great for them. I just wish the media and Musk's followers wouldn't overhype everything Elon Musk does so much. He has done some interesting things, but nothing is as revolutionary or as noval as he makes it out to be.

    32. Re: This sounds like nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "causal" != "casual"

    33. Re: This sounds like nothing by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      Total 2016 vehicle sales in U.S.17.55 million. Tesla sales in U.S. 45,000 units. What, exactly, is a "small niche" to you?

      Sources: http://www.latimes.com/busines... and http://insideevs.com/tesla-mot...

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    34. Re: This sounds like nothing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Tesla is not in a niche. They are in the early adopter phase of the technology adoption curve. A curve that will have virtually all cars shipped being shipped as EVs within a decade or two.

      Up to now, they've only shipped luxury priced cars. This Friday their first affordable car ships.

    35. Re: This sounds like nothing by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I mean, Solar City was saved because he propped it up with Tesla stock. And the Power Wall business isn't a success yet. Tesla hasn't shown it can really scale faster than Ford et. al can catch up.

      SpaceX is interesting... Musk founded it because he wanted to buy space on rockets and couldn't. It's one of those "I'm rich enough to build a company to get the product I want made" situations. If the rich person is lucky, it takes off and they get richer. If not, they get all the overstock.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  10. NE US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They have plenty of public transportation as it it.

    We need something to go from the E Coast to W Coast.

    1. Re:NE US by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      We have that. It's called the Interstate Highway System.

    2. Re:NE US by enjar · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are flying machines that can whisk you between coasts in about six hours. I know it sounds like science fiction, but it's true. It's even safer than driving! Even better, there are also options for stopping in cities BETWEEN the coasts! There are even well-developed electronic systems for procuring travel tickets at times convenient to you!

    3. Re:NE US by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Between parking and TSA and layovers, you'll want to add 6 more hours.

    4. Re:NE US by godrik · · Score: 1

      If you are looking at TGV tracks, they typically go 200mph. On a New York-Seattle trip, you are still talking about a 14 hours trip. And the amount of infrastructure you need is overwhelming if you need to connect most of the major city of the west to the major cities on the east.

      Hyperloop might be faster, but I doubt you'll be able to maintain a 600mph on that kind of length and for the kind of traffic we are talking about. And the infrastructure cost would be even higher.

      Frankly for a trip of that length, flying may be as good as it gets.

    5. Re:NE US by enjar · · Score: 1

      Well, even 12 hours still beats the time to drive or take a train across the US. City clusters like Boston/Baltimore/NYC/Philadelphia/DC can make a lot of sense for rail -- the TSA/parking/delay of air travel, plus the location of downtown/business district train stations that hook up to other transport make a lot of sense, in addition to the population density. Getting from NYC to LA on a train 12 hours, you'd need to average 250 MPH. That's a lot of track, a lot of fuel, a lot of tunnel, a lot of states, a lot of populated areas, a lot of NIMBY to get through.

    6. Re:NE US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Between parking and TSA and layovers, you'll want to add 0 more hours.

      Direct flights don't have layover. And security doesn't take long.

    7. Re:NE US by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Considering the Hyperloop is trying to hit 750mph or so, that wouldn't be a hard average to reach even with a few stops.

    8. Re:NE US by enjar · · Score: 1

      Boring tunnels through the continental US presents a bit of challenge, though.

    9. Re:NE US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There are flying machines that can whisk you between coasts in about six hours.

      The problem is jetliners are extremely polluting and the soot they spew is highly damaging, because it is ejected right into the troposphere (10-11km height) where is also hurts the ozone layer, besides causing greenhouse effect.

      To put things into perspective, a typical B-737 or A-320 plane develops about 60.000 hp and carries 180 or so people at app. 850km/h speed. Meanwhile, a japanese or french style electrified bullet-train uses some 15.000 kW (20.000 hp) of power to transport about 550 people at 270-300km/h. Thus, the plane transports 1/3rd as much people as 3x larger speed (thereby about equal carrying capacity in theory), but with 3x larger energy expenditure per passenger.

      Furthermore, energy for electrified bullet trains can come from clean(er) sources, like hydro dams, wind farms, nuclear or even natural gas based powerplants, causing very litle detriment to the natural environment. In contrast, jetliners must burn JP fuel, which is essentially a glorified grade of diesel fuel. At best, one coud use bio-diesel fuel, but it is still hydrocarbon and forces lots of AGW. Soviets tested and found liquified natural gas powered jetliner impractical and fully electric planes are not realistic beyond the very light biz plane (i.e. 10k lbs / 4500kg) weigtht category.

      Thus, flying should be discourages or even banned over land and planes should be the mode of transport for crossing oceans, since ships are realistically too slow for carrying people. But over land, high-speed railways should be built for people to travel, with electrified train propusion powered by cleaner (as clean as possible) energy sources. If we want to leave a liveable planet Earth for our sons and grandsons, we owe them doing that much.

    10. Re:NE US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever taken the Amtrack from Boston to DC? It's a special hell.

    11. Re: NE US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If done as a sleeper then it might not be so bad.

      "Dinner in the diner; nothing could be finer than to have your ham and eggs in Carolina".

  11. Taxation without representation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elon Musk cashes in without any public discussion, again.

    1. Re:Taxation without representation by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Public discussion is not representation. You elect representatives to Congress, and they represent you.

    2. Re:Taxation without representation by mspohr · · Score: 1

      That's a very naive view of the way our government works. Representatives work for corporations who bribe them. At election time they use the money to put up TV advertisements telling ignorant voters that they will do all kinds of good things for them. After the election, they go back to doing the work of corporations.
      The GOP and Trump have perfected this model of winning elections.
      So, if you're a corporation looking for government money all you need to do is get "approval" from the Trump mafia running the country. Apparently Musk got approval from Jared Kushner so that's all he needs.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    3. Re:Taxation without representation by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Then don't say "Taxation without representation". Say "taxation without public review". Say what you mean, don't use a common saying to mean something other than what it means.

    4. Re:Taxation without representation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a very naive view of the way our government works. Representatives work for corporations who bribe them. At election time they use the money to put up TV advertisements telling ignorant voters that they will do all kinds of good things for them. After the election, they go back to doing the work of corporations.
      The GOP and Trump have perfected this model of winning elections.
      So, if you're a corporation looking for government money all you need to do is get "approval" from the Trump mafia running the country. Apparently Musk got approval from Jared Kushner so that's all he needs.

      Yep, cuz professional Democrat politicians get all their campaign funds by running sidewalk lemonade stands and car washes...

    5. Re:Taxation without representation by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      He's going well underground. He's not going through your (or city's) property.

      Why the hell would you care?

      Or could it be that you are just one of those whose gut instinct is to ban anything new, because it is, goddamit, new! and bound to be terribly dangerous.

      Stop being such a whiner.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  12. Track record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on his track record over the years, I'd think twice before calling bullshit on Musk. He consistently delivers.

    1. Re:Track record by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. Musk does come up with a lot of wild ideas but he has an uncanny record of success.
      Really, start a car company making electric cars? Are you crazy?
      Really, start a rocket company to compete with NASA, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, etc.?
      The shorts keep attacking Tesla and keep losing piles of money. Not a good idea to short Musk.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  13. The one profitable Amtrak route by edtice1559 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This seems to be the one route in the US where a train service can make money so it's no surprise that he *wants* to build this route. If he could bore under existing railway rights of way, it should be a relatively simple project from an administrative standpoint (no worrying about easements et cetera). The tracks would then carry only freight and the number of tracks would be reduced in favor of green space and walking trails. Amtrak would go bankrupt and there would never be a public train service in this country again. I'll let others opine whether this is good or bad but certainly would be the outcome.

    1. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by bobbied · · Score: 4, Informative

      Problem is that at the speeds the Hyper loop is supposed to go, the existing right of way with all the twists and turns is has won't work very well. Musk needs as straight of a shot as he can manage to make the high speeds comfortable for the passengers. As it stands now, it would be one heck of a roller coaster ride to do that trip in 29 min using the existing right of way.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by Topwiz · · Score: 2

      The existing Acela train doesn't go very fast in some areas because of sharp turns and areas where the tracks are too close to each other.

    3. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I think that's why he wants to build a tunnel.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    4. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the existing right of way with all the twists and turns is has won't work very well.

      please pull out a map of the acela route from NYC to DC and point out these places

      hint: they don't exist

    5. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean, "as straight a shot as he can manage"? Inserting "of" where it doesn't belong doesn't improve anything.

    6. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tunnels aren't straight you stupid dumbass.

    7. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by kenh · · Score: 1

      It's an underground railway/maglev system, it can be as straight as he wants it to be.

      --
      Ken
    8. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by kenh · · Score: 1

      The tracks would then carry only freight and the number of tracks would be reduced in favor of green space and walking trails.

      You can't have walking trails alongside active freight lines, and most places in the northeast are single-track already, not many places where there are multiple parallel tracks for any meaningful distance.

      Amtrak would go bankrupt and there would never be a public train service in this country again.

      Amtrak IS bankrupt, as evidenced by the massive subsidies we shovel into the system each year.

      --
      Ken
    9. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not if it follows the existing right of way like GP was claiming it could.

      Pick one of the following:
      1. Follows right-of-way
      2. Is straight

    10. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your missing the point. The original poster claimed that they would tunnel following the existing twisty rail line to avoid many of the issues.

    11. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by edtice1559 · · Score: 2

      I guess it depends on your definition of "alongside." Here's an example of the Conotton Creek Trail. https://www.google.com/maps/pl... The Northeast corridor is part of that subsidy. Take it away and we'll have to either let Amtrak stop operating or make up the lost profits in additional subsidies.

    12. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by istartedi · · Score: 1

      If the hyperloop tech fails, that straight shot alone would have value. Amtrak has to limit speeds because the old right-of-way is full of turns. Tracks were there over 100 years ago, when nothing went that fast.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    13. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but Amtrak went bankrupt decades ago. There's no reason to believe that less revenue is going to cause anything to happen to them other than more government money to prop them up.

    14. Re:The one profitable Amtrak route by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Amtrak is in a catch-22. They can't shut down money losing lines because they need to votes from the empty states to keep up their subsidies.

      The profitable/breakeven parts need to be privatized or spun to a NGO. The rest needs to be shut down, yesterday. It's a useless money pit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re: The one profitable Amtrak route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP used a common construction for the phrase.

    16. Re: The one profitable Amtrak route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that it would push more freight onto roads, and heavy freight significantly damages roads. The subsidy needs to be considered against the cost of additional road building, maintenance, and secondary effects, positive and negative.

      There is also a danger that removal of some lines leads to fragmentation of the network such that previously profitable lines become unprofitable.

      In the UK the new rail lines being proposed in a few instances seem to be replicating routes torn up 50 years ago that now cannot be reused as the supporting infrastructure has gone, parts are now nature reserves, and so on, although that's probably less likely to happen in a less crowded country such as the USA

  14. Where Does It Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where does the hyperloop take you? Suicide booth?

  15. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will help us send anyone from Baltimore back from DC.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will help us send anyone from Baltimore back from DC.

      Quicker way to "drain the swamp" perhaps?

  16. Like, a president. Or someone who makes a diff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But no president of the US of A will never say something like that.
    A president has a value for his word. Because he is trustworthy, reliable, and does consider the implications of each word coming out of his mouth.

    1. Re:Like, a president. Or someone who makes a diff. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      you owe me a new sarcasm detector.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  17. Will it expand? by wolff000 · · Score: 1

    If they get it built I hope they expand to include more cities. Gettting to go from Boston to NY quickly would be great. Would much rather jump on this than a plane.

    --
    WTF?
    1. Re:Will it expand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having one run from Vancouver BC to Portland OR or even SF/LA and stops in between would be pretty boss.

    2. Re:Will it expand? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Gettting to go from Boston to NY quickly would be great.

      The Amtrak train takes 4 1/2 hours and costs about $50, the Accela train shaves an hour off that trip for a bit more.

      Flight time between Boston and NYC is about an hour and 11 minutes.

      How much are you willing to spend to shave some time off the above current travel times?

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Will it expand? by enjar · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the three or four bus companies that charge rock bottom fares, but seem to not catch on fire or run into as many things as the Fung Wah used to.

  18. Optimistic but not Realistic by PeteJanda · · Score: 1

    I love the optimism and derring-do. But I suspect Elon and his minions have zero experience with East Coast public works unions. Didn't NYC recently open a new subway station that took something like 20 years and a trillion dollars to finish (I exaggerate only slightly)?

  19. Verbal Approval? From who? For what? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Verbal approval from which government official for exactly what?

    It could be from the local dog catcher who agreed that he'd do his level best to convince all the animals under his control to help dig the holes?

    By the way... VERBAL approval means almost nothing... Heck, WRITTEN approval from the government is about worthless too... This only means that Musk had a conversation with somebody who said something Musk is interpreting to mean they agreed to something about this project. It could be as simple as "Yea, Mr. Musk, that sure sounds like an interesting idea. I hope we can give you approval to do that..."

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  20. "verbal [government] approval" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing. If it ain't in writing, it ain't approved. Also, which 'government'? I hate to break this to him, but he's talking about digging under several states and cities, all of which have their own local government.

  21. Many miles of solid rock. by swell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    New York City is built upon the North Atlantic Plate, a mass of solid rock extending from Canada and whose nearest boundary is in the mid Atlantic. The skyscrapers of the city have their foundations on that rock. It is difficult to imagine how the Boring machine would penetrate that mass. Certainly not at the affordable cost that has been mentioned here.

    While there have been smallish earthquakes in the area, a tunnel through solid rock should be relatively immune to such disturbances. Tunneling through California might be more of a risky venture.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:Many miles of solid rock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is difficult to imagine how the Boring machine would penetrate that mass.

      irish immigrants dug NYC subway tunnels with hand tools

    2. Re:Many miles of solid rock. by Whorhay · · Score: 3, Informative

      The solid rock substrate is unlikely to be a cause for concern. There have already been numerous tunnels dug all over the world using similar technology, as well as techniques far more ancient, through solid rock. I expect the economy gains will mostly come from the fact that the proposed hyper loop tunnels are very small compared to other bored tunnels. Consequently less rock has to be removed, and less materials used to line and seal the tunnel.

    3. Re:Many miles of solid rock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not through rock you fucking stupid dumbass.

    4. Re:Many miles of solid rock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. There is no way any regulator is going to allow a Hyperloop tunnel on its own - it will need secondary tunnels for emergency access (see Chunnel) and all that starts to drive up your costs considerably.

    5. Re:Many miles of solid rock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I assumed that instead of using tunnels it would just run over those bridges he just bought in New York.

    6. Re: Many miles of solid rock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not make it no wider than a person and send them through prone. It's only a half hour trip, so should be tolerable

  22. Re:Promotion of "A quick reference for posterity" by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    Ah! The original one was up-modded and its promotion down-modded! I guess that I am not the first programmer/engineer who isn't too good at promoting things :)

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  23. Re: Like, a president. Or someone who makes a diff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why isn't this modded +5 funny? In the times we are living in. Pshhh

  24. LOL @ Verbal by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    A verbal green light means almost nothing---some guy with some authority somewhere likes it. It doesn't give Musk so much as a construction permit.

    Don't mistakte this for a lack of enthusiasm. I like the Hyperloop concept, and American transit desperately needs modernization.

    But if I had to bet on whether this will be in service within 5-10 years... I would have to bet against it.

    Musk needs three states and DC to agree---on top of the feds remaining unobtrusive (EPA, DOT, and DHS in particular). I hope he has either luck or contacts.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  25. What about Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tunnel or wall?

    1. Re:What about Canada by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Shwayze Train!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  26. Comment from Article Said it Best by Koreantoast · · Score: 2
    This quote from the article said it best:

    Approval needed from: Federal DOT; 6 states; 17 counties; numerous cities; hundreds of elected officials. Definitely happening rapidly. @yfreemark

    1. Re:Comment from Article Said it Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus the many thousands of property owners. A Californian might not understand that in this part of the country we own the mineral rights (generally) and have ownership of the dirt beneath our land.

    2. Re:Comment from Article Said it Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure? The gas folks haven't come through Maryland yet? I know most of Pennsylvania and WV has already been sold off. Those big companies would be happy to sell Elon a deal for tunnels above the level that they are interested in. Free money to them.

  27. Re:Promotion of "A quick reference for posterity" by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Why bother? You seem committed to ignoring and belittling people that poke at the tissue-thin objections you raise.

    There are still numerous problems to be solved - just not the ones you're pointing out.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  28. Intended irony [Re:Raises Many Questions] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, there is almost nothing underground in NYC.

    except for all of the subway lines and the water mains and the sewage drains and the utility cables and the many tunnels to NJ and other boroughs

    I expect that the original comment was intended as sarcastic.

    On /. it is sometimes hard to tell, but: whooosh.

  29. A technical question by AlanObject · · Score: 1

    The last time a hyper loop thread came up I learned some things about it from links someone posted about the problems associated with establishing and maintaining a vacuum vessel need for this application. The explosive energy in such a system is indeed daunting. Even the most trivial bit of sabotage, let alone run-of-the-mill failures can set it off.

    Since then I haven't seen any convincing answers to those issues. You just don't need to be very advanced in physics to understand them. Does anyone here have any explanations or links to explanations about how this problem can be addressed?

    I'll admit to being something of a Musk fanboi but I am not willing to throw all sense to the wind because of it. I don't want a flamewar I just would like to know because if there is an answer it is well outside my intuition.

    1. Re:A technical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The capsules are quite small and robust compared to a train car or jumbo jet. And they are able to limp to safety in at least two different ways under several different kinds of failures. I would rather discuss how problems can be solved than how a project is not feasible, but that's just basic engineering philosophy. There are people who say something can't be done, and there are people who do them. For example, the vacuum issue might mitigated by sealing sections of track so you may only need to keep three sections in high vacuum at a time, while the rest are pumped for leaks. Perhaps there are even better options that take more than the 5 minutes of effort I spent to imagine.

    2. Re:A technical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also haven't seen any refutations to the (seemingly) very significant scientific hurdles a project like this would impose.

      It just seems to be pre-supposed that Musk definitely knows what he's doing here, and that's very worrying to me.

      If anyone can refute the seemingly huge hurdles of maintaining a multiple mile long vacuum (or vacuum-ish) tube, as well as the other issues touched upon by videos like the ones Thunderfoot has made, it would be appreciated.

    3. Re:A technical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't have to be a vacuum. airplanes don't fly in a vacuum. air-pressure is fairly cheap and easy to maintain (modern buildings do it all the time with air-conditioning).

      boring through rock... that's a challenge, but no reason it cannot be automated---and if it is automated, by that point it's just energy/time/boring equipment cost... no reason you cannot make a boring machine that's 99.9% automated, that moves at say 1-foot-an-hour... powered by solar energy (yes, long wires, etc.) One such machine may take 100 years to go from NYC to DC... so do the job in 20 sections, and complete the "deep-underground through the rock tunnel" in 5 years.

    4. Re:A technical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, I suspect nice, solid rock is one of the better scenarios for a hyperloop. I'd guess they'd force a sealer as deep into the rock as possible forming a near bomb proof vacuum vessel. The rock would be very bomb resistant. And blast waves can't propagate through vacuum, so the only blast wave propagation of concern would be through the rock.

      In tunnels through loose substrate, you'd be shooting something into the substrate to solidify it as well.

      In other words, many of the above ground problems go away. Even earthquake issues are reduced underground. The highly damaging surface waves aren't present once you get down aways. The main points of difficulty underground are at the actual faults where slippage can occur. This is much more limited and, most importantly, predictable.

    5. Re:A technical question by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Target pressure is around 100Pa, which is 99.99% of a vacuum. Next question ?

    6. Re:A technical question by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Boring is not the problem, mitigating the hundreds of thousands of things which can go wrong on a 100m long machine full of high pressure lines is the problem... Same with automated driving, cruising on the highway in calm weather or in bumper to bumper situation is easy, dealing with mechanical failure 500km from the nearest city or dealing with extreme road condition is.

    7. Re:A technical question by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Hundreds of mile long tunnel would be subject to something even worst than petty bombs; it would be subject to earth's tectonic. and all it take to break a vacuum is a *tiny* crack...

    8. Re:A technical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hyper Loop isn't in Vacuum, just low pressure. Apparently survivable to humans, but not for long, so emergency exits/procedures need be in place. Like a plane with the oxygen masks, going roughly the same speeds, but is already on/under the ground so gravity and falling need not really be taken into account. There is no such thing as explosive decompression at the pressures being dealt with here.

    9. Re:A technical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is the same pressure differential as between 10 meters of water and the surface. Surely beyond our engineering capabilities. As you say, next question?

  30. I really cannot wait by bravecanadian · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For people to finally see through the reality distortion field around this guy... there is exactly 0 chance of a hyperloop being built to connect those cities any time soon.

    While we're at it, there is 0 chance he's going to colonize Mars in his lifetime, and 0 chance Tesla is going to dislodge the major car makers too.. they might make it as a battery company, I guess.

    Go ahead and mod me to oblivion.

    1. Re:I really cannot wait by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the Hyperloop on Mars announcement.

    2. Re:I really cannot wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I want to see "The Hyperloop to Mars announcement". Tim S.

      I'm waiting for the Hyperloop on Mars announcement.

    3. Re:I really cannot wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hyperloop to Mars?

    4. Re:I really cannot wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be mod'd to oblivion.

      While PayPal has it's warts, it changed banking and internet shopping.

      The Tesla Roadster changed the game. I'd argue he's too slow in ramping up production, given the preorders of the later models.

      They might make it as a battery company? Good lord man, he's got factories on different continents, multiple domestic and foreign investors, multiple car manufacturers buying his batteries, areas beyond cars using them. By itself, for battery backup and renewables, by most measures, he's already delivered. No "might" about it.

      "0 chance Tesla is going to dislodge the major car makers too."

      Well, that's cute. What's a major car manufacturer? He already sells and delivers more luxury cars than several big name established/legacy companies who purposeful supply constrain their product lines. Most "major" car manufactures also have absorbed multiple little car manufacturers and their names, so if you compare by brand and lineup instead of parent company, Tesla is doing fairly okay right now. If he gets production up to demand, he would already be on the edge of some of the major car manufactures, and will have done so in around 15 years. You are betting in the next 10-20 he won't be competing against those parent "major" auto companies?

      "there is 0 chance he's going to colonize Mars in his lifetime,"

      If he lives to 80, in 34 years, or around 2050, you think there is 0 chance there will be a colony on Mars?

      "I guess."

      I guess you come off immature and envious as hell.

      That "guess" is already better than most business starters or innovators ever do once in their lifetime. He'd have hit on 3 things for sure (PayPal, Tesla Motors, battery storage). With the energy players putting the squeeze on consumers for their own profitability, we could be approaching a tipping point where people start death spiraling the grid, and he's sitting pretty on both supplying the major energy players, the co-ops, and those who cut the utilities.

      btw, if he spent a tenth of his time on legislative chops and political prowess, like if they changed underground laws to bypass the political red tape bs, akin to deep level mining laws in some states bypassing traditional property rights but applied to utility and public works, he'd probably build a hyperloop and a geothermal system and a superconductive energy system alongside it a f u the naysayers like you. Hid distortion field, as you say, is also more about getting the possibility, the dream, in people's mind for consideration. Hell, it's not as if he has to do this in the US either.

      There are people like Goddard, and then there are assholes like you who shoot them down and let others and other nations effect the same idea decades later.

    5. Re:I really cannot wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your bold prediction is that Musk will only be very successful instead of incredibly successful.

      Congratulations, you're a completely useless asshole.

  31. I want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To take a ride on Blaine the Mono!

    Wheeeeee!!

  32. Re:Promotion of "A quick reference for posterity" by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    ignoring and belittling people

    I have never and will ever do such a thing. I do respect every single person enough to not ignore them unless under extreme circumstances (belittling?! I am not even sure that this is a real behaviour; for me, it is just something which certain people say as an attack to those disagreeing with them. I haven't in my whole life tried to belittle anyone, no idea how could I even start to do such a thing. I have met many people having really weird behaviours towards me, not sure if trying to belittle me, certainly nobody has ever succeeded). Hyperloop-related chats have proven to be very prone to such conditions and that's why I have plainly decided to remain passive. Your short post already includes a good sample of the problems which I am referring: "tissue-thin objections you raise" (?!) Tremendous engineering problems (beyond tremendous as far as haven't ever been tried) are tissue-thin for you?! There you have it: an abstract absolute critic to all what I think about this against I cannot say anything?!

    Any objective watcher should know immediately that there is no possible understanding here. I do accept that, plainly say so and wait for results (-> they would certainly prove me wrong). You don't respect my position and rely on the aforementioned absolute, abstract critic forcing me to answer and here it comes the infinite loop to nowhere once again.

    The reality is very simple: this is an abstract-assumptions-based project where most of people supporting it easily relies on said abstractions. I am pretty much the contrary to all this. I do accept that, why you cannot do it too? Why talking when no understanding would ever happen? Why getting involved in the kind of discussion which I don't like and whose point I cannot even understand? But this doesn't mean that I have to be afraid of having an opinion or tolerate always unmotivated critics.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  33. Re:Promotion of "A quick reference for posterity" by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    I prefer the version "I have/will never do such a thing" because it is less confusing.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  34. So it is like.... by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

    So it is like a series of tubes?

    Been there, done that.

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  35. trifecta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you want to connect up these three bad neighborhoods? To complete the crime trifecta?

    1. Re:trifecta by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      To put an end to local governments and have one large national government with the power in the hands of a few elites in DC.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  36. DC to NY needs more approvals than going to Mars by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is easier to get approval to send men to Mars than it does to build a tunnel from DC to NY.

  37. Why not some elevated portions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whoe thing doesn't need to be underground. Also, underwater option, along the coast?

  38. Hyperloop vs Japanese SCMaglev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan would like for SCMaglev to get the DC-NYC route. Japan has been working on the SCMaglev since the 70s, and finished its development only a few years ago. SCMaglev is going to become the maglev tech of the premier Tokyo-Osaka hsr line. Hyperloop was only announced a few years ago.

    1. Re:Hyperloop vs Japanese SCMaglev by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      It's not like there is a very limited resource here. 1000s of tunnels could fit. Why would we have just one?

  39. To what end? by kenh · · Score: 1

    Commuter flights from NYC to DC are 1 hour 10 minutes, tarmac to tarmac, this service will cut that to 29 minutes - but it will retain all the TSA delays, ticketing issues, etc - this will not be an interstate subway system where you just walk on/walk off...

    Of course, if it has to stop in Philly and Baltimore, each stop adds at least 15 minutes to the travel time, and there goes your time savings.

    --
    Ken
  40. Re:DC to NY needs more approvals than going to Mar by kenh · · Score: 2

    It is easier to get approval to send men to Mars than it does to build a tunnel from DC to NY.

    Space travel doesn't cross state lines.

    --
    Ken
  41. Re:DC to NY needs more approvals than going to Mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's make this an apples to apples comparison:

    It takes less approval to send a man from DC to NY than it does to send them to Mars.

  42. Jobs-ian genius by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course Elon Musk didn't get verbal approval for the entire track. Perhaps he had the merest hint of a suggestion from someone (DOT? Two people on city councils at either end?).

    Getting actual approval from all the different cities, states, counties, and regulatory bodies involved will be an enormous undertaking. The fastest way to get this sort of discussion happening at all of these levels is probably to... force people involved to deny it.

    A single tweet and suddenly you have multiple nationwide news articles and, most critically, everyone responsible for approval at every level talking about it. They're talking about it to nail down who said, but they're talking about it. As are all their constituents and peers.

    The largest hurdle when dealing with so many people in authority is simply tendency toward inaction. With a tweet, he has solved that. Forcing people to say "he won't be approved without following the process" removes the option of sitting on it silently whether out of apathy or to gain leverage.

    1. Re:Jobs-ian genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also has the possibility of making the very people that would need to approve it pissed at him. Its one thing to strip the pot when lack of progress is occurring on something that is being "actively discussed". Whole different thing to stir the pot before its even on the stove.

    2. Re:Jobs-ian genius by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      It's certainly a calculated move.

      People are going to be mad... but at least they're moving.

      And if the public is talking about it, then the people blocking it are going to have to justify it.

  43. Re:Verbal Approval? From who? For what? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    True, I once got verbal consent to DVR an NFL football game, rather than the express written consent I needed.

    Damned game didn't record.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  44. Wow. "no president... will never". So true!!! by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    I've rarely seen a double negative so aptly placed !!!!

  45. One law and one court case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it takes is one federal law saying that any tunnel that crosses state lines and runs at least x feet below existing improvements is ONLY under federal authority because it it interstate commerce.

    Then that law has to be upheld before the Supreme Court of the United States once.

    That's it.

    I think Mr. Kushner (as Director of the Office of American Innovation) has the authority to say that President Donald Trump and a vast majority of the Republican Party would support such legislation and court rulings.

  46. Where does he get his numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I read a statement he could build a line from SF to LA for $6B. Considering it cost $4B for Seattle to build a 2-mile tunnel (including the time lost when the boring machine broke), I fail to see how he could achieve such a reduction in cost. Hell, the Channel Tunnel cost about $1B a mile in today's dollars. $6B wouldn't get him from SF to San Jose.

    1. Re:Where does he get his numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that's why he started the Boring Company. He's working on making the boring part of it cheaper. The was an interview with him at TED a couple of months ago where he explained some of the ideas. Most of them were pretty simple, like making the tunnel smaller.

  47. Anti-progressive forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The early tweet is a rational move by Elon to apply social pressure by tweeting early. Now public officials can carry the burden of shame - and possibly being elected out of office - for blocking it. The early tweet seems 'stupid' to the government officials and people who bow to bureaucracy and bow to forced collectivism of the NIMBY-inspired functional innovation haters. But the early tweet is actually part of a rational business plan.

    It is fascinating to me that *by far* the biggest obstacle to this innovation is government. This reaction of 'City Hall' to the tweet begs to be compared to events in California, where the people have been deceived by the High Speed Rail Initiative. There, the State of California has an actual vested interest in *squelching* this innovation or anything that looks like it.

    The close-minded arrogance of the authors of the California High Speed Rail Bill will be costing California for decades, and for nothing. The Bill could have been a written well, open to back-end funding of financially and technologically sustainable solutions that had actually been built and had proven themselves, whatever those technologies were. But instead the Bill became a tool of political zealots who decided they knew best which 200 year old technology they wanted because it resembled how the French did it. Idiots.

    It will be fascinating to see where Hyperloop thrives first: outside the U.S.A., or inside the U.S.A.

    I see the government and bureaucrats and NIMBY-ists clutching to their status quo and laugh. I wish they'd grow up and enjoy the excitement and higher quality of life that innovation like this brings.

  48. So update the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I guess we should update the summary to more accurately reflect that

  49. I wonder how will he decline TSA services by SPopulisQR · · Score: 1

    Anyone can build an underground tunnel. If you get consent/permission you can also build a tunnel through multiple jurisdictions. Eventually, if Hyperloop catches up, TSA will start checking people using tunnels. Because the terrorists can blow them up? TSA and the current state thinking as Hyperloop are just not compatible. TSA will find a way to force you to wait 2 hours so that you could travel from DC to NYC in 30 minutes.

  50. story I heard how an ancient dam was built by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Emperor was strolling along a river, stubbed his toe, "damn it!" So it was said, and so it was built.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  51. Rich people fart unicorn marshmallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone retweets it gleefully.

    This whole twitter thing is a rich mans wet dream for staying relevant - FOR FREE!

  52. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe in Elon Musk, it's people like him that push us forward, not that they themselves might provide that, but push others to beat them to it. Think, space race.

    Humanity must hit the next p.diagm shift, we can not sustain and grow as we are now.

    Push on!

  53. Verbal approval? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else finally convinced that Elon Musk is probably not well? This goes beyond simply being egotistical, the man is legitimately deluded.

  54. Where is the green light located ? by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    If it is at the end of the tunnel, and quickly moving backwards, it is better to bail out now!

  55. Jaded slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the high moderated points is almost all negative. We have a guy that wants to make the world better and all you guys does is complain. I know things are tough in the US economy, but still. Elon and his team has managed to build self landing rockets! ZOMG! Self landing rockets! So a long hole in the ground should not be that big of a challenge. He is a guy that is experienced working with entrenched entities in the government. We see this with Tesla and the dealerships. So it is very exciting to see if he manages to pull it off! I think he will do it. Cheer up slashdot! We live in a wonderous time.

  56. Well that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and the billions and billions of dollars of government subsidies that let him sell a luxury auto below cost along with investors willing to lose money for a long time on the off chance it all pans out.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  57. Re:DC to NY needs more approvals than going to Mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's because the technology exists to go to Mars. No so much for this hyperloop.

  58. Let me explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone wants to feel important, and also everyone is important, so Eric just wants others to recognize his importance.
    I think it would be a good idea to have two types of hyper-loop vehicle, a car-sled and a train car (for higher density foot traffic). Hyperloop is good except it needs multiply redundant systems to prevent accidents in the event of all kinds of equipment failure.

  59. Hell of a ride. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Imagine such a vehicle. You'd have to be strapped in if they expect to get from NYC to Washington in 29 minutes AND make stops in between. 226 miles, say it's 250, 30 minutes. That's airliner speeds. Now if they stop too? Hold on to your hat!