Apple Employees Rebelling Against Apple Park's Open Floor Plan, Report Says (neowin.net)
During a new episode of The Talk Show podcast on Daring Fireball, John Gruber touched on the topic of the open floor plans that Apple has implemented within its new campus, Apple Park. A WSJ profile of Jony Ive, where he talked about Apple Park, mentioned how programmers, engineers, and other employees had already expressed concerns about working in such an environment. Gruber shared what he has heard: I heard that when floor plans were announced, that there was some meeting with [Apple Vice President] Johny Srouji's team. He's in charge of Apple's silicon, the A10, the A11, all of their custom silicon. Obviously a very successful group at Apple, and a large growing one with a lot on their shoulders. When he [Srouji] was shown the floor plans, he was more or less just "F--- that, f--- you, f--- this, this is bulls---." And they built his team their own building, off to the side on the campus ... My understanding is that that building was built because Srouji was like, 'F--- this, my team isn't working like this.'"
If they do, I'll give them two options. Either I work from home, or I'm going to start looking for alternate employement.
That will make everyone happy.
1. No interview. Possibly a couple of questions via e-mail, but that's the most I will agree to.
2. No seeing anyone ever. I work remotely from home.
3. Payment will be in Bitcoin.
4. No stress or deadlines. If I feel like finishing something, that's when it will be ready.
5. I get paid a fixed sum per month even if I produce no results (for a reasonable amount of time), no less than 1 BTC/month with current value. Preferably 2 BTC with current value.
Those are my demands to work for somebody else. You think I'm writing satire or making a joke of some kind? Nope. This is how "entitled" I really am. Not spoiled -- just sick of all the BS in this world. Cannot conform to it. I just cannot.
How are you supposed to make money if you really can't "play the game"?
My manager and peers are constantly amazed at how much work I get done. The secret? Being a work at home employee means you don't have to deal with the incessant noise, eavesdropping on phone calls, office nonsense ("It's Tina in HR's birthday! Come sing!") etc. You can actually concentrate, especially when you're dealing with complex coding issues. Context switches are a fantastic productivity killer. I don't blame the Apple CPU designers. They're probably among the teams that require the most concentration in tech. Good for them for willing to buck the "accepted wisdom" about open offices.
Billions spent and they didn't evaluate how their people worked. Idiots.
Nobody but management and some handful of hyper-social outliers likes open floorplan. Cubicles are bad enough. But open floorplan is the devil. Of course the employees hate it. Management had to know that going in. They apparently didn't care or thought the level of spying they can do would be worth pissing the employees off and making them less productive. When you look at the confluence of IT type workers (that Apple, being a tech co, is heavy in), we tend to be on the "autism spectrum" (what was formerly called Asperger's). We don't do well with a cacophony - and white noise doesn't help.
We're going to open office floors soon-ish and they said "Air is excellent at dampening noise", I think just about everyone lost their minds at that point.
Open floor plans suck. Horribly. Why? Privacy. I'm stuff in a place doing work for 8 hours a day, and now you're going to take away my small walls so that everyone can watch my computer and listen to my phone calls.
If I'm tired at lunch - I can't take a 20 minute nap because everyone will see me and label me lazy. I can't have a private phone call because I have someone 3 feet away from me. I can't log onto slashdot because I'll quickly get a reputation as someone who doesn't work and just surfs the web.
So essentially if I don't fall into that small category of folks that like to bullshit and smooze (because if you're talking to people it looks like you're doing work, after all), then I am quite literally in the worst possible environment imaginable.
But my boss clearly has super important things to do and needs HIS privacy. So he gets walls. And a door.
And if the guy next to me is a serial yakker? Nope. No work getting done. Or the two guys diagonally are pranksters? Nope. The open floor plan was created by some Dilbert-Esque pointy haired boss who should have been fired a long long time ago.
I was got two competing job offers where salary and benefits came out about about equal. The dealbreaker was open seating at one of the companies. Everyone sat on long tables without assigned seating. Everyone just came in and picked an open seat. The "hotel" configuration was supposed to "facilitate collaboration." Bullshit. Last thing I wanted was to essentially have a work space akin to a broken down bus. Can't imagine trying to actually track down the people I need to interact with on a daily basis. When I turned down the offer, the recruiter confided in me that they lost several other candidates for the same reason.
Offices were created to trap talented employees at work. Once you go to an open office plan, they can all escape. And, they will. You will be left with only hipsters playing cornhole in the hallways.
Non-engineering shit show teams; ie helpdesk and call centers.
As someone who has worked in both env's, I cannot think when I have people around me flipping their shit; and if something breaks, I cannot think even more if a ton of unnecessary people are in the way.
The did this for half of my building (top floor is open while the bottom is still the standard cubicals) and every HATES it. Not that the little half-cubes we had before were spacious, but the shared desks are tiny! You get about 3 feet to yourself an two little dividers between you and the next person. That's about enough room for a computer, phone, and a piece of paper. They also gave everyone a little rolling footstool instead of a chair. People are in pure hell now. The noise is unbearable, no one has any room to do actual work, and everyone is ready to kill the person next to them. Thankfully I'm in a locked lab where they decided not to do this. Sometimes I think the only reason I stay in my position is so I don't have to be in one of those open desk areas.
When they first floated the idea of an open floor plan the response of universally negative (like 200+ negative comments to one positive). The management said they'd take our concerns into consideration and then promptly installed the new desks a week later. Turns out they already had everything ordered and the whole 'tell us what you think' discussions were just a smokescreen to placate people.
It can't work for anyone. Back to the silos!
apple is right everyone else is wrong.
I don't think so. There is evidence that open offices are bad for productivity. Some people like to work in a bullpen, but even for those people their productivity may go down more than they realize. Other people hate open offices, and refuse to work in them. These are often the best people, who have plenty of other employment options. Open offices are false economy. The cost of providing a real office is negligible compared to a typical tech salary in Cupertino.
My company has some open office space, and I work there sometimes. But I also have an office with real walls where I can sit and focus. It is small, about 8 ft by 10 ft, but that is enough for two chairs, a desk, and a bookshelf.
I will not accept any job that requires me to work in a cubicle or open office, although I did work that way when I was young and desperate.
I think part of the problem is that Apple has a lot of teams in a lot of different disciplines. An open floor plan is utterly terrible for programmers and other engineers. I don't mind having an open space where groups can meet for scrums or other occasional meetings, but for the rest of the time I want to be in an office or some other enclosed area where I can concentrate.
However, I don't doubt that there are other disciplines where putting everyone in a separate office for the entire day is good. I would imagine that various types of creative teams work best when they can be together and easily interact as a group in most scenarios. I'm not certain of this, but I suspect that people who function like this may not realize that engineers just want to be left alone so that they can function and if they get to make choices about how the workplace should be organized they make choices for how they like to operate.
In the era of "suck his own cock" coming straight out of the White House, can we please stop trying to disguise fuck as f___?
blah blah blah. apple is right everyone else is wrong.
Except it's actual Apple employees - and rather important ones - saying they don't want to work in that open environment.
#DeleteChrome
Actually what we should be seeing is that when management does it's job going to bat for it's employees, those under them prosper. Disparage management all we want, they do serve a purpose, and this story demonstrates that, as well as when it fails.
A very good friend had her office building staff (major medical provider) moved into an open office type building. It's been 2 years now... Productivity is down, tempers are up, sickness is up, management is still fucked with what to do with their multi-million dollar shithole. There you go.
Open floor plans suck. It is noisy, there is no privacy, and it feels like a mess hall in prison where the guards can constantly watch you. Some claim open floor plan fosters better collaboration. I worked in open floors, cubes, and shared offices and shared offices was the best. Ideally, you are closely working with your office mate or have one who understands that once in a while he or she needs to take coffee break now because two or three have to hash something out. What better than to work in a small meeting room all the time where you can have small meetings without p*ssing off everyone else. Worse than open floor plan is the crap with unassigned seats. You come in and pick any workstation available. While that may be efficient and theoretically there could be more employees than workstations it does not allow for any kind of personalization. And yes, I want to get a good chuckle out of my collected Dilberts on the wall when work is a downer.
Offices increase productivity for everyone, except the project manager.
Fuck the project manager.
I've tried to work in those open plan hells. Can't do it. I tried wearing headphones and putting up side-rails to limit the sound and eye distractions. It didn't work.
I've tried to work in gopher cubes. Can't do it. Too much shuffling around me.
Even worked in a fishbowl controlled access lab for 3 yrs. It wasn't comfortable until we rearranged all the furniture to setup "personal" spaces and mine was facing a wall.
Each of these cause anxiety and mental anguish. I'm stressed at the end of every day and very tired.
The most productive I've ever been was in an office with a door. No anxiety. Only tired after really long days. Any company not providing this setup to their $75K+ workers is just STUPID. You want your people to get the best rest they can and be ready for the next day.
When I want to goof off or yap on for a half hour with the guys its great, its a fucking nightmare if you have to actually DO any work or god forbid have a phone call with a customer or a supplier
Guys, guys, guys. Before you start going on about how open office plans are just blatantly evil, please consider the shareholders. That's right, publicly-traded companies are owned by investors who want, nay NEED, to ensure that their corporate ownership investments are competitive against other investment vehicles. That how they get rich. With low corporate gains taxes, investors are practically FORCED to invest in corporate ownership compared to other forms of investment. So before you go blab blabbing about how you can't stand to sit next to Shouting Stan and Coughing Cassandra, please realize that your sacrifice yields a greater return on investment for your corporate overlords than if you were each allocated 8 more square feet of floor space, and $186 worth of divider walls.
The worst thing is that open offices aren't just bad for productivity - they're bad for collaboration. Conversations in individual offices happen by poking your head around an office door and discussing something with your colleague. The same conversation in an open office will do one of three things - 1) not happen (because the person initiating it thinks 'this conversation will disturb everyone'); 2) happen in a meeting room, and involve 6 more useless people, because by making it a formal meeting you needed to make sure you used your 1 hour effectively, and had everyone you might possibly need in that meeting; or 3) happen anyway in the open office, slowly accumulate more people throwing random ideas into the pot, and not actually make any decisions.
THE COMPLAlNERS ARE FlRED! ALL OF THEM!!
Libre Office is almost as bad as Open Office for productivity.... just sayin.
Our company took over a floor and designed it to be an open floor plan for everyone below the program manager level. Even though I would have been allowed to work from home half the time, touring where I'd be working shortly definitely added weight to my early-retirement decision.
...I would imagine that various types of creative teams work best when they can be together and easily interact as a group in most scenarios. I'm not certain of this, but I suspect that people who function like this may not realize that engineers just want to be left alone...
I duno... all creativity needs r-mode, when have you ever seen a brainstorming session among a group of people ever output anything particularly creative, group interactions tends to make it impossible to contribute anything that is not just prior knowledge.
Actual creativity needs peace and quiet to let ideas peculate through your brain, when actively and prematurely probed by external forces these ideas collapse like an illusive wave function as you scramble for solidified, easily verbalised thought.
They used to call the unassigned seats method, "hot desking". The idea was that you didn't need a long commute to a particular campus office, you could simply go to your nearest office, and work from there.
I've worked in open plan offices in all but one company. Sometimes it was just four people in a room in a shared office. Other times it was a banquet hall of desks. But it will drive you crazy. Some people just love to pace about when thinking, talking on a mobile phone or even when talking to another person on a desk. Then they just yo-yo around the desks. I had one guy who just kept pacing back and forth behind me while talking to the person two cubes away.
Different professions work in different ways. I once had a hardware engineer sitting on the desk opposite me. Every day he was shouting down the phone at the component suppliers trying to negotiate lower prices or complaining that they had sent the wrong items. Sales people made even more noise. They would shout down the telephone line to compensate for crackly lines at the other end. Marketing people spent their time packing up brochure campaigns, unpacking presale models, taping up boxes, receiving deliveries of palette boxes. Electronics people who spend their time drilling holes in plastic boxes for prototypes. Project managers have a constant stream of accountants, marketing people all wanting PDF documents, spreadsheets all throughout the day, non-stop.
It was like Flowers for Algernon, every three minutes, a random noise like doors banging, boxes being dropped, sudden laughter, boxes being taped up, electric drills, fire alarms. Some teams even added sound effects to their Jira applications with air horns, cheering crowds, clapping, Ice hockey organ music.
I just started doing a WFH a bit and it's amazing, I used to wait till everyone left do work on complex or thoughtful tasks, now I can do it in the day :)
I must be weird then... We've been in an open floor plan now for a year at the new digs and I actually like it. I NEVER had a window view before and I like it much better than the 6' cube walls I had before. I also like being able to see if a coworker is in the office or not at a glance and I like being able to keep up with office happenings by listening in when I want to. I also feel like it helps me keep good discipline, keeping my desk space clean and staying on task and off things like Slashdot...
I get the complaints though, they are distracting, loud and don't offer ANY privacy but I've found ways to cope. I have a set of headphones that cover my ears so I can tune out the noise. The monitors on my computers cover most of my vision area when I want.
I suppose they are not for everybody though..
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
However, I don't doubt that there are other disciplines where putting everyone in a separate office for the entire day is good.
Hmm, like Jony Ive's skinny design team? Sure. They've been incredibly successful with an open floor plan office, makes sense to keep it that way for them in the new building.
But wait, who designed the entire building, assuming that all Apple teams would want to work this way? Oh yeah, that dumbass Jony Ive. Surrounded by yes-men telling him he's right, I'm sure. And enabled by no-balls Tim Cook who has no understanding of how actual engineers work. At least Steve Jobs made an electronic gadget or two in his youth.
Trying to have a conversation with someone in an open-plan office while two other groups of people are already having conversations is maddening. When I worked in one of those places, I seriously found myself losing track of sentences I was speaking midway through... something going on in another conversation distracted me. I sometimes found it easier to wear noise-isolating headphones and use jabber to chat with people, even when they were sitting a few feet away.
With the advent of group chats it's unfortunate Apple employees have to stare at each other's faces all day long.
Is if Cook and his cronies are getting massive offices with real door(s), walls and windows.
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
Didn't those go out when the dot-com bubble burst?
Just not sure who thought any of this was a great ideal?? Did anyone at the top even confer with heads of divisions? Apparently not. Personally I hate openness, because its like doing work in a cafeteria. I've worked in places where all you have is mostly open cubicles of workers and the heads have offices. But you try to have a personal conversation and it simply doesn't happen.
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
If they were moving from open plan offices to a new building where everyone had their own office, the slashdot hive mind would be pointing out how that leads to a reduction in ad-hoc collaboration, and is isolating.
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Corporate jackassery at it's finest.
Back when Walt designed the first real purpose-built buildings for his studios? It ended up segregating artists and designers from their support people, and rewarded some creative types just based on the amount of money they made or how important Walt thought they were to the processes?
It turned out to sour a lot of the employees working for WD.
Ditto. For 1.5 years, I worked from home 100% as a Cisco contractor. I loved it! I noticed my office co(lleague/worker)s had open-office setups. Even my former employer before that job started doing those setups. I am glad I never had to work like that. I hope I never will have to do that for my future jobs if I ever get a job (almost eight months now :(). I'd rather work in a tiny cubicle with low walls.
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
Oo would hold the copyright, and simply sue the pants off Cook and company.
I want my private space no matter how small. I can go to the central space as needed. I know the benefit (20-40% of the time).
When he [Srouji] was shown the floor plans, he was more or less just "F--- that, f--- you, f--- this, this is bulls---." And they built his team their own building, off to the side on the campus ... My understanding is that that building was built because Srouji was like, 'F--- this, my team isn't working like this.'"
Tourette's? I sometimes think of it as "Debra Morgan Syndrome". C--k S--k motherF---!
Hilarious!
Yes, they save the company some money in the short term, but in the long term, they're very expensive in terms of lost productivity and loss of talent as people quit.
I had a great position at major company that moved to an open floor plan. I gave it an honest try, but in the end it was crippling, and I quit because of it. Along with about 40% of the other engineers.
I will not accept any job that requires me to work in a cubicle or open office
I don't mind a cube if the walls are tall enough.
It's interesting that people have forgotten that when cubicles were invented, office workers rejoiced -- because cubicles brought an end to the nightmare of the open floor plans that used to be the standard office environment.
It seems like an especially strange choice given that nothing else about Apple's campus says "we are trying to save money by scrimping on the building here". Their HQ employees(not counting retail workers and indirect employees at contract manufacturers) are also relatively few, relatively expensive, and involved in making the highly profitable stuff happen.
It's hard to think of a less sensible place to go open-plan. Was their kool-aid during the architectural planning session? Some understimulated extrovert in management just dreaming of having his own noise-drome to stride through, bothering people? What possible advantage is there?
collaboration and communication you'd the usual office layout would be reversed:
Managers would be in the open space so they could coordinate things effectively with one another and people with actual work to do would have the offices so they could concentrate.
We all know the reason why this is not the case.
When I was trying to make the open floor plan work, I tried using noise-cancelling headphones. But that just made everything worse because then people had to tap me on the shoulder to get my attention, which startled me every time. It made my hypersensitive to everything around me as I was constantly on guard in case someone wanted me.
So, the headphones had to go. As did the job, in the end.
...has literally never met a programmer.
Nearly all of our wasted time comes from trying to navigate a context switch. Sometimes it's unavoidable—the code is compiling, and so unless you're only waiting less than 15s, you're going to start doing anything else, and that 15s is suddenly 15m. But that's how it goes, and we all learn to navigate this to greater or lesser degrees.
But being interrupted by someone else's random conversation is largely avoidable when you don't work in an open plan office, and largely impossible when you do. You're killing the productivity of your programmers if you put them in these open plans. Want to increase productivity and decrease costs without firing OR hiring anyone? Give them offices, or at least spacious (i.e., can fit 2 people and a white board) cubicles. It's like friggin' magic.
As someone who left their job with a beautiful windowed single person office for a more senior position at a larger company with better pay but an 6x6 cube, I can tell you it wasn't worth it and I am a worse architect/developer for it. Its noisy, distracting, and everyone is nosey. Lots of people just yelling questions over the office, trying to socially develop a product. It creates an environment of over exposure... Stay away from it unless you absolutely have no choice...
You can use modifiers to make much more repellent curses than single word expletives.
HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
I'm confused. I keep reading articles about how developers hate open floor plans and love working from home. But most companies have switched to Agile methodologies, especially Scrum. My company switched us to Scrum 8 months ago. Scrum mandates everyone sit in a large open floor and forbids working from home. It's all about collaboration! Walking into a dev area and it being quiet is very bad. You should hear the buzz of collaboration and feel the innovation in the air!
The trick is to only use the headphones when you really need to focus on something. People eventually figure out you don't want to be disturbed and wait until you take them off.
He always modeled FB after his dorm room.
Many new grads go directly from college open desks to business open desks,
I don't particularly want to work for Apple, but goddamn do I want to work for Johny Srouji.
-Styopa
That would be about 90% of the time I'm at my desk.
Because the real truth is agile sucks too.
"Hey, guys, we have decided to make our office match our overall ecosystem that we have become so famous for. So now all your work will be done on table shaped like a white disk in a massive open garden with 15 foot walls on the perimeter. Enjoy!"
Well, it's Apple, and Apple is all about trendiness. They probably saw other companies doing it and figured that if all the other cool kids are doing it, they should too.
The introverts vs the extroverts problem becomes exacerbated when everyone's in close quarters. As an introvert, my strong desire to stuff a rag in someone's mouth becomes really high. I try desperately not to blather. I don't care the race, age, religion, gender, or sexual persuasion of the yammerer-- some do not understand how to STFU, or even how to have a conversational exchange.
It is for this reason, constant, insipid, spewing blather, that I've left organizations; it was a good thing for both of us. They were good enough to wave goodbye. Not a good fit.... and it's a vortex for problems in an open environment. If concentration and focus is revered or needed, I'll find my own brainstorm, thank you.
Unless Apple has something up their sleeves not yet revealed, they blew a huge wad of shareholder dough on yet another bad idea.
---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
I know for a fact that I will never again have to work in an open floor plan, because I will not accept any position that requires it.
I might have to if it is a local job and can't telecommute. :(
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
Don't even get me started about how evil Agile is.
"F--- the t---- c---sucking perv---- who use them, and f--- the useless c-nts on the Diversity Team that thought this would be a f------ good idea", he added.
Apple should follow the design philosophy of the iMac G4.
The display is vertical but the optical drive is horizontal, because that is their natural position.
The designers work face-to-face but the engineers don't.
My manager and peers are constantly amazed at how much work I get done. The secret? Working in an open plan means I overhear conversations and know about upcoming initiatives that will impact my team and my projects. I'm aware of the business needs and big picture, so can plan more successful deliveries.
Different people excel in different kinds of working conditions. There is no one-size-fits-all. Even though I'm an introvert, I would absolutely hate working from home or working in cubicles and would quickly be looking for another job should I find myself in that situation.
I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
I'm probably one of the few people here who prefers open floor layout. When I'm working on something not totally exciting presence of people next to me keeps me a bit more concentrated on my work. If I'm alone in my corner my mind tends to wander off or just turn off. Being in the cubicle after lunch with somewhat boring coding task will get me dozing off. But separate office is the worst: I need increasing amounts of coffee to stay awake.
You could probably diagnose me with ADD though. So how rare am I?..
It took a while to get used to open office, but everyone learned to deal with it. Ours was large square layouts so you could face away from others for privacy. Going from open office to free seating destroyed the atmosphere and culture.
No more pictures on any desks, you can't leave anything behind at night because you may not get the same spot tomorrow. Sure, people are creatures of habit, but teams working at customer offices would return and large clusters of desks would be gone. No more walking over to talk to someone because you aren't sure where they were. It's like working remote, but from a sterile room.
Now I wfh but have my work space set up the way I like.
That was pretty much my reaction when Apple announced the 2014 Mac mini.
#DeleteFacebook
Courage!
Some people value windows/natural light very highly. Others value peace and quiet very highly. I am in the latter (although, much of my career I've had a private window office so that's the best of both worlds).
Solution: put the cubes/open space around the outside of the building, small private offices in the interior with "interior" hallways and w/o windows (in some countries though this might not be allowed as "natural light is a natural right" for workers in some countries). Workers have some input on which they get. Obviously it may be difficult to get the open space/office ratio right until one really knows what people want and those desires may change over time.
Indeed.
If you're a software developer and you don't need to concentrate on what you're doing, what you are doing probably isn't worth doing and should be removed from the workflow.
(I'm a Comcast subscriber and I'm pretty sure that their developers and testers and developers at their STB suppliers have open plan work spaces. That's the only rational explanation I have for how a fairly simple product could be updated with new software regularly and the new software has as many bugs as the prior version - just 50% of the bugs are new and 50% of the old bugs are gone. It's maddening).
I once applied for a job at one of them. They were offering considerably less than market rate. It was cubicles, not open plan, but pay peanuts, get monkeys.
I've spent most of my career in cube farms, but I did spend a few years working in a job where I had my own office with a door. I'll admit that it did allow me to goof off from time to time. But when I needed to concentrate, I was able to close the door and fly through code without any distractions. It was amazing how efficient I was there. In the cube farms, there are almost always distractions. Someone always has some silly conversation going on, or needs help with something they are too lazy to search for themselves. The cost of providing actual offices for senior developers is probably high, but I bet a scientific study would prove that it's worth the money in efficiency gains.
I worked in an open office for about a year, prior to that the company was using a typical cube farm. I can say the open concept was nice initially but after the first month it became quite annoying. It was loud, no real privacy ( which for a CSR group really sucks ) and didn't really foster a work with each other atmosphere as much as let's just listen to everyone's conversations and Snoop on people one.
scrum? eat shit and die you fuckwit
An "open office" floor plan uses low cube walls, no cube walls, or no cubes at all. Just depending on how "open and collaborative" they are trying to (appear) to be.
First-world-probleming on slashdot is a soft skill, which is one of the biggest difference makers to get hired in IT (besides gender and other forms of diversity-oriented qualities). Runner-up: being involved in a github project that has a code of conduct.
lucm, indeed.
Don't worry, we have plenty of ear plugs!
Don't you get cabin fever after a while? Working from home 1-2 days a week is great, but to me, being home 24x7 sounds a lot like being in jail. I've tried and it drove me nuts.
Commuting can be a bitch but I used to live really close to the office and it wasn't much better. I need at least a 15 minute buffer to make the switch between home and work life, but maybe it's just me.
lucm, indeed.
My manager and peers are constantly amazed at how much work I get done. The secret? Working in an open plan means I overhear conversations and know about upcoming initiatives that will impact my team and my projects. I'm aware of the business needs and big picture, so can plan more successful deliveries.
I believe you. If your organization is typical, you also probably catch idiotic ideas before they get too far.
This doesn't require an open floor plan, though. It can be achieved in a cubicle or office setup if you get friendly with the right people and figure out an optimal path to the coffee machine.
lucm, indeed.
Now only if you could build some kind of space where people could meet into your office plan in order to collaborate... I know, you could even have a way of scheduling these get-togethers so that people can prepare, and not get blindsided by when they happen! In fact, you could even mount some kind of board on the wall of these spaces that could be erased easily, so as to allow diagrams and charting to be done right on the wall, to help facilitate the discussion...
No, that's all crazy. Let's just have a big open space where everyone is up in everyone else's shit and it's just a cacophony and nobody can concentrate on anything.
Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
They've known for decades that open plan reduces developers productivity. An ex-manager at my company told me he once dared to raise the issue with senior management. The answer came back "just put more pressure on them; make them work harder; force it out of them".
they'll develop very thin employees with no errmm 'openings'
http://thecoolhunter.net/new-work-project-co-working-space-brooklyn-nyc/
Co-working is the current trend. Half-way between office and work-at-home.
The purpose of Apple Park should not be to have a beautiful building. The purpose should be to help SW and HW engineers create beautiful and useful products.
If a design decision forces a choice between creating a beautiful building, vs. employees creating beautiful and useful products, then the decision should be for the latter. If that means choosing offices with doors, instead of lovely minimalist open offices, then so be it.
Oh snap.
Point has been made before. I started working in an OPO recently. The noise and distraction started driving me crazy, exacerbated by the overlady actually decreeing: "no headphones, take part in collaboration and information-sharing" (she used to be a dev herself no less, according to her own claims).
However, I wanted to make a good impression in the new job, and started googling on how best to work in an OPO...
Now THAT was a depressing exercise....
* Even the most uncritical and positive articles regarding the benefits of OPOs still started of by a paragraph of caveats and excuses
* All tips given relate to negating the supposed benefits of the OPO setup: headphones (noise-cancelling or music) to minimize the collaboration (mostly irrelevant chatting in practice); finding some private space to work for a while to focus; even for employers to provide such spaces (no floor area savings there).
I'm a scum master (ex-dev), I WFH 1 or 2 days a week. These are my getting stuff done days. In the office it's my "helping everyone else get stuff done" days. :)
It really depends on where you are in the space and how your colleagues behave.
Sure, if your colleagues are quiet, if your desk is near a window with noone behind you, if there aren't too many people, it may be great. In most cases though, I highly doubt it.
The place I work at has real offices with 6 desks in each. 3 facing opposite sides, with windows on the third side and a door (or a big opening) on the fourth. It'd be better imho if we faced each other instead of the wall but it's way better than an open space while retaining many of the advantages you mentioned.
Too bad the company itself isn't as good as its facilities.
You should hear the buzz of collaboration and feel the innovation in the air! Flag as Inappropriate
I gotta remember that. Sounds much better than 'background noise'.
What this really reflects, perhaps, is that developers are no longer treated with respect. There was a time when companies treated a developer like a rocket scientist. But increasingly we are treated as disposable, especially by HR departments accustomed to hiring cheap staff from off-shore. This is just another sign of the same trend. After all, who cares if people who don't matter are working a little less efficiently?
The same problem can be seen in the abuse of Agile to micromanage developers. If developers are just slaves, what does it matter how often you drag them into pointless meetings?
I fear that this is the underlying problem - that our industry is becoming commoditised.
Whether Apple is wise to adopt this view is another matter.
Apple Ink may sink faster than the Titanic.
When iTunes gets caned, no more Pod casts. Timmy will be proud.
Hahaha
Just a hunch, but have you ever praised Apple for anything ever?
I've worked in cubes, open offices, and even had my own office for short stint. If it's loud, put some headphones on. Go to work, get your crap done, get paid. That simple. Can't believe how much people get bent out of shape over this.
its all about what sales and marketing want, since they get the executive jobs, and hire each other. fucking talkers, always keeping the doers down.
From the article, I noticed that Johny Srouji is quoted as defending his team...quite vocally...against having an open office imposed on them. Individual workers will never win over the MBAs touting cost per square foot, or the design eggheads like Jony Ive demanding everything be white, flat and rounded. But the boss of a very influential part of the company has a little more pull. If a boss has sufficient leverage (and guts) to say something like, "Maybe I should take my chip design team over to Qualcomm/Intel/AMD and you can just buy processors for your iThings from them!" things like corporate "mandates" tend to fall away pretty quickly. Problem is that most managers aren't like that; if I were a computer engineer I sure wouldn't mind working for this guy.
I know people have different work styles, and some extroverts and recent college graduates want to continue the college lifestyle by recreating the dorm/dining hall/open classroom feel. But in my experience, it's going to take Google saying "oops, we screwed up...open plan is only good for web startups with 25 people, and everywhere else should have a mix of styles and let teams/people choose." Every large company I've ever worked for copies HR policy verbatim from either GE, IBM or Google. I think they all use the same management consulting firm.
Yep. My experience with an open office plan was no cube walls, unless you count the little one foot wall around the edge of some (but not all) of the desks.
I like bullpens in an operational environment, when during a crisis you want to be able to provide more or less instant ("Hey, I've got this, can you take a look at that.") communication and you don't have a real NOC or Operations center (or you're providing team support to them but aren't physically collocated.
Outside of that -- some designer/programmer working on some discrete unit? Probably not. Separate offices and walled cubes, and then provide lots of shared whiteboard areas (or open rooms) for when collaboration does in fact need to happen.
Hire a Linux system administrator, systems engineer,
You piece of shit, scum! Oh wait, you just don't proofread. Excellent QA boss! Way to pay attention to detail.
It's a new software engineering technique. Soon all the Fortune 500's IT shops will be using SCUM, and SCUM masters will be all the rage.
My home has all sorts of things to do that I find enticing that aren't work. This is deliberate. We have a home that we like very much.
So, I can focus on work for one day at home. Two is a challenge. I'm not going to try three,
I do have an option other than finding other employment. I've got a nice retirement set up. I'm still working because I rather like the job and it gives me an even nicer retirement. So, if we go to an open office plan, I'll just wish everybody else the best in that setup.
"When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
Having worked in cubicles with noisy, obnoxious neighbors who would not shut up, I know from experience productivity drops when the walls disappear! One of the greater jokes related to converting offices to shared working spaces was that the guy who kept his office and had one of the biggest offices that remained did all of the planning for "optimized" work space in the cubicals. Optimizing meant continued reduction in individual workspaces, which meant everyone moves to a new area while they redo the partitions and put in smaller work tables and remove cabinets, then move into the newly reduced work areas, whilst the spaces vacated were downsized even further, and then moving back. Job security for that jerk, and a steady stream of expenses for new furniture, etc. And of course productivity was just soaring!
That is when you [go to the gym|go for a walk|go hang out with friends|work on a hobby|play with kids]. You can also go out to lunch on occasion to break the monotony. Be creative with that time that is "commute time" for everyone else, and add quality to your life.