Slashdot Mirror
Bitcoin Is Forking. Again. (vice.com)
Merely weeks after it was announced that Bitcoin was splitting into two separate entities, the initial version of bitcoin and it's new "bitcoin cash," the network is adding a third version, according to a report. From the article: On Wednesday, a group of bitcoiners scheduled yet another split for the network in November, which would create a third version of bitcoin. So, what makes this version different from the others? Right now, the bitcoin network can sometimes take a long time to process transactions due to so many people using it. This is because the "blocks" of transaction data that get added to bitcoin's public ledger, the blockchain, are getting full. In the weeks preceding the fork, bitcoin coalesced around a solution called "segregated witness," which will change how data is stored in blocks to free up some space when it kicks in later in August. But the size of the blocks themselves will stay at one megabyte on the original bitcoin blockchain. Still, some bitcoiners maintained that the only way to speed bitcoin up for the foreseeable future was to increase the size of blocks themselves. So, a group of bitcoin companies and developers got together and launched a fork called bitcoin cash, which does not include segregated witness. It bumped the size of blocks up to a maximum of eight megabytes. That fork was widely anticipated to be a failure before it happened, but at the time of writing, bitcoin cash is trading above $300 USD per coin, which is comparable to cryptocurrencies like ethereum. Sounds like everyone got what they wanted, right? Oh, no. There's a third group of bitcoin developers, companies, and users who advocate for a "best of both worlds approach." This group includes Bitmain, the largest bitcoin infrastructure company in the world, and legendary bitcoin developer Jeff Garzik. They got together back in May and signed what is known as the "New York Agreement," which bound them to implement a two megabyte block size increase alongside segregated witness via a hard fork within six months of the time of signing. They call the fork Segwit2x. Now, that's exactly what's happening. According to an announcement posted to the Segwit2x GitHub repository, a bitcoin block between one and two megabytes will be created at block 494,784.
Its getting closer and closer to paper money.
> That fork was widely anticipated to be a failure before it happened, but at the time of writing, bitcoin cash is trading above $300 USD per coin, which is comparable to cryptocurrencies like ethereum.
Well it is quite a failure in terms that it was given to each Bitcoin owner, and yet most owners dropped it, resulting in price drop from default 100% (you had N bitcoins and N of BCH "bitcoin-cash" tokens)
through 50% (two times more BCH was sold then bought) - on futures market
through 20% - when real trading opened, not just futures,
then 10%
now trading at 6-8% of original Bitcoin price.
Also this does not account for all the people who did not yet bothered to sell the BCH "bitcoin-cash" tokens they are given (e.g. because it's in cold-wallet, burried somewhere, or on address not used in years) - or because it is simply lost forever (all addresses that had N amount of BTC on August 1, were "given" also N of BCH).
Another metric is hashing power (mining power), it is at around 10% of original Bitcoin's.
In the future, everyone will have their own cryptocurrency for 15 minutes.
This is good news for Bitcoin.
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
When one pyramid scheme isn't enough to fuel speculation, triple down on it.
If only bitcoin could die ... people would finally stop with all their cryptoshit talking and their scam ICO ponzi schemes....
for the "best of both worlds"
The "success" of Bitcoin Cash has shown the way, as it is currently worth > $300 without impacting the price of BTC. Free money, right? So it will be seen as a no-brainer to keep doing hard forks, as long as different parties in the BTC ecosystem see some advantage to it.
But at some point, all of these hard forks will make it abundantly clear to everyone that there is nothing special about any cryptocurrency. They're all made up out of the ether. They may provide some marginal utility for currency transfer across borders, but as investment vehicles (which is what is driving the current price spikes), putting your money in a cryptocurrency is like getting involved in a bidding war for a patch of tulips sitting in the middle of a infinite field of them.
BTC is "special", because there are only 21 million of them, right? Except maybe if there are 210 million, or 21 billion, or 21 trillion, because hey, here comes another hard fork of the blockchain by some group that wants to get rich quick. At some point the whole cryptocurrency mania collapses as everyone realizes just how limitless they really are. That is something that the people pushing BTC do not want to happen, but it is inevitable.
There are interesting times ahead for cryptocurrencies.
Bitcoin will be able to go fork itself.
This is awesome. The more standards we have the better. The more forks we have the more like Linux it will be. Fragmented. Something for everyone, but nothing most people want. Sort of like imaginary money.
The eventual result will be the will be a separate forked bitcoin for every potential user and then their true value will be seen.
This is actually cute, clever, and funny.... but it will get modded down by SJW dipshits. Sad.
https://xkcd.com/927/
In that case:
8> This is white nationalist coin. :D This is alt-right Nazi coin.
Im sure this will get modded down by some over sensitive little Trump supporter.
PSA: Its vs it's
Liberals want bitcoin to fail because they know that fiat money is how you control people. These "forks" are designed to hurt the uptake of bitcoin to entrench anti-Trump pro-status quo power. The best way to fight this kind of thing is to not be deterred. Buy as many bitcoins as you can as quickly and as often as you can and donate profits big time to the NRA and the Trump 2020 campaign.
What I don't understand, is why bitcoin is being valued so stupidly highly. To me, this kind of instability is frightening. The risk of losing value is so high that only a fool would invest.
And yet in the real world, I'm the fool because if I had bought bitcoin earlier on, I'd be filthy rich now.
dammit! I was hoping for a more clever logo. They should rotate the hash lines more like this: =G=oatce Coin
Miner miner forty niner. twitcoin.
This is forking unbelievable.
Once you realise bitcoins are a commodity.
The coin that wins will be the commodity that is most useful. You need a lump of tin, gold, platinum or perhaps something like silicon instead?
As with most metals they are in small particles with impurities deep in the ground. Then you have to use a lot of energy to extract them in useful quantities and have the right equipment. Assets required to mine bitcoins are a server farm of hardware and a measure of energy.
they behave like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Considering most of the debate about which coin will win is probably none of the above. The coin that will win probably does not exist now and will have more than these 3 can offer for the great hordes of unwashed masses. The one that wins will be the one with most coercive uses probably tied to a utility purpose (ownership of said coin will be tied to getting something everyone wants). In the way touch screens were not popular until tied to Apple phones/pads. Or i-tunes gift cards.
The best outcome for it to act like currency for users will be acceptance, price stability not which type of bit-coin is worth the most versus USD but which one can be stored knowing it has stable purchasing power 1+ years from now, and end user experience that is user friendly Otherwise the 3rd intended fork is of relevence only to people who need to use it as a conduit to avoid bank fees (dump into coin, transfer it and excahnge for a currency at the other end), speculators, miners and enthusiasts.
Nice ascii art. Lefti/commi coin: :O
Well... Paypal won't take their money anymore. If the Neo Nazi's are already moving their sites to the dark net, it only makes sense for them to start using cryptocurrency as well.
I have a feeling George Soros and his faggot buddy David Brock are behind the forks and they will all fucking fail.
Dogecoin is Purple Faygo.
The usefulness of these forks may simply be that they allow an algorithm to determine at the moment of your transfer what coin has the greatest transaction speed at that moment for that transaction, so there will develop an abstract "Bitcoin of Bitcoins," environment. If you fold the other major coins in to such a "Coin of Coins" environment, money transfer goes to a truly mind-boggling level of abstraction. It would be like having one blank credit card that represents the best credit card deal at the moment for that particular purchase.
E Proelio Veritas.
There was a thing called bitcoin and according to what little I understood about it there was going to be a limited amount of bitcoins available. The process of generating them getting harder as time passed so that the limit would never actually be reached. With these forks generating new versions of the original bitcoin does that increase the number of bitcoins available or are these new bitcoins still part of that original pool just generated and handled differently?
Will one of the new ones be in the "halfwit" repository ?
You've got to be forking kidding me!
There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
No kidding that Bitcoin is Forking Us again.
How many Billions of dollars are on hard disk drives stuck in landfills from back when a mined Bitcoin was worth a fraction of penny?