Slashdot Mirror


New Data On H-1B Visas Prove That IT Outsourcers Hire a Lot But Pay Very Little (qz.com)

New submitter FerociousFerret shares a report from Quartz: Hard numbers have been released by the U.S. government agency that screens visas for high-skilled foreign workers, and they are not pretty. Data made available by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for the first time show that the widely made complaint about the visa program is true: a small number of IT outsourcing companies get a disproportionately high number of H-1B visas and pay below-average wages to their workers. The new data also gives a more accurate picture of salaries of H-1B workers by employer. The top IT outsourcing companies on average paid much lower salaries to their workers. The wage divide is largely a result of different education requirements of H-1B positions. H-1B visas are issued to workers with specialized skills which generally requires a Bachelor's degree or higher. More than 98% of approved H-1B visa positions were awarded to workers with either a Bachelor's or a Master's degree in fiscal year 2016. A closer look at the educations held by H-1B workers at companies like Google, Amazon and Intel -- places with in-house tech staffs -- show that more than 60% had Masters degrees. For most IT outsourcing companies, the majority of H-1B visa holders only had a Bachelor's.

39 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. "...they are not pretty." by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    beauty is in the eye of the employer

    1. Re:"...they are not pretty." by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Funny

      Since when are IT employees hired for their looks?

      Since, well, this prospect looks like he'll work more hours for less pay... beauty.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:"...they are not pretty." by arth1 · · Score: 3

      Since IT employees are not hired for their looks, why do IT employers insist upon Skype interviews?

      I can't speak for others, but I insist on video screening interviews so I can ask the applicants questions without them looking up answers in a search engine.

    3. Re: "...they are not pretty." by Reverend+Green · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends what they're looking up. Sometimes knowing how to find an answer efficiently is more important than memorizing random tech trivia.

    4. Re: "...they are not pretty." by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sometimes knowing how to find an answer efficiently is more important than memorizing random tech trivia.

      Actual knowledge is usually required to understand something. If you look something up, it doesn't mean you understand it, including understanding why or why not..
      I generally want to hire people who can not only answer and address problems by copy and paste, but will ask why more often than how, because they are subject matter experts with actual understanding.
      How to use locks or threads is child's play. Understanding when and when not, and being able to troubleshoot them in a non-standard environment requires knowledge residing in your own brain, not stackexchange.

    5. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why don't you just admit you want to judge the applicants on appearance and mannerism and sociability but you're too cheap to arrange face-to-face auditions.

      What you really want are actors who will look right into the camera and lie to you convincingly.

    6. Re: "...they are not pretty." by red+crab · · Score: 2

      And you do think that one can come up with a convincing answer on when to use locks and threads by looking it up on the stackexchange while on a voice call? If you are asking open-ended, conceptual questions then it doesn't really matter whether the candidate is on a voice call, video call or face-to-face IMO.

    7. Re: "...they are not pretty." by SScorpio · · Score: 2

      It lets the interviewer know who they are talking to. I've heard stories of Skype interviews where a different H1B Indian guy shows up after getting hired.

  2. Seriously? by technomom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is news? Companies wouldn't bother to even do H-1B visas unless they paid less than homegrown employees.

    1. Re:Seriously? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Has 3 great wins in the USA.
      Removes unions.
      Staff have to work under threat of not been able to stay in the USA.
      Low costs.
      One person with needed legal standing in US can have a lot of new low cost workers working US services.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Seriously? by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a former H1B holder who was paid far more than the equivalent homegrown employees, I can tell you that you missed the point of the article.

      The point is that US companies that directly employ H1B holders pay more than the companies whose business is outsourcing.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While simultaneously replacing jobs that U.S. citizens might take.. after a computer-focused IT education provides them what they thought was the means to a career....

      Yet you fail to understand the "argument" that the United States is failing to provide qualified tech workers... even with years of STEM programs.

      So if they don't get the overworked-underpaid H1B temp employees they want and they for some reason can't find local talent... its time to ship jobs beyond our shores!

      Wait.. do I hear an echo from Disney-world?

      https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/04/us/last-task-after-layoff-at-disney-train-foreign-replacements.html

      California dreaming!

      http://www.computerworld.com/article/3117602/it-outsourcing/university-of-california-to-send-some-it-jobs-to-india.html

      This is corporate greed funded by legislation.. and nothing more.

    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Precisely.

      H1-B visas should only be granted to companies that are hiring the holder directly - no contracting companies should be allowed to sponsor H1-B holders.

      If the employer of the H1-B candidate had to treat them as an employee, we would see the higher wages. But since they are employed by contract houses, they get less money, the corporations get cheap foreign labor, and wages stay low.

    5. Re: Seriously? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      Or you could just find a competent programmer who's willing to learn Fortran. Seriously, people get way too hung up on language experience. I guess it's a way to pigeonhole people and keep pay rates low.

      But seriously, any decent programmer can pick up a new language in a few weeks. And probably only half of the decent programmers have been pushed out of the industry So there's still a big pool of domestic labor to exploit.

    6. Re:Seriously? by jandersen · · Score: 2

      The eerie irony of this is that the companies using contractors are often paying a higher hourly rate than they would for a permanent employee at the same time as the contractor himself is paid less than the normal wage. I think what is needed is something like a minimum wage scheme, graded after the profession - something like the average pay for that category minus a small percentage. Yes, I do realise it would put many contracting agencies out of business - that is sort of the point.

    7. Re: Seriously? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      <em>Only a small chunk of the population has the cognitive capacity to learn the stuff and be able to apply it well.</em>
      <br><br>
      Your sense of self worth is a little inflated.  If you can do it, at least 1% of the population of the planet is capable of it.  You're nowhere near as special as you think.

    8. Re:Seriously? by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It also allows you to essentially fix costs for a position if you're using H1B as temporary labor. New employees every 3 years means never needing to raise what that position costs you.

      And as another poster pointed out above, these are rarely used to hire in workers of skill greater than they could find locally. I'm aware of a company that has staffed their QA department almost entirely through H1B, and their QA is not required to actually understand the product at all, just run specified test cases and report results. My dad is not a technical person and he could do their QA.

  3. I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by mhkohne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That corporations would do the most economically sensible thing, given the conditions at hand.

    In other words: Duh. Now that we have the evidence, can we PLEASE do something about this?

    I have serious problems with a visa that's designed for the worker to have to go home again later (I know that a fair number of H1B holders do convert to green card holders, but that's deliberately NOT the point of an H1B).

    H1B should be a fairly rare thing - if the US is so short of workers that you have to go oversees, then we should be giving out green cards and encouraging citizenship, not paying crap wages, depressing pay scales for US workers, and then sending them home.

    Take the number of H1B visas issued, and put that number into the green card program instead. I want people who are going to stay and be my neighbor, not temps from oversees!

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
    1. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      (I know that a fair number of H1B holders do convert to green card holders, but that's deliberately NOT the point of an H1B).

      Wrong. H1B visas are "dual-intent" -- this means that it is expected that the holder will apply for a green card.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by CraigCruden · · Score: 2

      H1B is a 3 year visa. An employee is limited to 2 of them. It is a dual-intent visa and it takes almost 6 years to navigate the green card process. H1B is one of the only dual-intent visas. The US Immigration system is broken and getting rid of H1B visas is only the answer if they replace it with a provisional green card where the employee is not tied to a single employer (i.e. if you are gainfully employed for 6 years on the provisional green card you a transferred to a permanent green card. Basically, there will be a limited number of sponsored tech workers entering the US but they will not be restricted in salary/benefit negotiations if they can just go to another company and not be locked into one employer during that period. Companies that currently abuse the visa would find there imported labour walk away from them for better jobs.

  4. The real money by bobstreo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The IT outsourcing companies make a ton of other money in the process.

        From a percentage of the pay their H-1B contracts receive, to the flop houses they store their programmers in while they're not at work, it's all pure profit.

  5. 2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Data here

    Is it any wonder that middle class wages have stagnated and young workers are under employed?

    And some people still can't figure out why Hillary lost....

    1. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Has Trump done something about it yet?
      Other than Boost the Number of Visas for Low skilled workers?

      Trump Lies Better than Hillary?

    2. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by CrankyFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [ Just to be clear: I'm a virulent anti-Trump liberal. I'm not trying to shill for the guy. I think he's awful ] On this front, there've been two developments you can attribute to Trump: 1. USCIS has suspended priority processing of H1Bs, which reduces some mobility of H1B workers; 2. The general travel ban and xenophobia of his administration has had a chilling effect on non-US residents' desire or willingness to come to the US to work. This also includes people who are in the US today who have started considering leaving. If you're against more foreign workers, I'd say he (well, his administration) actually has some accomplishments to point to.

    3. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, if you like fires, he's started them. Which means new home construction will be up.

    4. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Afty0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Has Trump done something about it yet?

      Yes, I am a Brit trying to get into the US on the H1B program because my girlfriend is there. It is now significantly harder to get companies to even talk to me since they defunded priority applications. My best shot is to apply in April, for a visa that *may* start in October. My chances of getting it are very slim though.

      Note that I'm in software, in London, earn a very good salary and have 20 years of experience - I'm a model candidate - and I've been told by some people over there that I may as well not bother and to "explore other options"...

    5. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by strikethree · · Score: 2

      Note that I'm in software, in London, earn a very good salary and have 20 years of experience - I'm a model candidate - and I've been told by some people over there that I may as well not bother and to "explore other options"...

      You are the perfect candidate for what the H1-B program "should" be for. The H1-B program has been twisted to lower the average wages of all employees, in which case, you are ideally the WRONG candidate.

      I wonder what they are doing with all of that extra money they are "saving"? Surely there are only so many castles and personal servants a person could own. I do not see the money going into new and innovative businesses nor improving infrastructure, nor, most importantly, increasing our understanding and ability to manipulate the universe through Scientific Research.

      Is it just desirable to have utterly poverty stricken masses that can be abused and an upper class that never needs to worry about anything other than how their stupid narcissistic endeavors may end up destroying all of modern civilization?

      I just don't get it. Life is more fun for everyone (including the upper class) if they have lots of talented and creative people willing to do talented and creative things. People in abject poverty can rarely achieve talented and creative things of note. There are no resources for such things. Sure, dancing, football (soccer or American), etc require talent and can be fun to watch, but I am thinking more fundamentally here. New literature that makes people think and possibly drives new cultural attitudes. Scientific questions generally need money to validate answers.

      I dunno. It seems like we are in a war of absolute control while forgetting what life is really all about: The Experience... and creating new humans.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    6. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      That's one perspective. Another is that she ran the most incompetent and negative campaign in modern history. It has been demonstrated that she completely failed to lay out a plan for why anyone would vote for her, other than that she wasn't Trump, and she spent most of her advertising money in places that she had already locked down instead of places where the outcomes were less sure.

      But, you can go ahead and blame it on the deluded white racists clinging to their God and guns if you want.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  6. There's a Fix by BBCWatcher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Naively capping H-1Bs at 1,000 per organization would only result in more organizations. The outsourcers would simply lean on shell companies. Depending on the elasticities, workers would get paid even less in order to fund the extra overhead. That won't work.

    2. There is an easy fix, actually: set minimum H-1B salaries to $10,000 per month (2017 dollars, inflation indexed) nationwide, up to $2,000/month more (2017 dollars) in high cost of living areas (e.g. Silicon Valley), plus require that the employer post a 12 month bond. That'll have zero impact on Apple and several other legitimate H-1B employers. Closely monitor compliance (e.g. compare to tax records), deport any employee paying kickbacks, throw anybody accepting kickbacks in prison, and keep the bond if there are any rule violations.

    3. A variation on #2 is to hold monthly or quarterly H-1B auctions. The bid price is the employee's salary, and the highest salaries win, subject to a $10,000/month (2017 dollars) floor.

    Options #2 and #3 would help boost government revenues since high salaries (for both the H-1Bs and resident workers) mean higher tax payments.

    1. Re:There's a Fix by taustin · · Score: 2

      On #2, I'd say only deport them if they refuse to testify against whoever they paid the kickbacks to. And if that person is convicted, give the H1B holder a green card.

      "You need to give me 10% of your paycheck."

      "Oh, thank you sir, I'll be a US citizen before you get out of prison."

  7. No, we can't by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    because it's not an issue that brings anyone to the polls. You've got guns, abortion, Obamacare and coal jobs (mostly because it's a swing state issue). But H1-Bs? Nope. Nobody votes on it. If you wanna end H1-B abuses you need to start voting in your primaries and tossing the incumbents out when then vote against it. But good luck, I doubt you could get the herd of cats that is IT people to vote as a block. Besides, we're all convinced we're the irreplaceable guy...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: No, we can't by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As real average wages (adjusted for cost of living) continue to drop, and the last of the independent consultants are starved out, maybe we programmers can finally grow up, stop acting like man-children, and show some solidarity.

      Or maybe we'll become like immediate post-USSR Russia. A huge pool of highly skilled programmers, with near zero job prospects. Nany of whom will turn to illicit activity.

  8. Re: You got to look at the reasons behind outsourc by Reverend+Green · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you were earning $500/mo in the States, you would NOT have a house of your own and plenty of food. You would be living in a cardboard box under a bridge and eating out of dumpsters. Get real, broham.

  9. Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by rossz · · Score: 2

    Don't tie the visa to a specific company. Make it easy for the workers to switch jobs. H1B workers are damn near indentured servants because it's so damn hard to switch jobs. The result is they have to put up with crap that a regular worker wouldn't tolerate, e.g. longer hours (at a fixed salary), no bonuses, shorter or no vacations, etc. It's not just about the salary. It's the ability to completely control the workers.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by CraigCruden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are two issues with the process. The H1B is the only visa that allows for dual purpose/intent - temporary worker while allowing for the person to have the intent to work permanently in the United States. It is often used while a company is sponsoring the individual for a green card. H1B is a maximum of 2 3yr visas, and sponsoring for a green card typically takes almost 6 years to process. During this time a worker cannot change employers or they have to start over on the green card application -- basically turning them into indentured servants with little or no ability to negotiate on pay.

      The H1B tech worker program should be changed into a temporary work permit given to the employee (not the employer) while the green card application is underway. The green card application once started should have the ability to "transfer sponsors". H1B visas should require a minimum salary at or above the prevailing wage. Data on salaries of local hires and H1Bs should be reported annually, and if a company is abusing the visa then they should be banned from sponsoring them for a period of 5 years.

  10. Neither of those had any practical effect by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the maximum number of H1-B visas was awarded this year as always. There's no sign of a drop for next year either. Putting a few hoops up doesn't change anything. The program needs to end.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  11. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by asylumx · · Score: 2

    Hillary lost because she didn't get enough electoral votes to win. Everything beyond that is speculation.

  12. Market Value 101 !! by ripvlan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My father always told me "don't get good at something you don't like to do" --- years later I'd learn that it was true, and B) don't ever get good at something that isn't valued (or can be automated).

    The low wages for these IT jobs is simply the Value That Companies Put on the Work. They need a semi-skilled laborer to write 'em some dumb code. Or push buttons for a manual testing effort. The cost of "now" vs "automate it" -- usually "now" wins. Regardless of how bad you may feel about somebody doing the same job for less -- realize this -- it's all the employer is willing to pay to get the job done.

    Don't get good at those jobs.

  13. Re:make the H1B min wage 80-150K+ based on COL by barc0001 · · Score: 2

    We have a similar shitshow with the TFW program in Canada. I've always said the solution is to force TFW/H1B positions to be paid 150% of market rate for the job, and paid through the TFW/equivalent office, who then pays the worker. The excess would then be used to fund the program and pay for career training programs to address the lack of local talent for those jobs.

    That way companies will look a little harder to see if there really is local talent before having to pony up 1.5 times the market rate for that foreign worker.