Slashdot Mirror


Adobe Announces that in 2020, Flash Player Will Reach Its 'End-of-Life' in Light of Newer Technologies (webkit.org)

Adobe said on Tuesday it will stop distributing and updating Flash Player at the end of 2020 and is encouraging web developers to migrate any existing Flash content to open standards. Apple is working with Adobe, industry partners, and developers to complete this transition. From a blog post: Apple users have been experiencing the web without Flash for some time. iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch never supported Flash. For the Mac, the transition from Flash began in 2010 when Flash was no longer pre-installed. Today, if users install Flash, it remains off by default. Safari requires explicit approval on each website before running the Flash plugin.
In a blog post, the company wrote: "Adobe has long played a leadership role in advancing interactivity and creative content -- from video, to games and more -- on the web. Where we've seen a need to push content and interactivity forward, we've innovated to meet those needs. Where a format didn't exist, we invented one -- such as with Flash and Shockwave. And over time, as the web evolved, these new formats were adopted by the community, in some cases formed the basis for open standards, and became an essential part of the web. But as open standards like HTML5, WebGL and WebAssembly have matured over the past several years, most now provide many of the capabilities and functionalities that plugins pioneered and have become a viable alternative for content on the web. Over time, we've seen helper apps evolve to become plugins, and more recently, have seen many of these plugin capabilities get incorporated into open web standards. Today, most browser vendors are integrating capabilities once provided by plugins directly into browsers and deprecating plugins. Given this progress, and in collaboration with several of our technology partners -- including Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Mozilla -- Adobe is planning to end-of-life Flash. Specifically, we will stop updating and distributing the Flash Player at the end of 2020 and encourage content creators to migrate any existing Flash content to these new open formats."

154 comments

  1. OMG! by intellitech · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hallelujah!

    --
    vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
    1. Re:OMG! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I've been hearing "Flash is dead" for a long time, but it still lives. For one, there's a lot of on-line games that are not practical or reliable in JavaScript/Html5 yet. Kids love those games and won't accept PC's without them.

    2. Re:OMG! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      I've had the opposite experience. I don't remember the last time I saw Flash anywhere.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:OMG! by omnichad · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kids love those games and won't accept PC's without them.

      Not if they've never seen the game before. I assure you that if you had the original .fla, the game would compile to HTML5/JS just fine in Adobe Animate. Or a reasonable facsimile could be recreated.

      Childhood is deprecated and by the time current kids reach 2020, they'll have otherwise the game.

    4. Re:OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've been hearing "Flash is dead" for a long time, but it still lives. For one, there's a lot of on-line games that are not practical or reliable in JavaScript/Html5 yet. Kids love those games and won't accept PC's without them.

      Their games will be okay. I hear the gnu version, gnash, is scheduled to be nearly 80% compatible with flash by 2020.

    5. Re: OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kids will accept whatever I decide to give them. Why do you let kids run your life?

    6. Re: OMG! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Then I guess those kids don't need a PC.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    7. Re:OMG! by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kids love those games and won't accept PC's without them.

      Kids will accept whatever they're given, because the alternative is nothing.

      That said - my 8 and 6 year old wouldn't even know what to do with a PC. Though they're quite comfortable using an iPad, they have no interest in using a traditional PC.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:OMG! by gmack · · Score: 1

      Really? The tools are definitely there so we can't blame HTML5 for not providing the ability.

    9. Re:OMG! by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Actually this is a VERY sad day because what do we have to replace it that is actually BETTER than Flash......anyone? Beuller?

      HTML V5 is WORSE in every measure, it sucks more resources, uses more CPU cycles, uses a codec that is a minefield of patents, and has everyone forgotten the fact that DRM is now gonna be baked into browsers just to support HTML V5? I'm all for replacing Flash but with something BETTER than Flash, what we are gonna be getting? Is worse for everyone but big corps and big media who can use it to make sure video only plays on approved OSes on approved devices. Remember folks Adobe didn't give a shit, you weren't gonna be buried in lawsuits from Adobe like MPEG-LA, hell Adobe didn't even say boo about Gnash or distros including Flash in their default installs!

      Mark my words HTML V5 is a love letter to the big three (Apple,Google, MSFT) and if you think because Google uses a (GPL V2 only) Linux kernel means Linux will be allowed up to the table? Think again. Mark my words 5 years from now the day Flash died will be looked upon as a black day, a day we took one more big step towards turning PCs into corporate owned black boxes that become obsolete when the corp owners say it does.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:OMG! by tepples · · Score: 1

      Whom can we blame for authors or their estates becoming difficult or impossible to contact?

    11. Re:OMG! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Is worse for everyone but big corps and big media who can use it to make sure video only plays on approved OSes on approved devices.

      When the alternative is not being offered digital video at all, I don't really care. HTML5 mostly supports the same codecs as Flash. And Flash is much more of a black box than HTML/JS is currently even with DRM.

    12. Re:OMG! by tepples · · Score: 1

      HTML V5 is WORSE in every measure, it sucks more resources, uses more CPU cycles, uses a codec that is a minefield of patents

      Major web browser engines other than Apple WebKit can play VP8, Vorbis, VP9, and Opus. How are these "a minefield of patents"? SWF can only use Sorenson Spark (similar to ye olde DivX) and MPEG-4 AVC, which is still patented.

      has everyone forgotten the fact that DRM is now gonna be baked into browsers just to support HTML V5? I

      SWF's strength was vector animations. HTML5 EME affects video, not vector animations.

    13. Re:OMG! by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Didn't Flash reach its end-of-life in about 2003? It's been in Return of the Revenge of the Bridge of the Undead Zombies mode since the.

    14. Re:OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Load. Of. Bullshit.

      I don't know who pays you but they're clearly paying too much. I see this crap on Slashdot every day, whining like a 4 year old about how companies won't give any digital video if they don't have the exact DRM that they want.

      Just like today, right? Where they're still trying to lock that DRM into place by hook or by crook? So I suppose we don't have any online video at all, then. Guess that "YouTube" place is a big fable, eh? Netflix is a government conspiracy?

      Companies will go where the market is, as they have done in the past, and will provide video without DRM. Always have, always will. If they don't they will be replaced, whether they like it or not. Corporate leviathans are powerful, but not invincible. You may want to FUD people into handing in their computers, security and privacy for the convenience of corporations that want to control us and all our property, but, frankly? It's going to be your ass on the chopping block, too.

      I can only guess that you, and others who tout the exact same, tired lies whenever DRM (or copyright infringement in general) comes up are being paid. In this case, you might want to consider that the corporations view you as an expendable pawn and always will. You're just helping to ensure that they're in a position to do so, whether or not you're still employed by them. Either that or you are so grossly ignorant in technology and business, and the implications thereof (particularly letting business run wild in this space), that you have no business commenting on this topic, since you just parrot whatever a corporation tells you.

    15. Re:OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids nowadays use iPads and get games from the App Store. The only Flash game they're familiar with is Happy Wheels.

    16. Re:OMG! by theweatherelectric · · Score: 1

      For one, there's a lot of on-line games that are not practical or reliable in JavaScript/Html5 yet.

      Like what? Offer an example.

    17. Re:OMG! by theweatherelectric · · Score: 1

      uses a codec that is a minefield of patents

      Which codec would that be? The same H.264 that Flash used?

      HTML5 video also offers the option of VP9 video. VP9 is royalty-free for all use cases and outperforms H.264.

      So just use VP9 and be happy.

    18. Re:OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their games will be okay. I hear the gnu version, gnash, is scheduled to be nearly 80% compatible with flash by 2020.

      Who knew an AC could get so much ignorance and entitlement into just one sentence?

  2. Gone in a ....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fill in the rest.

    1. Re:Gone in a ....... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...long slow lingering undeath that will now be drawn out for another three years before the zombified corpse of a once ubiquitous application shudders to a halt, ekes out its last cry of "warning flash player is out of date" and collapses into a pile of dust. Was that what you had in mind because it seems to be what Adobe is planning?

    2. Re: Gone in a ....... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      ... bout 50 seconds?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  3. In 2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You nerds will still be getting swirlies and sucking my BALLS

  4. When will MLB catch up? by FrankHaynes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe by 2040 or so Major League Baseball Advanced Media will finally ditch Flash Player for HTML5 to show baseball games. Believe it or not an outfit that is positively drowning in cash just can't be bothered to update their web players. Seriously!

    --
    slashdot: A failed experiment.
    1. Re:When will MLB catch up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because it works spectacularly, and the video quality is superb. I'd go so far as to say it is the gold standard by which all other internet video experiences are measured. Whatever they do from here will be a step backward, I assure you. Why fix it when it ain't broke.

    2. Re:When will MLB catch up? by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      Since when do you need flash to watch MLB TV? I just installed the apps on my apple tv and xbox and phones and ipads and it plays the games. never had to install flash

    3. Re:When will MLB catch up? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Since when do you need flash to watch MLB TV? I just installed the apps on my apple tv

      Me too, but the Apple TV app is pretty bad. Crashes, stalls, stale data, and fewer features.

    4. Re:When will MLB catch up? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Because it works spectacularly, and the video quality is superb.

      MLBAM's iOS apps also "work spectacularly, and the video quality is superb" - without Flash. They obviously know how to accomplish this without using out-of-date, malware-prone technologies... they just need to invest a small amount of that pile of cash they've been collecting from subscribers like me.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:When will MLB catch up? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Thanks to the integration of DRM in the HTML5 spec, now MLB actually *CAN* drop Adobe Flash...

    6. Re:When will MLB catch up? by tgetzoya · · Score: 1

      Since when do you need flash to watch MLB TV?

      You need it for PC. I am blacked out of Red Sox games because they're playing Seattle and I live in Portland. I wanted to see if a VPN would bypass that restriction and it did, but I had to allow Flash to run in Chrome first.

      Also, while it bypassed the restriction I couldn't get video to play. Not sure if Linux,Chrome or MLB on that.

    7. Re:When will MLB catch up? by fermion · · Score: 1
      No one should be using flash anymore. It is criminal. It was criminal in 2000, except for certain targeted applications. I remember when Google has a brief affair with it for the stock charts. I thought that was a creative use. Otherwise it was primarily for encapsulating p0rn, which even the p0rn industry left long ago.

      There are some non profits who have created some good actual applications using flash. Unfortunately, many of these do not have the funding to rewrite in a modern frameworks.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:When will MLB catch up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this base balls? Is it anything like blurnsball?

  5. Hmm... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    Didn't Adobe rename Flash to something else to avoid carrying the Flash baggage?

    1. Re:Hmm... by omnichad · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. They renamed the production suite to Animate because Flash wasn't the only supported output format, and they were already (almost certainly) planning to deprecate SWF.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Well, they did try to open-source the programming language as an extension of ECMA-Script.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They called it Adobe Creimer because it's bloated, slow, and useless.

  6. Fishy smell around a business giving up its market by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    Why would they even do this? Has the security situation gotten to the point where their hand is being forced or do they simply want to abandon their technical debt in the same manner that any industrial operation wishes to abandon their industrial waste, into the commons?

  7. At long last! by Kergan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, if the many sites that still assume it's present and default to it over HTML5 could finally start working properly when Flash isn't available, the Internet will be a much better place. I'm looking at you [crappy TV news channel websites of your choice goes here].

    1. Re:At long last! by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm irritated at how many of the crappy TV news channel websites have switched to HTML5. Blocking flash is easy, blocking their autoplaying HTML 5 videos reliably is hard. I just have to turn off javascript entirely, which isn't good because sometimes there's a slideshow I'd like to use.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:At long last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're using firefox you can block autoplay media in about:config. It's something like html5.media.autoplay I think?

    3. Re:At long last! by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      For Chrome there's the Disable HTML5 Autoplay extension.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  8. Obligatory HSR Reference by contrains · · Score: 1
  9. Re:Fishy smell around a business giving up its mar by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Their production tool already supports HTML5/JS. Hardware acceleration and security are both a huge cross-platform headache that browser vendors have already taken on. And they still haven't been allowed on the iPhone with Flash.

    They're only dragging their feet because of complaints of content producers.

  10. Dangerous Behaviours, Predictable Results by mfh · · Score: 2

    Most of what we need the internet for is being replaced and overshadowed by graphic-heavy bells & whistles. We could use the internet safely if we applied a more minimalist approach to design and if we standardized video or dynamic UI for the internet better than we are now.

    Ethics watchdogs need to step up and start really trying hard to break the current push for more javascript.

    The web browser should display a page that can be interacted with effectively and efficiently, without all the added bells & whistles, because those bells & whistles are often introduced to create security vectors for black hatters.

    Most people using the internet have limited safety understanding. Flash is one of those platforms that can seriously harm a computer if the Flash object is designed as malware. Couple this with the loose security in users still using IE that often utilizes ActiveX and the results are predictably negative.

    MSFT can try as much as they want but I'll never trust them very much and everything they release has to be combed through by teams of 3rd party security experts in order to protect their clients.

    Again, using Firefox & Noscript, coupled with a given user's paranoia, will prevent most malware type issues.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Dangerous Behaviours, Predictable Results by omnichad · · Score: 1

      standardized video or dynamic UI for the internet better than we are now.

      Ethics watchdogs need to step up and start really trying hard to break the current push for more javascript.

      Dynamic UI = JavaScript. Anything else is static. You talk about flashy graphics, but on web applications, the real bandwidth hog would be reloading the entire web page every time the UI needs to update.

    2. Re:Dangerous Behaviours, Predictable Results by srichard25 · · Score: 1

      You talk about flashy graphics, but on web applications, the real bandwidth hog would be reloading the entire web page every time the UI needs to update.

      Google AJAX and Single Page Applications.

    3. Re: Dangerous Behaviours, Predictable Results by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Guess what AJAX stands for.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Dangerous Behaviours, Predictable Results by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      Do you know what the J in AJAX stands for?

    5. Re:Dangerous Behaviours, Predictable Results by Junta · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can have dynamic UI often with nothing more than CSS trickery. If your application happens to fall in that category and you implement it in that way, the browser will behave much more smoothly and in fact there's less to micromanage.

      Of course there are things that plain CSS cannot do, but it can do far more than a lot of people do not realize.

      In short, guess my message is don't go too crazy doing something visual with javascript without seeing if CSS has a way of doing it first.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    6. Re:Dangerous Behaviours, Predictable Results by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Dynamic doesn't mean animated in this context. It means updating with external data based on the inputs.

  11. Apple secretly paid off Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Steve Jobs died, the vultures at Apple secretly gave Adobe billions to kill off their profitable business, because it competed too much with Apple.

    Why else would one just kill their profitable business off? Bribes from the richest company in recorded history.

    1. Re: Apple secretly paid off Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea I wonder that too. Adobe must have made bucketloads with flash. With flash they could control the web too.

  12. I dread Jan 1, 2021 by Train0987 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The day they end support for Flash there will be millions of vulnerable PC's with Flash installed that will never be patched. We're still going to be dealing with Flash problems for years to come, there just won't be any more security patches. It'll be open season with all the 0-days.

    1. Re: I dread Jan 1, 2021 by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, the same as the last decade or two then? That DOES seem like something about which we should be concerned. Has anybody alerted the media??!!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:I dread Jan 1, 2021 by Ramze · · Score: 2

      Will there really, though? By then, just about every Windows OS except Windows 10 will be End of Life, and the majority of people browse the web with Chrome which has flash built-in. By then, I suspect Firefox will mostly be gone and most will be on either Chrome or Edge -- both with built-in flash... which they'll simply disable permanently. Neither Android nor iOS support flash directly, and most browsers already have warnings for it and have content disabled by default -- with plans to remove the functionality altogether probably before then.

      It's the broken websites that I worry for -- like my stupid Charter Spectrum streaming TV website that requires both flash and silverlight of all things. But... they'll get the message rather quickly when it all stops working at once.

      I just really don't see people going back to Internet Explorer compatibility mode to get flash to work properly... or switching to Pale Moon or some other browser that hasn't ditched flash before then.

    3. Re:I dread Jan 1, 2021 by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      The day they end support for Flash there will be millions of vulnerable PC's with Flash installed that will never be patched.

      Most vulnerabilities stop being an issue if browser+plugin developers don't allow automatic blind execution. This is a lesson that should have been learned since the MS-DOS virus days. Since flash no longer auto-executes, there's much less concern for 0-days.

      If anything, it's a flaw with web browsers themselves. Web browsers tended to have vulnerabilities for much longer than what was acceptable. For example, Firefox took 10 years just to plug the alert() loop.

    4. Re:I dread Jan 1, 2021 by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      It'll be open season with all the 0-days.

      Good. I hope all of them get ransomwared and each forced to format and reinstall. Then we'll be rid of it once and for all.

    5. Re:I dread Jan 1, 2021 by tepples · · Score: 1

      Most vulnerabilities stop being an issue if browser+plugin developers don't allow automatic blind execution.

      Let me know when browsers "don't allow automatic blind execution" of proprietary JavaScript by default either.

    6. Re:I dread Jan 1, 2021 by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      Done.

      Netscape 2.0 also counts, as it's miles ahead in stopping blind execution compared to stock modern browsers. It also had bandwidth saving features too, allows manually loading images. Modern browser developers must think those two features would never have any use.

  13. Flash - Thought that was a Super Hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No seriously tho. Everyone I know has actively avoided flash for years. If a site says I need flash to do/view anything, I know that the site has no value and to look elsewhere.

  14. Snark time! by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    This can't happen soon enough. Might see about getting placed in a medically induced coma until then.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:Snark time! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      You know, you still *AGE* while you're in a coma...

  15. The alternatives aren't really much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a Pyrrhic victory at best. The alternatives often aren't any better, and in many ways are worse.

    At least with Flash we had the ability to just not install the plugin, or to remove it or disable it if it were installed, and then we wouldn't be forced to endure it.

    But that's not always the case with these built-in technologies. It's even worse with some of the JavaScript-based ones. It can become much harder, if not impossible, to separate "good" JavaScript from "unwanted" JavaScript for any given page. At least when Flash was used we could just block that part of a web page, without necessarily breaking the entire site. Having to dick around with an extension like NoScript to partially block scripts often doesn't work, especially when a site combines useful and unwanted JavaScript code into a single script.

    WebAssembly is particularly insidious. While minified or obfuscated JavaScript can be difficult enough to decipher, WASM's binary encoding makes it even harder to figure out what remotely-served code executing in the browser will actually try to do. It's like Java applets all over again.

    It's much the same for the embedded audio and video capabilities of modern browsers. They can be useful when they're wanted, but this also leaves them open to abuse (such as when used for advertising purposes).

    We've gone from getting screwed in one way to getting screwed in a slightly different way, and neither of these screwings feels good.

    1. Re:The alternatives aren't really much better. by gmack · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've had this problem solved for ages. I just use the Disable HTML5 autoplay plugin

    2. Re:The alternatives aren't really much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say insidious, I say awesome. I don't want people reverse engineering my shit. Who the fuck said you had the right to read the code running on a website? Do you have that right for a PC game? I don't fucking think so. Piss off with your opinions, the whole world doesn't share them.

    3. Re:The alternatives aren't really much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck said you had the right to read the code running on a website

      Um... Tim Berners-Lee?

    4. Re:The alternatives aren't really much better. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Who the fuck said you had the right to read the code running on a website? Do you have that right for a PC game? I don't fucking think so.

      Well, In my country, I actually do. Both of them.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  16. In its defense by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

    I was a Flash aficionado back in the early 2000s. Back then it was a good way to get something moving on your page or to provide a bit of interactivity. HTML 5 was some way off, iFrames were clunky, and JavaScript libraries like jQuery weren't very mature yet. Plus the player had a small footprint and was pretty widely installed on the browsers of the time. For a time it was a great way to deliver video.

    As a technology it was a decent stopgap measure IMHO but it was on borrowed time as open standards caught up. Not many slashdotters had anything positive to say about it because it was a closed standard, but I have fond memories of seeing what the future of the web looked like, even if it was implemented in a doomed technology.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:In its defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it was great. Still miss the quality / size of flash cartoons that are now all youtube monsters (Happy Tree Friends!)
      For all the security issues, Flash was extremely fast, produced smooth vector animation on slow hardware (early pocket pcs anyone?), and the IDE was excellent, intuitive, and super low barrier to entry for anyone to start making things. I dont think HTML5 or SVG monstrosity can come close in resource consumption, and as flash fell out of favor, the amount of casual vector animations and games online has declined (imho) - which is a pity, as it is evidence that nothing else stepped up to fill its place.
      I think the wide-spread flash hate is really rooted in intrusive animated ads, and not security or openness.

    2. Re:In its defense by tepples · · Score: 1

      I dont think HTML5 or SVG monstrosity can come close in resource consumption

      Which benchmark of Canvas vs. SWF is most honest nowadays?

    3. Re:In its defense by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I dont think HTML5 or SVG monstrosity can come close in resource consumption

      With a Servo-like engine, it actually might. Aside from that, WASM could serve your needs just as well.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:In its defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting because Flash originally was for vector-based drawings and animations. All that other stuff like video came later. People claim that Flash is dead and needs to go away, but you're right that there really isn't a good replacement for the stuff that Flash originally was created to do, just all that other crap that got tacked on later.

    5. Re:In its defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked Flash just fine as a vector animation format.

      It was only when the format was expanded to include scripting, interaction, and video that it got bad. The Flash plug-in became bloated, sluggish, buggy, and generally made web browsing a miserable experience.

      The irony, of course, is that now JavaScript and "Web 2.0" have made browsing a miserable experience anyway, whether you use Flash or not.

      What's the point of having shiny interactive browser capabilities if their constant abuse just makes you want to turn them off?

  17. Why so long? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Flash should be discontinued next year. OK, this year. :)

    1. Re:Why so long? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It'll take sites to transition away from Flash. Including business sites. Yes, some businesses have built business-critical sites on Flash. Hell, ESXi's vCenter Appliance used Flash for its UI until recently. The fact that there will still be sites using Flash means that people will still need to install the plugin. That means that Adobe will still need to support it. The announcement today is a clear signal to those sites to start moving away from Flash.

  18. On PC, of course by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

    I've subscribed to the NHL's streaming service over the past few years and they use the MLB's streaming service, MLB Advanced Media. Sadly it still requires flash on PC, which most browsers don't want you to use anymore. "Oh you want to watch in this browser, you must install flash for it. You installed it for that other browser last time, silly."

    It is long past due to kill it with fire, nuke it from orbit, double tap it, etc.

    1. Re: On PC, of course by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      NHL Center Ice is so bad that I have concluded that the NHL doesn't want people to watch the games.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:On PC, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC they only switched to MLB Advanced Media midway through this previous season and did not make any significant changes to the infrastructure (which was disappointing to be sure). I'm holding out hope they'll fully switch over for the coming season.

  19. Why wait... by CharlesAKAChuck · · Score: 2

    2020 is a long time from now...

  20. I'll be counting the days! by dmomo · · Score: 1

    Once I can find a suitable website that has a free flash-based countdown tool.

    1. Re:I'll be counting the days! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I can find a suitable website that has a free flash-based countdown tool.

      apparently you're too stupid to handle a calendar like the rest of us

  21. NOW! Kill it now! Kill it with fire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOT Soon Enough!!
    Kill it now kill it with fire!

  22. Attention Major League Baseball, Pandora by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Update your damn websites.

    Both of you have iOS and Android apps which don't use Flash... so you apparently have (or know where to find) at least one or two people whose skill sets are less than a decade out of date.

    It's not a particularly hard problem... so what's the holdup?

    Sincerely,
    A Paying Customer

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Attention Major League Baseball, Pandora by tepples · · Score: 1

      Both [MLB and Pandora] have iOS and Android apps which don't use Flash

      Would you prefer that use of MLB or Pandora on a PC require installing a Windows app or a macOS app, with GNU/Linux and FreeBSD users left out?

  23. True "end of life" by TFlan91 · · Score: 2

    On Jan 1, 2021, they should send out an update that completely uninstalls and removes Flash, period.

    Nothing short of that matters, millions of computers will remain infected, millions of websites will continue to be exploited.

    1. Re:True "end of life" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in reality they will just push a update which will silently install Norton AV plus few other useless crapware packages from Intel. Of course this will fail miserably as Adobe has traditionally had the worst installers which usually fail silently on upgrade and require manual cleanup before retrying. The cream of the cake is that the installer deletes its executable file before it exits, even when the installation failed.

    2. Re:True "end of life" by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      On Jan 1, 2021, they should send out an update that completely uninstalls and removes Flash, period.

      Yeah, shame on people actually being able to make choices. It's not like they could just disable it by default if it's already installed and not install it on new machines.

      It's easy to beat up on Flash, but I'm very disturbed by the accelerating trend of killing and deleting things on a schedule, rather than letting the market decide. That's especially true when 3rd parties, like Mozilla and Google, can decide when someone else's technology needs to die for the good of the people.

    3. Re:True "end of life" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Jan 1, 2021, they should send out an update that completely uninstalls and removes Flash, period.

      Yeah, shame on people actually being able to make choices. It's not like they could just disable it by default if it's already installed and not install it on new machines.

      It's easy to beat up on Flash, but I'm very disturbed by the accelerating trend of killing and deleting things on a schedule, rather than letting the market decide. That's especially true when 3rd parties, like Mozilla and Google, can decide when someone else's technology needs to die for the good of the people.

      Like how Mozilla and Google are ending XP support? For FireFox, I'd like to see them keep one ESR for as long as possible. For Chrome, they could continue patching Chrome 49 rather than do nothing. Some still use XP, and yes, we all know the security risks, but forcing people to upgrade doesn't feel the right path unless you're a financial institution.

      There is one thing that does need to end... recaptcha (the "storefront" ones and such)

  24. So what does that future look like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incompatible everything, horrible bug-ridden crap, having to "upgrade" every other day, finding you can't because your "platform" is no longer supported (adobe stopped supporting linux, now it's "32bit" that's getting booted), unless of course your "platform" was never supported at all (flash on *BSD? sparc, mips, powerpc?), you can't even download the updates you need. Or in the bigger picture, a "web" beholden to some large players (formerly adobe, now the browser makers united in the WHATWG, with the W3C their puppet), DRM, inability to support anything for more than a few years, no historic staying power whatsoever... yeah. Such a bright future.

    Verily, adobe showed us the way. Dancing rodents for world domination!

  25. Zombo.com will have to migrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Zombo.com all the time to test if flash player is installed. It briefly went ASCII during the net neutrality protests, looks like it will have to go pernament soon. Plus 2020 is far too long, it should of died before 2010.

  26. 2020 might be a good year after all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully, Trump will follow Flash on the way out. These dinosaurs need to go!

  27. Apple announced Flash dead in 2010 by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Apple announced Flash dead in 2010 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I remember that announcement. I also remember then Android came out with flash support and without half the internet broken and then ate Apple's lunch in the smartphone market. That announcement was full of self justifications at a time when they simply weren't true, e.g. Youtube's pitiful library on the iPhone compared to a PC.

      They were premature.

    2. Re:Apple announced Flash dead in 2010 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, we remember the times a bit differently.

      Adobe took out a full page ad in the New York Times attacking Steve Jobs for not allowing flash on the iphone. It was pathetic then, and looks desperate now. They knew how much it was going to hurt them. Sadly, they truly had no comprehension that Job's reasons were sound.

      Strangely, "half the internet" was not broken for me or other iPhone users.

      When Android was released it *was* trumpeted loudly that *it* supported flash. That was marketed as a major selling point. The only problem was... it ate the battery alive. It was buggy. It wasn't current enough to be compatible with much of the content that was out there. And, when it was finally pulled, there was barely a ripple as users had gotten used to disabling/avoiding it.

      The reason Android eventually got greater market share than iOS (you make it sound like it happened on release which was very much not the case) was because Apple doesn't even try to supply the world with phones. Even as it is, their unit sales are the envy of their competitors. Flash had nothing whatsoever to do with it.

      Ah, but now I think you already knew all of this and I fell for feeding a troll.

  28. Re:Flash is actually superior compared to by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  29. Old Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what is the fate of old games on websites like Armor Games, Kongregate, Nitrome?
    What if I want to play those games in the future (assuming those websites are still around.)
    It's not like they're going to be ported to HTML5; that would be a lot of work.
    The current installer for Flash is just a stub. Does Adobe have a full, offline installer?

    1. Re:Old Games by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's not like [classic SWF games are] going to be ported to HTML5; that would be a lot of work.

      The majority of work would be in tracking down the authors for the FLA source files and providing a rental of Adobe Animate CC with which to exporting them to HTML5.

  30. Re:Fishy smell around a business giving up its mar by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Because nobody uses Flash anymore. There is no designer in the world that can get work these days just on Flash. Flash has been dead, only there for legacy. There is also a huge amount of work to keep it maintained, the code goes back to the 90s at least and wasn't well written to begin with.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  31. Doesn't Really Solve The Problem by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

    Adobe no longer updating Flash doesn't mean a lot. If a business hasn't switch thus far, they may not do so when Flash stops getting updates. Instead, we'll be left to using a no longer supported Flash with vulnerabilities (as always pop up with Flash) to access sites that don't invest in moving their sites to HTML5 or other modern options.

    1. Re:Doesn't Really Solve The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adobe no longer updating Flash doesn't mean a lot. If a business hasn't switch thus far, they may not do so when Flash stops getting updates. Instead, we'll be left to using a no longer supported Flash with vulnerabilities (as always pop up with Flash) to access sites that don't invest in moving their sites to HTML5 or other modern options.

      no, flash's last auto-update will uninstall itself

      adobe will not leave around dead unsupported software, its a legal risk to them. they will nuke it into oblivion

    2. Re:Doesn't Really Solve The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like MS deactivated WinXP when it went out of support.

      Retard.

  32. VMWare by Zarhan · · Score: 2

    I hope VMWare gets it act together and comes up with some better technology for vCenter soon enough.

    I couldn't ever figure out why change the lean, relatively fast and responsive vSphere client to the flash-based mess. At least you can still do most things via vSphere but some need the web interface (e.g. vMotion where you move both the VM and the data in case the VM is stored on local drives).

    At least Cisco has gotten rid of it for their IMC modules (for some servers, not all).

  33. Not really by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    The browsers will just disable the plug-in by default. Problem solved.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  34. Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by Khashishi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm gonna miss the casual browser games with the sweet stylized graphics you only find in Flash games. What is the replacement easy to use programming and creation environment for artists?

    1. Re:Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna miss the casual browser games with the sweet stylized graphics you only find in Flash games. What is the replacement easy to use programming and creation environment for artists?

      fresh air and sunshine

    2. Re:Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by omnichad · · Score: 4, Informative

      What is the replacement easy to use programming and creation environment for artists?

      Open up the .fla file in Adobe Animate, go to the Command menu and choose "Convert to HTML5 Canvas from AS3 document formats"

      Debug a bit. Done.

    3. Re:Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      And... if I don't have the source code?

      Will there continue to be a standalone player that will let me play all the SWF files I've downloaded over the years?

    4. Re:Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can convert them to exe files for windows (https://forums.adobe.com/thread/212109). For linux and mac OS maybe there are alternative tools that accomplish the same.

    5. Re:Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Lots of discontinued programs have been preserved by end users to continue running pretty much forever (by emulation or virtualization). Flash already has an .exe player for SWF files included with the flash installer. Get an old offline installer for Flash Player and you're good to go - you don't want an insecure older version of Flash in your browser, though.

    6. Re:Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Adobe has been famous for trying to keep standalone versions of the Flash player exclusive to developers. At one point, they wouldn't let you download it unless you registered an account with Adobe, and today you have to do stupid tricks such as adding "&standalone=1" to the end of download URLs. Those tricks are of course not documented and tend to work and not work at random. What else do you expect from a company where the installer will instantly delete itself when you run it, BEFORE it has actually installed. I can't tell you how many times I've had to re-download the Flash stub installer because it wouldn't install live off the Internet. Adobe really, really doesn't want you to archive the installer.

      I think it's pretty clear that as time goes on and more things become cloud based, we have to face the reality that a LOT of things today will just stop working in the future. I find it very disappointing how the geek community, especially here on /., has jumped on the bandwagon, shouting for things like Flash to die by force by any means necessary. It's the digital equivalent to book burning. They should know better.

    7. Re:Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      All it takes is one person to keep a copy of the standalone installer to preserve the old stuff. It has no business being used on the web anymore, and that's the rallying cry here.

    8. Re:Is there truly a replacement for Flash? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there's serious social pressure not to do so. I keep having to turn to pirate networks to get archives of free software, let alone old commercial software.

      Stuff like Windows Live Mail 2009, which I needed as an intermediate upgrade. Microsoft killed 2009 and tore every trace of it from the web since it was "insecure", but a direct upgrade from Outlook Express to Live Mail 2012 doesn't work, so I had to upgrade from OE to 2009 to 2012. I never intended to use 2009 for production use, but I needed an archive anyway. It was near impossible to find a copy, because everybody knows nobody should use 2009 because it was "old." Where were all the archives?

      Possible doesn't mean it's easy. Any talk in favor of keeping Flash or Java running, even out of the mainstream, is usually met with screams of, "NO! KILL IT! We must go out of our way to make SURE people can't use it!"

      You know, kind of like how if you try to run certain applications under Windows10, the OS will forcibly delete the applications due to "compatibility issues". In fact, the apps work just fine if you disable the compatibility checks, but someone else is always trying to kill something for purely political reasons. I expect crap like that from commercial developers, but not from the geek community as a whole.

      It has no business being used on the web anymore, and that's the rallying cry here.

      That's perfectly fine. Disable it by default, and warn the user if they try to turn it on. If they do turn it on, let them deal with the consequences. It's perfectly possible to be reasonable and effective at the same time.

      Oh, no... people need to be FORCED not to use it, for their own good! Sorry, but I'd rather not have other people make my decisions for me.

  35. The Flash is dead, long live The Flash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open source the code for flash player, and port it to Javascript. Performance would suck, but the old flash would still play.
    And finally that would kill it off.

  36. Re:Fishy smell around a business giving up its mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody uses Flash anymore, except for all those game engines using Autodesk Scaleform.

  37. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If one company announces another company's product should die, that means it should die?

    Oh I see, apple fanboys modded this up because their favorite anti competitive slave labor hiring company plays godmode with what products live and die.

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah the weeping and wailing of the Apple hater crowd. How I do love their tears. Spanked hard by Apple over the years yet they come back for more.

      You would make a great Democrat. They are always looking for new whiny children like you.

  38. How to track down authors? by tepples · · Score: 2

    I assure you that if you had the original .fla, the game would compile to HTML5/JS just fine in Adobe Animate.

    What steps would the parent of the child who wants to play the game go about tracking down the author of the file in order to initiate conversion? And whose responsibility would it be to fund a month of access to Creative Cloud for each author whose works are affected?

    Or a reasonable facsimile could be recreated.

    Provided the author doesn't sue anyone whose "reasonable facsimile" becomes popular.

    1. Re:How to track down authors? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      What steps would the parent of the child who wants to play the game go about tracking down the author of the file in order to initiate conversion?

      That was a response to this - because it's certainly not true.

      there's a lot of on-line games that are not practical or reliable in JavaScript/Html5 yet

      Regardless, the answer is that the parents of the child are in charge and too bad if the child wants to run Flash. The home IT department says no.

    2. Re:How to track down authors? by tepples · · Score: 1

      The home IT department says no.

      Does the home IT department also have a habit of taking away the previous console and all its games once the next-generation console is purchased?

    3. Re:How to track down authors? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Are you equating the quality of Flash games with iconic console games? By the time 3 years passes, no one will care about the flash games. As it stands, I have emulation set up for everything I played prior to Wii. And I still spend time on NES games.

      No kid just yet, but I have plenty of experience owning console games.

    4. Re:How to track down authors? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Are you equating the quality of Flash games with iconic console games?

      I was more giving an example of the replacement of one video game platform with another incompatible platform.

      I have emulation set up for everything I played prior to Wii.

      Everything, including SWF?

      I know Retrode supports Super NES, Genesis, Game Boy, Master System, and Nintendo 64. Which cart readers did you buy to dump the cartridges you purchased for other consoles?

      I still spend time on NES games.

      So do I, on both sides of the screen.

    5. Re:How to track down authors? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Everything *I* played - I never played SWF games; always looked like junk to me. But I do have several DOS and Windows games running under DOSBox. You Don't Know Jack runs great on Windows 95 on top of DOSBox - other games I use 3.1 or 98. I imagine I could easily get older SWF games running directly on the Flash .exe on Windows 95/98. These are all launched from a TV remote from MythTV, and I can exit most of them with the remote also. Windows is set to shut down when the autorun game exits, but the game isn't set as the shell because that's too messy.

      While I have the cartridges, I outsourced the dumping. Or at least I have the plausible deniability to say that I sold the dumper when I was finished. I have pristine ROMS and the original cartridges and that's good enough for me.

  39. Native applications aren't static by tepples · · Score: 1

    Dynamic UI = JavaScript. Anything else is static.

    The last time we discussed the pros and cons of JavaScript and WebAssembly, the consensus in the comments appeared to be that people want web pages ought to be static apart from form submission and CSS checkbox hack menus. For dynamic UI, make a native application that users can download, install, and use.

    1. Re:Native applications aren't static by omnichad · · Score: 1

      comments appeared to be that people want

      Define people. Slashdot users are not typical users and installing an application is above many of their skill levels (as is typing a web address into the address bar).

    2. Re:Native applications aren't static by mfh · · Score: 1

      This would appear to solve so much trouble caused by JS.

      More info for those interested:
      http://webassembly.org/docs/se...

      Each WebAssembly module executes within a sandboxed environment separated from the host runtime using fault isolation techniques. This implies:

      1. Applications execute independently, and canâ(TM)t escape the sandbox without going through appropriate APIs.
      2. Applications generally execute deterministically with limited exceptions.

      Aaaaaand:

      The design of WebAssembly promotes safe programs by eliminating dangerous features from its execution semantics, while maintaining compatibility with programs written for C/C++.

      Provided this is designed & implemented with an end-user-first mentality, sign me up! If it's designed with a Facebook-shareholders-first mentality, it will trigger another Noscript update to deny webassembly reqs from unknown hosts...etc.

      tl;dr: just make the web work with the end users in mind not the greedy sods

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    3. Re:Native applications aren't static by mfh · · Score: 2

      I get a call from family members like the people you're describing and I always have to come up with an excuse as to why I can't fix their computer. Usually I just try to help them but only if they answer some questions quickly.

      I find that I can usually solve the problem by step 2, but I always send the questions to them via email so they can work it out.

      I find this helps even noob computer users to learn to fish.

      1. Can you summarize the problem in under ten words?
      2. Call me back when you can summarize the problem in under ten words.
      3. What did you do now?
      4. Why did you do that?
      5. What did you find when you googled the summarized ten word problem?
      6. Google it, call me back if it is still a problem in 1hr.

      Some internet users aggressively self-sabotage. You can't fix stupid, so you might as well be nice about it while you let them down gently.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    4. Re:Native applications aren't static by tepples · · Score: 1

      Would the following be an ideal reply?

      Can you summarize the problem in under ten words?

      Router on, cables connected, but websites give "server not found".

      What did you do now?

      Restarted PC, router, and modem.

      Why did you do that?

      ISP phone rep told me last time to do that, saying it'd snap the circuits out of a stuck state.

      What did you find when you googled the summarized ten word problem?

      "Server not found" on both Google and Bing.

  40. The cost of Creative Cloud by tepples · · Score: 1

    Open up the .fla file in Adobe Animate

    The difference is that like Macromedia Flash before it, Adobe Flash allows resale of a used copy, whereas Adobe Animate does not because it's offered exclusively through the Creative Cloud rental service. Someone who bought a used copy of Adobe Flash may not feel it worth it to continue to pony up for Creative Cloud every month for the rest of his life.

    1. Re:The cost of Creative Cloud by omnichad · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are these games in active development or something? Sign up for a 30-day trial, open / convert / save / done. Never touch it again.

      For new games, you can learn HTML/JS directly, and it's an open standard.

    2. Re:The cost of Creative Cloud by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Also, some of that functionality exists in CS6, I think. I don't know, I don't use Flash and the rest of my CS suite is at 5.5 because I'm not a subscriber.

    3. Re:The cost of Creative Cloud by tepples · · Score: 1

      Sign up for a 30-day trial, open / convert / save / done. Never touch it again.

      I thought trial-exported projects had conspicuous watermarks.

    4. Re:The cost of Creative Cloud by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Before CC, the Adobe trials wouldn't even let you use the save feature - I think the only watermarks were in video renders. I ran the current CC trial last year for 30 days and I was able to save with no problem and no visible watermarks in Photoshop and Illustrator. This is because you have to activate the trial with an Adobe account and the software won't function in trial mode until you do.

  41. Safr cleaner internet with host file engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See Subject:

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads rob speed, security (malvertising), privacy (tracking).

    Hosts add speed (hardcodes/adblocks), security (bad sites/poisoned dns), reliability (dns down), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) natively.

    (Via less moving parts & complexity + are completely easily end user controlled too!)

    Works vs. caps & PUSH ads.

    Avg. page = big as Doom http://www.theregister.co.uk/2... [theregister.co.uk] & ads = 40% of it.

    Hosts != ClarityRay blockable (vs. souled-out to admen inferior wasteful redundant slow usermode addons)

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus (slows you) + less security issues/complexity.

    Compliments "firewalls" (blocking less used IP addys vs. hosts blocking more used domains) & DNS (lightens dns load).

    Hosts "shore up" dns servers too (overcoming their weakness vs. fastflux + dynDNS botnets abusing dns' very nature & they are by far the more prevalent type out there) & resolve host-domains to IP addresses FASTER, locally (bonus).

    Gets data via 10 security sites.

    APK

    P.S.=> Been building my custom hosts file since 1997, & it "clocks in" @ 2,584,712++ & growing entries: If you use my app, yours WON'T be that big (you will have absolutely CURRENT blocks though - the good part on this note @ least...): Far from it if you avoid hostsfilemine.nu (updates yearly only & HUGE, but not absolutely current, my other 11 sources are daily).

    1. Re:Safr cleaner internet with host file engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't recommend anyone download a custom hosts file unless you absolutely trust the source. Anon here could easily set every big webpage to forward to his/her spam/scam/phishing site...etc.

      Hence the link to a google search and not a reputable source.

  42. HTML5Zombo.com exists by tepples · · Score: 1
  43. AC advice = fools gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My work has recieved much praise from other ./er

    Prove you have done better you little fucking faggot jew you can't so post AC and besmerch my work

    I must have dusted every time you play fool so you HIDE while I claim. Ha, I dusted you again! APK

    P.S. => Fools know nothing and trivialize the great

  44. YES YES YES!! by Sla$hPot · · Score: 0

    However.... seing is believing

  45. A bit late? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I thought Adobe already had an announcement to kill its Flash years ago.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  46. so long by karmawhore · · Score: 1

    So long, Flash. Slash.

    --
    =kw= lurkin' to please
  47. RIP newgrounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easily the one site with the most flash files.

  48. About time... by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Maybe now some of the holdouts that I encounter that still use Flash (ABC Australia iView catch-up TV for one) will finally stop using Flash and start using HTML5.

  49. G'bye and thx for all the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Flash now and then made our lives miserable (going from 9 to 10 was particularly painful); yeah, many times we thought Adobe was in cahoots with M$ or Intel; yeah, they're were not particularly responsive to any complaint -- including the ones coming from the big shots, like Jobs.

    All that was awful.

    But I have to thank them for contributing for a happier family life here. They and the good folks in Japan doing great animations. Thank you very much. Thanks for pdf, BTW, too. Try to mend your ways and having done it, be successful again.

    Doumo arigatou gozaimashita.

  50. Re:Fishy smell around a business giving up its mar by slowdeath · · Score: 0

    Really? Try buying a digital IP security camera that does NOT use Flash to encode its output. Good luck. There are millions of flash-based IP security cameras out there now, and they all suddenly become obsolete on 1 Jan 2020? I don't think so.

  51. Nostalgic by n329619 · · Score: 0

    It has being predicted. It has been expected, but it still has the feeling of nostalgic.

    It was the days when we consumed videos, animations and games available online. Heck, if you look hard enough you can even get the swf of the media for a standalone experience. Too bad the flash player is insecure.

    It was fun while it lasted.

  52. Macromedia by loufoque · · Score: 0

    Adobe never invented Flash, Macromedia did.
    Adobe never liked it, so they let it deteriorate and die.

  53. Re:Fishy smell around a business giving up its mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name one, I've not seen one in years.

  54. Yay! At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GwjfUFyY6M

  55. Re:Fishy smell around a business giving up its mar by Junta · · Score: 1

    Because Apple point blank refused to allow flash on the iPhone.

    As a result, Adobe sticking to their guns on flash and content creation for flash caused web developers to look elsewhere.

    Adobe decided the way forward was to refresh their content creation tools (where they actually make money) to help developers with non-flash content.

    With that in theory done, the flash platform represents a cost, and their whole marketing message is now that you don't need flash, so they are paying for something that, per their own messaging, doesn't advance the value of their authoring tools.

    The places using flash still are generally not revenue sources for Adobe right now. They are sites that authored their stuff ages ago and have not bought into new authoring tools. In a way, telling those developers 'your platform is dead, your users are going to evaporate,.... *unless* you buy our snazzy new authoring tools to help refresh your site to modern status!"

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  56. Re:Fishy smell around a business giving up its mar by guruevi · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen one in years. The cheapest ones I purchased 5 years ago had ActiveX but also could work with "Other browsers" which was just MJPEG. I've got one that's over 7 years old where the JavaScript was so crappy it stopped working altogether in modern browsers but no Flash.

    I've actually seen some that use a Flash interface more than a decade ago but very few that encode in the Flash codec (which is a predecessor of WebM BTW)

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  57. What is Lynx's usage share? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Done: Lynx

    You are technically correct. Pardon my moving the goalposts, but I had browsers in wide interactive use among English speakers in mind. Wikipedia's article about that browser gives no indication of usage share, and most sources found through Google lynx browser usage share lump it into "Other", which isn't helpful.

    Netscape 2.0 also counts

    Pardon my moving the goalposts, but I had browsers that still receive security updates in mind. The 2.0 series no longer receives security updates. When Netscape Navigator as a whole ended support, it had become a reskin of Mozilla Firefox, and users were advised to switch to Firefox. But Firefox runs JavaScript without asking and hides the preference not to behind about:config, which in turn is unreachable without a web search.