Slashdot Mirror


Apple Employees Rebelling Against Apple Park's Open Floor Plan, Report Says (neowin.net)

During a new episode of The Talk Show podcast on Daring Fireball, John Gruber touched on the topic of the open floor plans that Apple has implemented within its new campus, Apple Park. A WSJ profile of Jony Ive, where he talked about Apple Park, mentioned how programmers, engineers, and other employees had already expressed concerns about working in such an environment. Gruber shared what he has heard: I heard that when floor plans were announced, that there was some meeting with [Apple Vice President] Johny Srouji's team. He's in charge of Apple's silicon, the A10, the A11, all of their custom silicon. Obviously a very successful group at Apple, and a large growing one with a lot on their shoulders. When he [Srouji] was shown the floor plans, he was more or less just "F--- that, f--- you, f--- this, this is bulls---." And they built his team their own building, off to the side on the campus ... My understanding is that that building was built because Srouji was like, 'F--- this, my team isn't working like this.'"

174 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. They're considering doing this where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they do, I'll give them two options. Either I work from home, or I'm going to start looking for alternate employement.

    1. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      Ford Motor Company is starting to do this with their offices because they saw Apple and the other cool companies doing it. Fuck you Ford. Fuck you.

    2. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      They did this where I work. It's unbelievable to me how, today, someone can decide to do this to their employees when a simple google search for "open concept office" returns page after page about how terrible and anti-productive it is.

      But I told my manager to expect to see me less. I've worked at home at least four times more than I've been at my desk... probably more. And when I do go in to the office because I have to be there for a meeting or something, I go in and leave after.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      If they do, I'll give them two options. Either I work from home, or I'm going to start looking for alternate employement.

      I actually don't find it that bad. I have a good set of headphones to cut down on sound, good music to work to and large monitors to cover my field of view. I don't find it hard to concentrate or work effectively, just crank up the tunes and go at it. It sure beats the 6' cube walls in the dark corner of the rat maze I used to have with no windows in sight for 20 yards. I felt like a caged animal with nothing to see in the last place, here I can actually look outside when I like...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      The great part is doing this to the folks in the manufacturing environment. We have to hold private meetings, have union hearings, and store a SHITLOAD of documentation because of Sarbanes Oxley. Pay documents, ergo, union / vacation forms, etc. But the 'new' desks don't provide shit for storage space either.

      Have you ever tried to actually do work on a manufacturing floor? You can't even hear to make phone calls. Idiocy. And whoever approved it is a total moron.

    5. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ford Motor Company is starting to do this with their offices because they saw Apple and the other cool companies doing it. Fuck you Ford. Fuck you.

      No; Ford is doing it because architects work well in open plan offices - it suits their consultative, not too deep thinking, kind of work. And HR people. If they thought too deeply about what they are doing they would commit suicide, so they really really dream of open plan offices even though mostly they aren't allowed them. Then the two groups impose what would be good for their work on software developers and engineers, people who have two modes of work - absolute peace and heated discussion. There is no way a software developer can work effecively in a large open plan office.

      I have seen multiple companies going bankrupt after going properly open plan. Yes, sure, in most cases you could say that they went open plan because they foresaw financial problems, however the going open plan is probably what made it impossible for them to recover.

    6. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by lucm · · Score: 1

      Do you have an open floor plan at home?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by Bongo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It suits architects because most of them aren't doing the actual design work. You can bet the master designer is sitting somewhere completely undisturbed in a state of intense focus for a few hours at a time. But you only need one of those.

    8. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by enrique556 · · Score: 1

      I could probably get programming work done like this, with the addition of a simple "FUCK OFF" sign sticky-taped to the back of my chair.

    9. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      "The shit only comes up to my knees, so it's not that bad I guess."

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    10. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      That's why they call it "work" and not "play" and why they pay me to do it instead of me paying them. I'd much rather be doing my own thing than sitting in my cube at work, but the open bay environment I'm working in now is MUCH nicer than the dark and dingy rat maze we had before we moved to the new digs. Nothing is perfect and that applies to "work" for sure.

      Don't get me wrong, I see the down side of this open bay concept. I'm just saying that it's better than what we had before and most of the issues folks complain about are manageable if you think about it.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's bloody fantastic.

    12. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by lucm · · Score: 1

      I'm not trolling. I'm just curious; is it best to have a big area and you see the same big room all the time, or to have a separate room for work? Doesn't that bother you to see the kitchen table and tv from your workspace?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    13. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I suspect it depends entirely on whether you live alone or not :)

      However, I can't see my kitchen and my large TV at the same time, I can work out of sight from either. Even open plan offices tend to have ways to segment parts of the room, and living spaces do benefit from that.

      By avoiding actual walls though a relatively small house feels far more spacious.

      I want a big barn of a house with a three storey high ceiling, so that I can use an internal balcony for my bed, stick the kitchen under it and use the rest of the room for mixed social/work/entertainment purposes. Not there yet.. :(

    14. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      We are soon to move from the building where I started working for the company (shortly after it was acquired, a few years before the acquirer got acquired) to another building. The new building will have the standard workplace layout of the latter acquirer: open plan. Word is, the new location was obtained and furnished by corporate, with little or no local advice or control.

      It will be interesting to see if new employee interviews result in anyone actually accepting jobs there. And what the corporate response will be if there is an ever-increasing number of open reqs.

      I'm not sure if this is just ordinary bureaucratic cluelessness on the part of the home office, or part of a deliberate strategy of replacing the current workforce with less expensive staffers from the company's overseas offices.

      While I can't dismiss the deliberate strategy explanation, bureaucratic cluelessness is a real possibility. Data point: The corporate HR people kept sending upper management-level resumes when we needed to fill a data-entry position with a temp.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    15. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by Teckla · · Score: 1

      Enjoy that hearing loss when you get older.

    16. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      LOL... I AM older and I'm losing my hearing for the normal aging reasons, not because I listen to my headphones to loud. I'm losing my low end sensitivity because I'm getting older, but I am very careful about hearing protection and not listening to headphones very loud.

      Did I mention that my headphones are the type that totally cover my ears and although wouldn't be sufficient for hearing protection while shooting, do provide a high amount of isolation? I'm not going to lose my hearing, at least not from using headphones... Maybe at the shooting range or turning screws and nailing stuff in the garage, but not from headphones.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    17. Re:They're considering doing this where I work. by Teckla · · Score: 1

      Okay, just making sure, I got a little worried when you used the phrase "crank it up" :-)

  2. Put all the women on a seperate floor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That will make everyone happy.

    1. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I once worked for a company that did this. Why? Thermostats. The women were constantly pushing them higher, while the men were pushing them lower, leading to many arguments. The CEO finally got fed up and put the "hot" people in one room and the "cold" people in the other. This led to mostly segregation by gender, although there were some scrawny guys that went to the warm area, and a few "big" women preferred the cooler section.

    2. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me get this straight - all the hot women were on the same floor. Where do I sign up?

    3. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a thermosexual.

    4. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The OP assumed that readers understand satire.
      Big mistake.

      Which reminds me of my friend who works at Google.
      I asked him how it was there, and he said he couldn't complain.

    5. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by JohnFen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why didn't they just do what the majority of office buildings do? Don't connect the thermostats to the HVAC system.

    6. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by lucm · · Score: 1

      This is actually very common. Ask the security or maintenance people in the building where you work, they will confirm it.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by lucm · · Score: 2

      Been in this nightmare before: open floor plan and the thermostat happened to be just behind a menopausal woman.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    8. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is actually very common.

      Yes it is, but he asked for a citation, not a repetition of the assertion.

      Here is a citation: Employees Only Think They Control Thermostat.

    9. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by lucm · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      This being said, in terms of credibility, I put the WSJ somewhere between Yahoo Answers and David Icke's youtube channel (including the comments section).

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    10. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by johannesg · · Score: 2

      I once worked for a company that did this. Why? Thermostats. The women were constantly pushing them higher, while the men were pushing them lower, leading to many arguments. The CEO finally got fed up and put the "hot" people in one room and the "cold" people in the other. This led to mostly segregation by gender, although there were some scrawny guys that went to the warm area, and a few "big" women preferred the cooler section.

      Ah yes. My company is transitioning to an open floor right as I type this. One of my colleagues is known for having his window open, even when the temperature drops far below freezing in winter. If I still had a whiteboard, I'd write "WINTER IS COMING" on it in large letters...

    11. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by johannesg · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the designers have designed one of the desks to be located with its back to the bosses' office. That office has a glass wall on that side. I've publicly stated that if I get assigned to that desk I will resign the same day - and I was _not_ kidding.

    12. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by beuges · · Score: 1

      I went back to the offices of a previous employer a year or two after I left, and I noticed that the AC control panels each had a metal plate padlocked over them. Turns out one of the guys in the team I used to work in used to keep going through the office dropping the temperature to the minimum, and everyone else would be freezing. Apparently they spoke to him and he kept doing it, and the metal plates and padlocks worked out cheaper than having to go through the hassle of a disciplinary hearing.

    13. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      lol fat women.

    14. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      There's too many, and since you don't trust the WSJ, I can't predict which ones you will trust. I suggest researching it yourself. For a general overview and links to sources, this isn't a bad writeup: http://www.todayifoundout.com/...

      Interestingly, if you search for "dummy office thermostats", you'll find numerous places that sell them for this exact purpose.

    15. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Clearly you missed the memo : Air conditioning is sexist.
      https://www.theguardian.com/mo...

      Yes, making men wear a suit and tie then lowering the temperature to stop them permanently sweating is sexist against women that want bare shoulders and refuse to put on a fucking cardigan.

    16. Re: Put all the women on a seperate floor by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Was he the guy who always said, "tits nipply out today, eh?"

    17. Re:Put all the women on a seperate floor by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I once worked for a company that did this. Why? Thermostats. The women were constantly pushing them higher, while the men were pushing them lower, leading to many arguments. The CEO finally got fed up and put the "hot" people in one room and the "cold" people in the other. This led to mostly segregation by gender, although there were some scrawny guys that went to the warm area, and a few "big" women preferred the cooler section.

      Ha! I've worked dozens of different jobs and this is one of the few constants across the board. There is no easy solution to this since different people have different comfort levels, especially older females as they biologically suffer from menopause which throws their internal heating balance up the shit.

  3. My demands for a job: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. No interview. Possibly a couple of questions via e-mail, but that's the most I will agree to.
    2. No seeing anyone ever. I work remotely from home.
    3. Payment will be in Bitcoin.
    4. No stress or deadlines. If I feel like finishing something, that's when it will be ready.
    5. I get paid a fixed sum per month even if I produce no results (for a reasonable amount of time), no less than 1 BTC/month with current value. Preferably 2 BTC with current value.

    Those are my demands to work for somebody else. You think I'm writing satire or making a joke of some kind? Nope. This is how "entitled" I really am. Not spoiled -- just sick of all the BS in this world. Cannot conform to it. I just cannot.

    How are you supposed to make money if you really can't "play the game"?

    1. Re: My demands for a job: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey let's hire this autistic guy with no discernible skills!

    2. Re: My demands for a job: by avandesande · · Score: 2

      First-world-probleming on slashdot isn't a skill?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:My demands for a job: by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      My demands will increase until you hire me. So you're better off not bothering with the interviews or things like that--for every day I'm not working, I'm coming up with new demands. So hire me now!

    4. Re:My demands for a job: by lucm · · Score: 1

      no less than 1 BTC/month with current value

      That's $3,000 / month... and that's "entitled"? I guess you're some kind of GeekSquad guy who thinks 35k is a big salary, but at my company we pay a lot more than that for helpdesk, which is pretty much at the bottom of the IT ladder.

      I hope you live somewhere cheap.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re:My demands for a job: by Cederic · · Score: 1

      While meeting the work delivery commitments he made, I could easily find somewhere affordable to live even on $36k/year before tax.

      I could also meet those work commitments while taking a second job that pays a six figure sum, so really it's just a bonus $3k/month.

  4. As someone who went from an open-office to WFH... by geschbacher79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My manager and peers are constantly amazed at how much work I get done. The secret? Being a work at home employee means you don't have to deal with the incessant noise, eavesdropping on phone calls, office nonsense ("It's Tina in HR's birthday! Come sing!") etc. You can actually concentrate, especially when you're dealing with complex coding issues. Context switches are a fantastic productivity killer. I don't blame the Apple CPU designers. They're probably among the teams that require the most concentration in tech. Good for them for willing to buck the "accepted wisdom" about open offices.

  5. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nobody but management and some handful of hyper-social outliers likes open floorplan. Cubicles are bad enough. But open floorplan is the devil. Of course the employees hate it. Management had to know that going in. They apparently didn't care or thought the level of spying they can do would be worth pissing the employees off and making them less productive. When you look at the confluence of IT type workers (that Apple, being a tech co, is heavy in), we tend to be on the "autism spectrum" (what was formerly called Asperger's). We don't do well with a cacophony - and white noise doesn't help.

    1. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bose QC-25. Freakin' magic.

    2. Re:Duh! by lucm · · Score: 1

      How long can you wear that before it gets hot and annoying?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  6. And is anyone surprised? by Puls4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Open floor plans suck. Horribly. Why? Privacy. I'm stuff in a place doing work for 8 hours a day, and now you're going to take away my small walls so that everyone can watch my computer and listen to my phone calls.

    If I'm tired at lunch - I can't take a 20 minute nap because everyone will see me and label me lazy. I can't have a private phone call because I have someone 3 feet away from me. I can't log onto slashdot because I'll quickly get a reputation as someone who doesn't work and just surfs the web.

    So essentially if I don't fall into that small category of folks that like to bullshit and smooze (because if you're talking to people it looks like you're doing work, after all), then I am quite literally in the worst possible environment imaginable.

    But my boss clearly has super important things to do and needs HIS privacy. So he gets walls. And a door.

    And if the guy next to me is a serial yakker? Nope. No work getting done. Or the two guys diagonally are pranksters? Nope. The open floor plan was created by some Dilbert-Esque pointy haired boss who should have been fired a long long time ago.

    1. Re:And is anyone surprised? by apoc.famine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I worked in one tolerable open floor plan, and it worked for a few reasons: It was a small, close-knit team of a dozen, working on one project, with long tables to spread out over instead of cramped desks or cubes, with comfy chairs, and it was a corner room with windows the full length of two walls, with a private bathroom and kitchenette. Compared to where we moved from, that was fantastic. Offices would have been a step up, but compared to the dark dungeon of an open floor plan we came from, that quiet sunny office was amazing.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:And is anyone surprised? by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      I can't log onto slashdot because I'll quickly get a reputation as someone who doesn't work and just surfs the web.

      That might be bad for you. It's not bad for your employer. I mean the days when slashdot was a good way of following what's going on in the tech world as a professional are long gone. Now it is just a time sink.

      (And before the smart arse ACs come in, I'm at home, it's 10:50pm where I am, and so I'm definitely wasting my own time here.)

    3. Re:And is anyone surprised? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I'd take open plan over small offices/cubicles with no windows or fresh air. The noise reducing material they make cubicles out of gets very dusty too, bad for allergies.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:And is anyone surprised? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If I'm tired at lunch - I can't take a 20 minute nap because everyone will see me and label me lazy.

      We have napping rooms in our office for that.

      I can't have a private phone call because I have someone 3 feet away from me.

      We have private rooms with a phone in them for that.

      I can't log onto slashdot because I'll quickly get a reputation as someone who doesn't work and just surfs the web.

      My boss doesn't grade me on rumours of idiots.

    5. Re:And is anyone surprised? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Learn to read. I didn't say " following what's going on in the tech world as a professional" was a bad idea. Just that Slashdot is a very poor place to do it these days. It's days as a useful resource started declining about 15 years ago.

    6. Re:And is anyone surprised? by lucm · · Score: 1

      The noise reducing material they make cubicles out of gets very dusty too, bad for allergies.

      This is true and I had never realized that until recently. At work there's a row of cubicle next to a huge window, and I noticed that when the sun is bright in the morning the whole area looks like those aloe vera drinks with floating pulp.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re:And is anyone surprised? by lucm · · Score: 1

      It's not just slashdot:
      -techcrunch
      -newsgroups
      -expert sexchange

      techie blogs/forums also took a nosedive
      -coding horror
      -the daily wtf
      -joel on software

      even sites that used to offer excellent PowerPoint fodder for meetings with PHBs are now garbage:
      -baselinemag
      -mckinsey insights
      -cio.com

      even dilbert is no longer funny.

      nowadays content is numbered titles and a big unsplash header on medium.com ("10 reasons why...") or lame clickbait ("shocking discovery...").

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    8. Re:And is anyone surprised? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      He did mention lunch, though. If you're stuck at your desk for lunch (because there's nowhere else to go) why not have a shuftie at a few websites?

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    9. Re:And is anyone surprised? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Open floor plans suck. Horribly. Why? Privacy. I'm stuff in a place doing work for 8 hours a day, and now you're going to take away my small walls so that everyone can watch my computer and listen to my phone calls.

      Not all open plan is the same. A place I worked had many breakout spaces for private phone calls, whiteboard space for workshopping, even a couple of closed rooms with bean bags if you wanted some rest time.
      Open plan doesn't have to mean a warehouse.

  7. Don't let them escape by Toxiz · · Score: 1

    Offices were created to trap talented employees at work. Once you go to an open office plan, they can all escape. And, they will. You will be left with only hipsters playing cornhole in the hallways.

    1. Re:Don't let them escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and we all know how much Apple hipsters love cornhole

  8. They did it at my office by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The did this for half of my building (top floor is open while the bottom is still the standard cubicals) and every HATES it. Not that the little half-cubes we had before were spacious, but the shared desks are tiny! You get about 3 feet to yourself an two little dividers between you and the next person. That's about enough room for a computer, phone, and a piece of paper. They also gave everyone a little rolling footstool instead of a chair. People are in pure hell now. The noise is unbearable, no one has any room to do actual work, and everyone is ready to kill the person next to them. Thankfully I'm in a locked lab where they decided not to do this. Sometimes I think the only reason I stay in my position is so I don't have to be in one of those open desk areas.

    When they first floated the idea of an open floor plan the response of universally negative (like 200+ negative comments to one positive). The management said they'd take our concerns into consideration and then promptly installed the new desks a week later. Turns out they already had everything ordered and the whole 'tell us what you think' discussions were just a smokescreen to placate people.

    1. Re:They did it at my office by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Ahh... that, too. My open concept spot is less than half the size of my previous cubicle. I have two laptops and a full size desktop tower that I can't put on the floor. The actual desk space was purposely limited because they wanted a nice, uniform appearance with everybody with one monitor and one keyboard, and they actually started with a policy of one monitor on the desk until we told them (we all work in graphics) that it's simply not going to work... some of us even need TV preview monitors. Now I've gotten a number of people to join me in asking for returns so that we can increase desk space. At the moment, I just end up working from home most of the time.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:They did it at my office by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it really was. Especially since they made such a huge deal about the whole 'we're listening to you' angle. If they had spaced it out a little better they might have been able to get away with it, but they obviously didn't care about getting caught.

    3. Re:They did it at my office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Learn how to be a pain in the ass for big companies when they do this.

      Step 1: "My back hurts, I need an ergo assessment."
      Step 2: You get a big, VERY expensive chair that others covet. Let them know how you got it.
      Step 3: "My DVT is bothering me. I need an ergo assessment."
      Step 4: You get a special, extra large, VERY expensive sit stand desk that others covet. Let them know how you got it.
      Step 5: "My tinnitus is bothering me. I need an ergo assessment."
      etc etc etc

      After spending $5000+ on each employee as they go through the ergo motions, the health and safety board tells the PHB the cost of these ergo assessments and suggests that perhaps the new office furniture wasn't such a cheap deal after all. Or, the other employees don't care and you slowly end up with what is essentially your old cube setup with bells on.

      Note: This doesn't work at small, or even medium size companies. Sounds like your company is large enough for you to do this.

    4. Re:They did it at my office by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      One monitor? Are they animals?

    5. Re:They did it at my office by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      Anything less than 3 monitors is considered abuse these days.

    6. Re:They did it at my office by Puls4r · · Score: 2

      Do you work for the FCC by chance?

    7. Re:They did it at my office by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I get it: first world problems. Like our animators having a wacom cintiq acting as a second monitor... and then the VP complains because it doesn't look good.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    8. Re:They did it at my office by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Well, read what I wrote - we do graphics. So our animators (not me) have 30 inch monitors AND a second 27 inch Wacom Cintiq... which is what they had in their suites. Then they got moved to tiny open concept area and are expected to work "even better" because now they can collaborate. Meanwhile, the corporate idiots walk through the room, and contrary to their nice neat "one monitor" ideal, they complain the room they created looks like crap because everyone's desk packed and it looks like we're crammed in like cattle, like a tech version of "Hoarders."

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    9. Re:They did it at my office by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Not even joking. Two monitors improves worker performance from accounting to IT to graphics. Keeping people at one for some aesthetic reason is crazy.

    10. Re:They did it at my office by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Corporate idiots more concerned about looks than productivity. Typical.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re:They did it at my office by geoscodin · · Score: 1

      I was a consultant for 11 years. In the beginning we had our own offices even when the FTEs were in cubicles. Then we wound up in "war rooms" sitting at tables around the walls or even lined up tables like schools kids. Suddenly I'm listening to the buzz of someone's headphones (or worse PC speakers), crunching of snacks, slurping of drinks, arguments with their spouses on the phone (sometimes on speaker phone - WHY?), side conversations. Even when I try to focus someone tries to pull you in for your opinion on that new show or the big game. And when you explain that you're trying to work, you're called antisocial or accused of sucking up to the boss. I'll talk to you all through lunch or after work, but I've got a task with a deadline. I saw people let go for too much socializing (and presumable too little work). Cubicle walls don't block all of it, but it stops me from being distracted by constant movement, and requires people to intentionally seek me out instead of trying to pull me into their conversation just because we accidentally made eye contact. It was easier to train my family when I worked from home that I should not be interrupted while working, but even there I'm in a room by myself.

  9. Re:I can see the comments now.. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    apple is right everyone else is wrong.

    I don't think so. There is evidence that open offices are bad for productivity. Some people like to work in a bullpen, but even for those people their productivity may go down more than they realize. Other people hate open offices, and refuse to work in them. These are often the best people, who have plenty of other employment options. Open offices are false economy. The cost of providing a real office is negligible compared to a typical tech salary in Cupertino.

    My company has some open office space, and I work there sometimes. But I also have an office with real walls where I can sit and focus. It is small, about 8 ft by 10 ft, but that is enough for two chairs, a desk, and a bookshelf.

    I will not accept any job that requires me to work in a cubicle or open office, although I did work that way when I was young and desperate.

  10. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by alvinrod · · Score: 2

    I think part of the problem is that Apple has a lot of teams in a lot of different disciplines. An open floor plan is utterly terrible for programmers and other engineers. I don't mind having an open space where groups can meet for scrums or other occasional meetings, but for the rest of the time I want to be in an office or some other enclosed area where I can concentrate.

    However, I don't doubt that there are other disciplines where putting everyone in a separate office for the entire day is good. I would imagine that various types of creative teams work best when they can be together and easily interact as a group in most scenarios. I'm not certain of this, but I suspect that people who function like this may not realize that engineers just want to be left alone so that they can function and if they get to make choices about how the workplace should be organized they make choices for how they like to operate.

  11. For fuck's sake! by Kergan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the era of "suck his own cock" coming straight out of the White House, can we please stop trying to disguise fuck as f___?

    1. Re:For fuck's sake! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      can we please stop trying to disguise fuck as f___?

      No. The WHOLE POINT of profanity is its ability to shock and offend people. If it is used openly and casually, it loses that ability. This has already happened with "damn" and "hell" which used to be perfectly good swear words, and "shit" is less and less effective. If we give up on "fuck", then we have almost nothing left. Maybe "cunt", but that is used as more of an insult than as general profanity.

    2. Re:For fuck's sake! by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

      Now that we have documented serial killers, can we just start killing people who annoy us?

      There's something to be said for not joining the race to the bottom, even when it's minor things like foul language.

    3. Re:For fuck's sake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      Think of the fucking children.

    4. Re:For fuck's sake! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Just get creative. There's always an ability to shock. If Fuck and Shit aren't good enough for you, start translating some Croatian profanities into English. English is really soft when it comes to swear words.

    5. Re:For fuck's sake! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      start translating some Croatian profanities into English.

      I have heard that Hungarian has some wonderful profanity.

      I can speak some Mandarin Chinese, which also has some great profanity, but alas, I never get the tones right, and listeners end up confused rather than offended. So I understand enough to tell when I am being insulted, but not enough to retaliate in kind.

    6. Re:For fuck's sake! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Japanese is weak. Calling people animal names is worthless. The Dutch will call you some kind of disease. I stepped infront of a bicycle one day and I heard a trailing of what translated to "cancer jew".

      Also I didn't mean Croatian, I meant Serbian. And if you want to hear what it sounds like just tell a Serbian that Serbian and Croatian are the same thing ^_^

    7. Re:For fuck's sake! by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      no, fuck that shit, you cunt.

    8. Re:For fuck's sake! by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      It just doesn't have the same ring to it when translated into English. "Go into three pretty mother's pussies" sounds just plain... weird.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    9. Re:For fuck's sake! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yep I heard that one before. It took a while before I convinced my colleague to translate it for me.

    10. Re:For fuck's sake! by Gussington · · Score: 1

      can we please stop trying to disguise fuck as f___?

      No. The WHOLE POINT of profanity is its ability to shock and offend people. If it is used openly and casually, it loses that ability.

      The purpose of writing is to communicate. When I think 'fuck', then I write 'fuck', you read 'fuck' and think 'fuck'. Ie message communicated.
      If I write F___ instead of 'fuck' the exact same communication occurs, so replacing characters does nothing to change the message being communicated.

      If you want to keep certain words taboo then don't use them at all. Using them but censoring a couple of letter achieves nothing.

  12. Re:I can see the comments now.. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    blah blah blah. apple is right everyone else is wrong.

    Except it's actual Apple employees - and rather important ones - saying they don't want to work in that open environment.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  13. Re:I can see the comments now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A very good friend had her office building staff (major medical provider) moved into an open office type building. It's been 2 years now... Productivity is down, tempers are up, sickness is up, management is still fucked with what to do with their multi-million dollar shithole. There you go.

  14. Re:I can see the comments now.. by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 2

    Open floor plans suck. It is noisy, there is no privacy, and it feels like a mess hall in prison where the guards can constantly watch you. Some claim open floor plan fosters better collaboration. I worked in open floors, cubes, and shared offices and shared offices was the best. Ideally, you are closely working with your office mate or have one who understands that once in a while he or she needs to take coffee break now because two or three have to hash something out. What better than to work in a small meeting room all the time where you can have small meetings without p*ssing off everyone else. Worse than open floor plan is the crap with unassigned seats. You come in and pick any workstation available. While that may be efficient and theoretically there could be more employees than workstations it does not allow for any kind of personalization. And yes, I want to get a good chuckle out of my collected Dilberts on the wall when work is a downer.

  15. I love working in a open space by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I want to goof off or yap on for a half hour with the guys its great, its a fucking nightmare if you have to actually DO any work or god forbid have a phone call with a customer or a supplier

  16. ROI by null+etc. · · Score: 2

    Guys, guys, guys. Before you start going on about how open office plans are just blatantly evil, please consider the shareholders. That's right, publicly-traded companies are owned by investors who want, nay NEED, to ensure that their corporate ownership investments are competitive against other investment vehicles. That how they get rich. With low corporate gains taxes, investors are practically FORCED to invest in corporate ownership compared to other forms of investment. So before you go blab blabbing about how you can't stand to sit next to Shouting Stan and Coughing Cassandra, please realize that your sacrifice yields a greater return on investment for your corporate overlords than if you were each allocated 8 more square feet of floor space, and $186 worth of divider walls.

    1. Re:ROI by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      You'll never get a greater return on your investment if you totally destroy the productivity of the workers.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:ROI by drew_eckhardt · · Score: 1

      With IBM's Santa Teresa study showing 40% more productivity from employees with quiet private spaces, those open offices are costing share holders a lot of money,

      In a big, growing company
      40% of a young engineer's $200K annual package is $120K
      40% of a mature staff engineer's $600K annual package is $240K

      Walls cost much less.

    3. Re:ROI by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      That's right, publicly-traded companies are owned by investors who want, nay NEED, to ensure that their corporate ownership

      publicly traded companies are the worst form of cancer that capitalism brought us.

    4. Re:ROI by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You can get a greater short-term profit by destroying the productivity of some workers. If you time it right, you get a new job just before productivity as a whole crashes.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  17. Re:I can see the comments now.. by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The worst thing is that open offices aren't just bad for productivity - they're bad for collaboration. Conversations in individual offices happen by poking your head around an office door and discussing something with your colleague. The same conversation in an open office will do one of three things - 1) not happen (because the person initiating it thinks 'this conversation will disturb everyone'); 2) happen in a meeting room, and involve 6 more useless people, because by making it a formal meeting you needed to make sure you used your 1 hour effectively, and had everyone you might possibly need in that meeting; or 3) happen anyway in the open office, slowly accumulate more people throwing random ideas into the pot, and not actually make any decisions.

  18. Re:A while back by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    That's exactly what they said where I work - it's all about collaboration. Yes, we collaborate. Maybe 10 or 15 whole minutes.... they we need peace and quiet to work at our desks. I've been working from home around 80-90% of the time since I was forced to move into the open concept area.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  19. Re:I can see the comments now.. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Libre Office is almost as bad as Open Office for productivity.... just sayin.

  20. good for Srouji! by SpammersAreScum · · Score: 1

    Our company took over a floor and designed it to be an open floor plan for everyone below the program manager level. Even though I would have been allowed to work from home half the time, touring where I'd be working shortly definitely added weight to my early-retirement decision.

  21. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by tomxor · · Score: 2

    ...I would imagine that various types of creative teams work best when they can be together and easily interact as a group in most scenarios. I'm not certain of this, but I suspect that people who function like this may not realize that engineers just want to be left alone...

    I duno... all creativity needs r-mode, when have you ever seen a brainstorming session among a group of people ever output anything particularly creative, group interactions tends to make it impossible to contribute anything that is not just prior knowledge.

    Actual creativity needs peace and quiet to let ideas peculate through your brain, when actively and prematurely probed by external forces these ideas collapse like an illusive wave function as you scramble for solidified, easily verbalised thought.

  22. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by tomxor · · Score: 1

    I just started doing a WFH a bit and it's amazing, I used to wait till everyone left do work on complex or thoughtful tasks, now I can do it in the day :)

  23. Re:I can see the comments now.. by bobbied · · Score: 2

    I must be weird then... We've been in an open floor plan now for a year at the new digs and I actually like it. I NEVER had a window view before and I like it much better than the 6' cube walls I had before. I also like being able to see if a coworker is in the office or not at a glance and I like being able to keep up with office happenings by listening in when I want to. I also feel like it helps me keep good discipline, keeping my desk space clean and staying on task and off things like Slashdot...

    I get the complaints though, they are distracting, loud and don't offer ANY privacy but I've found ways to cope. I have a set of headphones that cover my ears so I can tune out the noise. The monitors on my computers cover most of my vision area when I want.

    I suppose they are not for everybody though..

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  24. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    However, I don't doubt that there are other disciplines where putting everyone in a separate office for the entire day is good.

    Hmm, like Jony Ive's skinny design team? Sure. They've been incredibly successful with an open floor plan office, makes sense to keep it that way for them in the new building.

    But wait, who designed the entire building, assuming that all Apple teams would want to work this way? Oh yeah, that dumbass Jony Ive. Surrounded by yes-men telling him he's right, I'm sure. And enabled by no-balls Tim Cook who has no understanding of how actual engineers work. At least Steve Jobs made an electronic gadget or two in his youth.

  25. Re:I can see the comments now.. by imidan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Trying to have a conversation with someone in an open-plan office while two other groups of people are already having conversations is maddening. When I worked in one of those places, I seriously found myself losing track of sentences I was speaking midway through... something going on in another conversation distracted me. I sometimes found it easier to wear noise-isolating headphones and use jabber to chat with people, even when they were sitting a few feet away.

  26. Grownup Recess 24/7 by AlexDelphino · · Score: 1

    With the advent of group chats it's unfortunate Apple employees have to stare at each other's faces all day long.

  27. what I like to know... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Is if Cook and his cronies are getting massive offices with real door(s), walls and windows.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:what I like to know... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Some CEOs do. Mark Zuckerberg for example works in an open plan office.

      Apple? Who knows. First of all Apple is secretive. Second, as a company they are not in the open plan offices yet.

    2. Re:what I like to know... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 3, Informative

      apparently covered in the TFA; "open office" is only for rank and file. Executives have their REAL offices on the 4th floor.

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    3. Re:what I like to know... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Intel is another company where everyone works in a cubicle, even the CEO.

      There are more: CEOs who work from cubicles.

      But just because cubicles may work for a CEO, that doesn't mean they work for programmers. The jobs are very different. There is nothing a CEO does that is analogous to tracking down a race condition in a 10,000 line threaded real-time application written by an intern three summers ago.

    4. Re: what I like to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're letting interns write critical code you don't work for a real company.

    5. Re: what I like to know... by jezwel · · Score: 2

      If you're letting interns write critical code you don't work for a real company.

      So...IBM?

    6. Re: what I like to know... by biojayc · · Score: 2

      You're right. Google isn't a real company.

    7. Re:what I like to know... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Do you think anyone has the guts to put a noisy printer right beside his cubicle?
      No, those managers of course get the best spots, surrounded by staff that's also working silently or else...

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    8. Re:what I like to know... by myid · · Score: 2

      Is if Cook and his cronies are getting massive offices with real door(s), walls and windows.

      The article says,

      The open floor work spaces will only be for standard employees, while the high-level executives will be exempt from the collective work environment and will have their own offices on the fourth floor of Apple Park. Other employees won’t even be moving to the new HQ, on this list is Eddy Cue, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Internet Software and Services; he and his team will remain at the current headquarters at Infinite Loop.

      The high-level executives who move to Apple Park get their own offices. So I guess they know the value of having an office.

      I wonder if Eddie Cue fought to keep his group at Infinite Loop, to protect them from open offices.

    9. Re:what I like to know... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      When this Johny Srouji guy told Apple to fuck off, he was probably told "We're Apple. We're incapable of making incorrect design decisions. When somebody doesn't like our design, it is them who is incorrect. You may bend over now."

    10. Re: what I like to know... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with letting interns write code if they go through the same q/a process as anyone else. There were interns writing code in the last group I was in at Apple, and their code was fine. They get valuable experience, and Apple gets to try them out and see whether they should be hired when they graduate. Plenty of Apple's best software engineers started a summer interns.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:what I like to know... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I don't think he had to fight for it. There was never any plan to abandon the office space that Apple already has at the Infinite Loop campus, or any of the dozens of other buildings in the neighborhood.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:what I like to know... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I work with a group of managers who were all put into cubicle farms a few years back, We frequently have conference calls, proposal work, disciplinary actions, salary discussions, and all within earshot of about a dozen other cubicles with non-managers. There are a limited number of rooms to go have a truly private discussion. So, while the company is saving on overhead, it was a penny wise, pound foolish decision. Personally, I try to work from home as frequently as I can get away with. It's ridiculous to expect us to have conference calls with customers on multi-million dollar contracts, where other people on the phone can hear three discussions going on near my cube. I often have to mute my mic. Now, as a former developer, I certainly saw value in having the team gather in a lab to pound out details, and get shit working, but that's not this failed concept. And you can toss "hoteling" in with it.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    13. Re:what I like to know... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      I feel you, been there before, will never go back...

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    14. Re:what I like to know... by torkus · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I highly doubt you have any more knowledge about what a CEO does than that CEO would about your programming example. Reviewing the details of a proposed multi-million (or billion) $ multi-faceted deal isn't incredibly different than chasing down code. Multiple input and output streams with a high degree of complexity and multiple variable data points throughout.

      Some positions benefit better from close coordination and constant communication. Other positions partly benefit from that and also benefit from closed off space that limits interruptions. And some positions greatly benefit from largely closeted space that minimizes unplanned interruptions for the majority of the day.

      With that said, it's the minority of jobs that fit into the first as best I can tell. But contrary to what people think, real-estate is actually pretty expensive in major cities. Fitting twice as many people on a floor is a huge savings to a medium size company - a savings that directly impacts your books (assuming a publicly traded company). So, while there's PLENTY of 'studies' showing the benefits and desire of employees they're all universally bullsh*t. They're driven by 1) people who want to sell office furniture and renovation and 2) people who want to save large amounts of $ on real estate (i.e. driving down run rate costs, which increases pretty much every aspect of your financial books).

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  28. Re:First Post? by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Not idiots.. Freshly minted Masters of Business Administration holders.

    Wait... I repeated myself..

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  29. Johny Srouji by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...is my new favorite person. I'd definitely work for him.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  30. Apple Geniuses by Charcharodon · · Score: 1, Informative
    Apple Geniuses, known by their more common name "Fuck Whits " came up with the brilliant idea of taking a group of people who are legendary for their desire to be able to focus, not to mention being highly introverted, and stuck them in a bright open floor plan with no privacy, no ability to personalize their space, and no ability to avoid socializing and are surprised when that didn't work out so well.

    Bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

    Corporate jackassery at it's finest.

    1. Re:Apple Geniuses by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      You don't know what autocorrect is? Hmmmmm curious? Kids these days are not very smart.

  31. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Ditto. For 1.5 years, I worked from home 100% as a Cisco contractor. I loved it! I noticed my office co(lleague/worker)s had open-office setups. Even my former employer before that job started doing those setups. I am glad I never had to work like that. I hope I never will have to do that for my future jobs if I ever get a job (almost eight months now :(). I'd rather work in a tiny cubicle with low walls.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  32. Name that syndrome by sheramil · · Score: 1

    When he [Srouji] was shown the floor plans, he was more or less just "F--- that, f--- you, f--- this, this is bulls---." And they built his team their own building, off to the side on the campus ... My understanding is that that building was built because Srouji was like, 'F--- this, my team isn't working like this.'"

    Tourette's? I sometimes think of it as "Debra Morgan Syndrome". C--k S--k motherF---!

  33. Open Floor Plans hurt everyone by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    Yes, they save the company some money in the short term, but in the long term, they're very expensive in terms of lost productivity and loss of talent as people quit.

    I had a great position at major company that moved to an open floor plan. I gave it an honest try, but in the end it was crippling, and I quit because of it. Along with about 40% of the other engineers.

  34. Re:I can see the comments now.. by JohnFen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I will not accept any job that requires me to work in a cubicle or open office

    I don't mind a cube if the walls are tall enough.

    It's interesting that people have forgotten that when cubicles were invented, office workers rejoiced -- because cubicles brought an end to the nightmare of the open floor plans that used to be the standard office environment.

  35. Re:I can see the comments now.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    It seems like an especially strange choice given that nothing else about Apple's campus says "we are trying to save money by scrimping on the building here". Their HQ employees(not counting retail workers and indirect employees at contract manufacturers) are also relatively few, relatively expensive, and involved in making the highly profitable stuff happen.

    It's hard to think of a less sensible place to go open-plan. Was their kool-aid during the architectural planning session? Some understimulated extrovert in management just dreaming of having his own noise-drome to stride through, bothering people? What possible advantage is there?

  36. If open offices were really meant to facilitate by bravecanadian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    collaboration and communication you'd the usual office layout would be reversed:

    Managers would be in the open space so they could coordinate things effectively with one another and people with actual work to do would have the offices so they could concentrate.

    We all know the reason why this is not the case.

    1. Re:If open offices were really meant to facilitate by Goldsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's exactly what we're trying to do at my company for exactly that reason.

      I am a manager, and I need to talk to way too many people every day. I hate repeating the same conversation over and over. And I really hate when people feel like they're out of the loop because they didn't get a chance to be in on an important conversation. Still, we're a small company, need to move fast, and simply can't schedule absolutely everything that needs to happen.

      The solution is that the management needs to be out in the open and accessible at most times. A couple conference rooms with doors are all we need; most conversations I have shouldn't be hidden.

      I'm also the technical lead at my company. The folks I manage under no circumstances want to work the way I have to. They want solid blocks of time with no interruptions. I want them to have that too!

      I'm also the founder of my company. That is why these things can happen here and why our business folks understand the value of the technical team's culture.

    2. Re:If open offices were really meant to facilitate by bravecanadian · · Score: 1

      You're the exception to the rule!

    3. Re:If open offices were really meant to facilitate by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      You sound like one of those increasingly rare managers who understand how to manage a team. When did everyone forget that one of the main purposes of a manager is to protect the team from anything that interferes with their ability to work effectively?

  37. Re:I can see the comments now.. by JohnFen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I was trying to make the open floor plan work, I tried using noise-cancelling headphones. But that just made everything worse because then people had to tap me on the shoulder to get my attention, which startled me every time. It made my hypersensitive to everything around me as I was constantly on guard in case someone wanted me.

    So, the headphones had to go. As did the job, in the end.

  38. Anyone surprised by this by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...has literally never met a programmer.

    Nearly all of our wasted time comes from trying to navigate a context switch. Sometimes it's unavoidable—the code is compiling, and so unless you're only waiting less than 15s, you're going to start doing anything else, and that 15s is suddenly 15m. But that's how it goes, and we all learn to navigate this to greater or lesser degrees.

    But being interrupted by someone else's random conversation is largely avoidable when you don't work in an open plan office, and largely impossible when you do. You're killing the productivity of your programmers if you put them in these open plans. Want to increase productivity and decrease costs without firing OR hiring anyone? Give them offices, or at least spacious (i.e., can fit 2 people and a white board) cubicles. It's like friggin' magic.

    1. Re:Anyone surprised by this by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      15s is suddenly 15m

      I work from home. A random 60-seconds clip on YouTube to change my mind can magically turns into a one-hour... let's call it "viewing session" on pornhub.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Anyone surprised by this by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Nearly all of our wasted time comes from trying to navigate a context switch.

      Even if true, it may not matter in way anyone should care. Because your employer cares about your team's overall productivity, not your productivity. Good software companies in the 21st century are not infatuated with engineers churning out huge piles of code, but with a merely good amount of code productivity that meets the real needs.

      Code that is built wrong, in either the wrong way or the towards the wrong goal, often has near zero or even negative value, once you factor in the opportunity costs.

      If you are working on a problem that is genuinely without ambiguous requirements, and if all the people who dependencies on your work know exactly what to expect, and if you really are completely competent to get it done without input from anyone else, if all that is true, then, yes, distracting you is very expensive.

      But when there are lots of ambiguities, then many of those "distractions" are useful events increasing other people's productivity. Certainly it is possible for that to get way out of hand, but it is not automatically true that open office spaces will cause such.

    3. Re:Anyone surprised by this by Solandri · · Score: 1

      It's Apple. Form over function.

  39. Creativity, please by HBI · · Score: 1

    You can use modifiers to make much more repellent curses than single word expletives.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  40. Devs Hate Open Floor Plans but Agile Mandates It. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm confused. I keep reading articles about how developers hate open floor plans and love working from home. But most companies have switched to Agile methodologies, especially Scrum. My company switched us to Scrum 8 months ago. Scrum mandates everyone sit in a large open floor and forbids working from home. It's all about collaboration! Walking into a dev area and it being quiet is very bad. You should hear the buzz of collaboration and feel the innovation in the air!

  41. Re:I can see the comments now.. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    The trick is to only use the headphones when you really need to focus on something. People eventually figure out you don't want to be disturbed and wait until you take them off.

  42. Please? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    I don't particularly want to work for Apple, but goddamn do I want to work for Johny Srouji.

    --
    -Styopa
  43. Re:I can see the comments now.. by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    That would be about 90% of the time I'm at my desk.

  44. Re:I can see the comments now.. by JohnFen · · Score: 3

    Well, it's Apple, and Apple is all about trendiness. They probably saw other companies doing it and figured that if all the other cool kids are doing it, they should too.

  45. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by postbigbang · · Score: 2

    The introverts vs the extroverts problem becomes exacerbated when everyone's in close quarters. As an introvert, my strong desire to stuff a rag in someone's mouth becomes really high. I try desperately not to blather. I don't care the race, age, religion, gender, or sexual persuasion of the yammerer-- some do not understand how to STFU, or even how to have a conversational exchange.

    It is for this reason, constant, insipid, spewing blather, that I've left organizations; it was a good thing for both of us. They were good enough to wave goodbye. Not a good fit.... and it's a vortex for problems in an open environment. If concentration and focus is revered or needed, I'll find my own brainstorm, thank you.

    Unless Apple has something up their sleeves not yet revealed, they blew a huge wad of shareholder dough on yet another bad idea.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  46. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I know for a fact that I will never again have to work in an open floor plan, because I will not accept any position that requires it.

  47. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I might have to if it is a local job and can't telecommute. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  48. Re:Devs Hate Open Floor Plans but Agile Mandates I by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Don't even get me started about how evil Agile is.

  49. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    My manager and peers are constantly amazed at how much work I get done. The secret? Working in an open plan means I overhear conversations and know about upcoming initiatives that will impact my team and my projects. I'm aware of the business needs and big picture, so can plan more successful deliveries.

    Different people excel in different kinds of working conditions. There is no one-size-fits-all. Even though I'm an introvert, I would absolutely hate working from home or working in cubicles and would quickly be looking for another job should I find myself in that situation.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  50. I like open floor by repka · · Score: 1

    I'm probably one of the few people here who prefers open floor layout. When I'm working on something not totally exciting presence of people next to me keeps me a bit more concentrated on my work. If I'm alone in my corner my mind tends to wander off or just turn off. Being in the cubicle after lunch with somewhat boring coding task will get me dozing off. But separate office is the worst: I need increasing amounts of coffee to stay awake.

    You could probably diagnose me with ADD though. So how rare am I?..

    1. Re:I like open floor by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Easy answer: you're an extrovert. You get your energy from outside sources.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  51. What a coincidence! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    When he [Srouji] was shown the floor plans, he was more or less just "Fuck that, fuck you, fuck this, this is bullshit."

    That was pretty much my reaction when Apple announced the 2014 Mac mini.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  52. Re:Didn't Disney experience something like this? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Walt Disney.
    Western Digital.

    It begins.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  53. Re:I can see the comments now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Indeed.

    If you're a software developer and you don't need to concentrate on what you're doing, what you are doing probably isn't worth doing and should be removed from the workflow.

    (I'm a Comcast subscriber and I'm pretty sure that their developers and testers and developers at their STB suppliers have open plan work spaces. That's the only rational explanation I have for how a fairly simple product could be updated with new software regularly and the new software has as many bugs as the prior version - just 50% of the bugs are new and 50% of the old bugs are gone. It's maddening).

  54. Re:I can see the comments now.. by russotto · · Score: 2

    (I'm a Comcast subscriber and I'm pretty sure that their developers and testers and developers at their STB suppliers have open plan work spaces. That's the only rational explanation I have for how a fairly simple product could be updated with new software regularly and the new software has as many bugs as the prior version - just 50% of the bugs are new and 50% of the old bugs are gone. It's maddening).

    I once applied for a job at one of them. They were offering considerably less than market rate. It was cubicles, not open plan, but pay peanuts, get monkeys.

  55. I once had my own office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've spent most of my career in cube farms, but I did spend a few years working in a job where I had my own office with a door. I'll admit that it did allow me to goof off from time to time. But when I needed to concentrate, I was able to close the door and fly through code without any distractions. It was amazing how efficient I was there. In the cube farms, there are almost always distractions. Someone always has some silly conversation going on, or needs help with something they are too lazy to search for themselves. The cost of providing actual offices for senior developers is probably high, but I bet a scientific study would prove that it's worth the money in efficiency gains.

  56. Re:It's Apple. It must be wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's Apple. I, BasilBrush, must defend it.

  57. dream skill set for today's IT workers by lucm · · Score: 1

    First-world-probleming on slashdot is a soft skill, which is one of the biggest difference makers to get hired in IT (besides gender and other forms of diversity-oriented qualities). Runner-up: being involved in a github project that has a code of conduct.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  58. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by lucm · · Score: 2

    Don't you get cabin fever after a while? Working from home 1-2 days a week is great, but to me, being home 24x7 sounds a lot like being in jail. I've tried and it drove me nuts.

    Commuting can be a bitch but I used to live really close to the office and it wasn't much better. I need at least a 15 minute buffer to make the switch between home and work life, but maybe it's just me.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  59. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by lucm · · Score: 1

    My manager and peers are constantly amazed at how much work I get done. The secret? Working in an open plan means I overhear conversations and know about upcoming initiatives that will impact my team and my projects. I'm aware of the business needs and big picture, so can plan more successful deliveries.

    I believe you. If your organization is typical, you also probably catch idiotic ideas before they get too far.

    This doesn't require an open floor plan, though. It can be achieved in a cubicle or office setup if you get friendly with the right people and figure out an optimal path to the coffee machine.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  60. Re: As someone who went from an open-office to WFH by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Now only if you could build some kind of space where people could meet into your office plan in order to collaborate... I know, you could even have a way of scheduling these get-togethers so that people can prepare, and not get blindsided by when they happen! In fact, you could even mount some kind of board on the wall of these spaces that could be erased easily, so as to allow diagrams and charting to be done right on the wall, to help facilitate the discussion...

    No, that's all crazy. Let's just have a big open space where everyone is up in everyone else's shit and it's just a cacophony and nobody can concentrate on anything.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  61. Purpose of Apple Park by myid · · Score: 1

    The purpose of Apple Park should not be to have a beautiful building. The purpose should be to help SW and HW engineers create beautiful and useful products.

    If a design decision forces a choice between creating a beautiful building, vs. employees creating beautiful and useful products, then the decision should be for the latter. If that means choosing offices with doors, instead of lovely minimalist open offices, then so be it.

    1. Re:Purpose of Apple Park by schleimkeim · · Score: 2

      create beautiful and useful products.

      The article says it's about apple though.

  62. Re:I can see the comments now.. by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

    Oh snap.

  63. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by Duds · · Score: 1

    I'm a scum master (ex-dev), I WFH 1 or 2 days a week. These are my getting stuff done days. In the office it's my "helping everyone else get stuff done" days. :)

  64. Re:I can see the comments now.. by hey00 · · Score: 1

    It really depends on where you are in the space and how your colleagues behave.

    Sure, if your colleagues are quiet, if your desk is near a window with noone behind you, if there aren't too many people, it may be great. In most cases though, I highly doubt it.

    The place I work at has real offices with 6 desks in each. 3 facing opposite sides, with windows on the third side and a door (or a big opening) on the fourth. It'd be better imho if we faced each other instead of the wall but it's way better than an open space while retaining many of the advantages you mentioned.

    Too bad the company itself isn't as good as its facilities.

  65. Re:Devs Hate Open Floor Plans but Agile Mandates I by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

    You should hear the buzz of collaboration and feel the innovation in the air! Flag as Inappropriate

    I gotta remember that. Sounds much better than 'background noise'.

  66. All about low status? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What this really reflects, perhaps, is that developers are no longer treated with respect. There was a time when companies treated a developer like a rocket scientist. But increasingly we are treated as disposable, especially by HR departments accustomed to hiring cheap staff from off-shore. This is just another sign of the same trend. After all, who cares if people who don't matter are working a little less efficiently?

    The same problem can be seen in the abuse of Agile to micromanage developers. If developers are just slaves, what does it matter how often you drag them into pointless meetings?

    I fear that this is the underlying problem - that our industry is becoming commoditised.

    Whether Apple is wise to adopt this view is another matter.

  67. Re:I can see the comments now.. by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    its all about what sales and marketing want, since they get the executive jobs, and hire each other. fucking talkers, always keeping the doers down.

  68. Maybe the right person has to say no by ErichTheRed · · Score: 2

    From the article, I noticed that Johny Srouji is quoted as defending his team...quite vocally...against having an open office imposed on them. Individual workers will never win over the MBAs touting cost per square foot, or the design eggheads like Jony Ive demanding everything be white, flat and rounded. But the boss of a very influential part of the company has a little more pull. If a boss has sufficient leverage (and guts) to say something like, "Maybe I should take my chip design team over to Qualcomm/Intel/AMD and you can just buy processors for your iThings from them!" things like corporate "mandates" tend to fall away pretty quickly. Problem is that most managers aren't like that; if I were a computer engineer I sure wouldn't mind working for this guy.

    I know people have different work styles, and some extroverts and recent college graduates want to continue the college lifestyle by recreating the dorm/dining hall/open classroom feel. But in my experience, it's going to take Google saying "oops, we screwed up...open plan is only good for web startups with 25 people, and everywhere else should have a mix of styles and let teams/people choose." Every large company I've ever worked for copies HR policy verbatim from either GE, IBM or Google. I think they all use the same management consulting firm.

  69. Re: I can see the comments now.. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Yep. My experience with an open office plan was no cube walls, unless you count the little one foot wall around the edge of some (but not all) of the desks.

  70. Re:I can see the comments now.. by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    I like bullpens in an operational environment, when during a crisis you want to be able to provide more or less instant ("Hey, I've got this, can you take a look at that.") communication and you don't have a real NOC or Operations center (or you're providing team support to them but aren't physically collocated.

    Outside of that -- some designer/programmer working on some discrete unit? Probably not. Separate offices and walled cubes, and then provide lots of shared whiteboard areas (or open rooms) for when collaboration does in fact need to happen.

  71. Re: As someone who went from an open-office to WFH by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    You piece of shit, scum! Oh wait, you just don't proofread. Excellent QA boss! Way to pay attention to detail.

  72. Re:As someone who went from an open-office to WFH. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    My home has all sorts of things to do that I find enticing that aren't work. This is deliberate. We have a home that we like very much.

    So, I can focus on work for one day at home. Two is a challenge. I'm not going to try three,

    I do have an option other than finding other employment. I've got a nice retirement set up. I'm still working because I rather like the job and it gives me an even nicer retirement. So, if we go to an open office plan, I'll just wish everybody else the best in that setup.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  73. Re:First Post? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    I've known some competent ones. Oddly enough, they're my two most leftist friends.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  74. Re:First Post? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    LOL... Leftists are not in their right minds...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  75. Re:First Post? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Brain hemispheres are reversed, so leftists are in their right minds.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes